07-22-2003 PC MIN
.
.
.
MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD AT ELK RIVER CITY HALL
TUESDAY, JULY 22, 2003
Members Present:
Chair Pederson, Commissioners Anderson, Lemke, Offerman and Ropp
Members Absent:
Franz
Staff Present:
Michele McPherson, Director of Planning; Chris Leeseberg, Planner; Terry
Maurer, City Engineer; Peter Beck, City Attorney; Debbie Huebner,
Recording Secretary-
1. Call Meeting To Order
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the meeting of the Elk River Planning Commission
was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chair Pederson.
2.
Consider 7/22/03 Planning Commission Agenda
COMMISSIONER OFERMAN MOVED TO APPROVE THE JULy 22,2003
PlANNING COMMISSION AGENDA. COMMISSIONER ANDERSON
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
3.
Consider Consent Agenda
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT
AGENDA AS FOLLOWS:
3.1. - REQUEST BY CASCADE 1 LAND COMPANY FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPROVAL (PHEASANT RUN 2ND ADDITION), PUBLIC HEARING - CASE
NO. P 03-05 - POSTPONED TO THE S/20/03 SPECIAL PlANNING
COMMISSION MEETING.
COMMISSIONER ROPP SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
CARRIED 5-0.
4.1. Consider 6/24/03 Planning Commission Minutes
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE JUNE 24, 2003
MINUTES. COMMISSIONER OFFERMAN SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 22, 2003
Page 2
4.2.
Consider 7/8/03 Planning Commissioner Minutes
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED APPROVAL OF THE JULy 8,2003
PlANNING COMMISSION MINUTES. COMMISSIONER ROPP SECONDED
THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
5. Planning Commission Representative to Attend August City Council Meeting
Commissioner Ropp will attend the August 18,2003 City Council meeting.
6.1. Request by Morcon Real Estate & Development. LLC to change the Land Use of Certain
Property from MR Medium Density Residential to HB Highway Business. Public Hearing -
Case No. LU 03-02
Request by Morcon Real Estate & Development. LLC for Rezoning of Certain Property
from R1c Single Family Residential to C3 Highway Business
Staff report on the request by Morcon Real Estate & Development was presented by
Director of Planning Michele McPherson. Morcon requests a land use amendment and
rezoning for Oudot A of Brentwood and Lots 3 and 4, Block 3 Ridgewood East 3rd
Addition in order to allow commercial development. Ms. McPherson described the
surrounding land uses and reviewed the history of previous requests by the property owner
for land use change and rezoning of the property in 1994 and 1995. She explained that the
1997 Strategic Plan approved by the City Council identified Oudot A as a potential industrial
site, but rezoning of the property was not pursued. Ms. McPherson stated that during the
current review process to update the City's Comprehensive Plan, a number of residents at
Public Meeting #3 expressed the opinion that Oudot A would be appropriate for some type
of commercial development.
Staff recommends approval of the land use amendment and rezoning based on the fact that
conditions have changed to warrant a change in the land use and there are no other
commercial opportunities along the Highway 169 corridor of substantial size to adequately
compete with adjacent surrounding communities' commercial sites.
Chair Pederson opened the public hearing.
Ron Peterson, 11625 197th Avenue, stated that the residents of Brentwood would like the
area to remain as a single-family residential neighborhood. He stated that, in going through
the Brentwood plat file at City Hall, a report by a previous planner, Gary Schmitz, indicated
that there are few details available regarding the future use of Oudot A. He stated that he
feels the initial intent of Oudot A was residential. Mr. Peterson cited information from the
restrictive covenants for the Brentwood subdivision and stated that he feels all the covenants
also apply to Oudot A.
Gary Kleis, 19815 Irving Avenue, stated that he has lived within the covenants and feels
that the developer of Oudot A also needs to comply with them.
Mike Demarre, 19484 Holt Street, stated that he did not feel more commercial property is
needed in Elk River, since there are commercial buildings that are vacant.
Dan Schwark, 19785 Irving Avenue, expressed concern with the traffic situation at the
197m and Highway 169 intersection.
.
.
.
Planning Conunission Minutes
July 22, 2003
Page 3
Jeanne Peabody, 11713 200th Avenue, stated that she was told by the property owner when
she purchased her property in 1987 that Oudot A would be a park. She stated she was also
told that mining at the Barton site would be complete in two years and it is still being mined.
