Loading...
7.1. SR 04-16-2012REQUEST FOR ACTION TO ITEM NUMBER Ma or and Ci Council 7.1 AGENDA SECTION MEETING DATE PREPARED BY Public Hearin s A ri116, 2012 Chris Leeseber ,Park Planner-Planner ITEM DESCRIPTION REVIEWED By Request by Tim Peterson for Conditional Use Permit and erem Barnhart, Plannin Mana er Private Kennel License, 11760 193`d Ave NW, Case No. CU 12- REVIEWED BY 05 Cal Portner, Ci Administrator ACTION REQUESTED A. Staff and the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) request to have a private kennel with the following conditions: 1. As a Conditional Use Permit is not a Building Permit, the applicant shall apply for all required permits. 2. The private kennel shall be limited to five (5) animals over the age of 6 months. Additional animals will require an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit. 3. Animal waste shall be disposed of per Section 10-9. 4. The applicant shall receive a private kennel license from the city. 5. All animals must be licensed and vaccinated. 6. All animals shall be on a six (6) foot or shorter leash when outside of the kennel. 7. No more than two (2) animals per supervisor shall be allowed outside of the kennel. 8. All dog waste shall be cleaned up immediately when dogs are off of the subject property. 9. No dogs designated as dangerous or potentially dangerous are allowed to be kept at the kennel and keeping of a dangerous or potentially dangerous dog shall be grounds for revocation. 10. Fence along the south property line shall be opaque. B. Approval of a private kennel license to Tim Peterson based upon approval of the Conditional Use Permit. PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their April 11, 2012, meeting and recommended approval, with one additional condition (#10), of the request by a 4-1 vote. The one vote against the request cited opposition by neighbors, interpreting strictly the criteria of conditional use. During the public hearing, seven individuals spoke on the request. Of the seven, four were in favor of the request, two were opposed to the request, and one was the applicant. Those that were in favor of the request (a couple living there for 10+ years) cited that they have never had issues with the applicant's dogs, the applicant's dogs are quieter than most of the dogs in the area, the dogs by their nature of what they do have to be well behaved and quiet. One neighbor indicated that he was not even aware that the applicant had five dogs. ~~rlEwEO sr N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\CUP\CU 12-OS Peterson Private Kennel\CU 12- ~~~ OS_CC.docx Those that were opposed to the request cited the total number of dogs in the past, they are on the downhill side of the subject property and see everything, and that the applicant should have to follow the same rules as the rest of the city. The applicant spoke to explain what a therapy dog is and the extensive training/time they require to become one, typically about three years. He explained what the dogs do and how they have to be well behaved and quiet because of the environments they go to. He indicated he has no desire to increase his kennel size (number of dogs) and just wants to keep his dogs until they pass away. He will not be breeding the dogs. The dogs are house dogs and do not care to be outside too much and only like. weather that is 65-70 degrees. He stated if he sees that his neighbors have their dog out, he waits to bring his outside. He is outside with the dogs at all times and carries a scooper with him to immediately clean up after the dogs. One commissioner asked what happens when five different dogs may be at the kennel. This was in reference to the comment that CUP's run with the property and not the applicant. Several commissioners agreed that the nature of therapy dogs is well behaved. One commissioner thought that two extra dogs could be an issue given the small lots sizes and proximity to neighbors. A tenth condition