6.3. SR 12-03-2001MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Pat Klaers, City Admini ~,/
November 26, 2001
SUBJECT: Consider Designation of Holt and Jackson Funds
Item 6.3.
On March 12, 2001, the City Council allocated into various funds the majority of the
proceeds from the Holt/Jackson land transaction. Following the spring 2001 decisions, the
Council also authorized the installation of a sidewalk along the Holt/Jackson commercial
project and funded this improvement from the land transaction proceeds. At this time,
approximately $60,000 of the land transaction proceeds remain undesignated.
At the March 12, 2001, City Council meeting, staff was requested to provide options as to
where the balance of the funds should be allocated. Some Councilmembers at that meeting
expressed interest in having the balance remain undesignated and/or not spending the
money in the near future.
It is suggested that the Council place the $60,000 balance into a reserve for special
unbudgeted projects, which develop from time to time. In a sense, this ~vould be like a
"contingency" reserve fund for the Council. For example, it would be appropriate to use this
fund if the city hired a planning consulting firm to assist in updating the comprehensive plan
and we had no funds in the 2002 budget for this activity. In the past, the Council has
authorized a YMCA study and participation in a communications/customer service study
without these activities being in the annual budget. Usually the annual budget contingency
fund can be used for these expenses, but this may not always be the case. In many respects
the more flexibility that the Council can have in addressing unforeseen expenditures the
better off we are as a municipality. Sometimes we are doing budget work 18-20 months
before an expenditure takes place and forecasting activities this far in the future can be
difficult.
If the Council would prefer to have these Holt/Jackson funds put toward a specific use, it is
suggested that the Council look at the fact that ultimately the ice arena floor in the old barn
will need replacing. When this will happen is unknown, but the expenditure is going to be
high and may even approach $500,000. Starting a reserve for this inevitable expenditure
would also be appropriate.
Other possible uses of these funds include helping with:
1. The development of the two baseball fields at YAC ($110,000').
2. The paving of the YAC parking lot ($150,000')
3. The FF&E fund for the city hall expansion project.
* Amoun~ are approximate.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council allocate the approximately $60,000 balance from
the Holt/Jackson land transaction into a council contingency reserve fund.
City Council Minutes Page 2
March 12, 2001
3°6.
REQUEST THAT THE SEASONAL BUILDING INSPECTOR POSITION BE MADE A
FULL TIME POSITION - APPROVED
RESOLUTION 01-12 ENTERING INTO AGREEMENT NO. 81236 WITH MNDOT FOR
ACQUISITION OF LANDSCAPE MATERIALS - APPROVED
COUNCILMEMBER TVEITE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
Review Use of Funds From Holt/Jackson Land Transaction
City Administrator Pat Klaers stated that the city-owned Holt and Jackson
property has been sold for $348,085. Mr. Klaers suggested that $48,085 be put into
the capital reserve fund, $150,000 into a TIF matching fund for business park
activities, and that $82,546 be used for the ice resurfacer purchase. Mr. Klaers
requested Council direction on the remaining balance of $67,454.
Mayor Klinzing inquired how the $150,000 in the TIF matching fund would be used.
Mr. Klaers stated that the money could be used for past or future TIF projects
where the city has an LGA penalty or a match requirement and that Council
action would be necessary before any funds are spent or transferred.
CouncJlmember Kuester suggested that the remaining $67,454 balance should
remain undesignated at this time.
COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ MOVED THAT $48,085 BE PUT INTO THE CAPITAL PROJECTS
RESERVE FUND, $150,000 BE PUT INTO A TIF MATCHING FUND, $82,546 FOR THE ICE
RESURFACER PURCHASE, AND THAT STAFF BRING OPTIONS TO COUNCIL AS TO
WHERE THE $67,454 REMAINING BALANCE COULD BE ALLOCATED. COUNCILMEMBER
TVEITE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
Councilmember Matin commented that he may not want to see the remaining
$67,454 balance spent right away.
5. Open Mike
Doug Franz, 19406 Dodge Street - Questioned if Item 6.3. was a public hearing.
Mayor Klinzing stated that the public hearing was closed but Council would listen
to comments.
Michael Mass, 19374 Baldwin Street - Stated he had an issue with the names of
the streets all being similar in the proposed Hillside Development. He also stated
that the proposed width of Dodge Street was too narrow to be safe.
Request for Preliminary Plat Approval (Twin Lakes Townhomes 2nd Addition, Public
Hearinq - Case No. P 01-04
Request for Conditional Use Permit for Site Plan - Twin Lake Townhomes 2nd
Addition, Public Hearin.q - Case No. CU 01-04
Staff report submitted by Director of Planning Michele McPherson. Senior Planner
Scott Harlicker stated that the developer, Phoenix Enterprises, is requesting
preliminary plat approval of Twin Lakes Townhomes 2nd Addition and that they
would like to amend the site plan for this addition. Mr. Harlicker stated that the
developer has acquired additional land and is requesting to put in an easterly
access on Twin Lakes Road, which would be in compliance with County
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Item # 4. I.
MEMORANDUM
Mayor and City Council
Pat Klaers, City Administrator
March 12, 200 I
Review Use of Funds from Holt/Jackson Land Transaction
The city owned Holt and Jackson property has been sold for a commercial development
project. After closing costs the city received $348,085.
It was a very long and difficult process to assemble this property with clear fide. Part of the
side was Right-of-Way and part of the property was owned by the Elk River Associated
Investors, Inc. In exchange for this Association deeding the property to the city, I indicated
in a November 30, 1995, letter to them that (if the site sells) I would recommend to the
Council that 50% of the revenues be dedicated toward Business Park or Industrial Park
development.
Assembling, platting, and getting clear tide to this property took years and the efforts of the
city was contested by various groups throughout the process. Ultimately, the city did get
clear tide (Order and Decree of Registration) in order to sell the property. Prior to selling the
site, the city also had to provide sewer and water and this involved additional expenses as the
utilities from the residential development around the cemetery did not get to the site and the
water line from the northern part of Elk Park Center had not been looped through this area.
In total, the city has somewhere in the neighborhood of $45-50,000 invested in assembling
this property and providing it with full utilities.
Furthermore, on June 14, 1999, the City Council purchased an Ice Resurfacer for the arena.
The cost was $82,546 and the motion stated that money from the Holt and Jackson Avenue
site be used to reimburse the reserve fund which originally financed this purchase.
A summary of the figures looks something like the following:
Revenues 348,085
- 48,085
300,000
-150,000
150,000
- 82,546
Balance $67,454
(goes back into the capital projects reserve fund)
(for business park activity)
(for ice resurfacer purchase)
It is recommended that the money that goes toward business park activities actually go into a
TIF matching fund. As the City Council knows, there is a penalty placed upon municipalities
with each new TIF district and this results in either an LGA loss or a local match
requirement. It is suggested that this $150,000 be dedicated toward this use.
Staff needs Council input on what to do with the $67,454 balance that is unallocated. These
funds could be used for any purpose including paying for part of the Library site expansion,
funding new bleachers at the Ice Arena, financing some of the improvements at YAC,
adding some beautification improvements to the downtown project such as tree grates, trash
receptacles, planters, etc. or it could go into equipment reserve or any other reserve, such as
one for a community center or YMCA project. There is no hurry for the Council to make
this decision - and I need to know if you want more information on various options.
Action Requested
The City Council is requested to use the proceeds from the Holt and Jackson transaction as
follows:
· $48,085 into the Capital Projects reserve
· $150,000 into a Business Park TIF match reserve
· $82,546 into the NSP reserve
It is recommended that the City Council consider where to allocate the $67,454 remaining
balance.
Howard R, Green Company
Item 8.1 - 8.6.
November 20, 2001
File: 230000M-0325
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Elk River
13065 Orono Parkway
P.O. Box 490
Elk River, MN 55330-0490
RE: TRANSPORTATION ISSUES
Dear Council Members:
As you are aware, the focus of Monday evening's City Council meeting will be various
transportation issues within the City. This letter is intended to give you a brief background on
some of the topics we will be prepared to discuss with the City Council:
1. INTERREGIONAL CORRIDOR STUDIES
MnDOT is currently performing planning studies on seven interregional corridors
throughout the State of Minnesota. Two of these studies happen to cross in the City of
Elk River. These are the corridor studies on TH 10 from 35W in Mounds View to Clear
Lake, and the TH 101FFH 169 Study from Rogers to Garrison. We have asked the
engineer working on the TH 10 Study to be available at the meeting to discuss
specifically the recommendations that will be coming forth relative to TH 10 in the City of
Elk River. We will have available the drawings and information for the TH 169 Study
relative, again, to proposals for inside the City of Elk River.
