07-01-1985 CC MIN
.
1
REGULAR WEEKLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE
ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT THE ELK RIVER PUBLIC LIBRARY
MONDAY. JULY 1. 1985
Members Present: Mayor Hinkle. Councilmembers Schuldt, Engstrom, Williams and
Gunkel.
Members Absent: None
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Hinkle.
2 . Agenda
Items 9~ - Sidewalk, HC - Sof tball Field Name, HB - Flag, HE - Star City
Program. and llF - Report on Industrial Park were added to the agenda.
COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO APPROVE THE JULY 1.1985 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA~AS
AMENDED. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
3. Consider Minutes of the June 17, 1985 City Council Meeting
Councilmember Gunkel indicated that the motion referring to the Elk River Plaza
Multi-Family housing site plan review should state "that the Elk River Plaza
Multi-Family housing site plan be referred back to the Planning Commission as a
public hearing for their review of the changes sited."
COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO APPROVE THE JUNE 17. 1985 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
AS AMENDED. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
4. Open Mike,
No one appeared for this item.
5A. Administrative Subdivision request by Mr. Art Peterson
The City Administrator indicated that Mr. Peterson is requesting an administrative
subdivision to split off a 10.89 acre parcel from the present 29.83 acre parcel.
The City Administrator further indicated that both parcels abut a public road.
The City Administrator further indicated that a new legal description should be
provided because the existing legal description includes the easement, and further
stated that the easement should not be included ina legal description for a parcel
of property.
Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing. No one appeared for or in opposition of
this item.
Mayor Hinkle closed the public hearing.
Mr. Mark Weber, a neighboring resident of the property in question, was present
and inquired about procedures for administrative subdivisions.
COUNCILMEMBERENGSTROM MOVED TO APPROVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISION REQUESTED
BY MR. ART PETERSON OF 19993 l82ND AVE. IN BIG LAKE, MINNESOTA FOR LAND HE OWNS
ON COUNTY ROAD 32 LOCATED NORTH AND WEST OF THE HOBBIT HILLS SUBDIVISION.
COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4"'-0.
.,
City Council Minutes
July 1. 1985
Page Two
5B. Request for Administrative Subdivision by John Plaisted
Mr. Plaisted indicated that he was requesting an administrative subdivision to
split approximately twenty two acres into three separate parcels consisting of
one parcel of approximately one acre in size, one parcel approximately four
acres in size and the remaining acres consisting of approximately seventeen
acres in size. Mr. Plaisted further indicated that the proposed property abuts
Highway #10 and is zoned as C-3A/Highway Commercial.
The City Administrator indicated that there was a proposed road easement con-
necting each of the three parcels and further stated that a private road agree-
ment would have to be entered into with the City of Elk River.
Further discussion was carried on regarding the moratorium on private roads.
It was determined that the moratorium set for private roads was for roads
connecting to a gravel road, and it was further indicated that the road in
Plaisted's subdivision was an asphalt road. It was further indicated that this
moratorium on private roads would not affect Plaisted's subdivision.
Councilmember Gunkel indicated that she was under the impression that the
objective for the private road moratorium was to control growth and development
of the subdivision.
Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing. No one appeared for or in opposition
of the item.
Mayor Hinkle closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Schuldt indicated that he felt he would vote in favor of the sub-
division as long as there could be access to tract A.
COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO APPROVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISION REQUESTED
BY JOHN PLAISTED FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG HIGHWAY 10 WITH THE STIPULATION THAT
THE PROPOSED EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY BE PROPERLY CONNECTED AND THAT A PRIVATE
ROAD AGREEMENT BE ENTERED INTO WITH THE CITY-OF ELK RIVER. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
6. Resolution Accepting Bid and Awarding Contract for Construction of Water Tower
Some members of the Utilities Col111ll1ilssion were present. Terry Maurer. the City's
Consulting Engineer was present and indicated that the water construction bids
were on two different sizes and two different styles of water towers. Mr. Terry
Maurer further indicated that there were two bidders and further stated that the
City ended up with one bid for each alternate. Terry Maurer indicated that the
bids were as follows:
Hydrostorage Inc. . 750.000 gallon hydropillar - $453.340
1,000.000 gallon hydropillar - $537.245
NaCon Services, Inc.750,000 gallon pedestal - $445.100
1.000,000 gallon pedestal - $566.400
~
City Council Minutes
July 1, 1985
Page Three
Terry Maurer indicated that the Utilities Commission had decided to recommend
the one million gallon hydropillar tank for $537,245 to the City Council. Mr.
Maurer further indicated that the feasibility report for the one million gallon
hydropillar tank was estimated at 1.1 million dollars for the project cost.
Mr. Maurer indicated that a twenty four inch water main extension still has to
be made up to the site which will be an approximate $120,000 improvement. Mr.
