Loading...
05-25-1999 BA MIN • MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS HELD AT ELK RIVER CITY HALL TUESDAY, MAY 25, 1999 Members Present: Chair Cote, Commissioners Kuester, Mesich, Thompson and Schuster Members Absent: Commissioners Chambers and Morris Staff Present: Michele McPherson, Director of Planning;Scott Harlicker, Assistant Planner;Steve Wensman, Planner;Terry Maurer, City Engineer; Peter Beck, City Attorney; Debbie Huebner, Recording Secretary 1. Call Meeting To Order Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the meeting of the Elk River Board of Adjustments was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chair Cote. 2. Consider 5/25/99 Board of Adjustments Agenda COMMISSIONER THOMPSON MOVED APPROVAL OF THE MAY 25, 1999, BOARD OF • ADJUSTMENTS AGENDA. COMMISSIONER KUESTER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 3. Consider 4/27/99 Board of Adjustments Minutes COMMISSIONER KUESTER MOVED TO APPROVE THE APRIL 27, 1999, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS MINUTES. COMMISSIONER MESICH SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 4. Request by Bradley Johnson for Side Yard Setback Variance and Shoreline Setback Variance, Public Hearing Case No. V 994 Staff report by Scott Harlicker. Bradley Johnson, 1209 Main Street, has requested a 3 foot variance to the required 5 foot side yard setback and a 29 foot variance to the required 30 foot bluff setback to rebuild a detached garage. Chair Cote opened the public hearing. There being no comments from the public, Chair Cote closed the public hearing. Commissioner Mesich asked if DNR approval is also necessary. Scott explained that the information has been submitted to the DNR and the DNR has indicated if the Planning Commission can make the necessary findings to support the variance, they will approve the request, as well. COMMISSIONER MESICH MOVED APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY BRADLEY • JOHNSON FOR A THREE FOOT(3') VARIANCE TO THE REQUIRED FIVE FOOT SIDE Board of Adjustments Minutes May 25, 1999 Page 2 O YARD SETBACK, AND A 29 FOOT VARIANCE TO THE REQUIRED 30 FOOT BLUFF SETBACK, PUBLIC HEARING CASE NO. V 99-4, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: 1. LITERAL ENFORCEMENT OF THE ORDINANCE WILL CAUSE UNDUE HARDSHIP IN THAT THE APPLICANT WILL NOT BE ABLE TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE. 2. THE HARDSHIP IS CAUSED BY SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH ARE PECULIAR TO THE PROPERTY AND THE STRUCTURE INVOLVED AND WHICH ARE NOT CHARACTERISTIC OF, OR APPLICABLE TO, OTHER LANDS OR STRUCTURE IN THE SAME AREA. 3. THE LITERAL APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE WOULD DEPRIVE THE PETITIONER OF RIGHTS ENJOYED BY OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE SAME DISTRICT UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS ORDINANCE. OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE DISTRICT HAVE GARAGES THAT DO NOT COMPLY WITH CURRENT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS 4. THE SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES ARE NOT A CONSEQUENCE OF THE PETITIONER'S OWN ACTION OR INACTION.THE SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE A RESULT OF THE PLACEMENT OF THE HOUSE ON THE PROPERTY. 5. THE VARIANCE WILL NOT BE INJURIOUS TO OR ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY OR WELFARE OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OR THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AND WILL IN KEEPING WITH SPIRIT AND INTENT O OF THE ORDINANCE. 6. THE ZONING CODE REQUIRES A GARAGE WITH NEW SINGLE FAMILY. IT IS STAFF'S BELIEF THAT A GARAGE IS NEEDED FOR REASONABLE USE OF THIS PROPERTY. 7. THE VARIANCE IS NOT BEING REQUESTED SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS.THE APPLICANT, AS WELL AS MOST RESIDENTS IN SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, HAVE A NEED FOR A GARAGE. 8. THE PROPOSED GARAGE WOULD BE IN CHARACTER WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. COMMISSIONER SCHUSTER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 6. Adjournment There being no further business, COMMISSIONER MESICH MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. COMMISSIONER THOMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. The meeting of the Elk River Board of Adjustments adjourned at 6:40 p.m. zR ectffully^^submitted, • Debbie Huebner Recording Secretary