It is important to point out that these are only planning studies at this point in time. Each
of these studies, when they are concluded, will develop a list of deficiencies in the
corridor and potential projects to remedy these deficiencies. It is likely that the seven
interregional corridor studies will generate several billion dollars worth of identified
improvements that are necessary. In order to implement any of these improvements,
first of all, money needs to be appropriated. Once money is appropriated to a specific
project, there is a fairly long process, including environmental studies, an ElS if
necessary, preliminary and final plan preparation, and land acquisition, followed by
construction. The typical project would take at least five years to implement once money
has been appropriated. MnDOT has appropriated a few hundred million dollars for
interregional corridor improvements. As you might guess, there will likely be stiff
competition for these dollars and no one knows at this time which interregional corridors
or which projects on those corridors will be allocated monies from this pool. Also, it is
unclear how quickly and how much additional dollars MnDOT will be able to earmark for
interregional corridor improvements.
Ltr 11-20-01 Council
1326 Energy Park Drive · St. Paul, MN 55108 ° 651/644-4389 fax 651/644-9446 toll free 888/368-4389
Honorable Mayor and City Council
November 20, 2001
Page Two
In conclusion, it is unlikely that any improvements on TH 10 or TH 169 in the City of Elk
River would actually begin construction any sooner than five years, and more likely it
would be in the 15 to 20 year time frame.
TRANSPORTATION PLAN
We will be available to discuss components in a typical transportation plan and to listen
to input from the City Council relative to their view of the type of transportation planning
needed for the City of Elk River. As you are aware, several years ago a plan was put
together that was called a transportation plan. In reality, that plan only contained one
component of an overall transportation plan. That component was corridor preservation.
That transportation plan dealt with identifying and preserving corridors for Tyler Street
and an east-west corridor across the northern part of the urban area of the City of Elk
River, essentially connecting Anoka County with TH 10 at the west end of the City.
Many other issues that are typically contained within a transportation plan were not dealt
with by this original study.
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION STUDY
A draft copy of the Pavement Rehabilitation Study is enclosed with this letter. Staff
would like to go through our vision for this process. As you review this document, keep
in mind that at this point in time it only deals with the old core City streets within the City
of Elk River. It is anticipated that once the City embarks on a pavement rehabilitation
program, it will go on indefinitely. By the time the streets in the old core City are updated
over a course of many years, there will be other streets within the City that are reaching
the same age and should be considered for the same type of improvement.
'I75TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS
We will be prepared to update the City Council on the progress on this project relative to
land acquisition, preparation and approval of plans and specifications, and the issue of
whether or not sanitary sewer and water improvements should be included in the project.
OTHER TRANSPORTATION-RELATED ISSUES
There are several other transportation-related issues that can or should be discussed as
time permits. These would include:
· Waco Street/TH 10 signalization
· TH 169/County Road 33 interchange update
· Main Street east of TH 169 left turn lane issue
· Jackson Avenue/School Street signal modifications update
· TH 10/171st Avenue signal update
Ltr 11-20-01 Council
Howard R, Green Company
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Honorable Mayor and City Council
November 20, 2001
Page Three
If you have any other issues you would like me to be prepared to discuss, or any specific
information you would like me to have available concerning items raised in this letter, please
call.
Sincerely,
Howard R. Green Company
Terry J. Maurer, P.E.
TJM:tw
Ltr 11-20-01 Council
Howard R, Green Company
QQNSULTING ENGINEERS
of
DRAFT
R. Green
November 2001
City
Pavement Rehabilitation Report
For
The City of Elk River
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly licensed professional
engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Terry J. Maurer, P.E.
Lic. No. 15316
Prepared by:
Date
Kdstina Thompson, E.I.T.
Howard R. Green Company
1326 Energy Park Ddve
St. Paul, MN 55108
Phone: 651-644-4389
Fax: 651-644-9446
Howard
R. Green Company
Table of Contents
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1
STREET EVALUATION ........................................................................... 2
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS .............................................................. 3
Street ............................................................................................ 3
Sanitary Sewer ............................................................................. 4
Watermain .................................................................................... 5
Storm Sewer ................................................................................. 5
Right-of-Way and Easements ....................................................... 5
Permits .......................................................................................... 6
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST AND PHASING ...................................... 7
FINANCING ............................................................................................. 8
ASSESSMENTS .................................................................................... 10
PROJECT SCHEDULE ......................................................................... 13
CONCLUSION ....................................................................................... 14
APPENDIX
Howard R. Green Company
Project No. 802400J
Pavement Rehabilitation Report
City of Elk River, Minnesota
I.INTRODUCTION
In 1997, Howard R. Green Company began working on the Pavement Rehabilitation
Program. The streets within the old core City were beginning to deteriorate with age
and had advanced past the useful life span of the bituminous surface and concrete curb
and gutter. It was determined that the most feasible method of pavement rehabilitation
for several of the roads was a full reconstruction. As the first step towards identifying
the streets that were in need of reconstruction, the streets within the old core City were
inspected. After the inspection was completed, the project was put on hold for several
years, but in May 2001 City Council authorized the preparation of a Pavement
Rehabilitation Report for the City of Elk River to serve as a guideline for street
reconstruction projects within the City.
There are several issues that this report will address including:
· Street Evaluation
· Proposed Improvements
· Estimated Project Cost and Phasing
· Financing
· Assessments
· Project Schedule
The area evaluated as part of this report is outlined on Exhibit 1. The area is identified
as the old core City for the purpose of this report.
The pavement rehabilitation report addresses how to rehabilitate one of the City of Elk
River's largest investments, its paved street network. The report identifies the need for
the project and provides a framework for the reconstruction process.
-1-
Howard R. Green Company
Project No. 802400J
Pavement Rehabilitation Report
City of Elk River, Minnesota
Ii. STREET EVALUATION
Due to the relatively young age of the streets within the City and proactive street
maintenance efforts, the City of Elk River has not had a need for large-scale street
reconstruction projects in the past. However, the streets are continuing to deteriorate
with age. Seal coating and overlay projects are no longer adequate measures to
increase the pavement life of a number of streets within the City. Total street
reconstruction is the only cost-effective means of continuing the City's proactive street
efforts and ensuring an adequate means of transportation for the residents. In addition
to rehabilitating street pavement, a total street reconstruction will allow for correction of
existing drainage problems through the construction of concrete curb and gutter,
modifying street grades, and the installation of a storm sewer collection system where
needed.
In 1997, a survey of the streets within the old core City was completed.
shows the streets that were determined to be in need of reconstruction.
showed severe signs of advanced pavement deterioration.
Exhibit 1
The streets
There are several signs that indicate pavement deterioration. They include:
Alligator Cracking - 2"'= Street
between York Avenue and Xenia
Avenue
-2-
Howard R. Green Company
Project No. 802400J
Pavement Rehabilitation Report
City of Elk River, Minnesota
III. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
At the time of construction of many of the streets within the old core City, there were no
guidelines in place to ensure uniform construction. Design standards are now in place
and all streets would be reconstructed in accordance with the current and proposed
standards. In conjunction with street reconstruction, improvements to existing utilities
including watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer will be completed. A detailed
description of each proposed improvement is provided below. Also included are
digitally prepared photographs showing "before" and "after" proposed improvements.
The proposed street improvements include:
· Uniform road width of 32 feet face-of-curb to face-of-curb
All residential streets would be constructed to a uniform width of 32 feet face-of-
curb to face-of-curb with B618 concrete curb and gutter. Residential streets that
do not currently meet this requirement would be examined to determine if
widening or narrowing the street is feasible during the preliminary design stage.
There are some streets within the City where a wider street width is necessary
based on average daily traffic counts, such as collector and county roads, and
where parking occurs on both sides of the street as a regular occurrence, such
as Main Street. In order to maintain a high level of service on these heavily used
streets, a width that meets the traffic needs would be used. Concrete driveway
aprons will be constructed at all driveway locations regardless of driveway type.
-3-
Howard R. Green Company
Project No. 802400J
Pavement Rehabilitation Report
City of Elk River, Minnesota
· Streets constructed to a 7-ton design
Urban residential streets should be constructed to a minimum 7-ton design.
Based on typical soils in Elk River, the proposed pavement section for residential
streets consists of 6 inches of Class 5 aggregate base, 2 inches of bituminous
base course, and 1% inches of bituminous wear course. The proposed street
section will need to be verified by a geotechnical investigation during the design
phase.
· Installation of concrete sidewalk
Proposed improvements also include constructing 6-foot wide sidewalk where
feasible on both sides of the road, and replacing existing concrete sidewalk
where necessary.
· Installation of street lights
Street lighting has been included as part of the proposed improvements to allow
for upgrading of intersection lighting and installation of street lights where
necessary for improved traffic safety. According to Elk River Municipal Utilities
Standard on Street Lighting, street lights shall be installed at all major
intersections and at mid-block provided that no lights are spaced closer than 300
feet. Street lighting layout shall be approved by the Elk River Municipal Utilities
and shall be consistent with the standard type of lighting currently being utilized
by the City to provide for a uniform City Street Lighting System.
