The URL can be used to link to this page

4.3 SR 03-20-2023�, Elk s �- River Request for Action To Item Number Ma Tor and CinT Council 4.3 Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by Consent A enda MaYch 20, 2023 Zack Carlton, Communittr Develo ment DirectoY Item Description Reviewed by Resolution: Foster Propert�r Environmental Cal Pormer, Ci r Administrator Assessment Worksheet Findings Reviewed by Action Requested Adopt, byT motion, a resolution approving a negative declaration of need for an environmental impact statement for the Foster PYopeYtyr Development. Background/Discussion In NovembeY of 2022, Lennar submitted a complete Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA� for their pYoposed residential development The EAW was Yequired per Minnesota rules and evaluated potenrial impacts to the natural and building environments as a result of their project The city, acting as the LGU, coordinated the formal revie�v and public comment period `vith the Environmental QualityT Board and relevant outside agencies. The public comment period ran from December 13, 2022, to Januaryr 12, 2023. In total, staff received fouY responses, `vith relevant comments requiring a response from one, the DNR. The applicant's consulting engineer prepared a formal response to comments and staff reviewed the EAW, public comments, and the response in their entiretyT to determine if a more intense environmental review (Environmental Impact Statement) `vas required. Staff's revie`v and analyTsis did not identifyT a need for the additional environmental review and recommends Council adopt the attached resolution confirming those findings. Additional information, along with a Finding of Fact, are attached for review. This is a required review due to the size of the pYoject and does not supeYsede the city's land use and zoning reviews. Financial Impact None Mission/Policy/Goal Support the growth and development of the communityT. Attachments ■ Resolution ■ FosteY PYoperty Development EAW The Elk River Vision A 2a�elcolning co�nlnunity 2a�ith T evolutiona� y and spizzted T esou� cefulness, exceptional se�vice, and coln�nunity engagelnent that encou�ages and ins�iz•es pTo�pe�zty. rowEREo ar �I'1 �� Update�l• January 2023 Ci_y �I E1k - River ~ City of Elk River City Council Resolution 23- A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Elk River Approving Record of Decision and the Negative Declaration of Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Foster Property Development WHEREAS, Lennar ("Applicant") proposes to develop a residential subdivision that includes appro�mately 433 single-family homes and 180 multi-familyT homes along �uith the required infrastructure such as roads, utilities, side`valks, trails, and stormwater ponds("PYoject"); and WHEREAS, the PYoject falls within the mandatory environmental assessment woYksheet ("EAW") categoryr of iVlinn. Rules paYt 4410.4300, Subd. 19 D; and WHEREAS, the City of Elk River is the Responsible Governmental Unit ("RGU"); and WHEREAS, an EAW `vas prepared byT ISG, on behalf of the Applicant, `vho submitted completed data poYtions of the EAW to the Cityr of Elk RiveY consistent with l��inn. Rules PaYt 4410.1400; and WHEREAS, the Cit�T of Elk River submitted a copyT of the EAW to all public agencies on the EAW distribution list and published the EAW availabilityT in the EQB Monitor on DecembeY 13, 2022, in accordance with applicable state laws, rules, and regulations; and WHEREAS, the EAW comment period lasted from December 13, 2022, to Januar�r 12, 2023, and regulatoryT agencies submitted written comments during the comment period; and WHEREAS, the City of Elk River acknowledges the comments received from Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, and ArmyT Corps of Engineers; and WHEREAS, CityT staff revie�ved the proposed Record of Decision and finds it to be consistent with the evidence submitted to the cit�T and the applicable statutes and regulations, to the best of their knowledge, and recommends the Cit�T Council approve the Findings of Fact and Record of Decision dated MaYch 16, 2023, and deteYmine that no environmental impact statement ("EIS") is necessar�r, Yeasonable oY warYanted with Yespect to the pYoject under the circumstances; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to make findings of fact and a record of decision that no EIS is Yequired with Yespect to the PYoject ("Negative DeclaYation"). rowER�o �r �� NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED byT the CityT Council of the CityT of Elk River, Minnesota, as follo�vs: Adopt and approve the Findings of Fact and Record of Decision on the Foster PYopeYty Development Environmental Assessment WoYksheet in the foYm which is attached hereto as E�ibit A and hereb�T makes the Findings of Fact and Conclusions �vhich are contained therein; and 2. Find and determine that, based upon the Findings of Fact and Record of Decision, no environmental impact statement is required for the Project pursuant to the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act of Minnesota Rules PaYts 4410.0200 to 4410.6500. Passed and adopted this 20th dayr of MaYch 2023. John J. Dietz, Mayor ATTEST: Tina Allard, CityT Clerk rowER�o �r �� Exhibit A Foster Property Development Findings of Fact and Record of Decision I. Administrative Background Lennar Corporation is proposing construction of a residential development located at in the CityT of Elk River, Sherburne Count�r, Minnesota. The project will include the construction of appro�matel�r 433 single-familyT homes and 180 multi-family housing units as well as infrastructure such as roads, utilities, `valks/trails, and storm`vater ponds. The CityT of Elk River is the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) for this project. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA� has been prepared in accordance `vith the iVlinnesota Rules Chapter 4410. The EAW was mandator�r peY Minnesota Rules, Part 4410.4300, Subd. 19 D. The EAW was filed with the Minnesota Environmental QualityT Board (EQB) and circulated for review and comment to the required EAW distribution list. A notice of availabilityT was published in the E�B Monito�� on December 13, 2022. A notice was also published in the StaY News. The notice included a description of the project, information on `vhere copies of the EAW `vere available, and invited the public to provide comments. The EAW was made available electronically on the City of Elk River's website at htt�s://��.elkrivermn.g�o�r/DocumentCenter/View/11562/Foster-Pro�ert��-EA�X� and in hard copy at Elk RiveY City= Hall, 13065 Orono Parkway NW, Elk River, MN 55376. The EAW comment period extended fYom DecembeY 13, 2022, to Januar�r 12, 2023. Written comments `vere received from four agencies during the comment period. All comments received were considered in determining the potential for significant environmental impacts. Comments and responses to comments are included in Appendix A. Based on the information in the record, �vhich is composed of the EAW for the proposed project, the comments submitted during the public comment period, the responses to the comments, and other supporting documents, the CinT of Elk River makes the follo`ving Findings of Fact and Conclusions. 2. Findings of Fact 2.1 Project Description Lennar Corporation is proposing construction of a residential development located at in the CityT of Elk River, Sherburne CountyT, Minnesota. The project �uill include the construction of approximatel�T 433 single-family- homes and 180 multi-family housing units as well as infrastructure such as roads, utilities, walks/trails, and storm`vater ponds. 2.2 Corrections to the EAW or Changes to the Project since the EAW was Published. There have been no changes or updates to the EAW since publication on DecembeY 13, 2023. The summary of impacts and mitigation outlined belo�v reflect the current proposed design. 2.3 Agency and Public Comments on the EAW The CityT of Elk River received written comments during the comment period from the following four agencies: ■ l��innesota DepaYtment of TranspoYtation ■ Mirinesota Department of Natural Resources ■ Minnesota State Historic PYeservation Office ■ ArmyT Corps of Engineers Consistent with state environmental review rules, Yesponses have been pYepaYed foY all substantive comments submitted during the comment period. Written responses have been provided for substantive comments pertaining to analyTsis conducted for and documented in the EAW (see Appendix A). Original comments in their entiretyT are included in Appendix B. 2.4 Decision Regarding Need for an Environmental Impact Statement The CityT of Elk River finds that the analyTsis completed for the EAW and the additional information considered in this Findings of Fact and Conclusions document are adequate to determine whether the pYoject has the potential foY significant environmental effects based on consideYation of the fouY criteria identified in Minnesota Rules, Part 4410.1700, Subd. 7(described in the sections that follo`v). 2.4.1 Type, Extent, and Reversibiliry of impacts The CityT of Elk River finds the analyTsis completed for the EAW is adequate to determine whether the pYoject has the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW described the tyrpe and extent of impacts to the natural and built environment anticipated to result from the proposed project The proposed design for the project includes features to mitigate the identified impacts. Based on the EAW analyrsis and mitigation commitments, the pYoposed pYoject is not anticipated to result in substantial impacts. Belo�v is a summaryT of the findings regarding potential environmental impacts of the proposed project and the design features included to avoid, minimize, and mitigate those impacts. 2.4.1.1 Land Use The project will be compatible with the land uses identified in the adopted comprehensive plan, Mixed Residential, and those adjacent to the project area. The project will include design features to mitigate impacts to adjacent public streets and improve pedestrian and bic�rcle mobility. The project is anticipated to be developed as a Planned Unit Development to allow fle�bilityT in residential design features `vhile still maintaining compliance `vith the Land Use designation. 2.4.1.2 Geology, Soils, and Topography Geologp Minnesota Geological Survey data within the PYoject site lists the bedYock as Wonewoc Sandstone and Eau Claire Formation with depths to the bedrock ranging from appro�mately 50 to 350 feet. There are no known or mapped sinkholes, shallow limestone, shallow aquifers, oY karst features identified within oY neaY the pYoject aYea. Soils and Topography There are appro�mately 110 acres of land within the project with a soil farmland classification rating of either "Farmland of State`vide Importance" or "All Areas are Prime Farmland". Ho`vever, there is currentlyT no land within the Project site that is cultivated for agricultural production. As a result, no faYmland will be taken out of production as a Yesult of the pYoject. The erosion capabilities of the soils are susceptible as described byT the NRCS Soil Erodibility- (K`v) Factor rating `vhich ranges across the site from 0.02 to 0.37. Construction activities will temporarilyT expose soils to an increased risk of erosion from wind and precipitation. Appropriate erosion and sediment control best management practices (BMPs) will be selected based on curYent site conditions and maintained thYough the duration of each construction phase to reduce the potential of sedimentation occurring to surface `vater resources or migrating offsite. TempoYaryr BMPs will be inspected and maintained (peY the NPDES Construction StoYmwateY Permit) until permanent vegetation and stabilization has occurred. PeYmanent BMPs will be incorporated into project design to minimize erosion during routine operational activities (post- construction�. A geotechnical evaluation of the site has been completed which included 22 soil borings across the site. A map of the boring locations and detailed description of the soils observed at each is included in E�ibit B— Geotechnical Report. TopographyT of the Project site, collected via LiDAR, is illustrated on Appendix A— Figure 6. Site elevations were shown ranging from 896 to 946 msl. Site topograph�r generally slopes downward towards the basin located neaY the centeY before continuing to the south. Some aYeas of steep slopes (12% oY gYeater) are pYesent within the site. 2.4.1.3 Water Resources Surfa ce Wa ters There is one DNR Public Waters `vatercourses, Trott Brook (M-063-001.5), located within the project aYea. TYott BYook meandeYs in and out of the pYoject site along its westeYn and southeYn boundaries. There are no DNR Public Waters basins, designated wildlife lakes, migratoryT waterfowl feeding/Yesting areas, trout streams/lakes, MPCA oY MDNR listed calcaYeous fens, outstanding resource value waters, and countyT or jurisdictional ditches within or adjacent to the project area. PYominent wateY features located witl�in 1 mile of the pYoject site include the aforementioned Trott BYook as well as two DNR Public WateYs wetlands. These wetlands weYe KlieveY MaYsh (71000300) located appro�mately 0.6 miles south of the project site, and an unnamed basin (71023800) located approximatelyT 0.8 miles to the north. There are no MPCA Section 303d listed impaired waters located within a 1-mile Yadius of the project site. 12 wetland areas, totaling appro�matelyT 71 acres, were delineated on the main Project site and approved by the Local Government Unit (CityT of Elk River) of the Minnesota Wetland ConseYvation Act (Minnesota Rules 8420). A Notice of Decision was issued on November 10, 2021 (LGU PYoject No. W-21-21). Groundwater The depth to ground water appears to varyT greatly across the site. During the geotechnical evaluation of the site 22 soil borings were completed across the site. Water tables, when they were observed, ranged from 894.4' to 908.5' MSL. These `vater tables `vere all observed in borings taken within or immediatelyT adjacent to wetlands or to open water on site. Water tables tyTpically were not observed within borings taken within upland areas. The deepest of which was taken to a depth of 887.3' MSL with no observed water table. A map of the boring locations and boring logs documenting water tables observed is included in Exhibit B— Geotechnical Report. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Cooperative Groundwater Monitoring Website maintains data on gYound wateY levels. The closest observation well to the Project site is DNR Observation Well #86017 (MDH #708372), which is located appro�matelyT 2.8 miles southwest of the Project site. The wateY level in the most Yecent data record (l�ZaYch 29, 2022) was measured at 859.51' MSL. A majorityT of the Project site is located within the Elk River Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA). The boundar�T of the ELK River WHPA is illustrated on Appendix A— Figure 8. According to the Minnesota DepaYtment of Health — Minnesota Well Index, theYe aYe no identified wells located within the Project site. Multiple domestic wells were mapped on adjacent properties, the neaYest of �uhich,lVIDH #551578, was located appro�matelyr 140 feet east of the Project site. Wastewater Waste`vater generated from the site `vill be discharged into the CityT of Elk River's sanitaryT sewer syrstem and flow to the Cityr of Elk RiveY WastewateY TYeatment Facility (Facilityr) located at 248 Railroad Drive, Elk RiveY. The Facilityr is described as follows within its NPDES PeYmit (MN0020788): "The FacilityT has a continuous discharge (SD 001) to the iVlississippi River (Class 1C, 2Bdg, 3C, 4A, 4B, 5, 6 water). This is a Class A facilityT. The Facilit�T is designed to treat an average dryT `veather design flo�v of 3.98 million gallons per da�T (MGD), an average wet weather (AW� design flow of 4.54 MGD, and a peak hourly wet weather flo`v of 7.27 1�1GD. Based on the r�WW design flo�v, the FacilityT is designed for a five-dayT carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand of 203.8 milligrams per liter (mg/L), a total suspended solid of 263.7 mg/L, a total phosphorus of 7.2 mg/L, and a total Keldahl nitYogen of 36.0 mg/L. The Facilit�r consists of inechanicall�r cleaned baY scYeens, an influent PaYshall flume, voYtex grit removers, t�vo anaerobic selector tanks for phosphorous removal, six extended aeration activated sludge cells in three pairs, three final clarifiers, six effluent sand filters, and UV disinfection. The Facilit�T also adds chlorine for filter maintenance, sulfur dio�de for removal of residual chlorine, and ferric chloride for phosphorous removal. Biosolids treatment consists of four aerated storage tanks (aerobic digesters), which is then processed in a screw press to produce a biosolids cake �vhich is landfill disposed." Construction of new sanitary sewer lines will be Yequired to service the pYoject but no expansions to the CityT's WWTP are anticipated to be required. Stormwater The qualit�r of e�sting storm�uateY runoff from the pYoject is t�rpical of foYested land. StoYmwater runoff flows from upland aYeas to loweY elevations on site as sheet flow wheYe it geneYally gets conveyed into the large wetland complex located near the center of the site. This wetland ultimately outlets into Trott Brook. The quality of stormwateY runoff fYom the pYoject post construction will be tyrpical of an urban land use with impervious surfaces and la`vn/landscaping generallyT generating higher concentrations of total suspended solids and total phosphorus. Stormwater runoff is proposed to be conve�Ted into permanent constructed stormwater treatment infrastructure (e.g. infiltration basins, filtration basins, holding ponds, vegetated swales, etc.) across the site for treatment prior to discharge. TemporaryT erosion and sediment control best management practices (BiVIPs) will initiallyT be installed (per the project's SWPPP), maintained/repaired, and amended throughout the construction phases as required to remain compliant `vith the applicant's NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit. BMPs mayT include (but are not limited to) silt fence, bio-rolls/filter logs, rock construction entrances, mulch/hyTdro mulch, and permanent native seeding or turf seeding in appropriate areas. L�aterAppropriat�on No appYopriations of suYface wateYs aYe proposed as paYt of the PYoject. WateY will be sourced from the Cit�T of Elk River's e�sting public `vater suppl�T s�Tstem (PWS #1710004). The CityT's PWS is currentlyr souYced from eight groundwateY wells (MDH #s 255153, 221176, 481794, 537682, 580320, 664852, 694499, and 757624). Construction of new watermains `vill be required to service the project but no expansions to the CityT's PWS are anticipated to be required. Short-term temporaryT construction de`vatering of surface or ground `vaters mayT be required at the time of construction (depending on current field conditions) to facilitate construction activities (e.g., utilityr installation, etc.). If dewatering is anticipated to exceed 10,000 gallons per dayr oY 1,000,000 gallons per �Tear, the contractor `vill be required to obtain a Water Appropriations Permit from the Department of Natural Resources (iVIDNR) Division of Waters prior to initiating such activities. Measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the environmental effects from construction related to dewatering are unknown at this time, and therefore �vill be determined when developing the dewatering plan as required by a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan amendment of the NPDES Construction Storm`vater Permit. L�etlands 12 wetland areas, totaling appro�mately 71 acres, were delineated on the main Project site and approved byT the Local Government Unit (CityT of Elk River) of the iVlinnesota Wetland Conservation Act (Minnesota Rules 8420). A Notice of Decision was issued on November 10, 2021 (LGU Project No. W-21-21). Appro�mately 18 acYes of the curYent wetland aYea on site consists of land that had previously been mined as part of a gravel pit These aYeas would meet the defu�irion of an "incidental wetland" undeY Minnesota Admitustrative Rule 8420.0105 and theYefoYe aYe not Yegulated undeY the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Additionally, poYtions of these aYeas have depths up to appro�matelyr 20'. As a Yesult, these aYeas funcrion moYe as deep-wateY habitats YatheY than wetlands. Wetland impacts were avoided to the extent possible during the preliminaryT design phase of the overall site plan (Exhibit A). The final design ��ill attempt to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the extent possible. Should unavoidable impacts remain, the proper permitting processes will be follo`ved in accordance �vith the WCA and/or Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as applicable. This process `vould involve applyTing for a replacement plan potenriallyT requiring compensatoryT mitigation. The area of wetland impact and jurisdictional status of the `vetlands will be determined b�T the proper governmental agencyT during the permitting process follo`ving conclusion of the environmental review process. Other Surface L�a ters No other surface water features (lakes, streams, intermittent channels, or count�T/jurisdictional ditches) will be phyTsicall�r or indirectlyT altered during the construction or operation of the proposed pYoject The only wateY feature located on the project site is the DNR Public Waters �vatercourse Trott Brook `vhich meanders in and out of the project site along its western and southern boundaries. Trott Brook was avoided during the preliminaryT design phase of the overall site plan (Exhibit A). TemporaryT erosion and sediment control best management pYactices (BMPs) will inirially be installed (peY the pYoject's SWPPP), maintained/repaired, and amended throughout the construction phases to avoid indirect impacts to Trott Brook. BMPs may include (but are not limited to) silt fence, bio-rolls/filter logs, rock construction entrances, mulch/hyTdro mulch, and permanent native seeding or turf seeding in appropriate areas. Follo`ving construction, permanent constructed storm`vater treatment infrastructure (e.g. infiltration basins, filtration basins, holding ponds, vegetated s`vales, etc.) �vill protect help Trott Brook. This will provide storage and treatment to waters prior to discharging into Trott Brook. 2.4.1.4 Contamination/Hazardous and Materials/Wastes Pre-ProjectSste Condstlons Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) records do not indicate any current or former contamination sites within or immediatelyr adjacent to the project aYea. The MPCA's What's In My Neighborhood database of knotivn sites within pro�mityr of the pYoject aYea is illustrated on Appendix A— Figure 10. TheYe was one documented petroleum leak within one-half mile of the project site. This leak occurred at the Holzen Residence site located appro�mately 0.4 miles north of the project site. This site was issued regulatoryT site closure on March 27, 2009. The project proposer anticipates a minimal risk of encountering contaminated materials or ground`vater during construction based on the lack of past land uses and due to geographic location of the listed leak sites in Yelarion to the project area. PYoject construction and opeYation is not expected to cause or exacerbate a pre-project contaminated condition(s); therefore, no measures are planned to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from e�sting contamination or potential environmental hazards. If potentially contaminated materials (or other environmental hazards) are discovered during construcrion activiries, the project proposer/contractor `vill immediatel�T cease activities in the area, then take appropriate and reasonable actions to contain and reduce the human health/environmental risk prior to contacring the State of Minnesota Dut�T Officer, Sherburne CountyT, and project proposer's representative. The development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan will be initiated if analyTtical results characterize the discovered materials as a regulated contaminated waste. Project-Related Generation/Storage ofSolsd Wastes Solid and liquid wastes generated from construction materials and equipment are expected in minimal amounts during periods of active construction. Wastes mayT include sediment laden construction dewatering or tyrpical construction debris associated with Yesidential development (lumber, siding, roofing materials, etc.).. The contractor will be required to immediatelyT haul offsite and/or temporarilyT store and dispose (or rec�rcle) of all waste in accordance with MPCA regulations and the NPDES Construction Storm`vater Permit. Project-Related Use/Storage ofHazardous Materials Hazardous materials (portable fuel tanks and lubricants) mayT be used for equipment operarions during construction and temporarily placed onsite in sealed containers (at all times) and under secured restricted access during non-working hours. These materials will onl�T be used during active construcrion for refueling and maintenance of construcrion equipment To ensure that fuel spills do not contaminate surface and ground `vaters, construction and maintenance activities would occur at Yeasonable distances from surface wateYs and steep sloped aYeas. The contractoY will be YequiYed to abide byT the Pollution Prevention Management Measures (Part N.F.2) of the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit All hazardous materials will be removed from the Project site upon completion of construction. Project-Related Generatlon/Storage ofl�azardous L�astes Hazardous waste stoYage and disposal associated with construction activities will comply with the NPDES Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan during periods of construction. Following construcrion, the development will not geneYate hazaYdous wastes. 2.4.1.5 Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) Fish and Wlldlife Resources Ecological land units foY the pYoject aYea have been mapped and defined in the Ecological Classification SyTstem (ECS), which has been adopted byT the Minnesota DNR. The project location occurs in the Anoka Sand Plain subsection (222Mc). The Anoka Sandplains subsecrion laYgely consists of a broad, flat, sandyT lake plain that historically consisted of oak savanna and upland Prairies. The Project occurs within the northern Twin Ciries metropolitan area and surrounding lands now largelyT consist of urban development. The Project site itself largelyT consists of wooded and wetland areas. Appro�mately 160 acres of �vooded lands are present across the site. Based on historic aerial photograph�T approximatel�T 62 of those wooded acYes used to be cultivated foY agricultural pYoduction through 2005, afteY which the land was left uncultivated and naturallyT developed into its current state. Wetlands comprise approximately 71 acres of the site. This includes multiple wetland communities including TyTpe 1— Floodplain Forest, TyTpe 2— Fresh (wet) Meadow, and TyTpe 5— Shallow Open Water. Approximately 18 acres of the current wetland area on site consists of land that had previousl�T been mined as part of a gravel pit. Portions of these areas have depths up to approximatel�r 20'. As a result, these areas function more as deep-water habitats rather than wetlands. Rare Features There �vere t��o areas of iVlinnesota CounnT Biological Surve�T Sites of BiodiversityT Significance located within the pYoject area. These areas weYe both paYt of the MBS site "Elk RiveY 36 Westcentral" and were given a biodiversityT significance rank of `Below". A U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Official Species List foY the PYoject site listed one fedeYally listed threatened species, the Northern Long-Eared Bat, and one candidate species, the Monarch Butterfly, that may potentially be affected by the PYoject TheYe weYe no critical habitats mapped tivitl�in the pYoject site. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Official Species List can be seen in Exhibit C. Natural Heritage Information Sy stem (NHIS) data for Sherburne CountyT has been obtained byT ISG via a license agreement with the Minnesota DNR (L.A-1040). A review of the database identified 1 rare feature within the immediate vicinityT of the Project site that could have the potential to be adversely affected by the pYoposed project This raYe feature was the Black Sanshell musseL The Project site was located entirely within the mapped element occurrence of the Black Sandshell. Since no `vork `vill be taking place within the banks of Trott Brook and erosion control BMPs `vill be implanted during construction to prevent indirect impacts to the stream no adverse impacts to Black Sandshell populations aYe anticipated to result from the PYoject IdentilYed Fssh, Wlldlife, Plant Co�munstles, Rare Features, and Ecosyste�s Existing plant communities will be affected by the change in land use. Approximately 148 acres of wooded land will be cleared to allow for construction of the Project. Based on historic aerial photographyT appro�matelyT 62 of those wooded acres used to be cultivated for agricultural production through 2005, after which the land was left uncultivated and naturallyT developed into its current state. It should be noted that manyT of the trees onsite are fallen, damaged, or in poor condition. AdditionallyT, an appro�mate 3.92 acres of unavoidable permanent �vetland impacts are anticipated to occur as a Yesult of construction of the Project including the ghost plat areas. This includes the following: li�iu Pr�o"�ect G�ust Plats ??