04-27-1993 PC MIN
.
.
.
MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD AT THE ELK RIVER CITY HALL
TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1993
Members Present:
Chairman Minton, Commissioners Eberley, Kreger,
Kuester, spotts and Tveite.
Members Absent:
Commissioner Johnson
Staff Present:
stephen Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator;
Gary Schmitz, Recycling Coordinator; Peter Beck,
City Attorney, Matt Ledvina, Environmental Consultant,
and Catherine Schmidt, Recording Secretary
1. Call Meeting to Order
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the meeting of the Elk River
Planning Commission was called to order at 7 p.m. by Chairman Minton.
2.
Consider Planning Commission Agenda
Commissioner Eber1ey added discussion of policy relating to public
meetings. Gary Schmitz added discussion regarding the interviewing
process for the City Planner, and comments from Tri-County Solid Waste
regarding transfer trucks.
MOVED TO
COMMISSIONER
APPROVE
TVEITE
THE AMENDED 4/27/93 PLANNING
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE
COMMISSIONER EBERLEY
COMMISSION AGENDA.
MOTION CARRIED 6-0.
3. Consider Planning Commission Minutes
Commissioner Eber1ey amended the approval vote of the Planning
Commission's Annual Meeting to reflect the vote 4-0-2. Further, page 7
(end of Item 9) Commissioner Johnson's statement regarding a tree
protection policy should have been reflected as a motion by
Commissioner Johnson, Seconded by Commissioner Eber1ey, carried 7-0.
Commissioner Kreger amended page 3, Item 7, paragraph 1, "Planning
Commissioner" should read "planning Commission"; page 4, Item 9,
paragraph 6, "gun club to possible fence..." should read "gun club to
possibly fence..."; and page 6, Item 9, the stipulation should read
"THE DEVELOPER MUST REIMBURSE THE CITY FOR THE COST OF REVIEWING THE
PLAT PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT REVIEW."
COMMISSIONER TVEITE
COMMISSION MINUTES.
MOTION CARRIED 6-0.
MOVED TO APPROVE
COMMISSIONER EBERLEY
THE AMENDED 4/27/93 PLANNING
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE
4.
Planning Commission Representative to Attend City Council Meeting
It was indicated commissioner Tveite would attend the 5/17/93 City
Council meeting to be held at the Elk River City Hall.
Elk River Planning Commission Minutes
April 27, 1993
Page 2
.
5.
Renewal of Conditional Use Permit For ConTeck Environmental Services/
Public Hearing, Case No. 93-05
Commissioner Kreger stated he would abstain from discussion and voting
due to conflict of interest, and removed himself from the table.
stephen Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator, briefed the Planning
Commission regarding the renewal of a conditional use permit to allow a
facility to thermally treat petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil.
This operation also requires a solid waste facility license, which is
acted upon only by the City Council. Mr. Rohlf reviewed the issues
raised in staff's memo dated April 21, 1993.
Chairman Minton opened the public hearing.
stephen Rohlf referred the Planning Commission to page 3 of the license
and conditional use permit and requested that part of the first
paragraph be amended to "subject to specific approval of an alternative
facility by the City of Elk River" read "subject to specific approval
of an alternative facility by the Building and zoning Administrator,
City of Elk River." The language amendment would serve to avoid the
repeated step of another Planning commission and City Council review.
.
Peter Beck, City Attorney, stated the language should still read "by
the City of Elk River" not "by the Building and Zoning Administrator"
and the City Council could appoint the Building and Zoning
Administrator as the City's agent to review the alternative facility.
Mr. Rohlf argued that the standards to review an alternative facility
will be set by this permit. This review is a technical issue not
requiring and additional public hearing. Further, the Attorney's
language leaves one to believe an additional public hearing is required.
Matt Ledvina, B.A. Liesch & Associates, commented
environmental issue and stated the language amendment
Zoning Administrator was merely a technicality and would
meaning of the documents. Discussion ensued.
regarding
to Building
not change
the
and
the
There being no further comments from the public, Chairman Minton closed
the public hearing.
Discussion between Planning Commission members continued.
COMMISSIONER EBERLEY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR CONTECK ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, CASE NO. CU 93-05, CITING STAFF'S
MEMO DATED APRIL 21, 1993, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS:
1.
CONTECK PROVIDE THE CITY WITH THE NEW AND CORRECTED
DESCRIPTION OF CONTECK'S PROPERTY.
LEGAL
2.
PROOF OF ADEQUATE INSURANCE FROM WHOEVER IS INVOLVED IN THE
OPERATION.
.
