Loading...
6.6. & 6.7. SR 03-15-1999 rll ---'\) ( )j tll< Item # 6. 6. & 6. 7 . River MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Scott Harlicker, Planning Assistan~ DATE: March 15, 1999 SUBJECT: Request by Associated Developers of the Twin Cities, Inc. for Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit, Public Hearing Case No.'s P 98-8 and CU 98-26 Request Consider a request by Associated Developers for the following: . 1. Preliminary plat of 70.71 acres into 9 commercial lots and 2 outlots 2. A conditional use permit for a 70.71 acre commercial Planned Unit Development Location The southeast corner of Highway 169 and Main Street Zoning/ Land use PUD (Planned Unit Development) / HB (Highway Business) Attachments - Staff report from March 8, 1999 City Council meeting . At the March 8th Council meeting, the staff presented an overview of the project and the Council had an opportunity to hear public comment. Unfortunately, the developer, the City Engineer and City Attorney were unable to be in attendance. Public comment was received from the adjacent property owner to the west, Kathy Swanberg. She wanted the proposed road 13065 Orono Parkway - P.O. Box 490 - Elk River, MN 55330 - TDD & Phone: (612) 441-7420 - Fax: (612) 441-7425 . . . Memo to Mayor and City Council March 15, 1999 Page 2 through the project to be public, not private. She was concerned about access to her property. The public hearing was left open. Most of the discussion centered on the proposed road through the project and whether it should be private, public or a combination of the two. The Council members expressed concerns regarding a private road. Other discussion included clarifying who was paying for street improvements along with an explanation of pedestrian access around and through the site. At Monday's meeting the developer, as well as the City Engineer and City Attorney, will be available to answer questions. Following this meeting the developer will have an opportunity to revise the development plan to address the Council's and staffs concerns and bring the project back for the Council's considera tion. f: \shrdoc \planning\scott \p98-8315.doc rei ---'\) ( ~ tli< Item # River MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Scott Harlicker, Planning Assistant DATE: March 8, 1999 SUBJECT: Request by Associated Developers of the Twin Cities, Inc. for Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit, Public Hearing Case No.'s P 98-8 and CU 98-26 Request Consider a request by Associated Developers for the following: . 1. Preliminary plat of 70.71 acres into 9 commercial lots and 2 outlots 2. A conditional use permit for a 70.71 acre commercial Planned Unit Development Location The southeast corner of Highway 169 and Main Street Zoning/ Land use PUD (Planned Unit Development) / HB (Highway Business) Attachments . Location map . Development plans . Memos from City Engineer dated 10/23/98 and 12/16/98 . Minutes from the November 24th and December 22nd Planning Commission meetings . 13065 Orono Parkway. P.O. Box 490 · Elk River, MN 55330. TDD & Phone: (612) 441-7420 · Fax: (612) 441-7425 . Overview Background At the December 22,1998 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat and the conditional use permit for the planned unit development. At the November 30, 1998 City Council meeting, the Council approved the rezoning request to Planned Unit Development. The Council is now being asked to consider the preliminary plat and the conditional use permit for the planned unit development. As each of the individual sites within the PUD are developed, they will be back before the Planning Commission and Council for all the necessary approvals. Those approvals will include conditional use permits and in some case final plat approval. . Monday night's meeting will provided the Council with an opportunity to review the project, listen to a presentation by the developer, ask questions and provide comments so the applicant can make any necessary revisions to the plan to address outstanding issues and concerns. The Council is not expected to make a decision at this meeting regarding approval of this project. General Layout The project consists of 9 commercial lots and 2 outlots. Walmart is proposed to be located on a 21 acre parcel and a home improvement store, along with a attached retail space and a freestanding retail site, will be located on a 15 acre lot. There are 5 freestanding sites along the east side of Highway 169 and 2 freestanding sites on the interior of the project, one on the south end of the project and one between Walmart and the proposed Crossing Avenue. The proposed layout along with the wetlands make the project appear less crowded than originally proposed. The open area and wetlands could be turned into an amenity for the site if landscaped properly. The proposed Walmart will have 197,000 square feet and the proposed home improvement store will have 112,00 square feet. An additional 38,000 square feet of retail space is proposed for the home improvement store site. Proposed uses for the freestanding sites includes the following: . 20,000 square foot office/service 12,000 square foot office 5,500 square foot convenience store 3,500 square foot fast food . 250 seat restaurant 65 unit motel 225 seat restaurant According to the Environmental assessment Worksheet submitted for this project there is approximately 404,200 square feet of commercial retail and office space. The developable acreage on this project is 60.9 acres; the resulting density is 6637 square feet per acre. For a comparison, Elk Park Center has 374,000 square feet on approximately 50 acres for a density of 7480 square feet per acre. Parking. Access and Streets There will be 989 parking spaces included on the Walmart site and 741 spaces on the home improvement store site. Parking for the freestanding sites will be reviewed when development plans are proposed. Adequate parking is being provided for the two big box retailers. . Access into the site is proposed from 3 locations. Main entrances are proposed from Main Street and Tyler Street. A secondary access is also proposed from Tyler Street; this will be a right in and right out only located in the rear of the proposed home improvement store. The development plans show a shared driveway for the two lots closest to Main Street. A city street, Crossing Avenue, is proposed to extend from Main Street about 1000 feet into the site. Access from six of the freestanding sites will be provided from this street. Crossing Avenue is proposed to be a private drive through the site in front of the two big box stores then become a city street again for about 1000 feet to the Tyler Street entrance. The applicant has indicated the appearance of Crossing Avenue will not change when the street changes from pubic to private and back to public again. The Planning Commission had some concerns regarding traffic flow and people using the drive as a short cut. They felt if it was a city street, it should be a city street all the way through the project and access points into the Walmart and home improvement store sites should be limited. The other option would be to have Crossing Avenue be a private drive all the way through the project from Main Street to Tyler. Access to the street, if it were private, could also be limited. . Concerns raised by the Police Department regarding the private street option include enforcing traffic laws. Typically the Police Department does not enforce traffic and parking laws on private property. Since the street will function as a public street in that it will provide public access to the individual lots and will be used by some as a connection between Main Street . and Tyler Street, the Police should have the ability to enforce traffic and parking regulations. The Street Superintendent also expressed some concerns regarding maintenance of the street. He is finding that some developments with private roads are requesting the Street Department conduct snow removal and maintenance on a contract basis. This can cause some problems regarding prioritizing which streets receive first attention when it comes to snow removal and maintenance. The applicant will also be responsible for all the necessary improvements to Main Street as contained in their traffic study. The City Engineer in his memo dated 10/23/98 outlined the traffic issues. Access to the property to the south of Lot 5 was also discussed. If Crossing Avenue was a public street there would be no need for any access agreements or easements ensuring the property would not be landlocked without access to a public street. The loading areas for both Walmart and the home improvement store face arterial streets. Provisions for screening and making the loading areas inconspicuous should be included in the plans. . Relation to Central Business District The City is currently undertaking a visioning process for the central business district. It is likely that this development will serve as the eastern terminus of the central business district corridor along Main Street. It is important the Council takes this into consideration when reviewing this project and find ways to make the connection to the Main Street corridor. Methods to accomplish this include architectural treatments and building materials, pedestrian walkways, landscaping and lighting. Architecture As in Elk Park Center there should be some type of unifying architecture that is included as part of the building elevations. The Council should consider the type of exterior materials and colors they would like to see as part of a comprehensive look to the site. Since the site has frontage on both County Road 12, Tyler Street and Highway 169, there is not really a rear side to the project. This is important to keep in mind when considering the design and architecture of the buildings. Both Walmart and the home improvement store will have large sections of their buildings facing an arterial or a collector street; it would be worthwhile to treat all sides of the buildings, which face a public street, as if they were the front. With input from both the . City Council and Planning Commission, staff will be working with the . . . developer on setting the architectural character of the project. Some form of design criteria will be incorporated into the PUD agreement. Pedestrian Access The pedestrian access between the Walmart and the home improvement parking lots will be widened from 20 feet to 24 feet. The sidewalk on the west side of Crossing Avenue has been extended through to the connection with the business park on the south end of the project. It was not extended through to Tyler Street. Staff will recommend the sidewalk be extended to Tyler Street. Landscaping The applicant has submitted a conceptual landscaping plan. A final plan will be submitted for approval which will incorporate Planning Commission, City Council and staff comments. It is staffs recommendation that landscape islands be more centrally located in the Walmart parking lot to better break up the expanse of pavement. EAW and Wetlands On February 16th the Council approved the proposed wetland mitigation plan and approved the negative declaration on the need for an EIS. Grading, Drainage and Utilitiies Drainage, grading and utilities are addressed in the City Engineer's memo. ~I ::: . .....