4 PCSR 06-10-1993 4
• / , I CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Maier Stewart & Associates Inc.
June 4, 1993
File: 230-152-11
Mr. Steve Rohlf
Building and Zoning Administrator
City of Elk River
P.O. Box 490
13065 Orono Parkway
Elk River, MN 55330
RE: ELK PARK CENTER REVIEW
Dear Mr. Rohlf:
As requested, we have reviewed the material submitted for the Elk Park Center project. Based
on our review, we would offer the following comments:
A. PRELIMINARY PLAT
• 1. The boundary lines of the adjoiningPe ro rties within 150 feet have been identified
P
but the property owner names are not labeled.
2. The existing zoning classifications for the adjoining properties are not shown.
3. The vertical datum used for the existing topography should be stated.
4. Setback lines should be shown.
5.' An easement will be required for the ponding area along the south property line.
6. Outlot B should be dedicated to the adjacent exception.
7. Additional easements will be needed for the hydrants in Block 4.
8. Additional easements will be required for the proposed sanitary sewer and
watermain through Block 1.
9. The drainage and utility easement along the north line of Lot 3, Block 4, as
shown, will go through the proposed building.
•
1959 SLOAN PLACE, SUITE 200, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021
9800 SHELARD PARKWAY, SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 612-546-0432 • Equal Opportunity Employer
152-0401.jun
• Mr. Steve Rohlf
June 4, 1993
Page 2
10. The preliminary plat is not consistent with the grading plan with regard to Lots
6, 7, and 8, Block 4. The preliminary plat indicates that these lots are part of the
plat and the grading plan does not include these lots. If these lots are part of the
plat, how do the proposed lot lines affect the existing buildings with regard to
setback requirements? The existing buildings and setback lines should be shown
on the preliminary plat.
B. PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN
1. Lot lines and lot numbers should be shown for ease of cross-reference.
2. No top or invert elevations are shown on the proposed storm sewer. This
information is required to complete the grading plan review.
3. Additional spot elevations are needed in the parking lots and along the buildings
to complete the grading plan review in these areas.
4. All ponds within the development should be provided with an emergency overflow
110 including spot elevations shown on the plan. These should be provided such that,
in the case of a blockage of the storm sewer, no buildings will be flooded.
5. The four storm sewer ponds, as shown on the grading plan, have slopes which
range from 2:1 up to 4:1. These slopes are not acceptable. No slopes on any of
these ponds should be any steeper than 4:1 and, wherever possible, should be less
steep than that.
6. Three retaining walls are shown on the grading plan. They have maximum
heights of six feet, fourteen feet, and sixteen feet. These raise the question of
whether or not retaining walls of these excessive heights are acceptable within a
commercial development. They also raise the question of who will own and
maintain the walls. The walls should be provided with easements adjacent to them
to provide for maintenance. If retaining walls of this excessive height are to be
allowed on the site, they must be designed by a professional registered engineer.
7. There is a pond along the entire southern property line between this development
and the School District property. Consideration should be given to providing a
fence along the ponding area between the pond and the School District.
8. Additional elevations are required along the south lot line of Lot 1, Block 3, to
IDcomplete the review of the grading plan in this area.
152-0401.jun
Mr. Steve Rohlf
•
June 4, 1993
Page 3
9. There is an existing 100-foot wide U.P.A. easement through Block 4 which is
proposed to be realigned. This realignment along the west line of Block 4 is
shown to be through the middle of one of the proposed storm drainage ponds. We
would recommend that it is not appropriate to have these types of utilities under
a storm drainage pond because of the potential maintenance problems associated
between the two.
C. STORM DRAINAGE PLAN
1. The majority of the storm drainage from the proposed development is shown to
flow easterly under Trunk Highway 169 to an existing ponding area on the east
side of the highway. This amount of storm drainage into this ponding area will
create a rise in the water level of several feet. Negative comments were received
relative to this increase in water level as part of the EAW.
The City is currently in the process of developing a comprehensive storm drainage
plan. One of the recommendations of this plan will be to provide an outlet to this
• large ponding area on the east side of Trunk Highway 169, the outlet ultimately
flowing to the Mississippi River. It will be necessary to coordinate the
construction of this outlet with the proposed development of this commercial area
such that there is not a negative impact from a rise in the water elevation of this
ponding area.
2. As part of the draft comprehensive storm drainage plan, it has been recommended
that the City of Elk River follow the Best Management Practices guideline set out
by the Metropolitan Council. Sedimentation ponds designed following these
policies would typically have a static water level of approximately four feet. Two
feet of this would be for sediment buildup and two feet for actual sedimentation
of runoff. As the bottom two feet fills with sediment and the total depth of the
pond is reduced, this leads up to the time that the pond needs to be cleaned out.
The design of the sedimentation ponds for this development have assumed that,
rather than a four foot static water level at the time of a rainfall event, the ponds
will actually be dry. Assuming that the ponds will be dry, the storm drainage
calculations indicate that the ponds are sized to hold the entire runoff from a two-
inch rainfall event, thus allowing sediment to settle to the bottom of the pond.
This assumption allows the size of the ponds to be smaller than they normally
would be following the Best Management Practices. We would recommend that
this assumption not be allowed in the storm drainage design, but rather the
• policies and design criteria as laid out in the Best Management Practices be
followed. The reason for this is over time sediment will wash into the ponds, thus
reducing the ability of the ponds to percolate water, resulting in standing water in
the ponds at the time of a rainfall event. Thus, the assumption that the ponds will
152-0401.jun
• Mr. Steve Rohlf
June 4, 1993
Page Four
be dry and a two-inch runoff volume entirely held within the ponds is not valid.
If this assumption is not valid, the ability of the ponds to reduce sediment prior
to discharging to the existing wetland is compromised. We believe it is
appropriate to be more conservative in the design and to follow the Best
Management Practices.
3. No information is provided in the storm drainage calculations indicating what type
of particles will be settled out in the ponds. This information needs to be
provided and should be based on a design which settles out medium silts up to
0.02 mm in diameter.
4. As indicated previously, the slopes on the ponds are too steep. No slope should
be provided on any ponds more steep than 4:1.
5. As indicated in the review comments on the grading plan, we would recommend
that the pond shown over the realigned U.P.A. easement be relocated to an area
outside of the easement boundaries.
• 6. A cursory review of the pipe sizes indicates that they may be too small.
However, detailed plans and specifications on the storm sewer system will need
to be provided at a later date. This information can be reviewed in detail at that
time.
D. TRAFFIC ISSUES
1. A Traffic Impact Study was previously completed, analyzing the traffic and
transportation concerns relative to this development. All the recommendations for
improvements necessary to the external facilities to accommodate the increase in
traffic generated by this development need to be considered and the improvements
programmed along with the development of this project.
