5.5 PCSR 04-25-2017Request for Action
ToItem Number
Planning Commission5.5
Agenda Section Meeting DatePrepared by
Public HearingsApril 25, 2017BrieAnna Simon, Planner
Item Description
Reviewed by
City of Elk River Ordinance AmendmentChris Leeseberg, SeniorPlanner
Ordinance amendment to expand opportunities
Reviewed by
for the keeping of chickens in residential areas,
Zack Carlton, Planning Manager
Case No. OA 17-03
Action Requested
Discuss the proposed regulations regarding the keeping of chicke
Recommend, by motion, approval of the proposed Ordinance Amendment, and direct staff to make any
appropriate changes. .
Why is this amendment being proposed?
Every year staff receives numerous calls asking if chickens are permitted within the urban
specifically on lot sizes less than five acres in size. The ordinance currently requires five acres of land and
a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for lots within the urban service district to h
urban service district, chickens are permitted on properties lesCUP. If the a
property is greater than five acres in size outside of the urban service district, chickens are permitted and
the number of chickens can be doubled with a CUP. On all propert
property lot size and required permitting is obtained, the prope animal units
per one acres of fenced pasture land or 100 chickens per one acr
Staff brought this information to the City Council during a work
ordinance, and staff was directed to look into a possible amendmTwosurveysrequesting resident
feedback were also posted to the citys social media pages. The results of those surveys are described
below.
What is the public benefit?
Based on the support shown in the first survey, residents would like to see the keeping of chickens
expanded to smaller lots, specifically those below 2.5 acres in
district. Additionally, the survey asked questions on the number of chickens permitted, specific
regulations on the keeping of chickens, and permitting requirements. This survey was open to everyone,
not just residents of Elk River. After eliminating duplicates, t6responses with 70
percent of those surveyed in favor of permitting chickens on smaller lot sizes. Of the survey participants
71 percent said they are in favor of permitting chickens on lots below the current minimum of 5 acres.
After the Planning Commission meeting on March 28, 2017, a second survey was posted to the citys
social media to receive feedback on regulations specific to discussions from the first public hearin. This
survey was open to everyone, not just residents of Elk River. Af
presented 135 responses.The survey resulted in approximately 50/50 responses for permitting chickens
on lot sizes less than 5 acres. These surveys are not statistically valid but staff has referenced the results to
help influence the proposed ordinance.Staff has also been contacted by residents concerned about the
proposed ordinance and impacts to their properties. Their specific concerns include free range chickens,
which are not permitted with this ordinance.
The proposed amendment expands opportunities for the keeping of ludes regulations
intended to reduce impacts to neighboring properties.
Background/Discussion
City staff reviewed all of the survey results and compared those to zoning regulations fromnearby and
similar cities. The cities inventoried include:
Otsego Hastings
RamseyBurnsville
Anoka Rochester
Jordan Shoreview
Shakopee
Other cities in the area were reviewed (e.g., Big Lake, St. Michael, and Rogers), however chickens on
smaller lot sizes are not permitted in these communities. Staff modified regulations from the above
communities to fit our communitys desires, and to address concerns of noise, pests, odor, waste
management, and predators expressed in the survey.
Number of Chickens
Staff recommends allowinga total of 12 chickens on lots all lots 2.5 to 5 acres in size regardless of
zoning.These are the lots that can be located within the urban service district (i.e., R1-b, R1-c, and R1-d
zoning district) or on lots located outside the urban service district (i.e., R1-a zoning district). Staff also
recommends allowing this number to be increased with a CUP to match the existing agricultural animal
units.
Chickens would not be permitted to roam the property, and must b
Chicken Coop and Run
Staff recommends requiring a fully enclosed run and coop, which must be located in the rear yard.
Additionally, to reduce impactsof animals and rodents, staff recommends the following:
The coop and run shall meet all building and zoning codes. This includes coops not exceeding
200 square feet.
The entire coop and run areas will need to be in a complete enclosure, including protective
overhead netting to defend against other predators. Staff recommends using hardware cloth to
enclose the run area.
Hardware cloth will be extended 1 foot at 90 degrees at the base
predators.
The coop and run area will need to maintain sanitary conditions.
The intent of the following regulations is to protect neighbors
encompass the entire rear yard area. The chicken coop size will be no larger than 10 square feet per
chicken with a maximum height allowed for accessory structures in the zoning district o.
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\OA\OA 17-03 Chickens\4-Planning Commission\PC 04-25-17\5.5_OA 17-03 sr
PC 03-28-17.docx
Coops must be elevated a minimum of 12 inches and maximum of 24 grade to provide
adequate circulation.The floor of the coop must be constructed of rodent resistant material. The run size
will be no larger than 20 square feet per chicken. The run is to be constructed of weather resistant wood
and wire material (i.e., hardware cloth) to completely enclose the facility.
Setbacks
Staff recommends limiting the location of coops and runs to the
10 foot setback from side and rear property lines. If the proper
be required from all property lines fronting a street. Coops and runs may not be located in drainage and
utility easements and need to meet all accessory structures requ The
coop will count towards the permitted garage size and towards thssory structures.
This limit will typically be two structures and a total of 1,200
from adjacent inhabited structures is proposed. This includes ne
Additionally, staff is recommending the location of coops and runs to maintain the 45 foot setback from
wetlands and stormwater ponds on all lots. This setback area is
animals and water quality. See the attached memo from the Stormwntal
Coordinator for more information.
Fencing
Staff is not looking to require a secondary fence (opaque or transparent)
for chickens on lots 2.5 acres or greater. Staff does recommend
chickens maintain a 25 foot setback from wetlands and stormwater
to ensure the safety of the animals and water quality. See the a
Coordinator and Environmental Coordinator for more information.
Additional Requirements
Staff recommends prohibiting roosters, guinea fowls,and animals running at large (free range). Roosters
may be permitted on lots 2.5 to 5 acres with a CUP as permitted in the code. This is important to control
noise levels and reduce the impacts to residents on other properties. A CUP will provide a public hearing
and a chance to inform neighbors of the proposed animals on the
All grains, feed, and manure are to be stored in rodent-proof containers and disposed of properlyand
promptly. Animals will be prohibited in the garage, house or accessory dwelling units of a property. The
slaughtering of animals will also be prohibited.
Additionally, manure may not be stored within 45 feet of all wetlands and stormwater ponds. This
setback area is important to ensure water quality. Maintaining the 45 foot buffer area will help protect the
water bodies from fecal contamination due to run off.