She expressed concern regarding the increased traffic that commercial development on
Oudot A would generate. Ms. Peabody stated that there are no sidewalks in Brentwood and
many residents walk on the streets and that increased traffic would create a safety issue.
Wayne Traaseth, 11707194th Avenue, comer of 194th and Irving Avenue, stated that he is
against any change in the zoning. He stated that there were trees on the site which were cut
down and left lying on the ground. He stated that when he moved to his home in 1987, he
spoke with Mr. Dennis Anderson, owner of Oudot A, and was told that the worst that
would happen would be development of townhomes on the site. He expressed his
opposition to the request due to his concerns regarding traffic, noise and pollution.
Leanne Brown, 19737 Lowell Street, stated that she purchased her home in Brentwood
because of the beauty of the Elk River area. She expressed her opposition to the land use
amendment and rezoning because of the aesthetic impacts.
Tom Halbakken, 11744194th Avenue, stated that it is his understanding that MNDot plans
an interchange at 197m Avenue and Highway 169. He felt that the City should plan for the
interchange now.
Tony Luciano, 19757 Irving Street, stated that he moved to Brentwood three years ago
because of the beauty of the area. He expressed his opposition to the request, stating that he
felt the commercial development would encroach on the Brentwood neighborhood.
Dave Weatherly, 19479 Lowell Street, stated that he is a life-long resident of Elk River and
recalls that Oudot A previously was a hill and that the reason it is flat now is because it was
mined for gravel. He asked if a plan was available for development of the site. Chair
Pederson noted that the applicant is not required to present a development plan for the land
use amendment and rezoning request. Mr. Weatherly asked what the status of Highway 169
is as far as MNDot is concerned. City Engineer Terry Maurer explained that Highway 169 is
identified as an interregional corridor and will have freeway status in the future. Mr.
Weatherly stated that he felt more property owners should have been notified of the request
beyond the 350' requirement because the impacts would be far beyond that.
John Polden, 11751196th Avenue, stated that when he built his home in Brentwood in
1989, he was told by the property owner that Oudot A would be a park. He felt that traffic
would be a major issue if the site was developed for commercial use. He asked why
commercial development is desired and if it increased the tax base. Chair Pederson stated
that there is very litde commercial land available for development of any substantial size, and
that commercial development does help to increase the tax base. Mr. Polden expressed his
concern that the trees on the east side of Highway 169 helped to absorb the traffic noise,
and when they were cut down for the Menards construction, the Brentwood residents were
impacted by the increased noise. Mr. Polden stated that his granddaughter will not play
outside when she visits because the traffic noise from Highway 169 hurts her ears. He
expressed his opposition to the request based on privacy, noise, and pollution issues.
Steve Brown, 19737 Lowell Street, asked that a decision on the request not be based on
the financial gain the approval would generate for the property owner. He asked that the
Commission look at the impact on the whole area.
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 22, 2003
Page 4
Dale Miller, 11795 196th Avenue, stated that when he purchased his property, he asked Mr.
Anderson what Oudot A would be used for and was told that part of it would be developed
as single family and part of it would be a park.
John Polden, 11751196th Avenue, stated that the Commission also needs to take into
consideration that there is a school in the neighborhood which is part of the Solid Rock
Church.
John Annen, 11966 195th Circle, stated that he felt Elk River does not need to create more
minimum wage jobs by the commercial development of Oudot A.
Jay Johnson of Dynamics Design & Land Co., representing the landowner, stated that
Mr. Dennis Anderson is proposing a high quality development for the site. He stated that
the potential buyer Marcon, will provide a quality development and that Mr. Dave Pertl of
Morcon will be able to address the issues with traffic and access. Mr. Johnson stated that he
feels the product will be pleasing to the public and will fit the updated Comprehensive Plan.
There being no further public comment, Chair Pederson closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Anderson stated that he felt it makes sense to rezone the property to
commercial and that he felt a project could be done in a tasteful manner. He stated that the
City has no control over traffic on Highway 169 and that the traffic will only continue to
increase. He stated that development of the site may actually improve the noise situation
from the highway. Commissioner Anderson stated that the gravel mining is moving
northward and that the area just north of Brentwood will eventually be complete and is
slated for redevelopment. He noted that although he feels the area should be commercial,
he felt it would be irresponsible to support the request until the Comprehensive Plan update
is completed.
