6.1. ERMUSR 04-12-2011i
ElkRiver --~
Municipal Utilities
13069 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 430
Elk River, MN 55330-0430
UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING
Q
iN
Phone: 763.441.2020
Fax 763.441.8099
TO: FROM:
Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission Troy Adams, P.E. -Director of Operations
John Dietz, Chair
Daryl Thompson, Vice Chair
Al Nadeau, Trustee
MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
A ril 12, 2011 6.1
SUBJECT:
Staff U dates -Director of O erations
DISCUSSION:
The first week of May I will be attending an American Public Power Association (APPA) certification
program for Public Power Managers. The training will be held in Austin, TX. This was a budgeted
training that was postponed from 2010 and is included in the 2011 budget. The certification program
includes the following required cowses: Power Supply and Integrated Resource Planning - An
Introduction; Financial Planning, Budgeting and Performance -What Managers Need to Know; and
Strategic Management for the 21s` Century. Due to the timing of this postponed training, I will not be
attending the 2011 APPA Annual Meeting. The APPA Annual Meeting was budget for 1 staff and 2
commissioners to attend.
Previously we've discussed the possibility of bringing the Conservation Improvement Program
Consultant position in house as a Full time CIP/Key Accounts Person when the unfortunate day comes
that Vance Zehringer retires. At this time, there is no scheduled date for Vance's retirement. However,
Vance has been begun some preliminary research into potential talent for consideration. The 2011 budget
included hiring a full time CIP/Key Accounts Person to overlap and train with under Vance. With the
early retirements occurring at Great River Energy and other Minnesota utilities, ERMU may be able to
find an experienced person.
Enclosed for your reading:
• March 28, 2011 Article - "Prepaying for Electricity in Ocala, Fla."
• The recent MMUA Capitol Tattlers.
• The MMUA Resource
Page 1 of 1
Prepaying for Electricity in Ocala, Fla.
Residents will have the option to pay their electricity usage similar to how they pay
for gas.
r ~ March 28, 2011
Opening up the electricity bill will no longer be a surprise to residents of Ocala, Fla. Set to start in May,
the city will give residents (and potentially some small businesses) the option of prepaying for their
electricity, according to the ~ r. In this respect, buying electricity would be similar to
buying gas for your car -you only buy what you need. In the pilot, participants can figure out how much
energy they have used, how much they have left, and fill up accounts by going online at anytime or
contacting the utility office during business hours. In addition, customers can pop into one of 15 locations
around town to buy more energy. Not only will participating residents say goodbye to late and connection
fees but City Manager Matt Brower told the Star-Bannerthat he expects the pilot will encourage people to
be more conservative with their energy consumption. Habits like falling asleep to the N may become a
thing of the past.
This article was printed from: http://www.governing.comlPrepaying-for-Electricity-in-Ocala-Fla
-.html
http://www.governing.com/templates/gov~rint_article?id=118783354 4/4/2011
Vol. 14, No. 5 March 11, 2011
The House Commerce and Regulatory Reform Committee Tuesday approved HF 72 (Beard, R-
Shakopee). The bill removes the state ban on new carbon dioxide emissions from utilities, either from
new in-state plants or importation of power from out-of-state plants.
That same day the Senate Committee on Energy Utilities and Telecommunications approved the
Senate companion bill, SF 86 (Rosen). The identical bills are expected to be approved by their respective
bodies.
Many observers question whether Gov. Mark Dayton will sign the bills, in their current form.
A conference committee was scheduled for today (Friday) to possibly reconcile differences in
the House and Senate versions of legislation which repeals the state's ban on new nuclear power plants.
In a move that is perhaps not coincidence, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce released a study
Thursday that identified five stalled energy projects in Minnesota that it said could contribute $12.8
billion in economic output and 21,100 jobs a year if they were approved. The five projects were part of a
national study that identified 351 proposed energy projects in 49 states that are caught in regulatory
limbo, according to the business group. Planning and construction of those projects would generate
$577 billion in direct investment, 1.9 million jobs and approximately $1.1 trillion for the U.S. gross
domestic product, said the Chamber.
