Loading...
10-28-1986 PC MIN . . . ~~@YbAi ~~TINU Of TH~ ELK RIVER PLANNING COMMISSION HELD AT THE ELK RIVER PUBLIC LIBRARY TUESDAY, OCTOBER 28. 1986 M~mb@ri Pr@i@nt: Chairman Wilson. Commissioners Fuchs. Barrett Kropuenske. Temple and Morton Members Absent: None ~t~ff Pr@ient: Stephen Rohlf, Building & Zoning Administrator Peter Beck. City Attorney and Pat Klaers. City Administrator 1. The meeting was called to order at 7: 00 p.m. by Chairman Wilson. 2. Agenda Item 11-1/2 Site for Conditional Use Permit/Variance Request for RDF Facility continued Public Hearing was added to the October 28, 1986 Planning Commission Agenda. COMMISSIONER BARRETT MOVED APPROVAL OF THE OCTOBER 28. 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AS AMENDED. COMMISSIONER MORTON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. ~. Cgfi~ideration of 9/23/86 Planning Commission Minutes The following corrections to the September 23, 1986 Planning Commission Minutes were noted: Page 7, Item 7.4 - insert the word "lot" in place of "building". Page 9, Item 10 - insert the name "Morton" in place of Fuchs in the motion. Page 11. Item 11 - insert "Commissioner Kropuenske" in place of "Barrett" as seconding the motion. COMMISSIONER FUCHS MOVED APPROVAL OF COMMI SSION MEETING MINUTES AS AMENDED. MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. THE SEPTEMBER 23. 1986 PLANNING COMMISSIONER TEMPLE SECONDED THE 4. Ordinance Amendment-Solid Waste Ordinance/Public Hearing Chairman Wilson explained that under City Council direction, the City staff has prepared a draft solid waste ordinance to gain better control of waste facilities. Chairman Wilson stated that the proposed ordinance would amend Chapter VI titled "Environmental Controls" and Chapter IX, "Zoning" of the City Code. Mr. Peter Beck, City Attorney, stated that the draft ordinance is a result of meetings among City Staff, consultants and himself. He further stated that he will review changes that have been proposed and then would like to hear any comments the Planning Commission may have. . . . Page 2 Planning Commission Minutes October 28. 1986 Mr. Beck stated that the formulation of a solid waste ordinance has been discussed over the past several years. He stated that originally the idea for this ordinance came about because of concerns with the increase in the volume of solid waste going into the landfill, and codispals of semi-dangerous materials to the landfill. Mr. Beck further stated that the new ordinance would regulate and identify four types of waste facilities that would be allowed in the City (1) sanitary Landfill (2) solid waste processing facilities (3) transfer stations (4) waste burning facilities. Mr. Beck stated that these types of facilities would be allowed under the new ordinance providing they had the proper zoning, a conditional use permit and a license. Mr. Beck then gave a summary of the draft ordinance, noting additions and corrections proposed. A copy of this draft ordinance is attached to and part of these official minutes. Commissioner Temple questioned if the ordinance was modeled after another community ordinance or if it was unique to Elk River. Mr. Beck stated that the ordinance, of other counties and cities were reviewed, and that this ordinance is as or more comprehensive than others, and further, that it address the specific needs of Elk River. Mr. Beck suggested that ordinance should contact the following Monday. anyone who wanted a copy of the revised draft city staff, and that it would be available by Commissioner Fuchs questioned how the criteria for waste burning facilities and/or incinerators was established. Mr. Rohlf stated that the revised ordinance would cover incinerators burning 2,000 lbs. per hour or more. Mr. Beck stated that they may leave the requirement at 6,000 lbs. per hour so that small incineration operations such as those at the school and grocery stores would not be included, but that the city's consultant felt they could still use the 2,000 lbs. per hour and not affect those types of uses. Chairman Wilson opened the public hearing. Mr. Joe Bizano, of Long Lake. Minnesota, attorney representing NSP. stated that the proposed ordinance would affect engineering and management considerations and that more time was needed to review the proposed ordinance. He also asked that if the ordinance is to be redrafted, when they would have an opportunity to express their comments. Mr. Beck stated that if the Planning Commission chose to continue the public hearing. NSP could present their comments at that time, or if they chose to approve the ordinance draft in concept and sent it