Loading...
10-28-1991 CC MIN e ~fF.ETING OF THE ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL HELD AT THE ELK RIVER HIGH SCHOOL THEATER MONDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1991 MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Tra.lle, Councilmember Holmgren, Schuldt, Dietz, and Kropuenske MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Patrick Klaers, City Administrator; Terry Mmlrer, City Engineer; Pp.ter Beck, City Attorney; and Sandra Thackeray, City Clerk 1. Call Meeting to Orde~ Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the meeting of the Elk River City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Tralle. 2. Consider 10/28/91 City Council ~t!enda COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO APPROVE THE 10/28/91 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. e 3.1. Consi der 10/17/91 Special City Counci 1 MiJ.lUtes COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE MOVED TO APPROVE THE 10/17/91 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 3.2. Considp.r 10/21/91 City Council Mim!..t.es COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO APPROVE THE 10/21/91 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES. COlJNCJLMEMBER DIETZ SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 4. Qpen Mike No one appeared for this item. I) .1. Consider Improvements for the Nortl1e~~:tt Connty State Aid Hil{hl!1!.Y_ #1 p'roj~ct (Ele!!LEIDtary School )/Public H~arLILl{ Terry Maurer indicated that the project consists of sanitary sewer, watermain and street and storm sewer improvements to serve the proposed elementary school as well as land for future development in the City of Elk River. - Terry Maurer indicated that the project was started from a petition which was si gned by three of the major property owners. Terry Maurer reviewed each element of the project and the proposed sanitary sewer assessment area. Sanitary Sewer is the only part of the project that City Council Minutes October 28, 1991 Page 2 e is to be assessed to properties other than the school si te. Terry Ma.urer indicated that the estimated total project cost was $465,424.50, plus overhead expenses, and was based on actual construction bids that were submitted in October. The City's Attorney, Peter Beck, reviewed the assessment appeal procedure. Mayor Tralle indicated that the assessment hearing is scheduled for November 6, at 7:00 at the Elk River Public Library. Mayor Tralle opened the public hearing. Bill Brady, of 12553 193rd, had several concerns. He stated that according to the original feasibility study, the cost for the project has increased 71%. Terry Maurer indicated that after soil borings were taken it was determined that there was more ground water to deal with than anticipated and, therefore, the installation method of the pipe as proposed in the original feasibility was not sui table. He indicated that this raised the cost considerably. Mr. Maurer indicated that 13 bids were received for the project and was satisfied that the City received the lowest bid possible. Mr. Brady questioned whether work has begun on the sewer line. Terry Maurer indicated that work has not begun on the sewer line. e Mr. Brady also questioned the benefit area. He questioned why only 198 acres were being assessed when the project actually benefits the entire northern area and felt the City should consider assessing the entire area. Terry Maurer indicated that the other areas Mr. Brady was referring to would be assessed when Phase II improvements were made. Mr. Brady questioned whether the sewer line would benefit these areas at the present time. Terry Maurer indicated that the area would not receive direct benefit. Mr. Brady indicated that he did not feel the City was treating him fairly by placing the assessment burden on a small area. Virginia Barnier indicated she owned property west of the elementary school. She questioned whether she would be able to connect to the sewer system if her property were sold. Terry Maurer explained that Ms. Barnier would have to petition the City for the improvements, thereby starting the assessment process for the Phase II improvements. There being no further comments, Mayor Tralle closed the public hearing. Council member Schuldt questioned whether the project could proceed if Mr. Brady's property were excluded from the project. Terry Maurer indicated that the cost would have to be absorbed by the remaining properties in the project. Councilmember Kropuenske indicated that the property owners i Dcluded in the proj ect area have the opportun i ty to gain direct benefits from the project. e COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE MOVED TO ADOPT R.ESOLUTION 91-61, A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BTD AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT IN THE MATTER OF THE COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY #1 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STREET AND UTILITY City Council Minutes October 28, 1991 Page 3 e IMPROVEMENTS OF 1991. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 5.2. COlJs!d~.r_ll!l12TOVements for Westwood Area P_ro.iectjpublic Hearing Terry Maurer reviewed the project history of the Westwood area improvement including results of the 1985 study. He indicated that on Sept.ember 30, 1991, an informational hearing wa.s held by t.he City Council and much public input was received. He stated that staff was given direction by the Council to look at possible reductions in the overall assessment. One assessment. reducti on that may be possible is to reduce the street assessment to $20 per front foot. He i nd i cated that this would make the street assessment equivalent to those streets receiving MSA funding. Terry Maurer indicated that City st.aff also looked at buildable unit assessments versus front footage assessments. Terry Maurer indicated that the City will review bot.h of these methods of assessment to determine t.he best assessment method for the project. Mayor Tralle opened the public hearing. e Arnie Mach of Paradise Park indicated that his plans for his property are to keep it in its natural state. He stat.ed that his lots are unbuildable lots and that the property is low land and wet land. He further indicated