��_� �E�`;7i:�ia:`� `7� ??'kar.'i��'�i7J 7 — ;J � 7 �.Ir��i�r�t�c�a�� 1��cid�r�rc�� i��F�cr��fxs �+.5� G.GG Since there aYe no critical habitats located within the Project site this change in land use should not result in an�r negative effects to anyT threatened or endangered species. Measures to prevent the spread of invasive species during construction include working in non- infested areas first before moving to infested areas, thoroughlyT cleaning equipment after working in infested aYeas and before mobilizing to a diffeYent poYtion of the project site or a diffeYent pYoject and revegetating disturbed areas as soon as possible after construction is completed in an area. Mlt�gation Measures Unavoidable wetland impacts will be minimized to the greatest extent feasible, considering the site constraints of each proposed wetland impact and surrounding area (such as special considerations per MN Rules 8420.0515). It is estimated that the pYoject mayr result in up to appro�matelyr 3.92 acres of permanent `vetland impacts that will occur as a result of construction of the Project including the ghost plat areas. Wetland impacts were avoided to the extent possible during the preliminaryT design phase of the overall site plan (Exhibit A). The final design will attempt to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the extent possible. Should unavoidable impacts remain, the proper permitring processes will be followed in accoYdance with the WCA and/oY Section 404 of the Clean WateY Act as applicable. This process �vould involve appl�Ting for a replacement plan potentiall�T requiring compensator�T mitigation. The aYea of wetland impact and jurisdictional status of the wetlands ��ill be deteYmined byT the proper governmental agencyT during the permitting process follo`ving conclusion of the EAW process. An estimated 148 acYes of wooded land will be cleaYed to allow foY construction of the PYoject. Based on historic aerial photography appro�matelyr 62 of those wooded acres used to be cultivated for agricultural production through 2005, after which the land was left uncultivated and naturally developed into its curYent state. It should be noted that many of the trees onsite are fallen, damaged, or in poor condition. A tree preservation plan `vill be submitted to the CityT of Elk River for approval prior to commencing construction. 2.4.1.6 Historic Properties Information `vas requested and received from the ��innesota Historical SocienT State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Upon conducring a search of the i��innesota Archaeological Inventor�T and Historic Structures InventoryT, no previously known archaeological sites or historic properties/structures were identified within the same sections or adjacent sections of the proposed project The proposed project `vill have no direct or indirect adverse impacts to archaeological sites or historical properties. SHPO also submitted written comments during the public comment period stating there are no records of historical significance. 2.4.1.7 Visual There is a large open water area that was formerlyT a pit resulting from past mining operations present within the Project site. This water body is currently landlocked within private propertyT and is not visible to the public from existing Rights-of-WayT. Development of the Project will avoid impacting this area to the extent feasible and will provide scenic views of the water bodyT `vithin the future neighborhood from roads, sidewalks, homes, and yTards. The completed Project will not create any significant visual nuisances such as intense light pollution or vapor plumes. Visual impacts `vill consist of nighttime lighting consisting of streetlamps and �Tard lights ty-pical of residenrial development and required for public safenT reasons. 2.4.1.8 Air Statlonary Source E�isssons The Project is not anticipated to result in anyT temporaryT or permanent stationaryT sources of air emissions. There are no e�sting permitted air facilities or sensitive receptors `vithin the vicinityT of the pYoposed Project. TTehicle Emissions The pYoject will Yesult in an incYease to local traffic. This will Yesult in an incYease to local vehicle air emissions. A number of recommended improvements to the public roadwayT net�vork have been included within the Traffic Impact Analysis Report. Examples include adding dedicated turn lanes to intersections and reevaluating posted speed limits to aid in traffic circulation and reduce stationaryT idling times. Dustand Odors Dust common to construction and earth moving practices is expected (in the form of fugitive dust) during periods of dryT `veather. Dust `vill be visuallyT monitored and recorded in conjunction `vith the NPDES Construction StoYmwateY Permit inspections. AppYopriate dust control best management practices (such as soil wetting, misting/water vapor, and hydraulic additives) mayT be implemented (upon inspection or public complaint) byT the contractor as necessaryT to control dust from leaving the Project site during all phases of construction. Specific dust control best management pYactices will be determined based on severity-, weather conditions (i.e. wind speed), and current site conditions. Dust and odors caused from vehicles parked within drivewayTs and along streets will varyT depending on the number and t�Tpes of vehicles activel�T moving in one area and current weather conditions. Pollutants generated from vehicle exhausts may- concentrate and linger (possibl�r where vehicles congregate) which mayT cause a short-term odor that eventuallyT dissipates. 2.4.1.9 Noise E�sting noise in the PYoject aYea includes vehicle traffic fYom adjacent Yoads and noise generated fYom the outdooY YecYeational facilityr to the south. Sensitive receptors located within pro�mityT to the project site include adjacent residential homes. Exterior noise while construction is taking place mayT range from 65-95 dBA. Post-construction exterior noise is anticipated to be generated from inteYmittent traffic and recreational activities. All exterioY noise is expected to be less than the State of Minnesota noise rules in a Yesidential land use setting (<65 dBA daytime &<55 dBA nighttime). NearbyT residential homes may experience a temporary increase in noise duration and frequency during construction; however, these noises will be conducted during restricted hours. Post construction noise `vill be tyTpical of surrounding residenrial areas and �vill not exceed the State of iVlinnesota statutoryT limits for residential receptors (NAC 1), iVlinnesota Rules 7030.0040, therefore, an�- noise anticipated from standard operations and construction activities `vill not result in a decreased qualit�T of life. 2.1.1.10 Transportation Currentlyr the site has no paYking stalls. Post construction theYe will be, including the ghost plats, 609 housing units which will all have garages and drivewa�Ts for parking. Additionally, street parking will be available across much of the Project site. A detailed breakdown of site parking is available in the Parking StudyT included in Exhibit F—Parking Study. A detailed breakdown of site traffic is available in the Traffic Impact Analysis Report is included in the EAW. The pYoject is estimated to geneYate 441 trips at peak hour traffic on �ueekda�r mornings (7:00 AM to 8:00 AlV� and 548 trips at peak hour on weekdayT afternoons (3:00 PM to 4:00 PiVI). Estimates weYe generated utilizing the ITE Trip GeneYation Manual (11 th Edition). The project `vill result in an increase to local traffic. A number of recommended improvements to the public roadwa�T net�vork have been included `vithin the Traffic Impact Anal�Tsis Report. Examples include adding dedicated turn lanes to intersections and Yeevaluating posted speed limits. Alternative methods of transportation include public transportation. The MetroTransit Elk River station is located approximately two miles south of the project site. Additionally, abundant sidewalks and bike trails are located throughout the City of Elk River. 2.4.2 Cumulative Potential Effects of Related or Anticipated Future Projects Cumulative effects result from the incremental impact of the pYoposed project when added to otheY past, present, and reasonablyT foreseeable future actions, regardless of �vhat agency or person undertakes such other action. Anal`Tsis of cumulative effects are summarized below. Site preparation work is anticipated to begin as soon as the Fall of 2022. Site construction will take place over the course of four phases �vhich may last up to multiple �Tears dependent upon market conditions. Construction activities will include tree removals, site earthwork, utilityT installarion, and the construction of housing units, roads, walks/trails, and storm`vater ponds. It is estimated that the project mayr result in up to appro�mately 3.92 acres of permanent wetland impacts that will occur as a result of construction of the Project including the ghost plat areas. This includes the follo`ving: liaiu Pr�a"�ect �G�ost Pl:�ts ??��.;� �: t?Fi:lia�:'_7� :T�Eatt,ia77[7:; } �r � 7 �Ir��ir��t'c��c� 1a�ciciera�r� �t'��cr.Ra�ts �.,5� G.G+� Wetland impacts were avoided to the extent possible during the preliminaryT design phase of the overall site plan (Exhibit A). The final design will attempt to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the extent possible. Should unavoidable impacts remain, the proper permitting processes will be followed in accordance with the WCA and/or Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as applicable. This process �vould involve applyTing for a replacement plan potentiallyT requiring compensatoryT mitigation. The area of wetland impact and jurisdictional status of the wetlands will be deteYmined byT the proper governmental agency during the permitting process follo`ving conclusion of the environmental revie�v process. An estimated 148 acYes of wooded land will be cleaYed to allow foY construction of the PYoject. Based on historic aerial photography appro�matelyr 62 of those wooded acres used to be cultivated for agricultural production through 2005, after which the land `vas left uncultivated and naturallyT developed into its current state. It should be noted that many of the trees onsite aYe fallen, damaged, or in poor condition. A tree preservation plan will be submitted to the CityT of Elk River for approval prior to commencing construct�on. Reasonably Foreseeable Future Pro�ects Reasonably foYeseeable futuYe projects that mayr inteYact with environmental effects of the pYoposed Project potentially include adjacent residential developments. The CityT of Elk River Comprehensive Plan pYojects the cityr to experience consistent population growth through the yeaY of 2035. The growing popularion will Yesult in an increased need for housing. Properties adjacent to the PYoject site aYe curYently zoned foY single-famil�r Yesidential use and as a Yesult will likely be looked at as potential sites for development. Due to the lengths of planning and design anyT adjacent developments likelywill not occur during the same timeframe as the construcrion of the PYoject. Following construction, the Project is not anticipated to contribute to any additional environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. TheYefoYe, the PYoject is not anticipated to contribute to anyT significant environmental effects due to cumulative effects. In addition to the potential environmental impacts addressed byr items 1 to 18, the economic and sociological impacts of the pYoject were consideYed. The economic and social impacts of the pYoject on the local communityT are anticipated to be beneficial by bringing additional housing opportunities and propertyT/sales tax income following construction. 2.4.3 Extent to which the Environmental Effects are Subject to Mitigation by Ongoing Public Regulatory Authority The mitigation of environmental impacts `vill be designed and implemented in coordination with regulatory agencies and will be subject to the plan approval and permitting process. Permits and approvals that have been obtained or may be required prior to project construction are outlined below: Cnit of n��erame�t T� � Of 8 L1fiRC1L�R �t�t�u� �,�iJi�:2'.�L7:.;' r�L�i�.i[7�� '�JiTI'v7! �_r�i.J �O:iSTF'21: R��i �c+.t}E .SP�wPrPi �'z:d _3ae�ati� �_'�1FC'_�, Sic7r��t:�e'7.��' rer�rPi. Ti�z�draradCa��st.fi-e�r�;ion�ict- :5iab�a��tterfr��ri�vpa•�k�ecP �T'e�d�rri r� L��2i.v��n 7aa i T� e�2r�r�rl C'orrsG�,�ra�iorr .3: � - 1 o he Su��r�ir�`� C7:-k� a€'�{:w r�'ik°er� 2T'et�:a7ir�1'�� a�t.�*aerr� a�r��i . . F2a��'t�frrrn :°a�a�+ai� 1� he Sr,w�MiYtr� (r�'daeu�'�.dl ,�a�ifd�.�r —r'�esic��.xa�aa{ 1c� be Src�Prrr��.r� Sewa�- rra�� 2Ter,er� �o �e Su&f�rr�ed �f�na�esotra D�y�rr�•rxra�ri��i Ti',�t��.-�,�r�opaza7orrs �o �e .SRr,�Prrr;�� /r;f`Faet.r��l :ti:r*��rrd R�;aar�°��s f 3:i''r�L7 �,'R,a 2.4.4 Extent to which Environmental Effects can be Anticipated and Controlled as a Result of Other Environmental Studies The CityT of Elk River has previous single-famil�r and mixed residential development experience, and similar projects have been designed and constructed within the communityT. The closes similar projecting immediately abuts the project on the north boundaryT. Design and construcrion staff are familiar with the project area. No problems are anticipated in `vhich staff has not encountered and successfull�r solved previouslyr in similaY projects in oY neaY the pYoject aYea. The cityr finds that the environmental effects of the project can be anticipated and controlled as a result of environmental review and experience on similar projects. 3. Conclusions 1. All requirements for environmental xeview of the proposed project have been met. 2. The EAW and the pernut development processes related to the pxoject have generated informati.on that is adequate to deterxnine whether the project has the potential for significant environmental effects. 3. Axeas wheYe potential environmental effects have been identified will be addressed during the final design of the project. Mirigarion will be provided where impacts axe expected to result from project construction, opexation, or maintenance. Mitigation measures are incorpoxated into project design and have been or will be coordinated with state and fedeYal agencies during the permit process 4. Based on the critexia in Minnesota Rules, part 4410.1700, the project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. 5. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required for the proposed pxoject. Fox the City of Elk Rivex -� .� ., � -� ack Carlton Community Development Dixector /��-c-� � �, �� Date y Appendix A: Responses to Substantive Comments FEBRUARY 15, 2023 RE: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR THE FOSTER PROPERTY - ELK RIVER The Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Foster Property development in Elk River was published and released for public review on Tuesday, December 13, 2022. The 30-day public comment period closed on Thursday, January 13, 2023. Acknowledgements of the EAW were received by four agencies. Three of which contained no formal comments to address. These were from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), and the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Copies of the written acknowledgments are attached for reference. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) submitted a plan review letter dated January 12, 2023 in response to the EAW. A copy of the letter is attached for reference. Please note that each review item is restated below along with our corresponding response. 1. Page 5, Zoning. It is not clear from the EAW if the subdivision does comply with R1D zoning. This section says the site is, "zoned as R1D Single Family Residential. The Plan defines the purpose of R1D districts as follows: `This district is intended to accommodate single-family residential dwellings with large lots and higher quality housing within the municipal sewer and water access area. This district is explicitly for areas that possess significant natural features and is intended to encourage the design of subdivisions that protect these natural features."' Based on this zoning description and intent to protect natural features, the destruction of nearly 148 acres of forest, along with nearly four acres of wetland impacts does not seem consistent with this intent. It is unclear if the site will be mass graded in such a way that removes nearly all existing natural features from individual lots. It is also unclear what attempts at tree preservation will be made, such as conducting a tree inventory and identifying high quality resources to preserve during the development process, and/or offsetting tree destruction through compensatory tree planting/restoration efforts. Response: The project site is located within a residentially zoned district. While the R-1D district does "encourage" the protection of natural features it is ultimately intended for residential development, not solely land conservation. The project both meets the city's requirements for site densities and includes natural feature protection as part of the project. Within the 253-acre site, approximately 134 acres of land will remain in a natural state within outlots following construction. This includes over 67 acres of wetland, including an area of over 42 contiguous acres. Planting of new trees across the site will offset the tree removals required to construct the project infrastructure. A planting plan has been developed in compliance with the City of Elk River's City Code (Sec. 30-934) which includes the planting of 1,575 new trees. It should be noted that much of the project site has previously been disturbed by mining and row crop production and many of the young trees onsite consist of non-desirable species. Additionally, a significant amount of the mature trees on-site are either rotted or have fallen as well. 2. Page 5, Zoning. It appears that portions of the proposed development will be located within 300 feet of Trott Brook, a public water. It is unclear how the project will comply with local shoreland ordinances regarding setbacks, impervious surFaces, and vegetation removal. Response: Within the City of Elk River's City Code (Sec. 30-2042), Planned Unit Development (PUD) is a permissible type of development within shoreland districts. All housing units that fall within the shoreland district will abide by the required setback of 50' from rivers for sewered structures (Sec. 30-2022) and any other applicable requirements. 7900 International Drive + Suite 550 + Bloomington, MN 55425 952.426.0699 + ISGlnc.com Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning 3. Page 10, Stormwater. Blanding's turtles, a protected state-listed threatened species, have been documented within the vicinity of the project. Stormwater features may be colonized by Blanding's turtles in the area, therefore we recommend incorporating measures to avoid impacting this species into stormwater management. In years when the stormwater features will be dredged to remove excess sediment, please draw down water levels by September 15th in order to allow turtles to find overwintering habitat elsewhere. Response: The City will ultimately be responsible for management of the stormwater features in the future and will make every attempt to draw down water levels by September 15t" when feasible during years when stormwater features will be dredged. 4. Page 10, Stormwater. We recommend that BWSR-approved, weed-free, native seed mixes be used to the greatest degree possible in stormwater features and development landscaping in order to provide pollinator habitat. Native plants also require less irrigation and soil inputs than traditional landscaping. Response: Seeding of stormwater features will consist of a combination of BWSR approved MnDOT seed mixes as well as ISG custom designed seed mixes, both of which are weed-free native seed mixes. Seed mixes were chosen/designed on a feature-to-feature basis based on soils and planned hydrology for each stormwater feature. The specified MnDOT seed mixes match typical hydrological conditions for stormwater features. The ISG custom designed seed mixes are created by Plant Ecologists and utilize native species that are sand specialists or able to handle extreme hydrology events. All stormwater features will serve as pollinator habitat. Additionally, pollinator friendly habitat is also planned as part of the project in and around the trail system and other open spaces within the development. 5. Page 10, Stormwater. The significant increase in impervious surFaces will also increase the amount of road salt used in the project area. Chloride released into local lakes and streams does not break down, and instead accumulates in the environment, potentially reaching levels that are toxic to aquatic wildlife and plants. Consider promoting local business and city participation in the Smart Salting Training offered through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. There are a variety of classes available for road applicators, sidewalk applicators, and properry managers. More information and resources can be found at this website. Many winter maintenance staff who have attended the Smart Salting training — both from cities and counties and from private companies — have used their knowledge to reduce salt use and save money for their organizations. We encourage local governments to request that project proposers who wish to significantly increase impervious surFaces develop a chloride management plan that outlines what BMP's and strategies will be used to reduce chloride use within the project area, and then tie that plan to City 0&M agreements. We also encourage cities and counties to consider how they may participate in the Statewide Chloride Management Plan and provide public outreach to reduce the overuse of chloride. Here are some educational resources for residents as well as a sample ordinance regarding chloride use. Response: The City Trains plow drivers to the standards outlined in the Statewide Chloride Management Plan. The city also has their own chloride management plan and closely monitors the amount of salt applied during a storm event. 6. Page 15, Rare Features. This section should describe common wildlife that utilizes the project area. Response: According to the Ecological Classification System (ECS) adopted by the DNR, the project site is located within the Anoka Sandplain subsection. The ECS Subsection Profile for the Anoka Sand Plain lists well-known species within the subsections as sandhill cranes, trumpeter swans, bald eagles, bobolinks, and lark sparrows. Page 2 of 4 952.426.0699 + ISGlnc.com 7. Page 15, Rare Features. If rare features are identified within one mile of a project area using a license agreement, then a concurrence and next steps from DNR must be obtained by coordinating through Minnesota Conservation Explorer. Only DNR can make a determination on whether or not a project is likely to impact a state-listed species. Response: A Natural Heritage Review request has been submitted for the project through the Minnesota Conservation Explorer. The project is currently "In Queue" for further review. Attached is a copy of the Formal Natural Heritage Review - Cover Page. 8. Page 15, Rare Features. Recently U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service made the decision to up-list the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) from the status of federally threatened to federally endangered. This new status goes into effect January 30th, 2023. This follows precipitous declines of more than 90% since the species federal listing as threatened in 2015. NLEB are known to occur in Sherburne County and throughout Minnesota. Tree removal is an activity that could negatively impact this species, therefore it is important that the project proposer coordinates with USFWS regarding potential impacts to the NLEB, and follows the instructions for consultation provided within the appendix. Please see the USFWS website for more information: Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) � U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (fws.gov) Response: The determination key for NLEB Consultation and 4(d) Rule Consistency was completed for the project using the USFWS IPaC system. An otficial Consistency Letter for the project was issued stating "this letter verifies that the Action is not likely to result in unauthorized take of the northern long-eared bat."A copy of this letter is attached. The project site is not located within a 0.25-mile radius of a known northern long-eared bat hibernacula, doesn't include any known occupied maternity roost trees, and isn't within a 150-foot (45-meter) radius from any known maternity trees. Therefore, the project is not subject to tree removal timeline restrictions. 9. Page 15, Rare Features. Blanding's turtles (Emydoidea blandingii), a state-listed threatened species, have been documented in the vicinity of the proposed project. Blanding's turtles use upland areas up to and over a mile distant from wetlands, waterbodies, and watercourses. Uplands are used for nesting, basking, periods of dormancy, and traveling between wetlands. Factors believed to contribute to the decline of this species include collisions with vehicles, wetland drainage and degradation, and the development of upland habitat. Any added mortality can be detrimental to populations of Blanding's turtles, as these turtles have a low reproduction rate that depends upon a high survival rate to maintain population levels. This project does have the potential to impact this rare turtle through direct fatalities and habitat disturbance/destruction due to excavation, fill, and other construction activities associated with the project. Minnesota's Endangered Species Statute (Minnesota Statutes, section 84.0895) and associated Rules (Minnesota Rules, part 6212.1800 to 62122300 and 6134) prohibit the take of threatened or endangered species without a permit. As such, the following avoidance measures are required: • Avoid aquatic impacts during hibernation season, between October 15th and April 15th, unless the area is unsuitable for hibernation. • The use of erosion control blanket shall be limited to `bio-netting' or `natural-netting' types, and specifically not products containing plastic mesh netting or other plastic components. Please update project plans so that this information is given to contractors. o Also, be aware that hydro-mulch products may contain small synthetic (plastic) fibers to aid in their matrix strength. These loose fibers could potentially re-suspend and make their way into Public Waters. As such, please review mulch products and not allow any materials with synthetic (plastic) fiber additives in areas that drain to Public Waters. Page 3 of 4 952.426.0699 + ISGlnc.com • Areas where there will be construction, especially aquatic areas, should be checked for turtles before the use of heavy equipment or any ground disturbance. o The Blanding's turtle flyer must be given to all contractors working in the area. o Monitor for turtles during construction and report any sightings to the DNR Nongame Specialist, Erica Hoaglund at 651-259-5772 or Erica.Hoaglund@state.mn.us. o If turtles are in imminent danger they must be moved by hand out of harm's way, otherwise, they are to be left undisturbed. If the above avoidance measures are not possible, please contact NHIS.Review@state.mn.us as further action may be needed. For additional information, see the Blanding's turtle fact sheet, which describes the habitat use and life history of this species. The fact sheet also provides two lists of recommendations for avoiding and minimizing impacts to this rare turtle. Please refer to both lists of recommendations and apply those that are relevant to your project. For further assistance regarding the Blanding's turtle, please contactthe DNR Regional Nongame Specialist, Erica Hoaglund. Response: The avoidance measures listed above will be included within the construction specifications for the project in order to educate contractors in an attempt to minimize any potential impacts on protected species. It should be noted that all pond outlets that are a part of the project were designed to the state standard for aquatic organism passage and that the wetland preservation within outlets will provide habitat onsite. 10. Page 16, Rare Features. The project plans to destroy 148 acres of contiguous forested habitat. The EAW states multiple times that 62 acres of the forested area has only established since 2005, and that fallen or dead trees are present indicating that the forested habitat is of poor quality. Please be aware that fallen or dead trees as well as relatively recent forest established within the past 20 years all provide significant wildlife habitat to many species. This level of tree removal would be a huge impact to wildlife in the area. Minnesota has lost much of the deciduous forests that used to present within the region to development, which makes retaining forest, even the small and isolated remnants on the landscape, especially important for wildlife habitat, clean water, and for the recreation/aesthetic values to the residents of the development. Therefore, we recommend minimizing the amount of tree removal to the greatest extent possible and not conducting tree and shrub removal during key nesting periods from April through July. Response: Tree removal will be avoided to the extent feasible during the key nesting period of April through July. As stated previously, approximately 134 acres of land within the 253-acres site will remain in a natural state within outlots following construction. Planting of new trees across the site will otfset the tree removals required to construct the project infrastructure. A planting plan has been developed in compliance with the City of Elk River's City Code (Sec. 30- 934) which includes the planting of 1,575 new trees. It should be noted that much of the project site has previously been disturbed by mining and row crop production and a many of the young trees onsite consist of non-desirable species. A significant amount of the mature trees on-site are either rotted or have fallen as well. Page 4 of 4 952.426.0699 + ISGlnc.com � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Foster Property Development MCE #: 2023-00035 Page 1 of 4 �C�E �l�RT�EhIT �F �1�1T�F��L ��5��'�E� Formal Natural Heritage Review - Cover Page See next page for results of review. A draft watermark means the project details have not been finalized and the results are not official. Project Name: Foster Property Development Project Proposer: US Home, LLC Project Type: Development, Residential Project Type Activities: Tree Removal;Wetland impacts (e.g., discharge, runoff, sedimentation, fill, excavation) TRS: T33 R26 S35, T33 R26 S36 County(s): Sherburne DNR Admin Region(s): Central Reason Requested: State EAW Project Description: US Home, LLC is proposing construction of a residential development located at in the City of Elk River, Sherburne County, Minnesota. The project will ... Existing Land Uses: Existing land use of the site consists primarily of wooded upland and wetland areas with some areas of grassland. Landcover / Habitat Impacted: The landcover/habitat type that will be impacted is predominantly consisted of wooded land. Areas of wetland will be impacted as well. Waterbodies Affected: Waterbodies that will be impacted consist entirely of wetland areas. Impacts will consist of areas of fill. Groundwater Resources Affected: Water for the project will be sourced from the City of Elk River's existing public water supply system (PWS #1710004). Construction of new watermains ... Previous Natural Heritage Review: No Previous Habitat Assessments / Surveys: No SUMMARY OF AUTOMATED RESULTS Category Results Response By Category Project Details No Comments No Further Review Required Ecologically Significant Area Comments Local Conservation Value - Comment State-Listed Endangered or Needs Further State-protected Species in Vicinity Threatened Species Review State-Listed Species of Special Comments Recommendations Concern Federally Listed Species No Records Visit IPaC For Federal Review 1/16/2023 04:18 PM Foster Property Development MCE #: 2023-00035 Page 2 of 4 �C�E �l�RT�E�IT �F �I�T��L �E��'�E� January 16, 2023 Project Name: Foster Property Development Project Proposer: US Home, LLC Project Type: Development, Residential Project ID: MCE #2023-00035 AUTOMATED RESULTS: FURTHER REVIEW IS NEEDED As requested, the above project has undergone an automated review for potential impacts to rare features. Based on this review, one or more rare features may be impacted by the proposed project and further review by the Natural Heritage Review Team is needed. You will receive a separate notification email when the review process is complete and the Natural Heritage Review letter has been posted. Please refer to the table on the cover page of this report for a summary of potential impacts to rare features. For additional information or planning purposes, use the Explore Page in Minnesota Conservation Explorer to view the potentially impacted rare features or to create a Conservation Planning Report for the proposed project. If you have additional information to help resolve the potential impacts listed in the summary results, please attach related project documentation in the Edit Details tab of the Project page. Relevant information includes, but is not limited to, additional project details, completed habitat assessments, or survey results. This additional information will be considered during the project review. 