Loading...
08-28-1990 PC MIN 'e . e MINUTES OF THE ELK RIVER PLANNING COMMISSION HELD AT THE ELK RIVER PUBLIC LIBRARY TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 Members Present: Chairman Kimball, Commissioners Eberley, Schroeder, Bischoff, and VanValkenburg Members Absent: Commissioners Johnson and Nadeau Staff Present: Janelle Szklarski, Zoning Assistant; Gary Schmitz, Zoning Assistant, Tim Keane, City Attorney, and Pat Klaers, City Administrator 1. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the meeting of the Elk River Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Kimball at 7:00 p.m. 2. Consider 8/28/90 Plannin~ Commission A~enda COMMISSIONER EBERLEY MOVED TO ADD THE 8/21/90 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES TO THE AGENDA. COMMISSIONER VANVALKENBURG SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. COMMISSIONER EBERLEY MOVED TO APPROVE THE 8/28/90 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AS AMENDED. COMMISSIONER BISCHOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. COMMISSIONER EBERLEY MOVED TO APPROVE THE 8/21/90 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES. COMMISSIONER SCHROEDER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 3. Consider 7/24/90 Plannin~ Commission Minutes COMMISSIONER EBERLEY MOVED TO APPROVE THE 7/24/90 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES. COMMISSIONER VANVALKENBURG SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 4. Plannin~ Commission Representative to Attend 9/17/90 City Council Meetin~ . It was indicated that Chairman Kimball and Commissioner Bischoff would attend the 9/17/90 City Council meeting. COMMISSIONER EBERLEY MOVED TO ACCEPT THE CALENDAR FOR THE 9/17/90 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. COMMISSIONER VANVALKENBURG SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. At this time Chairman Kimball welcomed the two new commissioners, Rob VanValkenburg and Robert Bischoff. Chairman Kimball explained that the meeting procedure would be video taped. 5. Consider Conditional Use Permit (Temporary Trailer) by Richard Vadey/P.H. ie . . Planning Commission Minutes August 28, 1990 Page 2 Janelle Szklarski, Zoning Assistant, explained that Richard Vagley is requesting a condi tional use permi t to allow a temporary trailer as a residential dwelling. The 40 ft. fifth wheel trailer will accommodate two people. Staff is recommending approval of this request for 6 months. Mr. Vagley was present to answer any concerns the commission had. Chairman Kimball reviewed the requirements for a conditional use permit and the procedure for a public hearing. Chairman Kimball opened the public hearing. There being no one for or against the request, Chairman Kimball closed the public hearing. COMMISSIONER EBERLEY MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A TEMPORARY TRAILER AS A RESIDENTIAL DWELLING BASED ON THE SEVEN STANDARDS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. ALSO, THAT THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE STIPULATIONS AS OUTLINED IN STAFF'S MEMO DATED 8/17/90. COMMISSIONER VANVALKENBURG SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 6. Consider Conditional Use Permit (New Clubhouse and Remodelin~ Pro ShOD) by Elk River Country Club/P.H. Gary Schmitz, Zoning Assistant, stated that the applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and site plan review for a new clubhouse and remodeling addition of the existing pro shop. Mr. Schmitz indicated that the existing clubhouse will be demolished to make room for the new one. He explained that the City Council on 11/20/89, made an interpretation that this type of activity would constitute an expansion of a conditional use, and that locker rooms, showers, and dining facili ties. could be considered as an accessory use to a golf course clubhouse. Mr. Schmitz reviewed the considerations relating to the proposed operation as stated in his memo. Chairman Kimball opened the public hearing. Doug Moe was present and showed a site plan of their request. Mr. Moe was requesting that they have the option to pave the road at a later date if they should be over budget. Tim Keane, City Attorney, stated that the Planning Commission should consider precedence if they waive the pavement request completely. Commissioner Schroeder asked if it was appropriate for the commission to grant them a time extension. Chairman Kimball stated that under the terms of a conditional use permit the applicant would have two years from the issuance of a permit to get the road blacktopped, and with that in mind, he would ask the Council not to grant an extension of time. Ms. Szklarski stated that the commission might add that the permit be reviewed in two years as one of the stipulations. Commissioner Eberley stated that she was not opposed to an extension, but would be against changing the standards that have been set forth for the City. COMMISSIONER EBERLEY MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY THE ELK RIVER COUNTRY CLUB SITING STAFF'S COMMENTS ON THE SEVEN STANDARDS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BASED ON ~. e e - .e Planning Commission Minutes August 28, 1990 Page 3 THE STIPULATIONS AS OUTLINED