Loading...
12.D. PRSR 09-13-1995 rkr �� ITEM 12d. tyof / ak_ River MEMORANDUM TO: Park and Recreation Commission FROM: Steven B. Ach, City Planner e., Z,� - DATE: September 13, 1995 SUBJECT: Park Dedication Fees Request Consider Resolution 95- , amending the park dedication fees which will be effective 1/1/96 and 1/1/97. Background • In 1992, the Park and Rec Commission recommended to the City Council a resolution to adjust the park dedication fees on an annual basis by $50 for a three-year period. The last adjustment setforth in the resolution was made on 1/1/95 and therefore, if the Park and Rec Commission would like to see an increase in the park dedication fees on the first of January, 1996, a new resolution will need to be forwarded to the City Council. Analysis As the Park and Rec Commission is well aware, demands are continually being placed on the development of the park and recreation system. Park dedication funds are a primary source for both acquiring land and purchasing recreational equipment for the parks throughout the community. As residential development continues throughout the community the demands for recreational development will continue to increase and the financing of these improvements is an issue the city will have to continuously contend with. In an attempt to keep pace with development and necessary park improvements, the Park and Rec Commission is asked to consider the attached resolution which would increase the park dedication fees for single Illfamily and multi-family development by $100 per lot annually, for the next 13065 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 490 • Elk River, MN 55330 • (612) 441-7420 • Fax: (612) 441-7425 • two years. The commission may also want to consider whether an increase in the commercial park dedication should be included at this time. To assist the commission in considering this matter, I have attached a survey of other communities to give you an idea of the park dedication fees for residential, commercial and industrial. This survey was conducted in December 1993 so the information may be out of date. Recommendation The Park and Rec Commission is asked to consider the attached resolution as presented or amended according to the desire of the Park Commission, whereby this resolution can then be forwarded to the City Council for their consideration. • 111 s:council:p&r:p arkdedi • 1CM' g-/ RESOLUTION 95-_ Ott RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY OF ELK RIVER A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PARK DEDICATION FEE ON NEW SUBDIVISIONS AND MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Elk River in Ordinance 87-1 established that the City Council can require a fixed fee to be paid for Park Dedication purposes and that this fee shall be set by resolution of the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the Elk River City Council has received and reviewed a recommendation from the Elk River Park and Recreation Commission that recommends that this Park Dedication Fee be increased per residential and multi-family dwelling unit based on the need for additional funds to provide recreation opportunities and based on the increased land value in the City of Elk River; and, WHEREAS, the Elk River Park and Recreation Commission recommends • that no change take place regarding the Park Dedication Fee requirements for commercial property; and, WHEREAS, the adoption of this resolution adjusts the Park Dedication Fee on new subdivisions and multi-family dwelling units that was adopted in Resolution 92-122. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Elk River that Park Dedication Fees paid to the City in lieu of 10% of the undeveloped land shall be set at: $600/lot or dwelling unit effective 1/1/96 $700/lot or dwelling unit effective 1/1/97 Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Elk River this day of September, 1995. Henry A. Duitsman, Mayor ATTEST: • Sandra A. Thackeray, City Clerk s:document:resolution:p arkdedi CITY OF CHAMPLIN 4217624 P. 02 ('IRR-03-1994 10:22 CITY OF FiM EY 612 427 5543 P.03/ta3 PARK DEDICATION SURVEY-CASH CONTRIBUTIONS • RESIDENTIAL cOMidIERCIALtIl4DltSY� AW Valley 10% of assessed land value 5% of land or cash In lieu of land (currently using 520,000/acre) (currently using 520,000/acre) Lino Lakes ' 'Formula using raw land value, housing density $200.00 per 1,000 sq to arrive at amount equal to what a parcel ft gross floor could be purchased for. area Chanhassen ' 'Single/Duplex $600.00 per unit park $3,000.00 per acre park 33% or $200 par unit trail 51,000.00 per acre trail Multi/Apts S525.00 per unit park $175.00 per unit trail Minnetonka Single Family $400.00 per unit Office/Ind $0.20 per square foot Town/Duplex $300.00 per unit Commercial $0.10 of buildin area Apartments $250.00 per unit Oakdale Single Family $525.00 per unit $1,575.00 per acre Multi Family $425.00 per unit (cash dedication in lieu of 10% land dedication) Burnsville Single Family $512.40 per unit Commercial $3,500.00 per acre • Duplex $581.00 per unit Industrial $2,000.00 per acre Multi Family - 3-4 units $596.00 per unit Apt-Complexes $752.00 per unit Chaska Greater of $1,000.per acre or 51,750.00 per acre Single/Duplex $475.00 per unit Townhomes/Ouad; 5300.00 per unit Apts/Condos $250.00 per unit Woodbury Single Family $725.00 per lot $1,600.00 per acre Multi Family 5500.00 per unit Moblie Home 5350.00 per lot (land contribution is 10% of value of gross acres) S' Elk River "Single Family $450.00 per unit w/o S&W $1,000.00 per acre with S&W $1,500.00 per acre Rosemount Single Family $520.00 per unit • $1,100.00 per acre (based on 5% of land value at - $22,000 per acre) Prior Lake Single Family $800.00 per unit $1.00 per square loot • (plus $300 on each bidg permit new construction) NOTE: ' Rates will be proposed to change during 1994 at corns point - recommendations not yet mad 'These are the recommended rates for 1994 - not necessarily adopted at this time. 1 2/7/93 • •+� +ter 1V•�l CTY_OFryC`AMPLIN 4217624 air 543 P.0zi0P3 ea rnnn ueii1..n 1 tvtf avrtrcT •t; n L JN I NbU I ILN so= RESIDEMTIAI .amsey ' ' CO $450.00 less than 1 unit 5% of gross land area as _ • 1!� 80o per 3.3 acres determined by Council all 'other dwellings 40 Single Family - $700.00 per unit 50.055 per square foot Duplex 3621.00 per unit of net land Quad $553.00 per unit Multi $559.00 per unit Eden Prairie • 'Single Family $900.00 per unit. $3,250.00 per acre It Piy ' Single Family $885.00 per unit $3,600.00 per acrs Lakeville Single Family 5650.00 per unit plus 5.00% of assessed $150.00 trails tee per unit valuation X apse Grov Single Family WON per unit industrial 52,058.00 per acre #8057 Commercial 53,064.00 per acre Champlin "Single Family � 0 per acre`8 �j � 56,750.00 per acre Multi Family $4,500.00 per acre ie- �/ _ 7 41am Lake 10% of market value of land or $400 per lot - based on recommendation from Park Ccmmiss Coon Racid-s-) Single Family $384.00 per unit $1,152.00 per acre Townhomes $286.00 per unit . (Includes offices) Apartments $238.00 per unit Blaine Single Family $620,00 per unit industrial $1,630.00 per acre Duplex • $530.00 per unit Commercial $1,860.00 per acre Townhouse/Quad $460.00 per unit Multi Family $390.00 per unit Mobile Home $475.00 per sr.it Andover Cash contribution based on Commission recommendation • calculated on the 'market value' of the undeveloped land that would otherwise have been conveyed or dedicated. cook(yn�P 10% of assessed value per parcel 4% of assessed value per parcel ��- (FMV range: $20,000 - 530,000/acre) (FMV range: $65,000 - 5400,000/acre) NOTE: Plats with 8400 - /a007207- . • • 4 or less lots $500.00 per lot Inver Grove Heights A & E DIstricts $850.00 per unit P & A $175.00 per 1,000 s:, R-1 & R-2 $850.00 per unit S-1 $175.00 ft gross floor 0 R-3 $650.00 per unit 8-2.3 & 4 5125.00 area I-1 & 1-2 575.00 1217/53 Monoay August 21 1995 Star Tribune Burnsville mulls 2 i '` HENNEPIN CO. t'-‘,- ■ 4 1. Bloomington zs. j, N -- ark land rnin = Burnsville P '„,,,,,,--7:0P- Terrace Into golf course . .;A d O Oaks Park DAKOTA G�tc1/46. r CO. iEl LW r n ” f' By Norman Draper ing for ways to raise revenues with- t�P Staff Writer out doing the same to taxes. At a time when preservation-minded To me it comes down not so much , © < suburbs are buying up large tracts of to being a matter of whether we need ® undisturbed land to lock them away another golf course as to whether we ,, 4. € ` . , from development, Burnsville's go- can afford to keep the park,"said city ".