1/16/2023 04:18 PM Foster Property Development MCE #: 2023-00035 Page 3 of 4 u Foster Propert� Develapment Aerial Imagery �th Locatar Map `� � _.... . � � tli ' 1, • . . s 7 , °Y p r �i ( Eri f� - . t •. . r � _��-��r _ . .l'" _ �r# � r � � �� f �r � ' ��, . � ' �r.� ��T.`,��'��~�� ..� jj��- ��}�' . �� -..� `' t.:�' i t� . „ � � iV l �� - . . $. � � , y � i`.,�1 ..,�. � .'�, _c .j�� '� ls''�.3 � . I r � � � i �,�„ ; � y,�� p.;��,�'�-, 1� .��_ , �s� ` � rya.11- � �,, t �, }� � It �� Y �. t, � 4 � - �, ■ .. � -... '^"'.r7 d �r'.�� i� � � �:� � �. . j '� � f' �� '�,�'--��,� ,�*� _ • � ��' J � � - '1; f� N.�,� , _ � + �/ 4 -,� "� ` i' � `._ �� '� �) [� is.4 ��y �, - r.� . . � ,� !� � ^ �� 1� _i3; ' . .� � s • � • 1� r • . r L'[7 " " :..�.+� , • , ' j . j'�� '� �� i .� � ',' � �" ' •e; ,:: f �r�� . '�� . . � �, .�JF � r , � ., i . �r 'N�, i.a � . . y � '� � � � f . � _ �^ �-��k . � • +�.,�°�� 0 �� `i. :� ,w ° • 1 ` ` , �w i- .a. y, �jw y• , �I ` ` ��x� ' Q� . . ^. i! } � 9i ��j '�'�'i' r ' : � r (I v '.j'� fi { • . C4 � � J =� � . tr �� r „ �J X d � !+ r' � �+ ' . � . . s �'y` ! ' ! , € y < �•' ��+ ,�, �+�y� 1-I - .� y � ?.. '� ° . .�`� k � �• � {� ��!.�f .� � �M` ` � �,�f�i� � ,'� *i + , ,,��"a?. ,f , . �, 1 , 1- �`��;� s �9r �, ,t♦ .�r a �s i �+�..' �.-� ...1 C P: 4 �. r � .' �- � :�'�,�, . 3�� "�� !�� . ;< � ° � �'. �? . i �r a!� � ►� c �:�` � �� ' � � `��Y � � , ��. • ,w,,,. °� � � ,� � ,�� - _ , � � � ` 't flC?'d�3� _ . , � �' f f� ',�, , � , �. ' �' �. 1. . ' ,: . _ . . , . � �� ^ '. T �; # � ,�'1' , x '; v 5.{T� r "�, • �� '... r I � �. � : � � !�•. y �t � � � � .: �r?@ � „ f �� •'• �� ,9r�� - �� (~� x �' .. 4�`R q�, �,` ,��,d�� h,, l , � W ^ 4 Y� P w. � M1. � .A� �� . ��. ,� ,�� i� y f �r� �"," +' � �M1 �..�1 } - � L }�! � .� � _ ��. r.,�L�Of`Y i , ��I I �� 4 = • ' � r � . f . �i� i�� .l . , �.t�,'. � _ � . r � � � � � �. - - _ .� .. , , � , .. .�, � ��, � . . *: ��. ; , �: . �',r�►�,� � f��.�,�� .: , _ � ��i } 'n; � ` 4 r�' ' �' ��A �y � � ��_ ` v t � � . � . , . • ��. . r � ,� • � � ' � � � << � R, . .r . � . � . � :.�„�,t��. . ' � ..� �'.1 , ��., ' - � � . � .�'' . ` ; ` ; `.'�"" :�` '� � �' • , �' .� ��r .`� t ,,��" , . �� ` .� a � ��, ` �.. � � . � ; ' � �` , . ,�. . �,�--,,. J > � ;.r« � ��1' _ �"'�` ,�' � '�._�, `' � 1�' `� �t'�:e`� • � ,` �� • -,• `�� + � t� R+` � rc• � ,,N .. .� E S � Project Baundary ' ,a. ��• �} Cl.1J fl.3 {).Ei {}.9 1.� N9iles Proj�ct Type: Development, Residential Project 5ize (acres)� 267_93 Counly(s}: 5herburne TRS: T33 R26 535, T33 R26 S36 Sherl�umF (]nun#ylv1l-! GIS, f4�lax�3r Esri, HERE c;��riliin, FAt=�: Id��r�,. USGS EPA A�1etrupcdit�n G'ounci1, fv1etroGl4, Esri, HE�E, [;armin, SareGr�aph. .i- �T' - = l` ��".erwv- � !'t7innesota � Minneapolis 0 1/16/2023 04:18 PM Foster Property Development MCE #: 2023-00035 Page 4 of 4 Foster Property Devela�ment U5A Topo Basemap With Lacatar ap „�z�� rr - � � ,. _ _=t 13 13 �Lakes Road Northwes� _.ir.I-i i��t��._d . I .i . .i .n• '�., l�.- _Sr. �169y :..i'�.;:.,:....:� C:i'�.Y P�ii'.:. �. � _ m in � 0 .f�� 'fj 4 � 975th Awenue Northwest ?1�� 3 � `o Z � � h y 0 � i i � 9�zh I • I I I I i I I I I I � � I f I I I� �a I N (} C7.15 fl.3 fl.6 0.9 1.� ,� ..._ ��`E N9iles � S � Project Baundary Proj�ct Type: Development, Residential Project 5ize (acres)� 267_93 Counly(s}: 5herburne TRS: T33 R26 535, T33 R26 S36 i.sn, rinsn: rica, ��scss € €:�::va Esri, HERE G��riliin, F,40: fd��P�,, USGS EPA 1v1etrupcdit�n G'ounci1, fv1etroGl�., Esri, HE�E, [;armin, SareGr�aph. `` � i,,. ,�:. 1 !'t7innesota � Minneapolis 0 1/16/2023 04:18 PM �,j�y "� �� _{. . ._� United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Minnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office 3815 American Blvd East Bloomington, MN 55425-1659 Phone: (952) 858-0793 Fax: (952) 646-2873 In Reply Refer To: Project code: 2022-0016504 Project Name: Foster Property � ..�. rt:�a r w �� .irfi: .%7'lk�'fl'fi �� t January 16, 2023 Subject: Consistency letter for the 'Foster Property' project indicating that any take of the northern long-eared bat that may occur as a result of the Action is not prohibited under the ESA Section 4(d) rule adopted for this species at 50 CFR §17.40(0). Dear Jeremy Groskreutz: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) received on January 16, 2023 your effects determination for the 'Foster Property' (the Action) using the northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) key within the Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) system. You indicated that no Federal agencies are involved in funding or authorizing this Action. This IPaC key assists users in determining whether a non-Federal action may cause "take"� of the northern long-eared bat that is prohibited under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (87 Stat.884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Based upon your IPaC submission, any take of the northern long-eared bat that may occur as a result of the Action is not prohibited under the ESA Section 4(d) rule adopted for this species at 50 CFR §17.40(0). Unless the Service advises you within 30 days of the date of this letter that your IPaC-assisted determination was incorrect, this letter verifies that the Action is not likely to result in unauthorized take of the northern long-eared bat. Additionally, please note that on March 23, 2022, the Service published a proposal to reclassify the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) as endangered under the Endangered Species Act. The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has ordered the Service to complete a new final listing determination for the NLEB by November 2022 (Case 1:15-cv-00477, March l, 2021). The bat, currently listed as threatened, faces extinction due to the range-wide impacts of white-nose syndrome (WNS), a deadly fungal disease affecting cave-dwelling bats across the continent. The proposed reclassification, if finalized, would remove the current 4(d) rule for the NLEB, as these rules may be applied only to threatened species. Depending on the type of effects a project has on NLEB, the change in the species' status may trigger the need to re-initiate consultation for any actions that are not completed and for which the Federal action agency retains discretion once the new listing determination becomes effective (anticipated to occur by December 30, 2022). If your project may result in incidental take of NLEB after the new listing goes into effect this will 01/16/2023 first need to be addressed in an updated consultation that includes an Incidental Take Statement. If your project may require re-initiation of consultation, please contact our office for additional guidance. Please report to our office any changes to the information about the Action that you entered into IPaC, the results of any bat surveys conducted in the Action area, and any dead, injured, or sick northern long-eared bats that are found during Action implementation. If your Action proceeds as described and no additional information about the Action's effects on species protected under the ESA becomes available, no further coordination with the Service is required with respect to the northern long-eared bat. The IPaC-assisted determination for the northern long-eared bat does not apply to the following ESA-protected species that also may occur in your Action area: • Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate • Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus Proposed Endangered You may coordinate with our Office to determine whether the Action may cause prohibited take of the animal species listed above. [1]Take means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct [ESA Section 3(19)]. 01/16/2023 Action Description You provided to IPaC the following name and description for the subject Action. 1. Name Foster Property 2. Description The following description was provided for the project'Foster Property': New housing development. Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://www.google.com/ maps/(c�45.305281949999994,-93.52499179120149,14z �,� =gF. �y.�{� ��h hba5a�. ::r.4+ d f 4r F '. Tratt R�r,rsk f 4� F'orki . �'�a. L! f� :_ f _,� �� I � � I I I I I � 1!!1sIA.r.h�Mr '�� ., w � I � 1i4�.c� � ±� S nM�� Finf�:s �F kp ,v�� rr.v6�- � Determination Key Result This non-Federal Action may affect the northern long-eared bat; however, any take of this species that may occur incidental to this Action is not prohibited under the final 4(d) rule at 50 CFR § 17.40(0). 3 Determination Key Description: Northern Long-eared Bat 4(d) Rule This key was last updated in IPaC on May 15, 2017. Keys are subject to periodic revision. This key is intended for actions that may affect the threatened northern long-eared bat. The purpose of the key for non-Federal actions is to assist determinations as to whether proposed actions are excepted from take prohibitions under the northern long-eared bat 4(d) rule. If a non-Federal action may cause prohibited take of northern long-eared bats or other ESA-listed animal species, we recommend that you coordinate with the Service. 01/16/2023 Determination Key Result Based upon your IPaC submission, any take of the northern long-eared bat that may occur as a result of the Action is not prohibited under the ESA Section 4(d) rule adopted for this species at 50 CFR § 17.40(0). Qualification Interview l. Is the action authorized, funded, or being carried out by a Federal agency? No 2. Will your activity purposefully Take northern long-eared bats? No 3. [Semantic] Is the project action area located wholly outside the White-nose Syndrome Zone? Automatically answered No 4. Have you contacted the appropriate agency to determine if your project is near a known hibernaculum or maternity roost tree? 0 Location information for northern long-eared bat hibernacula is generally kept in state Natural Heritage Inventory databases — the availability of this data varies state-by-state. Many states provide online access to their data, either directly by providing maps or by providing the opportunity to make a data request. In some cases, to protect those resources, access to the information may be limited. A web page with links to state Natural Heritage Inventory databases and other sources of information on the locations of northern long- eared bat roost trees and hibernacula is available at www.fws.gov/media/nleb-roost-tree- and-hibernacula-state-specific-data-links-0. Yes Will the action affect a cave or mine where northern long-eared bats are known to hibernate (i.e., hibernaculum) or could it alter the entrance or the environment (physical or other alteration) of a hibernaculum? No 6. Will the action involve Tree Removal? Yes 7. Will the action only remove hazardous trees for the protection of human life or property? No 8. Will the action remove trees within 0.25 miles of a known northern long-eared bat hibernaculum at any time of year? No 01/16/2023 9. Will the action remove a known occupied northern long-eared bat maternity roost tree or any trees within 150 feet of a known occupied maternity roost tree from June 1 through July 31? No 01/16/'L023 Project Questionnaire If the project includes forest conversion, report the appropriate acreages below. Otherwise, type `0' in questions 1-3. l. Estimated total acres of forest conversion: 148 2. If known, estimated acres of forest conversion from April 1 to October 31 0 3. If known, estimated acres of forest conversion from June 1 to July 31 0 If the project includes timber harvest, report the appropriate acreages below. Otherwise, type `0' in questions 4-6. 4. Estimated total acres of timber harvest 0 5. If known, estimated acres of timber harvest from April 1 to October 31 0 6. If known, estimated acres of timber harvest from June 1 to July 31 0 If the project includes prescribed fire, report the appropriate acreages below. Otherwise, type `0' in questions 7-9. 7. Estimated total acres of prescribed fire 0 8. If known, estimated acres of prescribed fire from April 1 to October 31 0 9. If known, estimated acres of prescribed fire from June 1 to July 31 0 If the project includes new wind turbines, report the megawatts of wind capacity below. Otherwise, type `0' in question 10. 10. What is the estimated wind capacity (in megawatts) of the new turbine(s)? 0 01/16/'L023 IPaC User Contact Information Agency: ISG Name: Jeremy Groskreutz Address: 115 East Hickory Street, Suite 300 City: State: Zip: Email Phone: Mankato MN 56001 j eremy. groskreutz@isginc. com 5073876651 Appendix B: Original Comments �DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Ecological and Water Resources Region 3 Headquarters 1200 Warner Road Saint Paul, MN 55106 January 12, 2023 Zachary Carlton, Planning Director City of Elk River 13065 Orono Parkway Elk River, MN 55330 Dear Zachary Carlton, Transmitted by Email Thank you for the opportunity to review The Foster Property Development Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) in Sherburne County. The DNR respectfully submits the following comments for your consideration: 1. Page 5, Zoning. It is not clear from the EAW if the subdivision does comply with R1D zoning. This section says the site is, "zoned as R1D Single Family Residential. The Plan defines the purpose of R1D districts as follows: 'This district is intended to accommodate single-family residential dwellings with large lots and higher quality housing within the municipal sewer and water access area. This district is explicitly for areas that possess significant natural features and is intended to encourage the design of subdivisions that protect these natural features."' Based on this zoning description and intent to protect natural features, the destruction of nearly 148 acres of forest, along with nearly four acres of wetland impacts does not seem consistent with this intent. It is unclear if the site will be mass graded in such a way that removes nearly all existing natural features from individual lots. It is also unclear what attempts at tree preservation will be made, such as conducting a tree inventory and identifying high quality resources to preserve during the development process, and/or offsetting tree destruction through compensatory tree planting/restoration efforts. 2. Page 5, Zoning. It appears that portions of the proposed development will be located within 300 feet of Trott Brook, a public water. It is unclear how the project will comply with local shoreland ordinances regarding setbacks, impervious surfaces, and vegetation removal. 3. Page 10, Stormwater. Blanding's turtles, a protected state-listed threatened species, have been documented within the vicinity of the project. Stormwater features may be colonized by Blanding's turtles in the area, therefore we recommend incorporating measures to avoid impacting this species into stormwater management. In years when the stormwater features will be dredged to remove excess sediment, please draw down water levels by September 15th in order to allow turtles to find overwintering habitat elsewhere. 4. Page 10, Stormwater. We recommend that BWSR-approved, weed-free, native seed mixes be used to the greatest degree possible in stormwater features and development landscaping in order to provide pollinator habitat. Native plants also require less irrigation and soil inputs than traditional landscaping. 5. Page 10, Stormwater. The significant increase in impervious surfaces will also increase the amount of road salt used in the project area. Chloride released into local lakes and streams does not break down, and instead accumulates in the environment, potentially reaching levels that are toxic to aquatic wildlife and plants. Consider promoting local business and city participation in the Smart Salting Training offered through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. There are a variety of classes available for road applicators, sidewalk applicators, and property managers. More information and resources can be found at this website. Many winter maintenance staff who have attended the Smart Salting training — both from cities and counties and from private companies — have used their knowledge to reduce salt use and save money for their organizations. We encourage local governments to request that project proposers who wish to significantly increase impervious surfaces develop a chloride management plan that outlines what BMP's and strategies will be used to reduce chloride use within the project area, and then tie that plan to City O&M agreements. We also encourage cities and counties to consider how they may participate in the Statewide Chloride Mana�ement Plan and provide public outreach to reduce the overuse of chloride. Here are some educational resources for residents as well as a sample ordinance regarding chloride use. 6. Page 15, Rare Features. This section should describe common wildlife that utilizes the project area. 7. Page 15, Rare Features. If rare features are identified within one mile of a project area using a license agreement, then a concurrence and next steps from DNR must be obtained by coordinating through Minnesota Conservation Explorer. Only DNR can make a determination on whether or not a project is likely to impact a state-listed species. 8. Page 15, Rare Features. Recently U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service made the decision to up-list the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) from the status of federally threatened to federally endangered. This new status goes into effect January 30th, 2023. This follows precipitous declines of more than 90% since the species federal listing as threatened in 2015. NLEB are known to occur in Sherburne County and throughout Minnesota. Tree removal is an activity that could negatively impact this species, therefore it is important that the project proposer coordinates with USFWS regarding potential impacts to the NLEB, and follows the instructions for consultation provided within the appendix. Please see the USFWS website for more information: Northern Lon�-eared Bat (Mvotis septentrionalis) I U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service fws. ov 9. Page 15, Rare Features. Blanding's turtles (Emydoidea blandingii), a state-listed threatened species, have been documented in the vicinity of the proposed project. Blanding's turtles use upland areas up to and over a mile distant from wetlands, waterbodies, and watercourses. Uplands are used for nesting, basking, periods of dormancy, and traveling between wetlands. Factors believed to contribute to the decline of this species include collisions with vehicles, wetland drainage and degradation, and the development of upland habitat. Any added mortality can be detrimental to populations of Blanding's turtles, as these turtles have a low reproduction rate that depends upon a high survival rate to maintain population levels. This project does have the potential to impact this rare turtle through direct fatalities and habitat disturbance/destruction due to excavation, fill, and other construction activities associated with the project. Minnesota's Endangered Species Statute (Minnesota Statutes, section 84.0895) and associated Rules (Minnesota Rules, part 6212.1800 to 6212.2300 and 6134) prohibit the take of threatened or endangered species without a permit. As such, the following avoidance measures are required: o Avoid aquatic impacts during hibernation season, between October 15th and April 15th, unless the area is unsuitable for hibernation. o The use of erosion control blanket shall be limited to'bio-netting' or'natural-netting' types, and specifically not products containing plastic mesh netting or other plastic components. Please update project plans so that this information is given to contractors. ■ Also, be aware that hydro-mulch products may contain small synthetic (plastic) fibers to aid in their matrix strength. These loose fibers could potentially re- suspend and make their way into Public Waters. As such, please review mulch products and not allow any materials with synthetic (plastic) fiber additives in areas that drain to Public Waters. o Areas where there will be construction, especially aquatic areas, should be checked for turtles before the use of heavy equipment or any ground disturbance. ■ The Blandin�'s turtle flyer must be given to all contractors working in the area. ■ Monitor for turtles during construction and report any sightings to the DNR Non�ame Specialist, Erica Hoaglund at 651-259-5772 or Erica.Hoa�lund@state.mn.us. ■ If turtles are in imminent danger they must be moved by hand out of harm's way, otherwise, they are to be left undisturbed. If the above avoidance measures are not possible, please contact NHIS.Review@state.mn.us as further action may be needed. For additional information, see the Blandin�'s turtle fact sheet, which describes the habitat use and life history of this species. The fact sheet also provides two lists of recommendations for avoiding and minimizing impacts to this rare turtle. Please refer to both lists of recommendations and apply those that are relevant to your project. For further assistance regarding the Blanding's turtle, please contact the DNR Regional Nongame Specialist, Erica Hoaglund. 10. Page 16, Rare Features. The project plans to destroy 148 acres of contiguous forested habitat. The EAW states multiple times that 62 acres of the forested area has only established since 2005, and that fallen or dead trees are present indicating that the forested habitat is of poor quality. Please be aware that fallen or dead trees as well as relatively recent forest established within the past 20 years all provide significant wildlife habitat to many species. This level of tree removal would be a huge impact to wildlife in the area. Minnesota has lost much of the deciduous forests that used to present within the region to development, which makes retaining forest, even the small and isolated remnants on the landscape, especially important for wildlife habitat, clean water, and for the recreation/aesthetic values to the residents of the development. Therefore, we recommend minimizing the amount of tree removal to the greatest extent possible and not conducting tree and shrub removal during key nesting periods from April through July. Thank you again for the opportunity to review this document. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, _ .��'j�.�.�� '+%u�r"�`�-�' l/ Melissa Collins Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist � Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Phone: 651-259-5755 Email: melissa.collins@state.mn.us CC: Joe Jablonski, US Home, LLC Equal Opportunity Employer 4 �dEPARTIMAENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE �-IISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE January 10, 2023 Zachary Carlton Planning Director City of Elk River 13065 Orono Parkway Elk River, MN 55330 RE: EAW — Foster Property Development T33 R26 536, Elk River, Sherburne County SHPO Number: 2023-0595 Dear Zachary Carlton: Thank you for providing this office with a copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the above-referenced project. Based on our review of the project information, we conclude that there are no properties listed in the National or State Registers of Historic Places, and no known or suspected archaeological properties in the area that will be affected by this project. Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36 CFR § 800. If this project is considered for federal financial assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, then review and consultation with our office will need to be initiated by the lead federal agency. Be advised that comments and recommendations provided by our office for this state-level review may differ from findings and determinations made by the federal agency as part of review and consultation under Section 106. Please contact Kelly Gragg-Johnson, Environmental Review Program Specialist, at 651-201-3285 or kellv.�ra��iohnson@state.mn.us if you have any questions regarding our review of this project. Sincerely, Sarah J. Beimers Environmental Review Program Manager MINNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE 50 Sherburne Avenue Administration Building 203 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 651-201-3287 mn.gov/admin/shpo mnshpo@state.mn.us AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND SERVICE PROVIDER From: Cruikshank, Thomas (DOT) To: Carlton. Zachary Cc: Voss. Steven (DOT) Subject: FW: EAW Public Comment Period - Lennar/City of Elk River Date: Friday, December 16, 2022 8:20:17 AM Attachments: imaae001.nna Hi Zack, I received this EAW for review. Congratulations on further growth in Elk River. I do not see any substantive issues related to MnDOT highway or right of way due to the development other than the additional traffic that will be driven to US 169, which does have sufficient capacity to accommodate the development related traffic. Let me know if you think otherwise or if you need anything further from MnDOT. Thanks, Tom Cruikshank Principal Planner � District 3 3725 12th Street North, St. Cloud, MN 56303-2107 Phone: (320) 223-6526 I Cell: (320) 267-9859 Email: thomas.cruikshank�state.mn.us mndot-email-signature u From: Lind, Katherine (DOT) <Katherine.Lind@state.mn.us> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2022 6:53 PM To: Cruikshank, Thomas (DOT) <Thomas.Cruikshank@state.mn.us>; Voss, Steven (DOT) <steve.voss@state.mn.us> Subject: FW: EAW Public Comment Period - Lennar/City of Elk River The following Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) has been forwarded for your District's possible review and comment. Due to large file size, the EAW is accessible or�line �r: htt�,[�w-ww.elkrivermn.�f DocumentCenter�Viewf 11562/Foster-Pro� ert�r-EAW Any transportation or MnDOT right of way concerns the District may have should be provided directly to the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) indicated on the transmittal (highlighted in the forwarded email, below or accessed via the weblinks to the EAW). Please note the comment period for this EAW closes on: J�nu�r�-12, 2023 Katherine Lind Environmental Review Specialist Office: 651-366-4296 Katherine.LindC�state.mn.us Minnesota Department of Transportation Central Office � Office of Environmental Stewardship (OES) 395 John Ireland Blvd, Mail Stop 620 St Paul, MN 55155 From: Carlton, Zachary<zcarltonC�ElkRiverMN.�ov> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 4:24 PM To: Lind, Katherine (DOT) <Katherine.LindC�state.mn.us> Subject: EAW Public Comment Period - Lennar/City of Elk River This message may be from an external email source. Do not select links or open attachments unless verified. Report all suspicious emails to Minnesota IT Services Security Operations Center. Lennar Corporation has proposed development of 267 unimproved acres into a residential subdivision consisting of approximatelyT 433 single-familyT homes and 180 multi-familyT homes. The project area is south of the iVliske Meado�vs subdivision and generally- south of Twin Lakes PaYk��ay NW and west of CR 40 (Cleveland Ave N�. The pYoject also includes infrastructuYe improvements such as roads, utilities, sidewalks, trails, and stormwater ponds. The subject site is within Section 36, Township 33, Range 26, SheYbuYne Countyr, Minnesota. Tax PaYcel Numbers include: 75-136-1300, 75-136-2400, 75-136-3100, 75-136-3200, 75-136-4200, & 75-136-4300. EAW can be reviewed at: ■ Elk River Cityr Hall, Planning and Zoning Office, 13065 OYono PaYkway NW, Elk RiveY, MN 55330 ■ Online at: htt�,�/«��.elkrivermn.g�v f D�cumentCenter/Viewf 11562 f F�ster-Pr� er =- EAW (�n1�T written c�mments can he accented. Please mail �r email b��anua ,r�T 12, 2023, at 430 ��•m• Zack Carlton, Communit�- Development Director CityT of Elk River 13065 OYono PaYkway NW Elk River, MN 55330 763.635.1035 or zcarltonn.ElkRi�rerMN. o�r E(�B M�nit�r Publicati�n Date — December 13, 2022 Comment Period Ends — January 12, 2023 Zacic Carlton, AICP Community Development Director 13065 Orono Parkway, Elk River, MN 55330 763.635.1035 E1kRiverMN.gov From: Chambers. Andrew R CIV USARMY CEMVP (USA) To: Carlton. Zachary Subject: RE: EAW Public Comment Period - Lennar/City of Elk River Date: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 7:53:50 AM Zack, Thank you for sending the EAW to the Corps. I think this is associated with 2021-02193-DWW, please let me know if that's not correct. We don't plan on submitting formal comments at this time, but I am reaching out to highly recommend scheduling a pre-application meeting with the WCA TEP and the Corps to discuss the replacement plan and 404 permitting process, when you're at that point. Those meetings are very helpful to get everyone on the same page and inform all parties of what's to come. Feel free to reach out with any questions. Thanks again, Andy Andrew Chambers Regulatory Project Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Duluth Field Office 600 South Lake Avenue, Suite 211 Duluth, MN 55802 (218) 788-6407 Information on Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program status during the COVID-19 pandemic can be found at: https://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/missions/re ul� ator� We are pleased to introduce our new paperless communication procedures in Minnesota. Requests for action (pre-application consultations, permit applications, requests for delineation concurrences, requests forjurisdictional determinations, and mitigation bank proposals) should be sent directly to the following email: usace_requests_mn�usace.army.mil <mailto:usace_requests_mn anusace.army.mil> . Please include the county name in the subject line of the email (e.g. Washington County). These changes will improve efficiency, reduce costs and reduce the environmental footprint. Additional information can be found in our public notice located here: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory.aspx From: Carlton, Zachary <zcarltonC�ElkRiverMN.