~ ~~{; --. I~ 'l./ . r--- '-- i I , r--- \ \ \; R1c AT! I ! I ! i j \~- \'- \ \ \ Rid J i I I ! --.. 'AI" : j ~ i I l : j t ~ j ""~ 1 7"e n.. 9 " ::-:--:>< Cil ;;1 !I 91 gl -, ~I 21 ~I =' '" ~I ~I ~! "I ~: oi ;1 3J t. ... /c. I ~I :;1 :<1 ~I ::1 -, I -1 I .... I I ; . ~ ':'\.I rue ;- ..- ': '-. ~..i" .-'.-. --- %b --.'.. >~ ~lKJRi-rer LOCATION MAP Z. C 'ij-C1 o ~7-~ r,' c::.::. r 1_ '-J'-.~~. ~ v C; ~ - <-to i ...ra.. \ W , ---.- - ...-....' . _..~~: - :-:~": :-"-:::':".\':"/ . :'.... =::- --, _.. - \ ..... .. - - - - ." ~ .:-' ~ ',' j ,. . '. -". ... -.. " . - . - . I ,...1 -/ i : J - - , I I , J i I I I I . . . us~ I m\snmG EXGI\mlS Formerly MSA Consulting Engineers Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS October 23, 1998 File: 800112J-0240 Honorable Chairman and Planning Commission City of Elk River 13065 Orono Parkway Elk River, MN 55330 RE: ELK RIVER CROSSING REVIEW Dear Planning Commission Members: We have done an initial review of the submittal package for the Elk River Crossing commercial development. As you are aware, this is the 70-acre Earl Hohlen property in the southeast quadrant of TH 169 and Main Street. It would be staffs hope to follow the Trott Brook Farms model in reviewing this project. In other words, we would hope to make a presentation on the major issues we see with this development at Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting. After the public hearing, we would hope for some discussion and direction from the Planning Commission to the staff on how to proceed with these major issues. We would anticipate that the Planning Commission would table action on this development to their next meeting. By that time, staff and the developers can work to revise the submittal package and staff will have a detailed list of conditions prepared for the Planning Commission to consider. The submittal package consisted of an 8-page set of drawings, prepared by McCombs, Frank, Roos and Associates, a draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet, a wetland report and mitigation plan, prepared by McCombs, Frank, Roos, and Associates, and a Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by Benshoof and Associates, Inc. Based on our review, comments received at the staff review meeting, and meetings with the developers, we would summarize the major issues as follows: A. PROJECT DENSITY According to the Environmental Assessment Worksheet, the project is proposed to have up to 404,200 square feet of commercial retail and office complex, located on 70.02 acres. Of the 70+. acres contained within the site, 9.12 of these acres are wetland; therefore the developable resulting acreage is 60.9. As a comparison, Elk Park Center, where Target and Cub Foods reside, was a development on approximately 50 acres that contain 374,000 square feet. It appears that Elk River Crossing has a density somewhat less than that of Elk Park Center. 0:\PROJ\800112j\0240\112-2101.oct.doc 1326 Energy Park Drive · St. Paul, MN 55108 · 612/644-4389 fax 612/644-9446 toll free 888/368-4389 Elk River Planning Commission October 23, 1998 Page 2 . B. TRANSPORTATION ISSUES 1. The Traffic Impact Analysis report prepared by Benshoof and Associates, dated October 1998, projects the p.m. peak hour traffic at 950 trips into the site and 1,052 trips out of the site. They go on to predict that 80% of these trips will be new trips, and that 20% will be bypass trips. Bypass trips represent vehicles that were already on the highway for some other purpose and decide to stop at Elk River Crossing. 2. The report goes on to analyze the exterior street infrastructure surrounding the development, and proposes additional improvements that will be needed. They are as follows: a) Trunk Highway 169 and Main Street At this intersection, they recommend the addition of a second westbound left turn lane, from Main Street onto Trunk Highway 10, a second southbound left turn lane, from'Trunk Highway 169 onto Main Street, and a separate westbound right turn lane with channelization. This recommendation will result in a six-lane Main Street at the east side of TH 169. It may also require some changes to Main Street on the west side of . TH 169 to make the geometry line up. b) Main Street and CSAH 13 At the intersection of Main Street and CSAH 13, which will be the major access point to the development, they suggest that the following intersection configuration is needed: . One eastbound left turn lane, two eastbound through lanes, and one eastbound right turn lane. . One westbound left turn lane, one westbound through lane, and one westbound through/right turn lane. . Two northbound left turn lanes and one northbound through/right turn lane. . One southbound left turn lane and one southbound through/right turn lane. The report goes on to indicate that the left turn lane into the old northbound liquor site needs to be eliminated, and the left turn lane onto Trunk Highway 169 extended. With the proposed improvements at Main Street and CSAH 13, major construction will be required between Trunk Highway 169 and this first intersection, including additional lanes and turn lanes. The report also indicates that this intersection needs to be . signalized to operate efficiently. Howard R. Green Company O:\PROJ\800112j\0240\112-2101.oct.doc CONSUL TI NG ENGI N EERS Elk River Planning Commission October 23, 1998 Page 3 Additional right-of-way will likely be needed from the plat to accomplish these proposed roadway improvements c) The site plan shows a right-inlright-out along CSAH 12, between the main entrance and the intersection of Tyler Street and CSAH 12, at the east edge of the development. The Traffic Impact Analysis report indicates that this access point will operate at a level of service B. It does not indicate whether a right turn lane and/or short acceleration lane will be needed for its efficient operation. It should be pointed out that this access point does not meet Sherburne County's adopted guidelines for access onto County State Aid Highways. This access is also of concern to City staff. d) CSAH 12/Tyler Street . This is the main intersection with the City's new north-south transportation corridor along the east side of this development. The design of this intersection meets or exceeds the recommendation contained within the Traffic Impact Analysis. The Traffic Impact Analysis indicates that a signal control will need to be installed once Elk Park Crossing begins to near full development. We have anticipated this in the design of Tyler Street and CSAH 12, and conduits are being placed for the future signalization of this intersection. e) Tyler Street/South Development Access The design of Tyler Street at this location meets or exceeds the Traffic Impact Analysis recommendation for lane configuration. Specifically, there will be a dedicated left turn lane into the site, which exceeds the Traffic Impact Analysis recommendation. One thing that Elk River Crossing should consider is future residential development east of this location. We would anticipate that there would be a four-legged intersection at some point in the future. f) Service Entrance/Tyler Street The Traffic Impact Analysis is silent on this intersection, but the site plan does show a full access to the rear of the large commercial sites off of Tyler Street. Staff would recommend that a right-in/right-out be allowed at this point for service vehicles, but that the median remain intact to preclude left turns at this point. . Howard R. Green Company O:\PROJ\800112j\0240\112-2101.oct.doc CONSULTING ENGINEERS Elk River Planning Commission October 23, 1998 Page 4 . 1. The County will likely need additional right-of-way from this development along CSAH 12. The City would require that the development construct a 10-foot bituminous pathway along CSAH 12, from the intersection of Tyler Street to Trunk Highway 169. This will tie into the pedestrian facilities anticipated along Tyler Street and the north side of CSAH 12, east of the intersection of Tyler Street. 2. The interior right of way is shown at 60 feet. There is no street section indicated. We believe that this right-of-way is too small to accommodate a commercial access road. It should also accommodate a sidewalk to connect Main Street with Tyler Street. c. Environmental 1. Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) The draft has been prepared and reviewed by City staff. The developer will be making the necessary changes and submitting the EAW to the City for signature and start of the public comment period. 2. Wetlands . As indicated, a wetland reporUmitigation plan has been prepared for the site. It was reviewed by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP). Comments were given to the developer. After the changes are made and received by the TEP, joint notification will be given. 3. County Ditch Sherburne County Ditch No. 10 meanders through this site. It is the City's intent to construct a storm sewer system along the Tyler Street alignment, which will eventually allow the abandonment of Sherburne County Ditch No. 10. This is the same process that was used with another leg of County Ditch No. 10 on the west side of Trunk Highway 169. The issue that needs to be resolved will be one of timing. The City and the developer will have to work with Sherburne County to accommodate timing of the construction of the storm sewer system and the abandonment of County Ditch No. 10 with the proposed schedule of the development of Elk River Crossing. 