5.7, 5.8, 5.9 PCSR 05-23-1995 Pk?
( ITEMS 5.7., 5.8. 5.9.
i"
•ty of
ElkMEMORANDUM
River
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Steven B. Ach, City Planneat.....
DATE: May 23, 1995
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment,
Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for
Windsor Development, Public Hearing
Case No.'s LUA 95-3, ZC 95-3, P 95-2
Request
Windsor Development is requesting the following applications:
A. Comprehensive plan amendment expanding the urban service
IIboundary.
B. Rezoning approximately 80 acres from Rla (Single Family Residential)
to Rlc (Single Family Residential).
C. Preliminary plat to subdivide approximately 120 acres into single
family residential lots.
Location
The subject property is bounded on the west by the City trail corridor, Proctor
on the east, County Road 1 on the south, and Ridgewood 2nd and 3rd
Additions immediately to the north.
Zoning/Land Use
Rla (Single Family Residential) and Rlc (Single Family Residential) /MR
(Medium Density Residential)
Attachments
• Memo from City Engineer dated May 17, 1995
• Location Map
411 • Zoning Map
• Urban Service Boundary Map
13065 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 490 • Elk River, MN 55330 • (612) 441-7420 • Fax: (612) 441-7425
Memo to Planning Commission Page 2
May 23, 1995
• • Letter from Sherburne County Highway Department
• Proposed development plans
• Minutes from the Park and Recreation Commission meetings
• Map illustrating possible trail corridors
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
The comprehensive plan amendment is necessary to expand the existing
urban service boundary. Presently, the urban service boundary is consistent
with the zoning line, which essentially bisects the subject property in and
east-west direction. Approximately one-half of the proposed development is
outside the urban service area, while the southerly half is within the current
urban service area. (See attached map)
At the time public utilities were extended north and west to serve both
Meadowvale Elementary School and eventually Meadowvale Heights, the
entire system was designed to serve all of the subject property. This was
done in anticipation of urban development occurring in a northerly direction
up to Ridgewood 2nd and 3rd Addition. With the existing homes and 2-1/2
acre lots in the Ridgewood Addition, the logical urban service boundary
appeared to be the south limits of Ridgewood or the northerly limits of the
• proposed development.
Staff believes the request to expand the urban service boundary is a
reasonable request and fits within the guidelines of the current
comprehensive plan to expand urban services. This request is coming at the
time of a development proposal and is not being requested to allow "leap frog"
development to occur. Furthermore, the expansion would be in keeping with
the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan and be a logical extension of
the urban service area.
It should also be pointed out that the Steering Committee at a previous
meeting to discuss the urban service area, recommended including the
subject property within the urban service area.
Rezoning
The second application for the Planning Commission to consider is the
rezoning from the Rla designation which requires a minimum 2-1/2 acre lot,
to the proposed R1c which allows minimum lot sizes of 10,000 square feet.
The applicant's request to rezone the property to Rlc would be an extension
of the current Ric designation immediately to the south and west. Once
• again, this rezoning request to a more dense zoning classification would be
s:planning:pc:P95-2
Memo to Planning Commission Page 3
May 23, 1995
• consistent with the comprehensive plan amendment expanding the urban
service boundary.
Preliminary Plat
• General description - The property consists of approximately 120 acres
and is accessed by two county roads. On the east Proctor Road, or County
Road 77, and on the south, County Road 1. The preliminary plat also
illustrates possible connections to adjacent property providing a complete
transportation system. The proposed plat consists of 213 single family
residential lots. The developer is also proposing to dedicate a large outlot
on the north end of the plat as public open space.
• Topography/Physical Features - The subject property has a tremendous
amount of grade change naturally rising from south to the north. There is
approximately 140 feet of grade change from the southwest corner of the
plat towards the northeast. This grade change not only provides a lot of
character and scenic beauty to the property, but provides some real
challenges for development.
Along with the dramatic change in grades, the property also has a wide
• mixture of existing vegetation. The existing tree line essentially covers
the north two-thirds of the development. Staff has had an opportunity to
walk the entire property with the developer and Tim Edgeton, from the
County Tree Board. Attached is a letter from Tim describing his
observations as we walked through the development on that day.
Generally speaking, the property has a wide mixture of oaks, birch,
cherry, poplar and elm, with a wide variety of sizes and health conditions.
Upon our investigation of this site, it was found that significant areas
have been infected with oak wilt and would need to be controlled, cleared
and re-forested.
The preliminary plat design has tried to take into strong consideration
the change in grades while preserving as many trees as possible.
Granted this will be very difficult to accomplish, however, with a
majority of the lots having a significant lot depth, rear yards will be
basically untouched and preserved with the existing vegetation.
• Roads - The proposed preliminary plat has two primary access points--
one off of County Road 1 from the south, and the second, from Proctor
Road or County Road 77 from the east. It is anticipated that with the
development of the 40 acres immediately to the southeast of the proposed
• plat, an additional access point would be provided to this area which
would line up with Highland Road. Staff believes the primary flow of
s:planning:pc:P95-2
Memo to Planning Commission Page 4
May 23, 1995
• traffic throughout this development will occur from County Road 1 and
County Road 77 utilizing Upland Avenue, Rush Drive and 195th Drive.
As Terry Maurer points out in his memo, 195th Drive and Upland
Avenue will need to be slightly larger than a typical residential street to
accommodate the expected vehicle trips on these segments of roadway.
The balance of the development consists of curvilinear streets, essentially
following the existing grades as much as possible to minimize extensive
grading which requires removing trees. The project also has several cul-
de-sacs extending to adjacent high points. As mentioned earlier, the plat
provides for additional access to the vacant forty acres immediately to the
southeast. These roads will eventually connect with a street system and
provide an alternative access from Proctor Avenue to the entire
development.
• 193rd Avenue - Currently 193rd is an unimproved gravel road. For the
most part, the property lying south 193rd is a large wetland basin and
essentially undevelopable. Staff has discussed a couple of options which
may be considered for 193rd. The first is to upgrade 193rd with an
improved pave section. However, there may be few parcels to assess.
Another option would be to no longer use 193rd for vehicle access, but
convert this corridor into a trail corridor which would connect with the
• City's primary trail corridor along the west edge of the proposed
development. Both of these options should be evaluated before a final
decision is made.
Park and Recreation Commission Recommendation
Early on in the process the developer elected to meet with the Park and
Recreation Commission to determine their needs so the plat could be
designed accordingly. Attached are minutes from previous Park and
Recreation meetings where the subject development was discussed. The Park
and Recreation Commission's final recommendations are included on the May
10, 1995 minutes.
Staff concurs with the Park and Recreation Commission's recommendation
with the exception of the recommendation regarding sidewalks. This
particular development has been designed with a series of local streets that
are typically found within a residential development. There are no streets
within the development that will achieve the classification of a collector
which typically have sidewalks associated with their construction. It has
been the past practice to not require sidewalks along local streets, however,
this issue has recently received a lot of attention. This similar discussion
• took place when Hillside Estates 3rd and 4th Additions were reviewed by the
Planning Commission and City Council. Within that particular development,
s:planning:pc:P95-2
Memo to Planning Commission Page 5
May 23, 1995
• the Park and Recreation Commission recommended a sidewalk on Auburn
Street which extends north of 193rd to 197th. The developer suggested the
plat's "design" discouraged cut-through traffic and; therefore, would not have
a significant number of vehicle trips. The City Council agreed that through
the design of that street and the localized nature, a sidewalk would not be
required. Staff believes that the same argument can be made for this
particular development; therefore, a sidewalk is not required.
Furthermore, the developer of Lafayette Woods has also expressed great
concern of having to develop sidewalks throughout the development. As
mentioned earlier, the grade changes throughout the development forcing
varying driveway slopes will further complicate the construction of a
sidewalk along these localized streets. In addition, sidewalk construction
may also have an affect on saving identified specimen trees within front yard
areas that are intended to be saved.
Pedestrian Circulation
Although the developer is not proposing any sidewalks along any of the
streets, there are a number of corridors that will be deeded to the City
allowing access to Outlot A, and eventually the main trail corridor along the
• west edge of the development. As recommended by the Park and Recreation
Commission, an additional pedestrian corridor should be provided in the
vicinity of Lots 14 and 13, of Block 3, in the southwest corner of the plat,
allowing additional access to the trail corridor and Meadowvale Elementary
School.
Attached is a plan illustrating potential trails that could be developed. These
concepts have been briefly discussed with the Park and Recreation
Commission and will need to be refined. However, the general idea is to
begin connecting logical points; main trail corridor, Meadowvale Elementary,
Highland Road and the open space found in Outlot A.
