9.1. SR 05-21-2018 E04y1� ,.,�� Request for Action
River
To Item Number
Mayor and City Council 9.1
Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by
Work Session May 21, 2018 Chris Leeseber , Senior Planner
Item Description Reviewed by
Concept Review: Subdivision for Bill Christian Zack Carlton,Planning Manager
Reviewed by
Cal Portner, City Administrator
Action Requested
Discuss the proposed concept plat and provide informal/non-binding feedback to the applicant.
Background/Discussion
The subject parcel is located at the northeast corner of CR 121 (Brook Road) and Monroe Street and is
40 acres in size. The current zoning for the property is R1-a,which requires a minimum lot size of 2 '/z
acre,permitting approximately 16 single-family lots.
The applicant is proposing to rezone the parcel to R1-b which would allow 1 acre parcels without access
to sewer and water. Their request would permit approximately 25 one-plus acre single-family lots.
This parcel has a large wetland complex in the center and two smaller basins on both the west and east
sides.
Brook Road is a paved county road and Monroe Street is a city gravel road. The concept plat shows two
cul-de-sac streets. One street is off of Monroe Street and the other street is off of Brook Road. The
applicant has spoken with county on the access from Brook Road.
Comprehensive Plan
Rural Residential
Rural Residential uses are guided to be developed as residential use in areas outside of the Urban Service
District (USD) that are not currently served by municipal sewer and water. The predominant land use in
this area is single family detached homes. Forms of detached single family units can be built in "cluster
subdivision". Cluster subdivisions are development patterns that place housing closer together in order to
preserve greater areas of undeveloped land and to minimize the number of individual on-site septic
systems.
A gross density of 0.4 units per acre (1 unit per 2.5 acres) is the target density in the Rural Residential
area. Increases in density should be allowed for achieving certain public objectives such as preserving
natural features (which are not otherwise protected by ordinance),implementing the city's trail and park
master plan (beyond the typical required park dedication),incorporating energy-saving building
techniques, or a combination of the above mentioned concepts.
The Elk River Vision
A PehoMing community Pitb revolutionary and spirited resourcefulness, exceptional P,`01 W E H E 8 6 T
service, and community engagement that encourages and inspires prosperity INAMIRE1
The proposed project would have a gross density of 0.625 units per acre (1 unit per 1.6 acres). Staff and
the Planning Commission did review a similar concept on a parcel approximately 0.3 miles outside of the
USD. The consensus of the Commission was favorable as the product type, 1-acre parcels,is not offered
in Elk River, and is relatively close to the USD, allowing expansion of services beyond the current 20-year
scope.
This site is approximately 3.1 miles beyond the current limits of the USD, severely limiting long-term
expansion options for connection to public services should that ever be needed.
Attachments
■ Location Maps
■ Applicant's Narrative
■ Concept Plat
■ Site Plan Comments dated May 16, 2018
N:APublic Bodies\Agenda Packets\05-21-2018\Final\9.1 sr.docx
7 -102-d1 5 75M2 101
A
75.102420 `
75=101 101
7a-101,3105
• a
.► 5-102403 75-101
r7 5- 9 4 �4�U1OA
�� •" '� r Z 75-10 f-330
75 102-4404
-LU rTEAPIN
75 7$A1 OS
4 {
75-102-4405 "0
"O
it
` i 75,191;1102__--� ••., �"'�• - -
j
yrs • 4• � +'
-1i1-122 7a-'111-1��Pi
7 -111-110 9
' 75-112,2200
_ 0
r t
+ 75-112-2'.
75-111-E405 .' at
NEW -
Bill Christian
Concept Review
ti •
-'� 13T F1 E'
F •ter �
7a 112 -1301
El
Case No: CR 18-02 River -.
-0m_02)0
-0crca*Cl)
-
C2
(D � 7
N O S
o -C3
O=
3
o 3
O
� m CD
M O -,
Q
CD O
Q
w (D
h O w
O?
:3 N
CD
CO CCD p
c)
3 `�
w N
�'���ZT�ro�o�w�h
v a
o
CD CD Q
CD
(�!� o
C(D
n
D
�-cn
�o�
CD o rn
a ca•
o CD
LQ, 3 m m
v?