requiring the south fence to be opaque was discussed to address one of the concerns by those opposed to the request. PRIVATE KENNEL LICENSE Tim Peterson has made application for a private kennel license in order to keep five dogs. The applicant has submitted all the necessary application materials and has successfully completed a kennel inspection by the Police Department. Kennels are inspected on a yearly basis prior to renewal of the license to ensure that the applicant is meeting the requirements of the ordinance relating to private kennels. A Conditional Use Pernut is required for this license because the property is less than five acres in the R1a zoning district. Approval of the private kennel license should be contingent upon approval of the Conditional Use Permit. ATTACHMENTS ^ Location Map ^ Planning Commission memo dated April 10, 2012 ^ Additional letters from neighbor ^ Photo submitted by neighbor Action Motion by Second by Vote FOllow Up N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\CUP\CU 12-05 Peterson Private Kennel\CU 12-OS_CC.docx WV b0~8Z~6 ZTOZ/6Z/8'6mp~deW uone~o~\~auua~ alenpd uovalad SO-ZT fU\dfU\sapd aseJ\6uiuueld\luawdo~ana4 6liunwwoJ\sluawy~edaQGN QOp~7 REQUEST FOR ACTION TO ITEM NUMBER Plannin Commission 5.2 AGENDA SECTION MEETING DATE PREPARED BY Plannin Items Aril 10, 2012 Chris Leeseber ,Park Planner-Planner ITEM DESCRIPTION REVIEWED By Request by Tim Peterson for Conditional Use Permit for Private erem Barnhart, Plannin Mana er Kennel, 11760 193=4 Ave NW, Case No. CU 12-05 -Public REVIEWED BY Hearing ACTION REQUESTED Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) request to have a private kennel with the following conditions: 1. As a Conditional Use Permit is not a Building Permit, the applicant shall apply for all require permits. 2. The private kennel shall be limited to five (5) animals over the age of 6 months. Additional animals will require an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit. 3. Animal waste shall be disposed of per Section 10-9. 4. The applicant shall receive a private kennel license from the City. 5. All animals must be licensed and vaccinated. 6. All animals shall be on a six (6) foot or shorter leash when outside of the kennel. 7. No more than two (2) animals per supervisor shall be allowed outside of the kennel. 8. All dog waste shall be cleaned up immediately when dogs are off of the subject property. 9. No dogs designated as dangerous or potentially dangerous are allowed to be kept at the kennel and keeping of a dangerous or potentially dangerous dog shall be grounds for revocation. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting a CUP to allow five dogs to be at his residence. The ordinance requires a private kennel license and CUP if there axe more than three dogs over the age of six months. Three of the dogs axe registered Rottweiler's and are registered therapy dogs through "Therapy Dog International." They visit hospitals, nursing homes, and do other special visits to work with individuals. The two other dogs are registered French Bulldogs and are in training to become therapy dogs. The subject property is .25 acres in size and the backyard is fenced in with chain link fencing. The property is surrounded by single family residents to the west, north, and east Directly to the south is a multiple family residential development. The applicant has received nine number letters of support of his request with four of these letters from neighbors adjacent to the subject property. All the letters indicated that they have never had issues with applicant's dogs. N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\CUP\CU 12-05 Peterson Private Kennel\CU 12- 05_PC.docx APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The issuance of a Conditional Use Permit can be ordered only if the use at the proposed location: 7. lYlill not endanger, injure or detrimentally aff ct the use and enjoyment of otherpropery in the immediate vicinity or the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience orgeneral welfare of the neighborhood or the city. 2. iYlill be consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. mill not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacantpropery. 