Loading...
5.4 PCSR 08-23-1994 � ) A- AGENDA ITEM 5.4 lty of 11 J1River MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: STEVEN B. ACH, CITY PLANNER DATE: AUGUST 23, 1994 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY ELK RIVER DEVELOPMENT, INC., PUBLIC HEARING, CASE NO. P 94-10 & CU 94-30 REQUEST Elk River Development is requesting a preliminary plat and conditional use permit to develop a commercial planned unit development. LOCATION • Northeast corner of Elk Hills Drive and US Highway 169 ZONING / LAND USE PUD (Planned Unit Development) / HB (Highway Business) ATTACHMENTS Location Map, Zoning Map, Memo from Terry Maurer, Development Plans, Narrative of Proposed PUD, Traffic Study, Minutes from previous Planning Commission and City Council meetings, Previous PUD Agreement OVERVIEW Elk River Development Inc., is requesting a conditional use permit approving a development plan for a commercial planned unit development on Outlot A, Deerfield Third Addition. The development plan will be a guide for future development and uses on the subject property. The developer's proposal consists of four (4) free standing buildings with a total of 29,687 square feet. Proposed uses include a mixture of retail, auto repair, and a sit-down "Class I" restaurant. The actual square footage of • each of the uses is broken down as follows: P.O. Box 490 • 13065 Orono Parkway • Elk River, MN 55330 • (612) 441-7420 • Fax: (612) 441-7425 Elk River Development Page 2 August 23, 1994 11111 • Retail: 18,800 square feet • Auto Repair: 4,512 square feet • Restaurant: 6,375 square feet TOTAL 29,787 square feet BACKGROUND In 1990, a commercial development was proposed for Outlot A. The development included a specialty food store, a sit-down restaurant, and a bank with a drive-up window. In total, the project had 35,080 square feet of commercial space. The Planning Commission and City Council discussed issues relative to traffic, allowable uses, hours of operation, buffer to the residential area, and road improvements to Dodge Avenue and Elk Hills Drive. The proposal was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council with the conditions addressing the issues stated above (see attached minutes). The project has never moved forward, therefore, the conditional use permit • and PUD Agreement (which was never executed) are no longer valid (see attached PUD Agreement). DEVELOPMENT PLAN The first step in the PUD process is to consider a development plan for the entire project. This plan is the guide for future applications and proposed site plans. The development plan package includes information relative to the general site plan, square footage of the buildings, landscaping, setbacks, and other definable parameters for development of this site. All of these standards and guidelines are incorporated into the PUD Agreement and made part of the Developers Agreement for development of the subject property. SITE PLAN APPROVAL Each phase of the PUD will require site plan review through the conditional use permit process. The Planning Commission and City Council will conduct public hearings to review each site plan to examine in detail each proposal and ensure the site plan is consistent with the approved Development Plan and the intent of the PUD (Planned Unit Development). • erdevel.doc Elk River Development Page 3 August 23, 1994 • The applicants are not requesting site plan approval for the first phase at this time. An application will be submitted at a later date when a specific tenant has been identified. ANALYSIS • Traffic The development presented to the City in 1990 raised considerable amount of discussion regarding Dodge Avenue and Elk Hills Drive. At that time, staff's recommendation was to have Dodge Street improved, along with Elk Hills Drive, to a condition that can adequately handle the additional traffic generated by the commercial development. That same situation applies today with the commercial development proposed for Outlot A, Deerfield Third Addition. In the attached memo from Terry Maurer, the conditions of Dodge Street and Elk Hills Drive are discussed. With this development proposal, it is anticipated that the issue of upgrading Elk Hills Drive and Dodge Avenue will need to take place to accommodate the • projected vehicle trips for this area. Furthermore, it may be appropriate that the City Council consider an improvement project including Dodge Avenue, both north and south of Elk Hills Drive, and Elk Hills Drive between US Highway 169 to accommodate future residential and commercial growth projections and additional traffic. • Site Plan The site plan has been designed to orient the development towards Highway 169 and away from the residential area to the east. Four (4) free standing buildings with a total of 29,687 square feet is proposed, which is approximately 5,300 square feet less than the commercial project proposed in 1990. • Uses / Hours of Operation Three (3) land uses are proposed: general/service retail, auto repair, and a sit-down restaurant. The auto repair and restaurant use are not consistent with the previous approval in 1990, however, the retail element is consistent. Given the proximity of this commercial area to the residential to the east, uses and business hours that are compatible IPwith the residential area will need to be considered. erdevel.doc Elk River Development Page 4 August 23, 1994 • Visually, as illustrated in the landscape plan, this site can be buffered from the residential area. The two areas which are more difficult to control is traffic on Dodge Avenue and hours of operation. In terms of traffic, the auto repair and restaurant generate the highest number of vehicle trips per 1,000 square feet of building area. Therefore, these two uses have been shifted to the southern portion of the site where customers will use the southern access and not travel further north on Dodge Avenue. This will certainly assist in reducing the mixing of commercial and residential traffic on Dodge Avenue. In terms of hours of operation, the previous approval limited business hours to 9 a.m. to 10 p.m. The developers have not identified whether these hours are acceptable or not. • Parking and Circulation Two access drives off of Dodge Avenue serve the development. The northerly access aligns with 189th Avenue, creating a typical intersection condition. This allows for safe turning movements to occur and in the event stop signs are to be installed, a typical four-way stop • could be created. The southerly access should be the most commonly used access drive to the site. Therefore, the location of this driveway is critical to reduce commercial traffic from infringing upon the residential area. It is recommended the southerly access be shifted to a location south of the first home that fronts onto Dodge Avenue. The realignment of this driveway will depend upon the improvements and any realignment to Dodge Avenue. The proposed development has adequate parking to meet City requirements. If additional parking is necessary, there are opportunities on site to add parking stalls. • Landscaping The proposed landscape plan includes a variety of plant material throughout the development. Large groupings of shrubs, overstory and conifers are concentrated within the fifty (50) foot buffer area along the east side of the site. This buffer area also has a berm that is approximately five to six (5-6) feet above Dodge Avenue and varying IIIbetween six and ten (6-10) feet above the parking lot to the west. erdevel.doc Elk River Development Page 5 August 23, 1994 • Planned Unit Developments typically establish a theme or some continuity in the landscaping. Staff will work with the developer's landscape architect to establish a common species or identifiable feature that can be carried throughout the project. Because this PUD has a small area the "theme" may not be as pronounced as Elk Park Center, which covers a larger area and is repeated throughout the fifty (50) acres. Staff recommends the conifers proposed within the fifty (50) foot buffer area vary in size with a minimum of six to eight (6-8) feet in height. This will assist in provide immediate screening to the east and establish some variation to the landscaping. Also, there should be some additional landscaping included within the landscaped setback along Highway 169. • Building Elevations /Architecture The proposed buildings consist of a combination of stucco, rock faced block, glass, and a fabric canopy. Staff recommends that an architectural element be consistent throughout the development and • be incorporated with each of the buildings. Also, it is recommended further consideration be given to enhancing the architectural appearance of each of the buildings. One way this may be accomplished is varying the roof line or providing relief on the building facade. Rooftop equipment should be screened from public view. The most effective means of establishing this is with a parapet wall around the building. • Signage Signage is an element of a planned unit development that can establish continuity throughout the project. As the Planning Commission and City Council have approved for previous PUD's and most recently, typical commercial projects, one monument style sign identifying the shopping center will be permitted along with wall signage consisting of individual letters. Staff recommends that one monument style sign with a maximum height of ten (10) feet and area of 100 square feet be allowed for the restaurant on the south end of the site. Furthermore, because of the proximity of the residential to the east, no signage will be allowed on the east elevations of any of the III buildings or along Dodge Avenue. erdevel.doc Elk River Development Page 6 August 23, 1994 • PRELIMINARY PLAT The preliminary plat consists of four (4) commercial lots. The lot lines have been drawn to allow each site to be sold separately to each of the tenants as well as each lot having adequate parking for that particular use. In the PUD (Planned Unit Development) zone, lots sizes are required to be a minimum of .8 acres in size, therefore, Lot 2 will need to be increased in area. Also, proper drainage and utility easements along with cross access, cross parking agreements will need to be included with the plat approval. RE COMMENDATION It is recommended the Planning Commission recommend approval of the following: A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVING A COMMERCIAL PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) FOR ELK RIVER RETAIL CENTER WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • 1. A PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) AGREEMENT BE PREPARED AND EXECUTED INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: A. A TOTAL OF 29,680 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING AREA BE ALLOWED. B. ALLOWABLE USES INCLUDE THE PROPOSED USES SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND THOSE LISTED IN THE C2 ZONING DISTRICT. C. BUSINESS HOURS BE LIMITED TO 9 AM TO 10 PM,MONDAY THROUGH SUNDAY. D. ALL OTHER ELEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN BE INCLUDED AND MADE PART OF FUTURE APPROVALS. E. TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR ADMINISTERING DEVELOPMENT OF THE PUD . 