ZY
CD
0
(D o.�
0 3
0�
W 3 (D
tn
=r
(n
Q w �'
ro
CD w
CD (D
Q
(D O
m
rt s=
;q: -O U)m
=r0 ;:w cn
_D
C7
0
CL
CD
zr
CQ
- rt
(vD
Z
NO"hCn
MMX---'
❑CD
o
D=r
0
, .0
-�
CD�=
m
W
o O
E Z
O �`O
O
C
O o
O
c m
N o
r*
V)
Cp
CD -0 N
cn (D Cn
-0 �,
O O
— C7
p
n
�
=rN
n Q7 (D v
Q
a
o m
o o (n
(D
(D
= o -0
co
W
3 C7
-
w =
0
w
`c c
v
uoi
O 0 aa
W
C 3
o
S`C
C L
ai
N Ln � Q
w (D
cn
A±
(D Q
(D o
O
rro
.+
o
Sfl3 (L3
C_O
ct)70
((-1fn D
�'o D
O' r -r C1
0 n
�
"p N �
�
� �
1" (D CQ �
O
O
O CL
O
cn
@
CD -0
CD
CSD n
CSD
C3
(D
"6
`�
ZT C L
(p `� v
CCD
om
-CD o
�_(D
n
� -IQ0
oT.
-� 3
c�
u�'', CD m
O (CD
o
O O N
= CSD
Cn
3 O o
O z
ff�Q
(D CU
0C
(D cn
_
�
O Q
O
t? � , 0
O
COD
CD (D *
_0
CD
D
NW CP
3
0
r-
CD
N
Q
0
r+
m
O
O
X
X
0
O
CD
CD
tll
6r"
0
71,
Fr f j Rig li t"0 F"V'fay (a -
Dedicated for Monroe Street
75-161 1111' -_ • f rIJA
.
Green Hatching
�� "r• Illustrates Potential
Conservation Easement
?r.d yy
i� New Cul -de -Sac
* 66' Right•cf-Way 121
B f Twenty-five {25] SF Lot 0�hedCircle stww:
1-D Acres Minimu 7%' Maximum Length'
iV
Existing.
_ Wetland J
E.'st'nro - ti
PROPOSED LAYOUT ASSUMES RE -ZONING TO R1 -B ALOWING
1.I ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE WITH NO MINIMUM BUILDABLE
AREA. LOT QUANTITIES SHOULD BE VIEWED AS THE MAXIMUM
NUMBER ALLOWED AND ARE SUBJECT TO MORE DETAILED
DESIGN TO CONFIRM ADEQUATE AREAS FOR HOUSE, AND SEPTIC
REQUIREMENTS.
— Single Access Point 221st Avenue NW
to County Road
v1
RECEIVED
APR 16 2013
100 200 N�
n
Q
O
O O
h
CL
rD
G
rt
o
rt
0O
PI ,
0
ct)�
A �D
v CD
go a
O po
OCL
A O
A �
O rD
O 07
CD
A
v
v Un
T
Y.
CD o
O
(D-
a ' � �' y pD ''G01
A vG tz om P OrQ C7 O Ci - `q �� 4' N h �• b Z `n 00
00 0
CD toO
CD
�� W•� �� ASO
CD
O• v O a O
8O
O6) CL MW n ¢ CL CL
c)
o rt 'n til
Q. A -d CCL 00
D Q-' O 4 a, ° (Dn7 O -C
g O(D o �' o pt
a, '� O4
fD N fD A "v CD ID ° 0 IAD G�
O 4 '.•r
v, R O
CL
p,, UR 0P K Q. O
O • ` O~ N
oCD
cn
0 4t
�-1 A
rt
Y CD 0 C
EnO O A O
a o a o
rt
¢' O 0 0CD
O rt' O OiQ� W
rt
ƒ $
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
]
«
7
R
`
/
4 O R §
ƒ \ / ƒ 2 \
@°
EA
no 4
4
CD
#
B R §
b
\
�
zr
n
/
7 k
p
§ 0 rD
d
0 ƒ
[ 2
J
�
0-�\ƒ
I
7 pa
a.0 i o
b �
\
� ^ \ �
/ ƒ / At
§ E § ƒ R
ch
�
2 ƒ b ƒ
/ ° +
7
ƒ� �o
ƒ / C /
� Q
n