· Standard boulevard restoration will consist of sodding all disturbed areas.
The typical street section is shown in Exhibit 2.
The majority of the City of Elk River is currently served with sanitary sewer as shown on
Exhibit 3. At this time, no specific sanitary sewer improvements are proposed;
however, before street reconstruction, all of the sanitary sewer within the project area
should be televised. Through reviewing televising reports, it will be possible to identify
any areas where deterioration of the sewer main from age and/or tree roots has
occurred and is compromising the system. Deterioration of the sanitary sewer mains
allows clean ground water to enter the mains. Treating this clean water is an
unnecessary expense and can be addressed if necessary during street reconstructions.
A general proactive street and utility reconstruction and maintenance program is the
best way to address infiltration and inflow due to sewer line deterioration. Minimal
improvements have been included in the cost estimate.
-4-
'W
60'
52.00' FACE TO FACE
16.00' 16.00'
B618 CONCRETE CURB AN[ GUTTER
-
13.50' 13.50'
6'
6' WIDE CONC.---~
SIDEWALK 5'
SIDEWALK
-- 1.5" 2550 TYPE MV5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE
-- TACK COAT
2" 2550 TYPE LV5 NONWEARING COURSE MIXTURE
6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE
APPROVED SUBGRADE
EXHIBIT
mlver
0
C
Z
(~ c)
--
"~ Z
-<
c
C)
z
~0
or-
z
~,.0 -'~
'-<
~ 1C; = lQ 10
LECEND
STREET RECONSTRUCTION
SANITARY SEWER LINE W/
PIPE SIZES & MANHOLES
WASTEWATER
-- TREATMENT
PLANT
CORE CITY STREETS
PAVEMENT REHABILATION PROGR
SANITARY SEWER EXHIBIT
EXHIBI
Howard R. Green Company
Project No. 802400J
Pavement Rehabilitation Report
City of Elk River, Minnesota
The City Engineer and General Manager of Elk River Municipal Utilities have identified
several areas where watermain improvements are necessary due to inadequate water
flow from east to west due to small sized mains. The small sized mains also result in
inadequate fire protection. The existing water system, with proposed improvements
noted, is shown on Exhibit 4. The improvements include:
· Installation ofwatermain
Currently, there is no watermain on York Avenue from Main Street to 2nd Street,
2nd Street from York Avenue to Xenia Avenue, and Xenia Avenue from 2nd
Street to Main Street. Six-inch watermain would be installed at the time of street
reconstruction.
· Upsizing of4-inch watermain
Currently all areas between Main Street and Trunk Highway 10 are served with
4-inch watermain. This small watermain size has resulted in Iow fire flows and
high head losses across the 4-inch main. All 4-inch watermain will be upsized to
a minimum of 8 inches as necessary.
The most crucial improvement to the overall water system is the upsizing of the 4-inch
watermain along 5th Street from Jackson Street to Main Street to provide adequate fire
flow protection to residential homes and businesses.
The existing storm sewer collection system is shown on Exhibit 5. Several streets
within the study area are not currently served with storm sewer. When streets are
reconstructed to an urban section, storm sewer will be constructed. During the
preliminary design phase, the collection system will be reviewed to determine if the
current pipe and storm sewer outlets are adequate. An example of existing storm sewer
that needs to be reconstructed is in the Upland/Tipton area. The existing storm sewer
currently runs through properties. The storm sewer location needs to be corrected so
that it is within the public right-of-way.
Approximately thirty feet of right-of-way (ROW) is necessary on either side of centerline
of the street to construct the proposed improvements. Currently, the majority of the
streets within the project area have adequate ROW. The streets that have less than 60-
feet are:
~0~ (NOT IN USE)
(NOT IN USE)
100,0OO GALLON
WA ]'ER TOWER
WELL ~1 (ABANDONED
,1,000,000 GALLO~
WATER TOWER
STATION
LEGEND
STREET RECONSTRUCTION
INSTALL WATERMAIN
INCREASE WATERMAIN SIZE
WATERMAIN W/ PIPE
SIZES &: VALVES
41t- HYDRANT
CORE CITY STREETS
PAVEMENT REHABILATION PROGR
WATER MAIN EXHIBIT
EXHIBI
~M
1!
STREET RECONSTRUCTION
STORM SEWER W/ PIPE
SIZES & STRUCTURES
CORE CITY STREETS
PAVEMENT REHABILATION PROGRAM
STORM SEWER EXHIBIT
~,~ EXHIBIT
5
Howard R. Green Company
Project No. 802400J
Pavement Rehabilitation Report
City of Elk River, Minnesota
· Upland Avenue from Main Street to Trunk Highway 10
· 5th Street from 5% Street to Gates Avenue
· Gates Avenue from 5th Street to 5% Street
· 5% Street from Gates Avenue to 5th Street
During preliminary design phase, it will be determined if additional right-of-way will be
necessary to construct the proposed improvements.
Temporary construction easements may be needed if grading is necessary outside of
the permanent ROW due to possible changes in the vertical street alignment. During
the preliminary design phase, necessary easement locations will be determined and
temporary construction easements acquired from individual property owners.
As with all construction projects, there are several permits that will need to be obtained
prior to construction of the proposed improvements. The required permits will depend
on the specific improvements of the project. They include, but are not limited to:
Agency
· Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
· Minnesota Department of Health
· Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
· Sherburne County
· Mn/DOT
Improvement
Sanitary Sewer
Watermain
Grading
Work within their ROW
Work within their ROW
-6-
Howard R. Green Company
Project No. 802400j Pavement Rehabilitation Report
City of Elk River, Minnesota
IV. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST AND PHASING
Exhibit 1 illustrates the streets that need to be reconstructed at this time. The financial
burden on the City that would result from the reconstruction of all these streets in a
single construction season makes one large project unfeasible. However, the project
size must be large enough in scale to insure that COmpetitive bids will be received.
Therefore, the streets have been grouped together into projects that have a total project
cost of apProximately $1,000,000.00 using today's construction costs. In addition to
financial concerns, the location of the streets was taken into account to minimize the
frequency of the construction impacts to residents when determining which streets
the
should be grouped together. In addition, the streets that contain watermain that needs
to be upsized for fire flow protection are proposed to be reconstructed in the first few
phases.
The base improvements used in determining the $1,000,000.00 project size includes:
· Reconstruction of the roadway
· Installation/Improvement of the storm sewer if necessary
· Installation of sidewalk
· Street lighting
· Boulevard Restoration
· 28% overhead
The 28% overhead is in accordance with the City's assessment manual. It includes city
administration, engineering design, construction staking and inspection, and fiscal and
legal costs.
The cost of the installation of watermain and/or sanitary sewer, or the repair of either
system would be in addition to the $1,000,000.00 costs. These costs were not included
due to the separate means of finance used to fund these types of improvements, SUch
as Elk River Municipal Utilities and the general sanitary sewer budget.
A Preliminary construction cost estimate for each street is provided in the Appendix.
The estimates are based on construction costs from recent years. An increase in
construction costs from inflation has not been added, but it should be noted that future
project costs would be higher due to inflation of construction costs and/or construction
materials. As each individual project is authorized, a more detailed cost estimate will be
COmpleted with revised construction costs in the feasibility phase.
No costs have been included for the acquisition of utility easements and rights-of-way.
The proposed project phasing is shown on Exhibit 6.
h
JLL
imiii
PROPOSED YEAR OF STREET
RECONSTRUCTION
2005
2005
2007
2009
2011
2015
2015
CORE CITY STREETS
PAVEMENT REHABILATION PROGRAM
STREET RECONSTRUCTION EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT
6
Howard R. Green Company
Project No. 802400J
Pavement Rehabilitation Report
City of Elk River, Minnesota
V. FINANCING
The improvements discussed in this report are proposed to be financed through a
number of different methods. These include:
· Assessment to benefiting properties
Assessments play an essential role in funding street reconstruction projects. The
reconstruction of a street improves the City transportation system for residents in
the community, however the major benefactor of the improvements is the
adjacent property owners. They are the primary users of the improved street and
typically, property values increase due to the reconstruction. Therefore, a portion
of the street reconstruction cost should be assessed to all adjacent, benefiting
property owners. The method and determination of the assessments is noted in
the following section.
· Elk River Municipal Funds
In areas currently served with watermain, it is anticipated that improvements to
the system will need to be completed in conjunction with the street reconstruction
projects. Improvements may be as minor as additional hydrant installation for
increased fire protection, replacement of existing hydrants and valves, and
isolated watermain replacement; or as significant as total watermain replacement
due to deterioration of the in-place watermain and upsizing of some of the
existing 4-inch watermains. The funding for repairs or replacement of an existing
watermain system would be paid for through Elk River Municipal Utility funds.
