4.4. SR 09-20-1999
rei ---'\)
( );
~li<
ITEM #4.4.
MEMORANDUM
River
TO:
FROM:
Mayor and City Council
Scott Harlicker, Senior Planner~
September 20, 1999
DATE:
SUBJECT: Northstar Corridor Update
At the September 2, 1999 meeting of the Northstar Corridor Development
Authority the Authority discussed capital funding, extending the Corridor to
include Morrision County, station locations, roadway alternatives and public
survey results.
.
The Executive Committee recommended the counties or regional railroad
authorities contribute 10% of the capital costs up to a maximum of $18,000,000.
Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority will issue bonds with a term of 30
years to cover the Authority's share of the capital costs. The contribution of each
county will be based on population. The contribution may be reduced by a
contribution of funds or property. Enhancements, such as station upgrades, will
not act to reduce the contribution. Sherburne County, and the cities located
within Sherburne County, will have to decide how much the County will be
responsible for and how much each city will be responsible for.
The Authority will be amending the Joint Powers Agreement to reflect changing
responsibilities of the Authority and the inclusion of Morrision County as a
member. The City Council, sometime this fall, will be asked to adopt the
amended joint powers agreement.
The Authority approved the station locations as recommended by the Technical
Advisory Committee. The 171st Street location was approved for Elk River. The
approved sites, and in the case of Anoka two possible sites, will be incorporated
into the environmental impact statement. Also approved were roadway
alternatives. In Elk River improvements include frontage roads, access
management and improving Highway 169/10 from Ramsey to the Highway 101
interchange.
Also included are the results of a public opinion survey completed by Shadwick
Research International.
.
13065 Orono Parkway · P.O. Box 490 · Elk River, MN 55330. TDD & Phone: (612) 441-7420 . Fax: (612) 441-7425
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
Thursday, September 2,1999
4:30 p.m.
Sherburne County Government Center
Elk River, MN
'i" \%~~
..~<o ~ ·
1.
Minutes of August 5, 1999 Meeting**
Action Requested
Approval
2.
Executive Committee Report
a. Capital Funding Recommendation*
b. Lindquist & Vennum: Legal Services*
c. Proposed Amendments to NCDA
Joint Powers Agreement*
Information
Approval
Approval and
Recommendation to Members
3.
Selection of Station Locations*
Approval
4.
MIS: Final Revised TH 10/TH 47
Roadway Alternatives*
Approval
5.
Public Involvement and Information Program
a. Survey Results*
b. Proposed Work Plan
Discussion
6.
Connection with Hiawatha LRT Corridor
Information
7.
Northstar Corridor Financial Plan
Information
8.
BNSF Negotiations
Update
9. Other
*Attached
Next Meeting: October 7, 1999
.
.
.
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
NORTHST AR CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Re2Ular Meeting Minutes
AU2Ust 5. 1999
The Northstar Corridor Development Authority met on August 5, 1999, at 4:30 p.m. at
the Sherburne County Government Center, Elk River, Minnesota.
The following members. alternates and citizens were present:
Robert Kirchner, Yvonne Chaillet, Stephanie Eiler, Mark Stenglein, Ken Stevens, Tim
Yantos, Betsy Wergin, Mary Richardson, Dave Saunders, Ken Paulson, Gary Erickson,
JTom Cruikshank(Tom Gamec,Duane Grandy, Art Daniel, Duane Cekalla, Carl Yilek,
/Gerald Goebel,"Paul Goeyner, Jim Dickinson, Terry Nagorski, John Norgren, Gary
Hammer, tJerry Donlin, tewis Stark, Paul McCarron, Patrick Cairns, April Manlapaz,
Rick Nau, Dave Showalter, Joy Scherber, Jean Keely, Scott Harlicker, Kathy
DeSpiegelaere, Jim Barton,"8tephanie Klinzing, Robert Kermes, Janice Rettman.
1. Chairperson Wergin called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m.
A motion was made by Mark Stenglein, seconded by Lewis Stark, and carried
unanimously to approve the agenda of August 5, 1999, as presented, and approve
the meeting minutes of July 1, 1999, as presented.
2. Executive Committee Report:
a. A motion was made by Duane Grandy, seconded by John Norgren, and carried
unanimously to approve an amendment to the Agreement with Richardson,
Richter & Associates, increasing the contract amount for 1999 by $75,000.
b. Mary Richardson reported on the negotiations with MnlDOT over the
Memorandum of Understanding between MnlDOT and the NCDA, which
have just commenced.
3.
Dave Showalter, BRW, presented a summary of the recommended station sites.
Thirteen stations were recommended for further consideration and analysis. Prior
to today's meeting, comments were received from the Project Management Team
and the Technical Advisory Committee. Additional comments were received
from the Scoping meetings held on July 27,28, and 29, 1999. The Station Area
Planning Team met earlier with representatives from cities along the corridor to .
obtain their feedback.
The NCDA will continue its review of the proposed sites and provide comments
to Mr. Showalter or Ken Stevens before meeting again on September 2, 1999.
4. Stephanie Eiler reported on the EIS Scoping meetings. Approximately 80 people
(excluding staff) attended the meetings held on July 27, 28, and 29, 1999 in St.
Cloud, Elk River, and Fridley respectively. The EIS Scoping comment period
ends on August 20, 1999. A Scoping Summary Report will then be prepared
documenting comments received and describing the process.
Resolutions of Support or other comments on the alternatives being considered
can be sent to the NCDA.
5. Rail~Volution '99, Building Livable Communities with Transit, will be held in
Dallas, Texas on September 25-28, 1999. For information, call Tim Yantos or
Mary Richardson.
6. The next meeting ofthe Northstar Corridor Development Authority is scheduled
for Thursday, September 2, 1999, at 4:30 p.m. at the Sherburne County
Government Center.
7.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:45 p.m.
.
Date
Betsy Wergin Chairperson
.
2
. 1:fNORTHSTAR
· CORRIDOR
.
3)
4)
Agenda Item #2a
MEMORANDUM
August 27, 1999
To:
NCDA
From:
Executive Committee
Subject:
Capital Funding Recommendation
At its meeting on August 19, the Executive Committee discussed the attached
information regarding the capital funding of the Northstar Corridor. The
recommendation of the Committee was as follows:
1)
The county or regional railroad authority members of the NCDA should
contribute 10% of the capital costs of the Northstar Corridor up to a
maximum of $18,000,000.
The obligation of each county or regional railroad authority should be
consistent with the allocation of contributions to the administrative budget
of the NCDA, determined by population within 5 miles of either side of the
rail corridor and bounded by the Mississippi River.
It was recommended that ACRRA issue bonds in the amount of
$18,000,000 with a term of 30 years.
The total amount of the bonds, and the share of the county or regional
railroad authority, may be reduced by a contribution of funds or property.
Enhancements to the system will not act to reduce the total amount (e.g.,
upgrades to a station requested by a city or town).
The obligation to issue bonds and contribute funds is contingent on the
receipt of state and federal funding for the remaining 90%.
2)
5)
Note that each county or regional railroad authority has been requested to
consider a resolution expressing its intent to contribute to the financing of the
Northstar Corridor. The ACRRA adopted its resolution (attached) at its meeting
of August 24.
Action Requested: Information.
.
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
2100 3rd Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2265 (612) 323-5700 Fax: (612) 323-5682
REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY
ANOKA COUNTY. MINNESOTA
DATE: August 24.1999 RESOLUTION #99-4
.
OFFERED BY Commissioner: Paul McCarron
RESOLUTION NO. 99-4
ANOKA COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY
RESOLUTION INTENT TO ISSUE BONDS TO FINANCE LOCAL
SHARE OF COMMUTER RAIL PROJECT SUBJECT TO CERTAIN
CONDITIONS SET FORTH HEREIN.
WHEREAS, the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority (the "Authority") is a regional railroad
authority organized and existing as a political subdivision and local government unit pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 398A.03; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has entered into a Joint Powers Agreement with various other
counties, county regional railroad authorities, cities and towns for the purpose of addressing
transportation needs along the Northstar Corridor, and such joint powers entity is known as the
Northstar Corridor Development Authority; and
WHEREAS, the Northstar Corridor Development Authority has determined to undertake a
project consisting of the development of commuter rail along the Northstar Corridor; and
WHEREAS, the Northstar Corridor Development Authority will apply for federal and state
funding of the project, and certain of its members will contribute an amount equal to 10% of the total
project cost, not to exceed $18 million, as a local (non-state) share; and
.
WHEREAS, the Authority is authorized to issue bonds for the purpose of financing the
acquisition, development, construction and equipment of railroads and railroad facilities including but
not limited to terminal buildings, roadways, crossings, bridges, causeways, tunnels, equipment and
rolling stock;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE
ANOKA COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY:
1. The Authority hereby expresses its intent to issue bonds for the purpose of financing
the local (non-state) share of the cost of developing the commuter rail component of the Northstar
Corridor, such bonds to be issued In an amount equal to 10% of the total project cost, not to exceed
$18 million.
2. The bonds are intended to be payable from proceeds of taxes levied by the Authority,
and from contribution agreements to be entered into with other participating counties and rail
authorities, pursuant to which contribution agreements such other counties and rail authorities will be
responsible for payment of at least 35% of debt service on the bonds. The share of the debt service
to be contributed by this Authority is up to 65%.
3. The bonds shall bear a term to maturity of 30 years.
4. The respective share of local (non-state) costs of the participating counties and rail
authorities, including the Authority, shall be reduced by the value of any funds or property contributed
by such county or rail authority, or any city located within its jurisdiction, in which case the maximum
principal amount of the bond, and such county or rail authority's respective share of debt service shall
be reduced accordingly. Enhancements to the system requested by a local government unit shall be
financed by the local government unit and shall not reduce the county or rail authority's respective
share of debt service.
.
5. The issuance of the bonds by the Authority Is subject to the availability of state and
federal funding for the remaining 90% of project costs, and to receipt of contribution agreements from
the other participating counties and rail authorities In an aggregate amount sufficient to pay 35% of
debt service on the bonds.
Resolution #99-4
Page 2
STATE OF MINNESOTA) m t!2
COUNTY OF ANOKA ) SS
I, Tim Yantos, Deputy County DISTRICT #1 -BERG X
Administrator, Anoka County, MInnesota, hereby
certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of
the resolution of the Regional Railroad Authority of DISTRICT #2 -LANG X
said County with the original record thereof on file In
the Administration Office, Anoka County, Minnesota,
as stated in the minutes of the proceedIngs of said DISTRICT #3-LANGFELD X
Authority at a meetIng duly held on August 24,
1999, and that the same Is a true and correct copy
of said original record and of the whole thereof, and DISTRICT #4 - KORDIAK X
that said resolution was duly passed by said
Authority at said meeting.
Witness my hand and seal this 24th day DISTRICT #5 -MCCAULEY X
OfAugust1999.-". ~
~'1 DISTRICT #6 . MCCARRON X
\ TIM YANTOS DISTRICT #7 - ERHART X
DEPUTY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
.
.
.
.
.
.
Northstar Corridor Capital Funding
Key Dates
1)
Local Funding:
A. Request: Fall 1999
B. Commitment - 1999 (Joint Powers Agreement)
C. Funds Available - Bonds sold 2001
Note: Property Tax levy 2000, payable 2001.
2)
State Funding:
A. Request - Fall 1999
B. Commitment - 2000 Legislative Session (authorize bonds for
Biennium 7/2000 - 6/2002)
C. Funds Available - Bonds sold in 2001
3) Federal Funding:
A. Request - Summer 2000
Note: Data due to FTA for 3J Report (recommendation for funding).
3J Report published in February 2001 , with recommendation for
fiscal year 2002 funding.
B. Commitment - Fall 2001 (Full Funding Grant Agreement)
C. Funds Available - After October 1,2001
Note: T21 ends 2003
Assumptions:
1) Construction: three construction se"asons needed according to BNSF
2) Operations: Commence - end of 2003
3) State and local commitment of funding necessary before federal,
commitment will be made.
en
c:
--
'"C
c:
::J
LL
-
as
...
--
c.
as
o
-
o
'"C
--
-
-
o
o
...
-
as
...
tn
.c:
...
-
o
z
c
0
--
...
U (],)
:J C,,)
:... c: (],) (],)
... ....
