4.10. SR 12-20-1999
rCI ---'\)
( );
~ll<
Item # 4 . 10 .
MEMORANDUM
Mayor and City Council
FROM: Scott Harlicker, Senior Plann~
DATE: December 20, 1999
SUBJECT: Northstar Corridor Update
.
At the December 9, 1999 meeting of the Northstar Corridor Development
Authority the Authority discussed multimodal transit facility development
and the transportation improvement strategies. Elk River was identified as
one of the four stations to be developed as a multimodal facility.MNDOT has
been meeting with representatives of the Authority to discuss relocating the
park and ride from its current location on Highway 169 to the commuter
station. It would be incorporated into the design of the station. The Authority
approved alternative 5 from the preferred transportation improvement
strategy. This alternative includes improvements from the three other
alternatives plus the construction of two river crossings, one in Ramsey and
one near St. Cloud. The consultants also indicated that neighborhood
meetings for the station areas will be held in January.
.
13065 Orono Parkway · P.O. Box 490 · Elk River, MN 55330. TDD & Phone: (612) 441-7420 · Fax: (612) 441-7425
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
Thursday, December 9,1999
4:30 p.m.
Sherburne County Government Center
Elk River, MN
Action Requested
1. Minutes of November 4, 1999 Meeting*
Approval
2. Checks and Claims*
Approval
3. Executive Committee Report
a. 2000 Budget and Contracts*
b. Multimodal Transit Facility Development*
Approval
Approval
4. MIS: Selection of Locally Preferred
Transportation Investment Strategy*
a. Process
b. Draft Evaluation Results
5. Next Steps: Upcoming Activities
Discussion/Approval
Discussion
6. Other
Next Meeting: January 6, 2000
*Attached
~
.
.
.
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
NORTHSTAR CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Rel!ular Meetinl! Minutes
November 4.1999
The Northstar Corridor Development Authority met on November 4, 1999, at 4:30 p.m. at the Sherburne
County Government Center, Elk River, Minnesota.
The followinl! members. alternates and citizens were present:
Tim Yantos, Ken Stevens, Yvonne Chaillet, Stephanie Eiler, Robert Kirchner, Gabriel Guevara, Jeff
Dehler, Jean M. Keely, Don Jolly, Walt Fehst, Rick Nau, Dick Wolsfeld, Dave Showalter, Tom Wenzel,
Dean Michalko, Rick Speak, Linda Jungwirth, Scott Harlicker, Noel Shughart, BifI Schreiber, Tom Poul,
Ross Kramer, Lona Schreiber, Brian Bensen, David Loch, Lynn George, Jim Dickinson, Terry Nagorski,
John Norgren, Gerry Donlin, Duane Grandy, Gerald Goebel, Carl Yilek, Duane Cekalla, Ken Paulson,
Tom Gamec, Paul Ostrow, Tom Cruikshank, Dave Saunders, Jerry Newton, Steve Billings, Paul
McCarron, Dan Erhart, Dick Nowlin, Mary Richardson, Betsy Wergin, Lewis Stark, Patrick Cairns,
Leslie Schumacher
1. The meeting was called to order at 4:35 p.m.
2.
A motion was made by Gerry Donlin, seconded by Dave Saunders and carried unanimously to
approve the agenda of November 4, 1999, as presented.
3.
A motion was made by Steve Billings, seconded by John Norgren and carried
approve the minutes of October 7, 1999, as amended.
unanimously to
4. Executive Committee Report:
a) A motion was made by Paul McCarron, seconded by Jerry Newton and carried
unanimously to approve the recommendation of the Executive Committee to authorize
the Chairperson to finalize negotiations and execute a contract with Messerli & Kramer
to provide governmental affairs representation that will include the following:
developing a strategy to maximize potential funding sources;
meeting with key decision makers at the Minnesota Department of
Transportation, Metropolitan Council, the Legislature, the Governor's Office,
and any agency, individual or entity that may provide funding assistance;
assisting in any manner necessary to secure a financial commitment from the
state for the Northstar Corridor, and
closely monitoring all potential funding initiatives
in an amount not to exceed $35,000, plus allowable expenses, for a term commencing
November 4, 1999 through December 31,2000, with a one-year renewal option.
b)
Discussion was held regarding the funding of the proposed BRW Work Plan Extension
North of the City of Rice to Camp Ripley. Stephanie Eiler, Anoka County, indicated that
the proposed study was mandated in the legislature with funding to be provided through
)
MnDOT and is not included in the Northstar Corridor Development Authority budget. .
BRW was recommended for the Extension study for continuity and their familiarity with
the project.
A motion was made by Duane Grandy, seconded by Jerry Goebel and carried
unanimously to approve the BRW WorkPlan for the Extension of the Northstar Corridor
Commuter Rail Feasibility Study North of the City of Rice to Camp Ripley.
c) Tim Yantos reviewed the commuter rail capital cost summary estimate comparing 1999
and 2003 cost elements of the Northstar Corridor (Minneapolis to East St. Cloud) and
LRT Connection. The total projected cost in 1999 dollars for the Northstar Corridor is
$196,270,000 and in 2003 dollars, the cost is estimated at $223,000,000. The projected
cost for the LRT Connection in 1999 dollars is $19,720,000 and in 2003 dollars, the cost
is estimated at $22,120,000.
5. Mr. Yantos reviewed the preliminary Rail Ridership Results for the Northstar Corridor (dated
October 11, 1999). The results represent a summary comparison for phase 1 and phase 2 of the
average weekday daily ridership, southbound to Minneapolis and northbound to St. Cloud and to
Rice, for the years 2005 and 2020.
6.
Gabriel Guevara, MnDOT, distributed and reviewed the Commuter Rail System Plan, Summary
of Progress, dated 11/04/99. The plan serves as a guideline only and is currently a work-in-
progress involving staff from Mn/DOT and the NCDA. The plan consists of Task I:
Development of Commuter Rail System Standards and Policies and Task II: Institutional Issues.
Draft technical memoranda have been prepared subsequent to analysis on the following task
elements:
.
Task I: Locomotives, Rolling Stock, Maintenance Facilities, Communication, Station
Spacing / Operating Speeds, Service Levels, Station Deferrals and Line Truncations,
Central Corridor Schedule, Right-of-Way, Fares, Park-n-Ride Facilities, and Performance
Standards.
Task II: Governance, Railroad Negotiations, Financing Techniques, and Funding
Sources.
Robert Kirchner, representing the City of Anoka, asked Mr. Guevara why the MnDOT standards
(2~ to 3 miles) and the NCDA standards (minimum 5 miles) for station spacing were so different
and what criteria are used to identify CBD's.
