Loading...
5.0. SR 08-31-1998ITEM ~5. ity of River MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor & City Council Administrato (< Pat Klaers, City .to ,/~~ August 31, 1998 SUBJECT: 1999 Budget The first City Council worksession on the 1999 budget is scheduled for Monday, August 31, 1998, in the Training Room following the completion of some regular city business items. The proposed maximum levy must be approved by the City Council and certified to the county no later than Tuesday, September 15, 1998. Additionally, by September 15, the City Council must establish its December public hearing dates for consideration of the 1999 tax levy and budget. Almost all of the August 31 evening will be dedicated to reviewing and discussing issues related to the 1999 proposed budget. An additional Council worksession to complete the budget review is anticipated to be necessary. The agenda for the budget worksessions looks something like the following: · Discuss and review 1999 proposed revenues; including the tax class compression impact on the net tax capacity. · Discuss the 1999 proposed expenditures concentrating on personnel and capital outlay items. · Discuss the 1998 budget gap. · Review the special levy and special revenue budgets. · Review miscellaneous financial issues. · Review required City Council action before September 15, 1998. The city budget issues in 1999 are similar to what the city has had to deal with in the past few years. As before, the challenge facing us in 1999 relates to how the city can finance the increased demand for services. The budget concerns in 1999 include how the city can finance the necessary additional personnel, capital outlay items, increases in services, and new programs when the only substantial increase in revenues comes from taxes. This will be especially challenging in 1999 with the continued compression of the tax classes and this impact on the city's net tax capacity (NTC) growth. 13065 Orono Parkway · P.O. Box 490 · Elk River, MN 55330 · TDD & Phone: (612) 441-7420 · Fax: (612) 441-7425 1999 Budget Memo August 31, 1998 Page 2 REVENUES Overview Last year the general fund revenues were budgeted to increase by $369,400. For an accurate comparison to the 1999 budgeted increase in revenues, the adiusted increase in 1998 is $341,000. This is based on the liquor store transfer of $28,400 for the City Hall debt being moved out of both the general fund revenues and expenditures. Of this $341,000 total, the tax increase was $191,000, the COPS FAST increase was $51,000, the local government aid (LGA) increase was $14,000, and the new PERA revenue was $10,000. These four sources amount to $266,000 of additional revenue. An additional $75,000 in revenue related to the city's growth (i.e. plan check fees, building permits, etc.) was generated in 1998. The initial 1999 projections show taxes increasing by $201,000. However, COPS FAST revenue decreases by $21,000, LGA decreases by $14,000, and there is no change in the PERA revenue. These four sources amount to an increase of $166,000 which is $100,000 less than last year. Additionally the city would like to decrease its dependence on cash flow reserves to balance the budget ($25,700 was used last year), and this compounds our revenue shortage problem. Growth related revenues can increase by a similar amount as to what we saw last year. Overall we are short of revenues and this is in part related to the changes in COPS FAST program and the LGA program. Taxes Last year the city had levy limits imposed for the first time in a number of years. This levy limit law continues for 1999. This law allows the city to increase its non-bonded 1998 tax revenue by an inflationary factor and a household growth rate. There should be sufficient increased tax revenue available within the levy limit to fund necessary expenditures. The real issue is if the NTC will increase sufficiently to keep the city tax rate reasonable. Taxes are over 50 percent of the general fund revenues. Accordingly, the increase in tax revenue