6.3 & 6.4 ,--(./ `\
\4 -
Board of Adjustments Item#V 98-5
ity of ,/ Planning Commission Item#'s 6.3. & 6.4.
.lkRiver MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
l
FROM: Scott Harlicker, Planning Assistan !j�
�
i/A
DATE: June 23, 1998
SUBJECT: Request by U.S. West Wireless for
Variance, Rezoning and Conditional
Use Permit, Public Hearing Case No.'s
V 98-5, ZC 98-5 and CU 98-16
Request
Consider a request by U.S. West Wireless for a variance request to setback
requirements, zone change to Antenna Overlay District (AT) and conditional
use permit for a wireless communication antenna tower and equipment
• building.
Location
The property is located at 19050 Industrial Boulevard, Lot 4, Block 2, Elk
River Industrial Park
Zoning/Land Use
I1 (Light Industrial) / LI (Light Industrial)
Attachments
• Location map
• Site plan
• Supporting documentation from applicant
Overview
U.S. West is proposing to lease an area approximately 32' by 32' in order to
construct a 150 foot tall self supporting mono-pole which will support their
wireless PCS antennas. The area the applicant is leasing is part of a 2 acre
Illlot located in the Elk River Industrial Park. The building is currently used as
13065 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 490 • Elk River, MN 55330 • TDD &Phone: (612) 441-7420 • Fax: (612) 441-7425
Memo to Board of Adjustments/Planning Commission
June 23, 1998
Page 2
411 office space and light manufacturing. The tower is proposed to be located
near the rear or northeast corner of the building.
The site is located in the middle of the industrial park. Adjacent businesses
include Tescom, School District 728 maintenance building, E & 0 Tool and
Plastics and Dynetics Systems.
In order to proceed with their proposal, the applicant has requested a
variance to the setback requirements, a rezoning to AT and a conditional use
permit for the tower.
Variance
The applicant is requesting a variance to the setback requirement for
antenna towers. The setback requirement from all property lines is equal to
the height of the tower. The proposed tower is 150 feet high which requires a
150 foot setback from all property lines. The proposed setbacks for the
antenna tower are:
• 190 feet from the south property line
• 110 feet from the north property line
• • 90 feet from the west property line
• 90 feet from the east property line
A variance of 40 feet is needed from the north property line, and 60 feet from
east and west property lines.
Staff refers the Board to Section 900.40 of the City of Elk River Code of
Ordinances for the five standards to consider when reviewing a variance. A
variance may be granted only if it meets the following five conditions:
1. Literal enforcement of the ordinance will cause undue hardship.
2. The hardship is caused by special conditions and circumstances which
are peculiar to the property and the structure involved and which are
not characteristic of, or applicable to, other lands or structure in the
same area.
3. The literal application of the provisions of this ordinance would
deprive the petitioner of rights enjoyed by other properties in the same
district under the terms of this ordinance.
4. The special conditions and circumstances are not a consequence of the
• petitioner's own action or inaction.
\\elkriver\sys\shrdoc\planning\scott\cu98-16.doc
Memo to Board of Adjustments/Planning Commission
June 23, 1998
Page 3
• 5. The variance will not be injurious to or adversely affect the health,
safety or welfare of the residents of the City or the neighborhood where
the property is located and will in keeping with spirit and intent of the
ordinance.
The applicant claims the structural design of the tower allows the tower to
bend to off-load the wind resistance, not fall over. Therefore, the 150 foot
setback is not necessary for safety reasons. The 150 foot setback would also
place the tower in the center of most industrial lots and would interfere with
the reasonable use of the property or is impossible given the existing
development.
The hardship is particular to the land and structure involved in that the
property is only 280 feet wide which does not allow any location on the site
to meet the 150 foot setback. The tower is setback a minimum of 90 feet
which is more than half the height of the tower.
There are two other sites in the city with monopole towers, AT&T and APT,
that do not meet the setback requirements. There are also 3 guyyed lattice
towers located near the intersection of County Road 33 and Proctor Road
which do not meet setback requirements. All the towers referred to in this
III
paragraph were constructed prior to the current setback requirements.
The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the health, safety or
welfare of the residents. The granting of the variance will allow the
placement of the tower in an industrial area with little or no impact on any
residences. The granting of the variance will also allow for improved digital
wireless technology for Elk River.
Rezoning
In order to construct the proposed tower, a rezoning.to AT is required. This
overlay district was established to manage the proliferation of antenna
towers and to insure there proper placement regarding health, safety and
welfare of the community. This overlay district does not change the
underlying I1 zoning district, all the uses allowed and the dimensional
regulations in the I1 district will continue to be allowed on land zoned AT.
In considering a rezoning request of this nature, consideration should be
given to the existing conditions within the area directly and indirectly
affected by the proposed rezoning as well as the compatibility with
surrounding land uses.
•
\\elkriver\sys\shrdoc\planning\scott\cu98-16.doc
Memo to Board of Adjustments/Planning Commission
June 23, 1998
Page 4
• The rezoning request should not adversely impact and would be compatible
with the zoning and current use of the property which is under consideration
for rezoning and adjacent properties. The applicant has shown how this
location will fit in with their plans for PCS coverage for this area The
applicant investigated co-locating on the towers owned by AT&T and APT
and found that they could not meet their coverage needs.
Conditional Use permit
Co-location requirements
The applicant has submitted a letter explaining their co-location policy. They
also examined the possibility of co-locating on other towers. They found they
could not meet their coverage needs at the other towers. At a height of 150
feet the proposed tower has to have the capability for providing co-location
opportunities for 2 other providers. In their supporting documentation the
applicant indicates the proposed tower will have the ability to accommodate
only one other set of antennas. The design should be modified to allow for
two co-location opportunities.
Construction requirements
• The applicant complies with the construction requirements outlined in the
zoning code except for the following:
1. The applicant should indicate how the tower will be protected from
unauthorized climbing. A 6 foot high fence is proposed, the zoning code
requires an 8 foot high fence
2. All connections from the tower to the equipment structure have to be
either 8 feet above the ground or buried underground.
Design standards
The applicant needs to show how the tower and antennas will blend in with
the surrounding environment.
Signs and advertising
No signs or advertising are proposed.
Accessory structures and equipment
•
\\elkriver\sys\shrdoc\planning\scott\cu98-16.doc
Memo to Board of Adjustments/Planning Commission
June 23, 1998
Page 5
• The accessory structures should be painted blue to match the existing
building and screened from view.
Illumination
No lighting is proposed for the tower.
Interference
All applications for new service have to be accompanied by an
intermodulation study which evaluates potential interference problems.
Recommendation
Variance
It is recommended the Board of Adjustment approve the variance request to
the setback requirements based on the following findings:
1. Literal enforcement of the ordinance will cause undue hardship in
that the tower is designed to collapse on itself not fall over and
• compliance with the setback requirement would place the tower in the
middle of the property which would interfere with reasonable use of
the property.