4. Corps of Engineers This project will require a Corps of Engineers permit. It is our understanding that the application for this permit has already been made, and is working its way through the process. . Howard R. Green Company O:\PROJ\800112j\0240\112-21 01.ocl.doc CONSULTING ENGIN EERS . . . Elk River Planning Commission October 23, 1998 Page 5 5. Indirect Source Permit Because of the number of parking stalls, this project will require an indirect source permit. The developers have not made application for this permit as of yet. It will be required prior to any activity on this project. D. Utilities The City is proceeding with the Eastern Area Trunk Utility Improvement, which will bring sanitary sewer and water through Elk River Crossing. These utilities will be adequate to sewer the proposed development. E. Miscellaneous 1. It should be noted that this proposed development does include three properties not yet controlled by the developer. There are three single-family lots along CSAH 12 that the developer is negotiating with the owners for their acquisition. 2. Drainage plans have been submitted and reviewed. They meet the necessary on-site ponding and limit the peak outflow from the site to an acceptable level. They may have to be adjusted slightly as the developers rework the wetland plan. 3. The 2:1 slopes shown in the ponds are unacceptable according to City policy. They need to be 3:1 or flatter. Again, reworking the wetland plan may address this issue, since the Wetland Conservation Act is more restrictive than City policy. 4. There are a few more minor issues that will be dealt with prior to the next submittal. If you have any questions, we will be in attendance at your Planning Commission meeting. Sincerely, Howard R. Green Company ._&~~ftz<<LbV Terry J. aurer, P.E. T JM/st Howard R, Green Company O:\PROJ\800112j\0240\112-2101.oct.doc CONSULTING ENGINEERS . Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS US1~ rmSrLTI\G DGI\IIRS Formerly MSA Consulting Engineers December 16, 1998 File: 800-112 J. 0240 The Honorable Chairman and Planning Commission 13065 Orono Parkway P.O. Box 490 Elk River, MN 55330-0490 RE: ELK RIVER CROSSING REVIEW Dear Planning Commissioner: . After the initial Planning Commission review of the Elk River Crossing Development at the October 27, 1998 meeting, the developer has submitted a revised packet of drawings. The packet we reviewed was printed on December 1, 1998 and had a latest revision date of November 30, 1998 on several of the sheets. The plan set had 8 pages consisting of a title sheet, boundary survey, existing conditions, preliminary development plan, preliminary plat, preliminary grading and drainage plan, preliminary utility plan and wetland fill/mitigation plan. In an effort to avoid redundancy and repetitiveness, we will only comment on engineering issues and only on those items that have changed since the initial review at the October 27, 1998 . meeting. For reference, we have attached a copy of our October 23, 1998 initial review of this project. Based on our review in meetings with the developer and his engineers, we would offer the following comments on the revised plans: A. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN . . The right-in-right-out along County Road 12 has been removed . The full access along Tyler Street to the rear of the major tenants has been modified to be a right-in right-out only . The southern entrance into the site off of Tyler Street still sh:)ws a median across the access point; however, this access point is intended to be full access with a left turn lane off of Tyler turning into the shopping center . Lot 1 and 2 in the northwest corner of the site are now shown to have a common driveway . The 6,000 square foot retail store labeled Retail "B" should be on a free standing lot 0.proj.l112-1601.dec 1326 Energy Park Drive. 51. Paul, MN 55108 . 612/644-4389 fax 612/644-9446 toll free 888/368-4389 The Honorable Chairman and Planning Commission December 16, 1998 Page 2 . . The development plan now shows a 6-foot sidewalk extending southerly into the industrial site to the south. Generally a sidewalk is along the west and southern part of the main access road coming from Main Street to this access to the south. At that point, the sidewalk is shown on the north side of the access road out to Tyler Street. This section of sidewalk along the north side of the access road makes sense for anybody wanting to access the retail opportunities from Tyler Street. We would; however, suggest that the sidewalk also be continued along the southern side of the access road out to Tyler Street to make a continuous path for pedestrians only wanting to cut through the retail center B. PRELIMINARY PLAT . Currently there are no easements showing on the preliminary plat. The sheet has a schedule, which calls out some of the necessary easements according to the ordinance. In addition to that, easements will need to shown for the truck sanitary sewer and water, which comes from the west side of Trunk Highway 169 into the site and then follows the road out to the south to Tyler Street. There will also need to be easements shown for the internal lateral sanitary sewer water to serve to major tenants. In addition, there . should be access easements shown for the parcel of property between Trunk Highway 169 and the site. The final easement that will need to be provided, although it cannot be shown on the plat, would be a sidewalk easement for the link to the south . Out lot "A" and "B" lying on the eastern side of Tyler Street are to be deeded to the city according to the note shown on the preliminary plat C. PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN . Storm drainage for the site has been provided through a series of catch basins and small diameter pipe conveying runoff to sedimentation ponds prior to discharging into wetlands located on the site. Generally, all the wetlands flow from northwest to southeast where the discharge ultimately leaves the site. Storm drain calculations that have been previously reviewed indicated that the ponds do an adequ;ate job of reducing the amount of runoff to predevelopment peak conditions. We have spoken with the developer and his engineer about the possibility of taking the storm water runoff from the last pond through the Vandenberg property to the large regional pond prior to conveyance under the railroad tracks. This would help to minimize the size of the storm sewer needed on Tyler Street. They have indicated that this would be a workable solution for their development. We will proceed to work on a final design for this type of system . All ponds and wetlands on the site now have minimum 3-to-1 slopes. . 0.proj.l112-1601.dec Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS . The Honorable Chairman and Planning Commission December 16, 1998 Page 3 . We have indicated to the developer's engineer that each of the storm sewer collection points and ponds need to have emergency over flows indicated such that in the case of a plugged catch basin the runoff will work its way to the ponds without endangering any of the buildings on the site. The developer's engineer has indicated'that he has thought about this but it was difficult to show on this large scale, but they will provide that information in greater detail in the future. . There is a small amount of grading shown off of the project site on a piece of property line between the development and Trunk Highway 169. Provisions should be made to either get permission from the property owner for this work or revise the development plan in such a way that this grading is not needed. D. PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN . . The preliminary utility plan accurately reflects the city's trunk sanitary sewer and water construction plans with one minor exception. The 24-inch sanitary sewer, which comes from the lift station, will extend north into the development then easterly to the ring load. Currently the utility plan is showing it going directly east through private property. The developers have acknowledged that and they will make this change in their plans and will provide the necessary easement for this sanitary sewer . The lateral sanitary sewer shown on the plan is adequate to provide service to all of the lots in the development. Easements will need to be provided over the portion of the sanitary sewer through the parking lots of the major tenants and the private portion of the ring road. . We have reviewed the watermain layout with Bruce West, Fire Chief, and Bryan Adams of the Elk River Municipal Utilities. Generally, the watermain serving the two major tenants will need to be looped and more hydrants placed around the buildings. It is also possible the fire chief will want looping and hydrants along TH 169, depending on the intensity of development. Since all buildings will have to go through a site plan review, additional more specific comments will be given at that time. . The storm sewer that drains the public road within the development will be publicly owned and maintained. All other storm sewers leading from the sedimentation ponds to the wetlands and draining the parking lot and private ring road will be privately owned and maintained E. ENVIROMENT AL ISSUES . . The Environmental Assessment Worksheet for this project has been review and signed off by the city and mailed to the appropriate agencies. The period for public comment ends on January 28, 1999. . The Wetland report has been reviewed by city staff and send out for joint notification. It includes a replacement plan for wetlands that are to be filled 0.proj.l112-1601.dec Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS The Honorable Chairman and Planning Commission December 16, 1998 Page 4 . by this development. The comment period for these issues will end on December 24, 1998 . Steve Rohlf is working with Sherburne County regarding the County Ditch No. 10 issues. As the commission is aware, a portion of County Ditch NO.1 0 crosses this development. The City's construction of the storm sewer under Tyler Street will eliminate the need for County Ditch No. 10. We are hopeful that the county will work with the City to abandon County Ditch No. 10 since the City is constructing a pipe network to replace it, while still not affecting the development timing for Elk River Crossing If you have questions regarding any of these comments, we will be in attendance at your December 22, 1998 planning commission meeting. Sincerely, HOWARD R. GREEN COMPANY ~fMI~ Terry J. Maurer, P.E. . . o.proj.l112-1601.dec Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS Planning Commission Minutes December 22. 