IN STAFF'S MEMO DATED 8/17/90 WITH THE ADDITIONAL STIPULATION THAT THE PERMIT BE REVIEWED IN TWO YEARS. COMMISSIONER BISCHOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 7. Site Plan Review (Permanent Slab for Green House) by Pamida Janelle Szklarski, Zoning Assistant, stated that the applicant (Dennis Burkstrand) is requesting site plan review for Pamida to allow expansion of their greenhouse area. Pamida lies within a PUD therefore any modification to the site needs to go through a site plan review by the Planning Commission and City Council. Staff is recommending approval of the request. Mr. Burkstrand explained their reason for the request is to pick up additional parking spaces. He indicated that they would use this concrete slab to construct a 24' by 50' greenhouse addition for 6 weeks of the year. The construction of this greenhouse would be more of a convenience for the customers and also provide security for the store. COMMISSIONER EBERELY MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN REVIEW AS PRESENTED BY PAMIDA INC. BASED ON THE FINDINGS THAT THE OPERATION WOULD IMPROVE THE TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND SECURITY THAT IS NEEDED FOR THE OPERATION OF THE BUSINESS WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1. THAT PAMIDA OBTAIN BUILDING PERMITS EACH TIME THE GREEN HOUSE IS TO BE ERECTED. 2. THAT THE GATES ON THE FENCES ARE TO REMAIN OPEN DURING BUSINESS HOURS. 3. THAT THE GREENHOUSE KEEP THE SAME HOURS AS THE STORE. COMMISSIONER VANVALKENBURG SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. Commissioner Eberley indicated that every effort should be made to replace damaged foliage in keeping with spirit of the new landscape ordinance. 8. Consider Variance (11 ft. Encroachment on 20 ft. Side Yard Setback to Accommodate a House) by SDrin~er Construction/P.H. Janelle Szklarski, Zoning Assistant, stated that Springer Construction is requesting a variance for a house which has already been constructed. She indicated that at the time the building permit was pulled, the site plan that was submitted to staff showed the proper setbacks, however, Springer Construction inadvertently located a pin (iron) that was used to mark the curve of Gary Street instead of the pin that marked the southeast corner of Lot 7. Staff is recommending approval of this request as staff feels they meet the five standards for granting a variance. Chairman Kimball opened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes August 28, 1990 Page 4 . Dave Harmonick - 21146 York Street NW (owner of Lot 8) questioned the location of the driveway. Mr. Harmonick felt that the portion of the driveway which encroaches on his property should be removed. Ms. Szklarski stated that the driveway does encroach slightly on Mr. Harmonick's property. She questioned if the City could require that portion of the driveway to be removed. Mr. Harmonick further requested that there be an additional stipulation that no permanent or temporary structures be erected along the south side of the structure other than landscaping. This would require the removal of two kennels that are on the south side. Tim Keane, City Attorney stated that it should be clearly stated that this variance does not constitute the City's blessing of the driveway encroachment on Lot 8. This would be a private matter between the two lot owners which is not covered by this variance. Ms. Sue Springer stated that the survey that was done for the new home on the property shows that the driveway is encroaching .08 feet on Lot 8. They had confronted the builder and he did not think this would be a problem. She further indicated that the two dog kennels on the south side are being removed. Chairman Kimball closed the public hearing. . COMMISSIONER SCHROEDER MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE BY SPRINGER CONSTRUCTION TO ALLOW, AN 11 FT. ENCROACHMENT ON THE 20 FT. SIDE YARD SETBACK TO ACCOMMODATE A HOUSE SITING THE FIVE STANDARDS AS OUTLINED IN STAFF'S MEMO TO INCLUDE THE STATEMENT GIVEN BY THE CITY ATTORNEY THAT THE CITY DOESN'T GIVE APPROVAL AS FAR AS THE DRIVEWAY IS CONCERNED REGARDING THIS VARIANCE. ALSO, THAT THE HOUSE ON LOT 7 SHOULD NOT HAVE PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY STRUCTURES BUILT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE LOT. COMMISSIONER BISCHOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 9. Consider Conditional Use Permit (Home Occupation - Phone Answering Service) by Gemini Communications/P.H. Janelle Szklarski, Zoning Assistant, stated that Paul Ouellette of 19741 Ulysses Street NW is requesting a condi tional use permit to operate a home occupation. The conditional use permit would allow the applicant to operate a telephone answering service from his home. Ms. Szklarski stated that Mr. Ouellette is currently operating the business out of his garage. Ms. Szklarski stated one of the concerns staff has with this proposal is the number of employees. In the past, it has been the Planning Commission and City Council's tendency to allow few if any outside employees. Chairman Kimball opened the public hearing. i. Mr. Ouellette explained his request indicating that they have a total of eight outside employees, four