6.5. SR 07-18-2005
Item# 6. 5 .
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Mayor and City Council
Scali Harlicker. Senior Pianne~
July 18, 2005 \
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Northstar Corridor Update
Councilmember Motin is the City's representative on the NCDA. He is scheduled to provide
an update at the July 18th Council meeting. Attached are the agenda and the packet from the
NCDA meeting held on July 7th,
NCDA
Meeting Agenda
JUL 0 1200"
July 7, 2005
4:30 P.M.
Anoka County Government Center
Anoka, MN
Action Reauested
1.
Minutes of the June 2, 2005 NCDA Meeting*
Approval
2. Executive Committee Report:
a) Resolution #2005-01: City of Big Lake Station Location*
Approval
b) Resolution #2005-02: Phase II of the Northstar Commuter
Rail Project *
Approval
c) 2005 Professional Service Contract Amendments:
i. Amendment #1 to the BNSF Rail Passenger Capacity
Improvements Engineering Agreement*
Approval
ii. Amendment #2 to the North Woods Advertising, Inc.
Agreement for Professional Services*
Approval
iii. Amendment #4 to the Agreement for Professional
Services with Kenneth Stevens*
Approval
iv. Amendment #4 to the Richardson, Richter & Associates,
Inc. Agreement for Professional Services*
Approval
3.
FTA Issues:
Information
a) Monthly Report*
b) Final Design Application Update
4.
Technical Reports:
Discussion
a) Advanced and Final Design of Commuter Rail
b) Advanced and Final Design of LRT Connection
..
.
1
NCDA Agenda Item #1
NORTHST AR CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DRAFT: Meeting Minutes for Approval
June 2, 2005
The Northstar Corridor Development Authority met on June 2, 2005, in regular session at the
Anoka County Government Center, Anoka, Minnesota.
In attendance: Duane Grandy, Tim Yantos, Joe Voigt, Steve Billings, Woody Bissett, Ewald
Petersen, John Norgren, Felix Schmiesing, Lewis Stark, Scott Schulte, Paul Motin, Dennis Berg,
Mike Schadauer, Mark Fuhrmann, Dave Peterson, Tim Kirchoff, Dean Michalko, Scott Johnson,
Pat Wussow, Jim Barton, Steve Novak, Scott LeDoux, Linda Jungwirth, Margaret Langfeld,
Lona Schreiber, Bill Schreiber, Robert Kirchner, Paul Danielson, Steve Apanian, Ken Stevens,
Jill Brown, Tom Gamec, Bruce Nawrocki, Paul Ostrow, Carl Anderson, Peg Aho, Jan Lucke,
Sue Youngs
1. Scott Schulte made a motion to approve the May 5, 2005 meeting minutes as presented.
The motion was seconded by John Norgren and passed unanimously on a voice vote.
2. Executive Committee Report: Commuter Coach: Jon Olson gave an update on the
current funding status for the Northstar Commuter Coach project and handed out a
budget estimate for 2006. The budget estimate showed the 2005 budget year shortfall
amounts and what the shortfalls would look like with or without a $0.75 increase in fares
for riders to/from the Elk River station. Mr. Olson noted that there is a projected
$251,529 shortfall for the remainder of 2005 and the beginning of 2006. The Executive
Committee/Capital Budget Committee made a recommendation that the NCDA approve
a fare increase of $0.75 for fares to/from the Elk River station which would be
implemented along with the Metropolitan Council's fare increase of $0.25 on July 1. The
Executive Committee directed that staff prepare an information sheet and hand out to
current Northstar Commuter Coach users so they may understand what the issues are
and why there needs to be a fare increase. Mr. Olson noted that the research for new
funding sources by staff and members has been unsuccessful but they will continue to
try to get funding from the State. Chair Grandy asked that the rider information sheet
include a note stating that fares may decrease if additional funding is received from the
State.
Paul Motin said that it seems strange that there would be an increase of more than $.25
for less than 75% of the riders, why not also increase the fares to/from the Coon
Rapids/Riverdale station. Mr. Olson noted that riders at the Coon Rapids/Riverdale
station would be able to use Metro Transit buses which will also be charging $2.75. If
Northstar Commuter Coach where to charge more than $2.75, people would use the
Metro Transit coaches instead of the Northstar coaches and lose in riders would result in
lower fare subsidies. Paul Motin asked if there had been a study of Coon Rapids/
Riverdale riders to see how a fare increase would affect them. Mr. Olson noted that he
doesn't recall, but he will check and if he locates information he will get it to Paul.
Tom Gamec made a motion that the NCDA approve a $0.75 per ride fare increase for
riders to/from the Elk River station. The motion was seconded by Scott Schulte and
passed unanimously on a voice vote.
3. Executive Committee Report: Northstar Project Office, Approval of Expenditures: Mike
Schadauer gave an overview of the NPO space preparation and related moving costs.
He noted that early lease negotiations included $70,000 as an amortized cost to be paid
back over the life of the lease plus interest. Mr. Schadauer noted that as lease
negotiations have progressed, however, the amount to be amortized was reduced to
approximately $47,000, thereby reducing the amount subject to future interest but
leaving $23,000 in costs that will have to be paid for in full as they are expended. The
Executive Committee/Capital Budget Committee made a recommendation that the
NCDA authorize Tim Yantos, Executive Director, to spend up to $23,000 for NPO move
expenses. A motion was made by Paul Ostrow that the NCDA authorize the Executive
Director to spend up to $23,000 for Northstar Project Office move expenses. The motion
was seconded by Paul Motin and the motion passed by majority vote with one nay vote
by Bruce Nawrocki.
Ii
.
,
4. BNSF Rail Passenger Capital Improvements Engineering Agreement: Mary Richardson
noted that the negotiation team has been working for the past six to eight months on
negotiating an agreement with BNSF for the advanced and final design of the signal and
rail improvements for the Northstar Commuter Rail Project. Because BNSF owns the
railroad, Northstar will be paying BNSF to do the improvements. BNSF has agreed to
absorb the first $50,000 in improvements. Ms. Richardson noted that the scope of work
includes 21 track improvements and the proposed contract amount is $993,288.
Because four of the improvements were not included in the contract maximum, a
contract amendment will be necessary at an upcoming meeting. The reason that the full
cost was not in the contract maximum is that BNSF has not yet completed its contract
negotiations with its engineering consultant. Staff recommend moving ahead in order to
get the work underway on the remaining requirements. Once these improvements are
finished, BNSF will issue an RFP for signal design improvements. As required by the
FTA, staff are preparing an independent cost estimate. Ms. Richardson noted that this
Agreement is part of a sequential design process, there will also be a RFP for signal
improvements, and there will need to be a contract amendment as these parts of the
project develop. Chair Grandy asked if this agreement includes design for the railroad
placement between Big Lake and Becker. Staff replied no. Scott Schulte made a
motion that the NCDA authorize the Chair to finalize negotiations and execute the Rail
Passenger Capital Improvements Engineering Agreement with BNSF as presented. The
motion was seconded by Lewis Stark and passed unanimously on a voice vote. Ms.
Richardson noted that reaching an agreement on the advanced and final design is like
BNSF saying they are ready to move ahead on this Project and get into the next phase
of work. This is a very positive sign.
5. Executive Committee Report: Selection of Broker/Insurance Consultant: Mary
Richardson noted that an RFP for broker insurance consulting services hao been issued
on April 18, 2005 because the NCDA wishes to engage a qualified property and casualty
insurance consultant/broker with successful experience in commuter rail projects to
perform professional services in connection with the Northstar Project, and who
possesses the expertise and specialized knowledge required to provide professional
advice and counsel in developing the risk management program for the Northstar
Commuter Rail Project, and to specifically advise the NCDA and Mn/DOT in negotiating
insurance terms and conditions with BNSF for both the construction and operational
phases of the Project. Two firms responded: Willis of Minnesota, Inc. and Marsh USA,
Inc. The Evaluation Team which consisted of Philip Blue and Marlys Williams, Mn/DOT,
Phil Walljasper, Metropolitan Council, John Sullivan and Colleen Herrmann, Anoka
2
.
,
County and Mary Richardson and Jan Lucke, RRA, interviewed both firms on June 1.
Staff then checked references.
Based on written proposals, interviews and evaluations, the Evaluation Team ranked
Marsh USA, Inc. the highest. Staff are asking for permission to negotiate an agreement
with Marsh USA, Inc. and if negotiations are unsuccessful permission to negotiate an
agreement with Willis of Minnesota, Inc.
Ewald Petersen made a motion that the NCDA select Marsh USA, Inc. as top ranked
proposer and direct staff to negotiate an agreement and if staff are not successful in
these negotiations staff are directed to negotiate with the second ranked firm, Willis of
Minnesota, Inc. Ms. Richardson noted that the FTA requires us to prepare an
independent cost estimate which has been done by the State. The State's estimate was
$130,000. These costs would be covered by the Full Funding Grant Agreement and
would be funded by grant funds. Bruce Nawrocki asked if the services to be provided
are for insurance or for consulting services. Ms. Richardson responded that the first
year of services would be consulting and there would be for broker purchasing insurance
services after the first year. The motion was second by Tom Gamec and passed
unanimously on a voice vote.