2. The hardship is caused by special conditions and circumstances which
are peculiar to the property and the structure involved and which are
not characteristic of, or applicable to, other lands or structure in the
same area. The hardship is particular to the land and structure
involved in that the property is only 280 feet wide which does not allow
any location on the site to meet the 150 foot setback.
3. The literal application of the provisions of this ordinance would
deprive the petitioner of rights enjoyed by other properties in the same
district under the terms of this ordinance. There are other two other
sites in the city with monopole towers, AT&T and APT, that do not
meet the setback requirements. There are also 3 guyyed lattice towers
located near the intersection of County Road 33 and Proctor Road
which do not meet setback requirements.
4. The special conditions and circumstances are not a consequence of the
petitioner's own action or inaction. The need for the variance is a
consequence of the lot width.
•
\\elkriver\sys\shrdoc\planning\scott\cu98-16.doc
Memo to Board of Adjustments/Planning Commission
June 23, 1998
Page 6
• 5. The variance will not be injurious to or adversely affect the health,
safety or welfare of the residents of the City or the neighborhood where
the property is located and will be in keeping with spirit and intent of
the ordinance. The granting of the variance will allow the placement of
the tower in an industrial area with little or no impact on any
residences. The granting of the variance will also allow for improved
digital wireless technology for Elk River.
Rezoning
It is recommended the Planning Commission recommend approval of the
rezoning request to AT based on the following findings:
1. The rezoning is compatible with the surrounding land uses and would
not adversely affect the property under consideration for rezoning.
2. The proposed rezoning is necessary in order to provide effective
wireless telecommunication coverage for the city.
3. The rezoning is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan for the
city.
• Conditional Use permit
It is recommended the Planning Commission recommend approval of the
conditional use permit for a 150 foot wireless telecommunication tower and
supporting equipment with the following conditions:
1. The tower be designed to accommodate 2 additional users.
2. The tower and equipment shall be screened from view and surrounded
by an 8 foot tall fence. The equipment structure shall be painted to
match the existing building.
3. The tower shall be a color that blends in with the surrounding
environment.
4. No signs, lighting or advertising are allowed on the tower.
5. The applicant shall supply an intermodulation study to evaluate any
potential interference problems.
6. All connections from the tower to the equipment structure shall be a
• minimum 8 feet above the ground or buried underground.
\\elkriver\sys\shrdoc\planning\scott\cu98-16.doc
Mr. Scott Harlicker
111 City of Elk River
13065 Orono Parkway
P.O. Box 490
Elk River, MN 55330
Planning Department
RE: Application to Construct a One Hundred Fifty (150) Foot Antenna Support
System at 19050 Industrial Blvd. N.W.
Site No. SCL-005
Dear Mr. Scott Harlicker,
This letter is designed to comply with application procedures for an administrative review
in order to receive a permit for a PCS antenna support system to be located in Elk River.
US WEST Wireless has been authorized by the landowner to present this application on
their behalf.
US WEST Wireless has been licensed by the Federal Communications Commission and
is scheduled to deploy a wireless Personal Communications System (PCS) in Sherburne
• County and the surrounding areas in the third quarter of 1998. To fulfill its mandate from
the Federal Communications Commission, US WEST Wireless will be developing a grid
of antenna throughout its service area. These antenna must be spaced, depending on
certain technical and geographical variables, at intervals approximately five (5) miles
from each other and at a height of approximately seventy five (75) to one hundred eighty
(180) feet above the ground. The intent of the deployed system will be to provide
wireless services to all Twin City area communities. Since US WEST Wireless
Communications intends to utilize PCS as an affordable Wireless Local Loop service,
coverage at the neighborhood level is essential (unlike Cellular, which is typically a high-
cost mobile service).
PROPOSED USE:
We propose to construct a one hundred fifty (150) foot antenna support system for a
wireless Personal Communications Service (PCS). An unmanned prefabricated
equipment rack measuring approximately 3'-0" x 12'-0" x 6'-0" will be located at the
base of the system. No advertising will be attached or located on the antenna support
system nor will the system be illuminated.
The foundation for the antenna support system will be a concrete caisson design. The
specifications take into account soils, local wind loading guidelines and the type of
equipment to be attached to the antenna support system. A safety factor is included in the
• design parameters resulting in a pole that typically exceeds local building code
requirements. We have included an structural integrity report of the antenna support
• system by a professional engineering detailing that the system is designed to bend but not
fall. (Exhibit C).
Drainage of the site will not be changed. This site will require single phase two hundred
(200) amp electrical service and a T1 telephone for utilities. US WEST Wireless agrees
to remove the antenna support system in twelve (12) months after the cessation of use,
unless a written exemption is granted to US WEST Wireless by the Zoning Administrator
of Elk River.
This site will enhance public safety and welfare because it will enable US WEST
Wireless Communications to bring new CDMA cellular technology to the area. CDMA
technology, which did not exist four years ago, now is considered the leading wireless
access technology in the industry. Police, firefighters and motorists will have greater
flexibility of wireless phone choices, which will allow them more security in placing
emergency calls as needed. Additionally, CDMA encoding will virtually eliminate the
possibility of phone number cloning and cell number theft.
US WEST Wireless is willing to provide for and accommodate co-location on the
proposed antenna support system. Screening of the equipment will be provided by trees
and scrubs which is illustrated in the enclosed site plan.
• ZONING REQUIREMENTS
The property is located at 19050 Industrial Blvd. N.W., Elk River and is zoned I-1
(Industrial). The placement of the antenna support system will have minimal impact on
neighboring properties and will allow for the development of personal wireless service to
serve the area of Elk River and the surrounding communities. This site does not meet the
necessary setbacks from the property lines. This site is also over a mile from the nearest
antenna support system.
The establishment, maintenance or operation of this site will promote and enhance the
general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety,
or comfort. PCS transmissions operate at very low power levels.
A variance will be needed in order to meet the necessary setbacks. The proposed antenna
support system is one hundred ninety (190) feet from the Southern property line, one
hundred ten (110) feet from the Northern property line, ninety (90) feet from the Western
property line and ninety (90) feet from the Eastern property line. The variance is needed
because the zoning allows setbacks equal to or greater than the height of the pole which is
one hundred fifty (150) feet. The ordinance/land use amendment will be needed to zone
the proposed site to allow for antenna support systems - create an AT (antenna tower)
district.
Special arrangements need not be made to accommodate access to the site. The proposed
• use will cause no traffic congestion or interference with traffic on the surrounding public
streets. Site visits will be rare and once the antenna has been installed. Parking will not
be an issue because site visits will be infrequent and of limited duration. This site will
have adequate utilities for the use and adequate access is provided to the site.