4. 1-Vill be served adequately by and will not adversely affect essential public facilities and services including streets, police and fireprotection, drainage, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems, parks and schools; and will not, in particular, create traff c congestion or interference with traffic on adjacent and neighboring public thoroughfares. 5. I,Ylill not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons or property becaarse of excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, dust or vibrations. 6. 1~ill not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. 7. mill fully comply with all other requirements of this Code, including any applicable requirements and standards for the issuance of a license orpermit to establish and operate the proposed use in the city. If denial of such a permit should occur, it shall accompany recommendations or determinations by findings or a report stating how the proposed use does not comply with the standards set forth in Section 30-654. In the review of the standards for CUP as outlined, it appears that the request is consistent with all of these standards. ATTACHMENTS ^ Location Map ^ Applicants Narrative ^ Nine Letters of Support from Neighbors ^ Images of Dogs ^ Images of the Property Action Motion by Second by Vote Follow Up N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\CUP\CU 12-OS Peterson Private Kennel\CU 12-OS_PC.docx February 23, 2012 Elk River City Council Planning Manager /Jeremy Barnhart, AICP City Offices Elk River, MN 55330 Mr. Barnhart, This letter explains my request for the City of Elk River to grant me a conditional use pernut. I live at 11760 193rd Ave. N. W. Elk River, MN. I have 5 dogs that live with me and I am asking for the conditional use permit to allow me to have them. Three of my dogs are registered therapy dogs through "Therapy Dog International", these dogs are registered Rottweilers. They visit hospitals, nursing homes and other special visits to work with individuals. I have been involved.with Therapy Dog International for 15 years. I myself am a certified evaluator for Therapy Dog International. I have evaluated and tested over 3,000 dogs from Minnesota to Anchorage, Alaska. My other two dogs are registered French Bulldogs. These two dogs are in training to become therapy dogs. I use my dogs as therapy dogs, companions, AKC competition dogs in (obedience, confirmation, sheep herding and carting). All of my dogs are very will socialized. I have 4 grandchildren that interact with my dogs on a regular basis. I have attached several pictures of my dogs in their normal life and therapy activities. Myself, I am a licensed American Kennel Club judge for AKC dog shows, a certified Canine Good Citizen Evaluator through the American Kennel Club and a certified evaluator for Therapy Dog International. My occupation is the Vice President of Operations for OSHA Environmental Compliance Systems, Inc.; we are an industrial safety consulting organization. I have been with OECS, Inc. for 18 years. My goal with dogs is to continue to work with organizations and individuals providing them the service of dog companionship and therapy. Therapy dogs were used during the days and months following the 911 disaster. They are important to the public and very important to me. My French Bulldogs are really my buddies and will be great therapy dogs in the future. I am a responsible dog owner. I do not let my dogs out to run withp-~myself or a member of my family out with them. My dogs are always in my fenced yard when running free. If I take them outside my yard they are always on a leash. All my dogs are current on their vaccinations "Therapy Dog International" requires this. They receive annual health checks by my vet "All Pets" in Zimmerman, Minnesota. I do not take short cuts with my dogs care, health or training. In closing I am asking your office to grant me a conditional land use permit for all the reasons I gave above. If you have any questions please call or email. I have also enclosed photos of my property. -~'sT 2-23-12 To Whom It May Concern: I have lived at 11788 193rd Ave. NW since 2003. In this time, I am aware that my neighbor Tim Peterson has a few dogs. I don't know how many dogs, but his dogs have never been a problem for me. In fact there are several people in our neighborhood who do have dogs who are excessively noisy, do not respect the boundaries of yards, and are just plain annoying to live around. Tim's dogs are not like this. Tim takes very good care of his property, keeps his dogs on his property, and has not given me a single reason to complain in the 9 years I have lived near him. (Tim's backyard and mine are about 100' apart) Feel free to call with questions. Sincerely, ~..,- ~:~ Troy Day 11788 193rd Ave NW Elk River, MN 55330 (763) 267-7872 City of Elk River We live across the street from Tim Peterson. We have never had any problems with his dogs. When he moved in he had been there for six months before we even knew he had dogs. The only time we have heard them is when there was a litter of puppies in the front yard being played with. They are very well behaved dogs. We personally don't have a problem with Tim and his dogs. Tim and Brenda Johnson 11751 193rd Ave. P.O.Box 205 Elk River,Mn February 22"d, 2012 To the City of Elk River, This letter is to inform you that we fully support our next door neighbor, Tim Peterson, in his attempt to have a conditional use permit for having more than the allotted number of dogs with in the City of Elk River, at his residence. Tim's dogs have always been kept either on a leash, within the confines of his home, or fenced in his backyard. Our entire family, including our children (4 & 12 year old sons), have played with all his dogs, Rottweilers and other breeds, on multiple occasions. They are show dogs, therapy dogs and family pets, which is all obvious by their constant good behavior. Thanks and feel free to contact us if you have any questions or concerns- Brian Altringer & Melanie Waite-Altringer (neighbor's of Tim Peterson for MANY years) 11748 193rd Ave NW Elk River, MN 55330 Abby Kittelson & Eric Kusch 11774 193rd Ave N W Elk River, MN 55330 February 22, 2012 The City of Elk River, It was brought to our attention that there has been a complaint in regards to our neighbor's dogs. We just wanted to inform you that since moving to the neighborhood we have encountered absolutely no issues with his dogs. Tim is an excellent dog owner and since day one has taken the appropriate actions to assure his dogs do not bother anyone in the area. Our family is not bothered by his dogs in the slightest. In our hunt to purchase a new house, barking dogs were a concern to our family, but we couldn't be any happier with how he handles his responsibility as a dog owner. Thank you, Abby Kittelson & Eric Kusch .~ ~ __ " `~ ~~' February 23, 1012 14051 55th St N E Saint Michael, MN 55376 City of Elk River: I am writing this letter to you to recommend that Tim Peterson receive special considerations to have more than 3 dogs living at his residence in Elk River. I have known Tim for over 20 years. I am also a Canine Good Citizen, STAR Puppy and Therapy Dogs International evaluator. Tim and I have worked closely since 2002 evaluating dogs for these certifications. All of Tim's dogs are certified working therapy dogs, which mean he is actively visiting with his dogs at facilities.. This is such an important job and Tim has done a wonderful job making days brighter for many adults and children with his dogs. Please consider special permiss-ion for Tim to have over 3 dogs. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Pat Kinch ~, ~liY1C~'1 763-497-5809 Dom February 22"d, 2012 City of Elk River Attn: Animal Licensing/Permits 13065 Orono Parkway Elk River, MN 55330 Dear City Administration & Council Members: It has come to my attention that Tim Peterson, along-time resident of Elk River is applying for a conditional use permit. According to the city laws this is for residents that keep more than 3 animals. One of the dogs that reside with Tim is co-owned by me and other individuals. I am not sure how this could affect him even needing a permit as the dog is there on occasion (not full-time residency). With regards to Tim's character and level of dog ownership responsibility; Ihold it in the highest regard. Tim is actively involved in several dog clubs promoting training and responsible ownership. The clubs (to name a few) are Northstar Rottweiler Club, Therapy Dogs International, MN Purebred Dog.. Breeders Association and The American Rottweiler Club. Tim is ever-present at my dog training facility teaching classes and testing dogs and their owners to become certified therapy dogs. I'd urge you to look at Tim's length of residence, his good standing within the city with his dogs and his services to other dog owners and organizations. I have known Tim for over 15 years and his merit in the dog world is well-renowned. Should you have any questions, require further credentials or references for me or Tim Peterson do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your kind consideration. Sincer, Tiffany Huebner, owner Dogue Spot, Inc. 5600 Queens Ave NE Suite 200 Otsego, MN 55330 tiffanyCa~doguespot.com 763-425-7768 2/23/2012 To Whom It May Concern: I recently learned that Tim Peterson, who lives at 1160 193rd Ave NW in Elk River, is applying for a Kennel License with your City, and I wanted to write a letter on his behalf. I have kno~~n Mr. Peterson for approximately 9 years. Throughout that time, I have found him to be responsible, compassionate, considerate, hardworking, respectful, and truly an upstanding citizen. A lot of our interaction has been centered around animal events, and I have seen all of Mr. Peterson's dogs at various times. I can confidently say that he takes excellent care of them. His dogs are clean, well behaved, socialized, and obedience trained. Many, if not all, have their therapy dog certification allowing them to go into schools and nursing homes to interact and assist with the students and residents. Mr. Peterson regularly socializes his dogs and attends weekly training classes with them. Mr. Peterson is also very involved in, and a huge asset to, all aspects of the dog world. He has held many various board positions within numerous dog clubs, he has trained and shown several dogs in obedience, herding, conformation, and carting, he is a Certified Therapy Dog Tester, and he is currently training to become an AKC certified judge. As a Police Officer in the metro area, I absolutely understand the need for cities to regulate how many animals a person owns. However, I also believe that there should be exceptions for those people that have shown that they are capable of handling and caring for more than the allotted amount. I believe that Mr. Peterson is definitely one of those people. I would have no reservations about having him as a neighbor, or of him living in the City for which I patrol, knowing the level of care and conscientiousness that he puts into his animals and the consideration he has for those around him. All that being said, I urge you to approve Mr. Peterson's Kennel License. He is a knowledgeable dog owner and a respectful citizen that is capable of handling the rules and responsibilities that come with having that license. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or if you would like to speak to me further. Sincerely, Rachel A. Meehan 11613 Both Street NE Albertville, MN 55301 #~63-300-7383 nle e~lal.iachel,~gmail.coin Hp r~. 