The URL can be used to link to this page

3 PCSR 01-12-1995 3 APPI VED MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER STEERING COMMITTEE HELD AT ELK RIVER CITY HALL THURSDAY, JANUARY 12, 1995 Members Present: Chairman Minton, Committee Members: Hank Duitsman, Dick Hinkle, Mary McDevitt, Lloyd Barthel, Arne Engstrom, Chris Kreger, Dave Anderson, Mark Lucas, Mary Eberley, Marly Glines, Pat Dwyer, Merry Sipe and Bill Birrenkott. Members Absent: Committee Member Keith Holme Staff Present: Steve Ach, City Planner 1. Call Meeting To Order The January 12, 1995 meeting of the Elk River Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chair Minton. 2. Consider Steering Committee Agenda DICK HINKLE MOVED TO APPROVE THE 1/12/95 STEERING COMMITTEE AGENDA. CHRIS KREGER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 7-0. • 3. Consider Steering Committee Minutes PAT DWYER MOVED TO APPROVE THE 12/1/95 STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES. CHRIS KREGER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 8-0. 4. Introduction of Southeast Planning Area 4.1. General Characteristics Overview of the Southeast Planning Area provided by Steve Ach. Maps were provided for location of the following: -The Southeast Planning Area boundaries - Cargill, Specht, Baldwin and Kelly Farm properties -Developed residential properties -Tree masses -Floodplains, shorelands,wetlands -Residential zoned property The Southeast Planning Area is bordered by 197th on the north, Tyler Street alignment and the Mississippi River on the West, and the City limits on the east; approximately 6,000 acres in size. Three main transportation routes divide the Planning area-Highway 10, Country Road #12 and Country Road #13. Cargill, Specht, Baldwin and the State of Minnesota control a majority of the property 4111 along East Highway 10 and play an important role in the extension of sewer and Steering Committee Minutes Page 2 January 12, 1995 • water into this area. Steve Ach noted that the Southeast Planning Area wetlands and large tree masses can be used as amenities in residential development. 4.2. Inventory of Land Uses Steve provided and inventory of residential, commercial and industrial property in the Southeast Planning Area. 4.3. Sewer Extensions At a previous meeting, City Engineer Terry Maurer, presented a preliminary feasibility study to extend city sewer and water east along Highway 10. The study included a "primary" and an "ultimate" study area. Steve explained that as a result of the study, it was determined that it is possible to serve the entire area with city water and sewer. 4.4. Land Use/Zoning Issues The Southeast Planning Area has one residential zoning district which is R 1 a, with a minimum lot size of 2-1/2 acres. Steve Ach explained that the limited number of 2-1/2 acre subdivisions in this planning area would make it easier to extend city sewer and water, when compared with the northern area. Steve noted the importance of identifying the ultimate city sewer and water service area, so that appropriate zoning can be established. Steve explained • that a moratorium was passed by the City Council to prevent subdivisions of land into parcels of less than 10 acres. Another issue is to determine the specific boundaries of commercial and industrial zoning on both the north and south side of East Highway 10, and how these areas will be affected by decisions regarding city sewer and water extensions. Ed Studniski, 9936 174th Avenue NW, resident of Hidden Creek subdivision, questioned whether or not areas would be rezoned if water and sewer were extended. Chair Minton stated that the improvements would be too expensive for 2-1/2 acre lots and probably would be rezoned. Paul Motin, 9910 174th Avenue NW, Hidden Creek subdivision, stated that it was his understanding there were covenants for Hidden Creek which referred to an agreement with the City requiring the developer to put in water and sewer laterals. Hank Duitsman, Committee Member, stated that covenants are not enforced by the City or County; only by the courts. He stated that he found it difficult to believe the City would have required laterals back then, since there were no plans for service to that area. Dick Hinkle stated that he served on the Council when Hidden Creek was platted and felt sure there were no laterals for sewer and water. Chair Minton stated that staff would research the issue. 0 Steering Committee Minutes Page 3 January 12, 1995 • Renee Pomerleau, 18996 Sunrise Circle, Sunset Ridge subdivision, questioned if sewer and water would be brought out to Sunset Ridge since most of the lots are 2-1/2 to 5 acres. Steve Ach explained that if it is determined that sewer and water are to be extended in the southeast planning area, it would be an incremental process, beginning with East Highway 10. He added that if it was decided to extend services in this direction it would be several years before it would ever extend into the residential areas in the Sunset Ridge location. Hank Duitsman explained that a public hearing will be held in the spring regarding extension of water and sewer from the railroad tracks south out to 165th. He did not feel that property owners north of tracks would be in favor because the costs would be too high for larger parcels and force people into development. Randy Barney, 19008 Lincoln Street, expressed his concern that Lincoln Street should remain a neighborhood street and not become a main transportation route. Renee Pomerleau stated that she would not be in favor of a development which would cause their street to become a through-street. Hank Duitsman suggested that the east-west corridor proposal be published in the paper to solicit public input. He stated that a recommendation is expected • from the Steering Committee on this issue. Steve Ach stated that Viking Boulevard is likely to be a connection point to the Anoka County east-west transportation system. Gerry Ruppelius, 10496 181st Avenue NW (County Road 12), stated that he was aware that the farm property across the road from his had been sold to a developer. Also the County will be upgrading County Road 12 next year and he asked whether or not it is planned to extend utilities at that time. Steve Ach explained that a realignment of County Road 12 is planned. Mr. Ruppelius stated the County Engineer indicated that they plan to widen and upgrade the road. He also stated he was not in favor of city water and sewer extending to his property. Dwight Kirkeide, 11230 173rd Avenue NW, stated that he owned 13 acres in Section 10 along the Mississippi River, zoned C3 Highway Commercial. He expressed his opposition to city water and sewer because of the high cost. He also noted that much of his property is located in floodplain. Hank Duitsman explained that floodplain property is not assessed. Pat Holzem, 19049 Davis Street, questioned how floodplain is identified. Steve Ach explained that when an area is included in an assessment project, the City Engineer would make a determination whether or not a particular property is in floodplain. Emma Holzem, 18925 Davis Street, explained that the U.S. Geological Society • maps done last year identifies their property as 1-2-3 Wetland and is unsuitable for housing. Steering Committee Minutes Page 4 January 12, 1995 • Ruth Brown, 18015 175th Avenue NW, asked for clarification on whether or not the water and sewer is going to be extended. Chair Minton explained that a public hearing will be held in the spring to extend utilities east on Highway 10 to 165th. He stated that information indicates it is too expensive to extend utilities to lots 2- 1/2 acres and larger in size. Hank Duitsman stated that if sewer and water were extended to these larger lots, the zoning would also be changed to allow subdivision into smaller lots. Ms. Brown questioned the affect subdividing would have on property values. Chris Kreger stated that the land value per square foot would go up because more lots could be created. Hank Duitsman explained that the property value would likely be more since a larger house could be built on a bigger lot. Chair Minton added that city sewer and water would add to the value. A resident from the Tyler Street area questioned whether or not sewer and water would be extended to his property, since it is not too far from Hillside Estates. Mary Eberley stated that there were residents from the Tyler Street area present at the Hillside Estates public hearing who asked that question and no decision has been made at this time. Hank Duitsman explained that the Council will meet in February to discuss the issue and that public hearings will be held before any thing is decided. Jeff Hendrickson, 11119 167th Avenue NW, asked if the sewer and water would come through Mississippi Heights if the residents there did not want it. Hank Duitsman stated that they would probably be assessed for the main line, but if the • majority of the residents did not want to hook up, they would not have a lateral assessment. Truman Moyer, 16807 Highway 10, asked why businesses along Highway 10 would be forced to hook up. He questioned who wanted the sewer and water extended and stated that those people that wanted it should pay for it. Chair Minton explained that no decision has been made to extend it. Chair Minton stated there is pressure to have city sewer and water in order for the City to attract industry. Dawn Moyer, 1116807 Highway 10, asked how far the extension is proposed. Hank Duitsman stated that the Council has discussed that the extension go down to 165th just west of the Specht farm, up to the railroad. He stated that the reason is to encourage industrial development and also the commercial businesses need the services for fire protection, etc. He added that there are people on both sides of the issue and that public hearings are held to determine what the majority of the property owners want. Chair Minton asked the audience what they would like to see in the Southeast area in the future. Mark Rockiles, Lincoln Street, stated an area could be established closer to Highway 10 for smaller lots with city water and sewer, and also, to maintain the remaining residential area for larger lots. . Ed Studniski, 9936 174th Avenue NW, stated that he would like to see his area continue to have the 2-/12 acre minimum lot size. Steering Committee Minutes Page 5 January 12, 1995 • Arne Engstrom stated that the Committee is looking for comments from the residents regarding how they would like to see this area developed 20-30 years from now. He explained that residential developments alone cannot carry the tax burden to support schools and city services. He stressed the importance of setting aside land now for industrial and commercial. Renee Pomerleau, Sunrise Circle, stated that residents in the Sunset Ridge subdivision pay higher taxes than most other property owners in the City ($2,500 to $5,000 per parcel), and she does not feel they receive any services, other than the snowplow. She stated that there are no amenities such as parks or trails and also expressed her frustration with the street system. Ms. Pomerleau explained that she lives at the end of a cul-de-sac and all the water, sand and garbage comes down the street to the front of her property. Dave Anderson, Committee Member, stated that he would encourage people to ask for parks. He stated that the Park and Recreation Commission is focusing on additional parks for the sewer and water area at this time, but that they are looking at putting in larger regional parks and trail systems for the surrounding area. Ms. Pomerleau stated that there is a great need for something in their area since she would estimate there are an average of 3 children per household. Truman Moyer stated that he did not understand why the City is not looking at going farther out Highway 10 with sewer and water, since a large portion of property is taken up by Cargill and the Oliver Kelly Farm. He added that he felt there would be more opportunity for development beyond those properties. II Chair Minton stated that the City is aware that Cargill has no plans to sell or develop their property at this time and explained that areas could be rezoned for development in the future. Mike Crepeau, 19016 Lincoln Street, suggested that other areas also be considered for industrial development. He also stated that he does not feel proud of the appearance of the East Highway 10 due to the number of billboards. Mr. Crepeau asked that the Committee to what they can to ensure that new development along Highway 10 be architecturally appealing. Truman Moyer requested that the speed limit on Highway 10 be given consideration. Mary Eberley