of which are family. He indicated two of the family members live across the street and the other two live in Anoka. Mr. Ouellette was requesting that the hours of operation be expanded to better accommodate his business. Planning Commission Minutes August 28, 1990 Page 5 it Mr. Neil Moody - 10113 213th Avenue NW asked about the location of Mr. Ouellette proposal and the lot sizes. Chairman Kimball reviewed a letter from Ronald Harrington of 19728 Ulysses Avenue opposing the request because of the additional traffic, noise and the size of the business in a residential zone. Chairman Kimball asked that Mr. Harrington's letter be made part of the public record. Chairman Kimball stated that he had visited the site earlier, and had talked to Mr. Harrington. Chairman Kimball closed the public hearing. Chairman Kimball indicated that he was concerned about setting a precedence with this request. He also stated that about three years ago Ann's Beauty Shop was before the commission requesting addi tional employees to help her with her business. The concern at that time was that a residential neighborhood is for residences and not for commerical business. Chairman Kimball stated that normally eleven people would be too many for a home occupation such as the case of Ann's Beauty Shop, as she also has customers that come in. Mr. Ouellette however, doesn't have any customer traffic. He indicated that if he were to approve this request it would be for the following reasons: outside employees consist mostly of family members, and the business does not generate a lot of outside traffic. e Commissioner Bischoff stated that he had visited the site earlier. He would like to see outside employees restricted. Tim Keane, City Attorney, stated that this is a business that probably 10 years ago would not have been technically feasible. Mr. Keane indicated that consideration should be given to encourage home occupations in which people are able to be in a working relationship with their families. He stated that the Planning Commission should balance all the issues here as far as traffic, outside customers, hours of operation etc. Commissioner Eberley felt it was time to review the standards for home occupation, as to whether they can fit within the neighborhood. She stated that everything we read about the future indicates that more and more people will work out of their homes because of transportation costs and technology capabilities. Commissioner Schroeder stated that he felt this request was a totally different request than that of the beauty operation. He was in agreement with Commissioner Eberley that the Commission should look at this request as part of the future growth. Commissioner Schroeder stated that he would be in favor of the request but would like to see a one year time frame limitation as one of the stipulations, so Mr. Ouellette could stay in business. . Mr. Keane stated that if the Planning Commission were to come to the conclusion that the standards are met, the Commission may put a reasonable stipulation as far as the time frame. . /. :. Planning Commission Minutes August 28, 1990 Page 6 Commissioner VanValkenburg stated that he was also concerned about setting a precedence. He asked at what point does a home occupation switch from residential to commerical. Commissioner VanValkenburg felt that some sort of time frame limit should be set. Chairman Kimball requested that home occupations be added to the agenda for discussion at the joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission on September 13, 1990. COMMISSIONER EBERLEY MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST BY PAUL OUELLETTE (GEMINI COMMUNICATIONS) SITING STAFF'S COMMENTS ON THE FIVE STANDARDS FOR A HOME OCCUPATION AND SITING THE SEVEN STANDARDS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. Chairman Kimball stated that he would like to see the following findings of fact added to the motion: the business is predominantly staffed with family members with very few outside members; the business does not generate any more traffic and noise than what is generated in a normal residential neighborhood; that the business is run in an extremely efficient manner and that the signage is kept to a minimal. Commissioner Eberley was in disagreement with Chairman Kimball's finding that family members should be supported as a finding of fact as the seven standards for a conditional use permit do not address family versus non-family, but rather they address resident versus non-resident employees. Chairman Kimball felt that this finding was supported by staff's memo. COMMISSIONER EBERLEY CONTINUED HER MOTION TO RECOMMEND THAT THE APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1. THE GARAGE SHALL MAINTAIN ONE PARKING STALL FOR THE SOLE USE OF A VEHICLE. 2. THAT ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED TO THE BUSINESS BE KEPT IN THE CONFINES OF THE HOUSE AND/OR GARAGE. 3. THAT THE APPLICANT IS PERMITTED ONE SIGN NOT TO EXCEED 2 SQ. FT. IN AREA AND SHALL BE MOUNTED FLAT ON THE OUTSIDE WALL OF THE BUILDING. 