Sources of these funds include Water Availability Charges (WAC) and normal
water usage fees.
In some areas that are not currently served, a minimum of a 6-inch watermain
would be installed for fire protection and domestic water service at the time of
street reconstruction. The cost for the watermain and all appurtenances would
be funded through assessments to the benefiting properties.
In the event, an individual property does not have existing watermain service;
one would be installed and financed through assessments to the benefiting
property.
· Other Utility funds
As described previously within the report, all existing sanitary sewer lines will be
televised for cracks, breaks, and infiltration to determine areas in which repair is
needed. The repairs will be financed through the general sanitary sewer funds.
-8-
Howard R. Green Company
Project No. 802400J
Pavement Rehabilitation Report
City of Elk River, Minnesota
In the event, an individual property does not have existing sanitary sewer service;
one would be installed and financed through assessments to the benefiting
property.
· Surface Water Management funds
Several of the streets within the project area do not have concrete curb and
gutter or a storm drainage system. When the road is reconstructed to an urban
section, it will be necessary to address the drainage and install the necessary
additions to the storm sewer system. In addition, if repairs are necessary to the
existing storm sewer it would be completed as part of the street project. Surface
water management funds would be contributed for storm drainage
improvements.
City contribution
In recent budget cycles, the City Council has dedicated a portion of the City levy
to a fund for future pavement rehabilitation projects. The purpose of this fund is
to provide an additional means of financing for street reconstruction projects
when the improvement costs exceed funds that can be obtained through
assessments and other sources.
· StateAid Municipal funds
An additional funding source available for only some of the streets within the city
is the City's Municipal State Aid Account. Some streets, which provide key
connections between State Highways, County Roads, and other major City
streets, have been designated as part of Elk River's Municipal State Aid (MSA)
street system. These streets typically carry higher volumes of traffic than
residential city streets and may have increased width and weight capacity to
handle the traffic volumes and loads. Due to the extra width and design
standards, the reconstruction costs are higher than that of a normal residential
city street. The portion of the construction cost of the reconstruction of MSA
streets is eligible for funding through the City's MSA account. However, to insure
equitable treatment of all property owners within the City the MSA funds should
not be used to lower the property assessment to adjacent property owners.
-9-
Howard R. Green Company
Project No. 802400J
Pavement Rehabilitation Report
City of Elk River, Minnesota
VI. ASSESSMENTS
The current Elk River Assessment Manual does provide some details on how to
proceed with assessments for street reconstruction projects. However, the current
manual proposes to assess street reconstruction projects based on a lot's front footage.
It is proposed that the assessment policy be revised to assess improvements against
the abutting or benefiting properties within the project area on a per unit basis. A "per
unit" assessment would consist of assessing a residential lot that could not be
subdivided as one unit. Lots that can be subdivided would be assessed multiple units
as appropriate. In addition commercial, industrial, and multi-use properties such as
apartments, schools and churches would be assessed more than one unit as
determined on a case-by-case basis. The proposed assessment per unit is $5,000 for
residential properties, which includes street, curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer,
and street lighting. The maximum assessment rate per unit should be adjusted annually
by the construction cost index.
It is recommended that the following guidelines be adopted and added to the
assessment policy to ensure equitable assessments for all affected property owners. It
should be noted that the assessment guidelines that follow have been prepared based
on circumstances and factors know today. It is recognized that modifications may be
necessary from time to time to ensure equitable treatment of affected properties. The
proposed additions or revisions to the assessment policy are as follows:
The cost for improving intersections of streets and similar parts of public
improvements not immediately fronting on either private or publicly owned property
should be distributed over the benefited properties within the assessment area.
A single-family residential lot should be assessed on a per unit basis in accordance with
the following guidelines:
· Interior lots - Interior lots fronting on streets should be assessed at 100% of
the per unit basis.
~UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT
STANDARD 1-UNIT LOT
-10-
Howard R. Green Company
Project No. 802400J
Pavement Rehabilitation Report
City of Elk River, Minnesota
Any lot where subdivision is possible based on zoning requirements and
placement of existing structures on the lot should be assessed on a per unit
basis for each sub-dividable lot.
UNIT UNIT UNIT UNITS UNIT
SUBDIVIDABLE LOT
Corner lots - Corner lots that are bordered by two City streets should be
assessed at 100% of the per unit assessment regardless of where the
improvement is.
LOT B~
L01 C LOT O
CORNER LOT
ON TWO CITY STREETS
Double frontage units - If a lot faces on one street and backs onto another, it
should be assessed 100% of the per unit assessment regardless of where the
improvement is. An exception is if the lot can be subdivided, in which case
the lot would be assessed on a per unit basis for each sub-dividable lot.
-11 -
Howard R. Green Company
Project No. 802400J
Pavement Rehabilitation Report
City of Elk River, Minnesota
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
FRONT & BACK
All properties other than residential including commercial, industrial, and multi-use such
as apartments, churches and schools should be assessed based on the following:
· All of the above shall be assessed an appropriate number of units as
determined on a case-by-case basis.
Exhibit 7 shows the zoning for the properties within the old core City.
-12-
R2b
Mecrlum In~
8oki Waste Faclty
R4
Antenna Tower
IVl~eral Excavation
LECEND
Sbl;lle Fam~ Reaidential
Single Fam~ Residential
Sbgle F. am~ Reeidential
S~31e Farna'y Residential
Two Fan'a~ Reaidenfial
Two Fe~ Reaidenlial
Townhouse/Mulliple Fama~ ReaidentiaJ
MullJple Fame/Reaidefflial
CORE CITY STREETS
PAVEMENT REHABILATION PR~M
ZONING MAP EXHIBIT
I-k:l~ed R (~n Cx3ml3a~
~,~ EXHIBIT
7
Howard R. Green Company
Project No. 802400J
Pavement Rehabilitation Report
City of Elk River, Minnesota
VII. PROJECT SCHEDULE
In order for each project to be successful, adequate time needs to be allowed for public
involvement in the process. To allow sufficient time for public informational meetings
and individual feedback on design concerns, it is proposed that a construction project
be authorized every other year. A tentative schedule for a typical construction project,
as provided in Table 1, is based upon guidelines established in Minnesota State
Statues, Chapter 429, Local Improvements, Special Assessments. These dates will be
revised as a project develops.
Table 1. Proiect Schedule
Identify pavement rehabilitation project
and prepare initial feasibility study July Year 1
including topographic survey
Hold a public information hearing with
September
affected property owners
Prepare a formal feasibility study, which
would include public informational October
hearing input.
Hold public hearing before City Council November
November thru
Prepare plans and specifications February
Coordinate walk-through of affeCted
March Year 2
properties with 95% comPleted plans
Bid project April
Hold assessment hearing April
Award Contract May
Begin Construction May
Construction substantially complete September
Final lift of bituminous placed and any June Year 3
punch list work completed
Final project with Contractor July
Begin new Pavement Rehabilitation
Program improvement project August
It is recommended that the first project be authorized in early spring of the first year the
project is to proceed in. This is earlier than the typical project schedule provided in
Table I and would allow for adequate time for City staff and Council to become familiar
with the process.
-13-
Howard R. Green Company
Project No. 802400J
Pavement Rehabilitation Report
City of Elk River, Minnesota
VIII. CONCLUSION
In order to maintain the integrity of street network system, it is the recommendation of
the report to proceed with the reconstruction projects as they have been outlined. As
the projects progress the streets scheduled for reconstruction can be evaluated and
revised based on comments from residents.
The City Council should take the following actions in order to proceed with the
reconstruction process:
· The report should be adopted
· The maximum "per unit" assessment rate for residential properties should be
finalized and adopted.
· Authorize televising of the sanitary sewer.
· Order feasibility study and preliminary survey for the first project.
This report focuses on the streets within the old core City. The streets within this area
are among the oldest in the City and have reached the end of their useful lifespan and
in order to maintain an adequate means of public transportation within the City of Elk
River the streets should be reconstructed. As time progresses and the streets are
rehabilitated, there will be areas outside of the old core City where the streets will be
approaching the end of their useful life. At that time it will be necessary to expand the
pavement rehabilitation process to include other areas of the City.
Pavement rehabilitation does not eliminate the need for preventative maintenance such
as seal coating and overlay programs. Seal coating and overlay projects enhance and
prolong the lifespan of the bituminous pavement. Through reconstruction and
preventative maintenance programs the City will be able to provide residents with a safe
and effective transportation system.
-14-
Howard R. Green Company
Project No. 802400J
Pavement Rehabilitation Report
City of Elk River, Minnesota
APPENDIX
Pavement Rehuuilitation Program 11/12/01
Street Improvements Schedule
STREET 2ND ST. 2ND ST. 2ND ST. 2ND ST. 3RD ST. 3RD ST. 3RD ST.