stated that she felt this is an important issue and should be part of the Committee's review. Ron Middelstad, 19681 Twin Lakes Road, stated that he would like to see his area remain rural as long as possible. He stated he hoped 197th would not be made an east-west corridor. Paul Motin, 9910 174th Avenue NW, stated that he would like to see the larger lot developments remain, except possibly closer to Highway 10. Also, he stated that he felt there is a need for more office space in the community. Renee Pomerleau expressed her concern regarding the need for a safe area for biking and walking along the County roads. Dave Anderson stated that the Park and Recreation Commission is aware of this need. Arne Engstrom stated that he • has proposed that any new County road be provided with a biking/pedestrian area on one side. Steering Committee Minutes Page 6 January 12, 1995 • has proposed that any new County road be provided with a biking/pedestrian area on one side. Emma Holzem stressed the need to preserve trees for environmental purposes. Randy Barney questioned what kind of businesses are proposed for east Highway 10. Steve Ach stated that the current zoning is industrial and commercial which allows a broad range of businesses. He stated that eventually uses would be similar to what is occuring along Highway 169. Steve stated that he would expect to see more of the larger retailers move out there if water and sewer were extended. LeRoy Brown, 10815 175th Avenue NW, questioned whether or not he would be assessed if the utilities did not go beyond the railroad tracks and 165th. Hank Duitsman stated an area of benefit would be determined by the City Engineer and those people would be assessed. Pete Salem, 19459 Tyler Street, expressed his concern regarding assessment costs for his property. He stated that he has a larger parcel which could only be divided into 2 lots, because of the wetlands. Hank Duitsman stated that wetlands would be excluded. Discussion followed regarding green acres deferment. It was noted that interest on assessments would still accrue on green acres property, even if the assessment itself did not have to be paid at that time. • 5. Other Business Chair Minton proposed that a comment phone line be set up for citizens to express their views on the overall visual aesthetics of the city and the image they would like to see projected. Committee members suggested that questions be included on an east-west corridor, bike/pedestrian pathways and housing mix. Discussion followed regarding R4-zoned property. MARY EBERLEY MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL PLACE A CITY- WIDE MORATORIUM ON ANY FURTHER R3 AND R4 MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT, UNTIL THE ZONING CAN BE FURTHER INVESTIGATED BY THE STEERING COMMITTEE DURING THEIR REVIEW OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. DICK HINKLE SECONDED THE MOTION. Merry Sipe expressed her concern that she is not completely sure of where all these R3 and R4 properties are located. Pat Dwyer stated that this motion is a only a recommendation, and that the City Council would hold a public hearing before any decision would be made. Dick Hinkle stated that he feels the moratorium would prevent construction of apartments on property that is currently zoned for them, but may be under consideration for rezoning. He further expressed his concern that the Committee try to move as quickly as possible and not drag out the process. He stated that 11) he would like to see their work completed by the end of May if possible. THE MOTION CARRIED 13-1. CHRIS KREGER OPPOSED. Steering Committee Minutes Page 7 January 12, 1995 6. Future Meeting The next meeting of the Elk River Steering Committee will be February 9, 1995. There will be a presentation by the Park and Recreation Commission. Chair Minton stated that Steve Ach will be compiling a list of issues for discussion at the Steering Committee meeting including the following: -land use mix (commercial, industrial, residential) -amount of single family housing vs. number of apartments He noted that the meetings will be informal with time set aside for citizen input. Chair Minton requested that the letter from Tom and Ruth Jenior be included in the official record of the Steering Committee. CHRIS KERGER MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. ARNE ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 14-0. The Elk River Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, 7A„,"_,) Debbie Kleckner Recording Secretary • jbyr) )/ /lip 0 D • MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER STEERING COMMITTEE HELD AT ELK RIVER CITY HALL THURSDAY, MARCH 23, 1995 Members Present: Chair Minton, Committee Members Dick Hinkle, Dave Anderson, Mark Lucas, Merry Sipe, Mary Eberley, Hank Duitsman, Pat Dwyer, Chris Kreger, Arne Engstrom, Keith Holme and Bill Birrenkott. Members Absent: Committee Members Lloyd Barthel, Mary McDevitt and Manly Glines Staff Present: Stephen Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator; Terry Maurer, City Engineer, Debbie Kleckner, Recording Secretary 1. Call Meeting To Order The March 23, 1995 meeting of the Elk River Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Chair Minton. 2. Consider Steering Committee Agenda 11 HANK DUITSMAN MOVED APPROVAL OF THE 3/23/95 STEERING COMMITTEE AGENDA. BILL BIRRENKOTT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 12-0. 3. Consider Steering Committee Minutes DICK HINKLE MOVED APPROVAL OF THE MARCH 6, 1995 STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES. MARY EBERLEY SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 12-0. 4. Consider Options for Expanding Urban Service Area Chair Minton stated that the Meadowvale Heights subdivision will not be included in the discussion for extending water and sewer. Terry Maurer, City Engineer, provided information regarding Option 6 and Option 7 to extend the urban service district. Option 6 -Add the Brady property to the current urban service district, add a portion along the eastern part of the city which would extend east from the current urban service district over to the eastern city limits, down to Highway 10, and take in much of the property between the highway and railroad tracks over to the river, excluding the Hidden Creek Estates subdivision. Option 7-A combination of two previously discussed areas, Options 3 &4. Terry referred the Committee to the table which was distributed in their packet, 411 comparing Options 6 and 7. Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Page 2 March 23, 1995 • Option 6 - 1,900 developable acres left after deducting the wetlands and floodplain and 25% lost for right-of-way, easements, parks, etc. Under this option, the sewage generation and water consumption would be the equivalent of 14,700 people. Option 7-This option has a net developable acreage of 1,350. The sewage generation and water consumption population equivalent fully developed of 10,700. Terry explained that the greatest difference between the two plans is the cost to cross the wetland and floodplain areas to extend the water and sewer. Dave Anderson used overlay transparencies to identify the following: -Power lines -Developable land -Wetlands -Businesses along Highway 10 -Specht and Cargill properties -Plat map identifying property owners He summarized that if the owners of the Specht and Cargill properties are not interested in developing at this time, it would not make sense to extend sewer and water beyond the existing commercial and industrial area in the Highway 10/165th Avenue location. He stressed the importance of listening to the • property owners regarding what they want. He discussed issues related to expanded residential development including loss of productive farmland, wildlife displacement, destruction of forests, increased traffic delays, additional demands on the school system, and increased need for city services. Dave stated that all the residents he has spoken with feel that extending the urban service district will force development of 10,000 acre lots. They feel this will result in a loss in the quality of life they moved to Elk River to experience. Chris proposed Phase 2 to include the Specht and Cargill properties so that if they petitioned, services could be extended and that the pipe be sized for this option. Chris Kreger stated that he is in favor of a phasing plan for 5, 10, 15 and 20 years in order to give property owners as much notice as possible regarding the City's plan for future growth. Chair Minton stated that it was his understanding the industrial, commercial and residential growth would be directed eastward. Hank Duitsman stated that he did not feel there would be any controversy regarding Area 1, since the developers are petitioning to have city sewer and water. He suggested that Areas 6, 7, 8 and 11, 13, 15, an 16 be the first phase in extending the urban service district. Hank then suggested that 2, 3, 4, 9 and half of 11 and 14 in the second phase. This would be an extension of the residential and also allow for commercial development. • Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Page 3 March 23, 1995 • Terry Maurer explained a method which could be used to extend water and sewer in phasing. Stoffel Reitsma, resident, stated that he owned property in Area 8. He indicated that he is not interested in developing his property at this time and that he felt the land was better suited to a more rural setting. Mr. Reitsma stated that if they were assessed they would be forced to sell their property. He stated that it would make sense to hook up Earl Hohlen's property since it is along the highway but not to go further, since he did not want it. He also noted that there is park land behind his property and farm land across the road which contains a large amount of wetlands. Discussion followed regarding absorption rates for residential property. Terry Maurer explained that current flow at the wastewater treatment facility is approximately 600,000 gallons per day. If all the current available lots and undeveloped property within the existing urban service district were served with city water and sewer, it would double the amount of usage at the treatment plant (an additional 600,000 gallons per day). Steve Rohlf explained that 1994 was the first year there were more permits issued for city sewer and water lots than non-urban service lots. Chris Kreger expressed his concern that private septic systems have the potential to pollute wetlands. Leroy Brown, 10815 175th Avenue NW, stated that he owns approximately 160 acres in Area 11, bounded on the west by the railroad tracks and on the north • by the Earl Hohlen and the Vandenberg properties. He expressed his concern that he would be forced to sell out if he is assessed for extending water and sewer. He stated that he would like to preserve it as it is, with its wild life and wetlands. Mark Lucas stated that he felt the Committee should discuss how far into the future they are attempting to project. Discussion followed regarding reasons to plan for sewer and water and development projections. Terry Maurer explained that using the western area as an example, it may 10 years before sewer and water is fully extended. Mary Eberley stressed that the Committee needs to look further than five years into the future and should consider issues such as roads, trails, parks and preservation of land. Chair Minton requested that the following letters be entered into the public record: 1. Mississippi Heights residents-Signatures from 100 percent of the property owners, stating they do not want city water and sewer. 2. Business owners along East Highway 10 - In favor of extending sewer and water. 