The URL can be used to link to this page

5. HRSR 11-05-2012 *ti REQUEST FOR ACTION River To ITEM NUMBER Housing and Redevelopment Authority 5. AGENDA SECTION MEETING DATE PREPARED BY November 5, 2012 Jeremy Barnhart,Planning Manager ITEM DESCRIPTION REVIEWED By Public Hearing for Downtown Task Force's Plan—Mississippi Connections REVIEWED BY ACTION REQUESTED Recommendation to approve the Downtown Task Force's Mississippi Connection plan for downtown. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Over the last 12 months, the City Council established Downtown Task Force has developed its plan, Mississippi Connections, that is intended to redefine the greater downtown area,preserve its historic character,while promoting the future viability of the community. The plan in large part provides priorities and strategies to improve or otherwise help six distinct"neighborhoods" throughout the plan area. The document is broken into 4 parts: Part I: Introduction. This section summarizes the document, and includes much of the `behind the scenes'work on the project originally completed by the Task Force in 2006 and updated in 2012. This includes the mission and vision statements,review of existing conditions, a review of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) recognized in the study area. This section references previous relevant studies, as many of these issues have been studied by plans as far back as 1970. This section also attempts to summarize the features of the area,including the natural amenities,the transportation systems, and the heritage-forming attributes of the area. Part II: Illustrative Master Plan. This section outlines the vision for the study area in both words and the graphic. The plan is intended as a series of goals,policies, and tasks that once completed, strengthen the study area into a recognizable neighborhood that is strong enough to sustain the negative impacts of major transportation shifts brought on by Highway 10 improvements. These tasks and goals were identified by the Task Force members, and reviewed by the public in two open houses. This section summarizes the public comment process. Many of these goals,policies, and strategies were intended as `work orders' for citizen and business groups, city boards and commissions, and the City Council. These are strategies that the Task Force has identified as being most efficient in achieving the goals outlined in Part I. These strategies are broken down into the six `neighborhoods'. Part III: Implementation priorities. This section takes the goals,policies and strategies outlined in Part II and prioritizes them into three time periods: short term (0-2 years), mid-term (3-5 years) and ongoing. The Task Force acknowledges that time is not the only trigger associated with these priorities; the Task Force sees resources (money, time) and political will as equal drivers to these priorities. The [P O W E R E D 8 1 NATURE intention behind this section is to outline projects that can be completed early,generating political momentum,which will help more resource intensive projects as they become prudent. Part IV:Appendix. This section includes the SWOT analysis, the sketches associated with the 2006 planning process, the received written public comments, and a place holder for the resolution approving the plan. Key changes from earlier draft. Following the public comment period, some changes were made,in response the comments received. These changes include: • Adding the historic context study to the relevant studies in Part I. This background information is important to the users of the document as they take on the strategies suggested. • A number of people commented on the size of the downtown, and their belief that the downtown area must grow in size to accommodate this activities sought. The Task Force agreed, increasing and reintroducing the core downtown development patterns to a 2 block area north of Highway 10. Comments not incorporated. The Task Force received a number of comments from interested parties that did not compel a change to the plan. Among them: • The plan maintains a goal to establish an historic preservation district, although the Task Force received some strongly worded comments from impacted residents noting their displeasure with this idea. The reference remains to allow the Historic Preservation Commission to further explore the issue with the neighborhood as a whole. If the neighborhood does not wish for an historic preservation district after information has been presented,it is understood that the Historic Preservation and City Council will not continue. • The plan does not show all of the impacts to area properties brought by Highway 10 construction. While the plan removes the buildings that will be lost to construct, the plan does not illustrate other impacts adequately,in the view of those commenting. Unfortunately, these impacts are not adequately known to develop meaningful responses. As more information is learned, modifications to the plan are expected. FINANCIAL IMPACT None ATTACHMENTS • Draft Mississippi Connections plan,prepared by the Downtown Task Force Action Motion by Second by Vote Follow Up C:\Users\dhuebner\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\X3O71NQV\SR to HRA Mississippi Connections Downtown Plan 11-5-12.docx pg.2 Executive Summary Mississippi Connections Redevelopment Framework Plan The Plan was prepared by a City Council appointed task force ..."To develop a comprehensive plan that will comprised of 18 members representing a variety of community redefine the "greater downtown area"to preserve interests. Deliberations took place over a period of eleven its historical character while promoting the future meetings which covered a one year time period in 2006 and 2007. viability of the community"... (Excerpt from the Task Force Mission Statement) The task force adopted the following vision statement to guide the formation of the plan: "The Mississippi Connections Study Area is the cornerstone of the community. The Redevelopment The downtown area of Elk River is the oldest part of the City and Framework provides the blueprint for creating an has long been considered the heart of the city. This area, the environment and culture that encourages private businesses in particular,have seen shopping patterns change, reinvestment. This environment will be characterized by a impacting the success of their businesses. Further, the robust business climate, strong affordable residential downtown businesses, and the residential neighborhoods neighborhoods, diverse recreational opportunities, an agreed surrounding it,will be impacted by expected changes to Highway upon transportation framework,recognition of its historical 10 in the next 2 decades. Highway 10 will evolve to an urban place,and enhancing opportunities for connections with the freeway in the future. It is not known when this will occur,but community." we know that it will further alter traffic patterns and impact businesses and homes in the area. Unaddressed, these changes It soon became evident that expected changes to Highway 10 can be devastating to fragile neighborhoods and businesses that (originally identified during as part of the 2002 Inter Regional are important to the Community of Elk River. Corridor Plan) would have a far greater impact to the downtown core than originally thought. To gain a better understanding of This document is intended to provide guidance to property these changes, the City Council tabled the Task Force in 2007, owners, stakeholders, and community leadership to position the and worked with MnDOT on a more defined Highway 10 plan area in such a way that strengthens the area to survive the impacts through the City. That plan was approved in late 2008. of time and change;methods to reestablish the downtown area as a destination;a desirable address to do business,live, and enjoy The task force was reconvened in 2011, adding more resident and the diversity of uses in a character rich downtown amid the hustle business representatives. Over 10 months starting in 2011, the Task Force reviewed the plan,updating it to address new and bustle of a growing community. information and goals. This Plan represents both the approved Draft as of November 5,2012 - Part I Executive Summary,page 1 - Highway 10 planned improvements and the task force's response The collection of small projects builds more momentum to those changes. from property owners, stakeholders, and other interests. This vision,albeit 2. "Redefine"- the strongest operative words found within appearing idealistic in The nature of a redevelopment the mission statement is...'redefine the `greater downtown framework plan demands area".... The word"redefine" carries with it both the most form,is a long term imagination, a strong vision, and controversial aspect of the redevelopment framework plan that allows the patience. The framework is both a (physical change) but it also explicitly conveys the hope and strategic and tactical description of vision of the plan. The intent of the framework is to respond City to guide its own how a community will address to time and market changes that have already occurred, and fate as development complicated issues such as to redefine a context for present and future changing markets, commitments development/redevelopment opportunities, offering and redevelopment to a process and defining an guidance and opportunity for the area to survive these opportunities present ultimate vision for the future. changes,many of which establish a development pattern much different from what the area was formed under. themselves to the The following is a summary of the "Redefine" becomes both the vision and the intrinsic value of community. Task Force's philosophy behind recognizing the need for careful and guided change. the framework, some of the key planning elements, and comments regarding its implementation. 3. History- the greatest challenge to the Task Force was The mission and vision statements, as shown at the top of this creating a framework that balanced future changes with the section, drove the formation of this plan. area's history and environmental assets and opportunities. The framework anticipates saving one major core downtown 1. 20-Year Vision- the redevelopment framework is block of buildings at Jackson and Main, the water tower, designed by necessity to have a long term horizon for reinvigorating the single family neighborhoods,re- completion. However, this reality should not serve as establishing the Mississippi and the Elk Rivers as a deterrence to either starting the plan or waiting for ideal commemoration to past history,by constructing interpretive market conditions.The framework's "Implementation signage and venues that tells the "Elk River Story".The Priorities" articulate,in detail, tasks needed to be done within framework envisions,in part, the creation of a new history the first three years of plan initiation followed by long term committed to attracting the community as a whole to enjoy objectives. Working hard in the first three years to establish this area's uniqueness and opportunities. Building on our rich momentum and excitement will serve to propel the vision history will take time and patience but this objective is a forward with commitment and conviction. critical tenant of the plan. Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I Executive Summary,page 2 - 4. "Core Downtown"- the Task Force's vision is based on a demand. All of which will be necessary in order to create the future market that will seek rehabilitation and redevelopment magnitude of real estate value that would make opportunities, especially for properties situated along the redevelopment feasible.While market driven, any Mississippi River. The plan seeks to establish the "Brick and redevelopment of this area will likely require taxpayer S. Main Blocks" as the center for historical rehabilitation and assistance,in the form of financial incentives and assistance, creates a path to determine the economic viability of this regulatory changes, and land acquisition. objective. Lastly,the plan attempts to provide opportunities to draw people to the core downtown. Festivals,markets, 7. Commitment to Implement- no redevelopment music events,in addition to physical connections to the river framework has value until commitment to implement is to promote the core as a destination, a characterization that agreed upon by all affected parties;this community consensus will be more and more important as travel patterns evolve is only initiated by the City Council's adoption of the Plan. away from the direct access currently employed. With this consensus, an agreed upon set of priorities and a work plan is established to begin the process of creating the S. Single Family Neighborhoods-the redevelopment foundational steps of the Plan. framework's philosophy started with the premise of preserving the single family neighborhoods, some for the rich 8. Financial Commitment- due to the economics of asset of affordability and other sectors for their historical redevelopment and revitalization,no vision can be quality.A goal of the plan is that the commercial implemented without a major financial commitment by the redevelopment and reinvestment successes on both sides of City. Some of the redevelopment costs will realistically have Highway 10 will translate directly into reinvestment interest to be absorbed through the use of tax increment, tax by residential property owners. abatement and other forms of public/private participation. In addition, taxpayers should anticipate the City may have to 6. "North of Highway 10"-the area of most significant capitalize rehabilitation related funds and commit to change is the 5 block area north of Highway 10. The Task significant capital improvements involving open space and Force envisions that as market dictates, this will evolve into a other infrastructure costs. destination neighborhood. An"employment center" (e.g. office,medical,institutional) to bring daytime users that In conclusion,the Mississippi Connections Redevelopment support the core downtown commercial is envisioned. Framework serves as a collection of prioritized tasks and Additionally,a higher density residential component should goals. Elements of the framework may have to be altered be located abutting Lions Park, coupled with a greenway and over time but the commitment to start the implementation strategically located storm water assets.This Study Area also inherently to pursue the redevelopment objectives vigorously creates the greatest challenge for redevelopment due to the should translate into making this part of Elk River strong and type of existing buildings,number of buildings,limited sustainable. inherent physical assets, and no immediate strong market Draft as of November 5,2012 -Part I Executive Summary,page 3 - Acknowledgements Redevelopment Framework Task Force (2006-2007) Nick Zerwas EDA/ City Council Mark Urista(Chair) Business Representative Dana Anderson Planning Commission Board/Commission/Public Input John Anderson Resident Representative City Council Keith Holme Business Representative Economic Development Authority Louise Kuester Housing&Redevelopment Authority Housing&Redevelopment Authority Jean