Loading...
4.5. SR 07-05-2016 EOty1� ,.,�� Request for Action River To Item Number Mayor and City Council 4.5 Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by ConsentJuly 5, 2016 Justin Femrite, P.E., City Engineer Item Description Reviewed by Professional Services for 2017 Street Improvements Cal Portner, City Administrator Reviewed by Action Requested Approve,by motion, $196,200 in professional services from Hakanson Anderson,Inc., associated with engineering services for the 2017 Street Improvement project. Background/Discussion Staff has advertised a Request for Proposal (RFP) for professional engineering services for the 2017 Street Improvement project. The RFP was advertised on the League of Minnesota Cities and the City or Elk River websites. We received 5 proposals which ranged in price from $196,200 to $390,717. Staff interviewed Hakanson Anderson,Inc. on June 23, 2016. Hakanson Anderson emphasized that they were comfortable in their ability to deliver a successful project for the city at the price they proposed. Based on the interview feedback, our review of their proposal, and past positive working history with their firm, staff is recommending award of the work to Hakanson Anderson,Inc. in the amount of $196,200. Upon the approval by the City Council, staff will work with the firm to finalize a contract and begin work immediately. The proposals received, further detail work associated with another request we made in the same RFP for similar professional services associated with the CSAR 1 Improvement project between TH 10 and the BNSF railroad should this move forward as a joint project between Sherburne County and the City of Elk River. Staff will be preparing this item for consideration at the upcoming joint County Board and City Council meeting. No action is being requested on this project or services associated with it at this time. Financial Impact The total financial impact for engineering services associated with this project will be $196,200 and be paid through the 2017 Street Improvement project budget. Attachments ■ Hakanson Anderson,Inc. Proposal POWERED 6T A IR PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CITY OF ELK RIVER !OWNr ■ �' -_q SEI June 6,2016 M2017 STREET IMPROVEMENTS & CSAH 1 IMPROVEMENTS Main Office: Prepared by: 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 Ph: (763) 852-0479 Fax: (763) 427-0520 Contact: Shane M. Nelson shanen@haa-inc.com HakansonMain Office: 40 3601 Thurston Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303 Anderson Phone: 763/427-5860 Fax: 763/427-0520 www.haa-inc.com June 6,2016 Justin Femrite, City Engineer City of Elk River 13065 Orono Parkway Elk River,MN 55330 RE: Proposal for Engineering Services City of Elk River 2017 Street Improvements and CSAH 1 Improvements Dear Mr. Femrite: Hakanson Anderson is pleased to submit our Proposal for Engineering Services. This Proposal is in response to your Request for Proposals for the 2017 Street Improvements and CSAH 1 Improvements for the City of Elk River. We have carefully selected a dedicated in house team that will provide the best combination of experience and flexibility available to accomplish your project goals and objectives. This team of energetic professionals are qualified and well suited to successfully accomplish the engineering services and continually meet your expectations. We have been providing Civil Engineering Services for governmental agencies for over 40 years. It is, and always has been, our primary focus. We believe we do it extremely well by listening and being responsive. Our quality performance is substantiated by our list of dedicated clients, many of whom we have been working with for over 20 years. Hakanson Anderson is committed to providing high quality cost-effective service to its' clients by maintaining low overhead rates. Our competitive billing rates are possible by maintaining high staff utilization and consistently managing our administrative,marketing and other overhead costs. Once again, we appreciate the opportunity in providing you with our Proposal for Engineering Services. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 763-852-0479 or Craig at 763- 852-0485. Sincerely, n Anderson Shane Nelson, P.E. Craig J. Jcrecipal-in- P.E. Vice President/Proposed Project Manager President PrCharge Table' / Contents i. TITLE PAGE ii. COVER LETTER iii. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section1. General Information .......................................................................................1 Section 2. Project Understanding.....................................................................................2 Section3. Project Approach.............................................................................................4 A. Project Approach...................................................................................................4 B. Work Plan ..............................................................................................................5 Section 4. Proposed Project Team and Experience........................................................11 A. Staff Commitment.................................................................................................11 B. Design Team...........................................................................................................11 C. Construction Observation Team..........................................................................12 D. Subconsultants.......................................................................................................12 E. Organizational Chart............................................................................................13 F. Relevant Project Experience ................................................................................13 =_ Section5. Schedule ... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ...........20 A. Project 1 2017 Street Improvements 20 B. Project 2 CSAH Improvements 22 �- Section 6. Why Hakanson Anderson 24 rf . Section7. Consultant Cost................................................................................................25 A. Project Costs...........................................................................................................25 B. Hourly Rates...........................................................................................................26 C. Reimbursable Costs 26 D. Not to Exceed Cost.................................................................................................26 E. Proposal Time Period ............................................................................................26 APPENDIX • Detailed Resumes for Key Personnel Certificate_of Liabili- Insu Table of Contents General Section Hakanson Anderson is a client-centered practice that provides professional consulting services in the areas of municipal engineering, environmental engineering, water resources, land development, transportation engineering and land surveying. We have provided these services to clients in the metropolitan area and outstate communities for over 40 years. Founded in 1975, we established our office to give our clients personalized attention, timely response, and most importantly, cost-effective solutions. Solutions that meet project requirements, yet still fit within a budget, require ingenuity and expertise. That is why municipalities as small as Nowthen and as large as the City of Minneapolis trust Hakanson Anderson. We have a proven history in municipal engineering, construction administration and specialty consulting engineering. Many of our clients have been with us for over 20 years. Though we have remained focused on our core disciplines - transportation, wastewater, water, stormwater and surveying - the nature of our work has become increasingly diverse. For example, to respond to more stringent stormwater quality standards, we have broadened our expertise to include advanced processes such as infiltration basins and hydrodynamic separators. We're applying these technologies for stormwater treatment in constricted areas where space for traditional storage and treatment ponds is limited and continue to help our clients find other opportunities. Similarly our transportation projects have become more complex as we look for ways to implement projects that address functional transportation needs while minimizing the disruption to the local community. Our multi-disciplined staff located in our Anoka office includes: Engineering Registered Engineers 7 Engineers in Training 2 Engineering Technicians 4 Environmental Specialist 1 Construction Observers 5 Office . Administrative Assistant 1 -- Receptionist 1 Business Manager/Human Resources 1 Surveying Registered Land Surveyors 3 >�! CADD Technicians 2 Survey Crew Chiefs 4 Survey Technicians, Full Time 2 .