COMMISSIONER SPOTTS SECONDED THE MOTION.
COMMISSIONER KREGER ABSTAINED FROM VOTING.
THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
Elk River Planning Commission Minutes
April 27, 1993
Page 3
.
6.
Preliminary Plat Review and Associated Variances For The Plat of
CherryHill Bluffs 2nd Addition by Richard Foster/Public Hearing, Case
No. 93-02
stephen Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator, explained that the
original preliminary plat was presented to the Planning Commission at
their March 23, 1993, meeting. This is a revision to the original
preliminary plat. The water issue appeared to be a major concern. Mr.
Rohlf reviewed the issues raised in staff's memo dated April 20, 1993.
Chairman Minton opened the public hearing.
Richard C. Foster, 241 East Main, Elk River, stated that he spoke with
the City Engineer regarding the water issue. Per the City Engineer,
the water is adequate with the existing system if the water tower is
ordered by the end of May so it is completed by June 1, 1994. Also,
there was some dispute as to who owned the southern five acres included
in the plat. It is owned by MnDot and will be sold to the City.
Outlot B is not owned by the developer and, therefore, can not be
dedicated to the City.
stephen Rohlf responded staff is still recommending the City own this
Outlot and suggested the developer relay this to the owner of Outlot B.
.
There being no further comments from the public, Chairman Minton closed
the public hearing.
Commissioner Eberley questioned whether the current water system was
adequate. Mr. Foster explained the comments by City Engineer, Terry
Maurer.
Discussion ensued regarding a drainage easement versus ownership of
Outlot B.
COMMISSIONER EBERLEY
CHERRYHILL BLUFFS 2ND
CITING STAFF'S MEMO
STIPULATIONS:
RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF
ADDITION BY RICHARD FOSTER, CASE NO. P 93-02,
DATED APRIL 20, 1993, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
1. PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT, LOT SIZES AND WIDTH REQUIREMENTS ARE VERIFIED
TO MEET CITY STANDARDS ON THE REVISED VERSION OF THE PLAT.
2. THE DRAINAGE PLAN FOR THE PLAT BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER
PRIOR TO COUNCIL REVIEW OF FINAL PLAT. FURTHER, THAT OUTLOT D AND
OUTLOT B BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY BECAUSE THEY ARE INTRICATE PARTS
OF THE PLAT DRAINAGE. IN ADDITION, THAT AN ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS AND DNR PERMIT IS OBTAINED TO ACCOMPLISH DRAINAGE IN THE
PLAT, IF REQUIRED. LASTLY, THAT MNDOT APPROVE THE DRAINAGE PLAN
AND ALLOW A CONSTRUCTION PERMIT WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO
ACCOMPLISH PLAT DRAINAGE.
.
3.
MNDOT'S NOISE STUDY IS CONSIDERED AND THE DEVELOPER PROVIDE PLANS
FOR BUFFERING THE PLAT FROM HIGHWAY NOISE PRIOR TO COUNCIL REVIEW
OF FINAL PLAT.
.
.
.
Elk River Planning commission Minutes
April 27, 1993
Page 4
4.
NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY'S REQUIREMENTS FOR WORK IN THEIR GAS
EASEMENT BE INCORPORATED IN THE PLANS AND SPECS FOR THE
IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PLAT PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT REVIEW.
5. CITY OWNERSHIP OF OUTLOT C IS CONSIDERED AND THIS OUTLOT IS DEEMED
UNBUILDABLE.
6. PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT REVIEW BY THE CITY COUNCIL THE DEVELOPER MUST
SUBMIT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR STAFF APPROVAL.
7. ROAD NAMES ARE ADJUSTED AS PER STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION.
8. THIS PLAT IS CONTINGENT UPON VARIANCES BEING GRANTED FOR BOTH
ROADS.
9. PARK DEDICATION BE $400 PER ADDITIONAL LOT CREATED.
10. SLOPES OF 30% OR MORE ARE PROTECTED BY EASEMENTS AND SPECIFICALLY
THE SLOPES ON THE WEST SIDE OF LOTS 3-7, BLOCK 2, ARE PROTECTED BY
EASEMENTS.
11. TREES REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PLAT AND
HOUSES HAVE THEIR STUMPS REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE TREES
BEING DROPPED OR HAVE THEIR ROOTS SEVERED FROM THE TREES THAT ARE
TO REMAIN PRIOR TO FELLING. FURTHER, THAT ROOTS EXPOSED BE BURIED
THE SAME DAY THEY ARE EXPOSED. LASTLY, THE TREES THAT ARE TO
REMAIN AFTER CONSTRUCTION ARE PROTECTED FROM MECHANICAL DAMAGE BY
ROPING OFF THEIR DRIP LINE.