Senator Michelle Benson is convening a Conservation Improvement Program (CIP) stakeholder's
meeting, scheduled for Tuesday, March 15th. The purpose of this meeting, according to legislative staff,
is to develop "the best possible legislation that will optimize the success of CIP in Minnesota."
Goals include: (1) achieving energy conservation, thereby reducing the need for utility
infrastructure investments to achieve ratepayer savings and other benefits; (2) Ensuring that CIP is
structured on sound business principles which will achieve real and verifiable energy savings; and (3)
Focus on utilizing CIP for economic development and job creation as part of an overall energy savings
process.
MMUA and municipal joint action agencies will participate in the meetings. Topics are expected
to include:
1) How can more job creation and economic development be achieved with CIP expenditures?
Should there be more focus on business customers?
2) Is a more rigorous policy necessary to direct investments towards projects with the best rate
of return in energy savings and/or economic development?
3) Why should energy savings achieved from utility infrastructure investments be treated
different from savings achieved by customers?
4) Why are energy savings from a certain protect only counted for one year, and not for the iife
of the project?
5) Should size of a utility and its customer demographics (number of customers, residential mix,
density, etc) affect the utility's CIP obligations? If so, how should it be affected?
6) Should cooperatives, municipal, or investor-owned utilities be treated differently simply
because of their differing characteristics unrelated to customer demographics?
7i Should the state of the economy in general and the economics of a particular utility (for
example: its energy sales growth or decline) affect CIP obligations? If so, how should it affect it?
Given the number of issues and pending legislative deadlines, CIP reform could be a multi-year
process.
Water issues are bubbling up to the top of legislative agenda this session. Among the water
issues drawing attention is HF 135 (Hackbarth, R-Cedar). This bill would rescind the authority of city
councils to regulate private wells within city limits.
The bill has been passed by the House Health and Human Services Reform and Government
Operations and Elections Committee (which Wednesday referred the bill to the Environment, Energy
and Natural Resources Policy and Finance Committee).
Cities asserted their authority after property owners within city boundaries drilled their own
irrigation wells within municipal water utility service areas to avoid paying city utility rates (which in
many cases have been driven higher by state-mandated water conservation rates). Private well drillers
have used state mandated conservation rates as a selling point for their services.
This has led to a serious strain on the financial viability of public water systems where it has
occurred, reports the League of Minnesota Cities, and has also resulted in large increases in water use
through new private wells, affecting future water availability and security of the public water supply.
No action has been taken yet on the Senate companion bill-SF 64-but pressure will build if
the measure continues to proceed in the House.
A related bill of interest is HF 517, which limits water conservation rate structure application to
public water suppliers serving more than 1,000 people in the metro area, along with other utility-related
pro posa Is.
The Senate Committee on State Government Innovation and Veterans Monday, March 9 passed
SF 196 (Pederson, R- St. Cloud)), which would place atwo-year moratorium on new water testing rules
from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and would require a study of cost-impacts of new
regulations. The committee re-referred the bill back to the Environment and Natural Resources
Committee, which passed the bill several weeks ago.
Gov. Mark Dayton March 9 announced his appointment of Senator Ellen Anderson (DFL-St. Paui)
to chair the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC). Anderson served in the Minnesota Senate
since 1992 and has resigned her seat. She previously chaired the Senate Environment, Energy & Natural
Resources Budget Division. Sen. Anderson has been a leader in the areas of sustainable energy policy,
clean water, affordable housing, family friendly workplace policies, inner city revitalization, and
consumer protection and is the author of Minnesota's Renewable Energy Standard law.
The appointment is official upon confirmation of the now Republican-controlled Senate.
Vol. 14, No. 6 March 18, 2011
Most utilities have never considered their state-mandated Conservation Improvement Programs
(CIP a jobs program. So it was with some surprise that the subject of jobs was much of the focus of a
March 15 CIP 'stakeholder' meeting, held at the behest of the Senate Energy. Utilities and
Telecommunications Committee. The Committee had previously discussed CIP and there seemed to be
general agreement that it made sense to get people together and see if certain items could be agreed
on.
Perhaps reflecting the depth and complexity of the issues involved, little was decided at the
meeting. It seemed that most people (including MMUA's Bill Black, Bob Jagusch and other municipal
reps) left the room at least a little disappointed, and wondering where this issue will go next.
