03-24-1998 BA MIN APPRN[11E!Jil
•
MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS
HELD AT ELK RIVER CITY HALL
TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
N
Members Present: Chair Mesich, Commissioners Chambers, Cote, Kuester and
Thompson. Commissioner Morris arrived at 6:35 p.m. Commissioner
Schuster arrived at 6:37 p.m.
Members Absent: None
Staff Present: Steve Ach, City Planner; Dave Sellergren, City Attorney; Scott
Harlicker, Planning Assistant; Debbie Huebner, Recording Secretary
1 Call Meeting,To.,Order
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the meeting of the Elk River Board of
Adjustments was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chair Mesich.
2. Consider 3/24/98 Board.3of Adjustments Agenda
• COMMISSIONER THOMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 24, 1998 BOARD OF
ADJUSTMENTS AGENDA. COMMISSIONER COTE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE
MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
3.1. Caraill,Inc. Reauest for Appeal of Building Permit.Denial Decision, Public Hearinq.;
Case No;:GP98-i.
Staff report by Steve Ach. Cargill, Inc. is appealing a staff decision not to issue a
building permit for construction of a new research facility within the urban service
district prior to the availability of sewer and water. The proposed facility location
is north of 165th Avenue and east of the solid waste facility along Highway 10.
Cargill submitted a building permit application in September of 1997. Since the
proposed site for the building was within the urban service area, staff interpreted
the ordinance to not allow a bulding permit prior to water and sewer being
available.
Dave sellergren, City Attorney, explained the Board of Adjustment's task is to
determine whether or not staff made an error in the decision to deny Cargill's
request for a building permit.
Chair Mesich opened the public hearing.
Greg Fontaine of Dorsey and Whitney law firm representing Cargill,introduced Tim
Thomas; Rita Schmahl, Manager of the Animal Nutrition operation; Mike Craig,
Vice President of the Animal Nutrition Division; and Carl Nelson of Cargill.
• Mr. Fontaine explained the proposed research and development facility would
be used for testing equipment for the pilot manufacture of various products and
Board of Adjustments Minutes
March 24, 1998
Page 2
• provide an array of research and development services related to food, animal
nutrition, and agricultural products for Cargill operations around the world. He
stated this is the type of operation the City is hoping to attract in the I-1 zone. Mr.
Fontaine stated the proposed project by Cargill would not cause any pollution,
would be compatible with neighboring property uses, is a permitted use within
the I-1 zone and meets all the performance building standards, and is consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that from Cargill's standpoint, they have
met all the City's requirements and are entitled to a building permit and under
Minnesota law and are entitled to build the facility because it is a permitted use.
Mr. Fontaine stated that in order for the ordinance to be applied legally, the City
must allow development of a permitted use to occur at some point in time. Mr.
Fontaine stated City staff has informed Cargill city sewer and water will not be
available anytime in the foreseeable future, if ever. The City Engineer,Terry
Maurer, informed him the only plans under consideration are as stated in the
interim feasibility study dated July 1997, to extend sewer and water into project
areas A and C,which is one-half mile or more from the project site. Mr. Fontaine
questioned why the urban service area was extended into the Cargill property if
there are no plans to extend sewer and water for at least 20 years, or possibly not
ever. Mr. Fontaine stated the City cannot impose a moratorium on development
for an indefinite period of time or for as long as 20 years. He stated that
application of Section 900.20(16) would result in arbitrary capricious unlawful
conduct by the City. Mr. Fontaine stated he felt this issue could be worked out
with the City, but if not, they were prepared to take action to protect their legal
rights.
• Chair asked Mesich why Cargill is against going through the process to amend
the ordinance to allow the proposed development. Mr. Fontaine indicated that
by Statute, Cargill must appeal within a certain period of time to protect their
rights. He asked the City to present a specific proposal to amend the ordinance
for them to review. He felt the City should not expect Cargill to agree to seek a
conditional use permit and wait to see what conditions would be required. Mr.
Fontaine expressed Cargill's concern for the special assessments they could incur
on their 980 acres, most of which is outside of the I-1 zoning. He stated Cargill is
not interested in taking any action that will create the slightest risk that the City
will use an ordinance amendment or other controls to prove benefit of water and
sewer. He estimated the assessments could be up to$10 million or more. Mr.
Fontaine indicated Cargill would like to find a solution to the matter so that the
proposed facility can be constructed and they will not be faced with a similar
situation in the future for other projects. He stressed that Cargill has been at this
location for 40 years and plans to be there forever. He expressed Cargill's
willingness to work with the city to resolve their issues.
There being no further public comment, Chair Mesich closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Thompson asked Mr. Sellergren, City Attorney,why Mr. Fontaine
feels the ordinance is not legally allowable.
Mr. Sellergren indicated he received a large amount of material from Cargill's
legal counsel in the last day and has not had a chance to review most of it. He
indicated the letter dated March 23rd cites public policy and law and would
• need to review the case information before advising on the merits of the
argument. Mr.Sellergren stated the Planning Commission's role is to decide if
Board of Adjustments Minutes
March 24, 1998
Page 3
• staff misread the ordinance. He explained the Planning Commission can make a
decision on staff's interpretation tonight or have the issue brought back in
another month after he and Mr. Ach have read through all of the information
Cargill has submitted.
Mr. Fontaine requested the Planning Commission take time to review the issue
thoroughly before making a decision.
Commissioner Kuester explained that a similar request was reviewed by the
Planning Commission in which the legal issues were unclear. She indicated it is
the Planning Commission's view to not allow development to occur within the
urban service district until water and sewer is available.
