5.5. SR 11-20-2000
Item # 5. 5 .
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT: Northstar Corridor Update
.
At the Northstar Corridor Development Authority meeting held on November 2nd,
the main topics of discussio,n were the approval of various contracts, update on
the responses to the Advanced Corridor Plan and an update on the overall
approval process. Most of the cities either approved the plan or approved the
plan with conditions. Thosethat approved the plan with conditions had similar
concerns regarding compliance with local ordinances and continued input in the
design process. Clear Lake" disapproved the station location. The station would
have required the removal of several residences and a business. Their motion
was to disapprove the station design and location as proposed; however, their
disapproval would be withdrawn if the station were moved outside city limits. The
city of Fridley disapproved the proposed station location and design and included
a long list of amendments needed to for them to withdraw their disapproval. The
representative from Fridley indicated that the NCDA and the city were very close
to resolving the outstanding issues.
The approval process is moving forward on schedule with a start up date of
December 2004. The designs for the extension of the Hiawatha LRT to the
Northstar Corridor downtown station site are being completed, as are the designs
for the connection to the Central Corridor/Red Rock line, which will connect with
downtown St. Paul and continue to Hastings.
.
13065 Orono Parkway. P.O. Box 490 · Elk River, MN 55330. TDD & Phone (763) 441-7420 · Fax (763) 441-7425
--3.
r
4.
7.
8.
.....--:-'\
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
I
.i;
Thursday, November 2, 2000
4:30 p.m.
Sherburne County Government Center
Elk River, MN
Action Requested
1.
Minutes of September 7,2000 Meeting*
Approval
2.
Executive Committee Report* Approval
a. 2001 Legislative Position*
b. Contract for Public Information Services*
c. NCDA Contracts for 2001 *
d. Procurement Process for Insurance Broker*
e. Parking Study (see attached draft Executive Committee minutes)
"""'"'
Advanced Corridor Plan: Responses by Cities and Towns*
Information
Multi-Modal Facilities and Commuter Services
Information
5.
Report on SeattleNancouver Commuter Rail System
Information
6.
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
a. DEIS Process
b. Public Hearing Dates and Location
Update
Information
Northstar Corridor Critical Milestones*
Information
Update on Connections
a. Hiawatha LRT
b. Red Rock/Central Commuter Rail*
Update
9. Other
a. December 7,2000 Meeting
*Attached
II
.
.
.
;
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
NORTHSTAR CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Regular Meeting Minutes
September 7, 2000
The Northstar Corridor Development Authority met in regular session on September 7, 2000, in the Board Room at the
Sherburne County Government Center, Elk River, Minnesota.
Present were: Bob Erdrick, Tom Wenzel, Tim Houle, Tim Yantos, Betsy Wergin, Mary Richardson, Mark
Stenglein, Paul Ostrow, Steve Billings, Lewis Stark, Don Jolly, Jim Dickinson, Duane Cekalla, Carl Yilek,
Gerald Goebel, Jerry Leese, Duane Grandy, Bob Johnson, John Ellenbecker, Terry Nagorski, Stephanie
Klinzing, Alicia Vap, Dean Michalko, Jeanne Witzig, Rick Speak, Luci Botzek, Sue Siemers, Jim McLean,
Kelli Neu, Scott Harlicker, Robert Kirchner, Mark Koegler, Ray Friedl, Vic Oviatt, Peggy Aho, Brian
Bensen, Lynn George, David Loch, Gabe Guevara, Mukutar Thakur, Mike Christensen, Jeff Dehler, Ken
Stevens, Jan Lucke
1. The meeting was called to order at 4:35 p.m.
2. Mr. Mukhtar Thakur, Director of Passenger Rail Operations with MnDOT was introduced. Mr.
Thakur will be representing MnDOT on the NCDA project.
3.
A motion was made by Stephanie Klinzing, seconded by Terry Nagorski and carried unanimously to
approve the agenda of September 7,2000, and the minutes of the August 3,2000 meeting, as
presented.
4. Executive Committee Report:
a) Discussion was held on the selection of a preliminary engineering firm for design of
commuter rail stations, maintenance facility, communications and control center, layover
facilities and related track work. The Executive Committee prepared and advertised an RFP
indicating the contract dates are September 7, 2000 through March 31, 2001, in an amount
not to exceed $1,000,000 with proposals due on August 11, 2000. Two firms responded:
URS/BRW and TKDA. The firms were interviewed by the proposal team on August 28,
2000. Based on the interviews, the Executive Committee is recommending that the NCDA
approve awarding the preliminary engineering contract to URS/BRW because of their:
allocation of project costs; flexibility; recognition of importance of the Project Management
Plan; references; project understanding and willingness to meet contract terms and insurance
requirements.
A motion was made by Mark Stenglein, seconded by Duane Grandy, and carried
unanimously to approve the recommendation of the Executive Committee to award the
preliminary engineering contract to URS/BRW for the design of commuter rail stations,
maintenance facility, communications and control center, layover facilities and related track
work, for services not to exceed $1,000,000 with a term of September 7, 2000 through
March 31, 2001, with the following additions as recommended by the Executive Committee:
That the URS/BRW / NCDA contract have a clause providing for penalties
for late deIiverables.
Page 1
;'
\,
That URSIBRW certify that the URSIBRW NCDA project manager, Paul .
Danielson, give his full dedication to the NCDA project and not act as
project manager on any other project.
That URSIBRW increase its DBE participation to 12% as required by
MnlDOT.
b) A motion was made by Duane Grandy, seconded by Jerry Leese and carried unanimously to
cancel the October 5, 2000 NCDA meeting due to a conflict with schedules. The next
meeting of the NCDA will be scheduled for November 2,2000.
c) A motion was made by Dan Erhart, seconded by Jerry Goebel, and carried unanimously to
approve the recommendation of the Executive Committee to approve Amendment #2 to
MnlDOT Agreement No. 78569, as follows:
Increase the contract amount by $2,500,000;
Extend the term of the contract to June 30, 2002; and
Provide for necessary changes to the federal conditions.
and authorize the Chairperson to sign said agreement.
d) A motion was made by Mark Stenglein, seconded by Lewis Stark, and carried unanimously
to approve the recommendation of the Executive Committee to approve the following
contract amendments for 2000:
Amendment No.2 to David Loch and Associates contract increasing the contract .
amount by $15,000 for a total amount of $30,000 for Calendar Year 2000.
Amendment No.4 to the Ken Stevens contract increasing the contract amount by
$65,000 for a total amount of$165,000 for Calendar Year 2000.
Amendment No.5 to the Richardson, Richter & Associates, Inc. contract increasing
the contract amount by $30,000 for a total amount of $230,000 for Calendar Year
2000.
and authorize the Chairperson to sign said Amendments.
e) A motion was made by Dan Erhart, seconded by Mark Stenglein, and carried unanimously to
approve Resolution #2000-8 authorizing the NCDA to enter into Agreement with the
Minnesota Department of Transportation for the Design and Construction of Multi-modal
Facilities and authorize the Chairperson or Vice Chairperson to execute the Agreement.
5. Tim Yantos, Jan Lucke and Jeff Dehler presented a report on the August 10,2000, Public
Information Commuter Rail Demonstration Project.
6. A motion was made by Mark Stenglein, seconded by Lewis Stark, and carried unanimously to
approve the recommendation ofthe Executive Committee to review other firms who responded to
the RFP issued previously and for which Shandwick had been hired. Staff will interview the public
information/public involvement firms and return with a recommendation to the Executive Committee
at its October 19 meeting with a recommendation for NCDA approval on November 2.
7.
Tim Yantos presented an update on the BNSF negotiations regarding capacity modeling.
.
8. Paul Ostrow provided information on the proposed Minneapolis baseball stadium multi-modal site.
9. Tim Yantos and Mary Richardson reviewed the proposed Advanced Corridor Plan review process.
Page 2
,
../
.
.
.
10.
The NCDA adjourned at 6:00 p.m. to attend the Public Hearing on the Advanced Corridor Plan
proposing a commuter rail system from Downtown Minneapolis to the City of 81. Cloud.
Representatives from Mn/DOT Passenger Rail Office and the NCDA were present at the public
hearing to answer questions from the public
Betsy Wergin Chairperson
Date
\ \FS I \SYS I \DEP1\Coord\Admndata\COMMITTE\CORRIDOR\2000\090700 draft. doc
Page 3
\
.
.
.
~~f[J,un~~
MINUTES
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
Executive Committee
Thursday. October 19. 2000
Next Meeting:; November 2. 12:00 p.m.
Anoka County 'Government Center
PLEASE NOTE: THESE MINUTES ARE IN "DRAFT" FORM AND ARE NOT TO BE
PUBLISHED IN ANY MANNER UNTIL THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS HAVE
REVIEWED AND APPROVED THEM.
Members present: Paul Ostrow. Lewis Stark, Paul McCarron. Steve Billings, Mark
Stenglein
Others present: Tim Yantos, Ken Stevens, Rick Speak, Gabriel Guevara. Thomas
Cruikshank. Dartell Lipscomb, Jeff Dehler. Mary Richardson, Colleen Herrmann, John
Sullivan, Brian Bensen, Jim Barton, Jeanne Witzig, Dean Michalko. Rick Speak. David
Loch, Paul Danielson. Peggy Aho
1. The meeting was called to order at 12:08 p.m.
2. Minutes: Paul McCarron moved approval of the minutes of the September 21.
2000 meeting. The motion waS seconded by Mark Stenglein and unanimously
approved.
3. Checks and Claims: Paul McCarron moved approval of the checks and claims as
presented. The motion was seconded by Lewis Stark and unanimously approved.
4. Contract for Public Information Services: Per direction from the Executive
Committee and in accordance with Mn/DOT and FT A requirements, staff
undertook a sole source procurement process for public information and
involvement services with Himle Horner. Paul McCarron made a motion that the
Executive Committee recommend that the NCDA approve an agreement with
Himle Horner, Inc. for Public Information Services with a term of November 2
through December 31,2000 for an amount not to exceed $40,000 and authorize
the chair to execute the agreement. Motion was seconded by Mark Stenglein and
was unanimously approved.
5. NCDA Contracts for2001: Tim Yantos reviewed a list of proposed NCDA
Contracts for 2001. The contracts are consistent with and set forth in the 2001
NCDA budget as approved by the NCDA at its July 6, 2000 meeting. A motion
was made by Paul McCarron that the Executive Committee recommend that the
NCDA approve the proposed 2001 contracts as shown in the list to follow and
authorize the Chair to finalize negotiations and execute the contract amendments
with a term of January 1,2001 to December 31,2001, as follows: 1) Ken Stevens,
$165,000; 2) Richardson, Richter & Associates, $250,000; 3) Harkins Cunningham
"
I.
- $250,000; 4) Robert Kessler - $50,000; 5) Lindquist & Vennum - $100,000; .
Mainline Management - $75,000; David Loch - $60,000; Messerli & Kramer-
$35,000; Capital Partnership - $35,000; and Brimsek - $30,000; and extend the
term of the URS/BRW contract to December 31, 2001. The motion was seconded
by Mark Stenglein and unanimously passed.
6. Procurement Process for Insurance Broker: Staff requested permission for the
NCDA to issue a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Administrative and
Brokerage Services for an Owner-Controlled or Other Insurance Program. Staff
believe that the NCDA should engage an insurance consultant/broker to perform
professional services in connection with the Project, to recommend whether OCIP
is appropriate for the design and construction phase of the Project, to advise the
NCDA concerning appropriate risk management techniques during the testing and
operations phases of the Project, and, if requested, to provide insurance and other
risk transfers appropriate to the Project. Once RFQ's have been received by
interested consultants/brokers, the NCDA will develop a short list of insurance
consultants/brokers which the NCDA determines are more capable of meeting the
needs of the Project. The schedule of the RFQ and RFP events would be as
follows: November 2, 2000 - NCDA authorizes issuance of RFQ; November 2,
2000 - release and publication; November 24, 2000 - Deadline for submission of
questions; December 1, 2000 - Responses due; and December 14, 2000 __
Approximate date of interviews; January 4,2001 - NCDA selects qualified
insurance consultants/brokers for short list; January 4,20001 - Mailing of Request
for Proposals to short list; January 11,20001 - Pre-proposal conference for
briefing of pre-qualified consultants/brokers; February 6,2001 - Proposals due;
March 1,2001 - NCDA authorizes negotiations with one or more proposers; March
2-26, 2001 - negotiations; and April 5, 2001 - contract awarded to successful
proposer by NCDA. A motion was made by Lewis Stark to recommend that the
NCDA authorize issuance of an RFQ in Novemberfor Administrative and
Brokerage Services for an Owner-Controlled or Other Insurance Program and
approval of the procurement process as listed above. Motion was seconded by
Paul McCarron and unanimously approved.