2. ALL FUTURE SITE PLAN PROPOSALS BE REVIEWED THROUGH THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROCESS. 3. ALL COMMENTS WITHIN THIS MEMO AND TERRY MAURER'S MEMO DATED AUGUST 18, 1994, BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND APPROVAL OF THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. 4. GUIDELINES FOR SIGNAGE FOR THE PLANNED UNIT • DEVELOPMENT CONSIST OF: erdevel.doc Elk River Development Page 7 August 23, 1994 • A. ONE MONUMENT STYLE SIGN IDENTIFYING THE DEVELOPMENT WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF TWENTY (20) FEET AND A WIDTH OF FIFTEEN (15) FEET. B. ONE MONUMENT STYLE SIGN IDENTIFYING THE RESTAURANT WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF TEN (10) FEET AND AREA OF ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET. C. WALL SIGNAGE CONSISTING OF INDIVIDUAL LETTERS WITH A MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT OF THREE (3) FEET. 5. ACCESS POINTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDE ONE AT 189TH AVENUE AND ONE SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERLY HOME ON THE EAST SIDE OF DODGE AVENUE AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY CITY STAFF BASED ON FINAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR DODGE AVENUE. 6. ALL PARKING AREAS BE BOUNDED BY B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. 7. EARTH BERMING BE MAXIMIZED ALONG THE EAST PORTION OF THE SITE TO BUFFER THE COMMERCIAL FROM THE RESIDENTIAL AREA. 8. THE LANDSCAPING PLAN INCLUDE A VARIETY OF LANDSCAPE MATERIAL WITH AN EMPHASIS OF CONIFERS ALONG THE EAST • PORTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH A VARYING SIZE OF SIX TO EIGHT (6-8) FEET. ALSO, ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE LANDSCAPED AREA ALONG HIGHWAY 169. 9. A LANDSCAPING THEME BE ESTABLISHED AND INCORPORATED INTO THE DEVELOPMENT. 10. THE EXISTING TREE AT THE SOUTH END OF THE SITE BE SAVED AND INCORPORATED INTO THE DEVELOPMENT. 11. UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION BE UTILIZED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT. 12. PROPOSED BUILDINGS ESTABLISH ARCHITECTURAL CONTINUITY AND ENHANCED TO MEET INTENT OF THE PUD ZONING DISTRICT. 13. ALL DELIVERY AND SERVICE VEHICLES SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO USING THE SOUTHERLY DRIVEWAY TO THE DEVELOPMENT. B. APPROVAL FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY SIX (6) ACRES INTO FOUR (4) COMMERCIAL LOTS WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • erdevel.doc Elk River Development Page 8 August 23, 1994 • 1. A DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT BE PREPARED AND EXECUTED PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. 2. TERRY MAURER'S MEMO DATED AUGUST 18, 1994, BE INCORPORATED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT. 3. THE DEVELOPER PAY FAIR SHARE OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TO DODGE AVENUE AND ELK HILLS DRIVE BETWEEN DODGE AND HIGHWAY 169. 4. PAYMENT OF PARK DEDICATION IN THE AMOUNT REQUIRED BY CITY ORDINANCE AT THE TIME OF FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. 5. A STORM DRAINAGE FEE IN THE AMOUNT OF $600 PER ACRE BE PAID PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF FINAL PLAT FOR RECORDING. 6. DEVELOPER CONSTRUCT A SIX (6) FOOT WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF DODGE AVENUE FROM THE INTERSECTION OF ELK HILLS DRIVE TO THE NORTHERLY LIMITS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. 7. NECESSARY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TO DODGE AND ELK HILLS DRIVE BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OF ANY • BUILDINGS WITHIN THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. 8. CROSS ACCESS/CROSS PARKING AGREEMENTS BE PREPARED AND REVIEWED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO RELEASING THE FINAL PLAT FOR RECORDING. 9. NECESSARY DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS BE INCLUDED ON THE PLAT ALLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES TO BE INSTALLED TO SERVE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. 10. STREET LIGHTS BE INSTALLED AS REQUESTED BY ELK RIVER UTILITIES. THESE LIGHTS SHALL BE PAID FOR BY THE DEVELOPERS. • erdevel.doc • • \ t i 1liml.arJ ,�� • � ,111 I -r .7-.4-1- .-� _r_.,,,'•• non 07. „r r---- •, - J I L ,,. 1 1 1/� ..ria t I }. f '' 77___77_ ---------•------- �. - --- a{ --- - _------- _ f ' I__.-- ---r toil ' I :"y' (' tea. . I -— •;• DO _ I 1--- ail Air 11.... ,,, , itr, ,..M.1110' 1 11'2 f,-- 41.1., • ,...111M 7)?,•4.1?...r.,_"-',...,„„_3i •JAM 1� • y`. ,: M In t}_ mow iti t ill III_:.,.-- i '.. S f f' - • '-T _,' , 1�.' LOCATIN: ii 0 =4,.,;—' t',�,Oa• L��i;i.:112.----„ . . we 117+ \ • at •• ® r! ' , ,,,\\� -.: .,1 'i,,�,�•,• x IOW.' -11 - g �'-' 6PAi i IMI Mai 60-mn' . \ 4 .. rilraP - J ,0,01EILOL=MI.. t Y , • �rl 7IV.. 0..- �1‘ r i s' ',;4' '1'. pri -'‘ .-..„ u°Nt... ..---, le79lMf dr ��'*IV' r.�. - 16' 71 :qt. 3. �q g • PARK ILLL'z••_ R. kik — 1• ` • •+• ' .r : int\ _, — �_—i R.n t ,9{L �” t .a \1�`,t i is ,Ir''' , . rifiti .1 JI f \ \.�® I.I. ...i• qui, j. ( L.. '1.171 r r r �I „° ? .,. HUP vl at• \'.1' ' 'LIJb111 ■�.- -- -- ---. .-.. ... . -- --. - -1.` ;; _ 1,ii 07111 j . P. • i i', I �:: HILLSIO£ A , \ Ili . _. ....\ 2,,,.... ..ir , , ss .. ..__ IIOCATTOY MAP • --(. .,... ---. ../ • -;:r.... ( , (.......z1 P 94-10 cry a��`���,1 Cis` CU 94-30 Elis. ' - r7 ('� '--S< - �C;� • 1^„^.,C; 01••1..'- ., •.v^-a • �'L ,,.o.- A.f\i Com __. - ,r .^V x.1 1 ;. ^(t • St CONSCLTING ENGINEERS August 18, 1994 File: 230-245-11 Mr. Steve Ach City Planner City of Elk River 13065 Orono Parkway CIVIL ENGINEERING: P.O. Box 490 Elk River, MN 55330 ENVIRONMENTAL RE: ELK RIVER RETAIL CENTER MUNICIPAL SITE PLAN REVIEW PLANNING Dear Mr. Ach: STRUCTURAL As requested, we have reviewed the package of information submitted for the proposed Elk River Retail Center. The site is on the northeast corner of TH 169 and Elk Hills Drive. •SURVEYING Based on our review, we would offer the following comments: TRAFFIC A. SUBMITTAL TRANSPORTATION The information reviewed consisted of a site plan, grading and utilities plan, landscape plan, and site lighting plan prepared by Cluts O'Brien Strother Architects and were dated July 27, 1994. Also submitted was a traffic analysis prepared by Benshoof and Associates, Inc., dated August 4, 1994. B. TRAFFIC The proposed development consists of a restaurant of approximately 6,400 square feet, an auto service business of approximately 4,500 square feet, and two retail buildings totaling 18,800 square feet. Based on the traffic report, the total amount 1326 Energy Park Drive of traffic expected to be generated in a 24-hour period is 2,652 trips. The PM peak St.Paul,MN 55108 hour traffic is expected to total approximately 239 trips. The traffic analysis concludes that a right turn lane should be added to southbound Dodge Avenue as it 612-644-4389 approaches Elk Hills Drive and also that the intersection of Elk Hills Drive and Fax:612-644-9446 Dodge Avenue should be converted to a 4-way stop condition. We would disagree with this conclusion at this point, based on the fact that we do not believe there is •9800 Shelard Parkway enough information to come to this conclusion. Minneapolis,MN 55441 612-546-0432 Fax:612-544-6398 230/245-1807.aug Mr. Steve Ach • August 18, 1994 Page Two First of all, a queuing analysis has not been performed. We would be concerned with a 4-way stop and the ability of traffic to back up between Dodge Avenue and TH 169 in an eastbound fashion. Also, the traffic analysis obviously is only concerned with the proposed development. As you recall, the Elk Park Center traffic analysis took a preliminary look at this intersection and recommended Dodge Avenue from the south be the major movement curving to Elk Hills Drive with Dodge Avenue from the north teeing into this alignment. We would suggest that, prior to making any decisions about external street improvements, a further traffic analysis be undertaken which would include analyzing the proposed traffic from this site, the existing traffic from the commercial area to the south, and the potential for all the residential traffic in the area. As with the Elk Park Center development, we would see this as a City initiated concurrent study which could be done at the same time that this proposal is working its way through the Planning Commission and City Council in a preliminary fashion. C. DRAINAGE The grading and utility plan shows storm drainage from the site sheeting in a • southwesterly fashion with a storm sewer pipe system along the west edge of the development leading to a pond at the south end. Currently, there is no good outlet for this pond area other than the highway ditch system. The pond as laid out shows a certain amount of storage internal with the emergency overflow that would use the highway system. To date, we have received no specific drainage calculations; however, we have asked for those to be submitted. We would envision that in the future this type of arrangement would work quite well with the City's Comprehensive Drainage Plan which calls for an outlet along TH 169 from approximately 193rd all the way to the river. This pond could easily be tied into that outlet in the future. The grading plan of the overall site is quite general in nature. We believe when specific lots provide detailed information that the grading plan may change slightly. For instance, we believe that it may be inappropriate to have the drainage flow along the curb line in front of the restaurant facility, where it may be better to create a V- gutter through the driving lane and convey the water in the traffic patterns rather than in the pedestrian patterns. The same would be true in some of the other parking areas where it may be appropriate to extend catch basins out and create intermittent lows to collect the runoff. These types of issues could be better addressed on the specific site plan review for each of the four lots. D. UTILITIES • There are existing sanitary sewer and watermain along the west and north sides of this site. The plan shows that the watermain would be looped through the site providing services to each site, individual building pads, and hydrants periodically 230/245-1807.aug Mr. Steve Ach August 18, 1994 Page Three throughout the parking area. The same is true with sanitary sewer being extended into the site from the line along the west property line. We believe that this is an adequate utility service plan. E. MISCELLANEOUS • Glenn Sundeen from the Elk River Municipal Utilities has indicated a need for utility easements around the perimeter of the site and on the lot line between the auto and retail sites. • A traffic analysis, as discussed previously, would also identify whether or not there is a need for a 4-way stop at 189th and Dodge Avenue, which is the northerly entrance and exit from the proposed site. • A sidewalk should be provided along Dodge Avenue adjacent to the project site. If you have any questions or comments regarding any of these issues, please call. • Sincerely, MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4;274 e(A ex Terry f. Maurer, P.E. TJM:tw • 230/245-1807.aug a3 •m 6 V" -..."".