Two more CIP-related bills were introduced yesterday, both in the House: HF 1189 and HF 1193
the second of which relates directly to cooperative and municipal CIP. MMUA is digesting the contents
of these two bills now.
The good news is that the Minnesota Office of Energy Security(OES) has signaled its willingness
to work with utilities on a number of issues that the utilities feel will make CIP "sustainable' for the
long-term.
MMUA will keep you updated on this issue as developments occur.
CIP is one issue on the table for discussion with legislators at the MMUA Winter Legislative
Conference March 30-April 1. Bill Grant, formerly of the Izaak Walton League and now head of OES, will
be our keynote speaker at 1 p.m., Wednesday, March 30. Grant is expected to outline the Governor's
energy proposals, where the state is going, and the municipal role.
The March 11 earthquake and tsunami in Japan is having repercussions around the globe. In
Minnesota, the Legislature has approved two very short but very big bills (HF 9 SF 4 repealing the
state's ban on new nuclear plants. The bill is now in a conference committee to resolve differences
between Senate and House versions. Even those who were 'bullish' on the chances of Gov. Mark Dayton
signing a nuclear bill, however, are no longer radiating confidence.
The real negotiation here is not between House and Senate conferees but with the Governor's
office, which wants three things:
Prohibition on creation of plutonium;
Rate-payer protection for construction of future facilities;
Triennial reports to the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission on financing long-term (up to 200
years)in-state waste storage.
Also passed by both houses, but in identical language, is a bill (HF7 SF86 repealing the state's
moratorium on constructOn of new coal plants, or importaUOn or power into the state trom new coal
plants. This proposal was given less chance of earning the Governor's signature than the nuclear bill,
prior to the possibility of a nuclear meltdown in Japan.
Can supporters of this bill modify it enough to earn the Governor's signature? Nobody's saying
right now.
Water issues continue to trickle to the top of MMUA's legislative concerns. At the top of the
bucket now are two bills-HF 135 and HF 562.
HF 135 would repeal city authority to regulate private wells. It has passed two committees
already and is now in the bailiwick of the House Environment, Energy and Natural Resources Policy and
Finance Committee. The Senate companion, SF 64, hasn't moved yet but pressure will grow if the House
bill continues to progress
If HF 135 becomes law, it would really complicate the second issue-manufactured housing park
water sub-metering by park owners-addressed in HF 562. Among other issues, the bill mandates that
water suppliers have to bill housing park owners at a residential rate. It also allows park owners to sub-
meterand bill park tenants. The bill raises a host of troublesome issues for municipal water suppliers. It
awaits action on the House floor. No action has yet been taken on its Senate companion, SF 406.
MMUA is also working, together with allied municipal organizations, on HF 367 SF 162, which
exempt municipal water laboratories from a federal certification requirement; SF 161 (Lake Pepin
phosphorus standard); SF 196/HF 182 requiring a water regulation moratorium and study; HF 1002 SF
732, the 'wild rice rule' setting water quality standards for sulfates in Class 4A waters used for
production of wild rice and affecting much of state.
As always, a number of other issues are on our radar screen, but that's enough for now. Have a
good weekend!
Vol. 14, No. 7 March 25, 2011
Municipal and cooperative representatives met with staff from the Minnesota Office of
Energy Security yesterday to discuss possible changes to the Conservation Improvement
Program statute. Many participants felt progress was made.
A number of fairly technical issues were discussed, including: counting energy savings on
the utility side of the meter; spending requirements and how to determine program cost-
effectiveness; the conservation potential from utility to utility based on size, customer mix, etc.;
and a large customer exemption, sought by cooperatives serving ethanol plants.
Senate counsel was in the meeting and taking notes. Office of Energy Security staff were
fully engaged in the discussion. While noting the validity of many points raised by utilities, Bill
Gr_~ OES Deputy Commissioner and former Izaak Walton League leader, noted that utilities
weren't the only stakeholders in the process.