UJ (],) :J (],)
c E c: C-
O E .... E
c:
0 0 0 0
U U U
.-..
rft (],) -
0 .c ~
an .... ctS 0
"'-" c: 0
- (],) ctS (\J
CO E > -
.. .... <( (],)
en ....
CD (],) E en .c
"C :J "'C 0
CD C" E ....
c: C,,)
LL (],) 0 :J 0
a: u u.. -
.-.. (],)
rft .c
0 .... ctS
~ c:
"'-" (],) ctS
CD E >
.... <(
... en ;t::
CO (],) E en
... :J E "'C
en C" c:
(],) 0 :J
a: U u..
...
.-.. (],)
~
0 .c
0 .... ctS
,.... c:
......... (],) ctS
- E >
cu - <(
en ;t::
0 (],) E en
0 :J E "'C
..J C" c:
(],) 0 :J
a: U u..
en 0 .... N ~
en 0 0 0 0
en 0 0 0 0
.... N N N N
.
.
.
.
0 .. 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
c:i 0 0 c:i
0 cO
en N CO
.... ....
"
.,...
0
0
N
0 0 0 0
0 0 N 0
0 It) 0 It)
~ M c:i ,...:
.... ....
0 0
"0 0
CD 0
CD N
Z
CD
::::J
C
CD
>
CD 0 0 0 0
~ 0 0 0 0
0 ~ N "
- u) c:i ,...:
"0 0 ....
CD "-
.- as
as-
E'O Q)
;-0 Q)
Q)
0(7) .,...
W(7)
"- (7)
0 ,...
"0 -
"i:
"-
0
(.) 0 0 8 CD
It) 0 It)
"- C') 0 .... ~
as c:i d c:i c:i
-
0
s::.
1::
0 CO
Z Q)
Q)
.,...
...J
<(
I-
0
I-
-
ca
... CD
CD ca
"C - (J
ca
CD - 0
LL en ..J
.
.
,
U)
-
C
CD
E
CD
>
o
...
c.
E
,-
E
CD
-
U)
>-
U)
-
'(i
...
...
CD
-
::s
E
E
o
(J
-
o
'#.
o
.,...
...
r ,{ti-#AI.;};
. *NORTHSTAR
CORRIDOR
Memorandum
August 24, 1999
To:
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
From:
Executive Committee
Subject:
Selection of Lindquist & Vennum to Provide Legal Services on Land Use
and Environmental Issues
.
In response to a request from staff for a statement of qualifications, Lindquist &
Vennum submitted a letter outlining the firm's experience in real estate, environmental,
and land use law. The firm's Environmental, Land Use and Energy Group has been in
practice since the early 1980's. Group members have experience in all aspects of
environmental and land use law including ordinance and legislative drafting, permit
processing and negotiation, environmental review issues and litigation.
With the accelerated planning and development schedule for the Northstar Corridor,
including the selection of station sites and the impending environmental assessment of
these sites, it seems appropriate for the NCDA to develop land use tools which could be
used by member cities, towns and counties to protect the Corridor and potential station
locations from premature or conflicting development initiatives.
The Executive Committee has reviewed Lindquist & Vennum's qualifications and
proposed services and recommends that the NCDA hire the firm to perform those tasks
necessary to insure the protection of the Corridor, particularly the land around the station
sites. Tasks include a) preparing an inventory and description of alternative protective
devices and official controls, b) examining and preparing a discussion of statutory
authority for the enactment of various devices and controls, c) developing model official
controls, and d) developing a description of the enactment process and a model
resolution(s). Lindquist & Vennum has agreed to perform these services for a not to
exceed cost of $10,000.
Action Requested: That the NCDA approve the selection of Lindquist & Vennum and
authorize the Chair to execute an agreement for professional services for performance
of land use and environmental services, as described above, for an amount not to
exceed $10,000. The term of this agreement would be from September 2, 1999 to
February 29, 2000.
.
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
2100 3rd Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2265 (612) 323-5700 Fax: (612) 323-5682
LINDQUIST &VENNUM P.LLP.
444c.-e-
a.qd)
BY PliIA.IlIIfGllTA .'111
T~l5t-3t"'3lIll
FAll:. "'t-m-am
4ZIIIIQII c:.n.r
eo liau1Ic l!lIImt Sl8f
~1INUIIf"~
TUI'I1IIIC 113-nWZ, 1
~ 8120371-.1217
All.-
4:Fdb
Dick Nowlin
('-51)]1~1l_
August 3, 1999
Ms. Mary Richardson
Executive Vice President
Richardson &. Rjchtet
413 Wacouta Street
200 Gilbert Building
St. Paul, MN 55101
Rc: Land Use and Environmental Services: Northstar Corridor Development Authority
Dear Ms. Richardson:
.
Thanks very much for requesting II. statement of our qualifications for providing land use
and environmental services to the Narthstar Corridor Joint Venture. Thili letter i5 written to
describe Lindquist" Vennum's background in these areas, discuss initia11and use work which
could be performed and potential conuact arrangements should the Authority desire our services.
Lindquist &. Vennum is a 30 year old firm with its principal office in Minneapolis and
smaller offices in St Paul and Denver. We have approximately 130 attorneys with practice
concentrations in business, health care, agricultural. truSt! and estates, rW estate and
environmental, land use and energy law. Lindquist &. Vennum attorneys work for cities. counties.
towns. joint powers entities, corporations and other private individuals and organizations.
Lindquist & Vennum has had a land use and environmental practice group since the early
1980's. nus Environmental, Land Use and Energy (BLUE) Group's practice is described in the
unclosed brochure. Group members have wide ranging experience in all aspects of environmental
and land use law including ordinance and legislative drafting. permit processing and negotiation,
environmental review issues and litigation. 1 also enclose a copy of my resume and those DfTom
Fabel, Kevin Johnson, Mike Freeman., Jeft'McNaught and Dave Moener to provide more
infonnation about our backsround in these areas.
.
If Lindquist "Vennum were hired to assist NCDA in the development of land U88 controls
and the resolution of environmental-legal issues, 1 would sarve as the project manager and would be
assisted by other members oftha ELlIE sroup. I have worked in the environmental and land use
areas continuously for Dver 25 years. While at the Metropolitan Council, I helped develop and
advance the municipal authority to impose moratoriums in anticipation of planning and major land
use changes. I also participated in the drafting of environmental overlay ordinances and provided
considerable asslstance to local governmental units in the development and enactment of
LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.LfI.
Ms. Mary Richardson
August 3. 1999
Page 2
.
comprehensive plans and land use ordinances. I also helped draft the environmental review rules
after the enactment of the Environmental Policy Act in 1979 and have participated in the
amendment of the rules as they hAve changed over the years. My work in dratting environmental
and land use ordinances. regulations and statutes hIlS been continuing with the most recent acti,,;ties
involving urban reserve planning/protection legislation for the Metropolitan Council (1998) and
feedlot statutory and regulatOry initiatives for the Minnesota Pork Producers (1998 to present).
Considerable experience has also been gained as a member, slnce 1996. of the Sl Paul PlanninS
Commission and its Zoning Committee.
Based on our preliminary discussion and the accelerated planning and development
schedule for the Northstar Corridor, it appears appropriate for the NCDA to develop land use tools
which could be used by member oities, towns and counties to protect the Corridor and potential
station loeations uom premature/conflicting development initiatives. Minnesota's county and
municipal planning acts. in general. provide authority for the development and enactment of such
official controls. Because of the timing constraints, background assistance would likely be very
helpful; coordination/compatibility with the environmental review process is also critical
If these services are desired, it would be our recommendation to perfonn the following tasks .
subject to the direction, control and modification by the Authority's representatives:
· Prepare an inventory and description of alternative protective devices/official
controls.
. Examine and prepare a discussion of statutory authority for the enactment of the
vGrious devices/official controls and any potential legal constraints, limitations or
problems ro implementation.
· Develop, with involvement of the advisory committee. model official controls
(likely a moratorium and a transit overlay zoning district).
· Develop enuctment process descriptions and model resolution(s).
· Presentation regarding land use control implementation documents.
These efforts could be accomplished in a very short time with the availability of and
documents from other parts of the country and Barb Dacy's work for the City of Fridley. The eJIort
needs to be closely coordinated with and reviewed by city. town and county planners and attorneys
repn:::sentins jurisdictions within the Corridor.
.
LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.I..L.P.
.
Ms. Mary Riclwdson
August 3, 1999
Page 3
IfSlllected. Lindquist" Vennum would perfonn this work on the basis of tho time devoted
and our established discounted billing rates for public sector entities. In general, s~ior attorneys
such lIS myself and Tom Fabel, are billed at a rate of 5200 per hour. associate attOrneys including
Kevin Johnson and Jeff McNaught are billed at a raw of$150 per hour and begiMins attorneys are
billed ala rate of$120 per hour with legal assistants billed at S100 per hour and below. The
Authority would be blUed for our services in the month following their performance. Our
statements would provade a description of the services performed. the attorneys involved and their
applicable billing rates. Payment would be expected within 30 days following your receipt of these
statements.
We would also agree to perfonn the referenced services for a not to exceed cost 0(S10,000.
If the time based cost for our services is less than this amount. out total billing would be based
exclusively on the time devoted. In the event that our time into the 5ystem exceeded 510,000. the
Authority would not be charged any excess amount. In addition to the time charged for our services
NCDA would also be charged for costs and expenses incurred in the provision of these sClVices
including those for communication, transportation. and copying.
. The Board of Professional Responsibility for Lawyers recommends that acknowledgments
be obtained to avoid misunderstandings with regard to legal fees and engagemena. Accordingly, I
enclose a copy of this letter and request that it be executed and returned if the Authority desires to
engage us as an acknowledgment of the seNtee arrangements set forth above.
Thanks very much for requesting this proposal. If yo 11 have any questions with regard to our
qualifications or the proposed arrangement set forth in this letter. please caU.
Very truly yours.
LINDQUIST &. VENNUM P.L.L.P.
Oick Nowlin
DNnng
Enclosures
oc: Tim Yantos, Deputy County Administrator
.
Agenda Item #2c
MEMORANDUM
August 27, 1999
To:
NCDA
From:
Executive Committee
Subject:
Amendment No.1 to the Joint Powers Agreement Establishing the
NCDA
.
At its meeting on August 19, the Executive Committee discussed revisions to the
joint powers agreement establishing the NCDA. The original agreement was
drafted to give the NCDA the authority to examine the feasibility and
environmental impacts of commuter rail and other transportation improvements.
In order for the NCDA to move the project into the next phases of development
through construction, it will be necessary to amend the Joint Powers Agreement.
The attached amendment would revise the Agreement by:
1) expanding the purpose of the Joint Powers Agreement;
2) clarifying the duties and powers of the NCDA to enter into the Memorandum
of Understanding or Agreement with Mn/DOT;
3) establishing a new Capital Budget Committee. The Committee will consist of
the members that contribute a portion of the local (non-state) share of capital
costs (the counties and regional railroad authorities) and will be charged with
reviewing decisions relating to capital costs and capital budgets; and
4) clarifying that it is not the intent of the members of the NCDA that the
Authority operate or finance the operations of commuter rail.
In order for the Amendment to become effective, it must be approved by each of
the 29 members (city, town, county, regional railroad authority or transit agency).
If the Amendment is not acceptable, the member has the option to withdraw from
the NCDA by submitting a certified copy of a resolution indicating its intent to
withdraw (Joint Powers Agreement Article VIII, Section 1).
.
Action Requested: That the NCDA approve Amendment #1 of the Joint
Powers Agreement establishing the Northstar Corridor
Development Authority and recommend approval by
each of its members.
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
2100 3'd Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2265 (612) 323-5700 Fax: (612) 323-5682
.
0)
0)
...........
~>.
Nc
...........0
OO~
O~
Q.
.
3
r-I.~
:J:t::~
0::::
1-"-
LLG:
<(
0:::
o
.
AMENDMENT NO.1
TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
ESTABLISHING THE
NORTHSTAR CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
THIS AMENDMENT NO.1 is made by and between the undersigned
Counties, Regional Railroad Authorities, Cities, and Townships, all being
governmental units of the State of Minnesota, (hereinafter the "Members")
pursuant to Minn. Stat. 99471.59 and 398A.04, subd. 9, and shall be effective upon
execution by each of the Members.
