4.2 PCSR 08-21-2017 J
city.,
Elk. Request for Action
River
To Item Number
Planning Commission 4.'?
Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by
Public Hearing August 22,2017 Chris Leeseberg, Senior Planner
Item Description Reviewed by
CM Points Holding—Outlot A,Hillside Estates BrieAnna Simon,Planner
Tenth Addition Reviewed by
• Preliminary Plat of Hillside Estates
Eleventh Addition,Case No. P 17-15
Action Requested
Recommend,by motion,approval of the Preliminary Plat for Hillside Estates Eleventh Addition.
Background/Discussion
The applicant is proposing a preliminary plat for 36 single family lots. The property is zoned R1-c (Single
Family Residential). The minimum lot size for lots in the R1-c district is 11,000 square feet with a
minimum lot width of 80 feet (100 feet for corner lots) and a minimum lot depth of 130 feet. The
proposed preliminary plat meets all the dimensional requirements.
Analysis
Comprehensive Plan
The property is identified as a residential land use. Urban Residential includes land for residential use in
areas that are currently served by municipal sanitary sewer system. Urban Residential land uses include
single family detached housing and attached housing in the form of duplexes and townhomes. The use
will be consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Transportation/ Circulation
The plat will be accessed by Baldwin Street from the west and by 195th Avenue from the north. A
through street connection will be created with the extension and intersection of Baldwin Street and 195`h
Avenue. There will be two cul-de-sacs (Carson Court and 195th Circle) off of these two streets.
Utilities
The 36 lots will be served with municipal services.
Stormwater/Grading/Drainage
The proposed development is still being reviewed in accordance with the Stormwater Ordinance Sections
78-503 and 78-504
Environmental
Wetlands are present on site and are delineated on the plans. Wetland delineations and WCA Decisions
are only valid for five years.
P~1UEIE1 II
NATURE
17/afej ,4t.-e 64_74
d49,.. /,
Simon, BrieAnna ,P6- /72
From: Jacob Folkeringa <jhwf44@gmail.com> (77/led/7 14-
2-
Sent: Tuesday,August 22, 2017 1:43 PM
To: Simon, BrieAnna
Subject: Input on Case No. P 17-15
BrieAnna-
Thank you for recently providing me with information regarding the development that is being planned for
behind my home(19450 Baldwin Circle NW). As you indicated, I received a Notice of Public Hearing in the
mail for this development(Case No. P 17-15). Unfortunately I am unable to make it to the Planning
Commission public hearing tonight. With that in mind I wanted to provide some comments that I hope you can
pass along.
Here are my comments:
• When I purchased my home a few years ago I contacted the City planning department. I was made
aware that this area could be developed at some point in time. Obviously it would be great if this
property remained undeveloped (we really like the quietness and privacy)but at the same time I realize
that development is probably inevitable.
• One of the nice features in this neighborhood is the mature trees. These are great to have in our yards as
well as between houses/streets. A lot of neighborhoods are built on old farm fields and don't get this
opportunity. Looking at the map provided on the back of the Notice of Public Hearing,it looks like
there are a fair number of trees in the proposed development area,particularly around the cul-de-sac on
Baldwin Circle(where I live). The majority of these trees are not on our property(or anyone's on the
cul-de-sac)but it would be greatly appreciated if they could keep as many of these trees as
possible. This will maintain the feel/appearance of the neighborhood that so many of us appreciate. In
addition, I think people who purchase homes in the new development would like these trees and it would
increase their property value.
• With this in mind I would like to request that the developer prepare a tree preservation plan as part of the
plat process. While I realize some trees may need to be removed for construction, I believe it is in
everyone's best interest to maintain as many trees as possible.
Thank you for taking this into consideration. I have spoken about this development with my neighbors on the
Baldwin Circle cul-de-sac and we all share in these concerns. If it helps, I would happy to obtain signatures
from my neighbors who are in support of the comments included in this email.
