Loading...
03-05-2007 AG DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TASKFORCE MEETING OF THE DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TASKFORCE AGENDA Monday, March 5, 2007 Elk River City Hall Upper Town Conference Room 6:00 p.m. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ I. Consider Approval of March 5t" Agenda 2. Consider Approval of February 5t"Minutes / Recap of Last Meeting 3. Public Participation Process & Final Plan Outcome 4. Purpose of March 5t" Meeting 5. Hwy 10 Presentation a. Interregional Corridor Study — City Engineer Terry Maurer b. Hwy 10 Options — Planner Chris Leeseberg C. Issues for Discussion — Small Groups/Circle 6 6. Photo "Homework" Summary 7. Next Steps 8. Final Comments "This agenda is available in alternate formats upon a 72 hour advanced notice. "Auxiliary aids and services are also available upon a 72 hour advanced notice. Please contact the City Clerk at 763-635-1000 to make a request. Examples of alternate formats may include:large print,Braille,audio tape,etc." Examples of auxiliary aids may include a sign language interpreter,assistive listening device, etc." Downtown Redevelopment Plan March 5, 2007Hwy 10 PresentationTaskforce Meeting #5 IRC Priority Ranking 55 mphTH 169 to TH 24 Medium Priority 60 mph35W to TH 169 High Priority-I TH 10 (Downtown Area)(Average Daily Trips)TH 10 & 169 Traffic TH 169 Traffic2025 83,9501998 32,40042,050 with Northstar 2025 22,3001998/2000 Additional Comments Shared vision for corridorMnDOT “subcontractor” groupScott Bradley, MnDOT Chief Landscape ArchitectHwy design lead by Hwy engineering groupNo funding in 30 yr. planTerry Humbert, MnDOT Project Manager for TH 10TH 10 through the downtown area. for $500,000 of Federal funding to further analyze request rd The Tinklenberg Group will submit a 3 OptionsEliminate one intersectionElevate highwayLower highway Lowered Highway Lowered Highway Elevated Highway Elevated Highway Eliminate One Intersection (Main Street Example) Issues for Discussion extending further west along Main Street?Should the Plan reflect the downtown area 3)recognize this?of the core downtown and should the Plan Is the land area north of Hwy 10 an extension 2)At gradeLoweredElevateddowntown?Which option for Hwy 10 is least detrimental to and/or accessed from Hwy 10?Is it important that downtown be “seen” 1) Downtown Redevelopment Plan March 5, 2007 (9 Submittals)Photo SummaryTaskforce Meeting #5 Downtown Elk River (7) SF Homes (6) Nature (5) Apartments (3) Former Napa building (2) Handke (2) “For Sale” (2) Outdoor Eating (2) Feed Mill (2)