••••'"••••••••.. ••••.............. i 30R 30R • t�.. _.— • .• �`18.. R=` •18.23'`87.69 24'-0' I----_ DODGE AVE EXIST. '1 T.N.950.0 • I ------ P R *. •_8 57'56=— 30 R 3 ` • II 25'R TRASH 100-0' ENCLOSURE CLEAN W/PAINTED OUT WD DRS • AJTO ,c. p 4 s1z sF bra b. 25R� .8 RE4AIL 1•sr s C B. SF 254' 40 STALL •1:200 FIE 946 50 / W C /STUCCO .. f TRASH ENCLOSURE W/PAINTED WD DRS •--" FFE 947 r- 25 4 m IDCP 10 , J FOCA 6L__ . /0' 2 LOT 3 LOT 2 • 30-0 6 FFE 947 - ( ) K y ''LAFOSCAPE 'h , SUFFER ' —t--r REQUIRED J 60•-0• 6'-0' 16'-0•A 24•-0' 4 40•-0• I 24'-0• 1 40'.' I 24•-0• I w Iu 1 24.-0 i a•-0• j 24 0' y if ( 40'-0. 5 L UTILITY __ _ w'r EUTILITNT gi •r q # FOCP w .— 12 RETAIL LOT 4 IT 11 1o.eoo SF ` 54 sraLs _ 1 •1:200 L............„ J EXIST. FFE 945 CYCLONE 22FENCE ON U NE —. .— —_ EY.USSX 'Ff1 19 m 1 041 V . —\ r 62 25R 4 i CC( W 194. 2243) _� ONE WAY—� 4 -- /500 --- -44'-'••'''''''.MON.F.ENT — ' 41 • NONW • / S. — I I _ • , • • • •- • • • 1 • 1 I 4 lw • 1 • •- 1 • • • TOTAL BLDG AREA 29.687 3 TOTAL PARKING REO'D 194 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED194F .1 • • • I. 1 1 • • •- • • 1 • • ClUtS 0 Brien Strother --......,...... • ARCHITECTS CH: • 7520 MARKET PLACE LOVE EDEN PRAHGE.101 55344 N • 91 12/94 1-4822 TAX 941-4951 308 • • ftx,/3.3/ -• S0'09'15-E 121.54 :... /3 .. I IfFEBY CIRLDFY THAT DRS PUN. •.m -- , v57. N .,,..... SFECIICATIC11,CR REAM WAS , (TERMED BY LE CR LION W WEI ARERNS1(31 ND MU 1 ALI A LILY •• REGISTERED ARCIIIIICI OUR PE ' LAMS OF TIE STATE CP LINESOTA ' DYE_REG MD. ----- 9.?e•,_, -- • N , — —----- N p....//6 1 P.\DY10\9424ELK N .• '1`/? 09 .- \31TE 11/904,7 A, i1 N N *g.'i:1:i,:-1. . - 303851E N :.*§O.iiitkix.,_ . 30.00 i NA1,4::::•.^..*:••••4$:',•'.. -..............._ ••:••••:•::6:,W.A.. • 1 \ ::.43:).;:,...........4...•;.• ••••.- ,... k5V:k*NO:••."44;..,,. -... •I.,:.•••,,,k*:::.:::•:•*4••::•,..$, 7.) X:4§:::..,.%:.:.:"••••2•,xs •••• tW•44.••••••••...k.••. .44,-.......*.•...•.., -t ..,..,2•40:::4:::-..4.44:4,,,,,kg,.A..,,,,,,,,*... I OWE OATA i tkielf.,:..,k:, —. -•••S• x.-.:4:4'4,4•74r`,4-,-1::,-**- —— ---, x•:+•A44•••4•••••••• •:•••••:•.:04•<4,4, q::•::::4A:•.:::,,Ak...•:,:•:.•#:04;;;:ts)*:::.:k., ::•::::;,&..V,":EV:,:e44,0 kr>y*.Pc: 1:3**;:%* tk•:•,••••46,.......,::::,•V>.•:'•,:ess•:40 0,0. ni:V...ax":$$..."-37,44***1>,Xt.P.432:::: to:ok.,11•:,.t.‘k. .4..:.,:. •.:•••.*".**4..,•:.%-:::: 0..:*....:4:*4:4Mhe•:•::ftk:M.....:••4.•s,.,„;• .ii*,::;:::...:t:&::':::i0f*AP:CP::::73:gkie*::•:):. '>:g...Z410i't:!?.. II- "iiietiSk4440:41;iSE•4:10. 1'SA.•413.:6 t.e.:+.•<:"..':;:k.t.i..44.044 Ii tETREExisi •1 30-0' BLDG . z • cr en v) nauirEaccramEw_.-7.: - — -------- --- ------------i 4,--•4'.8854,11,t...y....1,-.1.k"...1.1i:•Atis SETBACK J 1— I OT 1 .--- .:iivf...:I::::.1.1A...zv:*,•::::k*A6.4.,...s.:4›:.,$:..,..:w.w.„• Icp):Ix1:0:54Ixi.40/0:9,141:A.9,4 ..,1 ,Alt, ---------—- IL. MCP RESTAURAN i • ______ ? 04::sw:41,14::1:004:44400.00:*: 85 STA.3LR:I:75 ...C, 44.*41,4.**44:4;1.4.ft81:41. >10.:?(;(„8,V1i.:43.•••AAS(040.4;SW .;;. Y 1121CP .4::(1,A•.,W:•-AR:Wf,41:1.4.. . L1.1 • '----------- I . FFE 941 `?8(0:::03,1::8t... ..S.. ,:4.(. -,:•••A:8::.44em::. --I •IF. . Iiiiin,4'24kWR*4•01. I-- •I ..4<-41t41.1-$:.,•:::-S...^..*. --- I I ' ----• • ..4 . -u 4 24'-0' 4 180 81.4). 65'-0'' . _ _ —-----I • - - ,-_I .• ---- - -i ......•••''.....' ' (-TRASH ----- ,- 28 18 ,..__,. ROC4A • 1 .-- • __-- ---- -r...................-.•'• --.---) (I ------. "A5 ------------ .• :,..... ,.... b.„,_----- ....................--. --- --- . .. -- .k-- _... ..• - b ,...-- -', --- I----"--- , ..--- ---- -• ELK 1 RIVER , sgoo 060— .. I 1 1 --00-1.,---- 1 RETAIL •- --- CENTER 1 , , 1 , 1 , 1 i ? - 1 I 1 1 , SITE PLAN E Aii•ol& 1 =30'-0 71_7 mims 0 SITE.LAYOUT N k(). 1 ._ GC/11W 1994 N 0 10 30 60 FT w I • comma 10 9424 181 10 9424 ' 6 I ' 1 1 • I I OF XX Lu ¢3 il � z co 0 • c CH=I�6.88 R. 68�G=1 .. \ 1 __., 8•�3=`87.69 _ /917 DODGE AVE 1 A 0, P rn x208.14 .371.:8„:18E 3�4 \ B8,Vy�:18.57' 2Oy t \ \ 58" EH%XII I �9 T.N.•950.1 II •s----,___.___./. ___9 4 __, \ I 9S l .....„ \ 1 9p9 \ \ lorisseit. a. - p;ii ,/ - / ..0,5:, 0.EAN \ / / reTT // // -'SANT ' 1 o_i / •(e• �itikv_ I AIL (--7 ..... 0, I / \\ FE 916// // // r \ FFE 917 \ 1__ ,F-- \ \ \\ HYD ��1, W fri 1 \ !1■■��� 1MI . \ 6 VALVE V ■5 • !`�+ ' . -_��----- I \ A TEE N E%1ST. q 9 S. Y.H.I 7.RI.9M.(L_ \• A I FEE 917 • / !IN iWI /7 / = .. A II/4 --- /-_ 15 IIMI Z. o, in — / �r IIPP/ / .. \ RETAIL / ■, >__ — NS \ r\ 1 \ F� /01 : \ /--s. / // / /hre �,� ir ■ ... / / ����/�sTe� 6-x6'IfEE ---- -N \mg I OFF,Cn\\I: / 4...., \ _,i‘I•/, 7: \ (/--A_ "G, >•- Nv,•"° ! \ . 1 I\l_l___\__,. ! .______, ,,,_ , ____- \ IlliMilli qU�I � / ice' / / / $ \ y H ' \\ / TEE / / // / // i // / EXIST.S. /i /' / / / .•9130ijj/ OP.Pi/�/�/ /// // / N 0 ‘r pro P /ELEC 69X_-i / / ill: // N 0, /�� // / // �' III ■ I ii'1 , 1C1utS 0' Brien Strother ` ' ARCHITECTS 7FRAOEAINOCET.µ SSJ,. DRIVE 151.2/941-4122 941-492L i _-_--FA(MIi71 ,„ /0„ ..- N SO! 1S'E 121. O1 IAYf3;. \ I war SUMMIT OR INT TO REMIT WAS / I. 'T 57. ROARED BY IE CR MEI WI ERCT SPEIN�SR!No MN I IY A OLY / Dip uws ° 1E 11%: A. q/ • ______j '''..... 4.- OM: Kt low: f 1140::820 OPE AIA F —— ,_,-, N / LS^ CH,,I6 F:\DWG\9424EIX Y /;'-'/ \srtE 'ING ?7,•(Ii.# ' ' ( 5138E77 +�Z•,. '� /10.00 � I I N :::::1;;;4';;;IS:i1111ifaii: . I II I '�''•�,`�, e+�'a,"s nftF \\\1 t i / ! TE4LB 7-�OMIINIBY_ IF 1 I s¢t9s`i•`,.rA rs`ye.r�$ '�. ,:::::4,:i.:!:.,:!, I _ 27 (21 I I ,, 4vf* ! , I /•, / "''� -.../ -- ir 'tq'i`X;:a3`$:>C{{?i•,�`,�•�.1{Z `{}444ir�y(C4.:i+ = _..____'—_"_- {'•.'•rir"••'•t`.',•.las°<{•}'l..fi`va':.,y.N.t;•t!r • Z5 Y I f/53,,, FFE Int f 1 s�.v ,•a?;.xirti,,ya. 1's o jr, Arl OM .CBS :. / /�\ / ..........e.11.7/• .........e 1///(••lF � 9% \! / • • • v? / rte111111 -- `_ . // �/ �/// / i1 �1 i �� ''/'�,�] j/ /,/' ///•//�/ I t\ X ELK ' RIVER ,. � , % /// // „/ /I `;0.01" RETAIL / / / // / \ A CR x S PLAN �g9 z GRADING & UTILITIES PLAN1111.:17 ,-/ NQ. 1'=30'-0' 0 0 10 30 60 FT w • `^"'1° 1N+__. —• COMM MM. 9424 FILE 19. 9124 •.— .._.___._—.—__... y OW o. 2 1 ._-- .x" - .77 > W i/ \ • fr' 111 _1_ _ (.)Spruce,Colorado Green O 8' (2)Hackberry 0 2•-Col ----_ _______—____ _. _ _ (30)Dogwood.Rad-Twigged OS-Gd \ r+L/ (3)Spruce,Colorado Blue 0 e' =err• \` (15)Dogwaod.Red-Twigged•5-Cd :::: ()Moplee 2•-Cale.Compact O 5-Go � ."A . _ 6,5 40' -.4400 voki (18)Hosto 0 1-Gal GC� � 10 - < 9.Jii)111 "10 , (SOD Ii. 0 COD) '..dgbfkal-NIT,1.,-,:, _ (5)Juniper,Hugnps O 5-Ga ( SOD 0 (5)P 4,Scotch 0 s 41 (4)Linden,Greens.irs• 1.5-Cal AUTO f4 I (2)Spuce,Colorado Green O 6' (56)Hosta•1 Gal I RL AIL - 'r (8)Junlper,Mdorrb•O S-Cd 1111 0 44. (6)14e.Japans. reading a 5-Cal A jar '.1111 we- �� 1 a�+ uj�il 1 ° �10 4 imilli i AA 1 IIIF B'POLY ik (2)Spruce,Colorado Gra •n 0AIMI E PEr ak. MAT LUT 3 (e)klnlp., aarra 0 5-Gal LCI 1 c `' EDGER (10)Amur Maple,Compact 0 5-Gal l (3)pin..seam•5' Iisall (a)Hnpn)lacust.Imperial*1 5*-0n1 (3)Spruce.Black Hills a B' c--S00) - 10 LOT 4 1 0 (3)pin..Scotch 0 a• IF--,...„..„..„.........„., 0SQD RETAIL (2)Spruce.Nook HOW•♦' / c�� 500 ► v 6•POLY 0° C) _------------- •►o' It ____- (e)Spua,0 W 066 H •6' ., ♦ v In___ Red_Ipond"'e Y—Cal • •0 (B)Junlper.Apliorra O _•• /�'J'' -. - . /? 1/ ,) - • M�TO ASLOW-RELEASE� 641 POTTERER SUCH USUCMHAAS A ENEOF USE ACODRNO TO IMINNACIUNXS SATRUCTION5. MN FERTILIZER M A . A w_.._.9 4_..... MTS BACKFILL OR BROp0EF N A 101IETFR AROUND TIC NNIT. LATE SLIMIER TO FILL PMMINOS: UM A FERTILIZER WITHOUT HIROOE I RR DECWWS TREES W TOI APR"MW ro eM101EEN T g TREES AND 8HNA5 PIANIED N ULE U.VIfF OR FARLr ENL. IP SET PLANTS War.. SHE4 MOVING PRAM.LOT FROM PECAN 11E BEL n.... A d f 1.-.-. NOTE: DO NOT un If TE TRW.. 00 NOT MAN CI tOOSTN SOA.BML A.- SOC REOUREIIENTS NOW: N NEWT CAF SOILS CR COIP0CIFD SOILS.=SDI SOIL MOUND • ALL AREAS OISTURBED DURING PIT TO A DEIN O'402 DOE'S PINA 8010111100 OR PITCREONL PM TREES TM POMBE CONE M A TEN FOOT SPACTE 1 CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE SODDED. MOUND THE TREE PR. SOD TO BE LAID WITH MIN.4' -�lir L TOPSOIL UNDERUYMENT � - �p1f��pN PIMn IRQS AND SOMAS AT SHE DEPTH AT YIPCT TICS Dd N TE ALL FIANfEO AREAS INCLUDING 1 � (MA,w Eaa,Nc owmE.) e t e- SODDED AREAS AND PREVIOUSLY 111REDO0 HAPD\OOD MULCH MMS FROM 0RTEC1 CONTACT ATMA TEE I Y I�� - EXISTING GRASS AREAS ARE TO BE NOM OIL PLOD STEN 1 IRRIGATED.. C% .IWmNOOo 0000ABBE. . ALL PLANTINGS OF SHRUBS 0 Ii' AND TREES ARE TO BE 4fF - ..,....3.a .:. TAW s AORSA MIEN PIT S 1HREE-ouARrFR5 FULL MO ARAN MER M -� COVERED WITH 4'OF SHREADED •' - .."egg " EFULL "' �.. HARDWOOD MULCH. AREAS WITH 11-11- ,,,���,�NNNw,���, EDGER DESIGNATED ARE TO BE gall r CUT MD MOVE P.U.NENE MONO TRUTH. PUL DUNIM Mur naw Y APPROVED WEED HARMER FABRIC. 11=11--I ,� TORN NE NOP H BNL SO OLPFAC No NAnAP REMITS MINN THE TOP S 1 r 1 l is h e FILLED INSIDE THE BORDER W/ 11=11 TWO SMEs CI THE SOL SURFACE 1_ l `l S 11 I=II=11-u-e I-:III=I=M ENO NO MAME,Sy SNE MIMI TO OEM OF MO NOES. 'A\ 1 F l Y f l 11=11=11==11=Ir:1�=1Il=II=I y]I�cI-II I F'-I EDGER NOTE: MI BPaatL PLANT.PIT Nm4 OREM/SOIL NEM LP CLODS OF SOI. F SOILS ME POOR 11.E.WAVY CUTS.SNA OR COMPACTED_ ,11ACNR1 ED Wept A HOME 1/S PART OF Ir 0101 eTnR TNOSo1NNI1 EDGER TO BE IN HEIGHT SOIL M O LEE PEAT AS PMT OF 6,O1a11 N OA"SOLS REYO4 ILL ANCHOR ANGLE ON ROf.J6 Ab OD•1b5 F•`�eRMLL' 4 ..7520 MARKET PLACE DRIVE BOTTOM.TO BE SD JOINED EDEN PRAIRIE NO 33344 EVERY 5'NM.AND JOINED • RWCRN UP SEES DF m. <G II901-1822 WITH CONNECTORS. SLON95/CNTAINEIIED Ejaaf, .. FM NI-4951 TO BE INSTALLED AS RFAOVE sr amop f MCESSM") PER MANUFACTURERS ROOK ROOTS a ALL PLANT YIIERNLS AL BE FREE OF LOINS CIRCLESIEAID INSTRUCTIONS. '� COII7AW'RS MUNI 1RM4PORT(pars SNARL BE StMCTRIUL MOULD TIC (1570 UNI TOTAL REWIRED) If 80015 ME°OMP N A SPIRAL MOOED TNNN/S1EM OF PLAIDS. <,..... _ _ .... - TE SOIL MI.SMR AA0 SEPARATE N TIE 1 SEWED DRTEY'TIMI TNS PLM Ru 5150FF SRThTaK 0R 1DREPORT VAS LSEE STAMP P PER TAME 1TRIUd NOW IIT ME woos M ORM CRS Ce.THE SEW OF THE PAf L JUST SOILS APE POORLY OPIRJ♦((L HOTTED-UDONNG WM OE IDI OF VOWED AM TOT I M A ELY OFD T FROWN TO CM E NET OF ROMS. ROOTIM 1 ON A TWO NCH PEDESTAL AT BOTTOM Or PIT. SEI NAM (2)Hadlberry•2•-COI USE A PIMP KNIFE TO MME A CMS- SLOMLT MOVE olmep aRpE. �i0 TE EEO RIMESOTA DOSS Cur ACROSS THE BOTTOM OF TE BNL REMOVE 9OD/EAMRp MOUND TER Item Moan a 2'-CalALL SHRUB BE04. ROTOT.L TO 0EPM HTE, REG RDI (3)Maple,Amur 0 1'-Col (OfF'AWE)NMS�M.1O P•APOALTE 000101 l MONN0IORM uu1LN s.Mo0ENRE DMENT TO 2/3 IL S0otab 0 5' - -- • O 13)JUNper,Andorra O 6- .. (3)Sprucs.Block HON a e' w I (1)Ash,Creon N 2'-Cal \SI�GA9424ELK (6)MODIe,Anus•1 fyE 7r,P�T4.