Mr. Guevara responded that stations should generally be at least 2Y2 to 3 miles apart, perhaps
closer in CBD areas, but as much as seven miles apart in outlying areas. Essentially, population
and job density reflects station separation. Land uses near stations should be transit oriented to
generate ridership.
Mr. Kirchner stated that Mr. Guevara's answer was very significant and asked that it be reflected
in the minutes.
7.
Tim Yantos, reviewed the Northstar Corridor commuter rail operation and maintenance
(0 & M) cost estimates as follows:
.
2
Year 2003 per mile cost: Total $150,000
. (80 miles) Net $107,000
Year 2003 cost per passenger: Total $5.31
(2,620,000 passengers per year) Net: $3.79
8. Dave Showalter, BRW, Inc. presented the proposed layout for the commuter rail stations. The
various features of the prototypical station are based on the following primary elements of rail
station design: comfort, connectivity, convenience, coherence, and concept. They include
equipment and facilities such as lighting, bus shelters, park and ride areas, pedestrian plazas and
paths, ticket vending, telephones, signage and displays, and landscaping, to name a few.
9. Dick Nowlin, an environmental and land-use attorney with Lindquist and Vennum, presented an
overview of tools available to municipalities desiring to protect land for future use for rail and
development around transit. The following five tools are available to municipalities in
Minnesota: Moratorium, Overlay Zone, Independent Project Acquisition, Preventive Acquisition,
and Hardship Acquisition. Lindquist & Vennum was selected by the NCDA to assist member
cities, towns, and counties in developing land use tools which could be used in protecting the
Corridor and potential station locations from premature or conflicting development initiatives.
A motion was made by Dave Saunders, seconded by Tom Gamec and carried unanimously to
approve Resolution #99-5, on file with Richardson, Richter and Associates, resolving that:
a)
Cities, counties, and townships through which the Corridor extends and where
possible station locations have been identified are encouraged to undertake
planning studies, adopt official land use controls and take such other actions as
may be necessary to prevent the planning and development of incompatible land
use and development during the project study period and to maximize the
development of compatible land use following the completion of the
environmental review process and alternative selection;
.
b) That cities, counties and towns within the Corridor continue the process of
planning and constructing public projects and transportation improvements
within and for the Corridor which are needed and independently useful and
would improve mobility and safety within the Corridor provided that they do not
prejudice the alternative selection process being undertaken in connection with
the development of the EIS for the project; and
c) That the preliminary selection of locations for stations within the Corridor as well
as the consideration of other transportation system elements incident to the
preparation and completion of the EIS does not constitute a commitment to
construct particular improvements at any particular location or to favor the
selection of any alternative under consideration during the project review
process.
10.
Ken Stevens discussed the next steps to be taken to disseminate public information to planning
commissioners/councils and public meetings. It was agreed that the Station Area Planning
Team would meet with planning commissions, municipal staffs, etc. prior to scheduling public
information meetings. Neighborhood meetings likely will be scheduled in January. Station area
guidelines and designs will be finalized following all meetings and input from the respective
parties.
.
3
11.
Jeff Dehler presented the final version of the strategic plan for public information and public
involvement, June 1999 - December 2000, dated October 28, 1999 and requested that the NCDA
vote on acceptance of the plan.
A motion was made by Paul Ostrow, seconded by Dave Saunders and carried unanimously to
approve the NCDA Strategic Plan for Public Information and Public Involvement June 1999 -
December 2000, dated October 28, 1999, as presented.
12. The next meeting of the Northstar Corridor Development Authority is scheduled
for Thursday, December 9, 1999, at 4:30 p.m. at the Sherburne County Government Center.
13. The meeting was adjourned at 6:20 p.m.
Betsy Wergin Chairperson
Date
4
.
.
.
.
.. UIIDIITIISTJUI
CDBBIDDB
Agenda Item # 3a
MEMORANDUM
December 3, 1999
To:
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
From:
Executive Committee
Subject:
2000 Budget and Contracts
.
Included in your packet for the meeting of December 9, 1999 are the proposed
amended budget for 1999, the proposed 2000 budget, estimated and
appropriated revenues for 2000, and a list of current and proposed NCDA
contracts. The 1999 budget notes indicate the 1999 approved budget, estimated
expenditures by year's end and amendments that are needed to complete work
in 1999. The proposed 2000 budget accounts for projected costs for NCDA
activities. Revenues for 2000 include carry-over money, multi-modal
appropriations, an estimated New Starts federal appropriation, and a local
contribution. The list of contracts includes current contract amounts and
amounts needed for 2000.
At its meeting of November 18, 1999 the Executive Committee voted to
recommend approval of the 1999 amended budget, the proposed contract
amendments for 1999 and 2000, and the proposed 2000 budget as presented.
Action Requested: That the NCDA approve the1999 amended budget, the
proposed contract amendments for 1999 and 2000, and the proposed 2000
budget and authorize the Chair to finalize negotiations and execute the contract
amendments.
.
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
21003'" Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2265 (612) 323-5700 Fax: (612) 323-5682
DRAFT: November 12, 1999
.orthstar Corridor Development Authority
Budget
NOTES
1999 1999 1999
Approved Estimated Proposed
Budget Expenditures Amendments
1. Authority Expense $10,000
RRA - postage, copying, printing $13,700 $13,700
2. NCDA Coordination / Project Management $100,000 $140,000
Contracts:
. Ken Stevens $20,000
. RRA $120,000
3. Insurance $1,200 $20,000 $20,000
4. Community and Public Involvement $250,000 $125,000
. Contract: Shandwick $110,000
. Misc. Expense $15,000
(travel)
5. BNSF Negotiations/Legal Services $200,000 $155,000
Contracts:
. RRA $40,000
. Law firms:
. Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon $30,000
. Harkins Cunningham $40,000
. Bob Kessler $15,000
. Mainline Management $25,000
. Ken Stevens $5,000
6. Technical Services, including: $2,923,00
. EIS/MIS 0
. Engineering Support
. Station Planning
. Capacity Modeling / BNSF Technical Services
Contracts:
. BRW $1,209,440 $1,423,440
. Ken Stevens $64,000
. Mainline Management $115,000
. David Loch $15,000
. Dick Nowlin $20,000
7. Legislative Activities $60,000 $65,000 $65,000
Contracts:
. Capital Partnership $30,000
. Brimsek $30,000
. Messerli and Kramer $5,000
Total $3,544,20 $1,908,440
0
8. Unallocated Reserve $1,655,80 $3,291,560
0
TOTAL $5,200,00 $5,200,000
0
.