FROM RAILROAD DR. FREEPORT YORK EVANS IRVING HOLT GATES
TO FREEPORT EVANS XENIA CUL-DE-SAC HOLT GATES EVANS
COMMON EXCAVATION CY $ 10.00 579.4 770.0 727,2 913.9 797.2 855.6 1567.2
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 3.00 662.2 880.0 831.1 1618.9 1594.4 1857.8 2686.7
REMOVE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0
{EMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF $ 3.50 0.0 0.0 0m0
MAILBOX RELOCATION LS $ 500.00 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 9,50 0.0 0.0 0,6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS V TON $ 10.50 378.8 504.6 476.7 602.2 520.9 559.7 1027.(
TYPE 41A, WEAR COUSE MIXTURE TON $ 35.00 118,8 157.9 149.1 187.4 163.5 175.5 321.4
TYPE 31B, BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON $ 34.00 92.4 122.8 116.0 145.8 127.2 136.5 250.0
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $ 1.50 48.0 63.8 60,3 75,7 66.1 70.9 129.9
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DESIGN B618 LF $ 8.00 596.0 792.0 748.0 940.0 820.0 880.0 1612.0
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AND APRON SY $ 34.00 15.8 47.3 47.3 126.2 15.8 64.3 94.7
2" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SY $ 15.00 0.0 99.6 99.6 373.3 49.8 49.1 273.8
CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 1788.0 4752.0 2244.0 5640.0 2460.0 2640.0 9672.0
PEDESTRIAN RAMP EA $ 300.00 2.0 4.0 2.C 4.0 2.0 2.(3 4.0
SODDING, LAWN AND BOULEVARD SY $ 3.00 662.2 880.0 831.1 1044.4 911.1 977.8 1791 .1
FURNISH & INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE C SF $ 28.00 6.3 6.3 0.C 6,3 6.3 6.3 12.5
FURNISH & INSTALL STREET SIGNS EA $ 200.00 1.0 1.0 0.0 1,0 1.0 0.C 2.0
ADJUST GATE VALVE EA $ 150.00 0.0 1.0 0.C 1.0 2.0 0.C 0.0
ADJUST MANHOLE EA $ 200.00 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.C 3.0
STORM SEWER LF $ 50.00 298.0 396.0 374,C 470.0 410.0 440.0 806.0
STREET LIGHTING LS $ 200.00 1.0 1.0 I ,O 1.0 I ,0 1 .C 1.0
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 47,168.02 $ 71,320.17 $ 61,114.65 $ 92,417.26 $ 67,270.97 $ 73,374.83 $ 147,282.79
28% OVERHEAD: $ 13,207.05 $ 19,969.65 $ 17,112.10 $ 25,876.83 $ 18,835.87 $ 20,544.95 $ 41,239.18
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 60,375.06 $ 91,289.82 $ 78,226.75 $ 118,294.10 $ 86,106.84 $ 93,919.78 $ 188,521.97
TOTAL COST: $ 6,936,053.65
O:\Proj\802400j\costest-report 1
FROM
TO
CY
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY
REMOVE SIDEWALK SF
REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GU'I-rER LF
MAILBOX RELOCATION LS
MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY
AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS V TON
TYPE 41A, WEAR COUSE MIXTURE TON
TYPE 31B, BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL
CONCRETE CURB & GU'I-TER, DESIGN B618 LF
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AND APRON SY
2" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SY
CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF
PEDESTRIAN RAMP EA
SODDING, LAWN AND BOULEVARD SY
FURNISH & INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE C SF
FURNISH & INSTALL STREET SIGNS EA
ADJUST GATE VALVE EA
ADJUST MANHOLE EA
STORM SEWER LF
STREET LIGHTING LS
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST:
28% OVERHEAD:
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
tOTAL COST:
Pavement Reh,~litation Program
Street Improvements Schedule
JACKSON OXFORD MORTON
LOWELL KING PROCTOR TH 10 NORFOLK
$ 10.00 606. 600., 830.: 437 830.
$ 3.00 1040., 1030.~ 1992 1050. 1992.'
$ 2.50 0., 0.1 4270.0 1125 2135]
$ 3.50 0.0 0.0 854.0 0.0 854.
$ 500.00 O.C 0.0 0.0 O.
$ 9.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.(
$ 10.50 397.7 394.2
542.~ 285.5 543.9
$ 35.00 124.4 123.: 170.3 89.7 170.3
$ 34.00 96.; 95J 132., 69., 132.,
$ 1.50 49. 68,~ 36.; 68J
$ 8.00 I..( 618. 854.[
$ 34.00 450.~ 854.(
112.(, 23.7 32J 47.;
$ 15,00 24. 74.7 24.~ 0.( 149.:
$ 2,50 0,0 5124 1350. 2562.0
$ 300.00 0.0 4.0
$ 3.00 693.: 686.7 948. 2.0
500.0 948J
$ 28.00 6.3 6.3
$ 200.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
$ 150.00 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
$ 200.00 1.0 1.0
1 .C 1.0 1.0
$ 50.00 312.£ 309] 427.0 225.0
$ 200.00 1 .¢ 427.0
1.0 1.0
$ 46,068.38 $ 49,220.49 91,351.36 $ 41,116.35 ~; 81,366.76
$ 12,899.15 $ 13,781.74 $ 25,578.38 $ 11,512.58 $ 22,782.69 $
$ 58,967.52 $ 63,002.22 $ 116,929.74 $ 52,628.93 $ 104,149.46 $
6,936,053.65
NORFOLK
OXFORD
2240.
4800.~
960.~
0.0
611.2
191,4
148,9
77.;
960.1
80.'
124.4
1066.7
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
480.0
1.0
105,377.66
29,505.74
134,883.40
11/12/01
PROCTOR
QUINN
834.
2002.1
4290]
858
0.0
0.0
545.,
171.
133]
69.'
858.(
114.:
24.
5148.~
953.;
1,0
0.0
1.0
429.~
$ 94,684.96
$ 26,511.79
$ 121,196.75
O:~Proj\8024OOj\costest-report
Pavement Reh~,,~litation Program 11/12/01
Street Improvements Schedule
STREET 4TH ST. 5TH ST. 5 1/2TH ST. 5TH ST. 5TH ST. 5TH ST. 5TH ST.
FROM QUINN SEYMOUR GATES NORFOLK OXFORD PROCTOR QUINN
TO RUSH END HOLT OXFORD PROCTOR QUINN RUSH
COMMON EXCAVATION CY $ 10.00 830,3 565.8 1102.5 1098.6 824.4 840.0 834.2
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 3.00 1992.7 1164.0 1701.0 1946.1 1884.4 1920.0 1906.7
REMOVE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 2135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4240.0 2160.0 2145.(~
REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF $ 3.50 854.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 848.0 0.0 858.0
MAILBOX RELOCATION LS $ 500.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 9.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.7 0.0 0.0 0.O
AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS V TON $ 10.50 541.7 371.0 721.2 718.7 554.9 565.3 561.8
TYPE 41A, WEAR COUSE MIXTURE TON $ 35.00 170.3 116.0 226.1 225.3 174.9 178.2 177.~
TYPE 31B, BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON $ 34.00 132.4 90.3 175.8 175.2 136.0 138.6 137.6
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $ 1.50 68.8 46.9 91.4 91.0 70.7 72.0 71.5
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DESIGN B618 LF $ 8.00 854.0 582.0 1134.0 1130.0 848.0 864.0 858.0
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AND APRON SY $ 34.00 65.6 72.2 268.9 105.0 187.6 122.0 97.1
2" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SY $ 15.00 0.0 74.7 124.4 74.7 74.7 49.8 49.8
CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 2562.0 1746.0 3402.0 3390.0 5088.0 5184.0 5148.0
PEDESTRIAN RAMP EA $ 300.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
SODDING, LAWN AND BOULEVARD SY $ 3.00 948.9 646.7 1260.0 1255.6 942.2 960.0 953.3
FURNISH & INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE C SF $ 28.00 6.3 0.C 0.0 0.0 6.3 6.3 0.0
FURNISH & INSTALL STREET SIGNS EA $ 200.00 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1,0 0.0
ADJUST GATE VALVE EA $ 150.00 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
ADJUST MANHOLE EA $ 200.00 2.0 0.¢ 2.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
STORM SEWER LF $ 50.00 427.0 291.0; 567.0 565.0 424.0 432.0 429.0
STREET LIGHTING LS $ 200.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 80,248.17 $ 50,132.81 $ 99,645.48 $ 94,367.91 $ 96,946.93 $ 88,074.74 $ 88,998.62
28% OVERHEAD: $ 22,469.49 $ 14,037.19; $ 27,900.73 $ 26,423.01 $ 27,145.14 $ 24,660.93 $ 24,919.61
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 102,717.66 $ 64,170.00 $ 127,546.22 $ 120,790.92 $ 124,092.08 $ 112,735.67 $ 113,918.23
TOTAL COST: $ 6,936,053.65
O:\Proj\802400j\costest-report 3
Pavement Reh,,,~dtation Program 11/12/01
Street Improvements Schedule
STREET 5TH ST. 5TH ST. 5TH ST. 5TH ST. 5TH ST. 6TH ST. 6TH ST.
