4.6 PCSR 08-21-2017 1
Elk
..�. Request for Action
River
To Item Number
Planning Commission 4.6
Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by
Public Hearing August 22,2017 Chris Leeseberg, Senior Planner
Item Description Reviewed by
Regenscheid Homes/Robert Stuttgen BrieAnna Simon,Planner
• Preliminary Plat of Trace Heights Second Reviewed by
Addition,Case No. P 17-14
Action Requested
Recommend,by motion,approval of the Preliminary Plat of Trace Heights Second Addition.
Background/Discussion
The applicant will be subdividing the 53.77 acre property into 18 parcels and one Outlot. The subject
property is generally east of Auburn Street,south of the 205th Avenue,west of Vance Street,and north
of the 201st Avenue alignment. The property is zoned Single Family Residential (R1-a) with minimum lot
sizes of 2 1/2 acres. The proposed plat meets the dimensional requirements required by ordinance. The
one Outlot is proposed to be used for stormwater collection.
Analysis
Comprehensive Plan
The property is identified as a residential land use. Rural residential uses are guided to be developed as
residential uses in areas outside of the Urban Service Area (i.e.,not currently served by municipal sewer
and water).The predominant land use in this area is single family detached homes.
Transportation/Circulation
Access to the site will be via two street connections,one at County Road 33 and another at 202nd
Avenue/Zane Street. The proposed plat will have two streets (B &C on the preliminary plat) that will
eventually extend into the parcel to the northeast of the subject site. During the April 17,2017,City
Council work session,the council indicated they would be supportive of not requiring a cul-de-sac on
what is identified as Street B on the preliminary plat. The council also supported staff's recommendation
that no site access to Lot 1 Block 2 will be allowed from Street B and this street will not be maintained
until it is extended in the future.
During the same April 17,2017,City Council work session,the applicant was directed to adjust the
existing intersection at Zane and 202nd Avenue to fit the proposed plat as shown on the"Street
Connection Exhibit".
An updated preliminary plat showing the temporary cul-de-sac on Street C and the adjusted intersection
at Zane Street and 202nd Avenue shall be provided.
Landscaping
Section 30-934(c) states:
PINEREI Ir
NATURE
Permitted single family uses in all districts. Landscaping requirements for permitted single-family uses in all
districts are as follows:
(1) Applicability of requirements.All permitted single-family properties shall comply with the
requirements of this subdivision when new development or expansions are to occur on these
properties.
(2) Minimum requirements.All open areas of a lot which are not used and improved shall be
landscaped with a combination of overstory trees, ornamental trees,coniferous trees, shrubs,
flowers,and turf or permitted ground cover materials. The minimum number of trees in the front
yard is two.
a. Location of required front yard trees.
1.One tree must be located in the boulevard area and shall be an overstory type tree.
2.A second tree shall be located in the front yard area. Overstory,evergreen,and
ornamental tree species are permitted.
A landscape plan showing compliance with Section 30-934 shall be provided.
Environmental
The applicant submitted a wetland delineation for the site which shows two wetlands on the 56.4 acre
parcel. The applicant is requesting a wetland type confirmation and delineation concurrence for the Type
3 shallow marsh and Type 1 seasonally flooded basin via Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). These will
be reviewed by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) later in August and a decision will be made
regarding the wetland boundaries after that.There are currently no proposed impacts to the wetlands or
the required 45 foot buffer setback.
Parks and Recreation
The Parks and Recreation Commission recommended the plat of Trace Heights Second Addition pay
park dedication for 18 dwelling units at the rate applicable when the subdivision is released for recording,
with the following condition:
1. The applicant shall install a 10'wide bituminous trail,centered in a 20'trial easement,as shown in
the exhibit titled"Recommended Trails".
The City Engineer has requested the trails be incorporated into the grading plan.
Justin Moody,the applicant, spoke during the August 9,2017,Parks and Recreation meeting. He
questioned the need for a trail as it does not make sense to him. He wanted to know what the trail is
connecting to and stated no one uses County Road 33 to walk on. He also indicated he does not want to
pay the extra money for a trail and a trail will reduce the values of the lots they are located in. Parks and
Recreation Chairman,Dave Anderson,stated the city recently adopted the Parks and Recreation Master
Plan and as part of that process,a city wide survey was completed and the number one desire of the
community was trails. He further stated that the trail is a vital asset as it is a critical link in a north/south
pedestrian corridor on the east side of Highway 169,as shown in the master plan.
Applicable Regulation
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\P\P 17-14 Trace I'eights 2nd Addition\4-Planning Commission\P 17-14 sr PC 8-
22-17.docx
Approval of a plat may only be ordered if the following findings have been made, as outlined in Section
30-375:
(1) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the_zoning regulations(article VI of this chapter)and conforms in
all respects with all requirements of this Code, including the_zoning regulations and this article.