4. THAT THE HOURS OF OPERATION BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE AT 24 HOURS A DAY, BUT THAT THE NON-RESIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES BE RESTRICTED TO HOURS THAT ARE BETWEEN 7:00 A.M. AND 8:00 P.M. 5. THAT ANY STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS TO THE HOUSE OR. THE GARAGE TO ACCOMMODATE THIS BUSINESS SHALL REQUIRE A BUILDING PERMIT. 6. THAT THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SHALL BE VALID FOR ONE YEAR. AT THAT TIME THE APPLICANT MUST RENEW HIS PERMIT. COMMISSIONER SCHROEDER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. '. . - e Planning Commission Minutes August 28, 1990 Page 7 10. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY SUBDIVISION IDENTIFICATION SIGN BY TERRY LEE REALTY AND HOMES Janelle Szklarski, Zoning Assistant, stated that Terry Lee Douglas is requesting an extension to the time period allowed for a temporary subdivision sign. She further indicated that the applicant has revised his request to include an extension for a model home as well as the sign. Ms. Szklarski stated that the applicant was not present for this issue. It was the general consensus of the Commission that model home and the signage request were two separate issues and should be dealt with in that manner. The Commission indicated they would be acting only on the one issue (signage). Mr. Douglas would have to come in with a separate request for the model home extension. COMMISSIONER BISCHOFF MOVED TO APPROVE THE SIGNAGE EXTENSION FOR TERRY LEE REALTY AND HOMES FOR A PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS. COMMISSIONER EBERLEY SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 11. Amendments to City of Elk River Comorehensive Plan by the City of Elk River/P.H. A. PATHWAY PLAN Pat Klaers, City Administrator stated that the City has discussed the need for a City wide sidewalk policy for a number of years. Mr. Klaers stated that the City's insurance agent suggested that something be done with the sidewalks as to eliminate the liability. He indicated that the City Engineer, Terry Maurer, has drafted a pathway and sidewalk plan for the City to review. Mr. Klaers explained the difference between a pathway and sidewalk; a pathway is considered a major "people mover" throughout the community; sidewalks would be considered more residential to serving the surrounding area. Mr. Klaers stated one of the concerns of the City was how the sidewalks and the pathways would be financed. He stated that staff has concurred with the recommendation of the City Engineer that the cost of the sidewalks be split 50/50 with the City and the property owner. At this time, Mr. Klaers showed the proposed City sidewalk/pathway plan map drafted by Terry Maurer, City Engineer. Mr. Klaers explained that the City Attorney has recommended that in order for the plan and map to be enforced it should be incorporated into the City's Comprehensive Plan. He indicated he was seeking Planning Commission and public input on this request. Chairman Kimball opened the public hearing. Cecelia Scheel of 10271 213th Avenue was opposed to the request as she did not want her property taken away from her for a park. She further indicated that if a trail system was allowed to go through her property it would go through her front door. Planning Commission Minutes August 28, 1990 Page 8 --- e Jeff Scheel was also concerned with the pathway running through their property. He questioned if there would be restrictions as to what they could do with their property because of the park plan. Tim Keane explained the difference between a Comprehensive Plan and an official map. He stated that the designation of a land use such as a park, in the Comprehensive Plan is to be used as a guide and this does not in any way inhibit a property owner's rights to the use of their property. Steve Kreger questioned if his mother decides to sell her property in the near future, does this plan tell future buyers that the Ci ty has identified this area for purchase in the distant future? He indicated this will scare future buyers away which will decrease the value of her property. He felt that she would not get adequate compensation from the City for her property. Mr. Kreger stated that for personal reasons he would not like to see her land designated as a park. Jeff Scheel stated that he agrees that the City has to plan for the future of Elk River. There are people like the Kregers who enjoy their place in the country, who will have to accommodate others because of the plan that the Planning Commission is considering. Mr. Scheel questioned what rights the property owners have to stop this process. e Tim Keane, City Attorney, addressed his concern stating that there will be a public hearing with the City Council on September 17 where interested property owners or affected property owners have an opportunity to voice their opinion or to offer written correspondence. He indicated that the plan is putting owners on long term notice that this is an area that has been intended for purchase in the distant future. Mrs. Maria Moody indicated she was opposed to the plan as they moved out in the country to get away from people. She questioned if the City would buy their property at real market value. Tim Keane, City Attorney, stated that eminent domain settlements are generally acquired for greater