1998 Page 5 . . '* 6.6. 6.7. . · THAT THE NEWLY PLATTED 7.51 ACRE SITE BE LIMITED TO TRACTOR TRAILER STORAGE ONLY. · THAT STAFF'S COMMENTS BE INCLUDED INTO THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN PRIOR TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. STAFF'S COMMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: THE SITE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE: · IDENTIFICATION OF ACTUAL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED INCLUDING ACTUAL AND PROPOSED TRACTOR TRAILER STORAGE AREA WITH PROPER SETBACKS. . IDENTIFICATON OF THE SURFACE MATERIAL OF THE TRACTOR TRAILER STORAGE AREA (SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED AS GRAVEL). · IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTERS. CURB AND GUTTER SHOULD EXTEND ALONG THE TRACTOR TRAILER STORAGE AREA PARALLEL TO 17151 AVE. NW TO SEPARATE THE GRAVEL AREAS FROM LANDSCAPED AREAS. . LOCATION OF DUMPSTER AND ENCLOSURE . LOCATION OF FUEL VAULT . LOCATION OF MONUMENT SIGN . LOCATION OF UTILITIES . STRIPED PARKING WITH HANDICAP STALLS . EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO THE NORTH OF THE BUILDING . ANY PARKING LOT LIGHTING THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE: . 32 OVERSTORY TREES WITH NOT MORE THAT 50% OF THE TREES COMPRISED OF ONE SPECIES . 16 EVERGREEN TREES . 16 ORNAMENTAL TREES WITH NOT MORE THAT 50% OF THE TREES COMPRISED OF ONE SPECIES . IDENTIFICATION OF SODDED AND SEEDED AREAS . IDENTIFICATION OF AREAS WITH UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION INCLUDING THE LANDSCAPED AREA ALONG 17151 AVENUE. COMMISSIONER THOMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0. Request by Associated Developers of the Twin Cities, Inc. for Preliminary Plat (Elk River Crossina), Public Hearina Case No. P 98-8 Request by Associated Developers of the Twin Cities, Inc. for Conditional Use Permit, Public Hearinq Case No. CU 98-26 staff report by Scott Harlicker. Scott reviewed the revised plans for the Elk River Crossing preliminary plat and conditional use permit requested by Associated Developers of the Twin Cities, Inc. Scott also reviewed the issues which still need to be addressed including the status of Crossing Avenue, median break on Tyler Street, pedestrian accesses, design guidelines, lighting, landscaping, and EA W, wetlands, drainage, grading and utilities issues. Planning Commission Minutes December 22. 1998 Page 6 Chair Mesich opened the public hearing. . Greg Frank of McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc., explained that he felt Crossing A venue should be a public street as it enters the development so that the immediate 4 sites can be accessed. He felt that there would be very little thru-traffic through the remainder of the site and would be destination-oriented. Chair Mesich asked Mr. Frank to explain where the sidewalks and trails would be. Mr. Frank indicated that there would be a sidewalk along 3rd Street to Tyler, along Tyler there would be a sidewalk on the west and a trail on the east, and on County Road No. 12 the trail would switch to the north side at the residential development. Commissioner Chambers questioned if renditions of the home improvement center and Wal-Mart were available. Mr. Tony Gleekel, attorney representing the developer, indicated that he is still in negotiations with the prospective retailers and that the design standards will be addressed in the PUD agreement. Mr. Gleekel felt that the developer and staff will be able to agree upon a theme by using architectural treatments and lighting that can tie in with the downtown. Scott noted that the developer and staff will be looking for recommendations from the Planning Commission regarding building materials, color, architectural theme, lighting, etc. Kathy Swanberg, P.O. Box 130, Becker, MN, indicated she owns property in partnership with her father, Earl Hohlen, to the west of the proposed development. She indicated that a portion of her property has been included in the planning of this development without her knowledge. Ms. Swanberg reviewed past events which indicate a discrepancy in the number of acres included in the development, which needs to be resolved. She indicated she strongly objects to the proposed project because of ownership issues and the question of access to her property. . Scott Zirott, 128 Baldwin, resident of the mobile home park, stated that 3 or 4 of the mobile home owners have not been paid off by the developer. Chair Mesich stated that the residents should attend the City Council meeting on January 19the so that the matter can be discussed. Stoffel Reitsma, 10860 County Road No. 12, questioned what the outlots were going to be that are located towards Tyler. Terry Maurer, City Engineer, explained that nothing will be done with the outlots at this time, but that they may be used in the future in combination with Mr. Reitsma's property. Mr. Reitsma indicated he did support the trail along County Road No. 12 switching from one side to the other. Terry indicated that the trail can only be placed where right of way is available and that ideally, in the future the trail will be located on both sides of County Road No. 12. Dana Anderson, Park & Recreation Commission Chair, indicated that the Park & Recreation Commission discussed the location of the trail along County Road No. 12 and they felt the trail was better suited on the north side because of the proposed residential development and location of Hillside Park. Mr. Anderson also noted that the power line corridor located on the plat was previously . . . . Planning Commission Minutes December 22. 1998 Page 7 designated as a snowmobile trail connection by the Park & Recreation Commission. Discussion followed regarding Crossing A venue as a public street vs. a private street. Terry Maurer indicated that access would be available to the Swanbergs with either a public or private street. Mr. Frank indicated that they are requesting the parking islands be approved as requested because of future expansion plans. He felt the 30+ consecutive stalls is a reasonable standard and compares to most cities. Mr. Frank cited the Eagan Promenade commercial development as an example of a private street through a development. It was the consensus of the Commissioners to discuss design standards at a workshop meeting. There being no further comments from the public, Chair Mesich closed the public hearing. Further discussion followed regarding the status of Crossing Avenue. The Commissioners felt the street should be either be entirely public or entirely private. Mr. Gleekel indicated the design was based on what has worked in other developments. He expressed concern that having private accesses within the sites is redundant and will cause traffic to "bottleneck" when moving in and out of the sites. COMMISSIONER COTE MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ELK RIVER CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REQUESTED BY ASSOCIATED DEVELOPERS OF THE TWIN CITIES, INC. WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. A DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT BE PREPARED OUTLINING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PLAT APPROVAL AND INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS BE PREPARED AND EXECUTED PRIOR TO RELEASING THE PLAT FOR RECORDING. 2. A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BE PREPARED AND EXECUTED PRIOR TO RELEASING THE PLAT FOR RECORDING. 3. A LETTER OF CREDIT BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY IN THE AMOUNT OF 100% OF THE COSTS OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. 4. UPON COMPLETING ALL OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND HAVING THEM ACCEPTED BY THE CITY, A WARRANTY BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF 25% OF THE IMPROVEMENT COSTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR A ONE YEAR PERIOD. 5. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FEE IN THE AMOUNT REQUIRED BY THE CITY AT THE TIME OF FINAL PLAT BE PAID PRIOR TO RELEASING THE PLAT FOR RECORDING WITH SHERBURNE COUNTY. 6. A SEALCOAT FEE IN THE AMOUNT TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER BE PAID TO THE CITY PRIOR TO RELEASING THE PLAT FOR RECORDING WITH SHERBURNE COUNTY. Planning Commission Minutes December 22. 1998 Page 8 7. THE NECESSARY DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS BE DEDICATED ON THE PLAT AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. . 8. ALL COMMENTS OF THE CITY ENGINEER BE ADDRESSED. 9. ALL APPROPRIATE WETLAND PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK ON THE SITE. 10. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS BE PUT IN. PLACE OVER THE WETLANDS, THESE SHALL BE COMPLETED AND RECORDED WITH THE PLAT. 11. A BOND COVERING THE COST OF THE WETLAND MITIGATION IS REQUIRED AND SHALL BE MADE PART OF THE DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT. 12. PAYMENT OF PARK DEDICATION FEES IN THE AMOUNT REQUIRED BY THE CITY AT THE TIME OF FINAL PLAT BE PAID PRIOR TO RELEASING THE PLAT FOR RECORDING WITH SHERBURNE COUNTY. ":::\ @ APPROPRIATE CROSS- ACCESS / CROSS PARKING EASEMENTS, INCLUDING ACCESS EASEMENTS SOUTH OF LOT 5, SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND RECORDED WITH THE FINAL PLAT. 14. OUTLOTS A AND B SHALL BE DEEDED TO THE CITY. 15. A FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN AND LIGHTING PLAN BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. . 16. DESIGN GUIDELINES BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. 17. THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS BETWEEN THE WALMART AND HOME IMPROVEMENT PARKING LOTS BE WIDENED TO 24 FEET. 18. THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF CROSSING AVENUE BE EXTENDED TO TYLER STREET. 