.
Staff requested approval for C. Herrmann and J. Sullivan to attend the IRMI
Construction Risk Conference regarding insurance, surety and risk management
issues in Atlanta, Georgia. Their attendance at the Training Conference will assist
the NCDA in reviewing the proposals which come in in response to the RFQ being
issued in November. Paul McCarron made a motion approving the costs incurred
by C. Herrmann and J. Sullivan to attend the Training Conference in Atlanta,
Georgia, November 13 through 16, 2000. Motion was seconded by Lewis Stark
and unanimously approved.
7. Update on Cities' Actions on the Advanced Corridor Plan: Most of the cities with
station sites have approved the Advanced Corridor Plan with conditions, except for .
the City of Fridley and the City of Clear Lake. Comments are as follows: The City
of Fridley has disapproved the Plan and has presented a lengthy list of
2
.
.
.
improvements it wishes to see. Coon Rapids approved the Plan with no comment.
Elk River approved the Plan with a list of comments. Big Lake approved the Plan
by Resolution, but has frontage road questions that need to be worked out. City of
Becker approved the Plan with no comments. City of Clear Lake felt it was in their
best interest to submit a resolution of disapproval due to the issue of traffic dividing
their community and the loss of taxable property (two homes, one business). Joint
resolutions of approval were received by the City of St. Cloud and Haven Township
regarding the St. Cloud East Station. City of Rice is showing a strong position of
support for the Plan; but has issues regarding the station site.
The NCDA's approach from here on is to assemble all resolutions/comments and
bring them before the Administrative Team and Technical Advisory Committee to
look at each issue. Then staff will generate a draft response which the PMT and
TAC will bring before the Executive Committee for its recommendation to the
NCDA. The NCDA will then submit all comments to the Mn/DOT Commissioner.
8. FT A Comments on DEIS: Staff noted that they had a phone conversation with
Paul Fish from the FTA today, and were told that the NCDA's response was
appropriate. Staff will assemble and distribute the final DEIS when approved by
the FT A. Three public hearings along the Corridor on the Draft EIS will be set for
December 6 through 13.
9. Update on BNSF Negotiations: The negotiation process is moving slowly. Paul
Ostrow asked whether expanded services would be negotiated at this time. Staff
noted that 18 trains a day will be included in the negotiations, and that if more
capacity is needed, adding cars would perhaps accomplish this. Members of the
Washington legal team will be arriving in town shortly to start negotiations of
business points of the construction and operating agreements. A draft of the
BNSF agreement will be brought to the Executive Committee when it is developed
by the Negotiating Team. It was noted that Mn/DOT will be at the table when the
NCDA starts the negotiations with BNSF.
Steve Billings asked whether the NCDA should pass a resolution as part of the
negotiation process stating that Mn/DOT is not going to be in charge of operations.
Paul McCarron noted that this issue should go to the intergovernmental group for
discussion. Gabe Guevara noted that the Commissioner of Mn/DOT will be the
one to decide who will operate the system. Dispatching will be a service offered by
BNSF.
10. Update on Hiawatha Connection: The Hiawatha Line has been extended from
Nicollet Avenue to 1 st Avenue with design work to be included to 3rd Avenue.
NCDA will do Preliminary Engineering to 3rd Avenue No. to link up with commuter
rail project.
11. Other: Lawsuit by Earth Protectors: It was noted that Leslie Davis of Earth
Protectors, is bringing suit against Mn/DOT regarding the Hiawatha LRT line. The
3
Attorney General's office has advised NCDA staff that all information asked for by .
Earth Protectors be handled through the Attorney General's office.
12. Other: Minneapolis Junction: Staff were asked if it was possible to have the
transfer station for the Northstar Corridor and Red Rock to be at the Minneapolis
Junction. It was noted by staff that both TKDA and BRW have concluded that it is
not technically feasible to have the transfer station at the Minneapolis Junction. It
was further noted that the 7th Avenue NE site is a possible site for a transfer station
for the Northstar Corridor and Red Rock and that the City of Minneapolis approved
the Advanced Corridor Plan contingent on the NCDA continuing to look atthe 7th
Avenue NE site as a possible transfer station with the Red Rock Corridor. Paul
McCarron noted that coordination of stations/transfer stations are being handled at
the staff level. Paul Ostrow noted that the City of Minneapolis will be holding public
meetings on the ih Avenue NE transfer station site on November 8 and 29.
13. Other: Correspondence from Ramsey County RRA: Staff presented a letter from
Ramsey County Chair, Tony Bennett, which voices Ramsey County's concern with
the proposed transfer site of the Northstar Corridor/Red Rock Corridors and noted
that the County would prefer that the NCDA locate the Minneapolis transfer station
to avoid the necessity of transferring in downtown Minneapolis for commuter rail
passengers traveling on the Central/ Red Rock/Northstar Corridors.
14. Other: Parking StUdy/Metropolitan Council: Paul Ostrow noted that an invitation .
from the Metropolitan Council was extended to the NCDA , asking them to partner
with the Council on a parking study of various station sites. Mr. Stevens noted
that parking isn't an issue at most of the sites along the Northstar Corridor other
then the Minneapolis location and that the Minneapolis site is already included in
the study. Mr. Guevara noted that the NCDA's share of the cost of the study would
be in an amount not to exceed $100,000. Paul Ostrow suggested bringing this
issue before the NCDA at its November meeting asking that the NCDA make a
commitment to be part of the Metropolitan Council's parking study. A motion was
made by Paul McCarron recommend to the NCDA that the NCDA partner with the
Metropolitan Council on a parking study of station sites. The motion was seconded
by Lewis Stark and unanimously passed.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 1 :24 p.m.
.
4
I U^'UJ.~ vLv-,;JOOL
uct Lb '00 16:01
P.02
~~*-c?tL
.
DRAFT
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
2001 Legislative Position
The Northstar Corridor Development Authority {NCDA} has completed a Major
Investment Study (MIS) on the corridor that extends along TH 10/47 from
downtown Minneapolis to the City of St. Cloud and Rice, Minnesota. The
conclusion of the MIS was the selection of a locally preferred transportation
investment strategy that includes commuter rail, improvements to TH 10. river
crossings and feeder bus improvements. The priority for implementation is
commuter rail which will operate on an existing freight railway owned by the
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company.
.
The proposed Northstar commuter rail project was identified by the Minnesota
Department of Transportation as the corridor ranked as the most promising for a
cost effective system and the top priority for implementation. The Northstar
Commuter Rail will include 12 stations located approximately 5 miles apart, park
and ride facilities at most locations, and feeder bus services. Eighteen trains per
day are expected to provide service to approximately 10,000 riders.
The Federal Transit Administration has rated the Northstar Corridor Commuter
Rail Project as "recommended" and authorized preliminary engineering, the next
phase of project development.
The estimated capital cost of the project is $231,000,000 (2004 dollars),
including vehicles, stations, a maintenance facility, layover facilities and capacity
improvements to the BNSF Railroad. The estimated annual operating cost,
including feeder bus service, is $14,500,000 (2004 dollars). It is anticipated that
fares collected will cover 30-50'% of the operating costs.
The United States Congress has acted to fully authorize the construction of
commuter rail in the Northstar Corridor and has appropriated planning and
engineering funding for the last several years. The State of Minnesota has
provided matching funds for these appropriations. It is proposed that Congress
appropriate 50% of the $231 million capital costs, the State of Minnesota 40%
and the counties or regional railroad authorities 10%. Note that Hennepin,
Anoka, Sherburne and Benton Counties or Regional Railroad Authorities have
already committed the locaJ portion of the funding.
.
Proposed Legislative Position: 1) Tha.t the Northstar Corridor DeV(~~lopment
Authority supports a request to the Legislature for $92,000,000 (40% of the
capital costs of the Northstar Commuter Rail Project); and 2) The Northstar
Corridor Development Authority further supports a request for the identification
of a funding source for operating costs not covered by fare collection.
Agenda Item # 2b
MEMORANDUM
October 26, 2000
To:
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
From:
Executive Committee
Subject:
Public Information and Involvement Services
. At a previous meeting, the Executive Committee directed staff to undertake a
sole source procurement for public information and involvement services, in
accordance with Mn/DOT and FTA requirements, and to negotiate a contract with
Himle Horner Inc. On October 16, 2000, the Administrative Team met with John
Himle and negotiated the terms of a contract as attached. The contract would be
for the period of November and December, 2000, for a total contract amount not
to exceed $40,000. The proposed scope of services is described in the
attachment.
Action Requested: The Executive Committee recommends that the NCDA
authorize the Chair to execute an agreement with Himle Horner Incorporated in
an amount not to exceed $40,000 with a term of November through December
2000 to provide services as outlined in the attachment.
.
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
2100 3rJ Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2265 (763) 323-5700 Fax: (763) 323-5682 www.northstartrain.org
.
October 16, 2000
C:\TEMP\Phasel.wpd
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
Public Information and Involvement Scope of Services
November and December 2000
.
Definitions
For the purposes of this Scope of Services, public infonnation and public involvement are defined as follows:
Public Infonnation: The dissemination of materials that provide complete, accurate, and timely infonnation on the
project. Public infonnation is a one-way communication, with the planning organization providing infonnation to
the community.
Public Involvement: An early and continuing opportunity to debate issues, frame solutions, and shape the substance
of plans and projects. Public involvement uses techniques that create a dialogue between the planning organization
and the community.
Tasks
Work with Administrative Team to complete the Phase I (July 1999 - December 2000) Work Plan, which
includes the following tasks:
A. Review the public involvement and public infonnation materials that have been used by the NCDA.
B. Engage the public in station area planning, the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Hearing and the Advanced .
Corridor Plan approval process. Promote DEIS hearings. .
C. Publish two project updates.
D. Prepare corridor wide 4 page newsletter for January mailing.
E. Issue press releases for events as the project reaches milestones.
F. Maintain the NCDA mailing list.
G. Develop an email distribution strategy to distribute infonnationabouttheNorthstarCorridor. Maintain the
NCDA email distribution list.
H. Maintain the NCDA infonnation kit.
I. Work with the NCDA web site contractor to redesign the NCDA web site.
J. Monitor news coverage.
K. Identify trade magazines that could run stories on the Northstar Corridor. Develop plan to supply regular
updates. Write initial introductory story.
L. Assist NCDA in implementation of business involvement plans.
M. Update video presentation of public officials.
Budget
The total budget proposed for the tasks cannot exceed $40,000.
Invoices
All invoices must be broken down by tasks that correspond to the work plan approved by NCDA.
Term
.
November 2,2000 - December 31,2000
.
Agenda Item #2c
MEMORANDUM
October 26, 2000
To:
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
From:
Executive Committee
Subject:
NCDA Contracts for 2001
.
Attached please find a list of proposed NCDA contracts for 2001. Also attached
is the 2001 budget as approved by the NCDA on July 6,2000, showing the
estimated expenditures by year's end and contracts that are needed to complete
work in 2001.
The contracts as proposed are consistent with and set forth in the approved
budget. Note, however, that the budget item for BNSF negotiations identifies a
$50,000 contract with the Felhaber law firm. The services to be provided include
addressing issues of Minnesota law arising gin the negotiations (e.g., taxes,
financing, procurement). Because Barney Olson has retired from the Felhaber
law firm, staff recommend that these necessary services be provided by
Lindquist & Vennum. Lindquist & Vennum current provides legal services to the
NCDA in the area of environmental and planning law. The firm has the
necessary expertise to act as local counsel to the negotiations as well.
Action Requested: The Executive Committee recommends that the NCDA
approve the proposed 2001 contracts as shown in the attached list and authorize
the Chair to finalize negotiations and execute the contract amendments.
.
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
2100 3'd Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2265 (763) 323-5700 Fax: (763) 323-5682 www.northstartrain.org
..
.
.
.