.
DRAFT: November 15, 1999
eorthstar Corridor Development Authority
2000 Budget
NOTES
2000 Proposed
1. Authority Expense $30,000
Notes: Printing
Postage
Misc. Expense
2. NCDA Administration/Project Management $300,000
Notes: Ken Stevens - $100,000
RRA - $200,000
tp Insurance
$50,000(?)
Notes: Design and Construction $50,000
4. Legislative Activities $100,000
Notes: Capital Partnerships - $30,000
Brimsek $25,000
Messerli & Kramer - $30,000
Misc. Expenses - $15,000
5. Community and Public Involvement
$300,000
Notes: Shandwick - $90,000
Additional Shandwick Costs - $75,000
Misc. Expenses - $50,000
Direct Mailing -$85,000
.
6. BNSF Negotiations/Legal Services
$465,000
.
Notes: Harkins Cunningham - $250,000
Kessler - $50,000
Felhaber - $50,000
Mainline Management - $75,000
Miscellaneous - $40,000
7. Phase II Technical Services: $1,646,060
Notes: BRW - $1,546,060
Mainline Management - $100,000
8. Preliminary Engineering for Commuter Rail
$4,700,000
.
9. Preliminary Engineering for LRT (3rd to 5th)
$250,000
10. Station Area Development
$190,000
Notes: Lindquist & Vennum - $60,000
Land Use Planners - $100,000
David Loch - $ 30,000
11. Multi-Modal Station Development
$9,000,000
Notes: Land acquisition, design, construction of three stations.
12. Demo Train and Miscellaneous Expenses
SUBTOTAL
$75,000
$17,106,060
$2,643,940
.
13. Additional expenses related to commuter rail development,
acquisition and construction
TOTAL
$19,750,000
.
.
.
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
2000 Revenues
Dollar Amount Source
$ 3.3 million Carry-over from 1999 budget
$ 2.5 million Left from federal and state appropriations
for 1999
$12.5 million Multi-modal appropriations for 2000
$ 1.25 million Estimated New Starts federal
appropriation in 2000
$19.55 million Total
$ 0.2 million Local contribution
$19.75 million Total
s:
Q)
::J
r
::J
CD
s:
Q)
::J
Q)
(Q
CD
3
CD
::J
.-+
-t^
CD CD
(") ::J
5C/)
o'ro
Q) <
-CD
C/)::J
CD en
.., ..
<
-'CD
(") en
CD.-+
en -,
......3
o Q)
.., .-+
Q) CD
a.
.-+
o Q)
'-+::J
Q) 0
0'-+
_:::r
CD
-Efi ..,
.......-Efi
_co N
0-
001
08
0-
..,
CD
en
:::!:
3
Q)
.-+
CD
a.
Q)
::J
o
.-+
:::r
CD
..,
-Efi
~
o
o
o
o
0-
..,
-t
CD
(")
:::r
::J
0'
Q)
C/)
CD
..,
<
0'
CD
en
"0
c:
en
-Efi
N
01
o
o
o
0-
..,
OJ
Z
C/)
"
z
CD
(Q
o
:::!:
Q)
.-+
0'
::J
en
0-
..,
Q)
.-+
o
.-+
Q)
o
-
-Efi
0)
01
o
o
o
OJ
Z
C/)
"
z
CD
(Q
o
:::!:
Q)
.-+
0'
::J
en
z
o
.-+
CD
en
z
()
o
)>
()
o
o
..,
a.
::J
Q)
.-+
0'
::J
-
-0
..,
.Q,
CD
(")
.-+
s:
Q)
::J
Q)
(Q
CD
3
CD
::J
.-+
-Efi
01
o
o
o
0-
..,
Q)
::J
a.
-Efi
.......
.......
01
o
o
-
o
..,
--1(J):::o:::os:r^II10()OJOJ
o =r 0 0 Q) ~ CD Q) CD Q) Q) :::0 :::!.
W Q) 0- =r ~ a. ~ ~ =r < ~. < 3
~ CD Q) ..0 (J) -. Q) a. - < (f)
a.::l-..,~c_~o- Q) CD
~"T'a.CD(f)CD(f)CDr "
-. ....., (f) _ < () .., 0 "U
OCDO::::oo CD OQ)
"(f)~5)Qo~cr=r::l-
(f) <(f)~Q) ~
CD:::O~CD ~cn CD
"'O(Q~ ~o ..,
=rCD ~ ca~ ~
-3c ...J
CD 3 Q) 11 '"C
.., CD 3 CD
Qo~ ~
)> 0
(f) ~
~ Qo
o <
o
(Q
-
-Efl -Efl
c..v -Efl -Efl' N
CJ1N-Efl.....-Efl-Efl-Efl-Efl-Efl-Efl-Efl-.....l-Efl
.....OCJ1.j:::o.-.....I.....COCJ1CJ1c..vc..vCJ1c..v
0000CJ1000000CJ10
CJ10000000000CJ10
0000000000000
0000000000000
.................... ...................................
NNNNNNNNNNNN
------------
c..vc..vc..vc..vNc..vc..vc..vc..vc..vc..vc..v
....................co...................................
------------
oocooocooococooco
oocooocooococooco
-Efl * *
..... -Efl -Efl -Efl -Efl
..... NO>..........
.j:::o. 0CJ10CO
o 0000
o 0000
o 0000
-Efl -Efl
..... .....
- -
-.....I -Efl -Efl -Efl -Efl -Efl CJ1
.....coc..v .....N......j:::o.
0>0CJ1 00CJ1 0>
000 000 0
0>00 000 0>
0000000000000
-Efl
CO
0> -Efl-Efl-Efl-Efl
-.....I-Efl-EflN.....-Efl.....N-Efl-Efl-Efl
O-.....l.....O-.....lO>O.j:::o.c..v.....c..v
0CJ1CJ10CJ10000CJ10
00'00'00'0'000'0
00000000000
00000000000
-Efl
N
CJ1
o
o
00
)>0
3 0
o :a
c: ..,
~ 0)
. ,.. n
,..
mo
>< 0
"'C~
. ,..
c..,
0) 0)
,..n
CD ,..
z)>o
CD 3 0
CD CD ~
Q,~'"
CD Q, ~
Q,3n
.... ,..
o CD
.., ~
..J. ,..
U)tJJ
U)
U)
"'0
o 0)
I'J..,
0'"
0'<
00'
~
0)
..,
Q,
-no
o 0
.., ~
I'J ,..
0'"
00)
o~
)>
3
o
c:
~
,..
tJJ
z
o
c
)>
o
o
~
,..
..,
0)
n
,..
o
o
~
,..