2. The access road to TH 169 near the middle of the development is now shown
wide enough to accommodate two westbound lanes as recommended in the
summary of findings in the Traffic Impact Study. Also, we understand that the
location shown for this access to TH 169 is in a slightly different location than the
actual access point. This will require a request to MnDOT to officially move the
access point to the location indicated on the site plan.
3. The total number of handicapped accessible parking spaces shown on the site plan
• appears to be below the number that is needed. This should be revisited and
handicapped accessible parking spaces need to be shown in the parking lots for the
outlots.
152-0401.jun
Mr. Steve Rohlf
•
June 4, 1993
Page Five
4. The service drive behind Building E at the south end of the development is only
wide enough for one-way traffic. Consideration should be given to widening this
service drive. At a minimum, the service drive needs to be wider at the
intersection with Freeport Avenue to facilitate turning movements of large delivery
vehicles.
5. A previous site plan indicated that there were a total of 1,879 parking stalls
required, but only 1,781 stalls provided. The current site plan actually shows less
than 1,781 parking stalls by removing stalls between the Cub Foods and Wallmart
buildings. This raises the question of whether or not sufficient parking is
provided on the site.
6. The buildings shown north of the Wallmart store raise the issue of how deliveries
will be provided to these two facilities.
7. Access to the outside storage yard at Menards is not acceptable for the following
reasons:
• a. A vehicle headed southbound along the front of the Menards store would
be forced to make a 90° turn to the east followed immediately by a 120°
turn to the southwest to enter this area.
b. Delivery truck traffic would be forced to come down the driving aisle in
front of the southerly-most set of stores (Building E). This aisle is shown
to have parking stalls on both sides, resulting in a conflict between
delivery vehicles and customer vehicles. It would be desirable to separate
these two types of traffic.
8. The two access roads that lead from Freeport Avenue west to the storefronts and
are separated from the parking lots by raised median should have stop sign control
where they intersect other driving aisles.
9. We would recommend that stop signs and pavement markings for pedestrian
crossings be installed along the roadway directly in front of the Cub Foods,
Wallmart, and Menards stores.
10. The lack of green space on the site raises the obvious question of where will snow
be stored or where will it be removed to.
11. Curve data needs to be provided on the preliminary plat for Freeport Avenue to
•
ensure that the roadway alignment meets Municipal State Aid design criteria.
152-0401.jun
Mr. Steve Rohlf
•
June 4, 1993
Page Six
12. There is a potential concern over sight distance at the driveway access on the most
northerly curve of Freeport Avenue, given the building shown at this location.
More detailed review of this would be required as site plans are provided for these
building sites.
13. The Parks and Recreation Commission recommendations relative to pedestrian
facilities for this site and surrounding areas should be incorporated into the plan.
E. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER
1. An elevated water tower in the high pressure zone will be required to provide
water service to this site. The Elk River Municipal Utilities has recently awarded
the contract for the construction of this elevated water tower. It is anticipated the
water tower will be in service by the end of July 1994. Sanitary sewer service
to this site will be provided by extending the existing trunk line currently located
south of School Street through the site, ultimately serving properties to the north
and east of the proposed development. It is anticipated that the sanitary sewer and
• water to service this site would be constructed as part of a public improvement
project, thus requiring a feasibility study after the preliminary plat is approved.
This feasibility study will provide detailed information relative to the sizing and
location of these facilities.
F. INDIRECT SOURCE PERMIT (ISP)
1. The permit application was completed by the developers using traffic projections
prepared or supplied by Maier Stewart & Associates, Inc., and Benshoof and
Associates, Inc.
2. The application addresses the proposed project, the surrounding land use, and
anticipated impacts of project-related traffic. According to the draft application,
typical modeling methods were used to project levels of carbon monoxide and
noise levels at the site for 1997.
3. The draft application appears to cover analysis of the required impacts for a
community outside of the seven county metro area. Both the projected carbon
monoxide (CO) and noise are dependent on the traffic at and near the site.
4. The project description indicated that full development is estimated after more
than five years. However, a completion date of 1996 (only 3 years) is used for
• the ISP application with traffic and air quality analysis in 1997. Will the CO and
noise be monitored to verify the predictions of the model?
152-0401.jun
Mr. Steve Rohlf
• June 4, 1993
Page Seven
5. The base data for the air quality analysis was recorded at the Wedgewood
Commercial Center. According to the information in Section 7.1, the base
monitoring site is 15 miles from the proposed development. The adjustment factor
for the base conditions appears to account for the differences in development
density, as well as for regional traffic growth and the anticipated decrease in CO
from vehicle emissions due to the state inspection system.
6. The projections from the analysis showed that the carbon monoxide levels will
remain well below the MPCA standards. However, noise levels were projected
to be above the MPCA standards at two locations. The draft permit applications
proposed mitigating noise at Elk Ridge Manor by encouraging commercial traffic
to use other access roads into the development. Will this adversely impact other
receptors? The analysis also indicated noise levels above MPCA standards at the
Burger King site. However, there is no discussion of possible mitigation or of the
need for mitigation at that site.
7. The noise analysis was based upon the assumption of no deliveries after 10:00
p.m. In some commercial developments of this type, deliveries and trash pick-up
• take place in the very early morning hours. Will these activities take place
between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. at this location? If so, they should be included
in the analysis.
G. RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The preliminary plat should be revised providing the missing information and
addressing the concerns noted.
2. The grading plan needs to be revised addressing the items noted.
3. Storm drainage calculations are not adequate. They should be revised,
following exactly the design policies laid out in the Best Management
Practices.
4. The site plan should be revised, incorporating the issues noted relative to
traffic patterns.
5. A detailed feasibility study considering all improvements necessary both
internal and external, to provide service to this site should be required once
the preliminary plat is approved by the City Council.
•
152-0401.jun
Mr. Steve Rohlf
• June 4, 1993
Page Eight
6. The City needs to give consideration to the outfall line from the storm water
pond on the east side of TH 169. Lack of an outlet from this pond and the
development of this project could lead to a negative impact on the wetland
due to increased water levels.
7. Consideration needs to be given to the proposed improvements outlined in the
Traffic Impact Study.
8. The draft Indirect Source Permit application appears complete and the
analysis follows appropriate methods and procedures.
If you have any questions regarding these comments, please call.
Sincerely,
MAIER STEWART & ASSOCIATES, INC.
• /90&/-648-0
Terry J. aurer, P.E.
TJM:tp
•
152-0401.jun
O V H) JUN - 3 1995
ter,• D ONOHUE RAJKOWSKI LTD .