0 Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Page 4 March 23, 1995 • Jerry Richoias, property owner on County Road 12, questioned why the City is pursuing the extension of city water and sewer, rather than waiting for a petition from the land owners. He stated that if his property is assessed he will be forced to sell his property. Jerry Hofhenke, 15860 228th Avenue NW, stated that residents in the southeast area enjoy their peace and quiet and their privacy. He added that the smaller lot sizes and road to be discussed later goes against what the residents have told them they want. He asked that the Committee listen to what the people want. Chair Minton stated that the City can not stop development and that the Committee's job is to see that it happens in an orderly fashion. Chris Kreger explained that the Committee is attempting to define an area that can accept city water and sewer eventually. He added that this does not mean it will actually go in; that is a City Council budget issue. Chris stated that he wants the City to have some control over the growth. Merry Sipe stated that she feels the plans being proposed are projecting 30 years into the future, not 5, 10 or 15 years. Hank Duitsman stated that there are commercial business owners east on Highway 10 who want sewer and water. He stated he does not feel there is a need for more residential property served with sewer and water at this time. • Arne Engstrom stated that he would like to see those properties identified on a map whose owners want water and sewer extended. Chair Minton suggested Areas 5, 6, 7, 10, 12, and 13 be included in the extended urban service district. Arne Engstrom suggested that the extended urban service district include those properties which want it. Hank Duitsman stated that he did not feel it would be financially feasible to extend sewer and water to such a limited area. George Deschenes, 18513 Twin Lakes Road, expressed his concern that developers pay the cost for water and sewer out of their own pocket, not the property owners around them. Rick Kurth, owner of Broadway Bar and Pizza, stated that he would like it on the record that he is one business owner on Highway 10 that does not want city sewer and water. Milt Tuttle, 13390 Ranch Road, questioned how other costs associated with development will be paid, such as streets, storm sewer, and parks. • Terry Maurer indicated that Area 5 is the highway interchange area. He explained that the design of the sewer trunk line will be sized according to how Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Page 5 March 23, 1995 far east the line will be extended. The City will then need to determine how much of that area will be assessed. Terry explained that the line cannot be sized smaller to save costs now, and later add property further east. Hank Duitsman added that the pipe must be oversized now to allow for future expansion. Chair Minton questioned what the costs would be to serve the area in the 5 year plan under discussion, compared to what the costs would be to serve the "ultimate" area. Terry Maurer stated that typically in the past, the City has carried the cost for serving the ultimate area, so it would be hard to provide a dollar figure for that difference. Terry explained that in the western area improvement project, area 1 would have been close to $5,000 per acre, area 2 would have been somewhat lower, and by the time it was extended all the way out to area 4 the costs may have been approximately$2,000 per acre, since the lift station was already in and the pipes are smaller. Terry Maurer stated that the startup costs will be higher for the East Highway 10 to go through the Mn/DOT right-of-way highway interchange and UPA property. CHRIS KREGER MOVED THAT THE STEERING COMMITTEE DESIGNATE AREAS SHOWN ON THE MAP AS 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, PART OF 11 AND PART OF 12, AND 1 AS THE EXPANDED URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. Chris Kreger then proposed that the following motions be made: MOTION NUMBER 2. THAT THE COMMITTEE APPROVE INCLUDING APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF (1/2) OF AREAS 2, 3 AND 4 AS THE EXPANDED SERVICE AREA FOR THE • NEXT FIVE TO TEN (5 - 10) YEARS. MOTION NUMBER 3. THAT THE COMMITTEE CONSIDER THE AREA DESCRIBED ON THE ATTACHED MAP, FOR THE EXPANDED URBAN SERVICE AREA FOR THE NEXT TEN TO FIFTEEN (10-15) YEARS. MOTION NUMBER 4. THAT THE COMMITTEE CONSIDER THE AREA DESCRIBED ON THE ATTACHED MAP, AS THE EXPANDED SERVICE AREA FOR THE NEXT 15 TO TWENTY-FIVE (15 -25) YEARS. Hank Duitsman questioned the audience whether or not there was anyone in the audience that was interested in having sewer and water in the far south east Highway 10 area of the City. He explained that the City Council needs to know if this is all the further the sewer is going to go in order to determine the size of the trunk lines. Chair Minton noted that the first motion includes Mr. and Mrs. Leroy Brown's property. Arne Engstrom stated that if Brown's property included he would vote against the motion. Chris Kreger stated that Area #8 and #11 would most likely be included and assessed if the City Council voted to extend the sewer and water. Arne stated that he felt that area should only be included if the property owners petitioned for sewer and water. Arne continued that it is known that property owners in Areas 5, 6, 7 and parts of 12 want sewer, but people in Areas 8 and 11 do not want it. • Steve Rohlf stated that he was involved in the previous update of the urban service district in 1990. He stated that the Committee needs to look as far out Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Page 6 March 23, 1995 111 into the future as possible and come up with a plan. He added that the City needs to stick to that plan as much as possible, but that by reviewing the plan every five years, adjustments can be made as they are needed. ARNE ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION NUMBER 1 WITH THE CONDITION THAT AREA 8 AND 11 BE STRUCK FROM THE CHRIS KREGER'S ORIGINAL MOTION. THIS AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION WAS ACCEPTED BY MR. KREGER. Chris Kreger explained that the 10- 15 year plan included that part of Area #11 which was previously blocked out. The (15 -25) year plan would pick up area #8. He stated that he did not feel it would happen that way, in reality, because of the costs. Dave Anderson questioned whether or not Area #13 is included in the motion. CHRIS KREGER ADDED PART OF AREA 13 TO MOTION NUMBER 1. Dick Hinkle stated that the cost would be prohibitive to put in sewer and water in the proposed area because it was too small. Terry Maurer stated that the City would have to carry a significant part of the cost initially for costs to put lines through the Highway 169 and Highway 10 intersection and UPA area, which would not be assessed. He explained that 5 - 10 year service area proposal does not extend this service area so the City would need to carry the costs at least 10 years. S Rick Kurth, owner of Broadway Bar& Pizza, questioned whether or not there are plans for industrial or commercial development east of his business. Chair Minton stated that issue will be discussed at a future meeting. He stated that he did not feel there were enough businesses out there to support extending the sewer and water at this time. THE MOTION CARRIED 10-2. MERRY SIPE AND HANK DUITSMAN OPPOSED. CHRIS KREGER MOVED TO DESIGNATE AREA NUMBER 2 AS THE EXTENDED URBAN SERVICE AREA FOR THE NEXT FIVE TO TEN (5 - 10) YEARS. Wesley Hunt questioned whether or not there would be a public hearing before the second phase is implemented. Chair Minton stated that there would be a hearing before any thing was decided. Arne Engstrom explained that this is only a plan for the next 5 - 10 years and that it will be reviewed again in five years. Dick Hinkle questioned whether or not the zoning will be changed so that property owners cannot do anything with their property for the next 10 years or until sewer and water comes. Chair Minton stated that it would need to preserved somehow. Dick Hinkle stated that he wanted the property owners to be aware that the fact that they are included in the urban service district will affect the zoning of their property and what they can do with it. Mark Lucas indicated that areas and 2 and 3 should be reversed. Arne IPEngstrom stated that they could be combined to be just area 2. Pat Dwyer Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Page 7 March 23, 1995 • stated that property owners must be aware there will be larger minimum lot sizes which will be enforced. CHRIS KREGER AMENDED MOTION NUMBER 2 TO CHANGE AREA 3 TO 2, AND ALSO AREA 4 WOULD BE 3, AND ALSO THAT IT WOULD BE A FIVE TO FIFTEEN (5 - 15) YEAR PLAN TO EXTEND THE URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT (PHASE 2). THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. DAVE ANDERSON MOVED THAT THE NEXT AREA IS NUMBER 3 THAT BE INCLUDED EXCEPT THAT AREA 13 IS INCLUDED AND NOT AREA 14, AND INCLUDES THE CARGILL AND THE SPECHT PROPERTY. Dave Anderson asked that the representative of Cargill speak on this issue. Rita Schmal, Cargill representative, stated that Cargill does not want to be in the real estate business and would like to stay in the farming business. DAVE ANDERSON WITHDREW HIS MOTION. CHRIS KREGER MOVED THAT THE AREA DESCRIBED ON THE ATTACHED SKETCH BE INCLUDED IN THE URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT FIVE TO FIFTEEN (5 - 10) YEAR PLAN. MARY EBERLEY SECONDED THE MOTION. • Dave Anderson expressed his objection to the residential property being included in this motion. He stated that he has not heard of any residential development in this area that they want water and sewer. Brent Cotton, 19215 Tyler Street, expressed his objection to water and sewer. Mary Eberley expressed her agreement that the zoning must also be discussed, since zoning must follow the comprehensive land use plan. She suggested that it may be necessary to create a new zoning district to meet the intent of the comprehensive land use plan. She stated it may be too restrictive if extended urban service district plan is adopted, and zoning is put in place to preserve the land for future service. Ghost platting was suggested as a means of developing residential property so that it could be subdivided in the future to service more economically with water and sewer. Discussion followed regarding existing residential parcels of 2-1/2 acres and the difficulty to subdivide them to service with water and sewer in the future. Discussion also covered the exclusion of flood plain and wetland property from assessments. Dave Anderson questioned why the Committee could not only deal with the commercial and industrial target areas for extending water and sewer. Chris Kreger stated that if residential is not included in the second phase, it would be cut off from the ability to extend it anytime in the future. Dave questioned • whether the residential needs to be included to support the industrial and commercial sewer and water extensions. Chair Minton and Chris Kreger agreed Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Page 8 March 23, 1995 • that data supports that need. Dave Anderson expressed concern that the residents do not want 10,000 square foot lots; they want it to remain rural and keep the 2-1/2 acre minimum. Arne Engstrom questioned why the residential needs to be included now if there are enough residential lots within the present urban service district to serve development for the next 10 years. Chris Kreger explained that the inclusion of residential is for the 5 - 15 year plan. Janet Cotton, 19215 Tyler Street, questioned if they would have restrictions of 10 acre minimum lot sizes if they are included in the urban service district plan. She stated that if sewer and water may not come for 15 years, it would not be right for them not be able to do anything with their land, other than its current use. Chair Minton stated that there would be restrictions to preserve it for future possible development. Chris Kreger stated that there would likely be larger lot size restrictions. He stated that he would recommend that lots in Area 2 and 3 be a minimum of five acres when zoning issues are discussed by the Committee. Dick Hinkle stated that he would not be able to vote in favor of including residential property in the proposed urban service district, not knowing what the ramifications will be, in regard to minimum lot sizes and zoning. Stoffel Reistma, property owner in Area 8, stated that he is not interested in developing his property right now, but for someone that does, the impact of a rezoning is of great concern. He asked that Committee must first consider what is the desired maximum population of Elk River. He stated that the broader issue III is where they see Elk River in the future. Hank Duitsman stated that the growth is going to come, and the size of the lots will determine the population. Chair Minton added that population issues will be addressed at a future meeting. Mr. Reitsma stated that he felt the extension of the urban service district should be discussed after the Committee makes a determination of the maximum desired population. He added that designating residential property at this time as being in the urban service district will determine the population will be. Mr. Reitsma stated that he felt this proposal for such a large expansion of the urban service district is a total contradiction of what the City determined five years ago. He stated he felt the Committee should be discussing whether or not the residents of Elk River really want to throw out the old plan and come up with a new one, and do we really want to grow that large. A young resident stated that he has lived here all his life. He questioned why the Committee wants to make the City bigger when there is not enough room in the schools now. Chair Minton called for a vote at this time. THE MOTION FAILED 5-7. Chris Kreger requested that the audience conduct themselves in an orderly manner. Hank Duitsman stated that this meeting is not the last chance for changes in the • plan, and that a public hearing will be conducted by the Planning Commission and also the City Council before a plan is adopted. Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Page 9 March 23, 1995 IllCHRIS KREGER MOVED THAT THE COMMITTEE RECOMMEND THE AREA DESCRIBED AS AS THE FIVE TO FIFTEEN (5 - 15) YEAR PLAN FOR EXTENDING THE URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT. (EXTENDS EASTERLY; TAKES OUT THE WETLANDS AND SOME OF THE RESIDENTIAL). MARY EBERLEY SECONDED THE MOTION. Dave Anderson stated he did not support this plan. He stated there is a large working farm in this area, several small developments, a city park and a huge wetland in the proposed area. Pat Holzem, resident, questioned whether or not this farm is buildable and also stated that the property could not support such a large assessment. THE MOTION FAILED 2-11. DAVE ANDERSON MOVED THAT AN ULTIMATE SERVICE AREA INCLUDE THE PORTION OF AREA 13 THAT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE FIRST PHASE, AREA 15, EXCLUDE THE MISSISSIPPI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, INCLUDE THE PORTION OF AREA NOT PREVIOUSLY INCLUDED, AND THAT IT ONLY BE SERVED WITH SEWER AND WATER WHEN THE TWO PROPERTY OWNERS PETITION FOR THE SERVICES. Dave stated that he wished to include all the existing industrial zoning in the motion. • CHRIS KREGER SECONDED THE MOTION. Hank Duitsman stated that he supports the concept of the plan, but that when it comes down to defining an area for sewer and water, these plans will not work. Dick Hinkle stated that if both motions were included in a five-year plan, it may work financially. Arne Engstrom stated that he felt those that benefit the most from sewer and water should pay the most, and those benefiting the least should not be forced to pay more than they can afford. THE MOTION CARRIED 9-2-1. MARY EBERLEY ABSTAINED. Dick Hinkle explained that he did not wish to see the large residential included in the plan because of the fact that it could be 20 years before they would be able to use the system. CHRIS KREGER MOVED THAT PART OF AREA 11 AND 8 BE INCLUDED IN THE ULTIMATE SERVICE AREA, AND THAT IT ONLY BE SERVICED WHEN THE PROPERTY OWNERS PETITION FOR SEWER AND WATER. HANK DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Page 10 March 23, 1995 S Discussion followed regarding the Leroy Brown property and their desire to leave the property out of the urban service. Chris Kreger explained his reasons for including it in the ultimate urban service district. Hank Duitsman stated that sewer and water will not be petitioned by residents but rather, by developers, unless there is some type of ground water pollution problem. He added that the drive for sewer and water on Highway 10 is because of the desire for industrial development in the City. Mark Lucas questioned what the costs would be for extending the services. Terry Maurer stated that the costs and the actual assessments amounts may be different. Steve Rohlf pointed out the Areas 5, 6, 7 and 8 are already in the current urban service district. He stated that he felt that Area 8 was included on this map for discussion as to whether or not it should stay in the urban service district. Mr. Reistma stated that Area 8 was not included in the 1988 Comprehensive Plan but was added in 1990. Chris Kreger stated that if his motion passes, Area 8 would be included indefinitely, but that if it fails, Area 8 would still be included and a separate motion would need to be made if it is to be taken out. Merry Sipe stated that she opposes the plan because it was not her understanding that the Committee decided on these two plans and that they • would be presented on plans for 5-10-15 year phasing. Chair Minton stated that the previous motion was to call for more detail from staff on the two plans that are now under discussion and that phasing was not included in the minutes. Chair Minton stated that the motion before the Committee is to include Area 8, and a line drawn down through the eastern border of 8 through 11. THE MOTION FAILED 5-7. 5. Review Transportation Plan Terry Maurer explained that the March 1993 transportation study was done to identify and preserve transportation corridors that may be needed in the future. Engineering staff modeled future development of the city, and based on the zoning, the predicted. They attempted to estimate traffic routes to and from industrial and commercial areas in the city, as well as commuter traffic through the city. They used current traffic counts from Wright, Anoka and Sherburne to project future What kind of corridors are needed so that it does have to go through the core city. • Need to determine east-west corridor. One, route within City's corporate limits, one option discussed with the Sherburne County Highway Department, one Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Page 11 March 23, 1995 • option as a result of discussions with the Park and Recreation Commission. Begin at Anoka County Road 22 and leave the city limits at 209th Avenue. Terry explained 3 options using a large aerial map of the area. Arne Engstrom questioned why the jog was made in the road line, rather than follow the north boundary of the park. Steve Rohlf stated the reason was related to wetlands. Terry Maurer stated the County is slightly behind the City in working on a transportation for the County. Hank Duitsman indicated that the reason for the corridor is to take some of the traffic off Highway 10 and move it north up to the proposed east-west road and over to Highway 169. He stated that the north route off Highway 10 is shown as Waco Street, and will be changed to Zebulon. Terry Maurer explained that flooddplain considerations dictate the Zebulon alignment, rather than Waco Street, as previously proposed. Anoka County's transportation plan identifies County Road 22 as a minor arterial. It is his understanding that Anoka County envisions that Mn/DOT may eventually take over the County Road 22 route through their county. Terry explained that 209th seems to be the best route to get through the city, over to Big Lake Township and then for the Sherburne County to find a route back down to Highway 10. • Jerrry Hofhenke, 15860 228th Avenue NW, stated he lives in Big Lake Township but that he is affected by this plan. He stated that in speaking with Dave Fisher of Anoka County, he was informed they have no plans to expand County Road 22. He felt the proposed road would disrupt the lives of too many people. He stated he saw no reason to put a road through the County and felt the focus should be on improving traffic movement on Highway 10 in the downtown area. Milt Tuttle, resident, referred to a letter received by Troy Langer from the Sherburne County Highway dated July 13, 1994 which stated the County has no future construction plans for County Road 33. Chris Kreger stated that the letter means that there are no plans "adopted" at this time. Dave Quarry, Sherburne County Highway Engineer, explained that during the discussions for a gravel permit, alternate routes were discussed for moving traffic through the city, possibly through mining areas when mining is completed. He stated that planning needs to be done now to minimize the impacts on affected property owners and also for financial considerations. Dave explained that the County currently has no transpiration plan and that the last one was done in 1970. This plan showed roads going through the City of Elk River which were never implemented. Since then, there has been development in areas which were proposed for roadways. He stated that if a transportation route is approved, it may be 20 years before it is ever built. The County will be working with the City to come up with a transportation plan that will work for everyone. O Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Page 12 March 23, 1995 • Robin Tuttle, 13324 Ranch Road, expressed her concern that there may be a four-lane road built near their property. She stated that the quality of life will be affected. Also she expressed concern for noise and safety issues, and splitting of farmland. She questioned how property would be acquired for the corridor. Steve Taylor, 10975 205th Avenue NW, stated it is his feeling that highway is being proposed to serve the gravel trucks. He expressed his concern for safety of his children if a four-lane road was constructed by his property. Chair Minton stated that the reason the roadway is being proposed is to serve the residents. He stated that traffic will only increase, since it is not likely that people would be willing to give up their cars, the City needs to plan for Mark Olson, 18778 Yankton Street, owner of Lots 1 through 8, 6th Plat of Camp Cozy, expressed his concern that if a bridge is constructed across the river, it would take out his the rental house he owns. Also, he was planning to submit a building permit application for an addition to his house and is unsure what to do. Matt James, 21272 Elk Lake Road, cited his concern that he did not understand how a corridor in the Country Road 33 area will help the traffic get through the city. He questioned why traffic lights cannot be set up in sequence so that traffic may travel at a specific speed and move through the city without stopping. • Bill Zacharda, 13346 Ranch Road, questioned how long ago this road was planned. He expressed concern that building permits are being issued in areas where the proposed road may go through. Steve Rohlf explained the importance of road planning for future traffic needs. He stated that approximately one-half of the traffic traveling westbound across Anoka County to the intersection of Highway 169 and Main Street would not need to use that intersection if there was an alternate route to get to Highway 169. Also, another problem is congestion at School Street and Proctor caused by traffic coming from eastern Big Lake Township and western Elk River trying to get to Highway 10. He stated that a corridor needs to be identified before more development takes place, making the process even more difficult than it is at the present time. Lisa Green stated that she and her husband, Jeff, received a building permit to construct a new home at 13310 Ranch Road. The Green's stated that they would not have built there if they had known it would be in the way of a road. Diane Kohl, 20936 Ogden Street NW, was concerned that her home presently overlooks the gun club area now, and that view would become a major road there if this proposal goes through. She stressed the need to preserve the oak and prairie savanna located here, as it is one of the last ones remaining in the State. She stated that she felt most of the people in the audience moved to Elk River because of its natural beauty. Ms. Kohl urged that the residents make their views known to their elected officials. Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Page 13 March 23, 1995 • Ed Archer, resident on Viking Boulevard, He felt it did not make sense to have the route go north to link up with County Road 33, since 90 percent of the traffic past his residence is traveling to and from the Highway 169 and Highway 10 locations. He expressed concern the it appears the road would cut through the center of his farm. Scott Brobeck, resident on 211th Avenue NW, stated he moved to Elk River for the quality country life and was not in favor of the proposed road. Sue Stosser, 12772 210th Circle, expressed her concern that she was not told that there were plans to expand Country Road 33 when she bought her home 5 months ago, nor when she obtained a building permit to expand her drainfield. Claire Olson, 10476 205th Avenue NW, stated he felt 70 percent of the traffic on County Road 33 is gravel equipment. He indicated a widened shoulder for biking and pedestrians would be acceptable. He stressed that the Committee should listen to what the people want. Denise Henrichs, 11327 207th Avenue NW, she expressed her concern that half of her front yard would be gone if the road came through. She suggested that if there is excess money to be spent, that it should go to the schools, since they are already over capacity. Cecilia Scheel, 10271 213th Avenue NW, Ward 2 City Council representative, expressed her concern that County Road 33 is crooked and would be costly to IIIimprove. She stated that she felt there are other places to put the road. Hank Duitsman stated there are wetlands which prohibit the road from going straight across the City. Ted Dahmen, 12662 Ranch Road, questioned why the road could not be constructed in the northern part of the county. Hank Duitsman stated that the people that are going to use it live closer to the City of Elk River. Mr. Dahmen stated that he felt the people who use Highway 10 don't live in Elk River, they live in the Twin Cities. Mike Arnold, 20328 Smith Street, stated he was not in favor of the road, even though it would benefit him by reducing his commuting time. Debbie Leech, 210th Circle, stated she would like to see the road moved further north. She felt County Road 33 was being upgraded for the benefit of the gravel trucks. Pam Tuttle, 13390 Ranch Road, stated she felt the preservation of homes was more important than preserving ski trails. Stephanie Arnold, 20328 Smith Street, expressed her concern that the road would take people's homes, farms and their quality of life. Mike Gwynn, 13200 Ranch Road, stated that he owned 20 acres at the corner of 1110 County Roads 1 and 33. He stated that he was told be a realtor that if he were to list his property at this time he would be required to inform a potential buyer Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Page 14 March 23, 1995 • that a road project is proposed. Mr. Gwynn stated that even if the road never comes, it would affect his property value now. He added that the reason he moved out to Elk River was to get away from the traffic and now it was coming to him. Mark Martin, 11063 205th Avenue NW, stated that the City does not have to grow larger than the citizens want it to grow. He questioned how a road going east and west is going to help the traffic problem when the majority of the flow is north and south. Marcia Cunningham, 20883 York Street, questioned what studies have been done on County Road 22 to determine a need for the east-west corridor. She further questioned how much right-of-way will be needed if Mn/DOT takes over County Road 33. She stated they would not have put an addition on their home if they had known this issue was coming up. Dean Jongquist, 20464 Vance Street NW, stated he was totally opposed to the corridor project. He was concerned that it would be the residents tax dollars that would be used to acquire property for a road they did not want. Kathy Deutchman, 20523 Smith Street, resident for 16 years, stated that she feels the road is being built to accommodate gravel trucks. She added that along with a four-lane road will come Tom Thumbs and S.A. gas stations, and there will be no more "country". Tom Mortensen, 10576 205th Avenue NW, stated he felt if the Committee was III trying to project future needs, they would realize an east-west corridor should be placed further to the north. Diane Olson, 18778 Yankton Street, expressed her concern that there may be a four-lane bridge going through he present home site. She questioned when a decision would be made regarding the proposed bridge. Mike Niziolek, 12275 Rush Circle, biology teacher, expressed concern for the preservation of the natural scientific areas in Elk River. He discussed the Woodland Trails Park, Sand Dunes, gun club, golf course and Shiely properties and their potential value. Mr. Niziolek explained his desire to have an environmental learning center located in the Woodland Trails area. Robin Tuttle cited concern that children could not get to the park without crossing a highway. Chair Minton summarized the comments of the meeting as follows: -No one wants a highway -No one wants the traffic to increase -If we do need a highway, residents do not want it to affect their quality of life -They don't want it to go through people's homes -They don't want it to go through open area or park area III Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Page 15 March 23, 1995 • Jerry Hofhenke requested that maps be made available to the public showing the proposed transportation corridors, in a reduced size, and also copies of the March 1993 transportation study. Richard Lesitco, 11122 205th Avenue NW, suggested that the corridor be placed further north to hook up with Anoka County Road #24 and come out on Sherburne County Road 21. Also, he suggested that if Mn/DOT takes over Anoka County Road 22, they could continue on Sherburne County Road 12 down to Highway 169. ARNE ENGSTROM MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. CHRIS KREGER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 12-0. The meeting of the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debbie Kleckner Recording Secretary • • t I ; 1. . ,, ,i,,, , ,., , pipptav Q } r ' 6 ' F r D3 U '11) -,-, (.......-\.‘") y\s, ,..: -----____ ,,--,) . -ki) r-- DJ I y I 1 7 )': 11 d 1 h --'''0(...1 .......\ t ‘) , ...„ , , : •4; u' dr ft I Illi 4611,1 < . , 1 : 4111- A -_ 110'- - I 11011115.0 / 4'..sc.. )- . • Y 0) - , a • {i 2 ` 1p _ i11 I i c I — '— -- { O P a Y+ce p I- { f cp; o . • i ( eb,. 11111iW A' Irl\—) '1 — N,„ oaf r � � I {� ��ti t 0 0 0 c 1 ID H Tl_ , .. , ,-1---tN \ '' tigi Li :' • - III .//)( / ---------- - . c _,-- 14r 1-"1.2 fril 1 Pr Adill 1 Se - i1 .9. iii.•• gig ii "" • fititMitV MP 4: ..,"•'" , IIIE , L:Fralr ;•• 1,41 . A • iii1--- ........_,...._ -sD„,, mst 11,.i rip 6 Lev r. 1N4' '11 elf 4 A . . 1 ii fli"1:4 '/A1 ... UI if ltii H' i Iliiii iiiil Mil Mi rp Rh -41,-.10!. __ f_ Elmo.. mi -,-if airiiii 1 Ito- 6.,, MIJIVE Jr ilr:Irtt h 7 kiiim : .... • le' Fi imiNiiiii !17,11a141;.11. . 1 -r . i , .' - . 111, II lfile Wrarim- , Por . . .. . , . •' . icl.',„ Avsr,;,'s ,)i,i 1 MI II •• 11 111 1 . -161111111 d4 N. . 1,1 ... . .,.... .,..___ 1 , .. ,... . p .- 11 11111111111W. " 44011Q2 1 ' , - 1.- IPTIMIPP" so 'Of.)."..7 ••• - k- 1: . ' ; . 0:01 - ilai ,1441..f,ailleilt1111461 1114141/40 , A wr etiokitts"har ilia 01.2,,,,04, qi 14110 "' atil!iititigv,.4 ‘wi—ol&lv utfti -.14. ss 1 Meat t.'. !7.111 1 4101/1 • Wr 1 4` I( ‘ p .H. : . ,.• -.. \cn ' stem31' 1 . ILIJ s , , • . • • 4_0:___:_; __ . „wry, 61 11 ill IVow . - • . - • • ' --- ' : I • • Eil . - I OD • Illrh . . r I /SIN. ' i • ....... , i . 0 . • . o__elp...ar .•••–...1- . _0_ 11 oom toms 1111111*"' " 6 -- 1. am- ) 1.40 ,,.:. *Iti: --21 ' illb 0 • (5 63 --OFF ip roopip 0 i - Mx isisN - 0 ° ‘) v . ... i err, -— —- -. • ' al‘ ill .•ifft .. . .1 -\ c, -- - le - 1 • 0 o C.11:1111111\1• ... lownjur '.1-14w 1 #- A#.441 7* ,,t--,1,--- 4 I 4/I i‘ii:1 _._ i D:0 6 ---] --.. i . , teal U 0 . ' A . til_ -\---- ____ ._.T. ...., • 11104--ar w• : vt • 1 if !Fa , Arm 4 0 1 F__ ,. ., .: It 1 -- -- . 7, so. r 1— ' - 411Filliti ., --.: 1 I ss 1 0 :3 --. . t ) ..... ... , 1 0 .1 . . . ... N. I ( t----- - , It: of Jlk River MEMORANDUM TO: Steering Committee FROM: Steven B. Ach, City Planner/ pp" DATE: March 23, 1995 SUBJECT: Agenda Item Topics Expanding the Urban Service Area Terry Maurer will be in attendance Thursday night to present two options the Steering Committee requested to be brought back for consideration. Each of the two options include expanding the current boundary of the urban service area to include the Highway 10 corridor for commercial/industrial opportunities. Furthermore, additional acreage has been included in a more • easterly direction for primarily residential purposes. Included in the packet are minutes from a City Council meeting held June 15, 1993, discussing sewer and water down Highway 10. The Committee should be aware that the area lying west of Meadowvale Heights development to the western City limits and north of the railroad tracks has not been included in either option. This area was discussed at the last meeting and since, several phone calls have been made to City Hall and "flyers" distributed throughout those affected neighborhoods. I suspect several residents will be in attendance Thursday night to voice their opposition to being included in the urban service area. This affected area is not currently included within the urban service area and given the existing homes on lots ranging in size from two to five acres could easily be left out. Lastly, as discussed at the last Steering Committee meeting, it was suggested that once the urban service area is identified, certain subdivision and development guidelines will need to be considered. These guidelines will assist in managing the timing and size of development activity within the urban service. The timing can be managed through "phasing" techniques. For example, • dividing the ultimate service area into sub-districts with an attached time frame when sewer and water could be expected. Terry Maurer will be 13065 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 490 • Elk River, MN 55330 • (612) 441-7420 • Fax: (612) 441-7425 Memo to Steering Committee Page 2 March 23, 1995 • presenting this concept Thursday with possibly some illustrations of sewer and water line extensions to serve the identified areas within the urban service area. The second issue relates to establishing certain development guidelines within the urban service area to manage growth and provide for the efficient extension of utilities. The main issue here is the subdivision of land prior to water and sewer being available. Creating large lot sizes (i.e., 10 acres) which can be further subdivided in a cost effective and efficient manner will be the key. While establishing the minimum lot size will be the foundation for managing this subdivision activity, creative subdivision techniques will need to be considered to allow subdivisions prior to water and sewer. For example, "clustering" has been used quite successfully in other areas. Clustering basically is a concept that would permit subdivision of large tracts of land in a manner that would still allow efficient subdivision opportunities when water and sewer are made available. Under this scenario "density" would be implemented as opposed to a minimum lot size. Therefore, if a property owner has an eighty-acre parcel and the minimum lot size is, say, 10 acres, the clustering concept would allow the subdivision of eight lots. These lots would be clustered together on a portion of the property with the • majority left vacant for further subdivision opportunities when water and sewer is made available. This is one concept that can be applied within the urban service area and still provide for the efficient extension of utilities. Staff will continue to research other subdividing tools, allowing subdivision prior to the water and sewer. Transportation Once again, Terry Maurer will present the transportation plan to the Steering Committee. Certainly one of the issues will be the east-west route through the central part of Elk River. The article in Wednesday, March 15's Star News, triggered several phone calls and residents coming to City Hall to obtain more information on this roadway. I also learned late last week that several "flyers" were distributed to residents within the area of this planned roadway. In light of all this, there may be a large contingency of residents in attendance for the discussion on this item Thursday night. Goals and Policies Included in the packet, is a copy of goals and policies for Utilities and Transportation from the current Growth Management Plan. Please review • these and consider amendments that may be appropriate. s:planinng:steering:3-23memo Memo to Steering Committee Page 3 March 23, 1995 • Recommendation The issues being addressed by the Steering Committee are by no means easy. Public opinion on issues may be divided or strongly opposing, only making the Committee's efforts that much more difficult. However, in order to stick to any type of a schedule and have this comprehensive plan completed this summer, certain recommendations will need to be made by the Steering Committee. The schedule of meeting twice a month is a very aggressive schedule has no flexibility given public hearing notice requirements and putting together information for each of the packets. At this juncture, I think it is worthwhile to point out that although several important decisions will need to be made by the Committee that may have long-lasting effects, the comprehensive plan is still a "guide". The plan will be subject to further review, amendments and additional studies. Therefore, not all of the "specific details" of a future road alignment, sewer extension or development guidelines (i.e., ordinances) will need to be decided by the Steering Committee to be included in the final draft of the comprehensive plan. Rather, the plan will be a series of goals and objectives along with various maps, all providing the foundation for how the City should develop in • the future. The actual implementation of these goals and objectives will need to be carried out by the various commissions and ultimately, the City Council. • s:planinn g:steering:3-23memo • 11/ NE/6812oes uWou(. YOU RE /rv?r`EST>J 1nJ SkwW -7 , Quit 11) -IcoNraop Hoc ? rim o-r l I 77 g lS 9 PlOPOsgL /N1=2.6'v -r OF 7'/E cam Pt HFNs/vE PtAry S !;EittNb COrVtnti,-77¢E Of' 7/0 r a1 70 inr�cv,o,€ -TNk A ��9 tveS7� OF Q- oPL.,N / u bYlerifooc-'uc (E i i rs) io 7Ht cc7/gs /3oe4C ANC' F1 o /►I ? 