12-17-1984 CC MIN
REGULAR. WEEKLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE
ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT THE ELK RIVER PUBLIC LIBRARY
MONDAY, DECEMBER 17, 1984
Members Present: Mayor Hinkle, Councilmembers Duitsman and Gunkel
Members Absent: Councilmembers Engstrom and Schuldt
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Hinkle.
2. Agenda
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE DECEMBER 17, 1984 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0.
3. Minutes of November 15, 1984 City Council Meeting
Councilmember Gunkel requested that the motion to require the park dedication
fees required by Mr. Dennis Anderson for the Brentwood Addition be paid by June
1, 1985. The motion was made by Councilmember Duitsman and seconded by Council-
member Engstrom and was passed 4-0.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 15, 1984
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AS AMENDED. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION PASSED 3...,0.
4. Minutes of the November 26, 1984 City Council Meeting
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 26, 1984
CITY COUNCIL MEETING. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
PASSED 3-0.
5. Minutes of the December 3, 1984 City Council Meeting
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 3, 1984 CITY
COUNCIL MEETING. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED
3-0.
6. Open Mike
No one appeared for this item
Mayor Hinkle presented Councilmember Duitsman with a plaque of recognition for
his services to the City Council from 1978 to 1984.
7. Barthel PUD Industrial Revenue Notes
The City Administrator indicated that the final documents associated with the
issuance of industrial revenue bonds for the Barthel Planned Unit Development
shopping center are submitted to the City Council for their consideration and
approval. The City Administrator indicated that the City's Attorney, Mr. David
Sellergren, has reviewed the industrial revenue bond documents and has recommended
that the City Council accept the documents as presented.
",..
.
City Council Minutes
December 17, 1984
Page Two
Mayor Hinkle indicated that the City Council gave preliminary approval to the
Barthel PUD for issuance of industrial revenue bonds in October of 1981. Mayor
Hinkle further indicated that the project would not be feasible without the
industrial revenue bonds.
Discussion was carried on regarding the value of the industrial revenue bonds.
The City Administrator indicated that the bonds will be issued in the amount of
$2,200,000 for Parcel A only.
Mr. John Griese, Attorney for Barthel, indicated that the letter from Mr. Barthel
indicating that the project would not be feasible without the issuance of indus-
trial revenue bonds would be a part of the documents, as requested by Mr. Steve
Solomon of the Larkin Hoffman lawfirm.
Discussion was carried on regarding the maturity dates for the equipment and
leasehold improvements. Discussion was also carried on regarding the clause
in the documents discussion tax exempt interest.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE THE FINAL RESOLUTION, RESOLUTION 84-30,
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $3,400,000 IN INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND
NOTES FOR THE BARTHEL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SHOPPING CENTER. COUNCILMEMBER
GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0.
!
8. Turner Variance - Public Hearing
Mr. Arlon Fuchs, representative of the Planning Commission, indicated that Mr. Wade
Turner of 1854 Main Street, has .requested a variance to place an addition onto his
current home, which would be approximately 25 feet from the road right-of-way.
Mr. Fuchs indicated that Mr. Turner has requested the setback variance to allow
him to remove a portion of his existing home and put a new addition to the home
in the same location. Mr. Fuchs further indicated that the addition will be
~he same distance from the road right-of-way as the main portion of the home.
Mr. Fuchs indicated that the Planning Commission considered Mr. Turner's request
at their November 20, 1984 Planning Commission meeting and voted unanimously to
approve the variance request.
Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing. No one appeared for or in opposition of
the variance request.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE A VARIANCE REQUEST BY MR. WADE TURNER OF
1854 MAIN STREET TO PLACE AN ADDITION TO HIS CURRENT HOME APPROXIMATELY 25 FEET
FROM THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
PASSED 3-0.
~. Gerber Variance - Public Hearing
Mr. Arlon Fuchs, representative of the Planning Commission indicated that Mr.
Charles Gerber of 20418 Auburn Street, has requested a variance to allow him to
maintain an accessory building in the required front yard setback of his property.
Mr. Fuchs indicated that Gerber's accessory building encroaches in the front yard
setback by approximately 15 feet. Mr. Fuchs indicated that Mr. Gerber constructed
~
.
