11-19-1984 CC MIN
r-
.
REGULAR WEEKLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE
ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT THE ELK RIVER PUBLIC LIBRARY
MONDAY, NOVEMBER:..l~~ 1984
Members Present: Mayor Hinkle, Councilmembers, Schuldt, Engstrom, Duitsman and Gunkel
Members Absent: None
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Hinkle.
2. Agenda
Councilmember Gunkel asked that consideration of minutes for the November 8, 1984
Canvassing Board be added to the Agenda.
COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
3. November 5, 1984 City Council Meeting Minutes
Councilmember Gunkel asked that Item #3 in the November 5th minutes be changed to
reflect that Mayor Hinkle, not Councilmember Gunkel, asked for a correction in
Item #8 of the October 15th minutes. In Item #9, discussion of the rural tax ratio,
in the second paragraph, Mayor Hinkle asked that the word "insurance" be inserted
as it referred to rates related to fire protection.
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 5, 1984 CITY
COUNCIL MEETING AS AMENDED. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE
MOTION PASSED 4-0.
3k
2 .
November 8, 1984 Canvassing Board Minutes
Mayor Hinkle questioned the fact that two of the canvassing board members were
also candidates in the election results being reviewed. It was the Council
consensus that the results as presented in the canvassing board minutes were
accurate and that the actions of the canvassing board should be confirmed by the
entire City Counc~l.
COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO APPROVE THE NOVEMBER 6TH ELECTION DAY RESULTS AS
INDICATED IN THE NOVEMBER 8, 1984 CANVASSING BOARD MINUTES AND TO CONFIRM THE
ACTION OF THE CANVASSING BOARD. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE
MOTION PASSED 4-0.
4. Open Mike
Mr. Cliff Lundberg was present to address the City Council regarding the Heavenly
Hills assessment. Lundberg asked that the City Council declare the upcoming
November 26th Heavenly Hills assessment reconsideration a continuation of the
Council's original public hearing on the Heavenly Hills assessment. Mayor Hinkle
indicated that the original Council action had been properly concluded and that
the public hearing had been closed and minutes of the meeting already approved.
Mr. Lundberg indicated his concern that he would need to file two appeals in the
absence of the Council action he requested.
~
.
.
City Council Minutes
November 19, 1984
Page Two
Mr. Jim Tralle was present in the audience and asked if the Council action at the
upcoming Novmeber 26th consideration of the Heavenly Hills assessment would
permit an additional 30-day period to prepay assessments without interest. The
Administrator indicated that he thought it would but would check for sure and re-
spond to Mr. Tralle's request.
Councilmember Duitsman indicated his unwillingness to approve a motion which
would give up any of the City's rights as requested by Lundberg.
Lundberg submitted an appeal to the Heavenly Hills assessment as adopted by the
City Council to Mayor Hinkle. The appeal was entered into the City's record.
Lundberg asked if at or before the November 26th consideration of the Heavenly
Hills assessment by the Council. new letters to preserve the right to appeal
in district court would need to be submitted by individuals in the Heavenly
Hills area. The City Administrator indicated that the City attorney felt that
it would be necessary and recommended that Lundberg take that action.
5.
Nickerson Administrative Subdivision
Councilmember Gunkel reviewed the administrative subdivision request by Mrs. Vira
Nickerson of 426 3rd Street in Elk River. Mrs. Nickerson is requesting an
administrative subdivision to enable a property split of a parcel 15 feet by
165 feet which would be added to an adjacent parcel on 3rd Street. The staff
recommendation was to approve the administrative subdivision.
The City Administrator added that the property in question will be subject to
City Council consideration of a rezoning in the upcoming weeks. The Administrator
indicated that the zone is currently R-2. two Family Residential, and a request
to change the zoning to R-3 Townhouse would be made to the Planning Commission
and City Council. .
Mayor Hinkle declared the public hearing open.
Cliff Lundberg. representing Mr. Gene Kreuser, indicated that Mr. Kreuser intended
to build a six-unit apartment building on the site in question and asked how
assessments for the 15 foot by 165 foot parcel would be treated by the City.
