Loading...
7.10 (. ) A ITEM 7.10. tyof F41kRiver MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott Harlicker, Planning Assista DATE: February 27, 1996 SUBJECT: Request for Rezoning by the City of Elk River (Area #8), Public Hearing Case No. ZC 96-6 Request The City of Elk River is initiating this rezoning from Ric (Single Family Residential) to I1 (Light Industrial). Location The properties under consideration for rezoning consist of about 160 acres, north • of Sherburne Co. Road 12, south and east of Sherburne Co. Road 13, and west of Tyler Street alignment. Attachments • Zoning Map • Land Use Map • Wetlands Map • Steering Committee Minutes dated May 4, 1995 Existing Conditions The approximately 160 acres are currently zoned Rlc (Single Family Residential) and the land use designation is LI (Light Industrial). The adjoining zoning and land use designations are as follows: North - Rlc (Single Family Residential); MR (Medium Density Residential) South - Rld (Single Family Residential), R2b (Two Family Residential and PUD (Planned Unit Development; MR (Medium Density Residential) HB(Highway Business) East - R1a (Single Family Residential); MR (Medium Density Residential) West - Ric (Single Family Residential and R4 (Multi-Family Residential); MR 1111 (Medium Density Residential) 13065 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 490 • Elk River, MN 55330 • (612) 441-7420 • Fax: (612) 441-7425 Memo to Planning Commission Page 2 ZC 96-6 February 27, 1996 • The surrounding land uses are generally low density residential, vacant land and farmland and the homesteads associated with the farms. There is some higher density residential on the west side of Co. Road 13 along with some multi-family near the intersection of Co. Roads 12 and 13. Land uses in the area under consideration for rezoning are very similar to the surrounding land uses. Farms and vacant land are the two dominant land uses. Single family homes and a light industrial facility are also located in this area. The physical characteristics of the area are diverse. There is a substantial wetland located in the north central portion of the site with several scattered smaller ones surrounding it. The site is relatively flat with lowlands associated with the wetlands and somewhat higher ground in the area surrounding the wetlands. Vegetation includes stands of hardwoods, areas of brush and scrub trees, wetland plants and tillable farmland. Background This area was the subject of discussion by the Steering Committee during the recent Comprehensive Plan update. At their May 4, 1995 meeting, the Steering • Committee recommended the zoning be changed from Rlc (Single Family Residential) to I1 (Light Industrial). This area was also included in the recent revision to the Land Use Map. The land use designation of this area was changed from MR (Medium Density Residential) to LI (Light Industrial). The City initiated this rezoning request so that the zoning would be consistent with the recent change in the land use designation from MR (Medium Density Residential) to LI (Light Industrial). This rezoning request is part of a larger process that the City is undertaking to rezone certain areas so that they are consistent with the recent revisions to the Land Use Map. Evaluation of Request In order to approve a rezoning request there must be a finding that a) the plan was in error when it was adopted, and therefore, should be changed or, b) the times and circumstances have changed since the plan was adopted, and a change is warranted. This rezoning is being considered in order that this area will be consistent with the land use plan. The updated land use plan designated this area as LI (Light Industrial). The proposed rezoning to I1 (light Industrial) is consistent with that • revised land use designation, and therefore, the second finding is met. s:\planning\scott\zc96-6.doc Memo to Planning Commission Page 3 ZC 96-6 February 27, 1996 • Consideration should also be given to the existing conditions within the area directly and indirectly affected by the proposal, the use to which the property affected is being devoted at the time and the relevant portions of the land use plan. This proposed rezoning should not have an adverse impact on the adjacent properties. The rezoning is consistent with the concept of providing industrial land within the urban service area. The accessibility to Highway 169 and the ease that municipal services could be extended make this area very suitable for industrial uses. Recommendation Staff can recommend approval of the proposed rezoning from Rlc (Single Family Residential) to I1 (Light Industrial) based on the following: 1. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of LI (Light Industrial). 2. The proposed rezoning is compatible with the adjacent land uses and zoning. • 3. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the concept of providing industrial land within the urban service area. • s:\planning\scott\zc96-6.doc v lyeli�rd I C --t d \ h\t` .\\ \ r ; i ,,„,.. tl '\ 40 1 ��\f I �' { I f :—.,..........;....6...1. \\ :. \ \` NO: % I . • \NN, . te_-I 4_ c/ \ • ``�\�\ '\ \ \ i I •96Th • - s: ® a Ja J ` i\ � �� ` 0....,:t..1.4,„....„.,71 . 0 - I. $,J..fN„ 4 11 II ...0.:,..............:. �s,3....... .....; �� \` r I A ,>a.n, •-,- I. .•i i 1./‘,,-1 \-' : .. I.. ....:--:.:•:▪ ,.--- --... :- ....r-_4_____ 193R0 —E� -�� `* 44." N p0 •:. :i 1 ',,,,<;>c-'... r,'S r'� __`_.� r� L.----(„,,e .••' 5% `J i i ,• 1 I 0 192ND -7 ' .." A , . ....„... .401? ,�r ~'!. ,. "1. I .'. / ! I ����\.;,-...,.....▪ .,...:,kw ...,S '.' \\ .' i + it.:.....*--r---i,----4- —_r_______ ! ,• —' i, 191ST �1h ~ �}. 4�\N 111 \ \\�1 \\\\ �` \`� ' 1 +�,`�/--' ',\�' /f ' \ \\♦:'� • \`�\\ �r 190TH i11, fsaL: { \•�\ 1 `Z\\ti ,.. \\s\ •-'.,V,1,\1 � ;� Cif \\ \ \\' �•C\\ \� Il i \ 8 ,' •"'4"1"-"-1 �' \• j w N.,_ \ \ \:r♦�\\\�\\�. .\`� , \�. tEETN A ' \`• \, \�`'":�;_:. -- ` �\ — 167TH ' 1 66 .\\\�\ \ i 4 '\�.••.\` \\\♦!.' �`` -it, �,._ r•-?"-r- \\� `�� \ \ \\. — `\� : I" \ 166Th \�\v -ems — \:� - .\��\ - !i`� .'.' k\\ ./ ' ' 1 \•Z' • zo ::•••.• "--..:::::::::‘... - „•6\ • .-Zi f-.. i• \\ \ • I \♦\ I - il/ \ 181ST -tti.1. \� a`1 I \• ... Y.2. Nj%• \� ro� _; Wu Ioe •--- -1 1 \` `•'\ 160Th ,! „ 1 ' ' .• ; .i • ! if-------• ....v.cs,.... . I -\``.\ :� / 1 \ ;;rr caps i ® \� % ..._""`+"'_`'.' 1 . h ,. 1 179Th v f i f, �> 1 — • 1 \\:.:—I Vit. �;! \\ .'.."sem. ;/ `.: ! 1 ! 1 \\\: _, + `\ ;----,-%`/ f \, 176Th 11 1,1ft ♦\\. .yr •,`: ,1 \ �,\ \\, i 1 \ \\\ ?r, • V. 175TH • V : _ fit\\ 4J �\�i \ \\ $ �i' +t- \ `� \ • \\\\\\\ :. --"CA,''�., \ i"\.\ \r 1. _ \ \ \ f\\ ���� 174Th o .... _--_ter .l 1:\`\\\�� \\ \-, \ . � • 4.6,4 4\ • Steering Committee Minutes Page 2 May 4, 1995 Issues related to industrial development such as increased tax base and local • jobs were discussed. Steve Ach reviewed 6 areas (Areas A through F) as possible locations for industrial development, as referred to in his memo to the Steering Committee dated May 4, 1995. Bill Birrenkott stated that the problem with many of the areas mentioned is the lack of available sewer and water. He questioned if there are restrictions to prevent establishing smaller-sized sewer and water districts to service these areas. Steve Ach explained that Terry Maurer is researching the feasibility of setting up a small water and sewer district in the southeast area of the City. Steve noted that the City of Ramsey has stated their intent to bring water and sewer up to the City's southeastern boundary. Discussion followed regarding purchasing services from Ramsey vs. establishing a small sewer and water district to serve the southeast Highway 10 corridor. Bill Birrenkott stated he felt the Committee should decide where industrial development should occur based on best use of land and accessibility to highways, and that economics will determine how the property is serviced with water and sewer. Pat Dwyer commented that Areas A and B appear to be a natural extension of City water and sewer. He expressed concern with Area C for industrial use because of its close proximity to the river, and felt that should be used for residential. Pat stated that other areas such as E, D and F could be developed with smaller uses without city water