..,
0)
n
,..
tJJ
.
~
;::;:
::r
.
.
. UIIDIITIISTJUI
CORRIDOR
Agenda Item # 3b
Memorandum
December 3, 1999
To:
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
From:
Executive Committee
Subject:
Multimodal Transit Facility
At its meeting of November 18, 1999, the Executive Committee voted to recommend that the
Northstar Corridor Development Authority (NCDA) authorize working with MnDOT to develop
three initial multi modal transit facilities in the Northstar Corridor. The following elements
comprise this multimodal facility initiative:
.
);> Partners:
· Northstar Corridor
· MnDOT Metro Division, District 3, Office of Transit
· Anoka County Transit
· Sherburne County
);> Areas of Responsibility:
· Ridership
· Capital & Facility Maintenance Costs
· Environmental Clearance
. Service Planning
. Surveys
· RIW Acquisitions
. Local Approvals
Northstar Corridor
MnDOT
MnDOT
MnDOT Office of Transit and
Anoka County Transit
MnDOT
MnDOT, Anoka County
North~arCo~do~MnDOT
);> Funding:
. Capital
. Operating
· Flow Process
Federal (Northstar Appropriations) and
Local Match (MnDOT)
To be determined (MnDOT)
(All)
Grant Application (All)
.
Action Requested: That the NCDA authorize working with MnDOT to develop three initial
multimodal transit facilities in the Northstar Corridor.
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
21003"1 Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2265 (612) 323-5700 Fax: (612) 323-5682
.
.
.
November 18,1999
SUGGESTED PROCESS FOR SELECTING LOCALLY
PREFERRED TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT
STRATEGY (LPTIS)
ACTIVITY /EVENT DATE
Present evaluation results to Executive Committee 11-18-99
Present evaluation results to Project Management Team 11-18-99
Present evaluation results to Technical Advisory 12-2-99
Committee
Present evaluation results to NCDA 12-9-99
Review/Consideration by NCDA Members 12-10 to 1-5
NCDA Selects LPTIS 1-6-00
.
November 18, 1999
MAJOR INVESTMENT STUDY (MIS) EV ALUA TION
ALTERNATIVES
1. No-Build
2. Transportation System Management (TSM)
3. Commuter Rail with Feeder Bus
4. TH 10 Improvements, Commuter Rail and Feeder Bus
5. New River Crossings, TH 10 Improvements, Commuter Rail and Feeder Bus
EVALUATION CRITERIA
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Transit system usage
Roadway system operations
Safety
Proximity impacts (displacements, parks, wetlands, floodplains, historic
properties)
Air quality
Energy
Noise
Environmental justice
Land Use
Development form
Economic development
Cost
Cost effectiveness
.
December 2, 1999
KEY FINDINGS OF THE MAJOR INVESTMENT STUDY
(MIS) EV ALUA TION
Relative to the No-Build Alternative:
Alt. 2 Transportation System Management
. Increases 2020 transit ridership by 4,900 trips per day
. Insignificant change in roadway system operations and safety
. No significant environmental effects
. Promotes environmental justice by providing reverse commute
. No significant influence on land use development
. Capital cost approximately $43 million + $6 million for right-of-way (1999$)
.
Alt. 3 Commuter Rail and Feeder Bus
. Increases 2020 transit ridership by 10,000 trips per day
. Small decrease in vehicle miles of travel
. Reduction in regional air pollutant emissions and energy consumption
. No perceptible change in noise levels
. No significant negative environmental effects
. Promotes environmental justice by providing reverse commute
. Provides opportunity to focus economic growth
. Capital cost approximately $190 million + $6 million for right-of-way
(1999$)
.
Alt. 4 TH 10 Improvements, Commuter Rail and Feeder Bus
. Increases 2020 transit ridership by 9,800 trips per day
. Small decrease in regional vehicle miles of travel
. Reduces traffic in the 1-94 corridor
. Reduced highway accident potential
. Reduction in regional air pollutant emissions and energy consumption
. No perceptible change in noise levels
. Potential parkland and floodplain impacts
. Promotes environmental justice by providing reverse commute
. Provides opportunity to focus economic growth
. Capital cost approximately $304 million ($190 million rail + $114 million
roadways) + $6 million for rail right-of-way + $52 million for roadway right-
of-way (1999$)
.
.
.
KEY FINDINGS (Continued)
Alt. 5 New River Crossings, TH 10 Improvements, Commuter Rail and Feeder Bus
. Increases 2020 transit ridership by 9,750 trips per day
. Small decrease in regional vehicle miles of travel
Reduces traffic in the 1-94 corridor
. Reduced highway accident potential
. Small reduction in vehicle hours of travel and delay
. Provides additional river crossing capacity
. Reduction in regional air pollutant emissions and energy consumption
. No perceptible change in noise levels
. Potential parkland and floodplain impacts including severance of a portion of
Elm Creek Park
. Promotes environmental justice by providing reverse commute
. Provides opportunity to focus economic growth
. Capital cost approximately $361 million ($190 million rail + $114 million
roadways + $57 million river crossings) + $6 million for rail right-of-way +
$54 million for roadway right-of-way (1999$)
~
~
;::-
!1
.
m~~
coo
.j>.;:o::-:D
III <'
s:: . ~
5' a, I
::Jco~
CD .j>. ::J
III 0
Q. ~
~ iii"
~
~
Qj
~
:::t
3'
CD
~ 10 Sl Sl 0 Sl
~:"':"-a.......~......
~tJ'lI\)tJ'l(,)(Xl
~~~~~~
.....
~IOSlSlOSl
~~............~
~~~tJ'l~(Xl
C~tJ'l~.j>.~
~,loOOOSl
~~~~_~o;
~~~~~~
~Io
.1>,"
~c;,
I\:l ..
'l~
SloOO
......-t.~
!,?.j>.(,)(Xl
......i\)NN
(Xlcoo(,)
~ 10 Sl Sl 0 Sl
t:.:.............~
j..)~!'?.j>.(,)(Xl
'l~(Xlrg~~
;:
~
...,
l::
~
.....
~
c:")
o
o
t:l
00
~
~O
~ -<
!.t:!j
-l~
-. tlfj
~ Z
(/)>-3
III
<
5"
(Q
1/1
"3'-1
~:Dg ~
2" Ul ~
, 3 3
~. CD
arO"
00'<
in -I
CD ::c
8 ....
5.~
.e.::c
.j>.
-.j
00
CD
co
3
CD
3.
o
e
a~
'0
me
~l:
:Do.