US WEST Wireless hopes this correspondence and enclosures address all issues. Should
you have additional questions regarding the attached information or would like to discuss
PCS technology further, please contact us at 612/642-6016. US WEST Wireless
appreciates the assistance that we have received from the Elk River staff and we look
forward to working with you to better serve the citizens of your community.
In conclusion, US WEST Wireless has designed a wireless Personal Communications
System for the Twin Cities and area communities that attempts to work within the
allowable zoning ordinances without compromising the intended service requirements of
the system.
Thank you for your time and consideration of this application.
Respectfully,
/4/ F4'
• Mr. Kenneth Nielsen
Real Estate Administrator for US WEST Wireless L.L.P.
0
U S WEST Wireless,L.L.C.
426 North Fairview Avenue Room 101
St.Paul,MN 55014
• P L. '+e�i. I F'Mdi Mil w
June 3, 1998
Mr. Scott Harlicker
13065 Orono Parkway
P.O. Box 490
Elk River,MN 55330
RE: Additional information regarding US West Wireless's proposed
Communications Facility at 19050 Industrial Blvd. N.W.
Site No. SCL-005
Mr. Scott Harlicker,
As you requested please find enclosed a narrative of the required findings for a variance
to be granted.
1) The literal enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue (unnecessary,
unavoidable, extreme) hardship.
• The required setbacks equal to the height of the monopole places an unnecessary
hardship for the proposed facility. As the structural integrity letter attached as
Exhibit C to the conditional use permit application indicates, in the event of
extremely high winds the monopole is designed not to fall but to bend like an upside
down j just enough to off-load the wind resistance. The literal enforcement of the
ordinance would force the pole to unnecessarily be placed 150'from all property
lines. This would place the facility near the center of most industrial zoned properties
which would greatly interfere with reasonable development of the property, or be
impossible due to existing development as is the case with the proposed site. It is
important to note that the proposed site is centrally located in an industrial park,
which greatly helps to buffer it from residential areas.
2) The hardship is caused by special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to
the land and structure involved and which are not characteristic of or applicable to
other lands or structures in the same district.
The hardship is peculiar to the land and structure involved. The proposed monopole
does not have the same safety concerns regarding setbacks, as would a building or
even a guyed tower. The proposed monopole location works with the existing fully
developed property and gives it at least 90'setback from all property lines. Ninety
feet is well over half the height of the monopole and clearly poses no threat to public
safety.
Access2T""Advanced PCSTM'
Paging Services
• 3) That the literal application of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the
petitioner of rights enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of
Ordinance.
This is not a typical use in any district of the city and therefore it is difficult to
compare this proposal to other uses and properties in the same district. The literal
application of the provisions of this Ordinance would unnecessarily deprive the
petitioner of utilizing a site that clearly complies with the spirit of the ordinance,
which is to not harm public health safety or welfare and to buffer monopole sites
from residential districts as much as possible.
4) That the special conditions and circumstances are not a consequence of the
petitioner's own action or inaction.
The special conditions result from a combination of two factors. The height of the
monopole which is dictated by the characteristics of wireless technology and the fact
that industrially zoned properties not adjacent to residential districts in Elk River are
approximately 375'x3 75'. This makes it very difficult to utilize the properties for
reasonable industrial use and still meet the required setbacks. (see attached map)
5) That the variance will not be injurious to or adversely affect the health, safety or
Welfare of the residents of the City or the neighborhood wherein the property is
• situated and will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Ordinance.
This criteria set forth by this paragraph is clearly the most relevant to the proposed
facility. The proposed location for this facility will not adversely affect the health
safety or welfare of the residents or the industrial neighborhood In fact, by
approving this variance allowing the proposed site to be located centrally in the
industrial park the welfare of the residents will be enhanced by not having a site
located on a larger parcel directly adjacent to a residential neighborhood Also, the
benefits to the community from digital wireless technology can't be understated
Most of the residents of Elk River already recognize the ability of wireless service to
enhance their lives with added security, convenience and productivity.
If you require any further information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to call
me at 642-6279. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Respectfully,
:4'---
.4411h,C
Mr. Kenneth Nielsen
Real Estate Administrator for US WEST Wireless
•
Exhibit A
Coverage and Capacity Letter
0
0
U S WEST Wireless,L.L.C.
426 North Fairview Avenue Room 101
St.Paul,MN 55014
IP
May 15, 1998
Zoning Board
City of Elk River
Elk River, Minnesota
Re: Coverage, capacity and interference study for US WEST Wireless site SCL005A
located at 19050 Industrial Blvd. NW, Elk River.
Dear Members:
US WEST Communications is scheduled to deploy a wireless Personal
Communications System (PCS) for the Minneapolis -St. Paul greater metropolitan
area in the second quarter of 1998. The intent of the deployed system will be to
provide ubiquitous wireless services to the Twin Cities and surrounding communities
including St. Cloud and communities along I-94& Hwy. 10 corridor. In order to meet
• the requirements of continuous (seamless) coverage and to be able to carry the
projected traffic, a cell site is currently designed to be built at 19050 Industrial Blvd.
Elk River, Minnesota.
In deploying a PCS system, distinguishing features from conventional Cellular
services currently available will be the PCS system's voice quality, capacity and
coverage depth. Utilizing Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) technology, US
WEST's system will provide voice quality that compares favorably to landline quality
with site capacity capabilities of approximately six times that of an analog cell site.
While choosing an appropriate location for a proposed cell site, we try to meet
the coverage and capacity objectives of that particular service area. In a typical
situation when a system designer is faced with a trade off between capacity and
coverage, the RF design engineer applies the knowledge of the terrain and
surrounding clutter to the site selection process. For the service area encompassing
19050 Industrial Blvd. NW, the analysis was as follows:
Coverage: One of the major and most visible differences between PCS and
Cellular systems is the area of coverage of an individual cell. Due to the higher
frequency of operation, PCS cells will have considerably smaller coverage areas than
Cellular cells. (For purely coverage, all things except frequency being equal, to cover
a given area at the PCS frequency (1900 MHz) versus the Cellular frequency (900
MHz) requires, 2-3 times more cells.) In order to cover the traffic on the heavily
• Hwy. 10, connecting the cities of Anoka and Big Lake to Elk River and to ensure
proper connectivity to our proposed cell sites to the South-East and North-West
Access2TN Advanced PCSTN
Paging Services
U S WEST Wireless,L.L.C.
426 North Fairview Avenue Room 101
St.Paul,MN 55014
III:WEST
respectively, while at the same time providing coverage to the surrounding
community in the heart of Elk River, a cell site was deemed necessary to be situated
in the vicinity of this location. To accomplish these coverage objectives our monopole
has been designed to be situated at a height of 150 ft. at the proposed location.
