Loading...
09-23-1986 PC MIN . Regular Meeting of the Elk River Planning Commission Held at the Elk River Public Library Tuesday, September 23, 1986 Members Present: Chairman Wilson, Commissioners Fuchs, Barrett Kropuenske, Temple and Morton Members Absent: None Staff Present: Stephen Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator 1. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Wilson. 2. Consideration of 9/23/86 Agenda. Item 12a. - Mobile sales office, and Item 12b. - Public Hearing date for RDF were added to the September 23, 1986 Planning Commission agenda. COMMISSIONER BARRETT COMMISSION AGENDA AS THE MOTION PASSED 6-0~ MOVED TO AMENDED . APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 23, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSIONER FUCHS SECONDED THE MOTION. 3. Consideration of 8/26/86 Planning Commission Minutes . COMMISSIONER FUCHS COMMISSION MINUTES. PASSED 6-0. MOVED TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 26, 1986 COMMISSIONER MORTON SECONDED THE MOTION. PLANNING THE MOTION 4. Conditional Use Permit for Ralph Allision/P.H. Mr. Ralph Allison of 21380 Vernon Street explained his request for an agricultural building to be used as a horse barn in a platted area. Mr. A11ision stated that the building would have 8 ft. walls and will look like a garage, with painted siding to match their existing residence. He further stated that the proposed building will be 190 ft. from one of his closest neighbors and 230 ft. from the other. Chairman opposition Wilson opened the of the request. public hearing. No one appeared for or in Chairman Wilson closed the public hearing. Commissioner Fuchs questioned Mr. Allison as to the number of acres he had, and also the number of horses he planned to have. Mr. Allison stated that he has 7.5 acres and has two horses at the present time, but is requesting that he be allowed two to four horses. COMMI SSIONER BARRETT MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE REQUEST AS PRESENTED BY MR. RALPH ALLISON FOR AN AGRICULTURAL BUILDING IN A PLATTED AREA. COMMISSIONER FUCHS . SECONDED THE MOTION. THEMOTION PASSED 6-0. . Page 2 Planning Commission Minutes .ptember 23, 1986 -------------------------- . . 5. Conditional Use Permit to Amend the Elk River Plaza PUD Agreement by Barthel Construction/P.H. Mr. Ken Barthel explained his request for an amendment to the Planned Unit Development Agreement to allow 6,000 sq. ft of office/retail space on Lot 3, Block 1 in place of the 60 units of multi-family housing approved previously. Mr. Barthel stated that he felt there was a greater need for the office/retail space than for the multi-family housing. Chairman Wilson reviewed the history of the PUD agreement, stating that Lot 3, Block 1 was originally designated for housing to create a blend between adjacent office/retail use and residential use. Chairman Wilson opened the public hearing. Mrs. Eleanor Holme of 502 5 1/2 Street, questioned whether or not it was a good idea to mix residential with office on the same parcel. Mr. Barthel stated that he originally requested the amendment to place one office building on the parcel along with some multi-family but since making the request, he also felt it would make more sense to change the entire parcel to office/retail. Commissioner Fuchs stated that he would like to see a one-story office building. Mr. Joe Crawford. homeowner across Gates Avenue from the proposed site, stated that he wants to see a smooth transition between the residential and commercial districts. Discussion was carried on regarding an office/retail structure versus a three story multi-family structure as a buffer between the commercial and residential areas. Building and Zoning Administrator Stephen Rohlf stated that the question the Planning Commission must address is whether or not the concerns are still valid which were addressed at the time the original PUD Agreement was entered into; that is, will the additional office/retail space have a negative impact on the downtown business district. Chairman Wilson expressed his concern that when additional office and retail space became available in the PUD's on Highway #169, businesses and offices that were downtown moved out. He stated that he was not sure there was a need for more office/retail space. as there currently is office space available for lease. Mr. Barthel stated that at the