on to the City Council, a public hearing would be held for public input. . . . PAGE 3 Planning Commission Minutes October 28, 1986 Mr. Bizano stated that he felt the two year license was too restrictive and felt that the short term would make it difficult to sell bonds for a 20 to 30 million dollar issue. Mr. Bizano also stated that he felt some of the language was appropriate for an incinerator but not appropriate for an electric generating facility. Mr. Beck stated that an annual review for these types of operation is not unusual. and that the City ordinance specifies a two year review for conditional use permits. He further stated that it is not the City's intent to put an entire operation in danger of shutdown on a technicality, but places the two year limitation to see that the conditions set forth in the original permit are met. Mr. Jerry Schroader of 13575 Island View Drive, Elk River, expressed his support for the ordinance amendment stating that it was a real plus to help protect the health and safety of the City and surrounding community. Mr. Chris Kreger, Vice President of Elk River Landfill, Inc. stated that he felt it was unneccessary for City to require further licensing and permits, as he already must get a permit from the MPCA and from Sherburne County. He stated that they do the same work and he is continually touring inspectors through his operation as it is. Mr. Kreger stated that he originally was not part of the City and did not choose to be, but became a part of it due to the annexation. He stated that he tries to do the best job possible operating the site and that they are trying to be the best landfill in the State. Mr. Kreger further stated that he felt it was unfair to propose that a minor violation could cause them to be charged with a misdemeanor. Mr. Kreger concluded that they are all trying to solve a major waste problem in the State and that he would like to work with the City anyway he can, but felt that he should have been asked for comments before the ordinance was drafted. Mr. Mike Boelter, owner of Boelter's 76 Station, and a member of Minnesota Towing Association, expressed his concern that many refuse trucks are not properly plaquerd to show what they are carrying. He stated that in case of an accident, it is important to know what is in a particular vehicle for safety sake, to prevent contamination to a person's skin, the environment, etc. Mr. Dick Hetland, 18810 Boston Street, stated that he was interested in how a requirement for scrubbers would be addressed in the proposed ordinance. Chairman Wilson stated that page thirty-seven of the ordinance provides that the City. in its sole discretion, may require the best available control technology for a particular type of operation, and could include pollution control devices such as scrubbers or electro-static precipitators. . . . PAGE 4 Planning Commission Minut~~ October 28. 1986 Mr. Hetland stated that he has seen cases where trade-offs in water quality are made for air quality and does not want to see that happen here. He further stated that he was concerned that such a small group of people (the City Council) has the authority to make important decisions for such a large number of people. Chairman Wilson stated that it is the City government's pos~t~on to look out for its citizens. He further stated that this ordinance will give the city more control than they presently have. Mr. Wilson noted that the UPA burn facility will be required to obtain a license per the new ordinance requirements once the ordinance has been finalized, adopted and published. and that the City will have the authority to look at the operation in the future to place controls as necessary. Mrs. Marilyn Schroeder of 13575 Island View Drive expressed her concern that since the City is included in Clause 127. the operation can not be required to put scrubbers. She also expressed her concern that even if the City does have the authority to adopt this ordinance. Anoka County can appeal the City controls to the Waste Management Board and the City could be overruled. Mrs.Mari1yn Hentges questioned when the new ordinance would take effect. if inac ted. Mr. Beck stated that published, but that it in place. the ordinance will will take some months be in effect once it is to get the license process Chairman Wilson questioned Mr. Beck and Mr. Rohlf whether it would be appropriate to recommend approval of the ordinance in concept and send it on for the City Council to review the revised draft. or if the ordinance amendment should remain under the Planning Commission's consideration until they have worked out a