Thanks,
Jacob Folkeringa
19450 Baldwin Circle NW
763-242-0065
1
Landscaping
Section 30-934(c) states:
Permitted single-family uses in all districts. Landscaping requirements for permitted single-family uses in all
districts are as follows:
(1) Applicability of requirements. All permitted single-family properties shall comply with the
requirements of this subdivision when new developments or expansions are to occur on these
properties.
(2) Minimum requirements.All open areas of a lot which are not used and improved shall be
landscaped with a combination of overstory trees,ornamental trees, coniferous trees, shrubs,
flowers,and turf or permitted ground cover materials. The minimum number of trees in the front
yard is two.
a. Location of required front yard trees.
1.One tree must be located in the boulevard area and shall be an overstory type tree.
2.A second tree shall be located in the front yard area. Overstory,evergreen,and
ornamental tree species are permitted.
Parks and Recreation
Park dedication has been satisfied with earlier additions.
Applicable Regulation
Approval of a plat may only be ordered if the following findings have been made,as outlined in Section
30-375:
(1) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the.zoning regulations(article VI of this chapter)and conforms in
all respects with all requirements of this Code, including the zoning regulations and this article.
The property is zoned R1-c and the proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning
regulations outlined in the city code and approved plans.
(2) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable general and specialized city, county, and regional
plans, including, but not limited to, the city's comprehensive development plan.
The proposed subdivision does not conflict with any city,county,or regional plans,including
the Comprehensive Plan.
(3) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to
erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and drainage are suitable for the type and density of development
and uses contemplated.
The site is suitable for the proposed development.
(4) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage transportation,
erosion control and all other services,facilities and improvements otherwise required in this article.
The subdivision has adequate provision for all of these facilities.
N:\llepartments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\P\P 17-15 11illside Estates 11th Addition\4Planning Commission\P 17-15 sr PC
8-22.17.docx
(5) The proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage.
The proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage.
(6) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of
a court.
The subdivision will not conflict with easements of record.
(7) The proposed subdivision will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable development of
neighboring land.
The area has been guided for this type of development. The proposed subdivision will not
have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable development of neighboring land.
(8) The proposed subdivision is not premature.A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists:
a. Lack of adequate stormwater drainage.
b. Lack of adequate roads.
c. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems.
d Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems.
All of the above services or improvements will be connected or constructed as part of the
development.The area is within the municipal service area and existing facilities can
handle the additional capacity.
The project is consistent with all required findings for approval of the Preliminary Plat.
If denial of the plat should occur,it shall accompany recommendations or determinations by findings or a
report stating how the proposed use does not comply with the standards set forth in Section 30-375.
Financial Impact
None
Statutory Review Period
Per State Statute 15.99 the required 120-day review period ends on November 28, 2017.
Attachments
• Location Map
• Preliminary Plat
• Environmental Memo dated August 7,2017
• Engineering Division memo dated August 8,2017
• Stormwater Coordinator memo dated August 4,2017
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\P\P 17-15 Hillside Estates 11th Addition\4-Planning Commission\P 17-15 sr PC
8-22-17.docx
y w
?5-714 1 „- - .'' *% 5-6 0350
; r
.t ± � -6t7-0?d5r� ?5-714-01D5 C " ,'° � ° � �
tiiim
#�. ��79$7HNYyy 0 dx €,, ,r),, ';:!,t"*112,. il,i-:,--,,-.: ,„A*,,, rh*,,,,; ick 1
P
Ci4
� + "" 75-6-17-°23°
X, • - I bI -7Tl35 r
l T - _ e » i 75-771-0330 � w 1 .
-
re; - 75-754-0105 - �,;
i a j�6 ��
1 t _+IB# 75-714-0040
• - - _ 771=0320
'',," r
•
v ., e n
•
r�; 1 - 75-77,1-0010 :
irk
` 75.771-0230 0,..wx,..ii:;::,/,/ *
re t
it" 75 78
�� 7.03-0120 ` „�"w z y
,......... , "+�e
'°;,, .F?5=771-0110 f� r��
.� � 1 ' ,, , T5-5740210 75 574-0105 -"a-1 0 ,.