Permitting
Staff recommends no permit for the first 12 chickens on parcels 2.5 acres or greater. A CUP
obtained to increase the number of chickens to meet the existing agricultural animal units or to permit
roosters or guinea fowl. Similar to shedsless than 200 square feet, it will be the property owners
responsibility to meet all of the ordinance requirements. Sites
pursue enforcement measures.
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\OA\OA 17-03 Chickens\4-Planning Commission\PC 04-25-17\5.5_OA 17-03 sr
PC 03-28-17.docx
Overview of the Proposed Ordinance
(1)No chickens are permitted on parcels below 2.5 acres in size.
(2)A total of 12 chickens are allowed on parcels 2.5 acres to 5 acrin size. The number of
chickens can be increased with a CUP to the agricultural animal standards outlined in Section
30-803.
(3)No roosters on parcels 2.5 acres to 5 acres in size, unless a CUP is granted.
(4)Every person who owns, controls, keeps, maintains, or harbors ch
confined at all times in a chicken coop or chicken run on the premise. Chickens are not
allowed in any part of a house or accessory structures.
(5)No chicken coop or run shall be constructed on any parcel of land before co
principal building.
(6)All chicken coops and runs must comply with all applicable building and zoning codes and
regulations.
(7)A chicken coop and run will be considered an accessory structure and will count towards total
lot coverage.
(8)A chicken coop and run cannot be located in the front or side ya
front yard setbacks from all property lines adjacent to right-of-ways.
(9)A chicken coop and run must be setback at least 25 feet from any residential structure on any
adjacent lot and at least 10 feet from the property line.
(10)A chicken coop and run may not be located within 45 feet of a wetland or stormwater pond.
(11)A chicken coop may be no larger than 10 square feet per chicken and may not exceed 6 feet in
height. A chicken coop must be elevated a minimum of 12 inches a
above grade to ensure circulation beneath the coop. A chicken cot
flooring.
(12)A chicken run cannot exceed 20 square feet per chicken and the f
in height. A chicken run must have a protective overhead netting to keep th
separated from other animals.
(13)A chicken coop and run must be completely enclosed. A chicken coop and run may be
enclosed with weather resistant wood or woven wire materials, and may allow chickens to
contact the ground. Hardware cloth or similar material will extend1 foot at 90 degrees at the
base of the coop and run area to protect from predators.
(14)Chicken grains and feed must be stored in rodent-proof containers.
(15)No chicken may be kept or raised in a manner as to cause injury
other property in the vicinity by reason of noise, odor, or filt.
(16)The slaughtering of chickens is prohibited.
Financial Impact
None
Council Meeting
If acted on, this item will go to the May 15, 2017, City Council meeting.
Attachments
March 28, 2017 Planning Commission Staff Memo
Second Survey Results
Stormwater Coordinator and Environmental Coordinator Memo
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\OA\OA 17-03 Chickens\4-Planning Commission\PC 04-25-17\5.5_OA 17-03 sr
PC 03-28-17.docx
Request for Action
To Item Number
Planning Commission 6.8
Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by
Public HearingsMarch 28, 2017BrieAnna Simon, Planner
Item Description Reviewed by
City of Elk River Ordinance Amendment Chris Leeseberg, Senior Planner
Ordinance amendment to expand opportunities
Reviewed by
for the keeping of chickens in residential areas,
Zack Carlton, Planning Manager
Case No. OA 17-03
Action Requested
Recommend, by motion, approval of the Ordinance Amendment as proposed.
Why is this amendment being proposed?
Every year staff receives numerous calls asking if chickens are permitted within the urban
specifically on lot sizes less than five acres in size. The ordinance currently requires five acres of land and
a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for lots within the urban service
urban service district, chickens are permitted on properties less than five acres in size with a Conditional
Use Permit. If the a property is greater than five acres in size
chickens are permitted and the number of chickens can be doubled within
the City of Elk River, if the property lot size and required per
permitted to have 0.01 animal units per one acres of fenced past
fenced pasture land.
Staff brought this information to the City Council during a work session to discuss
ordinance, and staff was directed to look into a possible amendm
vey are described below,
but there is support for allowing chickens on properties of all
What is the public benefit?
Based on the support shown in the survey, a majority of resident
chickens expanded to smaller lots, specifically those below 2.5
district. Additionally, the survey asked questions on the number of chickens to allow, specific regulations
on the keeping of chickens, and permitting requirements. This survey was open to everyone, not just
residents of Elk River. After eliminating duplicates, the survey6 responses with 70 percent
of those surveyed in favor of permitting chickens on smaller lotOf the survey participants 89
percent lived in the City of Elk River, of which 71 percent said
on smaller lot sizes.
The proposed amendment expands opportunities for the keeping of chickens
intended to reduce impacts to neighboring properties.
Background/Discussion
With the majority of those surveyed in favor of permitting chickzes, city staff
reviewed all of the survey results and compared those to zoning regulations from nearby and similar
cities. The cities inventoried include:
Otsego Hastings
Ramsey Burnsville
Anoka Rochester
Jordan Shoreview
Shakopee
Other cities in the area were reviewed (e.g., Big Lake, St. Michael, and Rogers), however chickens on
smaller lot sizes are not permitted in these communities.
Staff modified regulations from the above communities to fit our communities desires, and t address
concerns of noise, pests, odor, waste management, and predators expressed in the survey.
Number of Chickens
Survey Results
Number of Chickens
Lot Size of Those in Support
Survey Results
of Urban Chickens
Survey Results
3%
V
Less Than 0.3
0
19%
Acres
29% 1-3
0.3 to 2.5
V
Acres
13%
4-6
Greater Than
7-10
2.5 Acres
V
36%
Blank
Other
City Code Research
Minnesota City Chickens Per Acre Minimum Lot Size
Anoka 4 Total Max 0
Burnsville 4 Total Max 0
Hastings 4 Per Acre 1 acre
Jordan 4 Total Max 10,000 square feet
Otsego 10 Per Acre 0
6-48 (Less than 3 Acres) Sliding Scale
Ramsey 0
0.04 Units (Greater Than 3 Acres)
3 Total Max
Rochester 0
12 Max - Education/Institutional Use
Shakopee 5 Total Max 0
4 Total Max 0
Shoreview
Greater than 4 2 acres or more with CUP
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\OA\OA 17-03 Chickens\4-Planning Commission\OA 17-03 sr PC 03-28-17.docx
Recommendation
Staff recommends allowing a total of 4 chickens on lots all lots less than 2.5 acres. These are the lots that
will typically be located in the urban service district (i.e., R1-b, R1-c, and R1-d zoning district) or on lots
with shared sewer and water in the Open Space Preservation zoning district.