proposed site, outside the City. he wished to locate a business office for himself and also has a potential tenant interested from Chairman Wilson stated that he does not want the City to set a precedent of amending PUD Agreements. Page 3 Planning Commission Minutes .ptember 23, 1986 -------------------------- . . Mr. Rohlf stated that the PUD Agreement has already been amended once, so the precedent is not the issue at this time, and that he felt the request should be addressed based on the PUD as it appears now. Mr. Barthel stated that it was a very difficult task to plat a 40 acre PUD all at once, but that he felt they have been quite consistent in keeping with the original plan. Mr. Joe Crawford stated that he felt the City has gone overboard on the number of multi-family housing units. He further stated that mu1it-fami1y housing attracts short term residents and that the City should work on attracting long term residents. Mr. Crawford stated he would prefer to see a well done office/retail complex rather than more multi-family. Commission Morton referred to the July 12, 1982 minutes, which showed that it was originally requested that Lot 3, Block 1 be used for office/retail space. Commissioner Fuchs stated that he felt a nice one story office building would be a better buffer between the commercial/retail and residential districts, but that he had some concerns about allowing retail along with the office, as there were some types of retail that would not be desirable in that area. Mr. Rohlf suggested that the Planning Commission could recommend approval of the request and restrict the types of office/retail to be allowed. Chairman Wilson closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kropuenske stated that he was not so concerned about the precedent for changing PUD's. as a certain amount of flexibility is needed as situations and time changes. Commission Barrett stated he also felt it was necessary to allow some flexibility so that if there is a need to change, it could be done. COMMISSIONER FUCHS MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO AMEND THE ELK RIVER PLAZA PUD AGREEMENT TO ELIMINATE THE 60 UNITS OF MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FOR LOT 3, BLOCK 1, ELK RIVER PLAZA 2ND ADDITION, AND TO ALLOW IN PLACE OF THE MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING A MAXIMUM OF 16,000 SQUARE FEET OF SINGLE STORY OFFICE/RETAIL SPACE. WITH 20% GREEN AREA WITH THE FOLLOWING USES RESTRICTED FROM OPERATION AT THE SITE: (1) ALL NIGHT CONVENIENCE STORES (2) GAS SERVICE STATIONS (3) INDOOR AND OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL FACILITIES Page 4 Planning Commission Minutes .eptember 23, 1986 ---------------------------- (4) PARKING RAMPS (5) TAVERNS AND BARS (6) HOTELS (7) LAUNDROMATS (8) THEATERS (9) ADULT BOOK STORES (10) RESTAURANTS (11) DEPARTMENT STORES AND FURTHER THAT A SITE PLAN BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING COMMI SSION AND CITY COUNCIL FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. COMMISSIONER MORTION SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. 6. Variance Request by Chatteau Construction/P.H. Mr. Richard Carson of 17551 Round Lake Boulevard, Anoka explained that he has purchased a piece of property on the Mississippi River from Mr. Jerry Smith of White Dove Realty, and that in order to construct a house, he needs the approval of the Planning Commission and City Council for the following items: (1) A private road agreement for access to his property from the 153rd Avenue easement. . (2) A variance on the required elevation of the private road. (3) A variance for a 25 foot encroachment on the 100 foot setback required from the ordinary highwater mark from the Mississippi River. Mr. Carson stated that in order to meet the requirement of the Flood plain ordinance it would be necessary to raise 153rd at the point where it connects with his property. Mr. Carson further stated that the lot was not large enough to permit him to meet the required 100 foot setback. Mr. Rohlf stated that he recommended approval of the 25 foot encroachment, contingent upon approval by the DNR when they have had more time to review the proposal. Mr. Rohlf further stated that he recommended that a private road agreement be entered into, whereas the property owner would be responsible for maintenance of the road. He explained that the reason for the designation of the road evaluation is to help insure that emergency vehicles could access the property in flood conditions. Mr. Rohlf further explained that to raise the road to such a height would be unreasonable and would cause problems for neighbors whose access is also lower than the required elevation and suggested that a slightly lower elevation be allowed so that Mr. Carson's property access would match up with the 153rd road easement and be built up toward the location of the home site. . Chairman Wilson opened the public hearing. Page 5 Planning Commission Minutes .ptember 23. 