The City Administrator indicated that the parcel being split was such a very small
percentage of the total 11.84 acres owned by Mrs. Nickerson, that to split an
assessment for that individual parcel would be meaningless and cost more for the
City to accomplish than the actual assessment. The Administrator indicated that
it would be best if the b~yer and seller would simply agree that assessments on
the original parcels as constituted in the area would remain and there would be
no affect on those assessments as a result of the property division requested by
Nickerson. The Administrator further indicated that the buyer and seller could
arrange any necessary compensation for the assessment as part of the transaction
for the property between themselves and therefore, not involve the City and require
that a separate assessment be created for the 15 by 165 foot parcel.
The Council's consensus was that the Administrator's recommendation for the treat-
ment of the assessment was acceptable.
r
City Council Minutes
November 19, 1984
Page Three
.
Mayor Hinkle declared the public hearing closed.
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISION TO ALLOW MRS.
NICKERSON TO SPLIT A 15 BY 165 FOOT PARCEL AND TO ADD IT TO THAT PROPERTY WHICH
SHE CURRENTLY OWNS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 3RD STREET, BEING A PART OF AUDITOR'S
SUBDIVISION #5, LOT 4. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
PASSED 4~0.
6. Hastings Variance Request
Planning Commission Chairman, James Tralle was present at the Council meeting
and introduced this item for the Councilmembers and audience. Mr. Tralle indicated
that Mr. Robert Hastings of 15260 Cleveland Street, had requested a variance
from the City's minimum lot size to permit the establishment of three lots of
2.3, 1.8 and 1.68 acres in size respectively, while the City's requirement was 2~
acres. Mr. Tralle indicated that the Planning Commission had reviewed Mr.
Hastings' request and conducted a public.hearing, and after consideration, recom-
mended denial. Mr. Tralle further indicated that during the discussion, some
concern was raised regarding the propriety of 2~ acre lots on riverfront property
within the City of Elk River. The Planning Commission had directed the staff
to conduct research into creating new or different zoning options to deal with
this problem.
.
The Building and Zoning Administrator, Rick Breezee, was present at the meeting
and indicated Mr. Robert Hastings had contacted him to express his support for
the variance and also to inform Mr. Breezee that it would not be possible for him
to be present at the Council consideration of his variance request due to other
commitments.
Mayor Hinkle declared the public hearing open and asked for any interested parties
to address the issue.
There being no one present, Mayor Hinkle declared the public hearing closed.
COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO DENY THE HASTINGS VARIANCE REQUEST, INASMUCH AS
THE NECESSARY FINDINGS PER THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE COULD NOT BE MADE IN
THE AFFIRMATIVE. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED
4":'0. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN. OPPOSED.
7.
Cowles Administrative Subdivision Request
.
Councilmember Duitsman introduced the Cowles' request for an administrative sub-
division for the Councilmembers. Councilmember Duitsman indicated that George
Cowles of 19731 Rush Street, has requested an administrative subdivision to
enable him to divide one existing parcel which presently contained two buildings
into 2 one-acre parcels with one building on each resulting parcel created.
Councilmember Duitsman indicated that the staff recommended approval and that
it had been recommended that access to the property through easements shown on
Mr. Cowles' site map be subject to a private road agreement between Mr. Cowles
and the City of Elk River.
Mayor Hinkle declared the public hearing open and asked for comments on the item.
r-
.
.
.
City Council Minutes
November 19, 1984
Page Four
There being no comments and no one wishing to speak on the item, Mayor Hinkle
declared the public hearing closed.
Councilmember Engstrom indicated that he felt the easement recommended by the
staff was a necessity and the arrangement as proposed by Mr. Cowles made sense.
Councilmember Schuldt indicated that it would be appropriate for the private
road agreement to reflect a responsibility on Mr. Cowles' part to provide the
necessary maintenance for the easements shown on Mr. Cowles' site map.