� GIS Specialist 2 � Total Current Staff: 35 General Information, Page l Project iSection The City of Elk River intends to retain a professional consulting firm to provide professional engineering services needed to successfully implement the design and construction of the 2017 Street Improvements and the CSAH 1 Improvements. These two separate projects consist of the following: Project 1 -2017 Street Improvements Project 1 consists of reconstruction, full depth reclamation and bituminous overlay of existing streets as specified on Figure 1 of the RFP. The full depth reclamation portion of the project will include replacement of large segments of curb and gutter. This will require topographic survey work to be completed to assure proper conveyance of drainage in critical areas. There are no sanitary sewer or water systems in the reconstruction areas; however the project will require management of stormwater which will consist of maintenance of existing facilities and minor modifications to accommodate the new street grades. There are several project areas and the work must be properly staged to ensure an orderly progression of the work. This project will be financed by Local and State Aid funds, and construction is expected to begin in May 2017. Project 2 - CSAH 1 Improvements Project 2 consists of the reconstruction and widening of CSAH 1, construction of raised medians, addition of turn lane capacity, reconfiguration of side street connections, and design and installation of all necessary safety measures to qualify as a whistle free zone at the BNSF rail crossing. This project is also anticipated to include the reconstruction of Quinn Street and 6th Street and the new construction of road segment between CSAH 1 and Quinn Street. The city street reconstruction will include replacement of the existing water system and the addition of new stormwater management systems to drain the reconstructed/new streets. This project will be a cooperative effort between the City of Elk River and Sherburne County and will be financed by City, County and State Aid funds. This project is expected to be completed in 2017 or 2018 depending on property acquisition. Property acquisition will be completed by others and is not included in the scope of this contract. We have divided the project into 7 phases consistent with the Scope of Services outlined in the RFP. The project phases which are discussed in greater detail in Section 3, are as follows: • Phase 1 — Feasibility Report — Prepare a Feasibility Report which will describe in a preliminary manner the work proposed to be completed and estimates the total project costs. The Feasibility Report's goal will be to deem the project technically feasible, cost effective and necessary. • Phase 2 — Topographic Survey — This phase will consist of performing a detailed site survey of the streets, sidewalks, driveway entrances, and utilities which are scheduled for reconstruction. We also anticipate obtaining adequate survey in the full depth reclamation and overlay areas to locate existing utilities, determine drainage patterns, and to review conflicts such as driveway match points on the rural street segments. • Phase 3 — Public Involvement and Meetings — The public involvement and meetings identified in this phase would include the recommended procedures identified by the City of Elk River as well as the public involvement discussed below. It is crucial that the design team listen to public Project Understanding, Page 2 Project iSection comment, evaluate it for merit, and openly discuss the decision making process. The first step in this process would include preparation and mailing of a notice prior to the start of any field surveys or geotechnical investigations. The notice would include a general description of the proposed project along with information on the upcoming activities. After the plans have been prepared but prior to soliciting bids, we would recommend that a neighborhood meeting be held to discuss the projects with the residents and business owners and receive public comment. It may be necessary to hold several separate neighborhood meetings for each of the project areas. In the project areas that will affect access to local businesses, we will be particularly interested in receiving comments and public input about access needs, deliveries, and project staging. The comments will be evaluated for merit and may warrant revisions to the traffic control and staging plans. After the bid award but prior to the start of construction, we would recommend that a notice be prepared and mailed to all parcel owners to outline the construction schedule and project contacts. This notice will also direct people to the project web page(s) as well as the social media page(s) for updates. • Phase 4 — Design including Plans and Specifications — Consists of preparing a complete set of construction plans and specifications, coordination with Mn/DOT District 3 and Sherburne County, coordination with BNSF and the Federal Railroad Administration, coordination with utility companies, and obtaining necessary permits and easements. • Phase 5 — Contract Bidding and Award — This phase consists of issuing drawings and specifications to prospective bidders, answering Contractor questions, issuing addendums if necessary, assisting the City in obtaining proposals from contractors and assisting in the awarding of a construction contract. • Phase 6— Construction Inspection, Staking and Management Services — This phase consists of administering the construction contract in accordance with the provisions of the Construction Documents. Responsibilities will include, but not be limited to, general construction administration, construction observation, construction staking, processing payment applications, contractor submittal review and preparing change orders. We would also propose that no more than 16 weeks be allowed for completion of Project 1 and 10 weeks for construction of Project 2 once the Contractor starts construction. This will minimize overhead costs to the City and disruption of residential neighborhoods and commercial businesses. This phase will also consist of updating bid document drawings and specifications, revising the original drawings and specifications to show as-built information. • Phase 7 — Warranty Inspection — This phase will consist of reviewing the warranty performance of the construction. A detailed punchlist and correction notice will be provided to the City, Contractor and Surety Company. Project Understanding, Page 3 Project Approach - Section 3 A. Project Approach The true measure of an effective approach to managing tasks is the ability to deliver the expected results on time and within budget. We at Hakanson Anderson are accountable for our work and obligations. Our project approach and work plan for this project is based on our thorough understanding of the project. Our approach is focused around providing a strong experienced team. It is our goal to exceed the City of Elk River's expectations in all aspects of the project. Major elements required to successfully complete the project within the timeframes allowed include the following: • Coordinating a Public Process • Communication/Project Management Plan • Development of Detailed Plans • Qualified Construction Observer • Highly Skilled and Organized Team A brief description of these major elements are as follows: Coordinating a Public Process Coordinating a public process requires excellent communication skills, a thorough understanding of the project, and a thorough understanding of the clients' goals and policies. Further, the ability to adapt and respond to situations when or if misinformation is presented is crucial. There is no single factor that is more damaging to a project than misinformation, and if it is presented it must be dealt with immediately in a professional manner. In order to be successful and gain the trust of the project stakeholders, the facilitator must present accurate information and have the skills to communicate the benefits of the proposed improvements. Further, it is crucial that the design team listen to public comment, evaluate it for merit, and openly discuss the decision making process. Our experience has shown us that stakeholders all lend different points of view to various aspects of the project and those points of view must be considered. When project stakeholders are treated with respect, they typically return the favor. Communication Plan ki 11 We propose to utilize a variety of methods to communicate relevant project information to the public. We propose to utilize a combination of mailed notices, project web pages and social media to deliver updates and other media to affected residents and business owners at strategic times during the various stages of the projects. Detailed Traffic Control and Staging Plans In order for this project to be successful a significant amount of effort and thought must be put into preparing detailed traffic control and staging plans. If the traffic control and staging plans are not adequate and the Contractor is allowed to"open up" all project areas at one time, there will likely be many unhappy residents and business owners. Staging plans that require a Contractor to finish one project area before opening up a new project area