is essential to cover increased expenditures. The city has grown rapidly, but last year we saw one of our smallest increases in NTC due to the compression of the tax classes. The NTC increased about 4 percent last year whereas it increased 11.5 percent in 1997 and 14.9 percent in 1996. This small increase in NTC made generating additional tax revenue without 1999 Budget Memo August 31, 1998 Page 3 a tax rate increase almost impossible, and is the main reason the 1998 city tax rate went up 6.2 percent. Last year for the first time, the city allocated $100,000 from its general tax levy towards a capital improvement program (CIP). In retrospect, this was a very wise decision as this money is needed for the Lake Orono project. This CIP tax levy is projected to continue and is again shown at $100,000 for 1999. If possible, this CIP tax levy should increase in order to pay off the city Lake Orono project expenses in 1999. This decision on the Lake Orono tax levy amount needs to be made by the Council in September. As an aside, if this CIP tax levy increases, it will help in the planning for a pavement replacement program. The 1999 tax revenue projection is based on keeping the tax rate identical to the 1998 level and based on an estimated city NTC increase of 4 percent. Based on these assumptions, the projection shows an additional $201,200 in tax revenue for 1999 and the city needs more than this amount of money to meet its needs. The taxes generated by the above formula is about $280,000 short of the maximum allowed by law. If the city's NTC increased by 4 percent and the city levied to the maximum allowed by law, then the city tax rate would go up approximately 8.2 percent from 26.255 to 28.416. However, if the city's NTC increases by 6 percent, then the city can levy to the maximum allowed by law with no change in its city tax rate. Information on the city NTC growth is vital in order for the City Council to make an informed decision on the appropriate level of additional tax revenue for 1999. Intergovernmental Revenues As noted above, due mainly to the reduction in COPS FAST and LGA revenues, this category is projected to decrease by $25,800. Char~es for Services This category is projected to increase by approximately $55,200. The major increases are in administrative projects fees (+ $15,000), plan check fees (+ $10,000), recreation fees (+$10,000) and the school liaison program (+ $10,000). Fines and Forfeits This police revenue category is projected to increase by $10,000. 1999 Budget Memo August 31, 1998 Page 4 Licenses/Permits This category is projected to increase by $21,200. The major changes include an increase in building permit fees (+$15,000) and plumbing/heating permit fees (+$5,000). Other Revenues No changes are projected in this category. Transfers This budget category fluctuates more from year to year than any other budget revenue category. The initial 1999 projections show a decrease of $83,300. The adjusted decrease is $54,900, due to the liquor store participation with the City Hall debt being moved out of the general fund. Accordingly, the $54,900 transfers decrease can be found in the cash flow reserve (-$25,700), capital outlay reserve (-$14,150), the street reserve (-$10,000), and the liquor store (-$5,050). As the Council knows, staffis always concerned about becoming too dependent on transfers from reserves as these reserves are finite in nature and limited. Using cash flow reserves is a poor budgeting habit that we try not to do on an annual basis. The capital outlay transfers went down due to (1.) the balancing of the school liaison program and use of D.A.R.E. reserves and (2.) the fact that no election is scheduled for 1999, and therefore, no election transfers are moving into the budget. From a realistic point of view it is understood that some transfers from reserves will have to increase in 1999 from this original projection. Summa~ Overall the revenue picture is not very pleasant. Total revenues are projected to increase $178,500. This will not be