1986 -------------------------- Ms. Debbie Johnson questioned whether or not the entire 153rd easement would be built up. Mr. Rohlf stated that the road would be built up just before it enters the property in question. Mr. Gerry Smith reviewed the past history of the property; stating that he was told by both the County and City that the lot was buildable. Mr. Rohlf stated that the first floor of the house must be one foot above the 100 year flood level and that the road can be no more than one foot below that mark unless a variance is granted by the City. Mr. Rohlf recommended that the road access be built up to 856 feet at the end of the street easement. Discussion was carried on regarding the berm on the riverbank side of the property and its value for flood control. Chairman Wilson closed the public hearing. Discussion was carried on whether it would be best to get the road up to City standards for acceptance or leave it as a private road with a private road agreement. . Commissioner Barrett questioned whether or not the City would accept the road easement as a City street. Mr. Carson stated that they would have to do the entire street to be accepted as a City street. Mr. Rohlf stated that the City maintenance currently ends at Mr. Burke's property for snow removal and grading. Commissioner Fuchs stated that in order for Mr. Carson's access to meet up with the current street he would need to extend his access approximately 25 feet from the end of his property line. Mr. Rohlf stated that he recommended a private road agreement. Mr. Carson stated that he was willing to enter into one. Mr. Rohlf stated that the new DNR requirement for a minimum of a 20,000 square foot lot did not apply to Mr. Carson's lot because it is an existing lot, not a new lot. COMMISSIONER FUCHS MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE FOLLOWING: 1. A REQUEST BY MR. RICHARD CARSON FOR A 25 FOOT ENCROACHMENT ON THE 100 FOOT SETBACK FROM THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK, CONTINGENT UPON THE DNR' S APPROVAL. . 2. THAT A PRIVATE ROAD AGREEMENT BE ENTERED INTO WITH MR. CARSON FOR THE ROAD ACCESS TO HIS PROPERTY. Page 6 Planning Commission Minutes .ptember 23. 1986 -------------------------- . . 3. THAT THE ROAD ACCESS BE BUILT TO AN ELEVATION OF 856 FT., WHICH IS 3.3 FEET BELOW THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK, TO CONNECT WITH THE END OF THE CITY'S MAINTENANCE AT MR. BURKE'S PROPERTY. 4. THAT THE ROAD ACCESS BE GRADED TO THE SATISFACTION OF MR. BURKE AT NO COST TO MR. BURKE. OR OTHER. ADJ ACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. 5. THAT THE 1ST FLOOR OF THE PROPOSED HOME BE BUILT ONE FOOT ABOVE THE 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION. 6. THAT THE BERM ON THE RIVER FRONT SIDE OF THE PROPERTY BE MAINTAINED. COMMISSIONER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. 7. Conditional Use Permit Request by Ronald G. Wright/P.H. Mr. Ronald Wright of 14311 N.W. 191st Street explained his request for a conditional use permit to allow enclosed warehouse storage in a C-3B zoned district. Mr. Wright explained that he is proposing to build it 30 ft. by 60 ft. all steel building to store equipment he buys and distributes to his customers. Mr. Wright stated that he is a machine tool distributor and handles large pieces of equipment. He further stated that he usually tries to ship directly from the source to the customer. but occassion1y needs to store a piece of equipment untill it can be picked up. Mr. Wright also stated that he currently runs an office with his wife at a rented facility in Rogers. Chairman Wilson opened the public hearing. Mr.Loren Stevenson, resident on Edison Street expressed his concerns regarding the looks of the proposed building and traffic which would