Staff also recommends allowing 12 chickens without a CUP on parcels above 2.5 acres, but below five
acres outside of the of the urban service district (i.e., R1-a zoning district). These lots would need to
follow the same permitting and design standards as those identified for smaller lot sizes. This number can
be increased with a CUP to meet the existing agricultural animal regulations.
Setbacks
Survey Results
Setback Requirments
Survey Results
4%
On the property line
15%
At least 5 feet
29%
At least 10 feet
30%
At least 20 feet
22%
Blank
City Code Research
Adjacent Inhabited
Minnesota City Property Lines (min)
Structures (min)
Anoka 5' 5'
Burnsville 10' 50'
Hastings 25' 25'
Jordan 25' 25'
Required Setbacks of Principal Buildings
Otsego in Respective Zoning District -
Doubled Side Yard Setback
Ramsey 10' 30'
Rochester Meet accessory structure setbacks 25'
Shakopee 10' 50'
Shoreview Meet accessory structure setbacks 30'
Recommendation
Staff recommends limiting the location of coops and runs to be t, and requiring
a 10 foot setback from side and rear property lines. If the property is a corner lot, front yard setbacks will
be required from all property lines adjacent to streets. Coops and runs may not be located in drainage and
utility easements and need to meet all additional accessory structures requirements outlined in the zoning
code. The coop and run area will count towards total lot coverage. Additionally, a 25 foot setback from
adjacent inhabited structures is proposed. This includes neighboring homes.
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\OA\OA 17-03 Chickens\4-Planning Commission\OA 17-03 sr PC 03-28-17.docx
Additionally, staff is recommending the location of coops and runs to maintain the 45 foot setbackon all
lots within the City of Elk River from wetlands and stormwater p This setback area is important to
ensure the safety of the animals and water quality. See the atta
Coordinator and Environmental Coordinator for more information.
Fencing
Survey Results
Fence Requirements
Survey Results
2%
Require fences (chain link
22%
ortransparent fence material)
Require 100 percent opaque
fences(cannot see through)
9%
Allow Free Range
67%
Blank
City Code Research
Minnesota City Fencing
Anoka
Fully Enclosed Facilities
Fully Screened with Solid Fence or Landscaped Buffer - Min of 4'
Burnsville
height and Max 6' height
Hastings
Fully Enclosed Facilities
Jordan
Fully Enclosed and Covered Facilities
Otsego
Fully Fenced Outdoor Yard
Fully Fenced Exercise Area
Ramsey
Non-opaque fencing - 10' setback from all property lines
Fully Screened with Solid Fence or Landscaped Buffer - Min of 4'
Rochester
height and Max 6' height
Fully Screened with Solid Fence or Landscaped Buffer - Min of 4'
Shakopee
height and Max 6' height
Shoreview
Fully Enclosed Facilities
Recommendation
Staff recommends requiring a fully enclosed run and coop area with a 100 percent opaque fence. The
opaque fence will improve safety of the chickens from predators and neighboring animals (e.g., dogs) by
eliminating them from view. Staff is open to discussing additional screening or secondary fences and
landscaped buffers, but would like the Planning CommissionHaving the yard
fully fenced may help prevent chickens from running loose if one/multiple get out of the coop and run
area, further reducing potential conflicts with other animals.
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\OA\OA 17-03 Chickens\4-Planning Commission\OA 17-03 sr PC 03-28-17.docx
Additionally, staff is recommends fencing for chicken run areas maintain a 25 foot setback from wetlands
and stormwater ponds. This setback area is important to ensure t
quality. See the attached memo from the Stormwater Coordinator a
more information.
Chicken Coop and Run
Concerns identified in the survey included noise, pests, odor, w
and run design requirements are important to help alleviate thes
among cities inventoried.
City Code Research
Minnesota City Coop and Run Restrictions
Comply with Zoning and Building Codes
Anoka
Clean, sanitary, fully enclosed
Must meet all building and zoning codes
Backyard only
Coop-max 10 sqft/chicken and max height 6 ft
Burnsville
Coop-Elevated min of 12 in/max 24 in above grade for circulation
Run-Not exceed 20 sqft/chicken
Run-wood or woven wire material
Protective overhead netting to separate from other animals
Completely covered enclosure to protect from elements and predators
Hastings
Solid floor
Maintain sanitary conditions
Located in Rear Yard
Jordan
Max Coop Size of 40 sqft - min 4 sqft per chicken
Max height of 10'
Otsego
Located in Rear Yard
Ramsey -
Coop-max 10 sqft/chicken and max height 6 ft
Coop-elevated at least 24 in
Coop-floor constructed using rodent resistant concrete
Rochester
Run-Not exceed 20 sqft/chicken
Run-wood or woven wire material
Protective overhead netting to separate from other animals
Maintain sanitary conditions
Backyard only
Coop-No larger than 10 sqft/chicken and max height 6 ft
Coop-Elevated min of 12 in/max 24 in above grade for circulation
Shakopee
Run-Not exceed 20 sqft/chicken
Run-wood or woven wire material
Protective overhead netting to separate from other animals
Must meet all building and zoning codes for accessory structures
Maintain sanitary conditions
Shoreview
Not placed in front yard
Not placed in side yard abutting a street
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\OA\OA 17-03 Chickens\4-Planning Commission\OA 17-03 sr PC 03-28-17.docx
RecommendationCoop and run area
Staff recommends requiring chicken coop and runs to only be permitted in the rear yard. Additionally, to
reduce impacts of animals and rodents, staff recommends the following:
The coop and run shall meet all building and zoning codes. This includes permits for coops and
runs exceeding 200 square feet.
The entire coop and run areas will need to be in a complete encl
protective overhead netting to protect from other animals for ru
The coop and run area will need to maintain sanitary conditions.
Due to the mixed results of the survey, the following recommendas are put in place to ensure chicken
coops and runs do not encompass the entire rear yard, along with establishing an atheistic standard. The
chicken coop size will be no larger than 10 square feet per chicken with a maximum height of six feet
Since the maximum height fence for residential properties withou
height of the coop should be six feet to ensure it does not exceed the fence height. Coops must be
elevated a minimum of 12 inches and maximum of 24 inches above grade to provide adequate circulation.