12. THE COMPLETION DATE FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS IN THIS PLAT IS ONE YEAR
FROM THE DATE OF FINAL PLAT APPROVAL.
13. PRIOR TO RECORDING THE PLAT THE DEVELOPER MUST SUPPLY THE CITY
WITH A LETTER OF CREDIT OF 100% OF THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE
IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PLAT OR WHATEVER PERCENT IS CITY POLICY AT THE
TIME OF RECORDING.
14. THE STIPULATIONS OF APPROVAL OF THIS PLAT ARE AGREED TO THROUGH A
DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT.
15. THE DEVELOPER REIMBURSE THE CITY FOR THE COST INCURRED IN
REVIEWING THE PLAT PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT REVIEW.
16. THE PLAT IS CONTINGENT UPON THE EXECUTED SALE OF CITY PROPERTY TO
THE DEVELOPER WITH THE ISSUE OF MNDOT'S PROPERTY BEING RESOLVED.
17. THIS PLAT APPROVAL IS CONTINGENT UPON A SATISFACTORY RESOLUTION OF
THE ISSUE OF WATER CAPACITY AND PRESSURE PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT
REVIEW.
COMMISSIONER TVEITE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0.
.
.
.
Elk River Planning Commission Minutes
April 27, 1993
Page 5
Variance
COMMISSIONER TVEITE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE ASSOCIATED VARIANCE
REQUEST FOR FREEPORT STREET AND EVANS STREET (CHERRYHILL BLUFFS 2ND
ADDITION) BY RICHARD FOSTER, CASE NO. V 93-01, CITING STAFF'S MEMO
DATED APRIL 20, 1993. COMMISSIONER EBERLEY SECONDED THE MOTION. THE
MOTION CARRIED 6-0.
7. Consider a Conditional Use Permit Request For An Accessory Structure
by Ed and Kris Stevens/Public Hearing, Case No. CU 93-09.
Stephen Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator, explained the
applicants, Ed and Kris Stevens, were requesting a conditional use
permit to exceed 3 standards: exceed the 1,000 square foot maximum size
of a single accessory structure, to exceed the maximum total square
footage of accessory structures on a single lot, and encroachment on
the 300 foot setback to metal skin building. Mr. Rohlf reviewed the
issues raised in staff's memo dated April 20, 1993.
Chairman Minton opened the public hearing.
Ed Stevens, 21216 Vernon Street, addressed the seven standards for a
conditional use permit and presented the Commission with photographs of
the proposed building site.
Jeannine Gerhardson, 5809
is the owner of lots 15
Gerhardson does not like
building.
Pearson Dr. N., Brooklyn Center, stated she
and 16, Greenhead 3rd Addition. Ms.
the proposed location or size of the
Jim Lundquist,
requirements and
Further, he stated
from his lot line.
21244 Vernon Street, questioned
the type of siding Ed Stevens would
he would like the building smaller and
the setback
be putting on.
further away
Ed Stevens, 21216 Vernon Street, explained to the Commission that he
would like to work with his neighbors and was willing to scale down the
size of the building and to slightly relocate it.
There being no further comments from the public, Chairman Minton closed
the public hearing.
The Planning Commission discussed the size and location of the proposed
structure.
COMMISSIONER TVEITE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUEST FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE BY ED AND KRIS STEVENS, CASE NO.
CU 93-09, CITING STAFF'S MEMO AND THE SEVEN STANDARDS FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS:
1.
THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE BE NO CLOSER THAN
NEIGHBORING RESIDENCES.
175
FROM
FEET
.
.
.
Elk River Planning Commission Minutes
April 27, 1993
Page 6
2.
THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT EXCEED
1,400 SQUARE FEET.
3. THE STRUCTURE BE INSULATED FOR SOUND DEADENING.
COMMISSIONER KREGER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0.
8.
Variance Request on Lot Size By Moyer
Inc.,/Public Hearing, Case No. V 93-03
Weicht
&
Investment,
Stephen Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator, stated the applicant,
represented by John Weicht, is requesting an administrative subdivision
to divide a lot containing an existing duplex into two lots with a zero
lot line. The applicant is also requesting variances on lot width and
size for both lots they are proposing to create. Only the City Council
will review the administrative subdivision, however, the Planning
Commission will review the variance requests. Mr. Rohlf reviewed the
issues raised in staff's memo dated April 20, 1993.
Chairman Minton opened the public hearing.