COMMISSIONER KUESTER MOVED TO SUPPORT STAFF'S DECISION TO DENY A
BUILDING PERMIT REQUEST BY CARGILL, INC. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW
FACIILITY WITHIN THE URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT PROR TO THE AVAILABILITY OF CITY
SEWER AND WATER AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 900.20(16) OF THE ELK RVIER CODE OF
ORDINANCES, PUBLIC HEARING CASE NO. GP 98-1. COMMISSIONER THOMPSON
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0-1. Commissioner Chambers
abstained.
Discussion followed regarding the City's willingness to work with Cargill to achieve
both the City's and Cargill's goals. Steve indicated Cargill could request an
ordinance amendment to exclude their property in question from the urban
service boundary, or some other type of ordinance amendment. Mr. Sellergren
• suggested the City come forward with some type of ordinance amendment and
present it to Cargill.
Mr. Fontaine stated Cargill is not interested in an ordinance amendment for the
urban service boundary, nor are they in favor of seeking some type of variance.
COMMISSIONER COTE MOVED THAT THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS CONVEY TO THE
CITY COUNCIL THAT,WHILE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS DID NOT BELIEVE THAT
STAFF ERRED IN APPLYING THE ORDINANCE,THE PLANNING COMMISSION DOES
SUPPORT CARGILL'S PROPOSED PROJECT AND WOULD ENCOURAGE STAFF AND THE
CITY COUNCIL TO WORK TOGETHER FOR AN ALTERNATIVE MEANS TO GET THIS
PROJECT IMPLEMENTED. COMMISSIONER THOMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE
MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
3.2. Edward and Cynthia Soltis Request for Accessory Structure Area Variance, Public
Hearing Case No. V 98-2
Staff report by Scott Harlicker. Edward and Cynthia Soltis have requested a
variance to the maximum square footage allowed for accessory structures at
13090 227th Avenue NW. The Soltis' propose to construct a 54' x 104' riding arena
which would exceed the maximum square feet allowed by 3231 square feet.
Scott reviewed the reasons for the request submitted by the applicants. He
indicated the applicants should combine the two lots they own for a total of
16.68 acres. Staff suggests the proposed building be relocated to a less
conspicuous site on the property.
• Chair Mesich opened the public hearing.
Board of Adjustments Minutes
March 24, 1998
Page 4
Edward and Cynthia Soltis, applicants, explained the reasons for building the
arena and the proposed location. They stated their neighbors have no objection
to their plans, as indicated in the attached letters.
There being no further public comment, Chair Mesich closed the public hearing.
COMMISSIONER COTE MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY EDWARD AND
CYNTHIA SOLTIS FOR A VARIANCE TO THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWED
FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, PUBLIC HEARING CASE NO. V 98-2, BASED ON THE
FOLLOWING FINDINGS:
1. LITERAL ENFORCEMENT OF THE ORDINANCE WILL CAUSE UNNECESSARY
HARDSHIP IN THAT THE APPLICANTS WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PROPERLY TRAIN THEIR
HORSES.
2. THE HARDSHIP IS CAUSED BY CONDITIONS UNIQUE TO THE PROPERTY BECAUSE
OF THE ABUNDANCE OF WETLANDS.
3. LITERAL APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE WOULD DEPRIVE THE APPLICANTS OF
RIGHTS ENJOYED BY OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE SAME DISTRICT IN THAT THERE ARE
OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE DISTRICT WITH SIMILAR STRUCTURES.
4. THE VARIANCE WOULD NOT BE INJURIOUS OR ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH,
SAFETY OR WELFARE OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OR THE NEIGHBORHOOD
• WHERE THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED;
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
1. THE TWO LOTS OWNED BY THE APPLICANT, PID#' 75-106-1205 AND 75-106-
1210, BE COMBINED INTO ONE LOT WITH A TOTAL ACREAGE OF
APPROXIMATELY 16.68 ACRES.
COMMISSIONER KUESTER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED
7-0.
3.3. Art Johnson Request for Front Yard Setback Variance, Public Hearing Case No. V
98-1
Staff report by Scott Harlicker. Art and Deborah Johnson have requested a
variance to the minimum front setback for an accessory structure on his property
located at 9956 153rd Avenue NW. The Johnson's are proposing to construct a 24'
x 30' detached garage, twelve feet from the existing street right of way. Scott
noted the proposed setback would be comparable to the neighbors' shed
setback and the front yard setback of the neighbor's house. The applicants feel
the location they have proposed for the garage will be the least obtrusive to the
neighborhood. Staff does not believe an undue hardship has been shown
because an alternative location is available and recommends denial of the
request.
• Chair Mesich opened the public hearing.
Board of Adjustments Minutes
March 24, 1998
Page 5
S Art and Deborah Johnson, applicants, explained their reasons why they cannot
build the garage in the alternative location proposed by staff.
There being no further comments from the public, Chair Mesich closed the public
hearing.
COMMISSIONER KUESTER MOVED TO DENY THE REQUEST BY ART JOHNSON FOR A
FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE, PUBLIC HEARING CASE NO. V 98-1, BASED ON
THE FOLLOWING FINDING:
1. SINCE THERE IS AN ALTERNATE LOCATION WHICH MEETS THE SETBACK
REQUIREMENT AND DOES NOT IMPACT THE EXISTING LANDSCAPING OR
IRRIGATION SYSTEM,THE APPLICANT DID NOT SHOW THAT THE LITERAL
ENFORCEMENT OF THIS ORDINANCE WOULD CAUSE UNDUE HARDSHIP.
COMMISSIONER COTE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
5. Adjournment
There being no further business, COMMISSIONER KUESTER MOVED TO ADJOURN THE
MEETING. COMMISSIONER THOMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
CARRIED 7-0.
The meeting of the Elk River Board of Adjustments adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
• Respectfully submitted,
4 /'/ &
Debbie Huebner
Recording Secretary
•