The floor of the coop must be constructed of rodent resistant material. The run size will be no larger than
20 square feet per chicken. The run is to be constructed of wood and wire material to completely encl
the facility.
Additional Requirements
City Code Research
Minnesota City Additional Restrictions
Anoka
No Roosters
No Roosters
Principal building required on property
Burnsville
Grains and feed stored in rodent-proof containers
Cannot run at large
Not allowed in home and/or garage
No roosters
Hastings
Food containers and feeders must not be accessible to rodents an
wild birds
Jordan
No Roosters
Otsego
No Roosters, Male Peacocks or Water Fowl
Ramsey
No Roosters
No roosters
Rochester
Feed and manure must keep rodent and raccoon proof containers an
not placed in yard compost piles
Principal building required on property
Grains and feed stored in rodent-proof containers
Shakopee
Cannot run at large
Not allowed in home and/or garage
No roosters (lot size less than 2 acres)
No slaughtering
Cannot run at large
Shoreview
Food materials stored outside must be in closed containers with lids
Not raised or kept for fighting
No cockfighting
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\OA\OA 17-03 Chickens\4-Planning Commission\OA 17-03 sr PC 03-28-17.docx
Recommendation
Staff recommends requiring a principle building on the property to ensure animals are looke
times. Additionally, staff recommends prohibiting roosters, guinea fowls, and animals running at large
(free range). This is important to control noise levels and reduce the impacts to residents on other
properties. All grains, feed, and manure are to be stored in rod-proof containers and disposed of
properly and promptly. Animals will be prohibited in the garage, house or accessory dwelling units of a
property. The slaughtering of animals will also be prohibited.
Additionally, manure may not be stored within 45 feet of all wetlands and stormwater ponds. This
setback area is important to ensure water quality. Maintaining the 45 foot buffer area will help protect the
water bodies from fecal contamination due to run off.
Permitting
Survey Results
Permitting
2%
Yes, application and chicken tags
9%
only (similar to dog license)
Yes, application and site inspection
28%
44%
Yes, review with public notices,public
hearing, and approval by CityCouncil
(conditional use permit)
17%
No permitting required
Notified if Neighbor Applying for Chicken
Permits
3%
36%
Yes
No
Blank
61%
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\OA\OA 17-03 Chickens\4-Planning Commission\OA 17-03 sr PC 03-28-17.docx
City Code Research
Minnesota City Permitting/ Licensing
Anoka
No Permit/ License
$50 License Fee
Burnsville
2 year permit
Police Department Enforce
Licenses approved by City Council
Notify property owners within 350' of Planning Commission meeting
Not run with land or transferable
Hastings
Staff inspect property prior
1 year probationary period before fully grant
Annual license fee
Backyard Chicken Permit
Jordan
Tags required for each chicken
Otsego
Fowl Keeping License
Ramsey
Fee Title
Permit Required
2 year permit
Rochester
Granted by common council
Provide scaled diagram and locations of coop, run, distance from
property lines, structures and sizes
Shakopee
No
License Required to City Manager
Shoreview
2 year permit
Minnesota City Impounding Restrictions
Burnsville
10 days
5 business days
Hastings
Failure to claim revoke license
Rochester
Suspended or revoked permit by council action guilty of misdemeanor
Shakopee
3 business days
Recommendation
Staff recommends requiring a two year permit, site inspection, and tags for each chicken. An initial site
inspection will be conducted prior to approval of the permit. Wi, the coop, run and fenced
area will need to be installed prior to a permit and chicken tags being issued.
Staff also recommends tagging the chickens. The cost of the permit is anticipated to c
the tags and site inspection. These tags will help code enforcement personnel easily detect those who do
verses those who do not have a permit. It will also help to return chickens to their rightful owner if they
get loose. The first time a loose chicken is identified, staff will work wi
enclosure. The second offence will result in a suspended or revoked permit. Without tags it may be
difficult to identify whose animals are loose and increased time to identify who does/does not have a
permit for code enforcement.
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\OA\OA 17-03 Chickens\4-Planning Commission\OA 17-03 sr PC 03-28-17.docx
Overview of the Proposed Ordinance
(1) No roosters or guinea fowl.
(2) No more than 4 chickens are allowed on parcels below 2.5 acres in size.
(3)A total of 12 chickens are allowed on parcels 2.5 acres to 5 acrin size. The number of
chickens can be increased with a conditional use permit for this in the urban service area.
(4)Every person who owns, controls, keeps, maintains, or harbors ch
confined on the premises at all times in a chicken coop or chickChickens are not
allowed in any part of a house or accessory structure.
(5)No chicken coop or run shall be constructed on any parcel of lan
principal building.
(6)All chicken coops and runs must comply with all applicable building and zoning codes and
regulations.
(7)A chicken coop and run will be considered an accessory structure and will count towards total
lot coverage.
(8)A chicken coop and run cannot be located in the front or side ya
front yard setbacks from all property lines adjacent to right-of-ways.
(9)A chicken coop and run must be setback at least 25 feet from any residential
adjacent lot and at least 10 feet from the property line.
(10)A chicken coop and run may not be located within 45 feet of a wetland or stormwater pond.
(11)A chicken coop and run must be completely screened from view with an opaque fencing.
(12)A chicken coop may be no larger than 10 square feet per chicken and may not exceed 6 feet in
height. A chicken coop must be elevated a minimum of 12 inches a
inches above grade to ensure circulation beneath the coop. A chicken coop must have ro
resistant flooring.
(13)A chicken run cannot exceed 20 square feet per chicken and the f
in height. A chicken run may be enclosed with wood or woven wires, and may allow
chickens to contact the ground. A chicken run must have a protec
keep the chickens separated from other animals.
(14)Chicken grains and feed must be stored in rodent-proof containers.
(15)No chicken may be kept or raised in a manner as to cause injury or annoyance to persons on
other property in the vicinity by reason of noise, odor, or filt
Financial Impact
None, the permit fee will cover the time necessary to inspect and ad
Council Meeting
If acted on, this item will go to the April 17, 2017, City Council meeting.