Attorneys at Law Reply to: St . Cloud
June 1, 1993
ST.CLOUD Elk River Planning Commission
11 Seventh Avenue North ', City Hal l
Po.Box 1433 13065 Orono Parkway
P. 0. Box 490
St.Cloud,MN 56302-1433 Elk River, MN 55330
612.251.1055
800.445.9617 '� RE: Hagen Foods, Inc. - Gerald Hagen
FAX 612.251.5896 �, Our File No. 15, 921
MINNEAPOLIS Dear Sir/Madam:
29o4Plaza VII Please be advised that our office has been retained to
45 South Seventh Street represent Elk River Shopping Center Company, the owner
Minneapolis,MN 55402-1620 of the Elk River Shopping Center. It has come to our
612.339.9206 � attention that application has been made to the Elk
800.445.9617 River Planning Commission for consideration of a
FAX 612.339.4775 conditional use permit and preliminary plat for Elk
Park Center.
• FRANK J.RAJKOWSKI We request that this correspondence be read at the
GORDON H.HANSMEIER public hearing, before consideration by the Planning
FREDERICKL.GRUNKE Commission of Elk Park Center. We further request this
THOMAS G.JOVANOVICH correspondence be placed in the Minutes of the meeting.
JOHN H.SCHERER Please provide a written copy of the Minutes to our
PAUL A.RAJKOWSKI office.
KEVINF.CRAY Please be advised that Hagen Foods, Inc. , has entered
into a Lease with Elk River Shopping Center Company.
WILLIAM J.CASHMAN The Lease contains a covenant on the part of Hagen
DAVID T.SHAY Foods, Inc. , not to directly or indirectly engage in
CAROL A.STARK any similar or competing business within a five (5)
RICHARD W.SOBALVARRO mile area, of the Elk River Shopping Center. The
business presently operated by Hagen Foods, Inc. is
MICHAEL C.RAJKOWSKI known as County Market and is located at 800 Freeport
A.CHAD MCKENNEY Avenue, Elk River.
MOLLY J.WINGATE
We believe that the Planning Commission and the City of
MICHAEL H.DONOHUE Elk River should be aware of the restriction to which
OF COUNSEL Hagen Foods, Inc. , and its principals are bound,
prohibiting operation of a similar food business within
JAMES H.KELLY,M.D.,F.A.C.P. the protected area. We believe this information should
MEDICAL CONSULTANT be of concern to the Planning Commission in that Hagen
GORDON H.HANSMEIER IS ADMITTED TO PRACTICE Foods, Inc. , or a related entity, may not be able to
IN NORTH DAKOTA AND WISCONSIN, perform pursuant to the terms of the application
PAUL A.RAJKOWSKI IN WISCONSIN,
AROL A.STARK IN ILLINOIS AND MISSOURI regarding the proposed Cub Food Store.
WILLIAM J.CASHMAN IN SOUTH DAKOTA.
Elk River Planning Commission
• June 1, 1993
Page -2-
Please be further advised that our office has been instructed on
behalf of the landlord to enforce this covenant if necessary.
Enforcement of this covenant may prevent Hagen Foods, Inc. , or a
related entity, from operating the proposed Cub Food Store.
In the event any further clarification regarding this obligation
is necessary, please feel free to contact our office. If the
present application is continued or tabled to a future date,
please notify our office of the new hearing date so we may have
the opportunity to attend the same.
Sincerely,
B• OHUE RAJKO -KI L
David T. - .y
DTS/lmm
• cc: John W. Sheedy
Larry Leitschuh
Hagen Foods, Inc.
Gerald Hagen
Ronald Myhre
1:Agen\15921\am051893.012
•
V
,) �pR " 2 1993
_
� t '�
March 31, 1993
• Elk River City Hall
720 Dodge Avenue NW
Elk River, Minnesota 55330
To Whom It May Concern,
I contacted my council represenative ; ) over a month
ago and have not heard back from . I called . in regards to
the new shopping center developement.
I am in favor of the shopping center for many reasons.
We need it for the tax base.
We need it for the citizens of Elk River, for shopping convience,
and it will be cheaper prices for citizens. Also they won't have
to go out of town for the cheaper prices.
The shopping center should attract business from the surrounding
communities. Currently I go to Coon Rapids Cub Foods and do my
grocery shopping there, along with other Elk River citizens.
I feel just because our council members are not in favor of the
• shopping center that it means a block in the progress . The council
memebers are suppose to be representing the citizens of Elk River
and what the citizens want and not what the city council members
want.
Sincerely,
A Concerned Elk River Citizen
•
• E1h RiverArea
Chamber ofCommerce
November 12, 1992
Mr. Don Heinzman, Editor
Elk River Star News
649 Main Street
•
Elk River,MN 55330
To The Editor:
Now that the busy election campaign season is finally over, Elk River citizens have the
opportunity and responsibility to focus on issues of critical importance to our community's
future. One such issue is Elk River's response to new business development and
community growth opportunities.
The Elk River Area Chamber of Commerce believes that growth of business and industry
• is essential to Elk River's future prosperity.
Businesses locate where there is a market for their products and services. It is the
community's responsibility to identify the most appropriate locations within the city to
accommodate the future business investments which are responding to market demands.
The proposed commercial development between Highway 169 and Jackson Avenue is a
good example of business responding to the marketplace. As a rapidly growing city
located in one of Minnesota's fastest growing counties, Elk River is in the enviable
position of becoming a destination shopping center for a significant trade area if major
retailers decide to invest in our community.
We believe that expansion of retailing is essential for the long term viability of our existing
retail businesses. The recent program sponsored by the Elk River Economic Development
Authority (EDA) presented the research of Kenneth E. Stone, Ph.D. which shows that net
retail sales continue to grow after a mass merchandiser such as WalMart comes to the
community. More store choices, greater variety, and a commitment to customer service
will encourage area residents to shop locally. The alternative is to discourage business
investment in Elk River and to shun the convenience, new jobs, and increased tax base that
new commercial development would bring to our city.
•
729 Main Street • Elk River, Minnesota 55330-1595 • (612) 441-3110
"Building a Better Community Together"
Elk River Star News
November 12, 1992
Page 2 •
The proposed Highway 169 development offers Elk River an exceptional opportunity to
strengthen our local economy and improve shopping convenience for our growing
population. The city and neighbors of the proposed development site should work closely
with project developers to insure that any impact this development may have for the
surrounding neighborhood is minimized.
Citizens have a responsibility to become fully informed about project specifics and to
participate in the public review process. Business has the responsibility to listen and
respond to the concerns and desires of our citizens. Our elected officials have the
responsibility to make informed decisions which they believe are in the best interest of the
entire community. Elk River should not expect anything less.
