04-23-2002 PC MIN
e
MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD AT ELK RIVER CITY HALL
TUESDAY, APRIL 23, 2002
Members Present:
Chair Pederson, Commissioners Anderson, Baker, Franz, Jenson and Ropp
Members Absent:
Mesich
Staff Present:
Michele McPherson, Director of Planning; Scott Harlicker, Senior
Planner; Chris Leeseberg, Planner; Terry Maurer, City Engineer; Peter Beck,
City Attorney; Debbie Huebner, Recording Secretary
1. Call Meeting To Order
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the meeting of the Elk River Planning Commission
was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chair Pederson.
2.
Consider 4/23/02 Planning Commission Agenda
It
COMMISSIONER BAKER MOVED TO APPROVE THE APRIL 23, 2002
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA. COMMISSIONER FRANZ
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0.
3.
Consider 3/26/02 Planning Commission Minutes & 4/9/02 Meeting Notes
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 26, 2002
MINUTES AND THE APRIL 9, 2002 MEETING NOTES. COMMISSIONER
FRANZ SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0.
4. Planning Commission Representative to Attend May City Council Meeting
Commissioner Baker will attend the May 20, 2002 City Council meeting.
5.1. Request by Coborn's for a Conditional Use Permit for Signage. Public Hearing - Case No.
CU 02-13
Staff report by Chris Leeseberg, Planner. Coborn' s, Inc. requests a conditional use permit to
allow a 2' - 4 ~" x 20' sign on the west fas:ade of the pharmacy drive-thm canopy at 19425
Evans Street. Mr. Leeseberg described the proposed sign layout and materials. Staff is in
agreement that the sign is needed to identify the business from Highway 169, as well as
minimize the confusion of what the drive-thm is for. Staff recommends approval of the
request with the condition that the sign will consist of individual letters.
e
Commissioner Baker asked how this request differs from the Cub Foods sign request, which
was denied. Mr. Leeseberg explained that Cub Foods already had a sign identifying the
pharmacy and requested additional signage to add the word "Cub". Coborns has no signage
identifying the pharmacy at this time.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 23, 2002
Page 2
e
Chair Pederson asked how much signage Coborns is allowed and if the requested signage is
within that amount. Mr. Leeseberg stated that they are allowed up to 10 percent of the wall
surface square footage and the request meets the requirement.
Chair Pederson opened the public hearing.
Mike Wallin, representative of Coborns, stated that they have signage on the building for
the 1 hour photo and video rental. He explained that there is confusion as to what the new
drive-thru pharmacy is for and customers have been trying to drop off film and video
rentals at the window. Mr. Wallin felt the new signage will help alleviate the confusion.
Chair Pederson asked if any of the existing signage will be changed. Mr. Wallin stated no.
Chair Pederson asked why the signage was not requested when the drive-thru was added.
Mr. Wallin stated they did not foresee a need for it. Chair Pederson asked if the entrance
and exit will have signage. Mr. Wallin stated that he would rather have the pharmacy sign if
it was an issue of which signs he would be allowed.
Commissioner Baker stated that he had a concern if this signage were allowed and Cub
Foods was denied additional signage. Commissioner Franz stated that Coborns request
meets the PUD requirements, and Cub Foods was asking for additional signage beyond what
the Elk Park Center PUD allowed. Commissioner Baker asked why Coborns needed a
conditional use permit if the signage was allowed. Ms. McPherson explained that changes to
a specific site plan within a PUD require a conditional use permit.
e
There being no further public comment, Chair Pederson closed the public hearing.
COMMISSIONER FRANZ MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE
REQUEST BY COBORN'S FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW
ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE ON THE WEST FA<;ADE OF THE PHARMACY
DRIVE THROUGH CANOPY, CASE NO. CD 02-13, WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
1. THE SIGN WILL CONSIST OF INDIVIDUAL LETTERS.
2. SIGNAGE SHALL BE PLACED AT THE ENDS OF THE CANOPY TO
IDENTIFY THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT OF THE DRIVE-THRU.
CHAIR PEDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED
5-1. Commissioner Baker opposed.
5.2. Request by Twistmasters Gymnastics. Inc. for Conditional Use Permit. Public Hearing-
Case No. CU 02-12
Staff report by Director of Planning Michele McPherson. Twistmasters Gymnastics, Inc.
requests a conditional use permit to allow establishment of a gymnastics training facility
within the Elk River Crossing Business Park, 17834 Industrial Circle. This multi-tenant
building currently houses Great River Energy's offices. Ms. McPherson explained that Mr.
Marten's letter explains why he feels the facility would fit in the Business Park District. She
noted that she is aware there are similar facilities located in business park districts of other
cities, but that these cities have a more liberal ordinance than the City of Elk River does.
e
Planning Commission Minutes
April 23, 2002
Page 3
e
Staff recommends denial of the request as there is no logical link between vocational,
technical, and trade schools and the proposed gymnastics training facility.