will be absolutely necessary. Project Approach, Page 4 Project o r o a Traffic control plans that allow for adequate business access will also be absolutely necessary in efforts to limit the disruption. Proper signage must be called for during all stages of the work and semi-truck and other delivery truck access must also be considered. While some inconvenience and disruption is unavoidable, the impact will be significantly reduced by well thought out staging and traffic control plans. Project Management Plan It is our company policy to create a Project Management Plan at the beginning of every project to ensure that all project goals and objectives are met. The Project Management Plan will further identify each team member's specific role in the proposed project and the deadline for each specific task to ensure that all major steps in the critical path are completed within the timeframe that is necessary to deliver the project within the time that is allotted. Development of Detailed Plans Our 40 years of experience focusing on infrastructure projects gives us the project understanding needed to prepare the detailed plans necessary for a successful project. It will be necessary to perform a detailed topographic survey of the existing streets, utilities, driveways, and other features scheduled for reconstruction. Our detailed plans will specifically show all removals, proposed work, features to protect (ex. trees) and will eliminate any confusion by the Contractor, allowing them to submit a confident and competitive bid. Qualified Construction Observer The overall quality and longevity of the improvements is highly dependent on the level of skill and the standard of work to which the Contractor is held. We firmly believe that construction observation by a qualified Construction Observer is required to ensure long lasting value to the City. In addition to holding Mn/DOT certifications, the Construction Observer that we have dedicated to this project has extensive experience in the construction of urban and rural streets and utilities. Highly Skilled and Organized Team The City of Elk River needs a consultant that is highly organized, has an established and streamlined Quality Program, is skilled in the area of design, and has sufficient in-house staff to complete the required work within a relatively short time frame such that the goal of fully executed plans and specifications can be realized for construction in 2017. The engineers dedicated to this project and discussed in Section 4 of this proposal have successfully completed many similar projects. B. Work Plan We fully understand that our required Responsibilities and Deliverables will be similar to those as outlined in the Request for Proposals. This Work Plan summarizes the major tasks that will be performed with each phase of the project. The major tasks are defined as those tasks that could affect the critical path of this project. The following pages summarize the anticipated tasks and deliverables for each phase. A proposed project schedule is also presented in Section 5 of this proposal. Project Approach, Page 5 = M I Project Approach - Section 3 Phase 1 — Feasibility Report Task 1—Analysis of City Needs/Site Analysis All pertinent existing information will be reviewed. We would propose at least one meeting with the City to define the project limits and City expectations. Meet with the City to define coordination activities, obtain existing project information, review project delivery method and define special project requirements. Task 2—Draft Feasibility Report Prepare a draft feasibility report which estimates the project cost, individual assessment amounts, and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessment amounts for affected parcels. Task 3 —Final Feasibility Report Prepare a final feasibility report which incorporates revisions as necessary based on City comments of the Draft Feasibility Report. Deliverables: Draft Feasibility Report, Final Feasibility Report. Phase 2 — Topographic Survey Task 1 — Geotechnical Investigation Identify locations for pavement cores and soil borings. We anticipate obtaining pavement cores to determine accurate pavement depths. This information will be needed to obtain accurate quantities for removal or salvage if the material is reclaimed for road base. We also propose to coordinate soil borings to obtain an accurate R-value estimate for pavement design. We would develop a scope of work for the required geotechnical investigation and obtain quotes from qualified firms. The quotes would be presented to the City for consideration. Task 2— Topographic Survey Our proposal includes performing a detailed site survey of the streets, buildings, sidewalks, driveway entrances, utilities and other features as necessary in the reconstruction area. We would also perform field surveys as necessary in the full depth reclamation and overlay areas to ensure complete and accurate construction plans. Phase 3 — Public Involvement and Meetings Task 1 —Project Notification Letter Prepare and mail notice to all affected parcels prior to start of field survey. Meet or discuss project with residents and business owners as requested. Task 2—Neighborhood Meetings Prepare and mail a notice to affected residents and business owners providing specific project components and inviting them to a neighborhood meeting. Attend neighborhood meetings and discuss the project and obtain public input. Evaluate public input for merit and make revisions and/or accommodations as necessary. Develop initial relationship with residents and business owners and follow up with additional Project Approach, Page 6 Project o r o a information if necessary. Introduce project web pages and social media pages. Task 3 — Create Project Web Pages Create a project web page for each individual project area which details the work to be completed. Include project personnel and their contact information, project exhibits, schedules and construction updates. Task 4—Notice Regarding Schedule and Contacts Prepare and mail a notice to all affected parcels to inform them of the construction schedule and project contact personnel. Direct them to the project webpage and social media page to receive future updates. Meet or discuss project with residents as requested. Task 5— Create Social Media Page Create either a Facebook or Twitter page for each of the project areas. Post relevant project and construction updates. Phase 4 — Design Including Plans and Specifications Task 1 —Existing Utilities Review We will investigate and review the existing data on the storm sewer, water, and sanitary sewer systems. In cooperation with City staff, a final report will be developed to summarize which systems are proposed to be replaced, repaired or protected. This task will include site visits to visually review the existing infrastructure. Task 2— Stormwater Model The storm water system will be modeled with XP-SWMM, HydroCAD or Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis. The model will define existing and future flow rates, anticipated problem areas, recommended pipe sizes, recommended ponding areas or rain gardens, and recommended future system improvements if applicable. The model will include areas outside the project area that currently drain to the proposed system. Task 3 — Small Utility Notification We will notify and coordinate the project improvements with the utility companies. Task 4—Value Engineering Review the project to determine possible cost savings such as recycle of bituminous as base material. Task 5—Identify Easements This task will consist of identifying the necessary easements based upon the project limits and preparing easement exhibits and descriptions for use by the City. Task 6—Utility Design Meeting Coordinate a meeting with Elk River Municipal Utilities and the small utilities as required. We will coordinate and attend the utility design meeting. The goal is to define potential conflicts and to provide the utility companies with advance notice of the project to avoid construction delays. Project Approach, Page 7 0 Project Approach - Section 3 Task 7— Construction Drawings Prepare detailed construction drawings for review by the City. We anticipate that a typical plan set will include: 1. Title Sheet 2. Construction Notes 3. Standard Plates 4. Schedules 5. Typical Sections and Details 6. Existing Conditions 7. Removals 8. List of Estimated Quantities 9. Street and Stormwater Plan and Profiles 10. Utility Plan and Profiles 11. Traffic Control and Staging Plans 12. Signage and Striping Plan 13. Contractor Storage Area 14. Erosion and Sediment Control 15. Cross Sections Task 8—Prepare Final Documents Prepare final drawings, estimated quantities, specifications, conditions of the contract and bidding requirements. Coordinate these plans and specifications with the permitting agencies and Mn/DOT. Task 9—Final Construction Cost Estimate Finalize the estimated cost of construction and value engineer as required to maintain budget. Task 10— Quality Control Review Schedule and conduct an in-house quality control