Loading...
6.9. SR 05-19-1997ITEM 6.9. ..,ty of MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Steve Ach, City Planner_~'~ May 19, 1997 Conditional Use Permit Request by L&W L.L.C., Public Hearing Case No. CU 97-10 Issue L&W Limited Liability Company is requesting a conditional use permit to operate an auto body repair and to construct a second principal building on the same lot. Location A general description is the northwest corner of 173rd Avenue and Highway 10 (directly behind Bridgemans). Zoning~and Use C3 (Highway Commercial) / HB (Highway Business) Attachments · Report to the Planning Commission dated April 22, 1997 Bachground L&W Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) received a conditional use permit in October, 1994. The conditional use permit was granted to allow the operation of an automobile repair facility. As part of the conditional use permit approval, a site plan was approved illustrating certain site improvements to be made to bring the site up to current performance standard requirements. These improvements included curb and gutter, landscaping and meeting setback requirements. 13065 Orono Parkway · P.O. Box 490 · Elk River, MN 55330 · TDD & Phone: (612) 441-7420 · Fax: (612) 441-7425 Memo to the Mayor and City Council/CU 97-10 May 19, 1997 Overview Page 2 The request involves constructing a second free-standing building of approximately 5,525 square feet on the same parcel as the existing building. The existing building is approximately 7,200 square feet and currently accommodates two businesses, Precision Frame & Alignment and Deano's Auto Collision. The proposed building would allow Precision Frame and Alignment to move into the new building, permitting Deano's Auto Collision to expand into the balance of the existing building. Along with the proposed building, the parking area will have to be expanded and improved, not only to meet the city's parking requirements but also the additional parking demands of both businesses. Future Water, Sewer and Other Infrastructure Currently, the city has an ordinance in place which delays development within commercial and industrial zoning districts which lie within the urban service district and do not have the availability of city sewer and water. This issue will be discussed by the City Council at the May 19th meeting. The proposed ordinance amendment would allow expansion of existing businesses and the opportunity to construct additional principal buildings on the same parcel. (Please refer to Case No. OA 97-8) Any action taken on this proposed application will be conditioned upon that ordinance amendment being approved by the City Council. Future Road Improvements It is anticipated that 173rd Avenue will be upgraded at some point in the future to accommodate the additional commercial and industrial traffic as this area redevelops. Currently there is 66 feet of right of way. It is anticipated 80 feet of right of way will ultimately be necessary. Therefore, staff is suggesting any parking lot improvements made along 173rd be set back in accordance with the planned right-of-way for 173rd. In addition to the improvements to 173r~ it is also envisioned that a frontage road will have to be put into place to provide access to future commercial development along the Highway 10 corridor. As the east Highway 10 corridor begins to develop into more intense uses, access issues will become more of a concern for both the city and MN/DOT. At this time, staff is uncertain where the frontage road will exactly be located. However, based on frontage roads' typical distance from a highway, the frontage road may occur between Bridgemans and the subject property. s:\planning\cu97-10.doc Memo to the Mayor and City Council/CU 97-10 May 19, 1997 Page 3 Other Site Improvements As previously mentioned, the parking lot improvements will have to be completed as part of this conditional use permit in accordance with the city's performance standards for commercial property. The required number of parking stalls will need to be provided on site in accordance with the city's parking requirements. A complete landscaping plan incorporating the city's standard requirements, as well as recommendations from the Planning Commission will also have to be submitted for final approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Septic and Well The subject property was originally part of the Bridgeman's site immediately to the west. The owner at that time constructed the drainfield for the Bridgeman's facility on the subject property. The drainfield itself is approximately 37 feet wide and 125 feet long. The existing drainfield does not fall within a "private" drainfield easement previously granted to the subject property. Therefore, a condition of this approval