sufficient to meet our needs. The main source of additional funds will have to be taxes, but some reserves could be added and/or cuts in expenditures will need to be made. Besides the tax class changes/NTC growth issue, we are starting to realize the impact of the COPS FAST revenue going down. This revenue will continue to decrease substantially in 2000 and 2001 and is anticipated to go from $131,000 in 1999 to zero by 2001. This will make balancing the budget in 2000 and 2001 difficult. It should be noted that last year the total tax rate went down in spite of the city and county tax rates going up. This was mainly due to action by the state legislature to increase funding for school districts. At this point we can 1999 Budget Memo August 31, 1998 Page 5 only hope for similar results in 1999. Unless the NTC increases more than it did last year, the city tax rate will have to go up in order to generate the additional tax revenue which is needed to support 1999 general fund and debt expenses. At the budget worksessions it will be recommended to the City Council that it approve the proposed maximum levy at the highest level allowed by the levy limit law. This is the same action the City Council took last year, however, at the December public hearing the Council reduced the tax levy amount. The NTC information from the county was not available last year until the beginning of October. This information is essential in order for the City Council to make an informed decision about the impact on the city tax rate for generating additional tax revenue. In a recent conversation with the County Auditor, it was indicated that the 1999 NTC information should be available "around" Labor Day. This may affect when the next budget worksession is scheduled. If the Council approves the levy limit maximum, then like last year, most of the real budget work will be done in October and November. This will allow staff time to receive Council input in September and refine revenue and expenditure estimates for worksessions later in the year. EXPENDITURES The requested expenditures for all city departmental budgets are scheduled to be handed out at the 8/31/98 worksession. Included in the departmental budgets will be a request for additional personnel. The list of personnel requests includes a full time Economic Development assistant (40% in the general fund, 40% in the EDA budget, and 20% in the HRA budget), a part time assistant for the Senior Citizen Coordinator, a police records clerk, and a 3/4 time recreation programming clerk. Additionally, there will be some new projects and programs to review with the City Council including the cost associated with the Youthbound project, a proposal to codify the city ordinances, and a proposal for a new mapping system called Arc View/Arc Info. New, large, or unusual equipment purchases that will require City Council review includes the $75,000 fire department tanker chassis, the $106,000 street department truck, and the expedition type of vehicle for the police sergeants rather than a more typical police sedan. A number of financial issues will also need to be decided by the City Council which are not in any individual budget. One of these issues is how the city is going to finance the police department's request to address the Y2K issue as 1999 Budget Memo August 31, 1998 Page 6 previously reviewed with the City Council in May. The police department still needs about $58,000 worth of expenditures to update their communication/computer systems. (The Council has already authorized approximately $12,000 in expenditures.) This approval by the City Council is needed before the end of the year, and a source of funds for this expenditure has yet to be identified. Finally, there are some organizational changes in some budgets that should be noted...The data processing budget has been eliminated and the data processing requests from individual departments are within their own budget...As previously noted, the liquor store transfer for part of the City Hall debt has