MMUA favors a full and reasoned discussion of the issues, perhaps over the interim,
with changes developed by a technical work group and taken up next session. But the utility
industry isn't speaking with one voice and there is an undercurrent for change now. Whichever
course this issue takes, we will be fully engaged in the discussion.
MMUA continues to work with the League of Minnesota Cities and Legal Aid
representatives on HF 562 (Sanders) and SF 406 (Limmer) that would legally authorize
manufactured home park owners to sub-meter their park residents for water and sewer
charges.
The bill mandates that a public water supplier shall impose charges for water or sewer
service to manufactured home parks at the lowest rate that is applied for service to single
family homes, and may not impose more than one connection fee per metered water or sewer
service that is provided to the manufactured home park.
The bill is awaiting action on the House floor. The author is waiting, at least for now, for
a compromise solution between the municipal and legal aid folks and the Minnesota
Manufactured Housing Association. There has been no action, so far, on the Senate bill.
A number of water issues remain intertwined this session, including HF 135 SF 64, which
repeals city authority to regulate private wells. These bills remain where they were a week ago:
The House bill has passed two committees and is now in the House Environment, Energy and
Natural Resources Policy and Finance Committee. The Senate companion, SF 64, hasn't moved
yet but pressure will grow if the House bill continues to progress.
Likewise, no movement on the session's two big energy bills: (HF 9 SF 4) repealing the
state's ban on new nuclear plants and (HF72 SF86) repealing the state's moratorium on
construction of new coal plants, or importation of power into the state from new coal plants.
Nuclear bills, with some differences, have been approved by both House and Senate and are in
conference committee. The coal bills are identical but haven't yet moved to the Senate or
House floor.
Gov. Dayton's signature remains unsure on these proposals.
This little missive will not appear next week. Our entire crack staff will be at the MMUA
Winter Legislative Conference. Hope to see you there!
Elk River
Municipal Utilities
13069 Ocono Parkway • P.O. Box 430
Elk Rivec, MN 55330-0430
UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING
Phone: 763.441.2020
Fax: 763.441.8099
TO: FROM:
Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission Theresa Slominski -Finance Director/Office
John Dietz Manager
Daryl Thompson
Allan Nadeau
MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
A ril 12, 20l 1 6.1
SUBJECT:
Staff Updates -Finance Director/Office Manager
DISCUSSION:
Our Customer Service Representative (CSR) that we hired in December did not work out and so
we have an opening. We are running an advertisement for the CSR position in the Star News and
Star Tribune for the two weekends of April 9"', and April 16`h with a resume submission deadline
of April 22"d
The Cooperative Resource Center (CRC) transition for after-hours phone coverage and
dispatching was successful. The cutover date was March 31s` and we transitioned without
incident. I received some very nice comments from GRE thanking us for the opportunity to
work with them over the years, and regrets that the business relationship had to end. It is
probably more challenging to deal with the change related to the early retirements for GRE than
what we are experiencing in changing to CRC.
We had 800 credit card payment transactions in March, up from 692 in February. March's fee
should be $1,800. F11 continue to update the commission on the transaction volume and costs
with the absorbed fee in place.
Elk River~~
Municipal Utilities
UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING
TO; FROM:
Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission David Berg- Water Superintendent
John Dietz, Chair
Al Nadeau, Vice Chair
Da I Thom son, Trustee
MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
A ril 12th, 20l 1 Staff U dates
SUBJECT:
Cost Share Pro am -Well Sealin
DISCUSSION:
The water departrnent has about $ 2,250.00 of grant money for the construction costs of
sealing abandoned wells. This should help to seal 5 or more wells. There are also some
grant funds for personnel wage to inspect well sealing sites. After discussing the topic with
water staff, we feel the best option would be to have the home owner to fill out an
application and get two bids from licensed well sealing contractors. We would like to see
ERIvIU pay for the lesser: a) half the cost of well sealing, b) or up to four hundred dollars
toward the cost of the well sealing. This cost share program would be for anyone within
our wellhead protection azea (Elk River, some of Otsego, some of Big Lake Township).
ERMi_J would have the jurisdiction to choose which wells are of higher priority. If a large
well of great contamination concern arises, we would also have the authority to put more
funding towazds the sealing of the well to ensure water safety. The Well Sealing Cost
Share Program Agreement Ihaft is included and requires assistance from legal advisors to
have all items ready for utilization as soon as possible, as we aze constructing reading
material for interested parties currently.