Commissioner Franz asked what is meant by accessory uses in regard to private recreational
facilities. Ms. McPherson explained that a permitted accessory use must be linked to the
principal use or permitted conditional use. City Attorney Peter Beck explained that the
ordinance specifies that an accessory use must be subordinate to a principal use, such as a
parking lot is an accessory use. If the gymnastics use was an accessory use to some other
business, it would likely be allowed. He noted that this request is for a conditional use
permit, not an accessory use. Ms. McPherson read the definition for private recreational
facilities from the City's ordinance. Commissioner Baker asked if there was a definition for
vocational, trade and technical schools. Ms. McPherson stated no.
Chair Pederson opened the public hearing.
Rick Martens, representing Brookstone, Inc., part-owner of the Elk River Industrial
Park, introduced Tim Flynn of Twistmasters Gymnastics, Inc.
e
Mr. Flynn explained that he and his wife, Renae propose to be the financial backers and will
not be managing the facility. J an Barlett, Elk River gymnastics coach, will be their business
manager. Mr. Flynn stated that the business would be more of a "feel-good" operation and
that do not expect to make any money for at least the first three years. He felt that there
would be a significant community benefit from the facility. Mr. Flynn explained that the Elk
River location was chosen because there are no other gymnastics facilities between St. Cloud
and Champlin, and also because of the good exposure to Highway 169 and Highway 10. He
felt this facility would draw from a number of surrounding cities including Zimmerman,
Princeton, Rogers, Monticello, and Big Lake. Mr. Flynn explained that retail space is too
expensive, due to the large amount of floor space required for this type of facility, and the
fact that retail space does not provide the ceiling height required.
Mr. Martens explained that the gymnastics facility would be used for training, schooling,
and education, and therefore meets the intent of the ordinance for vocational, trade and
technical schools. Mr. Martens stated that there are gymnastics facilities located in business
parks in Ham Lake, Champlin and Apple Valley. He stated that no other type of building
provides the height needed for gymnastics.
Jan Bartlett, Zimmerman, MN, Elk River Gymnastics Coach, explained the benefits of
gymnastics to the students, and the community.
Mr. Flynn noted that due to budget cuts in the schools, the junior high school age students
have no where to participate in gymnastics at this time.
There being no further public comment, Chair Pederson closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Ropp stated that he felt it was implied in the ordinance that the vocational
technical and trade schools are intended to provide employees for the businesses in the
business park.
Chair Pederson stated that he is not aware of any school that offers gymnastics as a vocation
and that the intent of the Business Park District is to create jobs.
e
Planning Commission Minutes
April 23, 2002
Page 4
e
Commissioner Baker concurred with Chair Pederson and stated that this type of use would
not create jobs, since they did not even expect to turn a profit for a number of years. He felt
that the only way the use could be allowed is by an ordinance amendment. He also did not
feel the use qualified as a vocational, trade or technical school.
Commissioner Franz stated that he understood why the use did not fit in the commercial
district due to the high rents and ceiling height requirements. He felt there are reasons why
it could be approved but that there are <<gray areas", and he suggested forwarding the request
on to the City Council.
Commissioner Anderson stated that he was not in favor of approving the request as
presented. He felt that vocational, trade and technical schools are intended to help students
earn a living wage and that a training school would better describe the gymnastics facility.
COMMISSIONER BAKER MOVED TO RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE
REQUEST BY TWISTMASTERS GYMNASTICS, INC. FOR A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT TO AllOW A GYMNASTICS TRAINING FACILITY WITHIN
THE BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT, CASE NO. CU 02-12, BASED ON THE
FOllOWING FINDINGS:
e
1. A GYMNASTICS FACILITY DOES NOT MEET THE ORDINANCE
REQUIREMENTS OF A VOCATIONAL, TECHNICAL, OR TRADE
SCHOOL.
2. THE GYMNASTICS FACILITY IS NOT PROPOSED TO BE AN INTERIM
USE AND WOULD BE CONSIDERED A NONCONFORMING
PERMANENT USE.
COMMISSIONER JENSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
CARRIED 6-0.
5.3. Request by John Alfords for Amendment to the Land Use Map to Change the Land Use
from MR to HR. Public Hearing - Case No. LU 02-02
5.4. Request by John Alfords for Rezoning from R1c to R4. Public Hearing - Case No. ZC 02-
03
Staff report by Chris Leeseberg. John Alfords requests a land use amendment to HR (High
Density Residential) and rezoning to R4 (Multiple Family Residential), for property located
at 423 and 433 Irving Avenue. The applicant currently owns an 8-unit apartment building at
433 Irving A venue which is nonconforming. He currently has a purchase agreement for the
single-family property to the south (423 Irving) on which he proposes to construct an 8-12
unit apartment building. Mr. Leeseberg reviewed the surrounding land uses. Staff
recommends approval of the request as presented.
Chair Pederson opened the public hearing.
John Alfords, applicant, stated that he has owned apartments in the Elk River area for 15
years and he feels that the new building will be a positive addition to the area.
e
Commissioner Franz asked if construction would begin during the school year, noting the
close proximity to St. Andrew's School. Mr. Alfords stated that the site would be cleaned up
and the existing building torn down this summer when school is out, and construction
Planning Commission Minutes
April 23, 2002
Page 5
e
would likely be in the summer of 2003. Mr. Alfords noted that the City has approached him
regarding use of the site to take down the old water tower.