�ov> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 4:25 PM To: USACE_Requests_MN <USACE_Requests_MNC�usace.army.mil> Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] EAW Public Comment Period - Lennar/City of Elk River Lennar Corporation has proposed development of 267 unimproved acres into a residential subdivision consisting of appro�matelyT 433 single-familyT homes and 180 multi-familyT homes. The project area is south of the iVliske Meado�vs subdivision and generallyT south of Twin Lakes PaYkway NW and west of CR 40 (Cleveland Ave N�. The pYoject also includes infrastructuYe improvements such as roads, utilities, sidewalks, trails, and stormwater ponds. The subject site is within Section 36, Township 33, Range 26, SherbuYne Countyr, Minnesota. Tax PaYcel Numbers include: 75-136-1300, 75-136-2400, 75-136-3100, 75-136-3200, 75-136-4200, & 75-136-4300. EAW can be reviewed at: ■ Elk River CityT Hall, Planning and Zoning Office, 13065 Orono Parkwa�T NW, Elk River, MN 55330 ■ Online at: htt�s:,�/��n�.elkri�rermn.�,/DocumentCenter, Vie«�, 11562/Foster-Pro erte- El�_ , (�n1�- written c�mments can he accented. Please mail �r email h��anua ,r�T 12, 2023, at 4:30 ��•m• Zack Carlton, CommunityT Development Director CityT of Elk River 13065 Orono PaYk�vay NW Elk RiveY, MN 55330 763.635.1035 or zcarltonna.ElkRiverl�ZN.� �B MonitoY Publication Date — DecembeY 13, 2022 Comment Period Ends — Januar�r 12, 2023 Zack Carlton, AICP Community Development Director 13065 Orono Parkway, Elk River, MN 55330 763.635.1035 Ell�RiverMN.go�r ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET This Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) form and EAW Guidelines are available at the Environmental Quality Board's website at: http:Uwww.eqb.state.mn.us/EnvRevGuidanceDocuments.htm. The EAW form provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW Guidelines provide additional detail and resources for completing the EAW form. Cumulative potential effects can either be addressed under each applicable EAW Item, or can be addresses collectively under EAW Item 19. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Proj ect title: Foster Property Development 2. Proposer: US Home, LLC Contact person: .Ioe .Iablonski Title: Director ofLand Development Address: 16305 36th Avenue North, Suite 600 City, State, ZIP: Plymouth, M1V 55446 Phone: 952.249.3014 3. RGU City of Elk River Contact person: Zachary Carlton Title: Planning Director Address: 13065 Orono Parkway City, State, ZIP: Elk River, M1V 55330 Phone : 763. 635.1035 Fax: Fax: EmaiL .Ioe..Iablonski(a�Lennar.com Email: zcarlton(a�ElkRiverMlV.gov 4. Reason for EAW Preparation: (check one) Required: Discretionary: ❑ EIS Scoping ❑ Citizen petition � Mandatory EAW ❑ RGU discretion ❑ Proposer initiated If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number(s) and name(s): MNRules 4410.4300, Subp. 19 D 5. Project Location: County: Sherburne City/Township: City of Elk River PLS Location ('/4, '/4, Section, Township, Range): Sec 36, T33N, R26W Watershed (81 major watershed scale): Rum River (21) GPS Coordinates: 45.306355, -93.516208 Tax Parcel Number(s): 75-136-1300, 75-136-2400, 75-136-3100, 75-136-3200, 75-136-4200, & 75-136-4300 Page 1 At a minimum attach each of the following to the EAW: • County map showing the general location of the project; (See Appendix A— Figure 1) • U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 124,000 scale map indicating projectboundaries (photocopy acceptable); (See Appendi� A— Figure 2) • Site plans showing all significant project and natural features. Pre-construction site plan and post- construction site plan. (See ExhibitA) 6. Project Description: a. Provide the briefproject summary to be published in the EQB Monitor, (approximately 50 words). Lennar Corporation is proposing construction of a residential development located at in the City ofElkRiver, Sherburne County, Minnesota. The project will include the construction of approximately 433 single family homes and 180 multi family housing units as well as infi^astructure such as roads, utilities, walks/ti^ails, and stormwater ponds. b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction, including infrastructure needs. If the project is an expansion include a description of the existing facility. Emphasize: 1) construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes, 2) modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes, 3) significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures, and 4) timing and duration of construction activities. 1) Construction activities that will manipulate the environment will include tree removals, site earthwork, utility installation, and the construction of housing units, roads, walks/trails, and stormwater ponds. 2) N/A 3) Removal of existing structures will consist of the demolition of an existing pole barn shed. 4) Site preparation work is anticipated to begin as soon as the Fall of 2022. Site construction is anticipated to take place over the course offour phases which will occur over the course of multiple years dependent upon market conditions. c. Project magnitude: Total Project Acreage 252.47 (Main Project) 15.25 (Ghost Plats) 267.72 (Total) Linear roject len th N/A Number and type of residential units 41 S Single Family Homes (Main Project) 120 Multi-Family Homes (Main Project) 14 Single Family Homes (Ghost Plats) 60 Multi-Family Homes (Ghost Plats) 429 Single Family Homes (Total) 180 Multi-Famil Homes (Total) Page 2 Commercial buildin area (in s uare feet) 0 Industrial buildin area (in s uare feet) 0 Institutional buildin area (in s uare feet) 0 Other uses — s eci (in s uare feet) 0 Structure hei ht(s) <30' d. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The purpose of this project is to create new housing opportunities within the City ofElkRiver. This project is not being carried out by a governmental unit. The need for this project is demonstrated by the following goal of the Housing Plan laid out in The City of Elk River Comprehensive Plan (October 18, 2021), hereinafter referred to as The Plan: `Encourage residential development with a variety of housing types that fosters high quality, livable neighborhoods to address the �reeds of existing and future residents ". Development of this project would help the city meet these goals by providing new housing opportunities for existing and future residents ofElk River looking for single family or multi family housing options. e. Are future stages of this development including development on any other property planned or likely to happen? ❑ Yes � No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present proj ect, timeline and plans for environmental review. Construction of this project will occur in phases. Additionally, two ghost plats are included in the project area that may or may not end up as part of the project. This EAW is covering the project as a whole and includes the ghost plat areas in order to incorporate all potential future impacts. £ Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlierproject? ❑ Yes � No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. N/A 7. Cover types: Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development: Before After Main Project: 70.72 Main Project: 67.12 Wetlands Ghost Plats: 0.80 Ghost Plats: 0.48 Total: 71.52 Total: 67.60 Main Project: 0.65 Main Project: 0.65 Deep water/streams Ghost Plats: 0.00 Ghost Plats: 0.00 Total: 0.65 Total: 0.65 Mai�r Project: 151.33 Main Project: 11.38 Wooded/forest Ghost Plats: 8.65 Ghost Plats: 0.91 Total: 159.98 Total: 12.29 Page 3 Before After Main Project: 28.40 Main Project: 10.34 Brush/Grassland Ghost Plats: 0.94 Ghost Plats: 0.00 Total: 29.34 Total: 10.34 Main Project: 0.00 Main Project: 0.00 Cropland Ghost Plats: 0. 00 Ghost Plats: 0. 00 Total: 0.00 Total: 0.00 Main Project: 0.51 Main Project: 88.31 Lawn/landscaping Ghost Plats: 4.44 Ghost Plats: 7.47 Total: 4.95 Total: 95. 78 Main Project: 0.86 Main Project: 59.64 Impervious surface Ghost Plats: 0.42 Ghost Plats: S. 73 Total: 1.28 Total: 65.37 Main Project: 0.00 Main Project: 15.03 Stormwater Pond Ghost Plats: 0. 00 Ghost Plats: 0. 66 Total: 0.00 Total: 15.69 Main Project: 0.00 Main Project: 0.00 Other (describe) Ghost Plats: 0.00 Ghost Plats: 0.00 Total: 0.00 Total: 0.00 Main Project: 252.47 Main Project: 252.47 TOTAL Ghost Plats: 15.25 Ghost Plats: 15.25 Total: 267. 72 Total: 267. 72 Existing land cover can be seen in Appendi� A- Figure 3. Proposed land cover can be seen in Appendi� A - Figure 4. 8. Permits and approvals required: List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals, certifications and financial assistance far the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review ofplans and all direct and indirect forms ofpublic financial assistance including bond guarantees, T� Increment Financing and infrastructure. All of these final decisions are prohibited until all appropriate environmental review has been completed. See Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410.3100. Unit of overnment T e of a lication Status Minnesota Pollution Control NPDES Co�rstruction To be Submitted A enc (MPCA) Stormwater Permit Wetland Conservation Act - Submitted and approved Wetland Delineation Wetland Conservation Act - To be Submitted City of Elk River Wetla�d Re lacement Plan Flood lain Permit To be Submitted (i needed) Buildin - Residential To be Submitted Sewer and Water To be Submitted Minnesota Department of Water Appropriations To be Submitted (if needed) Natural Resources (MnDNR) Page 4 Cumulative potential effects may be considered and addressed in response to individual EAW Item Nos. 9-18, or the RGU can address all cumulative potential effects in response to EAW Item No. 19. If addressing cumulative effect under individual items, mal�e sure to include information requested in EAW Item No. 19 9. Land use: a. Describe: i. Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks, trails, prime or unique farmlands. Existing land use of the site consists primarily of wooded upland and wetland areas with some areas ofgrassland. A gravel road is present near the northwest corner of the site and multiple driving ti^ails are present throughout the site. A sheet metal pole shed is also present along the eastern boundary of the site. Existing land cover on site can be seen in Appendix A— Figure 3. Adjacent land consists primarily of residential developme�rt with natural woodecl ancl wetland areas. Aclditionally, there are outdoor recreational facilities located to the south�. ii. Plans. Describe planned land use as identified in comprehensive plan (if available) and any other applicable plan for land use, water, or resources management by a local, regional, state, or federal agency. The Land Use Plan within the The City ofElkRiver Comprehensive Plan (October 18, 2021), hereinafter referred to as The Plan, h�as the project site listed for "Mixed Residential" use. Mixed residential was defined i�r The Plan as follows: "The mi�ed residential category consists of neighborhoods with multiple housing types, including single family detached, townhomes, duplexes, and small scale multi family buildings. Mixed residential areas should include existing residential neighborhoods where a gentle increase in density is appropriate such as surrounding the down-town as well as new neighborhood subdivisions. " iii. Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and scenic rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc. The Foster Property Development site is zoned as RID Single Family Residential. The Plan defines the purpose ofRID districts as follows: "This district is intended to accommodate single family reside�rtial dwellings with large lots and high�er quality h�ousing within the municipal sewer and water access area. This district is explicitly for areas that possess significant natural features and is intended to encourage the design of subdivisions that protect these natural features. " Th�ere are areas of FEMA floodway, 100 Year Floodplain and 500 Year Floodplain mapped within the project site. There are no wild and scenic river segments, critical areas, agricultural preserves, or airport safety zones located within or adjacent to the project site. Page 5 b. Discuss the project's compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans listed in Item 9a above, concentrating on implications for environmental effects. There are no identified compatibility conflicts between the proposed project ancl nearby lancl uses or any local or regional plans. There are no zoning conflicts for the proposed land use of the site. c. Identify measures incorporated into the proposed project to mitigate any potential incompatibility as discussed in Item 9b above. There are no incompatibility measures to mitigate. 10. Geology, soils and topography/land forms: a. Geology - Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any susceptible geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the project could ha�e on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to address effects to geologic features. Minnesota Geological Survey data within the Project site lists the bedrock as Wonewoc Sandstone and Eau Claire Formatio� with depths to the bedrock ranging fi^om approximately 50 to 350 feet. There are no known or mapped sinkholes, shallow limestone, shallow aquifers, or karst features identified within or near the project area. b. Soils and topography - Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating to erosion potential, soil stability or other soils limitations, such as steep slopes, highly permeable soils. Provide estiuiated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. Discuss impacts from project activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities) related to soils and topography. Identify measures during and afterproject construction to address soil limitations including stabiliaation, soil corrections or other measures. Erosion/sedimentation control related to stormwater runoff should be addressed in response to Item ll.b.ii. NRCS soil classifications with the Project Site and are illustrated on Appendi� A— Figure S, soils u�rit characteristics are provided in the followi�rg table. S mbol Soil Unit Name SI �oes HEL* Hydrologic Hydric Farmland y (° ) Group** Rating*** Classification 32B Nebish fine sandy 2_6 NHEL B Predominately All Areas are loam Non-H dric Prime Farmland Nebish fine sandy Predominately Farmland of 32C 6-12 PHEL B Statewide loam Non-Hydric Im ortance 32D Nebish fine sandy 12-18 HEL B P�'edominately Not Prime loam Non-H dric Farmland Page 6 S mbol Soil Unit Name SI �oes HEL* Hydrologic Hydric Farmland y (° ) Group** Rating*** Classification 125 Beltrami fine sandy 0-3 NHEL B/D P�"edominately All Areas are loam Non-H dric Prime Farmland Zimmerman fine Predominately Not Prime 158B sand 1-6 NHEL A Non-H dric Farmland 346 Talmoon loam 0-2 NHEL C/D P�"edominately Prime Farmland H dric i Drained 540 Seelyeville muck 0-1 NHEL A/D Hydric Not Prime Farmland 544 Cathro muck 0-1 NHEL B/D Hydric Not Prime Farmland Sanburn fine sancly Predominately Farmland of 730B 2-6 NHEL A Statewide loam Non-Hydric Im ortance Seelyeville and Predominately Not Prime 799 Bowstring soils, 0-1 NHEL A/D re uentl ooded Hydric Farmland 1028 Udorthents-Pits, N/A PHEL N/A N/A Not Prime ravel, com lex Farmland 1253B �tonelake-Sanburn 1-6 NHEL A P�'edominately Not Prime com lex Non-H dric Farmland 1260C Stonelake-Nebish 6-12 PHEL A P�'edominately Not Prime com lex Non-H dric Farmland 1288 Seelyeville-Markey 0-1 NHEL A/D Hydric Not Prime com lex, onded Farmland Fordum-Winterfield Predominately Not Prime 1946 complex, frequently 0-2 NHEL A/D ooded Non-Hydric Farmland W Water N/A N/A N/A N/A Not Prime Farmland *Hi,�hlv��rodibleLand **1n�iltrationXate **�YercentHvdricXating HEL: Highly Erodible Land fI: >0.30 in/hr Hydric: 100% PHEL: Potentially Highly Erodible Land B: 0.15-0.30 in/hr Predominately Hydric: > 67% &<I00% NHEL: Not Highly Erodible Land C: 0.05-01 S ins/hr Partially Hydric: > 33 %&<67% D: <0.05 in/hr Predominately Non-Hydric: <1 % & <33% Not Hydric: 0% There are approximately 110 acres of land within the project with a soil farmland classification rating of either ` Farmland of Statewide Importance " or `All Areas are Prime Farmland ". However there is currently no land within the Project site that is cultivated for agricultural production. As a result, no farmland will be taken out of production as a result of the project The erosion capabilities of the soils are susceptible as described by the NRCS Soil Erodibility (Kw) Factor rating which ranges across the site fi^om 0.02 to 0.37. Construction activities will temporarily expose soils to an increased risk of erosion fi^om wind and precipitation. Appropriate erosion ancl secliment conti^ol best management practices (BMPs) will be selected based on current site conditions and maintained through the duration of each construction phase to reduce the potential of sedimentation occurring to surface water resources or migrating offsite. Page 7 Temporary BMPs will be inspected and maintained (per the NPDES Consti^uction Stormwater Permit) until permanent vegetation a�rd stabilization has occurred. Permanent BMPs will be incorporated into project design to minimize erosion during routine operational activities (post- construction). A geotechnical evaluation of the site has been completed which included 22 soil borings across the site. A map of the boring locations and detailed description of the soils observed at each is included in Exhibit B— Geotechnical Report. Topography of the Project site, collected via LiDAR, is illusti^ated on Appendix A— Figure 6. Site elevations were shown ranging fi^om 896 to 946 msl. Site topography generally slopes downward towards the basin located near the center before continuing to the south. Some areas of steep slopes (12% or greater) are present within the site. NOTE: For silica sand projects, the EAW must include a hydrogeologic investigation assessing the potential groundwater and surface water effects and geologic conditions that could create an increased risk of potentially significant effects on groundwater and surface water. Descriptions of water resources and potential effects from the project in EAW Item 11 must be consistent with the geology, soils and topography/land forms and potential effects described in EAW Item 10. 11. Water resources: a. Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site in a.i. and a.ii. below. i. Surface water - lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial ditches. Include any special designations such as public waters, trout stream/lake, wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource value water. Include water quality impairments or special designations listed on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within 1 mile of the project. Include DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), if any. There is one DNR Public Waters watercourses, Ti^ott Brook (M-063-001.5), located within the project area. Ti^ott Brook meanders in and out of the project site along its western and southern boundaries. There are no DNR Public Waters basins, designated wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting areas, ti^out streams/lakes, MPCA or NIDNR listed calcareous fens, outstandi�g resource value waters, and county or jurisdictional ditches within or adjacent to th�e project area. Prominent water features located within 1 mile of the project site include the aforementioned Ti^ott Brook as well as two DNR Public Waters wetlands. These wetlands were Kliever Marsh (71000300) located approximately 0.6 miles south of the project site, and an unnamed basin (71023800) located approximately 0.8 miles to the north. Th�ere are no MPCA Section 303d listed impaired waters located within a 1-mile radius of the project site. 12 wetland areas, totaling approximately 71 acres, were delineated on the main Project site and approved by the Local Government Unit (City ofElkRiver) of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (Minnesota Rules 8420). A Notice ofDecision was issued on November 10, 2021 (LGUProjectNo. W-21-21). Surface water resources located within and adjacent to the Project site are illustrated on Appendix A — Figure 7. Page 8 ii. Groundwater — aquifers, springs, seeps. Include: 1) depth to groundwater; 2) if proj ect is within a MDH wellhead protection area; 3) identification of any onsite and/or nearby wells, including unique numbers and well logs if available. If there are no wells known on site or nearby, explain the methodology used to determine this. 1) The depth to ground water appears to vary greatly across the site. During the geotechnical evaluation of the site 22 soil borings were completed across the site. Water tables, wh�en th�ey were observed, ranged fi^om 894.4' to 908.5' MSL. These water tables were all observed in borings taken within or immediately adjacent to wetlands or to open water on site. Water tables typically were not observed within borings taken with�in upland areas. The deepest of which was taken to a depth of 887.3' MSL with no observed water table. A map of the boring locations and boring logs documenting water tables observed is included in Exhibit B— Geotechnical Report. Th�e Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Cooperative Groundwater Monitoring Website maintains clata on ground water levels. The closest observation well to the Project site is DNR Observation Well #86017 (MDH #708372), which is located approximately 2.8 miles southwest of the Project site. The water level in the most recent data record (March 29, 2022) was measured at 859. SI ' MSL. 2) A majority of the Project site is located within the Elk River Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA). The boundary of the ELK River WHPA is illustrated on Appendix A— Figure 8. 3) According to the Minnesota Department of Health — Minnesota Well Index, there are �o identified wells located within th�e Project site. Multiple domestic wells were mapped on adjacent properties, the nearest of which, MDH #SSI578, was located approximately 140 feet east of the Project site. Groundwater resources located within and adjacent to the Project site are illustrated on Appe�dix A— Figure 8. b. Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate the effects in Item b.i. through Item b.iv. below. Wastewater - For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities and composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. 1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added water and waste loadings, including any effects on, or required eXpansion of, municipal wastewater infrastructure. Wastewater ge�rerated fi^om the site will be discharged into the City ofElkRiver's sanitary sewer system and flow to th�e City ofElkRiver Wastewater Ti^eatment Facility (Facility) located at 248 Railroad Drive, ElkRiver. The Facility is described as follows within its NPDESPermit (M1V0020788): "The Facility has a continuous discharge (SD 001) to the Mississippi River (Class 1 C, 2Bdg, 3C, 4A, 4B, 5, 6 water). This is a Class A facility. Page 9 The Facility is designed to ti^eat an average dry weather design flow of 3.98 million gallons per day (MGD), an average wet weather (AWW) design flow of 4.54 MGD, and a peak hourly wet weather fZow of 7.27 MGD. Based on the AWW design_flow, the Facility is designed for a five-day carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand of 203.8 milligrams per liter (mg/L), a total suspended solid of 263. 7 mg/L, a total phosphorus of 7.2 mg/L, and a total Kjeldahl nitrogen of 36.0 mg/L. The Facility consists of inechanically cleaned bar screens, an influent Parshall flume, vortex grit removers, two anaerobic selector tanks for phosphorous removal, six extended aeration activated sludge cells in three pairs, three final clarifiers, six effluent sand filters, and UV disinfection. The Facility also adds chlorine for filter maintenance, sulfur dioxide for removal of residual chlorine, and ferric chloride for phosphorous removal. Biosolids treatment consists offour aerated storage tanks (aerobic digesters), which is then processed in a screw press to produce a biosolids cake which is landfill disposed. " Construction of new sanitary sewer lines will be required to service the project but no expansions to the City's YVWTP are anticipated to be required. The location of the Elk River WWTP is illustrated on Appendix A— Figure 9. 2) If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment systeins (SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site conditions for such a system. N/A 3) If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater treatment methods and identify discharge points and proposed effluent limitations to mitigate impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater from wastewater discharges. �/I ii. Stormwater - Describe the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff at the site prior to and post construction. Include the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss any environmental effects from stormwater discharges. Describe stormwater pollution prevention plans including temporary and permanent runoff controls and potential BMP site locations to manage or treat stormwater runof£ Identify specific erosion control, sedimentation control or stabilization measures to address soil limitations during and after project construction. The quality of existing stormwater runoff fi^om the project is typical of forested land. Stormwater runoff flows fi^om upland areas to lower elevations on site as sheet flow where it generally gets conveyed into the large wetland complex located near the center of the site. This wetland ultimately outlets into Ti^ott Brook. Page 10 The quality of stormwater runoff fi^om the project post consti^uction will be typical of an urban land use with impervious surfaces and lawn/landscaping generally ge�rerating higher conce�rtrations of total suspended solids and total phosph�orus. Stormwater runoff is proposed to be conveyed into permanent constructec� stormwater treatment infi^astructure (e.g. infiltration basins, filtration basins, holding ponds, vegetated swales, etc.) across the site for treatment prior to discharge. Temporary erosion and sediment co�rtrol best manageme�rt practices (BMPs) will initially be installed (per the project's SWPPP), maintained/repaired, and amended through�out the construction phases as required to remain compliant with the applicant's NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit. BMPs may include (but are not limited to) silt fence, bio-rolls/filter logs, rock construction entrances, mulch/hydro mulch, and permanent native seeding or turf seeding in appropriate areas. iii. Water appropriation - Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use and purpose of the water use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss environmental effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources a�ailable for appropriation. Identify any measures to a�oid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation. No appropriations of surface waters are proposed as part of the Project. Water will be sourced fi^om th�e City of Elk River's existing public water supply system (PWS #1710004). The City's PWS is currently sourced fi^om eight groundwater wells (MDH #s 255153, 221176, 481794, 537682, 580320, 664852, 694499, and 757624). Construction of new watermains will be required to service the project but no expansions to the City's PWS are anticipated to be required. Short-term temporary construction dewatering of surface or ground waters may be required at the time of construction (depending on current field conditions) to facilitate construction activities (e.g., utility installation, etc.). If dewatering is anticipated to exceed 10, 000 gallons per day or 1, 000, 000 gallons per year, the contractor will be required to obtain a Water Appropriations Permit fi^om the Department of Natural Resources (N�NR) Division of Waters prior to initiati�rg such activities. Measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate th�e environmental effects fi^om construction related to dewatering are unknown at this time, a�d therefore will be determined when developing the dewatering plan as required by a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan amendment of the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit. Page ll iv. Surface Waters a) Wetlands — Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland features such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging and vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any proposed wetland alterations may have to the host watershed. Identify measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that were considered), minimiae, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss whether any required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts will occur in the same minor or major watershed, and identify those probable locations. 