04-18-1983 CC MIN
REGULAR WEEKLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE
ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT THE ELK RIVER PUBLIC LIBRARY
APRIL 18, 1983
Members Present: Mayor Hinkle, Councilmembers Engstrom, Duitsman, Schuldt, and
Gunkel.
Members Absent: None
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Hinkle.
2. Agenda
ceUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO APPROVE THE APRIL 18, 1983 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA.
COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTLON. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
3. Minutes
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF APRIL 4, 1983 CITY COUNCIL
MEETING. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
4. Open Mike
Councilmember Gunkel indicated that she has contacted Mr. Ken Stueve, President
0:E the Jaycees regarding the placement of some play equipment, tires or culverts,
in Tot Park. Councilmember Gunkel indicated that Mr. Stueve indicated that
the Jaycees would be interested in working with the neighbors to fix up Tot
Park. Discussion was carried on regarding the location of an easement to get
to the Park.
5. Recognition of Officer Robert Petermann
Mayor Hinkle indicated that Police Officer Robert Petermann was recently
recognized by the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association as Officer of the Year,
Honorable Mention. Mayor Hinkle indicated that Resolution 83-5 is a resolution
recognizing Officer Petermann.
COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 83-5, A RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING
OFFICER PETERMANN AS OFFICER OF THE YEAR, 1983,HONORABLE MENTION. COUNCILMEMBER
DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 5-0.
Officer Petermann thanked the City Council and indicated his appreciation of
working for the City of Elk River, and Police Chief Tom Zerwas
6. Quit Claim Deed for Fairground Deed Restriction
Mayor Hinkle indicated that at a recent meeting of the County Board, the Board
members adopted a resolution authorizing the county to enter into a purchase
agreement for 42 acres owned by the Gospidar family, and requiring that the
City remove the existing deed restrictions on the 14 acres currently owned by
the Fairboard. Mayor Hinkle indicated that in a joint meeting of members of
the City Council, the Fairboard and the County Board, the necessity of a zone
change to accomodate the County's Fairground expansion was discussed. Mayor
Hinkle further indicated that information developed by the Fairboard will be
used by the City of Elk River to consider amending the City's Zoning Ordinance,
and to provide a conditional use for fairgrounds in R-1b Zones.
City Council Minutes
April 18, 1983
:rage Two
Council~ember Duitsman indicated that County Commissioner Frank Madsen had
indicated that the Quit Claim Deed could be given to the County contingent
upon purchase of the Gospidar property. Discussion was carried on regarding
the deed restriction and the need of a Quit Claim Deed to the County Board.
Further discussion was carried on regarding the effect of the purchase of the
property on the 1983 County Fair and subsequent years, as well as the trading
of the ball fields between the County and the City of Elk River.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE SIGNING OF A QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR
THE COUNTY FAIR PROPERTY TO THE COUNTY FAIRBOARD UPON THE SUCCESSFUL PURCHASE
OF THE GOSPIDARPROPE~TY BY THE COUNTY. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE
MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
7. Lion's Park Rezoning Public Hearing
The City Administrator indicated that the Elk River Lion's Club has requested
that their parcel of property in Ridgewood East Second addition be rezoned
from its existing classification of R-1b Single Family to R-3 Multiple Familyl
Townhouse. The City Administrator indicated that the Elk River Lion's Club
acquired the property during the planning of Ridgewood East Second Addition
and further indicated that the parel of property was donated to the Lion's
Club in fulfillment of the Park De ication requirements.
Councilmember Duitsman indicated t
Club in fulfillment of Park Dedica
the City should have some assuranc
would go to park development.
at if the land was donated to the Lion's
ion Requirements of the City, he felt that
that the money from the sale of the property
The City Administrator indicated t at the property is in the name of the
Lion's Club and that they are not ound by the City Council to dedicate the
funds to park development, but that it is the Lion's Club's intent to sell
the property and use the money fro the sale of the property to help with
the acquisition and construction 0 a park in what has been referred to as
the peat bog. The City Administrator indicated that the request for rezoning,
made by the Lion's Club, is in pre aration to sell the parcel of property,
as the R-3 zone would make it a more marketable piece of property than the
single family zone.
Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing.
Mr. Doug Hodkins of 19lst Street questioned what the property would be used
for and the possibility of a road built through the property.
The City Administrator indicated
allow for a development like the
indicated that in an R-3 zone it
15 units. The City Administrator
have plans for the property or a
would depend on the developer.