is the property owners resolve the drainfield easement issue and have the easement modified to accurately reflect the area where the existing drainfield currently exists. In speaking with Dick Lorntson from Precision Frame & Alignment, the property owners (Bridgemans and L&W L.L.C.) have met and are preparing the appropriate easements to correct the current situation. The other major issue associated with the well and septic is the condition of the existing drainfields. The building official did express a concern with the condition and operation of the drainfield from the Bridgemans site that encroaches on the L&W property. As a condition of the Bridgeman's approval, the drainfield will need to be tested and approved by a certified septic inspector to verify the drainfield's operation. Furthermore, the drainfields serving Precision Frame and Deano's Auto Collision buildings will need to be designed to accommodate both of their uses. Single family plats are required to demonstrate two septic locations and staff believes this should also apply to commercial and industrial. Based on the proposed plan, it may be difficult to install a "secondary drainfield" system on this property, in the event any of the drainfields fail. Staff is conce'rned with this since it is uncertain when city sewer and water will be made available to this site and there should be provisions made to accommodate installing a new system. Under the current conditions, the area where the building is s:Xplanning\cu97-10.doc Memo to the Mayor and City Council/CU 97-10 May 19, 1997 proposed would be ideal for a secondary system. proposed building this option will be eliminated. By constructing the Page 4 Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the conditional use permit and highlighted the issues relating to the septic system, future improvements to 173rd and maintaining performance standards for commercial development. Assuming these issues could be met, the Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit request for L&W L.L.C. with the conditions outlined in the staff report and the following additions and modifications: o The parking setback along 173rd be measured from the planned right of way of 80 feet. 10. All septic easement issues be resolved between the property owners prior to issuance of a building permit. 11. Additional landscaping be included between the proposed building and the Bridgeman's Restaurant immediately to the west. Recommendation Staff is concerned with the amount of development occurring on this parcel without city sewer and water available. Furthermore, the long range plans for this area may be in conflict with the proposed plans. If the City Council wishes to approve this request, staff recommends the City Council approve the conditional use permit request for L&W Limited Liability Company to construct a second principal building and operate an auto shop based on the following conditions: The proposed site plan be revised to demonstrate sufficient location for a primary and secondary drainfield for both commercial buildings. The site plan shall demonstrate a design that meets the city's dimensional requirements for parking and drive aisle widths. o No landscaping shall be placed in areas where there will be a drainfield. o The parking setback along 173r~ be measured from the planned right of way of 80 feet. s:XplanningXcu97-10.doc Memo to the Mayor and City Council/CU 97-10 Page 5 May 19, 1997 5. Drainage plan be approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing work on site. This plan shall include the necessary detention and quality control pond as required by the City Engineer. 6. All outdoor storage be confined to the fenced area. The Bridgeman's septic system, which encroaches onto this property, shall have an easement established over it and recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. o The ordinance amendment allowing development within the urban service area prior to city sewer and water be approved by the City Council. o No roof drainage from the proposed building shall be directed onto the area of the existing drainfield. 10. All septic easement issues be resolved between the property owners prior to issuance of a building permit. 11. Additional landscaping be included between the proposed building and the Bridgeman's Restaurant immediately to the west. s:\planning\cu97-10.doc I[ Z ity of E River TO: FROM: MEMORANDUM Planning Commission Steve Ach, City Planner.