Lot Size
The requested zoning of R1c would allow the developer to plat a minimum lot
size of 10,000 square feet. As indicated on the preliminary plat, there are a
handful of lots that have been platted to the this minimum requirement.
However, a majority of the lots well exceed the 10,000 square foot minimum
and are closer to 14,000 to 15,000 square feet on the average.
The overall density is roughly 1.7 units per acre. Depending upon how staff's
• recommendations are addressed by the developer, this density could slightly
be reduced. However, the density of 1.7 units per acre would not be
s:planning:pc:P95-2
Memo to Planning Commission Page 6
May 23, 1995
• considered a "dense" development for an Rlc (urban) residential
development.
Redesign of 195th Court
In the vicinity of 195th Court along the main trail corridor at the west edge of
the development, a significant stand of oak trees exists. These trees have not
been specifically located on the plan. Staff would suggest that further
investigation and locating the trees in this particular area occur to final plat
approval. Since this area is in a later phase of the development, the
preliminary plat could be approved with a condition that this area be further
studied and redesigned accordingly.
Questionable Lots
Throughout the plat there is a handful of lots that have either an irregular
lot shape or reduced lot depth or width. Although some of these lots may not
present as significant a problem due to their overall size. Furthermore, there
a couple of areas on the plat that may be slightly enhanced if a lot was
eliminated and lot lines adjusted accordingly.
• The following is a list of lots and areas that should be given consideration:
• Eliminate one lot from 195th Circle
• Eliminate one lot from the area of Tipton Court and 196th Circle
• Some of the lots along Upland Avenue appear to have unusual
configurations. This may change when the curves in Upland are corrected
pursuant to the City Engineer's recommendation.
Amenities/Entrance Features
The developer has indicated that the entrance points to this development will
have a significant amount of landscaping and entrance features, providing a
strong identification. Additional plans illustrating these proposed
improvements along with any other amenities proposed for the project should
be submitted prior to approval.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend the following:
A. Approval of the comprehensive plan amendment expanding the urban
• service boundary.
s:planning:pc:P95-2
Memo to Planning Commission Page 7
May 23, 1995
• B. Approving the rezoning of approximately 80 acres from Rla (Single
Family Residential) to Rlc (Single Family Residential).
C. Approval of preliminary plat to subdivide approximately 120 acres into
single family lots based on the following conditions:
1. A development agreement be prepared outlining the terms and
conditions for plat approval and installation of improvements.
2. Comments outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated May 17,
1995 be addressed and incorporated into final plans for the
development.
3. Excluding the reference made to sidewalks throughout the
development, the Park and Recreation Commission
recommendation of May 10, 1995 be incorporated into the
development.
4. A water availability charge in the amount of$300 per lot be
paid to Elk River Utilities. Developer should check with Elk
River Utilities for any additional charges relative to water
• connection fees.
5. A surface water management fee in the amount required by the
City at the time of final platting be paid prior to recording the
plat.
6. All of the appropriate permits to fill and mitigate wetlands be
approved prior to final plat approval.
7. The following areas of the plat be revised:
• Redesigning the lots and Upland Avenue at the southwest
corner of the plat.
• The area around 195th Court be further examined with a
tree inventory to determine the appropriate lot layout to
maximize the number of trees saved.
• Eliminating one lot from 195th Circle
• Eliminating one lot from the area of Tipton Court and
196th Circle.
8. A tree preservation plan be submitted along with a grading plan
• with each phase of the development to maximize tree
preservation during construction.
s:planning:pc:P95-2
Memo to Planning Commission Page 8
May 23, 1995
• 9. An NPDES Permit be obtained for the grading associated with
the development.
10. Proper erosion control be provided during the construction.
11. An additional 17 feet of right-of-way be dedicated along County
Road 77.
12. Prior to issuance of any building permits, a development plan be
submitted outlining the style of home and finished grades on
each lot.
13. The developer reimburse the City for costs associated with
reviewing this plat prior to final plat review by the City Council.
14. The developer provide the City with a letter of credit in the
amount required by the City to cover the costs of the
improvements.
15. Upon completing all of the improvements and having them
accepted by the City, a warranty bond in the amount of 25% of
• the improvement costs shall be submitted with the City for a
one year period.
0
s:planning:pc:P95-2
41 St
May 18, 1995
CONSULTING ENGINEERS File: 230-258-11
1326 Energy Park Drive
SL Paul,MN 55108 Mr. Steve Ach
612-644-4389 City Planner
1-800-888-2923 City of Elk River
Fax:612-644-9446 13065 Orono Parkway
P.O. Box 490
Elk River, MN 55330
RE: LAFAYETTE WOODS
Dear Mr. Ach:
As requested, we have reviewed the submittal package for the Lafayette Woods
development located north of 193rd Avenue and east of the City trail located on the former
Burlington Northern railroad alignment. The package we reviewed consisted of a
CIVIL ENGINEERINGr Preliminary Plat, a Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan, and a Preliminary Utility Plan,
ENVIRONMENTAL all prepared by John Oliver and Associates with a revision date of April 25, 1995. Based
OJNICIPAL on our review, we would offer the following comments:
PLANNING
SOLID WASTE A. Preliminary Plat
STRUCTURAL
SURVEYING • The Preliminary Plat contains approximately 123 acres with a zoning of
TRAFFIC Ric. It is proposed to be divided into 213 lots. This is an average of
TRANSPORTATION approximately 1.75 lots per acre. The reason for the low lots per acre ratio
ELECTRICAL/MECHANICAL is the topography and layout of this particular piece of property. There are
ENGINEERING: several large wetlands in the northwestern part of the property which
HVAC preclude this area from being divided into lots. There are also very steep
POWER DISTRIBUTION hills in the northeastern portion of the property which again preclude the
SCADA development of lots in this area. The remainder of the property is heavily
SYSTEM CONTROLS wooded with rolling terrain which causes many of the lots to be relatively
deep and large in area in an effort to fit into the terrain and save as many
trees as possible.
■ The proposed Preliminary Plat contains eight cul-de-sacs. This is a
significantly high number, given a typical plat layout. However, given the
specifics of the vegetation and rolling terrain of this site, it may be difficult
for the Developer to substantially reduce this number of cul-de-sacs without
significantly impacting the natural state of the land.
OFFICES IN:
MINNEAPOLIS
PRIOR LAKE
ST.PAUL
WASECA
230/258-1802.may
• Mr. Steve Ach
May 18, 1995
Page Two
• The two major points of access for the plat are CSAH 1 on the south and
Proctor Avenue (County Road 77) on the east. Given the large amount of
traffic which will use these two points for ingress and egress upon full
development of the area, we would recommend a slightly wider road section
at these two points. Specifically, we would recommend that Upland Avenue
between CSAH 1 and Rush Drive and 195th Drive between County Road
77 and Rush Drive be built to a 36-foot wide street section. This will
provide for two lanes of traffic with a slightly wider shoulder area. The
wider shoulder area should provide adequate space for pedestrian
movements such as bicycles, or vehicle movements accessing the lots
adjacent to these roads. It also provides a larger degree of safety, for
instance, for persons stepping off the curb to access their mailboxes.
In addition to the wider street section, we believe these two segments of
road should be built with minimum 30 mile per hour horizontal and vertical
curves for safe movement of the expected larger volume of traffic. This
will require a redesign of the layout of Upland Avenue on the south end of
• the plat where fairly sharp curves are currently proposed.
These proposed road sections can easily be constructed within a 60-foot
wide right-of-way. However, if a detached pathway of some kind is also
proposed in these areas, consideration should be given to requiring a wide
right-of-way, perhaps 70 feet, with the road slightly offset to allow more
room on one side for the pathway.
• This plat needs to provide access from the south boundary out to CSAH 1.
The submittal documents currently do not show any construction south of
the plat boundary. Additional information relative to the road access to
CSAH 1 needs to be provided.
• A temporary cul-de-sac should be provided on Highland Avenue at the east
plat boundary, and also on the stub street coming south of 195th Drive at the
south plat boundary. These temporary cul-de-sacs can either be of a gravel
nature off of the plat itself with permission from the appropriate land owner,
or can be a bituminous surface cul-de-sac of a smaller diameter constructed
within the existing right-of-way.