Commissioner Baker asked what the rent is for the apartments. Mr. Alfords stated that the
rent is currently $800, and that the rent would be approximately $1,200 for the new building.
He stated that some of the nuns from St. Andrew's Church live in the apartments and that
they have indicated that they need more housing.
There being no further public comment, Chair Pederson closed the public hearing.
Chair Pederson asked when the water tower was scheduled to come down. City Engineer
Terry Maurer stated that the timing has been moved up since this opportunity has become
available.
Chair Pederson stated that he feels the site is a good location for a second apartment
building. Commissioner Franz concurred and felt it was a good idea to bring the other
building into compliance, as well.
e
COMMISSIONER BAKER MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE
REQUEST BY JOHN ALFORDS TO AMEND THE LAND USE PLAN FROM
MR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO HR (HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL), CASE NO. LU 02-02, AND REZONING FROM RIC (SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO R4 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL), CASE
NO. ZC 02-03, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS:
1. THE LAND USE AND REZONING ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE
SURROUNDING LAND USES.
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
CARRIED 6-0.
5.5. Request by North Memorial Health Care for Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for
Signage, Public Hearing - Case No. CU 02-07
Staff report by Scott Harlicker, Senior Planner. North Memorial Health Care request an
amendment to the conditional use permit for Elk River Plaza 4th Addition to allow three
additional wall signs at 800 Freeport Avenue. A 2'6 x 20' (50 sJ.) wall sign is proposed to be
place on the east side of the building facing Highway 169, a 24" x 36 (72 sq. ft. ) sign on the
west side facing Freeport Avenue, and a 19"x6' (9.5 sq. ft.) addition to an existing wall sign.
The total wall signage, including the existing sign is 140.5 sq. ft.
Staff recommends approval of the wall sign on the east side of the building facing Highway
169, and denial of the illuminated sign facing Freeport Avenue, due to the fact that there are
single family homes across the street.
Commissioner Baker asked if North Memorial's sign on Highway 169 was temporary. Mr.
Harlicker stated yes, and that the sign can only be up a maximum of 90 days.
Chair Pederson opened the public hearing.
e
Jerry Pedlar, 3300 Oakdale, Robbinsdale, MN, representing North Memorial, stated
that they are experiencing a number of problems because of the limited signage on their
Planning Commission Minutes
April 23, 2002
Page 6
e
building. He stated that patients have a hard time finding the building, and that prospective
tenants are not interested in leasing because they do not feel the building is clearly identified
as a medical building. Mr. Pedlar provided a photo showing the side of the building facing
Highway 169. He stated that he felt the signage on the pylon sign was ineffective because of
the trees and other businesses. Mr. Pedlar stated that he feels visibility has had a severe
impact on the anticipated growth. He stated that they had planned for 12,000 square foot
expansion for facility by now, but the expected growth has not occurred. Mr. Pedlar stated
that he agreed with Mr. Harlicker that the sign facing Freeport Street should not be lit, and
therefore, would not need to be a boxed sign. He proposed that blue individual letters
indicating "Elk River Physicians" be considered instead.
Commissioner Baker stated that he felt the individual letters would be appropriate.
Chair Pederson asked if the letters would be made of metal. Mr. Pedlar stated that he was
not sure of the material at this time.
There being no further public comment, Chair Pederson closed the public hearing.
Chair Pederson stated that he feels the signage is needed. He stated that when he was
waiting for an appointment at the facility, a number of calls came in to the receptionist
asking where the building was, and one of the callers was in the parking lot. He felt that the
"Now Care" was also appropriate.
e
Commissioner Anderson stated that he feels this facility is a type of retail business and
visibility is needed. Commissioner Baker concurred. Commissioner Baker asked if staff
would support the sign facing Freeport if it was not back lit. Mr. Harlicker stated yes.
COMMISSIONER BAKER MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE
REQUEST BY NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE FOR A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT TO AMEND THE PUD AGREEMENT FOR ELK RIVER PLAZA
4TH ADDITION TO ALLOW A 2'6" x 20' WALL SIGN FACING HIGHWAY 169
AND SIGNAGE CONSISTING OF INDIVIDUAL LETTERS FACING
FREEPORT AVENUE, CASE NO. CU 02-07, WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
1. THE SIGNAGE FACING FREEPORT AVENUE SHALL NOT BE liT.
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
CARRIED 6-0.
5.6. Request by GSS Properties. LLC for Rezoninl;'; from R1c to R3 (Kliever Lake Fields East).
Public Hearing - Case No. ZC 02-04
5.7. Request by GSS Properties. LLC for Preliminary Plat Approval (Kliever Lake Fields East).
Public Hearinl;'; - Case No. P 02-02
Staff report by Michele McPherson. The applicant, GSS Properties, LLC requests a
rezoning to R1c and preliminary plat approval for 116 townhomes lots on 23 acres (Kliever
Lake Fields East), located in the southwest corner of County Road 12 and Fillmore Street.
e
Ms. McPherson explained that the Planning Commission reviewed a town home layout for
the 23-acre outlot during the platting process for Kliever Lake Fields.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 23, 2002
Page 7
e
Ms. McPherson explained the underlying land use of the subject property is MR, Medium
Density residential, which allows up to 8 units per acre. She noted that the net density of
this proposed development is 5.7 units per acre. Ms. McPherson stated that the Planning
Commission and City Council has voiced a concern in recent months regarding the number
of townhomes that have been approved.