There being no comments from the public, Chairman Minton closed the
public hearing.
Discussion among the Commission members ensued.
COMMISSIONER KREGER RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST BY
MOYER & WEICHT INVESTMENTS, INC., CASE NO. CU 93-03, CITING STAFF'S
MEMO DATED APRIL 20, 1993, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS:
1. LOT LINES BE CREATED IF THE STRUCTURES MEETS APPLICABLE BUILDING
CODES.
COMMISSIONER SPOTTS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0.
9. Preliminary Plat Review Request For The Plat of Bruce Addition By
Chris and Linda Bulow/Public Hearing, Case No. P 93-06
Stephen Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator,
applicants are requesting preliminary plat review of
development consisting of six duplexes (twelve units),
family lots, served by City sewer and water. Mr. Rohlf
issues raised in staff's memo dated April 20, 1993.
explained the
a residential
and two single
reviewed the
Chairman Minton opened the public hearing.
Chris Bulow,
stipulation #8
responded.
PO Box 506, Elk River, requested clarification of
in staff's memo dated April 20, 1993. Mr. Rohlf
There being no further comments from the public, Chairman Minton closed
the public hearing.
Elk River Planning Commission Minutes
April 27, 1993
Page 7
.
Commissioner Tveite stated stipulation #9 should include "the site be
seeded and maintained until self sufficient for erosion....."
Commissioner Eberley
density neighborhoods.
invited discussion regarding sidewalks in high
The Planning Commission discussed sidewalks.
COMMISSIONER KREGER RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BRUCE
ADDITION BY CHRIS AND LINDA BULOW, CASE NO. P 93-06, CITING STAFF'S
MEMO DATED APRIL 20, 1993, WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS:
1.
THE CITY ENGINEER DESIGNS THE SEWER AND
THE CITY ENGINEER APPROVE THE DRAINAGE
THE CITY ENGINEER INSPECTS THE SEWER,
IMPROVEMENTS.
WATER EXTENSIONS.
AND GRADING PLANS.
WATER, GRADING,
FURTHER THAT
LASTLY, THAT
AND DRAINAGE
2. THE COST OF SEWER, WATER, GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND DRIVES, AS ESTIMATED
BY THE CITY ENGINEER, BE SECURED BY A 100% LETTER OF CREDIT IN FAVOR OF
THE CITY TO ENSURE COMPLETION OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO RECORDING
THE PLAT.
3. A 25% WARRANTY BOND COVERS THE SEWER AND WATER EXTENSIONS FOR A ONE
YEAR PERIOD FOLLOWING ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE IMPROVEMENTS BY THE CITY.
4.
CITY APPROVAL OF THIS PLAT IS CONTINGENT UPON THE FOLLOWING OTHER
APPROVALS: MPCA FOR THE EXTENSION OF SEWER, CITY RESPONSIBILITY AND
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FOR THE EXTENSION OF WATER, CITY RESPONSIBILITY.
.
5. THE SETBACKS IN THE PLAT ARE 30' FRONT, 10' SIDE, AND 10' REAR, FOR THE
SINGLE FAMILY LOTS; AND 5 FOOT SIDE AND REAR FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
ON THE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. SETBACKS FOR THE DUPLEX LOTS ARE 5 FOOT ALL
SIDES, EXCEPT FOR THE COMMON WALL WHICH WOULD BE A ZERO LOT LINE.
6. PUBLICLY OWNED UTILITIES ARE PROTECTED BY EASEMENTS AND ACCOMMODATIONS
ARE MADE FOR THE EXTENSION OF UTILITY SERVICES THROUGH THE COMMON LOT
TO THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS WITHIN THE PLAT. FURTHER, THAT THE ELK RIVER
MUNICIPAL UTILITIES REVIEW THE PLAT AND EASEMENTS ARE ADDED, IF THEY
NEED THEM.
7. NO PARK DEDICATION FEES BE CHARGED.
8. SEWER, WATER, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE HAVE A ONE YEAR COMPLETION DATE AND
MUST BE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE WITHIN THE PLAT.
9. THE ENTIRE SITE BE SEEDED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL SELF SUFFICIENT FOR
EROSION CONTROL IN THE SAME CONSTRUCTION SEASON AS THE GRADING.
10. THE LOT SIZES AS PROPOSED IN THE PLAT ARE DEEMED ACCEPTABLE.
11. THE DEVELOPER REIMBURSE THE CITY FOR THE ESTIMATED COST FOR REVIEWING
THE PLAT PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT REVIEW.