• The Preliminary Plat contains several outlots which should be briefly
• discussed. It is our understanding that Outlot B near the access to County
Road 77 is intended to be attached to the existing residential property
immediately south of this plat to provide some additional buffering from the
development. It is also our understanding that Outlots C and D immediately
230/258-1802.may
• Mr. Steve Ach
May 18, 1995
Page Three
adjacent to the 195th Drive right-of-way, again at the access off of County
Road 77, are intended for landscaping the entrance to the plat. This is a
reasonable approach since, if the right-of-way were just enlarged in this area
and the landscaping placed in a wider right-of-way, the City would actually
have the authority in the future to remove this landscaping. By placing it
in an outlot, it will become the responsibility of the Homeowners
Association. Outlot E, located in the central part of the plat, is intended as
a parcel of property which in the future could be connected to the property
immediately to the south when that area is developed.
• An issue that needs to be dealt with regarding this plat is the status of 193rd
Avenue at the south plat line. Currently, the plat shows half of the right-of-
way for 193rd Avenue being platted. This causes lots in this area to become
double frontage. It would seem that, when this plat and the remaining
undeveloped property immediately west of County Road 77 are fully
developed, there will be no need for 193rd Avenue from Upland to County
Road 77. We would recommend that the need for 193rd Avenue be fully
• explored and if so determined, be planned to be phased out in the future
through vacation.
• Consideration should be given to platting an additional access to the railroad
bed pathway somewhere near the south end of the plat. This area is
immediately adjacent to the Meadowvale Elementary School and may be a
corridor used by pedestrians wanting to access either the pathway itself or
the school property. Currently, there is one access provided for off of Rush
Drive north of 195th Court.
• There are at least two locations where wetlands are proposed to be filled in
order to create buildable lots. These two locations would be on Lots 3 and
4, Block 2, Phase I, and Lot 40, Block 4, Phase 2 of the development.
These two specific wetlands and any other that are proposed to be impacted
by this development will need to go through the normal regulatory process.
B. Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan
• The primary issue in reviewing the grading of this development is the status
of the trees on the site. Since you have personally walked the site and are
well aware of the condition of the various stands of vegetation, I will
assume that your report will deal specifically with this issue. We would
•
note, however, that the Grading Plan does a good job of matching the rear
230/258-1802.may
9 Mr. Steve Ach
May 18, 1995
Page Four
of the building home sites with the natural topography of the area. This
should lend itself to the ability to save many trees in the rear of each
property. We would also note that, in our meetings with the Developer, he
has indicated that the grading process will individually mark trees in the
fronts of lots that can be saved. In areas of little or no cut or fill activities,
large specimen trees would be noted for saving, even ones that would
require small retaining walls or other measures to protect them and blend
them into the final product.
■ The City ordinance sets the maximum street grade at 8%. There are several
locations, specifically in the northern part of this development, where
proposed street grades exceed this maximum slope. However, there are
other items that we believe the City should balance in reviewing these areas.
Those would be the layout of the lot relative to the natural topography and
the vegetation. We can certainly envision a situation where an 8% street
grade could be exceeded if there are benefits such as saving substantial
stands of significant trees. In reviewing such an issue, we would look at the
• amount of traffic, the ability to provide a flat area for stopping, the ability
for the Street Department to keep the area clear of ice and snow during the
winter months, and the site distances provided through these types of
vertical curves. In order to make a final determination on the specific issues
relative to this plat, we would recommend that the Developer supply
additional information such as street profiles, cross-sections, and other
information which would support his position for asking for deviation from
the maximum street grade.
• No storm drainage calculations have been provided at this point in time.
The concept of storm drainage laid out on the Preliminary Grading Plan
provides for collection of runoff with a small diameter storm sewer system
and depositing it into various lowlands. These ponding areas would have
no outlet; therefore, they will need to be designed for a worse case scenario.
Also, sedimentation ponds will need to be provided prior to any areas
proposed to discharge to designated wetlands.
• There are several areas on the Grading Plan where contours are either
missing or mislabeled. These need to be corrected in future submittals.
• As this project moves forward and more specific drawings are provided for
the first phase, we would recommend that the City require the Grading and
0 Development Plans be prepared at a larger scale. It is very difficult to do
a detailed review of this type of area at such a small scale.
230/258-1802.may
• Mr. Steve Ach
May 18, 1995
Page Five
• There are a number of places on the Grading Plan where the driveways have
the potential to exceed 10% or that the elevation of the home to the street
would provide for a relatively flat driveway. There are also areas where it
is questionable if there is adequate rear yard drainage. Again, at this small
scale it is very difficult to review for that kind of detail. Also, the
Developer has indicated previously that he plans to do some selective
grading in an effort to save trees. We would recommend that these issues
be held over until the more detailed, larger scaled drawings for each phase
are submitted.
We would note that it is going to be very critical on this type of
development that the Development Plan, when submitted, be an accurate
representation of how the property was ultimately graded, and that it
accurately reflect the minimum and maximum house elevations and the
specific allowable types of homes on each lot. In other words, enough
effort needs to be put into the preparation of the Development Plan that
substantial deviations are not requested or allowed.
• C. Preliminary Utility Plan
• The watermain stubs at the ends of each cul-de-sac need to be looped
wherever possible. It may be difficult in the cul-de-sac at 196th Circle and
the cul-de-sac of Quinn Circle. The area between these two is Outlot A
which is very steep terrain and heavily wooded. The remaining cul-de-sacs
appear to have opportunities for looping which should be required.
• The Fire Chief has reviewed the Utility Plan relative to hydrant spacing.
Based on his comments, the following list of additional or relocated hydrants
is provided:
Phase l
- Add a hydrant at the rear of 194th Court cul-de-sac.
- Eliminate the hydrant between Lots 4 and 5, Block 4.
- Add a hydrant between Lots 3 and 4, Block 3.
- Add a hydrant between Lots 11 and 12, Block 1.
- Add a hydrant at the entrance to the plat off of County Road 77.
- Add a hydrant at the rear of the Quinn Street cul-de-sac.
Phase 2
• - Add a hydrant at the rear of 1931/2 Circle cul-de-sac.
- Eliminate the hydrant between Lots 4 and 5, Block 2.
- Add a hydrant between Lots 4 and 5, Block 3.
230/258-1802.may
110 Mr. Steve Ach
May 18, 1995
Page Six
- Add a hydrant between Lots 13 and 14, Block 3.
- Eliminate the hydrant between Lots 11 and 12, Block 3.
- Add a hydrant between Lots 7 and 8, Block 5.
- Add a hydrant between Lots 26 and 27, Block 5.
- Eliminate the hydrant between Lots 32 and 33, Block 5.
- Add a hydrant at the rear of the 195th Circle cul-de-sac.
- Eliminate the hydrant at the corner of Lot 23, Block 3.
- Add a hydrant at the rear of the 195th Court cul-de-sac.
- Add a hydrant between Lots 36 and 37, Block 4.
- Eliminate the hydrant between Lots 34 and 35, Block 4.
- Add a hydrant at the corner of Lot 6, Block 4.
- Eliminate the hydrant at the corner of Lot 18, Block 4.
- Add a hydrant at the rear of the Tipton Court cul-de-sac.
- Add a hydrant at the rear of the 196th Circle cul-de-sac.
• Ultimate water service to this plat will require a booster pumping station.
This is necessary since the bulk of the development falls within the high
i pressure water system which requires a water tower for adequate pressure.
The Elk River Municipal Utilities has programmed construction of the water
tower in this area for the year 1999/2000. In order to develop prior to that,
the booster pumping station is necessary.
Design of the booster station needs to provide for normal domestic
consumption plus fire flow. The design should be similar to the Deerfield
Third booster station which has redundant small pumps for domestic
consumption and a large 1,000 gallon per minute fire flow.
It is not clear whether or not the booster pumping station will need to be
provided for the first phase.
• At the access to the plat on County Road 77, provisions in the watermain
need to be provided for future extension to the south.
• A loop of watermain from 195th Court to the existing trunk line in the
railroad bed should be provided, but since the since the system will be
served initially from a booster pumping station, a valve will need to be
provided and closed until such time that the water tower for this area is
constructed.
230/258-1802.may
• Mr. Steve Ach
May 18, 1995
Page Seven
• It is likely that a trunk watermain loop will need to be provided through this
development. We are currently reviewing the City's model of their water
system and will provide this information to the Developer as soon as it is
available.
• Connection to the existing sanitary sewer system needs to be by an outside
drop rather than an inside drop.
D. Other Issues
• The Developer will have to provide the normal street signs and street
lighting as recommended by the Elk River Municipal Utilities.
• The phasing as described by the Developer is different than shown on the
submittal. Apparently Phase I will be at the south part of the development
near 193rd Avenue. This will likely only have one means of ingress and
egress, that being CSAH 1. It is important that when the second phase of
• the development is constructed, it be in a location that provides for a second
means of ingress and egress from County Road 77.