Ms. McPherson stated that the applicant is proposing 29 four-unit buildings (116 units total),
row units, with both a front and back yard for each unit. She noted that the proposed street
is 28' back-to-back, and needs to be revised to 28' face-to-face. Ms. McPherson reviewed lot
sizes, setbacks, open space, density, unit and garage sizes, vertical and horizontal fa~ade
changes, building materials, and landscaping. She stated that staff will work with the
applicant to meet the building material standards and changes in elevation requirements.
Commissioner Baker asked if the decks will be considered a change in elevation. Ms.
McPherson stated that the Commission previously approved the deck railings as a change in
elevation.
Chair Pederson opened the public hearing.
e
Horst Graser, GSS Properties, applicant, eXplained that the Commission reviewed a
concept plan for the townhomes several months ago and that changes were made to the plat,
accordingly. He stated that the density for the entire site is 2.74 acres, not including the
outlot. He stated that he feels townhomes are an appropriate use of the property, given its
location at the intersection of two major roads. He did not feel there would be a problem in
meeting the building standards and requirement for changes in elevation. Mr. Graser noted
that the townhomes will be in the $170,000-$175,000 price range. He eXplained that he
plans to start grading this year and that 45-50 units will be constructed, initially.
There being no further public comment, Chair Pederson closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Baker stated that even though the rezoning meets the Comprehensive Plan,
he was not in favor of rezoning, given the large number of townhomes already in this area.
Commissioner Franz stated that he felt that the townhome component was clearly shown in
the original proposal, but was held up pending approval of the townhome ordinance. He
felt that the applicant has made every effort to comply with the ordinance and he supports
the request.
Commissioner Ropp asked for clarification of condition number 2 in the findings for denial.
Ms. McPherson eXplained that the Planning Commission and City Council have both
previously stated that they felt townhomes should be closer to services, such as medical
clinics, etc. which are found in the core area of the city.
Commissioner Baker stated he did see a compelling reason to rezone the property.
Commissioner Anderson asked if the zoning remained Rle, how many units could be
constructed on the property. Ms. McPherson stated that approximately 69 single family
units could be constructed.
e
Commissioner Jenson asked if the property was designated for townhome development
during the plat review of Kliever Lake Fields. Chair Pederson stated yes, and that the
property was platted as an outlot because of the townhome moratorium.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 23, 2002
Page 8
e
Commissioner Baker stated that since that time, a significant number of townhome plats
have been brought into this area.
Chair Pederson stated that he felt the Commission understood the applicant's intent to plat
the property as townhomes, and that he could have requested a waiver, but instead chose to
wait out the process for the new ordinance to be written. Chair Pederson stated that his
concern is for the amount of traffic that will be generated which will flow back to the City.
Commissioner Anderson stated that he is not in favor of the rezoning, stating that this area
is farthest from the core area of any of the other townhomes, and also had a concern
regarding the number of units and traffic.
COMMISSIONER BAKER MOVED TO RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE
REQUEST BY GSS PROPERTIES, LLC FOR REZONING OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY FROM R1C TO R3, CASE NO. ZC 02-04, BASED ON THE
FOLLOWING FINDINGS:
1. TOWNHOMES IN THIS LOCATION ARE INAPPROPRIATE DUE TO
THEIR LOCATION ON A MAJOR ENTRANCE INTO THE CITY.
2. TOWNHOMES IN THIS LOCATION ARE INAPPROPRIATE AS THE
DISTANCE IS TOO GREAT TO SERVICES PROVIDED WITHIN THE
CORE CITY.
e
3. THE NUMBER OF RECENT APPROVALS FOR TOWNHOME PROJECTS
HAS INCREASED THE PROPORTION OF TOWNHOMES TO SINGLE
FAMILY HOMES TO INAPPROPRIATE LEVELS.
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
CARRIED 4-2. Commissioners Pederson and Franz opposed.
COMMISSIONER BAKER MOVED TO RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE
REQUEST BY GSS PROPERTIES, LLC FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
(KLIEVER LAKE FIELDS EAST), CASE NO. P 02-02. COMMISSIONER
ANDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-2.
Commissioners Pederson and Franz opposed.
5.8.
Request by D.R. Horton for Rezoning from Rlc to PUD (Marshes of Trott Brook Farms).
Public Hearing - Case No. ZC 02-05
Request by D.R. Horton for Conditional Use Permit for Site Plan Approval (Marshes of
Trott Brook Farms). Public Hearing - Case No. CU 02-14
Request by D .R. Horton for Preliminary Plat Approval (Marshes of Trott Brook Farms).
Public Hearing - Case No. P 02-08
5.9.