Capacity: CDMA technology has an inherent capacity advantage over
comparable (current) analog technologies. A conservative calculation puts this
capacity advantage at six times for comparable operating bandwidths. For a 1.23
MHz bandwidth (the bandwidth to be utilized in US WEST's initial deployment),
about 1000 subscribers per site can be supported during busy hour (with an
acceptable call blocking probability). For the corridor along Hwy. 10 which SCL005A
is designed to cover, the Minnesota DOT gives the traffic volume as approximately
31,000 automobiles per day, on average. A reasonable estimate of initial customer
penetration puts the traffic carrying requirements for a particular US WEST site in this
vicinity at approximately 250 mobiles during busy hour which equates to at least one
PCS cell site.
Interference: Our equipment manufacturer constructed our equipment to
comply with FCC mandated regulations, and we will not cause any interference to
any other broadcast systems.
• Site Selection:The site at 19050 Industrial Blvd. NW was selected because: (1)
drive test results indicated that this site fulfilled all our coverage requirements; (2)
mathematical analysis showed that it could meet the imposed capacity constraints.
Please do not hesitate to contact me directly at(612)642-6039 should you have
any questions regarding the study.
Sincerely,��ce/ el/
/2� Z : ./CAZ-
Khursheed Khan
RF Design Engineer
•
Access2TM Advanced PCSTM
Paging Services
i
Exhibit B
Rendering of Antenna Support System and Equipment
•
•
0
Exhibit C
Structural Integrity Report
•
•
ill
um ka. :y( 41:la-rl f 11LLEiiBc Rf ID _.._.. _ 77MILLER ru`{D P.1
JUN 05 '97 02t14PM
•� • .
June 5, 1997
?. Scott Ballance
• Bechtel
US West Wireless Project
426 North Fairview, Room 101
�' St. Paul,MN 55104
RE: Miferbernd Mfg. Co. Antenna Monopole Structural Integrity
The Millerbemd Mfg. Co. monopoles used by US West for this project meets or exceeds the
requirements of EIAJTIA 222 "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna
Supporting Structures" specification. This is the recognized specification for these types of
towers. When designing the structure, wind&ice loading along with the number, size, height
: -:, and style of mounting of the antennas are taken into account to determine the size of the
structure required. The structure will have an approximate safety factor of 1.5, or in other
words,will be 1.5 times stronger than it needs to be. The monopole has been designed to
withstand at least 100 MPH with a 1/2"thick coating of ice on the monopole and antennas.
III 0
Millerbemd Mfg. Co. only uses American-Made carbon steel(ASTM A572 or A6 7)which has
a 50,000 PSI min yield. All our steel is ordered with mdl certifications to verify integrity of the
material. The mill certifications are kept on file, should a copy be required at some future date.
Only AWS-D1.1 "Structural Welding Code" qualified personnel will be used during the wi-ldin¢
of the structure. Weld inspections will be performed by SNT-TC-1A qualified Non-Destructive
Test Personnel to verify the soundness of the welds.
With the pole designed and manufactured in accordance with the above criteria, Mi lerbernd
: • Mfg. Co. certifies that the monopole will not collapse. If for some reason,the wind loading
exceeds the monopole carry capabilities,the pole will not collapse,but rather the top of the pole
2"' will start to bend over and the pole will begin to look ltice an upside down I. The bending wi l
continue until the antennas at the top of the pole reach a position such that the wind is blowing
over the antennas and not into them Once this position is reached, the monopole will stop
bending and maintain that position. For the bending to happen, the wind would have to reach
over 175 MPH and be maintained for a length of time.
•
MILLERBERND MANUFACTURING COMPANY• P.O. BOX 98 • W/NSTED, MINNESOTA 55395
PHONE(320) 485-2111 • FAX(320) 485-4420
JUN 05 '97 01:14PM MILLERBERND MILLERBERND P.2
- 1J' 05 '97 02:14P
r
• Miflerbemd Mfg. Co. has been in business since 1933 and manufacturing monopoles since 1948.
Since then, thousands of monopoles have been built which are very siimiar to this type of
structure without a single one collapsing. Millerbemd has been building antenna monopoles
since 1990. In that time, 40 plus antenna monopoles have been built and also without any
collap sing.
If you have any questions or concerns,please call me at(320)485.2111.
•
Respectfully submitted,
Wade Linnertz,P.E.
Chief Engineer •
I hereby certify that this plan, specification,
or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly
Registered Professional Engineer under the
laws
/the 4eof Minnesota.
•t
Date 4/5141 Registration No. 24741
•
. .
1.b. may .4' N
rce or 11.4E VICRIL P ARK /
ITIFIV:,;.-.P*4'`441."7.41/1061:WWW :
111161.111 itifie
Zirk.sms F4f allk. Illain".701 Mr Ile
modioNim — ADDr:,'" &me Et .
rilli .n
OW ;- •41"! ••Ii d1014
• li • Ric LOCATION vs ift• ...ia. ,..-
.1.).:.__,„,_41.11. warai•0.,.../ ,".. .
AS a
4
1
TACir 4$.7?1%4'it Instiri
....4411.7.-,34- ,-Ire pi wiredin pogo** a
-iir,ems;4. rei:4vinime ft. .0.--
1
111.0 1
ilVi 7
.
,•.**j- •:vial mum "411.
T: .4.1.<:'—:•ii-- 1.7":12441.W.--151%.
- 40v.oft.is..vivito, ,...4,411:• I .. Vir
mamba •pit»..
.,..,-"ip.. ..winraZWI,
1110.1' i....gip I
am ,, .....
, Aiimir.8111,4?......iii
. Ah............
mom razads. +wt.. \- .4=a tal
• \ . 4
ab :14 1 POrk 111111 all : Pitalk4.41 -
....'''..........rasugui,:•41IN 1 , L,G 11.114 it - clipLir=
,as ms --.... drami, -•7 .. 111
1 ON ioN„,.... q.. tammi 1„--clitirlii—v •
1 Jail'404
'011aiir."1"11"1410111$314-19:71;. 4r al Ric 04041,..
L -,m,...-- • _ ....01. .
h ivivAt......0"-P. :•La4/11#1. -- III%' Ativiiiii;: i:•:,.:ii;P6474 \
aup olle
ar
-iii---% •-•!' il".5 tAkI:t1/Aik,•111111-. . \ „--
.
ii . „
s= ••
KW, aCt..fialb •ii4gZir u474." \ " ---
cf"*3 ....0 %lamenIit , ;12 .— Ntalliii:311 30-
IA
! i
1 ,PV
. , ..., .
;7M.VWSAO°' 6941N.. ,)7411i Fill.ft6. -
I,- 1411'&„.A- lit , Cl",-1oA-- N VIM.'• shir- zrt , 'Ft' MI
:7,,,:7::: :-. 111: if -•••KE '--. 111i.61.' R2b '42.111 - 1, 4ii Apkwigg in..