7i" -ve- �ou7N i fl i/ e 4/ e0/94 i2AcXS 1 W/7N 07-1/€4 CERAS t:11.1r orNwY /6'? . S o r t E N u Nl Eks o f 3 t-04TE42 YTEK-VO 4-/ 70sSEA rlttUNo UR.(rv(o THE 4..ris - r —1- v4, : .4S Ud(1t ee 19 (4C .E rod Tp.uN.& LIMAS A �01,.17p6 E FOOT Fo i • LATI�2►�[ � (IrUttSi PLUS (nsQtujUUAL I�ooK uP CaS7 -l1E cornnfirrt/z 1310 NoT A(oe. wCrH 714 rvvrvl8EA.& , Q uT A2E Cos-7-3 t3 PobG-4) o Th si9n11 PiP�k /rs7197rEc D EVrLaPrnkrlT Y ERe' ft o . Corn S 774--r00 INAT" -7f.= IIx7'16i--/Sf iv ri1(&HT /v07' OCcuk fok friOlafF YEAe-c • 4A-/E St4oUL - f x-rE.NSly QEF dee /7 6 C--rs 3"-T�-27i. F YOU u.ouLo 76 corn rri t - oAJ -alis ePOPOS/V.. PieZ ok. eaMl You C 6 U L ti CPU 7 f✓U E O cki - c rr y P LAN N - 4/4,/- ?YZo� Lt/eiTE ' l3oB /1ilArroN c/TS' NRI • 43o65 o,ea" a e0•1 DR A7TI O iNE1 X7 (.N 73 /9T 7-oo PM / r Cr-rY HALL (3T uuNlcL( PeoPesi4L 1-0/Li voTito TH AIA You /w A•o u/RN ctz F6 7 c14" .77/71E; • Q AN S TEFFI JS 138-!Z- /9 6)74-V41/E. /U CU. • SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL HELD AT THE ELK RIVER CITY HALL TUESDAY, JUNE 15, 1993 Members Present: Mayor Duitsman, Councilmembers Dietz, Scheel, and Farber Members Absent: Councilmember Holmgren Staff Present: Terry Maurer, City Engineer; Pat Klaers, City Administrator; Sandra Thackeray, City Clerk Mayor Duitsman called the special meeting of the Elk River City Council to order at 7:10 p.m. Mayor Duitsman informed the public that this meeting was an informational meeting to discuss the possibility of extending utilities to the East along the Trunk Highway 10 area. Mayor Duitsman introduced Terry Maurer, City Engineer. Terry Maurer distributed a handout which was titled East Trunk Highway 10 Area Informational Hearing, dated June 15, 1993. Terry Maurer informed the • public that some of the data on the information sheet was from the 1990 feasibility report which was originally completed for the extension of utilities along east Highway 10. Terry Maurer explained that the City is trying to determine the best timeframe for developing the area along East Highway 10 into a more urban nature. He indicated that the planning process of this project originally started in 1987-88 with the Growth Management Plan (GMP) . He further stated that in March, 1990, a preliminary study of the extension of East Highway 10 improvements was completed. Following that study, it was the decision of the City Council to extend utilities to the west in 1991 as recommended in the GMP. Terry Maurer indicated that an upgrade of the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant is being planned and the upgrade will triple the plant capacity. Terry Maurer indicated that notices have been sent to those properties abutting Highway 10 up to 170th Avenue. Terry Maurer reviewed the projected traffic counts for the area and stated that MnDOT expects the amount of traffic on Highway 101 to double by the year 2010. Terry Maurer discussed the estimated cost pertaining to the sewer and water extension. He indicated that there would be a cost of $3,800 per acre (in 1992-93 dollars) for the trunk water and sanitary sewer. He discussed the other charges which included lateral sanitary sewer, lateral water, lateral storm sewer, residential street, commercial/industrial street, sewer availability charge, water access fee, and water connection charge. He informed the public that all of these charges could be assessed with the • exception of sewer availability charge, water access fee, and the water connection charge. Mayor Duitsman opened the meeting to the public. Special City Council Meeting Page 2 June 15, 1993 • Stan Chase, 16800 Highway 10, questioned the method of notification of the meeting and commented on the poor turnout. Terry Maurer stated that 35 notices went out to highway/commercial and light industrial property owners along Highway 10 to 170th Avenue. He further indicated that a notice was published in the Elk River Star News. Ron Ebner, Ebner's Bait, stated he was opposed to sewer and water extension as he has no use for the utilities. He indicated he has just updated his septic system. He further stated that his son and daughter are opposed to the extension of utilities. Kenny Dehn, Dehn's Four Seasons, submitted a letter to the Council stating his opposition to the extension of utilities. Mr. Ebner informed the Council that Keith Johnson had informed him that he was also opposed to the extension of utilities. Charlie Houle, 17069 Highway 10, stated he was interested in the extension of utilities along Highway 10, however, he had some questions relating to cost of assessments and number of years to repay the assessment. He further questioned whether the extension of utilities would raise the value of his property. He requested City staff to put together cost scenarios which would provide the property owners with a better understanding of what a project like this would cost each property owner individually. • John Plaisted, 12750 182nd Avenue, stated he was in favor of the extension of utilities along East Highway 10. He stated that the AmericInn needed water when it was built and, therefore, had to build a swimming pool to supply the water for the sprinkler system. He further stated that he has had requests from restaurants to locate in the area, but have been unable to due to the lack of utilities. He stated that a health club was also unable to locate in the area because of the lack of utilities. Mr. Plaisted indicated that the lack of utilities along East Highway 10 is a detriment to the area. He further stated that the requirement of sprinkling large buildings makes it very difficult to develop the area without sewer and water. Doris Specht, 16330 Highway 10, questioned what the extension of utilities would do to her farm. She indicated she is opposed as she is not ready to develop her property. Scott Powell, Elk River Ford/Chrysler, indicated that he is interested in the extension of utilities as he feels the East Highway 10 area is a prime area for development. He also indicated he would be interested in receiving an estimate of the cost. Truman Moyer, 16807 Highway 10, stated he was opposed to the extension of utilities. He stated there is no interest in the area. Mr. Moyer is a residential home owner in the area. • Tom Price, 17533 Highway 10, stated that he is in favor of extending the utilities as soon as possible as the cost will only increase with time. He further stated that the property in this area will develop and there will be a need for utilities. Special City Council Meeting Page 3 June 15, 1993 • Stan Chase, Sun and Swim Pools, indicated he was interested in the extension of utilities and stated he would like to receive some estimated costs for the improvement of his property. Pat Klaers indicated that Paul Bell had contacted him and requested that he indicate to the Council his opposition to the extension of utilities. Councilmember Dietz suggested sending a packet of information to all property owners up to 170th Avenue that are not in attendance. He suggested that the packet include a questionnaire and a space for comments regarding the extension of utilities. Mr. Chase, Sun and Swim Pools, suggested that the Council send information to those property owners up to 167th Avenue. Just for the record, 32 notices were sent; five of those property owners were in attendance. Three other property owners that were not notified also attended the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, 1'41 • andra Thackeray City Clerk Appendix-1 APPENDIX I - SUMMARY OF GOALS AND POLICIES eiM" UTILITIES 1. GOAL: Provide and maintain adequate and efficient levels of public services within the community. POLICIES: •Allow the extension of sewer and water lines only after presently serviced areas have been developed to near capacity. • Develop and maintain on a continuing basis a five year capital improvements program and budget for the development, expansion and replacement of municipal systems (sewer, streets,water,storm sewer), municipal equipment (street maintenance, fire, office space), and park and recreation. •Provide storm sewers to those areas no longer adequately drained by natural systems. RESIDENTIAL 1. GOAL: Encourage the development of a quality residential community which • retains a semi-rural atmosphere while accommodating growing housing needs. POLICIES: • Guide the type and location of development to achieve an orderly develop- ment pattern consistent with the semi-rural character of the community. • Continue the low-density residential development pattern through the use of open space areas and the designation of buffer areas between non-compatible land uses. •Encourage a mix in housing opportunities in terms of costs and size while en- couraging a high degree of architectural and site planning integrity of the City. • Provide for, in appropriate circumstances, a Planned Unit Development (PUD) approach which, through the use of site design standards, allows for compatible residential, commercial, and industrial development. 2. GOAL: Provide and maintain adequate and efficient levels of public services within the community. POLICIES: •Encourage the extension of sewer and water lines only on a cost effective basis without undue burden to the taxpayer. TRANSPORTATION • 1. GOAL: Provide and maintain adequate and efficient levels of public services within the community. POLICIES: •Upgrade all primary local streets to hard-surface, all-weather roads. •Require that developers provide roads to City specifications before City as- sumes ownership and maintenance responsibilities. • Develop and maintain on a continuing basis a five year capital improvements program and budget for the development, expansion and replacement of municipal systems (sewer,streets,water,storm sewer),municipal equipment (street maintenance, fire, office space), and park and recreation. 2. GOAL: Support a regional transportation system which offers convenient and adequate service within and through the area. POLICIES: •Provide for off-street parking within the commercial area to reduce vehicle congestion. • Implement an intersection and traffic control program through the use of sig- • nage and signals. • Encourage a high level of efficiency, productivity, and quality of service in modes of transportation between Elk River, surrounding communities and the Metropolitan areas. •Provide frontage roads to reduce access points along major thoroughfares. •Provide collectors and local streets as appropriate to provide links to the ex- isting system. • . TENTATIVE SCHEDULE FOR UPCOMING STEERING COMMITTEE MEETINGS March 9 URBAN SERVICE AREA -East Highway 10 -Service District East -Possible Modification to the North (Conclude Urban Service Area) March 23 TRANSPORTATION -North East-West Route -Hwy. 169 & 10 Corridor -Future Collectors/Arterials April 6 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL -Location -Redevelopment III Opportunities April 20 HOUSING -Mix of Housing/ Land Use -Housing Maintenance -10 Acre Minimum Lot Size May 4 Parks & Recreation May 18 Land Use Plan/Zoning Map Review Goals & Policies of Comp Plan June 20 Planning Commission Public Hearing III July 24 City Council Public Hearing s:planning:sc:schedule To: Bob Minton Steve Ach -Over City Hall 13065 Orono Road . Elk River, MN 55330 We appreciate your consideration of our request to exclude Mississippi Heights from the proposed eastern water district. Mississippi Heights has no need for city sewer and water at this time or in the foreseeable future. • Many of the homes in our neighborhood are newer and all have working wells and sewer systems. A few systems are less than a year old. None of our homes are in need of upgrading their current water or sewer systems and there are no problems environmentally with our current systems. • All of the lots in our neighborhood were developed without. the consideration of city sewer and water. • Our homes are situated on their lots where it would be impossible to subdivide the property to help defer the cost. • In discussions with local Realtors we have found that city sewer and water would not enhance or add to the value of our property. • The primary reason to bring city sewer and water into this area is to enhance the Industrial/Conunercial corridor and to provide for FUTURE development in the eastern water district. This point was brought up many times by the committee at the meetings. • To enhance the Industrial/Commercial corridor and to provide for future development the line would not have pass through our neighborhood. Elk River currently has approximately 260 vacant lots currently accessible to city sewer and water. ctrIA 0 i 4 t .....