WHEREAS, the Members have entered into a joint powers agreement effective
(hereinafter the "Agreement") for the purpose of establishing the
Northstar Corridor Development Authority (hereinafter the "Authority") to analyze the
feasibility and environmental impacts of integrated transportation improvements along
the Highway 10 corridor; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has determined that commuter rail in the Northstar
Corridor is technically feasible; and
WHEREAS, in 1999, the Minnesota Legislature authorized the Minnesota
Department of Transportation to develop, construct, and operate commuter rail in
Minnesota and to delegate its authority to joint powers boards established for this
purpose; and
WHEREAS, the Members desire to amend the Agreement to authorize the
Authority develop and construct commuter rail and associated improvements in or
related to the Northstar Corridor and to enter into all agreements necessary or desirable
to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement as set forth below.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and benefits that
each Member shall derive herefrom, and other good and valuable consideration, receipt
of which is hereby acknowledged, the Members agree to amend the Agreement as
follows:
1.
Article I of the Agreement is amended by adding a new paragraph following the
existing language that reads as follows:
Additionally, the purpose of the parties is work together to meet the future
transportation needs of the Northstar Corridor with the following four
goals:
(1 )
(2)
(3)
Improve mobility and safety;
Minimize adverse environmental impacts and foster positive
environmental effects;
Encourage transportation-supportive land use and
development patterns; and
1
Q)
Q)
...........
~>.
Nc
...........0
OO~
O~
0..
I~
r-I.~
:t:t:~
0::::
~lo..
LL~
<(
0:::
o
(4) Provide a cost-effective and efficient transportation system.
In the furtherance of this purpose, the parties authorize the Authority to
accept the delegation from the State of the responsibility and authority to .
develop commuter rail in the Northstar Corridor, including but not limited
to preparing an advanced corridor plan, financial and operating plans,
negotiating with the railroads, preliminary engineering, final design, and
construction.
2. Article IV of the Agreement is amended by adding new paragraphs G. and H. as
follows:
G. The Authority shall seek, receive, and manage federal, state, and
local funding, in conjunction with Mn/DOT and the Metropolitan
Council.
H. The Authority shall perform the responsibilities delegated by the
Commissioner of Transportation for development and construction
of commuter rail, pursuant to an agreement with the State of
Minnesota and subject to the condition that sufficient funds are
received.
3.
Article V, Section 2, Paragraphs B, F, and G of the Agreement are amended to
read as follows:
B. The Authority may enter into any contract necessary or proper for
the exercise of its powers or the fulfillment of its duties, including
agreements entered into pursuant to Minn. Stat. ~~ 471.59,398.04,
subd. 9, and 174.82, and enforce such contracts to the extent
available in equity or at law. The Authority may approve any
contract relating to this Agreement up to the amount approved in
the annual budget, and may authorize the Chair of the Authority to
execute those contracts. No payment on any invoice for services
performed by a consultant or any other person or organization
providing services in connection with this Agreement shall be
authorized unless approved by the Executive Committee.
.
F. The Authority may apply for and accept gifts, grants or loans of
money, other property or assistance from the United States
Government, the State of Minnesota, local government units, or
any person, association or agency for any of its purposes; enter
into any agreement in connection therewith; and hold, use and
dispose of such money, other property to the parties and
assistance in accordance with the terms of this gift, grant or loan
relating thereto.
.
2
.
Q')
Q')
...........
~>,
Nc
...........0
CO~
O~
ti
,..--I . ~
::tt~
n::
1-'-
LL~
<(
0:::
o
.
G.
The Authority may acquire, hold, and dispose of such real and
personal property as may be required to accomplish the purposes
of this Agreement and upon termination of this Agreement, make
distribution of such property as is provided for in this Agreement,
agreements relating to the financing of the Northstar Corridor, or
agreements with the State of Minnesota.
4. Article V, Section 2, of the Agreement is amended by adding new paragraph I. as
follows:
I. The Authority may sue and be sued in its own name.
5.
Article VI, Section 3, of the Agreement is replaced by the following:
Section 3: Committees.
A. Executive Committee. The Authority shall establish an Executive
Committee of the Authority consisting of five members and
alternates, including one representative from a city, a town, a
county and a regional railroad authority, as well as the Chair of the
Authority. In establishing the Executive Committee, the Authority
shall consider geographic balance in the representation on the
Committee. The Executive Committee shall be responsible for
approving invoices within approved contract amounts, addressing
personnel issues, fulfilling the day-to-day management
responsibilities of the Corridor Coordinating Committee described
in Minn. Stat. 9 174.86, subd. 5, and performing such other duties
as set forth in the Authority's bylaws.
B. Capital Budget Committee. The Authority shall establish a Capital
Budget Committee of the Authority consisting of one member and
alternate from each of the following: the Anoka County Regional
Railroad Authority, the Hennepin County Regional Railroad
Authority, Sherburne County Regional Railroad Authority, and
Benton County. The Authority may add one or more additional
members to the Capital Budget Committee if that member has
made a significant contribution to the capital funding of the
Northstar Corridor. The Capital Budget Committee shall be
responsible for making recommendations to the Authority
concerning any decision regarding the capital costs or capital
budget for the Northstar Corridor and performing such other duties
as set forth in the Authority's bylaws. Any decision that would
increase the capital contribution of any member must be approved
by a unanimous decision of the Capital Budget Committee and
must be approved by the member's board of commissioners or
council.
3
(j)
Q')
..........
~>.
Nc
..........0
OO~
O:g
Q.
I~
~
,....-t.~
+t:~
0:::
1->-
lL.~
<(
0:::
o
6.
Article VII of the Agreement shall be amended by adding a new Section 5 as
follows:
Section 5: Capital Financing. It is understood by the parties that the
capital costs of the Northstar Corridor project are to be funded primarily by
grant monies from the United States Government, the State of Minnesota
or any other association or agency. In addition, it is contemplated that
certain member counties and regional railroad authorities will contribute
funding for capital costs pursuant to agreements independent of this
Agreement.
.
7. Article VII of the Agreement shall be amended by adding a new Section 6 as
follows:
Section 6: Operations and Operations Financing. Nothing in this
Agreement shall create an obligation or authorize the Authority to operate
or finance the operations of commuter rail in the Northstar Corridor.
8. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the
same instrument.
9. The terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement shall continue in full force
and effect, except as modified herein, and shall apply to this Amendment No. 1
as if fully set forth herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Amendment No.1 to the Joint
Powers Agreement Establishing the Northstar Corridor Development Authority have
hereunto set their hands on the date written below:
.
.
4
.
.
.
4/9/97
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
ESTABLISHING THE
NORTHSTAR CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
THIS AGREEMENT, is entered into by and between the undersigned
Counties, Regional Railroad Authorities, Cities, and Townships, all be~,l)g .
governmental units of the State of Minnesota, pursuant to the authority contained
in the Minn. Statutes ~ ~4 71.59 and 398A.04, subd. 9.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Trunk Highway 10 (TH 10) from Minneapolis to St. Cloud is a
transportation corridor in the fastest growing area in the State of Minnesota and
such growth has created significant transportation, safety and land use issues; and
WHEREAS, there are opportunities for a variety of multi-modal transportation
improvements in the TH 10 corridor, including highway improvements, commuter
and freight rail, multi use paths and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS); and
WHEREAS, TH 10 serves as a primary link between the Twin Cites
metropolitan area arid,the communities in the corridor from Minneapolis, north
along T~4 7 no~th to TH10 northwest to St. Cloud; and
WHEREAS, such communities wish to collaboratively pl,an for multi-modal
transportation improvements to the corridor and for the related land use ar'ld
development impacts.
.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and benefits that
each party shall derive herefrom, the parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE I. PURPOSE
The purpose of the parties in entering into this Agreement is to analyze the
feasibility and environmental impacts of integrated transportation improvements
along the Highway 10 corridor, including highway improvements, commuter and
freight rail, recreational trails, ITS, safety and related land use issues. The method
of accomplishing the purpose of this Agreement is the establishment of a joint
powers board to provide a mechanism whereby the parties can jointly address the
need for enhanced transportation along the corridor, congestion relief, decreased
traveling time, and systematic land use and development planning.
.
ARTICLE II. JOINT POWERS BOARD MEMBERS AND TERM
The government units that are eligible to participate in this joint powers
agreement include:
Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority
Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority
St. Cloud/Stearns County Regional Railroad Authority
Sherburne Cou~ty. Regjonal Railroad Authority
County of Anoka County of Hennepin
County of Sherburne County of Benton
City of Elk River County of Stearns
City of Big Lake City of Anoka
City of Clear Lake City of Coon Rapids
City of St. Cloud City of Blaine
.
2
.
City of Becker City of Sartell
City of Fridley City of Sauk Rapids
City of Spring Lake Park City of Ramsey
City of Columbia Heights Becker Township
City of Minneapolis Clear Lake Township
City of Rice Haven Township
Sauk Rapids Township Watab Township
Langola Township Big Lake Township
.
Additional governmental units may be eligible to participate if approved by
the Authority. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be effective as to
an eligible participant when the Agreement has been executed by the duly
authorized representatives of that party. This Agreement shall commence when it
has been duly executed by Anoka County and Sherburne County or their respective
railroad authorities and shall continue until terminated as provided herein.
ARTICLE III. JOINT POWERS BOARD
.
Section 1: Establishment and Composition.
The parties hereby establish a joint powers board to be known as the
Northstar Corridor Development Authority ("Authority") to jointly exercise such
powers and authorities as are necessary to achieve its purposes and fulfill its duties
as provided for in Article IV, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
The Authority shall consist of one elected official each from the member
governmental units. Each member shall be entitled to one vote. In the absence of
the appointed elected official at the meeting, the alternate appointed pursuant to'
Article VI, Section 1 may exercise the voting rights of the member. This
Agreement defines and establishes the structure and procedures of the Authority,
3
F.
the responsibilities and powers of ttie Authority, and the relationship between the
Authority and the member governmental units.
ARTICLE IV. DUTIES OF THE AUTHORITY
The duties of the Authority shall include the following:
A.
The Authority shall receive and manage ISTEA grant funding in accordance
with all applicable rules, regulations and other requirements by the Federal
Transit Administration.
The Authority shall assess the need for and analyze the feasibility of multi-
modal transportation improvements in the Corridor, including highway
improvements, commuter and freight rail, recreational trails, ITS, safety and
related land use issues.
The Authority shall establish such advisory committees and task forces as
needed for the purpose of receiving public input and shall identify appropriate
interested parties, and develop guidelines for public partiqipation.
The Authority shall conduct environmental evaluations, as required by law.
The Authority shall coordinate its activities as necessary with Burlington
Northern Railroad, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, affected
airports, the Metropolitan Council, the St. Cloud Planning Organization, and
other necessary entities.
The Authority shall prepare reports addressing implementation issues,
including but not limited to ownership, operation, construction, start-up and
f!nancing.. . The ~uthority s~all also prepare a report addressing the on-going
implementation responsibilities of the Authority, if any, and shall make
recommendations regarding the composition, powers and duties of the
Authority for implementation.
B.
C.
D.
E.
4
.
.
.
.
.
.
ARTICLE V. POWERS OF THE AUTHOR"ITY
Section 1: General Powers.
The Authority is hereby authorized to exercise such powers as are necessary
and proper to fulfill its purpose and perform its duties. Such powers shall include
those specific powers enumerated in Section 2 of this Article. The Authority may
refer decisions for approval by the governing bodies of its member governmental
units. The Authority shall not have the power to levy property taxes nor the power
to issue bonds.
Section 2: Specific Powers.
A. The Authority shall adopt an annual budget, together with a statement of the
sources of funding and an estimate of the proportion of such amounts
required of each governmental unit, in accordance with the provisions set
forth in Article VII.
B. The Authority may enter into any contract necessary or proper for the
exercise of its powers or the fulfillment of its duties and enforce such
contracts to the extent available in equity or at law. The Authority may
approve any contract relating to this Agreement up to the amount approved
in the annual budget, and may authorize the Chair of the Authority to
execute those contracts. No payment on any invoice for services performed
by a consultant or any other person or organization providing services in
connection with this Agreement shall be authorized unless approved by the
Executive Committee.
C. . The Authority f'!1ay pr.oVide for the employment, discipline or discharge of
personnel required to accomplish the purpose of the Agreement.
D. The Authority may disburse funds in a manner which is consistent with the
method provided by law for the disbursement of funds by counties, as well
as any federal or State requirements.
5
.
E.
The Authority shall have the power to adopt such by-laws that it may deem
necessary or desirable for the conduct of this business of the Authority.