NMI ,
'•.t.240. Mill 1111! N12 Ink Mho.. ' ... N9101.-"E
,,r,z, iv • . ,' Ric .........
CROIKO - "II PIL A41111 lat ISM his, .11'-'7qg all -
Aiii',--. ' u•-:''' ....4 in .
..,,,,,
, itik, , 2,11,4140744 itrimr:el"raft- ":•.%.1! .
.7 Yid " s •
.., '1ICW414-4
,4111rZ 7
'''_..* 'fill .1. - .
IP ii.
.5. 40 Yeisitomora,,,:x•int....„...,!..„..L.L...„/ „...... .
A.L - • A, .....
h '''i IIPVII Atiiitoll
2,.1111- =II.IIIII..4111.greM,TS/Mir 4:2 t.4. li.. wit,. 4•.•
•••• ''-..n manawmp.RPIPPRI IIVP lil 0 0 tut...70.:,- lio&iv., •
0....,.., .. . ie. . . .f. •
r••••T.,..i&-m•pr."1:71--"Ne- .ollis es- us . gra co. I /, p ro
..„,,4„, ... „. ar.L. At..L.1. ...._41- it,251, wilt vs 1
I
..1-1.4)40014 ig, 11: lr:lc 11. 'My. etrorATillfrO. '
.-..i-x:=0. MP gl.r, tr, .L vidie- A
-%,411:1 _i Y) ,
g P: 7 'IOW •T/I0
,..... •- .................m....s................ 41 : r -. ---1- -
\t / LOCATION N-
k
cipi of
t14_,T
1 j 1 1 U S 47
F 4 I ' N.iver MAP CI 1 z.c cIT
13065 Orono Parkway • P.O. Eox -L 9 0 CAS E:
Elk River. MN f 5:30
LIJfrVES1 Wireless
•
0 44
i.... .. i: NI
4.1ti / ' ttIN r
_illit;,„,/ A
, .
.,I' -$
• ,...„,„ ,.,,,
'1_ t - A ' :it' 41,,A,,.v., .11:.,i i''/ tt
iii ,,,-__
. . y ,,a ..t. „ ,,,,----:--r- , ?..t i,...-„, ....i ”
r - � ° 4 "vim` tl�x"1 .,. 1 a �f "e4.#*,
•nom 4:4'4047;01�. t , n.;:,:4;',..",73z,
-x.m
. z r # ' ° ` a ?' n r: aic a i1,tP:pE .7., „ 4#-. ,A�� Ssk`i'''�Z'5 ' •`'C'tF
,* y�'a' � { 4yfr � -� ��te
, „ ' n i.^44..,...,:,, F Lod iJti'4,,r9{ r
,•f
J
SCL005
• 19050 Industrial Way
Elk River, MN
•
Exhibit D
Co-location Agreement
•
•
U S WEST Communications
426 North Fairview Room 101
St.Paul.MN 55104
Wireless
January 28, 1997
We,US West Wireless Group,understand the importance of co-locating on our PCS communications
towers and we will work to accommodate a second carrier on our facilities.
Any questions should be directed to:
Anthony Scgale
US West Wireless Group/Regional Network Operations Manager
426 North Fairview Avenue
St.Paul,MN 55104
612-642-6020
Thank you.
Sincerely,
•
Anthony Segale
USWest Wireless Group
Regional Network Operations Manager
•
Co-Location Technical Data Sheet
• US West has the following parameters:
PCS 12 Block,Actual Channels Used: 325,350,375
Base Station Tx Frequencies: 1946.25 MHz, 1947.5 MHz, 1948.75 MHz
Base Station Rx Frequencies: 1866.25 MHz, 1867.5 MHz, 1868.75 MHz
Modulation/Standard: Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum/CDMA IS-95
Maximum EIRP: +53dBm(37dBm+ 16dBi gain Antenna)
Channel Bandwidth: 1.2388 MHz
Antenna Information: Swedcom SP9014-DIN Antenna Size
Gain= 16dBi 42"x 4.5"x 4"
Azimuth Beam Width=90° Weight= 15 lb.
Elevation Beam Width=8° including mounting
hardware
(Desired)U S West PCS Antenna Height 10- 15 ft above surrounding clutter(center of antenna)
Standard Antenna Configuration: 2 antennae per sector
3 sector design, 120°each
Center of sectors at 0°, 120°,&240°w.r.t.TRUE NORTH
Horizontal Spacing:_ 3 ft to 6 ft.depending on antenna height.
• Governing FCC Rules: Code of Federal Regulations
Title 47(Telecommunications)
Part 24(subpart E)
Out of Band Emissions: Section 24.238(a) on any frequency outside a licensee's
frequency block,the power of any emission shall be
attenuated below the transmitter power(P)by at least 43 + 10
log(P)dB. This is an FCC requirement. Below are the
equipment specifications:
Note that F=Frequency of other party and Fbe=Frequency
at,$lock Edge, for E-block Fbe= 1945 and 1950 MHz
Out of block:<=13dBm/12.5kHz for[F-Fbe]<=1 MHz
<_-13dBm/Mhz- 1.2 dB/MHz[F-Fbe) for 1
MHz<[F-Fbe]<65 MHz
<_-90 dBm/MHz for[F-Fbe] 65 MHz.
Intermodulation Levels: Less than-125 dBm delivered to the antenna,at the 1dB
compression point of Tx amplifier.
AC power requirements: AC input voltage: 208/240 VAC,50/60 Hz,single phase
AC input current: 35 Arms @ 180 Vrrns @ 2KW DC
output.
•
•
•
Exhibit E
Removal Agreement
0
0
• Removal Agreement with Elk River
US WEST Wireless proposes to construct a one hundred fifty (150) foot antenna support
system at 19050 Industrial Blvd. N.W. We agree with the Elk River that US WEST
Wireless will remove the antenna support system within twelve (12) months after the
termination of its intended use.
t 144
e;Z e
Mr. John Theilen D:to
Construction Manager for US WEST Wireless, L.L.P.
AOP
Mr. Kenneth Nielsen
Real Estate Administrator for US WEST Wireless. L.L.P.
i
i
usWEST cola
19050 INDUSTRIA
ELK RIVER ,
MI
COUNTY:
SHERBURNI
•
PROJECT DIRECTORY
APPLICANT
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
426 NORTH FAIRVIEW AVENUE, ROOM 101
ST. PAUL, MN 55104
P: (612) 642-6012
F: (612) 642-6942
CONTACT: JOHN THIELEN
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
426 NORTH FAIRVIEW AVENUE, ROOM 101
ST. PAUL, MN 55104
P: (612) 642-6014
F: (612) 642-6942
CONTACT: DAVE JOHNSTON
S
DI I
1UNICATIONS
L BLVD .