12 wetland areas, totaling approximately 71 acres, were delineated on the main Project site and approved by the Local Government Unit (City of Elk River) of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (Minnesota Rules 8420). A Notice ofDecision was issued on November 10, 2021 (LGUProjectNo. W-21-21). Approximately 18 acres of the current wetland area on site consists of land that had previously been mined as part of a gravel pit. These areas would meet the definition of an "incidental wetland" under Minnesota Admi�ristrative Rule 8420.0105 and therefore are not regulated under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Additionally, portions of these areas have depths up to approximately 20'. As a result, these areas function more as deep-water habitats rather than wetlands. Wetland impacts were avoided to the extent possible during the preliminary design phase of th�e overall site plan (ExhibitA). The final design will attempt to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the extentpossible. Should unavoidable impacts remain, the proper permitting processes will be followed in accordance with the WCA and/or Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as applicable. This process would involve applying for a replacement plan potentially requiring compensatory mitigation. Th�e area of wetland impact and jurisdictio�al status of the wetlands will be determined by the proper governmental agency during the permitting process following conclusion of the environmental review process. b) Other surface waters- Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to surface water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels, county/judicial ditches) such as draining, �lling, permanent inundation, dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant removal and riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of water features. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to surface water features, including in-water Best Management Practices that are proposed to a�oid or minimize turbidity/sedimentation while physically altering the water features. Discuss how the project will change the number or type of watercraft on any water body, including current and projected watercraft usage. Page 12 No other surface water features (lakes, sti^eams, intermittent channels, or county/jurisdictional ditches) will be physically or indirectly altered during the construction or operation of the proposed project. The only water feature located on the project site is the DNR Public Waters watercourse Ti^ott Brook which meanders in and out of th�e project site along its western and southern boundaries. Ti^ott Brook was avoided during the preliminary design phase of the overall site plan (ExhibitA). Temporary erosion and sediment control best management practices (BMPs) will initially be installed (per the project's SWPPP), maintained/repaired, and amended throughout the construction phases to avoid indirect impacts to Ti^ott Brook. BMPs may include (but are not limited to) silt fence, bio-rolls/filter logs, rock consti^uction entrances, mulch/hydro mulch, and permanent native seeding or turf seeding in appropriate areas. Following construction, permanent consti^ucted stormwater treatment infi^astructure (e.g. infiltration basins, filtration basins, holding ponds, vegetated swales, etc.) will protect help Ti^ott Brook. This will provide storage and treatment to waters prior to discharging into Ti^ott Brook. 12. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes: a. Pre-project site conditions - Describe existing contamination or potential environmental hazards on or in close proximity to the project site such as soil or ground water contamination, abandoned dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Discuss any potential environmental effects from pre-project site conditions that would be caused or exacerbated by project construction and operation. Identify measures to a�oid, minimiae or mitigate adverse effects from eXisting contamination or potential environmental hazards. Include development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) records do not indicate any current or former contamination sites within or immediately adjacent to the project area. The MPCA's What's In My Neighborhood database of known sites within proximity of the project area is illustrated on Appendi� A— Figure 10. There was one documented petroleum leak within one-half mile of th�e project site. This leak occurred at the Holzen Residence site located approximately 0.4 miles north of the project site. This site was issued regulatory site closure on March 27, 2009. The project proposer anticipates a minimal risk of encountering contaminated materials or groundwater during construction based on the lack of past land uses and due to geographic location of the listed leak sites in relation to the project area. Project consti^uction and operation is not expected to cause or exacerbate a pre project contaminated condition(s); th�erefore, �ro measures are plan�red to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects fi^om existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. Ifpotentially contaminated materials (or other environmental hazards) are discovered during construction activities, the project proposer/contractor will immediately cease activities in the area, the� take appropriate and reasonable actions to contain and reduce the human health/environmental risk prior to contacting the State of Minnesota Duty Officer Sherburne Cou�ty, and project proposer's represe�rtative. The developme�rt of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan will be initiated if analytical results characterize the discovered materials as a regulated contaminated waste. Page 13 b. Project related generation/storage of solid wastes - Describe solid wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the proj ect. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage and disposaL Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid waste including source reduction and recycling. Solid and liquid wastes generated fi^om construction materials and equipment are expected in minimal amounts during periods of active construction. Wastes may include sediment laden construction dewatering or typical consti^uction debris associated with� residential development (lumber, siding, roofing materials, etc.).. The contractor will be required to immediately haul offsite and/or temporarily store a�d dispose (or recycle) of all waste in accordance with MPCA regulations and the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit. c. Project related use/storage of haaardous materials - Describe chemicals/hazardous materials used/stored during construction and/or operation of the project including method of storage. Indicate the number, location and siae of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or other materials. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spill or release of hazardous materials. Identify measures to a�oid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the use/storage of chemicals/haaardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Include development of a spill prevention plan. Hazardous materials (portable fuel tanks and lubrica�ts) may be used for equipment operations during consti^uction and temporarily placed onsite in sealed containers (at all times) and under secured restricted access during non-working hours. These materials will only be used during active construction for refueling and maintenance of construction equipment. To ensure that fuel spills do not contaminate surface and ground waters, co�rstruction and maintenance activities would occur at reasonable distances fi^om surface waters and steep sloped areas. Th�e contractor will be required to abide by the Pollution Prevention Management Measures (Part IV.F.2) of the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit. All hazardous materials will be removed fi^om the Project site upon completion of constr�uction. d. Project related generation/storage of hazardous wastes - Describe hazardous wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of hazardous waste including source reduction and recycling. Hazardous waste storage and disposal associated with construction activities will comply with th�e NPDES Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan during periods of construction. Following construction, the development will not generate hazardous wastes. Page 14 13. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features): a. Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or near the site. Ecological land units for the project area have been mapped ancl defined in the Ecological Classification System (ECS), which has been adopted by the Minnesota DNR. The project location occurs in the Anoka Sand Plain subsection (222Mc). The Anoka Sandplains subsection largely consists of a broad, flat, sandy lake plain that historically consisted of oak savanna and upland Prairies. The Project occurs within the north�ern Twin Cities metropolitan area and surrounding lands now largely consist of urban development. The Project site itself largely consists of wooded and wetland areas. Approximately 160 acres of wooded lands are present across the site. Based on historic aerial photography approximately 62 of those wooded acres used to be cultivated for agricultural production through 2005, after which the land was left uncultivated and naturally developed into its current state. Wetla�ds comprise approximately 71 acres of the site. This includes multiple wetland communities including Type 1— Floodplain Forest, Type 2— Fresh (wet) Meadow, and Type S— Shallow Open Water. Approximately 18 acres of the current wetland area on site consists of land that had previously been mined as part of a gravel pit. Portions of these areas have depths up to approximately 20'. As a result, these areas function more as deep-water habitats rather than wetlands. Describe rare features such as state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, native plant communities, Minnesota County Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and other sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site. Provide the license agreement number (LA-� and/or correspondence number (ERDB ) from which the data were obtained and attach the Natural Heritage letter from the DNR Indicate if any additional habitat or species survey work has been conducted within the site and describe the results. There were two areas ofMinnesota County Biological Survey Sites ofBiodiversity Significance located within the project area. These areas were both part of the MBS site "Elk River 36 Westcentral" and were given a biodiversity significance rank of "Below ". A U.S. Fish & Wilcllife Service Official Species List for the Project site listed one federally listed threatened species, the Northern Long-Eared Bat, and one candidate species, the Monarch Butterfly, that may potentially be affected by the Project. There were no critical habitats mapped within the project site. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Official Species List can be seen in Exh�ibit C. Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) data for Sherburne County h�as been obtained by ISG via a license agreement with the Mi�nesota DNR (LA-1040). A review of the database ide�rtified 1 rare feature within th�e immediate vicinity of th�e Project site that could have the potential to be adversely affected by the proposed project. This rare feature was the Black Sanshell mussel. The Project site was located entirely within the mapped element occurrence of the Black Sandshell. Since no work will be taking place within the banks of Ti^ott Brook and erosion control BMPs will be implanted during consti^uction to prevent indirect impacts to the stream no adverse impacts to Black Sandshell populations are anticipated to result fi^om the Project. Page 15 b. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features and ecosystems may be affected by the project. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive species from the project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known threatened and endangered species. Existing plant communities will be affected by the change in land use. Approximately 148 acres of wooded land will be cleared to allow for construction of the Project. Based o�r historic aerial photography approximately 62 of those wooded acres used to be cultivated for agricultural production through 2005, after which the land was left uncultivated and naturally developed into its current state. It should be noted that many of the trees onsite are fallen, damaged, or in poor co�dition. Additionally, an approximate 392 acres of unavoidable permanent wetland impacts are anticipated to occur as a result of construction of the Project including the ghost plat areas. This includes the following: Main Pro'ect Ghost Plats WCA Re z�lated Wetlands 2. 71 0.32 Minin Pond Incidental Wetlands 0.89 0.00 Since there are no critical habitats located within the Project site this change in la�d use should not result in any negative effects to any threatened or endangered species. Measures to prevent the spread of invasive species during construction include working in non- infested areas first before moving to infested areas, thoroughly cleaning equipment after working in infested areas and before mobilizing to a different portion of the project site or a different project and revegetating disturbed areas as soon as possible after construction is completed in an area. c. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources. Unavoidable wetland impacts will be minimized to the greatest extent feasible, considering the site constraints of each proposed wetland impact and surrounding area (such as special considerations per M1V Rules 8420. OSI S). It is estimated that the project may result in up to approximately 392 acres of permanent wetland impacts that will occur as a result of construction of the Project including the ghost plat areas. Wetland impacts were avoided to the extent possible during the preliminary design phase of the overall site pla� (ExhibitA). The final design will attempt to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the extent possible. Should unavoidable impacts remain, the proper permitting processes will be followed in accordance with the WCA and/or Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as applicable. This process would involve applying for a replacement plan potentially requiring compensatory mitigation. Th�e area of wetland impact and jurisdictional status of the wetlands will be determined by the proper governmental agency during the permitting process following conclusion of the environmental review process. Page 16 An estimated 148 acres of wooded land will be cleared to allow for consti^uction of the Project. Based on historic aerial photography approximately 62 of those wooded acres used to be cultivated for agricultural production through 2005, after which the land was left uncultivated and naturally developed into its current state. It should be noted that many of the ti^ees onsite are fallen, damaged, or in poor condition. A tree preservation plan will be submitted to th�e City of Elk River for approval prior to commencing construction. 14. Historic properties: Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or in close proximity to the site. Include: 1) historic designations, 2) known artifact areas, and 3) architectural features. Attach letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Discuss any anticipated effects to historic properties during project construction and operation. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties. Information was requested and received fi^om the Minnesota Historical Society State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Upon conducting a search of the Minnesota Archaeological Inventory and Historic Structures Inventory, no previously known archaeological sites or historic properties/structures were identified within the same sections or adjacent sections of the proposed project. The proposed project will h�ave no direct or indirect adverse impacts to archaeological sites or historical properties. A copy of the SHPO correspondence can be seen in Exhibit D. 15. Visual: Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Describe any project related visual effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from the project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimiae, or mitigate visual effects. There is a large open water area that was formerly a pit resulting fi^om past mining operations present within the Project site. This water body is currently landlocked within private property and is not visible to the public fi^om existing Rights-of-Way. Development of the Project will avoid impacting th�is area to the extent feasible and will provide scenic views of the water body within the future neighborhood fi^om roads, sidewalks, homes, and yards. The completedProject will not create any significant visual nuisances such as intense lightpollution or vapor plumes. Visual impacts will consist of nighttime lighting consisting of streetlamps and yard lights typical of residential development and required for public safety reasons. 16. Air: a. Stationary source emissions - Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air pollutants, criteria pollutants, and any greenhouse gases. Discuss effects to air quality including any sensitive receptors, human health or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of any methods used assess the project's effect on air quality and the results of that assessment. Identify pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions. Page 17 The Project is not anticipated to result in any temporary or permanent stationary sources of air emissions. There are �ro existing permitted air facilities or sensitive receptors within the vicinity of the proposed Project. b. Vehicle emissions - Describe the effect of the project's traffic generation on air emissions. Discuss the project's vehicle-related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g. traffic operational improvements, diesel idling minimiaation plan) that will be taken to minimize or mitigate vehicle-related emissions. The project will result in an increase to local traffic. This will result in an increase to local vehicle air emissions. A number of recommended improvements to the public roadway network have been included within the Ti^affic ImpactAnalysis Report. Examples include adding dedicated turn lanes to intersections and reevaluating posted speed limits to aid in traffic circulation and reduce stationary idling times. The Ti^affic ImpactAnalysis Report is included in Exhibit E— Ti^affic Impact Analysis. c. Dust and odors - Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under item 16a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the project including nearby sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors. Dust common to construction and earth moving practices is expected (in the form of fugitive dust) during periods of dry weather. Dust will be visually monitored and recorded in conjunction with the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit inspections. Appropriate dust control best management practices (such as soil wetting, misting/water vapor, and hydraulic additives) may be implemented (upon inspection or public complaint) by the co�rtractor as necessary to conti^ol dust fi^om leaving the Project site during all phases of construction. Specific dust conti^ol best management practices will be determined based on severity, weather conditions (i.e. wind speed), and current site conditions. Dust and odors caused fi^om vehicles parked within driveways and along streets will vary depending on the number and types of vehicles actively moving in one area and current weather conditions. Pollutants generated fi^om vehicle exhausts may concenti^ate and linger (possibly where vehicles congregate) which may cause a short-term odor that eventually dissipates. 17. Noise Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during project construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the project including 1) existing noise levels/sources in the area, 2) nearby sensitive receptors, 3) conformance to state noise standards, and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise. 1) Existing noise in the Project area includes vehicle ti^affic fi^om adjacent roads and noise generated fi^om the outdoor recreational facility to the south. 2) Sensitive receptors located within proximity to the project site include adjacent residential homes. Page 18 3) Exterior noise while construction is taking place may range fi^om 65-95 dBA. Post- construction exterior noise is anticipated to be generated fi^om intermittent traffic and recreational activities. All exterior noise is expected to be less than the State ofMinnesota noise rules in a residential land use setting (<65 dBA daytime &<SS dBA nightime). 4) Nearby residential homes may experience a temporary increase in noise duration and fi^eque�rcy duri�rg construction; however, these noises will be conducted during restricted hours. Post construction noise will be typical of surrounding residential areas and will not exceed the State of Minnesota statutory limits for residential receptors (NAC 1), Minnesota Rules 7030.0040, therefore, any noise anticipated fi^om standard operations and consti^uction activities will not result in a decreased quality of life. 18. Transportation a. Describe traffic-related aspects ofproject construction and operation. Include: 1) existing and proposed additional parking spaces, 2) estimated total a�erage daily traffic generated, 3) estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence, 4) indicate source of trip generation rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation modes. 1) Currently the site has no parking stalls. Post construction there will be, including the ghost plats, 609 housing units which will all have garages and driveways for parking. Additionally, street parking will be available across much of the Project site. A detailed breakdown of site parking is available in the Parking Study included in Exhibit F— Parking Study. 2) A detailed breakdown ofsite traffic is available in the Ti^affic ImpactAnalysis Report included in Exh�ibit E— Ti^affic ImpactAnalysis. 3) The project is estimated to generate 441 trips at peak hour traffic on weekday mornings (7: 00 AM to 8: 00 AM) and 548 trips at peak hour on weekday afternoons (3: 00 PM to 4: 00 PM). 4) Estimates were generated utilizi�g the ITE Ti^ip Generation Manual (11 th Edition). S) Alternative methods of transportation include public transportation. The MetroTi^ansit Elk River station is located approximately two miles south of the project site. Additionally, abundant sidewalks and bike trails are located throughout the City of Elk River. b. Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. The analysis must discuss the project's impact on the regional transportation system. If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily ti^ips exceeds 2, 500, a traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EAW. Use the format and procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Access Management Manual, Chapter 5(available at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html) or a similar local guidance, Page 19 The project will result in an increase to local traffic. A number of recommended improvements to th�e public roadway network have been included within the Ti^affic ImpactAnalysis Report. Examples include adding dedicated turn lanes to intersections and reevaluating posted speed limits. The Ti^affic ImpactAnalysis Report is included in Exhibit E— Ti^affic ImpactAnalysis. c. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation effects. A number of recommended improvements to the public roadway network have been included within th�e Ti^a�c ImpactAnalysis Report. Examples include adding dedicated turn lanes to intersections and reevaluating posted speed limits. The Ti^affic ImpactAnalysis Report is included in Exh�ibitE— Ti^affic ImpactAnalysis. 19. Cumulative potential effects: (Preparers can leave this item blank if cumulative potential effects are addressed under the applicable EAW Items) a. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the project related environmental effects that could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. Site preparation work is anticipated to begin as soon as the Fall of 2022. Site construction will take place over the course of four phases which may last up to multiple years dependent upon market conditions. Construction activities will include tree removals, site earthwork, utility installation, and the construction of housing units, roads, walks/trails, and stormwater ponds. It is estimated that the project may result in up to approximately 392 acres of permanent wetland impacts that will occur as a result of construction of the Project including the ghost plat areas. This includes the following: Main Pro'ect Ghost Plats WCA Re ulated Wetlands 2. 71 0.32 Minin Pond Incidental Wetlands 0.89 0.00 Wetland impacts were avoided to the extent possible during the preliminary design phase of the overall site plan (ExhibitA). The final design will attempt to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the extent possible. Should unavoidable impacts remain, the proper permitting processes will be followed in accordance with the WCA and/or Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as applicable. This process would involve applying for a replacement plan potentially requiring compensatory mitigation. The area of wetland impact and jurisdictional status of the wetlands will be determined by th�e proper governmental agency during the permitting process following conclusion of the environmental review process. An estimated 148 acres of wooded land will be cleared to allow for consti^uction of the Project. Based on historic aerial photography approximately 62 of those wooded acres used to be cultivated for agricultural production through 2005, after which the land was left uncultivated and naturally developed into its current state. It should be noted that many of the ti^ees onsite are fallen, damaged, or in poor condition. A tree preservation plan will be submitted to the City of Elk River for approval prior to commencing construction. Page 20 b. Describe any reasonably foreseeable future projects (for which a basis of expectation has been laid) that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed project within the geographic scales and timeframes identified above. Reasonably fo��eseeable future projects that may interact with environmental effects of the p��oposed Project potentially include adjacent residential developments. The City of Elk River Comprehensive Plan projects the city to experience consistent population growth through the year of 2035. The growing population will �•esult in an increased need foi� housing. Properties adjacent to the Project site are currently zoned foY single family residential use and as a Yesult will likely be looked at as potential sites for development. Due to the lengths ofplanning and desig�a any adjacent developments likely will faot occui� durin.g the same timeframe as the constr-uction of the Project. c. Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for signiiicant environmental effects due to these cumulative effects. Following construction, the P��oject is not anticipated to contribute to any additional environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. TheYefore, the Project is not anticipated to contribute to any significant environmental effects due to cumulative effects. In addition to the potential environmental impacts addressed by items 1 to I8, the economic and sociological impacts of the project were considered. The economic and social impacts of the project on the local community are anticipated to be beneficial by bringing additional housing opportunities and property/sales tax income following construction. 20. Other potential environmental effects: If the project may cause any additional environmental effects not addressed by items 1 to 19, describe the effects here, discuss the how the environment will be affected, and identify measures that will be taken to minimize and mitigate these effects. There are no other known oY potential environmental effects that were not disczcssed in EAYV items 1 to 19. RGU CERTIFICATION. (The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor.) I hereby certify that: • The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. • The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9c and 60, respectively. • Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. '"� i�'� �%��da� Signature - � �_ _ �- ��- �- Date ,�" � Title � f MM . �% - I� 1+'�G �0 � Page 21 � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning EAW �-._ i`+ i5 $ 17 ,�6`— IS 14 13 ic ic in � I �T`34N � T`�: � � i�2fi�,n,! .; pn�dke � EII< Riv� � = � z `� _ kw�' � � � 21 22 23 24 �- Sherburne °�So ' ' � � 28 Z7 26 25 � County �� o a F y 33 s9 35 36 � o 4i � S.ird �. ��o A�e , � 4 3 2 I J�l.e L��G�.l.��n qp - 181st --� ��/ � � ��coln 1805 Ave NW �� 9 10 I I I Z � � J St � � � 14 13 18 17 16 IS 14 13 IS 17 16 IS 14 13 IS -- Nowthen -I 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 � Elk River 26 _ - �, 28 2/ "L6 25 30 10 169 �� r� ��r�� ?5 �I �� __ � 31 32 _� _, 35 36 31 I 6 5 4 I 0 -� wrlght • � " 2 I 6 5 4 3 2 � 14 13 18 �� 16 I5 �� 14 0 II 12 O 7 8 9 10 II 12 7 5 23 24 19 20 21 22 2� � Otsego �� Ramsey _ 14 13 IS 17 Ib IS I! 13 18 ` � Z 29 I � � 20 21 22 23 24 19 - =6 6 � 52 � 3� _ 29 28 27 26 �5 30 6 �i/70kQ � 5 52 �� y 33 ;;�`� �� pj� 169 31 II II 12 7 8 9 10 � a I =��. � II 10 I 4 � 3 I � �C� Cll �1 Z� I � I 6 I 5 I 4 ��' 6 S � � �j Anoka ' �� 5 Roger� Dayton �Z 24 7 23 24 19 20 21 �_ __ I`i 20 21 22 23 2=} � 19 18 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 �� 30 29 �R �� ,c � � I u.0 . . �,._� � � ��I�..mb � ��_ F i u re I N g Source s : 0 I 2 ' Municipalities (MnDOT, 2016) Miles � PrO�eCt �OCa.tlOfl Map Roads�Mn�o-r,zozo� Lal<es (MN DNR, 2020) I in = 2 mlles �OSte1" ��"Q�e1"t�/ Counties (MN DNR, 2013) EII< River, Sherburne County, Minnesota P�ss �us�s� ` " - "� ,� � • � f - - � Legend , . .