Loading...
01-28-2003 PC MIN e e e MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER PLANNING COMMISSION HELD AT ELK RIVER CITY HALL TUESDAY, JANUARY 28, 2003 Members Present: Chair Pederson, Commissioners Anderson, Franz, Jenson, Lemke, Offerman and Ropp Members Absent: None Staff Present: Michele McPherson, Director of Planning; Scott Harlicker, Senior Planner; Chris Leeseberg, Planner 1. Call Meeting To Order Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the meeting of the Elk River Planning Commission was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chair Pederson. 2. Consider 1/28/03 Planning Commission Agenda COMMISSIONER JENSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 28,2003 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSIONER ANDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 7-0. 3. Consider Minutes 12/17/02 Planning Commission Minutes COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE DECEMBER 17, 2002, MINUTES. COMMISSIONER JENSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0-1. Commissioner Franz abstained. 1/14/03 Joint City Council/Planning Commission/Comprehensive Plan Task Force Meeting Minutes COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 14, 2003 JOINT MEETING MINUTES. COMMISSIONER JENSON SECONDED TIlE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 7-0. 4. Planning Commission Representative to Attend February 2003 City Council Meeting 5.1. Commissioner Offerman will attend the February 18, 2003 City Council meeting. Request by Janeth Harpster (Absolutely Yours) for a Conditional Use Permit/Home Occupation (Beauty Shop), Public Hearing - Case No. CU 03-01 Staff report by Planner Chris Leeseberg. Mr. Leeseberg reviewed the layout of the proposed home beauty salon, hours of operation, and access issues. He noted that the City Engineer Planning Commission Meeting Minutes ]amwy 28, 2003 Page 2 e has drafted a Septic Impact Statement to be signed by the applicant. The Planning Commission agreed that the impact statement was a good idea and recommended that it be required for this application and future applications for home salons in areas with private septic systems and wells. COMMISSIONER JENSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY JANETH HARPSTER (ABSOLUTELY YOURS) FORA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FORA HOME OCCUPATION (BEAUTY SALON), CASE NO. CU 03-01, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. THE SALON SHALL COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. 2. THE APPLICANT SHALL MEET ALL STATE LICENSING REQUIREMENTS. 3. IF ADDITONAL WORKSTATIONS OR EQUIPMENT ARE TO BE ADDED, THE APPLICANT SHALL APPLY FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. 4. THE APPLICANT SHALL SIGN THE SEPTIC IMPACT AGREEMENT PRIOR TO BEING ISSUED THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. COMMISSIONER ROPP SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 7-0. . 6. Other Business 6.1. Update on 1/21/03 City Council Meeting Commissioner Anderson provided an update on the January 21,2003 City Council meetmg. 7. Adiournment There being no further business, COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. COMMISSIONER JENSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 7-0. The meeting of the Elk River Planning Commission adjourned at 6:40 p.m. to a workshop session. Respectfully submitted, iJJk ~ Debbie Huebner Recording Secretary e e ELK RIVER PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP NOTES TUESDAY, JANUARY 28,2003 Members Present: Chair Pederson, Commissioners Anderson, Franz, Jenson, Lemke, Offerman and Ropp Members Absent: None Staff Present: Michele McPherson, Director of Planning; Scott Harlicker, Senior Planner; Chris Leeseberg, Planner e The Commission met in workshop to discuss the land use and zoning options for the Ron's Foods area defined by Highway 169 on the west, 5th Street on the north, Line Avenue on the east, and Main Street on the south. Prior to reviewing the staff-prepared options, the Commission discussed the land use and transportation issues in the area. It was noted that commercial along the highway is a natural fit for what is going on in the area with the large box retailers south of Main Street and additional commercial to the north, as well as business park! office to the east in Mulvany Point. Chair Pederson noted, however, that a redevelopment project in the area creates a potential loss of affordable housing for the City. Commissioner Franz stated that any redevelopment or land use change would need to address the traffic congestion currently in the area, as well as acknowledging that MN/DOT's Highway 169 corridor plans include a diamond or cloverleaf interchange with highway access at this location. Commissioner Lemke stated that there needs to be a better transportation connection between Dodge Avenue and Zane Street; that currently there is a lot of vehicle travel that occurs through a predominantly residential area. Commissioner Franz suggested that the City consider changing the R4 areas in the study area to Highway Commercial, and that the single-family area should be changed to R4, Multi-Family. Commissioner Anderson stated that he concurred with the recommendation to change the Multi- Family areas to