5.10.
e
Staff report by Scott Harlicker. D.R. Horton requests a zone change to Planned Unit
Development; a conditional use permit; and preliminary plat approval for Marshes of Trott
Brook Farms, a 53.95 acre subdivision consisting of 23 single family lots and 110 townhome
lots. The property is located east of Twin Lakes Road at the Trott Brook Parkway
intersection. The property is a replat of a portion of the original 1998 Trott Brook Farms
Addition, and also includes approximately 6 acres which was acquired from the City in a
land exchange.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 23, 2002
Page 9
e
Mr. Harlicker reviewed the existing conditions, the unit mix compared with Trott Brook
Farms South, density, rezoning request, layout of the single family and each of the four
townhome clusters, building elevations, parking, landscaping, and park dedication
recommendation. Mr. Harlicker noted that staff is concerned with the number of driveways
that access onto Smith Street. He reviewed two alternatives proposed by staff which would
address this concern. Mr. Harlicker explained staff is also concerned with the access to the
41 units south of Trott Brook Parkway and east of the gas line easement. He stated that
staff has met with the developers since the staff report was written and they have agreed to
work with staff on resolving these issues. Therefore, staff is now recommending approval of
the requests by D .R. Horton.
Commissioner Franz asked if the proposed townhomes meet the R3 zoning district
standards. Mr. Harlicker stated that he did not compare the two.
e
Commissioner Anderson asked if Vance Drive will end where it is shown on the plat, or if it
will connect with a future development. Mr. Harlicker explained that there is a large wetland
complex to the south which would prevent a future connection. He noted that a turn-
around will likely be constructed where the street dead-ends. City Engineer Terry Maurer
noted that the road is a private street and will not be maintained by the City; therefore, a cul-
de-sac is not required. He felt that there is adequate room for an emergency vehicles.
Commissioner Anderson asked what standards are required for private streets. Mr. Maurer
stated that the City's street design standards will be maintained. Commissioner Anderson
asked if the streets were consistent with the rest of the PUD. Mr. Maurer stated that the
streets in the first addition are public streets, that the private streets for the townhomes were
approved with the original plat in 1998.
Chair Pederson opened the public hearing.
Tom Bakritges, Project Manager for D.R. Horton, explained why they did not feel that
the original proposal for this area would work out. He felt that the there will be sufficient
breaks in the townhouse buildings due to the topography. Mr. Bakritges stated that
Alternative B proposed by staff would be the most favorable. He felt that there would be no
problem in reducing the island in Smith Circle as recommended by staff.
Commissioner Baker asked if there would be sidewalks. Mr. Bakritges stated that the there
will be sidewalks on the public streets, but not on the private streets. Mr. Bakritges noted
that all homes will have basements and will be approximately 2,500 square feet in size.
Commissioner Baker asked how the variation in materials would be accomplished. Mr.
Bakritges stated that there will be brick on the sides and rear of the units. He stated that the
setback requirement is 25 feet and that they are trying to meet the 30 foot setback on the
private streets.
There being no further public comment, Chair Pederson closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Baker stated that he feels the applicant should be required to meet the
minimum standards of the townhome ordinance.
e
Chair Pederson asked if there would be a second access to the north. Mr. Harlicker
explained that the primary accesses would be Tyler Street and County Road 13, but that
Smith Street would provide a secondary access when the Becker property to the north is
developed.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 23, 2002
Page 10
e
Commissioner Anderson stated that he was not in favor of rezoning the single family to the
north, since the adjacent Becker property will be developed as single family. He felt that
townhomes would be appropriate for the new area. Commissioner Baker concurred that he
opposed rezoning the area which was part of the original PUD.
Mr. Bakritges explained that a certain number of units are required to make a project viable,
and that they did not feel the original plan would have worked. He stated that clustering of
residential units helps pay for improvements over time. Mr. Bakritges noted that the
$180,000 - $200,000 price of the townhome units is considered affordable work force
housing.
Chair Pederson stated that he felt the residential area to the north should remain single
family as originally proposed. He had no objection to the townhomes as originally
proposed, and also felt that townhomes are appropriate for the additional 6 acre site. Chair
Pederson stated these townhomes are quite a distance from services, and he questioned if
this is the best use of the property.
Commissioner Baker stated he was not in favor of clustered mailboxes. He felt that the
concept adds to the potential for identity theft and should be eliminated in the future.
Chair Pederson stated that the front elevations of the townhome units were appropriate, and
felt that the Commission should consider imposing further conditions on the building
materials.
e
Commissioners Baker, Anderson, Jenson, Franz and Ropp expressed their support for the
rezoning. Commissioner Franz felt that the area north of Trott Brook Parkway should be
single family and did not object to the townhomes in the Tyler Court area. Regarding the
elevations, he felt that the townhome ordinance standards should be maintained.
Commissioner Jenson concurred with Commissioner Franz. Commissioner Anderson
agreed that the standards should be met or exceeded, if possible. Commissioner Franz
noted that he felt requiring the minimum standards would be adequate, since the
Commission would want to encourage affordable housing. Commission Baker concurred.