6. Ms. Richardson noted that an additional agenda item was brought forward regarding the
Metropolitan Council Grant Agreement for Northstar Commuter Bus. At the September
2004 meeting, the NCDA approved a grant agreement in amount of $78,000. The
Metropolitan Council is going to give the NCDA $138,600 and wishes to revise the grant
activity period.
A motion was made by Dennis Berg that the NCDA rescind the September 2, 2004
action to approve a grant agreement with the Metropolitan Council for an amount to
exceed $78,000 in federal and regional funding for the Northstar Commuter Bus for one
year, from October 1, 2004 through September 30, 2005, and authorize the Chair to
negotiate and execute a grant agreement with the Metropolitan Council for an amount
not to exceed $138,601 for the capital lease payments for the Northstar Commuter
Coach for the grant activity period from April 15, 2005 through June 30, 2007. The
motion was seconded by Scott Schulte and approved unanimously on a voice vote.
7. Technical reports: PE Validation: Ken Stevens reviewed key items that the NCDA
needs to respond to in order to keep the Project moving ahead.
Key Item #1: ADA Regulations: Mr. Stevens handed out a FTA request for information
regarding compliance with DOT-ADA regulations for level boarding. The FTA ADA
regulations have been in force for many years and their methodology has applied to all
systems developed over the past 12 years. These systems used mini high platforms.
The approach developed for the Project during preliminary engineering is no longer
acceptable to the FT A so we need to do some more research on the issue and hopefully
reach a compromise with the FT A as to how the platforms will be developed to serve all
needs.
Key Item #2: Big Lake station location: The initial plan was to have the station located
in the NW quadrant. Mr. Stevens noted that as part of staff's evaluation it may be more
cost effective to move the station to the SE quadrant which would be closer to County
Road 43. Staff are in the process of meeting with Big lake staff and council members to
see if this idea will progress. Mr. Stevens noted that if the location does change, it will
be brought back to the NCDA for their approval.
3
Key Item #3: pedestrian crossing at the Coon Rapids station: Current plans have the
access over the tracks. There would be an elevator to take riders up and over to a
center of the platform for loading onto the commuter rail system. This is a single family
housing neighborhood and the tower would need to be approximately 40 feet in height to
allow for freight trains, structure, etc.. Staff and consultants looked at possibly putting in
a tunnel configuration instead. All options will be explored. Initially, it is thought that a
tunnel would not be the preferred method because of cost, construction issues (a bridge
would need to be built), and a high water table that would require dewatering. Staff and
consultants are also looking at possibly relocating the site of the tower to a portion of the
site that would provide the least offensive views to the neighborhood. Staff will be
meeting with city representatives, councilmember and NCDA members to discuss the
two alternatives.
,
Key Item #4: access and site plan at the Fridley station: Mr. Stevens noted that as staff
looked at the preliminary engineering document, they noted that the Fridley station is in
the middle of a five track system just out of Northtown. There are some concerns about
handicap parking and length of distance for handicapped individuals to reach the
platform. Staff are proposing to move the platform location more northerly and have
access in the center of the platform with a tunnel which will have stairs and an elevator.
Mr. Stevens noted that changing the platform design would give more visibility for
security issues and development of a TOO that would allow parking closer to handicap
spots which will allow better access to the platform. Staff are setting up additional
meetings to explore TOO ideas and platform design.
Key Item #5: operator maintenance input: Mr. Stevens noted the Project has received
good input from the Hiawatha operations center. This item could come off the key items
list.
Key Item #6: control system: Staff are working with Metro Transit to decide whether to
use a fiber optic control system versus a radio control system. Additional meetings are
planned with Mn/DOT and Metro Transit to get additional technical input.
Key Item #7: BNSF coordination: Ms. Richardson noted that BNSF is at the table and is
providing necessary input. It is critical to our design is that BNSF is on board and can
provide input on all pieces of the design and the Project progresses.
Key Item #8: City of Minneapolis Intermodal Station Location. Mr. Stevens noted that
staff are anticipating that the site could possibly be developed as a ball park and they
are working with the Twins organization, the City of Minneapolis and others to plan. The
station could have a long term impact on all systems coming in and out of that station.
Staff will be meeting with Hennepin County within the next two weeks to get their input.
Mr. Stevens noted that the Intermodal Station and the ADA regulations are two of the
most difficult issues being faced at this time.
Key Item #9: commuter rail rolling stock: Mr. Stevens noted that the design team and
consultants have developed a preliminary engineering evaluation report which looks at
rolling stock. The 2001 preliminary engineering document looked at using the push pull
locomotive. Staff did evaluate the diesel units which could be married with train cars
and their capacity is similar to push pull locomotives. Staff then met with manufacturers
and others and discussed a number of key issues regarding push pull versus DMU
options. Based on the discussions, staff ruled out pursuing the use of DMUs for the
4
f
Northstar Commuter Rail Project. Part of the conclusion in favor of push pulls was fleet
expansion costs, push pulls demonstrative reliability, procurement risk of DMUs (DMUs
have no demonstrated reliability because there are no orders out there), and lower
design risk of push pull (DMU design is new). Staff and consultants' recommendation is
to move forward with the push pull locomotive concept. Ms. Stevens noted that the
Study is available upon request for anyone who might like to review it. Mr. Stevens also
noted that L TK Engineering has now initiated the study that the NCDA mandated for the
use of biodiesel fuels in biodiesellocomotives.
Paul Motin asked if the use of push pull or DMUs determines how the tracks/platforms
are laid out. Mr. Stevens noted that BNSF has what is called a flow of axel rule. Shorter
trains have a history of shunting at the signal crossings. There is an issue of a waiver
that would be need to be acquired. Clearance also becomes an issue at the
maintenance facility. Mr. Stevens noted that staff do not believe there is any clearance
issues on the Northstar line but don't know what other lines might have a issue, such as
Red Rock and other regional lines.
Mr. Stevens noted that this list of items from the PE Validation will be kept on the
agenda for NCDA update as work progresses.
8. FT A Issues: New Starts Submittals: Mike Schadauer noted that staff are engaged in
submitting information to the FT A that will assist them in making decisions on the
Northstar New Starts Project rating. As part of that submittal, staff are developing a
detailed real estate plan, quality plan, fleet management plan and also plan on providing
the FTA with before and after plan information (for instance, regarding ridership). All
these items have to be provided to demonstrate how the Project is being developed. Mr.
Schadauer noted that the ridership forecast is still not complete, which is putting
submittal of plans on hold. Modelers are having a hard time getting the model
calibrated. There is a meeting scheduled with ridership modelers on Friday.
9. FT A Issues: Monthly report is in your packet. The report includes a schedule of when
the Plan's are expected to be submitted. Paul Motin asked when we can expect to enter
the final design phase of the Project. Mike Schadauer noted that that will depend on the
ridership forecast.
10. Legislative issues: Bill Schreiber noted that the regular session has completed and a
special session called by the Governor.
11. Public Information Update: John Himle gave a quick run down of recent activities. He
noted that there has been a variety of update pieces going out to various databases
(supporters, businesses and others) giving an update on the status of the Project.
Thank yous have been sent to legislators and other community leaders that have
supported the Project. He noted that a contact at Comcast Cable is looking for further
opportunities for interviews on their cable system. Himle Horner suggested interviewing
Representative Tinglestad. These interviews would run during portions of CNN headline
news.
Jill Brown noted that there has been many requests for presentations by Northstar
representatives at various functions around the region. Since the bonding bill has
passed, folks want to hear about TOO. Ms. Brown handed out a Northstar Commuter
Coach fact sheet which shows results of a survey completed of Commuter Coach riders.
5
Executive Committee Agenda Item #5
NCDA Agenda Item #2a
NORTHST AR CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Resolution 2005-01
City of Big Lake Station Location
WHEREAS,
approving Phase I
CI Resolution 2004-05
o proceed to acquire the
WHEREAS, on December 7, 2000, the Northstar Co
(NCDA) approved the Advanced Corridor Plan, including
at the station in the City of Big Lake; and
WHEREAS, on November 4,
requesting the Sherburne County Regi
property needed for the station; and
quires increased space to meet parking
ngineering was conducted on the Northstar
entify tential cost savings and operating efficiencies, as
it A ministration; and
WHER
Station be move
railroad tracks in 0
Project; and
engineers recommended that the location of the Big Lake
outheast corner of Sherburne County Road 43 and the BNSF
to improve safety and to enhance operating efficiencies of the
WHEREAS, on June 8, 2005, the City of Big Lake approved the new location of
the station to the Southeast corner of Sherburne County Road 43 and the BNSF
railroad tracks.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that:
1) the Northstar Corridor Development Authority hereby approves the location of the
Big Lake Commuter Rail Station in the Southeast corner of Sherburne County
Road 43 and the BNSF railroad tracks in the Town of Big Lake; and
2) the Northstar Corridor Development Authority recommends that the
Commissioner of Transportation incorporate the new location into the State's
plan for the Northstar Commuter Rail Project; and
3) the Northstar Corridor Development Authority requests the Sherburne County
Regional Railroad Authority to proceed to acquire the property as needed for the
commuter rail station and maintenance facility, on behalf of the project and in
accordance with Federal Transit Administration requirements.