. 12. THE STIPULATIONS OF APPROVAL ARE AGREED TO THROUGH A DEVELOPERS
AGREEMENT.
Elk River Planning commission Minutes
April 27, 1993
Page 8
4It 13. A DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS APPROVED BY STAFF PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL.
14. THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS COMFORTABLE WITH THE CHANGES TO THE DUPLEX
LOT SIZES PROPOSED BY THE DEVELOPER.
COMMISSIONER TVEITE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0.
10. Consider An Ordinance Amendment to Section 1008.14 (5) (j) "Length of
Dead-end Roads" by the City of Elk River/Public Hearing
Stephen Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator, briefed the Planning
Commission regarding the current ordinance and reviewed the issues
raised in staff's memo dated March 17, 1993.
Chairman Minton opened the public hearing.
There being no comments from the public, Chairman Minton closed the
public hearing.
Commissioner Eberley requested clarification of
versus cul-de-sac, and suggested staff be consistent
these terms.
the terms dead-end
with the use of
4It
Peter Beck, City Attorney, reviewed the proposed ordinance amendments
with the Planning commission. For clarification, Mr. Beck labeled the
amendments "A" (j. cul-de-sacs are undesirable) and "B". Discussion
ensued.
COMMISSIONER SPOTTS RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO
SECTION 1008.14 (5) (j) "LENGTH OF DEAD-END ROADS," AMENDMENT 93-B, BY
THE CITY OF ELK RIVER, PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSIONER TVEITE SECONDED
THE MOTION. THE MOTION TIED 3-3, CHAIRMAN MINTON, COMMISSIONERS SPOTTS
AND TVEITE WERE FOR THE MOTION WITH COMMISSIONERS EBERLEY, KREGER, AND
KUESTER AGAINST THE MOTION.
COMMISSIONER KREGER RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO
SECTION 1008.14 (5) (j) "LENGTH OF DEAD-END ROADS," AMENDMENT 93-A BY
THE CITY OF ELK RIVER, PUBLIC HEARING, WITH A MODIFICATION TO PARAGRAPH
(j) :
(j) Cul-de-sacs - cul-de-sac streets, permanently designed as such, can
be undesirable in terms of traffic, movement, emergency vehicle access,
school bus traffic, and snow plowing. (The remainder of this paragraph
remained the same)
COMMISSIONER EBERLEY SECONDED
COMMISSIONERS EBERLEY AND KREGER
MINTON, COMMISSIONERS KUESTER,
MOTION.
THE MOTION. THE MOTION FAILED 2-4.
WERE FOR THE MOTION, AND CHAIRMAN
SPOTTS, AND TVEITE WERE AGAINST THE
4It
It was the concensus of the commission that the maximum length of
dead-ends be increased to 700 feet measured to the center of the
circle, that longer cul-de-sacs be allowed under the criteria in the
.
.
.
Elk River Planning Commission Minutes
April 27, 1993
Page 9
proposed ordinance amendments without a variance, and that the City
accommodate the extension of dead-ends whenever possible.
11.
other Business
Commissioner Eberley requested suggestions/opinions regarding a policy
for attending public meetings. Discussion ensued. Peter Beck, City
Attorney, briefed the Commission regarding the Open Meeting Law,
however, he stated he knew of no law prohibiting the Planning
commission from attending public meetings. He did caution the
Commission regarding comments reflecting personal opinions. After some
discussion, the Planning Commission decided not to set a policy.
Gary Schmitz, Recycling Coordinator, advised the Planning commission of
a letter received from the Tri-County Solid Waste Management
Commission explaining a proposal by private refuse haulers to bypass
the refuse transfer station in st. Cloud and haul refuse to the RDF
plant. If this proposal is passed, it would increase truck traffic
from 6-8 semi trucks to 50-60 smaller refuse trucks. The City will be
drafting a letter to the Tri-County Solid Waste Commission detailing
their concerns.
Gary Schmitz, Recycling Coordinator, informed the Planning Commission
of the upcoming interview process for the City Planner. Mr. Schmitz
informed the Commission that the City Council has invited one Planning
Commission member to attend the interview process. Interviews are
tentatively scheduled for May 6, 1993, sometime after lunch. More
information would be presented at a later date.
12.
Adjournment
There being no further business, COMMISSIONER TVEITE MOVED
THE MEETING. COMMISSIONER KREGER SECONDED THE MOTION.
CARRIED 6-0.
TO ADJOURN
THE MOTION
The meeting of the Elk River Planning Commission adjourned at approximately
10:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
~~ In J'Mrnli&
Catherine M. Schmidt
Recording Secretary