Attachments
City Code Requirements Review
Survey Questions
Survey Results
Stormwater Coordinator and Environmental Coordinator Memo
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\OA\OA 17-03 Chickens\4-Planning Commission\OA 17-03 sr PC 03-28-17.docx
Survey Results
1.The keeping of chickens on parcels less than 1/2 acre will not b
Prohibit Chickens on Lots Less Than 1/2 Acre
44%
Agree
56%
Disagree
Agree Disagree
Way too close to neighbors and children Most of the homes in Elk River are on less than half an
acre! Chickens do NOT need much land. As for
proximity to neighbors and noise concerns, chickens are
far less noisy than a barking dog.
Chickens are meant to roam. I think it should be permitted. That is incredibly
restrictive.
The city don't take care of the dog problem why add Urban farming should not be limited to individuals with
more problems acreage restrictions.
No If you are trying to limit owners to four hens I really
don't see why a small yard can't handle this
Agree No more than 4 chickens NO ROOSTERS on less than
1/2 acre.
Good! Disagree
Yes! Houses are too close together! I disagree because chickens belong in the country, not
within city limits.
If they are that close to neighbors, it may get stinky or It's privately owned property, stay out of it.
noisy
Agree. You should lower the limit of chickens for this size of
property.
Only if they get a permit and approval of Let everyone have some chickens
shelter/location on property.
Half an acre (or less) is not proper area in which to 6 hens on city lots can be well maintained with fenced
have a decent size chicken coop and fenced in place lots and proper housing
outdoors to run.
would be permitted for hens only.Why does the size of the lot matter? Just keep them a
certain distance from property lines.
Agree. Even some hens can be noisy. This will eliminate most people.
Chickens should not be allowed in neighborhoods. Why not smaller fenced in yards? They are great for
You should have to have 1+ acres to have a chicken. insect and mosquito control. They are restricted to the
homeowners property. Less lawn chemicals are used on
lots where people have chickens, which is something the
city promotes.
Page 1
Agree Disagree
Good. Chickens don't belong in non-farm Many cities allow keeping of chickens on less than a 1/2
environments. While it's a current fad the fact is acre, including the city of Minneapolis, among others.
people abandon them, there are chicken shelters all Hens are quiet, each to care for, and a great way to teach
over the country because of that. Also, neighbors have children responsibility and where our food comes from.
no choice in living with these dirty, noisy animals being Limiting to over 1/2 acre limits most homes in the cities.
next to them. They are NOT the same as dogs.
Decreases house values next to it. People buying a city I would agree if this was 'free-range' chickens. However,
sized lot and building a nice home on it certainly do fully contained chicken coops (such as are purchased at
not expect to have chickens running around within 10 Fleet Farm or Tractor Supply can house 4 - 6 hens nicely
feet of their property. When it comes to resale of a with easy upkeep. They take up space no larger than 6' x
more expensive home and if there is a homemade 8'.
chicken coop, unpainted outside your window buyers
will not give your home a second look. If people want
to raise chickens they should buy a hobby farm or a
much larger parcel of land and landscape and build
hedges around it.
If the person gets agreement from all surrounding
neighbors within a specified distance, it should be
allowed.
I think you can have chickens but not roosters! Chickens
are awesome pets for laying and keeping bugs away
They don't hurt anything
Chickens need very little space. Let people have the
freedom to have laying hens. Roosters may be a nuisance.
Why let them. If they want to have chickens let them.
I feel that people should be able to have 2 chickens per
person in the household:
We needs less regulation
This is America, you know "Land of the FREE." Not
land of I can't do what I want on my own property that I
worked and paid for!
Nothing less than 2 acres should be permitted
If there's no rooster and the place is kept clean, they
should not be a problem
If they are just having laying hens then I don't see why it
matters on lot size if they only have 4.
Page 2
2.The keeping of chickens on parcels between 1/2 and 1 acre is lim
Limit to 4 Hens (0.5-1 Acres)
47% Agree
53%
Disagree
Agree Disagree
It should be 1/4-1 acre. The allowance should be at least six on half and more for up to an acre at
least six or more hens
Agree Should be 6 hens. Potentially not all will live, and if you star
may only end up with 2 which is not enough eggs for a small fami
A limit is good to be in place to No! Houses are WAY too close together! Chickens are NOT domest
help reduce overpopulation of the animals. I bought a city home, not a country home with farm ani
chickens, noise, and smell next door :(
Agree Why only 4?
4-6 Still too close to neighbors
6
The city don't take care of the dog problem why add more problem
If out of city limits.
I think that there should be a distinction between 'free-range' and fully
contained coops. 4 hens for free range would be healthy for the hens and
could be easily kept clean. If the homeowner had a fully contain
example) no larger than 8' x 10', they should be able to house 8
Six hens or less would be preferred.
You shouldn't count as long as they keep it clean
6 hens on any city lots can be well maintained with fenced lots
housing
Private property. Government should not be allowed to tell peopl
chickens they're allowed to have.
more than an acre is needed
You should be able to keep more.
Should not be allowed
I would say 6 is easy on that amount of land. 10 would be easy.
not that difficult to take care of. NO ROOSTERS
Half an acre to an acre is more than sufficient to handle more tens
I think chickens should only be allowed on 1+ acre
Not agreed
6
No limit, provided the hens are for personal uses and not commer
Page 3
Agree Disagree
I think that is still too small of an area. If you want farm an
to more acreage!
On an acre of land a resident should be allowed to have up to 20 birds
I would think 6 hens would be okay on 1 acre of land.
No limit needed
Should be less
None
Good. Chickens don't belong in non-farm environments. While it's a current
fad the fact is people abandon them, there are chicken shelters all over the
country because of that. Also, neighbors have no choice in livi
dirty, noisy animals being next to them. They are NOT the same
Again, we should have the freedom to do what we please. I think over 20
should be considered a farm, everything else should be fine.
6 seems okay.
No chickens in city Lim ts
No chickens in less than 1 acre.
Nothing less than 2 acres should be permitted.
Only parcels of 1+ should beallowed any chickens
Should not allow any
Should not allow any under 1 acre
No chickens should be allowed in a housing development like TBF
Even if they have a half acre.
1/2 acre is too small. An acre should still be landscaped to keit hidden.
3.The keeping of chickens on parcels between 1 and 2.5 acres is li
Limit to 8 Hens (1-2.5 Acres)
Agree
47%
53%
Disagree
Agree Disagree
I would think a rooster would be You should easily be able to keep 20 plus chickens on between 1
okay on parcels of this size. of land
That is reasonable
4 hens here is plenty
Not unreasonable
Why the limit on a large parcel?