Duane Grandy, Chairperson
J
U [l!]@[ff3u[J{][ffiu[fJ[ff3
@@[ff3[ff30@@[ff3
Executive Committee Agenda Item #6
NCDA Agenda Item #2b
June 30, 2005
MEMO TO:
Executive Committee / Capital Budget Committee Members
NCDA
FROM:
Paul McCarron
RE:
Benton County
On June 21, 2005, Benton County Committee of the Whole discussed their continued
involvement with the NCDA and further discussed requesting certain binding commitments from
the NCDA. While it is my belief that the NCDA is not able to make those commitments acting
within the constraints of the federal funding process, I do believe it is appropriate to address
Benton County concerns. Attached please find a resolution that I have prepared for your
consideration at the July 7,2005 NCDA meeting. Please call me if you have any questions or
concerns, at 763-784-9773.
C: Project Management Team
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
2] 00 3' . Avenue. Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2265 (763) 323-5700 Fax: (763) 323-5682 \vww,northstartrain.org
~
NORTHST AR CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Resolution 2005-01
Phase II of the Northstar Commuter Rail Project
WHEREAS, the Northstar Corridor Development Authority (NCDA) was formed
in May of 1997 by joint powers agreement among the 30 counties, county regional
railroad authorities, cities and towns along the Northstar Corr".. from Minneapolis to
the City of Rice; and
1. The NCDA a at Bent. County will not contribute to the capital
c hase roject, until such time as Phase II of the
. rove
irms co mitment to Phase II will service the St. Cloud
tatio 1. Cloud and a station in the City of Rice;
! y e blishes a Phase II Committee charged with the
moting the extension of Northstar Commuter Rail from Big
isting of the following members:
y
nty Regional Railroad Authority
St. Clo MTC
City of St. Cloud
Sherburne County
Sherburne County Regional Railroad Authority
Other interested members of the NCDA
4. Until such time as Phase II of the Project proceeds, the allocation of capital
costs for Phase I of the Northstar Project shall be as follows:
Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority - 68.3%
Sherburne County Regional Railroad Authority - 16.1 %
r Project include the
on Counties; and
WHEREAS, the capital funding partners for t
regional railroad authorities of Hennepin, Anoka, She b
WHEREAS, on January 8, 2004, the
approved Phase 1 of the Northstar Commut
Corridor between Big Lake and Minneapolis an
project including service to the St. Cloud area; an
2004-01 that
n of the
o the entire
WHEREAS, the 2005 Minne
for Phase 1 and stipulated that region
fund a portion of the Phase 1 capital c
equal to the amount they would have
entire line.
d $37.5 Million in bonding
he NCDA who did not
mount for the extension
proportional share of the
i
Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority - 15.6%
Duane Grandy, Chairperson
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true a
presented to and adopted by the Northstar Corrido
authorized meeting thereof held on the yth day of
said meeting in my possession.
Certification
opy of the resolution
uthority at a duly
the minutes of
(Name)
(Title)
U []!]@[ff3TlDDfBTl/lJ!XJ
@@!XJ[1JO[g)@!XJ
Executive Committee Agenda Item #7a
NCDA Agenda Item #2ci
June 30, 2005
MEMO TO: NCDA Executive Committee / Capital Budget Committee
NCDA
FROM: Staff
RE: Amendment #1 to the Rail Passenger Capital Improvements Engineering
Agreement with BNSF
At its June 2, 2005 meeting, the NCDA approved the Rail Passenger Capital Improvements
Engineering Agreement with BNSF. Pursuant to the agreement with the NCDA, BNSF will retain
engineering consultants to perform engineering services, provide oversight and necessary flagging
services, prepare and complete the advanced and final designs, prepare cost estimates, and
prepare all bid packages. The contract specified the twenty-one capacity improvements that will
be included in advanced and final design, but the contract maximum did not include the entire
costs of engineering track improvements #11, 12, 13, 14 and 16. As noted in the memorandum
dated May 27, 2005, contract amendments increasing the contract maximum are necessary to
pay the costs of engineering these additional or revised track improvements. The contract
maximum did not include the costs of engineering these improvements, because BNSF had not
completed its contract negotiations with its engineering consultant. BNSF entered into the
Agreement on the express condition that the contract be amended to include the additional funds
necessary to cover the costs of engineering the improvements. Note that once preliminary
engineering is complete on the track improvements, the Agreement will need to be amended again
to include services and costs relating to the design of the signal improvements.
The budget for the proposed amendment is $168,900 and is within the NCDA's budget for
advanced and final design. As required by the FTA, staff are preparing an independent cost
estimate. If the NCDA does not approve Amendment #1, the entire agreement is null and void.
Action Requested:
That the Executive Committee / Capital Budget Committee recommends
that the NCDA authorize the chair to execute Amendment #1 to the Rail
Passenger Capital Improvements Engineering Agreement with BNSF,
increasing the contract maximum by $168,900.
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
21003' Avenue. Anoka. Minnesota 55303-2265 (763) 323-5700 Fax: (763) 323-56x2 ww\v.northstartrain.org
U [l(]@!13Ll[]{]~Ll!JJm
@@!13!130@@m
Executive Committee Agenda Item #7b
NCDA Agenda Item #2cii
June 30, 2005
MEMO TO:
Executive Committee / Capital Budget Committee Members
NCDA
FROM:
Staff
RE:
Amendment #2 to the North Woods Advertising, Inc. Agreement for
Professional Services
In November 2003, the NCDA issued an RFP for Public Information and Involvement services
and selected North Woods Advertising, Inc. (North Woods) to provide such services for the
Northstar Commuter Rail Project. North Woods was selected as best meeting the needs of the
NCDA based on an evaluation of written proposals and oral interviews. The services provided
by North Woods are specifically to involve engage the public in the final design of the Project
and are paid for with federal grant funds.
At the time NCDA executed its contract with North Woods, the Northstar Commuter Rail Project
was expected to enter final design in early 2004. Final design has been delayed for several
reasons, including the lack of commitment of State funds and the continued effort to develop a
workable travel demand model. Due to these delays, North Woods did not begin work in 2004;
and in November 2004, the NCDA extended the term of its contract with North Woods to
December 31, 2005. Project delays continued in early 2005 and the request to enter final
design was delayed in anticipation of the approval of the travel demand model. The application
for approval to enter final design is being submitted in early July and North Woods' services are
now needed and are anticipated to extend into 2006. Therefore, staff recommends that the
NCDA extend the term of its contract with North Woods to December 31,2006, which will allow
North Woods to provide public information services in final design. No additional funds are
necessary.
Action ReQuested: That the Executive Committee / Capital Budget Committee recommend
that the NCDA authorize the chair to execute Amendment #2 to the
North Woods Advertising, Inc. agreement for public information and
involvement services extending the term of the Agreement to December
31,2006.
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
21003. Avenue. Anoka. Minnesota 55303-2265 (763) 323-5700 Fax: (763) 323-5682 www.northstartrain.org
U [J[J@m3ifOO@ifmm3
@@m3!X30@@m3
Executive Committee Agenda Item #7c
NCDA Agenda Item #2ciii
June 30, 2005
MEMO TO:
Executive Committee I Capital Budget Committee Members
NCDA
FROM:
Tim Yantos, Executive Director
RE:
Amendment #4 to the Agreement for Professional Services with Kenneth
Stevens (Contract No. 2003-0264)
Attached please find an analysis and justification of the need for an amendment to the Kenneth
Stevens Agreement for Professional Services to increase the contract amount by $70,000. I
have reviewed the proposal for additional time and fees and find it to be fair and reasonable
based on the Project's needs for services for the remainder of the year. The services requested
are within the scope of work of the Kenneth Stevens contract; the number of hours for 2005
were simply underestimated and unanticipated. As Executive Director, I provide oversight and
monitor the contractor's performance, in his role as Deputy Director of Design and Construction.
I recommend that the NCDA approve the proposed contract amendment. Note that the NCDA's
budget has sufficient funding to cover the increased costs.
Action Requested:
That the Executive Committee I Capital Budget Committee recommend
that the NCDA authorize the chair to execute Amendment #4 to the
Kenneth Stevens Agreement for Professional Services increasing the
contract amount by $70,000.
