Loading...
10-01-1984 CC MIN . ~ ~ REGULAR WEEKLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL HELD AT THE ELK RIVER PUBLIC LIBRARY MONDAY, OCTOBER 1, 1984 Members Present: Mayor Hinkle, Councilmembers Engstrom, Duitsman, Schuldt and Gunkel Members Absent: None 1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Hinkle. 2 . Agenda Item 9 - stop sign at Tyler Street and Twin Lakes Road, and additional miscellaneous items regarding other stop signs, 10d - Lawcon Grant, 103 - sanitary sewer line 5th Street update, and 10f - meeting schedule, were items added to the October 1, 1984 City Council agenda. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 1, 1984 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AS AMENDED. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 3. Minutes COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 6, 1984 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. Councilmember Gunkel requested that Item 10 of the September 17, 1984 City Council minutes specifically refer to the north approximate 1/3 of P~rcel D in the approval of the housing plan as submitted by Barthel developers. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 17, 1984 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AS AMENDED. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 4. Open Mike No one appeared for this item. 5. Lundberg Sewer Connection Fee Request The City Administrator indicated that Mr. Cliff Lundberg has objected to the sewer hookup fee charge to his new building on the corner of 4th Street and Jack- son Avenue. The City Administrator indicated that the hookup fee charged is based on 2,281 square feet per floor with 1 unit assigned for each 1,000 square feet. The City Administrator further indicated that the charge would be 2.28 units times $625 per unit for a total of $1,425.00. The City Administrator further indicated that the original sewer hookup fee for the building that was burned down was $125.00, therefore, crediting $125.00 against the $1,425 for a net fee of $1,300 being charged to Mr. Lundberg's building. The City Administrator indicated that Mr. Lundberg is objecting to the fee, as he believes that he has not increased the usage with the new building. The City Administrator further indicated that he has met with Mr. Lundberg, and Mr. Lundberg has indicated that he would do some additional curb, gutter and sidewalk work along 4th Street and Jackson Avenue in lieu of the City Council Minutes October 1, 1984 Page Two the hookup fee. The City Administrator indicated that Mr. Lundberg indicated that he would extend the curb from the private residence, Ollie Micheau's, on 4th Street, to the corner of Jackson. The City Administrator indicated that Mr. Lundberg has indicated that he would prefer to place the curb right next to the sidewalk which would give additional space for a turn lane on 4th Street onto Jackson. The City Administrator indicated that by moving the curb closer to the sidewalk, it would allow traffic to drive over a manhole at the corner of 4th Street and Jackson. The City Administrator further indicated that the City would not re- ceive enough benefit in the terms of a trade off for the hookup fee. The City Administrator indicated that he felt the hookup fee was fair and recommended that the City Council uphold the staff's decision regarding the hookup fee for Mr. Cliff Lundberg's building. Mr. Cliff Lundberg indicated that prior to the building burning down the occupancy was a pizza place on the main floor and a meeting hall on the upper floor. Mr. Lundberg indicated that the City's ordinance requires that for each ten seats in a restaurant, there is one unit charge. Mr. Lundberg further indicated that the pizza place in the old building had thirty-two seats, therefore, equivalent to three unit or hookups. Mr. Lundberg further indicated that if the upstairs was considered retail space, it would require one hookup. Therefore, the old building had approximately 4 to 5 hookups under the present ordinance. Mr. Lundberg in- dicated that his new building is being considered at 2.28 units, therefore, he believes he should not be charged a hookup fee for the new building. Mr. Lundberg indicated that he believed hookup fees were charged to pay for the expansion of the wastewater treatement plant and not to recapture costs from those already hooked up. Mr. Lundberg indicated that if he is required to pay the $1,300 hookup fee, he WQuld not be able to place the curb and gutter as discussed earlier. General discussion was carried on regarding the curb, gutter and sidewalk proposed by Mr. Lundberg along 4th Street and Jackson Avenue. The City Administrator indicated that Mr. Lundberg's new building was not considered an alteration or an addition and therefore, was charged the hookup fee. The City Administrator indicated that he and the City's Street Superintendent had looked at the curb line as proposed by Mr. Lundberg, and further indicated that the manhole and storm drain would cause a problem at the corner of Jackson and 4th Street if the curb was placed next to the sidewalk. The City Administrator further indicated that the Police Department has recommended that there be no parking in front of Mr. Lundberg's building on 4th Street and on Jackson Avenue. Discussion was carried on regarding the sewer hookup fee charged to Doug Johnson's building across the street from Mr. Lundberg's building. Councilmember Gunkel indicated that she likes the idea of the curb, gutter and sidewalk proposed by Mr. Lundberg but further indicated that the curb, gutter and sidewalk was not the issue. Councilmember Gunkel indicated that the sewer hookup fees for new building replacements was the issue to be considered. Councilmember Duitsman indicated that hookup fees are to pay