Such by-laws shall be consistent with this Agreement and any applicable
laws or regulations and shall address the requirements for a quorum of the
Authority .
The Authority may apply for and accept gifts, grants or loans of money,
other property or assistance from the United States Government, the State
of Minnesota, or any person, association or agency for any of its purposes; .
enter into any agreement in connection therewith; and hold, use and dispose
of such money, other property and assistance in accordance with the terms
of this gift, grant or loan relating thereto.
The Authority may hold such property as may be required to accomplish the
purposes of this Agreement and upon termination of this Agreement, make
distribution of such property to the parties as is provided for in this
Agreement.
The Authority may purchase insurance as is deemed advisable and may take
action to enforce its rights in equity or in law.
.
F.
G.
H.
Section 3: Exercise of Powers.
All powers granted herein shall be/exercised by the Authority in accordance
with the legal requirements applicable to counties. In accordance with Minn. Stat.
S 471.59, subd. 3, the purchasing and contracting requirements of the county
selected pursu~nt to Article VII, Section 4 shall apply to the Authority.
ARTICLE VI. STRUCTURE AND PROCEDU~ES
Section 1: Terms.
A. Each member governmental unit shall appoint a representative and alternate,
by resolution, to serve on the Authority for the period commencing with the
.
6
.
.
.
B.
execution of the Agreement until January 15, 1998. The representative
must be an elected official of the governmental unit. The alternate may be
an elected official or a staff person.
Each representative and alternate shall be appointed for two year terms,
beginning January 15, by resolution of the appointing governing body. In the
event that any representative or alternate shall not have been appointed by
January 1 5 in any year, the incumbent representative shall serve until a
successor has been appointed. Removal of any representative or alternate
during the term for which the representative has been appointed may be
done at any time but shall be done only by resolution of the appointing
governing body. Resolutions of any governing body under this section shall
be filed at the Office of Administration, Anoka County Courthouse, Anoka,
Minnesota.
Section 2: Chair and Vice Chair.
The Authority shall elect a Chair and Vice Chair from its membership at its
first regular meeting. The Chair and Vice Chair shall be elected by the Authority
from its membership for a two year term. The Chair shall preside at all meetings of
the Authority, may establish such subcommittees as may be needed from time to
time and shall perform other duties and functions as may be determined by the
Authority. The Vice Chair shall preside over and act for the Authority during the
absence of the Chair. The Vice Chair shall also perform the duties and functions of
the Treasurer as provided for. in the by-laws. If both the Chair and Vice Chair are
absent, the Authority may elect a temporary chair to conduct its business, provided
a quorum is present.
Section 3: Executive Committee.
The Authority shall establish an Executive Committee of the Authority
consisting of five members and alternates, including one representative from a city,
7
a town, a county and a regional railroad authority, as well as the Chair of the
Authority. In establishing the Executive Committee, the Authority shall consider
geographic balance in the representation on the Committee. The Executive
Committee shall be responsible for approving invoices within approved contract
amounts, addressing personnel issues and performing such other duties as set forth
in the Authority's bylaws.
.
Section 4: Staff.
Each member governmental unit may provide staff support to the Authority,
subject to the approval of the member governmental unit.
Section 5: Vacancies.
If an appointment of any representative or alternate is vacated before the end
of the term, the vacancy shall be filled by appointment by the appropriate
appointing governing body. Vacancies shall be filled within thirty (30) days of their
occurrence. A vacancy shall be deemed to have occurred when any of the
conditions specified in Minn. Stat. 9 351.02 exist, or if a representative fails to
qualify or act as an elected official.
.
Section 6: Meetings.
An initial organizational meeting of the Authority shall be held at the
Sherburne County Courthouse, on May 1, .1997, at 4:30 p.m. Thereafter, the
Authority shall meet at regular meetings at such times and places as the ~uthority
shall establish in its bylaws. Special meetings may be held on reasonable notice by
the Chair or any two representatives upon terms and conditions .as'the Authority
may determine.
.
8
.
.
.
ARTICLE VII". FUNDING
Section 1: Initial Funding.
It is understood by the parties that the activities and duties of the Authority
are to be funded primarily by grant monies from the United States Government, the
State of Minnesota or any other association or agency. Nevertheless, the member
counties and regional railroad authorities agree to contribute funding, if necessary,
for the start-up administrative expenses of the Board (to the extent not covered by
grant funds).
The member counties and regional railroad authorities will establish an initial
budget and agree to the allocation of any necessary initial contributions.
Each member county and regional railroad authority shall pay its appropriate
initial contribution to the county acting as fiscal agent of the Authority within 30
days of execution of this Agreement.
Section 2: On-Going Administrative Expenses.
A. By July 1 of each year, the Authority shall adopt an annual administrative
budget for the following calendar year, and shall determine the amount of
contribution, if any, by each member. The budget and the resulting assessments
shall be approved by a two-thirds majority of the Authority. Any excess funds in
the administrative budget remaining at the end of the fiscal year shall be carried
forward in such manner as to reduc,e proportionately each member's contribution
for the following fiscal year.
B.
If the Authority incurs any expenses as a result of a claim for damages, thl7
expenses and any damages paid shall be assessed against each member in
the same proportion as the assessments described in paragraph A above, as
applicable.
9
Section 3: Time of Payment.
Except for the initial contribution, all assessments made under the provisions
of this Article shall be paid by each member by January 1 of each year unless the
member has withdrawn pursuant to Article VIII.
.
Section 4: Budgeting and Accounting Services.
The Authority may contract with one of its member counties to provide any
and all budgeting and accounting services necessary or convenient for the
Authority. Such services shall includE~, but not be limited to: management of all
funds, including county contributions and grant monies; payment for contracted
services; and relevant bookkeeping and recordkeeping. The contracting and
purchasing requirements of the County so selected shall apply to transactions of
the Authority. Such County shall ide:ntify the staff person to work as liaison with
the Authority.
.
Section 5: Accountabilitv for Funds.
All funds shall be accounted for according to generally accep<table accounting
principles. A report on all receipts and disbursements shall be forwarded to the
Authority on an annual basis. The mE~mbers have the authority to request reports
pertaining to any and all budgeting and accounting services. All interest earned
from established Authority funds shall be credited back to that same fund.
ARTICLE VIII. WITHDRAWAL AND TERMINATION
Section 1: Withdrawal.
Any party may withdraw from this Agreement upon the following conditions:
a) giving 90 days written notice to the Authority, and b) showing that all amounts
due and owing pursuant to Article VII, Section 1 and 2, have been paid. Notice
.
10
.
.
.
shall be a certified copy of a resolution of its governing body indicating its intent to
withdraw from this Agreement. Upon receipt of the resolution, the Chair of the
Authority shall forward a copy of the resolution to each of the members. In the
event of withdrawal by any member body, this Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect as to all remaining member bodies.
Section 2: Effect of Withdrawal.
Withdrawal by any member shall not terminate this Agreement except as
provided in Section 3, herein. Withdrawal shall not act to discharge any liability
incurred or chargeable to any member before the effective date of withdrawal.
Such liability shall continue until appropriately discharged by law or agreement. No
member shall be entitled to a refund of assessments paid, or forgiveness of such
assessments owed, to the Authority.
Section 3: Termination.
This Agreement shall terminate upon the occurrence of anyone of the
following events:
A.
When members withdraw pursuant to Section 1 so that, in the judgment of
the Authority, it becomes impractical or uneconomical to continue.
When necessitated by operation of law or as a result of a decision by a court
of competent jurisdiction.
When a majority of the parties agree, by resolution adopted by the respective
governing ~odies, to terminate this Agreement.
When a majority of the Authority agree to terminate this Agreement because:
1) no grant funds from outside sources were received or 2) all duties or
activities of the Authority pursuant to this Agreement and any grant
agreements have been completed.
B.
C.
0:
11
Section 4: Effect of Termination.
Termination shall not discharge any liability incurred by the Authority or by
the members during the term of this Agreement. The Authority shall continue to
operate after the date of termination only for the purpose of winding up its business
and for aiding in the prosecution and defense of claims. Property or surplus money
acquired by the Authority shall be distributed to the members in proportion to
contributions of the members. The Authority shall approve a final report of its
activities and affairs and, on the expiration of thirty (30) days therefrom, shall
cease to exist.
ARTICLE IX. MISCELLANEOUS
Section 1: Amendments.
This Agreement may be amended by agreement of a majority of the parties
as evidenced by resolutions adopted by the respective governing bodies. Article
VII, Se,ction 2 and Article VIII, Sections 1 and 2 may be amended only by
unanimous agreement of the parties.
Section 2: Records. Accounts and Reports.
The Authority shall establish and maintain such funds and accounts as may
be required by good accounting practices. The books and records of the Authority
shall be subject to the provisions of Minn. Stat. Chapter 13, the Minnesota
Government Data Practices Act, and Minn. Stat. ~ 168.04. The Authority, within
one hundred and twenty (120) days after the close of each fiscal year, which shall
b~ January 1 to December 31, shall give a complete written report of all financial
activities for such fiscal year to the parties.
Section 3: Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of
12
.
.
.
.
.
.
which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and. the
same instrument.
Section 4: Severability.
The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any paragraph, section,
subdivision, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held to
be contrary to law, or contrary to any rule or regulation having the force and effect
of law, such decision shall not affect the remaining portions of this Agreement.
Section 5: Alternative Dispute Resolution.
In the event of a dispute arising under this Agreement, the parties and the
Authority agree to attempt to resolve their dispute by following the process
described below:
A. A party shall provide written notice to the Authority describing perceived
conflict, positions and underlying reasons.
B. The Authority or member shall provide written response to notice with 7
days of receipt of notice.
C. The parties shall meet within 14 days of receipt of response with a neutral
facilitator. The neutral facilitator will be a representative from the Minnesota
Office of Dispute Resolution.
D. At the first meeting, the neutral facilitator will assist the parties in identifying
the appropriate parties and participants in the dispute resolution process,
their concerns, .a meeting agenda and design for any subsequent meetings.
The parties shall agree on a process for resolving the problem that would,
involve additional negotiations, mediation or arbitration. . .
E. In developing the process, the parties will be guided by the following
principles:
1) The parties will attempt in good faith to reach a negotiated settlement.
2) The parties agree that there must be fair representation of the parties
13
directly involved in the dispute.
3} The parties will use legal proceedings as a last resort.
4) In the event the parties are unable to resolve the dispute, each party
retains all rights, remedies or defenses it had prior to entering the
process.
F. The parties will report to the Authority within 60 days of their first meeting
on the resolution of the dispute or a recommendation to commence legal
proceedings.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have hereunto set
their hands on the date written below:
14
.
.
.
.~ *NORTHSTAR
CORRIDOR
Agenda Item #3
MEMORANDUM
August 27, 1999
To:
NCDA
From:
Staff
Subject:
Selection of Station Locations
The attached Recommended Station Site Summary is submitted to your
consideration for approval of the recommended station sites for further analysis
in the Environmental Impact Statement and for system and site development.
.
Fourteen station sites are included in the recommendation. Two station locations
are unresolved and require further analysis:
. The northerly terminus includes stations at both Rice and Downtown St.
Cloud. Both sites are recommended to proceed to further analysis pending a
decision on the terminus of the Northstar Corridor.
. The Anoka 4th Avenue and Anoka-Coon Rapids Riverdale sites present very
good station opportunities and are supported by their respective communities.
Both sites are recommended to proceed to further analysis in order to
develop additional information. It is expected that such elements as site
configuration and layout, traffic and other community impacts, potential
ridership, cost, and other factors may lead to a more clearly defined
alternative that best services the Northstar Corridor.
Action Requested: Approval.
.
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
2100 3'd Avenue. Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2265 (612) 323-5700 Fax: (612) 323-5682
,c
cc~...
L
*1I01lJJlSTJUI
CORRIDOR
Mileage Shown is Approximate
Alternate Station Site Evaluation - Anoka @ 4th Avenue
Station Spacing
~NOIToscale
1l?8W_m.
,,~.. M(X)ftE GROUP c:ow>ANV
August 19, 1999
,
= ~ rJ1 rJ1 .ii'
'Sil ~ O:l ~ - r'" r'"
. ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
r;;' ~ '"l - -
'" '0 :;- '"l t"' = =
~ = =
!" ~ Q. Q. _:1
~
~ t"1'j ~
~ =
[I.l ~
~ Iii
=
~
=
~
=
l' U n n I:~
_. 0 -. 0 II
0" .....