FROM RUSH IRVING HOLT IRVING END GATES JACKSON
TO SEYMOUR HOLT GATES JACKSON UPLAND IRVING IRVING
COMMON EXCAVATION CY $ 10.00 591.1 591.1 1092.8 707.8 552.2 445.3 713.6
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 3.00 1216.0 1080.9 1748.4 1496.4 631.1 966.9 1304.9
REMOVE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF $ 3.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
,,1AILBOX RELOCATION LS $ 500.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 9.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS V TON $ 10.50 387.5 386.1 714.5 463.6 362.5 293.1 467.1
TYPE 41A, WEAR COUSE MIXTURE TON $ 35.00 121.2 121.2 224.1 145.1 113.2 91.3 146.3
TYPE 31B, BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON $ 34.00 94.3 94.3 174.3 112.9 88.1 71.0 113.8
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $ 1.50 49.0 49.0 90.5 58.6 45.8 36.9 59.1
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DESIGN B618 LF $ 8.00 608.0 608.0 1124.0 728.0 568.0 458.0 734.0
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AND APRON SY $ 34.00 105.( 40.7 195.4 72.2 112.9 415.8 64.3
2" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SY $ 15.00 74.7 24.9 99.6 74.7 149.3 149.3 0.0
CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 1824.0 3648.0 3372.0 4368.0 0.0 1374.(; 4404.0
~EDESTRIAN RAMP EA $ 300.00 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.C 0.0 2.0 4.0
SODDING, LAWN AND BOULEVARD SY $ 3.00 675.6 675.6 1248.9 808.§ 631.1 508.9 815.6
FURNISH & INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE C SF $ 28.00 0.0 12.5 0.0 12.5 6.3 6.3 12.5
FURNISH & INSTALL STREET SIGNS EA $ 200.00 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1 .(; 0.0 1.0
ADJUST GATE VALVE EA $ 150.00 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.(~
ADJUST MANHOLE EA $ 200.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.(}
STORM SEWER LF $ 50.00 304.0 304.0 562.0 364.0 284.0 229.0 367.(~
STREET LIGHTING LS $ 200.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 .O
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 53,690.53 $ 56,545.77 $ 96,537.64 $ 68,687.93 $ 45,739.44 $ 53,874.22 $ 67,251.71
28%OVERHEAD: $ 15,033.35 $ 15,832.81 $ 27,030.54 $ 19,232.62 $ 12,807.04 $ 15,084.78 $ 18,830.48
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 68,723.88 $ 72,378.58 $ 123,568.18 $ 87,920.55 $ 58,546.49 $ 68,959.00 $ 86,082.19
TOTAL COST: $ 6,936,053.65
O:\Proj\802400j\costest-report 4
Pavement Reh~.,~tation Program 11/12/01
Street Improvements Schedule
STREET 7TH ST. 7TH ST. 8TH ST. 8TH ST. 8TH ST. EVANS EVANS
FROM IRVING IRVING HOLT GATES IRVING RAILROAD DR. 1ST
TO GATES JACKSON GATES END JACKSON 1 ST ZND
OOMMON EXCAVATION CY $ 10.00 925.6 711.7 822.5 301.4 717.5 915.8 653.3
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 3.00 1745.3 1138.7 1880.0 688.9 984.0 889.7 709,3
REMOVE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.(]
REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF $ 3.50 0.0 0.0 846.0 310.0 0.0 0,0 0.0
MAILBOX RELOCATION LS $ 500.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 9.50 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.(] 0.0 0.~
AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS V TON $ 10.50 604.6 466.2 537.4 197.0 470.4' 597.9 428.1
TYPE 41A, WEAR COUSE MIXTURE TON $ 35.00 , 189.8 145.9 168.7 61.8 147.1 187.8 134.0
TYPE 31B, BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON $ 34.00 147.6 113.5 131.2 48.1 114.4 146.1 104.2
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $ 1.50 76.7 59.0 68.2 25.0 59.5 75.9 54.1
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DESIGN B618 LF $ 8.00 952.0 732.0 846.0 310.0 738.0 942.0 672.0
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AND APRON SY $ 34.00 409.1 72.2 212.4 73.4 80,1 40.7 39.4
2" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SY $ 15.00 24.9 49.8 49.8 24.9 124.4 24.9 99.6
CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 2856.(~ 4392.0 5076.0 1860.0 4428.0 0.0 4032.0
PEDESTRIAN RAMP EA $ 300.00 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0
SODDING, LAWN AND BOULEVARD SY $ 3.00 1057.8 813.3 940.0 344.4 820.0 1046.7 746.7
FURNISH & INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE C SF $ 28.00 6.3 12.5 0.C 0,0 12.5 6.3 0.0
FURNISH & INSTALL STREET SIGNS EA $ 200.00 0.0 1.0 1.(] 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0
ADJUST GATE VALVE EA $ 150.00 1.0 0.0 1.(~ 0.0 0.0 1.(] 0.0
ADJUST MANHOLE EA $ 200.00 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0
STORM SEWER LF $ 50.00 476.0 366,0 423.0 155.0 369.0 471.0 336.0
STREET LIGHTING LS $ 200.00 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 90,155.19 $ 67,411.61 $ 86,282.58 $ 32,453.12 $ 68,820.22 $ 66,666.35 $ 60,600.58
28% OVERHEAD: $ 25,243.45 $ 18,875.25 $ 24,159.12 $ 9,086.87 $ 19,269.66 $ 18,666.58 $ 16,968.16
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 115,398.65 $ 86,286.86 $ 110,441.70 $ 41,539.99 $ 88,089.88 $ 85,332.93 $ 77,568.74
TOTAL COST: $ 6,936,053.65
O:\Proj\802400j\costest-report 5
Pavement Reho,~itation Program 11/12/01
Street Improvements Schedule
STREET EVANS FREEPORT GATES GATES GATES GATES HOLT
FROM 2ND 2ND 8TH 5TH 7TH ST. RAILROAD DR. 5TH ST,
TO MAIN ST. MAIN ST. SCHOOL 5 1/2 ST 6TH ST. MAIN ST. 5TH ST.
COMMON EXCAVATION CY $ 10.00 771.9 775.8 884.7 575.6 604.7 595.C 245.0
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 3.00 838.1 931.0 1921.1 723.6 1313.1 1020.O 392,0
REMOVE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 0.0 0.0 0.C 0.0 0,(} 0.0 0.0
REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUq-FER LF $ 3.50 0.0 0.0 910,0 0.0 O.C 0.0 0.0
MAILBOX RELOCATION LS $ 500.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.C 0.0
MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 9.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.C
AGGREGATE BASE. CLASS V TON $ 10.50 504.8 508.4 578.7 375.9 395.3 389.3 160.2
TYPE 41A, WEAR COUSE MIXTURE TON $ 35.00 158.3 159.1 181.4 118.0 124.0 122.0 50.2;
TYPE 31B, BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON $ 34.00 123.1 123.7 141.1 91.6, 96,5 94.9 39.1
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $ 1.50 64.0 64.3 73.3 47.7 50.1 49.3 20.3
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DESIGN B618 LF $ 8.00 794.0 798.0 910.0 592.0 622.0 612.0 252.0
Y' CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AND APRON SY $ 34.00 56.4 47.3 97.1 7.9 146.9 23.7 7.9
2" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SY $ 15.00 49.8 149.3 99.6 24.9 49.8 49.8 24.9
CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 2382.0 4788.0 5460.0 1776.0 1866.0 1836.0 756.0
PEDESTRIAN RAMP EA $ 300.00 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
SODDING, LAWN AND BOULEVARD SY $ 3.00 882.2 886.7 1011.1 657.8 691.1 680.0 280.0
FURNISH & INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE C SF $ 28.00 0.C 12.,' 6.3 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0
FURNISH & INSTALL STREET SIGNS EA $ 200.00 0.C 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0
ADJUST GATE VALVE EA $ 150.00 2.(; 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ADJUST MANHOLE EA $ 200.00 0.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0
STORM SEWER LF $ 50.00 397.0 399.0 455.0 296.0 311.0 306.0 126.0
STREET LIGHTING LS $ 200.00 1.0 1.0: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 63,926.21 $ 72,725.36 $ 88,763.56 $ 46,987.92 $ 56,237.41 $ 50,421.50 $ 21,313.48
28% OVERHEAD: $ 17,899.34 $ 20,363.10 $ 24,853.80 $ 13,156.62 $ 15,746.47 $ 14,118.02 $ 5,967.77
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 81,825.55 $ 93,088.46 $ 113,617.36 $ 60,144.54 $ 71,983.88 $ 64,539.52 $ 27,281.26
TOTAL COST: $ 6,936,053.65
O:\Proj\802400j\costest-report 6
Pavement Rehaullitation Program 11/12/01
Street Improvements Schedule
STREET HOLT HOLT IRVING IRVING IRVING IRVING IRVING
FROM 5 1/2 ST SCHOOL 6TH ST. 4TH ST. 5TH ST. 6TH ST. 7TH ST.