Highway Commercial, but that a road realignment needs to occur to resolve the traffic issues. Most of the access points are too close to the intersections to create safe traffic maneuvers. Commissioner Offerman noted that there is no good east-west connection near 193rd Avenue, so residents typically leave Highway 169 at Main Street and travel the "back way" to the residential neighborhoods to the north. He questioned what the tax impact would be to the single- family homeowners if the property were guided to High Density Residential. e Staff then reviewed the six options for redevelopment/land use change with the Commission. Option A - Phase 1 affected only the Emporium and the Ron's Foods site and proposed a 45,500 square foot mixed-use office retail/housing project. The Commission felt that it was more of a strip mall versus big box and that there was no ability for the transportation system to support the increased traffic. They did acknowledge that it closes the access onto Main Street from the Emporium site, and that it also "cleaned up the Emporium site". This option presented the least public cost. Plarming Commission W otkshop Notes January 28, 2003 Page 2 e Option A - Phase 2 included the Emporium, the Ron's Foods site, and the two apartment buildings adjacent to Main Street. The same 45,500 square foot mixed use was included in the proposal, and a 24,500 square foot mixed use was added to the comer of Main Street and Line Avenue. The same comments that were provided under Option A - Phase 1 apply to Option A - Phase 2. Option B included the Ron's Foods site, the Emporium, the two Main Street apartment buildings, and a small portion of the single-family area. This option proposed two office buildings, 26,500 and 10,000 square feet respectively, a strip mall retail facility of 23,000 square feet, and a 10,000 square foot restaurant space. The Commission felt that this option proposed a good restaurant site. It did not go far enough in acquiring and removing the single-family homes. It began to anchor a commercial/mixed use comer. The Commission also liked that the plan was more open and that travelers would be able to see a variety of buildings and uses. Option C was a continuation of Option B and increased the amount of single-family dwellings to be acquired. Option C proposed 26,500 square feet of office, a 10,500 square foot restaurant space at the comer of Main Street and Highway 169, and two retail strip malls 23,000 square feet and 30,000 square feet, respectively. The option also included a realignment of Baldwin Avenue from 5th Street to County Road 13, north of 3rd Street. The Commission noted that they had concerns with access. The access still requires traffic to travel through a predominantly residential neighborhood to get to the redeveloped Commercial area. It also removed a number of single-family homes and increased the loss of affordable housing; there is no addition to the number of Multi-Family units. The Commission felt that the rest of the single-family might as well be acquired, based on Option C. e Option D proposed acquisition of the entire study area. All of the existing structures would be removed and replaced with two large box retailers at 128,000 and 100,000 square feet, each. The Commission noted that the park had disappeared. There was much discussion regarding the viability and the marketability of big box retailers. Commissioner Offerman noted that there could be one big box retailer anchoring the comer with smaller retail and office uses. Option D, in the Commission's opinion, did not appear to be very exciting. Option E as proposed, included an entire acquisition and redevelopment project. Two mixed-use buildings at 30,000 and 35,000 square feet would anchor the redevelopment at Main Street and Highway 169 and Main and County Road 13. Two retail buildings, 23,000 square feet each, would be adjacent to Highway 169, and the remainder of the site would be used for apartments and townhomes, and a relocated park. The Commission suggested that the southern part of Option B could be mixed with Option E as an alternative. The Commission liked the additional housing and the mix of uses. Option F is similar to Option C in the amount of area to be redeveloped, however, the proposal includes only a 90,000 square foot retail site and a 10,000 square foot restaurant site. It was noted that there was a lot of impact for very little benefit. It was the consensus of the Commission that the whole area needs to be guided for redevelopment and that if the entire site was not identified as Commercial, then Commercial should be identified along Highway 169 and Main Street, and that the single-family area should be guided for High Density Multi-Family housing. e The Commission expressed throughout the meeting concerns with the impacts of the MN/DOT Highway 169 corridor plan and felt that the traffic issues and transportation support system needed to be resolved in order to make positive change at the Highway 169/Main Street intersection. They Planning Commission Workshop Notes January 28, 2003 Page 3 e also discussed the possibility of expanding the study area to include the land east of Line Avenue and north of Mulvany Point. R!:f.spec lly sUbm~ ~ fV(~ Mic ele McPherson Director of Planning e e