Loading...
93-013 RES . ~ . . RESOLUTION 93 - 13 RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY OF ELK RIVER A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE DESIGNATION OF SHERBURNE COUNTY AS PART OF THE TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA WHEREAS, the City of Elk River, Minnesota, has experienced rapid population growth during the 1980's and 1990's, and; WHEREAS, a factor which has influenced this growth is Elk River's close proximity to the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, and; WHEREAS, because of this proximity, the population growth in Elk River is projected to increase, and; WHEREAS, the Office of Management and Budget recently designated Sherburne County as part of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), and; WHEREAS, because of this designation, Sherburne County and its municipalities and townships will realize many positive benefits, including higher mortgage insurance limits through the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), and increased Medicare payments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: 1. The City of Elk River, Minnesota supports Sherburne County's designation into the Twin Cities MSA. 2. The City of Elk River, Minnesota further supports the positive benefits that will be derived in Sherburne County as a result of this designation. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Elk River this ~ day of March, 1993. / ATTEST: r; /~ << Sandra A. Thackeray, k . . . EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELK RIVER, MINNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular or special meeting of the City Council of the Ci ty of Elk Ri ver , Minnesota, was duly called and held at the Elk River City Hall on AprilS, 1993, beginning at 7:00 p.m., C.T., for the purpose in part of considering the offers received for the purchase of the City's General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A. The following members of the Council were present: Mayor Duitsman, Councilmembers Dietz, Scheel, Farber and Holmgren and the following were absent: There was then presented a tabulation of the offers which had been received in the manner specified in the Terms of Proposal for the Bonds. The offers were as follows: 235883