review of the final draft of the construction documents. Deliverables: Preliminary Design Report including conceptual design drawings and provide the City a copy of the site survey, pavement cores and borings. Easement exhibits and descriptions. Agency Permits. Final construction drawings and specifications, and final construction cost estimate. Phase 5 — Contract Bidding and Award Task 1 —Pre-bid Conference Coordinate and attend pre-bid conference if the City requests one. Task 2—Bidding Process Respond to Contractor questions, review and approve proposed Contractor substitutions in coordination with the City. Prepare and coordinate any necessary Addenda. Task 3 —Bid Opening Coordinate and attend the bid opening. Project Approach, Page 8 Project o r o a Deliverables: Draft addenda if necessary. Prepare bid tabulation and award recommendation letter. Phase 6 — Construction Inspection, Staking and Management Services Task 1 —Pre-Construction Conference Coordinate and attend preconstruction conference. Task 2— Construction Administration The Project Manager will be responsible to coordinate and administer the construction contract, interpret the contract requirements and advise the City concerning the performance of the contractor. The Project Manager in cooperation with the Construction Observers will review and certify contractor pay requests. The Project Manager will conduct recurring visits to the site at a minimum each day that major contract quantities are occurring. The Project Manager and Construction Observer will coordinate and keep the City of Elk River informed of the status of the project. The Project Manager and Construction Observer will also develop the schedule of materials testing. Task 3 — Construction Observation The Field Representatives will provide full time construction observation and keep the City informed of progress through verbal communication and daily written reports. The Construction Observers will be responsible for documentation of actual quantities and verification that construction materials and methods are in accordance with the contract documents. Daily reports will include weather conditions, summary of contractors work force, quantities completed, site correspondence and hours worked. Task 4— Construction Staking Offsets will be provided prior to beginning removals and reclamation. Utility, storm sewer and curb stakes will be provided as necessary. Task 5— Substantial Completion Inspection The Project Manager, Construction Observer and City representative will conduct the substantial completion inspection of the project. Based on the inspection, a punchlist will be prepared and delivered to the Contractor. Task 6—Acceptance Letter Once the Contractor has completed all punchlist items to the satisfaction of the City and Project Manager, an acceptance letter will be drafted for consideration by the City. Task 7—As-Built Receive, review and assemble all as-built information onto the drawing and specifications. Deliverables: Meeting minutes, daily construction observation reports, shop drawings, payment requests, project closeout information, project punchlist, final acceptance letter, and electronic and hard copies of as -built drawings and specifications. Project Approach, Page 9 0 = I Project Approach - Section Phase 7 —Warranty Inspection Task 1 —Warranty Inspection The Project Manager, Field Representative, Elk River Municipal Utilities, and a City Representative will conduct the warranty inspection. Deliverables: Written report of the warranty inspection. Project Approach, Page 10 Proposed Project Team and Experience - Section 4 A. Staff Commitment The team for this project was carefully selected based on their qualifications, experience and availability. Due to the importance we have placed in serving you, your team will include many of our key employees with a wealth of relevant experience. We have assembled a team of over 14 qualified staff members to complete the work efficiently, cost effectively and professionally. B. Design Team Craig Jochum, P.E., is proposed to be the Principal-in-Charge. As the Principal-in-Charge, Craig will periodically check in with the project team and ensure that adequate staff resources are being provided to meet the critical path. Shane Nelson, P.E., is proposed to be the Project Manager. Shane will be the day to day contact for the project and will be involved in all aspects of the project. Shane will be directly involved in the design and construction management of the project and direct the Hakanson Anderson team on specific assignments. Timothy Eggerichs,P.E., is proposed to be a Lead Design Engineer. Tim will lead the design on the project ensuring that adequate detail and design elements are incorporated into the plans. Tim will assign specific design and drafting tasks to other design engineers and technicians and assemble multiple elements to ensure a complete design. Adam Thiele, P.E., is proposed to be a Design Engineer. Adam will carry out specific assignments and complete the design of individual project elements. Brent Larson, P.E., is proposed to be a Design Engineer. Brent will carry out specific assignments and complete the design of individual project elements. Ethan Peterson, P.E., is proposed to be a Traffic Engineer. Ethan will analyze the preliminary geometric layout of CSAH 1,prepare models with traffic predictions, determine necessary stacking and turn lane lengths, analyze intersections, and propose modifications to the geometric layout as necessary. Proposed Project Team and Experience, Page 11 Proposed Project Team and Experience - Section 4 Kaci Fischer, is proposed to be the Environmental Specialist. �F . Seth Monroe, is proposed to be the GIS Specialist. A Charlie Christopherson,P.L.S., is proposed to be the Survey Manager. Brian Person,P.L.S. is proposed to be a Survey Crew Chief s Dave St. Dennis is proposed to be a designer and the Lead CARD Technician. A C. Construction Observation Team Jon Halter, Construction Observer. Jon will be the on-site representative and will ensure that all components of the project are constructed in accordance with the contract documents. In addition, Jon will effectively communicate with affected property owners and City personnel on various aspects of the project. D. Subconsultants No subconsultants are proposed for this project. Proposed Project Team and Experience, Page 12 Proposed Project Team and Experience - Section 4 E. Organizational Chart Justin Femrite City Engineer Project Manager Principal-in-Charge Shane Nelson, PE Craig Jochum, PE Construction Design Services Survey Services Services Construction Manager Design/Traffic Engineers Survey Manager Shane Nelson, PE Tim Eggerichs,PE Brent Larson, PE Charles Christopherson,RLS Adam Thiele, PE Construction Observer Ethan Peterson, PE Survey Crew Chief Jon Halter Environmental/GIS Brian Person Kaci Fischer Seth Monroe F. Relevant Project Experience Six relevant project examples and references are summarized on the following pages. Proposed Project Team and Experience, Page 13 IProposed Project Team and Experience - Section 4 Project Example No. 1 A • . City of Anoka 2015 - 1 st Avenue N. REAL. CLASSIC. Anoka, MN 55303 (763) 576-2781 Contact Person: Greg Lee, City Manager Consultant City Engineer since 1985 1999 -2016 Street Renewal Program: The City of Anoka implemented a comprehensive Street Renewal Program in 1999 to systematically replace and upgrade its aging infrastructure, some of which dates to the 1880's. When residential streets are scheduled for reconstruction, the City trusts Hakanson Anderson to complete a thorough investigation of the existing facilities in order to coordinate and replace all old or undersized facilities. We have been assisting the City of Anoka with its Street Renewal Program since its inception. The Street Renewal Projects typically consist of the complete reconstruction of streets, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, watermain, sidewalk, lift stations and small utilities within existing urban neighborhoods. The aging sanitary sewer mains and laterals are replaced, as well as the cast iron watermains. Hakanson Anderson assists the City early on by helping to gain public support for the project at the annual neighborhood meeting. During construction, frequent communication with the City and affected property owners is the key in maintaining access and realizing a successful project. Our design team always meets with the small utility companies early in the design process to coordinate the impacts and allow the opportunity for replacement of private lines, as well as City owned electric facilities. The City Electric Utility seizes the opportunity to replace the existing overhead cobra street lights with underground wiring and decorative style street lights. Project Cost: Range from $850,000 to $2,700,000 Design Criteria: Municipal State Aid and City Standards Funding: Assessment,Municipal State Aid and Local Status: On-going Proposed Team Members Roles: Craig Jochum: Project Manager Tim Eggerichs: Design Engineer Shane Nelson: Design Engineer Dave St. Dennis: CADD Technician and Construction Observer Brian Person: Construction Staking Jon Halter: Construction Observer ]Xr Nk � rt 1 Proposed Project Team and Experience, Page 14 IProposed Project Team and Experience - Section 4 Project Example No. 2 ANREAL. • . City of Anoka 2015 - 1 st Avenue N. Anoka, MN 55303 (763) 576-2781 Contact Person: Greg Lee, City Manager Consultant City Engineer since 1985 City of Anoka Railroad Quiet Zone Project The City of Anoka initiated the establishment of a quite zone in 2012 for the crossings at County State Aid Highway 31 and Minnesota Trunk Highway 47. The project consisted of constructing Supplemental Safety Measures in the form of non-surmountable medians and also upgraded the trail signage and pavement markings at the crossings. Additionally, at the Trunk Highway 47 crossing, truncated domes were installed on the trail at the crossing, the driveway in the SE quadrant at Trunk Highway 47 was removed, and curb and gutter was installed in the NW quadrant at Trunk Highway 47 to better delineate the driveway on the north side of the tracks. On behalf of the City of Anoka, Hakanson Anderson completed all permitting, design, construction administration and coordination between the City, Anoka County,the Minnesota Department Transportation, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad, and the Federal Railroad Administration. The Quiet Zones were put into effect on December 23, 2012. Project Cost: $87,000 Design Criteria: MnDOT,Anoka County, Federal Railroad Administration Funding: Local Status: Constructed Proposed Team Members Roles: Craig Jochum: Project Manager Tim Eggerichs: Design Engineer Dave St. Dennis: CADD Technician and Construction Observer F y _ 1 Proposed Project Team and Experience, Page 15 IProposed Project Team and Experience - Section 4 Project Example No. 3 C0C3N City of Coon Rapids Community strength... 11155 Robinson Drive RAPIDSMi far generations Minnesota Coon Rapids, MN 55433-3761 (763) 767-6465 Contact Person: Mark Hansen,Assistant City Engineer Consultant Engineer Evergreen Boulevard, 90th Street and 93rd Street, Street Reconstruction, Reclaim and Pave, Watermain Replacement Project: The City of Coon Rapids retained Hakanson Anderson to prepare construction plans for watermain replacement and street improvements by reclamation and paving. The City's intent was to replace the streets in-kind. After design work had started,the City revised the scope to include a sidewalk along Evergreen Blvd. This design change would have triggered the need for additional stormwater treatment and right-of-way acquisition. When initially constructed in 1971, Evergreen Blvd. was a major collector. However when Highway 610 was constructed the north access was removed and replaced with a cul-de-sac. Hakanson Anderson proposed removal of 15 feet of extra pavement width to right-size the street for its current classification. This modification would also allow the project to proceed with the addition of sidewalk pavement while removing the need for additional stormwater treatment or right-of-way acquisition. It is estimated that the City will recognize savings of approximately $300,00 due to the value engineering that was performed in collaboration with the City engineering staff on this project. The project also includes replacement of approximately 7,500 feet of watermain, hydrants, valves, services, and replacement of a majority of the storm sewer structures within the curb lines. Project Cost: $4.5 Million Design Criteria: Municipal State Aid and City Standards Funding: Municipal State Aid,Assessment and Local Status: Under Construction Proposed Team Members Roles MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONCI Craig Jochum: Project Manager TM,°OF RAPIDS � aAµoAEa �E� Adam Thiele: Design Engineer �u.o oN ,.oM EaaEEueo .ao .o =Pa aaoo oa, .:°, Jon Halter: Construction Observer m \ � ® ®® . ��COON t��71�"nna s�°"IDS — 'i Proposed Project Team and Experience, Page 16 IProposed Project Team and Experience - Section 4 Project Example No. 4 City of Elk River 13065 Orono Parkway Elk River, MN 55330 ,� (763) 635-1051 Eik .� ever Contact Person(s): Justin Femrite, P.E. City Engineer Nature's Edge Business Center-Phase 1 Improvements The City of Elk River retained Hakanson Anderson in 2012 to implement the Nature's Edge Business Center - Phase 1 Improvements. The project consisted of the design and construction of improvements to public infrastructure including sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, and street improvements. Hakanson Anderson also provided all survey and platting for the project. Ultimate improvements included the extension of Twin Lakes Road from its current location towards the future connection with Trunk Highway 10. The ultimate buildout will include a multi-lane roundabout and will require the re-alignment of 171" Avenue. Twin Lakes Road will serve as a major collector, utilizing an urban four-lane divided roadway section. The two lane urban roadway constructed with the 2012 improvements will ultimately become the easterly half of the future Twin Lakes Road cross section. Hakanson Anderson planned and designed the ultimate improvements by completing the preliminary engineering work, including the full geometric layout, lane configurations, traffic engineering, roundabout layout, and storm water management. By completing this preliminary engineering work, the City can be assured that the 2012 Improvements will compliment the ultimate improvements and that future right-of-way has been secured. The project included a series of infiltration ponds and pipes to manage current and future stormwater runoff volumes. The construction also included the excavation of over 90,000 cubic yards of soil to provide a earth balance on three newly platted commercial lots. Project Cost: $1,164,000 Design Criteria: Municipal State Aid and City Standards Funding: Local and DEED Status: Constructed Proposed Team Members Roles: Craig Jochum: Project Manager Dave St. Dennis: CADD Technician Tim Eggerichs: Design Engineer Brian Person: Platting & Staking Shane Nelson: Design Engineer NATURES EDGE BUSINESS CENTER c e r Proposed Project Team and Experience, Page 17 IProposed Project Team and Experience - Section 4 Project Example No. 5 City of Otsego 410 8899 Nashua Avenue N.E. c i TY OF Otsego, MN 55330 (763)441-4414 Ot eO Contact Person(s): MINNESOTA Jessica Stockamp, Mayor City Engineer since 1983 70th Street NE and CSAH 37 Roundabout Project This project consists of 2.1 miles of new road construction, road reconstruct and realignment, roundabout construction, and trail construction. Hakanson Anderson's tasks included easement and right-of-way acquisition, preparation of plans and specifications and construction administration. A new segment of road was constructed from Martin Farms Avenue to Nadala Avenue, 701h Street was improved from Nadala Avenue to Oakwood Avenue, and a off street shared multiuse bituminous trail was constructed on the north side of the road alignment. This project also included the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of 70th Street and CSAH 37. The improvements have been designed to meet Municipal and County State Aid design standards. A Joint powers agreement was executed between the City and County for the turnback of 70th Street to Wright County. Construction of this project started in 2015 and will be completed by July 1, 2016. Project Cost: $3,375,00 Design Criteria: Municipal and County State Aid Funding: Federal,Municipal and County State Aid and Local Status: Under Construction Proposed Team Members Roles: Ron Wagner: Project Manager Tim Eggerichs: Design Engineer Brent Larson: Design Engineer Shane Nelson: Construction Manager Charlie Cherrier: Construction Observer 3 Proposed Project Team and Experience, Page 18 IProposed Project Team and Experience - Section 4 Project Example No. 6 City of City of St.Michael t• Michael 11800 Town Center Drive NE St. Michael, MN 55376 (763)416-7931 Contact Person(s): Steve Bot, City Administrator/Engineer Consultant Engineer 2015 MSA Street Rehabilitation and Local Street Rehabilitation Projects The City of St. Michael retained Hakanson Anderson to prepare detailed plans and specifications for the rehabilitation of several Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets, including Jamison Avenue, Frankfort Parkway, 34th Street, Carissa Lane, and Oakwood Parkway. This project consisted of milling the bituminous wearing course, installing paving fabric to add strength and reduce reflection cracking, and constructing a new bituminous wearing course. Sub-surface drainage was also added in select locations and numerous storm sewer manholes were rehabilitated. Shortly after completing the plans for the MSA project,the City asked us to assist with plans and specifications for a local street rehabilitation project. This project was similar in scope to the MSA project, however, it was 100% City funded. Both projects were successfully completed in 2015. Project Cost: $1.3 Million Design Criteria: Municipal State Aid and City Standards Funding: Municipal State Aid and Local Status: Constructed Proposed Team Members Roles: Shane Nelson,: Project Manager f Tim Eggerichs: Design Engineer Craig Jochum: QA/QC Reviewer �, �ri 7 e,x wx Rnxs MINNESOTADEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION�•,cw.exc s,.xP MEERl T 1 ���w..ei.,�.