more final document. Mr. Rohlf stated that he felt the intent of the ordinance is contained in this draft and that if the Planning Commission agrees with the intent of the ordinance. it could be approved in concept, if not, it could be denied. Mr. Beck stated that the Planning Commission also could table it for further consideration. Members of the Planning Commission expressed their agreement that this item should be tabled and to continue the public hearing. COMMISSIONER KROPUENSKE MOVED TO CONTINUE THE SOLID WASTE ORDINANCE PUBLIC HEARING TO NOVEMBER 12, 1986 AT 7: 00 PM AT THE ELK RIVER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL COMMONS AREA. COMMISSIONER FUCHS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. Chairman Wilson introduced Mr. Peter Kimball as the new Planning Commission member. . . . PAGE 5 Planning Commission Minutes Oc tober 28, 1986 5. Zone Change Request by Jody Kreuser/Public Hearing Chairman Wilson Drive for a zone from R2 to R3 to introduced the request by Jody Kreuser of 18593 Simonet change of Lots 6 and 7, Block 4, Auditors Subdivision #5 accommodate a daycare center. She stated that the proposed site was picked for a number of reasons; (1) no other R3 sites are available, (2) its close proximity to the schools, fire station, nursing home and Lion's Park and (3) close access to Highway #10 and Highway #169. Mrs. Kreuser stated that she is very aware of the need for a daycare facility, as she presently is full and has a waiting list to get into her present center. Mrs. Kreuser further stated that she realized there is some concern that the rezoning would create a spot zone but that the daycare center would be compatible with adjacent uses. Mr. Rohlf stated that the precedent for spot zoning in this area has already been established and that the R-3 would be consistent with the City land use map. Mr. Rohlf also stated that the Planning Commission must look at other uses allowed in R3 zones that this property could be used for in the event the daycare center did not happen. He explained the uses which would be allowed and noted that no more than seven density units would be allowed on the property, which would probably mean a 6- p1ex would be the largest structure that would be built. Chairman Wilson opened the public hearing. Mr. Doug Holmgren of 563 Gates stated that he did not object to the zone change, but that he had two concerns; (1) that the building should not project out toward the street and should be even with the other houses on the street, and (2) that there should be a stop sign at 4th and Gates with a painted crosswalk for the safety of the children. Mr. Al Hopper, neighbor immediately north of the proposed site, expressed his opposition to the proposed daycare center. He stated that he felt daycare is a business and should not be in a residential neighborhood, and further that the use would increase the already bad traffic situation. Mr. Hopper also stated he was concerned about what would happen to the building should the daycare center go out of business and concluded that the use would be an unwelcome addition to the area and would change the nature of the single family neighborhood. Mr. Rohlf stated that the following uses would be allowed in an R3 zone as principal uses and would only require a building permit: community centers, townhouses, multi-family dwelling units (maximum of seven for this size parcel), single family residences, two family, four family and public owned civic center uses. . . . PAGE 6 Planning Commission Mifiut~i October 28. 1986 Mr. Rohlf further stated that the following uses are conditional uses and require Planning Commission and City Council approval: (1) mobile home parks, temporary real estate offices, funeral parlors, group homes, and daycare centers for ten or more children. Mr. Rohlf continued that there is no R3 land available in Elk River for daycare at this time. He also explained that he did not feel the traffic flow on Gates would be hindered as an ingress and egress would be required. Discussion was carried on regarding the surrounding property uses and traffic generation. Mrs. Jody Kreuser stated that the hours of the daycare would be from 6:00 am to 6:00 pm and that the high traffic times would be between 7:00 to 8:30 am and 4:00 to 5:30 pm. Mr. Joe fenced. Beaudry of 573 Gates expressed his concern that the play area be Mrs. Kreuser stated that this is planned. Chairman Wilson closed the public hearing. Chairman Wilson stated that it is understood there is a definite need for a daycare center, but that there are neighborhood concerns regarding traffic, size