The property is zoned R1-a and the proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning
regulations outlined in the city code and approved plans.
(2) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable general and speciali zed city, county, and regional
plans, including, but not limited to, the city's comprehensive development plan.
The proposed subdivision does not conflict with any city,county,or regional plans,including
the Comprehensive Plan.
(3) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to
erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and drainage are suitable for the type and density of development
and uses contemplated.
The site is suitable for the proposed development.
(4) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage transportation,
erosion control and all other services,facilities and improvements otherwise required in this article.
The subdivision has adequate provision for all of these facilities.
(5) The proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage.
The proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage.
(6) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of
a court.
The existing easements are being vacated and new easements will be established. The
subdivision will not conflict with easements of record.
(7) The proposed subdivision will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable development of
neighboring land.
The proposed subdivision will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable
development of neighboring land.
(8) The proposed subdivision is not premature.A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists:
a. Lack of adequate stormwater drainage.
b. Lack of adequate roads.
a Lack of adequate sanitary sewer ystems.
d. Lack of adequate of-site public improvements or support systems.
All of the above services or improvements will be connected or constructed as part of the
development.
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\P\P 17-14 Trace I'eights 2nd Addition\4-Planning Commission\P 17-14 sr PC 8-
22-17.docx
III
The project is consistent with all required findings for approval of the Preliminary Plat.
If denial of the plat should occur,it shall accompany recommendations or determinations by findings or a
report stating how the proposed use does not comply with the standards set forth in Section 30-375.
Updated Plans/Additional Information
All updated plans and/or requested information shall be provided to city staff by September 8,2017 to
ensure adequate time to review prior to the September 18,2017,City Council meeting.
Financial Impact
None
Statutory Review Period
Per State Statute 15.99 the required 120-day review period ends on November 25,2017.
Attachments
• Location Map
• Preliminary Plat
• Environmental Memo dated August 7,2017
• Engineering Division memo dated August 8,2017
• Stormwater Coordinator memo dated August 4,2017
• Street Connection Exhibit
• Parks and Recreation memo dated August 9,2017
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\P\P 17-14 Trace I Ieights 2nd Addition\4-Planning Commission\P 17-14 sr PC 8-
22-17.docx
u r ��' ,_. _ -•• r 4.1 w"r4 I ;;x0.2. . 305 75-114 3405
if , � 5-1143002
* "' .. .. _. _.._. s11`1in3,:_sm- [ivi7 - 75-11
x�*"' tea.. ,Y
r,..s,...�...«` 4 76500-005 T
er . 1 3 4-1 CC
.a,°,` •° r 75.612-22i
Imo fa-C3 -122-120 15.6 084110 i d Tl 23 2207 0 75 812-4210 I
w
-c.
7 .0 11 t. a 5 812-4234
.,1 12
_ 7'.5.14- -4244
•' f
� ' 755' ,120 ' .',_'X021'
..:�124)25
p 7541242 754 -0134 755 m' S- 25
a
ii. 5-512-0270
/ io.
t.
�, 75-512-0230
ri
75600-0231 ,1-- `
J
75 19-0010
d
° '``' '235 `
z i 3 �� 75-406.023 I :
4,,=
1
mfrty ti
' Y
e ._
a 0534 6 75-548 0394 � ?5-123 2340
" � f a 75-010,4305 , 75510-0405
75-510.0S0,
76514-0380 73+510.0410
i * i' '' 1
44 75.457-4265. _
Jason Regenscheid
Plat E � �.
Case No: P 17- 14 River
TRACE HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION
.n r°ARCaR I MOW ,sosu, I ,: I... d. A 0.0&rc
-I " 04-10-0/40 I P10.75-4511-01.10 R.7 I T PO 7s-.ea ono (rc -aem
°�°'M'�°y TM MOW"' .m7xsav RM.e2 E smroAm
LEGEND VICINITY MAP 1 /t 0- .✓ s132562w
- ° 1«0 ) - 132 e2 I
Bert., Found...M..,n.1, W a.n«x«
° m�/b" a�a, A. .� m r----:1-� r r.. 3.ae rb a 3eae -I ra 6 .«.. -,--,-,-,-,T.