• This site will require an NPDES permit from the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency.
• The transportation section of the Growth Management Plan showed
Highland Road coming through this property and curving down to connect
with CSAH 1 east of the railroad pathway. The draft Comprehensive
Transportation Plan showed an alternative of a Highland Road extension
crossing the railroad path and connecting up with CSAH 1 further to the
west. At the time that Elk Park Center was developed, Freeport Avenue
through that development was not aligned with Highland Road. This was
an attempt to downplay the collector nature of Highland Road as an east-
west route between Proctor and Jackson. Given these actions previously
taken, we would recommend that it is not appropriate to consider the
westerly extension of Highland across the railroad alignment, but rather a
layout similar to what is proposed with this Preliminary Plat.
• Sherburne County has indicated they would like to acquire an additional 17
feet from this plat where it abuts County Road 77.
•
230/258-I802.may
Mr. Steve Ach
May 18, 1995
Page Eight
If you have any questions regarding any of these comments, please call.
Sincerely,
MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Terry J. Maurer, P.E.
TJM:tw
230/258-1802.may
4 7
o i
0 r
- _
a Adlin
1
N o
i ....,
,,,,,
la__. ,,,z,
4-
Co.RD•4e'3 GC.
3 /
11, * E
` I
_--
J
0
u
.p u
epr co Rvia o • 1,0a
3z CATION
iii . pr li ..,11
ir., :
tot, , , 4.-.
- :
Ak, 0 NI I
0 ,,....,_,______ / ii ____. .,1,- sm aim L,;
• _ E ,,
" I! gt
LI,
1� ,
1. r1; 0 ..k ''
1' , 40"• • /11140 1. ,--,-.'N.^•'
% - ,
, 1.
A. 111 m i i i; ----irl i.:°W-1 ft::;roi L , 1
,, lir"m\111111111111 , L; \ , ----4.--.— ,
0T1m""" VRIGHT �i.� zdz
4 L ,
. .
. .
U U
-- -..-\. . ..
. Yak _
..=
. _, i
City of
w
E1R R, ivcr '
I� L.y
O = _
�4.. ,,, v
0
LOCATION MAP ,T • -
P 95-02 -,..-r.- —R ` 4
CASE: LUA 95-03 �0.
ZC 95-03 (-
I 1
Elk River Park and Recreation Commission Meeting Page 2
May 10, 1995
Commissioner Olson arrived at this time. (7:30 p.m.)
6a. Lafayette Woods
Discussion was held regarding trails and sidewalks in this development.
COMMISSIONER DANA ANDERSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL
THAT IF 193RD AVENUE ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THIS PLAT IS CLOSED TO
VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IN THE FUTURE THAT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY BE MAINTAINED FOR
USE AS A NON-MOTORIZED PATHWAY. COMMISSIONER DONAIS SECONDED THE
MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0.
COMMISSIONER DANA ANDERSON MOVED TO CREATE AN ACCESS FROM RUSH
DRIVE , IN THE AREA OF LOT 14, BLOCK 3, OF ABOUT 35 FEET IN WIDTH TO PROVIDE A
TRAIL CORRIDOR TO THE RAILROAD TRAIL AND ON TO MEADOWVALE SCHOOL.
COMMISSIONER DONAIS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0.
COMMISSIONER DONAIS MOVED THAT LOTS 38 AND 39, BLOCK 4, BE SHORTENED
SLIGHTLY SO THAT THE REAR LOT LINES DO NOT ENCROACH ON THE HIGH PROPERTY
WITHIN THE PARK. COMMISSIONER DALEIDEN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE
MOTION CARRIED 6-0.
COMMISSIONER TUTTLE MOVED TO ASSUME THE POSITION AS STATED AT THE APRIL
12, 1995, PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING REGARDING SIDEWALKS.
• COMMISSIONER DALEIDEN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0.
COMMISSIONER DALEIDEN MOVED THAT OUTLOT "A" SERVE AS PARK DEDICATION
PROPERTY FOR THE PLAT UNLESS THE OWNER DONATES OUTLOT A AS A LAND
CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND GIVES THE PROPERTY TO THE CITY AFTER THE
EASEMENT IS GRANTED AT WHICH TIME STAFF SHOULD NEGOTIATE A REDUCED CASH
PARK DEDICATION FEE. COMMISSIONER OLSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE
MOTION CARRIED 6-0.
7. Discussion of Park Projects Used for Community Service
The Commission discussed recent community service projects and agreed that
while the city encourages and appreciates these projects, there needs to be
contact with the proper authority, planning, and coordinating construction and
the long term maintenance. After a year or two, some of these projects become
unsightly or fall into a state of disrepair.
Chair Anderson and staff will set down some guidelines and bring them back to
the Commission for a review at a future meeting.
8. Discussion of Issues Regarding Railroad Trail Crossing - County Road 1
Chair Anderson led the discussion on the upgrade of County Road 1 indicating
that the proposed plan calls for a 72 foot wide roadway which will include four
traffic lanes and 12 foot paved shoulders. The safety of a major trail crossing a
• major roadway and the expense of a foot bridge was discussed.
COMMISSIONER TUTTLE MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE ROAD IMPROVEMENT
PLANS INCLUDE AN UNDERGROUND PATHWAY FOR A SAFE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
Park and Recreation Commission Meeting Page 3
March 8, 1995
• COMMISSIONER TUTTLE MOVED TO ACCEPT CASH FOR PARK DEDICATION.
COMMISSIONER DANA ANDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED
7-0.
6. Information on Brady Property
Ron Bastier presented a concept for the development showing 116 acres which
will include 200 residential lots and a proposed park area of 16 or 18 acres of high
land plus some wetlands.
Commissioner Lipetzky commented that the plans are consistent with Mr. Bastier's
last presentation and he personally likes what he sees.
Commissioner Dana Anderson stated that he too likes the plan including the
parks and trail suggestions.
COMMISSIONER DANA ANDERSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE PLAN IN CONCEPT
AND THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION WOULD LIKE AN OPPORTUNITY TO
SEE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AT THE APRIL MEETING. COMMISSIONER ROLFE
ANDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
7. Review Hunting/Firearm Zone-Tom Zerwas
Police Chief Tom Zerwas presented a map of the hunting areas and explained
• that the City ordinance was adopted in 1989. Police Chief Zerwas stated that the
City of Ramsey requires a permit from the Police Department and proof of
permission from the property owner before hunting could be permitted.
Sherwin Coors stated that a permit process would be a benefit for his hunting
group and he would look favorably on such a procedure.
COMMISSIONER LIPETZKY MOVED THAT THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
WOULD SUPPORT A CITY WIDE PROGRAM REQUIRING THAT ALL HUNTERS BE
REQUIRED TO SECURE A PERMIT FROM THE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT BY SHOWING
WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM PROPERTY OWNERS. THE PERMIT AREA WOULD COVER
THE ENTIRE CITY AREA SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 33. COMMISSIONER DANA
ANDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
Chair Anderson led a discussion about the use of controlled hunting with firearms
or bow and arrows to control wildlife population at some point in the future.
COMMISSIONER LIPETZKY MOVED THAT THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
WISHES TO SHOW SUPPORT FOR THE IDEA OF AN ENFORCEABLE HUNTING AREA AND
HUNTING ORDINANCE AND WOULD LIKE THE POLICE CHIEF TO DEVELOP A MAP AND
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND RETURN AT A FUTURE MEETING WITH SPECIFICS.
COMMISSIONER DONAIS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
Chief Zerwas distributed a letter from a resident concerned by snowmobiles on
the railroad trail.
• COMMISSIONER LIPETZKY MOVED TO HAVE THE CITY PARK DEPARTMENT INSTALL
GATES ON THE RAILROAD TRAIL AT COUNTY ROAD 1 AND COUNTY ROAD 33.
COMMISSIONER DONAIS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
Park and Recreation Commission Meeting Page 3
April 12, 1995
el 6. Windsor Development- Lafayette Woods
Phil Hals led the discussion on Lafayette Woods and displayed a preliminary plat
of the property. He also stated that this plat will not be going to the Planning
Commission until May and there may be some slight revisions so the Park and
Recreation Commission will have the option of considering this plat at the May
Park and Recreation Commission meeting.
COMMISSIONER OLSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
TO CONSIDER SIDEWALKS ON BOTH SIDES OF 195TH AVENUE, RUSH DRIVE,
HIGHLAND ROAD, AND UPLAND AVENUE, AND ON ONE SIDE OF EACH OF THE CUL-
DE-SAC STREETS. COMMISSIONER DANA ANDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE
MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
It was the consensus of the Park and Recreation Commission that they would like
to see the plat before it reaches the Planning Commission for their preliminary
plant review.