PID No.
Abandoned Well Sealing Cost Share Agreement
Contract No.
Well Depth
Well Diameter
THIS AGREEMENT is between Elk River Municipal Utilities, 13069 Orono Parkway NW, Elk River,
Minnesota, 55330, ("ERMU") on behalf of the ERMU Water Department ("DEPARTMENT")and
at the address:
(Name of GRANTEE)
The parties agree as follows:
1. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED:
a. The GRANTEE warrants that s/he is the lawful and sole owner of the property at
("GRANTEE").
and that the well to be sealed is located on the
property. (sde Address)
b. The GRANTEE shall allow on-site inspection of the well by ERMU or by the Minnesota
Department of Health staff ("MDH"). Inspection by ERMU does not constitute approval or a
guarantee as to workmanship.
c. The GRANTEE shall be solely responsible for contracting directly with a licensed well-sealing
contractor and for paying the contractor; or payment of the agreed amount by ERMU to the
contractor with the GRANTEE paying the remaining portion is allowed if that is the agreed
upon method.
2. The performance of services shall commence on or about
and be
completed on or before .The GRANTEE shall submit proof of filing of the well
sealing report and an invoice from the well sealing contractor by
3. ERMU shall reimburse the GRANTEE or pay the GRANTEE'S contractor after completion of the
work and after the GRANTEE's contractor files a sealed well report and a copy of the well record
with ERMU and the MDH upon completion of the well sealing. Payment shall be made within (30)
working days after the GRANTEE provides proof of the filing of the sealed well report to ERMU and
an invoice from the GRANTEE'S contractor documenting the costs of the well sealing. ERMU shall
pay the GRANTEE or the GRANTEE'S contractor the lesser of the following: a) fifty percent (50%) of
the actual cost of the well sealing; or b) the maximum grant amount listed herein. The cost to
ERMU shall not exceed a total of four hundred dollars ($400.00). The cost of any work performed
by the GRANTEE'S contractor in excess of this Grant will be the sole responsibility of the GRANTEE.
4. The GRANTEE shall not be considered to be either a temporary or permanent employee of ERMU.
It is mutually understood that the GRANTEE and the GRANTEE'S contractor act hereunder as
independent contractors and acquires no tenure rights or any rights or benefits by way of
Workers' Compensation, unemployment compensation, medical and hospital care, vacation and
sick leave, severance pay, PERA, or any other rights or benefits offered to ERMU employees.
5. In accordance with ERMU'S policies against discrimination, no persons shall be excluded from full
employment rights or participation in the benefits of any program, service or activity on the
grounds of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, disability, marital status, sexual preference, public
assistance status, ex-offender status, or national origin; and no person who is protected by
applicable Federal or State laws, rules, or regulations against discrimination shall be otherwise
subjected to discrimination
6. All well sealing shall be done in accordance with Minnesota Statutes governing well sealing, the
rules of Commissioner of Health related to sealing of unused wells and all other applicable
statutes, rules, and ordinances related to the sealing of abandoned wells.
7. The MDH will resolve any disputes as to the best method of sealing the well.
8. The GRANTEE agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless ERMU and its employees from any
liability, claims, causes of actions, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including
reasonable attorneys' fees, resulting directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or and one for
whose act or omissions they may be liable in the performance or the services required by this
Agreement, and against all loss by reason of the failure of said GRANTEE to perform fully, in any
respect, all obligations under this Agreement.
9. ERMU requires that the GRANTEE has no current plan or intention of sale or moving from the well
sealing site property, or in the near future any plan to put the property up for sale.
lO.ERMU has jurisdiction to choose which well sealing projects are highest priority for assisting with
the funding through the Cost Share Agreement.
Elk River Municipal Utilities Authorization
Notarization Required?