19. THE TWO LOTS ON CROSSING AVENUES CLOSEST TO MAIN STREET HAVE A SHARED DRIVEWAY. 20. NO ACCESS BE ALLOWED, EXCEPT FOR CROSSING A VENUE, ON TO MAIN STREET OR 181sT AVENUE (COUNTY ROAD 12). 21. THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS IN THE WALMART PARKING LOT BE MORE CENTRALLY LOCATED AND ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPED ISLANDS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE NORTH AND WEST. 22. A SIGN AGREEMENT OUTLINING THE LOCATION AND SIZE OF FREESTANDING AND WALL SIGNS BE MADE PART OF THE PUD AGREEMENT. 23. A 10 FOOT PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT BE DEDICATED TO ALLOW FOR THE SIDEWALK CONNECTION BETWEEN THIS PROJECT AND THE BUSINESS PARK TO THE SOUTH. . . . . Planning Commission Minutes December 22, 1998 Page 9 24. TRASH COMPACTOR/DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES THAT MATCH THE EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIAL AND COLOR BE PROVIDED FOR EACH BUILDING AND/OR TENANT. 25. THE THRU-STREET, CROSSING STREET, SHALL BE EITHER COMPLETELY PRIVATE OR COMPLETELY PUBLIC. IF A PUBLIC STREET, THE ACCESSES SHALL BE LIMITED AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF AND THE CITY ENGINEER. 26. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY'S MOBILE HOME ORDINANCE PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. COMMISSIONER THOMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0. 7.1 . Action taken on Plannina Items at the December 21, 1998 City Council Meetinq Commissioner Schuster advised the Commissioners of action taken by the Council on planning issues at the December 21, 1998, City Council meeting. 8. Adjournment There being no further business, COMMISSIONER COTE MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. COMMISSIONER THOMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION 6-0. The meeting of the Elk River Planning Commission adjourned at 9: 15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, fu.{'(L' Wt~ Debbie Huebner Recording Secretary . . . Planning Commission Minutes November 24. 1998 Page 4 6.4. ~.5. 6.6. COMMISSIONER COTE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-1. Commissioner Cote opposed. COMMISSIONER KUESTER MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 98--1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF ELK RIVER ZONING MAP TO REZONE CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM R1 C (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO C4 (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL), PUBLIC HEARING CASE NO. ZC 98-10, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: 1. THE REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION OF CC (COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL). 2. TIMES AND CONDITIONS HAVE CHANGED TO WARRANT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY AS NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL. 3. THE PROPERTY IS ADJACENT TO A MINOR ARTERIAL WHICH CAN MEET THE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF BUSINESSES ALLOWED UNDER THE C4 ZONING DISTRICT. 4. THE PROPOSED C4 ZONING DISTRICT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT ZONING DISTRICTS. 5. THE PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA AND IS WITHIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO EXISTING SERVICES. COMMISSIONER CHAMBERS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-1. Commissioner Cote opposed. Request by Associated Develooers of the Twin Cities. Inc. for Rezonina. Public Hearing Case No. ZC 98-9 Request by Associated Develooers of the Twin Cities, Inc. for Preliminary Plat (Elk River Crossinal. Public Hearina Case No. P 98-8 Request by Associated Develooers of the Twin Cities. Inc. for Conditional Use Permit. Public Hearina Case No. CU 98-26 Staff report by Scott Harlicker. Associated Developers of the Twin Cities has requested the following: 1. Rezoning 60.43 acres from C3 (Highway Commercial and R2b (Two family Residential) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) 2. Preliminary plat of 60 .43 acres into 9 commercial lots and 2 outlots 3. A conditional use permit for a 60.43 acre commercial Planned Unit Development Scott explained changes made in the plat since the last Planning Commission reviewed as follows: The building orientation of the Wal-Mart store has changed, Planning Commission Minutes November 24. 1998 Page 5 leaving the wetland area open; the right-in-right-out and the free-standing office building has been eliminated; the city right-of-way for Crossing A venue ends at a point and becomes a private access road; there is a median pedestrian access through the middle of the site, a sidewalk is proposed off of Tyler to the home improvement store. and connects with the business park property. Scott indicated the number of lots in the preliminary plat have been reduced. 2 office lots which incorporate the wetlands. and the freestanding sites along Highway 169. Scott indicated the grading plan has been changed to incorporate the required 3: 1 slopes. Scott reviewed issues associated with the utilities, wetlands, EAW. and landscaping plan. He recommended clustering some landscaping along Highway 169. He suggested screening the back of the office building to replace the stand of oaks. Scott explained the location of the pylon sign and entry signs as indicated on the landscaping plan, noting that no other signage information is available at this time. Scott requested that the applicant provide the following: . -Show relocation of gasline easement -Extension of the sidewalk on the south side of the street and connect with Tyler -Realign sidewalk shown on plat so that it lines up with the access into the Wal-Mart -Include landscaped islands across the center of the parking area for both the Wal-Mart and home improvement center lot, to break up the parking lot, control traffic flow through the site and provide shade. -Widen/enhance the landscape strip -Provide elevations. parking calculations, signage, impervious surface calculation -Provide drainage and utility easements on the plat -Provide information on uses at various points of the home improvement center and Wal-Mart and impact on the UPA easement. . Scott indicated that since staff has not been given adequate time to review the preliminary plat and conditional use permit, staff recommends postponing these issues until the December 22 meeting. However, staff believes that the requirements for the rezoning request have been met and recommends approval of the rezoning request to PUD at this time. Commissioner Chambers asked if there is a break in the landscaped island between the two sites for vehicles to drive through. Scott stated that it would not be possible to drive through. Tony Gleekel, representing the applicant, Mathew Fischer, stated that he felt most of the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission at the November meeting have been addressed. Mr. Gleekel noted that the landscaping plan is a conceptual plan and that each user will need to submit specific plans for their site, as required in the PUD agreement. Greg Frank, civil engineer for the project, explained the following changes to the plans: -right-in-right-out and corresponding lot have been eliminated -accesses will be from 3rd A venue and future Tyler Street. and right-in-right-out truck access in back of the home improvement site. . Planning Commission Minutes November 24, 1998 Page 6 . -3: 1 slopes have been met and the wetland has been preserved by separating the Wal-Mart and home improvement sites -ponding areas have been platted as lots -pedestrian corridor from 3rd A venue is 20 foot wide with a 6 foot wide sidewalk. -a common access is shown in the plat for Lot 1 and Lot 2 -tie-in point of Wal-Mart and the home improvement site will be toward the front of the buildings -a portion of the public street has been eliminated and will be a private access into the parking lots. Chair Mesich asked Mr. Frank to explain the route of the truck traffic. Mr. Frank explained where the loading docks are located and how the trucks will move through the site. Mr. Frank indicated that a fenced garden center will be located within the UPA easement and UPA has expressed approval for this type of use. Mr. Frank noted that they also have received approval from Minnegasco to relocate the gas pipeline and Minnesgasco will work jointly with the developer in the relocation design. Mr. Frank explained that 5 parking stalls per 1,000 sq. ft. are included in the plans for the 204,000 sq. ft. Wal-Mart, and also 5 parking stalls per 1,000 sq. ft. for the 112,000 sq. ft. home improvement center. He noted that the same number of parking stalls are shown for retail sites A & B (5 per 1,000 s.f.). . Commissioner Kuester asked where the gas pipeline will be relocated. Mr. Frank explained the tentative alignment and noted that a final determination will be made by Minnegasco. Commissioner Kuester questioned if they plan to have one pylon sign for the PUD. Mr. Gleekel indicated they would like to have more than one pylon sign; one identifying "Elk River Crossing" and one identifying the two "big box" retailers. Commissioner Cote questioned why a median is shown for the truck traffic access. Mr. Frank indicated that it was an error and the access will be a right-in- right-out only. Commissioner Kuester asked where the access points would be for the other sites. Mr. Frank indicated those access points have not yet been determined. Mr. Gleekel indicated their engineers will work with city staff to determine general locations of the access points. Chair Mesich opened the public hearing for the three requests. There being no comments from the public, Chair Mesich closed the public fQr the rezoning request. . COMMISSIONER KUESTER MOVED TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY ASSOCIATED DEVELOPERS OF THE TWIN CITIES, INC. TO THE DECEMBER 22, 1998, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. COMMISSIONER COTE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0. Planning Commission Minutes November 24. 