Commissioner Ropp concurred with Commissioner Anderson's comments and stated he
was not in favor of the land use amendment and rezoning at this time.
Commissioner Offerman stated that he felt a traffic study of the area is needed to determine
how the area would be impacted by MNDo T's proposal. He stated he did not feel the
property should be zoned single family residential. He felt with proper planning, a good
commercial project could be designed.
Commissioner Lemke stated that he supports the commercial land use amendment and he
does not feel the residential zoning is appropriate. Commissioner Lemke stated his primary
concern is a lack of a transportation plan and he feels that more study is needed.
Chair Pederson stated that he feels a commercial use for the site is appropriate given the
high visibility from Highway 169. He explained that there were a number of open meetings
for the update of the Comprehensive Plan. He noted that a number of residents in the five
work groups at these meetings felt there was a need for additional commercial property in
the City. Locations suggested for commercial development included the area south of 197th
Avenue along the west side of Highway 169. He stated that no one knows when MNDoT
may implement their plan for an overpass at 197m Avenue. He stated that the build-out of
Elk River is proposed to be 35,000 - 36,000 people and that more commercial property is
needed to support a population of that size. Chair Pederson felt that a frontage road along
Highway 169 would help to address some of the traffic concerns of the Brentwood
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 22, 2003
Page 5
residents. He stated that he concurred with staff's recommendation to approve the land use
amendment and rezoning. Chair Pederson noted that it will not be long until the gravel
mining to the north of Brentwood is complete and that that area is proposed for industrial
development.
Commissioner Lemke asked what options the Commission has, and whether or not the land
use amendment could be approved but not the rezoning. Director of Planning Michele
McPherson stated that the Commission needs to make a recommendation either to approve
or deny the request, and if approved by the City Council, the applicant would then submit a
prelimin;uy plat application. At that time, issues regarding screening, berming, and access
would be addressed. Commissioner Lemke asked if the City would have more options if a
Planned Unit Development (PUD) was requested. City Attorney Peter Beck explained that
PUD is a zoning and that the applicant chose to request the C3 zoning. Mr. Beck noted that
it has been the City's goal to keep the land use and zoning the same, but that it is not
absolute to have it the same.
Commissioner Anderson stated that he feels that area should be zoned commercial but that
the timing of the request is ahead of the update of the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner
Anderson also expressed concern regarding the traffic traveling east to west.
A resident in the audience asked what the next step of the process would be. Director of
Planning Michele McPherson explained that the minutes of this meeting would be prepared
and presented to the City Council as part of the packet for the August 18th City Council
meeting.
Discussion followed regarding the requirements for resubmission of an application. City
Attorney Peter Beck stated that it was his understanding that an applicant must wait six
months to resubmit the same request. Commissioner Offerman stated that he would
support the request if it came back as a PUD. Director of Planning Michele McPherson
stated that the applicant could submit a different application after the August 18th City
Council meeting, if this request was denied.
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE
REQUEST BY MORCON CONSTRUCTION FORA LAND USE AMENDMENT
FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO HIGHWAY BUSINESS, CASE
NO. LU 03-02, BASED ON THE FACT THAT THE LAND USE REQUEST IS
NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND
INFORMATION PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING.
COMMISSIONER OFFERMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
CARRIED 4-1. Chair Pederson opposed.
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE
REQUEST BY MORCON CONSTRUCTION TO REZONE CERTAIN
PROPERTY FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO HIGHWAY
COMMERCIAL, CASE NO. ZC 03-04 BASED ON THE DENIAL OF THE LAND
USE AMENDMENT. COMMISSIONER ROPP SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION CARRIED 4-1. Chair Pederson opposed.
6.3. Request by Wash-N-Fill Properties of MN. LLC to Amend the PUD Agreement for Elk
River Crossing. Public Hearing - Case No. CO 03-18
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 22, 2003
Page 6
Staff report presented by Director of Planning Michele McPherson. Wash-N-Fill Properties
requests an amendment to the Planned Unit Development Agreement for Elk River
Crossing in order to allow additional wall and canopy signs and an illuminated canopy. Ms.