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
21003 Avenue. Anoka. Minnesota 55303-2265 (763) 323-5700 Fax: (63) 323~5682 ww\v.northstartrain.org
Kenneth Stevens: Rationale for Revised Estimated Hours for 2005
Contract Amendment #4 to Agreement for Professional Services (Contract No. 2003-
0264C)
Basis:
The estimated hours for 2005 are based upon historical requests for services and the level
of effort estimated to complete advanced and final design of the Northstar Project. The
level of effort is based upon the revised Northstar Project Organizational structure wherein
Kenneth Stevens is assigned the position of Project Oversight Consultant representing the
NCDA in technical issues and project development. In addition, Mr. Stevens is assigned the
role of Chairman of the Project Advisory Committee. All of these assignments are
consistent with the Scope of Services detailed within the referenced Contract.
At the beginning of the year, both the Project Deputy Director of Design and the Assistant
Deputy Director of Design resigned to pursue other employment. In the interim, Mr.
Stevens has been assigned the additional position of Acting Deputy Director of Design
along with Mr. Jon Olson of Anoka County. This interim position has resulted in Mr.
Stevens being far more directly involved in managing the design consultant contracts for
both Technical Services and Commuter Rail Stations and Maintenance Facilities. This
additional assignment, which is expected to continue through August when a new Deputy
Director of Design is anticipated, has resulted in expending far more time than originally
estimated.
In addition to the unanticipated temporary assignment, the nature of the project with a new
organization structure, continuing prolonged negotiations with BNSF, considerable
interaction and meetings with city staff regarding design, permits, approvals, and TOD,
and the many requirements of FT A, have required a greater than expected time
commitment. Of further consideration is the recent agreement with BNSF on an
Engineering Contract, which will require Mr. Stevens to provide coordination and liaison
between the BNSF, their engineering consultant, and the Northstar design consultants.
Summary:
The number of hours estimated in the original contract for services provided through
December 31, 2005 are based upon three days per week, or 24 hours. Currently, Mr.
Stevens is expending about 36 hours per week, or about 50 percent more time than
anticipated. This time commitment is expected to continue through the end of 2005.
Contract Amount:
The contract Total is $300,000 from inception to end of 2005.
The amount expended through May 31,2005 is $235,717.78.
Estimated Hours per month June-December is 144 which amountsto $18,000/month.
Estimated Direct Expense for June-December is $8,000.00.
Estimated Cost 6/1-12/3/05
Contract Balance as of 5/31/05
Balance Required through 12/31/05
$134,000.00
64,000.00
$ 70,000.00
~
t
,;.I'
U !JD@fX37JDfJ@L1!Ni3
@@fX3fX3D[Q)@fX3
Executive Committee Agenda Item #7d
NCDA Agenda Item #2civ
June 30,2005
MEMO TO:
Executive Committee I Capital Budget Committee Members
NCDA
FROM:
Tim Yantos, Executive Director
RE:
Amendment #4 to the Richardson, Richter & Associates, Inc. Agreement
for Professional Services (Contract No. 2003-0265)
Attached please find an analysis and justification of the need for an amendment to the
Richardson, Richter & Associates' Inc. Agreement for Professional Services to increase the
contract amount by $126,300. I have reviewed the proposal for additional time and fees and
find it to be fair and reasonable based on the Project's needs for services for the remainder of
the year. The services requested are within the scope of work of the Richardson, Richter &
Associates, Inc. contract; the number of hours for 2005 were simply underestimated. As
Executive Director, I provide oversight and monitor the contractor's performance, acting as
Deputy Director of Legal and Intergovernmental Affairs. I recommend that the NCDA approve
the proposed contract amendment. Note that the NCDA's budget has sufficient funding to cover
the increased costs.
Action Requested: That the Executive Committee I Capital Budget Committee recommend
that the NCDA authorize the chair to execute Amendment #4 to the
Richardson, Richter & Associates, Inc. Agreement for Professional
Services increasing the contract amount by $126,300.
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
2100 Y Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2265 (763) 323-5700 Fax: (763) 323-5682 www.l1onhstartrain.org
Richardson. Richter & Associates. Inc.: Rationale for Revised Estimated Hours for 2005
Contract Amendment #4 to Agreement for Professional Services (Contract No: 2003-0265)
Basis:
The hours estimated for calendar year 2005 were based on historical requests for services,
increased to reflect the new Northstar Project Office organizational structure and the
estimated level of effort to prepare for the final design phase of the Project. In 2005, Mary
Richardson is acting as the Deputy Director of Legal and Intergovernmental Affairs,
responsible for real estate acquisition, transit oriented development, public involvement,
BNSF negotiations, risk management, contract negotiations, and NCDA coordination. Jan
Lucke is leading efforts in public involvement and transit oriented development. Peggy Aho
is responsible for the administration of the Project Management Team and the Northstar
Corridor Development Authority.
The 2005 Contract Maximum reflects the following estimated hours for 2005:
Mary Richardson - 110 hours per month / 25.5 hours per week
Jan Lucke - 60 hours per month / 14.0 hours per week
Peggy Aho - 60 hours per month /14.0 hours per week
Clerical - 20 hours per month /4.75 hours per week
The hours needed to provide requested services exceed the estimated hours for a number
of reasons, including: prolonged negotiations with BNSF relating to the Engineering
Agreement, the complexity of structuring a new organization, establishing and leasing a new
office, development of necessary policies and procedures, the many requirements and
meetings relating to the FTA including an unanticipated procurement audit, a greater role in
documentation of the New Starts submittal, and extensive interaction with cities on TOO and
station issues. As a result, RRA has been exceeding its estimated hours. In the last several
months, the average has been:
Mary Richardson
Jan Lucke
Peggy Aho
Clerical
Weekly Actual
29.50
20.25
22.00
5.00
Monthly Actual
124.00
84.75
91.00
20.00
As the project continues, RRA expects fulfilling its responsibilities on the project will require
the current level of effort. While the FT A submittal is nearing completion and the new office
is established, work will increase on negotiations with BNSF, development of TOO,
administration of risk management committee, and procurement and policy development. It
is estimated that the number of hours for RRA staff will be as follows:
Mary Richardson
Jan Lucke
Peggy Aho
Clerical
Est. Weekly
30.00
22.75
22.75
7.00
Est. Monthly
120.00
95.00
95.00
30.00
Note that services are invoiced on an hourly basis. If services are not required, the contract
amount is not spent. The total annual amount was calculated based on eleven months to
account for vacations.
Receptionist/Secretarial Services for NPO:
Currently, URS provides receptionist/secretarial services to the HPO. Once the NPO move
is accomplished, URS will no longer be providing such services. After discussion with PMT
members, RRA was asked to provide the receptionist/secretarial services for the NPO
beginning July 1, 2005. RRA will contract with a temp service for a full-time clerical person
for the next six months.
Contract Amount:
The original contract amount for 2005 is: $325,000.00.
The amount expended through May 31,2005 is $162,018.00.
Estimated hours per month: 340 hours which would amount to $38,193.75 per
month or $257,267.50 for seven months a difference of $104,374.30.
Estimated cost for receptionist/secretary services: $22,000.00.
2005 Total: $429,300.00.
2005 Contract Amendment Amount Requested: $126,300.00
,
NCDA Agenda Item #3a
NORTHSTAR CORRIDOR RAIL PROJECT
MONTHLY REPORT
June 2005
Minnesota Department of Transportation
in Cooperation with the
Northstar Corridor Development Authority
and the
Metropolitan Council
~
The Northstar Corridor Rail Project
\ii\ Medic-A
Donlown SLOoud Center
(Mtc T:wiI Cal.q '~'_ .
........
St. Cloud ""i"..
Phase 2
(Proposed Future Route)
cker
:,.<..,."...,. QIIf
.,. -., .Big!.akl' ....
Phase 1
(2004 Minnesota Bonding Request)
*
}.hll DC !l!Ilu ia.
Northstar Corridor Monthly Report
June 17,2005
2
."~~
'<\?u.,.~_ -m>>
V'~ nvn _ nHilI.1f4D
_J6IMIlE1I UIL
I. Introduction
The proposed Northstar Corridor Rail Project (Project) will provide commuter
rail service along a 40-mile corridor from Downtown Minneapolis to Big Lake,
Minnesota parallel to Trunk Highways 47 and 10. It will use existing rail tracks
owned by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) and
include 6 stations. The commuter line is expected to carry 5,600 passengers per
day by the year 2025. The rail line will have inter-modal connections to bus
transit and to the Hiawatha Light Rail Transit (LRT) line. The Northstar
connection to LRT consists of a four-block extension on the north end of the
Hiawatha LR T to reach the Downtown Minneapolis commuter rail station.
With the exception of the Downtown Minneapolis station, all of the stations will
have park and ride facilities.
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT), the grantee, is
working closely with its partners, the Northstar Corridor Development
Authority (NCDA) and the Metropolitan Council, to deliver the Northstar
Project.
Since the last written report to the Federal Transit Administration (FT A), dated
May 2005, the following occurred:
. Project staffing changes
. A series of decisions have been made to enable design to proceed
. Second coordination meeting on Twins baseball stadium
. FT A is conducting a procurement system review
. The Project is submitting a series of materials to FTA to seek a
"Recommended" rating and approval for entry into final design
. A design agreement was reached with BNSF
. The Project selected a firm for risk management services
· Community and public meetings have been held regarding Northstar
II. Project Milestones
The following table lists the major milestones in the development and ongoing
implementation of the Northstar project.