7S-7714105 :`
75-0?40205
* '75-538-0202 3�75 5b*0205 .+.. :„.e.,,,..7.,,,27:_,:. 75668 0205
75-&3 8-0102 ��; 1 -011 ors r�
' � r 75-568-0105 a,� *;•
` -- - 75.5384204 75-6 8.0210 05:7,5. J'' "Y
75.664-0210
�_. . 75-6384104 t
0 i 'A' 75475-0210
�x 75-588-0110 '',-;:-.**-1'. t ,£ .
754 38-0206
r 7s-56a-0z1s I- t
CM Points Holding
Plat Case No: P 17- 15 Eli 41.44......lei er
1
Preliminary Plat
_ 01 '
4°,2 _:;-,1:--,\‘`- HILLSIDE ESTATES
,\ „i,,,,,,, „ , , \
- ELEVENTH ADDITION
..
\-----\' ,/ 41.* 7 r ■ "• 4.•,,?-.•..-r., , ,..
'' i '\A-A1\... ■ \ -- .'...",‘■ ' tuilLOe..btf N 1 -4'v)‘ „'
i
RIVERSIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
-,/,./ \\\ 1 ' 4 , i',',-1-'
,: .!..! _/,, I , ‘', 1- .,";''',<''' -1.."94”- \\'‘\..--34;;--1,.}1 4ic--2--n i/i4-1.113,9v7,'.'.4 ,-- 2.c,.,72,,c--"''' ...,‘ OFSD.PTION CB PROPERTY TO BE PI ATTE.
2,-- t.— - , ' s,.. \\\` °•7.1/4-•\ :A°.'" °'h"? 1/,'-.`' --, ." ' / -6 (MD NO 75-771-0010)
F . ,,...„,rm.. • , , I, .9,,..a.'7,. - 01,t 1 t ..0..".0-7•2•"is t, ;,\,,s - , , 3 . ,(A„ii,a1,,,,•),,,,,,, . 11330 AT ,):: /
\ \ I -4, i --. , 1.-4 .E ''' 'C''''''.57M.0105 .4".1/'4\ ' r-^S =-•.- 14- -. ,'( Outlet A.HILLSIDE ESTATES TENTH AMMON.Sherburne County.Minnesota
,•••.- „....- , -1 ,, ,25 - • ' `.n,‘,,,,Le 7.....t • \ \ -`,..., ,./ /,. A-At',.! 1b4rn,,,,,, r / /
, , , „ \-,..,,,, L_ L i ,.. ,25,.._,_
..
■
INV
. - - - ........ ----'-''.---.."- i, 11111. s' --,,17,82„.47.,k•,,,,s,„--- .. ‘.., ,,, ..,,,-,.,,7, e
' --\;,,, -:--77-'I'r-...."---, ‘-T ,-- ■ -= -4 , / >•,'.,- ,- ..-----, "--- Y4', Itk'1-" 1-/ -, z-orz,zzaromt4-:..=r.7..,:=1:•::"*"...'
,
\ ,;s '', '‘, FUTURE=-, ', .1 FL__„ .,...-,\", , '1_8,-* \'\ ---c::IT. /a•,•,' ■., , ----....