�\ rt.t•.' ln @gEe<� .P, �:���:�v���� •.,\ ._(2)W)Ilow,NioW Weeping 0 2"-Col i2)Dogwood.Rad-Twigged•5-Gal O ��d Lllil'A 0 tAlu° )Spnilca,Colorado Green 0 5' (2)Pine.Soot. t,;t./o7ipp---„ DRI[MTA :(z3)Judper,Andorra O tf-Gd (3)Maple,Nor.Em•rdd Lustre 0 2"-Cal 2L-�:9i 408-QTY REVEL c-soo- *SA° -- --.- .. . . 0 •(A'0,�,5) • (3)Do0.o44.2ogma a 1'-cal 0,64,L.�V •• • (2)- ,544449 a 5' F•s, _ - , .•5-Gal _ (22)Dogwood,Red-Twigged•a 5-Gd LI, _.. MGM.Compact a 5-Gd Will''3 L „,.,„ .. _e7 0,1/4J...: .... • l".;4 n 1 i _. .. .. J 11,11) I T ; F , KE S 1 AURANT `r`V 1-.7_1 I (4)Birch,River e 1-Gal 4 j• A W4 'A 1 L/FL(2'2)J iper.Hughes a 5-Gal V CEJ • EDgERLY Fri1.7 �Il (8)Ye.,Japanese Spreoding a 5-Gal �`:J IU• c5 -w l's • SLY 0 .J-�"` �.i-'J C Y`� ="PLANTING SCHEDULE ELK (3)Honeylo4wq Imperial -C'- I?I�VEq R sw. COMM• MAM[- BOTANICAL MK SIZE RODE COIN. SPECIAL CONS, RETAIL 2 •"=-'' WI•LOW0 OBt Salle alba'Ids.' 2-Col BSB t . 3 NOR�AL Pk[,"EMERND LUSTRE Meer 0104kooIIo,'ETHRId Lo*.' 2•-Cal BBB• )Hoelo•1-Gd 'ROYAL RED' Aur PWn>i Royal Red' 2' BSB CIIJN1R �S_HACK P�i -HONEYLOCUST IMPERIAL Gleditela triaoontllos Iner,nie'Imperial' 1.5"-Co BBB -/-- 3 MEM T REDMOND UNDEN TIM oHria<na redm Y 0Sd' -Col BSB -•---I 6 AMERICAN UNDER T'Nb omerir;10 Z-Col Bae ---..._...---"-- 5 l-- ----�� { GREENSPIRE LINDEN 7114 cordate,'Oreemplre' 7-Cal Beg 5 GINKGO Ginkgo bilobo(mak.) 7-Cal BSB ---- 4 MEIRNER BIRCH Betula nigra - ('-Cal BSB ..... ........... ---/ 1 MI=GREEN ASH Fraying.- nne nice r-CaI B&B(5)Ginkgo,male a 2'-Cal 11 -GREEN SPRUCE - -Picea pungens.Colorado Green 8' B&B -... - -... 2 GREEN SPRUCE Picea pungens.Colorado Green 4' BSB 10 _BUCK HILLS SPRUCE P)ce. •.uan demobs 6' BSB 2 =BLACK HILLS SPRUCE P)ceo gk.urx;donate 4' BAB LANDSCAPE 3 BLUE SPRUCE Picea pu4nro,ytouea 4' BSB PLAN 6 IIIIIIIII SCOTCH PINE Pinus Sylvestris 5• B&B • 3 SCOTCH PALE Pinus SyMsui• 4' BSB • 3 PAGODA DOGWW00 Comas aHemilolle 1'-Col BOB 34 - • Aur 91.0410 1'-Cal BOB 109 ,t Y. L,,,e 5, ,S,L5 Comas elolunxera 5-Go1 POT � CEMENT 1994 I. pri NL..Plerninw.••d P..", 86 ANDORRA JUMPER Juniper.horizontalis'Andorra' 5-Gal POT Mauer and^lR1Y91CLataa Ltd. 27 HUGHES JUNIPER Junlpero•horizontal's'Hughes' 5-Col POT -.....ao 43 JAPANESE SPREADING YEW Taxes 0us0:'19ta 5-Gal POT q• .__... .._ 97 HOSTS Haste•p. 1-Gal POTE W E=US l 9424 L.1I"LLiS1 N ,-'lir S ALE 195 9424 J t=30'-0• � DEFT 195 <-) 41 ) V I 1-) i lE xx - K 3 z , ,i /\ 0ISI } __..,__ _____ ) -- I `\ .___ _ . _ . . ,r ..._______. ss„, DODGE AVE -__7.- ---------..-----•-•-.. 1.°' ifOtA .- ..-_______• 00 \\NOVA -- --.__ PI i t 0001. 11101 _,______ ,i tonmiN , filitik. . AUT 1 ,461 0 um,I RElIAIL „.... 011i wo01111111111% a - ,.., ' i 460,120 wilaimbAAmmeijit ----- „. . •- ..'"INNEMONWIll le .'""IiMINIMIlratraWNIM 1.11MMIP Ili I lirillA reall41111411.fforia%$44 fir . tio := :=17,40. :,__,,s7..--77.. ,....4iiizioni 11\l eri.*L'L : 1114% r4,011 ____1 ... . WIAZiw-Aiimmk MEE ' %Fr RETAIL E1411 ,1"ellralift MAIM • OW. Mit 411=1111 miagiri''aier3,14 o_ - !`'eti% li . •►�' dempt Lir : 1".ri _.......1%L - VIIIIIIWW- - - r.1 wii-14 awti wiRt**-' ---- -.-5., , 0,6. ,iii -.. ,,1.0.61 air,, iiiimi, .., . __ -.1 -ri ErAr--i- ..:6*** --- 0 'igliTo ew-‘7-:-. •.1 I - -/ I- j i P9. /4Y I • -.. ---r- _-�—. • -_-+- _ —i-- Cluts 0' Brien B ITS LIaBTIRG ILIUM/MIDDLE Strother other XX DESCRIPTION �"►(YTT ►�1�1/'1I�1('1 A TWIN SHOEBOX STYLE, 400 WATT HIGH ('RESSURE SODIUM LAMPS, ARCHITECTS i 111 11 TYPE III DISTRIBUTION, 35' POLE ON I' CONC. BASE. itYC AA EC IJ MITER /KAD400SR3-TB-SPOD4-58635-5G-DM28-DDB B SINGLE SHOEBOX STYLE, 400 WATT HIG'f PRESSURE SODIUM I EDEN PRAISLA E 5344 OWE 1 E500 PMiFC 8554/ LAMP, TYPE II DISTRIBUTION, 15' I'U:,E ON 3' CONC. BASE. I012194I-4122 MITER #RAD400SR2-TB-SPDO4-8887E-5G••DM19-DDB __-,-, FAX NI-MSI C SINGLE SHOEBOX STYLE, 150 WATT HIG,T PRESSURE SODIUM LAMP, TYPE IV DISTRIBUTION, WALL MOUNTED. � HITEK /KAD1506R{-TB-NBDO{. CHMFISPECIFICATICW TKT OAS RM, REPOWAS WARD ED BY If OR SOFA MY MO 9FBMSOI ND MC I MI A BUY Mama NOYTECT Ka TIE LAWS O TIE STATE OF IMESOTA. I DATE: IEA.ID,: i;\_____________.. _ \BITE-A\9124E1K Mot � WA MTA �� iIllepl � N LLi� _kt8C .Y.BLI.4V r' N. N ____ irr jar - \ ,•r,., ----1 4 OT "111111101' RESTAURANT ' '' 1 - -• co . \ _ ,__- •• RIVER /' RETAIL . �! --- • %' CENTER ' 1.-------SITE ------ LIGHTING AamDH 1994 WAY NO `69 E I:ammo 91 9424 S NIGH MI e. 9E24 ( SITE LIGHTING N 1•1=111 4 1".30'-0. 41lT NO. 0 10 30 60 FT axx 4 O 3---- • i ii., l . :I ›. a� ii .._.._.._.._•._1 o�� ..._..„c......„ R-1•.--„.•. EDG 1...._.._.._._.. 5..6 An-cr„:,.,;--7--,. 4,f......... ,;--;,---. :". `,y3�7, ___"--`\``1 `,_ 1:3-----------:;„2564;:::"137._,....... �11'12 ANp;E:15,147.6;98.....:71:0,90__ ,00 51• —- 4 17.54 1 I s I s AUTO s REMAIL I� ji • FFE 945 ri 4 FFE 747 R-26 W w) v � � � l 1, kj L0� i .84 ACRES LOT 3 • ,59 ACRES 1 I P 'E /4 IFFE 945 Ara NM CRE' •P i /i OW l9'' ' IL__-----::__.--;- 1.*.-•••-• L_____,_..-,.......... w, ,3.5• • p PLAT P © 1'=50'-0 • 1- • • • I • 4- • .- • • 1 • 1 4- e • • • • • • • 1- • • • I I ' I .. ' I I! • -• — A ' 1 1 ELK ,,,vER, p44i 6 CilltS Aoh, . 0Brien ); ! \ ! • rgi 1 ,...1 Strother I Alt ARCHITECTS ' 1 ‘I L 1.11 • • 4Welli74.14 ,7 i f ' 6,520 MApamte iRKEziPLACE16225LIIVE, AV. 4.-R4TRLIM NIII:74 i.:: • • aim up-, 21..-4.-,._ ,• ' ---- , _ , Li,i wolp„..i..,,,,....„...x" V,: • 1113101Y 0301111117 1111S PLAY I :3 rtnNt(--. :4 H i SPEC:FOTO CR REPORT WAS REIM BY ilE GRINDER IR DIRECT SPERASION MD MST 1 IR A DULY LA TAM THEMIDISTATE?WIRIER% , "r\ •i' ' Nth A011.1 ., r•I•II,. .... _.-.....,_.........76.y.,...../tee ..,..%s•I ti0 - IN millit. ,T56. ev7 DATE FEG 110_ . • • F\DWG\9424ELK • — Mil!in ijir - -- -. \SITE •............., liellioVi II C22 amiim...tot 9 1 ci 1 ! — .. ---4 1::9 .•09 15 1 121 04 4;7/3 ie 1 • --• ID '15% 104 90 /INstv:,....or.57' ••‘••••, OM DATA •.......---........) -N,--- . ---, N ..S.......... ; ---------... N, N N 4#4,417.7*I Ns I 7 — [ • —V LOT 1rtSTAURANT - : 1 —1 PUD i i ---- 2. 18 ACRES- . I--- --- ----' FFE 939 --T-----11 Y -J . •-- __ — ---- , _ _---e "-I 1-:•.'•• I .... ) ( '-i....H.-- .-0.'101----- . ---------:-.....•-••••••••••• (.._„...\----___ , -1- „oogi-‘-----• (.....,) . ----- - ----! -0-.-.1--" --:"----%l• ELK "..:---• 1 RIVER C-3 CERETMLNTER LOCATION BY 0,41° IA°. PART OF OUTLOT A, DEERFIELD THIRD ADDITION, • -• SHERBURNE COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING NORTH OF THE SOUTH 289.00 FEET OF SAID OUTLOT A. PLAT PLAN ' GROSS AREA = 5.81 ACRES 1"=50.-0 i OF LOTS = 4 E EXISTING ZONING = PUD wow 1994 •- • AN 7101:MIM1 ail N °.' lir s PROPOSED ZONING = PUD • common MO 9424 RI WO 9424 • 0 10 50 100 FT w • • • • SWIG 5 . xx w 1 g --47.-- A -::re'•.•:-:,, - „.......f., • V V Orr.'7. ',7,111k , :.'1 STORE i' --.!• . , . _..::-..„,-f - ::-,..• --: . !,, ___ NANpfaillizaiiiiii:43COIRINFINIIIMPENIIIIIMIBMINIPAII_ „ „,, 949- -.1ilail=i;!...ii '- 945 941 , 937 933 929 0 NORTH - SOUTH SECTION THROUGH SITE LOOKING EAST • • •-=-20.-o' rIal V., 1 it9g ;foal go --_=____ solialimiramoma7.716.11Miliffil.iigiaNiiiiiiPiWiiMeiMPivillgiiiiiiilaiiImallialmalswilsisimEglii .- , , 945 ,/ gm=smi;iiiiiii;ummaiMIES amain'=iiiEN--a."-'-: .... _ ................., ....... -'- —M--- - :. 941— ----- 937 933 929 CDWEST - EAST SECTION THROUGH SITE LOOKING NORTH 1-=20.-0' o ----ir.:.-1- 953 -— 949 - -- 1 ------• Iiiitraii-7 .- • 945 . .i-7,11.111111111 ..:' 941 937 933 929 0 EAST - WEST SECTION THROUGH SIT" LOOKING SOUTH C=20'-0- . . ,': T z ' ,..."-,... -- . - ,-,...---......„0,-„....... -_,...-!..- •,-* — 949 =:=0--1....1"11.• - 941 937 933 929 (iDEAST - WEST SECTION AT NORTH PROPERTY LINE LOOKING SOUTH I"-20°-0 . hi. DEVELOWENT SIGN 'II , :,...-2.:. __.-....,- -• -.IV 1 --..........-..-- --.0....-- Adill 1..... .... , _...,._ ----.--ir-': .-... . - -. Filli .....„-,- ...-- TOM .1..— -....-- LWIIIIi•-, -.." '...- :;,-.-'— _.....,-,.:•41:fon.-.— —- — -.-----.me—.a7.1 vow int 1 nw - 1••••114,7,--,...,"4„S.,—.. ---ii...,-Ampr i• re ....avr liff. .1,1 , '.-- ,......... 0-4. s•rim,....r ..•-• .,-..-.... • • - - -- ------ ..- 4//1101!,4 .1,174 !mime Ekriglemi_ Fe ,.•', . vi,r ., ci)SOUTH .- NORTH SECTION AT DODGE AVENUE LOOKING WEST - / 0 .• ' . . , ---41- —+ , ! , • i ' , . ill , , 3TONE 4 -IF 1 , IMME IINIMII =111 7--- ' _ ClUtng —7:-----=-7-A..,-,--ii , ! - - 'tart0 `" 0" Brien ' 1 ARCHITECTS _ MO AFAMY RACE CRIVE-1 EMI MARE.IN 5344 10121941-4,22 i , • ' ' A Ds 941-1051 • I I IHRT WIRY MO 1ft5 RiM. ' SPECIICAHON.OR REPORT WAS -.46....-.... WANED BY YE CR WM IN DIRECT e...............--------... sIPERVISION NC THAT I AI A[MY .. --...7 FEGISTERED ARCHITECT LACER'RE g - -''.! 1 _ Iii 1 LAN OF 111E STATE Cr 111/NESOTA - - ---- — - • 953 949 DAR_____IB.110.: 945 1 • ____. 941 • --• 937 933 I F:WINGN9424ELK 929 I \SITESCT2 on • • • 4I IRIUE DATA 1 21-41L-24TFORMY1FROW.; 11 : 1 : SHOPPING CESTAANIT --_-____— MO KM - : -2J —_—_--_.-_- _--___________ . -- 1 94 I ---- - 937 - .._ . 933 1 ' 929 -77_ ------ • ----------- i . ---___ ==-: --- • i , 1 • •-•• ... ::4"...e ......." .., , • -- - ----- -- ------953 , . _ , IIIV:9---r' gi _____ ELK 945 4 .. 94 t RIVER , , 1 RETAIL 9zg 1 CENTER • W, I !' • , E•,_ - -.:•_•-•,- -.....i..• __ ----,..• ____ „.., ..... ........„. - WV- 1 I I I I I I ird e I I lint"."-- V - _ 1 ,p, , „a.- -1 .11,...E,---- * --AI ........:.,- - ___, ,,-;,,,,„.---,:r,.,,,,..-- _, SITE —,...1............. „ ai_, , 4„,,,,,,„"....-,-',. ,:, .id-7,— -......,,,,,-e,r0.77,4•:-, ,-,77., ,,_, . ,or.,_1-_ ---,„!. -.4...- I SECTIONS - r if/ZA'1,10'/.1 ',;.Z..:,,---?.2_Jia, - 9491 1 -945 , v4 1 937 933 , CORM 1904 • 929 , ORIDOINON fo. 9424 1 . 1 - Fti 09 0424 MET ID. 6 • I DE XX tf -21 2 " PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FOR ELK RIVER RETAIL CENTER • 1. Statement of reasons why the PUD is in the public interest. A. Designation of this property as PUD allows the flexibility to consolidate the parking within the interior of the site along Highway 169. Open space at the exterior of the site is maximized providing PUD neighbors with an attractive landscape buffer to the retail development. 2. Proposed development schedule A. Lots will be individually sold and developed once preliminary plat and PUD are approved. Earliest construction would begin in fall of 1994. 3. Screening A. Mechanical equipment shall be screened either by building parapet or by a screen constructed of materials compatible with building materials. B. Trash and outdoor storage areas shall be screened from adjacent differing land uses and public roads. Screening may consist of berms, walls, fences, shrubs, compact evergreen trees or dense deciduous hedge 6' in height. • 4. Signage A. Two freestanding development identification signs shall be provided at locations shown on site plan. 1. Signs shall be a maximum of thirty (30) feet high and fifteen (15) feet wide. The number of tenants allowed on this sign shall be three (3). 