-o - -
w er
Denotes a- °
41 -Denotes E.M =loom see. '
a«dew 6n. En _a.r.w�b s�.,.w w a W.1 $ r~� e i /
$ a 0 M W.su.,.c. ''...i.'. i '_1 it-i.R :men. .n r6.. ..lt. .. as eu:.n r'/ § a _-•S - ar.Sol Borne°7 o,e.. -- 7urrNl.onv°"9 3r2Ir,..r,a=.,.toner`°°
Swum °.'o ;,'%/
/ • 1..... aff
-_.,_ _ o..una.groune ra.pr.r. , 3i Rerw Se L 3x.1 J L 3er.s / C a
Red( - J L•L -'_s. /i�
Denom Underground Electric $ -Deno.EomH.z FE Contour a F-
n1. a
--_.°_- _Denotes UrnA«Accuu w R.,oee....tiny,o Fx.Contour --- - ------ ---- ---- . .,,6 _ __
ten aRt d„RACE HOP-1n - W 2 STREET C \_ "C --- 4 -- W
Ag I', .r,. Elm 61r g....9. Vg,,„,„
I g e " .x1..11.n
.tars...„n
• e 6 6 1 w=p
.. w� II - OUTLOT a V!
¢,. eon x
Ix m
I JL a ° °Ae277. A ,
g
St I sR Namw'We �9��-1".-6- S - z'.. v`i 437 caw..(o.or w ) it d _
a..� a 841.. L , 2
-ca
as :,r•
lr w e
I I ...40:g 1M I ." / ,e,' / 'J
i �T 181 1 x `FIS
°: Over.
.-.,m pmt = ..., .... } /'. 3 a 1 ;a I R.
��C, , - ( ,7 , .. ' • A B� 'it . 1.1+ P�yy�t44 //' �1° 4 t. � a= / la
ref ,C!^JM','
III r �r4 I e n p� a.R 1 , t'sod9s vl
II 1 : fl !7 J w,vo..an. II >m ' ` Mu".e°r� I. j ,a.ax an/ �z-2
1 r,00va•o i ■ it hA Il tto, :,ww<n e �r- ,w L-- n,o / � / r 'w
Ifi5. ww 435.; Iy °e 8w».o Ile _ 1 -_ -4. ' ` C� 1
m�
JL a�ixb 173.1 a5x-_ 4.-'--1
4 a ss L I
«.a a Me.. STREET A " 81 /4 A 1
a -
• � a.. test.
�{e u -_-_ -'r,aaoa -1 x''9'3 1 /Yj� -I{9 ^'6 3ze. -if;.- '\ 6 \
v
mm
1 .� `.» lie �3-4-6, _ 'l 14 6 �. 6 .'a Bbl w�6I ..., . �A� �s9. 1.,_I.
�1 ;',:,.1.+..r " ..n 1.111/..a "Il �. 6 mq4 '�w'�I�b-� Sr'�M1 5.i w :...,042.wen ill 1 ,mss i I
1 - _iTi bl It '71-1f R,dnn�L 'I e„ w2. ", i 2 e r n t
non=e -._._..- I I d., .ern 11,... ¢:r, �� .- I .need w+.+w• �i,
_-"over..=/ m It.--•111 B. °646°1 em, ._.. L_ =,,.-_.11 -- / f. • !:- \v\ t. LJ I
a
e.wnenx der°«M. 14z.
` ` ° �+iYW ^tea. q
RI-I "' 311. o . m ata
•o
°� Of a,(-� 936E
_ Z 3 L
„.x
1 m c ( /F 2'en°w / A4 F' r-M'M'�� n. ,�y s f RE" :'.
E L. u _
`0OA �"'° MROw.."oF.NR. ,/ / 1 T r
,p7.e-aoe-arm nwT M uu east �' dnT"L I T� PROPOSED
7C0'78-8 1x%''' ow5100'I I.0JUDY cau,a Y
t� \ SITE DATA / / 'a7S '0m / Fa> am �], /C•�. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
a 1rz1U.rs...48x.4..°.•.mere e.......r a...,..«.n. TOTAL STE AREA .63.]]AC. a I • EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS
"""`•°'° TOTAL ROW AREA .6.63 AC. / If t I
/C� /{ (Not To Scale)
TOTAL OUTLOT AREA *1.90 AC. / _
TOTAL LOT AREA .45.24 AC. , ROV r/," I
La
m tf,w -.w,T x817 SMALLEST LOT 11I
b.«.....e..,w.w .lm.aoo sE. BENCHMARK . / I 1
MA K [
LARGEST LOT .11 129 SR ,,„t„,.°w.•er,,,x,,,,,omm ; 'T r-a
' ._�,...1.a.deter,., sod• ""`"„'"'°'""• TOTAL I£LOT .uuu.s SETBACK DATA .48..48.48/..90 sxxa.a»a
,. s.... tee«...-1113.205.E x. 5.1.48. 9NAL NUMBER OF LOTS 19 aor 7a R. .•••Q -� _1____J L----- -_
••••• "4:::21=7"4.7'.' CutLOr LOTS FRONT 35 Fr. w-dm.M"ere(e: ee,�x - 7 '�FAMILY SIDE GARAGE)) 20 FT. maw pyere,,,,,,
sOE 20 FT.mu a mr 148.m-.,.148x.°u,-w-worn GROSS OENSItt .0.33 LOTS/AC. REAR�SETBACK 30 FT. I�a)e"48n n. a aw s a�wewi o O 5C1 MO 200
s •.,.ne»..erne,....°xr..e.°.�.°1 xd....°°e NET DENSITY 30.36 LOTS/AC. MAXIMUM HEIGHT ]FLOORS OR 40 FT. °"e1b"vM '"iw...n1..e em ..m o,
'"°'° .^°°'^°° CASTING ZONING Rl (; 041.ax.0.report was Dre.reo by/J��I. ". �R ao<s9.a..R me,,., s,...wx,m.,«ao y.� tern o,xxd u Aa.w Ls. aa,o m;e 1..e�... REGENSCHEID CUSTOM HOMES TRACE HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT 2 /
UTJ w Blaine,fi7a)• 6�QU/� 14000 Sunfish Lake Blvd. B of
_-- 1 ° a _ 44",° F0.p,w„m, n xn 7 7 Ramsey,MN 55303 Elk River,Minnesota EXISTING CONDITIONS / 9
ElkMemorandum
River
To: Planning Department
From: Amanda Bednar,Environmental Coordinator