and sewer. Mary Eberley suggested that public park land could be set aside in planning an industrial park near the river. Discussion followed regarding competition with neighboring communities for industrial development. Bill Rubin explained that competition is based on the level of incentives cities are willing to provide. Pat Dwyer stated that the areas identified are likely to be long-term prospects and that areas for immediate needs should be considered. Bill Rubin explained developers have indicated there is a real need for industrial property in Elk River. He suggested that area C may be a good option for a highway industrial, multi-tenant, office/warehouse development. Steve Ach stated industrial uses along Highway 10 after the Kelley Farm would create a "softer" entrance to the City, rather than the more intense, highway commercial uses. Mary Eberley stated she supported Areas A and B since these areas are close to city water and sewer. Also, she supported Area C,with a use as suggested by Bill Rubin. Steering Committee Minutes Page 3 May 4, 1995 Lloyd Barthel questioned how many areas are in Areas A and B. Steve Ach estimated a total of 140 acres in the two areas, but wetland would reduce the • number of developable acres to approximately 80. He felt that industrialp ark users should pay for water and sewer and not the residents. He felt that in Area C should be residential and the remaining area along the highway could be industrial. He stated that it would be necessary to spot zone the area and also, to extend water and sewer to the property. He felt the same could be said for Areas D, E and F, unless the parcels were large enough to develop with some type of on-site water and sewer, as suggested by Bill Birrenkott. Steve Ach suggested a mix of residential and commercial in the southeast area of the City to help pay for extending services. Dave Anderson expressed his concern for residential development in this area. Discussion followed regarding the impact of industrial taxes on residential. Arne Engstrom suggested some type of industrial dedication fees charged to residential developers, such as the current park dedication fees, to provide for future industrial land and/or development. He felt that portions of the Cargill property should be zoned industrial next to the railroad tracks. Discussion followed regarding zoning the property for future use. He stated he was in favor of the Specht property being zoned industrial. Dave Anderson stated he was in favor Mary Eberley's idea for a riverside park. 410 Chair Minton concluded that Areas A and B are preferences for industrial park use and also to extend industrial along the railroad tracks down to Areas F and D. Hank Duitsman stated that he felt the traffic problem would become worse at Highway 169 and Main Street if industrial development were to occur in Areas A and B. Discussion followed regarding traffic issues and also extending water and sewer southeast along Highway 10. Greg Renner, of Renner Well Co., expressed his concern regarding the pig farm, the excess speed of trains in the Jarvis Area. He stated he was in favor of developing the industrial areas from the core city area out. He felt that area F should be industrial, not residential. He stated that if it is desired to have industrial property in the extreme southeast area of the City, the only way it could be done is with private systems, and it would be 20 to 30 years city water and sewer would be extended. Discussion followed regarding traffic congestion that would be associated with Areas A and B. BILL BIRRENKOTT MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT AREAS A AND B BE REZONED FOR BUSINESS/INDUSTRIAL PARK USE. PAT DWYER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 8-2-1. DAVE ANDERSON AND DICK HINKLE OPPOSED. HANK DUITSMAN ABSTAINED. ARNE ENGSTROM MOVED TO ZONE AREAS G AND F BE REZONED FOR INDUSTRIAL USE. MARY EBERLEY SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 11-0. /0 ZONINGIV City of t MAP Elk River /� 13065 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 490 CASE: ZV 96 - 6 Elk River, MN 55330