2. See attachment A for sketch of proposed sign. B. Wall signage for freestanding buildings shall consist of one (1) wall sign for each principal building. 1. Signs shall consist of individual letters. 2. Gross surface area of sign shall not exceed ten (10) percent of area of building wall to which sign is attached. C. Wall signage for multi-tenant buildings shall be for individual store identity only. 1. Capital letters shall be no larger than 36"high, lower case letters shall be no larger than 24" high. Signs shall be centered over the entrance doors to the tenant space. 2. Signs shall be internally illuminated, individual letters placed on a 4" • square electrical raceway, painted to match the building. 3. No signage shall be permitted on the east side of the buildings, or the III north side of the multi-tenant building on Lot 4, other than that required for delivery identification or traffic control. 4. Attachment B illustrates a typical wall sign. 5. Site lighting A. Site lighting shall be as shown on site lighting plan utilizing the fixtures shown on attachment C and D. 6. Schedule of drawings A. Following is the list of drawings submitted: 1. Site Plan 2. Grading/Utilities Plan 3. Landscape Plan 4. Site Lighting 5. Preliminary Plat Plan 6. Site Sections • III a a S OPP \ ' • (--. \ R i _____. a R — S A „ RA \ ,i A 0 (0 `./ r' + o 0 R = A — _ , i_ - M • 0 N 1 -0 H a 15'-4' 1 -� • FREESTANDING SIGN ELEVATION 0 ATTACHMENT A TO PUD PROPOSAL FOR ELK RIVER DEVELOPMENT CENTER . EQ.• EQ. .c1) ‘ ‘ • • ,• • . • FABRIC CANOPY I TYPICAL WALL SIGNAGE 1/4 " = 1 '--0" ATTACHMENT B TO PUD PROPOSAL FOR ELK RIVER DEVELOPMENT CENTER . Future Type: A B Arm-Mounted SoftSquare Cutoff Lighting ORDERING SEQUENCE ilkCATALOG NUMBER DIST. VOLTAGE MTG. OPTIONSKAD _ HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM D KAD 400S R2 0 120 Shipped Installed In Fixture 4 O O W IES Type II Asymmetric ❑ 208 0 SF Single Fuse(120,277,347V)n/a TB D KAD 4005 R3 ❑ PE0 0 DF Double Fuse(208.240.460V)nh TB 20' to 35' Mounting IES Type III Asymmetric 277 0 PER NEMA Twist-Lock Receptacle only O KAD 400S R4 (no photocontrol) IES Type IV Forward Throw D 341 0 ORS' Quart Restrike System(tamp not ❑ 480 included)(150W max) D TB' Ordering Architectural Colors (powder finish) • MOUNTING(shipped kIti1 t xture) ,i Desig 0 DDB Dark Bronze(standard) Square Pole(4'arm) D SPDD4 0 DNB Dark Bronze It L. -4.•:.• Square Pole(9'arm) 0 SFD09' 0 DM,B Medium Bronze \ausill. Round Pole(4'arm) 0 RPDOd 0 DWH White Round Pole(9'arm) 0 RPD09' 0 DBL Black Wood Pole or Wall(4'arm) D WWDO4 0 DNA Natural Aluminum Wood Pole or Wall(9'arm) D WWDO9' 0 DSS Sand Stone Wall Bracket (4'arm) 0 WBDD4 0 DGC Charcoal Grey CCNTCU� ❑ DTG Tennis Green 11111111 OPTIONAL MOUNTING(shipped separate') 0 DER Bright Red Mast Arm Adapter 0 MA 0 DSB Steel Blue Twin Mounting Bar 0 KTMB SPECIFICATIONS Degree Arm(Pole) 0 DAD1ZP Shipped Separately 2 Aft Degree Arm(Wall) 0 DADIZW 0 PE1 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(120,208,240V) HOUSING -Rugged, die-cast, soft corner Vir O PE3 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(347V) aluminum housing with 0.12'nominal wall D PE4 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(480V) thickness. Die-cast door frame has impact- 'The SPDD9,RPM or WWD09 must be used 0 PE7 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(277V) resistant tempered glass lens. Door frame is •when luminaires are oriented on a 90' drilling 0 HS House Side Shield(R4 only) fully gasketed with one-piece tubular pattern. O KADVG Vandal Guard silicone. Extruded 4'soft corner arm for pole ❑ KADWG Wire Guard or wall mounting. Dark bronze(DDB) non- CANADIAN SHIPMENTS: Hater. TGIC polyester powder finish is standard Add CSA as suffix to catalog number. with optional architectural colors available. (120,277,347V only) Multi-Tap Ballast(120,208,240,277V) p e May be ordered as accessory. OPTICS -Anodized aluminum hydroformed/ segmented reflector. Three IES cutoff distributions available: 7.1/s' (18.1 cn) Type II (Asymmetric); Type III (Asymmetric); ____L Type IV(Forward Throw). I. c_l_-17.1/7 IELECTRICAL SYSTEM -Constant wattage (102 cm) (443 cm) autotransformer ballast (-40°F starting). ACCESSORIES Ballast is copper wound and 100%factory tested. EPA 12IL2 Tenon Mourding Slipfrtter is ordered as separate fine item. LISTING -UL 1572 Listed for wet locations. Weight 40Ibs(18.1 kg) CSA certified. Length:17-1/2'(44.5 cm) 1 Fixture 2 Fixtures 2 Fixtures 3 Fixtures 3 Fixtures 4 Fixtures Width:17-1/2'(445 cm) Tenon Stze at 180' at 90' at 120' at 90' at 90' SOCKET-Porcelain, horizontally oriented Depth:7-1/8'(181 cm) 2-3/8'OD 720.190 T20-280 T20-290' 120-320' 120-390' T20-490' mogul base socket with copper alloy nickel- 2-7/8'OD T25-190 T25-280 T25-290. 125-320 T25-390' 125-490' plated screw shell and center contact. UL 4'0D T30-190 T30-280 130-290' 130-320 T30-390' T30-490' listed 1500W-600V,4KV pulse rated. ' 'Must use RPD09 • (aLITHONIA ARCHITECTURAL OUTDOOR KAD S3 12/93 •SWOON>.n.C...n,rr.a Attachment D to P.U.D. proposal for Elk River Retail Center PHOTOMETRIC DATA The charts below provide the most useful dato from photometric tests of specific tamp/luminaire combinations. For complete results of any combina- tion shown, or other requirements, contact your LITHONIA representative. ilL,R2 a�0.,a H,1.n...1441....444 new(max KAD R3 iAYV: 400 ,Ko, sod." ,..1 30000 I14.111308251T1 F. 11.4110.tray Nagai Furaw t✓s t,i[`9aD1 o? {weal.. r o-...1 a xr"."..w.l,..W 1,-.....• INITIAL FOOTCJ iDLEI FL111 DtSTRDUTION INITIAL FOOTCANDLES FLUX DISTRIBUTION Y 7 I\��� I a 1 P•a+,+nVAV 11". 1 z cctw s T ` ("*??4.11.91 'I'�-T •S CF.10101 W f M T 24500 a4 1 _ 0 ����■� f4tGaT 2041,0 T T22 = t OTA\ \ RDA 3440 273 {QM 11450 7040 410 TOTAL 30100 71] _JiJ� ' 1. a RIHUi10N S T r- I IES TYPE 11, CUTOFF DISTRIBUTION AMR 11( IES TYPE (11, CUTOFF DlST -. councoas CF vn-CAT04 2 ,..�0., Cl rTi s t1Ttr�Dtor r i CI LI— I I I ( s 7 ��,�' e- c( I l e 1 2 7 I c 1 I ' o . I I 1 a D15714.21a urns DF YDU41 <XGNT } a, <�� 1 I wl e t 2 a . ( • et „- 1 LI 85 / 1 I o DIST44OE N UNITS OF YOUNING KIGHT 21 fL•1.4 0 I 2 7 4 1 n t.i. 0 I 2 7 12 1'...77 r t..3 TAARSVETI E NDTN H WIZ 6 WNT)L KOCS 40 I.11 TRANSVERSE w.^14 a 1.154737 143.441-144 143G,(1144 1.24 KAD R4 LAW.. 1• N,, sem.., t..e s000c KA D R4 HS LAO: a>o /40 Praratro sus.”l�o S13:150Tr Fyon 1b tittt2',JJi foo vd•r-44...b0.4.1 w 30 run n({"Y1. 1...p.c..,{h nodt3Q Foaarda..art Ora a 30 nanny 44,41 1444.40 1NTT1AL FOOTCANDLES FLUX Drreal/710H UITLAL FOOTCI,NDLES FLUX DISTRIBUTION 7 1 _ a P A'SW4Ccr Iw?-IS 1 c of Lwol – 7 FRONT 2L'70 a2.e ��■ D.a1M444T 11750th [57 1t11D$ c I —Ni REM. was 11.1 w FROHf 11750 371 TOTAL 3400 S/.1 ' KM its.) 31 ii. g aN� ■ TOTAI 2xse .,] . I IES TYPE (Y CUTOFF D5 RIBUT)OH 1 IES TYPE tY CUTOFF DISTRIBUTION TI Cf UTLLaT)JI o 1 ���11 ■ �r 7 I t f I ccETTCCert CF t7TLCAnCN alalOgffIMIIII I CS I ' I1 41 i 1 _� o,—� I jH1- 44 I z la t, I 5 t 64 I 14 t s" aII I II UNTS Cf 110l/412110l/4124110l/412440NEIG4T 0 1 2 5 4 ( DSTANCE 44 UNITS OF /401.43(T15415 HEIGHT nt•"' 1 I 2 5 4 1 21 t.A TWOSV to WON N LIFTS CE 130.MTG Hzcsra W a r t a.r Tw.614RE 440.241N WT CF Ita347NG 4110(72 K t.Al r 4.r ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS . • UE cup., ►AMMO? PEWTER ►RaUIIY (AYO'!) DRD OVT 114M FASOR RECIL.t2X* WATTAC2AALIuT VOLTAGE clART4OPER VOLTAGE MATT f=, 141E V•U3411 WENS - 120 3.10/3.90 . 90 . - 208 1.80/225 156 100 Auto-Regulator 240 160/1.95.- 180 465 90. :10%.:10% - . - 277 135/1.70 208 •. • .. 317:-- 1.10/136 - 260 .. • 480 .80/1.D0 .; 360_ .. - T.gad 10 arms(EES and NEW sland.rdt Urd.r a2abt.d laboratory car 010(. Varfoul oprabrq factors can mum wines b.hn ct laboratory data and actual fill moavam.ntc Dili rs and fir LI TNON/A m«fl �a T>y R an basal on�a mom,au,.K a�rlabla las a art a.�.�>o ARCHITECTURAL OUTDOOR •P1CW,CA�4 UAL DC a.e(t44Q >2—* V CS t. .o.u..r.,..>ta...o...,, CT$4 KAD S3 au+sr vr.o.Vn.a+...."""'4".".."4 4 •r c w.nr.UN Torn OA. - 4 •(C.ALC M rya...Cn.C.'.LL Kim"".."4 • - _- - 0 1992 Uthonta Uahtlnp,Rev.12.513 Ftx1 ie Type: C Arm-Mounted Soft Square Cutoff Lighting ORDERING SEQUENCE !-- CATALOG NUMBER DISTKAE) . VOLTAGE MTG. OPTIONS IP i , HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM D KAD 1505 R2 D 120 Shipped Installed in Fixture 1 5 O Vu IES Type II Asymmetric ❑ 2DE 0 SF Single Fuse(120.277,347V)nh TB D KAD 1505 R3 ❑ 240 0 DF Double Fuse(208,240,480V)nh TB 15' to 25' Mounting IES Type III Asymmetric 0 277 0 PER NEMA Twist-Lock Receptacle only D KAD 1505 R4 D 347 (no pholoconlrol) IES Type lV Forward Throw 0 ORS Ouartz Restrike System(Lamp not ❑ 4E) included) (150W max) ❑ TB' Ordering Architectural Colors (powder finish) MOUNTING(shipped M,rn fixture) ,i Desig 0 DDB Dark Bronze(standard) Square Pole(4'arm) 0 SF004 D DNB Dark Bronze II / 70110, s. Square Pole(9'arm) ❑ SPDD9' ❑ DMB Medium Bronze �Round Pole(4'arrn) D RPDW ❑ OWH While ' Round Pole(9'arm) 0 RPD09' 0 OBL Black Wood Pole or Wall(4'ami) 0 W1YDD4 ❑ DNA Natural Aluminum Wood Pole or Wall(9'arm) 0 Y,ry,'009' O DSS Sand Stone Wall Bracket (4'arm) 0 WED04 D DGC Charcoal Grey cO f� IT } f E"'`�' 0 DTG Tennis Green s e e , e e ,v K OPTIONAL MOUNTING(shipped sepaatty) 0 DER Bright Red Mast Arm Adapter ❑ ma D DSB Steel Blue Twin Mounting Bar 0 KTMB SPECIFICATIONS Degree Arm(Pole) D DAD12P Shipped Separately: HOUSING - Rugged, die-cast,soft corner Degree Arm(Wall) 0 DAD12W 0 PE1 NEMA Twist-Lock PEE(120,208,240V) aluminum housing with 0.12'nominal wall Illi 0 PE3 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(347V) thickness. Die-cast door frame has ❑ PE4 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(48OV) impact-resistant tempered glass lens. •The SPDD9,RPDD9 or NWD09 must be used 0 PE7 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(277V) Door frame is fully Basketed with one- when luminaires are oriented on a 90' drilling 0 HS House Side Shield(R4 only) piece tubular silicone. Extruded 4'soft pattern. 0 KAOYG Vandal Guard CI KADWG Wire Guard corner arm for pole or wail mounting. CANADU:NSHIPMENTS: Dark bronze (DDB) non-TGIC polyester Add CSA as suffix to catalog number. Notes: powder finish is standard with optional (120,277,347V only) 1 Multi-Tap Ballast(120,208,240,277V) architectural colors available. = May be ordered as accessory. OPTICS -Anodized aluminum e • —T hydroforrned/sepmented reflector. Three 17.18' (1E.1 an) IES cutoff distributions available: I Type II (Asymmetric); .i Type III (Asymmetric); Ls•____—_ 17.1/2. 1 _ Type IV(Forward Throw). (10.2 an) (445 an) ::.