~(~ DATE: April 22, 1997 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Request by L&W Limited Liability Company, Public Hearing Case No. CU 97-10 Request L&W Limited Liability Company is requesting a conditional use permit to operate an auto body repair and to construct a second principal building on a lot. Location A general description is the northwest corner of 173rd Avenue and Highway 10 (directly behind Bridgeman's). Zoning/Land Use C3 (Highway Commercial) / HB (Highway Business) Attachments Memo from City Engineer dated April 10, 1997 Zoning map Development plans Previously approved plans Conditions of previous approval Letter from the applicant Background L&W Limited Liability. Company (LLC) originally received a conditional use permit in October of 1994. At that time, L&W LLC remodeled the existing Cody Square building from its previous use of office to the present use of an auto repair business. In addition to the modifications made to the building, several on-site improvements were made as part of the approved conditional 13065 Orono Parkway · P.O. Box 490. Elk River, MN 55330- (612) 441-7420- Fax: (612) 441-7425 Memo to the Planning Commission/CU 97-10 April 22, 1997 use permit. Page 2 Overview The request consists of constructing a second free-standing building of approximately 5,525 sq. ft. The existing building on site is approximately 7,200 sq. ft. and is the current location of Precision Frame and Alignment and Deano's Auto Collision. The proposed building would be occupied by Precision Frame and Alignment, allowing Deano's Auto Collision to expand in the existing building. Parking and Circulation Based on the square footage of both buildings and the city's requirement of one parking stall for every 300 sq. ft., a total of 42 parking stalls would be required on site. The parking as shown on the plan raises the following concerns: · The parking design does not meet the dimensional requirements for designing a parking lot. · The parking stalls adjacent to the existing building do not meet the dimensional requirements. It is unclear whether the required number of parking stalls may be provided on site if designed according to the required dimensional requirements. In addition to the number of parking stalls, adequate handicap stalls will also need to be provided. According to the ordinance two handicap stalls are required. The proposed plans show parking along 173rd Avenue at a dimension less than 10' feet from the property line. If the variance request to the parking setback requirements is not granted, the site plan will need to be adjusted to meet the required 10' parking setback. At the time 173rd Avenue is upgraded, there is a possibility additional right- of-way will be needed to make the necessary road improvements. As a long term measure, all parking lot setbacks should be taken from the planned right-of-way which is expected to be a total of 80'. Given the existing right-of- way of 66' (33' each half), it is expected an additional 7 feet will ultimately be required off of this property. Therefore, in order to meet the ultimate setback f:\shrdoc\planning\pckcu97-1O.doc Memo to the Planning Commission]CU 97-10 April 22, 1997 requirement, the parking lot should be established 17' from the current property line. Page 3 Future Water, Sewer and Other Infrastructure Currently, the city has an ordinance in place which prohibits development within commercial and industrial areas which lie within the urban service district until water and sewer is available for hookup. The subject parcel is within the urban service boundary and does not have city water and sewer available for hookup. The City Council has initiated an ordinance amendment which will modify the current ordinance by allowing additions to existing buildings, as well as constructing free-standing buildings on developed parcels. The current ordinance will still apply to those properties that are undeveloped within the urban service area, whereby not allowing any development until services are made available for hookup. Action taken on this proposed application will be conditioned upon that ordinance amendment being approved by the City Council. Future Road Improvements It is anticipated that 173rd Avenue will be upgraded at some point in the future to accommodate the additional traffic demands in this area. It is also expected that there is possibility of a future frontage road extending both north and south of 173rd to serve future development of these areas. The exact location of this frontage road has not been identified; however, is a long range issue which should be given some consideration. In an application presented to the Planning Commission last month regarding the conversion of Bridgeman's restaurant, the issue of a frontage road was also discussed. As a condition of that application, it was recommended a "no build" area be established within 35' of the property line to preserve the opportunity for a future road alignment. If the proposed building by Precision Frame and Alignment is constructed, it is likely the frontage road