1998 Page 7 Commissioner Cote questioned if the property to the west was included in the development discussions. Peter Beck indicated the applicant does not have ownership of this property and it is not included in the plans. . Chair Mesich asked for clarification on the drainage plan. Mr. Frank explained the drainage plan and stated that all the storm water vvill be collected in a sedimentation pond before going into an existing wetland or the mitigation areas as shown on the plans in blue. He felt the hydrology of the site will be improved as :.l result of the mitigation. Commissioner Cote indicated he did not have a problem with the plans and supported the rezoning. Peter Beck explained that the city has approved rezoning requests prior to approval of the preliminary plat and conditional use permit for projects. Commissioner Cote expressed his approval of the changes made in the wetlands and building orientation of the two large retail sites. He expressed some concern for the private street and the access. and he indicated that he would like to see the parkway between the two developments widened. He expressed support proof of parking needs. Commissioner Cote indicated he also supported the extension of the sidewalk along Crossing Avenue. and the sidewalk connection to the business park. Commissioner Kuester indicated she supported widening of the walkway between the two sites and also has some concerns about the traffic flow through the sites. . Commissioner Cote indicated that he felt the opportunity for extension of the city's streetscape theme would be lost if the public street ends and becomes private. Chair Mesich agreed that the aesthetics would be lost. He supported the continuation of the sidewalk. Commissioner Chambers provided the developers with photos demonstrating how a streetscape can be incorporated into a development. Chair Mesich felt it would be difficult to blend a particular theme with the sites being separated. Commissioner Chambers questioned the developers whether or not the large users would be willing to incorporate an architectural theme. Mr. Gleekel indicated the city will have some control on this issue and that covenants can be used. He felt that there are architectural treatments available which can be used to tie the look of the buildings together. Mr. Gleekel indicated that landscaping and lighting can be used to tie into a streetscape. He felt this issue could be discussed further at the December 22nd Planning Commission meeting. He noted that Wal-Mart does has 4 -5 renditions of their building. so there may some flexibility in meeting the city's concerns. Mr. Gleekel indicated they will be working with staff to discuss what the ordinance requires and possible covenants. . Planning Commission Minutes November 24. 1998 Page 8 . Peter Beck indicated that if the plans were complete for the two large users, their conditional use permits could be approved as part of the approval of the overall project. COMMISSIONER MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY ASSOCIATED DEVELOPERS OF THE TWIN CITIES FOR A REZONING FROM C3 (HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) AND R2B (TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT), BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: 1. THE PROPOSED REZONING COMPLIES WITH THE REGULATIONS SET FORTH IN SECTION 900.12(17). 2. THE REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION OF HC (HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL). 3. TIMES AND CONDITIONS HAVE CHANGED TO WARRANT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY AS A PUD. 4. THE PROPOSED PUD ZONING IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT ZONING DISTRICTS. 5. THE PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA AND IS ABLE TO BE SERVICED BY MUNICIPAL SEWER AND WATER. COMMISSIONER CHAMBERS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0 . COMMISSIONER COTE MOVED TO POSPONE THE REQUEST BY ASSOCIATED DEVELOPERS OF THE TWIN CITIES, INC. FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT (CASE NO. P 98-8) AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CASE NO. CU 98-26), TO THE DECEMBER 21, 1998, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. COMMISSIONER MORRIS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0. 6.7. Reauest by Amcon for Preliminary Plat (Elk River Business Park. L.L.C.l. Public Hearina Case No. P 98-7 Staff report by Scott Harlicker. Amcon has requested preliminary plat approval to subdivide 40 acres into 7 lots (Elk River Business Park). Scott recommended that a sidewalk be installed with a connection to the retail development to the north. He indicated the easements need to be shown on the plat and that access to the property to the west should be included as part of this plat. Scott noted that a wetland mitigation plan has not yet been received. but Terry Maurer did not anticipate the layout of plat will change significantly. Also, the City Engineer requested that the grading plan be approved prior to final plat. Scott explained that the County Ditch shown on the plat will likely be abandoned when city sewer and water are extended.. staff recommends approval of the request with the conditions outlined in the staff report. . Discussion followed regarding location of the easements. parking. and access issues. Peter Beck stated that the applicant is being required to provide a private easement for access to the property to the west. Commissioner Kuester asked where the sidewalk would be located. Scott indicated the exact location is not known at this time. Peter Beck suggested that a condition be included that the "'V"" :=a~ ~ Ocn "'V-4 0- I cn% ""co) U) J ON . NO ~ 03: U) %% ("J -CO) % .. CO) 0 a trj .. n "'V~ ~ c: o "'V CJ ~ c: 0 > ~ ~ ~ % 0 ~ :=a N ~~ m t;S ~ ~o ~ ~ ~t::1 t:; ~ ~ . ~....... ~ ~ ~~ ~ t:; 0 ~ .. ~ trj ~ s ~~ ~ CJ ~~ ~ <C/l < ~ a n t"Xj · - z ~ CI)~ a U) a: o~ > ~ -= U) ~'"'< . trj S2 ~ ~ 0 U) ~ . \.,a ....... 1Ia ~ e~::3 \C ~ "'~ 2! < l:"'" ~ fIl t'Z:I 1"'" .. t"'l en z "':c '" ot'Z:l CJ i !a t'Z:I .li ~ . c.oN- ClI....CltUl. . . ." ~ I o o C! ~ !' tI2 Cl Cl ~ tI2 S ~ ~ " ", .,. ,., ~ ~ CI E"';::a:a ~cr- (') !::l~....,.,.... ~zl"l!! ~iiii ~!~ i O~~~~(')-C!:l :!~~~-c~~ s:: ." 0 0 :a ~~~E~~~ -.0 ~z ='-t_ 0 en o-cz ." · 0 J: Se.. 2 zZo -t ." ~ ." ~ ~ ~ o ,., ." ~ . & . r . ~ J ; i " ! ~ i I & r . ~ i 1111 tl:l .0 e~~ !" '=' = ~> _,,::a ; n-< z! en I !a c::: .z::a c< t'!J -< ! > ." en 51 en ." ~i ~ to:! ~ l:l !' l:l to:! < to:! 5 "tI l"J ~ z p CD II \ ~~~o \) \ \ I \ \\ .\. IN LID "UUJ.U ~ 3) r \ ~ .,1EI1I:llmI a. .. ~~ I I Ill.... LK IF'{- IE II'''' lit: IE 1I\.IIUI 1= f j, :.:. ".. \~\--\o;..... \~IN ST':".- -:.. :"~~~ -.. _.- ..~.. -.. -.. _.. -.. -r-.. -.. -.. \ \1(1 \ "' \ \_._.1 I if I " '>-: :~ '-','. i \ \\ \ \ \. ~,-r'V~.('<" "" " ':/ ':-- _ : \ '\"'... \ I ." \ ! 1;11 i ! : '" ~~~ ^" '"<:., "",_,: .:::_. I \ C' \\i \ \ I : ,=! ~ I ~ I ~;;:~~..., -f '- '-; , " ~ I .' \ \ ;:'i: ~ ~~~y}'~~. /' "'':'''A . ,-.(, \ \~ \ \ . . ~ 'l:l~ I ~ I ~ . t.p "'... ,-.,.'-, ,<,' . -: _' ~ \ . ~ I~' v .. ~..I) '. '.'" A ' ,,' , I ~ ;- \ \ y '\ \(" \ < ~ .,ii!: i I i ~~ ~'\.' ";' ..;>~ :~;. ,7., . l ,:~~A, '...4 '\ \ . ~ .;': I ~ I ,./ ~<"'U:l.. " '.' . ,~- I ~ " ,\ \\ '- \ ")1"1 1/ '-'. " ~ _ \ ,", '\ . \\ \-.-.-.,-.-\ \,,~J'I I I '" <:... ~ : ; ,,,'A ',"',,'A, ~'_ ~\. ",- . J ~ ~ .., "'-".. ~ -<">'\ '<, ~, 'l \ \ \-.~ \ il..L~,'11 / / ~ '..," "". I ~ - -, \. ,,\ \ ~ \ I" I "" ,~ ~ ' . i ,\""" \ 0 ~ \ i . ., I I ~ ~ ..:--.::" . !!I '" ..... \ _ \\ \ "' ) i I .. I '\. I ~ ~....~- ." I II \ ,',\:-. \ <.~ ,'\\ '\ rr" I ~ ,,~- .J:.,. ." j \ '{.? (,' '.;\ ~;~I 'I '-./.-~; -- -- -- "'~" . , " ~ ' , '\. ~.... I, I .. __ r ' -- -- ".."', \ \..A, ~ ,~- \ ~\ll:~ . i I _ __ --::;--: _ ___; ~ ":.... '. · y - ". ~!~~ hl.J I .. .-.-- ~;-:::-;;,::;""',. I ~ " , \ ~ ~..,~~~. \ \ IRi I ~ I , ~'<--.....'" "/ \ \ 0"'..0 -. \ \. !;; I' ~: I -- --_ ~;-- -- --~- ,I I \ " . \ '- \ I' . I --1-:::-::- -- -- .. /' \ \ \. \ \ ,\;\",;.: --;~ -- -- _----- .........._..............01<........ wm..."./c----,~~~ o_s.......,.~.. L-~-..'~-,\. \ ---- .,)...1;--, /;.IIt:IIIJllI~.IIt:SVIl.IFIlt:SVIl.IIXZ "--1- ".... ".:' 1 .-\-~~~..\ \,.;\ I .. ~~~~:-~~~;.:;;;.;; -.. . .'-.. a ---~ -- ~--'\-,- ,\ ;, -.j / \-----,. \ \\ \ I . ~ ~ I' '\1/ ~-~\ \\ ~ I ' ~~ I Y \ ,\ '\ \ ~ I I ~i I I ,., ~ ~ . ~ I ~v I ,., I_~,~ t"> \.-." &-.I.:rt' ~ I ~ , '. ' ".. · , I 'It: -- . \ 1.. \'. ~ ,,~ ,.., _...' - ,'.._---::...-n.-. .-.:-t' - . . I -0 (, '..., ~-*\- ,,~ ~ \ \; - ~ ~ -, \. \ I ft_ . ~ " -- \ \ \ ."'\. -" _~~----(:-" \ \ \. =1 I , - I , .. \ \~ I . .,.'. -,. \ 1 \ 1!' -......... I \"..,;' -A-.J'~'\-.\-...-i i.~ ',^ . \ ,A,' \ '; \ \ .T!'-;O;-. I~ , ~'--'-'_\'-'-'-I~~"I' ,~ ..'.1 \ ,..........., ' \ ' ':,' \ ~ l' i: ~ I~"" " -'_ ~\ il-'--.....,' I' ~>, " I .,.....' .1 '" '~" '..... I -'Flt'.I1~~';-r ~ r~" .,~~, "" " I I \I r ';1 . 1II,1 ' '''~ ' / 1/11 "y- ': II " '~"". "", ~. '1,' ','~. '.', . . -7- 'J 'r f , \ ~......' :-.... .>.. , f ~,. 0: ,.~ ~ "" / '/ f I \.';' \ ',~/~. .~,', I I,. /..../\ '<~ ~':-....'~', I . I I '.I! I' \ ,.~, ~.., ' -_ '//' I I !Ii' ~ / \ ", "~:.~ l', --7------;J;.f~1 ! I .. / " .,~l " t----~-==-r I /. , V / " ',,>=~~ ........-- I '.1 I , 1#' ~" . . - . . -::;"f::.:::' ,d -;:I . -H~ I __'K,::,______:,: '<'-'~'"', ;:: .. . . - . . , ~ /- ---"-_, l- q' II! ! !, foi " '.,,-.-.-.- ''i,llZ I ' !/' . '.'/-.-.-.-.- ~ / I --.- iir!l I ; 1/; "1'" / If/, I ,,'! vvn,".u, / 7-aumo " ~ , '" , JrZl_ " "" I , .._.~_.~ .-.....,.../~ . .",' , . , . ':" , .. , '.." .. , ~ ~ !l ,., I , A - ... ' , . . . ,. A -... ' .' - , , , '. ~ , , , ... , , ., A , ... ' (; . ,'.,' , . , . , :,,' ~ g i ~ . f 5 ~ . f 5 j II ,. I ., ",' - " ~ , , ., ,... -. ",' " A . , , , , " .... - . ~ '~ -. .. - - '" .:.' ~II "f i~! il' ~f1 11-, ij Iff 1'1 I !l~! -1, r ~ ! '[!Il1 .!~ ~i ..~i III I~I; '"1' f II' I! lalr ", I.! ".s" If ri I' , ~F "- -:,;sF }!11l{ I! i 'i~ d j Ii j ~lll ~f; j ~ l! t~t I r .. !: f I!~ ~~M l~ii - ". f I J!~ r; M i .. -I !r ! l .. .,r , , rf-1 1 , i a ~f ' I~ in ..ilr 1 J H if II" I! Ri r " ! . R' Ir ,- ;rr ngr t i F{ 1Ft "'1,' P. .. .. ../:0 .. f I I I I I I - ~--'\ \\ \l / \ \ \ ( \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ '\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ C-\ \ \\" ~ \ \ \t.f)\ \ \ \" \ \ \ \ \~\\ \ \ \~\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \,...>\\ \ \ \6'\ \ \It)\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \\ \ \ \ _ . . ~ . . L .