\ ,, = -- ..,' -/„.i; Th--- It 11 1/,`,...:"„‘ ,\.„,„1-a. --4,,.: -' `, ,N, .e,-9 ,),.)\. / ,'' ./' .., - - ., ---- ----..,_ ',-I,' ,,,-" ''',,-- ,"/,,-. -.i %,./: ,\\'‘i„-.?,'g,-..3,i'.i--,_-._,..\_.'s...,‘.,,,‘‘,,,s‘,`a.l.,„1,g.5...i\.r...A,.„k,,!0 3A',,,'%,,.".'•'='L','-.'_.--'--'.--'.'n':-.„l'It,0,I..L'_.-1,1_1-...._.,-...•-'.-''-..-k`1,'''750---.,„."4-.-..-.--e-<,-/---,--,-..----i,:),,'..-.-,•'1 1*
'4_1.,,••,,‘\, 1••••,'„,',•:”- i_,-, ,,./. a i r".,'I7."...,."_7._„«'°.':,.e..Mt,r,",o.'r.o"-t:...■.:T.',',,"(■..ar'..s7.'i'.-■C.1.r',5'7,4',u:-t„,'e0'0t t'0a.d..2*1).”'....'.".„T":.h 1e:r'•.„a,.r7'r-.n:7.enu1nr7Io.0'n o.:i.,:T■u:t.“.inntC..y 7.t a.XIn..:f.o=,"rl'merae a l.51 2 r tV"°hon e:C7 mM°N otIo"g,t N,:u•m',.a"
f?'..'?''a? '? '1.------'-'-----------':?''''''‘:?-'?''t/...- .1?' ' "l'''''' ir' -- -- ,,-""----'-..K.'-'15 ' ,\::\ \-:..z t 81‘y, ,',/07-s ' :',','- -',, 5.:'' - .,.- ,,,P1---).-- . . ,.' -.,-">1..ke,1,2'1., 11 / ','"/„.../.. " 1, P.■01:s'''.-,,,...!;:::tt:ylgr c'''''''.°'`''".``°""°'°'''''''''''°'
,c "'°4°°'' 'k c ''‘,/, '‘°:7-A,„ ''' / -'<---. C__:-->--- ./. ,,-- ,-- ‘.- .,. .,,,,-, .‘, ,,•/,
4 / ' /..'"• ''' ..,..e '''''"r" '' '' Al- , '\ a r--.--; .=,r- .---`,0,...i.."'.- _ '.3-,":"5•••:,.._ -r\ ...-_-f.. :
o..,...,.,_,_ . -0---•--,--iiiLlpf)_f__-1-----. _,...-, e-,' ../-C.\ s '\k„.:: _.,, ,__,, ,,,,,, . ,,,,:„,.. ,,,i„,.-„,,,y.,„, 7,,,,,__..... ‘ -,,,,,------_-- -
,__,_- .. \\ , , , _...1,-,, „„,,,,_„___ •• t ,-...., „ \ , n `.. _,',- .,,.,.4/(kt i , ,...?.., , ,/ my,Anigy1 .‘..,3.-,,,,,, .. --1, - ,,sf ,, . , --Y.--.-...--c.-
---.'-- s,.,\ ,,,,,s-, ' ( ',6,-- . ---,, _-.----'k\' ),",-. .•\ ..-,-.: - , / ,0-..4. /, - 4, - _ ..,/..4.1,,i,..4.-; -- -2------- rf-r--...,---'1),:7,-;":,-- , '„1,-/,'!"- _":-____E
/ ‘` ..4./` '.- ' ' ' ---" - - '1---16,- ‘'-- — .•-e... , 4.- - .. - ,L.,..,,,,..',;;„,• ,,,,,,...;,,, ..'A_, 4. ,, .. „:,-4 ,"-...-_,.3 ,;",:-I 51r; ,;....c.‘"----•'" BEAM...
\\ '',' ''. '\ . (r.- v- ..-.\\s.,\ / • - , ,. , ,,,-, , •-;s / ,z • --._,, --... 7.. 14
,.....,,,„_. , <:- ...--:%,,.... •-....„.... _ ..\\ ,.‘,.14114,,,_. ‘‘ /', . ‘, ', :,,
7 ")^,- \\,,...„ , 7 ' -,11 \\'‘,.\,,'<1.../Ch%\,_, /,„„.‘•„8 •.„,,..-.4....,.,. ., .."''''. „'//'/c(3y.',;'`..7;."--k-',,,t\N.... ',„ -:-..:,---717,--,;',--.7.-.-_,-_-__ 43,,---_,..-:__-:.-;,,,,,/,/j',•,', ,,
-
/ = ,‘ '3,' ,,,,' ,- .4.4 , --',,c1, , ••3- 2 '- '' = ii<k-,t; ''',;(<.".`,..' %;:.> -i-miarz*1 -, '- '-- ------'11------- •- , 'V',7 .,,i.