Elk River„
Municipal Utilities
UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING
TO: FROM:
Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission David Berg- Water Superintendent
John Dietz, Chair
Al Nadeau, Vice Chair
Da l Thom son, Trustee
MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
A ril 12 2011 Staff U dates
SUBJECT:
Water Quali Re ort
DISCUSSION:
This is the picture that will be on the cover of the Water Quality Report this year. We are
always trying to generate more interest in the Water Quality Report and would like to have
the citizens of Elk River get involved with next years design. We would like to have
anyone 18 years and under send in a picture to be used for the 2012 Water Quality Report
cover. The winner of the picture contest would be given fifty dollars and their name and
picture will be included in the next Water Quality Report.
~,
~,
,~,
..,
Elk River~~
Municipal Utilities
UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING
TO: FROM:
Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission David Berg -Water Superintendent
John Dietz, Chair
AI Nadeau, Vice Chair
Da I Thom son, Trustee
MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
A ril 12`h, 201 1 Staff U dates
SUBJECT: '.
Well Head Protection
Our newly updated Wellhead Protection Plan has now included wells 7, 8 and 9 into our
wellhead protection area (WHPA). These three wells were built after our WHP Plan was
initially established. Each well is now up to date in our WHP Plan and Part II ofthe WHP
Plan will be completed in the next yeaz. Part II requires ERMiJ to investigate and
inventory wells within the WHPA.
/~
Elk River -=
Municipal Utilities
13069 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 430
Elk Rwer, MN 55330-0430
UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING
P6one:763.441.2020
Fax: 763.441.8099
TO: FROM:
Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission Mark Fuchs
John Dietz, Chair Line Superintendent
Daryl Thompson, Vice Chair
Allan Nadeau, Trustee
MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
A ril 12, 2011 6.1
SUBJECT:
Staff U dates
Discussion:
• Continue working on changing out our overhead cutouts and fuses. With this we go thru
checking padmount transformers and padmount switch gear making sure nothing is
leaking, the proper tags are in place, the map book matches the tags, and all the warning
stickers are on the outside.
• Continue working on tree trimming.
• The City shop finished doing D.O.T.'s on all our trucks and trailers. We do half in
February and half in March.
• Diversified did our annual inspections on the bucket and digger trucks. The inspections
include: Visual/ Operational, Magnetic Particle, Dielectric, Load and Acoustic Emission
Testing.
• Repaired two faults on secondary underground services. We purchased a secondary fault
finder last year and have used it for about a year.
• Finished working on a street light count in Da}~ton, Otsego, Big Lake Township and Elk
River. We verify the size of the fixture and location. We also put this in the map book.
Elk River .~
Municipal Utilities
UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETLNG
TO:
Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission FROM:
Wade l.ovelette
John Dietz, Chair Superintendent of Technical Services
Daryl Thompson, Vice Chair
AI Nadeau, Trustee
MEETING DATE:
A ril l2, 201 I AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT: 6.1
Staffll dates-Su erinlendent of Technical Services
DISCUSSION:
The following is a summary of projects and/or updates over the past several weeks:
• In March, [he locating department had a total of fifty-five locate tickets. Three of
those were "emergency" locates.
• Staff has been using the thermal imaging camera to detect "hot-spots" in our primary
electrical equipment on the power distribution system. There were a few areas in
Station 14-3 that were "hot spots" and the Line dept had to switch out two feeders to
clean up some connections.
• The Metering department continues with weekly and monthly substation checks, and
doing the monthly power bill. The meter change-out program is still continuing as
time permits.
• I[ was Sam's last lime to read meters last month as he retired. Staff has been helping
out with the meter reading.
• Home Energy Audits are slowing down for the year. Outdoor temperatures are
getting too warm for the level 3 audits.
• The Security Systems department had a total of 74 phone contacts, 12 personal
visits, 12 systems quoted, 10 sales made, 10 installs completed and 21 service calls
for the month of March.
• Power plant staff did the monthly run on the engines. Everything went well. Web
deflections and megging was performed on the engines and everything appears
normal. All [he engines are in good running condition.
• Staff has been busy monitoring the lake level at [he Orono dam. All three gates were
frozen shut. The Elk River Fire department helped by spraying water on [he gates
and was able [o get two of them to open. This allowed the lake level to drop to a
more normal level.
One meter tech and one lineman attended a substation school in Shakopee last
month.