that a street could not be built in that area as originally platted due to the low land. Terry Maurer indicated that the City is considering looping a water line through the area, but is not proposing to build a street because of the low land. Mr. Watzke stated that he does not see a need for the street at 188th and Boston to continue and asked if this street could be vacated as is planned for 189th Street. Dave Hurd, 1891.9 Albany Street, indicated he had lived in the nei ghborhood for 14 years and t.hat there were no problems in the area with water for the first ten years. He stated that he feels the development north of the area, in the Industrial Park, has caused some of t.he water problems in the Westwood area. He further indicated that he is supporting the improvement project as he feels that ground water contamination may be a problem in the future. He further indicated that the safety and health issues should be considered by the Council. e Ed Buttweiler, 12891 1a7th Circle, inclicated that he had submit.ted a petition to the Council requesting that the Island View 3rd Addition and Lundgren Homes Add i tj ons be excluded from the proj ect. Mr. Buttweiler indicated that there are other State approved sanitary sewer systems that the Counci I may consider. He further indicated that he felt additional costs would be added to the project in order to bring the water and sewer uphill to Island View due to the depth needed for this service. Mr. Buttweiler commented on the fact that the cost of the project has risen since 1985. Mr. Buttweiler questioned why the Ci ty is including curb and gutter in the project when this is not included in other areas. He indicated that this could be a cost savings if it were deleted. He indicated that it is the City's responsi.bility to inform the homeowners of the full impact of the City Council Minutes October 28, 1991 Page 4 e project including hook up charges and interest. Mr. Buttweiler also commented on the flow of the storm sewer into Lake Orono and stated he would like to know what the DNR assessment is regarding the additional flow into the Lake. Mayor Tralle responded by stating that curb and gutter is primarily installed for water control. Terry Maurer addressed the concerns regarding the Ci ty using alternative sewer systems. Mr. Maurer indicated that he did investigate alternative systems, but felt the biggest factor in these systems would be the long term maintenance costs. He further indicated that staff felt as long as City sewer and water is readily available, it would be more cost efficient to hook up to City services. Mayor Tralle indicated that the plan for the project would receive DNR review. Eleanor Todahl, of Boston Street, indicated that she does not have problems with her sewer or well. She stated that she is concerned about how she will get the money to pay for the assessment. She further questioned whether she would be required to hook up to the services if the project were approved. Mr. Maurer indicated that it is the City's policy that homeowners hook up to sewer within two years after it is made available. Eleanor Todahl indicated that she is opposed to the project. e Larry Hickman, 12888 187th Avenue, gave a scenario of the cost for the largest lot and a low income owner of $20,000. He indicated that many of the people in the area will be losing thei I' homes because of the project. Ricki Buttweiler, 12891 187th Circle, gave a cost scenario for a 75 foot lot with financing over 15 years, she indicated that this cost would be $19,123 which includes interest. She stated that a homeowner with a 150 foot lot financed over 15 years, would pay $31,364 which includes interest. Ms. Buttweiler further indicated that she talked to the Minnesota State Health Department regarding the City's water tests. She stated that of the tests taken, the worst well in the area revealed a 5.1 parts per million (ppm)of nitrates. She stated that there is no enforceable maximum on private wells but there is a 10 ppm maximum on City wells. She indicated that she did not feel that the wells should be a concern at this time. Joe Berglove, 18860 Concord Street, indicated that he had 330 feet of frontage and that in order to pay the proposed assessment, he would have to sell some of his property. He stated that the neighbors must consider the people in the area who are having water problems. e Di ane Stragge of Paradise Park indicated she owned a lot in Paradise Park and has been trying to sell the lot since 1980. She indicated that the bank has refused a loan on the lot due to the water situation. She further stated that the area is in trouble and that the the project is needed. She further stated she hoped the City could find ways to reduce the assessments. . She indicated she was in favor of the project. City Council Minutes October 28, 1991 Page 5 e Jerry Roche indicated that the real need is for storm sewer. He indicated that if this is the real problem, the Council should consider installing only the stOrm sewer. Terry Maurer stated that it would be expensive to put in a storm sewer if the City is considering sanitary sp.wer and water improvements in the future because the storm sewer would have to be removed and reinstalled at that time. Butch Melton, 12838 l88th Avenue, questioned whether Outlot B was included in the proposed assessment. Terry Maurer indicated that Outlot B is not considp.red an assessable unlt. Mr. Maurer stated that thp. City is investigating putting in a water line for a loop system, howp.ver, no other improvements will be put into that undeveloped right-of-way adjacent to Outlot B. Mr. Melton indicated that he would like the area left in its natural state. Mr. Melton questioned the amount the right-of-way on Zumbro Street. Mr. Melton also commented on the fact that runoff from the Industrial Park into the neighborhood is not the homeowner's fault. He stated that it was not fair that the City wanted to charge him and the neighbors for this problem. He further indicated that he did not feel it is cost effective to put in only storm sewer and questioned whether the City was considering alternative funding for the project. e Mary Lornstron indicated she owned Lot 1 in Lundgren Homes Addition. She stated she has not built a home on the