TO 5TH ST. BTH ST. 6TH ST. 3RD ST. 5TH ST. 7TH ST. 8TH ST.
COMMON EXCAVATION CY $ 10.00 318.9 824.4 420.C 773.9 455.0 348.1 540.6
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 3.00 510.2 1884.4 768.0 1724.7 962.0 596.7' 926.7
REMOVE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 0.0 0.0 1080.0 3980.0 1170.0 895.(~ 1390.0
REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF $ 3.50 0.0 848.0 0.0 796.0 0.0 0.C 0.0
MAILBOX RELOCATION LS $ 500.00 0.0 0.0i 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.0
MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 9.50 0.0 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0~0
AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS V TON $ 10.50 208.4 539.8 274.8 507.1 298.0 227.8 353.1
TYPE 41A, WEAR COUSE MIXTURE TON $ 35.00 65.4 169.1 86.1 158.7 93.3 71.4 110.9
TYPE 31B, BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON $ 34.00 50.9 131.5 67.0 123.4 72.6 55.5 86.2
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $ 1.50 26.4 68.3 34.8 64.1 37.7 28.8 44.8
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DESIGN B618 LF $ 8.00 328.0 848.0 432.0 796.0 468.0 358.0 556.0
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AND APRON SY $ 34.00 73.4 236.1 48.6 80.1 23.7 48.6 106.2
2" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SY $ 15.00 24.9 99.6 49.8 49.8 24.9 49.8 0.0
CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 984.0 5088.0 2592.0 4776.0 2808.0 2148.0 3336.0
PEDESTRIAN RAMP EA $ 300.00 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
SODDING, LAWN AND BOULEVARD SY $ 3.00 364.4 942.2 480.0 884.4 520.0 397.8 617.8
FURNISH & INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE C SF $ 28.00 0.0 6.3 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
FURNISH & INSTALL STREET SIGNS EA $ 200.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
ADJUST GATE VALVE EA $ 150.00 1.0 1.0 0.0 1 .C 1.0 0.0 0.0
~,DJUST MANHOLE EA $ 200.00 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
STORM SEWER LF $ 50.00 164.0 424.0 216.0 398.0 234.0: 179.0 278.0
STREET LIGHTING LS $ 200.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 29,363.69 $ 88,200.99 $ 43,807.10 $ 87,653.30 $ 46,231.56 $ 36,704.12 $ 56,199.10
28% OVERHEAD: $ 8,221.83 $ 24,696.28 $ 12,265.99 $ 24,542.92 $ 12,944.84 $ 10,277.15 $ 15,735.75
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 37,585.53 $ 112,897.27 $ 56,073.09 $ 112,196.22 $ 59,176.39 $ 46,981.27 $ 71,934.85
TOTAL COST: $ 6,936,053.65
O:\Proj\802400j\costest-report 7
STREET
FROM
¥O
COMMON EXCAVATION CY
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY
REMOVE SIDEWALK SF
REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF
MAILBOX RELOCATION LS
MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY
~GGREGATE BASE, CLASS V TON
I'YPE 41A, WEAR COUSE MIXTURE TON
TYPE 31B, BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DESIGN B618 LF
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AND APRON SY
2" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SY
CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF
PEDESTRIAN RAMP EA
SODDING, LAWN AND BOULEVARD SY
FURNISH & INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE C SF
FURNISH & INSTALL STREET SIGNS EA
ADJUST GATE VALVE EA
ADJUST MANHOLE EA
STORM SEWER LF
STREET LIGHTING LS
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST:
28% OVERHEAD:
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
TOTALCOST:
$ 10.00
$ 3.00
$ 2.50
$ 3.50
$ 500.00
$ 9.50
$ 10.50
$ 35.00
$ 34.00
$ 1.50
$ 8.00
$ 34.OO
$ 15.00
$ 2.5O
$ 300.00
$ 3.OO
$ 28.OO
$ 200.00
$ 150.00
$ 200.00
$ 50.00
$ 200.00
$
$
6,936,053.65
Pavement Reh~,~nitation Program
Street Improvements Schedule
8TH ST.
SCHOOL ST.
925.6
1586.7
2380.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
607.6
189.8
147.6
76.7
952.0
78.9
149.3
5712.0
4.0
1057.8
6.3
1.0
0.0
1.0
476.0
1.0
93,889.17 $
26,288.97 $
120,178.13 $
5TH ST.
4TH ST.
1108.3
2660.0
2850.0
1140.0
0.0
0.0
723.~c
227.3
176.8
91.
1140.
48.,
24.'
6840.~
4.0
1266.7
6.3
1.0
2.0
3.0
570.0
1.0
115,101.77
32,228.49
147,330.26
5TH ST.
6TH ST.
460.8
895.3
1185.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
301.4
94.6
73.5
38.2
474.0
114.1
49.8
2844.0
4.0
526.7
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
237.0
1.0
50,044.17
14,012.37
64,056.53
7TH ST.
7TH ST.
440.~
660.~
0J
0.0
167.5
52.6
40.
21 .:
264.~
32J
0.~
1584.0
4.0
293.3
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
132.(;
1.0
$ 27,027.56
$ 7,567.72
$ 34,595.28
~ 1/12/01
TH 10 _ RIVER 4TH'~T.
. _865.3~ 755.3 234.7
~1_96.?.7l 1373.3J
3__577., 1~45.oJ
708J 0.0J
256.C
0.( 0.0 0.O
0.0
555.2
180.1
140.
72.;
708.1
139J
24.
4248.
4.
786.7
12.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
354.0
1.0
87,179.03 $
24,410.13 $
111,589.16 $
0.0
484.~
157.:
122.~
63J
0.0
106.
24.~
1854.~
2.1
686.7
6.3
0.0
0.0
2.0
309.0
1.0
57,884.00 $
16,207.52 $
74,091.53 $
0.0
162.4
51.0
39.7
20.6
256,0
O.C
0.0
1536.0
4.0
284.4
12.5
1.0
0.0
O.O
128.0
1.0
24,784.86
6,939.76
31,724.62
O:\Proj~802400j\costest-report
Pavement Rehau~itation Program 11/12/01
Street Improvements Schedule
STREET MORTON NORFOLK NORFOLK NORFOLK OXFORD OXFORD QUINN
FROM 4TH ST. TH 10 5TH ST. 4TH ST. TH 10 5TH ST. TH 10
TO MAIN ST. 5TH ST. 4TH ST. MAIN ST. 5TH ST. 4TH ST. 5TH ST
COMMON EXCAVATION CY $ 10.00 1079.2 127.0 583.3 1147.2 365.6 810.6 546.4
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 3.00 2035.0 152.4 933.3 1835.6 647.6 1343.7 874.2
REMOVE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 0.0 245.0 1500.0 2950.0 0.0 O.O 0.0
REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF $ 3.50 1110.0 98.0 600.0 1180.0 376.0 0.(] 0.0
MAILBOX RELOCATION LS $ 500.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 9.50 0.0 18.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.(] 0.O
AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS V TON $ 10.50 705.2 62.2 381.3 750.7 238.5 529.8 356.9
TYPE 41A, WEAR COUSE MIXTURE TON $ 35.00 221.3 19.5 119.6 235.3 75.0 166.3 112.0
TYPE 31B, BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON $ 34.00 172.1 19.5 93.0 183.0 58.3 129.3 87.1
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $ 1.50 89.4 7.9 48.3 95.1 30.3 67.2 45.3
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DESIG~I B618 LF $ 8.00 1110.0 98.0 600.0 1180.( 376.0 834.(] 562.0
§" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AND APRON SY $ 34.00 187.6 0.0 15.8 178.4 32.8 212.4 73.4
2" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SY $ 15.00 0.0 0.0 24.9 74.7 0.0 49.8 24.9
CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 6660.0 0.0 1800.0 3540.0 1128.0 5004.01 3372.0
PEDESTRIAN RAMP EA $ 300.00 4.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.(; 4.0
SODDING, LAWN AND BOULEVARD SY $ 3.00 1233.3 108.9 666.7 1311.1 417.8 926.7 624.4
FURNISH & INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE C SF $ 28.00 12.5 6.3 0.C 6.3 12.5 12.5 6.3
FURNISH & INSTALL STREET SIGNS EA $ 200.00 1.0 1.0 1 .C 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0
ADJUST GATE VALVE EA $ 150.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ADJUST MANHOLE EA $ 200.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
STORM SEWER LF $ 50.00 555.0 49.0 300.0 590.0 188.0 417.0 281.0
STREET LIGHTING LS $ 200.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 107,225.66 $ 9,008.97 $ 54,120.04 $ 111,250.26 $ 33,016.04 $ 80,551.53 $ 52,281.18
28% OVERHEAD: $ 30,023.19 $ 2,522.51 $ 15,153.61 $ 31,150.07 $ 9,244.49 $ 22,554.43 $ 14,638.73
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 137,248.85 $ 11,531.48 $ 69,273.64 $ 142,400.33 $ 42,260.53 $ 103,105.95 $ 66,919.91
TOTAL COST: $ 6,936,053.65
O:\Proj\802400j\costest-report 9
Pavement Reha,~,Htation Program 11/12/01
Street Improvements Schedule
STREET QUINN RAILROAD DR. RAILROAD DR RAILROAD DR RAILROAD DR RUSH RUSH
FROM 5TH ST. JACKSON IRVING GATES 2ND ST. TH 10 5TH ST.