Maurer further indicated that land costs and legal costs will also have to be
included in the total costs. Mr. Maurer stated that the water tower itself is
only one part of the project but further indicated that it is a major portion
of it. Mr. Maurer indicated that the feasibility study for 1.1 million dollars
is more than likely an over estimate. Terry Maurer further indicated that the
Utilities Commission and the Engineering firm for the City of Elk River felt
there was a need for a one million gallon tank and requested that the City
Council award the bid for the one million gallon hydropillar tank by Hydrostorage,
Inc.
Members of the Utilities Commission indicated that the one million gallon
hydvopillar tank was $250,000 lower than the estimate for that' size tank.
It was further indicated that the Utilities Commission felt the hydropillar
would be better than the pedestal because there would be more storage in the
base of the hydropillar model. It was indicated that the hydropillar could
house 2,100 square feet in the base which would be needed in the future for a
water treatment facility. The Utilities further indicated that the disadvantage
of the hydropillar tank to the pedestal tank would be future maintenance costs in
the painting of the tank.
Mr. Rupp of NaCon Services was present and presented the Council with a pedestal
style water tower for their examination. Mr. Rupp also had pictures of the
pedestal style water tower for the Council's examination. The Council questioned
what the difference in the diameter of the bases of the water tower would be.
Mr. Rupp indicated that there would be twenty eight feet in diameter of the
bottom of the pedestal as to compared to fifty-two feet in the hydropillar tower.
COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO ACCEPT THE BID FROM HYDROSTORAGE, INC. FOR THE
ONE MILLION GALLON HYDROPILLAR TANK FOR $537,245. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED
THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
Councilmernber Schuldt indicated he felt there was an extra advantage with the
storage space in the hydropillar style and also that it was less expensive than
the pedestal style. Councilmernber Schuldt stated that he liked the appearance
of the hydropillar better than the pedestal style.
Councilmernber Engstrom indicated he felt the pedestal style was more attractive
but further indicated he would have to go along with the Utilities Commission
recommendation with the hydropillar style.
Councilmernber Gunkel brought up the question regarding the storage in the bottom
of the tank and who would be able to use that storage. She questioned whether it
would be the City's or the Utility's to use. Members from the Utilities Commission
indicated that in the long term the water department would have use for it to
house a water treatment facility, but further indicated that in the near future
there would be no use for it, and they could see no reason why the City could
City Council Minutes
July 1, 1985
Page Four
1
not use the space for storage. Councilmember Gunkel further questioned whether
the Utilities would: be respon$ib1:e for future maintenance of the tank. It was
indicated that the Utilities would be responsible.
Discussion was held regarding the color of thewa ter tower. Councilmember Gunkel
felt a light beige with the darker brown lettering and the Elk would be attractive.
Councilmember Williams stated he agreed with Councilmember Gunkel.
Terry Maurer indicated he could send a request for the paint chips with the
contract documents. It was the consensus of the City Council to go with Terry
Maurer's recommendation to send for the paint chips and as soon as they are
received to decide on the color of the water tower.
7. Proposed Sign for Elk River Plaza
The City Administrator indicated !that the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed
sign for the Elk River Plaza at their June 25, 1985 Planning Commission Meeting.
The City Administrator further indicated that the Planning Commission generally
agreed that the sign was well designed but that the scale may not be appropriate
and may have a detrimental affect on the surrounding properties.
Mr. Del Blocher, president of Blocher Outdoor Advertising, Inc., was present and
he informed the City Council that the height of the sign was forty six to forty
eight feet overall and further indicated that the height was determined by the size
of the letter stating Elk River Mall and the position of the sign in contrast to
Highway 169. Mr. Blocher further indicated that the sign would be thirty feet
away from the building and stated that the sign was going next to the sidewalk
area. Mr. Blocher further indicated that the sign was approximately 450 feet
from Highway 169. Mr. Blocher stated that the lettering on the sign would be three
feet,nine inches in size.
Councilmember Gunkel indicated that on the site plan she had noted there were
three locations shown for signage and was questioning whether there would be two
other signs going in after this sign was approved. Mr. Blocher stated that this
sign would be the only sign if it were approved by the City Council. Mr. Blocher
further stated that because of the size of this sign, it would be taking the place
of the other two proposed signs. ~
~v
. ~
COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO APPROVE THE PROPOSEDLSIGN FOR THE ELK RIVER/BY
BLOCHER OUTDOOR ADVERTISING INC. WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THIS BE THE ONLY SIGN
IN THE ELK RIVER MALL AND FURTHER THAT THE SIGN BE SIXTEEN FEET BY FORTY-TWO FEET
IN SIZE. COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS SECONDED THE MOTION.