<'
~
g.g ~
a a (")
~r a5 a
!" 3 ~
a~'
00 00
III III
;;;$
g .g ~
cr a (")
::J a5 a
!" 3 ~
a~'
00 00
III III
;;;$
:D
!!.
..
o
III
0.
::cmO:Tm
~><Q6'~
III "8 :l. :T
a. ~ g. ~ ~.
5"m~6~
o.,"'Il!" ~ 0
.~Ill Z ~ :T
8- 0 cD ~
~tD(J)cc
~ ~ ~~.
a"'C ::c ~
Q) ~ ......
0.'<03
CD 0"
~ ~
g,
o ~ 16 ::J' ~ :E
8::. """,Q..Q.O
3-'o.CDCDl:
08~g:n.0:
~3' CD~:i"
a5"'C);:i"-.jo
000< tJ'lro
Q)~~m"O~
::J -. III -. CD 00
o.gcocg.6~
(XlnCD"'CDl:
~CN~;a.<D
~ cO':r 8"
~ ~ (J)
(,)
o
0)
0)
g ~ 16 ::J' ~ :E
o :i" ;;. ~ ~. g
B8~g:n.0:
~3' CD~S'
a5 "0); S'-.j 0
cno<_01m
t:>>~~m"C~
5. ci" ~ cO' CD CD
~~~=~g
~tj.laNaCD
~ cO' S' 0
~ ;?; en
tJ'l
g~~~~~
0.<s....30:
~~ccii)ffi-3.
CD8:["'~
3.arc.~!:>>
: -< ~ ... III
.... --:-~a.
(Xl :D~' l:
~. _ <D
-......8'
(Xl
:3
~ .g ~
....... a en
o' < S'
::JCDco
!" 3 00
~ ~
Cit~
~'<
(Xl
(,)0
" 0
~ 3
... 3
~ l:
SO ~
a:~
III
~~
:D S'
~.~
-....
:E
o
l:
0:
S'
o
ro
III
00
CD
a.
l:
CD
o
(Xl
01
co
~
g3a~80:E
~ "0 00 III 3
a 00 ... 3 5-
~~r a5 coS' Ill:t, l:' ,a.
!" 3 m 5'
CD8:~''''~
ama:~!:>>
: -< ~ ... III
.... -:-gja.
(Xl :D S' l:
~. ~ CD
-......5
(Xl
m
~
.
00
>
~
t:!j
>-3
0<
:D
o
III
a.
:IE
III
'<
0"0
"0 m
!ll '1':
~::c
S' 0
(Q E;
(/)~
"'C <
CD CD
CD ...
0.11I
(Q
CD
::c~<o~<o
o <::C:T<;S::T
l:~-IIlI~~1lI
iilQ:<cEQ:<cE
o CD !" CD CD !" CD
t; ::c z 5" s:: z S'
CDgol\)iSol\)
iiiUltllOootllO
'<0~~g,5.~
--10.0-15:0
..., D>>"" m
III -. III -.
< -<< -<
~ ~
:Dcb-l:Dcb
Jg.j>.::CJg.j>.
o' 0 0 o' 0
:J~o::J~
c:~ a:
Q c: Q
g
-I:Dcb
::c CD .j>.
o~. 0
(") ::J ~
8 a:
a: Q
g
-I:Dcb
::c CD .j>.
o~. 0
0::J~
~ is:
0: g
g
co
(,) (,)-.j(Xl
(,)(,)I\)~(,)ogco~~~~
....(Xl (Xl I\)-.j-.j I\) I\) 0(,)0) 0) I\)
333o,'(,)"...-J"...-J"coo>ooo(,)
"0"0"0 (Xl-.j.j>.ooooook>
:T:T:T(,)1\)00000000
~~~_ - 1\)1\)......
tJ'l tJ'l ....(,)tJ'l1\)
333).,(;301"co"@-:::000(,)
"O"O"OOI\)-.jooooook>
:T:T:T~~(Xl9909900
(,.)WI\) ......--
-LCO(X)(;) ~0i-:::-:::8~~1\)
333....~:..).,i\)).,000(,)
"O"O"Ooco....ooooook>
:T:T:TO)(XlOOOOOOoo
---------
C"JCJ.)CIJ(j) 1\3m.-.N~~1\)
(Xl....o tJ'l-.j1\)0)....(XltJ'l1\)
333....(1).,).,0,'(,)000(,)
"O"O"OI\)(XltJ'looooook>
:T:T:T(,)399990000
w w U)- - - - - I\) ......
....(Xll\)al-:::~~~~al~-.jl\)
333'(,),o:>).,....i\)0>000(,)
"O"O"O-.jco....ooooook>
:T:T:T~3~9999900
:ig~
-,-om
o:EOO
org,
g... 0 -I
Ul::c
0:0....
g m ~
::c
.j>.
-.j
00
CD
co
3
CD
::J
Cii
~
o
>
t:l
~
>
1\)0<
~rIJ
00<
roo
~ >-3
!.t:!j
2.~
ClJO
CD "'=
S. t:!j
lil ~
>-3
-
o
z
00
~-Iro:D
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
iil ~ ~ ~
3 ~ en
~ :D
~g:
:nUl
is:
CD
~
~
g:
0:1
I::
5:
II\) I\)
-.j-.j
0)0)
co "co
(Xl (Xl
Ccoco 0
~I\)
~ (Xl (Xl
-.... ....
0:, '0:>
~;j;j 0
.!O~~~o
~cotJ'l).,
Q)~~ ~
~f~i ~
.!01~~o
~ (;:U~ ~
'I 0) .j>. I\)
:D I\)
c: ~
CD 0
iil 0
:T !!!.
"6'0<
-I
...
III
:J
1/1
::;:
.
."s:
0)>
:ec..
enO
m:e
r--
mZ
0<
-tm
-en
~,-t
IS:
r-m
OZ
O-t
)>en
r--t
r-e
-<0
-e-<
:em
m<
.,,)>
mr-
:XJe
:e )>'
m-t
0-
-to
:eZ
)>s:
zm
en)>
-een
oe
:e:e
-tm
)>en
::!
o
Z
-
s:
-e
:e
o
<
m
s:
m
z
-t
en
-t
:e
)>
-t
m
G')
-<
~
I,~a
II'
I
II
-.
..
t:J
~
."
""'i
.....
~
~
\0
'0
g;
.::E
;:;-
~
.
......ens:
g'a(l)
1Il _00.
(I) 0 PiO
0. ::::J ::::J
o 1Il :;-
::::J 0
o
3
(I)
;;
:T
:i"
CD
CD
o
c
!:n
o
(I)
::::J
1Il
c:
~
.....