been eliminated from both the expenditures and the revenue sections of the budget. This shows up in the government building budget. Also, the government building's budget has changed whereby now we have a full time employee rather than contracted services, the police cleaning services are now out of this budget, and the budget title has been more correctly relabled to be a City Hall Maintenance budget...The City Council Contingency budget contains fewer dollars for additional employees as, in 1999, most of the additional employees are expected to be approved when the budget is adopted. In the past, there has always been some uncertainty as to if the employees would be hired and when. Therefore, money for the positions were in the contingency fund. Most of the 1999 positions will be reviewed with the departmental budgets. 1999 BUDGET GAP At this point, budget requests have only been received and compiled. The budget requests have not been reduced based on available revenues and whether or not the request is a minimum requirement or a "nice to have" request. Last year personal services went up $348,150 in the budget. The personal services increase in 1999 is expected to be more than last year as most of the employee additions have been moved out of the contingency fund and into each departmental budget. Additionally, last year there was a slightly higher number of additional employees hired and position changes than what we typically experience, and these actions are reflected in the 1999 figures. At this time, the 1999 personal services is projected to increase somewhere between $475,000 and $500,000. This personal services situation highlights the need for the city to add the additional $280,000 in tax revenue which is available within the levy limit law. If this tax revenue is added to the current projection of plus $178,500, 1999 Budget Memo August 31, 1998 Page 7 then the total general fund additional revenues will be in the $455,000 range and all of this general fund revenue increase will be in the taxes category. In addition to the personal services increase in 1999, the other budget categories typically increase in the $150,000 range. Accordingly, even if we levied to the maximum allowed by law, the city will still have a budget gap of $150,000 - 200,000 between available revenues and requested expenditures. With some cuts in requested expenditures, some increases in revenues, by purchasing some equipment now rather than in 1999, or by encumbering some 1998 funds for 1999 expenses; then it is believed that this $150,000 - 200,000 budget gap can be reduced down to a more reasonable and manageable level (i.e. under $50,000). SPECIAL LEVY AND SPECIAL REVENUE BUDGETS Outside the general fund, the city has a number of budgets that are special levy or special revenue budgets. These budgets are as follows: · Library · Surface Water Management (SWM) · Special Assessments · Equipment Certificates · Equipment Reserves · HRA · EDA · Landfill · Ice Arena The 1999 Library and SWM budgets have no substantial changes from the budgets that were adopted in 1998. The Special Assessments budget is going up in 1999 due to the city assessments for the Lake Orono project. These assessments are in addition to the city's contribution to the project. The Equipment Certificates are projected to increase in 1999 based on the street department's need for a new truck. Please note that the equipment certificate level is anticipated to remain near the $200,000 mark for the foreseeable future as the street department needs are anticipated to continue at the level identified in the 1999 budget. Certificates have been in the $100,000- $120,000 range for the past few years. Equipment Reserves are projected to increase due to the fire department request for tanker truck chassis in the amount of $75,000. Funding for this trunk expenditure will come from the Utilities' contribution. 