Mr. Dick Yaeger questioned why th
as originally proposed.
hat should the area be rezoned, it would
arrington Place development, and further
llows for a multiple dwelling of up to
indicated that the Lion's Club does not
eveloper, and that the extension of a road
Lion's didn't develop the area as a park,
City Council Minutes
April 18, 1983
Page Three
The City Administrator indicated that the Lion's tried to develop the area
as a park and had applied to the State for a grant, but were turned down,
basically because of location.
General discussion was carried on regarding the area and the various zones
in the area adjoining the proposed parcel of property for rezoning. The
City Administrator indicated that there was an R-4 zone and an R-3 zone in
the immediate area of the Lion's property.
Mayor Hinkle indicated that according to the Planning Commission minutes,
residents in the area were concerned that should this area be rezoned,
other vacant lots in the Ridgewood East development would also be rezoned
for multiple dwellings. Mayor Hinkle indicated that he could not see this
happening as that would be spot zoning, and that the City Council is very
much against spot zoning.
Discussion was carried on regarding the size of the area and how many units
could potentialtY be proposed for the total area. The City Administrator
indicated that a developer would have to have a plat approved by the Planning
Commission and 1ity Council, and therefore, the City Council can basically
dictate how the!plat should be developed.
Discussion was ~arried on regarding the type of multiple dwellings that could
be built in thelarea, and .whether or not there would be low income homes.
The City Admini$trator indicated that it would be up to the developer as to
the type of fin~ncing available for a project.
I
Mr. Wally Fox, 1 representative of the Lion's Cluh, indicated that the whole
purpose of the rezoning request was to make the property more marketable,
and therefore, mse the proceeds for development of another park.
!
!
Councilmember D*itsman indicated that a multiple family zone for that area
would provide more income. for the Interceptor Sewer Lines which therefore,
would benefit the whole City. Mayor Hinkle indicated that there is a need
for multiple dwelling zones within the City of Elk River.
Mr. Rick Breezee, Building and Zoning Administrator indicated that the
Planning Commission had expressed their concern of looking beyond this
specific zone request with regard to zoning and the zoning of additional
property for multiple family. Mr. Breezee further indicated that the
Planning Commission moved to deny the zone request in favor of looking at
a larger area for rezoning.
Discussion was carried on regarding the inconvenience of the residents in
the area by more people walking through the shortest route to the sChool.
The City Administrator indicated that the City could deal with those type
of problems by requiring buffer zones or sidewalks in the development, by
the developer.
Councilmember Schuldt asked if there was a definite commitment from the Lion's
regarding the development of another park in the peat bog.
Mr. Wally Fox indicated that the Lion's Club currently had approximately $20,000
for park development, and that it was the intent of the Lion's Club to use the
proceeds of the sale of the proposed property for rezoning to be used for
City Council Minutes
April 18, 1983
Page Four
development of a park in the peat bog. Mr. Fox indicated that the proposed
park in the peat bog would be for "people", without ball fields, and further
indicated that the ultimate dream is an open air swimming pool. Mr. Fox
indicated that the Lion's Club could send a letter to the City stating the
intent of the Lion's Club to use the proceeds of the sale of the property
in the Ridgewood East Second Addition, for the development of a park in
the Peat bog.
Further discussion was carried on regarding the compatibility of the rezone re-
quest to the rest of the area. Councilmember Schuldt indicated that there was
a shortage of multiple housing zoning within the City of Elk River, and felt
that a rezone request could be a benefit to the City. Councilmember Schuldt
further indicated that as there is not a thru street, the traffic would be re-
stricted in the area, and further indicated that the parcel of property in the
south could be used as a buffer zone from the Schoolview Addition. Council-
member Schuldt further indicated that he felt the rezone request was a better
solution than any other for this specific parcel of property.
Councilmember Gunkel indicated that she agreed with Councilmember Schuldt, but
further indicated that she had never heard of a request for rezoning in order
to make a piece of property more marketable.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE THE REZONE REQUEST BY THE ELK RIVER LION'S
CLUB FOR A PARCEL OF PROPERTY IN THE RIDGEWOOD EAST SECOND ADDITION FROM THE EX-
ISTING CLASSIFICATION OF AN R-lB TO AN R-3 CLASSIFICATION. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL
SECONDED THE MOTION~ THE MOTION PASSED 5-0.
8. Brutger Variance Request - Public Hearing
Mayor Hinkle indicated that the Brutger Companies have requested a setback var-
iance for five of their existing buildings in the Ridgewood East Second Addition.