of the building and property values. Commissioner Fuchs expressed his feeling that with all the commercial developemnt taking place in the Barthel PUD, the additional traffic from a daycare center will not make a substantial difference. Commissioner Barrett stated that he understood Mr. Hopper's concerns, and that he also understood there were both benefits and drawbacks to the proposal. He further commented that there may be less problems with a daycare center where the hours are restricted than there would be with a 6-plex where there would be traffic all hours of the day and evening. Chairman Wilson re-opened the public hearing. Mr. Hopper stated that he felt the neighborhood is somewhat buffered from area north of his property. single family atmosphere of the the commercial PUD by the swamp Mr. Harry Kreuser stated that Mrs. Nickerson has expressed her approval of the proposed daycare center. He also stated that he felt the traffic is going to increase whether the daycare center goes in or not. Commissioner Temple stated that she was contacted by Mr. Pat McCabe Property owner north of the proposed site, who expressed her displeasure with the proposal. Chairman Wilson closed the public hearing. . . . PAGE 7 Planning Commission Minutes October 28. 1986 COMMISSIONER FUCHS MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE ~ONl CRANG! R!QUEST BY JODY KREUSER FOR LOTS 6 AND 7. BLOCK 4. AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. 5 FROM R2 TO R3. COMMISSIONER MORTON SECONDED THE MOTION. Chairman Wilson stated that if the the request for R3 came up, he property is already R2 he felt existing zones and land use. area which was presently zoned R1 would not be in favor; but. since that R3 would be compatible with and the the Commissioner Temple stated that she felt the single family homes presently there should be an important concern, whether it is zoned R2 or not. Commissioner zoning would increase the Kropuenske stated that he did not feel that changing the decrease the property values and that the R3 may actually value because the property would have more capabilities. Commissioner Temple stated that she felt the single family homes in the area are slowly being squeezed out. Chairman Wilson stated the Planning Commission is operating within the parameters of the land use map and that eventually the area will change. Mr. Rohlf agreed that the land increased density and commercial existing single family homes will remain there as long as they wish. use and long range plan calls for development in the area, but that the not be pushed out and will be able to Chairman Wilson called for the vote at this time. THE MOTION PASSED 5-1. COMMISSIONER TEMPLE OPPOSED. 6. Conditional Use Permit Request by Jody Kreuser/Public Hearing Mr. Rohlf regarding coverage. daycare. reviewed his memo to the Planning Commission dated October 22 ingress and egress, parking, play area, hours of operation, lot He stated that there are no provisions in the ordinance for a Discussion was carried on regarding parking. Commissioner would have. 10 employees Fuchs asked Mrs. Kreuser how many permanent employees she Mrs. Jody Kreuser stated that there would be about and many are within walking distance. Discussion was carried on regarding the drop-off area in front of the building. . . . PAGE 8 Planning Commission Minute. October 28. 1986 Mr. Dan Kreuser stated that the building could be moved back to allow more parking. Discussion was carried on regarding parallel versus angle parking. It was the consensus thru arrangement with between the street and that the Planning Commission preferred the drive angle parking. and have a green area be maintained parking lot. Chairman Wilson opened the public hearing. Mr. Jerry Smith stated that he felt the daycare center was a great idea and definitely needed and that he would like to see it happen. Mr. Holmgren stated that his concerns that the building be set back from the street would be taken care of. since the parking would be in front of the building. Discussion was carried on regarding the need for slower speeds and the possibility of stop signs on Gates Avenue. Mrs. Barb Kreuser stated that she felt it would not be fair to make the speed zone and stop sign issue part of the conditional use. Discussion was carried on regarding whether or not there was a need for screeing. Chairman Wilson asked how many children would be using the facility? Mrs. Jody Kreuser stated that there would be a maximum of 106 children; the ages being infants through six years. and that most of the children would be between the ages of three and six years old. Discussion