Date: August 7,2017
Subject: Site Plan Review Meeting—August 7,2017
The department listed above has reviewed the application(s) listed below and has the following
comments:
1. Case #V 17-06-Parent Builders Variance
1. The property owner has submitted a Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) application
for proposed impacts to the wetlands on site including a delineation of the site.The proposed
driveway location will impact approximately 120 square feet of Type 2 wetlands.This will fall under
the de-minimis exemption and will not require any replacement plans. The Technical Evaluation
Panel has already visited the site and is in support of the discussed driveway location. Staff will
support the variance request as the location will result in the minimum amount of wetland impacts.
The WCA Decision will be noticed once the finalized site plan is received and approved by staff.
2. Case# CU 17-18—Swan Companies/Coborns
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed.
3. Case # P 17-13—Doug Warneke DHJ Plat
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed.
4. Case # Regenscheid/Robert Stuttgen—Trace Heights Second Addition
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed. The applicant also
submitted a delineation for the site which shows two wetlands on the 56.4 acre parcel.The applicant
is requesting a wetland type confirmation and delineation concurrence for the Type 3 shallow marsh
and Type 1 seasonally flooded basin via WCA. These will be reviewed by the Technical Evaluation
Panel later in August and a decision will be made regarding the wetland boundaries after that. There
are currently no proposed impacts to the wetlands or 45 foot buffer setback.
5. Case # LU 17-04,ZC 17-06, CU 17-19—Stars Hollow/Quintus 3D
1. This site has a wetland basin on the north edge of where the applicant plans to build
their facility. The site was reviewed by a Board of Water and Soil Resources (BSWR) Wetland
Specialist and a conservative boundary was determined for the approximate edge of the wetland and
the 45 foot setback was determined off of that. Staff recommends putting that wetland area into an
ikk , Memorandum
Rive
To: Planning Department
From: Justin Femrite,P.E.,Engineering Division
Date: August 8,2017
Subject: Site Plan Review Meeting—August 7,2017
The department listed above has reviewed the application(s) listed below and has the following
comments:
1. Parent Builders
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed.
2. Swan Companies/Coborns
1. Fully remove existing storm pipe and patch the existing storm structure.
2. Provide newly described easement over the proposed stormwater pipe. Have said
easement recorded.
3. DHJ Plat
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed.
4. Trace Heights 2"Addition
1. Need to adjust the existing intersection at Zane and 202nd Avenue to fit the proposed
plat.
2. Add cul-de-sac on ends of new dead ends
3. Incorporate trail into grading plan.
4. Show proposed grades on driveways
5. Complete final engineering drawings including plan profile sheets for all streets and
storm sewer systems.
6. Add permanent ditch checks in all ditches where grades are 4% or greater.
7. Identify pre and post runoff to parcel east of proposed Street A from Station 0+00
to 4+75.
8. Provide additional detail to the drainage of the ditch on the south side of Street A
from 24+50 to Zane Street.
9. Ditch grades along Street C from Station 13+25 to 17+25 are too flat.
10. Elevations on culvert crossing on Street B at Station 0+45 appear to be incorrect.
11. Show culverts and driveway grades to the limits of street grading area for all
"Custom Graded"lots.