(1) ~ '< :::
:::.. ::l n :::..
'-< ..... ::c
0 (1)
l' ~ g 0
Pol ""1 :::
::l e:.. (Zl
(1) (1)
r:n
(1)
~
_.
('l
(1)
(Zl
.
.
"'ll
~
'"
....
.
>-~. >-
0.. (JQ ('l
"'-0. ::l ('l
Pol Pol (1)
('l -(Zl
(1) -'(Zl
g ~ <
..... 0.. Pi'
o _.
(1) g 3
3 (1).E.
(1) ;;l 0
""1 (1) ""1
(JQ ('l ""1
S' C.o
(JQ 0 Pol
(1) ? ~
3 Pol
"0 '-<
- (Zl
o
'<
3
(1)
::l
.....
Pol
::l
0..
""1
(1)
(Zl
0.:
(1)
::l
.....
eI
0..
(1)
<
(1)
0-
"0
3
(1)
::l
;+
.
::c
cTQ'
::r'
~
~
0..0
(1)"0
<"0
~o
.9 :::..
'-.j :::
3 8.
(1) .....
g (0'
. (Zl
.....
o
"0
""1
o
3
o
.....
(1)
""1
(1)
[
(1)
0..
0..
o
~
.....
o
~
(1)
('l
o
::l
o
3
_.
('l
......
o
~
0..
l'
;;
(1)
:::..
'-<
l'
~
(1)
a
. . .
.
. .
. . . . . . . .
~ u ::c -3' n ~ ~ Q >- U
..... _. -. 0 (1) Pol 0 < _.
(1) @~"g E.. ~:::.: 0 (1) @
ti). g. ~ 0 0.. ~ 0 0.. S g.
<Pol Pol < 0" Pol "0 Pol (1) Pol
Pol ('l'< (1)3 (1) a~ g;,-,('l
('l ('l...... ('l Pol (1) ('l
~ ~ 0 9 0 a c. ~ ~
..... (Zl . ..... 3 :::t @:::.: (Zl
;:: < (Zl 0" Pol (Zl~. <
::l Pi' Pol -, 0.. ........:=: Pi'
0.. ::l ::l (1) :;;:" ,':t
(1)::C 0..(1) ~~"" 3
~ cTQ' ~ ~ '-<5 ;; S .E.
-'::r' ('l _. :::.: r:n 0
:::-: ~ ('D f""+ ~. ~ ~
(1)o..N ~ ~.; '< S' 8
('l 0 I..... Pol
...... 0..... ('l n 0..
o ::l (1) Pol _ ~
Pol (Zl::l ::l 0 Pol
::l 0 c. ::: '<
0.. :=: Pol (1) 0.. (Zl
0..- ~r:n
n o~' 3: "0.....
o Z ~ a
S ~u 0..(1)
~ ~. 0 ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~~.
o e:..n 3(1)
~ N' 0 ;;l
::: ::l-'
0\ a::l 0.....
o' ~ :::.. ':<
::l ""1 ::r'
"0 0 ~
-Pol Pol
~ 0.. a
[J) 0
~ ""1
""1
::c
cTQ'
::r'
~
~
......
~o
......
VI
:;.
~
0..
l'
S'
('l
o
S
"'Cl'
::: 0
O"('l
~a
('l _.
~@
o 0
~ ::l
~ 3
0.. .E.
o
""1
""1
o
Pol
0..
~
Pol
'-<
>-r:nr:nl'tIi
('l(1)::r'o~
('l ~ e; ('l ti)'
(1) (1) (1) a c.
~ (Zl 0.. -. ::l
Pol 0.. "0 @ (JQ
::l 0 Pol .....
o..~*@~
-'::l _. ('l
::l ..... ::l to ~
(t ~ (JQ Z [J)
""1 <: ~ r:n 0.:
w::l _. "Tj _.
?tl ~ s:- "0 Jg
>::t')o..n""1>::t')
Q n::::;:-8 Q
>::t') 0 '-< (1) (1)
(1) ::: "0 :::.. ::l
8.. g e; ':< 0..
(1) '-< ~ 0
""1 Q ~
g- 0 S'
~[J) (1i (1)
~ 2 g
0.. S _,
(1) (1) 0
~ g ::l
""1
Pi' ('l -8
5l 3 ~
~'E.. a
::l (1) o'
0.. ?< ::l
0" [J)
_.
('l
'<
('l
c:r
[J)
~
~
n
o
~
~
~
:z
~
~
~
rJ1
'""3
>
'""3
i-oI
o
:z
rJ1
i-oI
'""3
~
rJ1
~
~
~
>
~
~
>
~
<
~
~
~
00.
~
~
~
00.
Z
o
~
~
<
~
00.
~
~
~
z
~
~
~
o
u
~
~
I.
II
.1
III
{iQ
en
....
l::
0)
8
0)
;>
o
I-<
0..
.5
OJ)
d
:.g
~
0..
'"c:l
0)
>.. 8
~ ~
'"c:l I-<
ro OJ)
o 0
I-< I-<
'"c:l 0..
d 0
ro 0
.... II")
l:: en
0) 0)
.... 8 1a
~ 0.. "'d
ta ..s 0
o ~ S
- 0) S
en '"c:l 0
>.. 0) U
ro en -ci U
~ ;:j l:: ro
..d'"c:lcdl::
OJ) l:: -8 .9
.- ro ....
::c:- ro
~ I-<
ro 8 ;:j
'S: <-+=< '"c:l OJ)
en en 0) t+::
en l:: g. l::
O)ro_O
U - 0) U
U 0.. ;> '"c:l
ro >.. 0) l::
I-< '':::"2 ro
,.;su;:jO)
;:j '- N en
.~ O.~'Uj 0)
~t::EEg
>~Ci3Ci3 ~
..d
"5
o
r:/)
,e..
U :...
~
;>
~
~
~
o S~
o -15
8 ~.g
I ~ 'Uj
o ~ ..dO)
o ~ OJ) I-<
II") ~ ::E'"c:l
d.1:J l::
0) r:/) 0 ro
0) .... -
~ ro _ ro
.... S M'U
O);:j I-<
~ ~ ro ~ S
~ 1a e r:/) S
'"c:l .S ro 8 8
o oJ 15 >.. OJ)
8 '';:: 0) ro d
S OJ)s~:.o
8 .S g. ~ ~
U en - 0 .....
]roen~~I-<~
ro dO)l-< 0) I-< 0)
-8 0 g U '"c:l .~ "'d
..;:: 0.. I-< 0) ro l::
~~en~I-<Sro
~ ;:j OJ)'C ] ro OJ)
'"c:l OJ) d t;::;.""....'- d
0) t+::'- ~ ~ ;> ..;::
o..""~O)~enen
o (3 ro d ~ en .~
V U 0.. "a "'d 8 0)
;> '"c:l '"c:l .- .:::: ~ 12
0)l::0)....~"..~
'"c:l ro S ~ .'::: I-< >..
3 ~ 8 '0 U -3 .;
.~ .- ro 0.. '0 U ~
0) ~ bb ~ t:: :E .~ en
.'::: .'::: 2 zO) ro 0) 2 ~
r:/)r:/) 0.. ~>~;:j
.. ....
'"c:l
I-<
ro
;>
0)
"3
o
co
>..
0)
en
S
ro
~
0)
;:j
l::
0)
;>
<(
"'1"
>..
~
'"
8
~
c:::
~
~
Q
=
<
'"c:l
l::
ro
en >..
0) 0) en~
U - d
ro 0 0
~ l:.I.. '.g
OJ) '"c:l I-<
l:: ~ 0)
:.g 0 g.
I-<
ro - 0)
rJio.. \0 '"c:l
en ~ "'d ~ 'C "E
ti I j i ~
OJ) '"c:l OJ) 15 '-' en 0..
d 0 0) en ;:j S
..;:: ~ ~ S >.. ..0 0)
.~ ~ g .9" ~ .5 ]
~~_~ro ti S
't:: 0) I 0) 0 .~ rJi ''''
.~ 8 g '"c:l ~ 0) 8 0..
S II") "E.g, 0 ro '"c:l
E 0 en''''' ro .... 0.. d
._ U 0) 0 d 0.. en ro
en OJ).... . -, ~ :E OJ) OJ)
'"c:ldroO)ro enl::....
0) .- '"c:l 1a'- l::'-""
o..~ o'"c:l;> o~.~
o 0 S 0 ~ .- ro .-
vbbSSO) 1a0..><:
"- 0 U ~..... 0)
jouS ~ .l::a'o
'" .... U 0 '''' --- . - ....
d >..ro U ::"g"ati >..
;:j .'::: 0) g ..:.:: ro l::. ~ .':::
.... d N ;:j;> 0 "' d
l:: .a .- "'d U 0) ..... ""' ~
ro ~ r./'J ~ 0""" ~ t) 0 'x
uoO);:j.J:::;:jl::Oo
rol-<.':::OO)O;:j
>~r:/)u>col:.I..8d::
. . . . .
.
0)
-
ro
"0
I-<
0)
;>
;:2
0)
"0
;:2
r$d
~
I-<
ro
~
"0
I-<
ro
;>
0)
"3
o
co
>..
0)
"0
l:.I..
'"
~
...
Q.
~
~
=
Q
Q
U
'"
~
...
Q.
~
~
=
Q
Q
U
.
d
ti ~
>..a'5.8
~"€~
.- 0 0
~ZQ
'" '"
.- .-
- -
Q Q
Q.Q.
>.. ~ ~
~ ~ ~
- = =
~ = =
~~~
,
"l
"
~
Q.,
.
.
<.i
~O\ l' .
~-~ .~
~~g
.
.
.
QII1'IIBTIUI
DRRIBDR
BRW
A ~ & MOORE GROUP COMPANY
MEMORANDUM
BRW
Thresher Square
700 Third Street South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Phone: (612) 370-0700
Fax: (612) 370-1378
To: NCDA
From: BRW, Inc.
Date: August 25, 1999
Subject: TH lOrrH 47 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
Major Investment Study
RECOMMENDED HIGHWAY ALTERNATIVE ELEMENTS
The following recommended improvements to TH 10/TH 47 have been reviewed by the
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) on August 19, 1999. Their comments are included herein.
The recommended highway alternative elements presented in Table 1 will be evaluated in detail
in the Major Investment Study using various criteria, such as cost and benefits and
environmental impacts. They are shown in bold italic text in Table 1 and have been selected
from the Universe of Alternatives using the following:
Comments Received on Universe of Alternatives
· Mn/DOT Interregional Corridor Study - This ongoing study prioritizes each interregional
corridor and aims to establish performance measures for each corridor based on speed.
Currently, TH 10 is considered a high priority corridor east ofTH 169/TH 101 and west of
the TH 24 river crossing in Clear Lake. The segment between TH 24 and TH 169 is of
medium priority. The target speeds set for each priority is being reviewed and alternatives
that aim to meet these measures (such as construction of-interchange and addition of through
lanes) have been added to the Northstar Corridor MIS' Universe of Alternatives for
consistency with MnlDOT's Interregional Corridor Study.
Phase II Northstar Corridor Major Investment Study
TH lO/TH 47 Improvement Alternatives
August 25, 1999
. Mn/DOT District 3 River Crossing Study - The recommended roadway improvement
elements includes one of the recommended four river crossing alternatives in Sherburne
County and the St. Cloud area, as studied by Mn/DOT District 3 in 1997. Per Mn/DOT
District 3's direction, Alternatives A (St. Cloud Area) and D (Becker) are currently
considered for evaluation. Alternatives B and C are not included because of their proximity
to the existing TH 24 bridge and are therefore considered as having similar impacts as the
existing TH 24 bridge.
.
. Potential Dayton-Ramsey River Crossing - The recommended roadway improvement
elements includes the potential Dayton-Ramsey River crossing.
Principles
1. PRESERVEIIMPROVE MOBILITY ON TH 10 THROUGH:
Access Management
. Eliminate low-volume access points.
. Consolidate access points with frontage roads.
. Limit new access points.
. No new additional traffic signals.
Capacitv Improvements
. Add through lanes.
. Replace signals with interchanges.
.
2. MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND COMMUNITY DISRUPTION.
Alternatives with potential significant impacts (e.g. freeway section in Elk River) are not
recommended.
3. PROVIDE ADEQUATE CAPACITY TO ACCOMMODATE FORECAST TRAFFIC VOLUMES.
Alternatives that provide adequate capacity for 2015 or 2020 forecast volumes are
recommended.