Lieser Housing&Redevelopment Authority Heritage Preservation Commission Lance Lindberg Heritage Preservation Commission Parks&Recreation Commission Molly Nadeau Resident Representative Planning Commission Mike Niziolek Park&Recreation Commission Framework Plan Area Stakeholders Dave Rymanowski Business Representative General Public Larry Toth Housing&Redevelopment Authority Dan Tveite Economic Development Authority Stewart Wilson Housing&Redevelopment Authority Technical Advisory Team (2006-2007) Scott Clark Community Development Director Redevelopment Framework Task Force (2011-2012) Catherine Mehelich Director of Economic Development Dana Anderson (co-Chair) Planning Commission Heidi Steinmetz Assistant Director of Economic Development Stewart Wilson(co-Chair) Housing&Redevelopment Authority Jeremy Barnhart Planning Manager Mark Urista Business Representative Chris Leeseberg Planner John Anderson Resident Representative Terry Maurer City Engineer Keith Holme Business Representative Bill Maertz Park&Recreation Director Louise Kuester Housing&Redevelopment Authority Stacie Kvilvang Ehlers&Associates,Inc. Jean Lieser Housing&Redevelopment Authority Michael Schroeder LHB Architects&Engineers,Inc Lance Lindberg Heritage Preservation Commission Molly Nadeau Resident Representative Technical Advisory Team (2011-20012) Chad Wurm Resident Representative Jim Hudson Resident Representative Jeremy Barnhart Planning Manager Pat Dwyer Business Representative Chris Leeseberg Planner Mike Niziolek Park&Recreation Commission Annie Deckers Director of Economic Development Alan Sakry Business Representative Justin Femrite City Engineer Fred McCoy Business Representative Calvin Portner City Administrator • Larry Toth Housing&Redevelopment Authority Jerry Gumphrey EDA/ City Council Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I Executive Summary,page 4- Table of Contents Focus Areas Map I.9 Retail Shift Map 1.11 Executive Summary 2-5-mile Radius Competition Map I.12 Elk River in the Next 10 Years Map I.13 Land Use Chart I.14 I. Introduction Land Use Map I.15 Background Zoning Map I.16 Task Force Mission Statement Year Built Map I.17 Mississippi Connections Vision Statement Market Value expansion I.19 Study Area Defined Previous relevant studies 1.21 Statutory Authority Market Demand Summary I.29 Primary Redevelopment Sites I.30 Summary of Existing Conditions Illustrative Master Plan II.4 Recreation Opportunities II.9 II. Illustrative Master Plan Core Downtown 11.12 Highway 10 Corridor 1I.16 Goals North of Highway 10 II.18 Residential Neighborhoods II.22 Policies Proctor and Quinn Avenues II.26 Specific Area Strategies IV Appendices •Strengths/Weakness/Opportunities/Threats Analysis III. Implementation Priorities •2006 Planning Process •Public Comments (placeholder) Figures •Task Force Resolution (placeholder) Study Area Map I.8 Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 5 - introduction an evolutionary process which will occur over time and not overnight. The City hopes that public involvement, as exemplified by this Plan,will attract new private This document describes the formation of the Downtown Task investment to Elk River. Force, and their development of an Illustrative Mater Plan (Plan) for the long-range vision for the 432-acre core of the City of Elk a. Background River. The purpose of this Plan is threefold: to serve as a The City Council created a Task Force on October 2, 2006 for blueprint for the City to respond to private investment proposals, the purpose of creating a Plan for the "greater downtown area" and as a work plan for the City to create and maintain an and to provide direction and frequent feedback to the Technical environment in a manner consistent with the community's vision. Advisory Team made up of city staff and consultants. Lastly, the plan is intended to communicate to property owners and those interested in the area the City's long term goals for the The Task Force paused in late 2007 to allow for the completion area. of the Highway 10 plan as it routes through the downtown area. This document consists of four sections: Following completion of the Highway 10 plan in early 2009, and the review of the Highway 10 plan at the Federal level, the Task 1. Summary of Existing Conditions provides the Force reconvened in November 2011. background information used to shape the Plan. This Plan was developed based closely on the desires and vision 2. The Vision and Illustrative Master Plan provide a visual of the Task Force members,representing various interests representation and description of the type and character throughout the City. of desired development. This section references the summary of public input used to shape this Plan. The Goals and Policies set forth community aspirations for the study area and were used as a guide to follow in designing the long-range vision. 3. The Specific Area Strategies section contains the guide for public and private investment to occur over the 20- year timeframe. 4. The Implementation Priorities section presents proposed public actions and investments needed to realize the desired changes in the study area. Implementation will be Draft as of November 5,2012 -Part I,page 6 - b. Task Force Mission Statement Following City Council's appointment, the Task Force developed Vision Statement — and adopted the following mission statement which describes their role in the creation of this Plan: The Mississippi Connections Study Area is the cornerstone of the community. The Redevelopment Framework provides the blueprint for creating an environment and culture that Mission Statement — encourages private reinvestment This environment will be characterized by a robust business climate, strong affordable To develop a comprehensive plan that will redefine the residential neighborhoods, diverse recreational opportunities, "greater downtown area" to preserve its historical an agreed upon transportation framework, recognition of its character while promoting the future viability of the historical place, and enhancing opportunities for connections community. with the community. Maximum public input will be gathered to create and assess alternatives resulting in a formal redevelopment plan with a combination of a master vision, working policies, specific area recommendations and implementation priorities. c, Mississippi Connections Redevelopment Framework Vision Statement The following vision statement summarizes the end objective, purpose and intent of the Plan: Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 7 - d. Study Area Defined LIVONIA TOWNSH' The Task Force identified the study area boundaries starting from the "historic" core downtown area and expanded outward to include the adjacent areas which have tangible and intangible interrelationships with the health and vitality of the core downtown area. This "greater downtown area" is what is ELK referred to herein the Plan as the "Study Area". The Study Area encompasses the 432-acre south central core of the City of Elk River and includes a variety of land use RTVER components. The Plan divides the study area into five "Focus Areas". These a areas allow for a more detailed discussion of the opportunities LI i and approaches for key locations in the Study Area. The Focus Areas are: ituaato • Core Downtown w • :4DEVBLOPMBNT • Recreational Opportunities (Mississippi and Elk Rivers, 1 '#, ''' ST<JDYARBr�► Handke Stadium,River's Edge Commons and Lion's X10 . 7`' ' . Park). i 41, i • Residential Neighborhoods _ — All1/4. 4P-- 1111k • North of Highway 10 (Mixed use redevelopment '°'11P"°"" opportunity) • Proctor and Quinn Avenues The Study Area stems west, north and east of the core downtown 1 area and is bisected in half by east/west transportation corridors ■ S. -U.S. Highway 10 and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe 4o (BNSF) Railroad. Ililli Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 8 - r fit" ".,g Y* i Y '�y �'` .JF w' r , , • .,.. x . ,, 0 'tit45." ' ' ,,,,yeletj y fib, M —..., 1 ice * I , ' a ■ • COI{DGR77tCYV1t7 . I , 1 r iaon Oppgcctuu e dential�f gbbozho xts lies' e Cex iQx E!{s l fh�acksnii:irtnth cr r w °_* I * %t Hi hwav lO utcidat 1zectr1 we Qthnu A‘'cullcs Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 9 - e. Statutory Authority deteriorating areas and may involve any work or undertaking for that Formally established by the City Council in 1980, the Housing& purpose constituting a redevelopment project or any rehabilitation or conservation work. Redevelopment Authority (HRA) in and for the City of Elk River was formed under the public purposes identified in Minnesota Assuming that redevelopment will occur in multiple phases, the State Statutes Sections 469.001 to 469.047 (Housing and HRA and City Council have previously adopted a series of Redevelopment Authority Act). incremental redevelopment plans within the greater downtown area in order to satisfy Statute 469.028,which requires the HRA The Housing and Redevelopment Authority Act grants to adopt a redevelopment plan prior to accepting a development municipalities the authority to designate redevelopment areas proposal. within the boundaries of the municipalities. Within these areas, the municipality may adopt a redevelopment plan and establish a Phase I - In November 2004 the HRA and City Council adopted project consistent with the municipality's public purpose. The a Downtown Phase I Redevelopment Plan in conjunction with projects as contemplated by this plan are consistent with the Tax Increment Financing District No. 21. Phase I is known as definition of a "Redevelopment Project" as defined in Section Granite Shores and Jackson Place project,which resulted in a 469.002, Subdivision 14. Essentially a"Redevelopment Project" total of 67 for-sale condominium units, 32 rental units, and includes any work or undertaking: approximately 20,000 square feet of commercial lease space and 1) To acquire blighted areas and other real property for the purpose of underground parking. The original name of Granite Shores was removing,preventing,or reducing blight,blighting factors,or the causes The Bluffs of Elk River. of blight; Phase II—In November 2006 the HRA and City adopted a 2) To clear any areas acquired and install,construct or reconstruct streets, Redevelopment Plan which allowed the HRA to secure a contract utilities and site improvements essential to the preparation of sites for for deed on property in order to potentially expand the King uses in accordance with the redevelopment plan; Avenue parking lot in the future. The property consisted of two 3) To sell or lease land so acquired for uses in accordance with the contiguous buildings, 716 Main Street and 720 Main Street, redevelopment plan; commonly known as "Main Street Mall". 4) To prepare a redevelopment plan,and to incur initiation,planning,survey Phase III -The Illustrative Master Plan is considered the next and other administrative costs of a redevelopment project,and to prepare technical and financial plans and arrangements for buildings,structures, phase of the City's redevelopment planning process. Although and improvements and all other work in connection therewith;or this Plan is not in reaction to a specific development proposal,it serves to satisfy the statutory requirement for the City to adopt a 5) To conduct an urban renewal project. The term"urban renewal project" redevelopment plan prior to accepting and undertaking may include undertakings and activities for the elimination or for the prevention of the development or spread of slums or blighted or development proposals within the study area. Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 10 - II. Summary of Existing Conditions The Plan grew out of information collected and considered by the Task Force over several months. This section of the Plan highlights some of the key data sources that contributed to the planning process. The Changing Face of Downtown Historically, Elk River was a "freestanding community" (characterized by distance from the metropolitan area, self- contained economy, and limited transportation routes). An essential element of all freestanding communities was a core downtown area that served a highly agrarian economy.As is the case with many cities that are on the edge of the metropolitan area, the form and function of our downtown has changed based on a series of factors, these being: • Incorporation of the City of Elk River and the Township in the mi. - yr i � late 1970's started the process of land development through �� public utility extensions. - • As part of this process, the TH 169 corridor opened to i re _ 11111, sill‘'?,N‘ ' commercial development ultimately creating competition for the downtown area, starting in the early 1980's. y, 1 1 [130 , :, V i1'�-"'`z 1 w, X41�- ;�� ;.� • ��- • Over the past thirty years, shopping habits have shifted to �or�o �, , , larger complexes of value and destination shopping.• , .‘' . • Loyalty to shopping areas has been replaced by value attached y--- N ' - to location and accessibility. / T '0" j I 1 1 , :' ,.jl "S • As retail moved out of our downtown area it has I ii been replaced with office uses.Less retail starts the 11,1 chain of other retail uses not having a significant synergy to exist and in turn, seeking other market areas. • The economic downturn starting in 2008 has hampered ability of smaller businesses from opening or continuing businesses. It is these businesses that are the primary market for a downtown area of our size. Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 11 - Some of the challenges for the downtown area will include: • The Natures Edge Business Center and the Northstar Corridor will challenge market share from the downtown area • CORE (Ramsey) and Waterfront East (Otsego) provide greenfield development opportunities for businesses and housing not unlike those necessary for the vitality of the study area. • The loss of direct access from Highway 10 will hinder some businesses that rely on convenience sales. • The lack of privately owned parking suggests a perception that there is not enough parking downtown,hampering business traffic. • Future commercial development in the gravel mining. • Limiting the City's population to 35,000 reduces the need for expanded commercial services IP �r_�Vi�,��` ! tr Iile T vi%, Milli' Iligli kr— I f mm+,h- Qi ! ti 4� 3` M s.`I,"Gi inn -`'"`�41i�r`' /'.'•Ir_\l.r 4'' IllC f' 21411-2 it °'� F I s .P -■ ►U ' X01►h . ' rJ�� . r RADNS SMILE ,��y / e1. ".,► Iit L ;w1% RADIUS r P`�� 7' ,'ai !!9. 1III��_ c 11, ( •_, A►il le`r,M. � _.,set `�- •, Wile �Fg ,I� 1 a '* ' le —WARRIdtla4.-:'■:i'Z',',..-:- : - gl' ' -+NI% lik ;lug t lb 4 yc ! 11111 — , 1 v.., immolif,,,,;;16,•,„:- illw,Commercial Radius Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 12 - I III I I III I I I I I I !Fla I III III I I 1:1;4.:1:',I I I I I I I I I I I I III I I ' ...N.),, i-,,,Kt, _--; =lib_ Mr- __ - I 'c mei= ;Ili,1.1liiiiiii.iiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiii iItdiii iiiiiJihu t iiiiidIiillii� A � � Er a--1111,„,A,1 lir-'.4 i' k,,,,, iv :-,:igiftkp,..., aro, ..„....-, ,.. .; Imo„,.: --_,:fitilillti-i�l� ■1 . y,1, `►i'![� .1_��1 :11111411411111INVEFIV1 ill qlk*4N:-- -. grelailillilliMilltrialaajl Itlitiliffir- :II" ..sovitur,,,41-X,re ,..