COMMISSIONER BAKER MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE
REQUEST BY D.R. HORTON FOR A REZONING FROM R1C (SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT), CASE
NO. ZC 02-05, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS:
1. THE REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF ELK RIVER'S
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN.
2. THE REZONING IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT ZONING
DISTRICTS.
COMMISSIONER FRANZ SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
CARRIED 6-0.
The Commissioners concurred that a 20th condition be added to address the townhome
standards.
e
Planning Commission Minutes
April 23, 2002
Page 11
e
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF
THE REQUEST BY D.R. HORTON FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR
MARSHES OF TROTT BROOK FARMS~ CASE NO. P 02-08, AND A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CASE NO. CU 02-
11, WITH THE FOLLOWING CHANGES:
1. THE PORTION OF MARSHES OF TROTT BROOK FARMS WHICH WAS
ORIGINALLY PLATTED AS TROTT BROOK FARMS SHALL REMAIN THE
SAME REGARDING THE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF SINGLE
FAMILY AND TOWNHOME UNITS;
AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
e
1. ALL COMMENTS OF THE CITY ENGINEER SHALL BE ADDRESSED.
2. THE DEVELOPER SHALL ENTER INTO A DEVELOPER'S
AGREEMENT OUTLINING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE
DEVELOPMENT.
3. THAT THE MAILBOXES SHALL BE CLUSTERED.
4. A SEALCOAT FEE IN THE AMOUNT DETERMINED BY THE CITY BE
PAID PRIOR TO RELEASING THE PLAT FOR RECORDING.
5. AN ENGINEERING ESCROW IN THE AMOUNT DETERMINED BY
THE CITY BE PAID PRIOR TO RELEASING THE PLAT FOR
RECORDING.
6. PARK DEDICATION FEES IN THE AMOUNT DETERMINED BY THE
CITY BE PAID PRIOR TO RELEASING THE PLAT FOR RECORDING.
7. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FEES IN THE AMOUNT
DETERMINED BY THE CITY BE PAID PRIOR TO RELEASING THE
PLAT FOR RECORDING.
8. WATER ACCESSIBILITY FEES IN THE AMOUNT DETERMINED BY
THE CITY BE PAID PRIOR TO RELEASING THE PLAT FOR
RECORDING.
9. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AT LETTER OF CREDIT FOR 100%
OF THE COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS.
10. A WARRANTY BOND SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER THE
IMPROVEMENTS ARE ACCEPTED BY THE CITY AND SHALL BE HELD
FOR ONE YEAR.
11. SIDEWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ONE SIDE OF ALL STREETS.
e
12. A HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION SHALL BE ESTABLISHED FOR THE
MAINTENANCE OF THE COMMON AREAS INCLUDING THE
Planning Commission Minutes
April 23, 2002
Page 12
e
EMERGENCY ACCESS TO TWIN LAKES ROAD. A COPY OF THE
DOCUMENTS AND BUDGET SHALL BE PROVIDED TO STAFF.
13. A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AREA AROUND THE
TOWNHOUSE UNITS WILL BE REQUIRED.
14. ANY TREES OFF SITE OR ON SITE, NEAR THE LIMIT OF GRADING
THAT ARE TO BE PRESERVED, SHALL BE FENCED WITH A SNOW
FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE TO PREVENT GRADING, COMPACTION,
OR STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT, DEBRIS OR MATERIALS. STAFF SHALL
INSPECT FENCING PRIOR TO GRADING COMMENCING.
15. THAT THE APPLICANT COMPLIES WITH THE WETLAND
CONSERVATION ACT AND THAT:
e
. A TECHNICAL EVALUATION PANEL REVIEW ANY FILLING OR
MITIGATION OF WETLANDS.
. THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR THE PROJECT INCLUDE
LANGUAGE THAT PLACES THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
SUCCESS OF THE WETLAND MITIGATION ON THE DEVELOPER.
. THE DEVELOPER OBTAIN ALL THE APPLICABLE PERMITS PRIOR
TO FILLING ANY WETLANDS.
. A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AND DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
EASEMENT BE RECORDED ON THE WETLAND MITIGATION
AREAS WITH THE RECORDING OF THE FINAL PLAT.
. THAT A LETTER OF CREDIT BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY IN THE
AMOUNT OF 100% OF THE COSTS OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
INCLUDING THE COST OF THE MITIGATION WORK.
. THAT THE DEVELOPER SUBMIT A WRITTEN MONITORING
REPORT ON THE REPLACEMENT WETLANDS ONE YEAR AFTER
THIS MITIGATION WORK IS COMPLETED AND THAT THIS
REPORT BE APPROVED BY CITY STAFF PRIOR TO RELEASING
THE LETTER OF CREDIT.
16. CONNECT VANCE DRIVE WITH TYLER COURT.
17. ELIMINATE THE TOWNHOUSE DRIVEWAYS ON SMITH
STREET.
18. THE TOWNHOUSE EXTERIORS CONSIST OF MULTIPLE
COLOR PALETTES.
e
19. ALL COMMENTS OF THE SHERBURNE COUNTY HIGHWAY
DEPARTMENT SHALL BE ADDRESSED.