City Council Minutes
December 17, 1984
Page Three
the accessory building without a building permit and without previously checking
with the City to determine appropriate setbacks. Mr. Fuchs indicated that the
Planning Commission considered the Gerber variance request at their meeting of
November 20, 1984 and further indicated that the Planning Commission felt that
the necessary variance standards could not be met, that a hardship did not exist,
and that a bad precedent would be established if Mr. Gerber's request was granted.
Therefore, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of the
variance request.
Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing. No one appeared for or in opposition of
the Gerber variance request.
COUNCILMEMBERDUITSMAN MOVED TO DENY A VARIANCE REQUEST BY MR. CHARLES GERBER OF
204l8.AUBURN STREET TO ALLOW A.TWELVE (12) BY FOURTEEN (14) FOOT ACCESSORY BUILDING
TO REMAIN. IN THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK AND TO REQUIRE MR. GERBER TO REMOVE
THE ACCESSORY BUILDING BY MAY 1, 1985. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION PASSED 3-0.
10. Renner Preliminary Plat, Ordinance Amendment and Conditional Use Permit - Public
Hearing
Mr. Arlon Fuchs, representative of the Planning Commission, indicated that Mr. E.H.
Renner of 14747 County Road #30, has requested preliminary plat approval for a
parcel of property at the intersec.tion of Jarvis and Highway 1110 which would create
9 lots in an industrial zone. Mr. Fuchs indicated that the Planning Commission
considered the preliminary plat at their November 20, 1984 Planning Commission
meeting. and voted unanimously to recommend approval. Mr. Fuchs indicated that Mr.
Renner also requested an ordinance amendment and a conditional use permit to enable
him to make specific use of one of the parcels of property in the preliminary plat.
Mr. Fuchs indicated that Mr. Renner wants a residence in one of the office buildings
as proposed for the preliminary plat. Mr. Fuchs indicated that the Planning Com-
mission was uncomfortable with the language as presented and therefore, tabled the
matter until the City Attorney could prepare additional language to address Mr.
Renner's situation. Mr. Fuchs indicated that the Planning Commission wanted the
residence to be within the building and at the time of the sale of the building that
it be converted to office space; therefore, the conditional use would be only for
Mr. Renner.
Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing. No one appeared for or in opposition of
the Renner preliminary plat or the ordinance amendment and conditional use permit.
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AS PRESENTED BY MR.
E.H. RENNER OF 14747 COUNTY ROAD 30 FOR A PARCEL OF PROPERTY AT THE INTERSECTION
OF JARVIS AND HIGHWAY #10. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. TIlE MOTION
PASSED 3-0.
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MR. RENNER'S ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNTIL SUCH TIME AS LANGUAGE ADDRESSING MR.
RENNER'S REQUEST CAN BE PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THEIR APPROVAL AND
THEN PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AT THEIR FEBRUARY MEETING. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0.
r
.
City Council Minutes
December 17, 1984
Page Four
11. Krage Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing
Mr. Arlon Fuchs, representative of the Planning Commission, indicated that Mr.
Wayne Krage of 13400 Island View Drive, is requesting a conditional use permit
for a home occupation to allow him to have a sales and telephone office to dis-
tribute foil pleat insulation. Mr. Fuchs indicated that the home occupation is
not intended to store insulation and that Mr. Krage indicated that only a minimal
amount of storage would be done in the garage. Mr. Fuchs indicated that the
Planning Commission considered Mr. Krage's request at their November 20, 1984
Planning Commission meeting and voted unanimously to recommend approval of the
conditional use permit, with the stipulation that the permit be reviewed in two
years.
Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing. No one appeared for or in opposition of
the conditional use request.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A HOME
OCCUPATION TO MR. WAYNE KRAGE OF 13400 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE WITH THE CONDITIONS
THAT THE PERMIT BE REVIEWED IN TWO (2) YEARS, THAT THERE BE NO NON-RESIDENT
EMPLOYEES, AND THAT THE HOURS OF OPERATION FOR CUSTOMERS OR CLIENTS BE BETWEEN
8 :00 A.M. AND 7 :00 P.M. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
PASSED 3-0.