NNESQTA
SITE :
SCLOO5
DRAWING INDEX
Z-1 TITLE SHEET
-2 VICINITY MAP tJIJE57 '
Z-3 SITE PLAN
Z-4 ENLARGED SITE PLAN
Z-5 ELEVATION
DESIGN TYPE _rz
19050 INDUSTRIAL REVD. N.W.
MONOPOLE E11C
SCL-005
MONOPOLE MOUNTED
ANTENNAS AND OUTDOOR
EQUIPMENT
sm mu
TITLE SHEET
scrr mawRff�
f9- ;
Ff
cow
a
y<y SCL-005 SITE
193rd Ava.N.W.
cc
m
ido
ro
�
Industrial Blvd. y
R
Meed R.
�a.
oto�okA�e
Rai®
•
IN
90th St
• >,
0
VICINITY MAP
C
_ � a
A
LD
1211 A
We IIILIDE NM mac LA
No.EWE ravmaa
IP
•
Main St
t [WEST
SITE NTOQYATgN
a
s 19050 INDUSTRIAL BLVD. N.W.
'` i ELK RIVER, MN
CL. 173rd Av SCL-005
DESIGN TYPE
MONOPOLE MOUNTED
ANTENNAS AND OUTDOOR
EQUIPMENT
SHEET TITLE
VICINITY MAP
sI+EET eEa ,�
Z-2
1 l : !/ Pwr DATE
-'L-- - PROPERTY LINE--`
• EXISTINGI U.G. IRRI
1
TING LIGHT POLE PARKING LOT
- EXIS
EXISTING PHONE PEDESTAL
I EXISTING POWER POLE PROPOSE()
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE AND LEAS)
PROPOSED
I 1 PROPOSED
REMOVE E
RE-INSTAL.
I A& PLANTS
Iii I
I EXISTING TREE (2) TO 'Air •
-
BE MOVED (TYP.) -.O
I LOCATION OF RE-
INSTALLED TREE (2
TOTAL) (TYP.)
N O I
I BUILDING 1
•
Y
U
0
iz
L„
1ag
o PARKING LOT
I
0
Z
N
w
W
SIDEWALK �,
I
L3
W
Fc
0
1
- Q
t
INDUSTRIA _
L sn \EV1 R
D
• 0,
0 SITE PLAN
!,
p
I gro) p
No.DATE MISR/PG eY Cf�py�
ATION PIPE
6' HT. CHAIN LINK i'FENCE
D AREA
US WEST EQUIP. BINET
US WEST MONOPOL
!STING LANDSCAPE OCK dc PLANTS
LANDSCAPE ROCK
AROUND FENCE PER METER
RSIVAEST
SITE R4rORiNTTON
19050 INDUSTRIAL BLVD. N.W.
ELK RIVER, MN
SCL-005
•-...... DESIGN TYPE
J
MONOPOLE MOUNTED
ANTENNAS AND OUTDOOR
EQUIPMENT
SHEET DILE
32' 64' SITE PLAN
SHEET NUYEIE7R REV
0
, ,7-1 -
,��
Z-3
i ,__, PLOT auE; 8 WY TM
•
PARKING LOT
PROPOSED
AND LEASE
PROPOSED
PROPOSED
REMOVE E)
RE-INSTAL.q
�
& PLANTS
P :: li
�
1111111111-11111...
•
CD
CO
0' 16' 32' EXIS Ii
out? BE BE MC
LOCATI
Imo INSTAL
E-D ENLARGED SITE PLAN
A
A
A
0 AA
aneE rw m e u /
No.GTE REVISIONS I BY Pac$P,tS
1 1r
6' HT. CHAIN LINK FENCE
:D AREA
US WEST E UIP. CABINET
US WEST M NOPOLE
<ISTING LAND CAPE ROCK & PLANTS
LANDSCAPE ROCK
AROUND FENCE PERIMETER
>Q
w ltd` VEST
EE
0
SCE WroftmA IDN
,IG TREE (2 OTAL) 19050 INDUSTRIAL BLVD. N.W.
ELK RIVER. MN
LVED (TYP.) SGL-005
DESIGN TVPE
ON OF R E- MONOPOLE MOUNTED
LED TREE (2 TOTAL) (TYP.) ANTENNAS DOOR
EQUIPMENT
SHEET TITLE
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SHEET Nyr9ER 1 REv
6X7Z-4 'o
T GTE: !wY f Y9e
o
Tr
•
Li
tr
`
o
:3
_=
4J
s �
I
N
r7 (� Z
w Z 3
'� 4J o
® �. .011:NMC u
,c4„...-r
Ne.[WE REWOOWS a•
Cr
0
Y
U !kip...
cc Lu 41,
WaZm ••i•i�� n o
•
oi�.•�
0 ••!4.4
_
RISZYIESIrt
0
(3 z
0
CO 0
0
INDUSTRIAL BLVD. N.W.
_J ELK RIVER, MN
SCL-005
O MONOPOLE MOUNTED
�-- NTENNAS AND OUTDOOR
Q EQUIPMENT
LLJ ELEVATIONS
ss74anwei050
Z-5 0
l 1 U PLOT MIE: a
F
PROPERTY LINE::-
•
,....._
PARKING LOT
I PROPOS
LINK FE
INSTAL.
I � AND MAT
REMOVE EXIST NG LANDSCAPE INSTALL.
I ROCK & PLANTS TO MAIC
4-,,:„..,::. -,6„,
1
`lJ
1 ,
, b
JQ
I EXISTING TREE (2) TO 10 P'
BE MOVED (TYP.) t S
BLK. HILLS SPRUCE, WO
I 6' B do B, 2 TOTAL
N
111
I BUILDING
IiU
O
ce
W
I a
c
N
i PARKING L
v
z
I N
x
W
SIDEWALK
I
D-
L 46
..._ O
__
...._
__
____
SND US 7—RIA 1
Esq RBouLI
0
• .
1 C SITE PLAN '/ Q'
z / /
A
A
M7w OI1T( RfMSIOMS R p.p
D 6' HT. CHAIN
4CE AND LEASED AREI
LANDSCAPE FABRIC I
CH EXISTING ROCK
2' HT. SHRUBS
-1 EXISTING
•
RWEPISIT
RIFDRIIATOPI
19050 INDUSTRIAL am N.W.
ELK RIVER, MN
SCL-005
DES01 Trac
MONOPOLE MOUNTED
ANTENNAS AND OUTDOOR
EQUIPMENT
saw vrkt
SITE PLAN
32' 64'
• R UMEX Rey
•
PLOT d11[. fl ivy MS
of i
•
MaJOOS avason n rot,
USWEST
COMMUNICATIONS
19050 INDUSTRIAL BLVD. N. W.
ELK RIVER, MINNESOTA
COUNTY: SHERBURNE SITE : SCL-
005
•
PROJECT DIRECTORY DRAWING INDEX
APPLICANT
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Z-1 TITLE SHEET
426 NORTH FAIRVIEW AVENUE, ROOM 101 ;-2 VICINITY MAP LIQ .5T
ST. PAUL, MN 55104
P: (612) 642-6012 Z-3 SITE PLAN
F: (612642-6942
CONTACT: JOHN THIELEN Z-4 ENLARGED SITE PLAN
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER Z-5 ELEVATION
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS DESIGN TYPE
426 NORTH FAIRVIEW AVENUE, ROOM 101 WS N=
ST. PAUL, MN 55104
Euc P: (612) 642-6014 aoSO i"SC:uA BLVD.N.w.