was carried on regarding special activities in which the building would be open later than the established 6:00 pm closing time. Mr. & Mrs. Dan Kreuser stated that the only event past 6:00 pm would be the open house in which parents could visit anytime over a two to three hour time period. so there would not be 106 families all coming to the center at one specific time. Mr. Rohlf stated that the dumpster should be screened and lighting be directed away from neighboring residences. Mr. Dick Hetland. a local refuse hauler. requested that some flexibility be allowed in screening of dumpsters. as it is getting to be quite difficult to get at some of the dumpsters with the stricter requirements. COMMI SSIONER FUCHS MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST BY JODYKREUSER FOR A DAYCARE CEm1:R '1'0 BE LOCATED ON LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK 4, AUDITORS SUBDIVISION *5 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: PAGE 9 . Planning Commission Minutes Oc tober 28, 1986 (1) THAT 'IWO DRIVEWAYS BE PROVIDED OFF GATES AVENUE; ONE FOR INGRESS ON 'mE SOUTH AND ONE FOR EGRESS ON THE NORTH. AND THAT THERE BE ANGLE PARKING IN THE LOADING AREA. PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITY'S BUILDING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. (2) THAT THE PLAY AREA BE LANDSCAPED WITH GRASS AND TOTALLY FENCED. (3) THAT THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BE DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. (4) THAT THE NORMAL HOURS OF OPERATION BE FROM 6:00 TO 6:00 PM. (5) THAT AJ.ir{ LIGHTING BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM NEIGHBORING RESIDENCES. (6) THAT THE DUMPSTER BE SCREENED ON THE SOUTH. (7) THAT THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BE REVIEWED IN TWO YEARS. (8) THAT THERE BE A GREEN BOULE'iT ARD AREA WITH TREES BE'IWEEN THE STREET AND PARKING AREAS. (9) THAT A MAXIMUM OF A 'IWO SQUARE FOOT SIGN BE ALLOWED TO BE PLACED ON THE BUILDING. . COMMISSIONER BARRETT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. COMMISSIONER FUCHS MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING: (1) INSTALLATION OF A 4-WAY STOP SIGN AT 3RD STREET AND GATES AVENUE. (2) PAINTING A YELLOW-STRIPPED PEDISTRIAN CROSSWALK AT 3RD AND GATES. (3) A SPEED ZONE OF 20 MPR ON GATES AVENUE BETWEEN 4TH STREET AND MAIN STREET. COMMISSIONER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. 7. Boelter's Towing and Union 76 Station/Conditional Use Permit/P.R. Mr. Mike Boelter stated that he would like to place a 23-1/2 ft. by 14 ft. canopy next to the east side of his present building to protect his trucks. Mr. Boelter explained how the footings would be done and that two lights would be placed on the underside of the canopy. Chairman Wilson opened the opposition of the request. public hearing. No one appeared for or in Chairman Wilson closed the public hearing. . . . . PAGE 10 Planning Commission Minutel October 28. 1986 Mr. Rohlf stated that in addition to the canopy required. Mr. Boelter is requesting the conditional use permit so that his business will no longer be nonconforming. OOMMI SnONER BARRETT MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST BY MR. BOELTER FOR BOELTER'S TOWING AND UNION 76 STATION. SUBJECT TO A ONE YEAR REVIEW. AND ALSO TO APPROVE THE PLACEMENT OF A CANOPY WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. 1) THAT NO SIGNS BE PLACED ON THE CANOPY. 2.) THAT MR. BOEL TER CANOPY WILL NOT NORTHERN RAILROAD. PROVIDE PROJECT PROOF OF STAFF'S SATISFACTION THAT THE ONTO PROPERTY OWNED BY THE BURLIGNTON COMMISSIONER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. 8. Site Plan Review on Lot 3. Block 1. of the Elk River Plaza 2nd Addition Mr. Skip Sorenson explained plans for a 113.000 square foot single story office/retail complex to be located west of the Coast-to-Coast building on 2.6 acres at Jefferson Lane and Freeport Avneue. Mr. Sorenson stated that Phase 1 will include 8.000 sq. ft. of office/retail space and Phase 2 will include up to 8.000 sq. ft. additional space. He further stated that a minimum of forty-three parking spaces are required and the site plan shows sixty-two spaces provided. Mr. Sorenson explained that the employee parking will be in back and the customer parking will be in front of the building. off Jefferson Lane. He stated that there will be two accesses to the property,38% of site will be landscaped green area. that the property will be serviced by City water and sewer and underground utilities. Further. he explained that the building is designed to fit well in a residential setting with