Loading...
06-04-1984 CC MIN REGULAR WEEKLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL HELD AT THE ELK RIVER PUBLIC LIBRARY MONDAY, JUNE 4, 1984 Members Present: Mayor Hinkle, Councilmembers Engstrom, Duitsman, Schuldt and Gunkel Members Absent: None 1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Hinkle. 2. Agenda Item 12~ - Elk River Country Club Set Up License, Item 12 3/4 - Ridgewood Association Roads, Item 13 - Administrator's Update (H) -Speed Zone on Highway #10, (I) - Liquor Store Employee (J) - Councilmember Gunkel's Item Tot Park, Public Hearing Letters, and (K) - Councilmember Engstrom Issue - R-rated movies and Item 13~ - Check Register; were items added to the June 4, 1984 City Council agenda. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE JUNE 4, 1984 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AS AMENDED. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 3. Minutes of May.7 and May 21 City Council Meetings Mayor Hinkle requested that the word blacktopping be stricken from Item 6 - Road Standards and Policies, and acceptance of necessary improvements to 218th Avenue Northwest. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 7, 1984 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AS AMENDED. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. Councilmember Gunkel requested that Item 5~ - Feasibility Study for East Main Street Watermain Improvement, be changed to Feasibility for East Watermain Improvement. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 21, 1984 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AS AMENDED. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 4. Open Mike No one appeared for this item. 5. Board of Review - Continuation Mr. Jerry Kritzeck, Assessor for the County Assessor's office, indicated that at the Board of Review meeting, Mr. and Mrs. Goodfellow requested that the Assessor's office reconsider their property in the Camp Cozy Addition. Mr. Kritzeckfurther indicated that the County Assessor's office had appraised the property at $57,200 and after a physical inspection of the '" City Council Minutes June 4; 1984 P age Two property approximately a week ago, it was determined that there were some moisture problems, some outside work that had not been completed and some deterioration of the buildings , therefore, he depreciated the value five percent and recommends a reduction in the appraised value to $52,700. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE FOR THE GOODFELLOW PROPERTY IN THE CAMP COZY ADDITION TO $52,700. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. Mayor Hinkle indicated that Mr. and Mrs. Temple have requested a re- assessment of their property in the Lundgren Home Addition. Mr. Jerry Kritzeck of the County Assessor's office indicated that he inspected the Temple property and found that the size of the bedrooms were much smaller than would be expected for that size house and therefore, lowered the grade of house for determining assessed value. Mr. Kritzeck further indicated that the knotholes in the outside siding were falling out and that birds were getting inside of the sheeting. Mr. Kritzeck indicated that he recommended the assessed value change from $89,300 to $78,600. COUNCILMEMBERDUITSMAN MOVED TO ACCEPT THE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S RECOMMENDATION FOR THE TEMPLE PROPERTY IN THE LUNDGREN HOME ADDITION TO BE ASSESSED AT A VALUE OF $78,600. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 6. Signal Agreement Between Mn/Dot and the City of Elk River for Highway #169 and Main Street Signal The City Administrator indicated that the agreement between Mn/Dot and the City of Elk River is for the installation of a signal light and the associated turn lanes at Highway 4/:169 and Main Street. The City Admin- istrator indicated that the City is in the process of getting the pre- liminary engineering and design work fees paid through MSA funds. Mr. John Gilbertson, Engineer with Consulting Engineers Diversified, indicated that the Main Street project and the signal light project would be combined and all engineering costs would be submitted for reimbursement through the MSA funds. Mr.. Gilbertson indicated that the State engineer indicated thatMSA would pick up the additional preliminary engineering costs. Mr. Gilbertson indicated that when there is a split project such as the Main Street project, it does cause some confusion as the State does not generally use consultants. The City Administrator indicated that in order to get the signal light at #169 and Main Street, it was necessary that the City of Elk River split the engineering project with the State of Minnesota. The City Administrator further indicated that the State will do all of the engineering for the Highway #10 and Proctor signal and the City will just pay their share of each project. The City Administrator indicated that the City's attorney has reviewed the agreement and does not have a problem with the agreement. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 84-7, A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT City Council Minutes June 4, 1984 Page Three WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING.INTERSECTION CONTROL BEACON AND THE INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AT HIGHWAY #169 AND MAIN STREET. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 7. Barrington Place Replat - Public Hearing Mayor Hinkle indicated that this item is a joint meeting between the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider a replatting of a certain portion of Barrington Place. Mayor Hinkle indicated that the replatting is basically a formality as the concept and original layout waspreviously approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council. Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing. Mr. Gary Santwire introduced Mr . Lynn McLaughlin andMr . Lyle McGloughin as M & S Developers, the current owners of the townhome lots in Barrington Place. Mr. Santwire indicated that Lot 36 in Block 3is not included in the replatting and further indicated that the replatting involves Lots 1 - 8 boundaries. Mr. Larry Toth questioned the issuance of a building permit without a plat. Mr. Gary Santwire indicated that the density has already been approved and the replatting just involves the changing of the boundary lines of the eight-unit building so as to allow the owners to build condominium units. Mayor Hinkle indicated that the replatting process was to alJow the builders to sell the units in a different manner and that the replatting just allowed for a different type of ownership. Discussion was carried on regarding the misunderstanding by people that were notified of the public hearing with regard to the density allowed for the area. General discussion was carried on regarding the process necessary for replatting to allow for a different type of ownership. Mr. John Pearce, Acting Chairman of the Planning Commission, indicated that the Planning Commission does not have a problem with the plat as proposed. COMMISSIONER TRALLE MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT OF LOTS 1-8 BLOCK 3, BARRINGTON PLACE ,TO THE CITY COUNCIL. COMMISSIONER HARTMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. COMMISSIONERS TRALLE , PEARCE, HARTMAN AND WILLE VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION. NO ONE VOTED AGAINST. Mr. Lynn McLaughlin, developer for the townhomes in Barrington Place, indicated that as they developed the project and find the needs of the community, they may have to consider replatting of other parcel to satisfy those needs. Mr. Lyle McGlaughlin indicatedthay they will do their best to communicate to the City Council the communities needs with regard to the Barrington Place project. City Council Minutes June 4, 1984 Page Four COUNCILME11BERGUNKELMOVED TO APPROVE THE REPLAT OF LOTS 1. - 8, BLOCK 3, BARRINGTON PLACE. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 8. East Main Street Water Improvement - Public Hearing Counci1member Gunkel indicated that this public hearing is held to consider the replacement of the watermain between Gates Avenue and Evans Avenue. Counci1member Gunkel indicated that the replacement of the watermain was not a part of the Main Street feasibility study, therefore, no costs were available at the Main Street public hearing. Councilmember Gunkel further indicated that this was a public hearing to consider the project and not an assessment hearing. Counci1member Gunkel indicated that the costs for the replacement of the watermain are approximately $38,181. 00 which would amount to $1,765 per lot. Counci1member Gunkel indicated that becaus.e of the costs of the watermain replacement, the Utility C01mnission and the City Council met to discuss. how to pay for the project. Councilmember Gunkel indicated that it was determined that a split of 50 percent assessments and 50 percent water revenues could be used to finance the watermain improvement and that this method would be most appropriate. Counci1member Gunkel indicated that she would like the City Council to consider another alternative. Councilmember Gunkel indicated that even though the sanitary sewer is old and defective and needs replacement, it is proposed that no assessment will be made as the replacement costs can be paid out ofa revenue fund generated by the sanitary sewer utility. Councilmember Gunkel further indicated that the watermain is old and deteriorated but the utility does not have funds available for replacement. Counci1member Gunkel indicated that she would like the City Council to consider the possibility of using the funds generated by the assessment of the street replacement costs for financing of the watermain improvement. Councilmember Gunkel indicated that she felt it may be time for the City Council to consider this type of policy for replacement of old watermains, as there are not water utility funds available. The City Administrator indicated that the replacement of the sanitary sewer lines is also designed for re~routing to take pressure off of another area of the sanitary sewer line; therefore, it has a bigger purpose and difficult to define the area of benefit for assessment. The City Administrator indicated that the City Council must consider the whole project and that whatever policy the City Council decides will seta precedent for other areas within the City. The City Admin- istrator further indicated that it is legal to use the MSA funds as Counci1member Gunkel proposed. The City Administrator indicated that the assessment as proposed with a 50-50 split as compared to other projects, is not unreasonable and further inciated that the project as proposed is consistent with the School Street improvement project. The City Administrator further indicated that the monies replacing the MSA funds are proposed to be used for other projects in the City as proposed in the City's Capital Improvement Program. Mayor Hinkle indicated that based on the City's Capital Improvement program, the residents on west Main Street will be incurring the same costs as proposed for the residents on east Main