Agree A lot that large can handle more than eight hens without concern
Agree Not within city limits.
Page 4
Agree Disagree
I 'd say that 8 -10 chickens could I think the limit should be 20 or more. If people are raising to
be allowed on 2 -2.5 acres.keep them for 6-7 weeks then take in to get butchered
I thinkthat there should be a distinction between 'free-range' and fully
contained coops. 4 hens for free range would be healthy for the
could be easily kept clean. If the homeowner had a fully contain
example) no larger than 8' x 10', theyshould be able to house 8 hens.
You shouldn't count as long as they keep it clean
maybe 4 hens
You should be able to keep more.
None
On that much land (2 1/2 acres) you could have upwards of 30 or
chickens easily. On an acre you could have up to 15 easily
No!!!
Should be able to have as many as you want, just as long as they
property and kept for.
Maybe change the limit to 10-15
No limit they are paying taxes and should be able to have as man
they want
No limit.
12 hens
No limit needed
2
Freedom
There shouldn't be a limit
4 hens
Nothing less than 2 acres should be permitted
No limit
Should allow none
Depends on where you live.
4.The keeping of chickens on parcels between 2.5 and 5 acres is limited to 12 hens.
Limit to 12 Hens (2.5-5 Acres)
46%
Agree
Disagree
54%
Page 5
Agree Disagree
Agree 5 acres is enough to have 50+ chickens
Agree Should be able to have as many as they want.
Agree. Same concern here as stated above
Fine the city don't take care of the dog running free why add moreproblems
Starting to look like a small It depends on if they are keeping them for meat and slaughter or
business for egg sales but the zone eggs 12 is reasonable. For meat you process them in a few weeks
is rural. would not be much for 5 acres
You shouldn't count as long as they keep it clean
Chickens do not belong within city limits.
This is a bit too micromanaging.
Maybe 8 hens
If you have this much land you should be able to have a hobby fa
take a look at nowthen limits. They are far more practical.
Way too many
Thats a small hobby farm. :)
Seems that more could be kept on places with that acreage.
With this kind of acres you should be able to have as many as yo
as long as they are staying on property and being kept for with
I would think up to 20 would be ok
Tax payers
No limit.
Seems like too many chickens.
No limit
Roosters should also be allowed at this size yard
No limit needed
The limit should be higher - or no limit at all
2
Freedom
Definitely shouldn't be a limit
5 acres is a lot to limit to 12.
8 hens
No limit
Page 6
5.The keeping of roosters and guinea fowl will be prohibited (comments).
No Roosters and Guinea Fowl
29%
Agree
Disagree
71%
Agree Disagree
They are too noisy to be kept in a neighborhoodOn small acreage they should be prohibited because of
the noise
Unless they are a legal farm 1 rooster isn't unreasonable on large parcels (10
acres+)
Agree Learn the birds before you regulate them
Chickens do not belong within city limits.Above 2.5 acres they can be maintained in limited
quantities
The purpose of having chickens within the city limits the city don't take care of the dogs running free why
would be for egg production. Roosters are not needed for would I think they will police chickens any better
egg production. It does cost more to order only pullets,
however, it is difficult to get rid of a rooster if you order
straight run chicks. Guinea fowl and roosters are loud
and would be a nuisance to neighbors. However, dogs
barking are just as bad or worse.
On the largest parcels in the survey, a rooster should
be allowed. Not guinea fowl.
Roosters should be allowed if on more than 2 acres!!!
Roosters prohibited, guinea fowl in fenced area.
Limit to one rooster
Less regulation needed
roosters should be allowed at a certain acreage -such
as 5
Is this city wide? Because that's ridiculous if it's city
wide.
Page 7
6.Chickens must be contained within a coop or run at all times, an
least 10 feet from any property line, and 25 feet from a residen
Coops and runs also need to include a protective overhead covering.
Coop Setbacks and Covering
33%
Agree
Disagree
67%
Agree Disagree
I think on some larger properties, they don't need to be What is the concern about free-range chickens in
caged. Not sure what that magic number would be. I live someone's own yard? They are excellent for controlling
on a 4 acre lot and my surrounding neighbors have about pests (especially ticks!) so there is this added benefit for
15 acres or more. Their chickens are on my property all owners if they are allowed to roam in the yard.
the time, but I don't mind.
Size should depend on number of hens/chickens Chickens are not meant to be confined. They need to
be able to roam.
Agree Chickens do not belong within city limits.
I agreed to this for chickens on LT 1 acre, if that gets The city don't take care of the dogs running free why
approved. I would prefer it not. For properties over 3 would I believe they will police chickens
acres, I think the chickens could be let out during the day.
Sounds standard for city restrictions, but I would say that You are really limiting where a set up could be placed.
sounds unreasonable for acres 2.5 and above
Who will enforce this, how much in tax dollars will this Why an overhead covering. Predation shouldn't be the
cost? I see problems coming, big ones.city's concern.
AgreeRuns shouldn't need to be covered.
Mostly agree. However, if the neighbor's house is at least Should be more than 10 feet from any property lines.
25 feet away from the coop, I would think placing the They leave waste and make noise. TEN FEET from
coop close to the property line would not be an issue, and property lines is NOT ENOUGH! Also will reduce
would keep kids from entering a homeowner's yard to price values of homes next to it especially in a
look in the coop. residential area with regular sizedcity lots.
No chickens in city limits Who cares
Permit and inspection for under 1 acre. Structure no! House yes. A garage or playhouse is a
structure so they should not be considered!
Need protection from animals on the prowl: Dogs, 10 feet is not enough from property line. Rest of
Eagles, Fox, etc. statement sounds good.
They should be able to run free on acre or more.
free range chickens should be allowed at a certain
acreage - such as 5
At what acreage? Less than 5 I'm ok with. Anything
over 5 they should be able to do what they want.
Page 8
Agree Disagree
More distance should be mandatory
How about minimum size of coop according to # of
chickens. Otherwise you'll have completely copped up
chickens inside very tiny coops.
If I am outside Iallow my chickens to free range. If I
am not outside they are contained within a run and an
electric fence. Chickens will wander around my yard
but never too far from the coop as they are always
aware that they need to be near shelter. Have used a
chicken tractor before. I never lock my chickens in a
run unless we are out of town. Or in the winter. The
coop and run SHOULD be at least 10 feet from
property lines and 25 feet from houses. AGREE
7.Chicken coops shall be limited to 6 feet in height, will be considered an accessory structure, and must
follow all setback standards described in the city code.