Councilmember Schuldt questioned whether the Planning Commission was aware of the
loca tion where the proposed sign was to be placed. The City Adminis trator indicated
that he felt the Planning Commission was not aware of the exact location where the
sign was to be placed.
THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0.
Discussion was carried on regarding the signage to be placed on the outside of the
mall for each individual retailer. Mr. Blocherdndicated that the letters will
all be of the same color scheme and that the residents will have a choice of three
different tlypes of lettering to choose from.
---,
City Council Minutes
July 1, 1985
Page Five
Councilmember Schuldt stated he would like to make another motion regarding
the water tower to adopt the Resolution.
COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 85-23, A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE
BID AND AUTHORIZING THE CONTRACT FOR WATER TOWER TO HYDROSTORAGE, INC. FOR A ONE
MILLION GALLON HYDROPILLAR WATER TOWER AT $537,245. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED
THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 5-0.
8. Interim Wage Rates for Office Staff
The City Administrator indicated that the City Council at their April 8, 1985,
meeting approved the salary of Joan Geroy for a temporary increase to $7.00
per hour. The City Administrator further indicated that Ms. Geroy's salary was
to cease when the new City Administrator began work. The City Administrator in-
dicated that since Joan Geroy is performing the same duties now as she was per-
forming when the City Administrator started work, he would recommend the contin-
uationof her salary at $7.00 per hour until a permanent wage rate has been
established for the position. The City Administrator further indicated that
Sharon Maue had agreed to replace Sandy Thackeray's position as part time
Building and Zoning Secretary a.t a rate of $6.35 per hour for five hours per day.
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO CONTINUE JOAN GEROY'S SALARY AT $7.00 PER HOUR UNTIL
A PERMANENT WAGE RATE IS ESTABLISHED FOR THE POSITION. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
9. Consideration of Letter of Appreciation to Chamber of Commerce
COMMISSIONER ENGSTROM MOVED TO APPROVE THE LETTER OF APPRECIATION TO THE CHAMBER
OF COMMERCE FOR THEIR SUPPORT FOR THE CITY FACILITIES REFERENDUM. COMMISSIONER
WILLIAMS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
9B. Sidewalk
The City Administrator indicated that the Street Superintendent, Phil Ha1s, had
requested that the Council consider replacing the sidewalk that runs parallel-tg,
and on the south side of, Highway 1110 by the municipal parking lot. The City
Administrator further indicated that Phil Ha1s was requesting the removal of the
hand rail and the installation of a bituminous curb paral.1eling the sidewalk at the
edge of the parking lot. The City Administrator further indicated that the cost
involved would be $66.57 for sidewalk removal, $2,160 for sidewalk replacement
and $300 for material and rentals for the Street Department to install an asphalt
curbing along the parking lot. The City Administrator further indicated that the
funds could be drawn from the MSA discretionary fund. Discussion was held re-
garding the sidewalk. Discussion was further held regarding the hand rail and
who would be liable if someone should get hurt because of there being no hand rail.
COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS MOVED TO TABLE THE ITEM UNTIL THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
10A.Tax Increment Financing Plan for Guardian Angels
The City Administrator indicated that the Guardian Angels Foundation had requested
an extension of Third Street to be part of the tax increment finance district,
and recently have abandoned their request. The City Administrator indicated that
--.-,
City Council Minutes
July 1, 1985
Page Six
he had forwarded this request to the School Board so as to get comments back
from them by Wednesday. The City Administrator further stated that if the
School Board and the County Board get back to the City in time, the. City could
continue with the public hearing as scheduled. The City Administrator also
indicated that the legal description will be changed for the tax increment
district to relocate the parking lot.
10B.Bridge Dedication
It was indicated that the bridge dedication was moved to July 24th because of
problems with the railing. It was indicated that the railing was damaged and
must be sent back to the manufacturer.
11A.Report on League of Minnesota Cities 1985 Conference
Counci1member Gunkel stated she had attended the conference and gave reports on
some of the workshops she had attended. Counci1member Gunkel reported on the
following workshops: Different Personality Types, Information Systems, Economic
Development, Emergency Management and Hazardous Waste and Emergency Planning.
Counci1membea:- Gunkel indicated she felt the emergency management workshop was
one of the best sessions she had attended. She further indicated she would like
to see some type of plan implemented in the City of Elk River. Discussion was
held regarding emergency situations and what type of action could possibly be
taken if an emergency should ever occur in the City of Elk River.
11B. Review of City Facilities Referendum
It was the consensus of the City Council to hold a special committee meeting
with department heads regarding the City facilities referendum. The meeting will
be held Monday, July 8, 1985 at the Elk River Public Library.
11C. Softball Field
Mayor Hinkle indicated that the softball field complex was finished and that
the ribbon-breaking ceremony would be held Tuesday nigh t. Mayor Hinkle further
indicated that he felt the softball field should be named. Discussion was held
regarding the naming of the softball field. Nothing was determined at that time.
