Loading...
10-21-1985 CC MIN ~ THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL HELD AT THE ELK RIVER PUBLIC LIBRARY MONDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1985 NOTE: This was also a Joint meeting with the Planning Commission COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Williams, Hinkle, Councilmembers Gunkel, Schuldt and Engstrom COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Tralle, Commissoners Merrick, Temple, Willie, Warner, Wilson, and Fuchs PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Tom Bublitz, City Administrator; Rick Breezee, Building and Zoning Administrator; Phil Hals, Street Superintendent; and Dave Sellergren, City Attorney; Terry Maurer, City Engineer 1. The Meeting of the Elk River City Council was called to order by Mayor Hinkle at 7:30 p.m. 2. Cooside~ation_o!_~geoda Item 16b, Gambling License was added to the agenda. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 21, 1985 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AS AMENDED. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. , ~ 3. Cooside~atioo_o!_Dctobe~_Z1_19.85._Cit~_Couocil_Minutes CDUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 7, 1985 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 4. Deeo_Mike No one was present for this item. 5. Cansidecaiion___ot__Eeasibilii~__study_Eo~_Stceet_aDd_Utili~y Ime~o~emeots_on_Maio_St~eet_aod_D~ooo_aoad Terry Maurer, the City Engineer, stated that the Main street and Orono Road project would consist of sanitary sewer, water main, storm drainage and municipal state aid street improvements on Main Street and Orono Road. Terry Maurer stated that the construction would be on Main Street from ~ Pa SH? 2 October 21. 1985 the new County Road 42 Bridse westerly alons Main Street and Orono Road to the intersection of trunk hishway 10 near the County Fairsrounds. Terry Maurer went into fu~ther detail resardins the work to be done on the road. sanitary sewer. water main and storm drainase. Terry M.urer further stated that the City is ready to proceed with the public hearing stage for he easteroportion of the project. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 85-57 A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS ON MAIN STREET AND ORONO ROAD (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 85-5). COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 85-58 A RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ON MAIN STREET AND ORONO ROAD (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1985-5). COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 6 Conside~ation__of_Eeasihilitx_Studx_Eo~_Sanita~x_Sewe~_and Wate~__Main__lme~o~ements__in_Westwood_Suhdi~ision~_Lund9~en ~omes_Ei~st_Qddition_and_ls1and_V.iew_Ihi~d_Qdditon Terry Maurer. the City Engineer. introduced the Feasibility Study for Westwood Subdivision. Lundgren Homes First Addition and Island View Third Addition. He stated that the project would consist of sanitary sewer and water main extent ions to these areas. He further stated that the estimated total cost of the project is $664.900. Terry Maurer stated that the santary sewer improvement would involve the construction of an 8 inch connecton system for sanitary sewer with service to each home. He further stated there would be a need for a small lift station. Terry Maurer then noted that the water main is six inches in diameter providing service to each home or buildable lot. Councilmember Schuldt ~uestioned Mr. Maurer as to whether it would be necessary to put water in at the same time as sewer. Councilmember Schuldt further stated that the residents in the area had brought this ~uestion up. The City Engineer stated that it depends on how the people feel about putting water in and also what condition the existing wells are in at the present time. Councilmember Gunkel ~uestioned whether the balance of the MSA Discretionary fund could be used for this type of F'r'o~iect. Councilmember' Gun~:el fur.ther' stated that she would like the MSA funds discussed and would like to see the City Council come UP with some type of policy on this. ~ Page 3 October 21, 1985 COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 85-59, A RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS IN THE WESTWOOD SUBDIVISION, LUNDGREN HOMES FIRST ADDITION AND ISLAND VIEW THIRD ADDITION, (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1985- 4). COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 7. Canside~atian__af__aeguest__fae__Canditianal__Use_Ee~mit_fae Jahn_Satteesteam_aad_Lauea_~aa_EeeL_eublic_~ea~iag Torn Warner, representative of the Planning Commission, stated that John Satterstrom and Laura Van Erp had reques~ed a conditonal use permit to conduct a home occupation from property located at 14061 Hishway 10. Commissioner Warner further stated that the home occupation would consist of selling antiques from the barn that is located on the existins property. Commissioer Warner further stated that the Planning Commission denied the request for conditional use permit with a 5 to 1 vote. Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearins. Mayor Hinkle noted that the application was withdrawn at the applicant's request. There was no one for or in opposition of the conditional use request. Mayor Hinkle closed the public hearing. 8. ~a~iaace_aeguest_b~_Me__James_alb~ecbtLeublic_~ea~iag Steve Merrick, Planning Commission member stated that the Plannins Commission heard Mr. Albrecht's request for variance at their September Planning Commission Meetins. Commissioner Merrick stated that Mr. Albrecht who owns a business of remanufacturins of break pads and break products at the location of 10918 173rd Avenue NW, was requesting a variance to the required 25 foot side yard setback in order to construct an addition onto the rear of his exis~in9 structure. Commissioner Merrick further stated that the Planning Commission had recommended that the City Council accept the variance request of Mr. James Albrecht. Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearins. Mr. James Albrecht was present and stated to the Council he would like to see the Council approve his request. Mayor Hinkle closed the public hearins. ~ Page 4 October 21. 1985 COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE REQUESTED BY MR. wAMES ALBRECHT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10918 173RD AVENUE IN ELK RIVER. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 9. Conside~a1ion__of__eeglles1__fo~__~dminis1~a1iYe__Sllbdiyision E~om_Cen1~a1_1nYes1men1Lellb1ic_8ea~in9 Rick Breezee, Buildin9 and Zonin9 Administrator presented this item to the City Council. The Buildin9 and Zonin9 Administrator. stated that Central Investment Corporation is requestin9 an administrative subdivision for two pieces of property which they presently own on 191st Lane Northwest. in Elk River. He further stated that the lots are le9ally described as lot 2. block 2, Ridgewood East 2nd Addition. The Buildin9 and Zonin9 Administrator noted that the subdivision would allow him to split one large piece of property which is 158.51 feet in width into four smaller lots consistin9 of approximately 39.63 feet in width. The Buildin9 and Zonin9 Administrator indicated that the applicant is intendin9 to construct two structures with two separate livin9 units within each structure. He further stated these builin9s would be built with -0- lot line construction requirements with the anticipation of havin9 four individual owned and occupied units. He further stated that the zonin9 is R-2/townhouse and all setbacks would be met. Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearin9. Art Radio was present representin9 Central Inestment. No one spoke for or in opposition of the request. Mayor Hinkle closed the public hearin9. The Buildin9 and Zonin9 Administrator stated that a park dedication fee would be required. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISION REQUEST BY CENTRAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION FOR LOT 2 OF BLOCK 2. RIDGEWOOD EAST 2ND ADDITION WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1. A PARK DEDICATION FEE BE PAID FOR THE THREE NEW LOTS THAT HAVE BEEN CREATED. 2. THAT THE REQUIREMENTS AS OUTLINED IN THE BUILDING CODE FOR -0- LOT LINE BE REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF ACTUAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. PAGE 5 October 21, 1985 3. THAT ALL FOUR UNITS BE SERVICED BY ADEOUATE CITY UTILITIES. COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS SECONDED THE MOTION. PASSED 4-0. THE MOTION 16B. G~MBLl~G_LlNCESE The City required licenses further 9amblin9 Administrator stated that the to issue gambling licenses. 90 directly to the State that the cities do have the application. cities are no longer He stated that these Gambling Board, and authority to veto any The City Administrator stated that the two gambling license applications were being made for Dick's Main Tap and the -Elk River Bowl for pull tabs. The City Council took no acton. 