~
~o
ii)
sa.
z
)>
tv
::s=tz
000
o 3 1Il
3 0 cOO
!Il 0 20
c: ==
::::J 0
~~
~ Q;
0.::1:
Pi' ~
::::J !1l
::::J
o
(I)
::s=:'ZO@
000"0<
~3!!.!0-g~
!Il g~o 5 ~
c ~ _. 0
::::J 0 e. 0
~ ~ ll: 3
3 ;:;: 0 ~
~:t ai
PiO ~
::::J (I)
::::J
o
!1l
:J=:-ZO@
000"0<
o 3 !!.!o -g !1l
3 00 ::+ iil
!Il 0 205 !1l
c: =: _. 0
:J (') ~ 0
~ ~ ll: 3
3.... 3
!1l Q, c:
0.:::: CD
0)' ~
::::J !1l
::::J
o
(I)
CJ~6'
~9'-g
~ :i" ill
o -" d:
::::J ~ g
~ ~. ;5J
~mro
cg.::!.
!:nen~
6)-<
Oe.en
~ g ~
1Il 1Il <
C:~(I)
!- Co
"....
o "'
"0 ~
c: !!!_o
~
o 6
::::J III
:;-al
::::J
00.
o III
"' ::::J
"' -
c:
o
"'
trl
Z
-<
-
~
o
g>~~
"'~< ~ ~
!!!. --3
cn~ >
~9.t""
~. " c:...,
lil 0 e
_"0 C/)
05.>-3
Dl _
:!.(j
g trl
rod'
~ ai
~~
o e?,.
::::J-<
<03
CD "0
01>>
cU
i:n~
0"
~.g
1Il ~
c: I>>
en =:
.:......g
z
)>
8 8 3 G> 3 ~ ~ ~ ~o G>
3 c: so ~ SO 1Il ~ 2 o::::J ~
"0 ::::J Q (I) Q I>> 0 (I)
g~~illa:o(l)~~~
-03 =(I)iD30::::Jo,<
5-s08';:;!"~"O IO
?Q30 (I)~:;:-!1!.a83
;::;:"03 "'~~~
'<0"0 "Oo.~Olll"O
UJ n.. ~ "'..
-. ,..., ci "'Co -g. a: S
g~ ~-o::JQ6-
~ ii) ~~g>- CD
fJJ coac:
(I) 0" ::::J
g.::::J~
3~~~~0g>
SO 1Il (I) 0 ::::J ::::J
Q p) CD -s g. ~
a: 0 3-0 _0 ~ e?,.
(l)iD ::::Jo-<
!"~~I030
(I) 0 (I) 0
.... .... ::::J "0 3
~~~g"O
--0"0 ;:::;:~
2 0 so 00 I>>
::!.-g()::::Jg:
~ eT g (I)
(I) 00 ::::J
sa.::::J~
3 ~ ~ ~ ~o g>
SO 1Il (I) 0 ::::J ::::J
Q t>> CD -9. g. 9::
a: 0 3-0 _0 ~ !!!.
COco :Jo-.<
!"~~I030
(I) 0 (I) 0
.... .... ::::J "0 3
~~~g"O
"'" "'C "0 ;::;: ~
2 0 so 00 I>>
::!.-g()::::Jg:
~ eT g (I)
(I) 00 ::::J
sa.::::J~
::s=:-zo
000"0
o 3 !!.!o-g
3 00 ::+
!Il 0 205
c: _0 _0
:J (") =.
~~ll:
~ Q;
0.::1:
iii' ~
::::J (I)
::::J
o
(I)
~ ~o ~ g go ~ go ~ ~ ~ go ~
~~"O::::JQ(I)QI>>....(I)O(l)
~"O g~~ill ~o ~o~~~
~ ~ ~~"~~!" ~~ 1f~8
~iiro~-g.g ';ais-g.g
ai::::JO !!.!ol>> ~o.{gllll>>
~3 !:to; 2"8s.gi>>
3 gg: ::!.-go::::Jo-
S. !:U CD ,~ 5).... ~ m
~ tf) CD 0' :s
g.::::J~
~. 8 g ~. g>
= 3 5 5 ::::J
.g -g ~ ~o ~
a !!.!o 3 ~ ~
<g:5'8~
ll: ? Q 3 0
iiro~-g.g
::::J 0 !!.!o I>>
1Il...._. 3 d: a
3 g g:
s. p) CD
~ 1Il
~o 8 8 ~o g>
= 3 5 5 ::::J
il~~~
<g5'8~
m ? Q 3 0
iiro~-g.g
::::J 0 !!.!o I>>
!!.!..... 3 =: C3
3 g g:
S. Q) CD
!1! 1Il
z
)>
~5~~~
CDKf~o~
I>> .... (I)
~ii)~-g~
g!:~i>
....gOJ~~
::8"g.cElIl
!=> .... I>> !Il 3
I>> ::::J~I>>
::!; cg 15'
('):i" 52.
~5~~~
~~;~~
ll:<~2:!JJ
om. (I)......
::::Jg.o.g.~
.... (I) OJ I>> OJ
I8"o::::Jen
..... ~ cg 3
!=> ~ cE '- ~
00 (I) ll:
S' .-
Q) -. - '-J
0. g !!?o en
liio iD ca "2
(') f>> ;:::::. ~
CDcn....O
a ~ ~o ~
5' 0 ::J -
.... -. C/'J :r
ill ~ "0 0
o _ (I) iD
"CO-s:u
!" al g. 1Il
ij) '< (I)
~ so
c:
0:
~ gO [ Ol
liio iD ca "2
(') Q) ;:;. ~
CD en .... (')
a ~ e!. ~
~ Q. ffi s:
ill ~ "0 0
(') CD CD
"Am"'" I>>
!" < 0. 1Il
(I) I>> (I)
Ui"<
:E So
o
c:
0:
"0 0-
(1)'<
~ ~
"So.
C'OJ
ii)':"'"
o UJ
"30.
I>> OJ
::::J 1Il
cg 3
'-e?,.
ii)
!e-
:E .....
o (X)
~8
So 3
o 3
iD c:
~ ~
(I) ....
::::J ill
o So
000 1Il
(1)"0
m~
~g.
1Il,<
;:
~
l:l
'"
l:::
~
......
~
c:;-
~ (X)
c: 0
0:0
So 3
o 3
iD c:
~ ~
(I) ....
::::J ill
o SO
000 en
(1)"0
a;~.
~g.
1Il,<
z
o
-
C/)
trl
o
"3
Dl
::::J
o
III
S.