Northstar Corridor Monthly Report
June 17,2005
3
,t~~
-';(IIDBTHSTAR
alllllllD IUIll
Date
March 2000
June 2000
October 2000
January 2001
March 2002
December 2002
April 2005
September
2005
May 2006
Jul 2006
October 2006
S ring 2007
Early 2009
Northstar Pro' ect Milestones
Activi
Major Investment Study completed-Commuter rail
recommended
FT A a proveCl entry into Prelimin Engineering
Draft Environmental 1m act Statement (DEIS) ublished
Su lemental Information to the DEIS ublished
Final Environmental 1m act Statement ublished
FT A issued Record of Decision
Minnesota Legislature commits $37.5 million in bonding for
Northstar
FTA approves entry into Final Design
Minnesota Legislature commits remaining state funding for
Northstar
FTA issues Letter of No Pre'udice enabling utility relocation
FT A enters into Full Funding Grant A reement for Northstar
Construction be ins
Revenue service begins
III. Project Finances
Project Budget
The following table lists the existing Northstar Project budget by FTA Standard
Cost Category.
No. Cate 0
10 Guideway & Track Elements
20 Stations, Sto s, Terminals, Intermodal
30 Support Facilities: Yards, Shops, Admin. Bldgs
40 Sitework & Special Conditions
50 Systems
Construction Subtotal (Cate ories 10-50
60 ROW, Land, Existing Improvements
70 Vehicles
80 Professional Services
90 Unallocated Contin ency
Subtotal (Cate ories 10-90)
100 Finance Char es
c=JTotal Project Cost
et
Amount (FY 2008 $)
$32,920,00
$22,302,00
$20,927,00
$9,439,00
$23,964,00
$109,552,000
$7,959,00
$69,152,00
$40,929,00
$37,408,00
$265,000,000
Not determined
$265,000,0001
Northstar Corridor Monthly Report
June 17, 2005
4
,~~
'~IIDBTHSTMI
~1IIU1
Funding Sources
The following table summarizes the sources of funding to date for the Northstar
Project. The NCDA member counties have passed resolutions committing their
full share of the Northstar Project. Their commitment to date totals
approximately $44 million or $26 million in addition to that shown below.
Northstar Proiect Fundin~ Sources to Date
Source Federal State Met Council NCDA
1998 Twin Cities Transitway Projects $ 350,000 $ 287,562
Section 5309 (Grant MN-03-0056)
1999 STP Grant Section 5307 (MN-90 $ 3,999,981 $ 1,000,000
X110)
1999 STP Grant Section 5307 (MN-90 $ 2,000,000 $ 500,000
X138)
2000 CMAQ Grant Section 5307 $ 960,000 $ 69,885 $ 170,115
(Amendment to MN-90-X138)
2000 & 2001 Twin Cities Transitway $ 4,346,669 $ 1,086,667
Proiects Section 5309 (MN-03-0088)
2002 New Starts Section 5309 (MN- $ 9,900,131 $ 2,475,033
03-0111)
NCDA -- Advanced & Final Desion $ 10,000,00C
NCDA (Hennepin County) -- LRV $ 6,300,OOC
Procurement
2003 New Starts Section 5309 (no $ 4,917,912
grant yet)
2004 New Starts Section 5309 (no $ 5,659,028
grant yet)
2005 New Starts Section 5309 (no $ 4,960,000
grant vet)
2005 Minnesota Bonding $ 37,500,000
ITotal
I $ 37,093,7211 $ 39,069,8851 $ 2,475,0331 $ 17,844,3441
Project Obligations
The following table lists the contracts and obligations that have been incurred
by the Northstar project, including the amount expended to date. All funds
expensed to date have been for professional services.
Purpose Contractor Obligated Expended Balance
T otallhrouah Preliminary Engineering $ 8,474,650.71 $ 8474650.71 $ -
Advanced Preliminary Enoineerino Kimlev Horn & Assoc $ 428,900.00 $ 341,522.64 $ 87,377.36
Proiect Manaoement Kenneth Stevens (2004) $ 150,000,00 $ 146491.92 $ 3,508.08
Proiect Management Kenneth Stevens (2005) $ 150,000.00 $ 28,127.81 $ 121,872.19
Project Management Richardson, Richter & Associates (2004) $ 322,000.00 $ 308,788.66 $ 13,211.34
Project Management Richardson, Richter & Associates (2005) $ 347,000.00 $ - $ 347,000.00
Proiect Manaoement Loch & Associates $ 50,000.00 $ 2,123.05 $ 47,876.95
Project Manaaement Mn/DOT (under MN-03-0088) $ 248,569.00 $ 222,694.63 $ 25,874.37
Project Manaaement Mn/DOT (under MN-03-0111) $ 320,000.00 $ 3,012.02 $ 316,987.98
Host Railroad Neootiations Greene-Esoel (2004) $ 100,000.00 $ 45,172.94 $ 54,827.06
Host Railroad Negotiations Greene-Esoel (2005) $ 300,000.00 $ - $ 300,000.00
Tech Support for Railroad Negotiations Mainline Manaaement $ 158,000.00 $ 79,297.14 $ 78,702.86
Public Information Northwoods Advertisino $ 245,285.00 $ - $ 245,285.00
Station and Maintenance Facility
Advanced & Final Desian Kimley Horn & Assoc $ 4,173,632.00 $ 727,948.84 $ 3,445,683.16
LRT Advanced & Final Design &
Commuter Rail Oversioht L TK Enaineerina $ 3,098,927.00 $ 295,112.75 $ 2,803,81425
Lioht Rail Vehicle Procurement Bombardier $ 6,300,000.00 $ - $ 6,300,000.00
Northstar Project Obligations and Expenses
IGrand Total
1$ 24,866,963,71 1$ 10,674,943.11 I $14,192,020.60 I
Based on invoices receiVed by Mn/DOT to date.
Northstar Corridor Monthly Report
June 17, 2005
5
l~'~
'f,,~IIORTHSTAR
~RJlIL
IV. Project Staffing
The Deputy Director of Design position within the Northstar Project Office has
been filled on an interim basis by a combination of Jon Olson, the Anoka
County Public Services Division Manager and registered engineer, and Ken
Stevens, a long time consultant to the Northstar Corridor Development
Authority and former director of the Hennepin County Regional Railroad
Authority. Metro Transit is engaged in a national search to fill the position.
V. Advanced Design
Advanced design is underway, with the assistance of two teams of consultants.
A team led by Kimley Horn and Associates (KHA) is responsible for the six
commuter rail stations and the maintenance facility including the central control
facility. A team led by LTK Engineering (LTK) is responsible for the LRT
Connection and providing technical support for KHA's work on the commuter
rail stations and maintenance facility. The entire project design team meets on a
weekly basis.
Both teams submitted draft preliminary engineering validation reports for most
of their areas of responsibility. These reports validate the original preliminary
engineering completed in 2001, provide replacement preliminary engineering
plans reflecting changes in the conditions or project since 2001, or identify
issues to be addressed as the design advances. These reports will be carefully
reviewed by Mn/DOT, NCDA, and Metro Transit to ensure they fulfill project
requirements.
Key issues that have been resolved through the Value Engineering and
Preliminary Engineering Validation process include:
· Location of the Fridley Station platform and access points. The platform
is now moved northward and center loaded to better accommodate
disabled passengers.
· Access to the station platform at Coon Rapids has been confirmed as an
overpass. The underground option has been ruled out as a result of high
ground water tables, expensive construction to maintain continuous
railroad operations, and long-term liability for potential settlements
resulting from the construction methods, ground water, or both.
· The commuter rail rolling stock has been reviewed and confirmed as a
push-pull configuration of diesel locomotives and multi-level coaches as
previously defined within the preliminary engineering documents.
Project staff and consultants continue to evaluate several major issues including
Central Control Communication technology and location; Big Lake Station
location and layout; Inter-modal station coordination with prospective
developers and uses; and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Project staff and consultants meet bi-weekly with the City of Minneapolis on
design issues of the LRT Connection and inter-modal station. Periodic
Northstar Corridor Monthly Report 6 ~.~.' '..
June 17,2005 ~
'f):(IIDBTHSTAR
~IIAIL
meetings are also held with the State Historic Preservation Office and
Minneapolis Heritage Preservation Commission to get their input and
concurrence on the proposed plans because of the adjacent Warehouse Historic
District. Project staff will continue to work with these organizations to fulfill
the programmatic agreement regarding cultural resources that was included in
the Project's Record of Decision.
BNSF will manage advanced and final design of track and signal improvements
on their infrastructure with oversight by the Northstar Project Office with the
assistance of the L TK team. See section IX of this report for more details on the
progress of this contract.