4. PROVIDE LOGICAL TRANSITION AREAS BETWEEN DIFFERENT FACILITY TYPES
For example, a logical transition from a six-lane freeway to a six-lane expressway is a four-
lane freeway. See attached Figure 7 for estimated daily ~apacities of various facility types
applicable to the TH lO/TH 47 corridor.
.
Phase II Northstar Corridor Major Investment Study
TH lO/TH 47 Improvement Alternatives
2
August 25. 1999
.
.
.
TABLE 1
TH lO/TH 47 UNIVERSE OF ALTERNATIVES
Northstar Corridor Major Investment Study
August 19, 1999
TH 10/ TH 47 SEGMENT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT(S)
TH 47 between Hennepin Ave bridge No Improvement
and 37th Ave
TH 47 between 37th Ave and 1-694 Aft 1 No Improvement
Alt2 Expand existing 4-lane expressway to 6-lane expressway
Alt3 Expand existing 4-lane 'expressway to 4-lane freeway
TH 47 between 1-694 and TH610 Aft 1 No Improvement
AIt2 Expand existing 4-lane expressway to 6-lane expressway
TH 10 between TH 610 and Egret Blvd No Improvement
TH 10 between Egret Blvd and TH 169/ Alt1 Expand existing 4-lane freeway to 6-lane freeway
TH 101 in Elk River between Egret Blvd and Thurston Ave
Alt1a Expand existing 4-lane expressway to 6-lane expressway from
Thurston Ave to TH 169fTH 101 in Elk River with access
management and signal coordination
Alt1b Expand existing 4-lane expressway to 4-lane freeway
from Thurston Ave to TH 169fTH 101 in Elk River
Alt 1c Expand existing 4-lane freeway to 6-lane freeway
between Egret Blvd and Round Lake Blvd
Maintain existing 4-lane freeway from Round Lake Blvd
to Thurston Ave
Expand existing 4-lane expressway to 6-lane expressway
from Thurston Ave to TH 169nH 101 in Elk River with
access management and signal coordination
Alt 1d Expand existing 4-lane freeway to 6-lane freeway
between Egret Blvd and Round lake Blvd
Maintain existing 4-lane freeway from Round lake Blvd
to Seventh Ave
Expand existing 4-lane expressway to 4-lane freeway
from Seventh Ave to TH 169fTH 101 in Elk River
Alt2 Expand existing 4-lane freeway to 6-lane freeway between
Egret Blvd, And Round lake Blvd,
No improvements from Round lake Blvd. to Fairoak Ave.
Expand existing 4-lane freeway to 6-lane expressway
between Fairoak Ave. and potential river crossing to Dayton
Alt3 Expand 4-lane freeway to 6-lane freway from Egret Blvd to
Dayton-Ramsey river crossing
Alt 3a Potential Interchange at Dayton-Ramsey river crossing
Alt4 Consolidate access and coordinate signals west of Seventh
Ave
Aft 5a Construct south frontage road between 173rd Ave and
Jarvis St
Alt 5b Construct north frontage road between 173rd Ave and
Jarvis St
BRW Inc,
Page 1 of3
TABLE 1
TH lO/TH 47 UNIVERSE OF ALTERNATIVES
Northstar Corridor Major Investment Study
August 19, 1999
.
TH 10/ TH 47 SEGMENT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT(S)
TH 10 between TH 169/TH 10 1 in Elk River AIt1a Consolidate access
and CSAH 14/15 AIt 1 b Coordinate signals at Joplin and Upland
AIt 1c Construct south frontage road between Waco St and
Joplin St
Alt1d Construct frontage road between Zebulon St and Waco
St
Alt2 Construct interchange at CSAH 14/15
TH 10 between CSAH 14/15 and CSAH 11 Alt1 Construct southern bypass between 200th St and 162nd
Ln with interchange at east and west TH 10 termini
Alt2 Consolidate access and coordinate signals
Alt3 Construct interchange at 162nd Ln
Alt4 Construct south frontage road between CR 43 and
172nd St
Alt5 Construct north backage road between CR 43 and 172nd St
Alt6 Construct interchange/grade separate - 200th St
and TH 10
Alt7 Grade separate new north-south collector at CR 50 and
TH10
AItB Construct interchange CSAH 11/TH 10
TH 10 between Alt 1 West frontage road/CSAH 8 extension between CR 52 and
CSAH 11 and potential river crossing A CSAH 11 (conflict with proposed NSP rail spur)
Alt 2 West frontage road/CSAH B extension between Hancock
St and CSAH 11
Alt3 Consolidate access and coordinate signals
Alt4 Construct interchange to river crossing (Alt D)
Alt5 Construct interchange to river crossing - Alt B or Alt C
(Per Mn/DOT D3's direction - same impacts as existing TH 24
bridge)
Alt6 Extend CR 66 as frontage rd (northwest of Clear Lake) - as
area develops
TH 10 between potential river crossing Alt 1 Construct interchange to river crossing (AIt A)
Alt A and TH 23 Alt2 Construct interchange to river crossing (alternative G)
Alt2a Construct connection to TH 10 from local east-west
crossing (33rd St) in St Cloud.
Alt3 Consolidate access
Alt4 Construct frontage road between TH 301 to CSAH 3
Alt5 Extend Michigan Ave to TH 10 and Del-tone Rd
Alt6 . Realignment of Del-tone Rd with Lincoln Ave
Alt7 Extend frontage rd between 15th Ave and TH 301
AltS Extend frontage rd between 15th Ave and Del-tone Rd
AIt9 Eliminate at-grade access to TH 10 from 15th Ave
AIt 10 Construct east frontage rd between TH 23 and 15th Ave
BRW Inc.
Page 2 of3
~
,
. TABLE 1 August 19, 1999
TH lO/TH 47 UNIVERSE OF ALTERNATIVES
Northstar Corridor Major Investment Study
TH 10/ TH 47 SEGMENT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT(S)
TH 10 between TH 23 and Rice Alt 11 Construct interchange at TH 10 and St. Germain
Alt 11a Construct St Germain overpass at TH 10
Alt 12 Construct interchange at TH 10 and CR 46 (10th St NE)
Alt 13 Construct west frontage road south of Scenic
Aft 14 Access management from TH 15 to Rice
Alt 15 Construct interchange at TH 10 and Benton Drive*
Aft 16 Construct interchange atTH 10 and CSAH 4*
Alt 17 Construct interchange at TH 10 and CSAH 13*
Alt 18 Construct interchange at TH 10 and Main St* -
*As volumes warrant No new signals should be
installed.
~
Text in bold italics are BRW, Inc.'s recommended improvements.
.
.
BRW Inc. Page 3 of3
-R".",.JM
I- I ' ,I I
Potential Highway Improvements
Twin Cities Metropolitan Area
Fisure 1 of6
.
.
.
11"},iiit;;;5:~,[i;'~i." .,t>;ri':,'
I ',', ,{WX){{iCM?d8, ',.",0
~I Vj~ e
a:l '(r- e
!III ,,', >. C;j;;i
/', -g i lIS ~
~ ;',: 5 iil () .a: ~!l
iii' ! t~ ~ ti H .
og~ ~11 31 J ~
':.s C;j;;iJ2ti! -hog .s~
I ..!!' h~ ~~ "'.
coal ~ .- ..... la..::: :: <> = e >.
~ ~ si- ~ o.gc:l
.", : u ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ 18 og .s
c IL~ ~i~<.g;2.s!-]
<1:0 ! iii C;j;;i >;t:I a10g = Cl)>;t:I ~
' J] Is .5 ';; ~ j-i :! e
", Sj~ ~!~~~.B ~<~
." ':-'\\;'j::'c"'{f}:i"i;;~'~':1 ~ ....0 < ~.B I .s I
. '~i0~i!i 1M'" iii\ti!1;i!!:!ii!,'" - .
;"i'ii;;);~;~/'?f"!:'" ..... ,'~ ".
\!I1I'i :/,I;!;':S;H i; '"
'::,,';.,,::' ir,,\", ~ '< ',.:'
'~.' : ,
,: oiL: .' ) ,'.
---- ~'::i. .'
" .
.. ,':,:,,,,,,, "
",' "'J . ., '
,i. ..', ..... - . j ". ,'..
", " .". - . "'" i.'). "" .
)',,) '.. . ''V, .,!;, , ".... ... . ... ')'$...,. ') .,.~"t I
.' ; ""e .....;;; 0:, .;0,'.\, "W"":',"', ',':i: ,., '"-,,i.::i' 'Q~~/~/.' '<c- '. " .....;;0;.
", ~.. "')",... '. . '"
... ,. , ',""ii,;.,.. :.' ." ',,, ).')Ni;;;::
aJ C,.'. :', i" c,.;..:;...., " " ~".'>.~~::f..~'?.,~.,' ,\; ,',"::',: :,;":'-].,, :!l ";;'';;;f ", !!f"l ~'" :', :',"!-;',.. ''i':.' :','. '--"':,::i."" :':' ';; :/:<
WI" """'("1;)11'';9(ii01 '" -'>>"':~i-", .' ':'L~ '. """
I:" .' ,j,?;y;v'/T[_r ."::ij::}~~~:z;.: 1 ~ .,.' ',', "'~',.." __ ,,\,:i',.:..~/: "'; ',:;.:. '.j;.,.::,;:"__.......':,.:,..""....'::,:':.,..,.,,..',: .
I,,'. ,)./,.",;." '. A,e"i" 0 0 i,_ , F'. ..,...." "... ."
I'." ""':'::'H' ""X" ~ al '.,,<.:, ~" ",~.",:c,".'n:C!. '. ......i'.;".i.!'"".... \i"..'!"" "';!i" . i
iV';;',%;;...i,... .' ,), <. . . ~~'.",i,i/;.l' ", 'i.',,"";:' ,,(:,.:2.;,\)/:.,:.:.:... :....'.:'. .'
,;'.'Jl . . ,,".. '.i"!",,. .. 'iiI...:. " . ""',/" ,,,,. " """." '. 'i. iN,
-""'j''';''T'Z'!',:'j;'', <, """ "".' . <.., "', . " ..,".,.:,:'.' .,',i';':,'" ""';.:<
~~f ,.i':,. '.'.rIII, i:"".,;" F- ] ..~ '" "'ii,,.. ,. . , . /it " . .@.....,',.,..,.,.....
,', ..:,-' -.-'" --""i,'" ,"; IS = ., ''''I' ';>...,;::,.."'.,' . . ",4,.. .'. ....,. """.,
. '.,' t. . """",. '"'",,.; ~ 8 " ""'. . ..."i\;.>';A0J;;...."". .... "" ,;~' .... , '. ". .
'" · ;;::"!:'N_~.;., ~~ "" Fi',' .J "" ;!Pi...;'i/:." "" . . '" .. '"""..,&. 'J' ;;,,',
'C ""i.',.;, t".'"""", '"),, ,,- 8: <. . :i),<,?,;;....', i'"..!,:" ',";ii' . 'i'"''''':'i'''''
~ '" ""''', '" OJ .:! " ~ '. .,' <i' '..,..: ,.'.', .' "', i'),.,.t,.>
' . . "'F.;! ','d. ," < .. 7, . '" '),"'.h . ..'" .,,:, '. .>. 'Pi' . , , ..
f:,,,:';:: " ,'., '" ,'..... .... "';~~ ;0 '. '.. ;~::{,,,, . ..,"', '.}.~';tri&'!h '.' ..
I,>.! ill . ", i" .. .......,.". . """,,:;, '''''tli}';;,p':,.,..,;! ....' , i.2}P:tB n"
'., '.' '. ',>. . """"':;'. . iIIIi' ',:-".", ... '.
I ~!, ~i''-/i'Y<';!X,<_n >>;~" '.8i?", i . ...."'.,.. ",>-.: .:..iL' .' .
"'''':;" . . "'i', "
,......... ...., . . ...'. . t, _ ~ ,
"i";:;; """""'/", . . 1\.. . < 'i1 0
,""".... ...> :.'!H' '. i' ~ . 0 .::
i,p'ki;"., ,," j .. I, !l ~ .. ~ n ". b
")6". . '. . 0 ',.., "A . '" 'Ii ..0 Ii 1! . 1!i .