F: 612) 642-6942 MONOPOLE " "'""
C1-005
CONTACT: DAVE JOHNSTON
voNora.E"oUNTED
ANTENNAS AND OUTDOOR
EQUIPMENT
n+¢T MC
'MU SHEET
SPVST WY. ¢v
Z_1
A
• ��� •,‹ .
� •
4- SCL-005 SITE
193rd Ave.N.W.
s E
Industrial Blvd. y
S
RRi \
O Mead°w►'aj a
eR0 s
IS
a
a
z
0
Y
ke v
001 I—A
• % Main St
1\
1
/ LI WEST
.. \ lk
19050 INOUSTRML B N.W.
1 ELK RIVER,MN
a 173rd Av SCL-005
oaa PTV
a MONOPOLE MOUNTED
A ANTENNAS AND OUTDOOR
CM EQUIPMENT
0 90th St sm TS
VICINITY MAP
a\
O VICINITY MAP aO. ,a ,..
Z_2 0
6.
• ~` JR PROPERTY Ll.- s u . yy
II rt MOW Mk.WM. n r�Wa
EXISTING U.G. IRRIGATION PIPE
I I
I
EXISTING LIGHT POLE PARKING LOT
EXISTING PHONE PEDESTAL
EXISTING POWER POLE OPOSEAND SDEp'� CHAIN LINK NCE
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE EA
PROPOSED,LIS WEST EQUIP. INET
I PROPOSED US US WEST MONOPO
I REMOVE E1,STING LANDSCAPE OCK & PLANTS
RE-INSTAL LANDSCAPE ROCK
A& PLANTS AROUND FENCE PER METER
i
I I �� I
I ; I
J
I EXISTING TREE (2) TO
BE MOVED (TYP.) �•
LOCATION OF RE- 0
INSTALLED TREE (2
TOTAL) (TYP.)
I N O I
I BUILDING 7
«
I x J
I ^a
PARKING LOT
uminEsr
I i .6 \ I
SIDEWALK i
I iL I
rz
__ o
>m...wuw
_ Q I 19050 INDUSTRIAL BLVD.N.W.
---
_ I ELX RIVER,MN
SCL-D05
�N — _ _ ��
QSTRlq ANTENNAS
MOUNTED
ANTENNAS MID OUTDOOR
EQUIPMENT
�U�EVARD SQTT.II
SITE PLAN
0' 32' 64'
*UT NAR113I Rn
O SITE PLAN
Z-3 0
PLOT out. •..T II.
• • •
A
A
A
A
® = ^
PARKING LOT
PROPOSED 6' HT. CHAIN
LINK FENCE
AND LEASED AREA
PROPOSED US WEST E UIP. CABINET
PROPOSED US WEST M NOPOLE
REMOVE EXISTING LAND CAPE ROCK & PLANTS
RE-INSTALL LANDSCAPE ROCK
— -- / A& PLANTS AROUND FENCE PERIMETER
on:PG; . 111 •
x
_z
AI >-
W
LIMsr
m x o
_ , .y..a..}..
0' 16' 32' EXIS INC TREE (2 -OTAL) 19050 INOUSTRNL BLVD.N.W.
1 ',�..4,,� BE ?MOVED (TYP.) ELK R-0 YH
I I SCL-005
LOCATION OF RE- ���
TYPE
��',m o`�� INSTALLED TREE (2 TOTAL) (TYP.) ANTENNAS AN0 0UTDOOR
EQUIPMENT
VCR MU
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
O ENLARGED SITE PLAN °�
Z-4
LS
• • Ilk
k
®q l F ('
L CU
CO-
o
W
4....,
_>.
1 a
-I
o
I
w a Z m ���� 6 p_
Z_
O3 kV**
ISI ® p 0 IV.* -
Iii' a .:Wit
Niki
o
ce
�•AVi f- l sr
44411. (2
Z
b z ZZ
N N Z 2
0
w O Z
0 0
U
AR NOie1�iipl
CO 0
0 19050 INDUSTRAL BLVD,N W,
____I ELK RIVER.UN
SOL-005
z orwcN*.R
O NDNOPOLE NEWT
1-- ANTENNAS AND OUT DOER
Q EQUIPMENT
SHEET mll
LJ.I
w ELEVATIONS
w
• Z-5o
A
• 7-—-
0
~` y -T — PROPERTY LINE - —1 N 2
i.
1
1 -J \...______
PARKING LOT
I PROPOSED 6' HT. CHAIN
UNK FENCE AND LEASED ARD!{
INSTALL LANDSCAPE FABRIC I
IAND MATCH EXISTING ROCK
REMOVE EXIST NC LANDSCAPE INSTALL 2' HT. SHRUBS
I ROCK & PLA TS TO MATCH EXISTING
1
1.-
b
I 10
1
I EXISTING TREE (2) TO k IO.��' .O
BE MOVED (Trp.)I 0BLK. HILLS SPRUCE. 11.*14
4
6' B & B, 2 TOTAL
BUILDING
b
I o
1
ii PARKING LOT •
1 z LIJ'�IVFST
I E' III
SIDEWALK
I
r
EWrt.+o.erroi
19050 INDUSTRIAL BLVD.N.W.
ELK R VER.MN
SCL-005
I ...... omol m.t
NDUST,�gL — -I
MONOPOLE MOUNTED
/ KANTENNAS ANO OUTDOOR
EQUIPMENT
OVLEVARD
SITE PLAN
(I)
SITE PLAN 1 aloft - m
o' 32' ba 4.117 NMI. Wv
Z-6 0
, sireifpglitokup mmiw 1 ,, ,p liii ha--- . : 4 .- •.g. M1°i0
-=-0ARY 7 0 I
till ril ti,1-42 J i PITA i - zy
... 1.. .4. , F ‘.......... .
haw.
NW
(15200
; 1741/111 Vier rwermen _. s
FRESNO irigir $ , ,,, . .... •.....
g"-t, 0,444:4Npip. elm p
am, ,.\ ' 40 -44 a•111 ..if
lw Vs
ELGIN fj. po.i.,,„r* twig • 4 i g s;
df = .1 14P" etalatodli I ,/
(13100) 1 I \Ni SillV ' ••, i- 7i, I
1 ih -,E10.211 palarM meASA 4D
CHR . I. illitiliN „ mrmi WM I ,,,,.0,004..