12. Kreuser Zone Change Request ~ Public Hearing
Mayor Hinkle indicated that the City Council could not consider the Kreuser zone
change request as the request would require a four-fifths vote and there were only
three members of the City Council present.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING. FOR THE KREUSER ZONE
CHANGE REQUEST UNTIL THE NEXT REGULAR SCHEDULED CITY COUNCIL MEETING. COUNCILMEMBER
GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0.
13. Chouinard Variance- Public Hearing
Mr. Arlon Fuchs, representative of the Planning Commission, indicated that Mr.
Richard Chouinard of 19915 Proctor Road, is requesting a variance from the City's
Zoning Ordinance and an administrative subdivision. Mr. Fuchs indicated that Mr.
Chouinard currently owns a parcel of property approximately 2 acres in size on
Proctor Road and is requesting a variance from the City's minimum lot size of 2Yz
acres in the R-lA zone to allow him to divide his two-acre parcel of property into
two parcels. Mr. Fuchs indicated that the Planning Commission reviewed Mr. Chouinard's
request at their November 20, 1984 Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Fuchs indicated
that the Planning Commission determined that Mr. Chouinard could not meet the
necessary variance standards and felt that the granting of the variance could create
a negative precedent and therefore, the Planning Commission's action was to unan-
imously recommend denial of the variance request.
Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing.
Discussion was carried on regarding the size of other lots in the area of Mr.
Chouinard's property. Councilmember Duitsman indicated that he is aware of three
r-
.
City Council Minutes
December 17, 1984
Page Five
homes in the area that are on property of less than an acre. Mr. Chouinard
indicated that the home next to his is on property less than an acre in size.
Mr. Chouinard further indicated that he had requested the variance and admin-
istrative subdivision because he can no longer take care of his two-acre parcel
of property.
Discussion was carried on regarding the possibility of the new lot created as
a buildable lot. Mr. Rick Breezee indicated that he felt a home could be con-
structed on a lot next door to.the Chouinards', depending on the architecture
but further indicated that it was a ~uestion of precedent.
Counci1member Duitsman indicated that he is well aware of the property being
surrounded by other one-acre lots and further indicated that it would be
difficult for him to vote against the City's Ordinance.
Mr. Chouinard indi~aLed~ that his neighbor to the south, Mr. Goodin, was interested
at one point in. time in purchasing part of his property, but they had not been
able to come to an agreement and therefore, Mr. Chouinard indicated he is re-
questing the variance and administrative subdivision to create a separate buildable
lot.
Counci1member Gunkel indicated that she shared the concerns of Counci1member
Duitsman regarding the variance to the City's Zoning Ordinance.
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO DENY THE VARIANCE REQUEST BY MR. RICHARD CHOUINARD
OF 19915 PROCTOR ROAD. COUNCILMEMBER DUITS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
PASSED 3-0.
Mr. Rick Breezee, the City's Building and ZO ing Administrator, indicated that
the Planning Commission has directed City St ff to study the area to determine
if 2~ acre lots are appropriate for the area.
14. Nussbaum Variance- Public Hearing
Mr. Ar10n Fuchs, Planning Commission represe
Nussbaum of 12831 Ranch Road is requesting t
a setback variance from his rear property 1i
building and, 2) a variance from the City's
tura1 buildings from platted areas in the A-
the Planning Commission considered the Nussb
Planning Commission meeting of November 20,
Planning Commission voted unanimously to rec
the variances with the restriction that the
500 fowl and 25 adult animals including goat
Mr. Fuchs indicated that the property owners
objection to the variance request.
Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing.
Mr. Warren Williams, a resident of Greenhead
property, indicated that he did not have a p
questioned the number of anima1s~ Mr. Willi
perty was an unusual situation as it is surr
further indicated that he felt 500 fowl was
dicated that he did now want turkey or geese
fowl.
tative, indicated that Mr. Sam
o variances: 1) that he be granted
e for an accessory agricultural
etback requirements for agricu1-
zones. Mr. Fuchs indicated that
urn request for the variances at the
984. Mr. Fuchs indicated that the
mmendthat),the:: City Council grant
umber of animals be restricted to
, sheep and a maximum of three horses.
to the north have exp~essed no
Acres, a plat adjoining the Nussbaum
ob1em with the building location but
ms indicated that the Nussbaum pro-
unded by platted areas. Mr. Williams
n excessive number and further in-
to be allowed in the number of 500
.
.