10. P-ublic__~eacing_Qn_Sani~ac~_Sewec_and_Wa~ec~Main_lmEcQ~ement ecalect_Qn_Simanet_Dci~e~_6tb_Stceet_and_Xenia_a~enue Terry Maurer, the City's Engineer, stated that the City Council had ordered the Feasibility Study for the improvements in this area in late August of 1985. He further stated that what they are proposing is sanitary sewer and water main extension to serve the homes along Simonet Drive~ 6th Street and Xenia Avenue. He further stated that the total estimated cost of the project is 5249,400. The City Engineer noted that the assessments would be added to the 1987 Real Estate taxes. Mr. Maurer noted that the assessment per unit would be 58,600. Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing. Jerry McChesney questioned whether Westwood would hook UP to the interceptor. Discussion was held on regarding the question of cost if the residents waited until the interceptor went through and then hooked UP to the interceptor. The residents were questioning whether the cost would be less. The City Engineer stated that the cost probably would be higher mainly because of the fact of not knowing when the interceptor would 90 through. Barb Kreuser questioned involved. Terry Maurer units. the number of units that would be stated there would be 29 total Vern Lundber9 questioned why sewer and water was being considered at that time. ~ Page 6 October 21, 1985 Joe Engelbrecht questioned whether natural 9as could 90 throu9h the area. The City Administrator indicated he had spoken with somebody from North Central Public Service and they had sU9gested tha~ the people get a contact person to contact North Central Public Service re9ardin9 the situation. Barb Kreuser questioned whether it was necessary for water to 90 in with the sewer. Shes~ated she felt sewer was necessary but water was not. The CitvEn9ineer stated that it was not necessary that water and sewer 90 in at the same time but that it would be a savin9s in the 10n9 run because of having to restore the street twice. Tom Eckdahl stated that at a previous meeting, some of the residents had asked about putting water in at the same time as sewer. Vern Lundberg questioned what the requirements were for hook uP. Rick Breezee stated that there was a maximum time requirement of two years to hook UP to the sewer and that there was no time limit for water hook UP. Terrv Ber9 questioned whether there would be any DNR 9rant money available. Terrv Maurer stated there was no money available for this type of project. Barb Kreuser questioned on how the final decision would be made as to whether sewer, water or both would be goin9 in . Mayor Hinkle stated the Council would make the final decision. Councilmember Engstrom noted that he felt it totally depends on what the people want and that is how he would be voting. Richard Bickman questioned what other costs would be involved above and beyond the assessment charge. The Buildng and Zoning Administrator noted that the sewer hook- UP fee would be $1,000 for interceptor and the water charge is approximately $250. Bonnie Gruel noted she felt somebody should pursue outside funding for the project. A vote was taken at this time. 7 people voted to have sewer, 6 people voted to have sewer and water and 6 people voted to drop the project. Councilmember Gunkel stated that if any of the other systems fail in the future, the people have no recouse to take. Page 7 ctober 21, 1985 Harry Kreuser stated that he had put in a new drainfield last year and it cost him $4,000. Councilmember of any place area. Engstrom stated that he felt he does not know in the City that needs sewer more than this Tom Eckdahl stated that he felt it was on Iv a matter of time before it would have to be done. Discussion was held regarding whether the people should put in sewer only or sewer and water both. Tom Eckdahl questioned what the savings would be in putting the water in at the same time as sewer. The City Engineer stated that the biggest savings would be in street restorations. Another vote was taken at this time. 13 people voted to have sewer put in, 8 people voted for sewer and water and 5 people voted to drop the project. Mayor Hinkle closed the pOblic hearing. COUNCI~MEMBER WILLIAMS MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 85-60, A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS ON SIMONET DRIVE, 6TH STREET AND XENIA AVENUE WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE WATER PORTION CAN BE DELETED FROM THE PROJECT. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. Councilmember Gunkel noted that a majority of the people were in favor of the sewer. She stated that she would like to see water gO in at the same time. Councilmembers Engstrom and Schuldt both noted that they would approve the sewer only because there was not enough interest in the water. THE MOTION PASSED 5-0. 