;!isi~'Ji;.!i., ~ U" .;.. di! 1 ~ ~ i i !H~ ~
"':":'~"""" '0 S., . .,;;',X.D 1/1; ~ ...~ \0 -.::l ~..::: IS ~ ~ >;t:I
'1/1!t+,!,. .. "s. '" ""il)11_ ~ Silo...... 8 ~..
· ..{';I'. ,rll'l ~ "",}, J;/'~";";".~l.' '" . '.' i~ i U ~ ~ 1 ~ j;:"es
.-. . ~.. ", '" .- '" ,,~'" 0 .
.' .....,.. .. 0 """"" .. Ii - ~ 1! . .. 0 0 ~
1::i'/i:'''~':)J,.. ...... d If in h! ~
ai?"" .." '" ..' '...... . '. ~ ~ ~ &1 ss .8~,~,,,.
"1"" II! "'" ,.. "",.!,
',., "'. .'...' , ..,.
ii' ..11BW~[ ~
L." ,
-
,-
.
I',.'
L _
{i
~
e
~
8~
B"9~ I
~ 0 0 <
~u M _
~ ~ ~ !
ibg~.
=s<
ca
'~
Q)
-0
~
',.
~,_.
x:"" .
I
...
,
-
"""',: ,,","
"~:'i/'-' ..-...2...1
'i:<, iii'. "; ..' '-"';;t:
'!'II": ;:;::', .-', --,2,;"'" '-':"i' .
:'.. ,'" /'8]:>'
;':..6'~ " ',. '.
,'" .' ,':'fi/llll:- ,,,: "'<:ii, ~
. . II,') /)'," ..i C"!~,;
,., .,,'>"'" S2' , 'Ii'; ((l.. .:,;;. 'ii'
..,.':"" . . 'i",.",,,"" i": '. ....
,. ;;.:.:, . ./.'; ';it~..
:"i'\:' ,..~. i,; i.i0;;;~~~'
~~ '::.'/)V',:(, .' j> :'/.'- , . '"'-'~.'
'~~:':}5,.;,t::. ,,: .' . ""
f;i!~;;~i""!i '11,
5j ~ .%\+', '.:'."
~ "9 I)\~>Y;';':::;:" ',0:;,; ,
F- . e :' ":,>t"
IS i u .:7\ : ,,',",.:
~ 5 e...:'>'.."".
J 11 Q. "
o 1ib.5 :", __ ;'\''1
-- ~ ~ ~ .)",,".: '~2~:'~:
. .,." ". :'./' ," "::%, ,%'\, I
'ff ':..':);l;,." -:;.'.<. " ,;.:';i'~;:
>1', ,/>"': '.. ":;c'/.',
. 'js,!'~)&:;;;>i:'" '.,,'
',i',;:--
'Ilt
:"';"
':-.,
'" ';~':
},'.,i
\~f;~!\'::"; "
.' ,\il....p,~ ...
',i" .. '.;> :'~
: ':'-';~>Y'
''''-'..
.':.; '.
. ~'"
,,';.,
-aw:,. ".;: '"
_~trrjlrt~ .
,,,,;.-,.'.;f':;~;',,~:,;;;.,,.. '".,
'-,"
.~~ \
-',"
:":\ ~::"C:;';";:2
,~
.J
~ f I/.:"-S".;....... .'
U :>,' t.,>:,/':<" '.
e ii! ' .. "',l'iJ}"'c';-S;; ,I
~ III ,{? ';';'iV i,i; :"i,i.,:Z.';;;':i "
I ~ j ~ ; i"'" ,'~C ..:)'b "'i);;':',,"},;
I ~ h ~ <I · ., Z""'ff;..,,,, ' . . "i",;"""" .>.~.
:i - ,., J ..' .,,' ." ,.<>"Y
~ . 1....:.:.".
:tb ~ ~. 1/'"" .... ....e;; .. '..:;i;"Z",i
{i I'll l I \JI ..... ';"""?;'(;:;' ~
.:- ,.,.,.;,.p...:o.. ....:.~..;:;.~,"~..,7 .' ".. ........,.. .,,:, ..... ~~;!(" .' i fi;;,,;;i;i::~~fr;.j;;';ft
;~?;, "" ..;"..,,~ '. '. .. .. 5" ~ ~ I~i";;~~;';" '.", ..;;
." '. . . fc.; .:cO ti J'" :t~f,;;~i;" .'
.,Iii .t;;; .' "!:) -:"it; '..... .. :; I ! ,g ~ "1;"'" . " ..
i"". ....."::';,'i\' .';~L.. '< iA ~ U ,<fzzw'" ." ....
I i,,'; "i"";;' ' '. ..~.,\'.i:,:::,>.,::~!.'\.;r' '. .., ' . "'.
'::.:...;iL:, ..: .~';.'" ..i' ,/.'" .;, · .,U", ..,
", ',',' . ,.), _ . ',' , ," "'~L.i:"""; . . .,.)." ,"
", ,;" "." 'i;;';:;;;;:;; '. '. ' " ..,. '" ,..i: · '
". . ~:'-"\'.; firM' '.;, '~." ""'" . :;c~~''2 "';:~1;;&~f;'~"" .'
. '. .ii' ,,,,.',;,,, , .. "'". . "'w, .' . 0 . . .... . , .. '
'. :. .: .'< .. . }'."':'j:;v'!;:>':: 1:I.,:>.".~.';'.' ' .: . i:: ..,,;
"", . . .'" ",;.,x~.., " ' .'.' ':. x", ~ 'I ~ ~(
'.i"';. ..::...'.....'.,,::,: ........;...".:a;;; . ..........',.;;>...:}:';':; . '.,'. ~ ;:G 8 .
,.. . . . ' i',~" ".:., ';.i';" . .. , ",~' .. .. '".. i,,;;!; , I, 'l! .. ."
i",i' ('-'i' t'l:i, . ',i;; . .'. .~,.i j)+,. ..... l! B . .
",'Yicii';fil!lli" .' .' "', 'i! IL, . ,/. .Ii o 'C"
i'i'J ", W'i:"iiV;,jIiof' :: 'V "',:' / ".: w ,,. 5 ",': .... <;'.'i.,,:, "! "':::. ..
7",/>"',I"i':, ..," ". ..' I' ~ ~ " .', ....,.,'" 8 5 ",....
I'" .."""I#!I'} ",' " ,.' '?if 'ii .. "',' ~. 'x' ,.' . ,i','" " ~ ~ ,.. .
.c::';;,: ):i/.':...... -' 1'I.tI'... 1. . .c,5 ,5'..,r..;c " .'.... ......>,. .:/:.,'....
" /7',.>',,": ",ii'>." ,,1,' . , ..\.:i,-' ~ iilI:; ~8'" i5 1,1"> ......... . .....:. ..,...... ,"J'\' ,0..,...?3),'" . ':
""', ../0 i" _. .' '. . " '" -'< :::17/""" ,,"/' . '{'ii',; . ....
~:'0i;...... C,'F," "", ",;J;'\; .. C'!iGX' d,d U .",,:,,;,;,"'" ,} .' '; ',.j{,:~
'0 ....... ,'.ii.;,,,::,,-,'.,) ",,~:.+,,/ ..,,,;,::\Q"J ,'f-,"'': i.':W" '., :,c..i.:':/:>; .. ~,",: .
'i'. ,d,-, :" .""'//' . . ''''"' "':'Iii\i; ....,. .,!., . 'i'F" ,;Vi' i, .....
",'i", ..,. tiF ',""w/t, . ':':'.' ,?i~_':~;iI:r::;"7,:..'" ."
" ,ii" o,;::~;;/;d%;:"ii.;;;A~Y ',.' ,,:,-};I' ,', ;ii:i';,,,;; '''i;:!lm)i(:li~!:; , ','::
,'~.>: i:":-;"'.'\-'>,':::.' ~i<'i f..Jk"-;;j.:.. ~:Il-::'!'I~:' .."i.','''' '." ; ".. . ." .' '
, " .. '. ~",. '" . . ,,', ''''. .."" '", ..' '.. W',".. ' ~ ." '. ..
""'. ,. ' " '. ". ". '" ," .. .. ,.. ' (';,iii',- /,,,.. 8'
.::;........ '-:" lill'~ ~~,... ..", ~i':i:'tZ'::I~:;~.~"'" '.,,:;f.),~~~,::'r,~~::' H,. w'I" iii,' ...'
~ .:# :p _).' .~... ..~}-!~r :" .,.<..; .g :g ;,..\" , .
I~ ~ l~~ '1.. - ~ (Oi"s..J~W. .....c.. '.'..'....' ...",..;..::..:.!:.....,..'.:.".'.'.,.:...,.. '/,"','.','. ~ U i]"" u, .. ...
\01 n' "'.. .. ~ i/ ',;.,~e:';'
.
JJ.~<)!..;'i"":::">' ~ .. .. ..
./':" ' ' ,..;.,,"
8 ::;.. "', .:>> : .. '
./ "il'; [.'.;;,;>..'" .:, . ., ,
rr--{45ff ~ ~ "",':'> ':i;.,".
~ ;i;C~; 'tl 1lP .g:':.:.,"'.',-'i'--'
~; -...... . ".,(:-,., : ,. .', ,>: .
\, ..; ~ ~ .......".i;:.... .i/::'>....i,-':..::.. " , .' .
_ J-:'?1 <( ~ N.";":,>," · ." ..,;;"
,.:'1~:;:::'{\:. '.:1..!}2\"~:.':.::: . '. ". .::
..,,-./"., ," ',''''.:
.
\_','"
__II...: ~~
'113
(~
"<t
-
.
.. ',,' ,"
.
!i
]~
<1"0;':'
~-
7-
C;<.,.,._,.. ,.
:~r{~~
'6J.
<.-Aii""
?Ti,;i. ',;i,.
~" t~ " \~_I
i~GC"~~ ~l~ 1. ~s~'
~ ,- 7 _.... v
~",. ~ ~ C"
2~<~ ~~
~ ,~, e~
...... 'C' o!.]
~..... II ..f~.
~u u ;c.c !!
- ::! "0 .2 "CI 13 \0 iH!-8
<~ ~ e~Q ~~2~~
;; ,';::; < 0 t [11;H~t~~ ~
/ r ,;/ ~ ~ j lJ[tac"'l. '..
..
~
4)
5
~
....
0..
s:: 4) \0 i
-= ~ '- II
~~ ~ <
~ CD e ]
..c ..... i
CD~ It .
jf
.
~
ca
'~
~
o
t:..
;"
~
-
-
I
~I..\::
.
m
!!i
RI
-.:y :.:~.~'.::
It"
.J
8
~1~
r 8____
~'~t
.... -~
f"'"\:)
c
o
'il'i
j]-g ~ )
.."" eJ~~ ~~~<J
/ lStp~''''- ;J
i
.c
2
b- ~
'il
'.j:l
~I
.::.=
'"
~
'i
e
~'~~
!n~
'Q
~&!
- ~
(\&: ,
~
:~::'
tl
- 'i~
e~
'i ~S
'ltSC'fl
"'e~
... <....U
!W,~c
<....
-, ......
.:'~
;~,
,~.\
....,
,".\
.;.-
.
~""
..'
'0':'
\"
':,("
..
.s
Q
~
"0
Q
~
'il
'.j:l
c
~
~
-
l uOlflqgz
.,'ii'
. ..'
'.' .'. .'.'
J .'. .
.;
'f. ':'. -..' :'.'
'1';'.. ....
'.":/ ......., ,W\\I
!';.1),.JrI
( ..ll
:. ",'" ,
, M
~ M~i~i ~II
~
:!: rn ~ II
J ~ Jlim
'il
'..:;1
!
-
-
i
~
lS pUZL I 'il
'..:;I
=1
........._<~
~ !)~::i
~ r2:
- i: .....
~
~
;!;L'll"'"
( "y~.'"'''-'''''
I
~
"\.
'-
~
\l(r
'i::_:>:_:,;y'
.-
d
o
" .,-
r
, _l'~~
;:~
r
~<D:L,_
[",,e." "'>
.
rI.l
=
u
~~
I ~g
~u IJ:> Ii
.... 8
IJjjj >. Q) Cl <
l.uP
{t ~~ ., ~
'-=
5
~
I
~ I --...
gsj
"
~i.~
\
i
a
'i
fl] ~-'
I~~I~~I
<i> I
/ii,?'. ~
."
'."",," .