than the fair market value. . Jane Kreger was opposed to the plan as she was concerned with people walking around her property and she thought it would be difficult to keep people away from her house. She stated that they were not notified of the public hearing. Pat Klaers, City Administrator, stated that individual property owners are not notified individually because it is a City wide plan. . Commissioner Schroeder stated that he understood the public's fears. He explained that at one time, Sherburne County Wildlife Refuge was all privately owned. The owners were forced to sell because it was decided to make that land into a national refuge. He indicated there is no guarantee that one's property is going to be protected forever. Pat Klaers, City Administrator stated that by identifying the property on the map, the City is notifying the public that when the property . e . Planning Commission Minutes August 28, 1990 Page 9 owner is willing to sell, the City would like to be considered as a potential buyer. Mr. Klaers reviewed the goals and objectives of the master park plan. He indicated that the priorities of the plan follow the community survey that was conducted in December 1989, by Decision Resources Ltd. Mr. Klaers stated that the City has the Hillside and Woodland Trails Park Plans as well as a copy of the Master Park Plan available at City Hall. Chairman Kimball closed the public hearing. COMMISSIONER EBERELY MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE PATHWAY PLAN AND TO INCORPORATE IT INTO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN. COMMISSIONER BISCHOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. B. MASTER PARK PLAN Chairman Kimball opened the public hearing. The master park plan was discussed during the discussion of the Pathway Plan. Chairman Kimball closed the public hearing. COMMISSIONER EBERELY MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE ELK RIVER PARK AND RECREATION PLAN AS PREPARED BY THE ELK RIVER PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION AND TO INCORPORATE IT INTO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN. COMMISSIONER BISCHOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. A ten minutes recess was taken at this time. C. FOCUS AREA STUDIES Chairman Kimball opened the public hearing. Janelle Szklarski, Zoning Assistant, stated that the City has just received the final draft of the focus area studies. Ms. Szklarski indicated that the text needs to be officially adopted as an addendum to the City's Growth Management Plan. Chairman Kimball closed the public hearing. COMMISSIONER EBERLEY MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE FOCUS AREA STUDIES IN FINAL DRAFT AND TO INCORPORATE THE TEXT INTO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN. COMMISSIONER SCHROEDER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. D. MISSION STATEMENT Chairman Kimball opened the public hearing. There being no one for or against the request, Chairman Kimball closed the public hearing. COMMISSIONER SCHROEDER MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE MISSION STATEMENT AND TO INCORPORATE IT INTO THE GROWTH e e iA '. Planning Commission Minutes August 28, 1990 Page 10 MANAGEMENT PLAN. COMMISSIONER BISCHOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 12. Ordinance Amendments Section 900.08 {Definitions)Public Hearin~ Janelle Szklarski, Zoning Assistant, stated that there are several definitions in the Elk River Code of Ordinances which either need to be added or modified. Tim Keane, City Attorney explained the terms for Governmental Building and Facility and Governmental Offices. Chairman Kimball opened the public hearing. No one appeared for or against the request, Chairman Kimball closed the public hearing. COMMISSIONER EBERLEY MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO SECTION 900.08 TITLED "DEFINITIONS" AS PROPOSED IN STAFF'S OUTLINE OF 8/20/90 AND THE DEFINITIONS AS PROPOSED IN TIM KEANE'S LETTER DATED 8/27/90. COMMISSIONER VANVALKENBURG SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. 13. Plannin~ Commission Update A - MOBILE WORKSHOP (9/18/90) - Chairman Kimball asked the Commission if they had any additional items to add to the Mobile Workshop agenda. Chairman Kimball stated that Conteck would be discussed if they were in operation. He indicated that Sherri Borquist would be present to identify some weed sites. B - MODEL WEED ORDINANCE - There was no discussion on the model weed ordinance. C - JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING (9/13/90) - It was the general consensus of the Commission that they would like to discuss Home Occupations and Hohlan' s Mobile Home Park at the joint meeting. Arlon Fuchs indicated that he would like to see some tests done to determine what is being burned in County Market's incinerator. 14. Adjournment There being no further business, COMMISSIONER EBERLEY MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. COMMISSIONER VANVALKENBURG SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. The meeting of the Elk River Planning Commission adjourned at approximately 10:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, SAdJcfMJ t ln~ Sharon Maue Recording Secretary