20. THE BUILDING MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
SHALL COMPLY WITH THE R3 ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS AND
ALL COMPONENTS OF THE TOWNHOME ORDINANCE.
COMMISSIONER FRANZ SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
CARRIED 6-0.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 23, 2002
Page 13
e
5.11. Request by New Innovation Homes. Inc. for Preliminary Plat Approval (Echo Hill). Public
Hearing - Case No. P 02-09
This item was postponed to the May 28, 2002 Planning Commission meeting.
5.12. Request by Royal Oaks Realty for Preliminary Plat Approval (Nordic Hills). Public Hearing
- Case No. P 02-07
Staff report by Michele McPherson. Royal Oaks Realty requests preliminary plat approval
for a 50-lot single-family subdivision (Nordic Hills), located east of Elk Lake Road at the
194th Avenue alignment. Ms. McPherson reviewed the existing conditions, layout, lot sizes
and configuration, and the park dedication recommendation. Staff recommends approval of
the preliminary plat with the 19 conditions proposed by staff.
Commissioner Baker asked how long the cuI de sac on Zumbro Street would be. Ms.
McPherson stated that it is approximately 690 feet. Commissioner Baker asked if there are
sidewalks in Nordic Woods. Ms. McPherson stated no.
Commissioner Anderson asked if the access proposed for the Municipal Utilities water
treatment plant would be provided through the 70' easement. Ms. McPherson explained
that the access would likely be further north.
Chair Pederson opened the public hearing.
e
Jim Nord, 19806 Elk Lake Road, owner of property to the north and east of the subject
site, expressed concern with trespass and insurance liability issues, if the sidewalk were
constructed up to the property line. He explained that County Road 1 did not have a trail
when Meadowvale School was constructed. He stated that he sold property to the school so
that it was not land-locked.
Mike Black of Royal Oaks Realty, representing New Innovation Homes, questioned
the need for the sidewalks. He expressed concern that there would be no credit for the trail
easement. Mr. Black stated he did not have a problem in giving up the 60' outlot but he felt
that some credit should be given toward park dedication. Mr. Black asked who is
responsible for marking the park boundaries and providing the park signs. He asked for
clarification on the amount of the surface water management fees and park dedication fees.
Mr. Black stated that he was not in favor of having all the mailboxes in one location and
asked for clarification on the clustering requirement.
Chair Pederson stated that sidewalks are routinely required by the City for safety reasons.
Commissioner Baker concurred. Mr. Black stated that if sidewalks are a normal requirement
for plats, he would comply. Ms. McPherson stated that sidewalks have been consistently
required by the City, especially given the fact the school district has amended their policy to
limit bussing of students to those outside of a 2 mile radius of the school they are attending.
She stated that 194th Avenue is a major connection to get to the City trail. Ms. McPherson
noted that a sidewalk would not be constructed up to the property line until the property to
the north and east was developed.
e
Commissioner Anderson stated that he would support tabling this issue in order to allow
time for the developer's concerns to be addressed. Mr. Black stated he did not wish the
request to be tabled. He stated he did not have a problem with the conditions
recommended by staff, but was just asking for clarification on the issues he mentioned.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 23, 2002
Page 14
e
Ms. McPherson explained that the park dedication fee is $1,540 per lot, and that it is City
policy to not give credit for easements artd sidewalks. She stated that the surface water
management fee is charged for all developments and that the fee is approximately $120 per
lot. Ms. McPherson stated that the park signs and boundary signs are available from the
Street/Park Department, currently at no charge, and that the developer is responsible for
installing the signs at the direction of city staff.
Barb Johnson, 12906 190th Avenue NW, expressed concern for the quality ofthe proposed
development, because she is not happy with what they have in Nordic woods. She also
expressed concern that the wetlands be preserved and that there not be rental property
within the development. Ms. Johnson asked for clarification on the name of the
development since the property is platted as Nordic Woods and the sign at the development
entrance says Nordic Hills.
e
Ian Peterson, 12920 195th Avenue NW, stated that he felt the developer did an excellent
job in Nordic Woods to preserve the natural topography and trees. He asked if there would
be an additional access off County Road 1. He did not feel the lack of sidewalks in Nordic
Woods was an issue. He did not feel the additional homes would create enough traffic to
warrant sidewalks. He stated that the proposal to access the well house and pumping station
via 195th would provide a natural access to connect to the City trail. He asked why there was
no park planned for this development or for Nordic Woods. Ms. McPherson stated that a
neighborhood park has been proposed for the property to the north and east, when it is
developed. Mr. Peterson stated that the restrictive covenants in Nordic Woods had a great
impact on his decision to move there and he asked if the protective covenants would be
continued in Nordic Hills. Chair Pederson stated that the City is not involved in restrictive
covenants. Mr. Black stated that Nordic Hills would have the same covenants as Nordic
Woods.
Andrew Hulse, 12948 195th Avenue NW, expressed concern that there is no park planned
for this development. He felt that sidewalks are necessary. Mr. Hulse expressed concern
that there are no plans for a controlled access at 194th A venue and County Road 1, and felt
that a reduced speed limit should be required.