-1//igitri •'``t*.it IMI!r---.., — to �e Y 1_ ,0 �t 1 .... ..._ _........60.,..,...1,~, /-1 i.ii-e. , -7-t,-,h;.)"',.,4, 1 asas au. _. l,.r"— ' ' Ao..! of ikt,,. . - ..kovif ...,.- --'-i. — r.....„ .41. r.....5_arr II, . 7. t 1, lr"pe, ammo .,_1 —roiro:j1 ■ MIL ,I, , • V 1" ';iir Ir. I — ,...,,,_. - --,,,,,,,,=.‘-:42-:2"..-f_4”11r11,1110.,,,,47,-) — ',11)0L-F-s:;St,1�111111i11111�111I111111 1111li11111111111 t*.�� (4I°.%"''t I l I I I I I III I I I I 111111 t e I i t e :11_ N-1. _ --..�4T` 1 i-Ai Alin, '' ELK RIVER _ 1A YEARS 11 INTO THE FUTURE 1, 11 I— k,,,... :_- 4 -_—_ l ei 11' _ ,�.�d N I �' 7 a ° X, 'rIIIj�,II�'' Oak ® ! I i1I'111' 1 10 Year Projections Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I, page 13 - Land Use The study area contains the following current land uses based off of tax classification information registered with Sherburne County. Tax Classification Acreage Square feet*#of parcels Single Family Residential 193.71 481,516 511 Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Apartments The 2004 Comprehensive Plan, adopted by the City Council on 15 August 16, 2004 included a land use category identified as "Old (4 or more units) 10.34 293,376 Town". The Plan recognized that the Old Town area was a Low Income Rental 0.46 92,516 2 diverse blend of uses, styles, and characters, and further, a Residential (2-3 units) 5 n/a 9 focused study was necessary to identify,preserve and protect that Charitable Institutions 0.8 3,381 2 diversity. The following image indicates the Study Area in Church Properties 5.15 128,093 19 relationship to the Old Town area. . Commercial 87.38 547,520 102 The Old Town area, as defined in the 2004 Comprehensive Plan Commercial (over 150K) 6.37 88,311 20 includes several differing land uses, including high, medium, and County Public Prop. 1.62 3,000 3 low density residential, Highway, Central and Office Industrial 1.69 58,744 6 Commercial. K-12 Private School 5.9 n/a 1 The Plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the K-12 Public Schools 2.22 49,950 7 mix and balance of uses within the area are maintained, although Municipal 23.32 69,302 40 some realignment of infrastructure is necessary to ensure that the Public Utility 1.47 n/a 2 land is developed to its highest and best use. Agricultural 0.25 n/a 1 Other 2 n/a 6 Totals 348 1,815,709 745 *Building square feet estimated Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 14 - . j � r:. Vj � tip, :._.... .�.._ � "` Aka ,...:::,:zT.a7.•*:.:.„:1•.4....,::„.1.,,,,.,..4.,....v....:..,:.... .�f ■ tn ., i..,,,r_.� v- :*: >, P ;"l.IB4ir � _ •Y' ';S7Y'%(�a:.i i■ Ft��:., .w .,. 1 = G ,... .:1.• 1 •a .��-cs�:r : • .,...,,.,,,'r- ' 1 ':-''.' , -,,,..-.',"'1,,,,i, .''..1 ..',,,4,;:ili,',:.NIIV.11:72.2A:.t.".::;,:::',!.,.,4g 11 'L 1411144x1101111h. .... ..../.... .....E.............. .:'r '- .... ' '. '''. '''''t''N'F."1"r7:.t'...C.iPeAlalah:LVP.. :,W r3ill.b,4:*' �` t" '.�'9. :]5y Y3:�::rl.. .']S w k Vq i5��g •-.' 4T ':••�� .�•�.,».. 'i •r':„i .. ..'1' Sfl �' 'i'.f.:C..Sl"l:'�f 44.::,;.4.-:1:':' Yi r • •. 01111111110 ' r..-31&914•15 ,4 n.s. $: i.' iS'�$:X) �dS 1�;s g°" ,\ 6j KiK:.' A. x.N+F.�,..r....i'K':.r.i:'•Ar•:t.�Ti1'!•,•4 hy.�1 � t �� ai:'4j,v(. �r 1 IIIIIIRU Y `.. i.rw _ 't �yyyyy :, .....••••.:!: ys �3als ` .ICY°A a�" iE t opep1111150.1.04,,,...ii .,:flt:Ago,',*'..il'',.Let\ ..-1 Toot ti �., miliP IAMIm Industrial } b -,"=",,-,,,-!..•- •-1.I:: 3 w� Q ""5T it" Urban ReddM1YY i; -1"• '�"3 S 1► \ _• f 'K - F.Y 'fir 4.Y III i . *-7. .p ‘' '1134 _ - lid Dandy R"w"'Od alllight tduelrfel iit•:4",.A 3 >*' 4-`‹ i•��+ >t Orr 4 S °"."'"'""r" ij� :. % � 't t �1y),37,yS��'.�7- � a• . t4_ kk. '• 55.'1' �, tn'444_.i6'A[!a'r}l N.f.::-5.4:-0.:!:%..fi....4. itiii c 4 ..,,,,A,,.:.,-.. :-. ,..,-,),- ..„ ..' '��,�� 178TH Land Use Map- Partial -Part I,page 15 - Draft as of November 5,2012 Zoning Zoning designations show the current land use controls that apply to property in the Study Area. The Study Area includes a variety of zoning districts as indicated on the following image. � �� . aax R r II . � �, ,rte , ■ ■ i111,^ �i+. - 'Q). ' 1■11§1 Ail%xis ,,, ' 911111 ■ uwt 1 ¢=� '4: f '''' 1 N , 10".°-.---1111' ; '..-~,i ",,T;,...z."''°a' ; ' ',, a, f,,..''',•r - --" ,- . -. -'''.: , - ' . \\\,-' '',,,, Al ' ' - Yadun YndurlrW a---' ' ':1. - wry. 1 : �� e , a BNdlRbse ' ' ,.::- � rr3 a High 3s " � ' ^v ,a cyan alma. - rte'��7 , . ^# 5 i � ® 'W °' Y �y.�.�..,.�.. l 4 178TH hi IIIIF 4 J C, ! 0 Draft as of November 5,2012 -Part I, page 16 - Yea: Built Based on building permit issuance, the f ollowing image depicts the age of each primary structure and/or any improvements irmade to properties located the Study Area. L'ir',... a ELK 1-11L 09- _,. ._.. . , . ■ • r ._-. _, ■ ...,■.;■_„; r■n• ...,■.■„. ___ ,,.. all __ ..,..._,..., ■ i'-•-■* a, l■1,‘ II-- ;7- ;■■.: .. ■ - lif 11 ;'L47 L. _.._e.,....j III . i-etil - 0 1,0 'G') - , 1 wi , , , I T, r■ ■.,,k, ' ■' r.,. ''....... , k N . . i. ;MIME.1111.1.1 rnitillirillell ' ' ..k>\ .S\.. r 1; .■..... .ni # ,,' . ' . ' ! I r EL ■.' 1 i ..,\ ,.. ina.ji...........31.,L. ''' \ I ,4 '',,,,,,, ....,`;i“.''''...". . ... .. ::,,, t‘,. ,,ST ■e 0 ■■■■L...,...:,■ „.■,■ pair_ ..., - r_. i ,... . 3.5 . - - '4 '''— ' . 1444IN'i 1 i I ICJ i—ir•.„'—., '41-. .. . , 1 k ,,, ---- , , ,. .., . ..,,, ..„1.... ....mis 1 161 rii ti • ,' •n i ---ti'-,•■■■,,--c-- '• -.-.. '---' •----—-----1■111.---, • ...■■ - ■■ 444. ,■,.....,...,, __■ ■ , . ■■ . , 4' • „, _ _ I i ,,,._,_ ir /--„. ., ,, r ,, WirM :...-.\\ , „ r ii —..7.11.. It ----..,, •■■■ 'MI .. ■,.,.■ ■ , Legend 41 W>m, '■■■■■■'-i / ■--'-=---'1_L -, -=. . -.----- . ' .1 ■,-■1 - r .j."Illi I „,, ki w 1 l 1.... ix< 4, "..N ._ 6.c No Structure /Date Unknown . AN IIIII Unspecified-Pre 1976 Years Count 1, ' Study Area •.•. . . ----. 4* al Unspecified-Pre 1977 1800-1900 75 IN Unspecified-Pie 1978 1901-1930 83 . ' .! 1931-1960 138 : ' ,. ,, . ' I- an Unspecified-Pre 1983 - 0 250 500 1,000 1961-1970 68 IIIII 1800-1900 1971-1980 66 Feet al 1901-1930 1981-1990 100 gig 1931-1960 1991-2000 42 1961-1970 2001-Present 3 1 , Pre 1976 1 1971 1980 Pre 1977 24 sigg 1981-1990 Pre 1978 1 IMP-WM S.. - y dy.nol Ng.AA acsulacy Aro to ANA... e'verynrS4 MN 1991-2000 Pre 1983 4 No Date 139 Any ern.or - --- •1:1 be report.to .... Goo. Po.,... am 2001-Present 0-DEWANN.A.§.315 ryAscAsticlie...OWENpandeatuirey_asixtryt_AsAt n. .P.6 UNAIstat.nal. June Ad A107 Draft as of November 5,2012 -Part I, page 17 - The Need to Redefine To evaluate the need for redevelopment, the Task Force • New residential completed a series of exercises and small group discussions. ❖ Accessibility o Pedestrians Characteristics of"Downtown" Exercise o Traffic flow/access points The first exercise asked Task Force members to define the o River History "Components of a successful downtown" and describe"What Activities/amenities downtown means". Their responses included the following in no Aesthetically pleasing particular order: ;• Balance of old and new What makes a downtown successful? Charm,pleasant feel ❖ Brick and south Main Blocks ❖ "Heart"or center ❖ Nostalgia What should downtown have that it doesn't ❖ Authenticity ❖ Unique/traditional(sets us apart from suburban + Embellishments (flags,plantings,color) Specialty businesses development) Signage ❖ Past,present and future planning • Directional ❖ Shopping/eating • Informative Why do you come downtown? Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats Exercise ❖ Diversity of activity Destination The second exercise involved a discussion of Strengths, ❖ Tradition Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats, a summary of which is ❖ Special events/ entertainment provided in the Appendix. How do you know when you are downtown? It was a result of this exercise in which the Task Force reached ❖ Mass of historic buildings consensus that"Downtown Elk River" has already changed,as a ❖ Signage result of time and market, to a point where it is no longer the thriving commercial center it was 50 years prior. Further, What does downtown mean to you? consensus was that"Downtown Elk River" needs to reinvent ❖ Vitality itself as the historical, cultural, and energetic core of community. • Interest,not necessity With the core established and strengthened, the service and office ❖ Commercial,retail and service uses will reemerge in the area, even when changes to Highway 10 ❖ Connectivity,transition,cohesive require more destination driven trips. Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 18 - Recent Public & Private Investments There have been a number of significant private improvements to the area in recent years. -_,r i '^ 4.1 111 H 9 jai', I Before After—Granite Shores First National Bank of Elk River ,, • First National Financial Center Building(Year 2000) • The Bank of Elk River Expansion (Year 2005) Before-Jackson After-Jackson These private investments contribute significantly to increase the In 2001, the Elk River Housing&Redevelopment Authority city's taxable market value and maximize the benefit of public (HRA) determined that downtown Elk River's long-term vitality investments as shown in the table below: should be a community goal. At the same time, several key parcels along the riverfront became for sale,which prompted the Market Value Expansion HRA to solicit development proposals from approximately 100 Project Market Estimated Market Add'1 developers in order to form a public/private partnership to Value Before Value After tax revitalize downtown Elk River. After receiving five development proposals, the HRA and City Council selected MetroPlains payable Development to further refine their development concepts. 2012 Granite Shores $833,225 $9,241,600 $89,963 Five years later, concepts turned into reality and Granite Shores Jackson Place $175,800 $3,221,800 $36,092 and Jackson Place redevelopment projects were constructed. The The Bank of $1,395,600 $4,239,300 $56,874 projects added approximately 20,000 square feet of space for new Elk River businesses and over 100 new residents to the downtown. Expansion Project $2,606,100 $13,902,900 $182,929 Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 19 - As a result of these private investments, the City was able to expand the King Avenue parking lot and construct the long- awaited River's Edge Commons Park. In 2010, the City purchased the parking lot behind the Sunshine Depot block. This purchase retained approximately 70 parking spaces in public ownership. In 2012,the Elk River Lutheran Church began redevelopment of the former 1s`National Bank building into their new worship center. Included in the improvements was an easement to provide a trail along the river, a landscaped refuge center near Main Street, and a community room overlooking the river. In 2012, the HRA, due to poor building conditions and rising maintenance costs,removed the Main Street Mall at 720 and 716 Main Street. In their place, a 28 stall parking lot was added. As part of its exploration and understanding of the study area, the Task Force considered the following conditions and issues: • Previous Relevant Studies • Natural, Cultural and Recreational Amenities • Market Conditions • Transportation and Infrastructure • Historic Context Draft as of November 5,2012 -Part I,page 20 - Previous Relevant Studies ,o 7, !, Over the years the City has conducted several studies of the area \ ` °' j 4) R � in an effort to continue to encourage redevelopment and '�; \ a Cl 0 .,',%i.1011, , i" J j y`L [,, No i revitalization of downtown. � 1 ., irk �v �,q [� vr. saw The objectives identified by these studies remain relevant thirty- Sao, - '" & 0. G.. t ;' five years later. These objectives demonstrate the lon -terlu ,'" "" a �� y objectives g �, �z; ,III. nature of redevelopment planning. The 2007 Redevelopment ;. �`Framework Plan validates many of these objectives, as �Q QC7,,; Ater ;'�; y" ter ,' summarized below: fta'S / - t i t r,,---17.A�``...7„, 1970—Elk River Central Business District Report t9�o © , , •I{ 7 �` Prepared Gy Nason, Wlehrman, Knight&Chapman, Inc. �� s`'. ,,, �,,,�,i, Pa i��, 4!� The report established general guidelines for the physical © " '� -�! ' appearance, movement patterns and development potentials for a ki 20-year timeframe. i . RT.H RIVER, MINNESOTA Primary objectives included: ° ' `"L $" DISTRICT • Unify existing and new buildings for the districts unique 1970 character • Remove traffic conflicts (e.g. Hwy 10 overpass to connect \/,';', 2-., • r r r r�®r� °C north and south areas) p.- t �— I7 rc.1 [ r r it • Provide adequate parking (e.g. parking ramp) r • Utilize natural setting of the Mississippi River (e.g. ' - ,• ,,., 4-A , 'Firum,, r, r r c restaurant) r - I O.' Rte � 1 r rrr;� i Lt it r,t" , f `- ` 4 ice. 1. + j; ., .� 1970 Draft as of November 5,2012 -Part I, page 21 - 1982-Elk River Downtown Redevelopment Plan '�. ''` ,,,�;' , , Prepared by Zack Johnson &Associates, Inc. ) \w -a f �:.. The plan established a guide to evaluate physical improvements, ', /@Mk/#oL develop zoning policies, and establish a Capital Improvements `" yyy� Program. The plan identified priority improvements and v - ?.. :- 11' ,■■ redevelopment opportunities. ` :° �`" IY .� ,, , �'s� Primary objectives included: 'r` , x \, G/ • c. f • Rehabilitate architecturally and historically significant ±FG v \ e v `fir buildings (e.g. design standards) �� `° _ • Concentrate retail/office land uses south of Hwy 10 '. `6' t,;' • Concentrate service businesses north of Hwy 10 ' wy � i • Concentrate high-density residential west of Lowell Avenue `° • Identified priority redevelopment areas: ELK RIVER DOWNTOWN R PLAN o Town Square (known as Jackson Square) 1982 o King Avenue&Main Street o Former Star News building to former Cinema < ; � �� building. -`'ki°_`�``,_`.�.e C�V IG I PARKIN.` j BLOCK 'NU,r, ' d 1986-Governor's Design Team r roww Prepared by a team of professionals and active community _ ':G cgnnem . SQOAR participation, an overall plan was developed for the city's Central u Business District (CPD). MIXED-' 6®I Me' 6 c; Primary objectives included: `,-"'"�. "t � ` • Promote downtown as a"unique historic river town" ' `' Rw RERCIAL �l COMMERCIAL • Link downtown to the community through open space � "� r PEDESTRIAN and a trail system MarasE • Utilize the Mississippi River with a restaurant,hotel or community center uses • Consider a parking ramp for heavy traffic areas (e.g. King C ErM.I..MAN Avenue area) 1986 Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 22 - 1988—Elk River River-walk Project • Develop design standards for signage, facade Prepared Iy Brauer&Associates Ltd. improvements,interior improvements and new The report created a river-walk design and outlined the financial construction. feasibility for a new building on the former Hardware store site at • Develop activities and events (e.g. Heritage festival, the south intersection of Jackson Avenue and Main Street. winter festival,mural event) • Conduct a market analysis to assist business recruitment Primary objectives included: • Create more retail/service traffic via a restaurants._,. • Generate more interest in the Mississippi River via a ' 1•' • " boardwalk trail .I ' i . ' • Develop design standards for rehabilitation and new ��` construction # "'"`- MK � >Td s s c,w .,,�� "4' is *w�"'�,w. k41am' °. ` j. 1994—Mississippi River-walk Pathways Plan , _ + --"` ,. Prepared by Hoisington-Koegler Group, Inc. The planning process utilized a local committee to establish a ,a,.i " `"` •`"" '`� vision and cost estimate for developing the river-walk. 1988 Primary objectives included: • Create an interpretive walking/biking trail along the river 0 +t. . that depicts the early transportation history of the region , sr 4 ., 4 1,2 1998—Central Business District Action Plan ; ��''!y- A Prepared by Theresa Washburn The plan created the foundation for developing a downtown . master plan, and completing activities through working committees. „,_,.......