alignment will have to move further to the east. The only exception to this would be if, at the time this area is redeveloped a building or buildings are removed to facilitate the construction of the frontage road. Landscaping The proposed landscaping plan identifies several proposed tree locations that would occur over the existing and possibly in the proposed drainfield areas. These trees should be kept clear and removed from the drainfield area. In addition, the proposed landscaping quantities and sizes will have to be modified to meet the city's current landscaping requirements. As part of the f:~shrdocXplanningXpc\cu97-10.doc Memo to the Planning Commission/CU 97-10 Page 4 April 22, 1997 previous conditional use permit approval, a landscaping plan had been approved. The applicants did install sod along with underground irrigation throughout the site; however, they have not yet completed all of their landscaping installation. Septic and Well The subject property was originally owned by the same property owner of the Bridgeman's site. At that time, the septic system to serve the Bridgeman's facility was constructed on the subject property. The septic location is in the northwest corner of the site and covers an area of approximately 125' by 37' wide. Sometime before or after the septic system was installed, a 20 foot wide drainfield easement was established over this property. However, this 20 foot wide easement does not cover the actual location of the drainfield. It is recommended the appropriate easement be established to cover the area of the existing drainfield and to clean up this existing condition. The easement would be between the two property owners and not involve the city. The proposed plans do not show the location of the new septic field to serve the proposed building. The contractor has indicated that the septic field would be built adjacent to the existing field that extends onto this property from the Bridgeman's site. Staff is concerned with the area that is actually left on site to construct a septic system and drainfield. A portion of the proposed drainfield area is currently a parking lot which cannot be utilized for a drainfield. In addition, with the development of the proposed building, this site will no longer have a "secondary drainfield" system. Staff is concerned with the intensity this site is being developed in an unserviced area. Residential developments are required to demonstrate a primary and secondary drainfield. This same standard should apply to commercial and industrial in unserviced areas. Even though this property is within the urban service area, there is no guaranteed time frame when city water and sewer will be made available. Outdoor Storage/Trash Enclosure The site currently has an outdoor storage area used for vehicles waiting to be serviced. Originally, this area was to be used for storage of approximately 4 vehicles. The amount of storage seems to have increased since the 'building has been occupied. Since outdoor storage is not allowed in the commercial area, staff would suggest the area utilized for inoperable vehicles be minimized. Furthermore, the revised plans should indicate a trash enclosure f:XshrdocXplanning\pcXcu97-10.doc Memo to the Planning Commission/CU 97-10 Page 5 April 22, 1997 area large enough to accommodate all refuse generated, as well as areas for recycling. General Floor Plan The building is proposed to have six service bays, along with a small office area. The materials used on the building do not meet the current commercial standards and therefore, will need to have a variance approved to deviate from the architectural standards. If that variance is approved, the building will have a predominantly steel siding, along with some brick and Cedar in the front of the building. No roof drainage from the proposed building should be directed towards the existing septic system immediately to the west. Recommendation It is recommended the Planning Commission recommend approval of the conditional use permit request for L&W L.L.C. to construct a second principal building and operate an auto shop based on the following: The proposed site plan be revised to demonstrate sufficient location for a primary and secondary drainfield for both commercial buildings. The site plan shall demonstrate a design that meets the city's dimensional requirements for angled parking and drive aisle widths. No landscaping shall be placed in areas where there will be a drainfield. The Board of Adjustments approve the variance request to the parking lot setback and architectural material standards. Drainage plan be approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing work on site. This plan shall include the necessary detention and quality control pond as required by the City Engineer. 