Proposed 2001 Contracts based on Approved 2001 Budget, 10/13/00
Contract with: Services: Contract Term:
Amount:
Ken Stevens Administration/Project Management $16q,OOO 1/1/01-12/31/01
--~
Richardson, Richter & Administration/Project Management 250,000 1/1/01-12/31/01
Associates, Inc. ,
~ ~
Harkins Cunningham BNSF Negotiations/Legal Services 250,000 1/1/31-12/31/00
Robert Kessler . BNSF Negotiations/Legal Services 50,000 1/1/31-12/31/00
Lindquist & Vennum BNSF Negotiations/Legal 100,000 1/1/31-12/31/00
Services/Environmental and Station
Planning Services ..
Mainline Management BNSF Negotiations/Capacity.Modeling 75,000 1/1/31-12/31/00
Services
David Loch Station Area Development 60,000 1/1/31-12/31/00
Messerli & Kramer State Legislative Representation 35,000 1/1/31-12/31/00
Capital Partnership Federal Legislative Representation 35,000 1/1/31-12/31/00
Brimsek Federal Legislative Representation 30,000 1/1/31-12/31/00
URS/BRW Technical Services: Phase I Extend term to
12/31/01
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
As approved: July 6, 2000
.
2001 Budget
NOTES
.
2000 2000 2001
Budgeted Projected Proposed
1. Administrative Expense . $30,000 $60,000 $60,000
Notes: Printing
. ". Postage
- .
Misc. Expense
2. NCDA Administration I Project $300,000 $415,000 $415,000
Management
Notes: Ken Stevens - $165,000
RRA - $250,000
3. Insurance $50,000 $10,000 $50,000
Notes: Design and Construction - $50,000
4. Legislative Activities $100,000 $100,000 $115,000
Notes: Federal - $65,000
State - $35,000
Misc. Expenses- $15,000
5. Community and Public Involvement $300,000 $343,000 $550,000
Notes: Professional Services - $250,000
Commuter Rail System Review - $50,000
Misc. Expense - $50,000
Direct Mailing - $200,000
6. BNSF Negotiations I Legal Services $465,000 $250,000 $465,000
Notes: Harkins Cunningham - $250,000
Kessler - $50,000
Felhaber - $50,000
Mainline Management - $75,000
Miscellaneous - $40,000
7. Phase II Technical Services $1,646,060 $1,546,060 $100,000
Notes: BRW - $100,000
.
2000 2000 2001
BUdAeted Projected Proposed
8. Preliminary Engineering for Commuter $4,700,000 $2,000,000 $700,000
Rail
9. PreliminaIY EnjJineeri"-g for LRT (3ra to Sm) $250,000 $250,000 $0
10. Station Area Development $190,000 $220,000 $220,000
Notes: Professional Services - $160,000
David Loch - $60,000
. . ..
., - .
11. Final Des!gn $8,000,000
12. Demo Train and Miscellaneous EX.2enses $75,000 $75,000 $75,000
.. - SUBTOTAL $8,106,060 $5,269,060 $10,750,000
13.Additional Expenses Related to $2,643,940 $2,530,940 $0
Commuter Rail Development, Acquisition
and Construction
TOTAL $10,750,000 $7,800,000 $10,750,000
Multi-Modal Station Develoj)ment $9,000,000 $5,000,000 $7,250,000
GRAND TOTAL $19,750,000 $12,800,000 $18,000,000
.
.
.
. Northstar Corridor ~elopment Authority .
2000 Revenues
June 28, 2000
DOLLAR AMOUNT SOURCE
$3.35 million Fund Balance as of 12/31/99
$2.5 million* Left from federal and state appropriations for 1999
$1.75 million* Estimated New Starts federal appropriation in 2000 and state match
$7.6 million TOTAL
$0.2 million Local contribution
$7.8 million TOTAL !
*pending
2001 Projected Revenues
DOLLAR AMOUNT SOURCE
$2.5 million Carryover from 2000
$8.0 million* Federal and state appropriations for 2001
$0.25 million ' ~ Local contribution
,
$10.75 million TOTAL
*Pending
2000 Projected 2001 Proposed Total
Multi-Modal Stations 5.0M 7.25 M 12.25 M
C:\TEMP\OOO tREY. WPD
.
.
.
Proposed 2001 Contracts based on Approved 2001 Budget, 10/13/00
Contract with: Services: Contract Term:
Amount:
Ken Stevens Administration/Proiect ManaQement $165,000 1/1/01-12/31/01
Richardson, Richter & Administration/Project Management 250,000 1/1/01-12/31/01
Associates, Inc.
Harkins Cunningham BNSF Negotiations/Legal Services 250,000 1/1/01-12/31/01
Robert Kessler BNSF NeQotiations/LeQal Services 50,000 1/1/01-12/31/01
Lindquist & Vennum BNSF Negotiations/Legal 100,000 1/1/01-12/31/01
Services/Environmental and Station
Planning Services
Mainline Management BNSF Negotiations/Capacity Modeling 75,000 1/1/01-12/31/01
Services
David Loch Station Area Development 60,000 1/1/01-12/31/01
Messerli & Kramer State Legislative Representation 35,000 1/1/01-12/31/01
Capital Partnership Federal LeQislative Representation 35,000 1/1/01-12/31/01
Brimsek Federal Legislative Representation 30,000 1/1/01-12/31/01
URS/BRW Technical Services: Phase I Extend term to
. 12/31/01
.
.
.
NORTHSTAR CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ADDITIONAL AGENDA
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2000
4:30 P.M.
Sherburne County Government Center
Elk River, MN
9. Amendment to the existing Agreement for Professional Services with David Loch
Action Requested: NCDA authorize the Chair to execute an amendment to the
Agreement for Professional Services with David Loch, increasing the contract amount
by $27,000. .
Agenda Item #2d
MEMORANDUM
October 26,2000
To:
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
From:
Executive Committee
Subject:
Procurement Process for Insurance Broker
.
The Executive Committee is requesting authorization for staff to issue a Request for
Qualifications (RFQ) to insurance consultants/brokers. The purpose of an insurance
consultant/broker would be to recommend whether Owner Controlled Insurance
Program (OCIP) is appropriate for the design and construction phase of the Project, to
advise on appropriate risk management techniques during the testing and operations
phases of the Project, and, if requested, to provide insurance and other risk transfers
appropriate to the Project. The proposal process is as follows:
November 2, 2000 - NCDA Board authorizes issuance of RFQ
November 13, 2000 - Release and publication
November 24, 2000 - Deadline for submission of questions
December 4, 2000 - Responses due
December 14, 2000 - Approximate date of interviews
January 4, 2001 - NCDA Board selects qualified insurance
consultants/brokers for short list
- Mailing of Request for Proposals to pre-
qualified consultants/brokers
- Pre-proposal conference
- Proposals due
- NCDA Board authorizes negotiations with
one or more proposers
March 2 - 26, 2001 - Negotiations
April 5, 2001 - NCDA Board awards contract
January 5,2001
January 11, 2001
February 12, 2001
March 1, 2001
.
Action Requested: The Executive Committee recommends that the NCDA
authorize staff to issue an RFQ for Administrative and Brokerage Services for an Owner-
Controlled or Other Insurance Program and approve the procurement process for an
insurance broker as listed above.
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
21003'<1 Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2265 (763) 323-5700 Fax: (763) 323-5682 www.northstartrain.org
~.
Agenda Item #3
MEMORANDUM
October 26, 2000
To:
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
From:
Executive Committee
Subject:
Advanced Corridor Plan: Responses by Cities and Towns
.
On August 3, 2000, the NCDA and Mn/DOT submitted the Advanced Corridor Plan to
the cities, towns and counties in the Corridor. The cities and towns with potential
stations were asked to review the station design and location for their jurisdiction and
approve, approve with conditions or disapprove with specific amendments. The
statutory deadline for action by the cities and towns was October 23,2000.
Attached are the resolutions from the cities and towns with potential stations. Each of the
following cities/towns approved its station location and design with conditions: Rice, 8t.
Cloud/Haven Township, Becker, Big Lake, Elk River, Anoka, Coon Rapids and
Minneapolis The cities of Clear Lake and Fridley disapproved the proposed station
locations and designs and specified the amendments that would cause the withdrawal of
disapproval.
The next step in the process will be that Mn/DOT and the NCDA will address the cities'
conditions and comments and respond within 45 days. The PMT and Mn/DOT will work
together to prepare a response for consideration of the NCDA at its December meeting.
Action Requested: Information.
.
Northstar Corridor Developmellt Authority
2100 3,d Avenue, Anoka. Minnesota 55303-2265 (763) 323-5700 Fax: (763) 323-5682 www.northstartrain.org
THE CITY OF RICE
205 Main St. E
Post Office Box 22
Rice, Minnesota 56367
320-393-2280
It8r~
uu.
Faa
ECOIlOMIC
C DEVELOPMENr
RESOLUTION NUMBER 10-12-00
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE NORTHSTAR CORRIDOR
STATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF RICE
WHEREAS; The City of Rice has been involved with and is a member
of the NorthStar Corridor Development Authority (NCDA),
and
WHEREAS; NCDA and the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT) are in the process of planning and implementation
of a commuter train'transit operation on the Burlington
Northern/Santa Fe Railroad tracks, and
WHEREAS;
The Advanced Cor~idor Plan for the commuter train
operation has included the siting of a station in Rice on
Division Street adjacent to the Burlington Northern/Santa
Fe, and
.
WHEREAS; Minnesota Statute 174.86 provides each city the
opportunity to approve or disapprove the location and
initial design of the station located in each respective
city, and
WHEREAS; The Rice City Council finds the initial conceptual plan
for the station to be acceptable,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Rice City Council approves
the Advanced Corridor Plan for the City under conditions that
revised or more refined plans will be forthcoming for review by the
City and that final plans for the station will comply with City
Ordinances and development standards.
Dated this Twelfth day of October, 2000.
Cff:?~;~~uJ 0 '/:~Jf~/
~chael Fia-d'li'r, Mayor of Rice
.
RICE. MINNESOTA
"City On The Crow"
.
.
.
~.
St. Cloud Resolution No. 2000-10-344
JOINT RESOLUTION
as to the
ADVANCED CORRIDOR PLAN for the ST. CLOUD EAST STATION
by and between the
CITY OF ST. CLOUD and the TOWN OF HAVEN
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation for the State Of Minnesota has
submitted the proposed physical design components for the Advanced Corridor
Plan (ACP) for the St. Cloud East Station; and
WHEREAS the St. Cloud East Station site is situated within the Town of Haven
(the "Town") but is intended to be developed in the City of St. Cloud (the '"City");
and '
WHEREAS, the City and Town have reviewed the ACP and have reached
agreement with respect to the preferred plan layout and components
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ST. CLOUD, MINNESOTA AND THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
TOWN OF HAVEN that:
The Advanced Corridor Plan is hereby approved subject to the following
conditions:
1. The State of Minnesota to construct a frontage road along the southwest side
of T.H. 10 between 15th Avenue SE and Lincoln Avenue (Sherburne County
Road 63). Said frontage road construction to occur during or prior to
construction of the St. Cloud East Station.
2. Sherburne County to designate the new Lincoln Avenue alignment as a
County Road or Highway.
3. When signal warrants are met, the State of Minnesota and Sherburne County
to install a traffic control signal system at the intersection of T. H. 10 lLincoln
Avenue. Concurrent with traffic signal installation, Sherburne County to
relocate Del-Tone Road (Sherburne County State Aid Highway #7) so that it
connects to this relocated intersection.
4. The property boundaries depicted on the attached site plan are assumed to
be correct and no displacement of existing adjacent business establishments
will be required.
5. The ACP to be revised to show sufficient space to accommodate the future
relocation of the St. Cloud Amtrak station, either in its existing building or a
new building, to the St. Cloud East Station site.
The State of Minnesota and Northstar Corridor Development Authority .
(NCDA) to fully cooperate and assist in relocating said rail station to the St.
Cloud East Station site.
6. The St. Cloud East Station to fully comply with City and Town zoning and
development standards for design, landscaping and lighting. Detailed site
plans to be submitted to the City and Town for review and approval prior to
construction.
7. The City and the Town reserve the right to request either a railroad pedestrian
overpass or underpass at the station platform.
This resolution adopted by the City Council this
day of
,2000.