-.,f, „:,%4 ,2. - q Primary objectives included: " K,Y� ;,,;.r t,„�,-�,<,, ,n -_a,-es„�, ,,,. • Utilize the river, an arts center,pedestrian pathways and a 1994 beautification plan Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I, page 23 - 2002- Historic Context Study Prepared by Landscape Research, Carole Zeillie This study reviewed the history of select downtown commercial properties in the context of historical, architectural and landscape architecture features and themes. 23 properties south of 10, north of main street, east of King Avenue, and west of Jackson were inventoried and evaluated in these contexts. The study found that none of the properties appear to be eligible for the National Register, although five properties along Jackson street, recognized for their local significance, were recommended for further study. In particular the Kemper drugstore was recognized as locally significant as a well conserved example of an early 1960's retail building. More discussion of the Historic Context Study can be found on page 36 of this document. Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 24 - Natural, Cultural and Recreational Amenities Mississippi River The Mississippi River through Elk River is classified by the The Mississippi and Elk riverfronts are significant assets for the Minnesota State Wild& Scenic Rivers Program as a"Recreational entire community. It is an authentic amenity for the community, River". The area is classified as a Recreational River because it and potentially the region,but it has to be connected to where has undergone some impoundments and/or diversions in the people are and easily accessible from the community as a whole. past and has adjacent lands which are considerably developed, but are still capable of being managed. w "lip! '�� r The City of Elk River adopted the Wild&Scenic River Ordinance to regulate the subdivision,use, and conservation of the shorelands to preserve and protect the existing natural, scenic, '' historical, scientific, and recreational values. The regulations also Lv, i` reduce the effects of overcrowding and poorly planned development of adjacent lands,prevent pollution, preserve a natural beauty and quietude,maintain proper relationships between various land use types, and prohibit new uses that are inconsistent with the statewide standards and criteria. Mississippi River Public access to the Mississippi River is under-utilized;limited largely by private property ownership along the shorelines and topographic constraints. Island areas are owned and controlled by the MN Dept of Natural Resources (DNR), except with one major island in private ownership. Elk River , _ The Elk River is classified as an "Urban River" through Elk n�, River. The area is classified as an Urban River because it flows °�° through an incorporated area. The city has a 300 foot shore land overlay district along the river to provide for wise development, . to preserve and enhance the quality of the surface waters, and to ,4. . %.,,,,. y preserve the economic and natural values of the shore land area. Elk River south of Dam Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I, page 25 - Historic Elkhi Stadium Most commonly referred to by locals as Handke Stadium, due to its location next to the original Handke High School, the Elkhi vo Stadium is one of the landmarks of downtown Elk River. On May 26, 2004 Elkhi Stadium was listed on the National Register ' �: of Historic Places. Built in the 1920's when volunteers turned a ., £ x : slough in a natural amphitheater into a playing field, the stadium `= , �`` 4, was the place for a variety of high school athletic games over the t- `.» 1 ., ,:, years. During the winter,kids sledded down the hills and skated on the village's only ice rink. ' Over the years the stadium aged and fell into disrepair. The 1920's-Construction stone warming house that was added in the 1930's by WPA crews was rebuilt in 2000-2005 with funds raised by the Elk River ,-., ..4�:• , , • Rotary Club. The club completed additional restorations as well, L a;, �` including: a gas fireplace addition to the warming house, the ' stone wall was replaced, the steps were repaired, a stone plaza containing the original Handke High School bell was built at one of the entrances to the stadium and the area was landscaped. Today the beautifully restored stadium is used for recreational g hockey,ice skating and other events. -, 4 -,,, .it' 4R , t J Yw - --�R 4 + i Al 1 '. , ti e it , ' Bell Tower Ice Skating � � * s" Kq 2007 Draft as of November 5,2012 -Part I,page 26 - Rivers Edge Commons Park Rivers Edge Commons Park, completed in June 2007,is located at the intersection of Main Street and Jackson Avenue and extends from Main Street to the Mississippi River. IIII 6 The City acquired the parcel for the purpose of future park space ` in the late 1980's following the fire of a local hardware store. ' *P wf Over the years the City considered design enhancements to II _» develop the site as the central plaza with a boardwalk trail, or "river-walk",which would extend along the river through the *400' downtown area. Due to the cost of the park improvements the r-,,. A ' . f project was postponed until further private investment in the q ` 'No:, elf- downtown area justified the large public expenditure. In 2006, as a result of over$30 million of private investment with �t1 r- 4• , the addition of The Bluffs of Elk River,Jackson Place and The Bank of Elk River expansion, the City commenced construction w , :. 7, y°' ; of the park improvement project. The park includes a street-level , ' •.a��. , `°''"1 plaza, splash fountains,a natural amphitheater and a gazebo at . ' '- �'-1 the river level. , The Park is currently home to the Riverfront Concert series, a very popular program drawing hundreds of music fans to the downtown area on Thursday evenings in the summer month. °'°` ".. Lions Park „,s ° .; The 34-acre Lion's Park is located at the northern portion of the V study area,just south of School Street. Amenities included are 4 %,„,„,.„. picnic shelters,paved trails,hockey rinks, a sliding hill, a 9-disc golf course, a skateboarding park,playground equipment, and a band shell. A majority of the improvements have been funded over the years by the local Lion's Club. Park is home to many of the City's recreational programs. Rivers Edge Commons Draft as of November 5,2012 -Part I,page 27 - i w ‘`ww =.+'i"-°.� air • L Lions Park Lions Park -Part I,page 28 Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Market Conditions Market research provides a context for redevelopment planning. The market analysis report quantified demand for additional This research examines the type, form and quantity of new housing,retail and office space in the downtown area for the development that could occur in downtown Elk River. The period 2000 to 2010. market research helps to direct the type and scale of new development to locations where new investment provides the Demand Summary greatest positive effects. Downtown Elk River Redevelopment Area 2000 to 2010 2001 Market Analysis In April 2001,Maxfield Research,Inc. was retained by the HRA Housing to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the market potential for For-Sale Multifamily 95-115 units redevelopment for Elk River's downtown. The research included Market Rate Apartments 300-360 units an analysis of the existing supply and market conditions of Market Rate Senior Housing 60-70 units housing,retail and office in the area. Growth trends and demographic characteristics were analyzed to consider the impact Office 19,000-39,000 sq.ft. on the potential to develop various land uses in the study area. Retail* 14,000 sq.ft. The analysis identified 3 distinct areas in the study area based on * Demand through 2005 current land uses and physical barriers, opportunities and Source: Maxfield Research Inc. challenges. The report recommendations focused on development potential for each area and strategies to enable the Prior to use of public funds to facilitate redevelopment,it is areas to compliment one another. suggested that the market analysis be updated. The three areas are: 1. Core Central Business District —south of railroad, east of King Avenue The analysis cited this area as best suited for specialty retail and for-sale multi-family housing. 2. Northern Area—north of railroad The analysis cited this area as best suited for service businesses,such as office and institutions,along with rental and senior housing. 3. Western Transition Area—south of railroad, west of King Avenue The analysis cited this area as best suited for multi-family housing. Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 29 - In addition, the report identified sites that have the greatest potential for redevelopment based on the positive impact it would have on the downtown. Primary Redevelopment Sites Elk River Downtown Redevelopment Area 2007 Adjusted Market Analysis _� The table below reflects the remaining balance of demand a � ._ available after reducing the initial demand by the recent StMW development activity that has taken place within the Study Area. 1.___ These recent developments include: Northern Area * Elk AMYkiachlne Housing: ', j Granite Shores for-rent multi-family 67 units Jackson Place apartments 32 units ;� s h /A qt Office: �f 111 4 3 The Bank of Elk River expansion 20,000 sf �� • < r 7 1r western "/ •r *ofke jr Transition Si ; � ------- 3atst Retail: �' ---- a _`_ •! 1 : 6 The Bluffs commercial 10,000 sf f „�d nA Jackson Place commercial 10,000 sf * ' 11 Core CBD \. :. The balance indicates remaining housing demand to 2010. L..,..- - I N, Redevelopment proposals that exceed the indicated demand �� during that time shall be supported by an up to date market a �\ '` analysis. `, PaseoNM Demand Summary Otsego t!lets S•r9,16 Olin seYse , Downtown Elk River Redevelopment Area 3!MOM,emsseles 2007 to 2010 4�" taefeYH.srelbe. !O•w lose Housing 7 L0irild For-Sale Multifamily 48 units !lMIIroYd ! lisriag M ark et Rate Apartments 300-328 units Se Mildide.rW M ark et Rate Senior H ousing 60-70 units Source: M axfield Research Inc. & City of Elk River Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 30 - Transportation and Infrastructure priority" highway,whereas Highway 10 is rated"medium priority". Railroad On October 14,2002, the Elk River City Council adopted The railroad has right-of-way moving approximately 77 trains per Resolution 02-93 "Accepting, Supporting and Adopting the TH day through the area on two sets of tracks. The line carries 10 Interregional Corridor Management Plan". passenger and freight trains. A major pivot point in the 2006 Task Force discussions involved Vehicle and pedestrian crossing concerns may be alleviated if the Highway 10 routing through the study area. These Railroad Drive,which runs adjacent to the railroad,is removed as discussions, and the impact they had on the plan,led the City a frontage road eliminating close access to Highway 10. Council to table the process until the Highway 10 plan could be developed. Through their discussions, the Task Force developed U.S. Highway I 0 a number of scenarios and sketches to visually understand the design implications Highway 10 improvements. These sketches 2003-2023 Statewide Transportation Plan are included in the appendix as they are important to the history No improvements are planned for Highway 10 through the of the planning process, and provide valuable information to the downtown area for many years, according to the Minnesota user in understanding the changes that are coming. Department of Transportation's (MnDOT) 2003-2023 Statewide Transportation Plan. Future Highway 10 Issues In 2008,MnDOT finalized a plan for improvements to Highway Interregional Corridor Management Plan 10 as it routes through the study area, submitting it to the Federal MnDOT completed several Interregional Corridor Management Highway Administration for their review. This plan was prepared Plans in 2001 and early 2002, one of which included the stretch through the collaborative efforts of MnDOT, Sherburne County, of Highway 10 from approximately Highway 101 to Proctor the City of Elk River, and many others. Avenue. The results of the Plan suggested that even if a $21 million (2001 dollars) investment is spent on elevating Highway The proposed Highway 10 improvements represent a significant 10 through downtown, the level of service will not be improved change to the downtown area, and a major impetus for this from an"F"rating in peak times. planning project. In summary, the plan shows Highway 10 evolving into a freeway through the study area. To accommodate If funding were to become available to MnDOT District 3,the the necessary speeds and capacity, the main line will shift to the district in which Elk River is located,MnDOT would most likely north,requiring the Burlington Northern, Santa Fe rail line to fund improvements to Highway 169 in Elk River as opposed to shift to the north,in the area of present day railroad drive. Highway 10 since MnDOT rates Highway 169 as a"high Access to the study area from Highway 10-will be via interchanges at Proctor and south of Main street,with the Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 31 - entrances to the off ramps many blocks away. Local circulation will be handled via a surface frontage road,the southern boundary of which is near the current southern curb of Highway 10 mainline. An underpass between present day Jackson and King will maintain the north south connection of Jackson. Anticipating these access and visibility impacts,it is important that stakeholders work toward establishing the core area as a destination of sufficient strength that it can withstand these changes. Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 32 - Historic Context in downtown Elk River and assessed their potential National Register of Historic Places eligibility. The study area encompasses the 432-acre core of the City of Elk The study concluded that none of the 23 properties appeared to River. This core includes many of the first generation homes and be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. However, first platted neighborhoods in the City. In addition,it is the 5 buildings on the west side of Jackson Ave were recommended Mississippi River and the railroad,both located in the study area, for further preservation study as having significance as part of which largely defines the historic development pattern of the early twentieth-century downtown Elk River and retaining City. varying amounts of their historic facades. These buildings are commonly referred to as the"Brick and S. Main Blocks". In 2002 the HRA and HPC commissioned an independent study of properties within the core downtown area,in response to ,, concerns raised by the Heritage Preservation Commission regarding the then proposed Bluffs and Jackson Place developments. It was conducted by Carole Zellie of Landscape '* i ii „.,.. _...,, . ,,,., _ ill_ ,,,,.,,t Research. Part I of the study outlined six Elk River Historic Contexts for i �i which to provide a framework with which to evaluate the "" - --' "'�` historic, architectural, and landscape architectural significance of ' ' : it .. w'..