Sincerely,
Steve Pattison, President
Elk River Area Chamber of Commerce
SP/cjc •
•
•
e"./1 /r):-[-Cit--6---k) Z-ciz-a-c-z-647 (-4-e--
re _ 2-Y - U.
a_ 7f-e---e
f'-r-e19 /Le.
• 24--er
RECEIVED FEB 0 $ 1993
•
• MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION
HELD AT THE ELK RIVER CITY HALL
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1993
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Dave Anderson; Commissioners Mike O'Brien, Joe
St. Dennis, Clete Lipetzky, Clair Olson and Rolfe
Anderson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioners Dana Anderson, Byron Houghtelin
STAFF PRESENT: Pat Klaers, City Administrator; Phil Hals, Street/Park
Superintendent
ALSO PRESENT: Dean Thompson, Big Lake Snowmobile Club
1. Call Meeting to Order
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the meeting of the Elk River
Park and Recreation Commission was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by
Chair Anderson.
2. Consider 2/3/93 Park and Recreation Commission Agenda
• Chair Anderson added items 11.1 - Heritage Landing and 11.2 - Flat Land
Purchase. Commissioner Rolfe Anderson added item 11.3 New Highway
101 Bridge.
COMMISSERION MIKE O'BRIEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE 2/3/93 AGENDA AS
AMENDED. COMMISSIONER CLETE LIPETSKY SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
CARRIED 5-0.
3.1. Consider 12/2/92 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes
COMMISSIONER MIKE O'BRIEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE 12/2/92 PARK AND
RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES. COMMISSIONER ROLFE ANDERSON SECONDED
THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
3.2. Consider 1/6/93 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes
COMMISSIONER MIKE O'BRIEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE 1/6/93 PARK AND
RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES. COMMISSIONER ROLFE ANDERSON SECONDED
THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
5. Election of Park and Recreation Commission Officers
Chair Anderson requested that this item be delayed until after 8:00
p.m. when Commissioner Clair Olson was scheduled to arrive. The
Commissioners agreed with the request.
6. Elk Park Center Commercial Development
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes Page 2
February 3, 1993
• Patrick Klaers, City Administrator, presented the most current plans
for the Elk Park Center development and explained the developers will
be holding a general public meeting prior to going before the City
Planning Commission for a public hearing. The Park and Recreation
Commissioner's recommendations will be directed to the Planning
Commission and then combined with Planning Commission recommendations
and then forwarded to the City Council to be considered with the
preliminary plat. Pat Klaers indicated to the Park and Recreation
Commissioners that they should only address Park and Recreation issues
at this meeting and if they had personal concerns regarding the
proposed project that they should come before the Planning Commission
at the public hearing. Phil Hals listed the issues that the Commission
should address.
1. Consider if the City should accept money or land for park
dedication fees.
2. Consider pedestrian movements and sidewalk needs
3. Consider pathway connection needs from along Jackson.
4. Consider pedestrian traffic outside of this development,
particularly on the south side of School Street.
Commissioner Clair Olson arrived at this time (8:10 p.m. ) .
• After a lengthy discussion, COMMISSIONER CLETE LIPETSKY MOVED TO
APPROVE THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL:
1. TO ACCEPT MONEY IN LIEU OF LAND FOR PARK DEDICATION FEES.
2. THAT THE DEVELOPER PROVIDE ADEQUATE SIDEWALKS FROM SCHOOL STREET
TO JACKSON ALONG FREEPORT AVENUE.
3. THAT THE DEVELOPER PROVIDE A 12 FOOT WIDE DETACHED PAVED BIKE PATH
PARALLELING JACKSON AVENUE FROM SCHOOL STREET TO HIGHWAY 169.
COMMISSIONER JOE ST. DENNIS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED
6-0.
COMMISSIONER CLETE LIPETSKY MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL THAT FREEPORT AVENUE FROM SCHOOL STREET
TO JACKSON AVENUE BE CONSTRUCTED AS A PARKWAY WITH LANDSCAPED CENTER
ISLANDS SEPARATING THE NORTH AND SOUTHBOUND TRAFFIC LANES.
COMMISSIONER MIKE O'BRIEN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-2.
4. Open Mike
Dean Thompson, representing the Big Lake Snowmobile Club, arrived at
8:30 p.m. to update the Park and Recreation Commission on snowmobile
• trail development. Mr. Thompson stated that the club had chosen to
extend the trail north from Zimmerman to Princeton this season rather
than south to Elk River and that the club would like to return in May
• Ankeny t.C�^..
Kell ,�'-) i) 4 1 �
Richter
• Associates
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 2 March 1993
TO: Scott Erickson - Elk Park Associates
Orin Erickson - Elk P Associates
FROM: Michael Shields
RE: Elk Paric Center
Elk River, MN
Project No. 92075 •
SUBJECT: Review meeting of 2 March 1993 with City's planning consultant (BRW Inc.)
PRESENT: Bill Webber- BRW Architects
Tom Harrington - BRW Architects (landscape)
Michael Shields-AKRW
The purpose of this meeting was to review, on an informal basis, BRW's comments and
recommendations to the City regarding the proposed shopping center development. The
following items were discussed:
• 1. According to Bill Webber, the project will not appear before the Planning Commission
until after the School Board has acted on motions to approve the landscape easement
and extension of Freeport Avenue.
The first Planning Commission meeting after the School Board's March meeting will be on
March 30,1993. If the project is not scheduled for this meeting, then the next Planning
Commission meeting is on April 6, 1993. This should be confirmed with Steve Rohlf.
2. BRW has a few areas of concern regarding the proposed development. They are:
a. Landscaping and screening along the western edge of the project (Jackson
Road):
b. Landscaping and screening along the School District property.
c. Number of parking spaces required/provided
d. Traffic
e. Signage
3. Landscaping along Jackson Avenue:
a. The landscaping (green space) between Jackson and 1st Banks parking lot is
inadequate. It is suggested that the parking along Jackson be eliminated and the
green space increased.
b. Landscape berms shall be placed along Jackson Avenue wherever possible.
These berms shall be between 3 and 5 feet high with an average slope of 4 or
5:1. Plant material shall be placed on the lower portion of the slopes. Large
evergreens shall be placed between the berms or where the slopes are minimal.
i
Architecture
Planning
821 Raymond Ave.Sod..400
Si.Paul,Minnosola 55114
G12.645.6806
2 March 1993
Elk Park Center
Page 2
• c. The fence along Jackson should be omitted or shall be designed as a decorative
screen. in selective locations. If it is a decorative screen,then it must be shown
on the drawings.
d. Decorative walls shall be added to effectively screen the compactor and loading
areas at the west side of Cub Foods.
e. It was suggested that the curb cut between Cub and Building A (at Highland
Road) be omitted, and that the curb cut at the south end of Cub (at 191st
Avenue) be relocated further north to facilitate access to the loading dock.
f. The west property line, between Menards and the existing residential property
should be moved as far east as is acceptable to Medards. This creates a larger
rear yard buffer for the residences.