1999 Budget Memo August 31, 1998 Page 8 The HRA and EDA budgets are proposed to levy to the maximum allowed by law. The details of these budgets have yet to be completed. The city has always levied to the maximum allowed by law for these two budgets. It is the conclusion of the EDA and HRA that this revenue will again be needed in 1999 in order to finance additional staff support for economic development activities and for the projects currently being discussed. The Landfill budget is straightforward. Landfill revenues cover expenditures associated with monitoring activities at the landfill. The Ice Arena budget needs more discussion by the Council as we are slowly but surely getting a clearer picture of annual revenues and expenditures. This is the only expenditure budget that is included with this memo. The original projections from the Marquette feasibility study are not being realized. The deficit in 1996 and 1997 is approximately $55,000. Over time the facility should cash flow, but the 1996/1997 deficit needs to be addressed. The proposal includes using the $36,000 the city has put away over the past few years for ice arena "emergencies," and using $19,000 from the 1999 tax levy. Reserves could be used in lieu of the tax levy. The estimate for 1998 and 1999 is better than the deficit that was realized in 1997, but progress is slow as expenditures have exceeded projections for the operation of two ice rinks and revenues have not matched expectations. MISCELLANEOUS FINANCIAL ISSUES Last year under this budget worksession topic, we discussed a number of equipment purchases (in order to keep the next year's requests down), a number of personnel adjustments, the library improvements, and improvements at the old Nord house. This year our main topic is some personnel issues. The budget meeting is one of the City Council meetings throughout the year where the Council typically makes some decisions on personnel issues. The City Personnel Committee is still working on some requests and most of the recommendations are not yet ready for City Council consideration. However, on 8/31 there will be a number of requests verbally presented for the City Council's deliberation. CITY COUNCIL ACTION At the August 31, 1998, City Council budget worksession, or at a follow up City Council worksession, the City Council should consider the following: 1. Motion approving the EDA tax levy resolution. 1999 Budget Memo August 31, 1998 Page 9 Motion approving the HRA tax levy resolution. Motion to adjust debt levies per recommendation of the Assistant City Administrator (Lori will have a handout and make a presentation on these adjustments at the worksession). Motion approving the city tax levy resolution. Motion calling for the city Truth in Taxation public hearing on the tax levy and budget for December 2, 1998, with a continuation date of December 9, 1998. The issues noted above require City Council action no later than early September in order for information to be certified to the county by September 15, 1998. As previously noted, in order for the finance department to put together the tax levy resolution, some decisions by the City Council will need to be made in the very near future. These decisions include: 2. 3. 4. How the city will finance the Lake Orono project What level the equipment certificates will be at in 1999 How the city plans to finance eliminating the 1996-97 Ice Arena deficit Whether or not the City Council is comfortable approving the maximum levy allowed by law Attachment______as · 1999 general fund revenues · Ice Arena budget · 1997 tax rate information SOURCE OF FUNDS GENERAL PROPERTY TAX 1996 1997 1998 1999 ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED PROPOSED $2,160,675 $2,470,418 92,632,600 92,833,800 957,127 1,041,805 1,102,550 1,076,750 476,632 509,976 347,300 402,500 80,028 84,221 80,000 90,000 439,001 492,321 317,950 339,150 91,852 122,621 64,150 64,150 267,950 270,169 360,700 277,400 94,473,265 94,991,531 94,905,250 $5,083,750 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES CHARGES FOR SERVICES FINES & FORFEITS LICENSES & PERMITS OTHER REVENUES TRANSFERS TOTAL 8/28/98 GENERAL