12. Need easement on Lot 6 Block 2 for street drainage.
13. Expand easement areas anywhere street drainage/ditch systems drain outside of
proposed 10' front yard easement.
5. Aquaponics
1. Will need to review a formal detailed site plan with elevations when prepared.
6. Fence
1. Add language that states the City reserves the right to filed review sight distances on
curved lots to be sure the fences stay clear of road users sight lines.
7. Outlot B, Parkview Addition
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed.
8. Brewing
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed
9. Hillside
1. Erosion control plans do not show any erosion control devises.
2. Detail SMH 16 as a drop structure. Include standard detail.
3. Detail where the utility installation ends on 195th Avenue.
4. Add storm sewer catch basins on the end of curb on Carson Court.
5. Provide vertical curves between grade changes on Baldwin Street.
6. Transition between existing curb and proposed street at north end of Balwin Street
must be tangent and look like a continuous curve. May have to remove some
existing curbing to assure this is done adequately.
7. Structures on the Baldwin Street profile are extended above the street surface.
8. Shift SMH 17 west to assure 10' separation with existing storm line.
9. Water system comments shall be provided by ERMU
10. Assure grade on existing sanitary sewer coming from EX SHM 11 matches the
proposed extension. This line must pass a mandrel test.
11. Provide completed development plan that includes all required information.
10. Satellite Shelters
1. Any proposed uses on this site will require the final platting of the lot. At such time,
the adjacent streets should be constructed to the current City of Elk River Design
Standards. This shall be incorporated into this plan set for our review and approval
or a completely separate plan for the public infrastructure will need to be generated
and approved before this site plan will be reviewed further.
11. Casey's
1. Right in access off 171"Avenue will need to be shifted west. The access point will
not be allowed any closer to TH 10 than the opposing access point across 1715`
Avenue to the south. We will likely support more restrictive comments that
MnDOT has relating to this access.
2. Shift west driveway entrance north to not affect existing catch basin in the roadway.
3. Grade break or storm water collection needs to be added to assure on site drainage is
not directed out of the west access point on to the public right-of-way.
Crty of
ElkMemorandum
River
To: Planning Department
From: Brandon Wisner,Stormwater Coordinator
Date: August 4,2017
Subject: Site Plan Review Meeting—August 7,2017
The department listed above has reviewed the application(s) listed below and has the following
comments:
1. Parent Builders
1. Support the requested variance as it is the least impact option due to the limited
access to the property.
2. Swan Companies/Coborns
1. Maintain 20'wide easement centered on proposed stormwater pipe location.
3. DHJ Plat
1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed.
4. Trace Heights 2"d Addition
1. Issued NPDES permit before grading work can occur.
2. Submit MIDS water quality report.
3. Submit Full SWPPP plan and construction project sequencing.
4. Recommend moving the outlet pipe EOF for Pond 100 east so it would
discharge onto city owned park property. Also,add articulated block energy
dissipation for stormwater pipe outfall into this pond.
5. Provide storm pipe material spec.,and typical section for pipe crossings
5. Aquaponics
1. Stormwater management requirements will need to be met as listed in Ordinance
Sec. 78-503. - Stormwater and urban runoff control. and Sec. 78-504. - Post
construction stormwater management for proposed impervious surfaces.
http://mn-\ elkriver.civicplus.com/DocumentCenter/View/3180
2. Submit soil borings to determine saturated soils/groundwater elevation for the
proposed stormwater basin. If adequate separation from the saturated soils can be
achieved (3' from bottom of proposed basin),an infiltration basin may work on the
site,which would take up less area on the property.
6. Fence
City of
Elk ........... Request for Action
River
To Item Number
Parks and Recreation Commission 5.1
Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by
Action Items August 9,2017 Chris Leeseberg,Senior Planner
Item Description Reviewed by
Park Dedication for Final Plat for Trace Heights Steve Benoit,Recreation Manager
Second Addition (Regenscheid Homes/Robert Reviewed by
Stuttgen)
Action Requested
Recommend,by motion,park dedication for the plat of Trace Heights Second Addition be paid for 18
dwelling units at the rate applicable when the subdivision is released for recording,with the following
condition:
1. The applicant shall install a 10'wide bituminous trail,centered in a 20'trial easement,as shown in
the exhibit titled"Recommended Trails".
The 2017 rate for low density residential is $1,425.93 per dwelling unit.
Background/Discussion
Case Number P 17-14
The subject property is generally east of Auburn Street,south of the 205th Avenue,west of Vance Street,
and north of the 201"Avenue alignment. The property is zoned R1-a with minimum lot sizes of 2 '/z
acres. The proposed plat meets the dimensional requirements required by ordinance.