The fencing surrounding Menards lumber yard should be indicated on plan. In
addition, it should be shown in elevation or thoroughly described for Planning
Commission review.
g. Screened trash enclosures shall be shown on plan. These must be added at
Building C and Building E.
h. Additional site development must be shown at the Wal-mart building. The plan
should show Wal-mart's loading area, including where any doors, truck docks and
trash (compactor) containers will occur.
4. Landscaping along southern property edge:
• a. Screen/ security fencing should be shown along the entire property line,
including around the ponding area.
b. Plant material, specifically large trees and upright evergreens should be placed
along the south side of the fence, adjacent to the play fields, not by the retail
center.
c. More effective screening will occur if larger, more vertical,trees are installed in lieu
of many small shrubs.
d. In general, the landscaping adjacent to Menards needs to be more fully
developed.
5. Parking:
Bill Webber felt that while the parking provided appears to be less than would normally be
expected for a shopping center of this type, it exceeds the City's requirements. Rather
than recommend more parking spaces, if the major tenants find the plan acceptable, no
changes should be required.
6. Traffic:
a. According to Bill Webber, the City would like to prohibit truck traffic from School
Street. The revised plan appears to have minimized the potential for increased
truck traffic west of Freeport on School and south of Freeport on Jackson. Only
Cub and Wal-mart require deliveries from adjacent city streets.
Sb. Tom Harrington suggested that the sidewalk in front of the shopping center be
continued north to Freeport. Michael Shields noted that it was intended to do so.
2 March 1993
Elk Park Center
Page 3
• c. It was suggested that a pedestrian link (sidewalk) should be added between the
shopping center and the residential area west of Jackson. We agreed that a walk
would be placed along the south side of Cub Foods.
7. Signage:
a. Two (2) shopping center identification pylons are acceptable. One at the
Jackson/Freeport intersection, and one at the turn lane to Highway 169.
Individual outlot buildings would each have a smaller pylon sign, placed along
Freeport Avenue.
b. Tenant signage would be with 2'-0" high (maximum) internally lite, channel formed
letters placed within the sign band above the awnings. Major tenant signage
would be placed on the entrance canopies, sized as indicated on the drawings.
c. No signage would occur along the western side of the project (back of the
buildings).
8. Miscellaneous:
a. If Wal-mart's garden center is to occur in space Cl,than it should be shown as an
open space with a screen fence along the sidewalk edge similar to the fence
between Cub and Wal-mart. The elevation of Building C should be modified
accordingly.
b. It was suggested that the above modifications be submitted to the City prior to the
Planning Commission meeting, if possible.
• c. BRW will recommend approval of the project, subject to compliance with the
intent of the above modifications.
If the information contained herein does not meet with your recollection, please contact this office
so that we may amend our records.
xc: Steve Rohif
Bill Webber
•
• 1.
. _
_ .
_ .
___ ____
___
_ .
__
_ ___
NWS X69
�" •11ITLOT 9
Fr
/ ,1�.. ,M,w/3 ,..... . outwT �e _
• S �/� �.7Z ACRES - •
•
r I FAST l 1' 1
t.f0 ACR I1=11 / .. --=-
O-1-RN
(t_ -1` _
` \ ��11111IIIIP , -� - ... , �� n
•
lllljjlIlI
1 '4119
..
BANK I I /
\.. ....„............_
.. ,
\.. 1.44•ACRES 1 •
\ \-\ JI ' I �AALL A3 ,A5 A7A9LAIIAI3 CUB FOODS -�
•\ BUILDING
\ (,�.,.,� 1 A 15 Al 7 _
"-I l 11 l,.l l T A' 22
v -v °O' 111111
Li.......
r
-R040.___
Z- -
TENANT INDEX OUTLOTS PARKING INDEX 1-
BUILDING A 1 TACO BELL 2.300 S.F. PARKING LOT TOTAL T
Al RETAIL SPACE 5.600 S.F. 2 1ST NATIONAL BANK 6,400 S.F. PARKING LOT A 169 STALLS Cr)
A3 LEASE SPACE 4,175 S.F. 3 PERKINS 6.000 S.F. PARKING LOT A' 20 STALLS
AS MERLE NORMAN 2,250 S.F. 4 WENDY'S 3.300 S.F. PARKING LOT B 431 STALLS
Al 940. UNISEX HAIR 1.800 S.F. 5 SECURITY STATE BANK 6.800 S.F.
6 MIDAS MUFFLER 4.700 S.F. PARKING LOT C 703 STALLS
A9 NATIONAL KARATE 1.500 S.F. 7 TIRES PLUS 3.800 S.F. PARKING LOT D 440 STALLS
All RADIOSHACK 2.000 S.F. B FAST FOOD 2.500 S.F.
Ay HALLMARK 4.200 S.F. 9 CUB 3,000 S.F.
AI3 LEASEFOODS 38.000 S.F. TOTAL 1,766 STALLS
AlEXPANSION 12.000 S.F.D MAGEN VIDEO 7,200 S.F. 10 PAYLESS SHOES 3400 S.F. PARKING REOUIRED:
32.323 S.F. CUB FOODS 56.000 0 200 S.F.//STALL. 290
BUILDING B SUB TOTAL 106.900 S.F. WAL MART 103,200 0 200 S.O./STALL. SIB
FUTURE
4ENARDS 104.000 O 200 S.F./STALL. 520
B MMT 153.000 S.F. TOTAL 477,885 S.F. RETAIL BUILDING
B 2 UTURE EXPANSION 56.000 S.F. BUILDING A 32.325 S.F.
159.200 S.F. BUILDING C 6.500 S.F.
BUILDING C SITE COVERAGE BUILDING E 26.760 S.F.SUB TOTAL 65.525 S.F.
CI STORAGE 2.000 S.F.
0 200:S.F./STALL: 322
C3 FAMOUS FOOTWEAR 4.500 S.F. PERCENTAGE OF SITE COVERED 20[
1/1 6.300 S.F. BY BUILDING (F.A.R.) OUTLOT /l0 (SHOE STORE)
3000 S.P. 0 200 S.F./STALL. 15
BUILDING D OUTLOT 8(RESTURANT)
MENMOS 144300 SS. PERCENTAGE OF GREEN SPACE 25% 1250 F. DINNING 0 1/25 S.F. 40
WITH LANDSCAPE EASEMENT 29%
BUILDING E TOTAL STALLS REQUIRED 1,717
Cl FASHION BUG 12.060 S.F. TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED 1,766
E3 MIRACLE EAR 1.300 S.F. GENERAL NOTE
ES GREAT CUPS 3.000 S.F.