Jim Nord stated that he is in favor of stopping the sidewalk on 194th Avenue at its
intersection with Zumbro until further development occurs to the east.
Tim Sladek, Park and Recreation Commission representative, 11448 190th ~ Avenue,
explained that the Commission proposes to create a corridor to the Meadowvale School
property. He stated that they will speak to the School District representatives regarding this
proposal.
There being no further public comment, Chair Pederson closed the public hearing.
Ms. McPherson eXplained that Ms. Johnson's concern regarding the building standards
would need to be discussed with the developer. She stated that based on the preliminary
grading plan, it does not appear that the wetlands will be impacted, and if there are, the
developer will be required to go before the Technical Panel for review. Ms. McPherson
stated that any homeowner has the option of renting out their single family home, if they so
choose.
e
Planning Commission Minutes
Apri123, 2002
Page 15
e
Commissioner Franz asked how clustering of mailboxes is defined. City Engineer Terry
Maurer stated that there are no specific standards, but that the policy was developed on the
recommendation of the Public Works Department due to snow plowing issues. Mr. Black
stated that he would provide a plan for Public Works to review.
Commissioner Jenson asked if additional curb cuts would be required onto County Road 1.
Mr. Maurer explained that one additional access would be required when the Nord property
is development. Commissioner Jenson asked if some type of traffic control would be
required at 194th and County Road 1. Mr. Maurer stated that there currently is not sufficient
development for the State to conduct a speed study, nor is there adequate traffic to justify a
controlled intersection.
COMMISSIONER FRANZ MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE
REQUEST BY ROYAL OAKS REALTY FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
(NORDIC HILLS), CASE NO. P 02-07, WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
1. ALL COMMENTS OF THE CITY ENGINEER SHALL BE ADDRESSED.
2. A SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF
194TH AVENUE.
3. STREET LIGHTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED BY ELK RIVER
MUNICIPAL UTILITIES.
e
4. A SEALCOAT FEE SHALL BE PAID PRIOR TO RELEASING THE PLAT
FOR RECORDING.
5. A LETTER OF CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF 100% OF THE COST OF
THE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO RELEASING
THE PLAT FOR RECORDING.
6. THE APPLICANT SHALL EXECUTE A DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
OUTLINING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
7. THE APPLICANT SHALL PAY $300 PER UNIT TO ELK RIVER
MUNICIPAL UTILITIES FOR WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGES.
8. THE DEVELOPER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE
FINAL GRADE FOR THE TRAIL OUTLOT AND ESTABLISHING
VEGETATIVE COVER.
9. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MARKING PARK
BOUNDARIES WITH THE CITY'S PARK BOUNDARY SIGNS.
e
10. THE PARK SURVEY INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE
REQUIRED ELECTRONIC FORMAT.
11. UPON COMPLETING ALL OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND HAVING
THEM ACCEPTED BY THE CITY, A WARRANTY BOND IN THE
AMOUNT OF 25% OF THE IMPROVEMENT COSTS SHALL BE
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR THE PERIOD OF ONE YEAR.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 23, 2002
Page 16
e
12. A SURFACE W ATERMANAGEMENT FEE IN mE AMOUNT REQUIRED
BY THE CITY AT THE TIME OF FINAL PLAT BE PAID PRIOR TO
RELEASING THE PLAT FOR RECORDING.
13. A GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN BE APPROVED BY THE
CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS.
14. A DEVELOPMENT PLAN BE APPROVED BY mE CITY ENGINEER
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS.
15. A TREE PRESERVATION PLAN BE APPROVED PRIOR TO RELEASING
THE PLAT FOR RECORDING.
16. ANY TREES OFF SITE OR ON SITE, NEAR mE LIMIT OF GRADING
THAT ARE TO BE PRESERVED, SHALL BE FENCED WITH A SNOW
FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE TO PREVENT GRADING, COMPACTION,
OR STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT, DEBRIS OR MATERIALS. STAFF SHALL
INSPECT FENCING PRIOR TO GRADING COMMENCING.
17. THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION WILL REQUIRE FOR
PARK DEDICATION PURPOSES, CASH DEDICATION TO BE PAID AT
THE RATE REQUIRED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO RELEASING THE
PLAT FOR RECORDING.
e
18. ALL MAILBOXES SHALL BE CLUSTERED.
19. mE COMMENTS OF mE COUNTY ENGINEER SHALL ADDRESSED
REGARDING THE CURB CUT-OUT ON COUNTY ROAD 1.
COMMISSIONER BAKER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
CARRIED 6-0.
6. Other Business
6.1. Update on April 15. 2002 City Council Meeting
Chair Pederson provided an update on the April 15, 2002 City Council meeting.
8. Adjournment
There being no further business, COMMISSIONER BAKER MOVED TO ADJOURN
mE MEETING. COMMISSIONER ANDERSON SECONDED mE MOTION.
THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0.
The meeting of the Elk River Planning Commission adjourned at 10:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
e
Debbie Huebner
Recording Secretary