6. All outdoor storage be confined to the fenced area. The Bridgeman's septic system, which encroaches onto this property, shall have an easement established over it and recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. The ordinance amendment allowing development within the urban service area prior to city sewer and water be approved by the City Council. f:XshrdocXplanning\pc\cu97-10.doc Memo to the Planning Commission/CU 97-10 April 22, 1997 Page 6 No roof drainage from the proposed building shall be directed onto the area of the existing drainfield. f:XshrdocXplanning\pckcu97-10.doc CON~ILTING ENGINEEP~ 1326 Energy Park Drive St. Paul, MN 55108 612-644-4389 1-800-888-2923 Fax: 612-644-9446 CiViL ENGINEERING: ENVIRONMENTAL ~UNICIPAL 4NING SOLID WASTE STRUCTURAL SURVEYING TRAFFIC TRANSPORTATION ELECTRICAL/MECHANICAL ENGINEERING: HVAC POWER DISTRIBUTION SCADA SYSTEM CONTROLS OFFICES IN: .INEAPOLIS PRIOR LAKE ST. PAUL WASECA April 10, 1997 File: 230-368-11 Mr. Steve Ach City Planner City of Elk River 13065 Orono Parkway P.O. Box 490 Elk River, MN 55330-0490 PRECISION FRAME AND ALIGNMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW Dear Mr. Ach: As you requested, we have reviewed the site plan for the Precision Frame and Alignment property located along 173va Avenue Northwest. Based on our review, comments received at the staff review meeting, and meeting with the property owners and proposed building Contractor, we would offer the following comments: The submittal package consisted of a preliminary grading plan prepared by John Oliver and Associates dated April 2, 1997; a site and landscape plan prepared by John Weicht dated February 25, 1997; and three pages of building elevations, also prepared by John Weicht, dated February 20, 1997. The proposal is to construct a second primary structures on the lot consisting of a building 85' x 65', or 5,500 square feet. This site is already encumbered by the drain field for the Bridgeman's property located to the west. This drain field encompasses an area of approximately 125 feet wide by 37 feet deep, located in the northwest corner of the site. o Given these constraints on the property, it is questionable as to whether there is adequate, undisturbed soil to construct a septic tank and drain field to serve the proposed new building. There needs to be a drainage plan submitted for the site. At a minimum, the drainage plan should provide for a quality control pond for the additional impervious surface. It should also take a look at the amount of water discharged from the site. If there is not an adequate system to discharge to, the drainage plan should retain all of the increased flow from the further development of this site. The site is within the urban service district in East Elk River. Therefore, any further development of this site should consider sanitary sewer and water, and make provisions for connection to these utilities without disrupting the entire site. An Equal Opportunity Employer Mr. Steve Ach April 10, 1997 Page Two As you are aware, one of the concerns for development of the property just north of this area is a frontage road starting somewhere along 173rd Avenue to service the property. Right now, there are a number of smaller plots of land north of this site. It is assumed that in the future, with sewer and water provided, that this area may very well develop into larger parcels of land that will need to be serviced by some type of frontage road. Further development on this site may push that frontage road further to the east along 173ra Avenue. Currently, it is not clear what is the best location for the frontage road to connect with 173ra Avenue. If you have any questions regarding any of these comments, please contact me. Sincerely, MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS Terry J. Maurer, P.E. TJM :kh 368-0807.apr \ 178TH \ 175TH - ~ 172ND 171ST \ 170TH 169TH 168TH 187T~ 166TH ! 65TH 64TH LOCATION LOCATION x .[[ MAP I ,~o~, c,,,,s~: C U q'/- I 0 55'33'0 I 85'-0" 42'-6" ,3'-0' 39'-5 63/64" r 21'-0" .,, 20%0" ~, 13'-0" / , 31'-0 I/8" FinN. FLR. EL~.=96'-~ 1 ,, FIN. FLR. E~.=IO0'-O" X ~, ~ ~/ II ~ ~ FIN. FLR. FIN. FLR. EL~.= ~ 00'-0' i .............. ] ~-~ ....................... , ~ ,, ~ , ,, I , _./ ../ __ -1'-10" ~4' ,3'-0" 8'.0" / 10'-0" /~ 3'-0" / 4'-0' / 12'-0" ,3'.0" ,3'_0" .3'_0" 12'_0" ;:;:' STEEL SIDING 12 X 14- O.h. DOOR 12 X 14. O.H. DOOR lO X 12 O.H. DOOR 10 X 12 O.H. DOOR BRICK ¢,OUfH ~L~VAflON (~ V~Sf ~L~VAflON STEEL SIDING NO~H ~L~VAllON i/~.. i.