—'D cox ,e,...ousow .e .emiwra:sMluµewc�.oe.�..w P—N. xa .^^,^,.�... " �-^� Ei ® 000 — � 0 0 0 0 o00 0° � rn 0000000 00 o0o0000o - 000 00 0 /r Min W-2-M-NOT E X. w PROJECT of 1-rMIMA a �L LOCRTION wo d,p /r✓ - i4 Proposed Project Team and Experience, Page 19 2 9 1 6 2 3 3 1 6 1 3 2 0 2 7 6 1 3 2 0 2 7 3 1 0 1 7 2 4 1 8 1 5 2 2 2 9 5 1 2 1 9 2 6 3 1 0 1 7 2 4 3 1 7 1 4 2 1 2 8 4 1 1 1 8 2 5 2 9 1 6 2 3 3 0 6 1 3 2 0 2 7 4 1 1 1 8 2 5 An a l y s i s o f C i t y N e e d s / S i t e A n a l y s i s Dr a f t F e a s i b i l i t y R e p o r t 1 Fi n a l F e a s i b i l i t y R e p o r t 2 Ge o t e c h n i c a l I n v e s t i g a t i o n To p o g r a p h i c S u r v e y Pr o j e c t N o t i f i c a t i o n L e t t e r Ne i g h b o r h o o d M e e t i n g s Cr e a t e P r o j e c t W e b P a g e s No t i c e R e g a r d i n g S c h e d u l e a n d C o n t a c t s Cr e a t e S o c i a l M e d i a P a g e Ex i s t i n g U t i l i t i e s R e v i e w St o r m w a t e r M o d e l Sm a l l U t i l i t y N o t i f i c a t i o n Va l u e E n g i n e e r i n g Id e n t i f y E a s e m e n t s Ut i l i t y D e s i g n M e e t i n g Co n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s 345 Pr e p a r e F i n a l D o c u m e n t s 6 Fi n a l C o n s t r u c t i o n C o s t E s t i m a t e Qu a l i t y C o n t r o l R e v i e w PH A S E 4 - D E S I G N I N C L U D I N G P L A N S A N D S P E C I F I C A T I O N S PH A S E 3 - P U B L I C I N V O L V E M E N T A N D M E E T I N G S PH A S E 2 - T O P O G R A P H I C S U R V E Y PH A S E 1 - F E A S I B I L I T Y R E P O R T Au g . Se p . Oc t . Nov.Dec. PR O J E C T 1 - 2 0 1 7 S T R E E T I M P R O V E M E N T S De s c r i p t i o n Ja n . Fe b . Ma r c h Ap r i l Ma y Ju n e Ju l y Pr o j e c t S c h e d u l e - Section 5 Project Schedule, Page 20 2 9 1 6 2 3 3 1 6 1 3 2 0 2 7 6 1 3 2 0 2 7 3 1 0 1 7 2 4 1 8 1 5 2 2 2 9 5 1 2 1 9 2 6 3 1 0 1 7 2 4 3 1 7 1 4 2 1 2 8 4 1 1 1 8 2 5 2 9 1 6 2 3 3 0 6 1 3 2 0 2 7 4 1 1 1 8 2 5 Au g . Se p . Oc t . Nov.Dec. De s c r i p t i o n Ja n . Fe b . Ma r c h Ap r i l Ma y Ju n e Ju l y Pr e B i d C o n f e r e n c e Bi d d i n g P r o c e s s Bi d O p e n i n g 7 Pr e - C o n s t r u c t i o n C o n f e r e n c e Co n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n 89 Co n s t r u c t i o n O b s e r v a t i o n Co n s t r u c t i o n S t a k i n g Su b s t a n t i a l C o m p l e t i o n I n s p e c t i o n Ac c e p t a n c e L e t t e r As - B u i l t Wa r r a n t y I n s p e c t i o n To b e C o m p l e t e d i n 2 0 1 7 1. P r e s e n t D r a f t F e a s i b i l i t y t o S t a f f o n J u l y 2 9 , 2 0 1 6 . 2. D e l i v e r f i n a l F e a s i b i l i t y R e p o r t o n A u g u s t 2 6 , 2 0 1 6 . 3. P r e s e n t 5 0 % p l a n s e t t o C i t y S t a f f . 4. P r e s e n t 9 0 % p l a n s e t t o C i t y S t a f f . 5. D e l i v e r p l a n s t o M n / D O T f o r S t a t e A i d R e v i e w . 6. P r e s e n t p l a n s e t t o C i t y C o u n c i l a n d r e q u e s t a d v e r t i s e m e n t f o r b i d s . 7. O p e n b i d s M a r c h 2 0 1 7 . 8. B e g i n C o n s t r u c t i o n J u n e 2 0 1 7 . 9. S u b s t a n t i a l C o m p l e t i o n O c t o b e r 1 , 2 0 1 7 . PH A S E 7 - W A R R A N T Y I N S P E C T I O N PH A S E 6 - C O N S T R U C T I O N I N S P E C T I O N , S T A K I N G A N D MA N A G E M E N T S E R V I C E S PH A S E 5 - C O N T R A C T B I D D I N G A N D A W A R D Project Schedule, Page 21 2 9 1 6 2 3 3 1 6 1 3 2 0 2 7 6 1 3 2 0 2 7 3 1 0 1 7 2 4 1 8 1 5 2 2 2 9 5 1 2 1 9 2 6 3 1 0 1 7 2 4 3 1 7 1 4 2 1 2 8 4 1 1 1 8 2 5 2 9 1 6 2 3 3 0 6 1 3 2 0 2 7 4 1 1 1 8 2 5 An a l y s i s o f C i t y N e e d s / S i t e A n a l y s i s Dr a f t F e a s i b i l i t y R e p o r t 1 Fi n a l F e a s i b i l i t y R e p o r t 2 Ge o t e c h n i c a l I n v e s t i g a t i o n To p o g r a p h i c S u r v e y Pr o j e c t N o t i f i c a t i o n L e t t e r Ne i g h b o r h o o d M e e t i n g Cr e a t e P r o j e c t W e b P a g e s No t i c e R e g a r d i n g S c h e d u l e a n d C o n t a c t s Cr e a t e S o c i a l M e d i a P a g e Ex i s t i n g U t i l i t i e s R e v i e w St o r m w a t e r M o d e l Sm a l l U t i l i t y N o t i f i c a t i o n Va l u e E n g i n e e r i n g Id e n t i f y E a s e m e n t s Ut i l i t y D e s i g n M e e t i n g Co n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s 345 Pr e p a r e F i n a l D o c u m e n t s 6 Fi n a l C o n s t r u c t i o n C o s t E s t i m a t e Qu a l i t y C o n t r o l R e v i e w PH A S E 4 - D E S I G N I N C L U D I N G P L A N S A N D S P E C I F I C A T I O N S PH A S E 3 - P U B L I C I N V O L V E M E N T A N D M E E T I N G S PH A S E 2 - T O P O G R A P H I C S U R V E Y PH A S E 1 - F E A S I B I L I T Y R E P O R T Au g . Se p . Oc t . Nov.Dec. PR O J E C T 2 - C S A H 1 I M P R O V E M E N T S De s c r i p t i o n Ja n . Fe b . Ma r c h Ap r i l Ma y Ju n e Ju l y Pr o j e c t S c h e d u l e - Section 5 Project Schedule, Page 22 2 9 1 6 2 3 3 1 6 1 3 2 0 2 7 6 1 3 2 0 2 7 3 1 0 1 7 2 4 1 8 1 5 2 2 2 9 5 1 2 1 9 2 6 3 1 0 1 7 2 4 3 1 7 1 4 2 1 2 8 4 1 1 1 8 2 5 2 9 1 6 2 3 3 0 6 1 3 2 0 2 7 4 1 1 1 8 2 5 Au g . Se p . Oc t . Nov.Dec. De s c r i p t i o n Ja n . Fe b . Ma r c h Ap r i l Ma y Ju n e Ju l y Pr e B i d C o n f e r e n c e Bi d d i n g P r o c e s s Bi d O p e n i n g 7 Pr e - C o n s t r u c t i o n C o n f e r e n c e Co n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n 89 Co n s t r u c t i o n O b s e r v a t i o n Co n s t r u c t i o n S t a k i n g Su b s t a n t i a l C o m p l e t i o n I n s p e c t i o n Ac c e p t a n c e L e t t e r As - B u i l t Wa r r a n t y I n s p e c t i o n To b e C o m p l e t e d i n 2 0 1 8 1. P r e s e n t D r a f t F e a s i b i l i t y t o C i t y S t a f f . 2. D e l i v e r F i n a l F e a s i b i l i t y R e p o r t . 3. P r e s e n t 5 0 % p l a n s e t t o C i t y S t a f f a n d S h e r b u r n e C o u n t y . 4. P r e s e n t 9 0 % p l a n s e t t o C i t y S t a f f . 5. D e l i v e r p l a n s t o M n / D O T a n d B N S F a n d S h e r b u r n e C o u n t y f o r r e v e i w . 6. P r e s e n t p l a n s e t t o C i t y C o u n c i l a n d r e q u e s t a d v e r t i s e m e n t f o r b i d s . 7. O p e n b i d s . 8. B e g i n C o n s t r u c t i o n . 9. S u b s t a n t i a l C o m p l e t i o n . PH A S E 7 - W A R R A N T Y I N S P E C T I O N PH A S E 6 - C O N S T R U C T I O N I N S P E C T I O N , S T A K I N G A N D MA N A G E M E N T S E R V I C E S PH A S E 5 - C O N T R A C T B I D D I N G A N D A W A R D Project Schedule, Page 23 Why Hakanson Anderson We firmly believe that the advantages of selecting Hakanson Anderson are unmatched by any other firm. When considering all of our strengths as summarized below, we are confident that you will agree. An Established, Dedicated Municipal Firm - We have been providing Municipal Engineering services for over 40 years. Municipal engineering is what we do, and we do it well. It is, and always has been, our primary focus. Since our founding, we have been assisting cities of similar size and need with similar proj ects. Proximity — Our office is located in Anoka, MN. Our close proximity will allow our staff and key personnel to be available to the City on short notice. Project Understanding — Our extensive experience in similar projects gives us an understanding of the project that is second to none. Our detailed plans, thorough understanding of the project, and experienced team will increase bidder confidence, minimize or eliminate change orders, and result in an overall higher quality project. Proven Communication Skills - Our staff excels at effective communication. Our leadership, professionalism, and commitment from senior level staff will be crucial during the public process and assessment proceedings. During construction, we will keep the City staff, residents, business owners and other project stakeholders informed about the project progress. We are committed to treating all project stakeholders with respect and candor. Commitment of Key Staff — We are firm in our belief that a high level of involvement of senior level staff with relevant project experience is required for the City to realize a successful project. Specifically, you need project managers, design engineers, and field staff with relevant experience in urban reconstruction assessment projects and utility replacement. Our staff has a wealth of relevant experience and we are able to commit them to your project. We accomplish this by limiting the number of clients and/or projects that are assigned to our designated key staff. Cost-Effective Firm — Hakanson Anderson is committed to providing superior cost-effective service to its' clients. Our