McPherson explained that the applicant is changing the brand of gasoline from Conoco to
Exxon, and feels that the additional canopy signs are critical for business and product
identification. Staff recommends approval of the two additional canopy signs and wall signs,
but does not feel does not feel the illuminated canopy is required.
Chair Pederson opened the public hearing.
Mr. Dave Kroona, owner of the site, introduced Kevin Koenig of Croix Oil. Mr. Koenig
noted they are an Exxon supplier Mr. Koenig explained why the additional signage is
needed Chair Pederson explained that in the original approval of the site plan, lighting of
the canopy was not allowed because of the potential impact on the apartment buildings
across the street. Mr. Koenig stated he did not feel the lighting of the stripe in the canopy
would cany across the street.
Commissioner Offerman asked what type of lighting is proposed for the canopy. Mr.
Koenig stated that a flat lense-type lighting would be used. Commissioner Offerman asked
what type of material would be used for the canopy. Mr. Koenig stated that it would be a
flexible canvas-like material, similar to an awning. Commissioner Offerman asked if the
ordinance prohibited backlit canopies. Director of Planning Michele McPherson stated that
the proposed downtown ordinance would prohibit backlit canopies, but that the standard
sign ordinance does not prohibit them.
Chair Pederson asked if an amendment has already been requested for this site. Ms.
McPherson explained that that an amendment was previously approved to allow one sign on
the canopy.
Mr. Koenig stated that he felt that the signage on the site is virtually invisible, due to the
large Home DepotlWal-Mart freestanding sign. He explained that the overall height of the
canopy would be reduced from 48 inches to 36 inches and that the white band will not be
illuminated by direct lighting. Mr. Koenig noted that there will also no longer be lighting on
the dispensers.
Chair Pederson stated that in the original approval of the site plan, the applicant stated that
he would build an upscale convenience store and that he did not want to see any changes to
the building that would reflect otherwise. Chair Pederson stated that he felt there were other
options for the applicant to draw attention to the site.
There being no further public comment, Chair Pederson closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Offerman stated that he would support granting the request. He stated that
he felt the proposed signage would be pleasing to the eye and felt the signage is needed to
draw attention to the site.
Commissioner Anderson asked if the applicant would still replace the canopy if lighting of
the canopy was not approved. Commissioner Anderson stated that he felt the new canopy
would draw attention during the daytime hours. Mr. Koenig stated that he will go ahead
with changing the canopy.
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 22, 2003
Page 7
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF
THE REQUEST BY W ASH-N-FILL PROPERTIES TO AMEND THE PUD
AGREEMENT FOR ELK RIVER CROSSING, CASE NO. CU 03-18 TO ALLOW 2
I
ADDITIONAL CANOPy SIGNS AND 2 WALL SIGNS, AND THAT
ILLUMINATION OF THE CANOPy IS NOT ALLOWED. COMMISSIONER
LEMKE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
6.40
Request by William Morrow for a Conditional Use Permit for New Kentucky Fried Chicken
Restaurant. Public Hearing - Case No. CD 03-17
Staff report presented by Director of Planning Michele McPherson. William Morrow
requests a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new Kentucky Fried Chicken Restaurant at
525 Dodge Street. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing restaurant and replace it
with a new one.
Ms. McPherson reviewed outstanding issues that need to be addressed including location of
access drives, landscaping, rear building fa~ade, the location of the dumpster, building
dimensions, inaccurate site plan dimensions, and grading and drainage issues. Staff
recommends that the application be tabled so the issues can be resolved, and to approve a
60-day extension for review of the application.
Chair Pederson asked if the Gty Engineer felt the 5th Street access onto to Highway 169
would remain open. Gty Engineer Terry Maurer stated that he felt it would remain open for
the short term, but not long-term. Chair Pederson noted a discrepancy in the elevations and
site plan drawings regarding the vestibule doors.
Chair Pederson opened the public hearing.