~. STEEL SIDING I~ASf f~VAflON PROPOSED BLDG. EXISIlNG BLDG. £XIS~NG PAJ~KING 175RD AVE N.W. PROPOSED BLDG. EXISTING WELL EXISTING PARKIN/ EXISTING BLDG. EXISTING PARKING 150.00 173RD AVE N.W. '~'~ 9702 S~-et Gl ~ S~eets APPROVED PLAN 10-7-94 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF SHERBURNE CITY OF ELK RIVER In the matter of: L & W Limited Liability Company Request: A conditional use permit to operate an autobody repair and auto-truck frame repair shop from the existing Cody Square building, Case No. CU 94-27 CITY OF ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL CONDITIONAL USE PROCEEDINGS ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE L & W Limited Liability Company, Owner The above entitled matter came to be heard before the City Council on the 15th day of August, 1994, on a petition for a Conditional Use pursuant to the City of Ell< River Zoning Ordinance, for the following described property: See Attached Exhibit A IT IS ORDERED that a Cohditional Use be granted as upon the following conditions or reasons: 1. ALL GROUND AREAS NOT DEVOTED TO BUILDING OR BITUMINOUS SURFACE BE PLANTED WITH SEED WITHIN A TWO YEARS OF THE APPROVAL. 2. THE ENTIRE PARKING AND DRIVEWAY AREA BE BOUND BY B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GU1TER. 3. THE EXISTING PARKING LOT BE REQUIRED TO MEET THE TEN (10) FOOT PARKING SETBACK FROM ALL PROPERTY LINES. THE APPLICANT WORK WITH THE BUILDING OFFICIAL TO ENSURE THE BUILDING MEETS ALL BUILDING AND FIRE CODES PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING PERMIT. THE APPLICANT PROVIDE THE CITY WITH AN ACCEPTABLE DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN FOR THE SITE PRIOR TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING. THE CHAIN-LINK FENCE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PARCEL BE UPGRADED WITH A DURABLE OPAQUE MATERIAL APPROVED BY STAFF. AN UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM BE REQUIRED WITHIN TWO (2) YEARS OF APPROVAL. PERMITS FROM THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING PERMIT. o DATED this '~' day of ~'~- , 1994 March 7, 1997 To: The Members of the Elk River City Council Dear Council Members; On March 6 we were informed of a moratorium on new construction in our area. We are currently in the process of planning and design of a new addition to our property that is located at 11061 173rd Avenue NW (behind Bridgeman's). This addition is planned as a permanent, free standing, steel frame, steel building which will match the appearance of the existing structure. The addition will add 5525 square feet of work space and will be positioned on the property in the same approximate area as the planned second building in the original Cody Square design of 1987. This building is being designed to allow immediate city sewer and water hookup when it becomes available. The existing fresh water well is adequate and will be used as a water source until that time. The plan also calls for two holding tanks for gray water and two tanks for waste water and sewage. These tanks will be pumped as needed. When City sewer service is available, the two waste water/sewage collection tanks will be cleaned and converted to gray water collection tanks. In addition, hookup for overhead fire suppression sprinklers will be installed to accommodate immediate fire truck hookup and future city water hookup. This planned addition to the property is essential for the success of our respective businesses. Both businesses are active in the Elk River Chamber of Commerce and we support several community and youth activities. The inability for us to expand and build our new addition this Summer will severely limit the success of both businesses and the 12 families that are supported by employees of either Deano's or Precision Frame. As active members of the Elk River business community, we respectfully request an exception to the moratorium be granted for us to move ahead with our building plans for this Summer. Respectfully, ~~>~ A.~res~dent~ Precision Frame & Alignment, Inc. Nancy C. Lg~-ntson, ~ce President Precision Frame & Alignment, Inc. Thomas Wistrom, President Deano's Collision Specialists, Inc. Cheryl ~istrom, Vice President Deano's Collision Specialists, Inc. HALSTAD CONTRA CTING 14180 NE 91ST STREET ELK RIVER, MN 55330 612-441-4085 April 11, 1997 Weicht & Associates 13330 Island View Drive Elk River, MN 55330 Re~ 11061 - 173rd Ave. NW Elk River, MN Soil on this lot, in area designated for drainfield, is lomny fine sand, mid medium and coarse sand at approximately 3' and below. The perc rate averaged 1.5 MPI at 24" deep and no mottled soil was encountered to at least 6' deep. Trenches should be kept at 18" to 24" to keep from getting bottom of trench into the medium and coarse sand. The system is designed is for 450 gallons of water usage per day or 30 employees. A pump tank and pump will be required to lift effluent to drainfield. Approximate quantifies needed: 40' - 4" schedule 40 pipe I - 1,250 gallon septic