,„.s.... ..„... _,4, -...._,,„ —______ _ ........-7.-..---,.-_,7'''--•/ 1,,,..,1 2 - ';--.--
/
,„,, , -*—_---:_ ,( , ...,---,.„----„, ,,. .4$ -....-
'3/4.\', / -4,,„: ‘• , '. — - - —
\ , j, raT,24,....., ,1,...„- , ,,: , ......,,,---_ v /,, ,,,. . , ,<„, A ., _- -... LEGEND
1 ,- - ' -- -'" 2,.- /
, .3-DENOTES GATE VALVE
b.DENOTES HYDRANT
S, / --7•7',4•.114*, •^:,.,...;*::--r.--, 13,97 SR/ 4..,7 / ,....' - ',&\ X -- .s., . 1',4,.f.,,17tC),,, .1..;/'
-i-=DENOTES WATER LINE
"1„?---,, , :,.,4'- ''', ?,, N‘'; ' //(7°L.'\ \l".. #4,' - '''''','"."'s7-' „,,•,. ,-,, . ‘-‘,. ) CfD.DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
SANITARY SEWER LINE
W 0=DENOTES CATCHBASIN
6 DENOTES STORM SEWER MANHOLE
' ' `.. / --''---.. i C•<-.3‘‘ z ; -.-•DENOTES STORM SEWER LINE
'\ \'-'NN ' '
. 1 ' -' • •■DENOTES ELECTRIC RIMSFCRMER
'''.„...,- -
7L.,41.5B R.751 93
4:„, 74:7.,,:r..\.‘ , / \ 1 x \ E r,i,l.i t „, ,,,,,,g....„,17.4: ,`...:,,,,'`,.,,, ,,c-‘' . \ -..,::57,:317.2a29
'..■S' ‘j ‘;'
3w3.2, 3•19.,CHO•14.37
'''\ 'S '74,7E47.I , Re; mow% ' 4 ' ,4 •-' • ,44.-\,- . - • c.enc-SaglEVInv .. ,'''I .......:--' '.:MDE"NgTErESS VEG"LETPrOtt PEDESTAL
•.DENOTES CABLE N PEDESTAL
/ \ ''•.1 ''--' ' 4-
‘/ ,
',,,'.....1..... ••DENOTES POUND IRON MONUMENT
(. /
(',‘,-) \/ '•\
No •DENOTES SURFACE CONTOUR(2 rT INTERVAL)
..'e‘ .■ , ,■.. i s, j__----e--— -7,. , it-, ---''', .' '... '‘‘N \ so\ \ C.EING=NSEV01.4(YE '.
D.DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE
,<'' ,_.(;)s / ,, '-'-' : -.',--:s
• \ '2, c','i,z, / 3", i.,-; .. ,1 1,, ---- ., . -',.` ..."- ''' • ;
•,',",17,349 SPA-, ' % ----\ .."■4.' ,'. \
„ , ...,„ < ,, <;__0,. .. ,,
, .,..,-„ ,, , ,-, .. .< ,,:, , _,,, - ',,, ., , ,,...._. - ., ... ,
4,
/ /
C .
,- ) /-- ...- _---__ _-_:---1---,, ',' \g. ,) , %eN---2.-C_ .--;.-'-.:-.....',...,-,..-.
,', . r.t f s,--..,wr..'-•.cl',,,,: i ,., !
#0
VICINITY MAP .,
/ /'K--
. - - ,-- ,:-:----., -,t,-,7,2irs.01,,, ','<, '',-. , "%' -*"- -- -I.'' ' sw.I.7.3s,R26
SITIRSORRS 2021222.MI +
--."'-; - - AV'''. , ,..