Attested:
City of St. Cloud, Minnesota
o~
This. resolution adopted by the Town Board of Supervisors this Ii:> day of
~)cmPef2-. 2000.
.
Attested:
Town of Haven, Minnesota
By JlJ(,I~
Town Cle
THIS RESOLUTION DRAFTED BY:
St. Cloud City Engineer's Office
City Hall
400 2nd Street South
St. Cloud, MN 56301
320-255-7249
.
'OCT-17-00 TUE
'9':17
. p _ 02
.
COUNCIL MINUTES
CITY OF CLEAR l..AKIS
OCTOBER 2 . 2000
COUNCIL PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
William Kiffmeyer, Mayor
Dale Powers, Bob Arnold, Tim Goenner
Ron Juenemann, Roger Haller, Doug McRae, Ken K.o~2er, Alice laughton,
Gary Mealhouse, Larry Sakkinen
Marilyn Bujarski, Clerk-Treasurer
GUESTS PRESENT:
Mayor Kiffmeyer called the meeting to order at 7;19 pm.
MOTION BY POWERS. SECOND BY ARNOLD. TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF "(HE SEPTE,MBER
CITY COUNCil MEETING. MOTION CARRIED BY MAJORITV VOTE OF ALL MEMaERS
.' I .
PRESENT.
NORTHST AR CORRIDOR
Council diseussed possible options regarding station location and design. There was a public he~ring in
.tember on this issue. Mayor Kiffmeyer remarked that there should not be ~ stati~n Jocate~ a~ all on
site proposed by the Northstar Development Authority. Member Powers remarked that he had
spoken to State Representative Ma.rk Olson and was told by Olson that the City could turn down the
station location without conditions. Powers felt such ~n action might strengthefl the city posiUon. in any
future negotiation$ on a site. He also remarked that Clear Lake is the only City in which a station Is
located in a central portion of the city and that this in effect decimates our downtown area.
Alice laugh ton wa$ present and asked why the station had to be in the middle of the town. Mayor
Kiffmeyer and several members of the Council explained that the city had proposed several alternative
locations and that none were considered appropriate to the Northstar project people. Member Arnold
felt that if we turn down the station that the state would let the matter drop there and would no longer
pursue 41 location in the City of Clear Lake. He also fett that the city should say yes but only with
conditions.
Mayor Kiffmeyer remarked that any conditions would have to be strong ones. Member Powers asked
wtlat would be the ramifications of not allowing it. Member Arnoio ,~sponded thc;tt there are many
vart~bles . and so much of this is in the future that it is impossible to look that far ahead to know how
many people will be affected by a having the station here. It may be of benefit to the current
development and future developments.
Mayor Kiffmeyer said it Is relative to the amount of growth antidpated for this area. Member Goenner
remarked that 8 better location would be east of the city.
. Laughton remarked that she has lived in her home for more than 50 years and she does not wish to
cate now. She came to the meeting to express her hope that the Council wOuld not make her move
from her home for this train station. Council assured Ms. Laughton that they had no wish to see her
moved from her current home against her wishes.
.OCT-17-00 TUE
9 : 1 e
P_03
MOTION BY POWERS, SECOND BY GOENNE~ TO TURN DOWN NORTIiSTAR ~TATION
loeA TION AND DESIGN IN THE CITY OF CLEAR LAKE. Member Arnold objec~ed to th~ idea ..
straight out rejection of the plan. He felt the city might like to say yes to the station w:ith condi~o~s thJll'
the location be changed and the several other conditioo$ Jle establish~~ 'JS wen with r~ards tq financial
losses the city would likely sustain. He felt the city may wish to withdraw opposition if ~e station were to
be relocated. '
Member Goenner rescinds second to motion.
Member Powel'$ rescinds motion.
MOTION BY POW~R$, $ECONO BY GOENNER TO DISAPPROVE NORTHSTAR ~T~TION
LOCATION AND D~$JGN 1'$ PROPOSED. DISAPPROVAL TO BE WITHDRAWN' IF lOCATION IS
MOVED OUTSIDE City liMITS. MOTION CARRIED BY MAJORITY VOTE.: VOTING' AYE..
KJFFMEYER, GOEHNER, POWERS. VOTING NO-ARNOLD. MOTION CARRIED.
Clerk is directed to send letter to Northstar authority notifying them of this decision.
BALLFIELD
Larry Sakklnen was present ~nd gave the Council a handout with information about the am~te~r bait
teams season. He expressed gratitude to the council for the work done on the improvements. to the
ballfield. He said there.were many comments by the public and the prayers about how nice the field Is
now. Mr. sakkine. n also requested permission tl;> use the field ag~i~ for the 2001 season. Coun~
agreed to this without motion. .
Mr. Sakkinen further suggested some projects the amateur ballteam would like to CQllaborate ~th the
city on. He suggested adding lights for night games, an electronic scoreboard, blue mesh for .fence,
additional property behind home plate for foul ball territory and a grandstand. Smaller items included a
push mower for th~ Infield and more dirt put in by the second base area. The council requested tnat Mr;
$akkinen come back with some cost estimates for these items.
HUNTER LAKE BLUFFS
Ken Kotzer and Roger HaJler were present and requested information on possibly expa!1dipQ the
current phase I portion of the development into part of what is now phase 3. They also sugj;Jested
interchanging phases 2 and 3 so that phase 2 would be the section closest to County fM 6. Mempers of
the council explained that this would require additional annexation by the city and th~tthe development
agreement and financial commitments between the deveJoperand the city, would all haye to b.e r~done.
Also it woutd require review by city staff and advisors. Mr. Kotzer and Mr. Hallet explained that the idea
(s very preliminary at this point and they were simply exploring possible options. They will consl,Jlt with
personnel from the development. team to consider options before. going any further. Mr. Haller
suggested that the city would need to make concessions for him to go ahead and sell and build on some
of the lots before the road work is completed in order to generate some revenue while expanding Into
further aressof development. Mr. Haller was advised that the city engineer and the city ~uiJding
. inspector will not allow permits to be Issued until a street base is in. They can not get grade elevations
for dr~inage on the bulldi~g site wit~out starting at street revel. If homes are built below street leve.
there IS the problem of havmg water In basements.
O'C T - 1 7' - 0 a T U E
'9:1'9
P.04
,
. Goenner said he will contact maintenance person to raise m~l1hoJes before wint~r ~ome~ 'and the
ground is frolen. .
PARKS AND STREETS
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Chief Koren had requested re-Instatement of Gary Fiereck as a memt..;; :,f the fire de~artment 'unbl Jan.
2, 2001. Chief Koren also requested a one year leave of absence for Joe Newlander. MOTION BY
POWERS. SECOND BY GOENNER 'to ~EINSTATE GARY FIERECK AS A MEMBER OF THE
CLEAR LAKE FIRE DI;PARTMENT UNTIL JANUARY 2. ~001. MOTION CARRIED BY MA~9RfTY
VOTE OF ALL MEMBERS PRESENT. : ! ; 1
. . . t
MOTION BY POWERS, SEcOND BY ARNOLD TO APPROVE ONE YEAR,LEA~E OF ABSENCE
FOR JOE NEWlANDER OF THE CLEAR LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT. MOTION CARRIED BY
MAJORITY VOTE OF ALL ME,.,Bf:RS PRESENT. ; I
CLERK
Clerk requested payment of monthly statements as presented. MOTION BY POWERS, SECOND BY
ARNOLD TO AP~ROVc PAYMENT OF STATEMENTS AS PRESENTED. MOTION CAR,RIED BY
MAJORITY VOTE OF Al.L MEMBERS PRESENT. !
Clerk reported to CQuncil as directed on the options for purchase or lease of a ndw copier. Marco
.Iness PrOducts offered the best price by giving about a 50% discount for a comm~rcial gracfe:copier
enlargement, reduction, EllJto feed. and double side copy features. The copier retails at $2,600 and
the city could purchase it for about $1.300. The closest other model was a personal ~pier not
~ommercial quality at $~~g. NlOTION BY POWERS, SECOND BY J.~~OLD TO PURCHAS~ COPIER
fROM MARCO BUSINI;SS PRODUCTS AT COST PROVIDED. MOTION CARRIED BY MAJORiTY
VOle OF ALL MEMBERS PRESI;:NT. Member Tim Goenner will dispose of old City! copier that 'Marco
. . I
has estimated fit no value. !
,
Clerk also reported to council that the County Auditor has suggested vot,ing precIncts go ,to the
~utomated precinct ballot counting system. While this machine does eliminatesom'e of the' problems
with s.poiled ballots, it has a co~;t to the city of over $3,000. Given the small population, :lhis Is
considered ~n expense per ballot that would be cost prohibitive. The audit~r further suggested the
possibility of the city and the township combining to hold elections, as the township is :going to' purchase
one of the machines and it could be shared by both. Clerk Is instructed to contact township clerk to
exp10rG options and report back to council. '
ADJOURNMENT
.
There was no other busIness to discuss. MOTION BY POWERS. SECOND BY GOE~N~R TO
ADJOURN COUNCIL MEETING. MOTtoN CARRIED BY MAJORITY VOTe OF All MEMBERS
PRESENT. I
fting was adjourned at 9:00 pm.
Mayor~William Kiffmeyer, Clerkffreasurer-Marilyn Bujalski
.
.
.
RESOLUTION 00-42
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE NORTHSTAR CORRIDOR STATION SITING
FOR THE BECKER STATION AND SETTING A PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL
HEARING TO DISCUSS THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, The City of Becker has been involved with the Northstar Corridor in issues
concerning planning; and
WHEREAS, as part of the process a station site has been identified and work has been
accomplished planning for the development of the site; and
WHEREAS, the federal government requires a great number of procedural steps to be
undertaken in the process to ensure local approval and citizen awareness and
participation; and
WHEREAS, approval of the siting design is needed as one of these steps; and
WHEREAS, a public informational meeting is also required to discuss the project and
answer any questions the public may have.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOL YED by the Becker City Council that the general
station siting is hereby approved subject to storm sewer retention ponding, which would
be required for lot coverage that exceeds 50%.
BE IT FURTHER RESOL YED that Kelli Neu be named the alternate Northstar Corridor
representative for the City of Becker.
BE IT FURTHER RESOL YED that a public informational meeting is hereby called to be
held in the Becker City Council Chambers on Tuesday October 17th at 6:00 PM.
Roger Bigalke _Yes
Hal Lofgreen
Yes
Judy Bowatz _Yes
Greg Kolbinger _Yes
Ken Paulson Yes
Adopted this 5th day of September 2000.
-~ ~ ~
.-/ .' n
( '/L' d1
Mayor I dy Bo a.f- ~
Joe
Attest:
.
.
.
CITY OF BIG LAKE
MINNESOTA
A general meeting of the City Council of the City of Big Lake, Minnesota was called to order
by Acting Mayor Duane Langsdorf at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, Big
Lake, Minnesota, on Wednesday, September 27,2000. The following Council Members
were present: Jim Dickinson, Chuck Heitz, Jim Maas and Don Orrock. A motion to adopt
the following resolution was made by Council Member Heitz and seconded by Council
Member Dickinson.
CITY OF BIG LAKE
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-22
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE
NORTHST AR CORRIDOR STATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF BIG LAKE
WHEREAS, the City of Big Lake has been involved with and is a member of the
Northstar Corridor Development Authority (NCDA); and
WHEREAS, NCDA and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) are
in the process of planning and implementation of a commuter rail transit operation on the
Burlington Northern/Sante Fe rail line between the City of Rice and downtown Minneapolis,
thus passing through Big Lake; and
WHEREAS, the Advanced Corridor Plan for the commuter train operation has
included the siting of a station in Big Lake at the northwest corner of the railroad tracks and
County Road 43; and
.
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 174.86 provides each city the opportunity to review
and comment on the Advanced Corridor Plan and subsequent to a hearing conducted by
NCDA and MnDOT on said plan, the city shall approve ro disapprove the location and
design of the station located in each respective city; and
WHEREAS, the hearing on the Plan was conducted on September 7,2000, with no
comments received on the Big Lake Station; and
. .