• Type SYSTEM -High reactance, high power factor ballast(-40°F starting). ACCESSORIES Ballast is copper wound and 100%factory • Tenon Mounting Sliptitter is ordered as separate rine Item. tested. EPA: 12 TO - l• '- LISTING - UL 1572 Listed for wet Weight 34 lbs(15.4 kg) 1 Fo:tvre 2 Rxtures 2 Fixtures 3 Fatures 3 Fixtures 4 Rxtures locations. CSA certified. Length:17-112'(44.5 cin) Tenon Size at 180' at 9V at 120' at 90' at 90' Width:17-1/2'(44.5cm) Y-3,rg OD 724-190 120-280 T20-290' T20-320' T20-390' 124-490' mogul baseT- s Porcelain, ithrcopperfy oriented Depth 7-118'(18.1 cm) 2-7/8'OD T25-190 T25-280 T25-290' T25-320 125-390' T25-490' mogul socket with copper alloy 4'OD T30-190 130-280 130-290' 130-320 T30-390' T30-490' nickel-plated screw shell and center contact UL fisted 1500W-600V,4KV 'Must use RPDD9 pulse rated. • • r. �- (44LITHON/A ARCHITECTURAL OUTDOOR - . . ICAO s> 12/93 Attachment C to P.U.D. proposal for Elk River Retail Center PHOTOMETRIC DATA The charts below provide the most useful dola from photometric tests of specific Lamp/luminaire combinations. For complete results of any combina- tion shown, or other requirements, contact your LITHONIA rcprescntatn'e. DR2 L1.02 ,)a KO1,.a...a.d..%L .1...1110:0 Irmo* KA D R3 U,>.,v , Sof� .4,1000 . • F.wo.w.r...1►....h m.....s.Soy. Foaw1. b...d en 00._...y ti•9+ . T• • Ma.11,27Onail[ •11.04 Ho 11Z-04.3 Of INITIAL FOOTCANOLES FLUX DIS7RISUTI011 INrT1AL FOOTCANDLES FLUX DISIH!BJTION 2 z 1 - '4 >z `\\ pow,m4tU 11NP6 t 4F loin v 1 S . I nnyl*.�yAoT tu`'rt-moi_ IA,re = t . FROW 71 i 7,.1 FR OCT ,Y� ail 44 ALM 1)D{ I1.1 3 TOTAL 1341 IC.1 7 e MAI. 11104 IlJ i ' _�T,' - :...i-A IES TYPE 111, CUTOFF DISTRIBUTION ! 1 i IES TYPE III, CUTOFF DISTRIBUT]ON • ✓�' I Zs t ' s( GFSTCENTs a l/7LCATUi 2 �c. RHR�fT2 u VTLI:.CId -. 2 , I 0, OS • 2 1 I I na I Ell3 �.. is--�'� S f as ��'- a. 1 7 ; I is cs 1 OA „o. JI § I t"{ e , 2 1 . 1 r o, I as o , U1STA,LZ IX UN^S Of YDUAITMG HEIGHT a,,/ e 1 2 7 1 / 1 I 1 1 I I I DISTANCE H 123411S123411S OF UOUNiHG HEIGHT e I o 1 2 7 4 I 1S It.1.71 1 1 I 1 . I N1.iA 11 f-.tom ;7wcyDl5(>.1M M urZ Cr I117.11470 C HBG(Z u 4..n THJ45.17116E WON H UTA Cr 14.1eZTG FQ3f3 IS t.44 EI.Y KAD R4 110..14111 A...,.sad.., wen Lr.... KAD R4 HS w8 Asa.r H,,,A r..,S.A.t,."ra.1 11700 i,.._. Ta Fop.240 11HL'M01 Fmote..41.1 brad u ...NI 1.4,1•11wVI..' Fe .dN r .brad a.nr".. 1 N71 Tr Ncsat Ka 11=242402 INITIAL FOOTCANDLES FLUX DSTRIBUTION INITtAL FOOTCAND'..ES FLUX DSTRIBUTION 4 j/CN NNA1p ILLS i z Cr L•14 01 Y SrI I011.14 AQ ltu�rS I S CC LA-LPS i F RCN7 JSt ai.1 FAJij sea 34.1 I , I y REAR :l.l 17.4 e t I TOTAL 1°x0 I c11 = I I 0 I I I I IES TYPE N, CUTOFF DISTRIBUTION • i IES TYPE IY, CUTOFF DISTRIBUTION 10-ii- .i )1 ( I -§ 4"7EST7�7S Cf V1l lT17f 1 :�:.I I I 5 G+ffi"rr'pfrs Cf l/T2.l;ATI"N -f a1 12 i }1cs II 3 0.6 f I I 3 ;:s-n----''d 6 C•iri os ,, , . 5 c. I _ �1Jc� a� I 5I I _s_. cs a, 4...•f I • / 0 1 : 3 4 t • 1 ' I I I 1 1 2 7 4 I I O C' I '�'^ 5ISTANa H UNITS OF uotoj Tel Fre I GHT 0 1 2 3 4 5 D6TAN: H UNITS CF uOIAclHe HEIGHT e 1 2 1 4 F E a.aT0.A/E.ER E NCIH H 1HIS Cr ICIATIG/4ZGf1S a 1.1..)I iamsvE6£Y.4TI H UTA 6 14:Ll4T1,G/OCKTI X..Y E V Y • • ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS I,f CUR/EWT PRILLARY• p J, HILUAY.. IAa+F 07101.01/l HNT FAC011 REGULATT?1 . . WATTAGTJ1A 11A5T VOLTAGE 1TAtfi/D.ER VOLTAGE. WATh (%1 ill(V.LOOP tl►FM • . 120 2.00/1.6b 96 • • 208 . 1.15/.96 : 166 150 NX-NFF- 240 1.00/.83 192 ' 190 90+ t10%.t1CX .- _ • - ...- - - - 277--• .88/.72•. . 222... 347 .53/.57::=- 275 480 30/.44 364 Ta to tumid 1E5 and WEA ,bo undo( laboratory ry o*. Various op. tr • � L/TNON/A boon can ouu Cnna betran laboratory data and actual read moasuamatL DimansbrE and ty.CratbrE In this carillon an baud oil the/nod mart retrials data a1d an e„b;.e to char*".ARCH/TECTURAL OUTDOOR anCV/CATON olu,X OVIPOOo U011T11.G • -- - • _ r T..C.U.r=rug.a1O Lr/7.131..712.1. /.1oa{1/1„,.../.•a - - .�,. , 'r �� a__ 1fn101�.IIbMIM GYUGt MT/I�Y( 4ii 1.4 erA a py.C.11.1.1.141.21.34.we i _•-r-• KAD S1`; 6 1992 Uthonia lighting,Rev.1253 iiii7 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 110 7301 OHMS LANE, SUITE 500/EDINA, MN 55439/(612) 832-9858/FAX (612) 832-9564 August 4, 1994 REFER TO FILE: 94-28 MEMORANDUM TO: Dan O'Brien �q FROM: James A. Benshoof and Edward F. Terhaar Fr RE: Results of Traffic Analysis for Proposed Elk River Retail Center PURPOSE The purpose of this memorandum is to present the traffic analysis results for a proposed retail center in the City of Elk River, MN. The traffic analysis and results presented in this memorandum are organized as follows: 1) Background Information. This includes development characteristics and roadway IIIand traffic information. 2) Traffic Forecasts. Daily and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were developed based on pertinent background information and on trip generation figures for a post- development condition. 3) Traffic Analysis. The ability of the roadway system to effectively accommodate the projected post-development traffic volumes was analyzed and reviewed for any potential difficulties. 4) Conclusions. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Project Information The proposed development is to be located on Dodge Ave. north of Elk Hills Dr. and east of T.H. 169, as shown in Figure 1. The development is expected to consist of a family restaurant (6,375 sq. ft.), an auto service related use (4,512 sq. ft.), and two general retail uses (8,000 sq. ft. and 10,800 sq.ft.). All access will be on Dodge Ave. along the east side of the development. Existing Conditions Currently, Dodge Ave. serves as a two-way frontage road on the east side of T.H. 169 III and extends between 192nd Ave. on the north and 5th St. on the south. Along the site frontage, Dodge Ave. presently is 30 feet wide with low bituminous curbs. Elk Hills Dr. is also a two lane, two way roadway serving mainly residential uses and also serves p IN .......... F.5; ~ • )3rd LA. 4, . 11 J a• & # z' .t 4 z xs t. L,I AVE. N.W. °C N vl o 192nd AVE. ( W 193rd z 192ndz AVE. " W• At* L 5.-' n ...at C T. 2 z 2 4- X z AP0. LA z 1 2nd AVE 1.`;'J► u' 3 > • Ilst LA. N.W. 191st AVE_z ►vE• N.W.4 °0 ( : 190/ AVcg. . . N,W .Qn F aA < o . � `� 4F3.,› c' �190th 190th y Ctpw ti44;V ET. 2' a N 'w PROJECT 89t ^�' LOCATION AVE. Fr ELK HA. LA, r► 4,' N.W. DR. a N.W. ELK HILLS W O {)- ,io > 8th ST. N _ a 4t t—.•--iI 2 Q N.W. 3. II o ,Is ST. 7th ST. ST.N.W. 06th o Z� 6fih ST. s�,tiN'► in 4. k 45 • 5th 5 112 ST. ��Q � e 0 1- P 5th SI. z � � 4th '-' 2 > z 5. St. N.W. N V > o I ` W ..t h- > 4,11 , v► �� OR u �`' CO e N SCALE 111%11.1.11111.1 0 1000' GLUTS, O'BRIEN, STROTHER ARCHITECTS, INC. TRAFFIC STUDY FIGURE 1 FOR ELK RIVER • RETAIL CENTER PROJECT LOCATION WBENSHOOF&ASSOCIATES,INC. TRANSPORTAT ION END NE ERS A N DPI A N NE RN Mr. Dan O'Brien -3- August 4, 1994 the area's main access to T.H. 169. The Dodge Ave./Elk Hills Dr. intersection • consists of stop sign control of Dodge Ave., with one lane approaches on all legs except for eastbound Elk Hills Dr., which has a separate right turn lane. A 24 hour traffic count taken on Tuesday, July 26, 1994 by Benshoof& Associates, Inc. showed approximately 3,310 vehicles per day use Dodge Ave. north of Elk Hills Dr. TRAFFIC FORECASTS Trip Generation Utilizing results from local traffic studies and data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, trip generation rates were established for uses in the proposed new development. Next, it is important to classify trips to and from the development in terms of the following two categories: . New trips - These are trips solely to and from the proposed development. . Passby trips - These are existing "through" trips on T.H. 169 that in the future will include a stop at the proposed development. Based on our experiences for these types of retail uses and information published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, we estimate that approximately 80 percent of the trips generated by the development would be new, while 20 percent would be considered passby. To account for multi-purpose trips, or trips that would make stops • at more than one of the businesses in the development, a five percent reduction factor was applied to the overall trip generation. Table 1 shows the p.m. peak hour trip generation and Table 2 shows the daily trip generation for the proposed development. TABLE 1 P.M PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION PROJECTIONS FOR ELK RIVER RETAIL CENTER Trip New Passby Size Generation Ratel Trip Ends2 Trip Ends2 Use fSq.Ft.) In Out In Out In Out Family Restaurant 6,375 8.78 7.48 42 36 11 9 Auto Service 4,512 3.68 3.68 13 13 3 3 Retail 8,000 2.96 3.15 18 19 4 5 Retail 10,800 2.96 3.15 24 26 6 7 ---- ---- --- --- Totals 97 94 24 24 1 Trip Ends per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 Includes 5% reduction for multi-purpose trips • Mr. Dan O'Brien -4- August 4, 1994 • TABLE 2 DAILY TRIP GENERATION PROJECTIONS FOR ELK RIVER RETAIL CENTER Trip New Passby Size Generation Ratel Trip Ends2 Trip Ends2 Use (Sq.Ft.) In Out In Out In Out Family Restaurant 6,375 102.68 102.68 497 497 124 124 Auto Service 4,512 36.96 36.96 127 127 32 32 Retail 8,000 30.55 30.55 186 186 46 46 Retail 10,800 30.55 30.55 251 251 63 63 ---- ---- --- --- Totals 1061 1061 265 265 1 Trip Ends per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 Includes 5% reduction for multi-purpose trips Trip Distribution and Assignment The top half of Figure 2 shows the trip distribution percentages for new trips. These percentages are based on the expected distribution used in other similar projects in the area, including the Elk Park Center development. The bottom half of Figure 2 shows the expected trip distribution percentages for the passby trips, which are based on current directional traffic volumes on T.H. 169. Utilizing the trip generation and trip • distribution previously discussed, trips to and from the development were assigned to the roadway system. Traffic Volumes Traffic volumes were developed for three scenarios: 1) 1994 existing, 2) 1996 without the proposed development and 3) 1996 with the proposed development. Under both 1996 scenarios, it was assumed that two thirds of the Elk Park Center development was occupied and therefore contributing traffic to the surrounding streets. P.M. peak hour traffic volumes at the Elk Hill Dr./T.H. 169 intersection are based on traffic forecasts for the Elk Park Center development. From these forecasts, 1994 existing and 1996 base volumes without the development were determined. The expected p.m. peak hour trips generated by the proposed development were then added to the 1996 base volumes, resulting in 1996 post-development volumes. These volumes are shown in the top half of Figure 3. P.M. peak hour traffic volumes at the Elk Hills Dr./Dodge Ave. intersection are based on turning movement counts taken at the intersection from 4-6 p.m. on October 21, 1993 by Benshoof& Associates, Inc. In order to determine 1994 p.m. peak hour turn volumes, a growth factor based on expected growth in the area and on hourly traffic counts taken on Dodge Ave. was applied to the 1993 volumes. The same growth factor was applied to the 1994 p.m. peak hour volumes to determine the 1996 base volumes without the proposed development. The p.m. peak hour trips expected to be generated by the proposed development were then added to the 1996 base volumes, resulting in 1996 post-development volumes. These volumes are shown in the bottom half of Figure 3. e NEW TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES • 10% i E, Lti 10% y 0 w ,,s 10%% o 0 4,,4 5% SCHOOL ST. 30% 4.