Inelos
7. Lindquist/Mastley Developers- Weatherwood Plat
A brief discussion was held on this topic.
COMMISSIONER DANA ANDERSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND ACCEPTING CASH
FOR PARK DEDICATION. COMMISSIONER DALEIDEN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE
• MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
8. Grant Application for Property Purchase Under Minnesota DNR Natural and
Scenic Grant Program
Commissioner Tuttle reviewed the needs for information for the grant application
and the work involved with this process. A brief discussion was held.
COMMISSIONER OLSON MOVED TO SUPPORT MIKE NIZIOLEK AND HIS GRANT
APPLICATION. COMMISSIONER DANA ANDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE
MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
9. Park Improvement List for 1995
A lengthy discussion was held on the following list of park improvements.
Orono Park
Grade shoreline by boat dock $1,200
Install 4 street lights 3,200
Install ADA recommended pathways 5,000
ADA improvements to boat dock, picnic tables and
beach access path 3,000
III
Oak Knoll Park
Additional backstop fencing $5,500
*ADA access trails to spectator areas 5,000
!Pr Sherburne County
.11- •
�:�.�� 5Ci hwa IDepartment
mmliNmu_ ....s
P.O. BOX 338 • ELK RIVER, MN 55330 • PHONE(612)441-1722 • FAX(612)441-2264
May 19, 1995
Mr. Steven B. Ach
City Planner
City of Elk River
13065 Orono Parkway
Elk River, MN 55330
RE: May 23, 1995 Planning Commission Meeting
Preliminary Plat for Lafayette Woods
• Dear Mr. Ach:
As you requested, we have reviewed the above referenced plat for potential impacts on the
Sherburne County road system. Our initial review considered access into the development via
195th Drive from County Road 77 (Proctor Avenue) and Upland Avenue from 193rd Avenue as
shown own the preliminary plat map.
Based on our review of the preliminary plat map, we ask that 50 feet of right-of-way be dedicated
along that portion of Lafayette Woods that abuts County Road 77 in order to facilitate future
improvements to this roadway. We will also ask that additional right-of-way be dedicated as
adjacent property is developed.
As we discussed, there is the potential that the traffic generated by this development could expedite
the need for improvements at the intersection of CSAH 1 and County Road 77. Lafayette Woods,
when fully developed with 207 single family homes,has the potential to generate as much as 2,100
trips per day, all of which will likely circulate through this intersection.
You also indicated in our conversation that there is the possibility of extending Upland Avenue
directly to CSAH 1 and abandoning 193rd Avenue. While this would provide more direct access
into the development and relieve some of the traffic pressures on County Road 77, we are
concerned with the proliferation of intersections along this minor arterial.
We have also noticed that the development of this site in the manner shown on the preliminary plat
would not be consistent with your City of Elk River Comprehensive Transportation Plan. This
development precludes the corridor shown in your plan connecting Highland Avenue to
Meadowvale Road (Roadway C). Your plan identifies this critical network addition as "a much
• needed east-west minor arterial between School Street and 201st Avenue"that would remove some
of the traffic that would use CSAH 1.
. Based on this information, we believe that this development could have significant impacts on the
Sherburne County road system. In order to fully assess the implications of the development, we
believe a Traffic Impact Study for this plat would be beneficial. At a minimum, we should be
given the opportunity to further discuss these issues with the developer and the City prior to plat
approval.
If you have any questions or need any additional information,please feel free to call.
Sincer ,
oran M. Cote, P.E.
Assistant County Engineer
•
•
BUR&
/,e
.10
• SHERBURNE COUNTY TREE BOARD
d 21960 County Rd. 5
PO Box 83
Big Lake, MN 55309
IQ!" (612) 263-8522
T?FE Bole
Steve Ach
City of Elk River
1.1Q6': Orono Parkway
rilk River, MN 5E330
Dear Steve,
On May 2, 1995, I met with you, Gary Schmitz, and the developer of Lafayette Woods Windsor
Development to review the development and walk thru the site. I primarily focused on assessing
the health and condition of existing trees, reviewing species composition, and determining
location of trees relative to proposed roads and housing lots. The following is a summary of my
observations and recommendations.
1. Oak Wilt.
• The development has 2 or 3 large areas with high mortality caused from oak wilt and/or
drought. Using oak wilt aerial photography and inventories, a total of about 5 or 6 sites appear to
be infected with oak wilt totaling about 20-30 acres (see map). A more exact number can be
determined this summer after the site more thoroughly inspected. The largest infection center is
located in the north•central portion of the development. Although there are a few pockets of
healthy oak within the infection center, it would be wiser and more economical to treat this as 1
large infected area and remove all oak within it. Remaining oak wilt sites are relatively small. It is
my understanding that the developer wishes to treat and control all oak wilt sites in the
development, beginning this fall. The developer will be eligible to participate in the County Oak
Wilt Cost-Sham Program which pays for 75% cat control costs up to approved limits (between
$1000-$2000). •
,ig r g t rate...lone ! •a.11 • Zgin !halting
ail J'.. .� _, and ;.i ettl ail '. centers
l�a,;a.rt;ia:a�, .! ., .. .rry tti,,S. .,r:a r:tg ,el;.{ ,�,,,;� neer; a:{ �1 �7 a.Ll :rii';:UZiilrl (>%rlxi.lo
within the development. Once all sites are diagnosed, a proposal can be obtained to determine
total cost. Treatment of these sites can be done anytime from July 1 to mid November (snow
permitting).
Following the treatment of all oak wilt sites; we will mark all newly diseased trees from 1995
and recommend which trees should be removed and disposed of. The development will be
monitored for 3 years to identify future tree removals and recheck control lines.
2. Oak wilt prevention.
Ideally, any oak should not be pruned between Aprll 16 July 15. If work is i.harted within this
time frame:
cover all Open oak wounds with tree:paint
• -cover all fre;hiy cut- oak stumps with tree paint
review these points with all machinery of eraters
*Since there is a considerable amount of oak wilt alinady existing within 1 mile of this area, the
chance of starting new oak wilt is increased by about 4 times when development is occuting in
May of June. Therefore, if possible, begin work alter July 15.
voRB/JR
1\T •••,Id>
SHERBURNE COUNTY TREE BOARD
6 411111k
d 21960 County Rd. 5
11111
PO Box 83
Big Lake, MN 55309
(612) 263-8522
r?FE BOP'
3. Tree preservation steps.
The development has some rolling hills and some steep slopes which can often cause
problems when trying to prevent construction damage to trees. The south and southwest portion
of the development appears to be the healthiest and should have the most attention given to it for
protecting trees. Some things to keep in mind.
-use protective tree barrier fencing (especially near high valve trees)to prevent wounding, soil
compaction, grade changes near trunks, and other site disturbances to tree(s).
-if tree removal is necessary, save groupings of trees rather than individual ones
• -promote species diversity-this development consists primarily of red oak, white and bur oak,
and aspen; however maple, ash, elm, cherry, boxelder, and cedar are also present
-when choosing which trees to save consider placement of overhead and underground
utilities(going to house and along street) and their proximity to the trees drip line
-young, small trees survive site disturbance better than old, large trees
-save the best; remove damaged, declining, stressed, arid diseased trees
-for the small lots proposed on this development; consider saving groups of trees between
every other house
If you have any questions or need assistance on any of the above matters, please call me at 263-
8522. Thank you.
Sincerely,
rTh 2"2.3" .
Tim Fdgeton
County Forest Resource Specialist
Sherburne County Tree Board
o
--"--- Ina-
161211111414441s4
/9 ,/ e 0e///
ccAi it:LLT s irES
j 0 / 'ee///t///i
Qta
!
. i
\.-
/ . !
I 1,40,
0 21
114 e •
I •
4111\
ad I ;,- • fri
9
I. 0
---,
) •I'l
.,
i
H/ '
\ i
-.9.
,, Y .
/. 9 /, ! \ ii; • ,i7"--
• .
\ .
._____..--'
-- I
% r
• _ -- . --- ., ,=--"'"Ife
0,,,/,,, \...„ %.'.. !
e't .
‘•#_:,/.4 -
. I v .. „....
e... -
. .6•.. s
/.40 ./ •
'-. .Air 12 1 '. d) rei N • II
# 4)
--/
COT s / ',/,.
...." .....-:-......)
&I 0
4
...,
ik
fs
(I
.
a •
12
,.