- Burnsville t.. ' ing against the grain.The city council council member Glenn McKee. The ■ r there wants to explore turning a 230- actual outlay to maintain the park is � * acre natural park — Terrace Oaks not a big number, but the loss of as , , Park—into a golf course. opportunity might be a big number." n.. Star Tribune Map . This isn't mere contrariness.The Da- McKee said he'd like the matter put f" kola County suburb faces a large to city voters in a referendum. 'Burnsville .. budget deficit and needs to find ways Workman said golf course supporters to make the kind of money a golf The prospect of turning Terrace Oaks are just starting to organize and want Continued from page 1B course might generate.Also,the land Park's rolling,wetland-pocked wood- �.4 io see the city manager's study before on the Terrace Oaks Park site•was land into manicured greens and sand starting their counterpart to STOP's purchased in the early 1970s with a traps isn't imminent;the city manag- cast Burnsville park in its natural active campaign. Y P golf course in mind.It was allowed to er has been asked only to study what ';gate. evolve into a natural park when vot- sorts of revenues such a transforms- •But there's a notable lack of consen- �,il don't know why they just can't ers turned down two city bond issues lion might produce and report back Tsus eh the issue in the Workman that would have raised the money to to the council in October. ;►save some of this open space," said '-iousehold. build the course. :Nike McDonald, spokesman for a .... p �ioosely knit group of Burnsville ac- .2,Torkman's wife, Liz — who chairs Still, that's a notable departure from r• Since then, the city has built and Still, that's as notable Prairie, e Maple-from Ztivists called STOP (Save Terrace Slte city's parks and natural resources maintained trails now used by the wood and Plymouth, where voters '{Oaks Park). "I don't know why ev- board a supports the status quo for park's constituency— hikers, eques- over the past two years have over- gerything has to be developed. ... Terrace Oaks Park. trig cross-countr• skiers and whelmingly approved this is taken away,it will never »y 5 g y pproved the use of city *some back. An oak tree takes a lon m in bikers. funds to set aside open space. And, a "li can start some argument," Liz already,dozens of concerned citizens �me to grow... There's got to be a Workman said."It's just one of those But an annual operating budget have phoned and concerned d ci hens may of[finding additional city reve- topics we try to avoid....I told him shortfall projected to reach$2.5 mil- dreds signed petitions to keep the 'goes) without garage sale-ing this 21int if each goes to a vote, we'll just M Park." J lion in five years has got the city's W�, �ncel each other out." staff scrounging for savings and look- Burnsville continued on page 2B ' .0... *McDonald, whose Bloomington The Terrace Oaks Park controversy • =property adjoins the park,said STOP flame on the heels of another.Hikers 1 yeas gathered nearly 2,000 signatures and mountain bikers have feuded eon petitions. Those include signa- !¢ver park use in the past, and, last ,Mures of residents of neighboring tkpril, the city council voted 3-2 to ;;communities as well. allow mountain biking in the park, k' put to review park policy a ,-..:I've received phone calls, and we p p en Y Bain in als 'have all received letters to save Ter- months. Since then, city officials '.race Oaks park," said Deb Moran, have v rejiggered pail designations k- tune of two city council members to provide more mountain bikers,of and hh- ers from mountain bikers, and the 'oppose last spring's council approval dispute has cooled,said city manager ,.of the golf course study. I have yet Greg Konat. rte receive a letter that says, 'Build a :... no course out there.' What I can see - so. far is an overwhelming majority 'Wanting to keep the park the way it •pis } -‘But support for the golf course is ".building. Many of the city's golfers 'yearn for an 18-hole course,which it does not now have. Burnsville has .'two nine-hole courses, one of which ':is operated by the city. "I think the city deserves and should shave an 18-hole golf course," said •insurance salesman Jim Workman. `, ;It would also generate revenues for • the city. ... My whole thing is that Wit's time to put a turnstile on some of ;,;this land we have and start general- -ing some money."