tank i - 1,000 gallon pump tank 70' - 2" PVC supply line I - Effluent pump (20 GPM at 9' total head) I - Sight and sound alarm 5 - Drop boxes 47 - Tons I IA" sewer rock 200' - 4" perforated pipe 50' - 4" 3034 PVC pipe Geotextile fabric Pump septic tank every I to 2 years. Sincerely, Duane Halstad M?CA 764/1031 OMH:jh Loes of Soil Borines Location of Project Borings made by Classification System: AASHO__ Auger used (check two): Hand __ Boring Nmnber 1 Surface Elevation 98.9 11061 - 173rd Ave. NW, Elk River Duane Halstad, MPCA 764/Design 1031 ; USDA-SCS X , or Power__ Date, 4-10-07 X ; Unified __.; Other .; Flight__, or Bucket X : Other Boring Number 2 Surface Elevation 99.8 m feet COMMENTS in feet COMM E N TS 0' 0 - 3" Black 10YR 2/1 sandy loam topsoil 0' 0 - 4" Black 10YR 2/1 sandy Iomn topsoil 3"- 28" Yellow brown 10YR 5/8 loamy 4"- 24" Yellow brown 10YR 5/8 loamy sand sand 2' 28"- 72" Brownish yellow 10YR 6/6 2' 24"- 36" Brown 10YR 5/3 line sand medium sand 2.5' 2.5' 3' 3' 36"- 76" Dark yellow brown I 0YR 4/4 medium and coarse sand 3.5' 3.5' 4' 4' 4.5' 4.5' 5' ' 5; 60"- 76" Brown 10YR 5/3 fine sand 5.5' 5.5' 6' 6' 6.5' 6.5' 7' 7' 7.5' 7.5' End,of bonng at 6 feet. Standing water table: Present at feet of depth, hours after boring. Not present in boring hole X End of boring at 6 feet. Standing water robie: Present at feet of depth, __ hours after boring. Not present in bonng hole X Mottled soil: Observed at feet of depth. Not present in boring hole X Observations and comments: Mottled soil: Observed at feet of depth. Not present in boring hole X Observations and comments: Percolation Test Shqe, t D~ of hol, bottom: ~y' inch~ Di~ of hole: t inch~ 8oil D~ from t~t hole: DEP~ ~C~S SO~ ~ ,. SO~ COl .OR Me~hod of scratching sidewall: ~ Dep~/~ pe~ size gravel in bottom of hole ~ inche~ Dst, & h~ of initial water filling: ~/~.-~ ~- ~~ of initial warn fining: ~ /~ /?above hole bottom M~od us~ to maintain 12" of wat~ d~ in hole Lr 4'hour: P.colatlon t~t conducted by: Du~c M~imum wat~ d~lh above hole bollom d.rinR I~l: ~ inch~ IN21'~t. VAL WATER WATER WATER: ::: ::::::: :: pFLKc RA'II£ · ~ (~e~) [ DE~{ DROP DROP :~ :~ ~ I ........ : _:3 z .......:~:._~ ~ ~ --~,-~ - ,~ c R~L ~ DROP P~C D .............................. ~ DROP P~C E .................................. ~L ~ DROP P~C G ............................. (~t~) ~ DROP PERC H (~ conver~ion~ 1/16 = .06 1/8 - .13 3/16 = .19 1/4 = .25 5116 = .31 3/8 = .38 7/16 = .44 1/2 = .5 9/16 = .56 5/8 = .63 11/16 = .69 3/4 = ,75 13/16 = .81 7/8 = .88 15/16 = .94 Ten Percent Calculation* &B.C B,C,D 1. ,,,., /' D,E,F · 0.10 = · 0.10 = S~l,t ~ of CDE Small~ ~ of D~ E,F,G F,G.H ~g~ ~ of ~G Smallest ~ of EFG I~g~t ~ of FGH gmall~ ~ of FGH X 0.10 = X 0.10 = ~11~ ~ of F~G Small~ ~ of FGH ~e top numb~ in each n~ of box~ is I~g~ ~ ~c bottom ~mb~, ~ t~c ~o~ reading ~e top ~mb~ is ~ual or ~11~ ~ bottom numbs, ~ ~ ~ num~ for ~e p~c ~. Halstad Contractir~ Percolation Test Sheet D~ of hole bottom: inch~ Di~fl~ of hole: ~il D~ from t~t hole: DEP~ inches SOIL ~ -. SOIL COl OR '") / .., /7 ~") ' Method of ,crntching ~,dew,ll: ~'~-' D.ep4~h~f pc. ,~e ~,el ,n bottom of hole ~ ,rich. Dee & ~ ofinitial wat~ filling: ~/~.-~-~.~ff~ ofinitial wa~ filling . /~ /'above hole bottom M~odu.~tomamtaml2"ofwat~d~inholeLr4hou~: ~~. ~ ' M~inmm wat~ d~lh above hole bottom during I~t: ~ imh~ ~rlI':RVAL WATI~R WATER WATE~ : : ' PF. KC R^I'I.~ : ~ (~es) I D~ DROP DROP C~CIJI~ON I ............... ~ DROP D~C B .............. ~ DROP P~C C ............................ ~ D~OP P~C D (dec~) ~ DROP P~C E (~=~) ~ D~OP P~C F ............................. (~ ~ ~ DkOP P~C ~ DROP PERC H conves~ionn~ 1116 = .06 118 - .13 3116 = .19 1/4 = .25 5/16 = .31 318 = .38 7/16 = .44 112 = .5 9/1~ TM .56 519 = .63 11/16 =.69 3/4 = .75 13/16 = .81 7/8 = 15/16 = .94 Tm Percent Calculation* A. n, 5,,l c, o ,,,-, ,"rY" : ,,,, Lars~st # of ABC "~mallest # of ABC Largest # ofBCD Smallm # ofl~(~l~ .... [ AVerage pert x o.,o x O. lO I ~,mallest # of ABC Smallest # of BCD IJrgest # of ODE ~,~li~i ~-o((Sfii'i - - ' I.argest # of DEF 5nmllest # of DEF X 0 10 X 0.10 'Smallest # of CDE Smallest # of DEF ~.~, F, O F,G,H less = itxs = Largest # of EFG Smallest # of EFG I.argest # of FOH Smallest # of FGII X 0.10 = X 0.10 = Smallest # of EFG Smallest # of FGH elf the top number in each set of boxe~ ia larger than the bottom number, then take anothcf rcadin& If the top number is equal or smaller than bottom number, nvera[~ fl~e fll'ee auRal)eTs for the pete rate. Halstad Cot~ractit'~ INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM WORKSHEET FLOW A. Estimated V,,.