Z
o
iiiO
III
r-
III
;6
iii
00
o "3
::::J Dl
CII ::::J
CCC
3 III
" _0
_::::J
00 m
::::J ::::J
III
"'
cc
'<
......0
3 "3
=1>>
00 cE
::::J (I)
OJ _0
....::::J
C(l)
1Il ::::J
-<-(I)
m~
':::'0
o
::::J
1Il
c:
3
"S
00
::::J
.....
.....
.....
0:>
o
......
.....
~
(,)
N
~
.:::!
"i:
~
en
CD
CD
~ (X)
c: 0
0:0
SO 3
o 3
a: c:
~ ~
(I) ....
ill
5 So
000 1Il
(1)"0
ii)~
~g.
1Il,<
"i:
-oJ
01
'0
CD
.8
.
trl
Z
trl
~
~
0<
"<
~ozo
o()~O
----
0000
::::J ::::J ::::J ::::J
enl!!.l!!.lIl
-<-'<'<-<-
(I) (I) (I) (I)
~~~.!
CJ1
enOlO
~~b~
OlUJ(X)(x)
NN-oJ-oJ
...... .....
_....._0
=..9~~
......01
.....~~
.....CD~~
......
~
'":;:0,
......OOCJ1~
OlO-oJ.:::!
...........en
......-oJCJ1UJ
~g~=
....::0
DlcZ
::::J _0
CII 0
"0 ::::J
o Dl
~-
Dl 0
g:;-
::::J ::::J
~cg
"' -.
m::::J
3
iii
CII
00
::::J
CII
<I> :;-
3 0
~. CD
00 3
::::J (I)
1Il ::::J
iD ~
illg.
~~
(1)0
8" (I)
z So
o iD
OJO
5:0 00
-::::J
o.e?,.
>
-
~
,0
e
>
t""
-
>-3
0<
OZ
(I) I>>
co:::
.... Jl
3 (I)
~o~o
0.....
(I)
!!J"'
cOO
C'
ii)
>:1:
ri iii.
"3-
III ~
o n-
o!.
~Dl
!.~
"
...
o
al
~
ii"
CII
)>
'3
"3
(I)
o
5"
o
00
!!!.
I41
ooo.g
oeD
~. ~
~ il
I :f
OZ)>
~~<D
.... Jl I>>
~o (I) g.
~ CQo "
0. 1Il 0
matiD
_....::::J
cg: ~
0- -
ii) ~
5100 0'
~
zz
o 0
::::J ::::J
!Il !Il
zz
o 0
::::J ::::J
!D !Il
00
0.
~
51
......z
~o
Ol::::J
o-!D
5:0
0:
So
o
2.
00
0.
~
U~
-:::: s.
0lQ;
0- ::::J
c:o
B:1Il
So
o
2.
N
.0
c:
o~
ar
1Il
.....(X)
0.0-
00" 0:
::to
U~
.....
010.
~~
0:0
S" ;::
o (,)
2.~
N
.0
c:
o~
roO
1Il
.....0:>
0.0-
iir 0:
g.~
;+
010.
~~
g;~
::::J ......
o UJ
~~
"0
c _0
o-CII
-"
('jo ii)
)>0
o III
o a.
III C
CII "'
CII <"
III
~
'<
CII
-
::OC
III _0
_CII
0"
o -
Dl Dl
_ 0
-Ill
o 3
::::J III
CII ::::J
-
CII
Dl
::::J
a.
"tI
~
o
~
-
3:
-
:e>>-3
Dl .0 0<
_c_
~ !. ~
::0 ('j0 "tI
mm>
o 8 (j
5;CII>-3
lil ; C/)
fII III
it
2'g~:;-
g: 3 1Il0._0 !e-
o" 3 CD ~
f!l ~ 3. g"
iD Pi_o ~ 1Il
!2. SlO
"
c:
g:
00
"T1
I>>
~
ro"
1Il
()Jl)>)>)>
o (I) 0 0 0
3 ~. CD m CD
3 0. 1Il 1Il 1Il
~~aaa
90 g -0- :E "0
~cno~~
0.-;:0:-
"0 I>> ill
ill5.::::J
So 1Il 0.
~o 30 30
3"0"0
"0 I>> I>>
~ $- ~
aio.o.
0.
~IZZZZZZZZZ
~ g g g g g g g g g
~ !Il !Il !Il !Il !Il !Il !Il !Il !Il
il~~~~ Ol~~
~
~
en
I>> Z
o 0
iD ::::J
1Il !Il
il~ ~ ~
I\:) ~
i\)1~ ~ ~
I\:) .....
i\)1~ ~ ~
.
"3:
0)>
:ec..
C/)O
m:e
r--
mZ
0<
-tm
-C/)
Z-t
~s:
r-m
OZ
O-t
)>C/)
r--t
r-c:
-<0
"'C-<
:em
m<
,,)>
mr-
:cc:
:c>
m-t
0-
-to
:eZ
)>3:
zm
C/))>
"'CC/)
OC:
:e:c
-tm
)>C/)
::!
o
Z
-
3:
"'C
:e
o
<
m
3:
m
Z
-t
C/)
-t
:c
)>
-t
m
C)
-<
ft~
la
I
B
.il
tJ
~
."
"-t
......
tv
~
~
\0
b:l .
~
.~
S"
!'l
~ ~
0 0
~ ~
>-3 >-3
tr:! ,-,
I-"
"lrj \C
-I "lrj IoC
> tr:! ~ lDOIoC
:J 0 ~ 5. g 0
:J ~ "C
s:: >-3 ... 0:"'---
!!!. > - 0 >e:
< lQ
c: :J ... ;::;=
III :J tr:! III III III
s:: Z 3 ... ...
III !!!. :J III
... ~ 3 III :J
j;j' &~~
III
0. ~ "C III <
0 oS:!"
0
III _. n Z
- Pl c 0
"C -0.
III .!..CD
... III
85'-g5'
~ 0 .... 0
"'C (i) :J CD
~ ~ ~ ~
o :J .., :J
i~~~
::l n ... n
lQ ::T iil ::T
lD III .. III
-. ::l -I ::l
::llCencal
<~. ""
s: ::l "'" S'
-I::T -
cO' a
::T ::l
~ ~
'< 0
!!l.
v..
::!
Cl>
l:l
...
$::
~
....
~
t:;"
z
!a-
III
"0
"'Q.
~.
c:r
10
z
!a-
III
"0
"'Q.
~.
c:r
10
z
!a-
III
"0
"'Q.
ci"
III
c:r
10
{fl
./>.
.....
c.,
Ul
{fl
0)
01
<0
o
~>:OO
o ::l US' III
i:~;:r"&
).!!!.6!!!.