. ‘
co
.
/',•*
El /
.._
_ _ •i i
29•
f."-- . !•
,.
fa 400 ,, 7
13 ..1
, \ .
0 I
! ,
1 \
it .44 • : •. s \,
.. • ali, ,„
( \
_ •17W___\N ._ _ 4.is .
Irds.....1
...,
t
:Is
11
1
. 4
,,
N
.
6,„,-.,,
.......,
,.....
, ......,
. . . nw
iL--.....----1
•
4,0=-42
WI' I
40
' - — —11111111111/4 --- 11111111
di IP h
4 r
-,',.1,1,11111111
0 / /
1/
•
ralmallsimmormaroompredme....7
6. c •
i
E�
k
i
\ O \ r,I r♦ - I i r♦r♦
: \i. \ :::1Jls;t .". :::::: I r:t.: .+',.�:::: : !'sir! i:i�::
„.„...,,„71,,,,,,.,/....104.N.il-A \s. \,.A �' 1� ,�\::. Sr \., JTIi'r=t
_i i \ \ „,:2'444 ....-:----
-��. ...___moi -' `•4`�I .ll t( .„,/,./
i l r( \ ,.y\
--:%_:5-7;&,....,_ :t ._f; --"\`Ill I u�I;f ! •;/ ti;t,•jr.'
` Y vfi
'�. ���'�`.�.:'�• `tom`\ .y� \c: t\ ( /(...1/..------"Th
t J /' 1 , ' ' ' 1sT:'j tn \(,• •��
• '''‘ I
i:\ ,`,.• .,� : f ) •',... i 11.104,,,t ! / ',, •lJ / - 1 • •,rJ/ '' :,lir'II . '�.,,•. 1;.. ,
verT
-.-*---,--,L
1. \ --:----7--:•,,,,,_.,./1” lI l 1 ---2:7,7;7yA tr i' .t t i h �"r:.t ....,1 ,G ,-144044:4141r. e'.
1 7 � �\ter� Sq�,�P,� C •�: s
\C\,J\ . ` �, ' 1 it 'f :•\ `a' �:.,� �- +.ice 1444,
`\ \J ��.// ' ,)) •i— ,,j:a \: . irk N, , 1l
\_: � ..r-� _� - fes.."\ �h���t�`� ,ir ��c. lr I �i�l
IIII WirdiaplIrriri ilir—• -d ,1 --
` - '/$'� ,\) ...------.„,...........--,..-„,•-\ �. `c , ., ' :c
11
•
..,_,. -•al•., 1 ,,‘, -,..— to ip,e,te,v, ilmr. , 1 ---• ‘I oil il, . s.:...X\-.' fie • -
‘'Wte• \'IVI t at I 1 \ VFWVIei
Arialr
\` ) . 1. + ,+ � •
`pier ,� � �' r1. /,:r `
ob„aQ,or,utntr E .,t.are r.o•o \ \' .� t• i `retA
t'ieI•ll WE! 1 t: I P 1,4Viitik
\ � ''r \•�'
n-
`,---�I�---lc \\._ ,,,....r `'.._.f"7i, t� ��� • :' le�� � i� �, ` • .• 1 r \\ ,'ii�y�`d'�,
of f q, v.,
b;•C: \ ♦ • s:"
JoFMray Ilnes.alta a .at in.uM \ r I( •...�/',(HI. ,f , ` �'A+' +�ft, !1. 'r`�� i1
oandf-ae lot ne m unlale otin wt.a t 1 !<.b/ ,rte/ 7_
nacat ..no.n Ma lat t.; ��.�4/��I' EV ►JO
as a \1111) \'' " +1104 f % ' ^,�a p,Vt.,,
ri__`.....-14..._11111%.4.,..
\ +f � ' ;'► "���
owETt•oE\aoPen .a..eEr:or Loi s So ,• C r
e..e PROPOSED ZOMNC RI-8 \, ti.
�rr�•,i.•.•• • --'.D -:S `�r -74I`''A.kw:--1..,..i i i i imin.......wii
-----V -"V, vS7.--1'...1.7r •:•-:---Nr..-Votorfirget.‘,„, ,.."-*, --,4 „,„,,,01% ---"14-4.116M
blA`IEYORS!ETIGR$tS 41n.Lal.IAM DO R. ///,`rr'f��s� y�(kg,D..*k hat.•w.c Y,L Lal M.a: q.000 loft.MO Do*,Attroe
\\ ,'\.• • ` Y '�'~y I✓'•. �� ��11. ��W}�j(//,� �y1y
Ek River,I. 66.150 1,tettro art,*
40-Zan
SO.Tani 0 itet
lc' )'tea 14' •
PUT ARE, 1215 Ac n,Q Tar. 0 M1 "pi/
Front Vont 30 foe \ .,.,it..:4'....,, ,. ,, <.0j' el 4
iiiiit 2$.11
,• 't 44 lir. ...1;50,1i i. -7,-.4.N..
4,
.....
\,„ v./44•,..„--.50 i.1.4.-:. um i �.0- J
.411111141,1;
•
\14,,r., , Oa., My pitemlai rpti• 10-- do :ffl-ku.:.--.-1.‘ ,,#"•414f 411
\'0,‘\Ni :...._4.1 t ',::.,_lititgi, 'Ili AM 11:471t,..„L to,
\sk,,,,,,1* tit ...-zi. of. ..1.1...: s , Tar% .tr.;;,:gx 40' V •
\NA-tat ik\LikVit14,Att\t-illk - ritfil,k2y4e— /a'
„,. ' \',..\k,\liiw;.• ..vit,4,44:40,v•covzsea -. -4,. .,- ..:,-,,;, ,..N.:
';fid;,,,,,,„. ...,.,...,.. r r i. — ‘s• ow •
trilip''.%7 - 1.J-
� ) � a/� , .
_.... Nviti* ' '‘,.. '
•••.: 4"11,10;:i ,. z••• ."\
sil W4'
roo
GRAPHIC SCALE 50 1 Sao \"17%
, 4:• i'° _ -e i L!!r la. ."
pp,
r et rur) \.#` �.. it ` �\ h IIr,
20 + 21 \\ `
.... ,.. it -• ',r_. ....,
•
4 * I ' •
IF-
.
. '47 27 \ --*L _-____ ___ - \11\ 1�`� ...:4 C -�� •,
fit. 1 t,wa• \ , µ` '-L_�___ %\I v... �•irr. ii...�i+���.
21;1 •
IIIMIT Mr
1
I 2 \ \ 1\ \ \
70ax /e -e3 iii 1
--• i-i "iiii, i ` • i, 1 I , "Ir!(f-'./ !I"ma c/'•'^"
Nip +(� ,-!r. ' � ��r CITY OF ELK RIVER,
.!-1-..:4:,...s = \�`:.i •�1 a Y ,�: . =��.- i-::ti j - S E
�••_�=•� ./.4-4-:',',- -,__,---,-.--.-,--.,_,5,:-. --� � H RBURNE COUNTY, MN.
..,1-.1 `,s-�~\ w'-•-- t - : !-r �^- �� !/�. ..ie: 'r �j •,P. =f:�:::f
1t{� _ \ � -::l-' 1 ) j ‘,1„..-..)-- -,--..-.......r - �=.�-i� r.-_,i: i �_//ri;'iij !:' +`•-/'-=�'
( • �. rte_ _ ''
\ �' ti-` ..,rte_. , \�� s.....›.. .,-----„..._`- ''s i .��/ -%."_� — � ,_.�..,,_--_-____=.-_...- _-€.-_,...-.1.....,-5-?...„,
--_-c- 1( t +• J
lia
. N(. If� f!/i� • I r I lr' ,_- ` 1-C7S.\(.r r; \= 1////1/;r-2 ..s ....;f ] �5�4
...,....._ 1 ,, `, r /'1+—'r--.._.�, • ( { 1l1 y..,-.`- .��\ ;� •
=, a � ,...1 / %/'!! � t. .irk — �1\ -) j; pyl ,,�,__________.----c--\\--\ 4A►l It \\\ _- _A.
'�,v N 1 / a i 1 11,... .i' .' .b.-(-(ry"j r i.l r�`��._.._.- .4,. ..I-----..;:"-----_ - \\\• -✓
Ail ' r v 11 fs�tj �y j t` � f 7l.liii/ :;1 `•—._/...--.........:///- 2,:- - �,-"....:.\\\ �.4' \\\‘........_....-----..,
Mme` fa�H (t �\ .•• r r� ' `':�--� ..� . ` ,
/►" gym � �. 7 \•-� --'3',7----::-'9/91,i-
i�.�' /'Ir'f A. ��• I/ ,f,,,//...„----7.._.-------..‹,,' l� ,i`ll \ .