PROPERTY TAX Ad Valorem Tax INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES Local Government Aid HACA Local Performance Aid PERA Aid Police Relief Gravel Tax Urban Street Maintenance Cops Fast Grant State Crime Prevention Grant Police Training Reimbursement Other Grants (Safe & Sober) CHARGES FOR SERVICES GENERAL GOVERNMENT Administrative Project Fees Plan Check Fees Planning & Zoning Fees Contractor License Surcharge Sewer inspection Fees Miscellaneous Sales Assessment Searches PUBLIC SAFETY School Liaison Police Contract impound Fees Fire Calls & Contracts PUBLIC WORKS Street Services RECREATION Recreation Fees 92,833,800 227,650 506,000 17,750 11,500 100,000 41,000 28,000 108,350 23,000 5,500 8,000 30,000 122,750 17,500 5,200 1,000 2,500 5,000 70,000 7,000 2,300 76,000 3,000 60,250 92,833,800 1,076,750 402,500 SOURCE OF FUNDS FINES & FORFEITS Court Fines Parking Fines 85,000 5,000 90,000 LICENSES & PERMITS PERMITS Building Permits Building Permit Surcharge Plumbing & Heating Permits Other Non-Business LICENSES Dog/Cat Cigarette Liquor Amusement Gas Fitters Garbage Haulers Mineral Extraction Apartment Licenses Other Business OTHER REVENUE Interest Landfill Surcharge Contribution-Guardian Angels Refunds & Reimbursements TRANSFERS Liquor Capital Outlay Reserve Street Reserve Landfill NSP/RDF Reserve Sewer Utilities Economic Development Authority Housing & Redevelopment Authority 213,500 800 52,000 1,000 1,900 500 35,000 2,250 1,800 75O 10,800 11,850 7,000 45,000 9,000 3,700 6,450 90,000 28,900 30,000 19,750 19,750 8,000 78,000 2,000 1,000 339,150 64,150 277,400 TOTALSOURCE OFFUNDS $5,083,750 8/28/98 REVENUES ELK RIVER ICE ARENA 1999 PROPOSED BUDGET 1998 1999 1997 1998 Actual to Proposed Budqet Actual ~Bud.qet Estimate. Au.q. 20 Budget Ice Rental 364,715 295,141 376,900 324,655 85,268 337,600 Admissions 30,000 23,811 30,000 27,000 12,507 28,500 Sign Rental 20,000 16,809 20,000 18,000 (1,200) 9,000 Dry Floor Events 6,000 6,705 6,000 6,500 8,441 10,000 Concession Rent 20,400 20,000 21,000 21,000 20,000 21,500 Vending 20,000 23,103 20,000 24,000 14,366 24,000 Skate Sharpening 5,000 4,637 5,000 4,600 3,199 5,000 Other Mdse Sales/Phone Comm. 1,500 1,544 1,500 2,000 817 2,000 Interest Income 1,490 0 Contributions 1,100 0 TOTAL 467,615 394,340 480,400 427,755 143,398 437,600 EXPENDITURES Regular Pay 35,000 42,731 Overtime Pay Part Time Pay 34,400 46,810 Benefits 15,050 13,500 Operating Supplies 4,000 20,794 Building Maintenance Supplies Motor Fuels Uniforms Legal Fees 1,999 Other Professional Services 4,000 545 Building Repair & Maint. 39,000 2,237 Equipment Repair & Maint. 6,000 4,705 Equip. & Mach. Rent 2,397 Insurance 20,000 8,546 Utilities 90,000 68,654 Cleaning Services Dry Floor Events 2,000 1,176 Telephone 1,369 Postage 219 Travel, Conf. & Schools 766 Dues & Subscriptions 346 Printing & Publishing 1,275 Total Operating 249,400 217,072 Capital Outlay 10,847 Vending Mdse for Resale 11,683 Other Mdse for Resale 953 59,600 59,600 35,589 64,450 62 200 34,450 34,450 21,884 42,100 20,100 20,100 11,581 22,750 6,500 18,000 9,047 10,400 1,567 4,550 2,000 2,000 16 3,550 350 350 350 5,100 1,000 10,279 5,100 15,000 5,000 13,767 7,700 9,150 7,000 3,917 12,750 750 2,500 583 1,550 6,000 9,000 2,435 6,000 68,350 68,350 44,318 74,850 573 800 700 1,300 35 2,650 900 1,500 1,518 1,400 300 300 509 600 1,650 1,650 595 1,650 400 400 94 400 1,000 1,000 647 1,300 232,300 233,500 159,016 265,100 3,100 3,100 1,276 1,800 6,500 13,000 6,325 13,000 650 1,000 243 650 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 218,215 153,785 237,850 177,155 - 23,462 157,050 Bond Principal 40,000 Bond Interest 159,600 Total Debt Service 80,000 80,000 80,000 85,000 117,450 117,450 117,420 112,850 199,600 204,588 197,450 197,450 197,420 197,850 Excess (Deficiency) After Debt Service 18,615 (50,803) 40,400 (20,295) (220,882) (40,800) Fund Balance Previous Year (4,148) Fund Balance December 31, 1998 $(54,951) Notes: 1997 and 1998 Budgets based on ERYHA proposed budget and Marquette Study. 