Coop Height Regulations
36%
Agree
Disagree
64%
Agree Disagree
AgreeShould not be considered accessory structure especially if it ha
Permanent structure. Dog houses are not so it is unfair to restrict chicken coops
Agree No need to involve city staff in measuring a chicken coop
It's a chicken coop...
A chicken coop isn't any more exciting than a backyard shed. The
go through that many hoops to have a few pets
Take care of dog problem first
Chickens do not belong within city limits.
Because chickens spend most of their active time outside of the - 3
square feet per chicken is sufficient space inside a coop. You also will need to provide space to
roost at night and space for the nesting boxes. No one puts a s
Sheds can be taller, why not chicken coops?
Who cares
The coop is personal property and the city has no right wasting tax paying dollars trying to
collect permit fees for these types of structures
Page 9
Agree Disagree
7 feet
Need to be high enough (7 ft.) for adult to walk in to check nes
With this being considered a structure, I'd hope you aren't thinking of using this to raise
property taxes for people that will have these on theirproperty.
Why 6'? I think 8
The owner should have the right to build a coop based on their p
250 ft setback from property lines
Freedom
It's a chicken coop....
8.The size of a chicken coop will be 10 square feet per chicken an
Coop and Run Size Regulations
36%
Agree
Disagree
64%
AgreeDisagree
Not an expert here Again other pets are not subject to such strict rules this seems incredibly restrictive
Agree Not sure on this one for the smaller lots. Would need a visual o
would take on a 1/2 acre lot.
If on 1+acre lot Sounds way to large
Agree Take care of dog problem first
Chickens only need Because chickens spend most of their active time outside of the
2.5 sq feet per chicken - 3 square feet per chicken is sufficient space. Remember, you wil
in coop to roost at night and space for the nesting boxes.
This would require people to ADD chickens to their flocks to mai
coop/run.
You should be able to get more or less chickens without needing
of your coop.
Chickens do not belong within city limits.
Size shouldn't matter if it's not buggin anyone
Who cares
Too much regulation
Depends on the lot size
Room to run is good.
Too big.
Less regulations
No chickens
Page 10
AgreeDisagree
The number of chickens you keep varies from year to year - there is no way to enforce
this long-term
This is not nice to the chickens. They need more space! They sho
in a fenced yard.
Constitution
I understand the limiting of sizes but I'm afraid of people keeping too small of coops for
8 birds.
I feel that the chickens should have more space available to the
bird.
9.Chicken coops and runs do NOT need to be screened with an opaque fence on parcels of any size.
No Opaque Fence Requirement
30%
Agree
Disagree
70%
Agree Disagree
This is unsanitary to completely block chickens and is Must have screening, not just for the coop but also any area
also unfair. Other kept animals do not need this where the chickens would be visible to an unwilling
fencing and would cause undue financial burden on neighbor
people wishing to live a more renewable healthy
lifestyle.
Concern about air flow on a hot day.Chickens do not belong within city limits.
Agree Who cares
Lets put your dog in a fence it can't look out of. I would think the chickens would need adequate ventilation
This is a stupid thought. The first 2 feet from the coming into the coop on hot days.
ground on a chicken run should be hardware cloth
and the rest can be chicken wire. Chickens are meant
to eat bugs and worms. They are meant to breath
fresh air. They have better eye sight then humans.
Agree. Take care of dog problem first
This is just stupid.
Page 11
10.On parcels less than 2.5 acres, a site inspection and permit is
years, and chicken tags will be issued after the site inspection
Permting and Tags
39%
Agree
Disagree
61%
Agree Disagree
Permit fee should be higher and A site inspection is a complete waste of tax dollars. Again, younot inspect
also note that neighbors and city is dog houses or other animal fences and it is a waste of people's
not responsible should the complains could be investigated instead of site inspections. Als
chickens be attacked by wild into the reason of having chickens. Economically it is cheaper t
animals or should the chickens go from your own chickens and doing site inspections to pay for permits see
to a neighbors yard and the like an unnecessary financial burden on people.
neighbor's dog attacks the
chickens.
Agree Why would a permit be required?
I think it should be parcels under 2 Site inspection is a waste of money and time for the city. There
acres. I like this idea because it will inspections for sheds less than 200sq ft therefore there should
detour those who are not serious inspections for a chicken coop and run. Also, no one does site inspections on
about it and make sure the dog houses either. It makes no sense to do them for chicken coop
chickens are properly set up and should not be a fee either or tags.
cared for.
Reduce the permit fee to $30Seriously?
Raise the fee to $100We have enough permits already and why does the city need any money for
me to keep chickens?
Permit fee should be over $200 Why do they need to be tagged and permitted?
Should not allow chickens in Seriously! You are taxing people who want to raise chickens? What's next ...
property's under 2.5 acres!!!! I'm going to have to pay for my patio garden!
Residents on smaller parcels should not have to pay for a permit
They have dog license now but city still don't take care of them
Disagree
What part of the city budget is going to keep tabs on every chicken coop to
make sure that all the laws and regulations are being followed?
coops required to be made of? Old pallets or whatever the owner
around?
You are just taking any savings out of the reason for having them
This isn't necessary and would require the city to maintain a ch
The city already gets enough money from taxes.
You don't need money if people want to have their own chickens
Page 12
Agree Disagree
Disagree. No licensing or inspection required.
I don't feel like it's necessary to need a permit and I especial
years is adequate if you are going to charge considering the lif
chicken laying eggs. In addition if you truly feel it's necessary to charge for
something so dumb and invade our privacy for something as simpl
backyard pets then you should be charging everyone, not just sma
Seems a little extreme. I have not seen a similar requirement in
communities that have adopted this policy. It would be difficult
Would Elk River need to employ someone to do the inspections? $5
like a steep amount to pay for a permit to house a couple of chickens for their
eggs.
No. If you live on a lot that is less than an acre and in a res
sure. But if youre not in a residential area... are NOT on cit
and live on an acre or more. The answer to this should be NO.
City makes enough on my tax money already
Unreal! Too much government regulation. May as well start inspec
houses, etc, as well.
This is bullshit! Leave people alone and let them have the birds
tags? The city must be run by idiots!
