06-10-1985 CC MIN
~
REGULAR WEEKLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE
ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT THE ELK RIVER CITY HALL
MONDAY, JUNE 10, 1985
Members Present: Mayor Hinkle, Councilmembers Schuldt, Engstrom, Williams and
Gunkel
Members Absent: None
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Hinkle.
2. Agenda
Item 3~ - Ramsey PUD Proposal, Item 8~A ~ Treatment Plant Supervisor, 8~ -
RDF, 8~C ~ Bridge Opening, and 8~D - Check Register, were all items added to
the June 10, 1985 City Council meeting agenda.
COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA FOR THE JUNE 10, 1985 CITY
COUNCIL AGENDA AS AMENDED. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE
MOTION PASSED 4-0.
3. Resolution Recognizing the Bank of Elk River's 100th Anniversary
COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS~MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 84-17, A RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING
THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE BANK OF ELK RIVER. COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS SECONDED
THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
3~. Ramsey PUD Proposal
Mr. Rick Breezee, Building and Zoning Administrator, was present to review with
the City Council, plans for a Planned Unit Development in the City of Ramsey.
Rick Breezee explained that the first phase consisted of single family housing
to be located adjacent to Jarvis, a City of Elk River Street. Rick Breezee
further indicated that it was originally intended for the development to have
access from Highway #10 but Burlington Northern had denied the request for a
railroad crossing which was necessary. Rick Breezee further indicated he was
very concerned with the condition of Jarvis and that both he and the Street
Superintendent felt that the road would not take any additional traffic.
Rick Breezee reviewed a letter dated June 7, 1985 to the City Planner, Anne Norris
of the City of Ramsey, stating these concerns and recommended that a feasibility
study be done to determine cost and extent of work on Jarvis Avenue that was
necessary to bring the road up to standard. Rick Breezee further indicated that
he did not feel the cost for the feasibility study should be borne by the City
of Elk River, as the City has no plans to make improvements to this road due to
its limited use by Elk River residents.
Rick Breezee indicated that a public hearing for the proposed PUD would be held
by the City of Ramsey on Tuesday, June 11th, and this item was being presented
to the City Council for their information. Rick Breezee further commented that
he also informed the engineer for the project, Pete Radeke, that the proposed
single family housing will abut both light and heavy industrial zoning of the
City of Elk River.
r
.
.
City Council Minutes
Page Two
June 10, 1985
Mayor Hinkle commended Rick Breezee for his prompt attention to this issue and
the complete and thorough manner in which it was covered.
Update on Junkyards/Cars Ordinance Violations
Rick Breezee informed the Council that Mr. Peter Coyle of Larkin, Hoffman,
Daly, Lindgren has been assigned to process the significant number of junkyard
and junk car violations in the City and that approximately five were being
completed at this time.
Discussion was carried on between members of the City Council and Rick Breezee
regarding the Piwowar property, the Charest property and the Omitt property.
Rick Breezee indicated that Mr. Piwowar had signed a waiver giving the City the
right to clean up his property, with the cost of the cleanup to be assessed to
the property, but now has reneged on his agreement and wished to appear before
the City Council to discuss the issue.
Mayor Hinkle indicated that he felt as far as the Council was concerned, the
situation has been taken care of and the cleanup of the property should proceed
as planned. Mayor Hinkle further suggested that the City staff should contact
a private entity to handle the cleanup as the City's Street Department already
has quite a workload for the 1985 summer/fall work session.
4.
Elk River Landfill Update
Mr. Rick Breezee indicated that approximately two and one half years ago, the City
had requested a public hearing from the Pollution Control Agency (PCA) regarding
the Elk River Landfill, and as a result of that request the City had requested
Donahue and Associates to prepare plans and specifications for the landfill
operation in order to issue a landfill license. Breezee further indicated that
nothing had been received from Donahue until today, June 10, 1985.
Rick Breezee indicated that the County issues the license for the landfill
operation itself and that the City issues a conditional use permit. Breezee
indicated that upon contacting the County he learned that the County had re-
ceived the plans and specifications approximately two months ago. Breezee
further indicated that he felt there were some definite problems and concerns
with the landfill that should be addressed as soon as possible by means of the
landfill license process.
Rick Breezeestated that mineral extraction is also being conducted on the site
by H & S Asphalt, and that consideration of a mineral extraction license was
postponed until action on the landfill license was taken. Breezee explained
that excavation is done, the space filled with garbage, and then covered with
sand left from the excavation, thus avoiding gravel tax by reason that the
excavated material is used as cover.
Rick Breezee indicated that it was the staff's oplnlon at the time the PCA was
contacted requesting a public hearing, that the PCA was not receptive to the idea
of the City becoming involved in the licensing of the landfill. He further
indicated that he has been receiving feedback from City residents of their
concerns over what is being dumped in the landfill and whether or not proper
monitoring of the aquifer is being done.