VI. Twins Baseball Stadium Coordination Meeting
Chuck Ballentine of Northstar member Hennepin County chaired a second
discussion at the Northstar Project Office on Thursday, June 16 with stafffrom
HOK Architects, Twins Management, Hennepin County, and the Northstar
Project Office. Discussion focused on areas of potential space conflicts
adjacent to the commuter rail and light rail platforms.
The Minnesota Twins and Hennepin County have agreed to a funding plan for a
new baseball stadium in downtown Minneapolis. The plan for the $478 million
facility will include private funding from Twins owner Carl Pohlad and public
money from the county in the form of a 0.15% sales-tax increase.
The Twins ballpark legislation is still pending, but could be considered during
the current Special Legislative Session. The legislature is now focused on a
budget bill in order to avoid a partial shutdown of state services after July 1,
2005.
The property owners of the Twins ballpark site have announced plans for a
major Transit Oriented Development either with or without the ballpark. Stated
plans include 1,000 residential units with a ballpark or a mixed-use
development including 3,000 residential units without a ballpark. The property
owners cite the inter-modal access afforded by Northstar and Hiawatha as key
elements in their development plans. Staff continue to meet with both ballpark
designers and the developers.
VII. Procurement System Review
The FT A is conducting a procurement system review of Mn/DOT and the
Metropolitan Council, including the Northstar and Hiawatha Projects. Staff
from Leon Sneed and Associates arrived June 6 and will be working on the
review here until June 24. Their review also took them to Anoka to review
NCDA procured contract information for the Northstar project.
Northstar Corridor Monthly Report
June 17,2005
7
~-~
~1IOBTHS7JU1
. 11II.-.rBI U.IL
VIII. New Starts Criteria and Request to Enter Final Design
With $37.5 million in state bonding for Northstar approved by the 2005
Minnesota Legislature and signed into law by Governor Pawlenty, the Project is
in the process of submitting material needed to gain a "Recommended" rating
and to request to enter Final Design. The Project began this process with the
early submittal of two chapters of the Project Management Plan (PMP). The
remaining chapters of the PMP were submitted on March 31.
New Starts Criteria and a revised Financial Plan, containing more specific
information about the bonding passed by the legislature, will be submitted by
July 8, 2005. A schedule for submittal appears below.
Northstar Schedule for Request for Project Rating
and Request to Enter Final Design
(all months are in year 2005)
Time Activity
Feb 25 Northstar submitted to FTA Chapter 2, Project Organization, of the
Project Management Plan (PMP)
Mar 4 Northstar submitted to FTA Chapter 10, Real Estate Plan, of the PMP
Mar 31 Northstar submitted to FT A full PMP
Apr 11 Minnesota Legislature committed $37.5 million in bonding for
Northstar and Governor Pawlenty signed into law
July Northstar submits to FT A request to re-rate project and draft request
to enter final design containing New Starts Criteria and the Financial
Plan. The Project's response to the DOT request for ADA-related
information, Real Estate Plan, Quality Management Plan, Before &
After Study Plan will be submitted earlier if completed
July FT A review of above. Northstar revises material based on comments
from FT A.
July Northstar submits to FT A final request to enter final design containing
revised documents as necessary
July FT A review of above. Northstar revises material based on comments
from FT A.
August FT A re-rates the Project and submits final design recommendation to
Congress
September FT A issues approval to enter Final Design
Northstar Corridor Monthly Report
June 17,2005
Northstar Project staff, including Metropolitan Council, and forecasting
consultants met on Friday, June 3 to discuss issues and the process to complete
the ridership forecast and resultant Cost Effectiveness Index. It was determined
that a number of model inputs needed verification and several model functions
needed to be revisited. The conclusion was that it would take a minimum of
two months to attain a reasonably functional model and an acceptable forecast.
Consequently, a conference call was held with the Washington staff ofFTA to
explain the delay and discuss options to proceed. It was suggested by FT A and
~~.
=-
'~IIDBTIISTAB
....,.IUIIL
8
agreed by the Northstar Project Team that the existing model, which has been
carefully vetted by FT A, would be used for the current New Starts submittal.
Northstar will check on-board surveys conducted in Dallas and Seattle to
validate the non-work trips included within the existing forecast. Northstar will
also continue to work with the Twin Cities Region and FT A to resolve the
outstanding issues and inconsistencies with the new forecast model.
The date for submittal of the New Starts Criteria and Financial Plan to FTA has
been delayed to July 8, 2005. This will be accompanied by a request for FTA to
re-rate the Northstar project and a draft request to enter Final Design. Project
staff understands there is a new requirement for FT A to submit
recommendations for a project to enter final design to Congress and that
Congress has a 30-day period to act on the recommendation. If Congress does
not act, the recommendation is accepted.
IX. BNSF Negotiations
Northstar and the BNSF concluded negotiations on the advanced and final
design agreement for capacity improvements to BNSF infrastructure. Final
signatures are now underway. The agreement document has been sent to FT A
Chicago for their information. BNSF procured a design consultant following
federal procurement procedures. Preliminary engineering for the track capacity
improvements that was not performed earlier will now proceed. A signal
design consultant will be procured by BNSF once the track capacity preliminary
engineering is complete.
X. Risk Management
On April 18, 2005, the NCDA issued an RFP for Broker/Insurance Consulting
Services for the Northstar Commuter Rail Project. The services requested will
assist the project in addressing the risks arising out of the construction and
operations of the Northstar commuter rail project. Notice was published in the
State Register on April 18, 2005. Twelve firms requested a copy of the RFP. A
pre-proposal conference was held on Tuesday, May 3, and approximately five
firms attended the meeting. On May 6, the NCDA issued an addendum to the
RFP notifying potential vendors that the DBE goal for the project is race and
gender neutral and there is no percentage participation goal established by
Mn/DOT. Two firms submitted proposals by the May 20 deadline and the
selection panel selected the best. At its June 2 meeting, the NCDA Board
approved the selection and authorized staff to begin contract negotiations with
the selected firm. Those negotiations are still underway.
XI. Property Acquisition
Northstar Corridor Monthly Report
June 17,2005
Based on feedback from Andrea Orr ofFTA Region V, the Project is
developing a stand-alone Real Estate Plan. This will supplement the
~.
')){IIDBTHSTAR
...". BAR.
9
information in Chapter 10 of the Project Management Plan and be changed
more frequently. It will contain a description ofthe Project's property
acquisition process and the roles and responsibilities of the participating
counties and Mn/DOT personnel.
The Real Estate Plan will contain a Parcel Status List with summary
information that categorizes the number of parcels in defined value ranges. This
will offer a quick method to understand the magnitude of real estate work. The
Parcel Status List will be maintained and updated throughout the property
acquisition process to ensure property rights are acquired in the time-frame
necessary for construction and operations. It is included in this monthly report.
The Real Estate Plan will be delivered to FT A by July 8, 2005.
Northstar Corridor Monthly Report
June 17,2005
10
~-
'/)(IIDBTHSTAB
CIIIIMfiD MIL
u;
:::i
"'
::J
1il
iil
;;
"
:a
lL
:a
U;
.s::.
't=
o
Z
/~
>> :-:.
.. "
::::: ;:.'
.9 ~
8~
~
5
H
il
~~ i
c:
o
~
~
u
~
o
,~
F-
~.!!
E ::l
.!!~
::l.s:
tl"u
)i"'
c.s
.. ..
.5 E
E 0
wC
c:
o
'lil
c:
o
C
..
In
- ..
l!.s:
O~
...
.:
(!
:;
...
;; ..
'E""
:.~
1:1:
.. ..
:i ~
E In
.. ..
...W
i!:-1:
~ E
.....
E In
.. ..
t-W
..
::l
;;
>
..,
..
In
:::
In
In
..:
..Iii
~~
::
:J
1:
~
::l
tJ
..
!
1:
~
::l
tJ
c:
o
'"
~
o
...J
~
Ii
"
g
~j
~I
J I
01 '
'" "'.1
tll :J
g:;
,,;
~
x X
o
o
,"
A
.;;;
W,
e',
~
..
U)
"
"
a.
~\
'"
Ii;
n.
~
~
8
t-
O
Q
~
~
g
f<'
a.
7.5
z
~;
'T
(C
v
"
s
.,
~I
"I
cl
,'I
"'
o
'"
o
~
"'
o
'"
o
o
'"
o
o
o
o
..,
'"
;;;
.j
c.
(,:.
<t
.I
c;
~
.,
>
"
'..
,\)
t
G
"E
o
"
.,
<n
~
"
E
-'l5
~j..
I.,;
~)
~
-G
g
:1:
C'!
'"
~ '~"
..,
'"
C'!
U
;~
((
c
;;
~
:<1
C?I
...r.i
\!;:!
i
I
I;O;j '_'
~I .
C>
If)
~
If.:
o
~
o
ro
t-
o
c
<>
c
Ol
en
...
'"
1?
~
<<
."
B
"
'"
<n
.,
~
-~
t.::
;:.
~
(r.
a:
C
(/)
':,~
a:
U
..,
~
~j
01
I
21
"I
81
~!