E7 FLORIST 1.600 S.F. INFORMATION FOR THIS PLAN WAS TAKEN FROM
E1/ CARISON
E9 CALSON TRAVEL 900 S.F.BANKER 1.900 S.F. DRAWINGS CREATED BY JOHN OUVER a ASSOC. INC.
E13 RETAIL SPACE 6.000 S.F.
26.760 S.F.
&lel`./♦
Ankonr
i_ KW
-' Richter
_---
"� / Walsh/ "i /-� Aooeeblo
i
/"�
-TIRES PLUS I: WATER
- OUTLOT /7 TOWER
/-/ /- 1.02 ACRES i
--- /( • NUFFLER 1
_ /' 0 LOT
\ \ 1.'• ACREE
S '
•
\ � -----
/ ri
- 1 Dbnnlfp�' 1 I�;C 417 illi \ / 521 Rel+nond Avo.SWM 400
................•• '
\ \ / / _ 1 SI. Poul. YI fc 55114
D wG7Sr s I I I J�.. / I s1z-e4s-ffaos
/1 11.1 DL ya I TIRES 1/ /
1.1a�CRES I I -/ / .. \\ I
__J•. - I /" .77 ACRES
/ _ _ -i-
'
-r-REE-pp RT—HM -_—_ - PAYLESS
SHOES o — Mr
/ 1 P ,
t I -T
i .."__ —. .__
I T
•
.-•••••- -•[ip
Mali
---= =
El
MEM
T
•
�0 1 f **.t I H
r'_'_l�
' 1 u
.D ••••••• 2 L
WAL—MART Ag`t
a MENARDS .•
I'
4-21-93
771-; Pkv 4.0'13
BUILDING 8
•
1 1
111111111IlllllII "E
_ • 1•
• I IBUILDING 0 l'''"
MW : I t
I
�'• I I W YENARDS LUMBER YARD
.I
� 11
\ -_
POND
Cb
................:..... ::...z..1 •. '.123 IL ----1
!lam _ —___
___
__
____
____. .. ,,
r -7' , .
Z 1-
to
Li
Q \ V z
IH
Al
rimilmai
NORTH Elp
92075.00
0 50 100 300
i .
PROPOSED •
;' tFwsTmc vao w , yytr./ r
- /i�• ELK PARK CENTER fa
-
/,4V.
ir t . t ) ./4 C �Q ! r � vt�
�- _� • -----4--',`_ iii 'y::.�," '
—�:r), \ it .I. i \ t //Lit-�llj C__ = ra y •5-
::__'-‘_.--...
\..----;/./ : 3 \_________,, •, 1� sem-41'..,.44+,.._—:-.---..-.(3--_—/--- '----`- --�_ ri'�/�_5 f - "riNwI
`'•• ,-.--- . .. ,,f' � •" 1; f` "it_ ^ -i%�j._'- ` -r•..�!"i ��' �—..;.-- --..= ------- ---:w-==mss"` �r —. - • i i f x'.16 1K• .........
.-._.„_______.„_-,..„-___-.....„,,...„.-...,..:,...._,r I\' I --- 7 "4 ,-Traiimm411-11=MIlte... CM1=ri
.�'sI ,' ' t •• 1 `7/ , is u1! _ v �- ` .. .�� j f•
R��l[ t.l� ,�'. 1 au� S ,r - !/lir �;: — `.�. I; !__":
P�•pJ` J�• , ^ ^: �ig ' y\1-7' 75.70. 7 " ` /`l i.i� '�. j �4 iiii- —
x, itevi
• _ ,J`
,`yam ,i : ,,\ � i ,, I ; , \_� r. _ ,,
.. i 1 ti*IN*41'-'"Iwili.441110011111 ...., ,,., ,,, 77:-..77-‘1, _4: of_ ,
11
^i, {�{� ` --
1 i\` ` '_.�' �r '�� 1 �'' 4 1 5-6 FOOT V
Z. i` 1 '�� _ ,`SSS �'.r ti •..� S .. --
ii
i ,\!t --,-: ...\..:'''',--._
` i \,‘ • -' --• -.I-' --- 41:',..k .'"IlmMia • •••11k: -) ....
jr
l _ !` lit , it
! , `ems'� �' •�•`..
! ;-;� 1
<0es
1
CC;
--
—
, •\'‘„ '• ,..'- '..).•-•:-.:..-,---:.-..,-. ----'''' -; •1:-------_, .....-1,-;;;. --..-----"-- ____.:2-•-"<" _....--;-_-,--L.-"_
. j is t,.. V,.. ,....-- -•-.....__.. .«.;,1" .....- _.,..---"" -.-7:------ _......-". .....----- .....---S---7-,..-, ..-',
-'''..-- ; ".‘ - ..... --•.,"7..--,......- . ....- -_....-' ''. -..;,...--!...2-
` ......- ' --•-x......41.:;- ----. .-":..---"-..---1-.
';'• /1 ///.-'''''&---.."..\\--\\, ,::::„....„...1?:.. „•• '-------.-';' ------------5--- .,...).„..-----.-.......--;*:„...--;---:„,..-------,. .,,„.----r4:...„..../'-:--.„...-.....--;,...--:'-'-;;.....--<::;;----7---'
. f. i i Hi/ 1 1\\\\'‘, ,,.... ::,„.....-1.--- - ----.0."-'.....--------- C.-:''..,'"----"--:,...-. •----...:1"t'"--.3...„...---- --1072.---;- --
1 I i I il 1 x . ,, f \0. , ...., ,,....------ ...:4,-...,,->'---- .......-- ..---......-----..-...-..,'''_,,..-• -----.....-_-.....:----#.r..----..,,
, I WI 1„.., !0.,,...rr .-- x _.-- ....-0. ....... .. • ___.----,.......- .--,-.)..-...-1,--_,.---,...:-:-.0_,--;-..-_ _-_.;_„--:-:::-......„ i
i ) - . t', k',.._---'. _,..../.%-i,).; I.,/". _.,......-----,.a...." ...' ....--:...,..:::::::.......-
/ I .--.. l' ,'/, ''..1 -_.,...4._,,--..--•"' _....,.,--->11,,,,,;•.,1 te,:....2.--....--..-----*-- _.‘...----..,...-------%"- ..::,„„....----- -.....--51:::-......--- -;0..........-- ,-5.:^5....71) ) /
/ / ' 1 ..).......L...:-.-..--, ,.... .-,--- .-- ...---- ..,,„..----,...."-----. ,.. ..... ,.....„..„f;_.-....„„......--2:„.........„,..3_,..... ...e_......,.,. .