--, EEK NILLS Dn. O 00 N Om m 10% 25% NOT TO SCALE PASSBY TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES s 30°S. 14-_,, 'Lull . ,�s � o �rn o 0 SCHOOL ST. O ELK HILLS DR- O 32.4 N t 70% NOT TO SCALE oir GLUTS, O'BRIEN, STROTHER FIGURE 2 ARCHITECTS, INC. TRAFFIC STUDY FOR ELK RIVER TRIP DISTRIBUTION 0 4RF PERCENTAGES BENSHOOF&ASSOCIATES,INC. TRANSPORTATIONENOINEERSANDPLANNERS RETAIL CENTER /I "Nt PM PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENTS AT T.H. 169/ELK HILLS DR. 0 g § N a [D yO ti; M < l I I > ELK HILLS DR. f. 57/86/112 T < 137/2.32/260 143/235/235 58/63/92 155/200/229 > 133/196/198 j ` 1TI ' 1994 EXISTING ^ a a N 1996 NO BUILD r 1 '4 1996 POST-DEVELOPMENT ± 7 05 xXIX awxx °' t NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 1996 VOLUMES ASSUME ELK PARK CENTER IS 2/3 OCCUPIED PM PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENTS AT DODGE AVE./ELK HILLS DR. • o2 CO N , 1 I I �� ELK HILLS DR. J �j 1/1/6 <- 17/26/26 121/174/262 J I 1/1/1 30/43/43 —4 Y 177/255/255 N I 1 re ,., 1994 EXISTING > A 4 'S N 1996NO BUILD w r-1996 1996 POST-DEVELOPMENT a I N4 XX/XxJXX ° 0 NOT TO SCALE Ikkikk NOTE: 1996 VOLUMES ASSUME ELK PARK CENTER IS 2/3 OCCUPIED ile CLUTS, O'BRIEN, STROTHER FIGURE 3 ARCHITECTS, INC. TRAFFIC STUDY FOR ELK RIVER PM PEAK HOUR 11110 W RETAIL CENTER TURN MOVEMENTS BENSHOOF&ASSOCIATES,INC. IRANSPORTATIONENGINEERSANDPLANNERS Mr. Dan O'Brien -7- August 4, 1994 Daily traffic volumes for Dodge Ave. were also developed. The same growth factor • used for the p.m. peak hour turn movement volumes was applied to the 1994 daily volume, resulting in 1996 base daily volume without the proposed development. The expected number of daily trips generated by the development were added to the 1996 base volumes resulting in 1996 post-development daily traffic volumes. These volumes are shown in Figure 4. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Ability of Adjacent Roadways to Accommodate Proposed Development Traffic Based on current daily traffic volumes, it is apparent Dodge Ave. is serving as a collector route for this area. According to Minnesota State Aid design standards, the existing 30 foot width is not sufficient for a two lane collector with on-street parking on one side. The State Aid design standards recommend a 36 foot curb face to curb face width for a two lane collector with parking on one side. Therefore, Dodge Ave. needs to be widened sometime in the future even without any additional development in the area. However, the need to widen Dodge Ave. between Elk Hills Dr. and 189th Ave. becomes more urgent due to the additional traffic generated by the proposed development. Therefore, it is our recommendation that Dodge Ave. between Elk Hills Dr. and 189th Ave. be widened to 36 feet curb face to curb face in conjunction with the proposed development. Such widening should be accomplished according to City standards, including consideration for all pertinent items, such as a possible sidewalk. All of the above mentioned improvements to Dodge Ave. will fit within the existing 66 foot right-of-way. The recommended conceptual layout is shown in Figure 5. With these improvements, we are confident the adjacent roadways will be able to effectively 11) accommodate the additional trips generated by the proposed development. Elk Hills Dr./Dodge Ave. Intersection In order to accommodate the additional development traffic at this intersection, it is recommended that the following measures be implemented: . A right turn only lane be added for southbound traffic on Dodge Ave., creating a two lane approach (see Figure 5). . Convert the intersection to four-way stop sign control, except that right turns from the west to the south would continue to utilize a channelization island and operate with yield sign control. The recommended conceptual layout for Dodge Ave. is shown in Figure 5. With these improvements we are confident the intersection will be able to accommodate the traffic volumes generated by the proposed development. T.H. 169/Elk Hills Dr. Intersection A capacity and level of service analysis using post-development volumes showed all movements at a level of service D or better utilizing planned improvements to the intersection layout. Therefore, we believe this intersection will effectively accommodate the post-development traffic. • c0 w Q S co O a DEVELOPMENT DRIVES 3310/4600/5430 3310/4600/6820 SCHOOL ST. ELK""-LS DR' i -37G cIN • 1994 EXISTING 1996 NO BUILD N 1996 POST-DEVELOPMENT xwxXJxx NOTE: 1996 VOLUMES ASSUME ELK PARK CENTER IS 2/3 OCCUPIED NOT TO SCALE CLUTS, O'BRIEN, STROTHER FIGURE 4 ARCHITECTS, INC. TRAFFIC STUDY FOR ELK RIVER DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES • dor BENSHOOF&ASSOCIATES,INC. RETAIL CENTER ON DODGE AVE. NitiF ♦' TRANSPORTATIONENGINEERSANDPLANNERS • 1 SOUTH DEVELOPMENT DRIVE 4- I I I I I 14' 112' 10' I 1 / / kii / J' Q/ 8 / ° / • // / / / 1 1 14' 12' 117 10' N I ,i /I 1 At ELK HILLS DR. APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 60' [CLUTS, O'BRIEN, STROTHER FIGURE 5 ARCHITECTS, INC. TRAFFIC STUDY O 3? FOR ELK RIVER RECOMMENDED RETAIL CENTER CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT OF BENSHOOF&ASSOCIATES,INC. DODGE AVE. TRANSPORTATIONENGINEERSANDPLANNERS Mr. Dan O'Brien -10- August 4, 1994 Elk River Retail Center Driveways on Dodge Ave. In order to move customers in and out of the development in the most efficient and safe manner, we recommend the modifications to the existing site plan as shown in Figure 6 and described as follows: . Provide two 12 foot exiting lanes and one 14 foot entering lane at each driveway. This will allow more space for vehicles to queue while waiting to exit without backing up into the lot and greatly improves the safety and overall operation of the driveways as compared to options with fewer lanes. . Move the south driveway approximately 24 feet north so it aligns with the northern most parking lot aisle south of the auto service use. This will eliminate the "crossing" pattern that would have been experienced by entering and exiting customers under the current site plan, thereby greatly improving the safety and efficiency of the driveway. Relocating the driveway to the north will also center it between the two residences on the east side of Dodge Ave. and eliminate the partial offset condition with the residential driveway shown in the current site plan, thereby improving the safety of movements in and out of those driveways as well. CONCLUSIONS From the traffic analysis documented in this memorandum, we have established the following conclusions: . Current traffic volumes on Dodge Ave. indicate it is functioning as a collector route. . In order for Dodge Ave. to conform with pertinent standards as a collector street, it needs to be widened to 36 feet from face of curb to face of curb to allow for one through lane in each direction and a parking lane on one side. In order to accommodate the total post-development traffic volumes, it is recommended that this improvement be implemented in conjunction with the proposed development. . The amount of traffic generated by the proposed development indicates the need for a right turn only lane for southbound traffic on Dodge Ave. at the Elk Hills Dr. intersection, as well as the implementation of four-way stop sign control. . One entering and two exiting lanes are recommended for both development driveways on Dodge Ave. . Relocate the south development drive approximately 24 feet to the north of its location on the current site plan to improve the safety and efficiency of traffic movements. • 0 • • 11r r-` 14' 12' 12 DODGE AVE. ------------ T------------ --- -11,77 -------- I 14'I 12' 12' I j I i I AUTO I IRETAIL ; /_ ! r ) I i I I I , I i _ 111111111 1111111 ., i ill SCALE 0 60' CLUTS, O'BRIEN STRUTHER ARCHITECTS, INC. TRAFFIC STUDY FIGURE 6 FOR RECOMMENDED LAYOUT FOR Sip BENSHOOF&ASSOCIATES, INC. ELK RIVER RETAIL CENTER DRIVEWAYS ON DODGE AVE. TRANSPORTATIONENGINEERSANDPLANNERS Elk River City Council Minutes Page 6 October 1 , 1990 • with at a landfill that has state of the art environmental design. Peter Jones stated that they have no control over where the material goes because it is governed by the County. There being no further comments, Mayor Tralle closed the public hearing. COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF LICENSES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR NSP AND UPA UNTIL OCTOBER 29, 1990, 7:00 P.M. TO BE HELD AT THE ELK RIVER PUBLIC LIBRARY. COUNCILMEMBER DOBEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. The City Council recessed at 8:55 and reconvened at 9:05 p.m. 6.2. Business Park Zoning Designation in Focus Study Area A The Building and Zoning Administrator stated that at the 9/17/90 City Council meeting, the City Council zoned an area south of Highway 10 as Business Park. He indicated that the Planning Commission has studied the area and had recommended that the zoning designation be PUD for the parcel of land located south of Highway 10 in the Area A Focus Study. COUNCILMEMBER DOBEL MOVED TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 90-40, AN ORDINANCE RESCINDING ORDINANCE 90-35 AND AMENDING THE CITY OF ELK RIVER ZONING MAP TO ZONE CERTAIN PROPERTY IN AREA A. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE • SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 6.3. Retail Uses in Outlot A Deerfield III PUD The Building and Zoning Administrator stated that there was a discrepancy in the August 20, 1990, City Council minutes regarding uses in Outlot A, Deerfield III PUD. He indicated that the Council did give a consensus to allow retail uses along with the C2 uses in Outlot A. The Building and Zoning Administrator stated that the August 20, 1990 minutes have been corrected showing that retail uses are allowed in Outlot A. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE MOVED TO AMEND THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 20, 1990 COUNCIL MEETING. COUNCILMEMBER DOBEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. The Building and Zoning Administrator requested direction from the Council as to what type of retail uses the Council will allow in the area. Councilmember Kropuenske indicated that the amount of traffic, more than the size of the use, will dictate the type of use in the area. The Building and Zoning Administrator stated that the size of the site will limit the use and that all uses will go through a review process by the Council. It was the consensus of the Council to leave the retail status for the Outlot A, Deerfield III PUD area because of the fact that the standards will be set by the PUD. • City Council Minutes Page 13 September 17, 1990 recommending that the moratorium be extended to allow for proper review • of the issue. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 90-49, A RESOLUTION EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON LAND USE IN RELATION TO ADULT ENTERTAINMENT. COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. 5.13 Ordinance Amendment to Section 900.18 Definitions/P.H. Zoning Assistant, Janelle Szklarski, noted that the proposed ordinance amendment reflects changes to several definitions within the City's ordinance. Mayor Tralle opened the public hearing. There being no one for or against the matter, Mayor Tralle closed the public hearing. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE MOVED TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 90-39, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 900.18 DEFINITIONS OF THE ELK RIVER CITY CODE. COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. 5.14 Review Final Conditional Use Permit for Bauerly Brothers Inc. Mayor Tralle stated that Bauerly Brothers had recently received approval from City Council for a conditional use permit for gravel mining. He stated that presented before the City City Council this evening, was the final draft of the Conditional Use permit. • COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO APPROVE THE TEXT OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AGREEMENT FOR MINERAL EXCAVATION FOR BAUERLY BROTHERS, INC. COUNCILMEMBER DOBEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. 5.15 Review Final PUD Agreement for Elk River Development Corporation Outlay A Deerfield 3rd Discussion was held regarding the August 20, 1990, City Council minutes. Janelle Szklarski questioned the Council whether retail stores and shops should be added as stipulation to #3(02) , found on page 3 of the agreement. She stated that retail stores and shops were not specifically stated in the Council minutes. She also stated that stipulation #3(04) found on page 4 did not accurately reflect the type of signage approved for this area. The City Clerk indicated that after reviewing the tape recording of the meeting, that retail uses should have been included in the minutes. Council discussed the types of retail uses to be included in the developers agreement. It was the consensus of the Council to refer this back to staff for further study to determine what types of retail uses would be appropriate for that area. COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO TABLE APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT FOR ELK RIVER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OUTLOT A, DEERFIELD III FOR STAFF REVIEW OF RETAIL USES. COUNCILMEMBER DOBEL SECONDED THE • MOTION CARRIED 4-0. It was the consensus of the City Council to amend the August 20, 1990, City Council minutes to include retail uses in Outlot A, Deerfield III PUD. City Council Minutes Page 4 August 20, 1990 Councilmember Kropuenske stated that he is the president of Central • Lutheran, but that he would have voted on the matter even if he was not a member of the church because the request is a clearly stated issue. 5.2 Consider Conditional Use Permit/Elk River Development Corporation Outlot A/P.H. 5.3 Consider Administrative Subdivision/Elk River Development Corporation Outlot A/P.H. Steve Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator, indicated that the businesses proposed on Outlot A have withdrawn their offer for the land after Planning Commission review. He requested the City Council to review the PUD requirements for the area so that the owners of the property would have a clear understanding of what is allowed on the property. Vice Mayor Schuldt opened the public hearing. The memo from the Building and Zoning Administrator dated July 19, 1990, was reviewed item by item by the City Council. The numbers listed in these minutes coincide with the numbers listed in the previously mentioned memo starting on Page 6, titled "Summary of staff's recommended conditions". 1. Steve Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator, stated that the affected property should be split through the platting process. • Peter Kimball, Planning Commission Representative, stated that the Planning Commission felt the property should be platted due to the sensitivity of the area and the complexity of the area. 2. The Building and Zoning Administrator stated that staff is recommending uses allowed as principal and conditional uses in a C-2 zone be allowed within a PUD. The Building and Zoning Administrator stated that the petitioners have requested that retail be added to the list of uses allowed in the PUD. He stated that the City's Planning Consultant felt that there are certain commercial uses that should be excluded and that there are some uses that would be proper for the area with- certain criteria such as hours of operation, buffering, etc. The Planning Consultant felt retail would be appropriate. Peter Kimball stated that the Planning Commission considered this item for about one hour and 45 minutes. He indicated that 80% of the time was spent on traffic and safety issues. He stated that the design of the intersection and the fact that there are so many pedestrians in the area were major considerations. Councilmember Kropuenske stated that some of the retail businesses would generate less traffic than permitted uses in the C-2 zone and felt that retail should be included as long as it is controlled. Arlon Fuchs stated that he would like to have retail limited to smaller type retail businesses dependent upon the traffic flow. • City Council Minutes Page 5 August 20, 1990 Ed Wortman, 11857 Dodge Avenue, stated that he felt there should be • another way to get to Outlot A. Steve Rohif stated that there could not be another frontage road between Dodge Avenue and Highway 169. Tim Christeen, 11378 189th Avenue, questioned what type of retail would be allowed in the area. It was indicated that if retail were allowed in the area it would be controlled due to traffic volume. Terry Maurer stated that traffic counts have been done in that area. He reviewed with the Council and public the results of the traffic counts. Mr. Maurer indicated that a determining factor of the traffic situation is based on a level of service from A through E. He stated that the level of service at the present time for the Elk Hills/Dodge Street intersection is A, which is considered the highest level of service. Mr. Maurer stated that taking into account that all available lots are filled and Outlot A is consumed by commercial, the traffic count would increase dramatically and the level of service would drop to B. Mr. Maurer reviewed with the Council the ultimate intersection design for that area. He stated that the intersection has the capacity to handle the traffic generated at the present time and in the future, but it is a question of operation and how much the City wishes to spend on improvements. Terry Maurer further stated that he did not feel this was an unusual situation with the number of vehicles in relation to single family housing. He stated that there are other single family • areas in Elk River who have traffic volumes that match or exceed this area. 3. Steve Rohlf reviewed the dimensional regulations for the PUD as listed in his memo. It was indicated under iii that this stipulation could be eliminated during the site plan review process. It was further indicated that the number of accesses onto Dodge Avenue should be limited. Under item D, it was the consensus of the Council that the maximum building height be 24 feet. 4. It was the consensus of the Council to add the following to Number 4: That there be no signs on the east side of the building. That the signs on Dodge Avenue be limited to Driveway ID signs. 5. That the following be added: That the applicant must submit to standards of a conditional use permit and the request be processed as a conditional use permit. 6. No change. 7. No change. 8. Discussion was held regarding the hours of operation proposed, 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. , being too restrictive. • Lity Council Minutes Page 6 August 20, 1990 Arlon Fuchs indicated that many delivery trucks come and deliver • between 2:00 a.m. and 3:00 a.m. and felt that delivery hours should be restricted. Lou Polack stated that even a 9:00 p.m. limit would be restrictive for potential buyers. He proposed a 10:00 p.m. time limit for a closing time. Lou Polack further stated that he would like the option for a business to petition the Council to stay open longer. It was the consensus of the Council that the hours of operation be from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and that deliveries are restricted to 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 9. No change. 10. Developer be changed to petitioner. 11. Developer be changed to petitioner. 12. This item is a newly added item and shall state that the parking lot shall be on the Highway 169 side of the buildings on this parcel. There being no further comments from the public, Vice Mayor Schuldt closed the public hearing. • Stephen Rohlf indicated staff would prepare a formal PUD agreement reflecting the Council's stipulation for the 9/17/90 City Council meeting. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE MOVED TO APPROVE THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STIPULATIONS AS LISTED IN THE BUILDING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S MEMO DATED JULY 19, 1990, ON PAGES 6 THROUGH 8, ITEMS 1 THROUGH 11 AND FURTHER THAT THE STIPULATIONS LISTED BY THE COUNCIL BE INCLUDED IN THESE ITEMS. COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. The Council recessed at 9:25 p.m. and reconvened at 9:45 p.m. Vice Mayor Schuldt indicated that Item 5.3 would not be considered because it was withdrawn by the petitioner. 5.5 Consider Conditional Use Permit Mineral Excavation Bauerly Brothers, Inc./P.H. Building and Zoning Administrator, Stephen Rohlf, stated that Bauerly Brothers, Inc. are requesting a conditional use permit and license to continue to run an existing gravel pit. He further indicated that he has received a letter from Bauerly Brothers regarding the reclamation plan which will be on file in the minute book. reviewing the Peter Kimball stated that after property, the Planning • Commission strongly recommended that the Council reduce the requirement for soil reclamation from 3 inches to 1 inch which is the existing X`la3t 44� r Ciry, of a ElkRiver ZONING MAP P 94.10 CASE CU 94-30 P.O. Box 490 - 13065 Orcro Pari:Nzy z!R ver, ytti ^n