WHEREAS, the Big Lake City Council finds the conceptual plan for the station to be
acceptable; and
WHEREAS, the Big Lake City Council, having concerns relating to the access from
County Road 43 to the existing frontage road, want to continue to monitor the progress of
MnDOT.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Big Lake City Council approves the
Advanced Corridor Plan for the City; and
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the Big Lake City Council understands that the
Advanced Corridor Plan is conceptual in nature, that final station plans are forthcoming .
and, finally, said plans will comply with City ordinances.
Adopted by the Big Lake City Council this 27ttl day of September, 2000.
Attest:
<-4~4'~Ddd
Mayor Don Orrock
Jd.- H ____
Patrick Wussow, City Administrator
The following Council Members voted in favor: Orrock, Dickinson, Heitz, Langsdorf and
Maas. The following Council Members voted against or abstained: None.
.
Whereupon the motion was duly passed and executed.
.
.
.
RESOLUTION 00-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ELK RIVER,
ACCEPTING THE NORTHSTAR CORRIDOR STATION PLAN FOR
THE CITY OF ELK RIVER
WHEREAS, the City of Elk River has been involved with and is a member
of the Northstar Corridor Development Authority (NCDA);
and,
WHEREAS, NCDA and the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT) are in the process of planning and implementation of
a commuter rail transit operation on the Burlington
Northern/Sante Fe rail line between the City of Rice and
downtown Minneapolis, thus passing through Elk River; and,
WHEREAS, the Advanced Corridor Plan for the commuter train operation
has included the siting of a station in Elk River at the
northwest corner of the railroad tracks and 171st Avenue; and,
WHEREAS, Minnesota St'atutes 174.88 provides each city the opportunity
to review and comment on the Advanced Corridor Plan and
subsequent to a hearing conducted by NCDA and MnDOT on
said plan, the city shall approve or disapprove the location and
design of the station located in each respective city; and
WHEREAS, the hearing on the Plan was conducted on October 16, 2000;
and
WHEREAS, the Elk River City Council finds the conceptual plan for the
station to be acceptable; and
WHEREAS, the Elk River City Council, having concerns relating to the
final design of the facility, want to continue to monitor the
progress of the design of the station and park and ride facility.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Elk River, Minnesota approves the Advanced Corridor Plan for the City
with the following condition:
1.
The City of Elk River have an opportunity to work with the NCDA and
MnDOT on enhancing the depot site; and
s: \DOCUMENT\RESOLUTI\ncda.doc
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the Elk River City Council understands
that the Advanced Corridor Plan is conceptual in nature, that the final
station plans areforthcoming and, finally, said plans will comply with all
City ordinances.
.
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Elk River on this 16th
day of October, 2000.
Stephanie Klinzing, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sandra A. Peine, City Clerk
.
.
s: \DOCUMENT\RESOLUTI\ncda.doc
CCfnW @ll ~[J)JK&.
CITY HALL · 2015 FIRST AVE. :-';0. · ,A...,"OK-\. ~fI?'-i)iESOTA 55303-2'270
PHONE (763) 576-2700 · fAX (763) 576-2727 . ITY, (63) "+22-0442
RESOLUTION NO. 2000- 85
NORTHSTAR CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT AVTHORITY
ADY ANCED CORRIDOR STUDY
.
'WHEREAS, the Northstaf Commuter Rail Development Authority (NCDA) is a multi-
jurisdictionaljoint powers entity empowered to study multi-modal transportation systems in Hennepin.
Anoka, Benton, and Sherburne Counties;
WHEREAS, the NCDA is proposing an 80 mile commuter rail (tixed transit-way) system
extending from St. Cloud to downtown Minneapolis in conjunction with other transportation system
improvements ;
WHEREAS, the proposed commuter rail system will utilize the existing tracks of the
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad;
'WHEREAS, the City of Anoka fully supports the efforts of the Northstar Corridor
Development Authority (NCDA) [Q plan for and implement commuter rail transit and other forms of
dedicated transit ways to enhance travel alternatives for Anoka and regional residents. employees and
visitors;
WHEREAS, the NCDA has determined that a Commuter Rail Station Stop would be
appropriately located within the City limits of Anoka, Minnesota near the intersection of the BNSF
Railroad and Fourth Avenue North;
WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute Section 174.86 requires cities to review and comment
on the proposed location and design of commuter rail stations as depicted in "Adv:mced Corridor
Plans" ;
'WHEREAS, the City of Anoka received a request to complete the statutory defi.ned process
via a letter dated August 4, 2000 signed by the Commissioner of the Minnesota Deparnnent of
Transportation (MnDOT) and the Northstar Corridor Development Authority Chairperson:
WHEREAS, the Northstar Corridor Development Authority (NCDA) conducted its statutory
required public hearing on the "Advanced Corridor Plans" on September 7,2000;
'WHEREAS, the statute requires the City to complete its review within 45 days of said
hearing by the NCDA;
'WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public meeting to revie\v the "Advanced
Corridor Plans" on October 3, 2000;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission commented favorably on the Advanced Corridor
Plans;
. 'WHEREAS, the Commuter Rail Station location within the City of Anoka is in a partially
developed urban neighborhood within close proximity to the core dowmown area of the City and within
walking distance to the North IYktro Regional Treatment Center providing for a high population and
employment density;
- AN' EQUAL OPPORTUNITY E~IPLOYER-
,Q
~
Resolution 2000- 8 :>
Page 2
WHEREAS, the City of Anoka recognizes the relationship between land use planning and
transit usage and fully supports the principals and policies that suppon Transit Oriented Development;
and
.
WHEREAS, vacant land area in and around the proposed station Stop area provides
opportunity for future transit oriented development and redevelopment; and
WHEREAS, the City has identitied the station area and surrounding areas as a priority
p larming area.
NOW, THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Anoka encourages the efforts of the
NCDA by supporting the following land use policy in suppon of Transit Oriented Development
Future development and redevelopment effor-..s will strengthen pedestrian connections
to the commuter rail station from major destinations such as Downtown Anoka and the
Regional Treatment Center through use of sidewalks and trails. This will include the
analysis of alternative safe pedestrian railroad crossings.
Higher intensity development consisting of two and three story buildings will be
encouraged with future redevelopment efforts.
A mixed-use land use pattern is encouraged for future redevelopment efforts.
Future development and redevelopment will include commercial development that
would serve the residents in the area, commuters using the Northstar Train. and
employment centers such as Lakeland Tool and the Regional Treatment Center.
Open space and/or green spaces will be incorporated into the design of future
development to strengthen the pedestrian environment.
.
BE IT FURTHER RESOL YED that the City of Anoka will amend its comprehensive plan
and official controls (zoning and subdivision ordinances) prior to the implementation of commuter rail
to support the above policies for transit-oriented development; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOL YED that the City of Anoka approves of the Advanced Corridor
Plan subject to the following conditions:
That the NCDA follow normal procedures and regulations for site plan approvals
relative to design and consnuction of the commuter rail station stop facilities,
That the proposed design and location of the station is in compliance with the City
Zoning Ordinance and other official controls.
Adopted this 16th day of October, 2000.
f(,:t"i '" (1
(.;"... 1'1. Y~:L'f!..~
Peter M. Beberg, Mayor)
ATTEST:
.
CERTIFICATION BY CITY CLERK
'.. o:r ~ ; 2:0 ~ lli
. t-~ ~. '. .
~.~i_ r,~.,,-....,'~ .--....,;IVry
AOr' ~~I,.ll<''''R ""'OR'r\
~,.. ~ ..:l, ,~: \:) OFFICE
O{ Ls
..n~
.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF ANOKA )ss.
CITY OF COON RAPIDS)
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Coon Rapids, Minnesota,
hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing Resolution No.00-88 and the same
is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom, insofar as the same relates to a resolution approving with
comments the location and design of the proposed Riverdale and Foley Boulevard, Northstar Corridor
Commuter Rail Stations.
a'ITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the corporate seal of the City of Coon Rapids,
~innesota, this seventeenth day of October, 2000.
'r6~ '7J.~/b~fL
Betty Bac s, CMC, City Clerk
.
It' ,
RESOLUTION NO. 00-80
.
RESOLUTION APPROVING, WITH COl\tIMENTS, THE LOCATION AND DESIGN OF
THE PROPOSED RIVERDALE AND FOLEY BOULEVARD, NORTHSTAR CORR.IDOR
COMMUTER RAIL STATIONS
WHEREAS, the plans for the Riverdale and Foley Boulevard Northstar Corridor Commuter Rail
Stations are contained in the Northstar Corridor Advanced Corridor Plan, dated August 3, 2000; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute Section 174,86 gives the City the opportunity to review and approve
the proposed location and design of these Stations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City approves the proposed location and
desiQIl of the Stations with the following comments:
~ ~
I. Site plan approval by the City of the final station designs is required.
" The following aspects of the Riverdale Station need to be further addressed:
A. The appropriate location of the Northdale Boulevard access drive
B. Appropriate pedestrian tlow to the Station
C. Measures to control noise generated by Station activities
3. The ability of the City storm sewer system to serve the Foley Boulevard Station needs to be .
verified.
ADOPTED BY THE COON RAPIDS CITY COUNCIL THIS 17m DAY OF OCTOBER.
2000.
Attest:
~
.
)
III ~@ i " j ,.~r .:f
LiD \',; I ~ ~.i ,
. L:~ U J L::l ~
CIlY OF OCT 1 7 2000
FRIDLEY
TH;:- ',".,;, , . " "ry
, , ;. _ t-\f II(, w J "'.i ". ~ '-' ',...q ';;
FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER. 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, M~~Mj!tlixt~~~!~:rP.l?5~.@.Rflge) 571-1287
October 16, 2000
Mr. Tim Yantos
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
2100 Third Avenue
AIloka, Minnesota 55303
Dear Mr. Yantos,
.
On October 9,2000, the Fridley City Council passed the enclosed resolution in response to the
August 4, 2000 correspondence from Commissioner TinkJenberg and Chairperson Wergin. The
City of Fridley elected the "disapprove" option as described in State Statute 174.86 in regards to
the proposed location and design of the commuter rail station, and specifically outlined the
amendments by which the City would remove its disapproval. The resolution also identifies
several concerns in the "be it resolved" statements that the City of Fridley would like a response
from the NCDA or MnDOT.
Thank you for your cooperation, attendance at the Fridley public meetings (and Ken Stevens
too!), and for coordinating a revised plan in time for the September 25, 2000 Council meeting.
The additional site design analysis helped the City to clarify its concerns and to identify
alternatives to address them.
As noted during the meetings, the City Council wanted to insure that the neighborhood would be
made aware of the hearings for the Environmental Impact Statement. Feel free to contact me
with any materials, and I can arrange to have that sent to the people on the City's mailing list.
Should you have :my questions, please feel free to contact me at 763-572-3590.
C-00-185
.
.
STATEOFMINNESOTA }
COUNTY OF ANOKA } ~
CITY OF FRIDLEY }
I, the undersigned, being duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, do hereby
certify that I have carefully compared the RESOLUTION attached hereto, adopted by the City
Council of the City of Fridley at said meeting on OCTOBER 9,2000, with the origmal record
thereof on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as
the same relates to:
RESOLUTION NO. 89-2000
.
A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE ADVANCED CORRIDOR PLAN OF THE
NORTHSTAR COl\1M:UTER RAIL STATION
WITNESS MY HAND as City Clerk of the City of Fridley and the seal of the City this 16TH day of
OCTOBER 2000.
(SEAL)
~
I (41
:La.- ' . ,1/U-/
DebmOgen -
City Clerk of the City ofFndley
.