~ gpd measured x 1.5= __ gpd SEPTIC TANK VOLUME 6. ,cO ga.ons SOILS (Site evaluation data) C. Depth to restricting layer = ~ feet D. Maxunurn dcj~th oJTsystem C- 3 tt = ~'Q/~ feet E. Texture ~3c,de ~ Percolation rate /, ~J'"~ MPI F. SSF _/,-~9 sq ft/gpd G. Slope t~ % Lo TRENCH BOTTOM AREA For trenches with 6 roches of rock below the pipe: AxF=__x__ = sq f! of bottom area For trenches with 12 inches of rock below the pipe: A x F x 0.8 = ~/~-0 x J,-~? x 0.8 = b~Ogq ft of bottom area For trenches with 18 inches of rock below the pipe: A x F x O.e,t, = __ x __ x 0.66 = __ sq ft of bottom area For trenches with 24 inches of rock below the pipe: A x F x 0.6 = __ x __ x 0.(~= __ sq ft of bottom area BED BOTTOM AREA For seepage beds with 6 or 12 inches of rock below the pipe; 1.5 x A x F = 1.5 x x = sq it of bottom area ROCK VOLUME IN CU FT Rock depth below distribution pipe plus 0.5 foot times bottom area: M :Rock depth + 6 inches x ~Area (H,I,J,L,K) ( / +O.5ft) x~{,~=¥d-~ cuft ROCK VOLUME IN CU YDS Volume in cuft divided by 27 M + 27 = cu yds ?~J~ * 27 =~]-~rcu yds ROCK WEIGHT Cubic yards times 1,4 = tons N x 1.4 = tons 3~. y x 1.4 = ~/~/tons SYSTEM LENGTH P. Select trench width = ~ ft Q. Divide bottom area by trench width: (H, I, J, or K) + P = lineal feet QI. Gravelle~ [)e~n A x F * ( 3 for Iff' pipe, 2 for 8" pipe, width of ~e Chamber ) ' , ~x +~= f~t # P LAWN AREA Select trcrwh ,pacing, center to ccnh'r: b feet Multiply tt-cn~ h spacing by [mt,,d feet R x Q = sq ft of lawn area ~¢V × Z, =/,&0~sq ft LAYOUT (Use other side) 1. Select an appropriate scah'; one square = ~ feet. 2. Show pertinent property boundaries, right-of-way, easements. 3. Show locat.m of house, garage, driveway, and all other improvements, existing or proposed 4. Show location and layout of sewage treatment system. 5. Show location of water supply well. 6. Dimension all set backs and separation distances. Number of ~ Or 3 or4 5 or6 7.8or9 Eslimaled Sewage Flows in Gallons per da), 2 I .~-I 225 I 180 I - ~ I4-~) I ~o ! 2~s I ~ 6 k~l) 5.S 33. T' Septic Tank Capacities (In gallons) ~mm~um I.~quidI Lsqmd cap~cily ~idl garbage 750 ' ~ 1125 woo ] 1500 i soo / 2250 2(XX) [ 3O00 Soll C~l~l~clef~lics and Re, uired Areas for ~¢w~ee Trealmen! Mmules per I~ch (MPI) Fa.~r Ih,~t O l ' 0 I Io'~ OI 61o 15 I~ Io ]O 11 m4~ ~oll [cxluJcICCt per per day CoA[~ S~md Fmc 5~d*' I 67 Sandy Lo~ I 27 [oam ] 67 U~ systems for rap,dly permeable soils ~,oll hiving sO'~ or more t)f plus very fine ~and *"Soll wi~ I~ h~h a ~fccn~gc of clay ins~lau~ ol ~ reground s~d sys~m 6inches= 0% Reduction* 12 inches= 20% Reduction 18 inches= 34% Reduction 24 inches= 40% Reduction * sizing for gravelless trench 18-36" Width Geotextfle Fabric I 2" Rock Cover 4" Dist. Piim /,2 '? Rock 3/4-2 1/2" PUMP SELECTION PROCEDUiZ~ A. Determine pump capacity: Gravity Diatribution 1. Minimum suggested is 20 gpm 2. Maximum suggested is 45 gpm Psmssure Distibution 3. a. Select number of perforated laterals b. Select perforation spacing = feet. c. Subtract 2 ft. from the rock layer length. ~,~.~ ,.y., ~.~o~ - 2 ft. =. feet. d. Determine the number of spaces between perforations. Length perf. spacing = __ ft. + __ ft. = spaces e. __ spaces · 1 = ~ perforations/lateral f. Multiply perforations per lateral by number of laterals to get total number of perforations. ~,~,r~,s X .p,n,~ra= perforations. g' ~n~ x ~ = gpm. . SELECTED PUMP (~APACITY ~ ~) gpm Perforation Discharges in GPM Head Pertoration diameter (feet) tmchesl 7/32 1/4 1.0a 0.5O 0.74 ] 5 0t~9 090 2.Ob 0.80 1.04 a Use 1.0 toot single homes. b Use 2.0 feet tot anything else. B. Determine head requirements: 1. o Elevation difference between p]~'np and po~t of ~ge. If p~pmg to a pressure distribution system, five f~t for pressure required at m~ifold if gravity system, zero. _. feet ~,t~ ...... a. Enter friction loss table wi~ gpm ~d pipe di~eter. ~ ............... Read friction loss M feet per 1~ f~t from table (F-14) .... o F.L.= ,?.~ ft. /100 ft of pipe b. Determine total pipe length from pump to discharge point. Estimate by adding 25 percent to pipe length for fitting loss, or use a fitting loss chart (F-15 feet). Equivalent pipe length - 1.25 times,p~ip,$ length = ~Tt{~- x 1.25 = ~'lf feet c. Calculate total friction loss by multiplying friction loss m ft/100 ft by equivalent pipe length, c / Total friction lo~s = t '~ .~ x ~ '~' +100 = ~ "~ feet Total head required is the sum of elevation difference, special head requirements, and total friction loss. (1) (2) (3c) TOTALHEAD C. Pump selection feet Friction Loss in Plastic Pipe Nominal pipe dia. Flow Rate gpm 20 2.47 0.73 0.11 25 3.73 1.11 0.16 30 5.23 1.55 0.23 35 6.96 2.06 0.30 40 8.91 2.64 0.39 · 45 11.07 3.28 0.48 50 13.46 3.99 0.541 55 4.76 0.?0 60 5.60 0.82 65 6.48 0.95 70 7.44 1.09 [ ~ 0 8pm 1. A pump must be selected to deliver at least , . feet of total head (Step B).I[ (Step A) with at least PROPOSED BLDG. u¥ : l,,y',)'° EXISTING BLDG. XISI'IN EXISTING pARKING 175RD AVE N.W. i