� `j�� � � rte . ='i`^� Ij ..."4:----------------- -,- f is j- �..�,t) 1 ti t t t �'"7.----....-`,:\,
r, 1' ...-N:,...,.,:-.;-_,...........-5;^::::„'”......„,:.•.'_', ....„--_,--..---- --.
, /�-../ - /f/ ,. ......,„..._, 7,,,,,..../.:,,,,)1111x/i t f� � ♦
'a41111164111151V
- <�� .�...�_ .�.-----yam-�- E ,� ;; ;,�' f ,�,•� `,
kt. 'fr.::.--:',;,. .......„---7--._210[11(V1 tr71.2•-•;:-/f-----. ---- ----'7--------- ezNi‘'<`':::--7-:-...-- Th--1**-pp Ilk' i .k11911 i q ,."_,""t-----=_.:-..----.--.1---S•t!'t' A.-.._._
v...,
i.%`Vice� /,)11`Iliti r .� 1 %r f i P a -.�' r 4 F �' ` v1 ,r :�:
'iliti A �4-p---- -z--- --__..
6 •.�, 1, i illi) 1•,.. 4!" ilatl,__,,i...., \\ .-... .,/i
}!�` �<e.J 4c` 41•...f,:'' Irk ".%.— � �Nj'\�Olio ��; Z.,• o
,...
;'.;_to1140'i %i * y 1,, - � • c j '---, r. -•-•, al, - viiii'' :i�� !�; /7/ .`C-I ,,R; -ice / ` i„g � 1 • mo i "!: 15
1'1'. ‘%,/,.'' .**->---7"..-A WISVA;"1"","00ik.4ifi*?--c?.. ----.-.:-‘';'‘.:--", ----1%.,.1 I'l '77 i'l•.:/A---- ;
t)\ .ltei&./1*.-Aktv".tektf# tP--'
•".;;;):&:'',AtAiMilidikithstIlit,tre,,,/ik*s.4.0% ,'...,./.0/FC1)1111'\\\•N..-° -e''-- f.11/1!:'k si„....",t,i- I .•,-/'\(
ti
4ifr
, , ,.:fry\s,124„,,, p,:i*,,,,,,c„.., ,,,•-•,*,,,,4-,-. .-„-4,::;,:.::,-(7,711,•.,,,,,,:-....::::::;-_-_--, } ,),;,,,,,,‘,,...: ,...,-.-..: cf, / .4„,..„/..-
. /Jr 1,'t• ''-
ti/itAVAES. "- :Ger, _ ,,', .:: :-. -=-- -r *'J/,ri ; �+`,'j. +�_,,I � y il,,,l�.}� /�Hy7 �irf7444 i ftlY \TII / ;\ f/ ljl/ r� I � .
-_,11 t:�/ • �y ,,`%%; - i 1 //Ill l
104f ter¢ , �I 'i `, I irt,„. k, .:..,f
tt
Iram ' ' l•// l•1j ! ` may-� : .�' ; r 1j � � .--,\` 17 t `1 T . ? I � � �)i3i'
;I ••,1 i. x 11 j!! 1/t•�,.; - ' J i `.•.� ...-- "t,:/to r f I fey, r�. I '(
.... ---..-sy,® ` / ; \
.agrI ,� __-::-....4,,-/,._„...-___<-...„..._:,-\\:,...„ .` \ \� 'f ! r ; f I : ' 1 1 II 1._;---....0,..„--',......104.,--;--;--:::'>-"_,...,1110
� 1 _:.-.. �f•{r�
A ''jI irr^-"//I i'ri• 1�, - ,r r ,' "•i f . Z ., i t i t\--,--..--_,-----.:7--__",------;..>„:;',::••'..--'f--...,
..,-;_..-:-",-......<---__.--/ ..' ,- I - .. .- — — —T
^ I:.'�/ /ice'..•�� .: i f ,•.f%!.��/ �' -__ ,.
r I I?iceii..,/* iiiiiii(1( ( ..'`.' `../j J ' r` r t.•. i t.;�' .i r''-•- �'
(3.
If•3,� t ,; %.1...1. -:::<,i., `._... -._.,±t it'•,'\, ./.."--:------•/ •
` `-...--..... ....2"-----
._�... �f1-•'..• -'-/'f' '
.. i,� , ppd,... �'' �l ;3 y t .mss,-------.".,././r , ; _: - -� era;:: - -__
i t`t t. ',,j`\.`;\r,._•,`� \, r. J :..___ �_/,_.Y •'---->--------- -•.. -� / ice'-^� '�
IF\.,...„------. ,IeVW.-::::-Z,11 r‹.--*-----1 '-, —7- r/.-- / --- -4-( 7-- lie • ." i +-I-4 1 t--r-___-_
:!1 ,, j t\:,„,,`.fll l f 'ice,~ -� - - �..__-i i w
i1 `, 'jam ---7----..::::::-------------- ---1 1 I'I ('r;' r - ' ; �},• - �- i I
it, ::...--.,/,..---------• ......z.-_---:`,..--....--...,,11 ` ' _....: ✓ - 1 r'� I i'1 1 I
I -1' l r::' \ /�- ..,'111(%.rl,•' - i - ---- 1 J t, ,i I',I, I 1
•ZI 'x' l . o ` Vii[ I 7 fie ' %— 1
yK -. f.t •r //_ ...,f.Y i i l,' .,l'-�-.pa,J sic , i e / \ \
T1 -
t✓ / - �•'� i 1�/...•,..rte•••;
' ��`••.�..._l t Oj•” `T I i ri -.. t ( ', ^ /
J /
_-,a�_.., •---- - .• WE: 3/?6/95 I hereby certify that,I plat:vas
..1,7'.---11 oc_- — BKPG' - v'e�ee by,ae«,.,ea.my m jaw( a Aaaowr. !no. LAFAYETTE WOODS
' •II`-----'- -- - ___-�- .. DRAW By: DM eupa,,;:aa awl that,am a duly
_,:.. ,_-z•._ . .v- BY: LC Ia.aathei Siete a map" FOr
i.,. a..:r r.,-.... E1JC yRIVER. N
CHECKED I:1
aY r .«. , . •~`,.:tr.. .,,.._.. &'1 R Minnie Brady
i .-•�` r tea. PRELIMINARY PLAT
Date:•/.5- ,x.No.13057 041i.r"o• -PRE1 1 r ; --- SHEET 1 OF S 'ro.o
\ U \ r.II,i.r I a. IS \
.: \f\ i:i` �1.►- :n::::::: I L`.:::: :: " iii.iso.
A \ �+ \ Ul1TLU , C ,,,a I . . 10
1Q
��. • K7.({A NO. a. • .. w ' .. i \-•..:`ice ..•--'^—_ `. .. '1 r f ,1111 kk
•
,4,...i , � \
l f .^�� j ` . .;fes �' ti \ ' l ll � � ; ��ti�i , . sk. �/
•
,„9 ---\\1 (iff -1611 7,/ A 1--&1\'',.\\1,‘‘1, , ,, ,, or6,2wAiti.L.Atrit.LB.,
• \ ti_Ni
, is\ i. .1
.....„....„...e.-_, si/ \ ‘ 1,1,111,v43 , 1141111%111101bikiitt_t.\.
"-: ..`"..-> "..... \\\A ,k :I) A ‘'..:........J\----11 1 i, `-- i \ opi I,,/;IL ii fe'_b.NV%Z",.%..4,:thripz_04. 1,1"A Ifi 0.
t ‘X‘ \\ \''s. i \ I c-'''',/i 2 ) hr ,---„7:-..e-"-- '`.1 f....„-S" C •,1
via` - \ w4 fi�(+!f l S` ‘,47/4.(F �"f: .„---......:7-3?--).\ _ k•'I�, 1,,,,,,47/h
f/11.61,/.4,41/44.
� �1�.� ""' fi yi f 1113 , ,
, 0 `., i i`' �•,.
1k„ :/„ ..._.. "moi ,% ('€'fit, 1 TM- 4li�'r:.,401'
t \ ; �/ i f 1 '\ +\--::-'- % 'ii.---:'
tT G" `i i \ ..101.4.:.:,
M_";'SSS .�..�' ,i1 y
\ \ c" --.4..• i rif\_,./ ) k.„-_--------..„„..„-"'" I Al ,.." .• t \%,),.17,....,-,"•.r.v....,..