� . ' �• ■ �, � � � Project Area %� "! ��j Ghost Plat Areas �I� �f�� r � }+ '4 ► 4r � � � ' '` ��` - ` �` {,1 �� "'a . r. � � ' � � � - � � t ��l? a y, . - � , �' s - - � '� -' ,'� ��"��► � - � � * . TW � p�� , � , �� M ,-�'y '�+ ., � �. T`� ``Y � � �� ' t ;�� r � - - �1. 'E �f _ + • .. '�� , ' `'� � . ` ♦ � ,� i � � s � � - _ !�"� Y� _ . . �� 4� _ '� ' r ,•f..�F'1a,�'��,��E ; ! IJy •�"��S _ �? �Y� ^ �r�a+• •re ' . �� .> � �f i� • . J !� r � . �� . � „ . � �� — ,i Y��. '� F ` * �+ .R�� .��'� i �� ri��,�'Rt'�` , - �� • , r `"�' ��} +-� �^`� ��. � � ��u','�' ,�� r � ,� . � ��'� r � !!'�: � � � ,I'' � E � ^ i". - _ , � ,g � +��`. ,:' a . � �. - - - r.r�� ., � ••# - � F .� � • !' ' � �ti«-- � " f _ f '.rr� �■ • o 1+ '��`r. � -_.`.,^�t��' •� . . ��,%/• ,,�' . � , ,}• 1 �"w - r y � .` � � �_ frf/ � � �. l7 �.� 4 'k� .• d . X � �� ., � , �' j � / . I � �-� � : !.l � Y,.� �' � / '` 1 N �. f��'-'�`_ ` s'�, ''' �!� yLi' � �f ��%� .i ; i u r •r .f�,' _ / � �> i : ' �� > + � - . �, ~ f,r�, � �' - � /;��/ � �� ' I Q � " .r� 'l ~ � i �1 � ` ��a� �� ft � � � �� ,�.f ' � - �,{ ' � � i � � ' � _ �� ` � • �` � ' �,1. ■ � �� 1 x+�i1h� _'� 7R.� .� �� __ l�-� �� rr - � - � "z - F � � v �- ' � .. M � �� ' � • �- C �I J - � r y , s � 'ti r � t { � ♦ + � � [l � � s 6 �,, � � • . , �� \ � � j!��, �� Y ' � ! • � • I • � � � ~ .. a �� , � • r�y � 'J � •�• - _ •. ■«._--'► -- �- "�".,��!"R_-� •.- • �,r ,�-. �..M._ ..,• .. , .s. .�� '■ _ _� �r�g � � . � �� _ • �' �� + � ;�. . __ � �• . � • o '--.`, i • . . ; - � ; �.,� r • ': -- � ` � r'( , ��. . � � � • � ' ■ � � �� I ` „ � ' � I . ti � �t. � ,+�' - '""� , � ��., �, �,sa i ` . � . Tn��sday� May s, zoZZ �� iz�� N��,�e� zv�ws� �' Figu re 2 ° 500 ',°°° N USGS Topographic Map Sour�eS: � � I in = I,000 ft Foster Property 241<USGS Quads (USA Topo Maps) EII< River, Sherburne County, Minnesota - � ; -�-r�:. .. �. - ' na� � �L (% d� q. ��~ ' . �'"` i � �'�.'6 3 `^! � . - �2��,�` � .. - ��-,.�„�; + - — : - _� • 'i `. , � . � � v Y:7 � g- n T�, ^ ' , �'�, � -� sx .� t� _ r :`' � t � a, ' r� � ' _�pk�,yykes `4ir\ _ _ �� 1 . � .� �- �� .. ��, � � ��'°'zy�_ i �' . �- �y�, �'^.r _'/s-j ,- i _ f��l� �! �� `:il r � � :i�'' �: "'`� { . •t.._ __. '? \ h kr�� , � - V * �+-_ y - � 40 � � � �t ��` ",1 '�s • �� ^ ' ' [' �y' 'f, -i�� .a.. �^ n: �_ S�,• !. �" � / . * �` �r��- e i , � i . �.' �� 1 F { ! . 1 ` ,� .` � �. ,-��r,�,�= � ' , - -`F,t� .�" `'� i�' , v" ��,�" .�r 't � r 4 rl , } S� ?� _'y� ! � �'' ♦ � T• 'f'. f� '7 - -��• �_. � •, ,, e `'ti ` I � `�' ` �, �4 - - � � -. < ,:� �` ,�, � � �# . � �•-`, h �at . ..r " _ • . _ _ ,1 t �la%y � �. .. . _ a..r� ' ,�� . - ,� . .•f �;.4 L` � - ``�"` - �-'�. � •��_ �'* !� � -�� ` s � . �- ��N i'a't ♦ . �' T' ' -i �':.i � , " �� , ': . - �.{ ��i t � ..;,si �.c' ' � :ci f �.�'e � � � Y.S�� , v .f-., a - , ..M t �._ (�. a � R '# _ . ��+'�� 1 . -rw!'t _...._ � .�•i �4�'w-,} � _ �k ai.l ��'y - :1_,_ �� . . . � G- fi: Y . � . S�y��. � }I:� ` "� � _ t,�� , ,�� J �. , � . in�'�yj �. r-+ -- � � �� ' � ' ' , , /'� � / in ��# � i ! t / rf..! � y ��+ � 3"� I y 4 ,� .` - f. �� '�p . r - - - � "_• , ,�� - -' � - -. L; �' / - �0�� .te. . . . . j. r � � �� ; �. - . . . . - � � .,, � � � �. •. �� ,}� � �� ..� . . _ ?�, � �� ,/�% _ �,n � Y. ' y r: . _..��A ._��'�l�t�i . . , + `` ' � , �► t,rs�� 1 -: � ' "� 1 ` f � ,; �* y ,�s�'� � , — —. � �-` . _ _3- — ' � ; � . A �.,,� ��`� w. , � �z: - r. - 783rd,'q� { ��' � � � t . '' � ` �' � ^rn� / . .� '�?� , _ �. . `'a .� _ � �` ��j ` �� • `4 �._ _ _T.. � � I �'• , 1 ..�,. ". .. � , _ . • J",;� .-� . ,� r,-.• � , � ---- �r� . Legend � �" ," - . Q Project Area ,`s'.� � ,�_ � , � � ' � � ` � n I ,�. , //i Ghost Plat Areas ,. .� `' �` �� t• � �' ,. . e M .. a . Land Use ��: , "� 3 �`''` � � t�j _ _ - Brush/Grassland -' " - �tT��.r�+'• ;. � Deep Water/Streams . O 181st Ave NW "�. -- Impervious Surface = � ��_ . _ , � z �dwn ,., Lincoln St � 180th La 2� �n � Wetl� ,� 3 Q � o D � � # �T'- 3 " WOOC . " ._ < o � �� v - s �.rh - � � m � . ! f, i� . . '��„�� o � Monday, Odober 24, 2022 Project N��mbec 2b25553 � Figu re 3 0 300 600 N ft Existing Land Use Map Sources: � Orthophoto (ISG Drone, 2022) � �n = 60o ft Foster Property EII< River, Sherburne County, Minnesota _ � � � -�-r�:. .. �. - ' na� � �L (% d� q. �. �j , . �� . - ,s "T' - . . . ,qti•,6 7 =•, �. .� . - �2/.-�� `��. ' , '_ _ . V. `• , � . � , � Y�7 � Z T�--. Y* y. � �.- � -" � r . L�C.\ � T w�n �akes� � °� ,� '��l"� 1 . �'�., - � a, �,�, �, ,� ' Pki,yy �� , " � �� - � r•'t ; ��f� _ 6 �v'�.� • � . r �. 'S•. f.„ � - .Y. R S � .. . _ � � ' : ' _ - -' ' r . �= , __J�_ i� � � �„ i - r - � � . . -: , , ^" _. .- �� y`lj� � rj� �� -� r, �,.. . .., � '.;`}� 4 �', � -�� C., , �� 1'u�1 l{�,��-�- . - _ - I 4 �� - . _ I.� t L.�. I � �� . �. i . '' � '�a'� II � � � .�: i'. �_.. - . � `� � � ��I'��. ��,�.i: `� � � � . '� � .. _ . _ }� .,_ -' , �� -•�, Y' � • 'at :. !f }}� .. Ii,ti��Y�� . . ., . y -.� -�. l�y �h,�r r: R .-�1"; .� ¢:' � � ,.�' f��'` .C� i �� {� ,, ,,-.,,_,�y ,. �I�I �1� ' � �_�� r �;r� '' ' �� ,�r �' S _ } _ � -%��,�J��rs i�'1 Il �'�1:� � , � �'I��y,�,J � � .�.` � tl,. � � � db C',6� t� t .�` !� '� t� �, �' � -i�. � . _ ��- � �� •' ' . . _ 'd°y �' .��1 � I I I �� - � rsL � r �,� �_� , � �r �.. � � �� , ,� _ � - _ .�� s� r� �� u._ .. r ° , �.,� , � ��; ��j^�5�r � � � � =�F utJ� l� if j � - �..�� }s'1'"�1�,�� *�•� '�r j z � - � .- ,. {� �� ` 0� . ' k �.�i �� .S� .r �i �` . '�' ,r�...;�'�'�}`�� s.s' _ �..-. r - - ., 4P , r , _ , � � � ..� , , *� r ' � � . "�,'�,� .� t� �,'�'` i _ _ � �";'' 4�� •`; - � •� �. ;�. . "_ ti ,�. . � ` ! i ^i _- � < '' � � ;� . � � _ j� _. L.. � " � �1' �"1'',�L�` ' � �, ,��" � �:r� � r ; `� H • - +�=�' !--i k'--, r �t� L4 i��_; ,��t`, � " s .�� s �:J�. d F`� -'-1 � � .us^, ,:�' "y- �� L �� - ��-��I !� (`. �, �.: £' - _ - ,. �`�� -�'. `�j��.J i��i ��,�,, �a��:�` :- --'fI rf' y��yj,.w�C I4�j� 7}5— . � � f_ � __, _ - i � ' �i � �`"Y1 � � _ _ _.� � : � .�"`� 1 �, L _ ' � �__I . _—I L r { '�i► '_—. ��- � ';� �' :J `� '� � � h , �,�1 � __ 4 � ' �' , - `�� , ��: �� j/��,� � � �,�,� :�` � 'r� - � =- :�^��, E � ,� ��j`� ,,� �,.+�' i1r � . ,. �, A E � -- - - - � , s - - ' w: xs u b tl c; f:..rY r- i � � . q �'�,.,�' - � � � �� - _ w� �� . . � � as -� R F1C �,X�.. ��. �� _' �� • —�f�,�� ,� E; 7,!� °r`�r I � � -' � . . - _ � � �` ,:� I , � '+ /�� - - �/��'f �� _ _ . . � � t ' -i - I i '�� ✓f,Ff �. � . ' .. y° � ' :t i � �� ' • ' . - - . _ . . 3a � ,' , �� - I 'r�` • • ' . i �� ffij f ,+rfl. �, O p e� � *r '_-.✓�, !� / J _ f �, r : � , � ��`� �,� �i' !�� .��; _� � -•�.w _ • _ � _ ,,� - � '" r, , , �� " _ . ' `� ��: � '�--- � - � � ,; J � J �i��T� � " c � � ' � �'.l. � . � ,�, � ` ��.,-� I ; i; , , i � ,. F � l� I;,_I � �_ t� '�,�'` � � _ � ''' �� , - _ ., � � j� 83r ,;' f �� f� '- r. � 4i"'� ti' - ° � �(f7i�. dqve ,�i� �'�/ ',,�f � ��" ; $ . •.J - 4:. �.o� � ;.�;ir.��''�'r'�'��F ._ � �' . ' .. . " �,- . - — Legend � Q Project Area //i Ghost Plat Areas - Land Use � Brush/Grassland b � Deep Water/Streams - Impervious Surface Lawn/Landscaping , Stormwater Pond � Wetland Wooded/Forest r. _ � ` � �'� .� - Wednesday, October 19, 2022 0 300 600 ft I in=600ft Lincoln St � 180th La � � G m Z� O % 0 � 3 z v E i� � I � � � �' � ' � ,•d Y y "�� :�p �-� �� -. _ ��.'�'°'' r�� f��,,, ' ^�rf "sf.�..`�� o Projed Number�. 2b26553 � Figu re 4 N Proposed Land Use Map Source s: � Orthophoto QSG Drone, 2022) Foster Property EII< River, Sherburne County, Minnesota . ' �w . yA�. • � . 3 ?� . �-_ _ _. _ " Yi . '11 .�- � ..ft �. 4 � �� v181stAve NW '� � percent slopes . �� complex, 2 to.6 � .� ,,�: ' .:�. -- ��- -. - � � �' , �� . . , . percentslopes �S _ . 1, .. �� ,� � �, W - VLLater �.. `• 32C+ - Nebish �� se - � ' � - �d� � � '� � .sandy loam, 8>to _;Talmoon � �� - �tbum'fm ' _ '��' N ' . 12 pe'�rc'�""ent`slopeS . R �ndy Ioam, 2 tai6 - � ;,. . � �,. 3. . �+► ` Ioatn10�2�' _ ,�- � �R _ PeY`ee�opes - _ �' ' mY � �rl'Y�, . P?r'ceeitrs[4pes - ,� ,j, .� � , ,, �, , , - '"" - �y ,,` +' szc ,. � t�� ,�,� �:; �, �� - �Nebisti'fine�� .�� r . ^ a�' � � ti�i: • } : � ' '�i ■ Z� �. � s< : j � . .i y - • . ,t Z a� � U f � k . ry S�: , � t+- � fine . � � ii Y' y . 4K,4�� I�,iD. �., . � . •`' �� 730B Sanbum'ri � �'��u�� '� �� , �r � �. . 1to6� fine sandy,loam 2 to � �'�� . � i� ` ' •�- � tiy "� �� - ,yer�enf f�i� t� �. ; u 32B Netiish Ts r ..., � -', W = sb � � 6percentslopes r,L �, � . �5 f_ _.� ; � ,. w, �� percent slopes . , = , r ; C S fine�sandy loam 2 i �i��; • Water � r _ j � 1� ( 7�,.� �1 to'6 per�ceq•anf�t slopes ^ � }�� t"! .�h . ' }. ;1.'f , �y -.. i�lr.i � le i . ,1.�'�F�� 1 =� � � � .'.t- . � ' �r�r . . . . . � ,q. 799� i :. � , . �. .. • . . � �;' 1 � � ,i�Seetye"vdle.. . � p'f.' -� . � a '„ . . �i�' � . I . and Bowstnng , � �- a �, 't �+� � ,;A� `s!'� � , . ' sods 0 to 1 ,� Y �` � �� t�� _ - � peecent slopes;�-y � 32C ,Nebis � � � �. +r. ' � .�' '.. t ` 1253B - fre uentl ° ; ". �� - � �� " "32B Nebish fine„ - �4„-'Cathro . � _ �+�+�' . ' �,� .a, . 4 „ Y �� fine'sandy loam, 6 to � �� -�.,'� � �' t; flooded � . . `!''sandyJoam'2 to � .: � ��,:�=4tiO ��R ' �'�� . . :, � . .�' •� �h Stanelake- ': 12 percent slopes � r � - 1 percent•slopes- - _ . � � ' � Sanbum . p � - , _ 6'percent�slopes �y •� .. !"'. , ., .. � . ' � +�w 6 � 5' � c°mp. . f f Y ,:Z '. -` , w � '�` _ � .�t°'Y�F L 1028 Udorthents;Pits, •� : pe cenf" Y- � ; � � ' � . � gravel; complex � ' ,�` '�4. .. � i' + � .. . '� w- WateT � ' . ` s`lopes ;, �� +�, �+L, �` ,�.. y r _ 4, � ,� . . '�+� • �' ;� • ,: .. ' �,,��. . � � , - . �y�;; 54� - Cathro � . I , :`.',�", �. .� � y.'� .muck,Oto1 � 5*„� �i •i ;>.��.. . - � � . �percent . .� �� 'i ✓ ` . ,�f: � �' _ .. Y ,�. :"�;� . ,,^ � �- slopes -`32C Neb�sitf c �4 G�f �B-- ebsh'�fine s'`andyloam,;�6:t 1:: � �� rri, 2�to �, pe!'esntts�Pe e '� •c. �' - ,slopes .. �Pl�t?i5h e �' + . �' ��7� r.� .; ':"i ". w,� �Imnon _ � �e�n�'so�pes � �' - �'� C' ; '� � � 3�C' �Neb� �me , �,� 540�",,8eelyeville - � � {a � ; � �',�!++�'%� _ , san�ir.�m B�tts � � ��k' �0,Y,�g - . t slopes �� .. 3 12�per�entslopies . �� 1'percexit%sl�pes , h .�, 1288 �� y` _ - � . . - � � '� �� Seelyevdle-Markey -•..` . �� '+c - - - '+5::= . ��F%X, �Po„�d d� b _ 125� B2ltlami - � , 0 tor9 peGcent �s• - fine sandy, IQam�'�'�. � �� slo�� ` �. �� 0 to 3 p icent : •_- '�� ..� - � w} � � � ` slopest' `32B�Nebish fine �-346-Talmoon�'"� = 9 �� - _ � ..r �-sandyloam'�`2�to � '7 � . � � � a-' �' 6 percentfslopes � ,-,;loam, 0 to 2 , � � � � ; y, "1946 Fordur V�Rflt8e6#�1 32D - Nebish' � , �, •� , percentslopes'��.- �;, t �'i1 �� , compleX,Qto2 fine�sandyloam, > - ' �• y ' ` � � - _ � peecent sio es, � 12 to';1.8rperc`ent � �-qi ' . . �. �. � _: � . 9 Y. pe , �. i -� � ''�-� , �, fre uentl flovded.l�� `x= .slo s + �� „�' + 4 ., � ' 4, ,. � "i . � � / .. - a " _ � 'i � / �,i.. � i. i 540 Seelyevdle , mtick�`,�to � �;�,�� - 1 pe�cenY�slopes . • , �i, r 4, 346-Talmoon -., �' 4_ �}'� � Ioam,Oto2 Y', ,-- ,, � � ,�r,�� . �.y�.�_ . � percentslapes MF �� ` . #,. � k� �� - 1254 - Ricelake fine �� 5 - Blafl(vn loam, - _,�� s ��• . depressional, 0 ta sandy I�, 0 to �Z , 1 percent.slopes 3�peroent4slopes - � ,/�rw�� f :1' _ I�� - w '`jS��,... � 1 �,yr ` , , } � �� e `: s'�. .. ' e�� `�� i �.� l, � , F . l y e e . s� '� w..:. � o "� r'F� i':r�t''� �a��..• . �^ m -.� 0-,� �'.�p �S� B a�� y �` ��v rF .i .'1 � e� � �5 " �� ... � B �� / . �j " .� � °i � ri/'� � ..{� ' r ,� ' ,. r.. � . . - j � � !I � / - � _, �', s' �.+r�p'- � �' ; ..-o �... . ..k ' r { .. � y �� -��,.y�� ` W �� . e , _ � �� , �� ', . � :f e ��b�� ,� ; � u . ' m 4 ` " o �:� ' � ° ` � a � �� - _� ° O - � �t • � =:s� t $ � � er, r �� ,� ; D r'•,`. � - - ., -_, �•i _ _ 1' r -." , . � . . . . '�' _ ....., . . � � � { . i ��,, , - - �', •v . ;, . � ,. tr t � „ . i.. . : - • • . , . iJ" _ r1 . J � . . . � .... � � � �t �. Rr�', . 1' .. �;. ,� ..� � � ` �:�r'� F� �� '� � ' � e�3 � i�J �� 3 � �`.' � �h�: � �' ��, �?�.� , � �(� `�,4 —'� � .� � r Q: '�: � . r . . ' ` �� .� . , �, - i • � �, ; , ; y , `k' ' rr. �yY�/y �C n' � '- � I �'' � �� " � !. � � n/ / � •.� ,� I �• ��,y.4, . W' .. �`�I � 4 .I� t e... � � I i 7 v 'r . � '' r, i- � • � �� !S � r � J ' I � ` ` � � — ,�"�, i'' ` � 'f '' - 9' 0 3 • - -�} .�rw-r�� tl ��f � ��^ ,��- � �t. ('�,� 3 �� - � . �� , � . � _ � '�� j �, 1 ; � h'� i� .J � � ' � �� r ��. , . �- �� ' .. fi� �' r, i .. .. � . . . Y�y!. .��,�1 � . . .i.. . �� 4 � . � ... . ., , k , �.,. . ';�" •r-, � � ..,' '_ : :.. , �� r- _ -__- �> �•,��ec 'C�. ' , r�Yt��: � � {.. � . ..� p - e •��i��'O 1�y� A a � �! �', � . , � . .� � �� . � � . • O ' . . _ . " �., � .. f _ e F. � ,. ' � f � .'A.._ • � /r�� `J �•,� ,� / . ...i �O ' � � _� a �, #�, 4 s�y-�;:X �,. � { . r ;� � � : f r ' . ��,'."` j ', `,,,, ! . .- _ ". ' `� r � � -, I ; �'��r'� ��.�f �' `r¢ O ,i (}��'� ' �:� �' � ". � °e _ 1� � f.&:� tk" .r� � r,r��,..� � ,� , �� - , � �` °as �, ,¢ . � ,,_ � � � � � �' � �/ [7" �`� ,, . ('. . - . �� r , p i '. �.. . . { ; ' .: � . ..� . _. .... . ,t� . 4 � : „ �.- - - _ ,�. ,_.�r e0e . �.:� Q � ve � � �, cs� e �p - � � � � �1 •ae � , � �. ° � f w � °oo Leger�ci s a a � � � � Project Area } � ^ � � � s��,f Ghost Plat Areas '4 - � �.� �°B � °°� �v ; � •� 10' Lidar Contour ;� .��_ =t . eo . # k �` 2' Lidar Contour ;�oo ! � � � ,� r � ,�� i',' �', _ : n r Thursday, May 5, 2022 Figu re 6 0 30o boo N LiDAR Elevations Source s : ft � and Hillshade Maj� �°nt°��"'�T°P°,Z°"> I In = 600 ft i f-lillshade (MnTopo, 201 I) Foster Property EII< River, Sherburne County, Minnesota ' 1 � Rr i �� i • /r, + I.'� G, .s,f , -� i, ' �".__,;��`i� � � . - � h �L ... .��.'�. � 1�� . � �5 (� � : d� ..� � � � - . � � �. � ... � � I :.. � � .' � '_ ,� - , $. ,. : �j �2/" . � f � ey z� �, : ' �,� s " r � „ �: . , � � - Tw�n �ak , - - .4�Y , x � � Pk es R ' � _.,� =� � ^'F_. �.^3¢_ _ ��+�? — - �- �_- _ �.-, � _ 40 � . � „ . ' c�'" �, . o- '� ' yr •... �` ,. � _ �� - y� . -�! :,�:, I . ,i�2 �fi "�� ... J'( � �� t� - �' ;� � ��,F " zr- " - `� n, '•- �� < . � � _ ; G _ 4 � �„� � -� �� ;;� �s -.. � � ��;� �� { � � �� , �-. - w�`�� . r.��,�;�� ,, `' * � ,--. , �`�� , -" ;" � �- ,� �4 T. ,, ;�. � . _ �A , - - :,. -�T _ ;�`� .r ±'�.a; , �' � _� �` �" - z .� ^-;g� • . � S , r t. . � . _4"y � "i. �, 1 .� � � . � � • �/j' ' ��C` � . �?�i .��.�� / �'�'` ��' f ✓ ! �. , r �. �. � , � .� ,% F . � � � * � , Y + � ';�,y �l ,.: r .� � f, . ..t''. � � �.. k' �,�F � t � �, . -y t,��: :� s, ,� ' , ,, � / % }"'� y�e, .�. �_. / i 1 # �� ,� �/' r � ��C..�^� .Y�.r#.. %��1.�" ��I'I-�I`f ��' � �'. j�f` r j.. �yo � r � ,�p �� / �� `�i e',�" , � � � � r f �i . z � ,�' r ,/► y�� a� :�'. a � ,�"� • „�s�t� • �,'' , . � � : � ,,%� ` ,� `i ' � � �S i .i ` . � ''� 4 f /�'� t � � �,, :t �. �1: .+,��s: ��, � � . '�, � - � � - � I � " . - ��. ' . . � r _ l I : : * �� 4' , . � _... " , +� " � . � .� � _ 'y { � � _ �. , � " : � ! .jY�te'.., r . �' e �.. .� . . �� _ � . . . .. . , � �r fi � �8 . ' • , y.- .f � .. �" ' . � � ��f �: � '. _ ��rdAve , f, '�P � ,,.�;� �� rr�f'si: ., a '°'+' '' �, J �� ^� ,�'�� , ,�` � sy";;a +�� , ,, � t�� r�n��,�' � , �' Trott'� � ' � j i`� +� �: q,� :� - . :Brook '�: � ,�,•.`, - �' G� � �-�:- - �„ � ,�-� ,. .- • I�, �� I f�� • �- �� . �, . �� . ��. '- - .a'e� ! � • �� " � � C —_ -� - .��s-= � ,F�� ' � `--� - �� , Legend �� 4� , - ■ �_ - - - =-�- - �� .� ;� _ Q Project Area �/, Impaired Basins //, Ghost Plat Areas National Wetland Inventory ""' �� ave NW ' � Wetland Delineation 0 Freshwater Emergent Wetland �' Aoproximate Wetland Boundary � Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetla ' � -= ` z ��°��_ - . � "'�*i�i' � �DNR Public Watercourses �� '^ � Freshwater Pond _ v _ -DNR Public Waters Basins Riverine Q � � �� { ;i, �` �Impaired Streams ° � �/ .a; ' � � � ,�+, _; r, � �•�; r' v �.�y,,� � -- �` - .� � _ .. _ �.'� . ;t`i .r �� .� r', ._. / .h Tuesday, October I I, 2022 � � �'v �n�� e553� Figu re 7 Source s: 0 300 600 N Orthophoto QSG Drone, 2022) ft Surface Water Resources Map wet�a�doe��neat�on�a�obSon,ZOZ�; � NWI (MnDNR, 2019) I In = 600 ft F�$te�^ PC'Q�e�"t�/ PWI (MnDNR, 2020) Impaired Waters (MPCA, 2020) EII< River, Sherburne County, Minnesota � �, _ � �: � Ii � � �r� , .. i �� . m ` ;L firy � r y 3�: �`�� e�h � 4 rI. , '�,"`� j ' ,'� I� K � .`. `�_ * � � r� 9 + � y . "��q i► R ^�j . •sj:i i1, x �169 y � M �F �r' � � 4 � ,+,�:'`�►` !z 4, y � t�� r yVp +�''� � ,. � ` - � �, �a r ■ � � N � r � 4 � ��r �i� �: F � �-- ° �� , � , t - � . '"=. �� , ; � � � � � �� ,,.. . ''a"' �� '�`'.�...� �- _ Tuesday, October I I, 2022 o i,000 z,000 ft I in = 2,000 ft � — -- ..,r..yrt' _ . _ +.• � .. . p�... °'.i-.:.' 4 -.,+�r� : �� i� � �i! - i .�''�{ ,�.h � i,4 ,�' � �,`�..k� i � �� i �' � I . 9 _ � 1� � � � � �� _,�_ F � i r.._ .. ..�..'A� a � �.�-,� r Y•�� f ��. . �y�' � � ` �I �,: .,. ♦ r'7 � �.�-' . -+. , -� � �f �.� � ��- '. �'��' . � � k �� t r i� y�� i f� � `� � � � ,�' w`�� €; * ; _ . _ � � *` F � �;�� ,��j =� � ��.:� ��$.;; � �� r�� -ii P � � h , i � ��+ ;r x E � � •�i� - � *. +I�w�} 91r � �r•i �� y. . . . \ f . T�� t t _ :^��'£�• _ �M�' . ,.:,.. i . �" 40 * ��.t,+� �� J� s WY_,_ � i «7) uar� rr+� 43'� �• - " . r � � � � � . .. �° - �'�`-` y'� • � ��1{ � . .. T'.*y .. � �� Y 4 � O,R'j q p r'''y 1 � N � �� ,a ��`,� r� '��+:_ �'s�,� t` `':, �65 � .'l��' !� F°� m �a. � s��, � ..�1� � . � •; ��, ' d' ,. ! '• �s � � � i P;, Y�y{ � J � - ��.� i 5 �- 'y9" i� ��} � �tl1�'" , k {� I 1� 1' � S{ �''� . � ^'�: f �-; h" ;{ � `- _.�, � ,��,4 �� s � • a, � , : , . �! �� y �+.� ' �I�x!�'r� i . � ti � �•.: -. : 0 � �Y"y ' J . 4 . { • . - ' � ° �� . �� * _ � y � � I . � � � � .;� � - . _ . �. - � �; ' � � � � /:%�� ' �'� : 5 �.. . . '_.r— �r '��-s T ,: ,� F ��. r � Xa.; �� { � � . f �- +�l,r,..'. . . �A'� % �w* .e'��.+t'L.fi' � j 0 1Fv � J"�.� _ , ., �d k � ;;�� '�� ''- � ��1 + � l ,�, ' Il �� , pi � �# � , , �� : y�,i ,. � � i� r� .. . , `��I'�� • � �F++... F y' � . ; � .'+; _ � { �£63 �� * i ... ,4� �+ � �;� � � � �x' 'I � � _. . . F s,� � � a � 4 .. � ,�i% ; !3,°a� �3+�y`'... � ti ' . 64 � ;.`.. . ' r , , . �� ` � � '9ge �r �i.` i ��'.�� '�o t i � �f � � �.� 1 ' 1 -t � k .3f� � � , � �I �. � � �; _. !—! d"�. � � ' � � `} �fr�� iy''�� y,� �,.�. 3 � .. � j �y. � � _. ��;•'��, , 4;„�r ' d ';� ,"�, �, q �i � R ` � JK. •..� 7 ��; `,��4� �� + j�� Y� �°Y `'�+.,��. �" .�". , ' � ,v�i �z ,� ,�: a� `' : - ' ? ti,� i .■ #�� ` �,{N�.is ��.3 .� �� '� ..7N� � � . . ., � �3..�� a�. _ .. �iL3Yi . ` a �., r ,�'�^., . � �it�"..-�' . , � �.,';�� n.� e �� - ; 0 0 0 0 0 ':��''� ;, ..�' �Y � ,. � � �li _ ,��,�`,; ,."`, ' �{ � �� . . � ,. - a.,.�. , � �, , �., ._ � ��' ., � ��r'�` ' � +r � ■ ��'$' , � r. . y f o w++ ., �' i�� 4 �r �`�� . . . � 4 � ' � • , ,�,d - - i � .s�.. wetia�d ,� � - . � F}�-; �,,r ��'� I,i��.�i `� '�'•`�.�`�°� � � �± . � i }: - � .�,,,�,�.,�, .,� �. �� Figu re 7a Source s: N o�hopnaca �Fsa, zozi� Surface Water Resources Map wet�a�doe��neat�on�a�obSon,ZOZ�; � NWI (MnDNR, 2019) F�$tel� PI�O�ei'ty PWI (MnDNR, 2020) Impaired Waters (MPCA, 2020) EII< River, Sherburne County, Minnesota �`�`�`.�``��,,�.��n``,��.�`�,.\.��`�``,,��;�•.��' �� `� .`\� \�`��` �\`\��,��:�� ,`��`��: - � \ '� . ` �: . `�� w � '�,'`\.�\ �� ,,.' � ?� �.� . . , . , . _. , ,r, .` r `� �� ., � �,, . . . .. � . ` •�� F ,� � a # . . � ,.. . _ - 2�� ' � , : -- ` - .� � .ii y�? '14� �:'�'�r • - 3. �- � ' .•r: �+.` - , t, µ n _ , ' `. � �'�,�• '�' �►_, - .. c'` � � �' ,Twin �akw � _ '2" � r \.. � �. , �` , � � , Pk�j' �s �� ' � � •., _ . � , . `i` �` � J�v ,a � `. ` � P ,: , _i��a 40 r_'P��'►� a � *i:: lt� ,�;:_ '� r X�+��i'�� _... . . ; � , .T� �. � I�J _ .t.v b � _r � �r _ y ,`.:'66 Y �. . �w�i4� _ E� , �� - . � _ • � 1,�4; ��i `�1f •v' R '. , '��i-. -. . ti ' .. ��'- � t a` tiatS .�� 7 ..�'s�, 4S' , y F,r , ��n a . lf�F ; .. ' , � . , � k �y � r�i•" �� 7 _ ��!'-? 't- .�: s . � ' � � • �+{c � �(1 � I� : '` -t 1 v:. � J� v . (� j�' � � � ' �. � '� .�. { �f �,�.' '�+1 {I p`i��.r�)l� r'�h`J� �4 � �`�M1`3 � 1 `1 }}�� . .J� � �4e� ��S]��v��' . � � �� '�� •�� ' �� _£ \ 4. , " ..�-:�, . �)�'�' - �.�;-,_ y G_� :1�; .�f11 . � - p. � r y '1 ��'s �, � _.. _ t. :� . � , `� � i�� ; {�- R I + � " . . � . 1( .� Tr ; ..;�:��?h�.•l�: • 11 r S .''�.. . , ,.. . � , h � �i� ` ..,�� .�`j . i• • . � 1�a -...�o r,lj t �+` 1 �\ F . �•' '�� `��4s � �'� �Elk River � '� �;' , �:, � . "�. , z- .�. , - - Wellhead' Protection Area , , � \ w . ;f� �_. . —• � „ ; ,r ; ` , 1 � . �;.= , _; ' — M. i; '., ;� r. � + � � ., � '�., *'�' . - ;. � '. � u ti.Ajs: l�' 'it C t � �' - } �� J} -r- ., ; � �y,' �� ,� 'f� .l �' .♦ � ��,~ � -. ��` � �� j _ , "f �� . � � .�� ,1 . T �-zi t j'��! f f��. .� r � ' ti : � �` ° . � ; 4 , =-� � -'�''-•,� �► y �y` `fj f �� ' "� � r - + " •; ` f/ � � �`� . " t e ,m �,� � � �r� ' � !,. :� � ,�.�/% �%��, :r � # Y '},� � M � 4 ~ �� `� �3'�c ,' i �;"'. Y; J �� .`� � ''� . _ �: f-� .. . „��..� � ,�� ` � `f�j��' �, . � , .-,�,' yo � �fi"�F � a��C•� nr:� -- �. y'` a� � �,�1: f ' f y��\SS J �S}.F � M s •� - � � � �,: ti � ; ' �''4 F , ' ,�{ `�yF ��` '. � � n . � ' .rj t ., !' t r � � . `4'�L`'� , �y t ' � ' ��e � 5 , . . . . ',, � . , r ;,� � , � �= - � � . : . �,-. jy , �i� ! '� �s�t �� 1 � ' g ti ,� _ � � � � '�� ` �° c, t f _ � � � �+�il. • � ,�' .1 d�� _ �• � .'!� � :y��j..�'. ' _ � .w, . � •,.'� ��}`t �q ry 3 .< �;i { „ ..a�y�� -- �3t,l � . �� : R + . - • +y,. �.. . , �7 � ) a�� _ 1 _ s, _ _ .'�.�. � ' ` �1 9�' '. ,.:- r �t �r 4� "�� ;�. �=i� i '.�v� r �� Q ` �' ``�y �83dA� �'• ` • ti� �.� ~ j,�,4 � F +i . ^� �� A - �e f . � ' � Ns e. _a�i � y -- �: � - . . ��t ;j +�� • e � . � . f-'�/ i' i �,.. � ` ,.L.� �•M 'L' � r � �,hA�1•r • I- s;� `# ,! ~ _ N l � ,� � �'� f , �" `'I - - �/ . � � � I'� '�.+_.� d '�� . ., i. . �� oA , yR �' �_�.J�� S_ � � ., r � __ "' ' � ' ' H . t � • ��. � .. _ .. !., . -'�� Ys x+�. . �;, e r � , . '\ "\ ti -�' � ,` `�� ' ��r - , ' �- ' ,`� ,�.\```��' i� , . ]i 4 ��5� � �� `, \ l �. � � �� \ �� \�` � .. ..��. � � � � �� }`q �� .' � a . � \ . . � . . \� ` . ' � .. :-0 ... ..+ '�•.• . -:'dr}��` ' . . 78 \ O � � ��\�\,��•�. �� I� � � � �1 1 � � � �'�i � (]�%,: . . �� :� � . i` RT �/ %f� � �� .. .Y��. � .- .� • . �'� _ y , _ . . �1.��.�.`�� \ � � ��r _ � \`� . . .. � , m '-�� . ��` �\\\ _ �I'!! � j• 181st Ave NW ' Legend ��., *. �\ `` ♦ .\,. �. ' .i� \ . �. �. .,.\` '� Q Project Area � , • � ti � ", z ..��. � Lincoln St � 180th La ��. ` '� � Z'. ,;, �/i Ghost Plat Areas � � � �z v ,- �Wellhead Protection Areas �� ,.�,� �\, ��\�' . O o .�a .# � 3 O Minnesota Well Index �� -��'�m��S `t � � �\ � •. ��'� � • �� o ��`�,\.\ ti� �''�.,�\�� "��,\\ , �}� • `�- l _ � . :. \ \'L � �� \ \.�l `•. .,.. �,d ' i'�� Thursday, May 5, 2022 Project N��mbec 2b25553 � 0 300 600 ft I in=600ft Figu re 8 N Groundwater Resources Map � Foster Property EII< River, Sherburne County, Minnesota Source s : Orthophoto (ISG Drone, 202� � MWI (MDA, 2020) WHPf� (MDA, 2020) '� =��y '��* �y � �� .:��+�N� � Y4 � � � �rt � � � - a � f ' •f ' ' "' - „� 1 "'`� - ' .� � ,w � wtt � �' `�� . . ,, �. s < •� —�. ��.. -�ar..- x.,..,�o- � � �r e l at r, � - _ .. � i�'� • -` .� � �,*� �--9 ��R � -a.' r-.'� =� r. ti . . � - ��r 5,;; � • ,., : ;- . . ` •_ � :�fi � � li 6' . . �, � � a . _� : ; . .� �� :�� ,�� . . .. � , .� _� i > ,} � r� � � � . S"'r� � ,� y � +� lJ - . k'`.. � * �- �,, :�'' �'`r�r ,. ` � _ r. . ,n ' . �^ ,t�� • , � �, • 7i ,�: .. t_ .�ri � . , t 1�� F � � _ �� '�'��y �� ` y � ` .� � �r'�^k �l3. � '� • n ' � r £� '` y. a , i. �,�,�, ,_'�;`1� � �: �� '�. �. '� � r'd�:`.�' ��r . � .c : �,,; , �y��ll'=ti ' ,� r , �"• �, I s.r.�' + a ""T ,�r y, , .,r+,� �r �' t T Y! r yia �r .t �a� ��, - e} i�� .� � � i '' +�.�^ `s'. `� + Q T �� I �'.. ry� � f � b�a� �. '� •1� , } � �i� .� � s �.. �i� �,� �* '� i '°s v.,�' . i / � . r �� _ , i, '� �� •� �� . �r �t .. yy�� .�'" �". �� : �.�y..: .. � 4! � 1 � �-'�F �� }'z�� r'�� ataa��ry,'.� I � _�� . _ . i.',• �� ^ _ ' _ _ .� ! �T1 T� �� i� � � 1�, � I'.' r� 1f.r'-` �'.' ^ t ,' A l 5 1l `�.. . . . ..• .:.'- � �.- � - . . `� � Y� .T �.� f ... `�, R,_ 6�!. ._ ' M �w. •�I � _ �T ,p J. -... � �, �'.` � �` �. � iL4,�., '�'T°..r,t • �ta' � �.�1�' �,� .�Xj S $�� { ! � �.� V �. k��Y f - `'4 - ; ? �, e , ��.'�jPi � �-r� .� -�� {r�� r .,r,;� .�L ,3'�• ._' . ' �x��. .� �*` � ' � � , 4 3 , ,r � � _ - 1'i = . � .,,:� r�� a �.�. :� JY i'ea `.'� `��x ``- .} �. . �� , ' � _ ' 4".- _ "�Y' � .. " _ . + � '. � ± ',- � ; r s y 40'. . . , . �. � 9 _ . x •I�.�.��.,�y, �''"�� _ �' 't . '� ,� ' tiY P . �'� ', `-�_ ` s-n �4r � f+.,_ _ _ . .--e �j �Y � „ .� ��t a. � µ,` �I ('� x � � - F. � � �, �' °�� s ,, +� .'`�.!.�, 1 � 5�r �, fu �+7 a . ..( �t � . - , �'.j' . . � . . t .�ii .. �l � . . . L. 9 . ... . . . � . . ] - i � h i. . � . . . "Y s .. � �, f i _ . . i ��. r . � i4Rw'�'� � :� � , ;�� c�.:, ;;�. I � 1�,:�1ti. Y � _ . _e � S�r�'� :�. •.r � - .�� , - - �� 'T . �ti. `r . . t � . � '' - � �,� ..�1'.. , i�. �i, _ .� �� `� �. :1�'�� , ;;� 'T.#� �� . '� y +�� {� � ��^ \ t 1�ti� �r��y.� . Y� +� � �y ��; � ':r I � ,x :..'' P�'�� y ��>:'ry c� � ,: � �.- ., +� �. 1,°w,:! �7t� �,.. ...F �ff �. e �: � � . y � - 1..� � ��.I.q � � � ��'�' ^�.y4. . � . piew�"�,� �� -- �� ''L.': `� �• � F � �" ° , . � t� � �! `R r-� - �� r�� zs� � ' i � 4 ,1. .� �, . _ 7f � - � � , y ' T�. '�'�"' .kp� i �`•tl y, � r �- � 2 `'� � 4 •.5 t . : 4 � J'� � �!�7� �' '"" x r. '� � � ° f- .',� °', ` �.��'�v- �^c�2�+�J � � � � �,F.+� - I i�� .�"-" .y� r�"=� :-��.� ,oyr ��.��• ti �. 'k�f,�� , • a w .� � ,r'� +�ti f ¢" {1-�'#��' �'�,� 4� ,�� , ' rK , / � r � �.• � � i. � . ` � ��. -; # t � . .r Y. � 4>��. f, I� � �� r�� e m � "v l �6 , ' i : r ry .•r � - �' . �° . d'� r �5�� 169 4 _'� ` �.�",,, i K' .*..+��R �1 +f• ;� a�'sa* � _ _ �� '�� : . . . � � . �... - r s� F a� ,, e - �� i� y . ry - t, -'��,�`i. . `��' n � -,,�t' _ f� �q ��'�'�� ; �i'- a-„" . �t. ;�. �"� 7� � � ��.. "� �� ,�k�R ,,,d� 4�,� r •�....* p�� e r `_ �.� i _ + _ _ ''�I�''� ��•:� l� 'i3 •-a � �i � ir �,qrs=�,� ti ' d# �a � . � i , ,_. �' c"� - �� g'� . , ` . Y, �s � +� a� �;'�,` �` - °� � �� $� .�'4'�� . t�'. ° l ' 1' , *�'� p�� .;i ' .', . .. .� r� � - � �4 _ �� ' ~ fi r � � • �+i. . r � " r �'v r .: ' ' �;� � �IPd� -�, � , f s� rs r � i_ r r ... _. �� "� �� . � . �Yf . � �� v�t' `5y �--.�+--�.. �n d" _ �.. � � 711. •."5 ` � R -' , . � ��.q� } .5 '" �� ' _ - - . ' _` 3 �� -- :j � �1 �. n �� a`W�� -.� 4' ��'( � � � �� :��- � � _y � ; " �' �5 .y��._;�� - � � �� s• ., ��; . �k., � � - ' � sr�',� + . 1� � �� . le "f'�,-. � �p� �� .. e �4 � S , �R�i W. . :� � �'�.� �� . m � ; �, . ,�� „ _ � �i � S Y� ' �� i' ''�1��''.�3^� 6�T; � '�Y . � 44 '��: � '� A Z{ / f! 6 � `{4 'A '�J6 -. 'e -. � �- -Y � . .y i.,.--�, .. f}�t f.,�'c C ij'��j .'Y F{V � 4 � }° i �� • � a. a � a; iy+r� S�� b1 �Ri y, (�� T a � � �. 1 '�_�','' ��y ry I .,},r� ,�+'+p �y �� '�w:: � .L �`- ; �� p,�� ' K^ �� ^ih .} . r � G �-r � 4. � ' � *� • ,�}`��r�, -s� ° �` _ - ��- t� �°' . �„- 4 � g�^ 1y�► y :�'� � .�'�� s -�� : T : -� �r ' S` ,� � . � ;.+� �'� �E-�. � � : �� r �' � w1 .. � R.. - _ _.sY,� _�f x �.. ,•7 , A.� .1,;� y��;,, ��y�'� � A�� . y 10 �y. .j} � � "''� ',! � � r �7.' ' "'. � P �i1j -i � 4 .v �,., x � h� � ��5, 'y�1• + � Ri1 : ��-` ` ti¢ . �. : a . .,, .'b _ : ;, �z.: - � . .a*, „ : . h � � - _ �� `� � � � �� *i � � . ��' - .._.-.� � . •- a,, ' �_�� .q�p' r; x�•,� � N. .r`:: �t� :+� . . 'ar°�` � _ � ir�,'.�^'�,� �..'�+�ss, �, y� ��'. �. Lege� : � _�;:1 -� r . '� ",,�,•i,�' ��_ �� ,,'� ;i,..', � � ; a � . �� -t�' z•,�S` s_�. , Q Project Ar ea > : : ,,�� , 1 �; , �. • • � . � � , .�� -�^ _ . �7 �_ _ �.: _ ..�`�' �:�, �'� :,>`- � � ' , , �// Ghost Plat Areas ry g''�, `"� ��- � �i �� r�,;. `" � . ' i .k '� � � '"'�" — . „.,�, �a� � i .. _ 0 EII< River WWTP +y�;"�'� � �r ' � �� .��'" ' - _ �•" �r�' .t � �. . t'��.'^�d '�`r:' -� .. .- . . . o �so i,soo ft I in = I ,500 ft Figu re 9 N Wastewater Features Map � Foster Property EII< River, Sherburne County, Minnesota "', � - r K�. �.' ..3._:..� Thursday, May 5, 202L � � Source s : Orthophoto (FSA, 2021) �._.�� ' , �, �. � � _„ , � � � r1UISdaV, May 5, 2�22 � �`-.�` � .�� r- •- � , aq, �� ,��, , " ,- "�. �«�c" �' `' 7 Grace: - fi ` of Go� f" � ��,+ -s�.� ' � � o�r P�e ±� .�� .q��7 N �, ' 1�c t'�n;16c�� `�"'� o `�.`7�� ' s '� �q '' � � C,�C - c^ � J�e c ' } . �`.a fi : 1 '��' �s��r r i�aath".`�� . �,�. �� "` S� ,Ave,� . � O � FJ _ .,�; � 4 �� /so + C,; :�; �, n St .�� m. ,�,N . �� . ��'�F' o� ? ' � �� ''�183'�"��* - �.�+'� �,t'. ..,�: � VQ .. $ � v. � ,rn.� -...:s:,� } :. .�782nd P�e - �;.,�o + .^= � � ^ ` �'�Spectrt .. '� � ' �`� Atlilet c"�f fi � -: ° `� a, �8 � : velt _. °�'� � r�= Improverr ��st �� - 181st�a ;CSAH12 �`'�"��,� � �',:'�"'�_` . a v � �.. . �;.. �. �- Improvements r� �-ct. � - �,• � �.. 181stAveNW � r EI.k�River�.. , o \� �h�oh . � ; c, D`ump I � ' `. , , ; v � o a, 180th ��' ,; m, '�� 1��9th Ave. �� 2 �t ''� ,, 7gpt > Qye , o �� ,,�." v\� � „��" �' �' "--. s x� � `z- s:� . , ° ':�....179tIi:P � .� ��'- �� r � � ��. .�. � "� � ��9 - �� =,Eagles Ma . � �,.,, , � :.�� * ' " TihirdAddi � Eagles Marsh . � ,� 8th��r�` 3rd Addition.� , ,� -.�'�' . ��°�_ - it. - _ • � , � Ci ,: "�7, . � `� . . 7'� .. _ ♦ , _ e . 7 �. ��3t� . . } . ,� . C . _r , �.. Le end - • . _ °` ^' ;;,' : g �:i � � - �: �- � `S -„ o #�. Q Project Area " ,+ ' 9 ' .� " ,�+�i ; 7�6 �' ^ �/� Ghost Plat Areas .: , o� . th., �Ca" MPCA Sites �r 'si:'�h'�so' ' ��6tFi q�e r�� , �� >' � Multiple Programs q ��.,y sr ; "� ■ Hazardous Waste YO— ' � ' � ,_ -�� ,:1�7�th Ct �.�� • Investigation and CleanuF. ` '+ 175th Ave NW , _ ;-_- 7y�, � StOYIYlWdt2Y �. �� ' li +�, ��''�''. � SSTS ,t�,.'�� - � �' � " q�� . - n� .. .... f . IL•_. _.� _ �I `. 4 G.� �� '`si-yt .� � �� ` ��. : �. a;�y C q�` i i � ��}� . V. ��, s.a.� . "� '' *s'� . �.� ��" � -� � � � �r � , p,��Y y 1 ��.'� 5� '" �. � � �,' �� ''"E'�k;,1�'7� �' �::1�7n.,.:,��1: 33 �. r -`�,��, y s"1 M '�"�M�� ,�' � -�i �-4�i _' ' s�.� Figu re I 0 ° 'S° ',5°° N What's In My Neighborhood Map o�hop o�o`�FSA,ZOZ�, ft � WIMN (MPCA, 2020) � �n = �,Soo ft Foster Property EII< River, Sherburne County, Minnesota � .•� ��i � � � S �� s �4a"` a �. � �. ��' � � .J � - _ � � �._ �'�: _, .. __d,;. , _ .� s � �� d � f �i �' � 'a � k �� ,�, �,' �'�a p� �.� ion ,,�` �� . - . - _ � � ��i�� rf , � � •.� . y " ' 2 •.��i �-% I 1 � ...-� f � . � -�' _ s �i`�' ` /z % � F. �`Y ��'� � �E:,' 88thq�e NW � ''' � a�,. -..,4 . s�.� . . a � ,. �t. �r�g �o- � _ � I F.r- }Y. � ;Y_' r �- � I 9 t ', �`-'� �- ' -.+� _,�CSAH 13 Roundabouts �- ; +l• (CR401ntersection 'River Park'` �� _ _ 3rdA�ddttio�,�}.:192nd Y# ��' 40 . � � r • � LfN NINX � il I�ti. � I'` r Q River Park; '. ISD 728�Twin i � *�, , -,�-•� '� Meadows �� Lakes Elementary �. . . '� � 19.1 st LN NW SCh001 - `�°� � , � -; • ``�� , �� s z 19oth rJ �' ,, ��, Holzen. � � "�N Nw �~' °� Residence + � � - Z �. .�{: -, -� _; i � � � � -, i -�'__+', � � � � _ � , ��gOth,AVE NW � /}y4 �T'�F� � � F I V'� y ~y _• . ' C� � , r � [ � ; Muske �'�j1�� ` � � Marty Bro .