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-2000
A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE AnV ANCED CORRIDOR PLAN OF THE NORTHSTAR
COMMUTER RAIL STATION
WHEREAS, the Northstar Commuter Rail Development Authority (NCDA) is a multi-jurisdictional joint
powers entity empowered to study multi-modal transportation systems in Hennepin, Anoka, Benton, and
Sherburne Counties; and
WHEREAS, the NCDA is proposing an 80 mile commuter rail system extending from St. Cloud to
downtown Minneapolis in conjunction with other transportation system improvements; and
WHEREAS, the proposed commuter rail system will utilize the existing tracks of the Burlington Northern
Santa Fe railroad; and
WHEREAS, said railroad tracks run through the City of Fridley; and
WHEREAS, a commuter rail station is proposed in the City of Fridley; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute Section 174.86 requires cities to review and comment on the
proposed location and design of commuter rail stations as depicted in "advanced corridor plans"; and
WHEREAS, the City of Fridley received a request to complete the statutory defmed process via a letter
dated August 4,2000 signed by the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT) and the Northstar Corridor Development Authority Chairperson; and
WHEREAS, the Northstar Corridor Development Authority (NCDA) conducted its statutory required
public hearing on the Advanced Corridor Plan on September 7,2000; and
WHEREAS, the statute requires the City to complete its review within 45 days of said hearing by the
NCDA;and
WHEREAS, the NCDA and the City of Fridley conducted an informational meeting on August 2, 2000;
and
WHEREAS, the Fridley Planning Commission received public comment on the Advanced Corridor Plan
on September 6, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Fridley City Council received additional public comments at its September 25, 2000
regular council meeting; and
WHEREAS, the statute requires the city to either approve or disapprove the submitted Advanced Corridor
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the statute requires the city to specify the amendments or conditions by which, if resolved,
were to remove the city's disapproval; and
WHEREAS, the city acknowledges that the NCDA Board, by policy, has suggested a third option of
"approval with conditions"; and
Resolution No. 89-2000
Page 2
WHEREAS, the city must act in accordance with state statute; and
.
WHEREAS, the city acknowledges that the NCDA has attempted to address as many issues as possible
given that the level of design is equivalent to 10%; and .
WHERAS, the Environmental Impact Statement has not been released for public comment; and
WHEREAS, the city finds that a commuter rail system in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area will help
reduce traffic congestion and will help promote increased use of public transit systems; and
WHEREAS, the Northstar Corridor Development Authority's Advanced Corridor Plan has prompted a
public discussion of the proposed station location and station design in Fridley; and
WHEREAS, there was significant concern expressed about the size and location of the park and ride
facilities on both the east and west side of the railroad tracks; and
WHEREAS, there was significant concern expressed about the additional traffic, especially "cut through"
traffic, through adjacent residential neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, there was significant concern expressed about whether a station was appropriate within
and/or near a residential neighborhood; and
WHEREAS, the City suggested several changes to the site design of the proposed station; and
WHEREAS, a different location of the station was suggested by the public south of 1-694; and
.
WHEREAS, the NCDA reported that a station could not be located farther south of the 1-694 because of
the location of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe main switching and operation yards; and
WHEREAS, the NCDA responded with a revised site plan stamped "preliminary draft" and dated
September 20, 2000; and
WHEREAS, there was significant concern expressed by residents of the adjacent neighborhoods within ~
mile of the station that the additional sound generated by whistles, bells, and other warning devices on the
trains would detract from the livability and enjoyment of their properties; and
WHEREAS, there was significant concern expressed by the residents of the adjacent neighborhood about
the potential increase in crime associated with the park and ride facilities and the proposed underpass; and
WHEREAS, the City of Fridley assumes that there will be monitoring cameras at all stations and that the
NCDA will construct a central security control facility to monitor the activity of the commuter rail
operation (similar to the control facility in Oceanside, California) at a station site along the proposed
route; and
WHEREAS, the City of Fridley encourages development on the four-acre site, on the east side of the
railroad tracks, with uses that would be compatible with the residential neighborhood, commercial
neighborhood, and the commuter rail station; and
.
Resolution No. 89-2000
Page 3
.
WHEREAS, there has been significant concern expressed by the residents of the City of Fridley that the
commuter rail station area be properly maintained and meet the City Code requirements for exterior
maintenance for similar types of land uses; and
WHEREAS, the signal at 61 st Way/East River Road was installed at the request of School District No. 14,
and School District No. 14 pays for the annual operation ofthe signal; and
WHEREAS, the statutory process mandates that the City choose between 100% acceptance of the
proposed station or "disapproval" with an itemization of all potential changes without the benefit of the
Environmental Impact Statement and a higher level of design work; and
WHEREAS, the City of Fridley finds it extremely difficult to make specific comments and suggestions
about the Advanced Corridor Plan when, in fact, there are a number of questions still outstanding that will
be addressed in the forthcoming environmental impact statement or preliminary engineering phase of the
project
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley hereby
disapproves the station design as submitted by the Northstar Development Corridor Authority as
submitted in the Advanced Corridor Plan transmitted to the City on August 4, 2000.
BE IT FURTHER RESOL YED, that the City of Fridley encourages the NCDA and the Commissioner of
Transportation to evaluate possible station locations within Fridley that might create less impact on
residential neighborhoods.
.
BE IT FURTHER RESOL YED, that if the station is located at 61st Avenuel61 st Way, the City of Fridley
places the following conditions on the City's disapproval:
· The site plan dated September 20, 2000 is the preferred design alternative
· The southerly driveway on the east side parking lot shall be a right turn only
· The northerly driveway on the east side parking lot shall be shared with the development on the
remaining 4 acre parcel
· The proposed storm water management system shall meet the City of Fridley requirements.
· The storm water pond on the east side may be sized to accommodate the run off from the 4-acre
parcel.
· A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted prior to construction meeting City requirements
for parking lot and neighborhood screening.
· A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted prior to construction meeting City requirements for
lighting near residential areas.
· The Ashton Avenue connection shall be platted as a public right of way.
· The Ashton Avenue connection to 61st Way shall be designed such that the roadway is 30 feet
wide and is one way from 62nd Way to just south of the proposed pond.
· Access points to Ashton Avenue shall be consolidated to minimize traffic disruption.
· The underpass shall be designed with the "switchback" on either side of the railroad tracks, and
shall be designed with some type of enclosure to protect pedestrians from inclement weather, but
yet allows an appropriate amount oflight and air.
· Sidewalk and bikeway connections as shown on the September 20, 2000 plan shall be
constructed.
.
BE IT FURTHER RESOL YED, that the City of Fridley requests the Commissioner of Transportation, the
NCDA, and the Burlington Northern/Santa Fe to work with the appropriate state and federal authorities to
Resolution No. 89-2000
Page 4
minimize, ifnot eliminate, all train whistles and bells within the city limits of Fridley including, but not .
limited to, train crossings and stations.
BE IT FUR1HER RESOLVED, that the City of Fridley requests the NCDA to review appropriate means
to reduce and to mitigate the noise from any rail operations as a result of negative impact findings in the
Environmental Impact Statement
BE IT FUR1HER RESOLVED, that the City of Fridley encourages the Commissioner of Transportation
to locate the central security control facility as an anchor tenant of a building on the four-acre site on the
east side of the railroad tracks.
BE IT FUR1HER RESOLVED, that the City of Fridley requests the Minnesota Department of
Transportation arrange for the appropriate maintenance and operation of the commuter rail station in
order to meet the City of Fridley's code requirements for outdoor maintenance.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Fridley require the l'.~orthstar Corridor Development
Authority and the Commissioner of Transportation to submit all applications for land use issues (street
and easement vacations, plats, and others) to the City of Fridley for review as is typically completed by
other developers.
BE IT FUR1HER RESOLVED, thatthe City of Fridley reserves the right to place stipulations and
conditions on any land use applications as is typically done for other developers.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Fridley reserves ~e right to install traffic control
signage, as it deems appropriate on public streets around the station area.
.
BE IT FURTIIER RESOLVED, that the City of Fridley requests the Commissioner of Transportation, the
Northstar Corridor Development Authority, and the appropriate governmental agencies to review the
benefiting parties of the signal at 6151 Avenue/East River Road with a view towards the. operation of the
signal being undertaken by the general transportation funds of some governmental agency.
BE IT FUR1HER RESOLVED, that the City of Fridley requests the Commissioner of Transportation to
evaluate the current statutory process and to recommend a change to the legislature permitting approval of
Advanced Corridor Plans by municipalities after more information is available.
BE IT FUR1HER RESOLVED, that the City of Fridley requests the NCDA to respond to the issues
contained in this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 9TH
DAY OF OCTOBER 2000.
~~~r.v
NANCY J. JORGEN - MAYOR
ATTEST:
D~ilJ~CLERK
.
Oct 24 00 OS:1Sa
.
.
.
Kenneth Stevens
612-416-1960
p.2
Mead
Comments on the Northstar Corridor Advanced Corridor Plan
W.heras, the City fuJly supports the development of commuter raUand other forms of
dedicated transit ways to enhance travel alternatives for Minneapolis and regional residents and
workers: and
Whereas, the City supports and encourages the efforts of the Northstar Corridor
Development Authority (NCDA) to support land use planning that encourages transit use along
the North star Corridor;
Now, Therefore, Be It- Resoivedby The City Council-of The City of MinneapOlis:
That the City supports aod encourages discounted fare structures and other efforts to
encourage northbound (or "reverse.commuting-) along the Northstar Corridor.
Be It Further Resolved that the CJty approves North star Commuter Rail serving both
Downtown Minne~polis and. Northeast.Minneapolis with commuter. rail stations.
Be It Further Hesolved that the City approves the site location ,.,f the f1n,,"'!"ltown Minneapolis
station conditioned upon.specific.pJanning and technical work, and coordination with parties
including the NCOA, the Hiawatha {LRT) Project Office, Hennepin County, and Metro Transit,
that relates to the following issues with the Downtown station:
· Skyway connections
· Non-skyway pedestrian connections from downtown streets
· Cedar lake Trail and other bicycle connections near the station area
· Vehicle circulation. to and from- tbestation
· Interconnection with-Hiawatha LRT and otherfuture.transitconnections
· Identification of future land uses at or near the station, as well as deSign guidelines, as a
result of master planning work sponsored by Hennepin County for the intermodal station
area
Be it Further- Resolved that the C<<y approves a Northstar Northeast Station conditioned
upon further technical-and. planning consideration of a 7th Street OR LOWRY AVENUE AREA
alternative to the. Centr.allBroadway station. ~e.~n. recoanitionthat we are Dart of a reaional
transDortationsvstem; the NCDA, the City .of Minneapolis, Metro T-ransit and- others should
continue to -exPlore issues-related to connections with bus transit, connection to a possible
future CentralConidor/Red Rock.Commuter Rail,landuse .context, and urban design. Better
data for. btJs .transit connections with. the Northeast station, as well as data on potential transfers
between each proposed commuter rail line, should be obtained.
Be It Further Resolved that the City recognizes that a Harrison Street station is technically
unfeasible.
Be it Further Resolved that transit should create opportunity. not isolation. for all MinneaDolis
Oct 24 00 09:20a
Kenneth Stevens
612-416-1960
residents and that the City, AS A CONDITION OF SUPPORT, WANTS Metro Transit to improve
bus transit connections and amenities from North and Northeast Minneapofis neighborhoods to
. the Northstar commuter rail stations. specifically. along Broadway Avenue. As the princioal
medium of oublic.transit in the MinneaDolis area. bus transit must be safe. efficient. and
: accessible for aD Minneaoolis residents.
. Be It Further Resolved thatthe'Cityconditionallyapprovestl1~ !,m..tn~~e station plans
identified in the. Nodhstar Corridor Advanced. Corridor Plan,. subject to the following:
· . Review and.approval of future amended or more detailed' site and elevation plans by the City
Planning COmr1"lissionand Minneapolis City Council.
· . Meeting an:City zoning.stonnwater management, design guidelines. and other regulations
that.WOUld pertain to commuterrailstatioRs.
Belt Further Resolved that the City conditionally apPf'Qvesthe Northstar Corridor Advanced
Corridor. Plan. -subject.tothe 'abov.e statements and to future review and approval of a specifIC
NortheastMinneapolis station stte:by the Minneapolis Plannjng Commission and Minneapolis
City Councit. The NCDA and .City !If-Minneapolis Plannmg and Pubrrc Works staff should
develop a timeline and process to resolve this issue, including continued community
involvement
p.3
(
.
.
.
COUNTY
OF
ANOKA
'"::'i;:~
...:'1
" 4. 'NOT..l":.4 ,'-
.fi...........~1
\'C'-O- 'UN..' " T::Y-7J
, ,.,..". ....j
,-: .... '.. ,',' .:- .....
. . _.". ..',.
'.. . _' . _. " ,. .,.. . . -, -. l' '~.,' . ..' ",.
.,/.:~..~~~~~i!;lf~~..;;:.~-..~~:J
Office of County Administration
GOVERNMENT CENTER
2100 3rd Avenue · Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2265
(763) 323-5700
October 25, 2000
JOHN "JAY" McUNDEN
County Administrator
Mr. Timothy Yantos
Executive Director, NCDA
, 2100 3rd Avenue
Anoka, MN 55303
Dear Mr. Yantos:
.