for the new wastewater treatment plant and therefore, a second charge to a replacement building was not fair. Discussion was carried on regarding the size of the sewer line from the building to the street. Councilmember Duitsman indicated that if there was an increase in size or usage, a hookup fee is warranted. Discussion was also carried on regarding the City Council Minutes October 1, 1984 ;Page Three usage oe the sewer line and the determination of that usage. Councilmember Engstrom questioned the hookup fee charged to the Gar-San building which replaced approximately 3 homes in that area. Councilmember Schuldt indicated that he felt it was a policy decision by the City Council and that the City Council should consider the possibility of the downtown redevelopment in their policy decision. Councilmember Schuldt further indicated that tennants can change, therefore, tennants and usage should not be the issue, that the City Council should consider the policy of a replacement building as a new building, therefore, charged as a new building. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO UPHOLD THE STAFF'S DECISION TO CHARGE MR. LUNDBERG A SEWER HOOKUP FEE OF $1,300.00 FOR HIS BUILDING AT THE CORNER OF 4TH STREET AND JACKSON AVENUE. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION FAILED 2-3. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL, COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN AND MAYOR HINKLE OPPOSED. Mayor Hinkle indicated that he felt the City should encourage new development and help developers whenever possible to encourage that development in the City of Elk River. Mayor Hinkle further indicated that he felt the City Staff should review the sewer hookup charge to the Doug Johnson building and readjust the hookup fee, if required. The City Administrator indicated that City Staff was not trying to make development in the City of Elk River difficult, but further indicated that sewer hookup fees are essential to maintain the integrity of the sewer fund. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO CANCEL THE SEWER HOOKUP FEE CHARGED TO MR. CLIFF LUNDBERG ON HIS BUILDING AT 4TH STREET AND JACKSON AVENUE AND FURTHER, AUTHORIZE AN INTERERETATION OF THE CITY'S ORDINANCE TO CONSIDER REPLACEMENT BUILDINGS THE SAME AS ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THE SITE. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-2. COUNCILMEMBERS SCHULDT AND ENGSTROM OPPOSED. The City Administrator asked Mr. Lundberg if he would now do the curb/gutter and side- walk improvements reviewed. Mr. Lundberg indicated he would. The Administrator in- dicated the Street Superintendent and Building and Zoning Administrator would contact him regarding specifications. Pollack Zone Change Request - Continued Public Hearing Mayor Hinkle indicated that at the September 17, 1984 City Council meeting, the re- quest for a zone change for property north of Elk Hills was considered. Mayor Hinkle further indicated that as a result of several questions and concerns raised by both the Councilmembers and residents of the Elk Hills area, the Council determined that they would continue the public hearing until the October 1st meeting. Mayor Hinkle indicated that at a City Council committee session on September 24th, the City Council again discussed the Pollack re.zoning request and site concept. Mayor Hinkle further indicated that the proposed density was discussed, the land uses in the present site were discussed, road patterns and ownership were discussed, as well as the concerns of the Elk Hills residents. Councilmember Duitsman indicated that he felt the property must be zoned PUD to allow for the density necessary to allow for development and yet retain the terrain of the property. Councilmember Duitsman indicated that there are some very nice homes on very nice lots in the downtown Elk River which is a higher density than Elk Hills. Councilmember Duitsman further indicated that a planned unit development does allow for citizens' input, as each portion of the development requires a public hearing. City Council Minutes October 1, 1984 Page Four Councilmember Schuldt indicated that the rezoning of the property to a planned unit development would not automatically accept the site plan as originally proposed. Councilmember Duitsman indicated that in the City Council's work session, the Council determined that a commercial site at the corner of Elk Hills Drive and Highway #169 would not be acceptable and further indicated that the City Council also determined that it would require thru streets to Highway #169 on the northern edge of the planned unit development. Councilmember Gunkel indicated that she could appreciate the apprehension of the Elk Hills residents regarding planned unit developments. Councilmember Gunkel further indicated that she felt the only way to retain the beauty of the property was to allow the development through a planned unit development process. Council- member Gunkel indicated that with the present zoning, the City Council can only stipulate the maximum density and further indicated that through a planned unit development zone, the City Council can place other controls. Councilmember Engstrom indicated that in the City Council's committee session the City Council expressed their concerns of traffic flow in the area. Councilmember Engstrom further indicated that the City Council would require roads to go through Highway #169 on the northern edge of the development. Discussion was carried on regarding the proposed concept of the development with regard to the cul-de-sacs, roads and entrances into the area. Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing. The City Administrator indicated that the concerns of the Elk Hills Residents would be considered and the developers would develop a concept that would be consistent with those concerns. Mr. Larry Toth indicated that the City Council could still maintain the controls necessary through the preliminary plat process. Mr. Cliff Lundberg requested that the City Council consider the maximum density to be compatible to the Elk Hills development. Mr. Lundberg further indicated that in the Elk Hills development, there are two units per acre. The City Admin- istrator indicated that the Elk Hills development is zoned R-lc and therefore, could be developed at a higher density than what is currently in place. Mr. Larry Toth indicated that the density in an R-lc zone for unsewered property is 3 units per acre. Councilmember Schuldt indicated that the area has been assessed for interceptor sewer, and therefore, will be developed with sewer. General discussion was carried on regarding the requirement of sewer in the develop- ment. Councilmember Duitsman indicated that at the time of the sewer interceptor assess- ment, it was the consensus of the City Council that the City develop from the core area outward and therefore, specific areas were assessed for the sewer interceptor as it was planned that these areas would be sewered when developed. Mr. Larry Toth indicated that he was also on the City Council at the time of the sewer interceptor assessment and further indicated that he felt it was not the intent of the City Council at that time to cram houses on a particular area to pay for the interceptor. Mr. Toth indicated that the concept proposed by the Pollacks showed an average of City Council Minutes October 1, 1984 Page Five approximately 5 units per acre and further ~ndicated that if the hill was not considered in the average, the density would be even higher per acre. General discussion was carried on regarding the proposed density per acre for the development. Mr. Vance Syring indicated that he was opposed to the proposed planned unit development rezoning and requested that the City Council leave the zoning as is. Ms. Julie Kastendick indicated that the residents are very sensitive to a planned unit development zone as there is the possibility of constant change and the people must be able to attend every meeting to be aware of what is happening with those changes. Mr. Denny Carlson indicated that he felt the property should remain as currently zoned and further indicated that he is not convinced that a planned unit development zone would be better. Mr. Norm Kastendick questioned the law requiring that the property must be sewered. Councilmember Duitsman indicated that there was not a law requiring that the pro- perty be sewered and further indicated that it was a Council decision that the property be a part of the sewer district, and therefore, developed with sewer. Ms. Barb Burandt indicated that the Elk Hills development has been assessed for the sewer interceptor and yet is not sewered, therefore, indicated that the pro- posed area could also be developed unsewered. Discussion was carried on regarding the percent of the property that was considered buildable and the requirements for park or park land. The City Administrator in- dicated that the development would be required to either set aside park land or deposit money into the park development fund of the City. Mayor Hinkle indicated that it was economically not feasible to develop a develop- ment in two and one-half acre lots and yet require the property to be sewered. Mr. Vance Syring indicated that the Brentwood Addition is developed in two and one~half acre parcels and appears to be economically feasible, therefore, he felt the City Council should not require the area to be sewered and allow the develop- ment to be developed in two and one-half acre parcels. Mayor Hinkle indicated that he felt there was not enough land to go around for everyone to have a two and one-half acre parcel of property. Ms. Flo Bird expressed her opposition to the proposed planned unit development zone and the higher density proposed for the development. Mr. Bill Farnan, architect for the developer, indicated that the terrain of the property allowed for a higher density to be planned for the northern part of the property and a lower density planned for the southern portion nearest the Elk Hills development. Mr. Farnan indicated that the planned unit development zone would enable the developers to develop with that higher density to the north. Mr. Arlon Fuchs expressed his concern of the density proposed closest to the Elk Hills development. Councilmember Gunkel questioned at what point would the City Council specify the maximum density that they would accept. The City Administrator indicated that the developers have not had an opportunity to design a concept taking into con- sideration the Elk Hills residents' concerns. The City Administrator suggested City Council Minutes October 1, 1984 Page Si.x that the City Council give the developers an opportunity to submit a concept plan for the development. The City Administrator further indicated that if the Elk Hills residents formed a group with a chair person the City could then contact that person regarding the planned unit development process and the review of the concept as proposed. Councilmember Engstrom indicated that he felt that through the planned unit develop- ment process, the developers and the City Council could get the density most suit- able for the whole community, the development and the Elk Hills residents. Councilmember Gunkel indicated that she felt a rezoning to a planned unit develop- ment would be better to work with and allow for something tood to develop on the property. Councilmember Schuldt indicated that he felt the City Council must work with the developers to develop a project which is in the best interest of the City of Elk River. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM R-'IC, R-lB AND R-lA TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONE. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 5-0. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED THAT THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONE BE DEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 5-0. 7. Consider City Facilities Mayor Hinkle indicated that the City Council held two public hearings regarding the Citizen's Advisory Committee's recommendation on the municipal facilities study. Mayor Hinkle further noted that the City has approximately 3,000 registered voters and a total of 35 people came to the two public hearings. Mayor Hinkle indicated that it is very difficult for a City Council to make decisions regarding the total City when so few people express their interest in the community and their interest in supporting the Council and the decisions the Council must make. Mayor Hinkle further indicated that the City can be what it wants to be and further indicated that people need to work for what they want and not necessarily always be paid for that work; volunteers are needed. Mayor Hinkle indicated that the Citizen's Advisory Committee consisted of approximately 40 people that had six meetings in the last six months to review problems, options and solutions to the City's municipal facilities and to ultimately make a recommendation to the City Council; Mayor Hinkle indicated that the present City Hall building was purchased by the Elk River Utilities in 1959 for the purpose of the artesian well, and further'indicated that the building has been used for various uses in the past 25 years. Mayor Hinkle indicated that the Advisory Committee's recommendation was to remodel the City Hall for its continued use as a City facility. Mayor Hinkle further indicated that the remodeled building will be landscaped and sufficient parking will be pro- vided. Mayor Hinkle further indicated that the proposed remodeled City Hall will enhance the entrance into the community. Mayor Hinkle indicated that he supported the committee's recommendation to place the question of a bond issue to the citizens. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 84-24 A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT THE REPORT OF THE CITIZEN'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TO AUTHORIZE A REFERENDUM TO BE PLACED BEFORE THE VOTERS AT THE NOVEMBER 6TH GENERAL ELECTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY TO Council Minutes October 1, 1984 Page Seven ISSUE BDNDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,300,000 FOR THE 15 YEAR REMODELING OPTION OF THE CITY HALL, A NEW PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE AND AN ADDITION TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. Councilmember Duitsman indicated that if the motion is as presently stated, he will vote no, as he believes there is a definite need for a public works facility but that he is not sure of the other municipal facility needs. Councilmember Duitsman indicated that the mill rate for the rural community is projected to double by the year 1989. Councilmember Duitsman further indicated that he would support the question to be placed before the voters as three different issues; one for a public works garage, one for a remodeled city hall and one for an addition for the fire department building. Discussion was carried on regarding the legality of CouncilmemberDuitsman's suggestion. Councilmember Schuldt indicated that he felt the referendum could not be split as the voters could approve a remodeled city hall and not approve a public works facility, and then the public works would not have a location. Mayor Hinkle indicated that he felt it should be as one referendum. Mayor Hinkle further indicated that suppose the remodeling of the City Hall did not pass; then the City Council would have to consider the federal handicapped requirements and money would have to be spent to make the building handicapped accessible. Mayor Hinkle questioned what was best for the City. Councilmember Duitsman indicated that he is concerned with the projected mill rate increases and if the people can decide, they will decide to spend what they think they can afford. Councilmember Engstrom indicated that he could see both the good and the bad of the proposal suggested by Councilmember Duitsman. Councilmember Engstrom indicated that he also is concerned with the increase in mill rate for the rural area. Mayor Hinkle called for the vote. THE MOTION PASSED 3-2. COUNCILMEMBERS DUITSMAN AND ENGSTROM OPPOSED. 8. Election Judges Salary COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO AUTHORIZE ELECTION JUDGES TO BE PAID $4.50 PER HOUR FOR THEIR TIME SPENT IN TRAINING AND WORKING AS AN ELECTION JUDGE. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 9. Stop Sign at Tyler Street and Twin Lakes Road and Miscellaneous Other Locations COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO REC0MMEND THAT THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR REQUEST THE COUNTY TO PLACE A STOP SIGN AT THE INTERSECTION OF TYLER STREET AND TWIN LAKES ROAD. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. The City Administrator indicated that it is proposed that Railroad Drive and Irving Avenue both be two-way streets during the construction of Highway #10 next year, as they will be used for detours. The City Administrator indicated that it was City City Council Minutes October 1, 1984 :Page Eight Staff's recommendation that the Council authorize Railroad Drive and Irving Avenue to be made two-way streets now. The City Administrator indicated that if Irving Avenue becomes a two-way street, the mail drop box will have to be relocated. The City Administrator indicated that in his discussion with the City Street Super- intendent regarding two-way traffic on Irving, it was suggested that the mail drop box be placed on an island in the parking lot across from what was Adam's .