TO 4TH ST. IRVING MAIN I;~ND ST. EVANS 5TH ST. CTH ST.
COMMON EXCAVATION CY $ 10.00 801.1 838.1 1411.7 262.5 2000.8 593.1 929.41
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 3.00 1281.8 1676.1 2016.7 360.0 2744.0 948.9 2018.2!
REMOVE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 2060.(] 2155.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2390.0
REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUq-FER LF $ 3.50 0.(~ 0.0 1452.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 956.0
MAILBOX RELOCATION LS $ 500.00 0.C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 9.50 0.0i 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS V TON $ 10.50 524.5 547.2 922.9 171.3 1306.6 387.7 607.5
TYPE 41A, WEAR COUSE MIXTURE TON $ 35.00 164.3 171.9 289.5 53.8 410.3 121.6 190.6
TYPE 31B, BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON $ 34.00 127.8 133.7 225.2 41.9 319.1 94.6 148.2
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $ 1.50 66.4 69.4 117.0 21.8 165.8 49.1 77.0
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DESIGN B618 LF $ 8.00 824.0 862.0 1452.0 270.0 2058.0 610.0 956.0
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AND APRON SY $ 34.00 72.2 7.9 39.4 0.0 23.7 15.8 122.0
2" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SY $ 15.00 49.8 24.9, 124.4 0.0 49.8 24.(` 49.8
' OONCRETE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 4944.0 2586.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3660.0 5736.0
PEDESTRIAN RAMP EA $ 300.00 4.0 2.0 0.C 0.0 0.0 4.(] 4.0
SODDING, LAWN AND BOULEVARD SY $ 3,00 915.6 957.8 1613.3 300.0 2286.7 677.8 1062.2
FURNISH & INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE C SF $ 28.00 6.3 6.3 12.5 0.0 0.0 12.5 12.5
FURNISH & INSTALL STREET SIGNS EA $ 200.00 1.0 1.0 2.0~ 1.0 1.0 1.(] 2.0
ADJUST GATE VALVE EA $ 150.00 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
ADJUST MANHOLE EA $ 200.00 1.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
STORM SEWER LF $ 50.00 412.0 431.0 726.0 135.0 1029.0 305.0 478.0
STREET LIGHTING LS $ 200.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 .(] 1.0 1.0 1.0
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 80,184.00 $ 75,556.73 $ 110,216.22 $ 19,053.64 $ t44,145.12 $ 54,717.58 $ 99,145.62
28% OVERHEAD: $ 22,451.52 $ 21,155.88 $ 30,860.54 $ 5,335.02 $ 40,360.63 $ 15,320.92 $ 27,760.77
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 102,635.52 $ 96,712.62 $ 141,076.76 $ 24,388.66 $ 184,505.76 $ 70,038.50 $ 126,906.40
TOTAL COST: $ 6,936,053.65
O:\Proj\8024OOj\costest-report 10
Pavement Reh~,,,itation Program 11/12/01
Street Improvements Schedule
STREET RUSH TIPTON UPLAND UPLAND UPLAND WATSON XENIA
FROM 4TH ST. MAIN TH 10 TIPTON 5TH ST. MAIN 2ND ST.
TO MAIN UPLAND TIPTON 5TH ST. MAIN END MAIN
COMMON EXCAVATION CY $ 10.00 0.0 1678.1 618.3 750.6 1403.9 425.8 762.2
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 3.00 0.0 2493.1 848.0 857.8 1604.4 584.0 958.2
REMOVE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
iREMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF $ 3.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
MAILBOX RELOCATION LS $ 500.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 9.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
~GGREGATE BASE, CLASS V TON $ 10.50 0.0 1098.2 403.8 490.1 917.8 278.9 498.4
I~'PE 41A, WEAR COUSE MIXTURE TON $ 35.00 0.0 344.1 126.8 153.9 287.9 87.3 156.3
TYPE 31 B, BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON $ 34.00 0.0 267.6 98.6 119.7 223.9 67.9 121.6
'BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $ 1.50 0.0 139.0 51.2 62.2 116.3 35.3 63.2
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DESIGN B618 LF $ 8.00 0.0 1726.0 636.0 772.( 1444.0 438.0 784.0
~" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AND APRON SY $ 34.00 0.0 136.6 7.9 139.0 137.8 56.4 89.2
2" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SY $ 15.00 0.0 149.3 24.9 24.9 74.7 0.0 49.8
CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 0.0 10356.0 3816.0 4632.0 4332.0 0.0 2352.0
PEDESTRIAN RAMP EA $ 300.00 0.0 4.0 4.(~ 4.0 2.0 0.0 2.0
SODDING, LAWN AND BOULEVARD SY $ 3.00 0.0 1917.8 706.7 857.8 1604.4 486.7 871.1
FURNISH & INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE C SF $ 28.00 0.0 12.5 0.C 0.0 6.3 6.3 6.3
FURNISH & INSTALL STREET SIGNS EA $ 200.00 0.0 2.0 1.C 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
ADJUST GATE VALVE EA $ 150.00 0.0 2.0 0.C 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
ADJUST MANHOLE EA $ 200.00 0.0 4,0 0.(~ 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.0
STORM SEWER LF $ 50.00 0.0 863.0 318.(~ 386.0 722.0 219.0 392.0
STREET LIGHTING LS $ 200.00 0.0 1.0 1.(~ 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ $ 155,878.09 $ 55,725.11 $ 71,604.13 $ 116,828.52 $ 32,916.04 $ 65,100.12
28% OVERHEAD: $ $ 43,645.86 $ 15,603.03 $ 20,049.16 $ 32,711.98 $ 9,216.49 $ 18,228.03
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ $ 199,523.95 $ 71,328.14 $ 91,653.28 $ 149,540.50 $ 42,132.53 $ 83,328.15
TOTAL COST: $ 6,936,053.65
O:\Proj\802400j\costest-report 11
Pavement Ret, .... ,ration Program ,1/12/01
Street Improvements Schedule
STREET YORK YORk
FROM MAIN 183RD CT.
TO 183RD CT. 2ND ST.
COMMON EXCAVATION CY $ 10,00 530.8 208.1
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 3.00 667.3 261.6
REMOVE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 0.0 0.0
REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF $ 3.50 0.0 0.0
MAILBOX RELOCATION LS $ 500.00 0.0 0.0
MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY $ 9.50 0.0 0.0
AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS V TON $ 10.50 347.5 136.5
TYPE 41A, WEAR COUSE MIXTURE TON $ 35.00 108.9 42.7
~YPE 31B, BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON $ 34.00 84.7 33.2
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $ 1.50 44.0 17.2
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DESIGN B618 LF $ 8.00 546.0 214.0
S" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AND APRON SY $ 34.00 23.7 15.8
2" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SY $ 15.00 74.7 49.8
CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF $ 2.50 1638.0 642.0
PEDESTRIAN RAMP EA $ 300.00 2.0 2.0
SODDING, LAWN AND BOULEVARD SY $ 3.00 606.7 237.8
FURNISH & INSTALL SIGN PANELS. TYPE C SF $ 28.00 6.3 0.0~
FURNISH & INSTALL STREET SIGNS EA $ 200.00 1.0 0.0
ADJUST GATE VALVE EA $ 150.00 0.0 0.0
ADJUST MANHOLE EA $ 200.00 1.0 1.0
STORM SEWER LF $ 50.00 273.0 107.0
STREET LIGHTING LS $ 200.00 1.0 1.0
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 44,946.05 $ 18,609.23
28% OVERHEAD: $ 12,584.89 i $ 5,210.59
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 57,530.95 $ 23,819.82
TOTAL COST: $ 6,936,053.65
O:\Proj\802400j\costest-report 12