8.0. EDSR 12-11-1995 CLIFFORD C. LUNDBERG ITEM 8.
Attorney At Law
Real Estate 400 Jackson Avenue Business Law
Probate P. 0. Box 326 Taxes
Wills & Trusts Elk River, Minnesota 55330 Accounting
• Phone: (612) 441-1251
Fax: (612) 441-1258
November 15, 1995
Pat Klaers
City Manager
Elk River City Hall
13065 Orono Road
Elk River, MN 55330
Bill Rubin
Economic Development Director
Elk River City Hall
13065 Orono Road
Elk River, MN 55330
RE: Proposal for Elk River Community Center
• Gentlemen:
I wish to make an informal presentation to the EDA and the Elk River City Council and I
wonder if it is possible to do it at a short joint meeting on December 11, 1995. I'simply wish
to make an informal presentation of the results of the Art Space Grant obtained by the Elk River
Arts Council to show the ideas presented in that process for a multi-use auditorium to be used
by both the Arts community and the community at large and to request that the EDA and the
City Council start thinking about artful ways of fmancing such a structure. I believe I will also
request that the City Council consider revitalizing its Community Center Task Force to review
our proposal as well as add any additional space required for recreational uses. Our concept has
already been presented to the Recreation Committee by Louise Kuester. I enclose a copy of the
Arts Space final report and final drawings.
Sincerely,
ff-•
Clifford C. Lundberg
CCL:dmp
Enclosures
File: L89067
Real Property Law Specialist
Certified by the Minnesota State Bar Association
• ART SPACE
Entertainment, Arts & Education Wing
of Proposed Community Center
Elk River, Minnesota
•
Final Report to
The Elk River Area Arts Council
Made possible through Artspace Projects,Inc
250 3rd Ave.N.#111
• Artspace's Regional Minneapolis,MN
55401
Cultural Facility Consulting Program (800)229-5715
(612)339-4372
• Final Report to the Elk River Area Arts Council
Table of Contents
I. Artspace Projects, Inc.
and the Regional Cultural Facility Consulting Program
II. Background
III. Executive Summary of Design Work
Att. A Schematic Plans and Design Philosophy-- John Justad
20/20 Design
Att. B Code Compliance and Cost Estimates-- Jeff Garetz
The Parliament Companies
•
•
Artspace Projects, Inc.
• and the Regional Cultural Facility Consulting Program
Artspace Projects, Inc. is a unique non-profit development corporation that creates space for arts
organizations and individual artists. Artspace's mission reflects its commitment to strengthening
the role of the arts as a source of cultural and economic vitality in our communities.
The mission of Artspace as put forth by its Board of Directors is as follows:
The mission of Artspace Projects, Inc. is to create space where artists can
live, work, exhibit, perform, and conduct business. By creating this space,
Artspace supports the continued vitality of the surrounding community.
We pursue this mission through development projects, consulting services
and community-building activities which serve artists and arts
organizations of all disciplines, cultures, and economic circumstances. We
address the space needs of art organizations and artists for the long-term.
By encouraging dialogue among artists and between artists and members
of the surrounding community, we foster community and economic
growth.
Our success is measured both by the creation of functional space for
artists and by the enduring positive impact on artists and the communities
around them.
While most widely recognized for its role in the development of artists' live/work space in
Minnesota, Artspace's consulting work takes staff to communities throughout the country. In this
capacity, Artspace has developed expertise in the areas of arts facility development and operation,
housing and planning. In addition, Artspace is a national advocate for the arts and assists local
arts groups and individual artists in their search for safe, affordable and appropriate space.
In response to the need for human resources in North Dakota, South Dakota and Minnesota,
Artspace has created the Regional Cultural Facility Consulting Program. The intent of this
Program is to assist organizations in the tri-state region with the technical, procedural and
organizational elements of facility development, renovation and operation. This report outlines
the work completed through this program for the Elk River Area Arts Council.
•
Background
•
In 1990, the City of Elk River sponsored a study from EOS Architects to determine what
functional areas might be included in their eventual plans to build a new community center. The
resulting report identified the needs of various user groups in Elk River. It allocated approximate
square footage amounts for each activity, examined possible sites and outlined a number of
timelines for project completion.
The Elk River Area Arts Council requested Artspace's assistance in determining the specific
nature of arts related space in the potential civic center. Their intention was to complete
preliminary design work that would enable them to more accurately communicate their needs and
to reconcile different artistic users' needs, prior to any community wide design determinations.
By clearly defining the space requirements of arts related users at an early stage, the Council
hopes to ensure that proper consideration is given to their needs. It also may help to relate these
needs and those of non-arts users in a way that is beneficial to both and most cost effective for the
project as a whole.
•
Executive Summary of Design Work
•
Artspace contracted with a theater design and outfitting specialist (20/20 Design) and a
Construction Manager (Parliament Companies) to help give shape to the various arts related
space requirements as well as determine a general cost estimate and identify code compliance
issues that the design might present.