( I t , \ --,-- •------..i ••••••• ,•-.31.----:_-..- -•-• • .0„..„---.: ..---;-",-..„--_,---- ....-s---..-r------- .„4„...;•..-!-- ,/ //
_.-.,,,,...,,.-.. ....---•=- -----,---...--------/ -----..---- ••••---- -------- -...,..•-----•-------- ---4:------ -----.:---.- -----.•-••••/ „ /i
1 ! ... - -...—,- _.---,..._,....„-_,•*--__- .-.-- .--,----, ,--_,..---- ..--- .-•---;---- ,.›....7.-_ - ..-;---- ,:n_____••••,, --- / f
!..,./.."7. '---........-."---.............-^"..„..-•-• .„.....-..............--- i - j„.. ,.....-........,,..... ..... _.....,...!,..: _......,..... , „,...0.._
.) „.„........------- ..........X / /
_le....„.........„,......"'"..„,..... ..,.-:- .11,......>...57.. .... ....."-..-
,I,..: ..,""..--".......-..%'•::.......„...............,.„,....... ...,/ ---"---•-•-//...,,.-'".". ../i /
.. .........5,-..-<...,-...-t-'-- ........."r N ""-.......---...-- ,-...„...... .........- .....
..• .....--- .....-- .,...../..... .._„...-
...„...-<;--• ....`,_,.........-">:„.111-r-:".. ' .....---___/...„.)t--,....-- ......../ /7 /
: / -----
( i
...- ...."•........-_....- _.....». -, ,,-- -•- . ..--- ,...._..- ,..-----
----lf \ 's ...,.___..—-
/ . 1 . ,-------
._,.
0-------- ---":"--- ---2.--:',- \ \ \ 0, \ \ ,_.-------- - 1 7
1.1 ......., .......-. .... •••-- ......•,..„,,,firaT
,...„.............,,,..c,„/ ,.... „.... ,,,......7.! - - ,.. '..\\,..„.\ \ 1, 1 ,,,1 . ....... ,, r,x 1 I
-- ......- ...-."- ro!". 'T.-:* ‘........*-'7.„,,,
<„......." ......-- ".../ \ I.
...\ I , \ La ii 94D .1..........-2„.... ..„,. •••''
/ I * STCAU SENER TO CONNECT
._,i:---. 1.41I''''' .....",. ,...' 1;e(..XIS1VITORII SEVER
--''.._,,,. N-r-r -I"' •••'''''7".......' 1 , t'.
wow...0'.....- --it. 1 i 14W 1 ‘..4 ti : . g - • / *
• --- ....- -ze--05°5. i ( - .....
(''...;...11kioNsi 1• , , : 1 / _....,0 Om i
, ......, ••••••t Ili .r. Is; I I 11P111 -- ilip . _digeoliPlila 1 , ,
, .., . .
.....- ,.
./.....
i ill OCTAL Air 1-4-1- _.4--- :i i
• --- ..... / -- - 111.4...4. „dar....,„,,,rigi ,/ Fiza.0 . i It Ili i . f ., -‘
.micAR4r.”1910119119,120' • i- . .., . , = ._
eliiii -Jia. ..•ti.V.4..
7, „ A/ ,..,i." ...- 0, ,-------
i 1 7 lg.:), 1 7- '7 7-77r-11 1-1.12.1 .".1 .' ! x 7 .a... .a,r: ....,71‘, . ',.,/,•;;.:.
7 x .1_1.1,N. 'EH iii rir472-1.,..i.,\\' !,:,.;•,,-,'t:,:;•.,:,.,
ft I. .14-, .1 I I i r .-,--------,
.-
•__
; ..2_ • „,, ,.5. N. .gi 1 10/.72-22
\
..,. "-.. ,-•
I ' i\ ,J '04-- 1\\t' --....---- . ,.-
\ `,..--•-•"5-`" - , I \ 11; . ..
, 1 ----, I m i 1 / 9% I'I. .1 i!''7:„/
III -. "Rr-1.----" t- N. .. i V '! ‘ • i.
El ) x 111. ., .1 'i i, 'It F. .e .. \
t \ b i Inomp. :.. //
x .
" 11 .........-----.. I ' r..2j• _.......j:- ;4 , f 4! •-.,.
..: i lit _. ••,, (‘' „_____,2 ( 1 f
1 iil
n .
• ,
r4 __..-, II. \ ,
I r• '
4 CI 1.----' '."•—,,,, ,= , c=,\ '.,_ ,==,
== lit ,. \
II x , -..
..........
—a-- ..... ......_ _,-....1: ,. -..
0 1 ...
. I 1 '''..s•
:•-•• ••• \ 1 -g•••"-/1 --' .- ---,. ,, •- -=:::"',NI IP ; ..•
.1 d 1 • . ,• „.....-
! 6 ....._
rona--; I ' / -. : i / y I /----__...)//, „-• ,
•
' ii......___...-
F ti \--1'-'-'4---.131 \ ' / ------- ' fiF '‘# /
_,
i/ --- --..-- -----/--/ -1( ----. ....1. 1 --/
..., ...,„,. •• . , •
1 '\ N
IrTs.:".. ..---\\N ----------.' ) )‘\,ig .1( /.... r / r"
DETENTION POND
IIg at ' ,..
.„.......0..... ' ,) a g;...-- g 1 r / r
--------"— / J - 1 / I
---' I 1 1 I g , f
. r. X \ ‘.---.-2"-‘Ar---Th.\ I
••• t, ------; i i 1 / l
t t I x
_................ . ------ ' 1 ' - ! I t 1 t I , I
. mia , 1 i / /
.:...101,..1... . IJ r .....,___ _________ ___ , •
4 i I I F* / i 0" iN I I.
-4 ,7Z-- _....,. - • \
--4,
f I y '': .''". •'-' •s'•.- . -1-
-4 i „ ----* 1 - 4 I I
., 1. ..--:4--s.:11::&_,Amif
, ,
.—, ,_, _., ," J \ '' '•
.\ ! . ....„....-----726 .,1 / , • ..„, I. . ,4
1 z•..:......-.....• .„„ ....„,,
I s, . ""-aR I, c------ - / 1 I ' '
- . • ....
- „,-
::. kit I „rikl. ; „,. .„.milimmirai.k s i 'II:
k . I
VI :HI
, . .., ,,,„. ., .1,
. :,,,s,„wymizt ,*,atsviimaiwirli , i
-. itTi i ,
,..---- -....,..... ,...4h,......