._01
..c:i
gj
I,.,
o
~
C>
C>
<>
~
"'
'"
'ffi
a
!
~
i3
"5
.~
<<
."
.g
~
<n
"
..
E
-(~
~
~
"
"
~
fr
'"5
OJ)
"';
'"
"
U
i'j
LW
o
:',
."
f',
'0
'"
If..
~
x x
c
o
c
o
o
...:
..,
'"
'C
~
u~
c
w
v
'"
~
({.
a:
o
(/)
..,
'1"
a:
G
t:
"
?
'"
'-=:
~
f...J
=
~
:;
'"
'"
CI
1I~'
<:>
?<:
o
<:>
g
N
~
0>
'"
'ffi
t
p
<<
'"
.~
...J
C
&5
...J
~
?
'"
...J
'0
.g
:i:i
U)
'0
W
on
~
cr.
n:
"
oj)
~
g
u.
';
(~
'.J
-:;
w
o
""
r:'..
Q,
~~
s:
'0
'"
It,
o
g
0;.0:,
c.
~~:
o
IIJ
t-
o
I!'
'"
o
g
'"
,-
...,
~"l
'"
8
o
i2
'"
~
E
~
;;
~
..
a
~
"
4':1:
(ij
~
.~
<(
j
J:
"
"
::<
-J.?
:s
.9.
~
0;
"
~
~
'0
~
~\1
"'
'0
".
co
:,"'~
~.".
co
~
~
~
o
;!
~
~
i
~
;;
~
'"
o
""
o
o
N
x
<>
o
o
o
'"
..,
..,
;;;
~
~
~
'Vi
d5
"'
"
'e
R
o
a:
~
"
1>
...J
~
..
'"
'"
'0
;:
v>
.,.,
E;
'"
...
;c'
~
~
~
8
'0
:x
'"
o
N
x
'"
o
o
:2
...
~j
...
!'l
rJi
.~
ci
00
-"
ffi
a.
!il
:;
u
t-
o
~~
~
;;:
L
..c
~
r.E
<0
o
~
o
f!!
-
8
o
<:>
co,
'"
~
""
"
c
11
'"
:>
]l1
g
""
a
u
~
!ii
rr.
L
'"
o
;:~
,
J
t!
..
,',
:;~
-
-
-
-
-
~"',
;:)
'";)
,::,
:~.
,,:',
H.
0<
E
':
:
"'
o
o
N
o
<ll
t-
C>
'"
..,
R
l'{
,,'j
....
,n
u
'~
W
.~
:'~
",1
iJ
5
:z
'"
g
<(
;;;.
"
'"
~
.(
'0
;~
u
~
~
~",
~;
of;
t.C.1
~
~
co
o
o
"
o
I!'
o
o
o
o
N
~
V.
'.0
<:)
"'
'0
~
iD
-~
i
'"
-~
g
<(
l:
~
o
~
~
U
*
c
o
'i3
W
UJ
g
~,
~.
"
eo
'.Q
U,
""
<0
o
~
o
f!!
o
<>
o
:2
0;
V>
'"
'"
i.ii
'0
.~
iD
-g
'5
:;;
-~
g
~:
.'l!
o
~
a
i'-
u
~
iji
c
"
v>
6
~
~
~
u
c
'"
F
~
""
~f'
"
CD
t-
tj
~:t
u
<.
Ii
r3
(;
1"
<..;
tj,
:'
t
.-
:'.;
,..
'=-,
,~,
',,~
:,.!
;".;
\i
(J
f~~
lO
C;
"
~:'
:,;,.j
.:,~
II
IJ<II
;;1.
;1.1
c.,
l"~
t-
~
~;
:3
~~i
c::
i;~
c.
<,
U
:"0
.>
(.'I
-,
:1.
o
c.:.
~~
."
..~.
.:~
....
;:'.
....
..,
.:'~
fr
I'.;
I
~~
'-
1/;
i
--1,
~
...
o
Co
<J
0:::
~
C
o
2
..:.,
f
,...
'~'.
:.;
,,',
i:~
:::
': ::
? :,
':'
:1:1
.,.,
88
I... ("'.1
~r--:
g
C g
;z~
...
o
:g
[ 5 .!I
E ::I
,,;:
::I./:
<1'"
:l.'"
.
"
..
~./:
C ~
~ ?.
E
~ !
~ :;
'0 lI..
..
~ ...
F- :e-'<
:.~
:~
;;: "
'~
I
:
I
L-
11:! c
..01
C E
E 0
wC
C
o
ill
c
o
C
1:!1:!
5 E
E :
:~
~1:!
I! ..
o E
0."
E ::
~w
.
::I
01
>
"
..
"
"
..
~
.
:!l
1:!
~
::I
U
~
1:!
~
::I
U
c
o
~
o
..J
S
i
"
9
~
..
0.
C
o
'.l
Ii>
"
g
x
<::>
<::>
'"
'"
,,>
o
N
",
,,,
II>
N
~
"
u;
"
"
0::
'"
e
'"
l.L
co
"
"
a
..(
[~
'"
u
-<
"
in
co
~
m
g
r"",
,;:;.
u
-0
'"
,;:
c
(;
1... rd.
I
"
c
r
(s
x
g
g
<<l,
~
"',
;;;
r-
,--
~
G
'"
"
0::
'"
"
'"
"-
co
'"
t
(j
;~
'"
u
-<
r-.:;
~
c
::
1'-'
t/,
C?
~I
:;::j,;
.,
~i
b
I
~:':
'-
,'.,
'l.,
',<
,:;)
'::)
'.:J
,;;)
;:::,
v".
;...:
~~.
H,
~::J
~~
c,
ri.i
...
,-
:s
ill
~;
"0
"
("1
<"
~;1
';j
~l}
ii'
:;;
L1J
l.!l
,i.;
~
CS
G.!
I:::
::..:'
"
~;j
tel
'.r
~:~
L-
vi
",:,
::.
i;;
J;
I
~:1
H
i
,'1
-,
::1
:1
.~ I
I
~:
I
:'-.:'
,,":
5;~
;;-,.
::2
.~~
"
~'jj
!-
ffi
J~i
ti1
~~!
"I:
....>
4:
-<c,
uJ
0)
::;
,,'
0:(
'"
t)
~;.
u.;
".;:
~
~:i
:.:<
_:
, ,
i '-.'
:
11.
I
w
f~
:"'~
c.
q
r;:}
(;:,
...~
"
l';;
E
(~...
~~:
N
8~
r.,..
...
c
'"
!-
;;:'
q
~
c.
;(
111
UJ
~)
.'6
l~)
I::'
C
t
C~
..ic'
(/;
ir:
,..
.;
,.",
c:
{.,.
.;
;6
(",
';::.
I,,)
i.i5
!-
"
'C
'i:
'0
iI":
-J.
c
(;;
[!':
c.'~
!i.'
C:.
';
...1
;...1
,-j
-I
:,1
J. -" '
'"
<::>
<::>
N
x
o
CO!
<::>
g
'0
...
,...
II>
r-
....
co
M
'"
(fj
ll.J
i=
IX:
l.W
n
o
rr.:
CL
G
_J
CJ
ii
"-
tu
w
~
z
<
:;
g,
u;
r;;,-
~
,:;
iii
L...j
o
o
..,
0,
co
,,,...,
~~
'1
'"
o
o
N
;..~
o
C>
c>
<::>
..,
",
N
II>
""
...
1.::
'"
"
~
(fJ
Iii
t=
fY
lU
n
o
rr:
"-
~
(/
,<
"-
...
lI.!
lU
a:
,-
(fJ
z
:;;:
L
"
ffi
-6
t?
lU
9
~
c.
t'..
"-,
,EI
'"
'='
~
x
8
o
'='
"
~
'"
'1
..;
~
~
(fJ
UJ
,-
n'
lU
n
"
6~
c-
!i.i
o
('2
Li.
tJ
lU
!Y
t1
z
;;:
::i
ill
;;;
'5
'"
:.n
'"
~
ill
01
o
~
'"
r"",
;:~i
!
>,
-,~~, ;
'"
o
g
x
o
q
c:-
o
'"
~
C',
~
~
'"
'"
c
.~
o
c
'"
'J
':\)
"
Iii
'0
ru
"-
u
Z
rJ?
UJ
I:::
'"
UJ
c-
o
Ct":
c-
o
z
:5
~~
~
lli
;;;
.;;;
m
~
{ii
;
q
":',
C
"'i
'.',1
~!
~
';;~
1':)
~
'-'I
,;~
Cl
(e
;,y
"
""1
~r,
I'
~
.)
?:f;
,Ii
;;:,
..
-,
I
'I
:;;
U
Z
;;:
d
'"
..
o
0:
..
~
.(
:;'
W
~~
w
Z
'"
c
o
C'
'"
'"
'"
u
~
,>
g
:t
~.
J
~
'"
'"
~
,~
o
<::>
"
'"
"
~
:-:
;..~
x
~
C
<::>
;;;
8
o
o
"
~
0'
8
c
<::>
<::>
....