�;:� � � � Meadows d �`� � South � o. Construct �� `Nw : , . . �'�,. �d � � s ,',' 1� .. �i �" ' 187th A�P :. �e �+�`.' • :�.�� . � �+�� s�• �c,' " � � �' , :, � 186th Ave�, ; , ,� „�o � � -+., ��s4� � � �i � ��a �• �t;. �+ •� � �� 6R N ,�; . '�'�7� � c �'s. , � � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning EAW �� — �� y � s �,: � �,J �_r 1—L ' y' � � � ' �I—I��T �� ' c < � � C ��-�I 1J ll I ��`^:-a• � � � .. �a \y�� , �� \ fi � � 1717r1I�I�f�I�I�C1� � —�;.�� ; �� UU�UUIJLJLJLJ❑LJLJLJLJLJ❑ C (f �U � 'a s R , 'r �� LJLJCJLJLJLJLJLJL]I�IJIJUUU `" G� ��J � �nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn C ° �O C ' r� �. nnnnnnon C� nnnnn �, G u0 �C �r�� - � ° � � � v�� uuuuuuuuuuW .-nn��<` `� �� , � uuuuuu❑ � � �U '��: � i � r �� 0!> " �G onnnnnnnc��` ' uu � s��`� ' � C� nnnnnn C J �i G vuvU U ,; �� j C «k�?'� �OU�� nnn '�t� � � � � G,�� C �<� � ��°. v�� nnnn� �� ,�R� � �G � C U❑ -.. . � ��On � �� , � � � � �� u � � � " n� '� . ,�, r .. � `4: ' � C � n �` �. J � 0��,�� . . - J �._ f� � � c � nn nn ' �J� � , J fi � � s> . �JJ c� � ` vUUUIJ�Jv� ��O'� \ % � �vJ �' '`� .. * .II II � c uuu� �� " % �� C' J� �d.. �� c � ... ��nClrl�l - � �J r � C `3 + J � • ��. "�t' �,K `� +'�� C �..w`, s@� � , 'F. � �%�� i��i �i:, �4i4�. �L. A�< �^ � � C . k�- ��,,' ; � ,� , (�� JUUU�J � �9 e � ; ��i � ��', � c n_ ' Y��, # �II �� a �: +� .r n�i� C � �- � 1 r y�. . . ��.zo,�� C .� r ._„ � � � � r � � r / '� G � �� n��nn� m�� R � � � + � � �, �� - , � F.. v►,: i� t� C�, �7��GGC _ , $ �' � � � ;�;� � �'- , � ,- �` A�.% ��, � �� ' -, � C � _ � _ �ta�� a� O � �� _ - �� ` .� � � � _... �� G � � ❑ � % ,JJJ �` C� l C�� -- • � � ° � �q' �J� �� C ' . � ,�: ��L, � �„' _ n . � � � � "T �f � �n rl �� '�4 / A T^ . ' i.l�� oo �_ �� l� y � a .�. � a8//� �" .� !' t �� r• <;»`- ;'��5• � ll - , � �' , �"t Y � �r � l y„�.r � 7 � * � �� ,, � ,: � ,�, ,�, ��%� � ` �°�'�: . � ��" '�.. '."� a �. a - - �U� 1s1t �' �y _ � / ' -- � tr,- Z, ti.� . '7�'- 1 CONCEPTUALLAYOUT �a `` ' . .. M,.�.�f Easn��PzoPERr �� ;� i £: ,��..�� o .00 � � FOSTER PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT Archltecture + Engineenng+ Emironmental + Planning E�K aivEa, mwvEso,a-eoeznoiii ISGlnc.com �sc aR�Ecr rvo. zz-zessa � - -'4� *,�"' •� : � � � 0 �� ' g �5�--'�WFr� . �^ \ V ` ✓/ �\� � r �� ,�i � � --- � �` � � � �� \'�� . j ��, � : ,----T , ❑ � ❑ �� PROPERn�NEnP � , � a � � __ , , , s�o�,� , s.oR �,.Eaa�� ,� —�.�. � �; , � � �_�� , �I �,,=; ,,, ❑!❑i0!❑! ��" �� , � ��E�no�,�,a, o , � ' _ _ � _ � _ _ � _ � " � �/�� %" ' � _ - ,i� V" � i T � � � � „s��o Ev ��v o.s _ � -- � — — — � `�� , � �,�� -- I�% �,, ❑I❑ ❑I�I�\ y�� i �= � � � o-- � '� ,��,, o��rs�r�NE �o �mo: _, �� ,� �� — �, ,� F��F�ooP�� „a',�= � ; r�,— , ,, � ��o, ---- m �, ,, � �- . = , ," -- , __�,00_-- ��' —°��" � i _��,��EOF.Ro..aRoo� �� , , �------ �o�:��. � � , ; �` ,� i '�� _� � � �= �� GHOST PLATTED AREAS / � �\� _ _ . _ __ ,, � I " � i�� - - --- ------- � � `�u � — _ f _ _ f _ _ � � _. _. —� L — .__ ' IL — .— ' IL _ _ ' I I — � RaPE=r��NENP. z'i � _� ; �,,__-- — ----_ � oo.o,u ,' � � ,� — — � ,��i��, � ��i ��, x' i , � � — — —�— _ � �� _ _ �� ',�I�'',,I,,�}�,I''�, �� >� i , I' � , � � � �� '�� I � �', � � 1 �'�� I � � � �� ''�� , i _ _ ' � � I I' I, '',, � � I � � � I '��I�', �I�, � ,,� � � I — — , I �',��', � �� ' � �� ''�� 1�� I � 1�� I �''� � � �'� �� ,�� y � ' � '�� '� i , ��, � � � i � � � �� — �� ' � ��'� , ' �'�� 'i ooRo„ i ---- , � �� 1I �� , � �� I� I^ ��.,, m ° �° N �' I — I I — ' —�I— � � nrcnitecmre+engineering+environmental+alann�ing FOSTER PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ISGlnc.com �: ioen. imnesar,�- ize �sc aamEcr No. zazessa � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning EAW Geotechnical Evaluation Report Foster Property 181st Avenue and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota Prepared for Lennar Corporation Professional Certification: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. � ��.t�KY f v� p ��ii �..� ; � ' . . ' 'N'I �f j {" �� t� � 0~1, � � � �'. ' • �.� J Henry Vloo, PE � � �� .. � = Senior Engineer � ; ��E��' � � �i1NEER � License Number: 21140 +�+� : �� .: �Q.� . August 11, 2022 '�,'�r''••.....•••'' y4; � �i�� it► t` �� Project B2202158 �� Braun Intertec Corporation . . i . I NT� �T�C The Science You Build On. August 11, 2022 Mr. Collin Coffman Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North, Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 Re: Geotechnical Evaluation Foster Property 181st Avenue and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota Dear Mr. Coffman: Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Project B2202158 Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com We are pleased to present this Geotechnical Evaluation Report for the proposed residential development at the Foster Property in Elk River, Minnesota. Thank you for making Braun Intertec your geotechnical consultant for this project. If you have questions about this report, or if there are other services that we can provide in support of our work to date, please contact Henry Vloo at 952.995.2234 (hvloo@braunintertec.com) or Ray Huber at 952.995.2260 (rhuber@braunintertec.com). Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION � ii :4� ,rj t. F� 'J ,f , Henry Vloo, PE Senior Engineer ��`�J � Ray�Huber, PE Vice President, Principal Engineer c: Mr. Paul Tabone, Lennar Corporation Mr. Jerremy Foss, ISG, Inc. Ms. Whitney Behny, ISG, Inc. Table of Contents Description A. I ntroduction ................................................................................................ A.1. Project Description ........................................................................ A.1.a. Structural Loads ................................................................ A.1.b. Pavement and Traffic Loads ............................................. A.2. Site Conditions and History ........................................................... A.3. Purpose .......................................................................................... A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents .................... A.S. Scope of Services ........................................................................... B. Results ........................................................................................................ B.1. Geologic Overview ........................................................................ B.2. Boring Results ................................................................................ B.3. Groundwater ................................................................................. B.4. LaboratoryTest Results ................................................................. C. Recommendations ..................................................................................... C.1. Design and Construction Discussion ............................................. C.1.a. Building Subgrade Preparation ........................................ C.1.b. Reuse of On-Site Soils ....................................................... C.1.c. Groundwater .................................................................... C.1.d. Construction Disturbance ................................................. C.2. Site Grading and Subgrade Preparation ........................................ C.2.a. Building Subgrade Excavations ......................................... C.2.b. Road Crossing and Box Culvert ......................................... C.2.c. Excavation Oversizing ....................................................... C.2.d. Excavated Slopes .............................................................. C.2.e. Excavation Dewatering ..................................................... C.2.f. Pavement and Exterior Slab Subgrade Preparation......... C.2.g. Pavement Subgrade Proofroll .......................................... C.2.h. Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction ...................... C.3. Spread Footings ............................................................................. C.3.a. Embedment Depth ........................................................... C.3.b. Subgrade Improvement ................................................... C.3.c. Net Allowable Bearing Pressure ....................................... C.3.d. Settlement ........................................................................ C.4. Below-Grade Walls ........................................................................ C.4.a. Drainage Control .............................................................. C.4.b. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill............ C.4.c. Configuring and Resisting Lateral Loads ........................... C.S. Interior Slabs ................................................................................. C.S.a. Moisture Vapor Protection .............................................. C.S.b. Radon ............................................................................... C.6. Frost Protection ............................................................................. C.6.a. General ............................................................................. C.6.b. Frost Heave Mitigation ..................................................... C.7. Pavements and Exterior Slabs ....................................................... C.7.a. Design Sections ................................................................ ............................... ............................... ............................... ............................... ............................... ............................... ............................... ............................... ............................... ............................... ............................... ............................... ............................... .............................. . .............................. . ............................... .............................. . ............................... .............................. . ............................... .............................. . .............................. . .............................. . ............................... .............................. . .............................. . ............................... ............................... .............................. . .............................. . .............................. . .............................. . ............................... ..... ................ .......... ..... ................ .......... ..... .......................... .............. ................ .............. ................ ..... .......... ...... .......... .............. ................ .............................. .............. ................ .............................. .............. ................ .............................. �� INTERTE� Page ..1 ..1 ..1 ..1 ..1 .. 2 .. 2 ..3 .. 4 .. 4 .. 4 ..6 ..6 ..7 ..7 .. 7 ..7 .. 8 ..8 .. 8 ..8 10 10 11 12 12 12 13 14 14 15 15 15 15 15 17 18 19 19 19 19 19 19 21 21 Table of Contents (continued) Description � E C.7.b. Bituminous Pavement Materials .............................. C.7.c. Subgrade Drainage ................................................... C.7.d. Performance and Maintenance ............................... C.8. Utilities .................................................................................. C.8.a. Subgrade Stabilization .............................................. C.8.b. Corrosion Potential .................................................. C.9. Stormwater ............................................................................ Proced u res .......................................................................................... D.1. Penetration Test Borings ....................................................... D.2. Exploration Logs .................................................................... D.2.a. Log of Boring Sheets ................................................. D.2.b. Geologic Origins ....................................................... D.3. Material Classification and Testing ....................................... D.3.a. Visual and Manual Classification .............................. D.3.b. LaboratoryTesting ................................................... D.4. Groundwater Measurements ................................................ Qualifications...................................................................................... E.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions ...................................... E.1.a. Material Strata ......................................................... E.1.b. Groundwater Levels ................................................. E.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility .............................. E.2.a. Plan Review .............................................................. E.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing ................... E.3. Use of Report ......................................................................... E.4. Standard of Care .................................................................... Appendix Soil Boring Location Sketch Log of Boring Sheets ST-1 to ST-21, ST-7A Descriptive Terminology of Soil ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... Page ................. 22 .................22 .................22 ................. 23 ................. 23 ................. 23 ................. 23 ................. 24 ................. 24 ................. 24 ................. 24 .................25 .................25 ................. 25 .................25 ................. 25 .................26 ................. 26 .................26 .................26 ................. 26 ................. 26 .................27 .................27 ................. 27 B�auM INTERTE� A. Introduction A.1. Project Description This Geotechnical Evaluation Report addresses the proposed design and construction of a residential development, denoted as the Foster Property, located in Elk River, Minnesota. The subject site consists of 6 parcels of land totaling about 252 acres. All 6 parcels of land are mostly wooded with some ponds and wetlands. The preliminary development sketch provided shows plans to construct both single-family and townhome type house pads, associated streets, underground utilities, and retention/infiltration ponds. The preliminary house types, as well as garage and basement elevations, were not available at the time of this report. A.1.a. Structural Loads We have assumed that the construction will likely consist of one- to two-story, wood-framed homes or townhomes with full basements, supported on poured concrete foundations. Foundation styles will consist of walk-out, look-out, and full basements. Some of the single-family homes and townhomes may also be constructed as slab-on-grade buildings, that is without basements. We have assumed that bearing wall loads associated with the proposed residential construction will range from 3 to 4 kips (3,000 to 4,000 pounds) per linear foot (klf) and column loads, if any, will be no greater than 50 kips per column. A.1.b. Pavement and Traffic Loads We have assumed that bituminous pavements, typical of residential neighborhoods, will be subject to normal traffic conditions over an assumed design life of 20 years. A.2. Site Conditions and History Currently and historically, the site has been mostly wooded. There are some wetlands and ponds on the site. Some of the ponds appear to have been artificially. Based on aerial imagery, it appears that no structures or farmsteads have been present on the property in the past. The site is rolling with current surface elevations at the borings ranging from approximately 898 to 941 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL). Figure 1 below depicts the proposed site concept plan. B�auM INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 2 . -. ��.��... � ''��i��wi�.��' .� � 4 �t; �� ..:I a�iil�=� �' � � � � '• }. � , -_ � ,� � � � � � 'r - ` }, � �-_ �a'ri' .�: fJ' :. � � �; t�,� �%f� AF ��.� �� t. � �� r, :.� -� Figure provided by ISG, Inc. A.3. Purpose :� � � �``�T - _ ..� , �� ,- �„r�� - ` �, ' j � �- •- —�-� - ` ..a.. .. _ •� ', , '�_ . � 1-�- - �� ?� , • } � � � _ i� :�, . '� l � 5, � `� ,t��i ��,R.� '. . , . � _' • . � r -:� ��'"'�"�'� . ! �� . �--t",� {4; 4 . } ,�� . f � ..w�.. �. •— �� `,� � v 4 �7- . �,�"�., y^ i �� r, �. . �� l/ � �► r ��, ,t� � 4 �■ " �� F 6 e -• `v` ` y � � �' � � � � � �� _ "� � �'' �, �� .._ �=•�� .�z = .�__—.� = _— — �.-�--�.: - +��::� �r�r ��c� , : �:n r� S�r€_ n,er.� The purpose of our geotechnical evaluation will be to characterize subsurface geologic conditions at selected exploration locations, evaluate their impact on the project, and provide geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of proposed residential development. A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents We reviewed the following information: ■ Existing topographic map prepared by MnTOPO. ��M INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 3 ■ Communications with Lennar Corporation and ISG, Inc. regarding the proposed development design and proposed soil boring locations. ■ The available surficial geology maps for this area. We have described our understanding of the proposed construction and site to the extent others reported it to us. Depending on the extent of available information, we may have made assumptions based on our experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or interpreted the project details, the project team should notify us. New or changed information could require additional evaluation, analyses and/or recommendations. A.S. Scope of Services We performed our scope of services for the project in accordance with our Proposal QTB150444 to Lennar Corporation, dated January 11, 2022. The following list describes the geotechnical tasks completed in accordance with our authorized scope of services. ■ Reviewing the background information and reference documents previously cited. ■ Staking and clearing the exploration location of underground utilities. The project team selected and we staked the new exploration locations. We acquired the surface elevations and locations with GPS technology using the State of Minnesota's permanent GPS base station network. The Soil Boring Location Sketch included in the Appendix shows the approximate locations of the borings. ■ Performing 22 standard penetration test (SPT) borings, denoted as ST-1 to ST-21 and ST-7A, to nominal depths of 15 to 20 feet below grade across the site. The borings were completed in two phases. The first phase was completed at the locations that our drill rig could access. The second phase was completed after some tree clearing was done to allow our drill rig to access the remaining locations. ■ Install piezometers at 3 selected boring locations from which groundwater levels could be measured. e��a�uw INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 4 ■ Performing laboratory testing on select samples to aid in soil classification and engineering analysis. ■ Preparing this report containing a boring location sketch, logs of soil borings, a summary of the soils encountered, results of laboratory tests, and recommendations for structure and pavement subgrade preparation and the design of foundations, floor slabs, exterior slabs, utilities, stormwater improvements and pavements. Our scope of services also included environmental services consisting of a Phase I ESA and a Limited Environmental soil sampling. Both of those reports were sent under separate cover. No other environmental services or testing were completed on this site. We can provide additional environmental services or testing at your request. B. Results B.1. Geologic Overview We based the geologic origins used in this report on the soil types, in-situ and laboratory testing, and available common knowledge of the geological history of the site. Because of the complex depositional history, geologic origins can be difficult to ascertain. We did not perform a detailed investigation of the geologic history for the site. B.2. Boring Results Table 1 provides a summary of the soil boring results in the general order we encountered the strata. Please refer to the Log of Boring sheets in the Appendix for additional details. The Descriptive Terminology sheet in the Appendix includes definitions of abbreviations used in Table 1. s�auw INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 5 Table 1. Subsurface Profile Summary* Soil Type - Range of ASTM Penetration Strata Classification Resistances Commentary and Details ■ Predominantly silty sand with lesser amounts of lean clay, clayey sand, and organic clay. Topsoil/Topsoil SM SC CL OL NA ' Thicknesses at boring locations varied from fill ''' 1/2 to 4 feet. ■ Dark brown to black in color. ■ Moisture condition generally moist. ■ Only present in Borings ST-7, ST-7A, ST-10, ST-13 and consisted of silty sand, poorly SM SP SC-SM 4 to 25 Blows per graded sand, silty clayey sand, and lean clay. Fill soil CL Foot (BPF) Some wood encountered in Boring ST-13. ■ Extended to depths of about 4 to 9 feet. ■ Brown, dark brown and black in color. ■ Moisture condition generally moist. ■ Encountered by Boring ST-5 from depths of about 12 to 17 feet, and Boring ST-13 from Swamp OH OL 6 BPF depths of about 9 to 12 feet. deposits ' ■ Mostly organic silt and organic clay. ■ Black in color. ■ Moisture condition generally moist. ■ Only encountered by Borings ST-5 and ST-18. ■ Consisted of a mixture of silty sand, lean clay, Alluvial SM, CL, CH 2 to 11 BPF and fat clay. deposits ■ Some soils judged to be slightly organic. ■ Brown, gray, and black in color. ■ Moisture condition generally moist to wet. ■ Encountered by all the borings and consisted of SP, SP-SM, 2 to 23 BPF a mixture of sandy and clayey soil with lesser SM, SC-SM amounts of silt. Glacial deposits • Intermixed layers of glacial outwash and till. ■ Variable amounts of gravel; may contain cobbles and boulders. CL, SC, ML 2 to 43 BPF . grown, reddish brown and gray in color. ■ Moisture condition generally moist to wet. *Abbreviations defined in the attached Descriptive Terminology sheet. For simplicity in this report, we define existing fill to mean existing, uncontrolled, or undocumented fill. B�auM INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 6 6.3. Groundwater Table 2 summarizes the depths where we observed groundwater. They include water observed while drilling as well as water observed in the piezometers. Table 2 only includes those borings where water was observed. The attached Log of Boring sheets in the Appendix also include this information and additional details. Table 2. Groundwater Summary Measured or Estimated Corresponding Surface Depth to Groundwater Groundwater Elevation Location Elevation (ft) (ft) ST-3 927.6 20 907 1/2 ST-5 912.8 20 893 ST-7 913.5 13 900 1/2 ST-7A 913.5 8 905 1/2 3 1/2* 907 1/2* ST-8 911.1 9 1/2 ** 901 1/2 ** ST-9 911.3 7 904 1/2 ST-12 906.5 7 1/2 899 ST-13 904.1 4 1/2* 899 1/2* 6 1/2 * * 897 1/2 * * ST-16 900.4 6 894 1/2 ST-18 898.3 1 897 1/2 *Piezometer reading from June 1, 2022. The piezometer in Boring ST-20 was dry. **Piezometer reading from August 2, 2022. The piezometer in Boring ST-20 was dry. Project planning should anticipate seasonal and annual fluctuations of groundwater. 6.4. Laboratory Test Results The boring logs show the results of laboratory testing we performed, next to the tested sample depth. The Appendix contains the results of these tests. s�auw INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 7 The moisture content (ASTM D2216) of the selected samples varied from approximately 3 to 66 percent, indicating that the clayey soils tested were likely near or above their probable optimum moisture content. The sandy soils were likely dry of their probable optimum moisture content. Our mechanical analyses tests through the number 200 sieve only (ASTM C 117) indicated that the selected soil samples contained 2 to 15 percent silt and clay by weight. These tested soil samples were classified as poorly graded sand, poorly graded sand with silt, or silty sand. One organic content test (ASTM D2974) was completed on a soil sample from the 10-foot depth of Boring ST-5. The test results showed that the selected soil sample contained approximately 10 percent organic material, indicating the tested soil sample was organic. Pocket penetrometer tests were completed on selected clayey soil samples to estimate the soils' unconfined compressive strengths. The results ranged from 1/2 to 1 ton per square foot (tsf). C. Recommendations C.1. Design and Construction Discussion C.1.a. Building Subgrade Preparation Based on the results of our subsurface exploration and evaluation, spread footing foundations bearing on engineered fill and/or native soils can support the proposed homes, after performing typical subgrade preparation. Typical subgrade preparation includes removing existing vegetation, topsoil, organic soils, fill soils, soft clays/loose silts, and any existing structures. Based on the current site contours, we anticipate cuts and fills to be less than 10 feet from existing grades. Any soil correction work could add or subtract to the cut and fill depths. C.1.b. Reuse of On-Site Soils Based on the results of the soil borings, the on-site, non-organic soils should be suitable for reuse as engineered fill but may require moisture conditioning prior to reuse and compaction. Some of the clayey soils may be above their optimum moisture content and would require space, time, and favorable weather to dry the material for reuse. Any materials used as engineered fill should be tested and approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to placement. s�auM INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 8 C.1.c. Groundwater We observed groundwater within some of the borings and could be encountered during the site grading activities. Some of the soils, such as silty sands, clayey sands, and clay, can also collect water from precipitation or if water drains to the site. We recommend the contractor remove any water that collects in work areas before performing further work. C.1.d. Construction Disturbance The contractor should note that some of the on-site silty and clayey soils are highly susceptible to disturbance, due to repeated construction traffic. Disturbance of these soils may cause areas that were previously prepared, or that were suitable for pavement or structure support, to become unstable and require moisture conditioning and compaction. Subcutting and replacing the disturbed material with crushed, coarse gravel, free of fines is also an alternative. The contractor should use means and methods to limit disturbance of the soils. C.2. Site Grading and Subgrade Preparation C.2.a. Building Subgrade Excavations We recommend removing unsuitable materials from beneath house pads and oversize areas. We define unsuitable materials as vegetation, topsoil, fill, organic soils, existing structures, existing utilities, and soft/loose soil. Table 3 shows the anticipated excavation depths and bottom elevations at each of the current soil boring locations. As final plans are not available at this time and the site layout may change, we have included all borings, even those currently in ponding areas, in the table below. Table 3. Building Excavation Depths Measure Surface Anticipated Excavation Anticipated Elevation Depth Bottom Elevation Location (ft MSL) (ft) (ft MSL) ST-1 908.4 1/2 908 ST-2 941.1 1/2 940 1/2 ST-3 927.6 1/2 927 ST-4 932.5 1/2 932 ST-5 912.8 17 895 1/2 ST-6 938.1 1/2 937 1/2 ST-7 913.5 9 904 1/2 B�auM INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 9 Measure Surface Anticipated Excavation Anticipated Elevation Depth Bottom Elevation Location (ft MSL) (ft) (ft MSL) ST-7A 913.5 4 909 1/2 ST-8 911.1 1 910 ST-9 9113 4 907 1/2 ST-10 926.0 4 922 ST-11 913.5 1-4* 912 1/2-909 1/2* ST-12 906.5 1 1/2 905 ST-13 904.1 12 892 ST-14 909.5 3 906 1/2 ST-15 920.9 1 920 ST-16 900.4 4 896 1/2 ST-17 901.8 4-7* 897 1/2-894 1/2* ST-18 8983 1-13* 897-885* ST-19 916.3 1 1/2 914 1/2 ST-20 926.9 4 923 ST-21 931.8 1/2 931 *To be determined in the field at the time of excavation. Excavation depths will vary between the borings. Portions of the excavations may also extend deeper than indicated by the borings. In addition, extra excavations will likely be needed to remove tree roots from the heavily wooded areas of the site. A geotechnical representative should observe the excavations to make the necessary field judgments regarding the suitability of the exposed soils. The contractor should use equipment and techniques to minimize soil disturbance. If soils become disturbed or are wet, we recommend excavation and replacement. B�auM INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 10 C.2.b. Road Crossing and Box Culvert Because of access issues on site, we could not drill soil borings directly on the apparent man-made dykes between the on-site ponds. One of these dykes will be used to construct a new road and trail crossing. A box culvert will be constructed under the new road and trail, connecting the bodies of water. A new sanitary sewer will be constructed under the proposed trail. We have assumed that it will be below the box culvert. Soil correction work to construct the box culvert will likely involve damming up the water in the ponds on either side of where the box culvert will need to be placed and then removing the water (see Excavation Dewatering in Section C.2.e) from the construction zone. Soil correction, if needed, can then be completed beneath the footprint and oversize areas of the box culvert. We recommend that the excavations be completed such that at least 18 inches of bedding sand or gravel be placed under the box culvert. To limit any frost heave potential, we recommend that the box culvert be backfilled with clean sand fill, with less than 50 percent passing the number 200 sieve and less than 5 percent passing the number 200 sieve. This material should also be used over the box culvert and under the road and trail section. In addition, we recommend a groundwater cut-off wall below the culvert, to prevent groundwater seepage below the culvert, which has potential to undermine the structure. At a minimum, there should be a cut- off wall on the high side of the culvert, but consideration should be given to a cut-off wall on both sides depending on the final pond design. C.2.c. Excavation Oversizing When removing unsuitable materials below structures or pavements, we recommend the excavation extend outward and downward at a slope of 1H:1V (horizontal:vertical) or flatter. See Figure 2 for an illustration of excavation oversizing. e��a�uw INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 11 Figure 2. Generalized Illustration of Oversizing 1. Engineered fill as defined in C.2.g 2. Excavation oversizing minimum of 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) slope or flatter 3. Engineered fill as required to meet pavement support or landscaping requirements as defined in C.2.g 4. Backslope to OSHA requirements EXCAVATE�N 6ACI(SL�F'E � \ �.' \ \ \ '�J �\� � �` �xisrirv� t soi�s \ \ \ t 5UI7ABLE EXCAV{1TION SC7TTaM A5 dETERG411NED 16V THE FIELd EXCAVATIt]N OVERSIZINC SKE'iCH NbT T� SCALE C.2.d. Excavated Slopes Based on the borings, we anticipate on-site soils in excavations will consist of a mixture of clayey and sandy soils. The clayey soils are typically considered Type B Soil under OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) guidelines. OSHA guidelines indicate unsupported excavations in Type B soils should have a gradient no steeper than 1H:1V. The sandy soils are typically considered Type C Soil under OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) guidelines. OSHA guidelines indicate unsupported excavations in Type C soils should have a gradient no steeper than 1.5H:1V. Slopes constructed in this manner may still exhibit surface sloughing. OSHA requires an engineer to evaluate slopes or excavations over 20 feet in depth. B�auM INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 12 An OSHA-approved qualified person should review the soil classification in the field. Excavations must comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, "Excavations and Trenches." This document states excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. The project specifications should reference these OSHA requirements. C.2.e. Excavation Dewatering We recommend removing groundwater from the excavations. Project planning should include temporary sumps and pumps for excavations in low-permeability soils, such as clays. We recommend dewatering of high-permeability soils (e.g., sands) prior to excavation with well points. Any dewatering from within the excavation with conventional pumps has the potential to loosen the soils, due to upward flow. A well contractor should develop a dewatering plan; the design team should review this plan. C.2.f. Pavement and Exterior Slab Subgrade Preparation We recommend the following steps for pavement and exterior slab subgrade preparation. Note that project planning may need to require additional subcuts to limit frost heave. 