£ tr �rw.irrr inventoried properties. The Elk River historic contexts identified 7 ;' . in the study are: .-� sfl - 1) Landscape Setting, 1848-1950 . 2) Agriculture, 1850-1950 3) Transportation, 1848-1950 a 4) Indus and Commerce 1851-1950 F he Industry Jackson Avenue-Brick Block"Then and Now 5) Residential Architecture, 1851-1920 6) Schools, Churches, and Local Institutions, 1857-1920 Part II of the Historic Context Study included an inventory of 23 properties in the Elk River downtown commercial area. The study assisted in determining the significance of historic resources Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part I,page 33 - In addition to review of the Historic Context Study, the Task Force considered an overview of historically significant properties as identified by the City's Heritage Preservation Commission and policy recommendations. It is the consensus of the Task Force that core downtown area contains much of the history of Elk River,and serves as the cultural foundation of the community. While the area may not be deemed historic from a national or statewide perspective,it is Elk River History, and important in that respect. Every effort should be employed to preserve these buildings to further communicate the link to the past that they represent. Draft as of November 5,2012 -Part I,page 34 11. Illustrative Master Plan The Task Force felt that strengthening the perception of the downtown area was a priority. Introduction and expansion of The planning process which resulted in the Illustrative Master amenities, support systems, and activity are necessary to Plan (Plan) consisted of the following three steps: encourage people to come downtown and businesses to locate in the area. The Task Force understands that the history and 1) Task Force Visioning Process character of the study area,in particular the core downtown area, 2) Gathering of Public &Stakeholder Input is not replaceable. 3) City Board and Commission Review The Plan is a tool for shaping development in a manner Task Force Visioning Process consistent with the vision for the Study Area. The Plan uses a The Task Force met over several months starting in 2006. In variety of illustrations to depict the potential redevelopment and 2006, the planning process identified a number of variables revitalization of the Study Area. dependent on completion of a Highway 10 geometric plan. After determining that these variables were too numerous and The Plan is not a specific blueprint,but rather a series of impactful, the City Council suspended the Task Force,pending priorities,goals, tasks, and opportunities that once completed, resolution of the Highway 10 plans. This plan was completed in promote the area and the city toward sustainability. The actual November 2008, the Task Force reconvened in November, 2011. design of each site will be determined through negotiations between the city and private parties seeking to invest in the Study The 2006 Task Force members had developed a Plan that was Area. The designation of existing building(s) simply sets a basis nearing formal public comment. Upon reconvening, the 2012 for the initial strategy concept for a site,but should not preclude task force, after spending some time identifying their goals, future redevelopment. agreeing on assumptions, and developing sketches of key components of a successful downtown environment,broke into small design charettes over several months to fine tune the Plan. "The Plan is not a specific blueprint,but rather a series of priorities,goals, tasks, and opportunities that once Recognizing that the triggers to major changes are not likely to completed, promote the city..." surface in the near term, the task force focused on enhancing the - quality and value of the core area, as it relates to the Elk River community. The Task Force believes that the downtown area The Plan seeks to reinforce and create a variety of connections serves as the community center. Visitors through and to the between the Mississippi River,which is unique to the Study Area, downtown area develop perceptions of the Elk River community and the rest of the Elk River community and region. The Plan based on these initial reactions. A vibrant, healthy downtown establishes a development framework to guide the necessary area strengthens the community by extension. relationships between areas of common and varied uses that are Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II, page 1 - important in the Study Area's form and function. The images Recreational Opportunities incorporated within the Plan are intended to provide guidance toward the development of formal design guidelines and small • Identify appropriate locations along the rivers for public area plans after the Plan's adoption. access. Primary Elements of the • Work with Elk River Municipal Utilities to screen or Illustrative Master Plan relocate outdoor storage. • Establish a trail system throughout the study area,: Greater Downtown Area — General Promoting connections to the rivers,parks,and activity venues. ❖ Identify opportunities to visually improve the Highway 10 corridor by adding areas of landscaping,lighting,visual • Create interpretive signs to highlight historic occurrences features and removing blight. and view sheds ❖ Maintain the integrity of single family neighborhoods by Promote people generating activities(farmers markets, encouraging opportunities for reinvestment. festivals, concerts,sidewalk sales)to expand and enhance ••• Maintain historic character of the area by: citizen activity in the Study Area: • o Rehabilitation of the`Brick and South Main blocks" Core Downtown o Maintain the water tower at Jackson Ave o Designate historic single family residential areas o Commemorative signage • Establish the Mississippi River as the significant o Establish design standards for new development that reflect recreational amenity by creating a variety of public access characteristics of the past opportunities,physical connections and activities within the Study Area. • Establish identifiable pedestrian corridors to enhance traffic patterns and connections throughout the Study Area: ❖ Establish specialized commercial land uses in the core o Main Street to Handke Stadium to Hwy 10 at Proctor downtown (e.g. hotel,restaurant,banquet facility). o Main Street to the mixed use area o Jackson Avenue •••• Protect the large scale massing of buildings in the core • Establish identifiable landscape corridors to enhance traffic downtown that establish the character of the core area patterns and connections throughout the Study Area: o Main Street to Handke Stadium • Use structured parking in the core downtown to provide o Main Street/4th Street parking necessary to support diversity of uses in the downtown o Jackson Avenue area. Draft as of November 5,2012 -Part II,page 2 - North of Highway I 0 ❖ Concentrate mixed uses in taller buildings at the intersection of Main Street and 4th Street to maximize views • Reconfigure roadway patterns through the Study area to of the Mississippi River. respect the Highway 10 future plan. ❖ Manage storm water drainage through a greenway ❖ Concentrate employment generating land uses (e.g. concept that connects Lion's Park to maximize views of the office/medical)north of Highway 10 to bring daytime users Mississippi River. that support the core downtown commercial. ❖ Establish higher density residential around Lion's Park to increase its value and desirability. • Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II,page 3 - '' ,, , ,._ .,, ...„.. .., D R , . n f I , ... . . f r.1 ... w•r i= i r..1 �.ww 4 ■N ,,, ..r1, ` ' .••.■ � ,. , CORE ARIA MI. •■ hit,. 1r MIXED usE TM NIGH RESOENTIAI 1111.1 BUSINESS NUtK HfTORKAREA 1/:n1717"‘°'"' PfIIE1E ! 1 ► r,r w+H 1s Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II, page 4 - Public Participation Process In general,the comments heard and reviewed by the Task Force were separated into three themes. Some comments directed a Upon completion of defining the goals,policies and strategies change to the plan. These include suggestions to expand the and the creation of the Master Plan concepts for the area, the downtown area to facilitate more opportunities for Task Force opened the plan for public inspection at two open redevelopment,remove references to forming a Historic houses. One held on September 13th was lightly attended. A Preservation residential district,and add or remove trails second open house on October 22nd was more heavily attended, throughout the plan, and complete a historic context study north with approximately 30-40 people reviewing the plan and talking of Highway 10. to staff and Task Force members. The purpose of the community open houses was to receive community feedback Other comments were characterized by the Task Force as general regarding the planning process and subsequent master plan beliefs; these comments voiced a concern over the viability of concepts. This was also an opportunity to educate the public on businesses in the area, the impact Highway 10 changes will have the changes expected as part of MnDOT's improvements, and on them, and concern over the use of eminent domain. our reaction to those changes and gain public understanding for These comments were helpful in reaffirming the purpose behind the plan. the plan. Task Force did not make changes to the plan,but reiterated to the commenter the purpose behind the plan,and A public comment period was opened on September 4, 2012 and how the city intends to address these changes. Additionally, the formally closed on October 22,2012. Notices for a September Task Force received comments from property owners who would open house were posted on the city website, chamber newsletter, be impacted by the plan,but these impacts were not shown. It and Star News. Notices for an October open house were mailed was recognized that as the plans become more and more detailed, to each property owner in the study area,in addition to the impacts will be better understood. In the meantime, the user of sources above. During that 6 week period, the Planning the plan should be cognizant of these impacts as they develop Commission,Park Commission, Heritage Preservation over time. Commission, Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Economic Development Authority and City Council all received the plan. Lastly, the Task force reviewed comments from property owners All written comments received during the month were reviewed who voiced skepticism that the changes to Highway 10 would by the task force at their meeting on October 22,2012. These ever materialize,and that the plan is premature. Further, written comments are included in the appendix. commenters expect changes to the Highway 10 plan,which will impact the Task Forces'Mississippi Connections framework. No No significant redevelopment plan can be universally agreed to plan is final;it is common, even expected, that as more by all parties,but this plan does represent the consensus of those information is known,modifications to a plan are necessary. This participating in the process based on the information known at plan represents a solution to the impacts anticipated today. The the time. Task Force suggested that a review of the plan occur in 10 years to see how new information might improve the plan. Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II,page 5 - 8. Maintain Highway 10 access and visibility to the core Goals downtown area and create enhanced primary traffic corridors through the Study Area to strengthen its Redevelopment Framework Goals connection to the community. The following Goals are supported by various Policies and 9. Introduce new land uses for the area north of Highway Specific Area Strategies within this Plan that will assist in 10 that complement the core downtown area. implementing the long term vision for the Study Area: 10. Maximize long term public investments within the Study 1. Establish the core downtown area as an identifiable asset Area by encouraging a significant amount of private to current and future residents. investment in a way that benefits the community as a whole. 2. Create opportunities to identify the Study Area both as a 11. Monitor the health of the multi-family inventory to gateway to the community and as a place of historical significance. (Historical photo sites) ensure its sustainability. 3. Establish the Mississippi River as the significant recreational amenity to the community by increasing public access connections and activities to the river and the Study Area's other recreational amenities. 4. Maintain a philosophy that recognizes revitalization efforts respecting the Study Area's historic context with a vision for the future. 5. Encourage reinvestment in the single family residential areas while maintaining housing affordability. 6. Balance the future needs of vehicular and pedestrian traffic, and accommodate a mix of parking opportunities. 7. Redefine the Study Area in order to increase its economic viability by introducing land uses that can be supported in the long term. Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part II,page 6 - Policies 5. Identify and agree as a community those buildings that best represent the historic nature of Elk River's past and promote programs that will assist in the rehabilitation of The Task Force developed the following Policies to be used as a those residential and commercial buildings. framework for the long term Plan and Specific Area Strategies: 6. North of Highway 10 should not be an extension of the 1. Through the Task Force Mission Statement,it has been core downtown. The land uses on the north side should: determined that the Study Area needs to be redefined and that substantial redevelopment efforts will most likely a. Not be in competition with the core downtown occur in the future as a response to the market. In order to respond to these changes, a comprehensive b. Compliment the core downtown in terms of redevelopment framework is necessary to guide both design, transportation,pedestrian movement and private and public investment/reinvestment efforts to market opportunities, and ensure that the goals of the community are met in the short and long term. c. Include employment centers to bring daytime users and jobs (e.g. office/medical) to support the 2. The Mississippi and Elk Rivers define downtown's retail in the core downtown. uniqueness and history;these should be emphasized both as a recreational amenity and as an asset enhancement for d. Include opportunities for draws; activity centers, redevelopment opportunities. plazas, etcetera that add visibility and identity to the area. 3. Explore opportunities for public access improvements and activity generation at the Mississippi River,Elk River, 7. Responding to redevelopment opportunities are critical to Handke Stadium,Lion's Park and River's Edge the area. Recognizing that redevelopment is more costly Commons Park in order to achieve a sense of place and and riskier than greenfield development,market triggered connection to the community. redevelopment should be encouraged and assisted. 