'''
.101- 41111. NW Iv
O
. • , 17m I 1
(13(M) CONCORD . %%' '' .1 i WO ibiL4 ' • Ott‘ . 1 .4 4 :ill Cr gl 1 SOIIIRL,71t,I, % i
% ,,111 6 AligiN.11 .1. *as
• s
BOSTON
0.00) %.iwitt. •. 0,- ..i.„ ... if ,,, rwit.armages _ .1 ... •
ALBANY
4 <h., .. ..E exitirip II, Id
12800) Zwirxrio
•
p
."sin. L -r ',A..' I it.! 81 A Illit4r P1.11 - -•-•-•1-•--:•?+- . .
( U1418R0 ,I. •hop _ .
e JO ftr, , piti• • s ' ' - m - - • t 4
Ns I III
9 Er gall/0 if
lc a NON • •
02,00)
c, - ' I .......- ai AA '- i - ....-4----•'
. ./
,,, . --.... 4,
XENIA e Stanw..1.
AP f•-•
• ii ifiark Z'..-1..., i ,,,, _ It ,4. _ ..;.
I ..fitalltF 0!Of Alieh.Agebv,
4. .,.......sar tft›.:111111.: . , n ---,. ..1 ;I T .. , 0";t•I
WATSON :kittP.:;«
a- vli OC1:
,,,..0) .. ... . . ..,411.4 ill Pil IMF r/ 1111"Filgr 0:44 /4-,4• / : 61AI he IA '11'°%p a j'il
Q
i ••41.1 rf: ...f.-0-. -• al.•
VERNON o
.., • 4'
.,S.a. 44TIA PO 114:4101 PIMILINIV,,*r e'," .--;,,' , 'it . in • `2,,,.4e.1111411.,01.
(12500) UPLAND 0 . .4, ... . #2,... ..,,---, ..e. , ,• ..- iji -,,,„, -
. lt 1 .,- ...P.'" " 401, 1%.,fw.,.-3in t146. ----,---.-----. 1.,a,. -'-..,/,, ,, ." ,.._I ::
/0.- 7,‘,.. •
:. liktd4r;r4014 ' :; c'v _ ...A.
,4,... ti.,/„.,e,,,,.,,r.46,......'.,.......30:-,-/-7, . . .- °17..A1'-• . i ',' '''',.-dui/flit. 7. .,. 1/14\1111'....74. •
11P TIM
(12400)
,.i., . . 't•---I k.....-:•::-- = f 11. . t.. • -• -- 4 -. '
-gs- • -•,-.4- /
lif
IN a• 7 V7411
5,-,..ouR ,:, : ..........‘,...._.I '"::::1",..>„..„. -?AN N i --4.',t.' 41'-. 4-. -P°-. ...,:,.. „ ,... is.:.. ..to• iNy A
. .--I .....,_ ---, , iii, .# - LA***4-A.
ir
RUSH . 4, = kr, -'i:',...'::- 44-' .. '- ' M, :t... . Araiim
''-' va.--- a .0-714 I •. ..e, '-. - 4-.,---,,,i_j-i'i,•rt-t-
. ,
. • •
Iliiitt,_
QUINN • . I , ' . • bp, :471:1,13"4: an fliferrA NMI''-'"7-I 4" .'4 Alt 10* Ill •-.L7 P• 1`4
,r .,...... . ..,-,
• -- -,, A"4.47-4r '-'41 il gr. -evil i ir''' r' 411‘1.0; . . .Al& Ikt tal IN
onoo) - - ' +-1.... ..... _ All _.... .......,
PROCTOR ' • , ME kli.TM A 11111\t
°...„..y,Ag AI ER I,Viinir ii 1 ,,- ,,,o . immvrii -1
_.x..,?!. .....=. ':.n . .1 :- • ;:i,... .4110 . ail 111/1111
11E12ir/Aii
6: ...*- aPali i ....... -.4%4
(12,o3) ,. • sin . .71 For •,:
NORFOIX,'./-' ,. : • , Pi,.fin ...VII:: 4...
r ti 1 It
till
, 'id; ,in: c.-plea, r...... .
C12 ) 110114TON • 1,..,4 le '7 ...:• :2 r.-4.0 .8 . ,! ...11,6 _ _ . --..... 0,-v-idratim ha fa IP
_______,
INN .
... tilb ,....7, 4....s....07-.11 sty.. i ,a-.. Ato -a.22. ,,,,... Leib 42,41141.424;
• et ga 11"‘' .-.. ' Ill -•-• i 4 tyhribi,if I
Amik
.. /
rriCI .riffiriri 4.7
._.. , w. .... . 41 4 tc!
(-4-
sillIM,• .1:45111!..,47lia-411114. j ..,
..4 I 41 4 ‘ la t .1P411
Iiikio vim-if
8
8
[
4111 ..1 ‘...
0
fl-I ..-+,
. . ...,...
.01 all Mit
tio. till 11 ri
1......1 •
(1)
4.. 44111
t 1111111 :11111111111111:11Clirrilin 11.........m.11 -. Ib -Rini 7 111,1.r.ti Pliklitillii Pin I 'Ilk. ..k all
i i .. lir . 1W
s 44 IR . '
ti 71:_ki..... iii44 4. „,.„. ihe illo
g 111WilibiAli. Vi -
7:i r 1 .4, 1111 ...„. r=usum....„„„,,,mmommantommuumi 1116111111
ta,/AU a Mitt
kgpitijAtIttMejiliall MI irliiR :
'S 14, "1710111041-In
oliriann"Plearli ill%Ong
ti c!et10,01.1... wok?, ,..1.1.4:przt • .,./777.4,1711.... .. ' ''''". „. .-iviam,- , .,„Ailimatirik
1,..44.40,Jet..• i 1 liff4t•44',.11"1112PINPA
, -,.,...t.: -7--•
. ••
1 1 .at„ 1111:Sirlilliral HO'%:1)\ eat
•
t.9%.° - . ' VII 'I P(,,, an:?-71"Air i • _ ... Rtt
- r , .
• ';, • ill‘V
• 1
r....-__.
_
-
• • •
O�
a)2 4
a coo
r.) - 's I _() _----I
t. o co T )O G
D
s c
U
Ug *OS\WES NI a
, Nwy s.
APT/Aerial
Elk Rive W\ Cn y Hwy•2
:.--;1','441.- NNW 1111A1111- 11111111111.1"" .
, a 41 ,_.. __..,...., ---- -- -. 444\anift..- __%, i
Cnty Hwy 39 MAT&T
Gs
ti
/ \49, 0
;1.3 D
S EST
S WEST w = \liii
l
,�
111!)
0 2 4 r-% .'� I
lillt
;110
Miles SCL-005A
005A
/ \ 1/4.
Adjacent Sites
June 3, 1998