Mayor Hinkle further indicated that the reason for the variance request appears
to be that in several incidences the eaves on one or more of the garages en-
croaches into a front or sideyard setback and some foundations encroach from.l
to .8 inches beyond the requirement. Mayor Hinkle indicated that it was basically
a clean up of a small problem that is virtually meaningless in terms of any impact
on the City Zoning or Subdivision Ordinance.
Rick Breezee, the Building and Zoning Administrator, indicated that the Brutger
Companies have been most cooperative to work with during the construction of their
project in the City of Elk River. Mr. Breezee indicated that he has been in the
building profession for the past five years and has not worked with another company
that had done as good a job and has been as cooperative to work with. Mr. Breezee
indicated that when measuring over mounds of dirt, an inch up to six inches is not
unlikely to happen.
Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing. No one appeared for or opposed to the
variance request.
COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTORM MOVED TO GRANT A VARIANCE REQUEST TO THE BRUTGER COMPANIES
FOR A SETBACK VARIANCE FOR FIVE BUILDINGS IN THE RIDGEWOOD EAST SECOND ADDITION.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
City Council Minutes
April 18, 1983
Page Five
9. Amendment to Subdivision Ordinance Section 1008.22 - Public Hearing
Mayor Hinkle indicated that Ordinance 83-4 is an amendment to Section 1008.22
of the City Subdivision Ordinance dealing with the paving requirements of
the City of Elk River. Mayor Hinkle indicated that the Ordinance requires
what the City has already done.
Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing. No one appeared for, or in
opposition, of the amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance.
COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED
ORDINANCE SECtION 100a.22.
MpTION PASSED 4~0.
TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 83-4 AN AMENDMENT TO SUBDIVISION
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE
10. G~tes Avenue Road Improvement and Ordering Bids.
Mayor Hinkle indicated that the City has received notification that the
State has completed its review of the MSA Road Project for Gates Avenue,
and that the City is in the position of being able to receive bids for the
project.
Mr. Terry Mauer of Consulting Engineers Diversified, indicated that the State
approved the Gates Avenue project plans, and that it was his recommendation
that the City Council advertise for bids as it is necessary to advertise 21
days. Mr. Terry Mauer suggested that the City take bids May 12 and stipulate
in the specifications that the City Council may have 60 days to award the bid.
Councilmember Duitsman indicated that he felt the City Council should advertise
for bids as soon as possible. Councilmember Gunkel questioned the sequence
of the Gates Construction Project with regard to the ordering of the project
and the taking of bids.
The City Administrator indicated that as long-as all of the steps are taken,
it is not critical as to how they are done, and further indicated that there
is a typical sequence of holding a public hearing, ordering plans and spec-
ifications, receiving bids, and ordering the project.
Councilmember Gunkel questioned the point of no return, that is, could bids
be taken and yet the project not be awarded. Discussion was carried on re-
garding the way the specifications are written and the fact that a portion
of the contract could be awarded, or all of the project. Mr. Terry Mauer
indicated that the specifications are written such that the street will be
bid separately with regard to the north half and the south half, as will the
storm sewer and the water, and that any part of, or all of the projects
could be awarded.
Discussion was carried on regarding the placement of water pipe in the street
improvement of Gates Avenue and water pipe on 5~ Street and 5th Street.
Further discussion was carried on regarding the funding of the project and
what portions will be covered by MSA funds.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE
GATES AVENUE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT AND TO INCLUDE A PERIOD OF 60 DAYS FOR AWARD
OF THE BIDS IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
City Council Minutes
April 18. 1983
Page Six
11. Ordinance Requiring.LiquorLiability Insurance for 3.2% Beer License
The City Administrator indicated that at a recent City Council meeting. the
City Council expressed its desire to adopt an ordinance which would require
that all holders of liquor licenses, including non-intoxicating malt liquor
licenses, be required to have liquor liability insurance. The City Admin-
istrator further indicated that new legislation has raised the limits for
liquor liability insurance, and further indicated that the two proposed
ordinance amendments addressed the new limits issue, and the requirement
of liquor liability for non-intoxicating malt liquor license holders.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 83-6. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
SECTION 802.04 AN APPLICATION FOR LICENSE OF THE CITY CODE. COUNCILMEMBER
SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 83-7, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
SECTION 800.04 LICENSE APPLICATION OF CITY CODE. COUNCILMEMBERDUITSMAN
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4~0.