Two design workshops were held, with an invitation being issued by the Arts Council to local art
programming organizations and interested individuals. Potential users that participated in the
workshops included live theater presenters, arts educators and exhibitors. Given this wide base of
attendees, Artspace feels confident that a full spectrum of needs are addressed in the schematic
plans that are Attachment A to this report.
The plan was designed to provide the highest flexibility at the lowest cost. It includes a theater, a
gallery, meeting space, banquet facilities and classroom space. By situating arts related space in
close relation to complementary non-arts space, each benefit from a broader range of
programming possibilities.
Important elements of the design include:
• A 700 seat theatre sufficient for large audiences
• Capacity to divide the theatre seating area to create lecture hall space or accommodate smaller
• theatre audiences
• A 61 foot fly loft for ease of presenting and exterior promotion possibilities
• Ample storage for properties and scenes
• Easily accessible costume storage and dressing rooms
• A freight elevator for movement of properties and equipment
• Full orchestra pit with lift
• Means for sound attenuation between the shop and stage
• Classroom and meeting space for community groups
• Sound and fire retardant dividing walls between multi-use space and theatre
• Flexible design of stage and house allowing for orientation in either direction
• Box office and administrative office space
• Gallery space near public traffic patterns
• Collection storage for artwork
• Archive space
• Potential artists studio/work space in the basement or first floor
• Event and convention space with kitchen facilities
• Grid system for convention space that would allow lighting, presentation and division flexibility
• A passenger elevator and ramps for ADA compliance
•
•
The estimated cost for the construction of this design was researched by both 20/20 design and
Parliament Companies. Basement support space is far less expensive than the first floor structure
at $60.00/sq. ft., with.total cost for 12,000 sq. ft. being $720,000.00. The remaining 37,932 sq.
ft. could range between $100.00 and $175.00/sq. ft., ranging between $4.5 Million and $7.5
Million dollars. In this early stage of design the cost estimates can vary widely, but this range is
consistent with other projects recently completed. It is important to recognized that this price tag
relates to some non-arts related facility space as well, such as the convention space.
Attachment B is the research completed by the Parliament Companies regarding code compliance
and costing estimates. Highlighted are sections of the Uniform building Code that would apply to
a structure of this sort. American with Disabilities Act requirements should be relatively
inexpensive to achieve given that the structure will be new construction.
The material presented in this report and drawings will be helpful as plans for the proposed civic
center move forward. Major requirements of potential users have been identified, and specific
issues addressed.
The design addresses itself to the needs of those that participated in the process. An architect
planning the greater facility may be forced to balance these needs with others. Having a clear
concept of the arts related needs will hopefully increase the ability of the Council and arts users to
impact the decision-making process. The Arts Council may wish to actively pursuit coalitions with
non-arts related users. The flexibility of this design my appeal to them, as might the synergy with
arts groups. it would be reasonable to except to revisit these plans at a later date to align the
costs with the resources available and to balance arts/education needs with others. By creating
positive working partnerships with athletic and non-arts related programming entities, the needs
space needs of arts programmers may be held in higher priority.
•
Attachment A
Schematic Plans and Design Philosophy
•
ENTERTAINMENT, ARTS and EDUCATION WING
Elk River Minnesota
• by 20/20 Design, John Justad
•
Background
In 1990 a report by EOS architecture studying space requirements in a proposed community center
was completed. Input from user groups from throughout the community was compiled and the
architect's work then resulted in a 100,388 square foot,single story structure containing spaces for
a theatre,meeting and banquet space,commons,food and games and an athletic area.
In the layout of the spaces in the drawings for the Entertainment,Arts and education Wine
(drawings C-1 through G3)space allocations from the original architects study were used in
proportion to their original allocations in most cases. Only the addition.of the basement in the
theatre area represents an addition of square footage to the original study recommendations.
The drawings represent about 38,900 square feet of space on the main level and 12,000 square feet
in the basement. The 38,900 square feet and basement will address the needs of the following user
groups from the original report:
• 1. Meetings and Banquets, 11,950sf
2. Seniors Crafts 1,000sf
3. Commons 6,242sf
4. Presentations 18 740s
Total 37,932sf
Design process for the Drawings
Two meetings were held between user groups concerned with the overall community center project
and in particular the theatre and arts concerns. In the .first,the group brainstormed possible
solutions to various perceived and documented needs in the above areas. In the second meeting,a
preliminary design was presented to many of the same individuals for refinement and corrections.
The designs that resulted are based largely on the input from the sessions and subsequent research
done by 20/20 design.
