4.5. SR 07-19-1999
rei ---'\)
( );
tli{
Item #4.5. a-b
River
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Patrick KlaerfF~strator
July 19, 1999 JfiJ
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT: Community Recreation Program
a.
Update on Activities
.
Interim Community Recreation Director Michele Bergh will be in
attendance to update the council on recent community recreation and
city of Elk River recreation activities. One of our biggest summer city
programs, the Safety Camp, was recently completed and a five minute
video on this two day event is scheduled to be shown to the council.
Michele also will provide the council with an update on Emporium
activities.
Michele should be able to answer questions from the council about the
current status of city programs and what is on the horizon.
b. Discussion on Community Recreation Prolttam Options
Ever since Jeff Asfahl resigned as the Community Recreation Director
in May, options for the future of the Community Recreation Program
have been discussed and reviewed. Michele Bergh has been appointed
Interim Community Recreation Director and is doing a very good job
with these additional responsibilities. Accordingly, there is no great
urgency for a decision to be made on Elk River's future role with this
organization.
.
Whenever a major personnel change occurs within a department it
presents an opportunity for evaluation of the future direction of the
program or department. Such an evaluation is currently taking place
regarding the community recreation program and the city is
considering withdrawing from the organization and providing its own
municipal recreation programs.
f: \shrdoc \ council \comrecud.doc
13065 Orono Parkway · P.O. Box 490 · Elk River, MN 55330 · TDD & Phone: (612) 441-7420. Fax: (612) 441-7425
.
One of the reasons why the City of Elk River is considering
establishing its own recreation department is the ongoing financial
concerns raised by Otsego (and, to a certain extent, Dayton and
Hassan Township). It seems that the goals of members of the
organization have changed from when the organization began seven
years ago. In 1992, the goals of the members included combining
resources in order to offer more and better recreation services and
programs. Now, since reasonably good recreation programs, facilities,
and services are available, it seems that the goal for some members is
to maintain the status quo (especially financially) versus wanting to
continue to offer more and better recreation services and programs.
This changing goal is creating conflicts and is one of the reasons for
Elk River's evaluation of its future role with the organization.
Most everyone has "weighed in" with opinions on the various options
for the future of the organization. This includes Elk River considering
doing its own recreation programming and the school district offering
to manage the municipal recreation programs if the joint powers
organization dissolves. Under the right conditions, it may be best to
continue with the community recreation organizations with all of the
current members remaining as participants.
.
The Community Recreation Board meets on July 19 and the budget is
anticipated to be considered by the board in the near future. Assuming
that a new director is hired, and that some additional part time
programming time will be needed in order to increase services and
programming opportunities, then a modest budget increase is
anticipated. Response to a proposed community recreation budget
increase from Otsego, Dayton, and Hassan Township, or if the
community recreation budget is "frozen," may be beneficial to Elk
River in deciding which of the three program options is best for our
residents.
Regarding a decision timeframe for the city to withdraw from the joint
powers agreement or not, there doesn't seem to be any great rush and
the city can wait until the community recreation budget is considered.
Also, the city can, if it decides to withdraw from the organization, give
one year notice rather than a six month notice. This one year notice
gets all the members through next summer's programming season, and
this is the heaviest program period for the organization. The
additional six months also allows everyone more time to better
consider their future options as individual communities.
.
If (for whatever reasons) the current joint powers agreement does not
survive, then Elk River will have to decide if it should go on its own
.
and form a city recreation department or if it should have the school
manage its municipal recreation programs. In this regard, it may be to
the advantage of all the members to have Elk River make this decision
now. Eliminating one option now would simplify issues for everyone.
If the City Council wants to make this decision now, staff still
recommends establishing a city recreation department and not having
the school district manage the city's recreation programs.
.
.
J?~.
".",.y:~, "\....:;:.\: '/r"~.~~-=- -~~,,.
........-./"1-
~ "~ ,-~
. , - . .
":P~
:,~ ,"
,'p' ",-.'" ""-'
~", " '. ,P - ,_ _. ~'.
, BOARD
The following amount represents your community's assessment to the Joint
Powers Agreement forthe period of July and August 1999
City of Elk River
City of Dayton
City of Otsego
City of Rogers
Hassan Township
$10,33ROO
$ 530.84
$ 3,313.68
$ 1 ,536.34
$ 1 ,384.34
I.S.D. 728
Make your check payable to:
and send to:
Community Recreation
1230 School Street
Elk River, Mn 55330
The following results have been compiled from information received
from 82 out of 42 cities surveyed. The survey consisted of 28 metro
cities and 14 non-metro cities having a population over 10,000 and
under 25,000. Keep in mind that on some surveys, not all questions
were answered.
.
.
.
Recreation Proerammine Services
The desired result of this survey is to determine how many municipalities,
which are similar to Elk River, provide their own municipal recreation
programming or have this service provided by the school district (as part of
Community Education) or by another contract.
1.
Does your city have its own park or recreation or park and recreation
department? Yes 25
No 1
Park / Rec. with additional Pub. Works, Ice Arena,
Arts, or Forestry 1
Joint Powers - School/City ,g
What is the size of the city park/recreation staff (maintenance,
programming, administration)?
Average FT admin. / prog. !!
Average PT admin. / prog. ~
Average FT maint. / pub. works !!
Average PT maint. / pub. works 1
Average Seasonal 90
What is the approximate amount of the city park/recreation budget?
Average overall budget $1.2 million
Average Parks only budget $500.000
Average Recreation only budget $200.000
2.
Does your city do its own recreation programming or is this service done
by the school district (as part of community education) or is this service
contracted out to another agency?
City 23
School District ~
Other - majority city / some Community Ed.,
parent / volunteer organized, or
joint with school district '1
Recreation Facilities
1. Does your city or school district have the majority of the:
Inside facilities (gymnasiums) City 1
School District 24
Shared 1
.
Outside facilities (softballlbaseball, soccer fields)
City 21
School District !
Shared ~
2. What type of revenue is generated through recreation
programming...How does this compare to programming expenditures?
Average Revenue $100 - 300.000
- Majority break even on expenses
- 20-50% recuperated, not incl. staff costs 1
- 60-90% recuperated, not incl. staff costs 1
3.
What is the municipal relationship with the organized youth athletic
associations for such things as scheduling fields, maintenance of fields,
registration of participants, etc.?
Majority stated that youth athletic associations
organize programs; city registers, schedules, and
maintains fields at no cost.
.
3. stated that the city charges each association a
fee to offset city expenses.
(~ f- ~C
r y:r --
.-
jO 111'
.(t,o .<<1
0\,\."""
c) ev I c. t< (
<;'tr; ff
Or
CO., J,^c-+('~ 1iis. fer. <)"V.n)t'y JtJ1e .
~~e. J,\ The 't~'I.A.(f~ are \I.o"y Ii) PII..T-
;::. w et ~ WI () d- ,'1'\ +t!"v'~ '!Je J ; h -rh e rr: ( lA lis
b ~,us+i"'" -fi;:1., ~ ~
.