competitive billing schedule is possible by maintaining high staff utilization and consistently managing our administrative, marketing, and other overhead costs. Simply stated, you will receive added service for less cost. Why Hakanson Anderson, Page 24 Consultant / Section A. Project Costs The proposed cost for Project 1 - 2017 Street Improvements as outlined in Section 3 of our proposal is as follows: Project No. 1 Phase 1 — Feasibility Report $ 11,500.00 Phase 2—Topographic Survey $ 20,500.00 Phase 3 —Public Involvement and Meetings $ 8,000.00 Phase 4—Design Including Plans and Specifications $ 77,000.00 Phase 5—Contract Bidding and Award $ 3,600.00 Phase 6—Construction Inspection, Staking and Management Services $ 73,000.00 Phase 7— Warranty Inspection $ 2,600.00 Total Cost $ 196,200.00 The proposed cost for Project 2 - CSAH 1 Improvements and Reconstruction of Quinn Avenue and 6th Street as outlined in Section 3 of our proposal is as follows: Project No. 2 Phase 1 — Feasibility Report $ 8,500.00 Phase 2—Topographic Survey $ 7,200.00 Phase 3 —Public Involvement and Meetings $ 6,000.00 Phase 4—Design Including Plans and Specifications $ 33,000.00 Phase 5—Contract Bidding and Award $ 2,800.00 Phase 6—Construction Inspection, Staking and Management Services $ 49,000.00 Phase 7— Warranty Inspection $ 1,800.00 Total Cost $ 108,300.00 Consultant Cost, Page 25 Consultant / Section B. Hourly Rates: Hakanson Anderson Hourly Rates for these projects will be as follows: ................................................................................................................ ................................................................................................................ ................................................................................................................ ................................................................................................................ Job Classification Hourly Billing Rate Craig Jochum -Principal -in-Charge $120 Shane Nelson, Project Manager $112 Tim Eggerichs, Lead Design Engineer $107 Brent Larson, Design Engineer $103 Adam Thiele, Design Engineer $103 Ethan Peterson, Traffic Engineer $103 Dave St. Dennis, Lead CADD Technician $90 Kaci Fisher, Environmental Specialist $85 Seth Monroe, GIS $85 Charlie Christopherson, PLS $107 Brian Person, Survey Crew Chief $85 Jon Halter, Construction Observer $85 Senior Technician $75 - $90 Technician $50 - $75 Clerical $50 .................... Robotic Total Station $35 per hour Construction Observation Mileage Current IRS Rate C. Reimbursable Costs Hakanson Anderson charges for robotic total stations and mileage for construction observers as shown in the schedule above. These expenses are included in our Not to Exceed cost. All our expenses are included in our hourly rates. Hakanson Anderson will pay directly for the permit fees, and invoice these expenses to the City at the actual cost. D. Not to Exceed Cost Hakanson Anderson's Not to Exceed cost for Project 1 is $196,200. Hakanson Anderson's Not to Exceed cost for Project 2 is $108,300. E. Proposal Time Period This proposal shall remain valid until September 30, 2016. Consultant Cost, Page 26 APPENDIX Craig J. Jochum, P.E. EDUCATION SUMMARY Mr. Jochum,P.E. is the President of the firm with 26 years of experience in Bachelor Science general municipal engineering,residential and commercial development and -Civil Engineering water resource and environmental engineering. Craig is currently the North Dakota State University appointed City Engineer for the City of East Bethel and Township Engineer for Linwood Township. Craig has been serving the City of East Bethel REGISTRATION since 1998. Licensed Professional Engineer EXPERIENCE State of Minnesota Craig has extensive experience in general municipal engineering projects ORGANIZATIONS including the design and construction of municipal state aid and local streets;residential and commercial plan review;residential and commercial City Engineer Association of site and utility design, municipal water source and storage design, and Minnesota comprehensive storm water planning. He has developed City Engineering Standards Manuals for the Cities of East Bethel and Otsego. Craig has Minnesota Public Works successfully obtained over $2.4 million in grant money from Mn/DOT for Association the City of East Bethel through the Cooperative Agreement Program. The grant money has been used for construction and access American Council of control/consolidation along Trunk Highway 65. Engineering Companies Craig has worked with numerous private developers as Project Manager and Design Engineer. He has assisted with the development of lots in the Cities Anoka Chamber of Commerce of Andover,Ham Lake and Zimmerman. Metro North Chamber of PROJECT EXAMPLES Commerce STREET RENEWAL PROJECT 1999 TO 2016,CITY OF ANOKA- The City of Anoka retained Hakanson Anderson to assist the City with its Street Renewal Program since its inception in 1999. These projects consisted of reconstruction of streets, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, r� 7 watermain, sidewalk, lift stations and small utilities within existing - neighborhoods. 1 p F ANOKA RAILROAD QUIET ZONE PROJECT,CITY OF ANOKA- ;7 The City of Anoka retained Hakanson Anderson to prepare plans and specification for the Anoka Railroad Quiet Zone Project which consisted of constructing Supplemental Safety Measures in the form of non- ___ surmountable medians and also upgraded the trail signage, pavement `''` r __ markings at the crossings, truncated domes, driveway removal, and installation of curb and gutter. EVERGREEN BOULEVARD, 90 STREET AND 93 STREET, STREET RECONSTRUCTION, RECLAIM AND PAVE, -; WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT. CITY OF COON a - RAPIDS - The City of Coon Rapids retained Hakanson Anderson to -w prepare construction plans for a reclaim and pave project on Evergreen Boulevard, 90th Street and 93rd Street. This project also included watermain replacement. WEST TRUNK HIGHWAY 65 SERVICE ROAD IMPROVMENTS, CITY OF EAST BETHEL-The City of East Bethel retained Hakanson Anderson to design the West Trunk Highway 65 Service Road to meet State Aid Design requirements. This project included acquiring the necessary Hakanson right-of-way, installing new storm sewer systems, grading of stormwater Anderson ponds and the construction of a new street with concrete curb and gutter, I-illbituminous pavement and Trunk Highway 65 Improvements. Page I of I Shane M. Nelson, P.E. EDUCATION SUMMARY Bachelor of Science Civil Mr. Shane Nelson, P.E., is a Vice President of the firm. He has over 16 Engineering years of engineering experience working with municipal clients. Shane is University of Minnesota currently the appointed City Engineer for the City of Nowthen and Township Engineer for Credit River Township and consults to a number of REGISTRATION cities including Ramsey,St.Michael and Plymouth. Licensed Professional Engineer EXPERIENCE State of Minnesota Shane has experience in the design and construction of Municipal State Aid, residential,and commercial streets;residential and commercial plan review; ORGANIZATIONS comprehensive storm sewer planning; site and utility design; community sewage treatment systems; MS4 storm water planning; Wetland City Engineer Association of Conservation Act administration; and roadway maintenance plans. Shane Minnesota currently provides a wide range of services to the City of Nowthen and American Society of Civil Credit River Township. Engineers PROJECT EXAMPLES Minnesota Surveyors& Engineers Society CENTER STREET,CITY OF RAMSEY-The City of Ramsey retained Hakanson Anderson to prepare the preliminary design, construction plans, and construction management for Center Street located within The "COR". The project consisted of design of new street and utilities,including sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, street furniture, street lighting, and landscaping. The total cost of this DEED funded project was$500,000. 