-cfr iXIlnls Ila igen ,,titie'C' /1 g'..e.„14_, . ,--).4pow l� i / / 401„2. � J ,. vl -)‘\0,,,__„ 4,/ i/ ( ti-;_A- --,17V772..../4:1 g'---------‘in 'At 7'''‘.7".4(5.1. - oeicaft /,./tiet.,A /71fla efilv ek ,/' az-/L-- 7-> ---�__ fri v1 ,�!�� v`�� '1�r�� •�/� !�4c�aal ✓111 //}so 'ir4 444 f9K R . 7 und..„.., z 1; I/ 1 &"/ -&) 5;( '‘ /Re . ici4 e - c( r--- b 6'4' ' .tr / «,,,, J'W $ Z. C4Afe 4/// Ee.: ii))47r/,.a,c / �«A (h A.O.\ -�,; t 1 % b i c- ' l x‘4,--r.,,__ .- ,,i,„47`/„� /-!//�it)S �- ; (y� �' A ^ 12, to S ( ti �' t J / 1 i 1 ' 4' vl • MAR 2 0 1995 • , .,-, „.., „ .• .,.„, ,,- 0.,...,,,. .04 .0 .'•*..9 ''. ..!.. ' 4. ..'i• ' irk, ....0. lilt iiii gAl .....711 1, ' 1,i " ,•:,, .,1 ,1 4 # 1.. •g,,,,:„.. gi.. te„2:jr • &irii. ... ., .., . .,--- .ik River- Township Sherhurne County, Minnesota North hne of SW//4 of NW1,4Sec./Ii -- --: -7---7 -----.7- __-59909 Nee,-•- 1 Nrry.Resurrey: ••,•r. 4,45-•""r•Por**,'"V...... \ .11,5•0_,40 vo, ':'‘, AT CA th6490 0 5 Mess• J1Tg!,li , 596 C6 0440 NW R,16 5/.25 .,... 9,5.04'00. ‘,5d 1,616 60 :••I Vt 0 P -,.,\-1 \ \ CA/ire poro/Aet with North hne o/SW//4 of NW//4,Sec.I/ - :-1 --....... --N89•5033.E 980 -.57- \ 0 - ow...';‘,•-)75 ,...,, 0,;:,how-,:.•.•-- __ - I 2.'3.. .•,,`, ' 596.18 r--- __--384.39--- 0 ' ' \ '' . I *c /70/h't Ave. 1/ - - --- - ------- --- ----------i ,-si , t;I -c, • k 1 \ \ to to ,. •S89.50'.33‘W --•293.86.'-- \ (\i'tti) :I o•I.. . •2 . " ' 14,73'39'49' 4 _.,1 536 72 --- 1=85 8.3 I , 1 I. 2 a 5.. A kZ • ..-, pe_K47.fe/ 3 j 5' :''•%' 1(\ .--7 .• • tu i #8959'27? 477.29 Caill oi N 1 1 \ • 1.' I - \ iP. Ts. u •-•, .,• 4, ". (Z. 1.---i..s.i --,1,, u• ,,,,k) • • . - ',7,-. IA.0,firfin.ofs000l ,-.of swim°,No-/-74-) / ,- ..-3- Scale: 1 inc! •!.k . • , : 1:e!rings .i.re 4 I .!.I .x T"'" N 8964730"C 440.80 C Dsnotet. irc •!::' " IN,, / 1 CO ° . plastic pluY ' I.--\ sl) \ •Denotes foal , _.In' *Z,;•z,- It-it. Lo, .6) .", NZ. '.\,_East fine of West 350 of Z a plaSliC OW .... I 1,..„N lb ‘, PI rtiC. • \ „ SeC.// unless noted o 1 I ,t, S. o -.. -.. .....„- .4..T•45.99 ,‘: 7`• . Dc•iotes drain 1 '', Ir, 4...C-' -- 25Z9,,-,•,....6,..:6 /N89•38.26"(/87.37..i.; I-C) #8947"301' 7. .---• -1,, 387/4 /". .1./6°,044" 1. t....,0 • z! ''''' of 3W//4 of Ahe//4 evi 20 "--, ' 1.9.4..., 1C•r89.72 I Sec.// 1 ;..,......4 ct . _tvta-4.4.,,f; .,.?, 1 I • , , ,,._1 : !•• f'13 .1 1 N ,66 ,, 000 West \ ........CS :hi 1,",:', .- glbla.'10i1 .A Sherburne Co. • 20000 `•-•E.Mem'West 350o/SW 1/4 of/VW I/4.Sec I/ , ^..c., ..,- ''... '' Monument N89•47.30''e '' ,7, South line Of;....-4,1/4 01 NWI/4,Sec//•J \ <-A/8940342T . _ _ / ...";- (351/./4 Cor. '- 295.92_ O• ,/0,732, • 4 11 i_eCice/ p North tine of NW/14 of SW//4,Sec.I/ `:.. \ :101E: the -West//4 C orjn'e°r°°. R26 :I 1 Sec.//,1•52,R. c, West 1 ripti 0 n S on \ i Lirkiiess a, it *.'4\1Z' I 6 . .?, ,?;I i 200.30 1 mortgay...d : .c.,,, t, i o : Elk River v. r/ V ceoroIlel enifiNorth line of Nli'l./4. 0../.SW//4,Sec.I I-:-..i..ji [1 .,/ i,,,7,5,,,::i \ 1-. c..) a ii d 1972 t; N89'4730 I- (I ••fire.: CJ 1 . 7 417 4:: 66 I $9959 V'' (, I •• c:n (lion inonum Dept. In 1 . ..\4(./ ,x, . • 200.00 :. 113 1 '-,- ... resurveyed 1.4.1 i I:, 7 to -v-dt i.', cl \ \ right of WI: to E I k Rive ill A''' r•N: 1 I ., . . , , • . N \,J I.-,,1 I..; +, !, ,?),/1 .), lt, 4 Q ., ,s. of way shIf -.., Line parallel wi/h South line of NW//4 of SW1/4 ---of.,A•Sec.” .5? ..b. 1.3 lect, t ,1 i • _--•/45 66\-- - 1Se•st Li . ,„. ''' Corr . 7.,_1\_.1 ....,,,... ...33z.h--- _f.f.e2.-- difference '131"/.._ -5CNCHmaRA' 1 44/.97 • . -- •••;te., 200.00 ari --•5.1/00 0444 55:31 14 ees '771 „ ,...\ "Meas." di I 66 . \t s-P of way for I / 1 Z ,t. • 01 ,,,, . .z., • :1( c...) ..t .,1 5 O O :. Z:p 1 ,• , • ,.k , l ,; ts ; co ... „ ,..•):'',./t.::,..., :,.. .. , ..,,,, >.:..., i ;,', . -, z . 4 c ,s• , \-i.a .c.)A- °,`' -- r Line parallel w/thSoulA Ime o/ ,,,,- INW//4 of SW1/4 of Sec.//--) ^••-• \ \J ,k ---i / \ \ i ;;;•,as. .7.3.:: •- i'..A • •.._.- ,...t.,,,,-- -4-- •--40.88 '-- ----1 '-, ilt, 354.89 1 '':':••Z 1 a •,i '•..\- .,.m.. ..... z!„:v to , . , ...--;,. sv-- c\i % 0 z, / .'• , / ,• • \ .' Z' ' 9 $ \* \ I .ik . s ' ,/ / inl" 1 West I.. ks. West 398.29 . I 0 354 89 ' '8 _. -.:•. .1 I , \ - \:., \„ . _ i. - „ . . ,i;'...44 0 0 V• 1 , 1,/ri l' ,'' /0 ' k.- Ti/170141.1 a c j , Wesr / 0 4.2.2 k --.. o• o I I_ _6.:",_:jp.....T--- --; r- ! 12. t. I _....- t 354 9.9 -C'------1--1 -- . . \ - I Ni I.. 38269 (...."2' I"I de-./""kill 2 () 8 O ; , i I. I 0 ii 1 \ Ts•‘.1 I 0 /: , . , '• \°, 's- 0 '4 o i-.) '''' .C3.. , - I \1 1 _, •-. // o Q.) s-. q.) I Wes/ 354 89 I -- ,t ..- • , ..., • I/8 3/ 1/8.29 /18.29 \ \ki . •. re, *est ; (r) i .z. 367./0 I , . / , . . silo , .,..'r . ' I \ ifi . \t ..I.z.e ,A..t(2,,,.g., -r ,i, 66 I ,4 • .... '.,-... /2 k-, le , -`9- ; /0. "-i•-•5. //'.•: ,5•„ I \ ‘ ''t 1; l'' '•:' lb i1; ZA'‘• i?-: ‘6 ,, u ‘. I \t. \, ,,,, west ' . n ' '. .T 2 ••• •-./ North/inept South 30/.00\ \''.., I'', \ I,' 35/3/ ' ... .• ----i --- ' - of NW 1/4 of SW1/4 , 1 '' ,c, .--//8.5/--- --11829---- --88 29•-• -. -- 4 --w^s,i e 37'282 1- . \I \n, .•.9, S2.....-41-tir'.7_ /J ' " . • --•0149/ 354 89--- 15., 4-2' s I 7-,tp; ,N./.00.40- • ' Is•33 0: /67th AveNW , •-•,•, -, toto \,- W'Iy Weapon a North ), ,--I._______ww-- West N hne of SooM 235.00 of . . ,., .r 489 35 •' k .'''‘ \ NWI/4 of SWI/4,Sec.II .., • r 4, .' ,., .. Jr 744454 ''' ::"•: ) -west Q, North hne of South 23500 of NW//4 of SW 1/4,Seci/D \ \ ‘0, I '5J” .1 1 "- ..I., ':1t. \ V, ' \c:,,iz.'; -, /4 1.•118/4 '4 ' '. ti. ' C,88 16 C.,/s8 Of '''' --. OS IL / . VI t. r,, \ 11 1-4-/\-- ' ..: ‘ --,. v..,%, ... 1,. o, , 1 k \\ 7.1 West 4, , • '.'_, '‘A...-.-_---1---f.',-.7:-. (:) ftt,i N\Li 1 111,1 St) •h2a n7pauwuw7 u76aq uo7srua xa ua nm/ kamasr p d-a-unuw as sr o az17d" nnom pun a2gn7nau7 pun h 1)9MDau c'7 a6uvya sr;rly- ana72aq am • 177unuwuwoa n srn kan7?l X2'3 yoaq u7 aq P2-nom vrla 1 ana727aq op am `71anamoy :pa7aayyn uaz7 -Ira hvana asrna2'd o7 h2az172' 'ou r7 -7 `a6unya vrza yo 7c-o0 7167y yo arnnaag •pasroddo auo h2'uo pun 2-9kpnau 61,7aq awoc i07m `pa7anuoa akam sr2raumo 147kadoz'd/rsrau7srnq ka7a0 •aP7c 7vna a7a 7,(a7nm/kama2nd7a-unuw yo uo7sruaxa az1 yo bonny u7 h7U7403 ▪ akn sruaumo huadowd/srsraursrnq 6u7mo2 2'oy ayl • uanm/)rama c 2'ndTayunuw a2p1n2.7nnn yo ▪ yo asrnnaaq sra7 'un �roddo muTsrnq -24an-aaxa pasrsr7uw pub zianq P2'all h2279a-pnuw72up uaaq sr5,11 warm -22'g yo naun v77/1 • sna ala Wo2ry 3ran721 X73 gra ua sruo 7sr7n ,n h77unuwuwoa kno yo a6nuw7 pun aaun1rnaddn 2.2 nlrano aauniyua 22"7m 7uauwdo2-anap srsrau7srn2 ' 01 hnmfy67p . mo uo knaao sr uawdo2anap 1n1a7raw woa mau `691 hnm1167}1 y koN uo uo7 sra6uoa a7yynwr paanpad •huwouoaa nsrau7sinq ap)sr -srna 07 7srooq ap7rno-2(d p2nom sruo77do uauwdo2anap puv sran2'nn punt pasrnakaul 411 h27Pnak c' 7uauwdo2anap srsrau-srnq koy hx72-7g-c'-rn puv srsraaan h90111671{ . . 'a29n2l7nnn au+oaaq Vrala P2nom punt? 2'n7a2raw woa yo sraaald va61r792( srn h77unuwwoa Arno troy acnq xn7 2nuo7-7Ppn a4-1:aka Trym -74auwdo2-anap v?-y/ •pado2'anap aq 2"2"7m 7 az'oyaq uo7rn22n sru7 ka nm/)ramasr 2nd7arunuw -oy 6u777nm sr7 h kadozd srsrau-srnq 2'V 7 c'npu7 pun 2- 2.a7rawwop sruosrna�r 2n7rana9 uoy uo7sruaxa Croy auw7 - sraq ay c7 mou 7n7y7 ana72'aq am • 0 1 hnm7167 f 6u 07v kan72l -q yo aP7sr -srna a y o- uo7srua xa y nm/kma2ndyayunuw troy a-20-rop 7rno srcaudxa o uasr sr7 4-1 • s'Iraumo hr2radolyd 2-n7akauwuwoa pun mu7srnq pau7raauoa yo 2raquwnu n uwo7ry noh o7 Vauwoa 1/04'7a2 sr77y1 : 902 unaa as T wuwo0 6u7kaa s un2'd an7rruayawrduwo3 u7n1I0 `24ou7W 9og :Nllb 5661 `ZZ 71D71VW 411 1111 ?Uu7Y1 Y kn 'uknd kaumo 'uv DTH h67-IN Ira-dsrh7(110/P3od Iran721 zi73 •D741 `7an7d 20'3 Yo bdVN 7r : umo `7-amod �r oa saumo `ogag b77 3!)09 111 A. OA ---71Tt Amer 1/Ar WO / ; sr?-o d w7ms Y unS uu1 -adkno pad mum() `asrnyD hp VN y ub7s v3raumo `Ybti1s wn9nh Y n-2rpuayVW .___?__c..7 ‘4"5\AA2_).1.i / ,, /.,2: : t ailli nW y r kodS ma-nkan-d • au1 `hundw 770 ?plop 3raumo ` sr7nbpun7 rra7uaP7sra7td ` . , noh arptv D Gni . 7 7-C -->" ) ---140P/A72r •uo74-n7iaP7sruoa knob -)ro9 non yunyl • sr6u7Irva y awn n j 4-n uo7-nwkoYu-r akow Ito uo7s n-Ds(7p ua yn) uo j ,n yo 7/ana ab7uoa to , aauY -p-Dy asrVa'd 5661 'ZZ YD109W • Z aubd •THERE WERE 35 NEW CONSTRUCTION SALES "REPORTED" TO THE MULTIPLE LISTING SERVICE (M.L.S.), IN ELK RIVER FOR 1994. AVERAGE SALE PRICE, $110,620. 2 OF THE 35 WERE ON 1 ACRE OR4ORE. THIS EQUALS 5.7% OF REPORTED SALES. AVERAGE SALE PRICE, $1 17,865. 94.3% OF REPORTED NEW CONSTRUCTION SALES WERE ON CITY WATER& SEWER LOTS. AVERAGE SALE PRICE, $110,181. WHERE ARE THE BUYERS GOING, WHEN THEY WANT ACREAGE? AVG. SALE PRICE AREA M.L.S REPORTED SALES $105,092 OTSEGO 5 ALL ELK RIVER SCHOOLS $104,404 BIG LAKE & BIG LAKE TWSP. 9 1 ELK RIVER SCHOOLS $104,271 ZIMMERMAN 17 ALL ELK RIVER SCHOOLS $158,248 RAMSEY 14 4 ELK RIVER SCHOOLS •122,021 BURNS TOWNSHIP 5 3 ELK RIVER SCHOOLS "REPORTED" NEW CONSTRUCTION SALES 50 30 ELK RIVER SCHOOLS ON ACREAGE 60% ELK RIVER SCHOOLS AVAILABLE LOTS WITH CITY SERVICES IN ELK RIVER(PER REPORT) 246 AVAILABLE LOTS (RESIDENTIAL) 1+ ACRE IN ELK RIVER(PER M.L.S) 6 1+ ACRE (RESIDENTIAL) LOTS AVAILABLE (PER M.L.S) ALL ELK RIVER SCHOOLS. OTSEGO 10 BIG LAKE & BIG LAKE TWSP. 1 ZIMMERMAN 15 RAMSEY 2 BURNS TOWNSHIP 1 • INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED. • Manch 22, 1995 ATTN: Bob Minton, Cha.i.t Compkehenhjve Plan SteekLng Committee Peak Bob : Th.i.h tetter comes to you Brom a number og concerned buh.i.nehs and commekciLal pkopekty owners . It £h hent to exptehh out des .te Kot mun.icipat hewer/water extenh.i.on to the east .Lde oK Elk R.i,vek along Highway 10. We believe that now .ih the be time got extenh,ion gok hevekat neaon : . . Commekc.i.al and -i.nduhtkial buzinehs ptopekty .ih waiting gok mun.i.cLpat hewer/water .i.nhtallat.ion begoke it will be developed. Th- zThiz development wLtl create addJtLonat tax babe gat auk community ah /akget pieces og commetciat land would then become ava.itabte. . . Highway accehh and v.i,h.i,btti,ty Kok buh.i.nedevelopment i4 kead.i.ty • ava.i.labte. Tnckeahed land vatueh and development opt..onh would pkov.i.de a boost to east h-i.de buh.i.nesh economy. . . Reduced ttaKK,ic congeht.ion on Nokth Highway 169, ah new commercial devetopmenth occur on eah-t Highway 10. Buhtinehh development w,itt enhance overall appearance and .image oK out community a6 v.i.h-i.tokh enter Etk R.i.vek Kkom the east. Th.ih area oK Etk R.ivek has been dkamatJcatty herd back and m.ihsed excellent buhi.nehs oppoktun.i.ttie, because oK the tack oK ava.i.tabte municLpat hewer/water. The got/owing bus.i.nehh/property owners ate htkongty £n Kavak oK the extension oK munLc.i.pat hewer/water to the east hide. O.thet business/ptopekty ownekh were contacted, with home being neutkat and only one opposed. Because og the high cont oK thtz change, .it -i.h not t.i.kety to please every citizen aKgected; however, we do be/.i.eve that this would be .in the be .i.ntekest og Elk R.ivek as a community. We bet.i.eve this change .is necehhaty and inevitable and would tike to see municipal hewek /water extent on begin immediate/y. Paye 2 Al Manch 22, 1995 P.eea. e Deet /nee to contact each of uz 1Con tun.then d.i,zcuisz.ion on mon.e -Lnsonmat.ion at Wun.e heakingz . Thank you ioit youk con3.i.denatLon. C an.P_.i.e Hou' ei Pnea.ident Leis Lundqu.i.4t, Owners Hou.2e O.it mpany, Inc . Rivenv.i,ew Spon.t4 8 Ma ' e ! / Mahendna 8 Ku�sum Shah, Owneno Stan K Naha. e, Owners. Red Carpet Inn Sun g Swim P. o!3 , ilk Hurnljr:LP7r-lr'— a — �.. eba, Ownenh cots Pau�e�k , Own �n ill, NAPA o F2k Riven, Inc. FZk Riven Fond/Chnyz.P_en ii e(._.Z..t _267-y2_ ani y H.ic an, Own en CFunnJtun g Thing. 111 ! CITY OF ELK RIVER REGULAR MEETING OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE AGENDA Thursday, March 9, 1995 7:00 p.m. City Hall - Council Chambers ITEM NUMBER . 