\. \-\\. \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ a .. . ft dsj -ili 'II I ill III i Hi I I . I i J r - , ." :;0 l:!I!3 E: i:: 2 DlI> , I"" :;0 :. e : 00( " ~ ~~ JIll :a l:!I!3 II:n< : Z :a I:Z:l , .. 0 t""" 1 a!:lO il ~ - ." j ~i:: l:!I!3 :z ~ ." s: :z ; .i : ~ .' "ll L e l i I !J ~ ~ =!' f : .. ~ t ('II I ~ ~ f CD- ~ I J( I \ 3RD AVENUE N.W. I ~...-:--==-= -==-=----"/J1, \ , _-/ V \ \ \ \ I I I I I / / / / / I a i o c: ~ r- o ~ ~ I II I III II I I I II I I II I " I I 11 I I II I 1111 I II I I II I I III 111 I 111 I / II I I II I 1/1 I II I / III I I I I I / / / / ;~1Il ~A! .. ;. .. fit .. .. .. E !! ~~i I!~~II I ~BI! to sl II ..S....i..~I~ ......i~ iI 2 2 ... ... ... ... ... 5 5 5 ~!~I:II II ; ~I~III ~I . 0 0 0 0 " It I~!; ;:t ;:t to.... s.... to.... s.... ~ ,~ s.... s.... s.... i! laliil I 0 . 0 0 i; ~'" ~N i; ~'" ~. ~'" ~'" ~ ~II.:~.:~N ~ ~1~:~Ni I II ; I; I: lie lie !~ lie lie lie ~ :i8.i8 i ~ i8-} I n ... . ! a a a a a ~ a ~ I I.!. I I · Ii liS ~ a .. .. I . l'" i'" i'" J'" ;- ;.- ,1- ;- ~~ a i i I ;. I - Ii i II I II ~~ II .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. tII ~ a . . . . . . . . . . !c~ iiis.ii! 1111 Iii 0 Ii &II: 11I..a I I~ It .. . ;; II i 5 E t ,. ~ . ~ II & . ;! r .aa t@aas ! A a I s a i I I I I I I ~~ ;0 ~ !:!: !:!: !:!: a ~ i .. 6 . ~ " ~~-::.~. -;"._, ~. )-: '. <.:-:.e\ . :'. ". :,\...;,'- . ,\'1 ,'\ '."-. 1 t\ ." l\' V . , .1' , ' \ r \\: '. 1\" ~I \ ' , .,'. ...."" I 1\,' 1\, '1\' " ":s.;,,,/~ '\! \" . \". "\' ~ -r"" . I'.' ',I \, ',I \ . 't;-, t' _ I I' ,'\' \ \ . . N' '0' \: I I' ",,' ", .1 . t. .., I ,. \ \ I \ :, 1 - '. ,\ \ '. '.\ \ .\ \ ,( . .. '\'" I' I \', '\ , \;"'> ; 1.::\ \, \ \, :,., \ '.i'-'_':-~~ ,'1 '~\ to.' \. .\ \ \ '\ ,\ . ,.:~ I . '. " \ ~ . ~ I " \' \ 1" '. I '. "" \' , \ I "'" .!""'.. \. ~'\ " ,\ ',\ I" \ \ . '\''''. 'I \'\' y. .\. I " '. .....,,~ -:.\ -~), '-\ \" \ . \ . \~\ " , ....\ \ --', \ . -=\'" :.\. . \. 'I \ ;;,..; :.," \ 1 ' "', \ k~ " .- X' ':.; , ..... ... ", ~',:;,\'\ . .\, <: '. ' c:. " \. .;\ \ . " ":ctlj;, . \ '-,\ ~ \ ':\ .,., S . \" :\ \':7 \ "\':'\ 'e, .'. \..... \ .... .:: 7.. \.' -\ - . :"\ \. .\ ;..., \, ""\-.!. .'~'~ . ~ "..\ - :...._"'"'.. q I ,I ~ c \ JRD ST NV . -...~,~.~...~ i i i I 5 J .. is I .... "~ . . ,::"'-~.'..... ....-.....-:.......... ...-. ''4 \_..::. \< ""~~" \\ \ \ ~.,~-:.L ._ /.- ',\ .. . ,.":-, , .\ ->;\~ . --.,: \ . \ \ ,.,,\ '\:.\ " \ . \,'\ ' , i l \ J \. ,0 \ 'I \. " ,ii' I /1 . " ,Il ',f I j /" II "j I ,..i. II / , I I . ...... ~ >< ~e~ !ll '" 'Z ~~~ ''''n II: no ~~'Z i ~o ~z~ g_ O 'Z en ~ .., i: ii ~ ~ ~ !' tI:I C C tI:I < tI:I S ." tI:I ~ ~~ ;I CD II I \ \ .. \ . \ , \ ,\ \ \ of ,\ .. \ ; .\ " \ , "s"',' ," " \ i I 1 " ., . '! J , , . , ,. , ' , . . " ;, " \ i " .' :\ -', ., '\ , " " '- ....----- " ." .1 :'I r~ ,'" g : l r f - It : ! -I - 1 "l ; , : " 7 5 i I i r { ~ ,.. .. ~~c~aa~~n-. ~ ~ ... ... f????????~? ~ a :~~ii~~i!~! ~ = 1:~l~R~i!i ~ i ~i~ ~~ [7 ~ ; F5 ~ .. ,., '" ~ fi ii! ~ <;~~....:...~~, ,.,....<-:..~..._~ ..-- I \ I " r , .. \ '. , ... , ... '. I -.. .. 'P,. '. " ' '., " . -..... ;,;......... .;.,. f , ~-i : l .t ~ ,.J .}; . ; J '. ... 4--" ~ .r i :i j' , '.' 'I ~ ., .' '1 I .; r ~... ,,' .~ ... ;*' J ! ,...;.,~,.'.~~,.r.' .;.~i"J."" . I , (:... '.. ' '14;'1 ..,. ;: f I , ' ( I I I : I I I I I , , I I I " I . r "-'-...' , . \ l. , . ' , "," \ , . gi~iS88j~i~j~;~~;;~J~;~j~:~~~~~~~!Z!!!!2!~z~~~~~~~~a~al!J~~a2;~a~i.;i!j!l!CiiU~~ ~ ;;j 1!ll!ll!l!!1!!!lIll11lIllll!!lIl'.!l1o'1ll!!!!!!!!lI!ll!!!!l!ll1l1l1l!l!!l!l!!IIlll'.l!!!;; ~ - -< !~!l~!!!!~!~!!~!O~~ ~8"!!!!!!~!!!~!!!!..~!~!~~!!!!!~!!!!!!!~i!!!!~!!!!il ~ ;. ;''l . . "~r:'8 't" ; ..0:0: :: 't."" a . . Eli ~u II B d; r S . a r . ~ I . ::: r a ~ . ~ , I !. .~ ~ , i ~ J ,,;g ~ E ~C , liD_ ~.! <- :' J3!:l Z '; Ie n> ., !i! liD ::a tim-< 1'. z~ t a 5: r ~ 1 i , i- , a I':: t t ." I ~! .. a" I i II \ \ ~ 3RD ST N\I -----......, 51 - I.. \ \ \ \ \ c::. \ i{l l \ -f \ ~ ~ \ ~ \ \ \ \ 5; \ I.. CIl --l\-.L.._.. -.. . .....,. -.... \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ I I I I I I I I I I I / I / / / ... &1.. I.. tN ." - :Ill flI 0 c ;i~ '" ... a I..~ i .... -< ~ ,... PI :Ill '" .... :Ill PI ... .... i!~ = !i . 3flN3^ II !)NlSSO~:l - 'I N I.. ........ ...... !~ ill ,., ...,. .... 5 i~1 ni IS~.il I !lil: : I Ii !elii~ I !I!i ! II I ~i! : I :; ~ it II II I I ~~ ~ if\ ~ ii @@ !@ii; l.v ! P i I ; i i i I ~ III ; II I I . . ~ ;.... l~ :" r I i I I ! j , a I r .. ~ I ~11 I , 10 f ~ .s ~ ." ::tl tr:l E: a:: llll_ !! S;C Z "lIll> .~ < ::tl = l'I:I 0< .lIll ; nC'l .. ~ ::tl Cl~> ~ _I:::' ~z- aZ C'l ." s: Z ." ii Q~ ~!' " = = ~ roJ S ." roJ iZ ~CCll ) " jr I 3RD AVENUE N.W. 'r-- '.1 ' --i~:.:--. . . ~..\: ~', . ]-~~i\ . ...~ ..~ .- ., .,- t _ "__, ,---... ", ... ") '.""- : \,. . ~\ , " ,; \. \\"... \ -:- -~ .~.~.~ \~ \ \ \ \ ~~-,;:. l', . \. Lt - . I .\\" '\\" ~.J \1..1 ,. '. . . . \ \ \ \ '. .!, \ J - "\ I i \. .\", . \. .: ~:~... i.\ ~ \. ~ \ \. '_.' = , l 1 . ... \ \ 1," t. \ .. .~ \ ~\. "; 't.. -.\. \ . . ;. \ '. ',,","'.\ '. '\,,-' " \ \"' 't." \.",\, , \ .., \ ,. \ \ \ \ . ", \ ',-..( \. \ . \ -'. \, I. .\ \ \ . \ . ,'.;. \. \ ,~~ I \ ", \ ~.._" \' \ . \ .. \ ;\ '\" . \ (.y\., ". \ \ \ '. . .... '. "' '\.\ " , '\ " \. -.' '-~ . .:t\ .\. . 1.~ ..:.--....., .. ~. ',.\ '. ',">. ':.) \..... "~ .~. 'I V' . \\> 'to - \. , .'':;). \\ ". -.'--r- ':<~C ......------:..----...-... ~""""\ . -.-. \ - ''';''',.' :~:.~\-' ..., .\ i I \ V: "-'\ .\ . \\ . ",\ '. i, . ! d. \ ..;J I '<. I "' \ .~ I '; . .c. ecj)" '~'." .,.(, ;. . ( " ,..--"" \ \ \ . ; \ . '. \ . \. .... \ '\ \ I . ... .... ,'. \ .\ "\ .\ \ , \ ,,\\ , \ '\ ." <\ ., \ .,' '\ ....:. ~ ",'.: \,"\ . \' . " '.\.' "" ,..~: ',' . -. \... -'":'<: \ '.~ .~, "'J "\",,_ . -'- "" .\ ; r...... . ,,; ;,' ...., ~ :,:,,~._, " . --. . '.\' .. - \ \.\ "", ~. .... '" '\l '.............___.... "',.: ..' i, I \. \.; ! I ~ \ : ,~ - \ ,I \ ; ..: I / . , .. ~,' , . \ I l J .'. \' ; i '1' . .\ ! : t. " . I '.,.: . ~ ~ , ... . ~ I :, .. ~ ,!--. ~ ....." ", '; \. \ ~ . I" I \ ~ -....... \ ::0 .;:/ ' 'I .' r I ../ .J J '1/ .i,'/ . "/ II 'I ., II j I : il I ! "; ,VI I I . .J / -'!'-.. , "~ I ,/ l' '. '/ '\ ,. f ~ : .:; I .J , . i: I' ; f ~ o c: ~ CD .- / .~!. . -.. /......~. .. __J; 1 I I I ''j( . t. . ; "..' f..~ .,~ . ~ ' ,f? i " . .! . , I \ i ", j~\ v' . , , ::I ~r.f;/, . :; , . l nunil~ .2~S~j~ c j~~h!!~ ; ~~ 0 i, A . It'D II ;11 i I 0, I I .. ~ r r 1,1 ii ;Ji: i !;i llil J'l~j I~ II ~ ~ A~6 sa-! ill~~ ai ;; ~ ~d l~~; li!!1 o .~ ~ ~u .~5! ~ 'l- :i i- ~ ,51 ~I!!l .~~ 518 ~!l i ~. ~ ~I'O e;;l~11 I~ is ~ 8;;!I!ill:l, tli~ - .. ill . .. ~ I!!" .. 0 II -..... Ii II ;!! i: !~ ~ill- .~ d I~ ~ ii oiiJ hi Ii aa i I~!ad lit ,.. ~!. i~ ij! I.: Ii i!j i~ if! I:: .. =i~ EOIl I ;Ii Iii ial ~~ ~ . I... n lIB i I 'III ! ill '~ I = ~ s I ~ ~ I . J I I: i I ! i I I t I a r . , I ." :tJ ~ E: ""S:: eS:Cz 2! '" > ~<::o 1" !: 0< ! n c= ~ "'~ ~ 5l- ~2lE: z~ ao< ." 5: z i~. ~;- ~-ni. i ~I 0(1 ~!' tIS c C ~ tIS S ." tIS ~ CD \ J .. _~RDAVENUE N.W. : .___ _~_-.:.. . I ~ " - _.- I \ ' , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \Co \ ' .. c.J'I \ ',,~ \ \'~. \ ,...,>>,- \ .<Jl. ,~ \ o_..~..L · " I.li I \ . ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I I / / / / / I .%E~lII ~,.,. ~n . I"'N~ ~ \ 3 i . 0' . ~-;;iiil " 11:"~ \ .:; ~o~ \-~ ~ ~i . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ . I I I I I I I / / / / unnnlnl~ UUli!iUi ~ .!1Il5ii;~g Ill; i~5 5 ii 6 ~3~ ii ~ ~ o c: 6 .. ~ I 0.' , , ~ ij~ ... I! i:: z~ a~ "11 ",r ,I' tl' ,. ft IUi't- ,1 I" . . II !.; i I~ .' . I I I Jr I I ~ ',es - ~l~ ~~ ilS i~~ a~ i ;;:1 -i51 d ~ U) ;~~ ~'i ! l'i!a oCl · .! i~ ! e ~. i I~ ~ i ii I. 0"\ 11"\ liJ ~ !U8 p~~~ ~ ~u'U Ii s!!:o itl ..02 .:.. ~o ; c ; ~ ~ ': I"" ~ J I " - lH 'II Ii '. I- ..:$ .. , i I r . 1.~ 1 ;~ !I 0 ..~ . ~ .'- i j , ::II! '" . ~ ; ~ ~ z ~ IlI:I t::I ! ~ "I:l .E",r: : 2!l:C! t"" ';:l'II' ""'5: ~!n.... ~~"'~ : ~ ~ E i ~ 52 > , a~ , - o z ~ f; z JH~ .., ~ e i ~ I 1. n C1 ~ ~!!' J tIS 1 t:I t t:I i ~ ~ ros S ." tIS ~ gf I 1 . ; II CD CD tl:l _ ........ '\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ --i'-r-" L.. ...-.. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I I / / I / / ) \........ . . -. -- ..... ," ". -"-", \ . c:. . '<<{l '~" . -f. ~ ~ .. CT' . ..0 . . \ . ... , " \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I . I I I I I I I / / / :~ . ....< ,., ~ .... . ~ . '" . Ie ~ ~ '" l:l 'tl ;0 o 'tl o U) l"'I o o c ... ~ . o '~ ': . '~ ~ l"'I ;0 U) ~ l"'I l"'I -l .. , . ;Si ... .. i '" ".n N o c: g ... ID I I I J( . ? -~ ~ ,<P """,Ill ~~~O ~R~;g ._oZ p 0 . .... " .. =' "ll JJ2 I!.o ~..... .0. . ;: iJi;UII~ z,.do~ :;: UI~dR .. :b~a~ 5~-!'i~t; =~~x z i i!d:~ .~l;~h :;;iUi g5!i~! e=!.ll = Di~J~J IS& i & li I -II a ~ II ~ ~ I~ 5 I! i s ~ti ~ t; , ", ~ ~~ ; Ii If 'is ir i n~ ~ Ii ~ 'ZIt!l II , J I:I~ if [nl~l i (.,c."W II. -Ii I , ~ i~ ' ~, lEi i t r Sl i r i ~ES I; r J f ; ~.. s:=;; ~ t: ~I~ti I .: H Eifif I ;: I ~! U". leG.. ~ ~ if" . ~ t. ' .i. c if . if ~ ! If ~.. ccE= ; i -Is I . '. ~. J ~li Ii ~ ~ :I cil l liils Ii I I ~l ;l if if if if.. I" l:' ~ .liEcc= C i 'II! Ii; ~~~ ! l , i ~ t I' ~ ~l Is. , cc= C E C ,s[ II 3 I I ~ ;; , ." . · GII~ I~i" ,,, . . ,II! i (Hlfl !ii ~I s " ' , I I E ! ! I . ;: III ... i Ul n ... i ... n 0 ... z 0 ID z Ii . ... I . ! I ElISWC ~ ! I l - - I I I~ I~ II ~~ J Il:: ~-; J I -;1 ~-; I .... -;' Co ~ Ii{ 61 ~ . I . I~- -----... '-.. ...... -, ..... ---- --- --~:.:~ fl - - --- ".11 / . -.,;, i/ .,' ij'r~- , . j.... ....~ : I' . . .,., r. ._. .'. !...- / -.' - . : ,: " ..... .' - @)!: 1/';'. ....,./., /._,.. .... I . , ~ ! /'"'' /.~' d., . . .1;... ..:,.t:--. , -t." . ~i...'"".J ' , . ~ : , /.'#~....Y': . ~ '-.---. .,.' /. . / / /' ./ ,,/ nn IJli ,I il II'm 0 I "I i (i I . I Inll e IUli f;J11 ,',\\'/1 i I ! t:-::: fIt i ';;i" III rrrll! Uhli if t HI Jill [J Ihhl I'ill ~ ! 2lI5II~A_S. 8lL 1011 IIN 55COll . . __I \ ~..o::...._~ ~ oz= ~ \ <::::-i~_, --:,....-........... .... .' --!:.~~- -~ '-~~-;- ....,. .....",,~..... -'. . /' , 'Q 'C' 'C. '0' ~,., '1 . ~' ""~ )'05' I Ii"'; I ft. f1~-'-..'__~---,. ~,..... <\'. f /... >e,J" _,. i J'~'''' . _:~'__'__ ,..~, / : I I! ~ . 'I ~. c....~. _~'_~ ~_ '-':., .-<1, \ ..11 ~i - '/;:"" i .-:1:... .:.~:..,~,.,' ~A. . ('!I '''. ~.-/ ,~ ." ..<,~.",.,<~~, ~., .... \ \. .~/~)! 4:.: /:;h:';'~~0~~1:~:?': \ \ ~ /' :../ $,.:.. ':i':;:,,~; .....~.~., , ,i...- :~ . 1", ~..' ":<::"~:~.. '\,-, '" " \ " ,..;::,".0 I~" .....,. ':-:',","., \\ \ ~~... ,i .