Street in the very near future. City Council Minutes June 4, 1984 Page Five The City Administrator reviewed a typical assessment for the residents on east Main Street as proposed with a 50-50 split of the watermain costs between assessments and the water utility fund. Ms. Linda Hageseth, a resident on Railroad Drive, indicated that her watermain is now hooked to the watermain on Main Street, and questioned the possibility of it being hooked to the Gates Avenue watermain. Discussion was carried on regarding the possibility of the Hageseth property being hooked into the Gates Avenue watermain. Ms. Ellie Kretsch questioned the possible benefit to the residents on the east side of Highway #169, based on the upgrading of the watermain as proposed from a four-inch pipe to a six-inch pipe. Discussion was carried on regarding the necessity of replacing the water- main between Gates and Evans because of its deterioration and the current minimum requirements of a six-inch pipe. Ms. Peggy Bode indicated that she did agree with the fact that the water- main should be replaced and further indicated that she was very concerned about the cost that would be assessed to the individual property owners. Ms. Bode indicated that the property owners needed some help in paying for those costs. Discussion was carried on regarding the use of MSA funds, the School Street project, and the Gates Avenue project. The City Administrator indicated that the Gates Avenue project was not the same as the School Street project or the Main Street project as Gates Avenue, prior to the expansion into the planned unit development, was an average residential street and because of the planned unit development, was expanded to a major thoroughfare street. Councilmember Duitsman indicated that the City Council must discuss the various options and the 5 year Capital Improvement program prior to setting a policy regarding the use of MSA funds for major development and infra- structure replacement. Councilmember Duitsman further indicated that if there were excess funds, the City could authorize those funds to be spread over the various completed projects. Further discussion was carried on regarding the necessity of planning and a capital improvement program. Mr. Kermit Bode indicated that he felt the MSA funds should be used to help the people on Main Street, and as the water utility fund is increased, this fund could be used to help other projects in the future. Ms. Peggy Bode expressed her appreciation of Council member Gunkel's work in trying to find alternatives for the payment of the watermain improvement and further, requested that the City Council consider Councilmember Gunkel's proposal. City Council Minutes June 4, 1984 Page Six Mayor Hinkle indicated that the public hearing was held to hear the public's comments and further indicated that the City Council would consider their comments and be as fair as possible in working out a policy that will work for the whole community. Councilmember Schuldt indicated that he was a resident of west Main Street and therefore, very concerned with the precedent set by the methods of assessment used for the east Main Street project. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 84-16, A RESOLUTION ACCEPTIN~ THE FEASIBILITY STUDY AND ORDERING THE WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT FOR THE EAST MAIN.. . STREET PROJECT. AND ALSO. TO AWARD THE BID TO NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION. COUNCIL- MEMBER GUNKEll SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. Mr. John Gilbertson of Consulting Engineers Diversified then reviewed the plans of the sidewalk on the north side of the street and the striping proposed for east Main Street. Ms. Ellie Kretsch indicated that she wanted the sidewalk back on the south side of the street. Mr. Kermit Bode also expressed his interest in having the sidewalk back on the south side of the street. Discussion was carried on regarding the placement of the sidewalk on the south side versus the north side of the street. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE SIDEWALK TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE SOUTH. SIDE OF THE STREET. . COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION FAILED 2-3. MAYOR HINKLE, COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT AND COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN OPPOSED. It was the consensus that the sidewalk would remain as planned on the north side of east Main Street. 9. Re-Assessment of Lot in Barrington Plaoe The CitY, Clerk indicated that the public hearing is held to reassess a parcel of property in the Barrington Place development. The City Clerk indicated that at the October 1982 assessment hearing for Barrington Place, Lot 19, Block 3, was assessed $1,400.00 and yet the property owners have a statement from the City stating that the assessments were paid. The City Clerk indicated that the confusion came about due to the sale of properties and repayment of assessment fees for the actual hearing. The City Clerk further indicated that the Barrington Place developer, Mr. Gary Santwire, indicated that there was a possibility of a mistake in the October 1982 assessment, as one of the single family lots in Block 1 was assessed less than the other single family lot. Therefore, Mr. Santwire suggested that the $1,400 assessed to Lot 19, Block 3, be reassessed to Lot 2 Block 1 in the Barrington Place development. The City Clerk recommended that the City Council approve the proposed reassessment for the property described as Lot 2, Block 1, Barrington Place. Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing. No one appeared for or in opposition of the proposed reassessment hearing. Mr. Gary Santwire indicated that the r . City Council Minutes June 4, 1984 Page Seven reassessment of the single family lot would bring the assessment of that lot more in line with the other single family lots. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE REASSESSMENT OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2, BLOCK 1, BARRINGTON PLACE. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 10. Change Order for Sanitary Sewer on East Main Street Improvement Project Mayor Hinkle indicated that the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisor and the City's Engineer, Mr. John Gilbertson determined that there is a section of sanitary sewer that needs to be replaced in the east Main Street improvement project. Mayor Hinkle indicated that in televising the sanitary sewer line it was apparent that most of the sewer line joints are offset, there are several places where roots are beginning to grow into the joints, and that there are several cracks in the line,. as well as several residential services that protrude into the lines . to such an extent that they may cause future backups. Mayor Hinkle indicated that the change order would allow for approximately 335 feet of sewer to be replaced for a bid price of $11 ,415.00. Discussion was carried on regarding the inspection process and the assurance that residential services are hooked into the sewer line properly. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO APPROVE THE CHANGE ORDER FOR SANITARY SEWER REPLACEMENT ON EAST MAIN STREET FOR A NET COST OF $11,415.00. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 11. Pay Estimate #2 for Heavenly Hills COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE PAY ESTIMATE #2 TO S & L EXCAVATING FOR THE HEAVENLY HILLS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $49,102.65. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED. THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 12. Pay Estimate 1f7 for Gates Avenue Improvement Project COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE PAY ESTIMATE if7 AVENUE IMPROVEMENTPROJUCT TO.BARBAROSSA AND SONS, INC. $42,828.95. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. 4-0. FOR THE GATES IN THE AMOUNT OF THE MOTION PASSED Councilmember Gunkel indicated that there are two residents that have not had their sand points restored by the contractor. Mr. Phil Hals, Street Superintendent, indicated that he has talked with the inspector on the project and that they are working with the super- intendent and the gas company to get the sand points replaced and restored. Mr. Hals indicated that the gas company was responsible for the Rydell property problem. It was the consensus that the check to Barbarossa and Sons not be released until the problems with the two property owners and their wells be solved. City Council Mintues June 4, 1984 Page Eight 12~. Set Up License for the Elk River Country Club COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO APPROVE A SET UP LICENSE FOR THE ELK RIVER COUNTRY CLUB. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 12 3/4. Ridgewood Association Roads Councilmember Duitsman indicated that the members of the Ridgewood Association want to meet with the City Council on June 25 to discuss the roads in their development and how they may be improved and paid for. It was the consensus that the City Council would meet with members of the Ridgewood Association at the June 25 City Council meeting. 13. Administrator's Update A. Ground Cover Discussion was carried on regarding the ground cover and cleanup of the property along Highway #10 between UPA and the City property. Mayor Hinkle indicated that Mr.~Mag(Johnson, member of the Beautification Committee, indicated that he cannot get someone to clean up the dead brush and trees along that portion of the highway. Mayor Hinkle further indicated that Mn/Dot indicated that the City could clean up "the area without causing any type of soil erosion. It was the consensus that the City staff will organize some individuals to clean up the bank along Highway 1110. B. Proctor Avenue and Highway #10 Signal The City Administrator indicated that the County has indicated their intent to participate in the Highway #10 and Proctor Avenue signal light and that the Minnesota Department of Transportation will continue in the process of authorizing installation of a signal light. C. Gates Avenue Improvement The City Administrator indicated that the Gates Avenue improvement project is virtually done and that speed signs would be placed along Gates Avenue. Discussion was carried on regarding the naming of the street in the planned unit development. Councilmember Gunkel suggested the name Monarch Lane. Councilmember Schuldt indicated that there was a street south of Main Str~et named Freeport which is between Evans and Gates and further indicate: that the street in the planned unit development would line up with Fre port, .therefore, it was his suggestion that the street be named Freeport Avenue. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE NAMING OF THE STREET THROUGH THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AS FREEPORT AVENUE. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 5-0. r City Council Minutes June 4, 1984 Page Nine D. Orono. Park Ballfield Construction The City Administrator indicated that the construction of the ballfields is moving along as scheduled. The Ciyt's Street Superintendent, Mr. Phil Hals. indicated that class 5 will be brought in for the infield followed by the installation of the fencing and the irregation system, and seeding in August. Mayor Hinkle complimented Mr. Phil Hals on his work in the construction of the ballfields. E. Lions Park The City Administrator indicated that the City.has closed on.the purchase of the park property and has submitted an application for a Lawcon grant in the amount of $100,000 to construct trails and parking lots. F. Municipal Facilities The City Administrator indicated that he received a quote of $1,500 from one appraisal firm to appraise the City Hall property. The City Administrator further indicated that Mr. Ty Bischoff, the County Assessor, indicated that he would be interested in doing an appraisal of the City <Hall property. The City Administrator further indicated that an appraisal by Mr. Ty Bischoff would be a Sherburne County view of the property without a lot of commercial development influence. Councilmember Duitsman questioned how the appraisal would be used. The City Administrator indicated that the appraisaL could help the City Council, the City staff, and the Citizens Advisory Committee determine whether the property was saleable or if it would be more worthwhile to keep the property and locate the municipal facility at the present site. It was the consensus to request Mr. Ty Bischoff to submitt a quote to the City for the cost of an appraisal and a time schedule. G. Sanitary Sewer Line The City Administrator indicated that the City is considering construction of a bypass sanitary d~wer line from 5th Street to Main Street, in the City's Capital Improvement Program. The City Administrator further indicated that the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisor feels the bypass should be constructed sooner than proposed in the Capital Improvement Program of 1985, as development along School Street and the Bud Houlton property would create more flow than the line could handle. The City Administrator indicated that there already has been backup problems on 5th Street; therefore, it is recommended that the City Council authorize a feasibility study to implement the process of the project and address the cost of the project. COUNCILMEMBERGUNKEL MOVED TO AUTHORIZE A FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF.A BYPASS SANITARY . SEWER LINE FROM 5TH STREET TO MAIN STREET. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. City Council Minutes June 4, 1984 Page Ten H. Speed Zone - Highway #10 The City Administrator indicated that Mn/Dot will be doing a speed study along Highway #10 in the vicinity of Proctor Avenue in relation to the installation of a signal at Highway #10 and Proctor. I. Liquor Store Employee The City Administrator" indicated that a liquor store employee, Mr. Greg Jackman, has been caught stealing money and store items, therefore, it is recommended that the City Council terminate his employment. The City Administrator indicated that a letter has been sent to Mr. Jackman indicating his suspension and right to a hearing. The City Administrator further indicated that the City has not had any response from Mr. Jacktpan. COUNQ:ILMEMBERDUITSMAN MOVED TO AUTHORIZE TERMINATION OF MR. GREG JACKItfAN AS AN EMPLOYEE OF THE CITY OF ELK RIVER. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. J. Tot ~ark and Public Hearing Letters Councilmember Gunkel indicated that Tot Park has not been mowed and furtq.er indicated that she has contacted Mr. Dave Bleyhl regarding maintenance of the park again this year. Councilmember Gunkel indicated thatlMr. Bleyhl indicated that in order to do a good job with Tot Park, he n~eds a weed cutter to cut around the various pieces of play equipment in tIle park. Councilmember Gunkel indicated that she has a neighbor that has two J?oys that would be interested in maintaining the park. The City Admi4istrator indicated that he has again asked the City's attorney, DavelSellergren, to determine if there is a way to get rid of Tot Park. It w4s the consensus of the City Council to wait for the City Attorney's opinton rega:ding the Tot P~rk and if t ~h~uldremain.City property, befolfe the C1ty contracts w1th a local c1t1zen for ma1ntenance. Councilmember Gunkel indicated that she would like a copy of the public hearing notice letters that go to the residents in order to be informed of t~e subjcet. K. Counqilmember Gunkel questioned the development of the Prairie House rest4urant. The City Administrator indicated that the Prairie House rest4urant proposal did not have to come to the City Council for approval and tfhe developers are in the process of proceeding with their development. R-Ra#ed Movies CounJilmember Engstrom indicated that he has received complaints rega~ding young people allowed into the theater -whenR-rated movies are showq. After some general discussion, it was the consensus of the City ICouncil that the City Council could not legislate morality or enforce that type of legislation. City Council Minutes June 4, 1984 Page Eleven 13~. Check Register COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO APPROVE THE JUNE 4, 1984 CHECK REGISTER. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 14. Tentative Agenda Hobbit Hills Assessments, Sidewalk Replacement Program, Easement Acquisition, and Tot Park are items tentatively scheduled for the June 11 City Council meeting. There being no further business, COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. Respectfully submitted, ~ &~.uo Phyllis Boedigheimer City Clerk/Treasurer PB:mj