City Council Minutes
December 17, 1984
Page Six
Ms. Marge Nussbaum indicated that currently t
fryers and wanted to be allowed to have turke
profitable. Ms. Nussbaum indicated that thei
fryers hut would like to be allowed to have a
ey have 300 laying chickens, 100
, ducks and geese, as they are also
primary business is eggs and
least 100 ducks and geese.
General discussion was carried on regarding t e number of fowl and the type of
fowl allowed. Discussion was also carried on regarding the City's nuisance or-
dinance. Further discussion was also carried on regarding the allowing of turkey,
ducks and geese and whether they would be hou ed in the barn or just penned up
on the property.
Councilmember Gunkel indicated that she has s me problems with placing restrictions
on the variance as the farm property was ther prior to the areas being platted.
Mr. Rick Breezee, Building and Zoning Administrator, indicated that the farm property
was there prior to the various platted areas, and further indicated that the City's
Zoning Ordinance allows for the setback requi ements for agricultural buildings,
as neighbors, whether in a platted area or not, have rights as well.
Mr. Warren Williams indicated that he felt the Nussbaum property was a little
different situation, as it is a small farm of approximately 11 acres which is
generally considered a hobby farm. Mr. Williams indicated that if the farm was
150 acres, the platted areas would not be as close. Mr. Williams indicated that
the previous owners of the Nussbaum property did not have farm animals and that
residents in the area built their homes based upon the fact that there were not
animals on the farm.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE THE AR YARD VARIANCE SETBACK RE UEST
AND THE VARIANCE FROM THE CITY'S SETBACK REQ IREMENTS FROM PLATTED AREAS OR
RESIDENCES IN THE A.;...l ZONE FOR AN ACCESSORY UILDING FOR THE NUSSBAUMS AT 12831
RANCH ROAD, WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE NUSSBAUMS BE RESTRICTED TO 500 FOWL,
EXCLUDING TURKEYS, AND 25 ADULT ANIMALS TO I CLUDE SHEEP, GOATS AND NO MORE THAN
THREE HORSES, AND THAT ANY ANIMALS KEPT OUT F DOORS ARE TO BE PENNED OR MAIN-
TAINED IN AN AREA SOUTH AND WEST OF THE BARN AND THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THE
NUISANCE ORDINANCE SPECIFICALLY APPLY TO THE NUSSBAUM PROPERTY. COUNCILMEMBER
GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASS D 3-0.
15. Tescom Cor oration Administrative Subdivisio - Public Hearin
Mayor Hinkle indicated that the Tescom Corpo ation located at 12616 Industrial
Boulevard is requesting an administrative su division to allow them to add a two-
acre parcel of property to their existing 4. 6 acre parcel of property.
The City Administrator indicated that the Ie a1 description as proposed will change
slightly as there are MSA standards for the urve of the road adjoining the Tescom
property.
Discussion was carried on regarding the ease ent requirements. The City Admin-
istrator indicated that the easements will b a part of the administrative
subdivision plat.
.
.
City Council Minutes
December 17, 1984
Page Seven
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE AN AD NISTRATlVE SUBDIVISION RE UEST FOR
THE TESCOM CORPORATION TO ALLOW THEM TO ADD A 2 ACRE PARCEL OF PROPERTY TO THEIR
EXISTING 4.36 ACRE PARCEL OF PROPERTY IN THE NDUSTRIAL PARK. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0.
16. Preliminar
the Main Stree
Mayor Hinkle indicated that in the City's capital improvement program, the Main
Street Bridge is scheduled for repalcement in 1987. Mayor Hinkle further indicated
that originally it was anticipated that the MSA funds would be utilized to finance
the replacement of the bridge, but because of the high costs associated with the
bridge replacement, it is suggested that the City's engineer look for other alterna-
tives. Mayor Hinkle indicated that in Mr. John Gilber~son's memorandum, Mr.
Gilbertson indicated that a combination of Federal bridge replacement funds and
State bridge replacement funds could be made available. Mayor Hinkle indicated
that the time associated with the Federal and State bridge replacement funds
requires approximately two years, and in order for the City to become eligible
for that funding, the City must complete two studies; 1) a project development
report and, 2) a location design study. Mayor Hinkle indicated that it is
recommended that the City Council authorize the completion of,a project develop-
ment report and a location design study.