C',
II>
II
~II
<"".
if$..
'"
o
"
"
.::
M
:;.
F.:
f:l
.,
'"
~
:;;
!5!
:i.:
-,
iJJ
'"
<
CJ
0:
~
~
2"
"U
Z
;;;:
..,
w
'"
..
o
::r:
~:
7.
>-
-<
:;
ItJ
[/)
Uj
z
;ij
(fJ
...
;JJ
Z
-
"
0;
c
.,
~
'-'
~
.8
iii
t
o
0-
0)
cr::
>.
...
~
o
:2
~
','
'"
"
v;
'"
0':
c;.
o
'"
'"
'"
~
~
'"
:;;
::;
"'0
oE lr)
00
U~
~ ~
~r--...
U'J_
E g
;Z
$
::;,
~,
.~ -~
'11 -~
c:
o
E
..
~
~
o
..
~ ~.:l
:.~
I
I
a..!
E"
.!!~
"<=
<Tu
.:;.cn
ii
oS E
E 0
wO
::
t:!!
-u
o ~
"
"-
c-
~ ~
E ::
.. ..
"-w
~-
.. c:
(; E
<>...
E ..
.. ..
I-w
..
"
"iii
>
"Z
..
..
..
:::
c(
...
~~
c:
o
'iil
c:
o
o
..
'"
..
I-
:;
...
..
~
c
~
"
u
c
~
"
u
c:
o
.,
:l
o
..J
~
~
Cl
g
~
:;;
"-
.-< -,
c)
;~;
.;:<i
,,:~
,..
~l
~
~~;
?:;
"
c,
c>
,:,.-'
v,
{",';
;:::
;!
~:
_..i
~~-
J
"
'"
o
~
;..:~
:5
<:;;,
o
o
...:
N
'"
"J"
o
c
~~
"'
:>
~
UJ
Z
<.
...J
W
...
<(
o
rr
0:
;.-
,.(
.:!:
Z
LLJ
~l
W
z
~
in
~
til
'!)
'0
C')
,>
o
'?
"
..
.:,1 .J 'j €
i :1 ,. cl
c:
o
'iil
<il
~~
,il
co
<>
o
N
;..~
:5
ci
~~
<1"
Ij~
(:1
(:)
c
..
"
,n
:>
:?:
~
:5
w
.,
<(
o
D:
~
<(
:;;
W
~
tu
Z
8
'"
c
~
~
"
in
:-
o
'"
~
~
g
.;.'.
'"
o
:?
r:;;
u.:
f~;
>-
,,.
it:
<'r.
u
Z,'
I.
ei
rn
;)'
>
.:
....
co
'"
'='
(.;
x
co
Cl
n
6
(i)
"..
ci
~~
:>
".;."f.
lJ.J
Z
:s
UJ
'"
<(
o
r<
<(
?::
~
z
w
(j)
l
UJ
Z
'"
Vi
Q
m
tn
"
Jj
;.,.
c
c
:'!I
~1
>
'':'
'"
'"
g
x
:5
<::>
o
o
",,'
<D
",
<::>
~
c
'"
~
~
<-
..,
W
.,
<(
o
[C-
o:
>c
,.(
:<
z
UJ
CfJ
.l
UJ
Z
'"
in
~
Q
.~
{5
iii
?
c
o
r-,
I
~I .1 -''''_~_
"I J
c~
o
g
'x'
~
;;:)
E
r.
~~':
i"
.
-
ii)
,,~
>-
:i
is
~h
.~
;.
:'
'.
'"
o
~
:-< x:
<::>
o
c:i
o
o
,."
'D
v,
""
'"
'-
~
:>
:;;;
UJ
Z
:3
w
""
<(
o
rr
<(
..,.
:;;.:
<(
::.
z
liJ
~~
W
Z
.:Po
iJj
~
ill
'"
'J
en
:;:
g
"
"
"
N
~
'"
o
o
'.~~
<:>
<.:>
cj
>?
'"
o
:~1
:~
UJ
Z.
<
.J
W
'"
<C
o
rr
?i
;.-
<C
'"
:z:
lLJ
~l
UJ
z
s
'"
~
~
"
"J
:fi
;.,.
r~';.
~
'"
R
>< "
x
'"
o
o
S?
~f';
."
<:>
Ci
c
'"
m
:>
L:
UJ
Z
;;;;
UJ
""
..(
C
0:
"".
z
>-
<(
~
~.U
iJ)
UJ
'7
~~
if.
c
o
"
!r.
'"
,>
i;':
~
g
,;
S-;
.>
,.:.;
x
o
o
6
<>
c:..
o
<0
'"
'"
",
o
C!l
I-
o
"2
~
o.
in
'"
E
'"
"-
of.?
.]
l;~j
'0
">
'J
in
(/i
'-!)"
1ii
c
L:..
~
m
''0
'"
n
u:
w
b
",
8
~
~
..~
x
o
o
o
o
o
o
"'
o
I!!
'5
~
~
"-
in
€
'"
"-
-g
'"
..J
~.
"'
15
'"
n
;;;
Z
~
'"
"-
(/l
Z
ID
'0
'"
n
Vi
W
o
",
'T
itl
O'J!
8;
~;i
IJ.:I
0'
~j
~i
~i
x
x
8
6
o
o
o
N
<0
o
o
o
o
o
'"
<:1>
""
IJA.....I. ;
\ II
...~.
"Y.\
o
In
>-
~
~
o
;;
~
i!
..
"-
<=
e
..
:>
o.
I
co
r<
w
z
~
"-
o
~
L
:::;
is
o
::J
o
U
..J
..J
~
"
"
..J
Ql
C
Ql
>
<(
.,
li;
Cl.
~
"'
15
Ql
"
in
Z
z
'"
>
<(
g
N
~
Z
if;
"
.0
o
E
8
'.u
z
;.,
~
(5
:2
...
o
:2
~~
u5
C"'J
~~
~
1: g
o ::l
Z-.
in
~
'"
U.
/1)
Z
ill
15
'"
'"
in
L;j
"?
~
g;
'"
~~
-
...
o
0-
OJ
"'
~
'T
~
a,
~I
e,
I
~.j
~
~j
in
-g
j
XII. Land Use
Anoka
A Resolution to pursue a joint agreement with the Northstar Corridor
Development Authority concerning the Development of the Anoka Station was
signed on May 16,2005. It was resolved that the City of Anoka will continue to
work in cooperation with the NCDA to pursue the successful development of
the Northstar Corridor Commuter Rail Project and development of the Anoka
Station. It was also resolved that the city of Anoka will continue to pursue
development of the Commuter Rail Transit Village at and surrounding Anoka
Station. Finally, it was resolved, that the city of Anoka is prepared to enter into
a Memorandum of Understanding with the NCDA concerning the initial
development and future expansion of the Anoka Station and requests that the
NCDA agree to pursue a mutually beneficial long term relationship concerning
development of the Anoka Station and the Anoka Commuter Rail Village.
Project staff are scheduling meetings to discuss transit oriented development
opportunities at Big Lake, Elk River, Anoka, Coon Rapids, Fridley and the
Inter-modal station in Minneapolis with local government staff.
XIII. Community Involvement
Since the May 2005 Northstar report the following public meetings and
presentations have been held:
Date(s)
May 11,2005
May 25, 2005
May 31,2005
Audience .
Group of Metro Area Realtors, TPC
Sensible Land Use Coalition Luncheon, St. Louis Park
Quad County Meeting (Representatives from Stearns,
Benton, Sherburne and Wright Counties), St. Cloud History
Center
NCDA Board Meeting, Anoka
June 2, 2005
XIV. Next Steps
Project staff continues work on the material FT A will need to change the
project's rating from "Not Recommended" to "Recommended" and to approve
entry into the final design phase. The date for submittal of the New Starts
Criteria, Financial Plan is July 8, 2005. The Real Estate Plan, Quality Plan,
Before & After Study Plan and the Project's response to the DOT request for
ADA-related data will also be provided by July 8 or earlier if possible. Project
staff will communicate with FT A Region V staff throughout the submittal
process to ensure timely review and progress.
Northstar Corridor Monthly Report
June 17,2005
13
~~
~rllllRTllBTAR
_-.rm aIL
Mn/DOT, NCDA, and Metro Transit are providing comments on the draft
preliminary engineering validation report. Work is beginning on updating
environmental documentation and on Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
issues at commuter rail platforms.
Project staff keeps in contact with station cities and counties on design issues.
Meetings are being scheduled to address the best location for the Big Lake
Station. In addition, the staff will continue to work with the City of
Minneapolis and Hennepin County on issues surrounding the inter-modal
station, including the proposed Minnesota Twins stadium. The project takes
advantage of public information opportunities, giving presentations to civic
groups and business organizations.
Northstar Corridor Monthly Report
June 17,2005
14
~
. '-
';;'fllDRTHBTMI
_JIIIIfIlDIlVIlL