" - ' ''''-7 M2
——— \ 1:--,.",-;;,:r,-:,-1-,x,-...-17...",•:-.-,-c- ,‘,,11,1,'". 'h-t1-6/'/. ,,' ''ft,,-
.. SITE
,' ' ,'"re 0-1- -':+■!' ' '- '-:-
••■-.''..N.. ;',.: 4 i / `A
.• r- ir,Litl.:4;F:::::,',, -r------1
'- /1. ,....5 ,'-,•,. , - -, •• ,,,, ,-,-,..:,- -4,--- ‘ i, ,,
1 oq" i.Tigiri;\itiflo,,
n•pe(cm) 5 Iwo
... , ''.''. • S., ,,, ,,, , ..",.., . 4 .1--- . titC4n41111:'
ovittives
I -.,--.:!..,‘„,:t..,,......7.„'.•-v...., s.,<,,, ,s,...: ,,„..., , 7 1 '.- ;1(67
..,•-■ n,sia.,1`-'•-i E. ''',:....., `",-- ,-- ,../ k-----,-,
r-- ,
VZ°4;."'s'-'
I ,..,,,,,,,1.". •-• ....,. -/-. . .----... ..• . . '
r..- rug=raTer4a FA Rh./IN 55.150
f
,,„, .i ,,, 9,., , ,,,
. (NOT TO SCALE) ' I 0/,i , .N/'
,
„.... ..2 it‘4„...,, \i„,,,, 1 : 1 i•177,irs10.7711.:EalF:'Al.
nrepro=7:no trMZrat''r: L__ __1_'•- _J_ J
/
4,_/.---7-L'A, ,
, ',■ /, \.
I
I Meetly certify that thoe sun,pIan or'Nand 7 77d 7.•
DATE REVISION
RUM RIVER<4 HILLSIDE ESTATES ELEVENTH ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT 1
arm er pm
07/31/17 __..,LAPIDSURVIrletItSalktINORGIERS
CITY OF ELK RIVER,MINNESOTA 1
RIVERSIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
P-2135.15
ElkMemorandum
River
To: Planning Department
From: Amanda Bednar,Environmental Coordinator
Date: August 7,2017
Subject: Site Plan Review Meeting—August 7, 2017
The department listed above has reviewed the application(s) listed below and has the following
comments:
1. Case #V 17-06—Parent Builders Variance
1. The property owner has submitted a Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) application
for proposed impacts to the wetlands on site including a delineation of the site. The proposed
driveway location will impact approximately 120 square feet of Type 2 wetlands.This will fall under
the de-minimis exemption and will not require any replacement plans.The Technical Evaluation
Panel has already visited the site and is in support of the discussed driveway location. Staff will
support the variance request as the location will result in the minimum amount of wetland impacts.
The WCA Decision will be noticed once the finalized site plan is received and approved by staff.
2. Case# CU 17-18—Swan Companies/Coborns
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed.
3. Case # P 17-13—Doug Warneke DHJ Plat
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed.
4. Case# Regenscheid/Robert Stuttgen—Trace Heights Second Addition
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed.The applicant also
submitted a delineation for the site which shows two wetlands on the 56.4 acre parcel. The applicant
is requesting a wetland type confirmation and delineation concurrence for the Type 3 shallow marsh
and Type 1 seasonally flooded basin via WCA. These will be reviewed by the Technical Evaluation
Panel later in August and a decision will be made regarding the wetland boundaries after that.There
are currently no proposed impacts to the wetlands or 45 foot buffer setback.
5. Case # LU 17-04,ZC 17-06, CU 17-19—Stars Hollow/Quintus 3D
1. This site has a wetland basin on the north edge of where the applicant plans to build
their facility. The site was reviewed by a Board of Water and Soil Resources (BSWR) Wetland
Specialist and a conservative boundary was determined for the approximate edge of the wetland and
the 45 foot setback was determined off of that. Staff recommends putting that wetland area into an
easement to ensure the wetlands are not impacted.There was no delineation required as this area
was a conservative estimate to ensure all possible wetlands are protected. The applicant may qualify
for energy efficiency rebates for use of LED bulbs and energy efficient items. No other concerns or
issues with the application as proposed.
6. Case # OA 17-09—City of Elk River Ordinance Amendment
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed.