The applicant will be subdividing the 53.77 acre property into 18 parcels for 18 new homes. There will be
one Outlot used for stormwater collection. The proposed plat will have two streets that will eventually
continue into the parcel to the northeast of the subject site.
Parks and Recreation Master Plan
The Neighborhood Parks Service Area text in Chapter 5 of the master plan states, recreation facilities should
be developed when 300 or more households within cluster developments or on lots less than 2 acres are located within 1.5
miles of the park. The subject property does not meet this requirement. Therefore, staff recommends the
Parks and Recreation Commission recommend Park Dedication be in the form of cash.
Trail Connectivity,as indicated in the master plan,indicates "Other Future Trails" are desired along
County Road 33 (205th Avenue).
Priority Conceptual Connections, as indicated in the master plan, shows a conceptual connection through
the subject property. Now that the property is being developed, this is the time the city can further
analyze this desired connection. Initiative 3 Strengthen Trail Connections (p. 55) recommends creating a
connected trail network by creating a north/south spine east of Highway 169 from Main Street to 221'.
1 / sEIEI II
NATURE
These connections could be completed or supplement through the linking of the natural greenway
system. The Priority Conceptual Connection is shown as a north/south connection running through
Sedge Meadow Park(directly adjacent to the subject parcel),connecting into the trials in Highlands Park
East, through Royal Valley Park,and finally connecting into County Road 13 and ending at Main Street.
To accomplish creating another portion of this desired overall connection,staff recommends the Parks
and Recreation Commission recommend the applicant install a 10'wide bituminous trail,centered in a
20' trial easement,as shown in the exhibit titled "Recommended Trails". The ordinance states park
dedication credit shall not be granted for the construction of recreational facilities unless specifically
approved by the city council. It has not been the practice of the city council to give park dedication
credit for the installation of trails.
Financial Impact
None
Attachments
• Location Map
• Preliminary Plat
• Fig 5-6 Trail Connectivity
• Fig 5-6 Trail Connectivity (partial)
• Recommended Trails
•
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Hies\P\P 17-14 Trace I Icights 2nd Addition\3-Parks and Recreation\5.1 sr Trace
1 leights Second Addition Park Dedication.docx
. s 01 r I J I tY�?4 I t 'J-114:1306`75.1.14,3-405
�.
76 114,7
-
002 „
I .r, µ, r 75-1t
-a
„... �
75412-022t
C
0„ 12 75-122..1201 75.508-0110 ,' % '234207 75412,4210
508-021 C
7 0$4011M' 70.612 0
r -ate
75.612-0244
, 1 1, , 7540041 •4+ 15
r 12-0250
_ k
1 4 .122-,11011 ' i. .,, .6,' `'75 123-2206 t,c v:_,,60
. iir. ° 1 "'�` 2 4270
ill t .;, .°'13- �C
{ t .", ti: 76�f2-0280
y7 x
9 �7
JJ
r
lip ti .t ■' 1
' �Z ` ' 7 '
' lw., " : ' . 1,
IX1 �,rte+
V
75.506
a
75.600-0310 .8 ++E 1 Sao
r °. °` „ - 4° 75d100385 c 75-510-0405 i ; ' ,r ° 75-510 0305
w J
754104Y3 B6 75-f►10-041p 5.,
75-4b7-026
st.., _
Jason Regenscheid
,1.-...,Sk°
E
Plat Case No: P 17- 14 River
TRACE HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION
0. — ,~,D.'�KTLS. I a�H.°v." w,,e nom~..
LEGEND VICINITY MAP I ;: ■I n
• ....,,w,cd,.ocMw,w„m, _Denote.D,e->..,e,r (,.te) ------ v v.,v L, I 2552w c I�
o - .,S/0 leM 92x,1 Inch, es �T r n.. M0° 1 N re e ° -�
wwe.R
„= r—. -n , �. rem a
.wwe
Demote),M, „anew,.S� ,—. °.� m, w,0.
Denotes E..;gT.
r4 '
-Denotes r n 90. -. Denotes Storm Fence,..nb .. =„ %
i Denotes L,W -Denotes aoM Sunoce ( • 0.1 «, m /
wD Denotes Electric 9o. -Dena Corn..,.Surface �, 3 ..
pq a
a Telephone.Ma� O mr..a. w o
!,4;�i n _,« ..A 92.92, 3 210°..,2 ro.k �
m
_:0106
�": Denotes Wn,ow.,no,...delineated 0. M n9n' B tm a ii % I gb; C]
i D.,,o,6,sow 9w«w o.m^wx .. .E,,,«o m.c,o,sw,lo.. . rw
--- 'C'mvci„mn. 6.92.1 2i*.w x Ww 2. :m ..,o % ��
ine 2 re Conine x0.6 J L x.s J L46_-°_— ii o f
unew0.oww oecn c D. E H, a _ a N .MD A Denotes L c..R- -Dmo,r E.Mw.,O Fx*N.. W a STREET C "< ¢'>de 4 e
u.Met of TRADE HraTS .,s6 p p'1 r \ o x/10.2 a : 0192 C
EV" 6
- $ 4 :.. :-0.o .. .� V. ��¢= S
w
a
0.2 "
1 i� I 1 6 xl.Nm.»A
=1.46.0 en.e e e e e
rz x
i ....J L 0 4 t); OUTWT A ?