UD. Flag
Mayor Hinkle indicated that he had received complaints on the flag in the City
and questioned whether a new flag would be put up by the 4th of July. The
City Administrator indicated that Phil Ha1s had contacted UpA and they were
going to get a new flag up before the fourth of July. Discussion was held regarding
the flag and the cos t to replace the flag and to raise and lower it. Mayor Hinkle
indicated that the City is intending to put up an apparatus so that the City can
raise and lower their own flag and not have to pay UPA to do it.
11E. Star Cities
The City Administrator indicated that the Star Cities Committee has a meeting
coming up on July 17. The City Administrator further indicated that the Star
Cities had requested the City Administrator to seek direction from the Council
City Council Minutes
July I, 1985
Page Seven
as to what type of assistance the City can provide to the Star Cities Connnittee.
The Star Cities Committee had indicated that they were in need of secretarial
help such as typing and stuffing of envelopes and also a secretary to take minutes
of the meetings.
The City Administrator indicated that he had a meeting with Dick Gongoll and
Mayor Hinkle and discussed the Star Cities budget for 1986, the possibility of
simplifying the City Ordinance and making bylaws. The City Administrator
further indicated that mainly the Star Cities was concerned with what type of
involvement the City would like to have with this group. The City Administrator
further indicated that replacing of committee members who have moved out of town
was also discussed.
Mayor Hinkle stated he felt a simple ordinance and a fifteen member committee is
what the Star Cities should strive for.
Councilmember Gunkel stated that the Star Cities should be able to use the City's
computer to store any information. Discussion was held regarding the City
providing someone to do the minutes and to help with the secretarial services
involved.
Discussion was held regarding the position of financial advisor being directly
involved with the Economic Development Commission.
llF. Industrial Park
The City Administrator indicated that an extension of street on Industrial
Boulevard had been proposed and that a preliminary study had been done by CED
in January of 1985. The City Administrator further indicated that costs for
road construction, curb and gutter etc. had to be determined. The City
Administrator further indicated that Terry Maurer of Maier Stewart and Assoc.,
had offered to finfsh the feasibility study and address the financing for cornr
pletion of the Industrial Park.
It was the consensus of the City Council that Terry Maurer of Maier Stewart
continue and finish with the feasibility study for the extension of the street
on Industrial Boulevard.
Mayor Hinkle addressed the City Administrator and stated that he has been pleased
with the job he had done so far, and further indicated he had appreciated the extra
effort the City Administrator has put in on the job.
12. Liquor Licenses
The City Administrator indicated there were a number of liquor licenses to be
approved. The Administrator further indicated that all were renewals except for
Dino's Pizza which was a new license taken over by a new owner.
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE RENEWAL OF THE LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION
CONDITIONAL UPON THEM PAYING THE LIQUOR FEES BY AUGUST 1ST.
Councilmember Gunkel withdrew her motion.
City Council Minutes
July I, 1985
Page Eigh t
----,
Discussion was held regarding the fact that liquor establishments continue to
operate even though they have not paid their license fees which are due by
July 1st. It was the consensus of the City Council that if the license fee were
not paid, the liquor operation would be suspended. It was further felt that
each liquor establishment should be notified that they must pay for their license
before they will be granted a license renewal. It was further stated that the
liquor establishments should be given one week after the date of notification to
pay the license fee at which time the liquor license would be suspended if not
paid.
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE RENEWAL OF. THE LIQUOR LICENSE ABPLICATIONS
WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE LICENSE FEE BE PAID, OR THE LICENSE BE SUSPENDED.
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
13. Check Register
Councilmember Schuldt questioned Jim LaDuke's check for a badge, the $240 phone
bill for the Police Department and the John Oliver Site Plan for the Star Cities.
J~m LaDuke's check was held out for the badge until further information could be
provided.
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE CHECK REGISTER WITH THE EXCEPTION OF
THE CHECK FOR JIM LADUKE'S BADGE. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
Phil Hals arrived at 10:10 p.m. Discussion was brought back regarding the side-
walk on Highway 1110 by the City's municipal parking lot. Phil Hals, the City's
Street Superintendent cleared up all questions the Councilmembers had regarding
the sidewalk.
COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS MOVED TO APPROVE THE PLANS SUBMITTED BY PHIL HALS, THE
CITY'S STREET SUPERINTENDENT, FOR THE SIDEWALK THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO, AND ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF, HIGHWAY 10 BY THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL PARKING LOT. COUNCILMEMBER
GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
There being no further business, COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS MOVED TO ADJOURN THE
MEETING. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4~0.
The Meeting adjourned at 10:25 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
~
Sandra Thackeray
Administrative Secretary