7. Case# P 17-16—City of Elk River Simple Plat—Outlot B, Parkview Addition
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed. Project site has wetlands
present,delineation would be required before any work can be done.
8. Case # SP 17-02—Aegir Brewing Company
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed.
9. Case# P 17-15—CM Points Holding—Hillside 11th Addition
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed. Wetlands present on site but
delineated boundary shown on plans.Wetland delineations and WCA Decisions are only valid for
five years.
10. Case # OA 17-10, CU 17-20—Satellite Shelters Ordinance Amendment& CUP
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed. Project site has wetlands
present,delineation would be required before any work can be done on site.
11. Case # CU 17-21—Casey's General Store
1. This site is located within the Wild and Scenic River District which limits impervious
surface to 25% and has strict design criteria to visual conceal structures from the river view, set forth
by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. DNR Area Hydrologist for Sherburne County
discussed this site with staff and agreed that the development could occur and meet the goals of the
District,as long as visual concealment is maintained. Given there are other buildings between this
site and the river,this requirement is less of a concern. Staff would still recommend including visual
conditions within the variance. Staff would also recommend the property owner be required to treat
all stormwater on site to ensure the proposed increase in impervious surface does not negatively
impact site stormwater management overall.
ElkMemorandum
River
To: Planning Department
From: Justin Femrite,P.E.,Engineering Division
Date: August 8,2017
Subject: Site Plan Review Meeting—August 7,2017
The department listed above has reviewed the application(s) listed below and has the following
comments:
1. Parent Builders
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed.
2. Swan Companies/Coborns
1. Fully remove existing storm pipe and patch the existing storm structure.
2. Provide newly described easement over the proposed stormwater pipe. Have said
easement recorded.
3. DHJ Plat
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed.
4. Trace Heights rd Addition
1. Need to adjust the existing intersection at Zane and 202"d Avenue to fit the proposed
plat.
2. Add cul-de-sac on ends of new dead ends
3. Incorporate trail into grading plan.
4. Show proposed grades on driveways
5. Complete final engineering drawings including plan profile sheets for all streets and
storm sewer systems.
6. Add permanent ditch checks in all ditches where grades are 4%or greater.
7. Identify pre and post runoff to parcel east of proposed Street A from Station 0+00
to 4+75.
8. Provide additional detail to the drainage of the ditch on the south side of Street A
from 24+50 to Zane Street.
9. Ditch grades along Street C from Station 13+25 to 17+25 are too flat.
10. Elevations on culvert crossing on Street B at Station 0+45 appear to be incorrect.
11. Show culverts and driveway grades to the limits of street grading area for all
"Custom Graded"lots.
12. Need easement on Lot 6 Block 2 for street drainage.
13. Expand easement areas anywhere street drainage/ditch systems drain outside of
proposed 10' front yard easement.
5. Aquaponics
1. Will need to review a formal detailed site plan with elevations when prepared.
6. Fence
1. Add language that states the City reserves the right to filed review sight distances on
curved lots to be sure the fences stay clear of road users sight lines.
7. Outlot B, Parkview Addition
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed.
8. Brewing
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed
9. Hillside
1. Erosion control plans do not show any erosion control devises.
2. Detail SMH 16 as a drop structure. Include standard detail.
3. Detail where the utility installation ends on 195th Avenue.
4. Add storm sewer catch basins on the end of curb on Carson Court.
5. Provide vertical curves between grade changes on Baldwin Street.
6. Transition between existing curb and proposed street at north end of Balwin Street
must be tangent and look like a continuous curve. May have to remove some
existing curbing to assure this is done adequately.
7. Structures on the Baldwin Street profile are extended above the street surface.
8. Shift SMH 17 west to assure 10' separation with existing storm line.
9. Water system comments shall be provided by ERMU
10. Assure grade on existing sanitary sewer coming from EX SHM 11 matches the
proposed extension. This line must pass a mandrel test.