No way, now you're trying to profit from this, no permits needed
Really?
Yearly inspections
The men who wrote the Constitution would be turning over in thei
they read this. Taxed for chickens? Are you going to tax my tomato plants
too?
Dont charge unless you'll actually enforce.
Need to pay 50 per chicken
Seems excessive.
$50 is fine for the first inspection but too much to pay every t
Negates the cost benefit of having your own eggs.
11.Do you have any additional comments regarding the keeping of chi
Comments
Chickens are less disruptive than dogs. They allow homeowners to
animals for their eggs. They contribute to controlling insects and other pests. This shouldn't be rocket scie
I think
Enforcement will be a problem with this. How badly is this need
I agree regulations should be in place for small residential lot
regulations or restrictions.
My fear is that too many residents that are uninformed about kee
roosters that are not prohibited, Also the fact that hens do not l
I do with this chicken" affect. 6 months equals many unwanted ro-5 years and ongoing equals many
unwanted hens. Leave the "farming" to the actual farmers.
Take care of dog problem first and yes I have two dogs but they dpeoplesproperty
The city needs to get a clue and stop regulating.
Why should I have to ask permission to own animals on my privateproperty? The amount of government
overreach is astonishing. Stay out of my business, stay out of m
Page 13
Comments
I think the city has better things to spend money and time on. S
yards of old cars, junk, over grown grass etc. Keep the chickens
keeping chickens than maintain a coop. Chickens can carry diseases and how knowledgeable a
be on chickens. I think the city is opening a big can of worms.
It seems like the amount of rules is quite in depth and the purpe housing of
chickens in the city limits. It is not a friendly policy. The po
contained coop and run); health of bird considerations (no more
bird); neighbor/noise considerations (25 feet from neighbor's home and no roo
in today's society, inspections would only be necessary when the
behave these days, they will complain if the birds are noisy, smelly, or loose. A $50 permit every two
steep for the casual chicken keeper who intends to keep the eggs
beneficial for someone who intends to use the chickens as a potential income source.
I really don't think there is any need to have chickens in a res
are too close together and it will be too easy for the chickens e
concerns about additional predators that may come into the area
are housed. The city needs to be ready to enforce that the chic
happens to their chickens.
Very disappointed in the change in size of lot chickens will be
forward moving city.
What's next cows and horses.
Someone needs to read up on keeping chickens. They are not loud. LESS then a dog
though. NO ROOSTERS in town. Chickens need space to roam. I t
around your yard is good. I have a moveable electric fence. I caI
move the electric fence around my chicken coop. I lock my chickens in my garden fo
time. Chickens are good composters. They eat your food and po
move dirt around. They can be put to work on a compost pile and move it for you. They poop in compost pile
which adds nitrogen to break down the pile into compost. (just l
for worms and bugs. They WILL eat your garden goods but are grere gardens. They will eat
ticks and mosquitoes.
Coops are allowed ten feet from property lines!? I live in the
dollars for the city to respond to chicken calls :(
Yes, all residents should be allowed to have chickens, even renters not just homeowners.
I dontthink they should be allowed in residential areas. Should have 1+ acre
Bigger things to worry about
I feel that people should have the freedom to have chickens in r
nuisance to the neighbors.
In general, I do not agree that chickens should be kept in residif
my neighbor thought this was a good idea. MOVE TO THE COUNTRY!!
Too much thinking about the issue. Many progressive cities allo
People raise birds for a variety of reasons but mainly to feed ttaxing
and permitting and tagging is going to make it too expensive to
farming!
Smell and noise are a big worry. Need to have a way for citizens
them follow up on the concerns.
No chickens in residential neighborhoods.
How noisy they can be vocally.
Less regulations are needed.
No chickens in residential areas.
Opposed for any lot less than 2.5 acres.
No chickens in less than 1 acre. We moved to a neighborhood, not
Page 14
Comments
While we agree that some rules should be put in place to ensure
disturbance, this seems to be way too much. Instead of burdening our administration and police department with
enforcing tight regulation on chickens - this time and effort could be focused on more important issues.
What would George Washington do?
Must have written notarized permission from neighbors allowing chickens. My neighbors had illegal chickens for 2
years and I notified city several times due to myself getting a
wandering into my yard of my home daycare. The 'male city contacthe complaints did NOTHING
about the illegal chickens. Neighbors finally were told to get
complained.
I want some clarification of this. I'm on 5 acres west of the gos going to ban
roosters and corner me into only have 12 chickens. Also, if that
chickens out of the run-and that absurd when I'm on 5 acres.
Keep them out of the neighborhoods.
I strongly disagree with allowing any chickens on property's und
outdoor enjoyment by allowing this. People can't even seem to ta
alone allowing additional animals. I pay very large property taxes to live in this kind of neigh
would be ridiculous to be burdened with neighbors' live hobbies.
Chickens should not be allowed in residential areas. I don't wan
screened in areas that hold the chickens tend to be an eye sore,
neighborhood.
This would be a great experience for kids who live in the City. What about
bird population or the mess that dogs leave? A well-kept group of chickens is pretty quiet and provides a direct
food benefit as well as an opportunity for kids to learn.
What about other foul that people are putting in chicken coops,
Page 15
Memorandum
To:
BrieAnna Simon
From:
Brandon Wisner, Stormwater Coordinator
Amanda Bednar,Environmental Coordinator
Date:
March 22, 2017
Subject:
Ordinance amendment to expand opportunities for the keeping of chickens
in residential areas
________________________________________________________________
In accordance with the current city wetland buffer ordinance, I
associated structures (i.e. chicken coop and run) not be placed in the 45 foot setback. Also,
the 25 foot wetland buffer should still be free of structures and mowing to allow the
vegetation to properly filter fecal content from this type of ust
down gradient surface waters such as wetlands, stormwater ponds and lakes/rivers.
Associated structures should meet all requirements outlined in t
properties within the shoreland district and adjacent to bodies Any structures
associated with chickens should not be placed in any drainage and utility easement. These
structures should also be placed a minimum of 10 feet from side yard property lines to
ensure that any drainage easements are not impacted. Manure management should be
properly disposed of, similar to how the county soil and water c
.
recommends for other agricultural animal uses
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\OA\OA 17-03 Chickens\6-Exhibits\Stormwater and
Enviornmental Memos\stormwater&enviornmental 3-22-2017 Chickens.docx