General discussion was carried on regarding the ratings as done on an annual basis
by the State. Discussion was also carried on regarding the cost range for the
study. Councilmember Duitsman indicated that he wanted a more firm commitment
from the City Engineer regarding the cost of the study.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY'S ENGINEER TO COMPLETE A PROJECT
DEVELOPMENT REPORT AND A LOCATION DESIGN STUDY FOR THE MAIN STREET BRIDGE REPLACE-
MENT. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0.
17.
Acceptance of Countryside Acres Roads
Mayor Hinkle indicated that the City has received a memorandum from the City's
engineer regarding the acceptance of the Countryside Acres roads.
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE AND ACCEPT THE COUNTRYSIDE ACRES ROADS WITH
THE CONDITION THAT A WARRANTY BOND BE MAINTAINED BY THE DEVELOPER FOR A PERIOD OF
ONE YEAR. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0.
18. Participation in Joint Comparable Worth Study
The City Administrator indicated that the State of Minnesota adopted legislation
that requires that all Minnesota cities, counties, townships and school districts
adopt a comparable worth plan by October 1, 1985 with a two....yearperiod to make
changes necessary. The City Administrator indicated that the Association of Metropol-
itan Cities and the Coalition of Outs tate Cities have joined together to conduct a
joint comparable worth study. The City Administrator indicated that the joint com-
parable worth study would provide a large savings to the City, would be more complete
and defensable, should it be required. The City Administrator indicated that the
~
.
City Council Minutes
December 17, 1984
Page Eight
joint comparable worth study as proposed would cost the City of Elk River approxi-
mately $3,750, and further indicated that should the City pursue the comparable worth
study on its own, it could cost approximately $10,000 to $15,000.
CouncilmemberDuitsman questioned what cities would be participating in the joint
comparable worth study and if there were any other outstate cities that would
form a joint effort in accomplishing a comparable worth study.
The City Administrator indicated that he knew of no other joint comparable worth
studies being done, other than the joint study as proposed by the Coalition of
Outs tate Cities and the Metro Cities.
Councilmember Gunkel indicated that the proposal as submitted by the Control Data
Corporation would provide for the study to be an ongoing process.
Councilmember Duitsman indicated that he had a problem with the joint comparable
worth study being accomplished with the Metro Citiep.
Discussion was carried on reg~rding the proposal by the Control Data
and how the joint comparable worth study would be accompltshed. The
tor indicated that each individual city and employee will be studied
The City Administrator indicated that the study will involve a very
and the study will .place values upon each position within each city.
Corporation
City Administra-
and reviewed.
detailed survey
Discussion was carried on regarding the possibility of Elk River Utilities joining
in the joint comparable worth study and the cost that would be charged the
Utilities.
Councilmember Duitsman requested that the surveys as presented to each of the in-
dividual employees be presented to the City Council prior to returning them to the
Control Date Corporation.
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 84-29, A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
CITY OF ELK RIVER'S PARTICIPATION IN A JOINT COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY TO BE COMPLETED
BY THE CONTROL DATA CORPORATION, WITH THE REQUIREMENT THAT ALL INFORMATION BE PRO-
VIDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL BEFORE BEING SENT TO THE CONTROL DATA CORPORATION.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0.
19. 218th Avenue Improvement Project and Winter Maintenance
Mayor Hinkle indicated that some time ago, the City Council was approached by the
residents of 218th Avenue requesting that the City improve the road to an acceptable
gravel standard and to accept the road for uwnership and maintenance. Mayor Hinkle
indicated that the residents were informed that if the necessary easements for right-
of-way were granted and all of the homeowners affected by the cost would sign a
petition asking for the improvement and agreeing to waive their rights to a public
hearing, the City would proceed with the proj ecL Mayor Hinkle indicated that the
City Administrator has received the documents as required. Mayor Hinkle indicated
that two of the six properties have been excluded for assessment even though the
properties abut 218th. Mayor Hinkle indicated that the properties do not benefit
r-
.
.
I
I
I
City Counbl
December 11.7.
Page Ninel
I
I
I
Minu te s
1984
direcFly from the road improvement. Mayor Hinkle indicated that the four other proper-
ty owpers have agreed that the costs associated with the road improvement will be paid
for bf the four property owners.
