Loading...
5.4. A & B SR 08-12-2002 Howard R , Green Company Item 5.4.A.&B. August 5, 2002 File: 806550-0030/0564 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Elk River 13065 Orono Parkway Elk River, MN 55330 RE: 175TM AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS Dear Council Members: As you are aware the public hearing/assessment hearing for the 175th Avenue Improvements is scheduled for Monday, August 12, 2002. I will have a brief prepared presentation regarding the proposed improvements and assessments of the project. Through the land acquisition phase of this project, I have had an opportunity to talk in-depth with most of the property owners along the roadway. Therefore, I do not expect significant questions regarding the actual improvement, but more so toward the assessment of the cost of the improvements. At the close of my presentation, I will be available to answer questions from the City Council and/or affected property owners. As directed previously by the City Council, bids were open for the 175th Avenue Improvements on Thursday, July 25, 2002. Consideration for accepting the lowest responsible bid and authorizing execution of the contract will be an item later in the City Council's agenda. As the City Council is aware, assessed property owners have the right to appeal the assessment of this project against their property. In order to preserve their rights to appeal, the property owner must submit a written objection to the mayor or City administrator at or before the assessment hearing. Simply orally stating an objection to the assessment at the assessment hearinq does not preserve the property owner's right to appeal the assessment. As of the date of this memo, staff has received no written objections to the proposed assessment. At the close of the public hearing/assessment hearing, the City Council should consider adopting the attached two resolutions. Resolution ordering the improvement This resolution requires a 4/5 vote of the City Council because this is a Council initiated project. Resolution adopting final assessment roll This resolution would adopt the final assessment roll. The feasibility study provides specific information relative to credits given to some of the properties along 175th Avenue because of the granting of easements with no payment. Other properties that received payment for the easements do not receive any credit. The proposed assessment roll is exactly the same as presented in the feasibility study. The assessment roll can be adopted, however, with any modification the City Council deems appropriate. Ltr-08050.2-Council 1326 Energy Park Drive · St. Paul, MN 55108 · 651/644-4389 fax 651/644-9446 toll free 888/368-4389 City Council August 5, 2002 Page Two If you have any questions regarding any of this information or would like anything else available for the public hearing/assessment hearing, please call. Sincerely, Howard R. Green Company ~urer, P.E. TJM:sgw Attachments Ltr-O80502-Cou ncil Howard R, Green Company RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY OF ELK RIVER A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE MATTER OF THE 175TM AVENUE IMPROVEMENT OF 2002 WHEREAS upon due notice properly made as required by law, the Elk River City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the 175th Avenue Improvement and has determined the amount to be assessed against each individual property as the Council deems just; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Elk River, Minnesota: The final assessment roll, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby accepted and adopted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands therein named. Each such tract of land in the assessment roll is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in an amount not less than the amount of the assessment levied against it. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments, including both principal and interest, amortized in such amount annually as is required to pay the principal with interest at 5.5% over a period of five (5) years. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification to the County Auditor of the assessment or the first installment thereof, pay to the City Treasurer the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment; except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days after the adoption of this Resolution. Prepayment may also be made after the certification of the assessment or first installment thereof by paying to the City Treasurer/County Auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid with interest. In the case of a payment made before November 15, interest will be calculated through December 31 of the year in which payment is made. If payment is made after November 15, interest will be calculated through December 31 of the next succeeding year. The City Administrator shall transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of the attached assessment roll to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Passed and adopted this 12th day of August, 2002. ATTEST: Stephanie A. Klinzing, Mayor Sandra A. Peine, City Clerk O:\Proj\806550j\Res-080502-a. 14.doc RESOLUTION 02- A RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY OF ELK RIVER A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT IN THE MATTER OF THE 175TM AVENUE IMPROVEMENT OF 2002 WHEREAS a public hearing relating to the 175th Avenue Improvement was held before the Elk River City Council after ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given; and WHEREAS the City Council has duly considered the Feasibility Report and those matter presented at the public hearing by those person desiring to be heard on the matter; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Elk River, Minnesota: The 175th Avenue Improvement is hereby ordered as recommended in the Feasibility Report revised June 2002. Passed and adopted this 12th day of August, 2002. ATTEST: Stephanie A. Klinzing, Mayor Sandra A. Peine, City Clerk O:\Proj\806550j\Res-080502-a. 10.doc August 12, 2002 City of Elk River 13065 Orono Parkway Elk River, MN 55330 Attn: City Council presiding officer/Municipal Clerk RE: Ronald & Susan Myhre, Appeal of Assessment for improvements to 175~ Avenue We contest the proposed assessment based on the following: We reside at the comer of 175t~ Avenue & Fillmore. The city representative led us to believe that if we were to be assessed for street improvements that the amount would be similar to the amount we were offered for the easement. He stated that we might not be assessed at all for street improvements because the city was anxious to get the project started. We were recently assessed for the improvements to Fillmore Street. Due to the double burden of assessments we are asking that any assessments to 175t~ Avenue be waived or adjusted. Were the homeowners at the comer of Tyler & 175t~ assessed when the Tyler street improvements were done? ~ I (Ron) worked in the defense industry and my job was eliminated due to downsizing in 1998. I have been employed in lower paying positions and on unemployment since then. We have suffered financially and are unable to afford any additional payments. ~ Much of the proposed costs are for city water and sewer that benefits others but not us. We appreciate your consideration of our above listed objections to the proposed 175t~ Street assessments. Ron and Sue Myhre 10022 175t~ Avenue N.W. Elk River, MN 55330 #763441-2139 17451 Tyler Street N.W. Elk River, MN 55330 763/441-5862 August 12, 2002 Elk River Municipal Clerk City of Elk River 1 3065 Orono Parkway Elk River, MN 55330 Dear Sirs and Madams: In regard to your July 22, 2002 letter announcing that the City Council will consider adopting an assessment for property owners along 175~ Avenue, we would like to submit the following objection for the Council's consideration: a) The property owners along 175~ avenue have had no drainage problems in the past which would require the installation of storm drainage. The soil in this area is very sandy. The existing homes along this street are from six to thirty or more years old and have had no histories of storm drainage problems. b) If installation of storm drainage, curb/gutter is being done now just because other road work is being done at the same time, please consider that the proposed curb/gutter/storm drainage is not needed by existing residents. Adding these items to the current road work seems to be an excessive effort, since the neighborhood has gotten along just fine in the past without curb/gutter/storm drainage. The only repair that is truly needed is road resurfacing, which the City should be including in its normal operating budgets. c) If the curb/gutter/storm drainage is being installed because it is an amenity desired by the upcoming housing development planned for the end of 1 75~ near Fillmore, then the developer should be responsible for the entire cost, since the existing homes along 1 75~ have had no functional need in the past for curb/gutter/storm drainage. d) We also object to the $5,000 proposed for our share of the assessment. In light of the fact that the curb/gutter/storm drainage is not needed in the first place, we believe $5,000 is an excessive tax. Sinc. /¢ William A. Gra am Geraldine K. Graham