2015 MSA STREET AND LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION PROJECTS, CITY OF ST. MICHAEL - The City of St. Michael retained Hakanson Anderson to prepare detailed plans and specifications for the 2015 MSA Street and Local Street Rehabilitation Project which includes the rehabilitation of several MSA streets, including Jamison Avenue, Frankfort Parkway, 34th Street,Carissa Lane,and Oakwood Parkway. This project consisted of milling the surface bituminous layer, installing paving I h-111 -=-- fabric to add strength and reduce reflective cracking,and constructing a new bituminous wearing course. Sub-surface drainage was also added in select locations and numerous storm sewer manholes were rehabilitated. The overall project costs were $1.3 Million and funding was obtained from State w,„; ,,,,,,,, Aid and local sources. _ . WOW- - SCOTTVIEW ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION �f PROJECT,CREDIT RIVER-Credit River Township retained Hakanson - Anderson to prepare detailed plans and specifications for the reconstruction -_ of the streets in Scottview Estates, a large lot rural development. This project will be completed in 2016 and consists of reclaiming the existing bituminous, re-building the subgrade, installing new culverts, and re- ��„ constructing the pavement section. The overall project costs for this project is $800,000 and special assessments will be levied to the benefitting properties. MISSISSIPPI RIVER REGIONAL TRAIL EXPANSION, ANOKA COUNTY - Anoka County retained Hakanson Anderson to prepare the detailed design, Project Memorandum, specifications and construction Hakanson management for this extension of the Mississippi River Trail. The project is IIIIAnderson currently in design and construction is anticipated to begin in 2017. Page I of I Timothy A. Eggerichs, P.E. EDUCATION SUMMARY Bachelor of Science in Civil Mr. Eggerichs,P.E.,is a licensed professional engineer in his 17th year with the firm. Tim has extensive experience in the preparation of plans and Engineering specifications for a wide variety of municipal and private utility projects. North Dakota State University Tim also has extensive experience in water resource engineering including REGISTRATION hydrologic and hydraulic modeling. Licensed Professional Engineer EXPERIENCE State of Minnesota Tim's focus over the past 17 years has been development of plans and specifications for a variety of projects. Tim has developed comprehensive ORGANIZATIONS water resource management plans which address water quality, flooding and wetland concerns. He has also worked on grading and construction American Council of plans for numerous residential and commercial developments. These plans Engineering Co. have involved the design of streets, sewer and water utilities and storm sewer drainage systems. Tim has also been involved in the design of State Aid and locally funded municipal street projects. PROJECT EXAMPLES STREET RENEWAL PROJECT 1999 TO 2016, CITY OF ANOKA - Assists in the design of the annual street renewal projects in the City of Anoka. RAILROAD QUIET ZONE, CITY OF ANOKA — Prepared detailed plans and specifications for Railroad Quiet Zone. CSAH 116 AND CASTLE FIELDS BOUELVARD, CITY OF ANOKA — Designed the construction plans for Castle Fields Boulevard and CSAH 116 signlaization. JACKSON STREET, 197TH AVENUE, POLK STREET AND KLONDIKE DRIVE, CITY OF EAST BETHEL - Designed the State Aid Construction Plans for Jackson Street, 197th Avenue, Polk Street and Klondike Drive. WILD RICE DRIVE, CITY OF EAST BETHEL - Designed the State Aid Construction Plans for Wild Rice Drive. 185th AVENUE,LINCOLN DRIVE AND LAUREL ROAD, CITY OF EAST BETHEL - Designed the State Aid Construction Plans for 185th Avenue,Lincoln Drive and Laurel Road. KLONDIKE DIRVE AND CLONDIKE DRIVE EXTENSIONS, CITYOF EAST BETHEL-Designed Klondike Drive and Klondike Drive Extension. SUNWOOD DRIVE, CITY OF RAMSEY - Designed the State Aid Construction Plans for Sunwood Drive. Hakanson ■■ Anderson Page I of I Jon Halter EDUCATION SUMMARY Anoka Ramsey Technical Mr. Halter is a construction observer for Hakanson Anderson. He has over College 25 years of construction experience at federal, state and local levels. He is responsible for administering and inspecting the construction of public St,Cloud State University works projects in the communities Hakanson Anderson serves. CERTIFICATIONS EXPERIENCE Mn/DOT Certification for Jon has extensive experience in the engineering consulting business as a Bituminous 1 &2 construction observer. His construction observation duties have included: street construction and reconstruction, sanitary sewer, pipe jackings and Mn/DOT Certification for borings, liftstations, watermain, water supply, storage and treatment Concrete 1 &2 facilities and storm sewer. Jon has the required Mn/DOT Certifications needed to perform Municipal State Aid Street inspections. Several project Mn/DOT Certification for examples of Jon's construction observation experience are listed below: Grading and Base 1 &2 PROJECT EXAMPLES NPDES Erosion Control Design Training EVERGREEN BLVD, CITY OF COON RAPIDS — This project is located in an industrial/business park and receives considerable traffic, including semi and large delivery truck traffic. This project involves the replacement of watermain throughout a majority of the project and reconstruction of the streets. Multiple coordination and staging efforts must be implemented to ensure minimal impact to the local businesses. The total cost of this MSA funded project was$4,500,000 MONROE STREET RENEWAL PROJECT,CITY OF ANOKA—This project consisted of the reconstruction of the street,replacement of sanitary sewer,replacement of watermain,and storm sewer in an existing residential neighborhood. The overall project costs were $1,500,000 and funding was obtained from assessments and local sources. CSAH 116 AND CASTLE FIELD BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS, CITY OF ANOKA—This project involved the new construction of Castle Fields Boulevard and the intersection improvements necessary to accommodate the access to CSAH 116. Watermain was installed along the new road alignment and an underground infiltration system was constructed to mitigate the stormwater impacts. A signalized intersection was constructed to accommodate the access, which included modifications to the medians to construct turn lanes. The total cost of this project was $2,500,000. 185TH AVENUE, LAUREL ROAD AND LINCOLN DRIVE STREET RECONSTRUCTION, CITY OF EAST BETHEL — This project involved the reconstruction of three state aid routes. This project included excavation of muck and the rebuilding of the subgrade to prepare the road for the pavement section. Storm sewer and drainage improvements were also constructed with this project. The total project cost was $1,200,000 and the project was funded from MSA and local sources. Hakanson IIIIAnderson Page I of I Client#: 118291 HAKAAND DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) ACORD.,,, CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 11/03/2015 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S),AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT:If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must be endorsed.If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement.A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT Michelle Balck NAME: CBIZ Insurance Services, Inc. :PHONE 763 549-2200 FAX 763-549-2299 A/C,No,Ext (A/C,No): 2800 Freeway Blvd. E-MAIL ADDRESS: mbalck@cbiz.com Minneapolis, MN 55430 INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# 763 549-2200 INSURER A:Depositors Insurance Co. 42587 INSURED INSURER B:SFM Mutual Insurance Co. 11347 Hakanson Anderson Assoc Inc INSURER C:Continental Casualty Company 20443 3601 Thurston Avenue#101 Anoka, MN 55303 INSURER D: INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ADDLSUBR IN TYPE OF INSURANCE NSR WVD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXPM) LIMITS (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/Y ) A GENERAL LIABILITY ACP7144733339 11/01/2015 11/01/2016 EACHOCCURRENCE $1,000,000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PREMISESOEa occurs nce $300,000 CLAIMS-MADE FXI OCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) $5,000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $11,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $2,000,000 POLICY M PRO LOC $ JECT A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ACP7144733339 11/01/2015 11/01/2016EaacccideDSINGLELIMIT $1,000,000 X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ ALL OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ AUTOS AUTOS X HIRED AUTOS X NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ AUTOS Per accident A X UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR ACP7144733339 11/01/2015 11/01/2016 EACH OCCURRENCE s2,000,000 EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE s2,000,000 DED I X RETENTION$2000000 $ B WORKERS COMPENSATION 043702206 11/01/2015 11/01/201 X TyORYLTU- MITS EORH AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE Y/N E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $500,000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N] N/A (Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $500,000 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT 1$500,000 C E&O AEH004312681 6/20/2015 06/20/201 $250005000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES(Attach ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,if more space is required) CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION City of Elk River SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE y THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN 13065 Orono Parkway ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Elk River, MN 55330 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CBIZ Insurance Services, Inc. ©1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION.All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2010/05) 1 of 1 The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD #S1213070/M1212551 OPRS