6, 1U 1'1 6 : 7UNIVI I`o, ~31L r, L April 1, 2012 City of Elk River REC~+ ~'~j APR 0 6 2012 Re: Tim Peterson/Private Kennel Request ~Y To Whom It May Concern: My name is Sharon Gall. ~ I am writing to share my experience of living next to Tim Peterson and his dogs. I was the previous owner of 19246 Freeport Court from 1999 to 2010. In 2004, Tim Peterson, moved in. His dogs never caused a problem in the 6 years of him being neighbors with me. Tim has a secure fence for them and a kennel. I neverfelt threatened by his dogs, nor did I fear the safety of my grandson when he was over. Tim kept the yard looking neat and clean at all times. He was out in the yard twice a day cleaning up fecal matter. The dogs were never outside for long periods of time. He spent several hours training them, which it showed, through the dogs not barking an overabundance when they were outside. They were never a disturbance to me at any time. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at 612-741-0760. Sincerely, Sharon M. Gall Leeseberg, Chris From: Barnhart, Jeremy Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 3:25 PM fo; Leeseberg, Chris Subject: FW: Tim Peterson - FYI Jeremy Barnhart, AICP ~ Planning Manager 763.635.1034 w ~ 763.635.1090 f 13065 Grono Parkway ~ Elk River ~ MN ~ 55330 ~, f - ~~_~ P~llE>Itf 8t ~1~~. ~ ~ I~~~r From: Dennis and Gwen jmailto:dennishausCa>charter.netl Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 3:20 PM To: Barnhart, Jeremy Subject: Tim Peterson - I am writing to support a request for Tim Peterson for a Conditional Use Permit for a private kennel, at 11760133rd Ave NW, Elk River -Case No 12-05. We live at 19342 King Circle, Elk River and have been Tim's neighbor since he's moved fio his home. We have never had an issue with Tim or his dogs and know that Tim takes good care of them and is very committed to raising them to be good, obedient and quiet dogs. We hope that Tim is able to receive his Permit and continue with raising his dogs. Ewen and Dennis Haus 1 April 5, 2012 City of Elk River Attn: Jeremy Barnhart, Planning Manager 13065 Orono Parkway Elk River, MN 55330 Dear Mr. Barnhart, We recent{y received a letter from the city stating that there would be a public hearing on Tuesday, April 10, 2012 at City Hall to consider a Conditional Use Permit for a private kennel which was requested by Tim Peterson of 11760 193~d Avenue NW, Case No. CU 12-05. Tim and my family have been neighbors for many years. He has been an exemplary neighbor. We have never had any issues with any of his pets (dogs). They are well contained within a fenced yard. They are not annoying, nor do they bark incessantly. The only time we ever see them is when he is working with them to train for shows, etc. My family and I have no issues whatsoever in allowing this Conditional Use Permit. Please consider issuing the permit and allowing Tim to continue to enjoy his pets and hobby. Sincerely, ,,-~-,-~., ~.. , °4. 1 ill C ndiff f 19 1 Kin Circle `~~~ Elk River, ~N 55330 Elk River Planning Commission and City Council The request for a private kennel permit at 11760193th Ave. N.W, case No. CU 12-05, should not be allowed in a residential neighborhood. He has had a illegal kennel for many years and we have had nothing but problems. Dogs barking at all hours, morning, noon & night. They bark at us anytime we are outside or walking up our driveway. We have contacted the Police Department and nothing is done about it. I feel sorry for the residents whose yards are next to the subject property. We have observed up to nine dogs at a time in that yard. The kennel belongs out in the country, not in a populated residential neighborhood. Dale &~S~iirley Halberg 19240 Freeport CT. NW Elk River, MN 55330 1 ~~ ®^ - A ~ ~, 4. F ti ., ~ o ~ O N_ ~~,, r~ ~ C3 z M ti a V W ~' z H ~ ~€ a ~i ~ ~~~€ . J ~~ ti ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ d `--~-~ 'v J ~~ y, r (/j N ~ W G1 ~ N ~ N ~- a ~- - y O ~ 'r ~' .