::! 0 ...
::!"C :E
~ lD III
QI"''<
;:::a
N -.
III ::l
Q.1C
(")ll<>
~ ~
- -.
::l
CD
::l
ll>
::l
o
lD
z
!a-
ll>
"0
"'Q.
~.
c:r
10
~~~~
....,-+--
QI III III III
:g~~~
g: ~. ~. ~.
t:r2: 2: 2:
_lDlDlD
!II' . ,
z
!a-
III
"0
"'Q.
0'
III
c:r
10
1It{fl{fl{fl
{fl
.... ./>.
"'-4 ~...,,(.."! .~
~7...J7...J:"
...../>.N./>.
(,)000
booo
<:)000
<:)000
1It{fl{fl{fl
.....
Ul
N
(0
.....
(,)..... co
<:)UlO)(o
~~~~
<:)000
booo
<:)000
<:)000
{fl
1It{fl{fl{fl
w
i>>
o
W
..........010
....../>......./>.
b7...Jeoo
.....(0.....0)
<:)000
booo
<:)000
<:)000
1It{fl{fl{fl
{fl
.....
Ul
i>>
(0
w
..........0)0)
10./>.0.....
~~~~
bggg
8000
.
..
..
tr:! 0 t"'"
~ tr:! >-
0 < ~
Z tr:!
0 t"'" ~
:: 0 ~
- ~ otr:!
0. 0 ~ m 0 ::
lD lD III s:: 0
< C/) 0 n !!!. tr:! :J
~ 2. ::r Z III
tr:! > ;:;: iii'
"0"0 !. >-3
3 eo < ;::; c;-
lD 0 tr:! III :C' "lrj ::l
::l ::l ... III
t"'" :J 0 n
~Sl III C '<
::T 0 - III ~ ~
0 ~ ~' III ::
n
:E ... ::T
C/) -6' m
et t%j - ><
z o' iii'
o' >-3 :J -
::l !a. S'
III lQ
iil c 0
ll> ~ 0
C/)
0 III 3
0 0' "C
c: "C iil
a: 3 ::r
a III III
a :J
c III
lD 3" ~.
::l
0 "C "0
lD III
Q n Ai
- :J
0' III III
0 !a.
c:
C/)
.
z
!a-
III
"0
"'Q.
~'
c:r
10
iil Z
10 0
0' 0
::l ::T
!!!.~
010
... lD
0:::-
o 0
!!!.3
"C"C
~@
~ III
::l ::l
!" -
..
~~~~
lC=lD"
a.o3~
CD == 50 0.....
Q. o' Q
!!.!. lD 0:
OOS_'lD
. iil, ....
S' C 0'
c.~c;;
~2~
~ g ~
iil Z
10 0
o' 0
::l ::r
!!!.~
010
.... lD
0:;"
!;l 0
-3
"0"0
III ....
::t lD
~ ~
::l ::l
!" -
~m(J)
:fS"a
10 = o'
o.o::l
lD =: C/)
Q. o' 8
!!!. lD c:
g Q c:
!" S' a:
g.c
~ ~
~2
-
::l ....
-Ill
.... ::l
III C/)
!!l."O
.... 0
~ii}
C d':.
CD 0
. ::l
0"0"0 Z
&l g;, CD 0
= ~ lll~.
~ ~ ;? S:
0. 0' o'
s::::EOlll
~g~a
o III Q 0
o"O...::T
::l"O,lg~
a a --co
(i)~g~
. iii'!!!. a
CD 3
!!!.O
O'~
:E CD
3 CD
o 0.
CD 10
~a
o' :s-
(ii' ?T
;?
c: ::E
C/) g
lD a:
Q.
- 0 :E
Q ~ 0
3 5 c:
_(Q c:
a <l> rn
3 S'{5
C/) 0."0
!;l 91 g
::t lD
~oc
CD-cC
0. 3 CD
Oa
en
III
3
lD
III
C/)
~
CD
3
~
<'
lD
p
~lfilg5:&'
C516Q:g,3
.ga~g':
3 m ~ ~ C/)
~ S' 0. '::<= lD~
- 0 ll>
~ iil 0 3' 3
lDlllO"O~
~ III m a <'
c:a.C/)C5lD
1;) a.p
en
III
3
lD
III
C/)
>
it
3
~
<'
lD
p
::lIll"Oen
~ g ~ 3
....lDO.lD
<' ~ c:
~lllii>~
o a~ >
g3~.it
(f) 0 :T 3
~. g S' ~
!" ~ >l ~.
g. m ../>.
lD III
O'a.
::l Z
2.S!.
~s:
0-<
o 0
3 0
~ iil,
o C/)
-CD
~ :J
o ,...
~~
, c:
a:
03lD()
o 0 ::l 0
3 < 8 iil
~ ~ c: en'
S). CD DJ CD
co3.<g~
a 0' en
~:E0::E
::T1ll30
a. lD c:
a:
8 o~
3 ~. ~
~ C::l
~~~
i>> "8 a
~~-6
lD_a.
:< 5i' ~
o' - S'
~ ~
ii>
::l
C/)
3lD()
III X 0
::l ~ 3
'< ::l 3
0'10 c:
~~i
-ll>
s ~ ~
iif:I:::l
o !a-
-~"O
lD III
ffi a
lD 3 3 en
~."O ll> III
~ a Q' ~
:J < ;:+
IClD,<1ll
"0 3 0 C/)
ii>lD->
:J :J ..., ;:;
en-Oeo
. en s:>> ""'"
"0 a. ::l
III :E ~
::l. III -.
o'<C5
- W
"0
C
C/)
"'Oo:O:I:en
ii>iil~'~lll
::l ;::r .... lD ~
~:I:~C5ll>
~ ~ 0 ..- (J)
C/) ::l C/) :0 ~
={gsoll>fi)
3S'1C33
~ () ::l III ~
o St '4=
c: "0 0 ~.
.;:; III III ./>..
"" ::l. ':S.
o 0
-::l
"T1S:
0)>
:D(...
enO
m:D
1-
mZ
0<
-1m
-en
Z-I
C)s:
~m
OZ
0-1
)>en
1-1
Ie:
-<0
'tJ-<
:Dm
m<
"T1)>
ml
:De:
:D)>
m-l
0-
-10
:DZ
)>s:
zm
en)>
'tJen
Oe:
:D:D
-1m
)>en
-I
-
o
Z
-
s:
'tJ
:D
o
<
m
s:
m
Z
-I
en
-I
:D
)>
-I
m
C)
-<
t:)
~
."
--I
....
~
~
\0
\0