-: furniture. Councilmember Schuldt indicated that he had discussed the possibility of two-way traffic on Railroad Drive and Irving Avenue with both the City's Street Super- intendent and the Police Chief. Councilmember Schuldt indicated that in his discussions, both the City's Street Superintendent and the Police Chief also indicated to him that it would be best to dispense with the one-way traffic and allow two-way traffic on both streets. Discussion was carried on regarding signage or a small island or some other means to let motorists know that a left turn cannot be made from Railroad Drive onto Jackson Avenue. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO AUTHORIZE A TRAFFIC CHANGE TO TWO-WAY STREETS ON RAILROAD DRIVE AND IRVING AVENUE AND TO MARK THE CHANGE WITH SIGNS AND STRIPING WITH NO LEFT TURN SIGNS ON TO JACKSON AVENUE FROM RAILROAD DRIVE. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. Mayor Hinkle indicated that he received a request for stop sign at the intersection of 5th Street and Twin Lakes Road. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO REQUEST THE COUNTY TO :PLACE A STO:P SIGN. AT 5TH STREET AND TWIN LAKES ROAD. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. Mayor Hinkle indicated that he has received a request that the City Council consider a street light at the corner of 5th Street and Twin Lakes Road. The City Admin- istrator indicated that if there was a pole there, the Elk River Utilities would just have to mount a light head, which would cost approximately $400.00. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO AUTHORIZE A STREET LIGHT AT THE CORNER OF 5TH STREET AND TWIN LAKES ROAD. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO AUTHORIZE STOP SIGNS ON GATES AVENUE AND HOLT AVENUE AT SCHOOL STREET. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. Councilmember Gunkel indicated that the street department should be sure that the stop signs at Gates Avenue and at Holt are visable. 10. Administrator's Update A. Cable Television The City Administrator indicated that the cable company had a ground-breaking ceremony in Buffalo last week and further indicated that the City of Elk River City Council Minutes October 1, 1984 Page N;i.,ne should see cable installation approximately next July. The City Administrator indicated that there were no substantial changes in the cable television ordinance from the original draft. B. East Main Street The City Administrator indicated that the concrete curb and gutter is in place and the gravel base is down. The City Administrator further indicated that it is anticipated that the first layer of blacktop will be placed on Main Street by the end of the week; and if the weather holds, the total black- topping will be completed this year. The City Administrator indicated that the electrical contractor has the conduit in for the signal light at Highway 1/169 and Main Street and that the signal light should be operational by February. C. Sidewalk Repairs The City Administrator indicated that the City's Street crew is repalrlng sidewalks on Main Street and will be working on Morton and Norfolk. The City Administrator indicated that the Street Department is repairing all of the very bad sidewalk areas first. D. Lawcon Grant The City Administrator indicated that the City of Elk River's application was number one in our region. The City Administrator further indicated that the City's grant application received 153 points from a total of 200. The City Administrator indicated that 19 grants were funded out of 192 applications and further indicated that Cannon Falls received a large grant in the amount of $606,000. The City Administrator indicated that the State office has indicated that the City of Elk River should have a good chance again next year. E. Sewer Line on 5th Street The City Administrator questioned the next step in the process of replacement of a sewer line on 5th street. Councilmember Duitsman indicated that the Utilities Commission has met regarding the feasibility study for the water and sewer line on 5th Street and have recommended that the City Council accept the feasibility study and assess fifty percent of the cost. Council- member Duitsman further indicated that the City Council should schedule public hearings to get the people's input regarding the proposed water and sewer line on 5th Street. F. Meeting Schedule The City Administrator indicated that Monday, October 8th is a holiday and that the City Council committee meeting could be scheduled for October 9th. It was the consensus that the City Council would hold a committee meeting on October 9th at the City Hall to discuss Planning Commission interviews, the Barthel developer's agreement, and the budget. The City Administrator indicated that October 22nd is scheduled for the assessment hearing for the Heavenly Hills project. It was the consensus that the City Council would hold the assessment City Council Minutes October 1, 1984 Pa.geTen hearing for the Main Street Project on October 29th and budget review on October 18th. 11. Check Register COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 1 ,1984 CHECK REGISTER. COUNCIL- MEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 12. Tentative Agenda Planning Connnission interviews, the Barthel developer's agreement and the budget are tentatively scheduled for the October 9th City Council meeting. There being no further business, COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. Respectfully submitted, ~~0-4?~ Phyllis Boedigheimer ~ City Clerk/Treasurer ~ PB:st