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. CONSIDER 3/9/95 AGENDA 3. CONSIDER 2/9/95 MINUTES 4. PRESENTATION OF URBAN SERVICE AREA -Existing Boundary -Possible Changes to Existing Boundary *Additional information will be handed out Thursday night for discussion 5. STEERING COMMITTEE OPINION LINE 6. LETTERS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS/NEIGHBORING COMMUNITY 7. TENTATIVE SCHEDULE FOR UPCOMING MEETINGS 8. OTHER BUSINESS 9. FUTURE MEETING 0 10. ADJOURNMENT • MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER STEERING COMMITTEE HELD AT ELK RIVER CITY HALL THURSDAY, MARCH 9, 1995 Members Present: Robert Minton, Chair; Committee Members Dick Hinkle, Dave Anderson, Mark Lucas, Merry Sipe, Mary Eberley, Hank Duitsman and Pat Dwyer. Chris Kreger arrived at 7:12 p.m. Members Absent: Lloyd Barthel, Arne Engstrom, Keith Holme, Bill Birrenkott, Mary McDevitt and Manly Glines Staff Present: Steve Ach, City Planner; Jason Chen, representing MSA Consulting Engineers; Debbie Kleckner, Recording Secretary Also Present: 42 Residents/Property owners 1. Call Meeting To Order The March 9, 1995 meeting of the Elk River Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chair Minton. 2. Consider Steering Committee Agenda • MERRY SIPE MOVED APPROVAL OF THE 3/9/95 STEERING COMMITTEE AGENDA AS AMENDED. PAT DWYER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 8-0. 3. Consider Steering Committee Minutes It was noted that Mary Eberley's name should be added to those listed as present at the March 9, 1995 meeting. MARY EBERLEY MOVED APPROVAL OF THE 2/9/95 STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES AS AMENDED. DICK HINKLE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 8-0. 4. Presentation of Urban Service Area City Planner Steve Ach provided maps detailing the following information: Exhibit A - Existing urban service area, Phases 1 and 2 proposed expansion of service area from 1988 Comprehensive Plan. Steve explained if the current service district were fully developed, it would exceed the wastewater treatment facility capacity by 15%. The present facility treats 1.2 million gallons per day. He noted there are developed areas within the urban service area that are not served by sewer and water and are not foreseen to need it at this time. • Steering Committee Minutes Page 2 March 9, 1995 Exhibit B- Location of Oliver Kelly Farm and Cargill property. These properties may • create a natural boundary where sewer and water would not extend any further east. Exhibit C - Possible expanded urban service area. This area could be served with City water and sewer with the wastewater treatment plant expansion to 2.2 million gallons per day. Steve Ach displayed a map which identified the wetland areas which are undevelopable. Next Steve reviewed five options for extending the urban service district. Steve concluded that the future service area identified by the revised comprehensive plan will determine the long term growth area for the community. He explained that wherever the boundary is, the 2-1/2 acre subdivision will limit extending the urban service areas in the future. He added that the service area may be phased over several years. Chris Kreger introduced an additional option, identified as Option 6, which identified a larger area for extending the urban service district, and included a phasing plan. Steve Ach explained that there are design issues that need to be considered. The size of the trunk lines will be determined by how far the urban service area will • extend in the future. Discussion followed regarding costs for sewer and water and population projections. Jason Chen of MSA stated that the population is projected to be 40,000 when the City is fully developed. A resident questioned who will pay the costs for updating the wastewater facility. Hank Duitsman explained that it will be paid for by those people using the system and also by developers. Jason Chen noted that the costs will be somewhat higher than in other areas, due to the large amount of unassessable property in the proposed district (i.e., Oliver Kelly Farm). Hank Duitsman also explained that only the area served by the trunk line would be assessed, and also, that properties would have 2 years to hook up to the system. Dwight Kirkeide, 11230 173rd Avenue NW, expressed his concern that development causes hardship for homeowners. He does not want to see land taken up by commercial and industrial development that may be needed for other purposes such as schools, in the future. Chair Minton asked that Steve Ach explain the benefits of extending sewer and water. Steve noted the following: -sewer and water is a prerequisite for commercial and industrial development -city water necessary for fire protection systems for commercial and industrial -commercial and industrial provides the majority of the tax base to support . residential; brings in tax dollars. Steering Committee Minutes Page 3 March 9, 1995 • -balance overall land uses Steve Ach pointed out there is a large residential area to the north that will likely remain excluded from the urban service district. This residential development must be balanced with industrial and commercial development to support services its residential population will demand, including schools, road maintenance, police and fire protection. Dwight Kirkeide questioned why the industrial and commercial development can't be done without destroying the lives of the residential population in the area. Discussion following regarding assessment procedures. Hank Duitsman explained the green acres deferment. He also explained he feels it is unfair to exclude a specific area from assessments and then later, those properties end up hooking up to the system and pay the same price, even though costs have risen significantly. Further discussion ensued regarding private septic and water systems vs. city sewer and water, and the effects on the environment. Scott Passuello, resident, expressed his opinion that the "per acre" assessment was unfair and felt another method should be used that would assess commercial and industrial property a higher rate. Hank Duitsman stated that there would be additional costs for lateral and III hookups, which would be higher for commercial and industrial. Sue Mordahl, resident of Mississippi Heights, stated that she was not in favor of the assessments and asked that the Mississippi Heights subdivision be excluded from the proposed urban service district, as Sandpiper Estates was excluded. Hank Duitsman explained that the Sandpiper Additions have escaped an assessment at the current time, but that there is the potential for an assessment in the future, at a higher rate, if sewer and water is needed in the future. Jim Langer, resident of Mississippi Heights, expressed his concern that Mississippi Heights not be rezoned commercial, since it is so close to Highway 10. Jeff Hendrickson, resident of Mississippi Heights, stated that he was not interested in connecting to the truck line at$100-$150 per foot. Chris Kreger explained that the Steering Committee will only be making a recommendation for the Comprehensive Plan update, which is a plan for the next 5 - 10 years growth of the City. He stated the areas which will actually be serviced with city sewer and water will be determined piece meal. Chris added that the City needs to provide for the possibility that property owners may need or want sewer and water in the future, and would be able to be serviced by the trunk line. Les Lundquist, business owner on Highway 10 east, stated that sewer and water is needed to serve properties on Highway 10. He explained that it cost $40,000 to III put in a special fire suppression system in the motel because there was no city Steering Committee Minutes Page 4 March 9, 1995 water available. He added that Houle's needs to have their septic tank pumped 3-4 times a week and would welcome city services. Mike Vadnais, resident, questioned the cost of assessments. Staff explained that costs for street, curb and gutter, water and sewer for a typical lot of 10,000 - 12,000 square feet is between $9,000 and $11,000 per lot. A question was raised regarding front footage assessment for lateral on a corner lot. Staff explained that the property would be assessed for the long side of the lot only. Dwight Kirkeide, resident, stated that if a septic system fails it is a problem for the homeowner, but if the sewer system fails, the raw sewage goes directly into the river. Pat Dwyer stated that the City must plan for the future needs of the City. Chair Minton stated that the Committee must now prepare to make a recommendation for setting the boundaries for the future urban service district. Dave Anderson stated that he felt the Committee is not fulfilling its purpose if they make a recommendation contrary to what the residents have expressed. Discussion followed regarding the projected growth of the City. Jason Chen suggested that based population projections, the City would reach 18,000 people in 20 years, but added that Elk River is growing at a much faster pace than the average community. • Further discussion followed regarding cluster development on 10 acre parcels. The five options for extension of the urban service district were discussed at length,with an Option 6 added as proposed by Chris Kreger. DICK HINKLE MOVED TO RECOMMEND THE PROPOSED URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT FOR THE UPDATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMBINE OPTIONS 3 & 4, AND ALSO ADD THE AREA NORTH AND EAST OF THE RAILROAD TRACKS AS PROPOSED BY HANK DUITSMAN. Discussion followed regarding Chris Kreger's proposed Option 6 phasing plan. DICK HINKLE WITHDREW HIS MOTION. DICK HINKLE MOVED TO REQUEST STAFF TO PROVIDE DETAIL ON THE FOLLOWING TWO OPTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE STEERING COMMITTEE AT THE MARCH 23, 1995 STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING: (1) A COMBINATION OF OPTIONS 3 AND 4, INCLUDING THE AREA EAST AND NORTH OF THE RAILROAD TRACKS IN THE AREA OF HIGHWAY 10 AND 165TH AVENUE NW. (2) OPTION 6 AS PROPOSED BY CHRIS KREGER, ALSO INCLUDING THE AREA EAST AND NORTH OF THE RAILROAD TRACKS IN THE AREA OF HIGHWAY 10 AND 165TH AVENUE NW. MARY EBERLEY SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 9-0. Steering Committee Minutes Page 5 March 9, 1995 • 5. Steering Committee Opinion Line Chair Minton highlighted some of the most frequent comments received on the "hotline", such as development of trails and parks, the desire to preserve the theme "where city and country flow together, and the need to establish and enforce ordinances for property maintenance. Jeff Mastley, resident, stressed the need to enforce the ordinances that are currently in place. 6. Letters from Property Owners/Neighboring Community Chair Minton asked that letters from Rick and Jackie Fredricksen, Shirley Pierce, and Otsego's Planning Consultant, Robert Kirmis, be entered into the official record. 7. Tentative Schedule for Upcoming Meetings Steve Ach reviewed this schedule for the Committee. 9. Future Meeting The next meeting of the Elk River Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee will be March 23, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. • Steve Ach requested that all Committee members bring their copy of the transportation study to this meeting. Steve noted that the County Engineer is planning to attend this meeting. 10. Adjournment There being no further business, CHRIS KREGER MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. MARY EBERLEY SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 9-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, kie21-- -ate. Ys. -1Le-'4"/-"-- Debbie Kleckner Recording Secretary • 1Pi i H 0 0 ;�4 N wpm& 4 -A LLIJ _TJ _,j Oat -cw H vAlGVM" in im U.0 IN l8Od33Hj (00911) © DO9LL) M9 Jr TH HAE]HEE foogt[I ')N F4-- (006 L I) (00n7 I '00jeffi)N "00i�t) Lj, It it z .00ZZt) ala 7 0 ■ L —M �3s 00.1 QWldn-- (00w I) NONM-l� ■ (009"1) 11 YIN3� A5 (Ooi 7 1) i7 { lwg:w-- si— vQ Nrll ONS3di NosanH koout) N0114081 V) 3OW1 L.Li 0 L - (0094 i I A It, 4b Slld*N NIOX • 311 LLJ 006% f v/ ll i FT (Dotoi) 4� o0z t, I) ti 401ANY Iz-1z- 4 4 N lo o ao o �00961 �AA 8V( INVIIAl n Icw J (Do6b oe (OOOOt. __ i00LOt1 P�Kl- NHOr ZI Nr t4 -r e N- T)T r X)d 14, 4 40 1 -)NOC (00"0" ROME 00901) s3ssA3n (006011 IONVA (000 1 NOS* 16 d3LAY)( (00m) 3NV7 (OOZ I L 48renv (M: L L) N NWalvs WSW,) Mil L TWO 0 LA ci qIt < 0 a- cn LLI 04 LLJ C i Z I— Z CID z Z -i: W W C) 0 (D 04 < L.Lj F- LLJ V) Z d, z 1, -7- z z � it LAJ LLJ ui - F■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ �00961 �AA 8V( INVIIAl n Icw J (Do6b oe (OOOOt. __ i00LOt1 P�Kl- NHOr ZI Nr t4 -r e N- T)T r X)d 14, 4 40 1 -)NOC (00"0" ROME 00901) s3ssA3n (006011 IONVA (000 1 NOS* 16 d3LAY)( (00m) 3NV7 (OOZ I L 48renv (M: L L) N NWalvs WSW,) Mil L TWO 0 LA ci qIt < 0 a- cn LLI 04 LLJ C i Z I— Z CID z Z -i: W W (D 04 < EL F- LLJ V) Z d, z 1, -7- lp --