4. Achieve the preservation of historic character by a wide range of strategies, e.g. new construction design standards to appear traditional,rehabilitation,interpretive signage and special events. Draft as of November 5,2012 - Part II,page 7 - 8. Highway 10 is a physical barrier that will always create a challenge in providing an optimum redevelopment strategy to connect the north and south Study Areas. Although the Study Area does not depend on customer traffic from Highway 10,it is important for this area to be seen and accessed in order to maintain downtown's uniqueness and sense of place in the community. 9. In order to strengthen the Study Area's single family neighborhoods,multiple strategies should be implemented in order to encourage continuous reinvestment, e.g. rehabilitation, code compliance and building removal/rebuilding. Draft as of November 5,2012 -Part II,page 8 - Specific Area Strategies ,.. ...„. , . . ,..0,-- ...,,. .1 ., 4f . . ..Recreational .J. illr. .." 4& # .. Opportunities *, ` Objective Statement = *Ai `f The unique recreational amenities ;' located within the Study Area are I ,r._; the Mississippi River, the Elk River, t t` is -'1 historic Handke Stadium,Lions Elk River near the Dam Elk River Meets Mississippi Park and Rivers Edge Commons Park. # z 'is AL n oil • . t. One of the key findings of the community's 2011 branding '` process was the recognition that Elk River residents are physically active, and the area park amenities are known region wide. This �, recognition helps form the development of the community's ._-�- _- Powered by Nature brand. The effective preservation and expansion of these recreational features will do more to establish 4 . am , Lions Park Rivers Edge Commons Park the study area as the hub of the city than any development s nrigg~gg goihogliggigiM 1 project devoted to commercial or residential uses of comparable 11,11:i® expense. The Plan emphasizes the need to connect these amenities to provide the public a variety of venues to connect and experience the area's historic, cultural and natural environment. Initially, a„ S these connections will be found via the established routes,it is 4 #' . ' M mi envisioned that as properties develop or redevelop, connections Handke Stadium along the amenity will be added. Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II, page 9 - Strategies z -- 1. Identify specific locations along the Mississippi River and ~~ Elk River,including the islands for certain types of public u p .� - �~ access opportunities (e.g. fishing, canoeing,boating, � `"` birding, etc.). Incorporate a variety of public access " '— v opportunities with improvements that allow the public to 'w ...-- -.."..7::.-,� s."" interact with and experience the rivers. .. � 2. Work with Elk Rivers Municipal Utility Commission to 'a `; relocate outdoor storage located along the Elk River. 3. Secure property immediately adjacent to the Mississippi ,� River as a public access recreation and connection r , " , opportunity. / - 4. Establish an integrated trail system throughout the core Fishin downtown area, promoting connections to Babcock Park, ~•the confluence of the Elk River, the dam, parks and shopping venues. Explore and access grant programs and _ local community service organizations to support the development of the trail connection. Explore opportunities to connect the trail to Otsego and regionally by initiating discussions with area communities �, ,,_€;,o about their plans. 5. Create inte retive sign s to hi hli ht historic occurrences ' , t "� ` �• N.Rr + a '� 'fir and experiences along the trail system and throughout the -4„,,,,.. ,�~ '�� ' Study Area. . � } y ` y" ` 4 �, � < 6. Identify key parcels for archeological digs in partnership with landowners (e.g. mill site). ,X Historical Signage Draft as of November 5,2012 - Part II, page 10 - 7. Actively promote the linkage between Lion's Park and the Mississippi River through a greenway concept as '' '`'" •' illustrated in the Plan. Explore opportunities to provide safe, attractive pedestrian crossings of the railroad tracks !. and highway to connect the areas. r R 8. Promote a wide variety of people generating activities s (e.g. farmers market, concerts, street dances, sidewalk �,, ,. sales, etc.) in addition to the currently scheduled River's 4 } " '' Edge Commons Park activities. ,' - � ' '""�►' ap 9. Explore acquisition or use of Bailey point and Houlton • Farm property as a way to expand the trail in the short term, and long term options to create a nature park that may include educational and interpretive amenities along the Mississippi and Elk Rivers. People-Generating Activities 10. Review and consider potential impacts of DNR Wild& Scenic River Standards on riverfront development in order to protect the integrity of the bluff. 11. Partner with the community's "Elk River Area Arts Alliance" to explore a permanent arts center to be located within the Study Area. 12. Develop a long term capital improvements program that will guide public investment to complete the Plan's recreational components. Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II,page 11 - Core Downtown Objective Statement al. Due to the effects of time and market changes, the Core Downtown has evolved from being the retail heart of the City to il an area that has shifted to office and service uses with the UM majority of retail moving to the Highway 169 corridor. Activities include specialized commercial/ service, and increased .,P recreational opportunities. Additional residential units are A .i t* F necessary to support these businesses, especially when traffic v ! _ t. patterns further evolve away from direct access. *"' 1 P r° ii! For the downtown to succeed, Downtown needs to become more of a destination now, so that when access is vastly different, t.` ,� the businesses have already built up customer base. _ . ,•i I _ j!ll Iii Desired redevelopment should not only reflect the Plan elements, ' but be sensitive to the area's unique historic context, the 1 1 pedestrian view sheds and public access opportunities to the Mississippi River. ',- t t i r�+R a ri, .,. .--J. 1 • fi -fir+.,,,,„,„Granite Shores Project Core Downtown n Residential, Office and Service k Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II, page 12 - Strategies EDA loan program, etc.) and communicate information to property owners. 1. Expand the Core area to the north side of Highway 10. This will add additional properties for the expansion of 6. Develop design standards that embody the spirit and the downtown marketplace, allowing for a greater intent of the long range vision. Designs should reflect complement of activities,uses, and businesses. historical elements of the existing downtown structures maximize visual participation to the river, encourage 2. Develop and implement a way finding signage plan, as an proper mass, scale, and materials that balance new added connection between the core downtown area and development with rehabilitated and preserved properties. other neighborhoods in the study area. Transition existing regulatory and informative signage to the theme == established by the signage plan. 3. Develop streetscape improvements (embellishments) ;.,,,may, throughout the study area,but centered in the downtown ' area that could include benches,banners, landscaping, r ,,,,, lighting, all intended to communicate visitors' location as "in the downtown area" ; 4. As suggested by the 2002 Historic Context study, "'1MI "i determine the financial feasibility of preserving the "Brick and South Main blocks" as both historical and economically viable assets. Efforts to achieve this result * ` 1 should include a structural survey to determine � rehabilitation feasibility,agreement on facade restoration Downtown Character Through Design Details design and exploring options to ensure participation by all affected property owners. 7. Develop land use regulations that supports development of high density specialized commercial land uses and high 5. Encourage maintenance and upkeep of the"Brick and density residential at all price points,provide appropriate South Main Blocks" through incentive programs for density rights and/or other incentives to make projects commercial building code, fire and facade restoration and financially viable. rehabilitation. Explore incentive programs available through state and local resources (e.g. historic tax credits, Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II,page 13 - 8. Promote the Core Downtown's unique identity as "Mississippi i River Connections"within the Powered b pp by .;tr Nature brand and establish a marketing design and theme rt to attract new residents,visitors and businesses to the ; '° area. Direct a portion of City marketing funds to assist in "' '- r•... Ivy the recruitment of highly desirable businesses (i.e. hotel, fine dining,banquet/conference facility) to this area. 0111, 9. Establish the short and lon g term parking arkin needs and g recommendations as identified within the 2007 A ,N Downtown Parking Study,including a variety of options (e.g. ramp,underground, surface stalls, etc.). Explore the feasibility, design and economics of a parking structure with a built-in commercial component. • P 10. Review and establish parking code requirements in the downtown area, to allow for a mix of private and public parking areas,recognizing that an excessive surplus of Embellishments parking is detrimental to the downtown character and its • pedestrian friendly design. 14,8,„ t 11. Require a traffic and parking demand study for every «+ ' L, major new project to determine if infrastructure ' x ,4$ improvements are needed and parking can be • accommodated. IMF 12. Communicate with the School District on long term plans for their office building. Consider reuse as office or an opportunity to expand the parking lot. ., wemouient ISD 728 Facility Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II,page 14 - 13. Explore mechanisms to continue to communicate the f,,— - 1 redevelopment/expansion successes created by Granite ,, -j k ► Shores,Jackson Place,The Bank of Elk River and River's '' I IJ : Edge Commons Park and the reinvestment they ill 11 represent. 14. Capitalize an HRA Redevelopment Fund annually and ili III!l develop criteria for the selective acquisition of key ,,.. redevelopment parcels. ""' 15. Identify current property owners'interest in redevelopment efforts and assist them by working with ""` ` uo+ �, .et the development community to achieve shared objectives. s P ty ®I t .- -� J� 16. Establish a special taxing mechanism to capitalize an improvement,maintenance,and incentive fund to support the downtown businesses and the infrastructure , ; V i 4R So that supports them. Iv 17. Consider a tax increment finance district(s), as '� appropriate,as a way to leverage private investment. The < ' City will actively seek additional public and private funding sources to secure redevelopment objectives in the t area. 18. The Historic Preservation Commission should explore a , historic context study for the blocks on the north side of ` ,, °` ; Highway 10, south of 4th street,west of Gates. Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II, page 15 - Highway I0 Corridor Objective Statement Highway 10 is a central transportation corridor through the City and also serves as the gateway to the core downtown area. Currently, a wide array of highway commercial land uses aligns this corridor and the greatest redevelopment challenge is that a number of existing structures have become marginalized. W3117.9 The Plan recognizes that this corridor's image represents the community's health and vitality. oil' : 1I1 % III• #11, . im.r� 1 L •I. •+ „„,„„«...., gm, ♦• �r III ' meg Fe ••• f iI IIII`/,� . . ,'� i. •1 0 .0 * d ■r 111 • ♦ v sIll e " ir ro1/4„,40,,-,, , ,-..--, -,-,-- .- , „,„„.. t Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II, page 16 - Strategies 1. Work with MnDOT to improve streetscape aesthetics (lighting,landscaping,banners, etc.) 2. The City will assist property owners to redevelop selective sites in order to improve the image of the corridor. _- 3. Review land use regulations that will promote the Highway 10 Corridor as the City's "front door",protect it from future incompatible land uses, and incorporates flexibility for final design changes to Highway 10. * , 4. Seek out beautification opportunities (landscaping, art, ' °' etc.) along the corridor. 5. Work with property owners to rehabilitate obsolete Main Street and Highway I 0 buildings. 6. Establish educational opportunities to encourage code compliance and improvements by property owners. 7. After City approval on a final design, enter into negotiations with MnDOT to secure an agreement on the implementation schedule and securing potential funding options. - Part II,page 17 - Draft as of November 5, 2012 North of Highway I 0 d . , f . —Jackson Ave and 4t" Street Corridors Objective Statement While historically identified as part of "downtown", the area north of Highway 10 has evolved over the years into different land uses (e.g. industrial and highway commercial) that no longer vpiartswk ...001.8 M;, represent a traditional downtown market. ` 1 = a i .. The Plan recognizes the opportunity to create an improved a q :n ��,�.��.: physical connection between the north and south areas of : Strategies "" , iiii 1. In order to create Jackson Avenue and 4th Street as primary corridors, as described in the Plan, an overall $ feasibility study should be completed in order to implement the following action steps: f w a. Secure additional right-of-way (100 feet °' RN minimum) for Jackson Avenue to create an area .. M sufficient for parking, trees, sidewalks/trails, 41 r , lighting, and a center landscaped median. ' ?" � . . . . 2 r / b. Secure additional right-of-way for Jackson Avenue and 4``' Street intersection and < , ,. A. ► ,r-,�.�.• realignment modifications and improvements. '. r �. k c. Vacate Railroad Drive between Main Street and . •.,l` Jackson Avenue to facilitate a safer travel corridor f T �, . via 4th Street. T d. Identify necessary road and infrastructure 4 ry improvements. V 4. 4 w e. Incorporate roadway improvements into the Jackson&4 Street realignment City's Capital Improvements Program and Transportation Plan. Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II,page 19 - 0.1" 2. Identify parcels that can be assembled in order to create a �� " ~' significantly sized area for redevelopment as indicated on the Plan. Seek to acquire these parcels when they become ,"' available to facilitate redevelopment efforts. 3. Create an identifiable landscape corridor along Main Street/4t h Street to enhance traffic patterns and 1 iii connection to Highway 169. 4. Maintain the existing Jackson Avenue & 4th Street water 4 tower as both a historical structure and as an identifiable +P ii asset and landmark for future redevelopment efforts. �.. i, -- 5. Encourage, through design and zoning standards,multi `¢ 4 4 story office buildings for the Main Street and 4 Street a . .1< '''' area that can maximize the view sheds to the Mississippi : • .