11. Provide completed development plan that includes all required information.
10. Satellite Shelters
1. Any proposed uses on this site will require the final platting of the lot. At such time,
the adjacent streets should be constructed to the current City of Elk River Design
Standards. This shall be incorporated into this plan set for our review and approval
or a completely separate plan for the public infrastructure will need to be generated
and approved before this site plan will be reviewed further.
11. Casey's
1. Right in access off 171"Avenue will need to be shifted west. The access point will
not be allowed any closer to TH 10 than the opposing access point across 171"
Avenue to the south. We will likely support more restrictive comments that
MnDOT has relating to this access.
2. Shift west driveway entrance north to not affect existing catch basin in the roadway.
3. Grade break or storm water collection needs to be added to assure on site drainage is
not directed out of the west access point on to the public right-of-way.
4. Assure existing gutter line is conveyed through proposed driveways to continue
street drainage patterns. Maintain a minimum 18"gutter pan.
12. Storage Expansion 15656 Edison St.
1. Further grading plan details will need to be submitted for review of a possible
connection point to the existing service road.
13. Commercial Kennels in C3
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed.
.41/
ElkMemorandum
River
To: Planning Department
From: Brandon Wisner,Stormwater Coordinator
Date: August 4,2017
Subject: Site Plan Review Meeting—August 7,2017
The department listed above has reviewed the application(s) listed below and has the following
comments:
1. Parent Builders
1. Support the requested variance as it is the least impact option due to the limited
access to the property.
2. Swan Companies/Coborns
1. Maintain 20'wide easement centered on proposed stormwater pipe location.
3. DHJ Plat
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed.
4. Trace Heights 2°d Addition
1. Issued NPDES permit before grading work can occur.
2. Submit MIDS water quality report.
3. Submit Full SWPPP plan and construction project sequencing.
4. Recommend moving the outlet pipe EOF for Pond 100 east so it would
discharge onto city owned park property.Also,add articulated block energy
dissipation for stormwater pipe outfall into this pond.
5. Provide storm pipe material spec.,and typical section for pipe crossings
5. Aquaponics
1. Stormwater management requirements will need to be met as listed in Ordinance
Sec. 78-503. - Stormwater and urban runoff control. and Sec. 78-504. - Post
construction stormwater management for proposed impervious surfaces.
http://mn-\ elkriver.civicplus.com/DocumentCenter/View/3180
2. Submit soil borings to determine saturated soils/groundwater elevation for the
proposed stormwater basin. If adequate separation from the saturated soils can be
achieved (3' from bottom of proposed basin),an infiltration basin may work on the
site,which would take up less area on the property.
6. Fence
1. Update may be needed for allowing fences within emergency overflow locations.
7. Outlot B, Parkview Addition
1. No comment
8. Brewing
1. No comment
9. Hillside
1. The proposed development is still being reviewed in accordance with Stormwater
Ordinance Sec. 78-503 and 78-504 http://mn-\
elkriver.civicplus.com/DocumentCenter/View/3180
10. Satelite
1. Stormwater management requirements will need to be met as listed in Ordinance
Sec. 78-503. - Stormwater and urban runoff control. and Sec. 78-504. - Post
construction stormwater management for proposed impervious surfaces.
http://mn-\ elkriver.civicplus.com/DocumentCenter/View/3180
2. Submit required HydroCAD,MIDS report and pre-post rates (Atlas 14).
2. In accordance with city ordinance,a 45 foot structure setback is required from the
NWL of any stormwater pond.
2. The size of the drainage and utility easement area will be reviewed once when the
drainage plan/HydroCAD is submitted.
11. Casey's
1. Stormwater management requirements will need to be met as listed in Ordinance
Sec. 78-503. - Stormwater and urban runoff control. and Sec. 78-504. - Post
construction stormwater management for proposed impervious surfaces.
http://mn-\ elkriver.civicplus.com/DocumentCenter/View/3180
2. Being that this development drains to a previous regionally constructed stormwater
pond,the pond used the previous precipitation event of TP40. Since then,the city
updated the city stormwater management ordinance to Atlas 14.This proposed
development will need to make up the difference between the event models on-site
for volume control.