be coming and going from the property. Mr. & Mrs. Stevenson stated that when they purchased their property, they inquired at City Hall about the uses allowed on the property behind theirs and were told warehouses and those types of uses were not allowed. Under that assumption they stated that they had placed their home at the back of their lot and now it appears their house will face the building proposed. Mr. Rohlf stated that if someone told him that warehouses were not allowed that was incorrect because the City's ordinance does allow them as a conditional use; and further that light industry is a principal use which could potentially be located adjacent to their property. Discussion was carried on regarding landscaping. screening, truck traffic, and hours of operation. COMMI SSIONER. TEMPLE MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL GRANT THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF MR. RONALD WRIGHT TO CONSTRUCT AN ALL STEEL 30 FT. BY 60 FT. WAREHOUSE WITH AN ATTACHED OFFICE STRUCTURE, IN THE PROPOSED C-3B ZONE, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Page 7 Planning Commission Minutes .ptember 23, 1986 --------------------------- tt. . 1. TRASH RECEPTICLES SHALL BE SCREENED. 2. ALL PARKING AND DRIVE AREAS BE HARDSURFACED. 3. ALL ARIAS GRADED FOR CONSTRUCTION BE LANDSCAPED WITH AT LEAST NATIVE GRASSES. 4. THAT ONE PARKING SPACE FOR EACH 400 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE BE PROVIDED AND ALSO ONE PARKING SPACE PER EMPLOYEE IN THE WAREHOUSE BE PROVIDED ON SITE. THAT TWO ROWS OF YOUNG CONIFER TREES THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE SOUTH SIDE OF THBLOT BE PROVIDED AS SCREENING. 6. THAT A 72 SQUARE FOOT FREE-STANDING SIGN NOT TO EXCEED 10 FT. IN HEIGHT BE PERMITTED. 7. THE NORMAL HOURS OF BUSINESS SHALL BE FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. 8. THAT THE CONDITIONAL USE SHALL BE REVIEWED IN ONE YEAR. COMMISSION FUCHS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. Sign Request by Coast to Coast Mr. Ken Barthel stated that the owner of Coast to Coast, Mr. John Plaisted. is requesting approval for an additional sign to be placed on the Coast to Coast building for an additional tenant to advertise his business. Mr. Barthel explained that the owner does not plan to use the entire building at the present time and wishes to temporarily rent out approximately 2,000 square feet of the 10,000 square feet for retail use, until they decide to expand at some point in the future. COMMI SSIONER BARRETT MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST OF THE OWNER OF THE COAST TO COAST STORE TO TEMPORARILY RENT OUT PART OF THE FACILITY FOR RETAIL USE, AND TO ALLOW AN ADDITIONAL SIGN TO BE PLACED ON THE MANSARD WITH A MAXIMUM SIZE OF 2 FT. BY 26 FT. COMMISSIONER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. 9. Conditional Use Permit for Sipes Service/P.H. Mr. Joseph Sipe was present to request a conditional use permit so that his station at 611 Highway #10 may become a conditioa1 use, and also, that he may be allowed to place a free-standing 46 ft. by 32 ft. canopy over the gas pumps. Mr. Sipe stated that he will be reconstructing the pump island closest to Highway #10 so that it will be parallel to the other pump island. He further stated that the canopy will be built to the specification set by the oil company and would have a minimum clearance of 13 feet. Page 8 Planning Commission Minutes ~eptember 23, 1986 ~----------------------------- Chairman Wilson opened the opposition of the request. public hearing. No one appeared for or in Chairman Wilson closed the public hearing. Discussion was carried on regarding terms of the conditional use and s ignage . Mr. Rohlf questioned Highway #10. Mr. sidewalk. what Sipe the setback of the canopy would be closest to stated that it will not go over the State's COMMI SSIONER FUCHS MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MR. JOSEPH SIPE OF SIPES SERVICE TO BE REVIEWED IN ONE YEAR, AND ALSO TO APPROVE THE PLACEMENT OF A CANOPY OVER THE GAS PUMPS NO LOWER THAN 12 FEET AND NOT TO EXCEED THE HEIGHT OF THE PRESENT BUILDING, AND THAT TWO ADDITIONAL SIGNS MAY BE PLACED ON THE CANOPY AND FURTHER THAT THE CITY SHALL ACCEPT THE PARKING AND THE INGRESS AND EGRESS OF THE PROPERTY AS SATISFACTORY ALTHOUGH IT IS LESS THAN THE PRESENT ORDINANCE REQUIRES IN CONSIDERATION OF THE UNUSUAL SIZE AND SHAPE OF MR. SIPES PROPERTY. COMMISSIONERKROPUENSKE SECONDDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. . Mr. Boelter questioned what process approval for a canopy for his service his business was also non-conforming conditional use process Mr. Sipe did, or canopy only and remain non-conforming if he would need to go through to get station. Mr. Rohlf explained that and would need to go through the he could ask for approval for the he so chose. 