Discufsion was carried on regarding the fact that the actual improvement and
accep~an ce of the road improvements cannot be done until the spring of 1985, and
that ~he City Council should consider winter maintenance of 218th Avenue if the City
does frder the completion of the 218th Avenue project.
COUNCtLMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO ACCEPT THE PETITIONS FOR THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT OF
218TH AVENUE AND RECOGNIZE AND DECLARE THAT 100 PERCENT OF THE AFFECTED PROPERTY
OWNE HAVE PETITIONED FOR THE IMPROVEMENT. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE M1 TION PASSED 3-0.
COUNmLMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY'S STREET DEPARTMENT TO PERFORM
WINTE~ MAINTENANCE ON 218TH AVENUE. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MbTION PASSED 3-0.
20.
1985
The City Administrator indicated that the total valuation of the City of Elk River
is approximately $42,030,814. The City Administrator indicated that $434,000 is the
maximum levy allowed for the City's general fund with estimated collections of
$408,000.
General discussion was carried on regarding the proposed levy.
COUN iILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 84- 31 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
THE 1985 TAX LEVY IN THE AMOUNT OF $741,400. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE
MOTI N. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0.
21.
Purc ase of Police Squad Cars
::]e Chief Tom Zerwas discussed his memorandum to the City Administnrtor dated
December 14, 1984 regarding the purchase of an additional squad car. Tom Zerwas
indidated that there were funds available in the 1984 police department budget
to a]low for the purchase of an additional car in 1984.
COUN ILMEMBERDUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE AN ADDITIONAL S UAD CAR PURCHASE IN THE
1984 BUDGET. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0.
22. Eagl~s Club Mechanical Amusement Device License
I
COUN I LMEMB ER DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE THE MECHANICAL AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSE
FOR HE EAGLES CLUB. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0.
23. CIP
The ity Administrator indicated that at the December 3rd City Council meeting,
a nadrative regarding the capital improvement program was distributed to the City
Coun IiI. The City Administrator requested that any comments or additions or
",...
.
.
City Council Minutes
December 17, 1984
Page Ten
corrections the City Council wishes to make should be accomplished before the
final draft is made available to the Economic Development Commission.
It was the Conseasus of the City Council that the draft of the capital improvement
program was accurate and complete and should be submitted to the Economic Develop-
ment Conunission.
24. Administrator's Update
A. Snow Plowing Policy
Discussion was carried on re~~rding the snow plowing policy as proposed.
Councilmember Gunkel indicated that she felt the snow plowing policy was reason-
able.
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE SNOW PLOWING POLICY AS SlJBMITTED.
COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0.
B. Minnesota Coalition of Outstate Cities
The City Administrator indicated that a representative of the City of Elk
River has been named to the subcommittee for the Coalition of Outs tate Cities
Lobbyists. The City Administrator further indicated that the comparison of
Elk River to the Coalition member cities and to the metro area suburbs pro-
vides information to the City Council.
C. Budget
It was the consensus of the City Council that the City Council would select
its next budget meeting date at the January 7th City Council Meeting.
D. Newsletter
The City Administrator indicated that the City staff would begin preparation
of the City's newsletter in January.
E. Meeting with the Chamber of Conunerce - January 22, 1985
The City Administrator indicated that the Chamber of Commerce has requested
that the City Council and City staff meet with the Chamber on January 22, 1985
to open up lines of communication between the Chamber and the City Council and
to further discuss building plans for the City. The City Administrator in-
dicated that the Chamber of Conunerce is conducting a survey which will also
be discussed at that January 22.nd meeting.
F. Heavenly Hills Assessment Appeal
The City Administrator indicated that the Heavenly Hills assessment appeal
is scheduled for trial by court on Monday, January 28, 1985 at 9:00 a.m.
before the Honorable Glen W. Swenson.
~
City Council Minutes
December 17, 1981'1
Page Eleven
.25.
Check Register
COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE DECEMBER 11, 1984 CHECK REGISTER.
COUNCILMEMBERDUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0.
There being no further business, COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE
ADJOURNED. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0.
R~~;eC~~Ul~y submi.tte7' ')
(:-" (/....";jtt~, ((:; o-e ,::tZjj hL/:YJ- ( .
_:/7,,;. .
Phyllis Boedighei er
City Clerk/Treasurer
PB:dk