�� ,`• ��; River. t '.\\:.6. Review and modify existing land use regulations to • �R'� !' prevent incompatible land use changes that may <4 t' negatively impact the redevelopment potential of the area, Critical Land Mark including restrictions on single-family home conversions to businesses. 7. Modify land use regulations to support the development i of employment generators such as medical facilities, office, and institutional uses along west Jackson Avenue and 4th Street/Main Street to further the overall objectives 41 _> ;tai of the Plan. .- .... Railroad Drive Looking West Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II,page 20 - 8. Incorporate high density housing options surrounding Lion's Park to further define the urban character of the Jackson Avenue corridor. Housing shall utilize a wide range of styles and design,with a variety of ownership/rental opportunities, price points, etc. and shall be of significantly different design/style from the existing high density housing inventory. fA N2HwM NG( 9. Incorporate medium density urban style town homes along west Jackson Avenue to better define the Jackson ` " 1111 Avenue parkway. 10. Initiate discussions with Sherburne County regarding the future,long term use of their highway administration building. County Building 11. Promote opportunities to develop green ways and storm water retention areas both as an amenity and to treat storm water within and through the area. 12. Capitalize annually an HRA Redevelopment Fund to �' ''h finance acquisition or control of key blighted properties _> that have negative impacts on the redevelopment potential and/or prevents the implementation of the Plan's key objectives. 34 I High Density Housing Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II,page 21 - Residential Neighborhoods a4r, Objective Statement , The Study Area's diverse neighborhoods,largely single family in nature, are characterized by a variety of ages, styles, and price ¢t14:' points. neighborhoods play oints. The health of these nei hborhoods la a critical role in the success of the Plan and the collective Elk River Community. The Plan focuses on two objectives: the first ensures that continuous reinvestment occurs to strengthen the stability of these neighborhoods, and secondly,identify and establish programs to preserve historical authenticity of selected areas. .......01111firlipopAllig •T W. -- siiiia 4 ii. ..kia 11.1111110111.111111111111, ----- 1111/.1 - 1r , ......• rWile. - • *:-' . ;;...... 4, Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II, page 22 - Single-Family Strategies 1. Define the edge of the commercial businesses in the downtown area, prevent the migration of business into the adjacent residential areas. 2. Establish land use regulations that protect the areas from inconsistent land uses and provide buffers and transition zones that protect existing single family homes. 3. Analyze and designate, as appropriate,historic housing districts in the area and promote rehabilitation financing programs for continued preservation. Establish design guidelines in order to ensure that infill single family homes and remodeling"fits in" (e.g. similar design characteristics and scale) with the established historic housing district. 4. Encourage single family housing rehabilitation by promoting existing rehabilitation financing programs (e.g. Tri-County Action Programs, Central MN Housing Partnership and MN Housing Finance Agency) to property owners. 5. Explore opportunities to partner with established housing organizations to fund a program that supports a selective removal and rebuilding program of homes in which rehabilitation is financially and structurally infeasible. If programs are not available, the City should analyze the feasibility of establishing an internally funded project. 6. Examine zoning code provisions to allow home expansions while preserving the existing character of the area. 7. Establish educational opportunities to encourage code compliance and improvements by property owners. Draft as of November 5,2012 -Part II,page 23 - 8. Identify focus areas in which to pursue state and federal grant funds for housing rehabilitation. 9. Implement licensing of single family and duplex rental units. 10. Establish neighborhood groups to assist in promoting and encouraging coordinated housing improvements throughout the area. ,c, : .} 4. • i Single Family Neighborhood Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II, page 24 - Multi-Family Strategies �., s " . +, 4t 1. Carefully analyze any development proposals that restrict `' either income or rent to ensure that the existing Study A. .4. Area maintains a variety of housing options. 2. Ensure that all properties participate in crime-free and x 1h. . '''' r IAIIIIN/II""'I ;111t4,;_l, ' 4 '.i , , safety initiatives administered by the City. 3. Establish educational opportunities to encourage code '' compliance and improvements by property owners. 1 t . j I 49 111 1 4. Develop a rental housing monitoring system that will serve as the basis for future program development. .4 Multi-Family Housing- Proctor Avenue 5. Encourage multi-family housing rehabilitation by promoting existing rehabilitation financing programs e. . p g g g P g ; ' ,, ` Tri-County Action Programs, Central MN Housing 4 Partnership and MN Housing Finance Agency) to �� property owners. `k �w - ��'. , ' , si ` "s'* V ,r -s.x'-- ms s "'7 , `3 "`� ',4 � ; v' any a"; i "hhk -- 11`,E° or l_ _. Multi-Family Housing—School Street Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II,page 25 - Proctor and Quinn Avenues Objective Statement 4 The Proctor and Quinn Avenue area is a relatively small area with , a variety of incompatible land uses including both residential and dm IPO ' `g heavy industrial. P' Highway 10 improvements will include Proctor Drive intersecting with Highway 10 via an overpass. This overpass will extend to ."-4' the north, over the railroad tracks. This long elevated road will 15 ,.111r „" create a unique opportunity for the property in the area, altering FIIAI'� visibility and access. r• Due to the area's proximity to the train tracks and Highway 10 t. i , ,• traffic, the Plan suggests business park uses and employment centers. ■.. . ill I I1I IIII • I ® i 1 r. . ...#it .. Future Redevelopment Opportunities—Proctor& Highway 10 Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II, page 26 - Strategies 1. Work with the development community to identify and explore market opportunities and the feasibility of redeveloping the area as a whole. 2. Work with interested property owners in the development of a master plan prior to rezoning the parcels. 3. Establish opportunities to construct community directional signage and gateway signage along Proctor Avenue. II 1 `a 4 'r . ..- E 0004 ir to I -... wow'"n.a_ .. ,?+r_... a.,.... Adjacent Land Uses Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part II, page 27 - III. Implementation Priorities Implementation Implementation Policies The Mississippi Connections Redevelopment Framework Plan is Redevelopment is an ever-changing process and activity may intended as a framework for the evolution of the area as occur outside the identified Priority Project strategies, therefore transportation,market, and use pattern shifts shape the area. The the City,property owners,and stakeholders should consider the goal with this plan is to recognize these changes and guide them following policies as a framework for decision-making and and the resulting development and redevelopment toward a strategy as the City evaluates potential redevelopment projects preconceived vision. and determines where to direct resources. These policies should It is recognized that the Mississippi Connections Redevelopment serve as the basis for development of a work plan for the Framework Plan will not be implemented in its entirety Housing&Redevelopment Authority. immediately but will evolve over the next 20 years. Thus, the Plan should be viewed as a sound,yet flexible sequence of orderly • The availability of external resources (i.e. grants) and/or developments within the Study Area to achieve the vision. market conditions may create redevelopment opportunities Establishing priorities to create the environment that encourages outside of established short-term priorities. These private reinvestment helps guide the City's decision-making opportunities may be pursued even if they are not part of process and allocation of time and resources. the short-term priority list. The sizes and shapes of the facilities illustrated are not meant as • The City and the Housing&Redevelopment Authority hard and fast rules. They are intended to be suggestions and should examine the creation of a permanent redevelopment points of discussion as to the intensity and options for funding source(s) that will complement the resources development. Each structure must be an individual statement of traditionally available through tax increment financing and architecture,yet fit into the general character of the study area. other forms of public financing assistance. • The Goals and Policies within this Plan,which establish the framework for the Illustrative Master Plan, shall serve as the guiding principles for future City action. Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part III,page 1 - Priority Projects The following strategies are a reflection of the Task Force's Create concept drawings for an integrated trail system and work consensus priorities. with affected landowners an implementation strategy. Short Term (0 — 2 Years) Develop and promote a wide variety of people-generating activities in addition to current scheduled activities in River's Edge After City approval on final design,secure an agreement with Commons Park. MnDOT regarding potential funding sources. Identify key parcels for archeological digs along the riverfront in Identify current property owners'and businesses'interest in partnership with landowners. redevelopment efforts both north and south of Highway 10. Develop design standards that embody the spirit and intent of the Identify and promote housing rehabilitation financing programs long range plan for new construction in the core downtown area. that are provided by other entities and applicable to the study area. Communicate with School District on long term plans for their Work with Municipal Utilities to relocate outdoor storage located office building. along the Elk River and secure property to create a public access opportunity. Direct a portion of City marketing funds to assist in the recruitment of highly desirable businesses to the core downtown Amend the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinances to (e.g. hotel,fine dining,banquet facility). match the Illustrative Land Use Plan. Create through the HRA a redevelopment policy regarding Implement a Downtown District signage plan.,including parking capitalizing a redevelopment fund and parameters for purchasing and directional signage parcels. Establish historical point of view context signage. Establish educational opportunities to encourage code compliance and improvements by property owners within the entire study area. Review and as necessary update strategies identified within the 2007 Downtown Parking Study. Establish educational opportunities to encourage code compliance and improvements by property owners within the entire study area. Work with State Historic Preservation Office to determine structural and financial feasibility to preserve the"Brick and S. Identify a partner housing organization to fund and support a Main Blocks"and if applicable for the blocks north of Highway 10. selective housing removal and rebuilding program. Conduct a survey of residential properties to identify and establish Analyze the need for a single family and duplex rental units a historic residential neighborhood district. licensing program. Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part III,page 2 - Create a roadway connection that links Jackson Avenue to Lion's Establish neighborhood groups to assist in promoting coordinated Park Drive. housing improvements throughout the area. City partnering with property owners and the development Conduct historic context study for blocks north of 10 community to implement redevelopment projects that meet the community vision. Mid Term (3 — 5 Years) Expanded parks programming aimed at attracting residents to the Create interpretive signs highlighting historic occurrences along the area. Mississippi River trail after trail is installed. Promote programs that encourage single family residential Partner with Elk River Area Arts Alliance to explore funding rehabilitation. concepts for an arts center within the study area. Continue to assist in the recruitment of highly desirable businesses Establish a facade restoration financing program for maintenance to the core downtown(e.g.hotel, fine dining,banquet facility). and upkeep of the"Brick and S.Main Blocks". Continuously seek and secure opportunities to expand funding Finalize roadway design for north Highway 10 and related sources. intersection improvements. Start the implementation process to create new roadway improvements north of Highway 10. Work toward full participation and renovation of the`Brick and S. Main Blocks". Develop a rental housing inventory and monitoring system that will serve as the basis for future program development. Work with the City Council and City Boards and Commissions on continuous review and modifications to the Plan,as needed. Explore alternative models for multi-family housing that serve as a catalyst for private development. Implement a trail system along the Mississippi and Elk Rivers. On-going Based on demand,work with property owners and development community on redevelopment proposals. Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part III,page 3 - IV. Appendices •Strengths/Weakness/Opportunities/Threats Analysis •2006 Planning Process •Public Comments (placeholder) •Task Force Resolution (placeholder) Draft as of November 5,2012 -Part IV,page 1 - Task Force Stren: s,Weaknesses, O.s ortunities, and Threats SWOT) Anal sis STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES OPPORTUNITIES THREATS • Neighborhood Schools • Small and limited geographic area • New retail and business uses • Competing retail both locally(internal)and from • River • Small critical mass • New customer base surroun ding communities(external) • Lack of commuter rail stop in Downtown • Businesses that are easily accessible • Limited interest in going • Rehabilitation of existing buildings Downtown by people • Possible bypass of Highway 10 • Nice homes • More public gathering spaces for social • Everyone knows your name activities • Continued expansion of Otsego/Highway 101 • Churches area • • Age of existing real estate • Outdoor dining Authentic small town character • Traffic issues(congestion,increased traffic, (buildings) • Lack of reinvestment • Blank slate north of railroad tracks crossing Highway 10,etc) • Opportunity for individually • Highway 10 and railroad divides • More riverfront development • Value of housing stock going down owned businesses(affordable and area and people don't want to cross • More access to River • Land speculators(buying homes and renting them non national chain) • Limited access to River until they can put together large enough parcel to • Personal Touch—Everyone knows • Tie north and south areas together develop on) your name • Parking • More residential development • Economic fluctuations in general • Nostalgia/sentiment • No grocery store • Moving west of Downtown to develop • Noise(Highway 10 and railroad) • Identifiable location • Lack of variety in businesses • Enhance Handke Center • Not leasing out existing retail in new redevelopment • Variety of services • Not pedestrian friendly(snow projects issues,biking,etc) • Current redevelopment efforts lend • Charm/Character(lights, credibility • Land locked for River access/trail streets,etc.) • Traffic congestion • to outside investors • Market saturation • Local financial institutions • Delivery trucks (anchors) • North Star Rail and depot location • Raising rents for existing businesses • Lack of fine dining • Safe environment • Screen railroad tracks and create buffers • Through traffic • Lack of benches or places to sit outside • Public gathering places(new • Put in trail system along the River • Increasing land acquisition costs • New residents have an unfamiliarity park) • with Downtown Promote an authentic Downtown • Changes in eminent domain laws • Proximity to Otsego retail • • Incubator businesses Limited connectivity of north and • Fear of change • Heritage/history south areas • Corridor to cross Highway 10 and railroad • Lifestyle to support Downtown(convenience,price • Connectivity(Highway 10,rail • Market saturation tracks vs.nostalgia,lack of interest and lack of road and transportation) • wanted/needed services) Attract more residents to live Downtown • Public facilities in close proximity • Cost to upkeep aging real estate (City Hall,Library,future YMCA) • Interest in viable business that wants to expand(no are to expand to Downtown or viability is no longer there since interest has moved elsewhere in the community) Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part IV,page 2 - 2006 Planning Process Initial Small Group Concepts - May 7, 2007 meeting Group#1 Concept { ❖ Utilize Mississippi River views through "view shed" areas • Utilize downtown park as a"people generator", connect the park to Handke Stadium and the rest of the river via a trail • ❖ Leave Highway 10 at-grade • Use Babcock's Point • Leave Jackson Ave/Highway 10 intersection as the "prominent" downtown intersection t� • Make Jackson Ave into a boulevard, connecting north and south sides of Highway 10 through prominent Task Force Design Charette Sketches corridor design ❖ Provide employment opportunities north of Highway 10 ❖ Protect single-family neighborhoods north and south of Highway 10 • Continue redevelopment west along Main Street in core downtown Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part IV,page 3 - r 31 " k °,,, ,,,,.4,,,,,r;,,,, of ,,,,, :,. 'F„. .- ,,.,4,'-,.', ', , ' .Air4 ,u,. 1,44.„;.- ...- :,,N4,-, 4., t,. , , ,,,,,,_,,.., . ...,.. __...:::.:,::;,....;,1:,t4c,,,,.:,.„„-- ,. .44b..: , 3,1_, , .,. : - . :. =,z I trl,7,,: ''- ;, R 7 Task Force Design Charette Sketches Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part IV,page 4 - Group#2 Concept 4 ' t al . ., 4 ,.,,,,..,,-:`..:."' , , r , , 1 •;• Use Jackson Ave as a tree-lined "feeder" to core sb downtown o• Focus early redevelopment efforts north of Highway 10 + Provide river connections �,t ❖ Consider o tions for intersections on Hwy 10,including �� ,� ' ,,,, : leaving them. hem"as is" r • Provide em to ment o ortunities north of Hwy 10 p Y pP wY x ❖ Provide transitions in land use that protect remaining single-family neighborhoods north of Hwy 10;protect existing single family homes south of Hwy 10 Task Force Design Charette Sketches ❖ Use Babcock's Point Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part IV, page 5 - Refined Large Group Concept—June 4, 2007 meeting • Highway 10 Frontage from Jackson Avenue to Gates o High scale commercial/office building at intersection of ❖ Core Downtown Main Street&Railroad Drive to maximize view of river o Maintain the`Brick Block" through rehabilitation o Allow for redevelopment of area between The Bluffs& East Main Street Connecting to Highway 169 First National/Dare's o Redevelop as commercial (office/service)rather than o Proper scale,e.g. row homes,to buffer single-family single-family residential homes and new developments o Alley to serve as main access to buildings along o Main Street between Morton&Lowell should be Main/minimal setbacks along Main to obtain"urban feel" considered a good transition area between new o Continue tree-lined parkway along Main Street to Hwy 169 developments& single-family homes o First floor commercial to be based on market demand Quinn Avenue Area o Discourage"leapfrog"redevelopment o A separate redevelopment study of this area should be o Utilize design standards to promote historic"look" for completed new buildings o Conduct traffic studies on a project-by-project basis to determine roadway improvements for certain land uses l,..� -- 1 y-- »». .,' o Remove outside storage to incorporate a public access to ;111 / £ A "4k ,(a s. �.:i %•ice1 Mississippi River(at Municipal Utilities building) acr L♦• t i • ~•'` �; Yid 1� ♦ t! s ''wrw i❖ East Jackson Avenue Corridor • 1 i.:.•:- ; o Jackson becomes a tree-lined parkway design as primary �, f:II t:..,-S r.k. -+.t- --, , corridor ` . f•.S..y • ,n•. a .sic= ''''',11._ o Single family homes fronting east Jackson may be removed �1' �. A ;f I: � to accommodate live/work structures F'+,6• •- •w, �„ I . .N11 o Alley to serve as main access to buildings along ''- �'' ;� '„� w ` _. !„�� M 1 Jackson/minimal setbacks along Jackson to obtain"urban -_ , ' • .� -�'�-''�y �tat r�r •!• :'6i .1 j '-1 ,rMi feel" .t. •�A - _--_= -- ---- •-i• ,r- ❖ West Jackson Avenue Corridor Including the Current Industrial �ti ; Area f ( THE 20 YEAR VISION o High density residential abutting Lion's Park o "Anchor"commercial/institutional land use needed on `. -..,-"" southwest corner of Jackson&School Street Figure A-Overall Land Use Concept o Create roadway connection between Jackson&Lion's Park Drive Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part IV, page 6 - 1 i r ..r�i.+�•.• i �I �: •i.M.s,:■ .n■ err it ,Jr-j' �.� ! THE 2 ION Lti ;.....I.,;,„.., •.., ','•' , ; • '�-J •• � rte. ♦• b h + u f i`�w�r r,._ " '•a � .� i a. L.'7 :1 .J�.t� I �Jrr r,� 1 +#t �� • 'f/ts` w l L../ f ..1 (� ♦ CtJt9mH• r 1.,.._ 1 + r + l 1 � i • t " `, / N /�' _ �� THE 20YEARVISION t • ' I Impiwie / num. INN ION all Figure B-Main Street View Sheds to Mississippi River Figure C-Trail Loop and Pedestrian Connections' '-' k, ,..... , .. ''illik, ‘IIh z s i Figure D—S. Hwy 10 0 Looking North to Jackson Ave Parkway Figure E-Main Street Detail Looking Southeast Draft as of November 5, 2012 - Part IV, page 7 - Refined Large Group Concepts —June 4, 2007 meeting ,z. '�..."'"_ ',,, : THE 20 YEAR VISION - WINED ET`E' w - v- . 3 mow`"",.. A i ,...., .a t4 C:4 '.t IfIIA' { t. 1:1. , : . , i - $ t I ' V 1." '' 'l i Figure G ' -4,-, . a, 67-3--'17-•-• ,' o i- -1". _ North Hwy 10 Looking South Along Jackson Ave Parkway 14 ---"1"1". kr"-----..... 4"-:--;.7-'4644114141'alii'-'.ill" ------- "- — -.......1...441.11::,_ //»^azt ", J v c�. -.1" .P F r I� r law — _ yyy Y-- ,Iit, Mt ....or i , :irli , • f }�yif �.{ t r //0,' Figure F North Hwy 10-Jackson Ave&4th Street Corridor Refined .. t. Figure H North Hwy 10 Looking North Along Jackson Ave Parkway Draft as of November 5,2012 - Part IV,page 8 - Public Comments Making our neighborhood into a"historic"neighborhood. I own my The following were the written comments received during the home and property and would refuse to request permission from a public comment period ending October 22nd committee to change my own home. I purposefully do not live in an "association". Resident Mixed use areas—be careful of not too much residential because still What is the best aspect of this plan? close to tracks—doesn't attract upper end residential. Business operator Great for moving traffic through town;terrible for the downtown Bike trail from downtown to the train station. We have a unique businesses—have you no concern for them? Business owner opportunity to have a 3—4 mile loop heading north from the station and looping back to the downtown. With parking an issue and more Nothing on our behalf. Resident people living downtown,this also encourages pedal power to reduce traffic. Planning Commissioner Turning Bailey Point into a nature park. Resident Turning the Babcock's `Bailey Point"property to a nature park. General Comments— Resident With reduction of immediate access,traffic decreases,giving reduction Redevelopment of obsolete buildings. Business operator of retail value in terms of sales and rents available to owners thereby reducing value of area. Business owner This destroys property value—corner home with wall surround. Truly What should the Task Force reconsider? upset—by out some homes. Resident Downtown access,very limited,inhibiting growth. Retailers need Thanks for emailing postcards to keep people informed. On page 10, visibility and immediate access, this plan eliminates immediate access. #2,Mississippi River should say Elk River. Resident Business owner We will never go along with this plan and will paint our house with a I strongly urge the Task Force to explain their vision of"historic bright polka dot design if necessary. Resident downtown"to include the 100+ year old buildings in the"mixed use" area north of Highway 10 between Jackson and Main Street. This area I will never go along with this nor pay any fines. I will do everything should be part of the"core"area. Business owner in my power to speak against this and act against this in any and every avenue! Also,most homes in the neighborhood are not very historic to Value of all property near road expansion/ramps. Great walls begin with. Resident surround my property;wow—great! Resident Git'ex done—it would invigorate all of Elk River! Business operator Making our neighborhood a"historic neighborhood." Resident Draft as of November 5, 2012 -Part IV, page 9 - really makes the area viable as a destination because the businesses 1. I fully believe in the historical FEEL of the downtown area. That don't complement each other well. Expanding the area will allow is more the result of the looks of the buildings (mostly brick) (design development of a new area the purpose of which could be better standards) and the close proximity than the actual structures defined. themselves. 6. I'm not in favor or requiring the rehabilitation of homes that have 2. While the core downtown has a historical FEEL, I believe there is exceeded their life expectancies. Times have changed. Energy very little historical significance to the downtown itself. Yes,for some efficiencies have improved greatly. Building materials and codes have residents and former residents,it brings back memories (nostalgia),the changed. Styles have changed. Desired amenities have changed. To future of the City is not in looking backward,it is in looking forward. require someone to keep a style house favorable in the 1920s (or Keep in mind the 1980 population was less than 7,000,in 1990 it was whatever period) is inefficient and will eventually cause blight. Yes, less than 12,000 and in 2000 it was less than 17,000. It is now about incentives might be possible now,but eventually,structures degrade to 23,000. Of the 7,000 who were here in 1980,I would guess less than the point of being very cost inefficient and/or unsafe. half remain whether due to moving or death. So we're preserving "nostalgia" of the past for maybe 15%of our current population-a 7. I do not favor retaining the Water Tower and will oppose the use number that is ever decreasing. The Plan talks about"creating a new of ANY city money to preserve it. I truly believe the effort to preserve history." That won't occur holding onto someone else's past. it to this date was the result of the actions of a select few. In 2002, costs to repaint the tower were stated to be from$50,000 to$100,000. 3. The Core Downtown Statement says to rehabilitate and redevelop The cost to remove the tower would be less. Ownership was stated to - but it also discusses the Brick and S. Main Blocks as needing be in ERMU and nearly all discussion went via ERMU and the HPC. "historical rehabilitation". If those blocks are "off the table",that Even ERMU voted to tear it down in 2002. Updates were not pretty much eliminates much of the potential redevelopment. When provided to the Council and no approval for the application for the the Metro Plains developments were being considered,it was discussed National Register was requested of the Council. Then,just last month, that a Phase 2,encompassing the area from Granite Shores to the it was disclosed during a budget session that it looks like the City is the Cinema Building could be possible. Again,with proper design actual owner and the cost to repaint would be close to$400,000. standards,I still see that as a viable redevelopment project. Apparently,staff new this in December or before;however,it was never mentioned to the Council. It has been stated the painting will 4. The Plan doesn't really seem to discuss the viability of the occur only if grants are received to pay for all of it. I have no objection businesses in the area. Having a mere "location" doesn't make the area to that,but I will not vote to approve the use of City funds. I am also "destination." How will the realignment of Jackson Street/ King hearing(but not from information provided to the Council), Street affect the Jackson Street buildings? What is the "hook" to get apparently, there may be concerns about the structural integrity of the people to want to come to the downtown area-especially the core water tower... the cement at its base may be degrading. downtown? Maybe entertainment?? 8. The section"Previous Relevant Studies" should include a full 5. I believe the core downtown area is too small of a commercial discussion about the Historical Context Study. While the Context area. I think it should be expanded (but not extremely)but with good Study is discussed a bit several sections later,it provided an actual "historical feeling" design standards. I don't believe the current size professionally prepared and researched account of why the area is really Draft as of November 5,2012 -Part IV, page 10 - NOT historically significant. Each building was individually researched. The Context Study was very critical of historical preservation in the core downtown. As included in the Downtown Task Force report,the entire context study is pretty much relegated to a statement that"The study concluded that none of the 23 properties appeared to be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. However,5 buildings on the west side of Jackson Ave were recommended for further preservation study..." No further study has ever occurred. Basically,the Task Force,because of it's bent on preserving the old,decided to pretty much ignore the Context Study. Council Member Draft as of November 5,2012 -Part IV,page 11 -