The City Administrator indicated that the City's standard private road agreement
had a provision which required the owner of the property in question to maintain
any easements covered under the private road agreement.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE MR. COWLES' ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISION
REQUEST AS MADE, WITH THE PROVISION THAT MR. COWLES ENTER INTO A PRIVATE ROAD
AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ELK RIVER TO PROVIDE LEGAL ACCESS TO PARCEL "A" WITH
EASEMENTS TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION. COUNCILMEMBER
ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
8.
Barrington Place Street Light Improvement Project
The City Administrator informed the members of the Council that new information
had been developed regarding a proposed street light improvement project in the
Barrington Place Addition. The Administrator reviewed the contents of a memoran-
dum from the Utilities Superintendent, Mr. Edson Stansfield, with revised costs
and materials for the improvement originally requested by the Barrington Place
addition residents. The Administrator also presented a revised petition from the
board of directors of the Barrington Place Addition, indicating their support of
the revised materials and improvement costs.
The City Administrator informed the Council that with the current cost projections
and also the support of the residents in question, it would be possible for the
City Council to order the completion of the improvement.
COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO ORDER THE COMPLETION OF A STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT IN THE BARRINGTON PLACE ADDITION, INASMUCH AS 100 PERCENT OF THE AFFECTED
PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE PETITIONED THE CITY OF ELK RIVER TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT AND
REQUESTED THEIR WILLINGNESS TO WAIVE THEIR RIGHT TO A PUBLIC HEARING, AND THAT
THE PROJECT BE COMPLETED PURSUANT TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY MR. EDSON STANSFIELD,
THEUTILITIES SUPERINTENDENT. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
PASSED 4-0.
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE INSTALLATION OF AN ADDITIONAL LIGHT
POLE TO THE NORTH OF THE PROJECT AREA UPON PROPER RECEIPT OF A PETITION FROM THE
AFFECTED PROPERTY, MR. LYLE McGLOUGHLIN UNDER THE SAME TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS
PROPOSED BY MR. STANSFIELD FOR THE THREE LIGHTS TO BE INSTALLED IN THE BARRINGTON
PLACE ADDITION. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
9. Traffic Signing Changes
The City Council reviewed a staff request to make three traffic signing changes
within the City of Elk River.
Tn the change requested at the intersection of Irving and 4th Street regarding
removing a stop sign, Councilmember Duitsman indicated that he felt the sign wouIn
City Council Minutes
November 19, 1984
Page Five
be necessary at the intersection in question, until the construction of Highway
#10 was completed in 1985. It was the Council consensus that the sign should be
left in place until after the reconstruction of Highway #10 is completed.
At the intersection of Morton and 4th Street, the Street Superintendent and Police
Chief have recommended the installation of a stop sign which the Council agreed
was appropriate.
COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED THAT A STOP SIGN BE INSTALLED AT THE INTERSECTION
OF MORTON AND 4TH STREET, STOPPING TRAFFIC TRAVELLING NORTHBOUND ON MORTON.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
At the intersection of 194th Avenue and Lowell, the staff had recommended that the
yield signs be removed from Lowell Avenue to 194th Avenue, therefore, persons approach-
ing the intersection from 194th would yield to traffic travelling along Lowell Avenue.
COUNCILMEMBERDUITSMAN MOVED APPROVAL OF A CHANGE IN THE TRAFFIC SIGNS AT THE INTER-
SECTION OF 194TH AVENUE AND LOWELL STREET, SUCH THAT EXISTING SIGNS REQUIRING TRAFFIC
TO YIELD ON LOWELL STREET BE REMOVED SO THAT TRAFFIC TRAVELLING WEST ON 194TH STREET
WOULD BE REQUIRED TO YIELD. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THEMOTION
PASSED 4-0.
10. Police Officer Hiring
The City Council reviewed a request by the Chief of Police to hire Mr. Dennis Johnson
as a police officer for the City of Elk River. The Chief of Police indicated that
Mr. Johnson had been one of 162 applicants which had been thoroughly tested by the
City.
COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO APPROVE THE HIRING OF MR. DENNIS JOHNSON AS A POLICE
OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF Elk RIVER. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE
MOTION PASSED 4-0.
11. Pay Estimate #1. for Watermain Construction
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED APPROVAL OF PAY ESTIMATE #1 TO LATOUR CONSTRUCTION IN
THE AMOUNT OF $50,550.97 FOR WORK RELATED TO WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION FROM FREEPORT
AVENUE TO DODGE AVENUE. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
PASSED 4-0.
12. Pay Estimate #4 for.East Main. Street Improvement Project
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL. MOVED APPROVAL OF PAY ESTIMATE #4 TO NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION
IN THE AMOUNT OF $62,829.06 FOR WORK RELATED TO THE EAST MAIN STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
Mayor Hinkle asked about restoration costs in the project and where the City was
responsible for restoration. The City Administrator indicated that all costs for
restoration were included in the original project estimates and in the pay estimates
approved by the City Council to date, and that the City had an obligation to restore
all property disturbed as a result of the construction to equal or better condition,
regardless of whether or not the property was within City right-of-way.
C~ty Counc~l M~nutes
November 19, 1984
;l;'gge $:Lx
13. Camp Cozy 5th Addition Road Right-of-way Plat 111 Correction
Mr. John Oliver was present to review the correction certificate for the City
Councilts information.
COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED APPROVAL OF THE CORRECTION CERTIFICATE RECOMMENDED
~y MR. JOHN OLIVER IN THE CAMP COZY 5TH ADDITION ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT #1.
COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
14. Administrator's Update
A. Anoka County Refuse Ordinance
The City Administrator distributed a copy of the refuse ordinance recently
passed by Anoka County relative to landfills and landfill fees.
B. Meeting with UPA Regarding Refuse Burning Facility in Elk River
The Administrator informed the Council that as advertised and per mailed
notice, the Council will be meeting on Tuesday, November 20th, at UPA in a
special session to consider ~nformation presented by UPA regarding a pro-
posed refuse-derived burning facility in the City of Elk River.
C. Cable Television
The Administrator indicated that at the present time, the SWC4 was attempting
to identify potential users of the City's future cable system for the purpose
of determining where various pieces of production equipment and where facil-
ities should be lOcated. The Administrator asked that any groups which the
Council was aware of that might have an interest in cable television access,
be directed to the SWC4 for inclusion in the process.
D. Municipal Facilities
.' The Administrator questioned the City eoimciLon:wnatfarthet' acti€lns the"
Council desired to take regarding the municipal facilities recently subjected
to a referendum vote of the City. The Council indicated that because of the
close vote and the amount of support indicated, that future actions appeared
to be warranted on the facilities question. Mayor Hinkle indicated his con-
cern about automatically extending the contract of the City's architect for
the facilities proposal without first discussing the matter in some detail
with other members of the City Council in a committee session. The Council
also indicated that they wished to have the results of a public survey to be
completed in the City's newsletter prior to meeting with Mr. Boarman so as
to have a better feel for the public's perception on the referendum question
and any changes they might deem necessary.
E. Industrial Park Expansion
Mr: John Oliver informed the Councilmembers that there were plans by both
Tescom and Alltool, who currently are tennants in the Industrial Park, to
undergo significant expansions to their facilities. Mr. Oliver indicated
that the efforts to expand Alltool, in order to be successful, required
r-
City CQuncil Minutes
November 19, 1984
Page Seven
.
certain information from the City regarding improvements to the Industrial
Park. The Council consensus was to authorize the City Administrator and City
Engineer to perform the necessary work on improvements to the undeveloped
portion of the Industrial Park so as to facilitate the plans of Alltool and
Tescom for expansion.
There being no further business, COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE
ADJOURNED. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0.
4S1~.bmi~,
.. ~y;~ <f
Robert C. Middaugh
City Administrator
.i
RCM:dk