1 \ it*) I1, , •Ix• ‘,
' l'r ) \ LI\ / I-
, --,..--...- -,.....-_-„,...,c..-.......,.....--7,,,-,..fts........ -. 4.-..- - ..,- • --,- , .,. \ i
, i J.
..-----'-'.
\--„•.,-.
c44 "
It g
A --, '
I I i ------t:-.......-.------ ---7--z....-4.....:::.--- --:.--.L...---....-.-4...g---,, ...c... -•,..• • t I
ID i' i I
,
1 ) -.:,,:-.4:-.... ... 7- 7 , ,-..-z... ----...:.- ---.;_.-z.... ......,„ :,,, A , r„
J
(zi
7i --,-,---z.,-i-z---4•.::'_zt:;(:_-;--:.f.---;-,,i.__,:,,,,t_-----i___._--i.-=za..p.,.!.----s-_,1_,.„ i lc./.
-.....--- „----4,--_------`7 ,,:,,,„,Z---..Z- ____•---z-••• __-. __-...____Zi. i
I I: .***•t, .:. - ..1 ••,•E— -:.--_____--_---—------- -----4:-— ' .-----'
fly
-----,...,- ,------:::::==i--
,
,,,,,/----,,v„._.) ,
•,„. : ..A......„..._,,---4
---.1:1 ;"---
ORIGINAL DATE-4/27.43 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, JOHN OLJVER & ASSOCIATES, INC. ELK PARK CENTER
DESIGN Br SPECIFICAR ON, CR REPORT WAS
DRAIN BY- PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY seo occa AND=
GRAPHIC SCALE CHECKED BY:_-- DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM zif NKR. ITA PRELIMINARY
.. A DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER
s
m imi
REVISIONS: UNDER THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DRAINAGE AND
STATUTES SEClIONS 326.02 TO CM.ENDOIEENNO
326.16. WO SUINNTN0
LAND MANNINO
( .) GRADING PLAN
1 lash.•100 ft. SIGNED: - '
FILE NO.
\8I NINPARK2 DAM / /93 REG. NO. 19900
SAP No. SHEET 2 OF 3 §v ,_e____
i
PROPOSED
• ELK PARK CENT1..c,
„,...........,
„..........
___
........ „......_.......
,. .„.:.......
........--
ER
.,.........::::_____.......„.........._ Aes%
tea"'•" / �/ 0.s. '' -
�„.--*" /. ;ice„
i - �"'�•��-'' .mss
___i---- �._...._...- -. ' "'_—�` i +moi"-.��,,,1"�' •�
VENUE - .
� - F=51
7 c :1 t
1 1 lilt cn I
I j .lefill .=, 7,' It 1-
/111 1
IqmrgNilo
:
L
IYA.. .=
0 -3.
L� .."---• .--:.--.
",�-\= i !7_ 1��i1",i�i�. N N Z�d9 M-Si� IM+:.S1P I i�
....
•-•:.---:,-.- !� i IP—
„ F rr, E a jr,
is
`r \ ,..-\\..„� I w# .'. 4 � 6 .1 o a y�� WN ‘,1„..2,44,
w�SFrE •
r`r ��4\` ` 4 ti 7 �� ae h e .. 1
,t n '
r`..r \rr� . wxas.tn, a as y 1 —
```` �` Sg1r- 4.e'„ 1 { L
- .sl 1 1
l likk
I.
E. rr ti ! 1 I
:d. i
c I .
11
Cr.
Cr::
ai
MI
esj
r.---
c‘.1
C..
C:-.
v`
•
C.;
:
0
C.:
co
-?ur4 c c 133 HS •°N d b S won. °`3 -T--:��u m: a
;ori 3114 _... -------- — Y ow -0oet,
Ndld NI`dW2i31b'M .....OYel l('::T (mai
M .'M G> za 3 s x��3�s3trlrls - --—- —-- -
QN`d 2i3M3S J121d1INVS V XI 3,.,r..Ls 3'u alarm SP SV3a ., --- -...
J121d N I W I-132i d a'''''' '''4-"a-'"4,i; �QOM V mo rsSS La-° - -7 i8-:4:I
Mon n3:11,Do.:IT=AK Ar mein yo"et Ati 03krvaliel ;alv3s JIxaXa.)
2131N30 y121dcl >113ONi •s3!voossv ,9 83n110 NHor •myn4521u.lwu.iea ?,.e3al+t (.n.,1,,..4:ro"PINIOn.
i ti j k L.
,, , i
_..... .._. _... ._ „._.
.........„.„..___-7--- ......_i_d ......„. ,
II .."'"*".....,... ........ *"..-,....;:•+.. -, .....Z.......,.... -..........."si ! I L,.... 1 .
1 i
1 a .
c - IY YID.
41-45174i: :1644:: :.,:goil‘ ,,,,,K41:..,,,-.,' I milt
ip.i..Nraixf-,,,44.::.:*.iiiroi .Diect
iis
ozza-,,..„: a
* i *4* l 3 a� tgo! tmz n isr"
a! h -,4 'n .7,31.44,..:*
0 n -nr'
- 60LaZAWITITii . P£ 4 ��€ *
a. fic ! M �r- �i t >Fs n t. �
n
is4Myxy uLtltl te o s xs+ s .
rILxyy . Y•M $Y 9.I N w dOsW Ha}
-:- :4firiVrftW'I'Vii2Vizratakficrovita, 1.
s -+.f•Z '444'. iN if 1 - nn FH : n-s i .
4 i♦ 3 ti :704,::.1.:; "0 Ir• w� IC- f s t sr ti s +•.xi 0- ! n l-
'n x i x N 4 ,a,,A N4- N -NV 0 xk•!*$n•-s war ss-e•a , »-
ir:., -n,. IMI.-.t. i .yl. .�.
iia='"‘I'll ' -,....H".—. ':== dll" CZ= ,== ,, ,,t,/,_",1 1==,, (=D .....7 11
- _ ,,,, r i
w•.
NMx 1•1� t,
M
N.i 111 `� y•
0
:............:„:„..._.-17::I;_______,.,
e I` .
i
moi kµl�� „...-••••• `\ s _ O t I
RI „I'. „„.....'".. \
�/ p.
_+� :mss=::. � i 01 ! ,.�
/ iltM
nwx
j/ Ai ,ii+�x3fii.
s•..F� Q L
HI dliv:01=null
/.
^J
i�^
% r
/rFM190L id 13MrG /
i'.—
al
16r:J.: /i/' / /,--
_--i`, j •-i../.
•
......„..s7;...--;_....-.. - --'^-^✓ '.;A ....�.
-
� .+firf .... ^