F1 I 42,2-...-•-n1:::::::‘— +lm / �«A ' eEe>. t(9.. wLOA> /
C]
z
_
II
t
p ppFp '�1 E x�D� ii
,s is I R C E m u ,�M .. ` -w°0;A -� - 1�T- ^\� ,BT nel..w m„4 ,..'I/ 06x'6//,� /�^�° \/< g U
r
,e 00.x0.. n r : _ :me,6o0 n c 7 \ LV
�s rc,'�s- os pg( s .we. 1- l •-.`A--6. ��"' jlm- / :ee
n �
dil 11 1 rT r ( , T ., � A e=, w ear r-,e\ . 1 \r.W 0 i� - 1 e-..,, /i`AYd / 1 / / t .as c')
I-f I-� .b.o.< x1 e0o a e 'i L-- 2°- i/ /
li �t 1 1 I oat - / ,
i f l t � •.15 31 .•• r I v e .wo m'r°n a 5a �I - 2 3092 r J i:1,4-11.'/ 4 � C '..
: - — — — ______L__ — — — — — — STREET — — —« — /�- F•e? I I ]
a a a a ,, 3jy
:w 'D>I 1. 020. 1r--- °' F329.8 �r ,926---- '- / '•gg a
�F'c:.'Sf L In �,. �" m.,, Es.,,.c, I e ,o I X ` \‘, e/�/ .e I J
A !
f. t ., E
£'.,+ .tee' 6 x,00aw 0.A �,. ,� ... --„lr-��x+sa6o.a. �'° .... -
T ..... t n a 2 x,°...00 o0. MIle-n NI. .1.2 q/1 =,00.926.40. / �� (1 1 I I=,o0. - -'''' . J I'.[II k, .�.,,;� -� =1m,.D..4A e 1 e + 5 T(1 Ham., ..e � �v '�/ �'
a a
e^ n
sY,s,T w,w.tw.A v.o.,.HS �.. Q, W I , I I s LA J
a
I ti«' I r L,
amen
,
� LCOt > e .,.e tram.” en,r - L r T�
ttte �-' w,o,
2m. !..I..,�w,a e.."tr,evtle
' B9R8
.w M �n r r -) i : C / c. ��) Soo-0.60w /m'oc oc l%,w a``ry'y^�) w.r n T 3" S .,�'REE, •..::
3
U E orvxn: J _
Iv I
IMAM•RA,W rear yam mms,°�-�wre owx1.. EmM oew / J r, U U I I v■ 7: /,';' • PROPOSED
3e•E
• 'Po¢1'� �'o I SITE DATA / n om / 'r'� 3o/ e \ ; •Y, Irv.DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
I TrOnrr•4pM14ar?ABM /? EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS:
TOTAL STE AREA 453.61 AC. soma/ 1927!-ms-0220 ( (Not To Bode)
••^•m^. TOTAL ROW AREA 16.83 AG 0}?I �', /.d/ 5-.-11'*-
TOTAL OUTLOT AREA 21.90 AC. / ^J
TOTAL LOT AREA *4.52A AC. J
fd`m': b,.e w,w..w w.4..,«w,w,,,ea, SMALLEST LOr ,O9,9oo SF. BENCHMARK I I
w,n ,s,,,,,,,,.
LARGEST LOT 2116,320 sF. t_ w ewe m a,�a.0e, -T r.-s _
0w.nw w.w,wt',Ter.'"o^.
w,..,,°.'..:.,e'..w, mo>=>a.. AVERAGE LOT xuo.,a,s.E. SETBACK DATA _, 1 I J L_
x...M www,..uw.-„i»zmw. .._. v,•�,w»0..o TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS 19 20.„IMOm x.920 r,m v. `TTY --J----
.ew.aw.e.,0.,r trice tree.z.."7:.....:4'7:7.1,i..000..e ww,aw 5NIX£RANI?LOTS IS SIDE((GARAGE)--- —20 FT EH.nvn-venom MAw m) z OUTLOT
a..,w. mn "pP'6 w.,w, - GROSS DENSITY :0.33 LOTS/AC. SIDE'HOUSE) --_--20 FT. anww,vaw..,,.t nmss•a°"° e.av s r..,n.Mm. oesleHV.M.wi In..