\
>> <'
6 l:
O! :.. .=
~ ~ - _ '2
oo~~l -
~dl3~ ~
,~ ~~~~
~utiSz ---J
u c..lol..s ........
r B 8'~ ........
~]~~
tJ-Nli!
i-'1 ~~~.c:s
':-'
,,-',
: ::.
/i
<110
t~
-.c;l
,.~~~\ : "l~' .'
-
:
,,'
'",
/.
-
IDIl
~ttI'"
- ~~
~ ~,
~
"""""- ,,>
~
IDII
,
~
,t! ~ ~
i----' Ii ""~l;:' 1\
<;YF "~'i -] j 7
1-, : ~~!v
_ se- ~ '0', ,i < ~ ,5
~~ ~ '0.' 'ii ~
'\." "<;, Io!' '+:l l3
~ <2:: U..
_ ":5' '0 ~
:, ; ~'C
f\ ~;; ~ ~ ~
.
~
II
..-
"i
e -
~
\O~
.:: e....,
< ~....
e
1-
~
'ij
] ~
c
~ ~
j:l., 'C
5!
,,),
I .< :5
, < r
~"c~ U ~~,~~\ .
~ll'J
". -'-
''''''''';.;:::/>' ../
.'-=~ dk1j?~.;:-LP I
R -t'
[
.
r
,<
~;.
I!' ,.
o
~~~
c -,- '--~
-
~'
D
-
.
" :
", "" ....
, ,,~
, ""
t~f~ ~~,~~ ~2:J
n
'"
.
1-'1' ,1111,'
AlU8
Potential interehan e
*".".JD
Potential Highway Improvements
St . CloudlRice
Fillute 6 of6
. Focol A_,
''''' Aupll 19. 1m I~~....",,"
..
A.
N
Alt.ll . ........... '. ......
Potentiitl interchange'
m 10 i1i1dStGemiairi
. . .
~
.
.
.
sb.andWick
"\.'
"'-o~~
INTERNp..\
TO:
NORTHSTAR CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SHANDWICK RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
FROM:
RE:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF RESEARCH
DATE:
August 11, 1999
METHODOLOGY
Agenda Item #5a
Below are results from the Northstar Corridor commuter rail survey. These results are
based on telephone interviews with a randomly selected sample of 500 adults, within the
counties of Anoka, Benton, Hennepin, Sherburne, Stearns and Wright, MN conducted
August 1 - 5, 1999. Based on this sample, one can say with 95 percent confidence that
the maximum error attributable to sampling and other random effects is plus or minus
4.4 percentage points.
KEY FINDINGS
Heard about Rail Project
More than half (51.8%) of respondents from the Northstar
Corridor region say there is not a difference between
commuter rail and light rail, while 22.2% say "yes" there is a
difference. These feelings regarding differences between
commuter rails and light rails stay consistent throughout all
major demographics in our survey results.
(
We asked these respondents "which proposed rail plans have you seen, read, or heard .
something about?" The following chart shows the overall percentages to this question,
as well as showing how the individual counties answered.
CHOICES:
1. Central light rail transit connecting downtowns of Minneapolis and St. Paul.
2. Hiawatha light rail transit connecting downtown Minneapolis to the airport.
3. Northstar Corridor commuter rail transit connecting Minneapolis to St. Cloud
4. Riverview light rail transit adjacent to Mississippi River in St. Paul.
TOTAL Anoka Benton Hennepin Sherburne Stearns Wright
Northstar 56.6 60 70 40.7 73.3 61.3 60
Hiawatha 52.2 58.8 46.7 69.3 48.9 22.5 32.5
Central 41.4 44.8 43.3 42.1 42.2 35 35
Riverview 12.8 12.7 10 12.1 26.7 11.3 5
Obviously, it is a very encouraging sign for the Northstar Corridor rail project to have the
most recognition by these respondents. More than half (56.6%) said they had seen,
read, or heard something about the proposed commuter rail from downtown Minneapolis
to St. Cloud. Also receiving more than half (52.2%) overall recognition was the
Hiawatha light rail project followed by 41.4% for the Central light rail and 12.8% for the
Riverview light rail. However, only four in ten (40.7%) respondents in Hennepin County
had seen, read, or heard of the Northstar Corridor commuter rail project, while more than
two-thirds (69.3%) had heard of the Hiawatha project.
Almost two-thirds (64.3%) of respondents say they have heard
about the proposed Northstar Corridor rail project through "the
newspaper", along with 59.7% saying by "radio or television".
Seven percent say they have heard about it in "public
meetings", followed by "employer" (6%), and "neighbor"
(4.9%). Almost seven in ten (68.9%) of respondents who
describe themselves as living in "rural" communities say they
have heard of the project through "the newspaper", followed
by "radio or television" (62.2%) and "employer" (11.1 %).
Respondents were asked, "how informed or uninformed would
you say you are about the proposed Northstar Corridor rail
project?" Respondents answered this question with very
moderate responses. While more than half (52.3%) say they
feel "informed" about this project, only 7.1 % answer this
question with a level of intensity by saying "very" informed.
The majority of these respondents said "somewhat" (45.2%)
informed. This finding holds true on the opposite side of this
question as well. 47.3% of respondents overall say they feel
"uniformed" in regards to the Northstar Corridor rail project.
However, while 17% answered "very" uninformed, three in ten
(30.4%) say "somewhat" uninformed. Clearly you have a
great deal of these respondents who are aware of this proposed Rail project, but are not
knowledgeable of the subject.
.
Executive Survey Summary for the Northstar Corridor Development Authority
August 24, 1999
Page 2
. In regards to the Highway10/Highway 47 corridor,
respondents were asked "if they were aware or unaware of
any transportation issues or problems in their area?"
Respondents were split right down the middle on this
question. Half (50.8%) of respondents say they are "unaware"
of any transportation issues, with 30.4% saying "very"
unaware and 20.4% saying "somewhat unaware. While more
than four in ten (46.4%) say they are "aware" of transportation
issues and problems in their area. Of these respondents
24.2% say "somewhat" aware and 22.2% answered this
question by saying "very" aware. Six in ten (60%)
respondents from Benton and Sherburne counties answered this question by saying
they are "aware" of transportation issues and problems in their area. While Benton
county lacked much intensity to this response with only 13.3% saying "very", a third
(33.3%) of Sherburne County respondents say they are "very" aware of transportation
issues in their area.
Feelings regarding commuter rail connecting Minneapolis to St. Cloud
.
Overwhelmingly, respondents from the six counties surveyed feel that the proposed
commuter rail train that would run from the Burlington Northern Santa Fe tracks,
connecting downtown Minneapolis to the St. Cloud area, is a good idea. More than
seven in ten (72.6%) overall say this project would be a "good idea", along with more
than one in four (27.6%) saying they feel this project would be a "very" good idea. Less
than one in five (19.4%) say this proposed project would be a "bad idea" and less than
one in ten (8.8%) had intensity to there response by saying it would be a "very" bad idea.
The following chart illustrates how the six individual counties expressed themselves
regarding this question:
TOTAL Anoka Benton Hennepin Sherburne Stearns Wright
GOOD IDEA 72.6 66.7 83.3 67.1 82.2 83.8 75
Very Good 27.6 26.7 36.7 17.9 48.9 30 30
Good 45 40 46.7 49.3 33.3 53.8 45
BAD IDEA 19.4 21.8 13.3 23.6 13.3 13.8 17.5
Bad 10.6 12.1 10 15 4.4 6.3 5
Very Bad 8.8 9.7 3.3 8.6 8.9 7.5 12.5
*Notice the overwhelming amount of support from Benton, Sherburne and Stearns
counties.
.
Executive Survey Summary for the Northstar Corridor Development Authority
August 24, 1999
Page 3
Respondents were read a series of goals in relation to the
Northstar Corridor project. Almost four in ten (39.2%) felt that
the most important goal for their region was "relieve
congestion." More than one in four (27%) said "provide cost-
effective and efficient ways to travel", followed by "protect the
environment" (9.4%), "address safety concerns" (8.4%) and
"address concerns related to sprawl" (6%). More than four in
ten (44%) of respondents who describe themselves as living
in a "suburban" area say the most important goal to them for
this is "relieve congestion." The number one goal for
respondents from "small towns" (34.1 %) and "urban" (33.8%)
environments was "provide cost-effective and efficient ways to
travel." Interestingly, 15.5% of urban respondents say "protecting the environment" was
their number one goal.
When respondents were asked "whom they believed would benefit from the proposed
Northstar Corridor commuter rail line?" most of the choices given were looked at
favorably. The number one response was "commuting workers" which received 67.4%
of respondents acknowledging benefits to this segment of their population. "St. Cloud"
and "students" each receive 50%. The following chart shows how each of these choices
ranked in terms of the percentage of respondents feeling that this proposed commuter
rail project would have benefits for these segments of people.
Executive Survey Summary for the Northstar Corridor Development Authority
August 24, 1999
Page 4
.
.
.
More than one-third (36.6%) of respondents say they would
use the Northstar Corridor Commuter Rail line "to get to
social or cultural activities." Almost one in four (24%) say "to
visit friends and relatives", followed by "as a back-up method
for work" (18.6%), "for my regular commute to work"
(17.2%), "for errands and appointments" (16%), "to get to
school" (5.8%) and "bring employees to my business"
(5.4%). There were some specific demographic segments
Jhat had an above average reaction to using the commuter
rail for their regular commute to work. They are: "Sherburne
County" (22.2%), respondents "under 44 years old" (23.3%),
"women 44 and under" (27.1%) and respondents with a
"family income between $75,000 and $99,999" (27.3%).
.
Four in ten (40.4%) respondents say the number one factor
that would influence their decision to use the Northstar
Corridor commuter rail line is "convenient park-and-ride
facilities." Three in ten (30%) say "cost of fare" is the biggest
factor that will influence their decision making. There were a
handful of responses that received about the same level of
interest: "clean and safe passenger cars" (21.2%), "proximity
to retail centers and cultural attractions" (21%), "frequent,
on-time and reliable trains" (21%), "travel time on board"
(20.8%), "connections to other transit services" (20.2%) and
"clean and safe stations" (20%).
Opinions regarding current commute to work
When asked "how would you describe your current level of
satisfaction with your work commute and/or the transit options
in your area?", almost two-thirds (63.2%) say they are
"satisfied". More than one in four (28.2%) respondents said
"very" satisfied, along with 35% saying "somewhat" satisfied. A
little more than one in four (27.2%) say they are "dissatisfied"
with their current work commute and/or transit options in their
area. 75% of Stearns County respondents said they are
"satisfied", along with 72.5% of Wright County. However, four
in ten (40%) respondents from Sherburne County, as well as a
third (32.7%) of respondents from Anoka County said they are
"dissatisfied" with their current commute and transit options in their area.
.
Executive Survey Summary for the Northstar Corridor Development Authority
August 24, 1999
Page 5
Almost half (49%) of Northstar Corridor respondents say their
current commute is "more congested than five years ago. One
in four (26%) say their commute has stayed the "same" and
less than one in ten (9%) said their commute is "less
congested" when compare to five years ago. More than half
(55.2%) of respondents within Anoka County say their commute
has become "more congested" compared to five years ago,
along with 54.9% of respondents from "urban" areas. Besides
these two specific areas the overall response percentages stay
consistent throughout this survey.
CONCLUSION
With more than half (51.8%) of Northstar Corridor residents saying there is not a
difference between commuter rail and light rail this offers an opportunity that should not
be passed up. If the Northstar Corridor Development Authority takes advantage of this
blank slate, it gives them an opportunity to draw out the differences themselves.
Therefore they have painted the picture and have educated the public about the positive
differences, rather then having to combat or overcome negative stereotypes.
Almost three-quarters (72.6%) of these respondents believe this commuter rail proposal
is a "good idea". These respondents seemed knowledgeable of this proposed commuter .
rail project, and for the most part believe they are well informed regarding its progress.
More direction and information must be given to these respondents regarding the
benefits of using this commuter rail for "their regular commute to work." While 63.2%
say they are satisfied with their current commute and transit options, almost half (49%)
say their commute to work has become more congested over the past five years.
Obviously, the residents of the Northstar Corridor need help in making this connection.
By pointing out the source of their unhappiness and showing them a solution to their
problems, a significant number of people are likely to be more in favor of using this
method for their daily commute, as well as increase their overall support of the Northstar
Corridor commuter rail project.
.
Executive Survey Summary for the Northstar Corridor Development Authority
August 24, 1999
Page 6