On behalf of Anoka County, I would like to offer several comments on the Northstar Corridor's
Advanced Corridor Plan. As a member of the Northstar Corridor Development Authority, Anoka
County very actively participated in the development of the Plan. Commissioners McCarron and
Erhart offered comments at the NCDA meetings when the Plan was approved for distribution for
the public. Our staff participated on the Project Management Team review. As a result, Anoka
County has no specific comments or concerns regarding the physical design component of the
Plan.
Nevertheless, Anoka County commends the NCDA and Mn/DOT on the Advanced Corridor Plan.
We recognize that many, many hours of hard work went into the development of the Plan, and that
staff and NCDA members worked very closely with our cities to develop station design and
locations that work well for the communities and for the operation of the commuter rail system.
Anoka County has become seriously concerned about the growing congestion on Highway 10. Our
residents are facing longer and increasingly unsafe commutes. Anoka County and the Anoka
County Regional Railroad Authority have worked hard to offer alternatives and strongly believe that
commuter rail is a critical component of an integrated transportation solution.
The Anoka County stations of Anoka, Coon Rapids and Fridley will well serve our population and
employment centers. Additionally, the commuter rail offers opportunities for a safe and cost
effective commute to jobs and to educational institutions along the Corridor.
Anoka County is committed to making commuter rail a reality and will continue its active
participation on the NCDA as the project moves forward into preliminary engineering.
.
SinCere!,__ _ /
~ -r'!:::Y-~
f-!.Ohn":Jay' MC~
County Administrator
JM:sc
FAX: 763-323-5682 Affirmative Action I EqualsOpportunity Employer TOOmV: 763-323-5289
.. '!.;uw;~-.
.
.
.
MARK J. STENGLEIN
COMMISSIONER
612-343-7332
FAX 343-3701
TDD 343-7703
BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
A-2400 GOVERNMENT CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55487-0240
(D l5~rnn\'!J~ ~
OCT 26 2000
THE i-\NOrV\ \JvuNTY
,l.OM\N\STRATOR1S OFFICE
October 23,2000
Mr. Timothy Yantos
Executive Director, NCDA
2100 3rd Avenue
Anoka, MN 55303
Dear Mr. Yantos:
On behalf of Hennepin County, I would like to offer some brief comments on the Northstar
Corridor's Advanced Corridor Plan. As you know, Hennepin County actively participated in the
development of the Plan as a member of the Northstar Corridor Development Authority. We
have reviewed the Plan from the perspective of Hennepin County and would like to commend the
NCDA and the Minnesota Department of Transportation for all their hard work in developing the
State's first Advanced Corridor Plan.
Weare excited about the potential of rail serving Northeast Minneapolis and downtown
Minneapolis. As you are aware, congestion is a significant issue in Hennepin County and
Minneapolis. The commuter rail should alleviate some of the increasing pressures on our road
system. Secondly, we believe that the Northstar Corridor will provide a safe, reliable and cost
effective alternative for people commuting to jobs in downtown Minneapolis and for those
seeking jobs outside Minneapolis in Anoka County and farther north on the Corridor.
Finally, we have reviewed the station design and location for the multi-modal station in
downtown Minneapolis with its connection to the Hiawatha LRT Corridor. The commuter
rail/LRT connection will provide passengers significant opportunities for travel to major
destinations in Hennepin County and along the Northstar Corridor. This type of integrated
transit system will be important for the economic health of the County and the region as we move
forward into the 21 st Century.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
~mcerely ,
( )\ \ ./.rt---~Of----
\ I, ..,q._~ ----
"- iN I \ \.. ......
Y' ''''-'''-... ~ . j
. - ~
Mark Stenglein, District 2
Hennepin County Board of Commissioners
~ nn....'T"n ON RECYCLED PAPER
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
November 2, 2000
TO:
NCDA
FROM:
Tim Yantos
SUBJECT: Final Report on NCDATrip to Seattle and Vancouver
NCDA members and staff toured commuter rail systems in Seattle and
Vancouver on October 2 and 3, 2000. Representatives met withSound
Transit officials and rode the new Sounder commuter rail system linking
Seattle and Tacoma, Wash. The Sounder began operation in late
September. Sound Transit, the transit authority in the Seattle area,
provided passenger rail cars to the Northstcr Corridor for a demonstration
of commuter rail in August.
Staff is particularly interested in the Sounder system because the Seattle
area is similar in metropolitan population to the Twin Cities area. In
addition, both systems link urban areas togetherand use Burlington
Northern Sante Fe rail lines.
NCDA representatives also toured a commuter rail system in Vancouver,
B. C. Meetings with officials from TransLink, the transit authority for the
Vancouver area, were followed by a ride on the 5-year oldWest Coast
Express commuter train.
On-time performance, a variety of marketing techniques, and well-
maintained passenger cars which appeared new, despite their 5-year
history, were highlights of the system.
The attached report provides details on Sourd Transit and West Coast
Express systems; as well as NCDA itinerary for touring the two systems,
and lessons learned from both visits.
Final Report
NCDA Trip to Seattle and Vancouver
October 2000
Seattle: October 2, 2000
Description of Sound Transit Commuter Rail Service
1. Sound Transit, the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority
· A special purpose government formed to build and operate a high
capacity transit system.
· Authorized under state law, subject to local voter approval.
· Requires a system plan, description of benefits and a local financing
proposal.
· State law sets planning requirements, revenue collecting authority and
board composition.
· One member per 145,000 population, not to exceed 25 members.
· Half of the members must be drawn from local transit boards.
· Current board of 18 members: 17 local elected officials plus the
Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT) secretary.
· Urbanized area of three counties - King, Pierce and Snohomish
· Population - 2.5 million
2. Components of the Sound Transit commuter rail system:
· Sounder will eventually serve 13 stations and cross three counties for
a total of 82 miles, divided into three segments (Seattle-Tacoma 39.5
miles, Seattle-Everett 34.5 miles, and Tacoma-Lakewood 8 miles).
See the Sound Transit map in Attachment One.
· When the system is fully operational, trains will run every half-hour
during peak commute hours.
· Sounder trains will travel at speeds up to 79 mph.
· Each climate-controlled Sounder car has worktables, high-back cloth
upholstered seats, surge-protected outlets for laptop computers,
overhead storage, bicycle storage, rest rooms and cup holders. NCDA
used two Sounder cars for its demonstration run in August 2000.
· By 2007, about 2,400 passengers a day are expected to ride Sounder
trains from Everett to Seattle. About 10,200 passengers are expected
to ride the Lakewood to Seattle commuter route daily.
· Sounder is expected to recover about 30 percent of its operating costs
through the fare box.
· Sounder fares are based on zones - the one-zone fare is $2, two-zone
is $3 (e.g. Auburn to Seattle), and 3-zone is $4 (e.g. Tacoma to
1
~
Seattle).
3. Other Components of the Sound Transit System.
· Sound Transit Express bus service and facilities
- 200 commuter buses on 18 regional routes, contracted to operating
transit agencies.
- Park and ride lots, transit centers and HOV ramps to the freeway
HOV lanes
. Link Light Rail
- Tacoma Link, 1.6 surface miles in downtown Tacoma with 4 stations.
- Central Link, 24 miles (subway, elevated and surface), 20 stations,
120,000 riders/day in 2010.
4. Timeline and Funding (includes commuter rail, light rail and bus service):
Cost: $3.9 billion in 1995 dollars
Completion: 1996-2006
Funding: Local sales tax (4/10%) and motor vehicle excise tax
(3/10%) generates $200 million/year. Additional funding
includes: federal grants, bonds backed by local revenues,
fares.
NCDA Itinerary in Seattle
1. NCDA representatives met with the following individuals at Sound Transit Union
Station:
Paul Price, Sound Transit Director
Betty Laurs, Director, Communications, Marketing and Human Resources
Barbara Dougherty, Program Manager, Communications
Val Batey, Project Manager, Auburn Station
Noel Peck, Program Manager, Operations
Dave Enslow, City of Sumner Councilmember
2. Toured Sound Transit Union Station
3. Rode the Sounder to Auburn
4. Disembarked in Auburn and met with Mayor Booth, City of Auburn
5. Toured Auburn Station
Lessons Learned
Sound Transit assembled an outstanding presentation for NCDA
representatives. The following are a few of the many insights Sound Transit
shared with NCDA:
2
~
1. Sound Transit conducted a marketing segmentation study, which identified the
demographics and cytographics of ridership. Because of this study,
Sounds Transit was able to develop an aggressive marketing campaign
focused on its target audience. This study found that "convenience" was
more important to Sounder commuter rail customers than "cost".
2. Sound Transit noted that its marketing segmentation study helped them identify
its key message. Sound Transit repeatedly returned to its key message
when interfacing with the media and the public. Eventually, the key
message became the truth.
3. Sound Transit chose to design stations on urban brown fields, opposed to green
fields. This approach proved to be more expensive, but a great way to
concentrate stations in high density urban areas.
4. Sound Transit noted that its project was completed within 1 % of its proposed
budget. Sound Transit noted that the soft budget (expenses such as
environmental costs and station location costs) was the most difficult to
control.
5. Sound Transit made a conscious decision to "land bank" for future parking
expansion. Sound Transit noted that the cost of land surrounding the
stations increases significantly upon the opening of commuter rail. Sound
Transit suggested that any additional land that could be secured for
parking expansion now is a worthwhile investment.
6. Sound Transit noted that it was most successful at securing federal funding by
working with Washington State's federal delegation.
7. Sound Transit noted that stations have been catalyst for economic development
in downtown areas and city centers. Councilmember Dave Enslow, City
of Sumner, said its biggest issue is adequate parking and parking
enforcement.
8. Noel Peck, Sound Transit Operations Manager, recommended bringing the
locomotive people and car people together during equipment design to
prevent design problems. Also, Mr. Peck noted that West Coast
commuter rail services have formed a consortium, which has created an
efficient way to share parts and equipment. Potential exists for NCDA to
become a part of this consortium once operational.
Vancouver: October 3,2000
TalQo Train
NCDA representatives toured Seattle's historic King Street Station with Stephen
3
~
,
Anderson, WSDOT. Following the tour, NCDA representatives rode the Talgo train,
operated by AMTRAK, from Seattle to Vancouver. The trip cost $21 per person
(coach fare) and took approximately 3 hours.
Description of West Coast Express (WCE) Commuter Rail Service.
1. TransLink
Translink was created as a result of the Greater Vancouver Transportation
Authority Act (1998). It is a regional organization and is not part of the
provincial government. TransLink's mandate is to plan and finance a
regional transportation system that moves people and goods efficiently
and supports the regional growth strategy, air quality objectives and
economic development of the Greater Vancouver Regional District
(GVRD). GVRD has a population of 2 million people, and is expected to
rise to 2.2 million by 2005. Commuter rail service was introduced in
November 1995. West Coast Express (WCE) is an operating subsidiary of
TransLink and operates commuter rail for the GVRD.
2. Components of the WCE System:
. Average ridership is approximately 7,600 per day.
. Peak ridership has exceeded 9,000 per day.
. Ridership has grown by more than 50 percent since opening.
. WCE is currently operating at 95 percent capacity.
. WCE operates ten trains per day, with more than 1,500 customers on
the busiest trains.
. WCE is fully integrated with conventional transit system.
. WCE has eight stations (Starting in Mission, through the northeast
sector, to Waterfront). See the WCE map in Attachment Two.
. WCE competes directly with cars for market share.
3. Other components of the TransLink system
. B-Iine bus service features long, articulated vehicles with frequent
boardings.
. Express bus service, features new, comfortable highway coaches
between town centers.
. City buses are the backbone of the system, with frequent stops in
more densely populated areas. Translink plans to begin replacing the
existing city bus fleet with trolleys.
. Mini-buses and shared-ride taxis are essential where large
conventional buses are too expensive and inefficient to operate.
Expansion of this service is focused on linking hospitals, schools and
recreation facilities to major transportation corridors.
. Custom transit offers opportunities for persons with disabilities
(HandyDART vehicles).
~
I
4
~
,
· SkyTrain is an advanced rapid transit system. Four downtown stations
are underground and marked at street level. The other 16 are elevated
and visible from the street. SkyTrain links with a network of buses at
many stations and with Sea Bus at Waterfront Station in downtown
Vancouver. SkyTrain provides daily service, every three to five
minutes.