wood casement windows and gables. Also. the refuse area would be screened. It was the consensus that the City would have no reason for objection to the "condo" concept of tennant ownership (paint to paint). Mr. Ken Barthel stated that all of the parking would be developed in Phase 1 except for nine spaces which would be completed with Phase 2 in the spring. Mr. Rohlf stated that Mr. Terry Maurer. City Engineer. has reviewed the drainage plan and finds it accepteab1e. Mr. Rohlf also stated that the Fire Chief has not yet approved the plan. but he is requesting that the back drive area be maintained as a fire lane. It was the consensus that a 35 foot drive area be utilized with a 15 foot striped loading area. . . . PAGE 11 Planning Commission Minutes October 28. 1986 Discussion was carried on regarding signage on the building and the install ion of a pylon sign. Mr. Barthel noted that there would be a 30 inch sign band across the building on which 18 inch letters would be used proportionately per square foot of space rented by the tennants. COMMISSIONER TEMPLE MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN AS PRESENTED FOR LOT 3. BLOCK 1. ELK RIVER PLAZA 2ND ADDITION BY MR. KEN BARTHEL. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1) THAT THE PHASE 2 AREA BE LANDSCAPED AS GREEN AREA UNTIL DEVELOPED. 2) THE DUMPSTER BE SCREENED. 3) THAT A MAXIMUM OF 520 SQ. FT. OF SIGNAGE BE ALLOWED INCLUDING: A. A 30 INCH SIGN BAND ON THE NORTHSIDE OF THE BUILDING ONLY. WITH UNIFORM LETTERING CONTAINED WITHIN THE SIGN BAND. B. A FREE-STANDING 15 FT. HIGH BY 6 FT. WIDE PYLON SIGN. WHICH MAY BI ILLUMINATED INTERNALLY WITH FLORESCENT TUBING. FROM DAYLIGHT TO 10:00 PM. 4) ANY LIGHTING SHALL BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS. 5) A 20 FT. FIRELANE ON THE SOUTHS IDE OF THE BUILDING. 6) A 15 FT. DESIGNATED STRIPED LOADING AREA BE MAINTAINED. 7) THE APPROVAL OF THE FIRE CHIEF I S GRANTED. 8) THE GREEN AREA AND PARKING BE CONSTRUCTED AS PRESENTED IN THE SITE PLAN. COMMISSIONER MORTON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. 9. Sign Request for Deerfield 3rd Addition Mr. Gerry Smith explained his request to place a 12 ft. high 128 sq. ft. sign at the northeast corner of the intersection of Elk Hills Drive and Highway //169. Discussion was carried on regarding the 3 ft. by 16 ft. band of signs to be placed just under the larger sign advertising the various builders in the new subdivision. PAGE 12 . Planning Commission Minutes October 28. 1986 Discussion was also carried on regarding the possibility of the Chamber using the north side of the sign to promote the City. Mr. Smith stated that he has completed the northerly access as far as he can go. Mr. Rohlf stated that they are now waiting for the State to obtain formal approval from the Federal government agency in Washington. D.C. and that it will probably be January 1st before the approval is in hand. gOMMISUONlilR BARRETT MOVED TO APPROVE THE SIGN REQUEST BY MR. GERALD SMITH AS PRESENTED FOR A 12 FT. HIGH MAXIMUM OF 176 SQ. FT. TEMPORARY SIGN. ADVERTISING THE DEERFIELD 3RD SUBDIVISION. SUBJECT TO A TWO YEAR REVIEW. AND THAT LIGHTING OF THE SIGN BE FROM DAYLIGHT TO 10: 00 PM AND BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM NEIGHBORING RESIDENCES. AND FURTHER THAT THE ELK RIVER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BE CONTACTED REGARDING PLACEMENT OF A COMMUNITY SIGN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE DEERFIELD SIGN. COMMISSIONER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 5-1. COMMISSIONER FUCHS OPPOSED. 10. Ordinance Amendments Amending the Zoning Ordinance to Make Light Manufacturing a Conditional Use in a C-3B Zoned Dsitrict/P.H. . COMMISSIONER FUCHS MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 86-16. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 900.16 CONDITIONAL USES. SUB. 6B (C3-B HIGHWAY) COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS COMMISSIONER BARRETT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. COMMISSIONER MORTON MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 86-15. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 900.12. PRINCIPAL USES. SUB. 9B~(C-3B HIGHWAY) COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS. COMMISSIONER BARRETT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. COMMISSIONER BARRETT MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. COMMISSIONER FUCHS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. The meeting adjourned at 11:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted. :D~tlI/W~ Deborah Kleckner f:_. . Recording Secretary ~ .