~ ® Z O ~ Q ~ U ~ ~ Q ~ V ~ ~-+ d z O z 5 ~ i ~ W ai ~> ue ~ z3 o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EQ~ ~ F' s ., E-+ r~+ A v - z ^ `~ O .~ Z W ~ ~ N Z 4 = ~ ~~ ~ N _;_ r .-~ ~ Q bA E,,,~ 0 ~„~ Q ~ ~ ~ •~ r ~ z ~ ~~~ o~ a~ rQ~ C ~--i ~ ~sY z ;~; CO y ~ ~ e W C ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~* w ~ O ~ ~ ~ O „ w z S c H ~ u ~ ~ c .~Zu N ~ F ~ G u -, (Vla r. 11. 1011 ~ ~ UUAM ~~ r~:,: ~;;~:.,~ :.,r . ... ~: ~' ., I. ,. .. ,~vq, ns'gv.',~Lyl ; I ~ i';Y~', r~ '~''' ~e x9 . ~' r ~'~, .~ a~Pi "s•~. ~,... l w p ~. U ~~ ~ ~ ~~ e ~ `. W ~ G '1 ~ ~ ~ 1~ w ~: W ~ ~'+ ~ 4 ~ Z <t ~ w V ~ a ~i W V.. `. ~,, ., } ~' „ •-. s ', r.. !~ k= tom;. .~': Y O[ ~c w '~ . Jo • ` ~.~~1, ~'~~ i :. W ~ ~ ~ W o ~ i sk rc.:.~wa~;( ~., 1 A c(am)>~ Q 1 ~~ ,,~~' `, ~~ ~ ~~~' L1.J t ~ ~ ~"~" ~' ~ ~ ) '^;~ ' ,~ ' ~ r ~''.~.~ i ~' "'~~)I ,zk 1 1 t7 ~ ~' s . ~':•"' .ice' ,r. rys. ~ 1 ~ -~+~'~f~`~':. ~'i cam. 1. 1r•.~ k .I ~ tom; -~• .'~• 1^ ~ -~~ ~~ ', ~ rt~I~1 ~P f1I ~S~ •..Il ftl{PI~+I .r. b.! ~ tlll~l~l' ;w .~ I I+fll .; ~.'„~.y . f~„' ~1~1 1+If~1~e~: I fl } IY~,r..n, -5 !'N,..,~.. ..c.~-,. b 1 1 11~ 1~1. t ~~t ~,. ,~~F" ~tl 1~~ ~,~~?~~ SyFS~~~ f, ~IIPIIP LI,~ { C ~I f'l~i~~~, y~ ~~ ~P1~fP+~~Y d~~c ~ ,.~„r~ ~~~~~~ ~M' ~~~ ~~iP?r, {,.~.~~f'1 .v~~- ,I'3r `~'iK'1F~~ .~f~~,~l~~~1~3, •• .,'r~~~4'5..~~f~ ~4~tIIY,~9~``~,7 '~%a ~. ,rt~~~~•.,& * ~r~,S~Y~t~x ~~~~~',,'~<<~~~ R~'`R .•.~~w~`~h~~f~k 4~~~.~~~.~'~ }~°~~.,t~,~n•:n <,..,.~~,~~~,..~;~ ~ 1;, ,s.• _~~J jfj•v~,<; •r;15'7cv~.. :,2..r,~,.s+:4a.L,>i~':+".'•' .•'Qi,,'.~.,?{~rt~Tkr~:: t~i.lr+n',~1?St:; ;~~~ .~p,.q,(~_ ~.~s*~a~~.~'~~~.,ti.y~y; `.~~'.~., .~iyi'r'' .i)'.~ '~.n•.o~,,.:: •' :•,J~~+rr..~ J~` tl r~~V+.: ~~.r '•~., ~•:~j~.V.. l'-''.~ ':~~. .~"....:~ r1. ~'S •± - r~~rr..,~''C4'R~w /• 'a/~+.. .~G`~~~.~.~_ ^•~Sal~ 6•/ Ii~~(~ /r1~' ~ !6 a~ •(~ ti ~~ ~ v f ,nf ++ D ~~ ~ rjj~yfy~~ ~ ~ p ~ ~, ~- Y ra ~v> '~a .~ ~s r ~3~ a ; `' ~~r ~' ?' a 7 1i -Y:Y,;ry ~° ~ f ~ >'- «~ i ~ - ~. c ,$ f _' Zb~."_ ~. .. i'~°a ~~ ~ s: t ~S r µa ~t ~. ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ w~ ,_~ .~:. .. ~. ,~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ :. ,~ '~° ~:~. Select ~~a[e, V-~ ~ ~~N CN atcar~s Gala 1~ashdea Tai D, RN, PT, TT, NT, UGC, TDI ~~ ¢~s ~, ~/j~ April 5, 2012 City of Elk River Attn: Jeremy Barnhart, Planning Manager 13065 Orono Parkway Elk River, MN 55330 Dear Mr. Barnhart, We recently received a letter from the city stating that there would be a public hearing on Tuesday, April 10, 2012 at City Hall to consider a Conditional Use Permit for a private kennel which was requested by Tim Peterson of 11760 193`d Avenue NW, Case No. CU 12-05. Tim and my family have been neighbors far many years. He has been an exemplary neighbor. We have never had any issues with any of his pets (dogs). They are well contained within a fenced yard. They are not annoying, nor do they bark. incessantly. The only time we ever see them is when he is working with them to train for shows, etc. My #amily and I have no issues whatsoever in allowing this Conditional Use Permit. Please consider issuing the permit and allowing Tim to continue to enjoy his pets and hobby. Sincerely, ~. ~ ~ ~ ,'`~ ill C ndiff ~` 193 1 King' Circle Elk River, MN 55330 Elk River Planning Commission and City Council The request for a private kennel permit at 11760193th Ave. N.W, case No. CU 12-05, should not be allowed in a residential neighborhood. He has had a illegal kennel for many years and we have had nothing but problems. Dogs barking at all hours, morning, noon & night.. They bark at us anytime we are outside or walking up our driveway. We have contacted the. Police Department and nothing. is done about it. I feel sorry for the residents. whose yards are next to the subject property. We have observed. up to nine dogs at a time in that yard. The. kennel belongs out in the country, not in a populated residential neighborhood. f. ~ ~ Dale & Sh`~rley Halberg 19240 Freeport CT. NW Elk River, MN 55330 1