11. CQnside~aLiQn_Qf_SiLe_elan_EQ~_Bll~ge~_King Rick Breezee, the Building and Zoning Administrator, stated that Barthel Realtv had a request from Dolphin Temporary Job Services to construct a Burger King Restaurant which would be located on the corner of School Street and 169 in the Elk River Barthel PUD. The Building and Zoning Administrator stated that representatives from Barthel and representatives from Burger King Restaurant were present to present a site plan for the proposed Burger King Restaurant. PAGE 8 October' 21, 1985 The Buildins and Zoning Administrator indicated that the critical part of the plan was the on and off access on School Street. The Building and Zoning Administ~ator indicated that the restaurant would have two drive UP ser- vice windows to keep traffic moving. Rick Breezee further indicated that he had spoken to the City Engineer and the City Street Superintendent and they had stated that they had no problem with the traffic situation and it was further indicated that hopefully the City would be looking at seeing a stop light put UP at the intersection in approximatelY 2 1/2 Years. The Building and Zoning Administrator indicated that he had spoken with Mr. Dave Flannery of the School District and he noted that he did not get a positive or negative reaction from Mr. Flannery. However, Mr. Flannery did state that they would rather see an inlet only. Discussion was held regarding the on off entrance for the Burger King Restaurant on School Street. Discussion was also held regarding another entrance and exit off the rear portion of the shopping center parkin, lot. Councilmember Gunkel noted that Freeport Avenue could probably use a stop light. It was noted that instead of a stop lisht perhaps the area could be policed more frequently. Councilmember Schuldt felt that when a squad car. is there changes will be made, but when the squads are not pre~ent things would be bad: to norma 1. Signage was discussed. Mr. Dolphin stated that the sign would be about the same size as McDonalds and would be a 50 foot pole with ~ 12' bv 12' sign on it. Commissioner Warner noted he would not like to see the sign so close to the corner because of traffic conditions. Mr. Dolphin further stated that they were requesting an 8' by 8' pylon sign with the Burger King logo on it and would also include on the sign a 4' x 8' reader board. He further stated this sign would be 25' in height. Councilmember Gunkel noted that the Council only allowed one free standing pylon sign for the shoppins center. Chairman Tralle noted that the City Council and Planning Commission also only allowed one sign for Food N Fuel. Discussion was held regardin, landscaping. The Building and Zoning Administrator noted that at previous times the City Council and Planning Commission had left landscaping up ~o the discretion of the City Staff. The second sign was discussed. Mr. Dolphin noted that instead of an 8' bv 8' pvl~n sign, a smaller sign of 6' x 6' with a 20' pole could be installed. Commissioner Warner noted that he had no problem with the smaller sign. Commissoner Wilson stated he concurred with Commissioner Warner. It was further stated that the sign be no closer half way between the driveway and the intersection. ~ PAGE 9 ctobe~ 21,1985 COMMISSONER ACCEPT THE MOVED BACK LEFT TO THE PYLON SIGN COMMISSIONER 7-0. MERRICK MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL BURGER KING SITE PLAN WITH THE 6' X 6' 20' SIGN FROM THE HIGHWAY AND WITH THE LANDSCAPING TO BE CITY STAFF, AND WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE 50' BE A MINIMUM OF 125' OFF OF THE INTERSECTION. WARNER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED COMMISSIONER MERRICK MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OF EXTRA PARKING STALLS ALONG THE NORTH AND TO INCLUDE THE EXTRA ENTRANCE ON THE CORNER AS NOTED IN EXHIBIT 3 AS PREPARED BY THE BUILDING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. COMMISSIONER WILSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 7-0. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO ACCEPT THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING THE BURGER KING SITE PLAN. COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 12. Cans~deca~~an_af_S~~e_elan_amendmen~_Eac_Bac~bel_eUD The Building and Zoning Administ~ato~ noted that the change would allow a 40,000 square foot Pamida Sto~e and a 10,000 squa~e foot Coast to Coast Store to be located to the South of the existing Ben Franklin Sto~e. He fu~the~ stated that the la~ge ~etail store would not have a negtive impact with the Downtown a~ea. He stated that the ma.io~ change is the L shape effect on the Cente~, which would change the mall f~om an enclosed a~e~ to an unenclosed area. Chairman T~alle noted that there had been no effort shown in the housing p~oJect on Barthel's part. M~. Ken Ba~thel stated that the o~iginal concept was fo~ 36 units and that the concept had been changed to 40 units and that it took time to process this because it was fede~ally funded. M~. Ba~thel stated he is expecting funding in approximately two weeks and that the single family housing is ready and does have funding available. Chai~man Tralle noted he was opposed to any changes until the housing is developed because of the stipulations stated in the develope~s a9~eement. Rick Breezee, the Building and Zoning Administrator noted that because Pamida is on part of Pa~cel G, the develope~s ag~eement would not apply. Councilmembe~ Schuldt noted that most of the building would be on Parcel N, not G. The Building and Zoning Administ~ator noted that this was not the point whethe~ the building was mostly on Pa~cel G or N, but whethe~ o~ not they should approve the concept. ~ 10 ctob~~ 21, 1985 Councilm~mbe~ Gunk~l stat~d that sh~ f~lt what th~v a~~ asking fo~ is not much diff~~~nt f~om th~ o~iginal conc~pt. Commission~r Fuchs not~d that he do~s gO along with th~ concept but has a probl~m with th~ P~09~~SS 90in9 along with the p~es~nt location in ~~ga~ds to landscaping and a gene~al cl~anin9 UP of th~ sit~. Mavo~ Hinkl~ not~d that the City has a la~ge investm~nt in the shopping c~nte~, and h~ would like to S~~ the conc~pt chan9~ p~oc~~d. The Senio~ Vic~ P~esident of Pamida was p~~sent and he not~d that Pamida Sto~e would b~ a block buildin9. He fu~th~~ not~d that the ~mplovees of Pamida own th~ company and he not~d that 78% of the 900ds that Pamida s~lls a~e not availabl~ in the City of Elk Riv~~. H~ not~d that two o~ th~e~ p~ople would be impo~t~d p~ople and th~ oth~~ peopl~ would b~ local p~opl~. COMMISSIONER TEMPLE MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE CONCEPT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE BARTHEL PUD AS OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT C, WITH THE STIPULATION THAT AN ECNLOSED WALK SPACE BETWEEN THE BEN FRANKLIN STORE AND THE COAST TO COAST BE REQUIRED. COMMISSIONER WILLE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 7-0. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO EXEND THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING PAST MIDNIGHT. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. The Council and Plannin9 Commission then discuss~d th~ site plan fo~ the Pamida sto~e. Skip So~enson,A~chitect fo~ Ba~th~l, noted that th~ propos~d Pamida was 200' x 200' and was mad~ out of the sam~block mat~~ial as was used on the Elk River Plaza, and fu~the~ that the sto~e would be built to match the Plaza. H~ fu~th~~ noted that pa~kin9 is enti~elv to the south. He stated that Pamida was ~equesting an outside va~d sto~age fo~ s~asonal ~oods. He noted that the exterior landscapin9, signage and lighting would be in confo~manc~ with what is al~~adv existin9. Commission~~ Me~~ick used. Mr. So~enson si9n. qu~stion~d what kind of sign would b~ stat~d th~v would use a f~~~ standin9 Th~ Building and Zonin9 Administ~ato~ qu~stioned if the~e would b~ ~xcess t~ail~~s s~tting outsid~ the sto~~, in the ~~a~. M~. Sor~nson not~d that th~~~ would be apP~oximat~lv 3 t~ail~~s out~ide th~ ~~ar of th~ sto~~ locat~dat a ~~c~ivin9 dock a~~a. r ~ Page 11 Octobe~ 21. 1985 COMMISSIONER MERRICK MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN FOR THE PAMIDA STORE WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE SIGNAGE WILL BE SUBMITTED AT A LATER DATE WITH AN EXTRA FIRE HYDRANT AND WITH LANDSCAPING BEING LEFT TO STAFF DISCRETION. COMMISSIONER WARNER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 7-0. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION OF REVIEW OF THE PAMIDA STORE COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE 4-0. ACCEPT THE PLANNING APPROVAL FOR THE SITE PLAN FOR THE BARTHEL PUD. MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 13. CODsidecaiion_o~_eesnluiioD_Gcaniing_8celimiDac~_aeeco~al The City Administ~ato~ indicated that he had ~eceived a letter f~om the lawfi~m of Fae9~e an Benson alon9 with a ~esolution ~e9a~din9 a request fo~ an indust~ial development ~evenue bond fo~ a 40.000 squa~e foot ~etail facility in Elk Rive~ Plaza. He fu~the~ stated that the ~esolution title indicates that it is 9~antin9 p~elimina~y app~ovalto a p~oposed and iridust~ial development p~oJect. but the ~esolution does not commit the City to issuin9 the bond. He stated that the ~esolution autho~izes the city to submit an application to the State's Disc~etiona~y Fund fo~ Indust~ial Development Revenue Bonds. The City's Atto~neY. Dave Selle~9ren. noted that this needs to be p~ocessed bY the 28th of Octobe~ if the~e is any chance in ~eceivin9 an allocation. It was also noted that the ~esolution stated that the company shall pay any and all costs incu~red by the City in connection with the p~oJect. COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 85-61. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT BY SCHERER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AND AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR BOND ISSUANCE AUTHORITY THEREFOR. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 14. Considecaiion_o~_Bid_eeLei~ed_~oc_Sbeliec_BuildiD9S COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EARL F. ANDERSON AND COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM PASSED 4-0. MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 85-62. A THE PURCHASE OF PARK SHELTERS FROM ASSOCIATES IN THE AMOUNT OF $19.995. SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION ~ Page 12 ctobe~ 21. 1985 Considecaiion_of_Bids_ee~ei~ed_fQc_LQadec Phil Hals. the St~eet Supe~intendent noted that the City accepted bids fo~ the pu~chase of anew f~ont end loade~ with a quick hook UP attachment on the Boom and noted that Ziegle~ was the only bidde~. He stated that the pu~chase p~ice o~ the loade~ would be $69.442 with a t~ade in fo~ thei~ 1983 Cat 930 at $58.373. leaving a pu~chase p~ice of $11.179. The St~eet Supe~intendent noted that he was happy with the Cat 930. and stated that it was in no way inse~viceable. but felt he thought it made sense economically to t~ade fo~ a new machine which would give them mo~e ve~satilitv and one mo~e snow ~emoval machine to put on the st~eets. MaYo~ Hinkle noted that he was not in favo~ of the t~ade. He stated he felt the St~eet Depa~tment could get along with what they had. Councilmembe~ Gunkel noted that the City would be looking at additional development going on which would c~eate additional staff wo~k. and felt the new machine would be an added asset. Councilmembe~ Williams stated he would gO along with the change. He felt the City would be getting equipment that would save much time. and fu~the~ wouldc~eate much safer wo~king conditions with the quick hook UP attachment. COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS MOVED TO TABLE THE ITEM FOR APPROXIMATELY TWO WEEKS UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT PHIL HALS CAN GET MORE INFORMATION ON THE MATTER. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 16. eenial_Gacage_S2a~e_fQc_eubli~_Wocks_E9ui2meni_Siocage The City Administ~ato~ indicated that the Street Supe~intendent had found some possible ~entalsites for garage space for public works equipment. the City Administrator furthe~ stated that he felt the problem with the facilities at the p~esent time is that there is no place for the street department equipment. Site #1. Cedar Log Homes Building and Site #2. Insti-tops building were both discussed as possible public works ~ental space. The St~eet Superintendent stated he felt site #2 would be the bette~ of the two sites. He noted that the building has two la~ge ove~head doors, the~e is 3+ ac~es of land which includes a paved lot which could be used fo~ the sand stock pile. He stated the building was 50' bv 120'. and the~e was office space. bath~ooms and elect~ical hook uP. Page 13 Octobe~ 21. 1985 MOVED TO APPROVE SITE #2. INSTI-TOPS AND ORONO ROAD FOR A TEMPORARY RENTAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AT A PRICE OF COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS SECONDED THE PASSED 4-0. COUNCI LMEMBER GUNKEL BUILDING. HIGHWAY 10 GARAGE SPACE FOR THE $1.000 PER MONTH. MOTION. THE MOTION 17. Cbeck_Besistec Councilmembe~ Schuldt questioned the check on fi~e call fo~ $80.00 and the Police Rese~ve unifo~m allowance check. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE CHECK REGISTER. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. The~e being no fu~ther' business. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO ADJOURN THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING. COUNCI LMEMBER WILLIAMS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. The Elk Rive~ City Council adJou~nedat 12:45 p.m. J~ Sandra Thacke~aY Reco~ding Sec~eta~Y