12. A 3.2% Beer License for Entertainment Concepts. Inc.. at City Ball Fields.
The City Administrator indicated that at the time of his memo to the City
Council, Mr. Reg Powell was the only person that had come into the City
and applied fora 3.2% Beer License for the City ball fields. The City
Administrator indicated that since that time. someone else has also
applied for a 3.2% beer license for the City ball fields. The City Admin-
istrator further indicated that in talking to the City's Attorney regarding
the issuance of a 3.2% beer license to a private individual, the City
Attorney indicated that the City could not issue a license to a private
individual or corporation on City owned property. The City Administrator
suggested that the City Council table the license request by Entertainment
Concepts.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO TABLE THE 3.2% REGULAR ON SALE BEER LICENSE
REQUEST BY ENTERTAINMENT CONCEPTS. COUNCILMEMBERSCHULDT SECONDEDTHEMOTIO~.
THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
City Council Minutes
April 18, 1983
Page Seyen
13. Administrator's Update
A. Cable Television.
The City Administrator indicated that a draft of the Joint Powers Agreement
for the proposed Sherburne/Wright County Cable Communications Commission has
been sent to all cities involved in the cable process. The City Administrator
further indicated that at this time he has received an agreement from the City
of Cokatot and the City of Big Lake. The City Administrator indicated
that an Advisory Commission will be set up to do the leg work for the cable
TV process which would involve the soliciting of bids and recommended franchise.
The City Administrator indicated that each Council will award the contract. The
City Administrator further indicated that Mr. Tom Creighton will discuss the
Joint Powers Agreement with the City Council.
B. City Administrator's Conference
The City Administrator indicated that the City Manager's Conference is scheduled
for May 11, 12 and 13 at Cragun's Lodge in Brainerd.
COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO APPROVE THE ATTENDANCE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR
AT THE CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE IN BRAINERD. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED
THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED. 4-0.
C. Deputy City Clerk's Conference.
The City Administrator indicated that the International Institute of Municipal
Clerks will be holding their annual national conference in Minneapolis, May
22-26. The City Administrator indicated that the conference could be an
opportunity for the Deputy City Clerk to attend a national conference and
receive the benefits at a very modest cost, which were anticipated in the
1983 budget.
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE ATTENDANCE OF THE DEPUTY CITY
CLERK AT THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MUNICIPAL CLERK'S NATIONAL CONFER-
ENCE, MAY 22-26. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
PASSED 5-0.
D. Old #101 Bridge Replacement Review.
The City Administrator indicated that a cost estimate of the project has been
received, and further indicated that the Bridge plans are at the State for
their approval. The City Administrator further indicated that the next step
in the process is funding approval.
E. Board of Review.
The City Administrator indicated that the Board of Review is scheduled for
April 27, at 7:00 p.m.
F. Heavenly Hills Feasibility Study
The City Administrator indicated that the Feasibility Study for the Heavenly
Hills Project has been completed and the next step is to schedule a public
hearing.
City Council Minutes
April 18. 1983
Page Eagiht
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO ACCEPT THE FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE HEAVENLY
HILLS PROJECT AND TO ORDER A PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 16. 1983. at 8:00 P.M.
COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
G. School Street.
Mr. Terry Mauer presented a copy of a letter to Mr. Bauerly regarding the
School Street Project. Mr. Mauer indicated that the letter was with regard
to the completion of the project and the problems that need to be solved.
H. Notice from the PCA to amend the landfill permit in Elk River.
The City Administrator indicated that the City received notice of request
for a public hearing regarding the amendment to a landfill permit for the
landfill in Elk River. The City Administrator indicated that the City would
request a Public Hearing to find out what can be done regarding the problems
with the Elk River Landfill.
1. Gravel Tax.
The City Administrator indicated that he had been in attendance at the State
Legislative Tax Committee regarding the Gravel Tax. The City Administrator
indicated that there was a lot of sentiment statewide against the Gravel Tax
and that the proposed bill would eliminate the Gravel Tax. The City Adminis-
trator indicated that the hearing would be continued the following Wednesday.
General discussion was carried on regarding the Gravel Tax Bill, and the
option of anotherbii1 which would allow counties to opt for or against the
Gravel Tax. Further discussion was carried on regarding the pros and cons
of this Gravel Tax.
14. Check Register
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE APRIL 18, 1983 CHECK REGISTER.
COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION.' THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
15. Tentative Agenda
The water study is tentatively scheduled for the next City Council meeting.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED THAT THE MEETING
BE ADJOURNED. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED
4-0.
Respectfully Submitted,
C:;~!':ed~~/L
Deputy City Clerk Treasurer