NET DENSITY 30.36 LOW... REAR SETBACK -_OR JO FT. O.,ry.r,.4rzrlvA,u m) let inw..l.�e do°.,.H.'xo nrm
EJOSiWG SWING R10 MAXIMUM HEIGHT 3 FLOORS OR 40 T. (SCALE in FEET) ,hn ea
Cartscin nw�.NK,,.wn woof,.co^ ^'»'b" ^ 'mss '^"m o •^ ^^,,e• REGENSCHEID CUSTOM HOMES PRELIMINARY PLAT a w.w,we..w. TRACE HEIGHTS i ND ADDITION
..��ew c�.c r�nw,�`nQ0 0-b5 H •�o "b' °`�,«.o�^v 6'0"^01..: QL%� 0^,E. „La1' 14000 Sunfish Lake Blvd. & O
ell
"^ 04._y'nam1,nmwx•.•° i"+ Ramsey,MN 55303 Elk River,Minnesota EXISTING CONOITIONB 9
Figure 5.6 Trail Connectivity
1 Work troth Znnmel main Shot bwna S
]. t,o.to develop had connertlon to Develop oneRlon
I IJ Princeton [o Gil l Scout Camp
It. i. 407) t .
I
i RICE LAKE �h�
1 �s RID rk:,. .. -.. I
1 \
1, ARA
Link nail,tohelghborhoods - - --
--- .......... BURR
OAK I S PARK 1 l b
r"- i '
1 future:Po.t-tinnin ‘
# �
--/ a• 0 • I
I J ' 1
qv —may 1
1
F �\ Y bad.too,<164 / 1
�,� 1 I I 1
1
I
1 1 e
J �Jf•; PlomotebYood-nd Trmis L • .4 S• '� N' ,.:
Pr ornot nil destination in : r K I■
-- Metro 912] � � � t
�Y
•
11„'.til. 1
' 1 { t al Hx RFIERK i 1 • I•14-44 miirAczpv
# x3 RO i.� .< i L I
t ARK HA S '.l++� Q + _
• 1 I
/ � N-�' RAs Y+ 1
._.r �,} �, .K PARK ..
flRfE1J_P ACEo { "t - BARRINCTON 1, 4t.' ` T•
R IRA\K !, „9. Kc /_ .._ f+ t IN s 1.,' _
1 OA• PSON N !_�
i � ATHIi* ■FLEX 1 '1•'"'..
tr.'. wa. 0 fl ,;9- I. I P
'.._\ p1 FR RK r .0 j I
S Eslttin`4
MT■ I t�t ty �I ;11,, on ro`. s K ••KIERIEII LAKE`.■1 I t•r�tray, _ KS I i =3 7ElD5 B1kK 1
...ser •_�. _ I 4 .�
• T I
u..16..m Intl E - '`*... s M I
TRAIL CONNECTIONS a...:
EXISTING GREAT NORTHERNTRAIL t 1
I
PRIORITY CONCEPTUAL CONNECTIONS
POTENTIALGREEMNAYS Ci., \ 11
CONCEPTUAL GREENWAYS , 1
■
41”.POTENTIAL RIVERTRAIL \\\
CONCEPTUAL FUTURE RIVER TRAIL t'
IN PARKS AND CONSERVATION AREAS
UNDEVELOPED PARK C
s
PUBLIC/PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 1 11111 ,,'
URBAN SERVICE AREA `�
AddrivGtfio tt uRN•4
011. OTHER EXI STING TRAILS the apportanityat z
"'v OTHER FUTURE TRAILS
i SCHOOLS
II EXISTING GRADE SEP.CROSSING
J PROPOSED GRADE SEP.CROSSING
PROPOSED BIKE/PED CROSSING 1
Anokt'Iianney
i onnectlari
N
A 0 0.5 1
Miles
... (H........*.....a....•..i..i...♦..♦.......0....t....*.............i...s.......a.....•...........•.•.....................••
Chapter 5: How We Get There 56
ig RID
o Figure 5.6 Trail Connectivity (Partial)
*<, _ .
, 'It it l'"'1, /
1, 1 11 TRAIL CONNECTIONS 1 I
Future: Post-mining PRIORITY CONCEPTUAL CONNECTIONS
, " - 110 1 j
1 \ e *"."..• OTHER FUTliRE TRAILS 1 / !
41 i
4 ,
1 , I;,' 4" , ' ' 8 a s / !
rir 6 ir________________;!il 1".°4'''.:.„ i
l'''464‘‘'' .--c I
LL,