4/4.-..., . %;\,\(-1 ,, ,,,,,,-..„--).--- 1 iv, / /..,, ,\,,,his. , ..,......-,..a. pi......f,. .---F.4,,,,-. 1,rmr.......".,,,ii,tie,v,:
, ,,.. 1:
,,,,k,
+ 0, rcia -. ...7.16.5,,,‘„„AT:711.,::,,,,i.s,,,k,r,1
i ► f
t ,. --,44:44.0siqviziErilifirigaiattv: 44,
‘ •_, ,, , . iirltk..4".0. , -,e----ri.se---141-- . C.-alt.-4i-
•::::s‘ \---V ' •t -------- 1'-4Y-410,,,,•:, VA lit 178,41M " WA .:41117:144.....::
\ •
\_ .7...z..„7- �t „ • - , l' � r,.. ; ,,,. , '�=moo,
lj4l, ,,'� // � ; /oat ligr l."1 f,/ *AA
-.1.'
\\ lid - t .„Nki. ,, �s `/ ., ✓/,!..„„.0;. V `' Iwolfr it; f
\ \\,'t . r 1-p;d, OW
\ • ` _� ' ''' r 11(j�, i 1 �J.•.10;�. 44 \`� � 70•,`,it ---,-.dam')
\ ,c, i ik..,..4",f4VaUts .;4(AVOISt4,-5_4-.... r4.**4 ill fr .., .,,'
• \ ..\- �” �C !n ►/ 4ti '?ISN* rt �O� :r.4.4% wN i; ��i/
rt ,fie •y. s--.,„„.'77---7. \:•4r �$,*,/,i,s'm-. , itS).......,••• iii,
s.
V sfi.„ i --1,,,,c,..;-- ,601*,.„,, ,iffili
416.74k",,_ -.wail k,.7WV.-IiirAearii;h4:44:4„,,, ko
,.-...0-V.
\ t " 4/ .'44 -11
)f4;1rMirf1llt, .mr '4 4,,fpc, 1, '
iI
44
\ ? '.•11Z'+1i���t:tom” av-m 2"r1 .sem•-• ` . ..' l
1ali06.
i.
ll
\ ;tit\: y f i. 1�#; �i.4114iNli '' � ��:..-Si k,*k l ti it°�'�� �t
rte. A lay-... at 1414112.0 . Oh :::10... 1 ' '' V'. Ake
i
\ t ( •00111,13i417-146":'"',r ....4h r--,...:-.A `,...4.4).0,i0,,,or.'
WA. ',,t1k07,,,t; lacx.00r ...ther t` ,- ,,,,, ,por .4
d.: , \V ;., 3:11/40,41 t Notigt .4.... . 5P k .,,,,A t Vlek tkfligir.0.044,4k .
4.-..z. r `k,,„\ .. 1,I t. k..‘0,.., -7--,-- -'''----•%'ia. -��' . ice �I 0 .O
re -"f f YAP I
% �tukeZekizsirtfoorp-4SVAviiki.„it.Nt
? ; \ pc: I \\ \,, fi10":"'"T
` uip� �. ►.i\`SSNei'"-,•' ,-t_�✓ i, 4110'14 �'�"-. a
GRAPHIC SCALE \G. \ b .,:ti '!'i_0$2. Y�rt �� 1l �i�Ir
too so tao mo t ,�,�=�^- ' `C\R�I`i'f�r �/0 4 ..��
F___ ; ry ii t� �I�y
r (arar> \\ \* \N, .40$0,1,...,.. ..,...,- ,w,
@ � • Ass \ill�it,,,y+�} �kw
ilirtn
��mi I \\ ,'''It-'�� �'�,��-'� �' "tom L, ✓ l .:
I ,, \ 1 \ A \t
%'%1% "%Psi t S r �fof, 1 '' 'OW r.•-•%'.-:-. 11/7 "'".. ...^54.1,-"-. CITY OF ELK RIVER,
„` O ti•'` :• �i`i,•,,, `M `� ......... .............................. SHERBURNE COUNTY, MN.
�Ij; .`.�'`w^��...„,.........„. •---_-...„--....„1.70:-.7-•
� • &...\,,Li:"..!....',...:,........,_ f' -5 =Y. , ttiY ' (./•/•/1-7---------t".. ! �1ri�/"•"`• y q _ •
fAPI((fes�'`_'•� ...`11 `'..e.'",,,;7'":-..... ,:`:'‘,N"' '�. /ice �-ij• I - �y�C:� p�j•
! -..�,i jf �.
: tt ' . ^ .,.a � N\�=.:.`�-ter,..,i
\\ \\ \ i \ \ I I
S`� \\\\\\\\ 4 'EIV%1NYA/N1V - ;;, ..#.!
\ \. .
a '''''* 1 \�
\ I OOL OOt bOl
111. 1/1°111.11111111 \
\ \ fl'W3S D(HdY219
a lig 40 \
#\\ \
,\`:.V040.7"
\\ \ ,:_-,
.,./ ii
4,4
\
wok
; \\\ \
\ ._,./
. ,,
..„
._. .,,.
,...__ _____„.„1 W \\ \
I t! ‘.- V;..'
\
,...irjr4 pi
-1. ofteopow_tuovii_\ \\\
.1\ \\ \
.„,._.. , -,.,..... \\
:\
11414:4441r1\\\\,, I.N .
111110/410):11wer-,tvgiLewi \ •
\
Aiiiyetw;; 404 : v:.
...;.. \
__..
.._ .
liviimorei : \
\ , ..
.s,„.
.i., .
.1 .1 .1 , ,
„it .,. i
- \\
.. a.
,41ov Al tip
illik \
WIIIIIIk
r 1.011f10 \
0
�
QL ci
\ 'Yl'1'N 4^Yil 3 ..I1..I1'N N 411^N Ci .. �.: l�1:11 \ \- \ \ Yl 1114 N VI-Arm;,"U 4WN
I
).1 ___i i.s,I ' I%JJ,.7 C.SJ EI � riiLi iJt SJ \ ' \
J J • J L r
1
:;:'....qr.nr1 'N[), ;:'�" 5 i r 4 l ' T CITY OF ELK RIVER,
_
I
' F \Narth Poolaf KM.I/{d NE l4.'
I I __ _ _ _ -_... SHERBURNE COUNTY, MN.
e
V j-1111Higra
OUTLOT A
e
/ la
I
a a a l
4a7' to ,, 0
, ,,...„,..s.„\ I
N,,,\. 11,
\\„.0 e
1•
"41tr°35All % ii._,. -.r4.----* ;._
10 1 ,,,,..i, of.L,W.:--.•- .... iiiiiiiiiiii----....... -.........- .. . ,:///e.///
.. ikk' ,,,, •
,!-tal 1, tom— � —�i!��/
1 '
. /
/
IIC,,. I /;t
if '• s 1 — / /l f/ -
E�( I e/ / 1/
,, I I
I �
Ill
I (FMK 014 1 I�
• I I ,
r
II
Al __LT _ _ __,.._ _
.. ,:„,
I .^.T
...„,
.,_.. ,,.!
__ I
j: \=
\,,,-,,
„Ai r ) N
^ /
a
4
5 DATE: 3/18/95 I heathy certify that this pkn .
BKS, pepared by f„e a 1mder my aced A',C .r a Aaatttwrara ►+a LAFAYETTE WOODS
D,,,,,,,,,ar: ou ape..lelaa as rose 1 ELK RIVER, MN
_ CHECKED BY:JB =7°,.,
ear the Rd17;:' too a ry.w.�
y Y.\,C. :.1 de he bwa d a Stve d �� For
—— '' N __ fxnne.ata. n..)«-,..:f+.o«r-erns 8"iil & M•Nnie Brody
0 `�”" e°" PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
IDate:3/28/95 R .No. 91\702024 8 UTY l MCAE- SHEET 3 OF 3 702.0-03
.;x�•;
"immiviAm =Mfol I ILI I It TA
0
9
haMp. eN WItY • F w nv'1lli
IFM 1\
N
9MiY 10 Im1 F MM tlN aapaa�F rF1�4- ' 1.
end uapFFp � •F•••pMFM a1Mnm \
F6n<a1 m Man n W ppt
f.'M�l„ M4HlLlVi� MJbfll ff LOfY SU
FOF PIs. Os m
Pls. is !0
vmsmm zww PK
awlevms • uoamrs M. in nam : m n
r eun • ary k M. Lm w.: uob atl.
�M M�•41N
MM.->Ol, MNv W
F..a r.c ban
MT. .1 11c YSS tl Iw
µr1
N
1
L
G
9
i
-- s
OL
a
9/,l