08-10-1988 PC MIN
.
.
.
MINY~~ ~, TKI ILK RIVER PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
HELD AT THE ELK RIVER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
AUGUST 10. 1988
Members Present:
Commissioners Johnson, Fuchs, Olsen, Kimball
Morton, and Schroeder
Members Absent:
Chairman Kropuenske
Staff Present:
Steve Rohlf, Building & Zoning Administrator,
Greg Korstad, City Attorney and John Lickner,
Environmental Consultant from Liesch & Associates
1.
to due call and notice thereof, Vice Chairman Kimball called the
of the Elk River Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m.
Pursant
meeting
2. Consider Zone Change, Conditional Use Permit and License Request by Elk
River Landfill/P.H.
Vice Chairman Kimball asked Greg Korstad, City Attorney to provide
background information on the requests by the landfill.
Greg Korstad explained the issues being considered. The landfill was
requesting a zone change from A-l/Agricultural to Solid Waste Overlay
District. The conditional use permit allows the City to set conditions on
an operation to assure its compatibility with surrounding land uses. The
reason for the licensing is that it adds flexibility to keep current with
changing technology that the conditional use permit does not.
Mr. Korstad further explained the documents (Conditional Use Permit and
Solid Waste Facility License). These documents address each of the issues
that are required in the Solid Waste Ordinance. He further explained the
operation of the landfill as it has existed previously and how it will be
regulated.
Mr. Jim Church of Lavonia Township questioned why the CUP and license
agreement documents were not availabe at the last meeting and was not
aware that they were avilable now. He felt he did not have sufficient
time to read this now.
Greg Korstad reviewed the issues regarding the conditional use permit
agreement.
Vice Chairman Kimball continued the public hearing from last meeting and
noted the public could respond to questions at this time.
A number of residents were concerned about contamination of their wells
and what was being done about this.
Marlene Hentges lives near the landfill and was concerned
contamination of their wells.
about
.
.
.
Page 2
Planning Commission Minutes
8/10/88
Gene Thompson resident of Elk River asked if there were any guarantee our
water is not being contaminated. I don't feel safe drinking my own
water.
Greg Korstad addressed their concerns. Mr. Korstad explained montitoring
wells were reviewed by our environmental consultants, Leisch and
Associates on behalf of the City. Information is compiled and
recommendation made by the City and approved and tested by the MPCA
(Minnesota Pollution Control Agency).
John Cannon of Donohue and Associates also addressed the issue by
explaining about the monitoring wells. Contamination was found along west
area of site in small amounts such as metals, degreasers, aerosol sprays
etc. He further explained sampling was done within a perimeter of 3,000
ft. of landfill. The City's permits expanded surface water testing more
than what is required from the MPCA. Sampling on the site has to be done
three times a year on a continuing basis and sent to the MPCA.
Gene Thompson was concerned about the ash and what goes into the
landfill.
The subject of ash was discussed and
people. Vice Chairman Kimball indicated
this current license request.
was a concern of a number of
ash disposal was not part of
Lengthy discussion was held regarding the zoning of the three parcels;
south, middle and north parcel.
Chris Kreger explained the reason they wanted all three parcels rezoned.
They have uses planned for all that property and do not want to go
through the time and expense of rezoning again. He felt there was a
misundestanding as far as zoning was concerned
Tim Thorton, Landfill Attorney, said it was all or nothing, package
deal or no deal. Unless the zone change was for all parcels they would
withdraw their request. He further stated this ordinace and CUP went
beyond the MPCA regulations. He felt the City could not take away part of
our deal without giving something back.
The question of rezoning land proposed to be owned by the Landfill in the
future came up. Stephen Rohlf, B & Z Administrator, explained that the
property owner must be present to recommend a zone change. You cannot
petition for a zone change on property you do not own and has not been
advertized. He felt there would be no problem getting rezoning in the
future if used for recycling area. He would go along with the zoning on
the north and middle parcel. Staff is opposed to the southern most
parcel being rezoned at this time. That parcel is a long narrow strip of
land with inadequate depth to serve for landfill purposes.
Page 3
.
Planning Commission Minutes
8/10/88
Commissioner Fuchs questioned if stipulations could be put on a zone
change. Greg Korstad indicated there could be no stipulations put on a
zone change. Commissioner Fuchs indicated he had a great concern
regarding the landfill. We have not been able to have control and we do
now with the conditional use permit and license.
Greg Korstad. City Attorney explained the City is trying to regulate an
existing business - needs to be cleaned up. If not cleaned up it could
be a great expense to the public and county.
Tim Thorton felt this was a long
involved. He would like to see this
Zoning was an absolute requirement.
Chris Kreger cares about this town and
process here and a lot of money
settled and reach some compromise.
Were trying to work with the City.
lives here.
Marlene Hentges
buil t. Stephen
major highway.
was concerned about traffic if a recycling plant was
Rohlf felt there should be no problem as it was off a
.
Vice Chairman Kimball noted that the Planning Commissioner's role is to
make recommendations only and not to make a final decision. That is up
to the City Council. The City is attempting to place some regulations
where there is none now.
Commissioner Schroeder was against the south parcel being rezoned
because of statement made by Mr. Thorton. all or none.
Commissioner Olson was opposed to south parcel being rezoned but could
compromise with north and middle.
Commissioner Kimball stated in fairness to the Landfill he appreciated
staff's memo regarding both con and pro (zone change) without
recommendation for rezoning the northern two parcels.
COMMISSIONER FUCHS MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL or THE
REZONING OF THE MIDDLE AND NORTH PARCEL TO A SOLID WASTE OVERLAY DISTRICT
AS BEING PRESENTLY OWNED AND OPERATED BY CHRI S KREGER BUT NOT THE SOUTH
PARCEL. COMMISSIONER OLSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0.
COMMISSIONER OLSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NORTHERN PARCEL ONLY WITH
THE STIPULATIONS AS OULlNED IN THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH THE
FOLLOWING CHANGES:
1. PAGE 11 (ITIM 15) "CHARGES AND rEES" DELETE LAST LINE AS THIS REFERS
TO THE LICENSE.
2.
PAGE 11
AND ADD
CONTACT."
(ITEM 16) "ON-SITE INSPECTION" DELETE WORDS "CHRIS KREGER"
"LANDFILL SHALL PROVIDE TO THE CITY NAME OF PERSON TO
.
3. THAT SPECIFIC TIME DEADLINES BE ESTABLISHED FOR COMPLETING TaE WORK
I)IICIIIID IN SICTION 6. "HYDROGEOLOGIC REPORTS" SECOND PARAGRAPH.
COMMISSIONKR MORTON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0.
.
.
.
Page 4
Planning Commission Minutes
8/10/88
COMMISSIONER OLSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND SUPPORT OF THE SOLID WASTE
LICENSE. COMMISSIONER SCHROEDER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE VOTE PASSED
6-0.
Mr. Thorton made the comment that they reserve the right to withdraw
their application before this issue is in front of the City Council.
By being present at the meeting they are not conceding that the City has
any authority in imposing any restriction on the landfill.
There being no further business. COMMISSIONER FUCHS MOVED TO ADJOURN THE
MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER PLANNING COMMISSION. COMMISSIONER OLSON
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0.
The meeting of the Elk River Planning Commission adjourned at 10:20 p.m.
Jh!t/tUJ1JJ.wv
Sharon Maue
Recording Secretary
slm