10. Site Plan Review for Multiple Principal Buildings on a Lot Harold Gramstad - Public Hearing Mr. Harold Gramstad of 19342 King Circle, explained that he was requesting site plan approval for the three mini storage buildings on Lot 5, Block 1 of McChesney Industrial Park. Mr. Gramstad stated that he would like to combine the two most easterly buildngs into one building. Mr. Gramstad stated that he must obtain approval from the State Board of Engineering to waive their requirement for the costly special structural engineering study required on buildings over a certain size, of which this building would be. If that approval is not granted, then he stated that he would go ahead with the three buildings. Chairman Wilson opened the public hearing. The owner of Tadson. Inc. in the McChesney Industrial Park, expressed his concern that the buildings be well maintained. Mr. Gramstad stated that the parking and drive areas will be blacktopped and the open areas will be seeded with grass. . Commissioner Temple stated that she felt there was a definite need for storage in the City. Page 9 Planning Commission Minutes .ptember 23 1986 -------------------------- Commissioner Fuchs expressed his concern with metal buildings. Mr. Gramstad stated that the buildings would have a colored baked-on finish on the sides and roof. Commissioner Fuchs questioned what the amount of green space would be. Mr. Gramstad stated that there would be ten to fifteen percent lot coverage in green space. COMMISSIONER MORTON MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF MR. HAROLD GRAMSTAD' S SITE PLAN FOR THREE (3) PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS ON LOT 5, BLOCK 1, MCCHESNEY INDUSTRIAL PARK, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. ALL PARKING AND DRIVE AREAS SHALL BE HARD SURFACED. B. ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH AT LEAST GRASS; AND FURTHER. AN ALLOWANCE SHALL BE MADE FOR THE COMBINING OF THE TWO EASTERN BUILDINGS PROPOSED INTO ONE BUILDING, CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL OF THE STATE BOARD OF ENGINEERING. COMMISSIONER BARRETT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. .11. Variance Request by Gerald Smith This item was cancelled. 12. Final Plat Review for M-Vale Subdivision-Public Hearing Mr. Dennis Taylor, surveyor for the developer, Mr. Gerry Smith, explained that the cul-de-sac has been eliminated from the plat by taking out approximately ten lots. He further explained that the main road through the plat has been curved toward the east. Mr. Bill Harju of the Sherburne County Soils Conservation Office explained concerns regarding the plat as outlined in his memo to the City dated September 23, 1986 attached to and part of these official minutes. Mr. Harju generally recommended percolation tests be done before design of septic systems and also. that it was imperative that the County ditch and tile system remain intact to help insure proper drainage. Mr. Harju recommended that the tile system be located on the individual lots so that people will not dig into it and cause damage. Mr. Smith stated that oversize culverts will be used throughout the plat to maintain proper drainage. Mr. Taylor stated that there are drainage easements throughout the plat on individual lots for the natural drainage to be undisturbed. . Mr. Harju recommended that some kind of an agreement be made between the developer and the County to maintain the ditch and tile system. Page 10 Planning Commission Minutes ~eptember 23, 1986 ~---------------------------- Mr. Smith stated that he is negotiating with Mr. Fritz regarding the access to his property. Mr. Rohlf attached Mr. Rohlf stated that the recommendations of the City Engineer are to his memo to the Planning Commission dated September 18, 1986. further stated that the County Engineering Department feels the access to County Road 32 is an improvement over the original design. new