6.5. SR 09-17-2001RAver
13065 Orono Parkway
Elk River, MN 55330
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Mayor and City Council
Scott Harlicker, Senior Planner~
September 17, 2001
Case No. P 01-15
Request by S & T Development for Preliminary Plat
Approval - Elk River Crossing 3rd Addition
Item# 6.5..
Request
Consider a request by S & T Developments for preliminary plat approval of Elk River
Crossing Third Addition.
Location
East side of Highway 169, south of Main Street; Lots 3-5, Block 1 Elk River crossing and
Lot 2, Block 1 Elk River Crossing 2nd Addition
Zonin;/Land use
PUD (Planned Unit Development) / HB (Highway Business)
Attachments
· Location map
· Preliminary plat
· Original plat
· Memo from the City Engineer
Overview
The applicant is asking to replat Lots 3-5, Block 1, Elk River Crossing and Lot 2, Block 1,
Elk River Crossing 2n~Addition. The property is located on the west side of Zane Street,
between Zane Street and Highway 169. The area to be replatted is 290,439 square feet (6.67
acres) and is currently platted as 4 lots, ranging in size from .94 acres to 2.07 acres.
Phone: 763.441.7420
Fax: 763.441.7425
www. ci.elk-river, mn.us
Memo to Mayor and City Council/P 01-15
September 17, 2001
Page 2
The applicant would like to replat these 4 lots into 6 lots. The newly created lots will range in
size from .74 acres to 1.45 acres. Two lots are less than 1 acre in size. For a comparison, 1
acre is the minimum lots size in the C3 (Highway Commercial District). However, since this
development is a PUD, there is flexibility in lot size and dimensions.
Access to Lot 2 is restricted to the existing shared access with Jiffy Lube and the Conoco
convenience store. Shared driveways should be considered when possible on the remaining
lots.
The existing drainage and utility easements along the current property lines will have to be
vacated. There is a 40 foot wide easement that extends from the lift station to Zane Street
that will have to remain in place. New easements will be located along the proposed property
lines.
Planning Commission Meeting
At the Planning Commission held on August 28th no one spoke at the public hearing. The
Commission asked the applicant what size buildings were likely to be constructed. The
applicant explained that because of an agreement with Walmart the buildings could not
exceed 7,500 square feet. The Commission was also concerned about the existing access to
Lot 2. Access to Lot 2 is limited to sharing the existing driveway that currently provides
access to Jiffy Lube and the Conoco convenience store. It was explained that if another
access is needed for Lot 2, it would have to be a shared access with Lot 3. Access from Zane
Street to the new lots will be limited; shared access will be required were ever possible.
Recommendation
The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the City Council approve the
preliminary plat request for Elk River Crossing Third Addition with the following
conditions:
1. All comments of the City Engineer shall be addressed.
2. Access to Lot 2 shall be restricted to the existing shared driveway.
The existing easements on the current property line shall be vacated, except for the
40 foot wide easement that extends from the lift station to Zane Street, and new
easements shall be dedicated along the proposed property lines.
S:\PLANNING\SCOTTkP01-15CC.DOC
LOCATION
E~k ~ver, MN 55330
Howard R
, Green Qompany
August 7, 2001
File: 800115J-0240
Ms. Michele McPherson
Director of Planning
City of Elk River
13065 Orono Parkway
P.O. Box 490
Elk River, Minnesota 55330-0490
RE: ELK RIVER CROSSING THIRD ADDITION
Dear Ms. McPherson:
As requested, we have reviewed the submittal for the Elk River Crossing Third Addition. The
submittal was prepared by Cluts O'Bdan Strother Architects and consisted of an existing
conditions map and a proposed preliminary plat.
Elk River Crossing Third Addition consists of the replatting of Lots 3, 4 and 5, Block 1 of Elk
River Crossing and Lo[ 2, Block 1 of Elk River Crossing Second Addition. The proposed replat
creates six new lots in a location currently occupied by four lots. The newly created lots would
range in size from Lots 2 and 7 which are approximately three-quarters of an acre to Lots 3, 4, 5
and 6 which are 1.2 to 1.45 acres in size.