· SeaBus and passenger ferries offer transportation over local
waterways.
4. Funding:
· Operating revenue, mainly fare box recovery - $1.62 billion
· Fuel tax - $1.23 billion
· Non-fuel tax - $.78 billion
· Motorist tax - $.45 billion
5. 1998/1999 WCE Accomplishments:
· 99 percent customer satisfaction.
· Celebrated the five millionth passenger.
· On-time performance - 98.50 percent.
· Scheduled service delivery - 99.85 percent.
· Implemented System Safety Program Plan.
· Won Web site of the week award.
· Purchased nine new cars.
NCDA Itinerary in Vancouver
1. NCDA representatives met with the following individuals at WCE:
Doug Kellsey, President, West Coast Express
Ken Hardy, Acting Vice President of Translink Communications and
Marketing
Greg Blasko, West Coast Express Operations Manager
James Kirshin, West Coast Express Operations
George Bell, West Coast Express Safety Manager
2. Rode the West Coast Express to the Coquitlam Station.
3. Disembarked in Coquitlam and meet with Mayor Jon Kingsbury, City of
Coquitlam and Norm Cook, Coquitlam City Manager.
4. Toured the Coquitlam Station.
5. Rode a charter bus to the SkyTrain, Vancouver's mode of rapid transit.
6. Rode the SkyTrain.
5
}>
Lessons Learned
1. WCE has only 17 employees, but contracts with approximately 200 employees to
deliver services. WCE suggests this helps to control costs and maintain
fresh ideas by continually seeking proposals to do the work better and for
less money.
2. WCE drafted a business plan. WCE believes one must understand its "qualified
commuter".
3. WCE offers a "SMART card" for riders to purchase tickets. The card offers
discounted fares. Approximately 30% of WCE customers use the card.
WCE can generate reports on card usage that provide the demographics
of its customers.
4. WCE noted that the "customer = King/Queen". WCE has numerous "listening
posts" to determine customer needs, such as:
. Customer satisfaction surveys
. Area resident surveys
. On-board surveys
. Comment cards
. Front-line reporting
. Quantitative and qualitative research
. Employee surveys
. Special projects surveys
. President rap sessions
. WCE advisory committee
. "Management by walking around" - contractors and staff
6
~
.--- ___ -._- _ '_~__"';""""''"''~=''_"~''_'M,-,_,;..-",~_,,,,,,,,,,,____,,,~,~~_,,,,,,,,_,,,,,'_''''''M'''''''"",''''''__'.'_~'_'' .
5. The following outlines some of the changes WeE has made based on customer feedback:
· Special Trains:
· Summer Trains
· Santa Trains
· Brain Train
· Craft Train
· Additional parking and machines
· Insurance programs (Home Run - guaranteed ride home)
· Snoozer Cruiser (lights out, quite car for sleeping)
· Leased 3 cars to help reduce overcrowding
· Pre-purchase of 28 day passes
· No smoking policy on all WCE platforms
· More fare checks
· 9 new cars
· TrainBus
Trip Attendees
~ Councilmember John Ellenbecker, City of St. Cloud
~ Commissioner Dan Erhart, Anoka County
~ Commissioner Duane Grandy, Benton County
~ Gabe Guevara, Mn/DOT
~ Commissioner Paul McCarron, Anoka County
~ Kelly Neu, City of Becker
~ John Norgren, Big Lake Township
~ Councilmember Paul Ostrow, City of Minneapolis
~ Mary Richardson, NCDA
~ Richard Speak, Benton County
~ Ken Stevens, NCDA
~ Jim Thares, City of Big Lake
~ Tim Yantos, NCDA Project Director
~ Jim Barton, Metropolitan Council
~ Jeff Dehler, Anoka County
~ Dave Loch, NCDA
~ Jan Lucke, NCDA
~ Dean Michalko, Hennepin County
~ Bob Morgan, City of Minneapolis
~ Tom Poul, Messerlie & Kramer
~ Lona Schreiber, Anoka County
~ Bill Schreiber, Messerlie & Kramer
~ David Showalter, URS/BRW
~ Dick WOlsfeld, URS/BRW
7
~
~..~..____ Critical Milestones for Northstar Corridor Schedule
H!IJ~
@~I!HBI!HBI!l/J!!J~fij .
~Record of
STATE F:UNDING Decision
,. .
· CAPITAL
.O&M I
. FINAL OESIGN -<r Funding Authorized
CRITICAL DECISION POINTS
* State Funding -6 / 01
* EIS Record of Decision - 7 / 01
* New Starts Submitted for FFGA - 9/01
* Northstar Included in Presidents Budget - 2/02
* Congressional Appropriation - 9 / 02
* Full Funding Grant Agreement
Executed & Approved 4 / 03
lEIS.
I
CONGRESSIONAL APPROPRIATION
I
---
· FINAL DESIGN
PE DESIGN
u ID _~._" ..
AUTHORIZATION
TO ENTER
. FINAL DESIGN.
VEHICLE
MANUFACTURING
FINAL DESIGN
BIDDING
CONSTRUCTION
I FFGA :
FTA DECIDES WHICH NEGOTIATIONS FFGA FINALIZATION
e.- :. . :.
PROJECTS TO RECOMMEND '
FOR FULL FUNDING
, I
<r New : <r Northstar <r Congress <r Full
Starts : included in appro~riates Funding
Submittal' Presidents Northstar Grant
I . I
lor FFGA: Budget lundln~ Ag~emenl
I I _I I I I I I I I I I lei I I I I I I I I 11.1 I I I I I I I lei I
2000 0 2001 ~ 2002 ~ 2003 2004
o 0 0
N N N
4> SYSTEMS
Y OPEN
: 12/31/04
912. (Rev 10/13/00)
.
ill'
~~J '--Uo.L,.'
.
)
Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority
665 Ramsey County Government Center"West, 50 West Kellogg Boulevard
St. Paul. Minnesota 55102 (651) 266--2760 I FAX (651)]20 ~1@ rn II W \.5
,
j
\
l
OCT 09 2000
1HE Al\iu,'-'" ....""vNTY
ADM\NiSTRA TOR'S OFFICE
September 2611'1, 2000
Mr. Tim Yantos
Northstar Conidor Development Authority
Anoka County Govemment Center
2100 3rd Avenue
Anoka, MN 55303
/
Dear Tim:
I am writing to comment on the Northstar Conidor Advanced Corridor Plan. The Ramsey
County Regional Railroad Authority has received a copy of this plan and would like to offer
comments on the Minneapolis Northeast Station and the Minneapolis Downtown Station.
.
The Railroad Authority would like to express our concerns with the Minneapolis Northeast
Station plan. After examining this plan, we have conduded that the only way to safely and
reasonably transfer from the Central ConidorlRed Rock Corridor to the Northstar Corridor is to
continue traveling into the downtown Minneapolis Station a star
train headed out of downtown Minneapolis. This is n acceptable transfer concept to us.
We would like the location of a transfer station in an .' SI of
transferring in downtown Minneapolis. We recommend that the Minneapolis Northeast station
be the station that could accommodate this transfer, which at its present location and design,
would not The proposed station is too far north or too far south (we feel a more appropriate
location would be north or south of the existing location) and does not connect with future
Central CorridorlRed Rock Corridor Commuter Rail.
Anoka County Commissioner and NCDA member Paul McCarron and I had reached an
agreement that this connection issue be resolved. I would recommend that the Minnesota
Department of Transportation arrange a meeting to discuss this issue_ This issue of a regional
and seamless commuter rail system is a significant concern to this board and to Ramsey
County.
Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority would like to reaffirm its commitment to working
with the Northstar Corridor towards a regional transit system.
Thank you in advance for your consideration of these comments.
Sincerely.
.
-,
-:;~~~-.,_... -
.t' ;
- ' .. . ~.../;;.
. .,
.. .' ..
I .
/
Tony Bennett, Chair
Pnnted on Rr<ycled Pv.p"r
\-uur'll I HUITll.l'l
~ct 11 '00 15:39
r-ax :t>1L'-jLj-~b~L
cc: aNyn Tinklenberg, Transportation Commissioner
Mukhtar Thakur, MnJDOT Office of Passenger Rail
Betsy Wergin, NCDA Chair
Paul McCarron, NCDA
Dan Erhardt, NCOA
Myra Peterson, Red Rock Conidor Commission Chair
Joe Harris, Red Rock Corridor Commission
Kathryn DeSpiegelaere, Railroad Authority Director
P.03
\,
.
.
.
.
.
.
RESOLUTION
Board of Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority
Date: September 26.2000 No.: ROO-20
WHEREAS. The Northstar Corridor Development Authority has completed the physical design
component of the Advanced Corridor Plan forme Northstar Corridor Commuter Riilline; and
WHEREAS. The Notthstar Corridor Advance Corridor Plan includes preliminary station plans
for tile Minneapolis Northeast "and Minneapolis Downtown commuter rail stations; and
WHEREAS, The Northeast Minneapolis commuter rail station is the preferred station to connect
with and facilitate transfers with the Central CorridorJRed Rock Commuter Rail Corridor; and
WHEREAS. The Ramsey_(;;oumy Regional Railroad Authority has reviewed the Northstar
Corridor Advanced Corridor Plan for the Minneapolis Northeast and Minneapolis Downtown commuter
rail stations; Now, Therefore, Be It
RESOLVED. That the Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority strongly recommends that
the Northstar Corridor Development Authority locate the Minneapolis Northeast Station to avoid the
necessity oftnmsferring in downtown Minneapolis for commuter rail passengers traveling on Central
CorridorlR.ed Rock Corridor wanting to travel to Anob COUnty and points beyond, and for commuter rail
passengers traveling on Northstar wanting to travel to St. Paul and points beyond; and Be It Further
RESOt VED, That the Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority recommends that the
Minnesota Department of Transportation convene a Northstar Corridor Development Authority
joint subcommittee that has requested one member from the Central Corridor~ the Red Rock
Corridor, the City of Minneapolis, and Mn/DOT to determine the viability of the Minneapolis
Junction transfer station and to share and review infonnation regarding the Minneapolis Junction
station.
RAMSEY COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORJTY
yeA NAY OTHER
X
X
X
X
X
Tony Bennett
Susan M. Haigh
Rafael E. Ortega
Victoria Reinhardt
Janice Rettman
Jan Wiessner.
T any Bennett, Chair
By:
RESOLUTION
Board of Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority
Date: September 26. 2000
No.: ROO-20
WHEREAS, The Northstar Corridor Development Authority has completed the physical design
component of the Advanced Corridor Plan for the Northstar Corridor Commuter Rail line; and
WHEREAS, The Northstar Corridor Advance Corridor Plan includes preliminary station plans
for the Minneapolis Northeast and Minneapolis Downtown commuter rail stations; and
WHEREAS, The Northeast Minneapolis commuter rail station is the preferred station to connect
with and facilitate transfers with the Central Corridor/Red Rock Commuter Rail Corridor; and
WHEREAS, The Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority has reviewed the Northstar
Corridor Advanced Corridor Plan for the Minneapolis Northeast and Minneapolis Downtown commuter
rail stations; Now, Therefore, Be It
,
.
.
RESOL VED, That the Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority strongly recommends that
the Northstar Corridor Development Authority locate the Minneapolis Northeast Station to avoid the
necessity of transferring in downtown Minneapolis for commuter rail passengers traveling on Central
CorridorlRed Rock Corridor wanting to travel to Anoka County and points beyond, and for commuter rail .
passengers traveling on Northstar wanting to ~vel to St. Paul and points beyond; and Be It Further
RESOL VED, That the Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority recommends that the
Minnesota Department of Transportation convene a Northstar Corridor Development Authority
joint subcommittee that has requested one member from.the Central Corridor, the Red Rock
Corridor, the City of Minneapolis, and Mn/DOT to determine the viability of the Minneapolis
Junction transfer station and to share and review information regarding the Minneapolis Junction
station.
RAMSEY COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY
YEA NA YOTHER
X
X
X
X
X
Tony Bennett
Susan M. Haigh
Rafael E. Ortega
Victoria Reinhardt
Janice Rettman
Jan Wiessner
Tony Bennett, Chair
By:
X
.