~, :G' "<{>~ ~~~~ ~, ',', \ :"6' ~ j;Is,;",.,:.:>> .,:::s..., \ '. :r \ \ \ \ \ \ " '. \ '. e ,'".< .' '. ~~:~::'~ ~~~>, . ','.'. '.' .... ". .::;-. "~~,::""~,:,-,,,,<;;- '.. . \. ,,~ eo,,' -:"', ::,<....> ' ~'Ja _. \ ,,~, ~U'.~ . ~. " ~. . . /^ ~~':~, ".~...~~. .'.' , . ", :." '-( '~"'!I!'\'" <'.. ", ',:' _ '. \ ".. ~-;t Q)'~ .", ;. .' ...., " N;o '"~~~~:-..~," '," - . ", \. ,,"t '" ~ ~'f. __>~, J- /"~:~.;:( "~'-'~;;;;'~~~"<~'" '-," '~'. '. ',,' , \ \ 7:"~ ~~;. s..... ~'" /''-''/ /.'....', .Y'" .<~~~;~...... '<')",.' '. .:.0 \ \ -:;.' \ \ ~ ....... \' ///" :::~....., '. '''''> ~~1\.:~.' ~"~,' "- ' ~', \ ~~ 1&.)" . ~ ..I/..~"~""'" / ,'" ~ ~, ......~~, _ '" '.'...-:-... \" \. -'- ----~. ~$ ~~ 'I!/'/>/>"/ ~<~~> <<.. ~"~~~'" '" ". ~,"" i 1 \ ~ H V'''''' /~~' '. ~ ~ ............ 'i~~~~...~......'" ~ " I ". \ \ . ----- iIIt. "0' '"- '.i.~ : . ~~~.", U.<-,",. ';)'\-."~-e'P~'~~"'::';;' ~' . . --- ~ V.. ~ ,.... ~}-<. #", ..f' . ~".. ~ _ .' \ ...."i'" . \ ".~~ , ./'/ '"!41...... '.~l .o/t~; " I, ....~~... '., '. " ~ '. '\ ~ \ //......... '''. t..: t;~ " .1 "\ ~ . '-~ ~ , , , \', ........ ,// /' $ '.:- -'.. , . '. /:- .' '" .~~~~. '~...."', \ (!o \~. \ /;/ / ~ ,...... / ~ V'l ~.. I ',. ~... "'..~ "" .-. . , ,.'" ~, '. / / ~. "'~- '/ ". ~''''''''~ ..' " \ '. ; ..,:;-'" "'l/. \ W " // . . '-=--', /', . 0:~ ~ /J \ '. " \ ,,- \~~" ", ~ // / / C)JJV"'~ ~ / ')-.' '<6h..', -::.... /: . ,\ \..~ '- / /~ / / ~"...... ..' / ," - / 1 ". ~-:'). ,," / ... \.... \ i \ ' (" .,~ .' / / ' ~-~.' ... <~'.... / ;~", : i:!i: !'.!. ..... \ \, \ \ \. ~G\' ~ ,/ / // // //~:$~... c/;/ '.;;;' / ,;.<<:.;~.:w:::.: rr/..:~/; O;::"'_~i' ... \ \ \, ..-- t!l. / /, .' ~ 0:. / /', ;';" ';;:':,...;'.. y JT of ~ ---":'. .. ," \ \ \,---- ~,'\iOt '/ / / // 'iIO' ". " / .:A"'" :.;::; ';'~' 1/ //1 .....".. , ,\" $a.... e /./,'./ ~ ,'... . // /' :;> ,,":;":'~}' q ij.;) - '. \ ,'. \ ~. M' / / / / 4Il "'" " , .:.. '.:.:' :.:v.:l FiJ;.Ii \ \ \, \. ~..:;; A ~ . ,. / / 'c<'Y ,........ . / " :., .::/:'iiiAl/,' '1.1 ' , \ ;..~;; vr """. , / / / / 0, '.'" /.:' ":':~:':: " 'P! '! '11/ ! " \ \. \ \, ,.,~ ~ e . / /, / (\1 .....~ /.;:" ':."" ' l i '/ i \ \ \ \ \ .;~." .,..;:..:::':':-'.;';;....~~ ~ 'I.ft,/ / // / / " 1'--;,(. :.,.,.~ II !~I i \ \ \, \ -~ ~.. ~ / / /.,' >'" ,">Of$;" / lId ' \.. \" I ~ 4\~' 0 .' / / .>:'" ./:;..... tk',. ~((; / /.7./ I ' \ . :~~ '" "'-0' . ~ .' " ,.' ,f:::' "', ~fIo.! 1 II; . \ \ At... t ~ / / ' 1/." . .,~, I ',.. \, :!'!>f ,'" '.....^' .. .' " ,::::.::' ':i'~1 I .:!I( I \\ \\ ! :~& ~., ,. 'IQ''g{ -if(' 'L"':t;.< ,,':>' rXI I: if! I \ \, \ \ ' J.... p, ,--".~.'. . ,,~,,' ~ '''I ' \ \ '. \ :;~ €J.' ,,' /'~, /-..:.. ' ' '=;. I I, i I , ~~~ _.l .....,:, C~/~0'''' '.. :. .,'.' :;.::'.';" '.'$\ 'i1i I \ \ I \ ~m-; - . ,. ,.." t ... .....-:,. . .,J.. , .l!! \ : '. '. \ \ ~fi-'1" _-.:$.0:G.e.,:.$"'-~-~ :.$1 ',:11 I , '\ \ '. ,~ $ . '\ ~':ll ' ~I.~ r. :,111'1 co I , . . /. lI' ~- 'WI"..._I \ \ "\\\ ~ ~\ \.-;, ~~-'''---::l' ~~ '. ,~;,. J illl~j1\ ~ i '''~\ ~i~; $ / ~ '. ',:', i 1 ill :l> i \ \. \ \ !~ ~t ~""~ ~ G ~1' . :-+.j--/i-td . \ \, " '\ !"'/ ~h.__; ~~ _' II .Il , ,6!tf.,. - I "e;:"'" t ii I' \ ' '\ \ l , .""" ~ ~ e..; :;:;::",.1., I 1\ , ,\ \i..:J.' loOt ....-.;;t , . ;.::.:::;';.~;;~; '. ,'I,ll \ I' \ "': -0 I ~ \ . .+,~"'" I ,I \ " " ,(.....\ \ i" , "~./ ~ \ ~~ ~~:.::~"i ' i :' \l ill I! i ~s .." € I ~~ ~} ~\ ,I Ilil :, '\ \, 1".1 ~. ,'e. '. $\ 3 t :\.. ~.'.'~ I i\ :Ii\ . ~ ,. ~e, ~ 1\ II' t , ..., a"'" lUji, :bP'i 1"1 I \ I ;. 0--::-=- 'IV '...., I I"; ;~i111 II ';, I I" ' .' I ~ Ii:. l'~ I' I 1 \ .. : e $ \ "li' \. .:. . I \ \ i.1 I I I; "~ - " I Ei~ 4~! ~I 11\1 :'11 ~'~"~$ :\~' it '.;\'i::1 i ii! I }l...,' '. "Gl$ ~:~.~ ~~,I'~~II\\:\U /. Ii I I -- ~~" . '. ~"J II"ii ! I I. I.!ll.. .... '!I I," . . ..~.' .'. I" , I Ii; i .....~ _ :.-_____~~A~~~;.~ III 111 ,ii' f " ~,.~~~~.~ss'.;;::...->.~~,r\\t;l:, l Ii;! I", -----.-.:----.; 1l:?~F:=':~" - :$\ \ 1\1\\ ~ : . ~~.':; . 'I i'f..,rT' II." '1'1 - I /t / '. (-...<~:-:~~---:..,~~~ - ~'; !i:\~~L~~:~.-~:~;:~.~:~j~~~\; It;'!',' ; i ' " . I ---- . I. ...... _......."..~~................. II. , .11 ../,i "f - ' ., ... ..... '....... ..... .. '. ".-" '\d ii' t;f: : I \ ii1i\ 1 /; /,' / \:' \ 1\:\1 . , i: I \ !:.;\ j ~, ~ ~ it! : ~ i o 7f,~ 8 ~~ lillllti Illi!i i Ii Ii II i;f~j tllii~il Ifllif' f il l~l II R.Ill lJli~i Ii I II I t, il lllitlt ~ii! I iI it 11 ill li;li(J! 11ft! It lit ! Iii I I 1 III~ i I I IIi .~ .' " <~{ 0,-,., "'.' . .,~.~ ...-' ........~., m:", ..- , """. ~ ' '~___.;,' ...~.~. - . . .......:~~... ~. 'r. e:\ ..:.-:=:...... / , " - .' : .... ..; ((\ . . . .. , sa. cIIIIlPl pnMded by: ~ -~__.___, . RA ~ "2/476-ltJItJ _ 112/47f-8532 -=.-:: c-_ ..-........ ASSOCIATES Conceptual Landscape Plan Elk RIver Crossing 8k River, MN pIIllIlI:81:l/m~ III: 81:l/m-1010 HIlI: _ _..._~,~4~..::....~.~~~'_,__ ,'" . SECTION 1010,04. NOTICE OF CLOSING. If a manufactured home park is to be closed, converted in whole or pan to another use or tenninated as a use of the propeny, the park owner shall, at least nine (9) months prior to the closure, conversion to another use or termination of use, provide a copy of a closure statement to a resident of each manufactured home and to the City's Planning Commission. "6t SECTION 1010.06. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING. The Planning Commission shall submit the closure statement to the City Council and request the City Council to schedule a public hearing. The City shall mail a notice at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing to a resident of each manufactured home in the park stating the time, place and purpose of the hearing. The park owner shall provide the City with a list of the names and addresses of at least one resident of each manufactured home in the park at the time the closure statement is submined to the Planning Commission. SECTION 1010.08" PUBLIC HEARING. A public hearing shall be held before the City Council for the purpose of reviewing the closure statement and evaluating what impact the park closing may have on the displaced residents and the park owner. . ,SECTION 1010 10, PAYMENT OF RELOCATION COSTS. (A) After service of the closure statement by the park owner and upon submittal by the displaced resident of a contract or other verification of relocation expenses, the park owner shall pay to the displaced resident the reasonable cost of relocating the manufactured home to another manufactured home park located within a 25-mile radius of the park that is being closed, converted to another use, or ceasing operation. Reasonable relocation costs shall include: (1) The actual expenses incurred in moving the displaced resident's manufactured home and personal property, including the reasonable cost of dissembling, moving and reassembling any attached appurtenances, such as porches, decks, skirting and awnings, which were not acquired after notice of closure or conversion of the park, and utility "hook;'up" charges. (2) The cost of insurance for the replacement value of the property being moved. ~) The cost of repairs or modifications that are required in order to take down, move, and set up the manufactured home. (B) Ifa resident cannot relocate the manufactured home within a 25-mile radius of the park which is being closed or some other agreed upon distance, and the resident elects not to tender title to the manufactured home, the resident is entitled to relocation costs based upon an average of relocation costs awarded to other residents in the park. . SE'tD 508417.2 ",<( r" t- . ' ","- ". '_' ',' -'- r'., 1 \ (I'" \" , ,G>,... 'l. I' \ !~ . '..--.- ".,:.1 " . ,i ". (" [,\. \,t,\y.....",y.:. ft" fr'- ~..\ / ...... :j..A,...: I ~ '- 2 ::.'~+-" c; ; 1 ;,.;' . i-<> ~ 'f J.,;~ S&,1-( '_ J /' / /, ':'.". /\:"--t"~/'1- I I .' 1/'" ~ l ct- 1-;)" J/~) ,ii."( 1 t-". Cd"',' I'll :" y\ /v.{ /\. ~-"'L ,I . ! A displaced resident compensated under this section shall retain title to the manufactured home and shall be responsible for its prompt removal from the manufactured home park. The park owner shall make the payments under this section directly to the person performing the relocation services after performance thereof, or, upon submission of written evidence of payment of relocation costs by a displaced resident, shall reimburse the displaced resident for such costs. .J(! (E) The displaced resident must submit a contract or other verified cost estimate for relocating the manufactured home to the park owner as a condition to the park owner's liability to pay relocation expenses. SECTION 1010.12. PA YMENT OF ADDTTIONAJ. COIv1PENSATION. !fa resident cannot relocate the manufactured home within a 25-mile radius of the park that is being closed or some other agreed upon distance and tenders title to the manufactured home, the resident is entitled to additional compensation to be paid by the purchaser of the park in order to . mitigate the adverse financial impact of the park closing. In such instance, the additional compensation shall be in an amount equal to the estimated marker value of the manufactured home as determined by an independent appraiser experienced in mobile home appraisal approved by the City Administrator. The purchaser shall pay the cost of the appraisal. The purchaser shall pay such compensation into an escrow account, established by the park owner, for distribution upon transfer oftitie to the home. Such compensation shall be paid to the displaced residents no later than the earlier of thirty (30) days prior to the closing of the park or its conversion to another use. e. SECTION 1010 14 PENALTY. (A) Violation of any provision of this Section shall be a misdemeanor. (B) Any provisions of this Section may be enforced by injunction or other appropriate civil remedy. (C) The City shall not issue a building permit in conjunction with reuse of manufactured home park property unless the park owner has paid reasonable location costs and the purchaser of the park has provided additional compensation in accordance with the requirements of this Section. Approval of any application for rezoning, platting, conditional use permit, planned unit development or variance in conjunction with a park closing or conversion shall be conditional on compliance with the requirements of this Chapter. SECTION 1010 16. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be effective upon publication. . SEUED 50g417.1 3 i i I I __.J r-nA_ MT..., .,-", .