Mr. Demarre, owner of the Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant, stated that revised
plans were submitted to the Planning Department on Monday, July 21st. He stated that the
new building would be constructed in Worthington, Minnesota and then shipped here for
assembly on site. Mr. Demarre expressed his concern with the dumpster location proposed
by staff, the raised islands, and the number of trees required. Ms. McPherson explained that
the number of trees is based on the total lineal feet of the site. She stated that staff would
work with the applicant regarding credit for existing trees, but that some ornamental and
evergreen trees would be required. Mr. Demarre stated that he objected to the raised islands
because his delivery truck would not be able to maneuver through the site. He explained
that placing the dumpster so far away from the building would create security issues, as well
as maintenance issues.
Commissioner Anderson asked if the coolers were enclosed in metal, rather than being
inside the building. Mr. Demarre stated that was correct.
Discussion followed regarding tabling the request in order to address a number of
outstanding issues. Gty Engineer Terry Maurer stated that the very large issue is how the
existing store can remain open while the new restaurant is being constructed. He stated that
there are a number of concerns to be addressed including safety, fencing and access.
Mr. Demarre asked that the Commission recommend approval of the request and that the
issues could be addressed before the Gty Council meeting. He stated that he would not be
able to construct the new restaurant this fall if the issue were tabled. Staff and the
Commission discussed tabling the request to the August 12th workshop date.
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 22, 2003
PageS
There being no further public comment, Chair Pederson closed the public hearing.
COMMISSIONER LEMKE MOVED TO TABLE THE REQUEST BY WILLIAM
MORROW FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. CU 03-17, TO
THE AUGUST 12,2003 SPECIAL MEETING, IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THE
FOLLOWING ISSUES:
. LANDSCAPING
. REAR BUILDING FA<.;ADE
. LOCATION OF DUMPSTER
. BUILDING DIMENSIONS
. SITE PLAN DIMENSIONS
. BUILDING ELEVATION INCONSISTENCIES
· GRADING AND DRAINAGE ISSUES
. PLANS TO ADDRESS UFE, HEALTH, AND SAFETY ISSUES DURING
THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS, WHILE KEEPING THE PRESENT
STORE IN OPERATION.
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION
CARRIED 5-0.
6.5.
Request by the City of Elk River for an Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 30. "Land
Development Regulations". to Establish a Downtown Development District and Standards.
Public Hearing - Case No. OA 03-01
Staff report presented by Planner Chris Leeseberg. The Planning Commission is asked to
consider an amendment to establish a Downtown Development District and Standards. Mr.
Leeseberg reviewed the history of the request and revision process. Staff recommends
approval of the language pertaining to the Downtown Development District and the area
which is to be included in the District. Mr. Leeseberg noted that the only comment the
BRA had was that they feel the standards are too restrictive, but did not explain what
specific items they felt were restrictive.
Commissioner Anderson asked for clarification on the boundaries. Mr. Leeseberg stated
that the BRA has not yet defined the boundary west of Lowell. Commissioner Anderson
asked if the boundary could possibly go all the way down to Hanke School. Mr. Leeseberg
stated that he did not believe it would go down that far, but that the BRA was not specific.
Commissioner Anderson asked if the School District office site would be included. Mr.
Leeseberg stated that it is included.
Discussion followed regarding the standards. Mr. Leeseberg noted removal on page nine of
the standards, Items H. and 1. He noted that the intent of the standards is to create vertical
separation of buildings. Ms. McPherson noted that the intent of the standards is to allow
new buildings to be integrated that will complement but not clash with or overpower what is
already there. Chair Pederson asked if Metro Plains has seen the revisions. Mr. Leeseberg
stated that they have reviewed the standards three or four times. Metro Plains concerns
regarded the building height and unit width.
Chair Pederson opened the public hearin~. There being no public comment, Chair Pederson
closed the public hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 22, 2003
Page 9
--------------------------
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF
THE REQUEST BY THE CITY OF ELK RIVER FOR AN ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 30 “LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS”,
TO ESTABLISH A DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND
STANDARDS, CASE NO. OA 03-01. COMMISSIONER ROPP SECONDED THE
MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
7. Other Business
7.1. Update on 7/21/03 City Council Meeting
Commissioner Lemke provided an update on the July 21, 2003 City Council
meeting.
8. Adjournment
There being no further business, COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO
ADJOURN THE MEETING. COMMISSIONER ROPP SECONDED THE
MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
The meeting of the Elk River Planning Commission adjourned at 9:25 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debbie Huebner
Recording Secretary