lot but may have to consider selling the lot if the assessment goes through. She stated that even if the assessment goes through, the cost of the assessment may not allow her to sell her lot. Yvonne Hetland, lSSth and Boston, indicated that the Council should make the homeowners aware of all hidden costs. She further indicated that once the assessment project is completed, there will be several homeowners that will not be able to pay for this project and will lose their homes. Diane Olson, 18743 Al bany, questioned what happens to the assessments on the lots that are turned back to the County. Marilyn VanPatten-Chuba indicated that she did not feel the cost of the improvement would raise the value on her home in the area. .Jim Smith, of la8th Avenue, questioned how the small lots and large lots were determined by the staff. Marvin Weaver, 12815 Meadowvale, questioned how the City determines whi ch properties are excluded from the assessment area. He indicated that he owns property north of Meadowvale with significant road frontage. Terry Maurer indicated that the City would not assess the total length of the his property for the street if the property were included in the assessment project. e Roger Tarnowski, 18881 Boston, indicated that his main concern is the water coming down from the railroad tracks. He questioned whether the fi ve foot storm sewer pipe would keep the basements dry in the area. Terry Maurer indicated that the storm sewer will not dry up underground City Council Minutes October 28, 1991 Page 6 e springs in the area, however, i.f homeowners are experiencing water problems from surface water run-off, this will be corrected by the project. Mr. Tarnowski stated he was opposed to project. Mr. Ken Case of 12951 Meadowvale questioned whether he would be included in the project. Terry Maurer indicated that sewer and water could be provided but that roads will not be included in his area north of Meadowvale Road. Scott Fitzgerald, 12782 Meadowvale, indicated that he was in favor of the project and he was concerned about personal welfare of his children drinking private well water. Stephen Rohlf, 12821 188th Avenue, stated there were homes in the area that could not be sold without addressing the problems. Diane Strege inevi table. wi thout the project. of 18821 Albany, stated that she felt the project was She further indicated that she could not sell her home project being completed and that she is in favor the There being no further comment, Mayor Tralle closed the public hearing. e Mayor TraUe stated that after hearing the comments, it seems to be where the individuals live that determines whether or not they are in favor or opposed to the project. He indicated that he feels this issue will come back to haunt future Council's until the issue is settled. Mayor Tral] e indicated that he has walked the area and that there is the smell of septic in the area. He stated that there are septic tank~ that are fat ling in the area and feels that with the septic and sewer problems, the State of Minnesota could force the project and the Ci ty would not be in a position to receive favorable bids or they may be in the position to have to condemn homes. Councilmember Schuldt indicated that the project did not go through in 1985 because of the divided feelings of the neighborhood. Councilmember Schuldt indicated that the problem will not disappear, but will only be delayed if the Council chooses not to act on it at this time. Councilmember Schuldt indicated that he felt if nothing is done in the area, some people will be faced with properties and homes that they will not be able to sell or live in. Councilmember Kropuenske indicated he agreed with Councilmember Schuldt. He indicated that the Council must look at the situation as a whole and not on an individual basis. Councilmember Kropuenske stated that he can Bee the possibility of the excluding Lundgren Homes and the property north of Meadowvale from the project. e Councilmember Dietz indicated that the issue seems to come down to where you live in the area. He indicated that the Council must consider what is best for the entire neighborhood. City Council Minutes October 28, 1991 Page 7 e Councilmember Holmgren indicated that he does not like the high cost being assessed to the homeowners, but agrees it is a project that needs to be done. He indicated that the City must address the cost issues. Mayor 'l'ralle stated that he does not feel that Lundgren Homes and I sland View Homes Additions, which were mentioned in the peti tion, should be excluded from the area. He stated that if the project had went through in 1985, all of these lots would be hooked up to Ci ty sewer and wa.ter. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 91-62, A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS IN THE MATTER OF THE WESTWOOD AREA IMPROVEMENT OF 1991 AND THAT ALL AREAS BE INCLUDED IN THE PRO.JECT. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. Mayor Tralle indicated that he would support the motion. He further indicated that the City will look at any possibility of tapping into State or Federa.l funds for assistance for this project. He further j ndicated that ] etters will be sent to Legislators and Congressmen regarding funding. e Mr. Brady questioned whether the Mayor would also consider this type of support for the School project. Mayor Tralle indicated that School project wi 11 be mentioned in the request for support letters to the Congress and Legislature. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. The Council recessed at 9:55 p.m. and reconvened at 10:00. 7. nther BusineS}i Pat Klaers indicated that the Chamber of Commerce State of the City Address will be held on Tuesday, 1/21/92, and requested Council consensus to participate in this program. COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO CALL A MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL ON 1/21/92 FOR. THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE STATE OF THE CITY ADDRESS. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 9. .Adjpurnment COUNCTLMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. COUNC I TJMEMBER The meeting of the Elk River City Council adjourned at 10:10 p.m. e Respectfully submitted, I <=4~ ./ Sandra Thackeray