Discussion was carried on regarding the 166 foot Burlington Northern easement which previously was reduced to 66 feet except at Ogden, as explained in Mr. Rohlf's attached memorandum. Discussion was also carried on regarding the northern access as it relates to the sliver of Mr. Bronniches land in the County Road 32 easement, also explained in the memorandum. Chairman Wilson opened the public hearing. Mr. Phil adj acent the end property. Casperson, owner of a five acre parcel in the Peterson Addition, to the proposed plat, expressed his concern for the cul-de-sac at of 196th Avenue and also the drainage area to the north of his . It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the cul-de-sac be taken down to the standard width for a tarred road, not the cul-de-sac width, and 66 foot easement, and also that an easement be shown on the lot north of Mr. Casperson's property for the drainage contour to be left undisturbed. Discussion was carried on regarding the road construction and request of the developer to have building permits issued before the road base was completed and class 5 installed. Mr. Rohlf recommended that since it is the City's policy not to issue permits for plats before the roads are class fived and ready for tarring, that no permits be issued until this is completed all the way through the plat up to County Road #32. Further discussion was carried on regarding the County ditch and tile system. Mr. Rohlf stated that he will meet with the developer and County Engineer to review the system. Chairman Wilson closed the public hearing. COMMISSIONER FINAL PLAT CONDITIONS: FUCHS MOVED FOR M-VALE TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE SUBDIVISION AS PRESENTED WITH THE FOLLOWING 1. THAT THE URBAN RUN OFF, ERROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK IS USED AS THE SPECIFICATIONS TO CONTROL ERROSION WITHIN THIS PLAT. . 2. THAT THE DEVELOPER PAYS FOR THE CONNECTIONS FROM THIS PLAT TO THE EXISTING 196TH AVENUE AND TO OGDEN STREET AND ALSO THAT THE CUL-DE-SAC ON THE EASTERN END OF 196TH AVENUE IN' THE PETERSON ADDITION BE NARROWED SO TO BE THE SAME WIDTH AS THE ROAD. Page 11 Planning Commission Minutes .eptember 23, 1986 --------------------------- 3. THAT THE CITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE FOLLOWED WHEN BUILDING THE ROADS IN THIS PLAT. 'ALSO THAT THE ROADS BE DESIGNED TO A 40MPH DESIGN SPEED AND AN URBAN SECTION. 4. THill 192 1/2 AVENUE IS IMPROVED PRIOR TO WINTER BECAUSE THAT IS CURRENTLY THE ACCESS FOR ONE HOME IN THAT AREA. ; . THAT THill CONCERNS ADDRESSED IN THE LETTER FROM THE CITY ENGINEER AND ANY ADDITIONAL CONCERNS THE ENGINEER MAY HAVE AFTER REVIEWING THE PLAT BE ADDRESSED. 6. THAT NO BUILDING PERMITS BE PERMITTED IN THIS PLAT UNTIL THE ROADS HAVE AT LEAST CLASS 5 ON THEM AND THAT' ALL THAT REMAINS TO DO ON THE ROAD IS TARRING. 7. THAT PRIOR TO THE PLAT BEING RECORDED, A DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO, PARK DEDICATION IS PAID AND A TITLE OPINION AD RES SED TO THE CITY OF ELK RIVER IS REVIEWED AND ACCEPTED BY DAVE SELLERGREN. THE CITY'S ATTORNEY. . 8. THE DEVELOPER SHALL FURNISH THE CITY WITH ONE 8 1/2 BY 11 INCH COpy OF THE PLAT, THE NECESSARY HARDSHELLS AND MYLAR COPIES OF THE PLAT, AND TWO PAPER COPIES OF THE PLAT. 9. ALL FEES ARE PAID PRIOR TO THE COUNCIL HEARING FINAL PLAT REVIEW. 10. DRAIN TILE SHALL BE NOTED ON PLAT AND REVIEWED BY COUNTY ENGINEER. 11. PERCOLATION TEST SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN. COMMISSIONER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. 12a.Mobile Sales Office Commissioner Fuchs asked Mr. Rohlf to check on a complaint of a mobile sales office to sell lots in the Deerfield 3rd Addition set up off of Elk Hills Drive by Christian Realty. 12b.Public Hearing Date for RDF Tentative dates of October 21st and 22nd were discussed for the Planning Commission to act on the proposed RDF facility. Mr. Rohlf stated that he would get back to the Planning Commission Members with a final date. COMMISSIONER BARRETT MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. C<JtMISSIOWI FUCHS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. . Page 12 Planning Commission Minutes ~eptember 23. 1986 ~-----~--------------------- The Planning Commission Meeting adjourned at 11:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, j).tk~K.JnJ4uu ~ Deborah Kleckner Recording Secretary . .