1998 Estimated Budget is based on 1997 actuals with inflation and growth increases. 8/25/98 Ice97sum Average Total Tax Rate City 1996 Population for 1997 7 County Metro Andover 21,495 107.37 Anoka 17,693 113.42 Champlin 19,838 116.41 Ch~uhassen 16,199 150.80 Chaska 14,370 136.55 H_~m Lake 11,030 103.12 Hastings 16,920 121.30 Lino Lakes 13,756 129.03 Mounds View 12,789 136.34 N. St. Paul 12,764 130.37 Prior Lake 13,519 140.48 Ramsey 16,431 108.54 Rosemount 12,272 124.05 Savage 15,152 142.17 Shakopee 14,292 133.83 Stillwater 15,906 127.70 Vadnais Heights 12,895 125.04 White Bear Lake Twp. 10,703 123.16 Non Metro Albert Lea 18,183 114.16 Brsinerd 12,591 111.29 Fairmount 11,337 117.30 Fairbault 18,838 132.75 Fergas Falls 13,079 117.33 Hutchinson 12, 587 146.76 Marshall 12,348 113.46 New Ulm 13,881 128.12 N. Mankato 11,561 122.69 Northfield 15,859 119.52 Owatonna 20,577 121.23 St. Peter 9,789 130.33 Willmar 18,654 130.31 Worthington 10,411 110.25 Becker 1,711 75.49 Big Lake 4,022 111.53 Buffalo 9,114 112.76 Otsego 6,391 125.41 Rogers 1,364 122.62 Zimmerm an 2,022 134.91 ELK RIVER 14,019 Source: September 1997 League of MN Cities Magazine s:\admin\citypop.doc 112.77 1999 PRELIMINARY LEVY ESTIMATES Levy to Levy Limit Gross Levy Levy Limit 3,945,591 Matching Grants** 64,922 City Special Assessments 30,451 1989 Fire Equipment Bonds 71,862 1994 Storm Sewer Bonds 114,225 1995 Certificate of Indebtednes 23,631 1996 Certificate of Indebtednes 22,857 1997 Certificate of Indebtednes 28,978 1998 Certificate of Indebtednes 31,500 1999 Certificate of Indebtednes 50,000 601,079 Net HACA Levy 540,968 3,404,623 8,901 56,021 4,175 26,276 9,853 62,009 15,661 98,564 3,240 20,391 3,134 19,723 3,973 25,005 4,319 27,181 6,855 43,145 4,384,017 601,079 3,782,938 Levy to 26.255 Tax Rate Gross 601,079 Net Levy HACA Levy 3,645,327 536,548 3,108,779 64,922 9,556 55,366 30,451 4,482 25,969 71,862 10,577 61,285 114,225 16,813 97,412 23,631 3,478 20,153 22,857 3,364 19,493 28,978 4,265 24,713 31,500 4,636 26,864 50,000 7,359 42,641 4,083,753 601,079 3,482,674 Programs included in Levy Limit General Fund Library Dam Loan Development Fund Surface Water Management projects Capital Improvements 8/31/98 1999 BUDGET NTC, Tax Rate, and Levy Information 1998 Levy Limit: $2,956,151 1998 Tax Rate: 26.255% 1998 Taxable Tax Capacity: 12,383,123 1998 Tax Capacity increase: 3.84% 1998 General Fund Ad Valorem Tax: $2,632,600 1998 Final Levy included in Limit: $2,906,501 1998 HACA: $601,385 1999 Growth Assumption Tax Capacity No growth 12,383,123 1% growth 12,506,954 2% growth 12,630,785 3% growth 12,754,617 4% growth 12,878,448 5% growth 13,002,279 6% growth 13,126,110 7% growth 13,249,942 8% growth 13,373,773 9% growth 13,497,604 10% growth 13,621,435 11% growth 13,745,267 Maximum Levy with 26.255% Tax Rate 3,251,189 3,283,701 3,316,213 3,348,725 3,381,237 3,413,748 3,446,260 3,478,772 3,511,284 3,543,796 3,576,308 3,608,820 1999 Levy Limit: $3,404,623 1999 Debt Levies: $373,504 1999 Matching Grants Levy: $64,922 1999 HACA: $601,079 Tax Rate if Levy to the Limit 30.549% 30.247% 29.950% 29.659% 29.374% 29.094% 28.820% 28.551% 28.286% 28.027% 27.772% 27.522% 8/31/98:5:00 PM 1999 CAPITAL OUTLAY & Council Administration Elections l~ng Item City Code Software Meter opy Machine Fundin~ General Fund 1,500 1,900 Internet Research Workstation ~uters - 2 File Server Upgrade Optical Scanners - 3 mputer 10,650 1 10,650 20,1 2,500 Source Equipment Equipment Certificate Reserve Department Total 1,500 27,300 20,10C & Envior. Govt. Buildin~ Police Software/Hardware for mapping system 3mputers opy Machine City Hall Building Debt Squad Cars (2) & Setup/S__ttriping Tahoe/Expedition 3,500 67,6OO 35,000 Fire Streets Parks Recreation Mobile Radios stigator Vehicle __ Chassis for Tanker 2 payment Siren ;omputer/Fuel System Upgrade Tandem Axel Truck Skid Loader tility Vehicle Bleachers Water Pump Improvements Ice Arena 6,000 6,000 6,000 8,00C $203, 30,000 31,000 17,00( 23,100 67,600 11 75,000 29,000 117,000 13,000 1 111,00C 21,000 137,000 16,000 8,000 $139 $552 8/31/98