Glen Sundeen of the Elk River Municipal Utilities indicated at the staff review meeting that they
have no facilities on any of the existing side lot lines with the exception of the 40-foot easement
running from Zane Street to the lift station site on the Mn/DOT park and pool facility. Therefore,
the vacation of these existing side lot easements should not create any problem. This will,
however, need a separate process to vacate the existing side yard drainage and utility
easements.
Lot 2 has been determined previously to share access via the existing driveway to Lot 1 Elk
River Crossing Second Addition. Therefore, limited access should be shown along the Zane
Street frontage of Lot 2. As the remaining newly proposed lots develop, all opportunities should
be investigated to minimize the number of access points onto Zane Street and maximize the
amount of cross access and shared ddveway opportunities.
It should be noted that the placement of sanitary sewer and water services along with hydrants
was based on the original plat of Elk River Crossing. The developers of the newly created lots
should be required to work with the existing sewer and water services and hydrant locations to
service the new lots. This may require easements from one lot to another. It appears that only
Lot 7 may have difficulty getting sanitary sewer and water service from one of these existing
locations.
O:~PROJ\800115J\0240\Ltr-080701-McPherson.doc
1326 Energy Park Drive · St. Paul, MN 55108 · 651/644-4389 fax 651/644-9446 toll free 888/368-4389
Ms Michele McPherson
August 7, 2001
Page Two
If you have any questions regarding any of these comments or would like further information,
please call.
Sincerely,
Howard R. Green Company
Terry J/Maurer, P.E.
TJM:mw
Howard R, Green Company
O:~d:~ROJ~800115J\0240~Ltr'0a0701-McPhers°n'%k:"~)NSULTING ENGINEERS
DETAIL
LOT 4
1.20 ACRES
LOT 6
1.45 ACRES
63,378 SQ FT
/ 1
LOT 7 j
.75 ACRE
'3~2,492 SO
LOT 5
1.33 ACRES '\
57,999 SO FT _----'-' ~' .~-.~;'-
:1
LOT N:~=A J
~a~- 52,270
..... ~ , \ ~
~ ' ~ ' LOT 3
',
~, t '~ ~ 62,202 sa FT ~ ~
~ J2,098 SQ F~ ~ ~ ~
0 25
50 100 FT
Cluts
O'Brien
SLro[her
ARCHITECTS
S&T
DEVELOPMENT
L.L.P
ELK RIVER
RETAIL
PROPOSED
PRELIMINARY
PLAT
J\
/
/
/
/
/
DETAIL
SPECIAL NOTES
1. A Certificate of Correction is b~ing prepared for the plat of ELK R~/ER
CROSSING SECOND ADDmON The co~ectlon is in regard to the width of
the drainage and utility easements not adjoining o right--of--way. The
widths of easements shown on Lot 2, Block 1, ELK RIVER CROSSING
SECOND ADDITION. reflect that co¢~ectlon.
4
2. The She~oume County Surveyor has infor~ned ~choetJ & Modson. Inc. that
he is requesting o Cert;ficote of Correction be prepared for [he plot of
O-
LEGEND
o Denote~ iron monument set
Denotes ;ran monument found
Denotes Hydrant
Denotes Water Valve
0 Demotes mo nhole
...... Denotes Concrete Cur'o & Gutter
[ I Denotes bltum; ..... ~cce
DESCRIPTION
Lots 3, 4 and 5. ~lock t. ELK ~fV[~ CROSSING and Lot 2. ~lock 1.
BENCHMARK
Top of MNOOT d~sk POWER MNOT AZ MK. SW quadrant of Co. Rd.
No. 12 and U.S H~. No. 169 Os shown.
Elevation - 902.23 (N.G.V.D--1929)
GENERAL NOTES
1. B~or~ngs shown ore based on the east I;ne of U. S. H;ghwoy
I am,a.
0 25 50 100 FT
T---°, I, ~T T TI ~
:_:_:_! ~ ,~.
¢luts
O'Brien
Strother
ARCHITECTS
S&T
iDEVELOPM]~N~
L.L.?
ELK RIVER
RETAIL
: EXISTING
CONDITIONS