20/20 Design, John Justad, HC 74 Box 469B, I-tackensnck, MN 56452(218)682-2818
APR-26-95 THU 10 :39 AM HACKEN'=A K LMBR 218 675 6804 a P. 02
ENTERTAINMENT, ARTS and EDUCATION WING
Elk River Minnesota
by 20/20 Design, John Justad
•
Design Philosophy
The plans present a facility that will,at least in the wing drawn,have an excellent opportunity to
pay for itself over the long run and pay for its own maintenance and improvements. The traffic in
and around this area will be greatly enhanced by the addition of the multi-purpose presentation
area. However, the design is layed out to be multi-purpose in all areas,being accessible and
reconfigureable in many ways.
This overall design is of the style being used more and more around the country in
public/community spaces as it has such high usage and revenue generating potential.
Banquets,dinner theatre, straight theatre,music,dance,classes,touring groups,trade shows,
conferences,conventions and seminars,all of these multi-purpose room activities are enhanced
with the proximity of the adjoining arts/entertainment activities.
•
A busy office was placed near the gallery for security and convenience of volunteers in gallery.
The entire wing transitions from the quietest to the loudest activities with studio,lecture,
auditorium,stage, multi-use,then shops and docks.
In the perspective sketch,the fly loft from the exterior is lit and decorated to serve as high-profile
• ad space for the center and the main entrance lands the guest in the middle of the overall center.
The design plans can be set in either a hill (less expensive)or flat site.
Cost
The costs for the space as drawn should be about$150 per square foot,based on similar facilities
studied for this design and the work done by Jeff Garetz of the Parliament Company that was also
used in the design process. This is my best realistic budget figure for a somewhat basic structure
and decoration as drawn, but including the costs for the specialty theatre and multi-purpose
equipment.
Submitted by,
C_.
ohn .ustad
Designer
20/20 Design, John Justad, HC 74 Box 469B, Hackensack, MN 56452(218)682-2818
•
__--
---
Attachment B
•
Code Compliance and Cost Estimates
•
•
THE PARLIAMENT COMPANY
• 1929 South Fifth Street
March9, 1(U 339-0042
Minneapolis,MN 55454 FAX-339-0835
TO: ART SPACE PROJECTS, INC.
FROM: JEFF GARETZ - THE PARLIAMENT COMPANY
•
RE: COMMUNITY CENTER PROPOSAL FOR ELK RIVER, MN.
As these are design or concept drawings, there are many details
excluded; such as the nature of the mechanical systems, and the
engineering of the structure itself. For the purpose of this
report I will therefore only reference code issues and only in
general terms . The proposal for a theater and related space use
is referenced in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as a Group A
Occupancy. This space falls under Division 2 . " A building or
portion of a building having an assembly room with an occupant
load of less than 1000 and a legitimate stage. "
As this space is designed for high occupant loads, the codes
regarding the physical nature of the space are very explicit. In
reviewing the current plan, these requirements could easily be
met. The following list notes these requirements and where they
are referenced in the UBC:
1. General building - types of construction - table 5B
Sections 504, 505, & 506
2. Roof and ceiling assemblies
section 405
3. Construction of the stage
section 405
4. Slope of the main floor
section 1007
5. Location on property
section 303. 3
6. Access and exiting
Chapter 10 section 1016
7 . Accessibility
Chapter 11
8. Light and ventilation
Chapter 12
9 . Sanitation
Section 2902 .2 •
10. Shaft and exit enclosures
Chapter 10
11 . Elevator enclosures
Section 711
12 . Sprinklers and Standpipes
Chapter 9 section 904 .2 . 1
13. Special hazards - automatic ventilators
Section 405. 3 . 3
14 . Motion picture booths
Section 408
Equal Employment and Housing Opportunities
• The other need regarding plan review is compliance with ADA
(Americans with Disabilities Act) , which requires all new
construction to be accessible to persons with disabilities.
These include sight, sound, and mobility with regard to this
construction. it will necessitate elevator access to all floors,
sight impaired signage, automatic door openers, special
provisions for wheelchair seating and bathroom facilities, and
hearing impaired equipment. As this is new construction these
requirements are easily meet and will have only minor impact on
cost.
Construction costs can vary greatly, depending on amenities,
finishes, and architectural design. As such I can only estimate
..t-kS costs at between $100.00 and $175.00 per square foot for the
0,,s-basic structure. This would not include costs for rigging,
'Pr lighting, stage sound equipment, curtains, and other theater
L; 4.f,,j. specific equipment. It would include the cost to build the code
compliant structure with all permanent fixtures and finishes
If including all mechanical and electrical systems. Cost to build
` "" the basement space would be less, approximately $60.00 per square
,rei ` foot. Below is a chart of potential costs.
1st floor 37,932sq. ' @ $100/sq. = $3793,200.00
@ $175/sq. = $6, 638, 100.00
. Basement 12,000sq. ' @ $60/sq. = $720,000.00
TOTALS> 49,932sq. ' @ $100/sq. = $4,513,200.00
+ $60/sq.
49,932sq. ' @ $175/sq. = $7,358,100.00
+ $60/sq.
Sincerely,
iwor
Jeff Garetz