City Council Minutes
Page Three
June 10, 1985
Councilmember Williams indicated that he was very concerned with the situation
at the landfill and felt something must be done to control the operation as
soon as possible.
It was the consensus of the City Council that the City Administrator should
contact Terry Maurer of Maier Stewart to obtain a cost for review of the land-
fill license plans and specifications by a qualified staff person of Maier Stewart.
The City Council further directed the City Administrator to contact the PCA
regarding a possible meeting with a representative of the peA and the City Council
to discuss the landfill operation, and that if a negative response from the PCA
was received, the City's attorney, Dick Nowlin of Larkin, Hoffman be contacted
for direction.
5. Ridgewood West Street Overlay
The City Administrator indicated that the residents of Ridgewood West sub-
division had requested an overlay of the existing streets in 1984. It was pro~
posed at that time that the cost of the overlay be split between the City and the
residents with the City picking up approximately twenty percent (20%) of the cost
and the residents paying apprxoimately eighty percent (80%) of the cost. It
was determined that the homeowner cost would be approximately $1,000. The City
Administrator further indicated that a petition was to be presented to the
City Council from the homeowners requesting that the project be completed and no
petition has been received to this date. He further indicated that a petition
should be circulated to residents in the area to show those for and against the
project to determine whether or not the City should go ahead with the project.
Councilmember Gunkel stated that she felt it should be the responsibility of
the homeowners association in Ridgewood West to circulate the petition. The
City Administrator indicated that the City will provide the forms necessary and
that the homeowners association would be contacted regarding circulation.
Councilmember Schuldt indicated that he felt a large majority of the residents
should be shown to be in favor of the project before taking any action, to avoid
a situation such as the one encountered in the Heavenly Hills road improvement
project.
It was the consensus of the City Council that approximately eighty percent (80%)
of the homeowners should be shown in favor of the project on the petition before
considering the improvement.
6. Star Cities Program
The City Administrator reviewed his memo dated June 7, 1985 regarding the Star
Cities quarterly meeting with the City Council. He indicated that an advertising
campaign was being organized for the promotion of all the Star -Cities, and that the
City of Elk River's share of the cost would be approximately $598.00.
Discussion was carried on regarding the need for establishment of a policy for
allocation of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds.
City Council Minutes
Page Four
June 10, 1985
The City Administrator indicated that he was waiting for a copy of the State's
sign ordinance regarding placement of the Star City signs in the City.
Councilmember Gunkel indicated that she felt there may be a need for a Star
Cities Committee to go out and market the City in the future and that it was
important that the City make full use of the Star Cities designation.
Discussion was carried on regarding the City brochures and it was the con-
sensus of the Council that the brochures were intended to be used for marketing
of the City and should be given out to potential developers.
Discussion was also carried on regarding the need for an additional flyer to
be mailed out to all residents of the City approximately one week prior to the
upcoming referendum. It was the consensus of the City Council that additional
information be placed on the proposed brochure regarding the public works
garage and also that the day of the election, polling place and hours of voting
be noted on the front of the brochure.
8. Report on Replacement of Administrative Staff Positions
The City Administrator reviewed with the City Council a proposal to fill the
City's need for a financial person by using the services of a firm such as the
City's auditor to organize and research the financial situation as it now exists.
He further indicated that this type of firm could be utilized on a temporary
basis to fill its present needs and to implement the computer system to its
fullest potential. He further stated that once some clear cut job responsibilities
are established for a financial director, advertising for the position could
begin.
The City Administrator further discussed needs for a full time bookkeeper and
perhaps changing the position of administrative assistant/secretary to deputy
city clerk and assigning that position the responsibilities of taking minutes,
elections, licensing, etc.
Discussion was carried on regarding the possibility of making the proposed
deputy city clerk a salaried position rather than an hourly paid position.
8~. Recognition of Treatment Plant Superintendent
Mayor Hinkle indicated that Darrell Mack, Treatment Plant Superintendent, has
received an annual award for the operation of the facility for the past several
years from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
It was the consensus of the City Council that the City Administrator draft a
letter of recognition for Darrell Mack.
RDF
Discussion was carried on regarding the Refuse Derived Fuel project, and the
fact that now recent information was available to the City.
City Council Minutes
Page Five
June 10. 1985
8~C. CSAH #42 Bridge Opening
The City Administrator indicated that
scheduled for July 10th at 7:30 p.m.
bility of refreshments and an idea to
be the first to cross the bridge.
-..,
the official opening of the bridge has been
Discussion was carried on regarding the possi-
contact owners of antique cars in the area to
Councilmember Gunkel indicated that she felt it would be appropriate for the City
Administrator to direct a letter to the community education staff to recognize them
for their efforts associated with the 1985 Community Festival.
8~D. Check Register
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE JUNE 10. 1985 CHECK REGISTER. COUNILMEMBER
SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
There being no further business, COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE
ADJOURNED. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
Respectfully submitted,
1J~olWh J:!~
Deborah Kleckner ~
Administrative Assistant
sm