1. Strip unsuitable soils consisting of vegetation, topsoil, organic soils, existing fill, and soft clays down to native soils. 2. Have a geotechnical representative observe the excavated subgrade to evaluate if additional subgrade improvements are necessary. 3. Place pavement engineered fill to grade and compact in accordance with Section C.2.g to bottom of pavement and exterior slab section. 4. Scarify, moisture condition and surface compact the subgrade with at least 3 passes of a large roller with a minimum drum diameter of 3 1/2 feet. 5. Proofroll the pavement subgrade as described in Section C.2.f. C.2.g. Pavement Subgrade Proofroll After preparing the subgrade as described above and prior to the placement of the aggregate base, we recommend proofrolling the subgrade soils with a fully loaded tandem-axle truck. We also recommend having a geotechnical representative observe the proofroll. Areas that fail the proofroll likely indicate soft or weak areas that will require additional soil correction work to support pavements. s�auw INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 13 The contractor should correct areas that display excessive yielding or rutting during the proofroll, as determined by the geotechnical representative. Possible options for subgrade correction include moisture conditioning and re-compaction, subcutting and replacement with soil or crushed aggregate, chemical stabilization and/or geotextiles. We recommend performing a second proofroll after the aggregate base material is in place, and prior to placing bituminous or concrete pavement. C.2.h. Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction Table 4 below contains our recommendations for engineered fill materials. Table 4. Engineered Fill Materials* Possible Soil Engineered Fill Type Additional Locations To Be Used Classification Descriptions Gradation Requirements < 2% Organic ■ Below foundations SP, SP-SM, SM, 100% passing 3-inch sieve Content (OC) ■ Below interior Structural fill SC, CL < 25% passing #200 Sieve Plasticity Index (PI) slabs < 20% ■ Below-grade wall backfill; drainage ■ Free draining 100% passing 1-inch sieve layer ■ Non-frost- GP, GW, SP, SW < 50% passing #40 sieve < 2% OC ■ Non-frost- susceptible fill < 5% passing #200 sieve susceptible Behind below-grade walls, beyond Retained fill SP, SW, SP-SM, 100% passing 3-inch sieve < 2% OC drainage layer SW-SM, SM < 20% passing #200 sieve PI< 4% Pavements Pavement fill SP, SP-SM, SM, 100% passing 3-inch sieve < 2% OC SC, CL < 30% passing #200 Sieve PI < 20% Below landscaped surfaces, where Non-structural SP, SP-SM, SM, subsidence is not a fill SC, CL, ML 100% passing 6-inch sieve < 10% OC concern *More select soils comprised of coarse sands with < 5% passing #200 sieve may be needed to accommodate work occurring in periods of wet or freezing weather. We recommend spreading engineered fill in loose lifts of approximately 8 to 12 inches thick. We recommend compacting engineered fill in accordance with the criteria presented below in Table 5. The project documents should specify relative compaction of engineered fill, based on the structure located above the engineered fill, and vertical proximity to that structure. e��a�uw INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 14 Table 5. Compaction Recommendations Summary Relative Compaction, Moisture Content Variance from Optimum, percent percentage points (ASTM D698 — < 12% Passing #200 Sieve > 12% Passing #200 Sieve Reference Standard Proctor) (typically SP, SP-SM) (typically CL, SC, ML, SM) Below foundations, less 95 * -1 to +3 than 10 feet of fill Below foundations, greater than 10 feet of 98 * -1 to +3 fill Below pavements, within 3 feet of top of subgrade 100 * -2 to +1 elevations Below pavements, more than 3 feet below 95 * -1 to +3 subgrade elevations Below landscaped * surfaces 92 -1 to +5 *The minimum moisture content should be no less than 5 percent and no more than 3 percentage points over optimum. The project documents should not allow the contractor to use frozen material as engineered fill or to place engineered fill on frozen material. Frost should not penetrate under foundations during construction. We recommend performing density tests in engineered fill to evaluate if the contractors are effectively compacting the soil and meeting project requirements. C.3. Spread Footings C.3.a. Embedment Depth For frost protection, we recommend embedding perimeter footings of the structures, including attached garages, a minimum of 42 inches below the lowest exterior grade. Interior footings may be placed directly below floor slabs unless they will be subjected to freezing. We recommend embedding building footings not heated during winter construction, and other unheated footings associated with porches, decks, or stoops 60 inches below the lowest exterior grade. s�auM INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 15 C.3.b. Subgrade Improvement If a small amount of groundwater is present within the footing excavation, or if the footing subgrade soils become disturbed prior to placing forms or reinforcement, we recommend subcutting the soft or wet soil and placing a 6- to 8-inch layer of clear rock, which should be compacted into the subgrade. The clear rock will provide a stable working surface and will allow for the flow of water to a drain tile or sump pump. C.3.c. Net Allowable Bearing Pressure We recommend sizing spread footings to exert a net allowable bearing pressure of up to 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf). This value includes a safety factor of at least 3.0 with regard to bearing capacity failure. C.3.d. Settlement We estimate that total and differential settlements among the footings will amount to less than 1- and 1/2-inch, respectively, under the assumed loads. If there are areas where more than 10 feet of fill is required, higher settlements could occur, unless the deeper fill areas are only filled with granular fill (consisting of SP or SP-SM soils). C.4. Below-Grade Walls The following sections address soil parameters for basement wall design. Although construction of retaining walls has not been specified for this project to date, the following recommendations can also be used for preliminary retaining wall design. We recommend that additional soil borings be completed for final retaining wall design. C.4.a. Drainage Control We recommend installing drain tile to remove water behind the below-grade walls at the location shown in Figure 3. The below-grade wall drainage system should also incorporate free-draining, engineered fill or a drainage board placed against the wall and connected to the drain tile. Even with the use of free-draining, engineered fill, we recommend general waterproofing of below-grade walls that surround occupied or potentially occupied areas because of the potential cost impacts related to seepage after construction is complete. �� INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 16 Figure 3. Generalized Illustration of Wall Engineered Fill SL❑PE� AWAY FRDlv1 THE BUIL�ING TO MRliVTAIN LDNG TERM DRAINAGE � I � DRAINTILE Ex15TING SC]EL 1. 2-foot wide area of Free- Draining Engineered Fill or Drainage Board 2. Retained Engineered Fill 3. 1 foot of Low-Permeability Soil or Pavement WALL BACKFILL SKETCH NDT T4 SCAL� The materials listed in the sketch should meet the definitions in Section C.4.b. Low-permeability material is capable of directing water away from the wall, like clay, topsoil or pavement. The project documents should indicate if the contractor should brace the walls prior to filling and allowable unbalanced fill heights. As shown in Figure 2, we recommend Zone 2 consist of retained, engineered fill, and this material will control lateral pressures on the wall. However, we are also providing design parameters for using other engineered fill material. If final design uses non-sand material for engineered fill, project planning should account for the following items: ■ Other engineered fill material may result in higher lateral pressure on the wall. ■ Other engineered fill material may be more difficult to compact. B�auM INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 17 ■ Post-construction consolidation of other engineered fill material may result in settlement- related damage to the structures or slabs supported on the engineered fill. Post-construction settlement of other engineered fill material may also cause drainage towards the structure. The magnitude of consolidation could be up to about 3 percent of the wall fill thickness. C.4.b. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill Unless a drainage composite is placed against the backs of the exterior perimeter basement walls, we recommend that backfill placed within 2 horizontal feet of those walls consist of sand having less than 50 percent of the particles, by weight, passing the #40 sieve and less than 5 percent of the particles, by weight, passing the #200 sieve. Sand meeting this gradation appears to be present on the site although the readily available quantities of this material was not determined. We recommend that the balance of the backfill placed against exterior perimeter walls also consist of sand, though it is our opinion that the sand may contain up to 20 percent of the particles, by weight, passing a#200 sieve. If clay must be considered for use to make up the balance of the below-grade wall backfill (assuming a drainage composite or sand is placed against the backs of the walls), post-compaction consolidation of the clay occurring under its own weight can be expected to continue beyond the end of construction. The magnitude of consolidation could amount to between 1 and 3 percent of the backfill thickness, or wall height, and if not accommodated could cause slabs or pavements to settle unfavorably or be damaged. Should clay still be considered for use as backfill, however, we further recommend that: ■ The bottoms of the excavations required for basement wall construction are wide enough to accommodate compaction equipment. ■ Backfill is placed at moisture contents at least equal to, but not more than, 3 percentage points above its optimum moisture content. ■ Backfill is placed in loose lifts no thicker than 6 inches prior to compaction. ■ The relative compaction of the backfill is measured through density testing at intervals not exceeding one test per 50 horizontal feet for each 2 vertical feet of backfill placed. We recommend using a walk behind compactor to compact the backfill placed within about 5 feet of the basement walls. Further away than that, a self-propelled compactor can be used. Compaction criteria for basement walls should be determined based on the compaction recommendations provided above in Section C.2. �� INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 18 Exterior wall backfill not capped with slabs or pavement should be capped with a low-permeability soil to limit the infiltration of surface drainage into the backfill. The finished surface should also be sloped to divert water away from the walls. C.4.c. Configuring and Resisting Lateral Loads Below-grade wall design can use active earth pressure conditions if the walls can rotate slightly. If the wall design cannot tolerate rotation, then design should use at-rest earth pressure conditions. Rotation up to 0.002 times the wall height is generally required for walls supporting sand. Rotation up to 0.02 times the wall height is required when wall supports clay. Table 6 presents our recommended lateral coefficients and equivalent fluid pressures for wall design of active, at-rest and passive earth pressure conditions. Table 6 also provides recommended wet unit weights and internal friction angles. Designs should also consider the slope of any engineered fill and dead or live loads placed behind the walls within a horizontal distance that is equal to the height of the walls. Our recommended values assume the wall design provides drainage so water cannot accumulate behind the walls. The construction documents should clearly identify what soils the contractor should use for engineered fill of walls. Table 6. Recommended Below-Grade Wall Design Parameters — Drained Conditions Wet Unit Friction Equivalent Active Equivalent At-Rest Equivalent Passive Weight, Angle, Fluid Pressure* Fluid Pressure* Fluid Pressure* Retained Soil pcf degrees (pcf) (pcf) (pcf) Sand (SP, SP-SM) 120 33 35 55 N/A Silty Sand (SM) 130 30 42 62 390 Clay (SC, CL) 125 26 50 70 345 *Based on Rankine model for soils in a region behind the wall extending at least 2 horizontal feet beyond the bottom outer edges of the wall footings and then rising up and away from the wall at an angle no steeper than 60 degrees from horizontal. Sliding resistance between the bottom of the footing and the soil can also resist lateral pressures. We recommend assuming a sliding coefficient equal to 0.3 between the concrete and mostly clayey soil. The values presented in this section are un-factored. B�auM INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 19 C.S. Interior Slabs C.S.a. Moisture Vapor Protection Excess transmission of water vapor could cause floor dampness, certain types of floor bonding agents to separate, or mold to form under floor coverings. If project planning includes using floor coverings or coatings, we recommend placing a vapor retarder or vapor barrier immediately beneath the slab. We also recommend consulting with floor covering manufacturers regarding the appropriate type, use and installation of the vapor retarder or barrier to preserve warranty assurances. C.S.b. Radon We recommend installing a radon mitigation system in occupied spaces in accordance with local building code. Our certified and licensed radon mitigation professionals can assist in this design, at your request. C.6. Frost Protection C.6.a. General Clayey and silty sand soils will underlie all or some of the exterior slabs, as well as pavements. We consider these soils to be moderately to highly frost susceptible. Soils of this type can retain moisture and heave upon freezing. In general, this characteristic is not an issue unless these soils become saturated, due to surface runoff or infiltration, or are excessively wet in situ. Once frozen, unfavorable amounts of general and isolated heaving of the soils and the surface structures supported on them could develop. This type of heaving could affect design drainage patterns and the performance of exterior slabs and pavements, as well as any isolated exterior footings and piers. Note that general runoff and infiltration from precipitation are not the only sources of water that can saturate subgrade soils and contribute to frost heave. Roof drainage and irrigation of landscaped areas, in close proximity to exterior slabs, pavements, and isolated footings and piers, contribute as well. C.6.b. Frost Heave Mitigation To address most of the heave related issues, we recommend setting general site grades and grades for exterior surface features to direct surface drainage away from buildings, across large, paved areas and away from walkways. Such grading will limit the potential for saturation of the subgrade and subsequent heaving. General grades should also have enough "slope" to tolerate potential larger areas of heave, which may not fully settle after thawing. e��a�uw INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 20 Even small amounts of frost-related differential movement at walkwayjoints or cracks can create tripping hazards. Project planning can explore several subgrade improvement options to address this condition. One of the more conservative subgrade improvement options to mitigate potential heave is removing any frost-susceptible soils present below the exterior slab areas down to a minimum depth of 4 feet below subgrade elevations. We recommend filling the resulting excavation with non-frost-susceptible fill. We also recommend sloping the bottom of the excavation toward one or more collection points to remove any water entering the engineered fill. This approach will not be effective in controlling frost heave without removing the water. An important geometric aspect of the excavation and replacement approach described above is sloping the banks of the excavations to create a more gradual transition between the unexcavated soils considered frost susceptible and the engineered fill in the excavated area, which is not frost susceptible. The slope allows attenuation of differential movement that may occur along the excavation boundary. We recommend slopes that are 3H:1V, or flatter, along transitions between frost-susceptible and non- frost-susceptible soils. Figure 4 shows an illustration summarizing some of the recommendations. Figure 4. Frost Protection Geometry Illustration �PAVEMENT OR SLAB FR95T aEPTH Y NC]N-FftOS�-SLISCEPTIBLE FILL _ t3H:1V SL.QPE IN � . FRDST-SUSCEP7IBLE TRANSfTIONS MAl`ERfAL5 SL{]P� TO �RRIN TILE / WHERE SUBGRADE�� W�UL� COLEEGT WATER DRAW TILE RpUTEp Tp $UfTABL� DISPOSAL SITE V4'H�N SUBGRADE UVQIJL� CpLLEGT WAT�R B�auM INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 21 Another option is to limit frost heave in critical areas, such as doorways and entrances, via frost-depth footings or localized excavations with sloped transitions between frost-susceptible and non-frost- susceptible soils, as described above. Over the life of slabs and pavements, cracks will develop, and joints will open up, which will expose the subgrade and allow water to enter from the surface and either saturate or perch atop the subgrade soils. This water intrusion increases the potential for frost heave or moisture-related distress near the crack or joint. Therefore, we recommend implementing a detailed maintenance program to seal and/or fill any cracks and joints. The maintenance program should give special attention to areas where dissimilar materials abut one another, where construction joints occur and where shrinkage cracks develop. C.7. Pavements and Exterior Slabs C.7.a. Design Sections Our scope of services for this project did not include laboratory tests on subgrade soils to determine an R-value for pavement design. Based on our experience with similar clayey and silty soils anticipated at the pavement subgrade elevation, we recommend pavement design assume an R-value of 12. Note, the contractor may need to perform limited removal of unsuitable or less suitable soils to achieve this value. Based upon the aforementioned traffic loads and an R-value of 12, we recommend a bituminous pavement section for the local residential streets that includes a minimum of 3 1/2 inches of bituminous pavement (a 1 1/2-inch surface course over a 2-inch base course), over 8 inches of aggregate base material, and 18 inches of select granular fill. The City of Elk River may have a standard pavement section that is different in which we recommend following the City Standard Plates. For the bituminous trails, we recommend a pavement section of 6 inches of aggregate base overlain by 3 inches of bituminous wear course. If there are soft areas during trail construction, some subgrade soil correction work may be needed. An alternative would be to use additional aggregate base or use a separation fabric between the subgrade and aggregate base. For concrete sidewalks, we recommend a minimum of 4 inches of concrete underlain by a minimum of 4 inches of aggregate base. The ongoing performance of bituminous pavements is impacted by conditions under which the pavement is asked to perform in. These conditions include the environmental conditions, the actual use conditions and the level of ongoing maintenance performed. Because of normal thermos-expansion and B�auM INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 22 contraction, it is not unusual to have cracking develop within the first few years of placement and for the cracking to continue throughout the life of the pavement. A regular maintenance plan should be developed for filling cracks to lessen the potential impacts for cold weather distress due to frost heave or warm weather distress due to wetting and softening of the subgrade. It is also not unusual for the pavement to require a seal coat within the first 5 to 10 years to increase the long-term performance of the bituminous pavement. C.7.b. Bituminous Pavement Materials Appropriate mix designs are critical to the performance of flexible pavements. We can provide recommendations for pavement material selection during final pavement design. C.7.c. Subgrade Drainage We recommend installing perforated drainpipes throughout pavement areas at low points, around catch basins, and behind curb in landscaped areas. We also recommend installing drainpipes along pavement and exterior slab edges where exterior grades promote drainage toward those edge areas. The contractor should place drainpipes in small trenches, extended at least 8 inches below the granular subbase layer, or below the aggregate base material where no subbase is present. C.7.d. Performance and Maintenance We based the above pavement designs on a 20-year performance life for bituminous. This is the amount of time before we anticipate the pavement will require reconstruction. This performance life assumes routine maintenance, such as seal coating and crack sealing. The actual pavement life will vary depending on variations in weather, traffic conditions and maintenance. It is common to place the non-wear course of bituminous and then delay placement of wear course. For this situation, we recommend evaluating if the reduced pavement section will have sufficient structure to support construction traffic. Many conditions affect the overall performance of the exterior slabs and pavements. Some of these conditions include the environment, loading conditions and the level of ongoing maintenance. With regard to bituminous pavements in particular, it is common to have thermal cracking develop within the first few years of placement and continue throughout the life of the pavement. We recommend developing a regular maintenance plan for filling cracks in exterior slabs and pavements to lessen the potential impacts for cold weather distress due to frost heave or warm weather distress due to wetting and softening of the subgrade. B�auM INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 23 C.g. UtI�It12S C.8.a. Subgrade Stabilization Earthwork activities associated with utility installations located inside the building areas should adhere to the recommendations in Section C.2.g. For exterior utilities, we anticipate the soils at typical invert elevations will be suitable for utility support. However, if construction encounters unfavorable conditions such as soft clay, organic soils or perched water at invert grades, the unsuitable soils may require some additional subcutting and replacement with sand or crushed rock to prepare a proper subgrade for pipe support. Project design and construction should not place utilities within the 1H:1V oversizing of foundations — this may require special consideration where utilities are placed along lot lines between house pads. C.8.b. Corrosion Potential Based on our experience, the soils encountered by the borings are moderately corrosive to metallic conduits, but only marginally corrosive to concrete. We recommend specifying non-corrosive materials or providing corrosion protection, unless project planning chooses to perform additional tests to demonstrate the soils are not corrosive. C.9. Stormwater We estimated infiltration rates for some of the soils we encountered in our soil borings, as listed in Table 7. These infiltration rates represent the long-term infiltration capacity of a practice and not the capacity of the soils in their natural state. Field testing, such as with a double-ring infiltrometer (ASTM D3385), may justify the use of higher infiltration rates. However, we recommend adjusting field test rates by the appropriate correction factor, as provided for in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual or as allowed by the local watershed. We recommend consulting the Minnesota Stormwater Manual for stormwater design. Table 7. Estimated Design Infiltration Rates Based on Soil Classification Infiltration Rate * Soil Type (inches/hour) Sands 0.80 Silty sands, silty gravelly sands 0.45 Silts, very fine sands, silty or clayey fine sands 0.2 Clayey sands and clays 0.06 or less *From Minnesota Stormwater Manual. Rates may differ at individual sites. B�auM INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 24 Fine-grained soils (silts and clays), topsoil or organic matter that mixes into or washes onto the soil will lower the permeability. The contractor should maintain and protect infiltration areas during construction. Furthermore, organic matter and silt washed into the system after construction can fill the soil pores and reduce permeability over time. Proper maintenance is important for long-term performance of infiltration systems. This geotechnical evaluation does not constitute a review of site suitability for stormwater infiltration or evaluate the potential impacts, if any, from infiltration of large amounts of stormwater. D. Procedures D.1. Penetration Test Borings We drilled the penetration test borings with an all-terrain mounted core and auger drill equipped with hollow-stem auger. The first phase of borings was completed from March 28 through 29, 2022. The second phase of borings was completed from May 19 through 20, 2022. We performed the borings in general accordance with ASTM D6151 taking penetration test samples at 2 1/2- or 5-foot intervals in general accordance with ASTM D1586. The boring logs show the actual sample intervals and corresponding depths. We sealed penetration test boreholes meeting the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Environmental Borehole criteria with an MDH-approved grout. We will forward a sealing record for those boreholes to the Minnesota Department of Health Well Management Section. D.2. Exploration Logs D.2.a. Log of Boring Sheets The Appendix includes Log of Boring sheets for our penetration test borings. The logs identify and describe the penetrated geologic materials and present the results of penetration resistance and other in-situ tests performed. The logs also present the results of laboratory tests performed on penetration test samples, and groundwater measurements. e��a�uw INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 25 We inferred strata boundaries from changes in the penetration test samples and the auger cuttings. Because we did not perform continuous sampling, the strata boundary depths are only approximate. The boundary depths likely vary away from the boring locations, and the boundaries themselves may occur as gradual rather than abrupt transitions. D.2.b. Geologic Origins We assigned geologic origins to the materials shown on the logs and referenced within this report, based on: (1) a review of the background information and reference documents cited above, (2) visual classification of the various geologic material samples retrieved during the course of our subsurface exploration, (3) penetration resistance and other in-situ testing performed for the project, (4) laboratory test results, and (5) available common knowledge of the geologic processes and environments that have impacted the site and surrounding area in the past. D.3. Material Classification and Testing D.3.a. Visual and Manual Classification We visually and manually classified the geologic materials encountered based on ASTM D2488. When we performed laboratory classification tests, we used the results to classify the geologic materials in accordance with ASTM D2487. The Appendix includes a chart explaining the classification system we used. D.3.b. Laboratory Testing The exploration logs in the Appendix note the results of the laboratory tests performed on geologic material samples. We performed the tests in general accordance with ASTM procedures. D.4. Groundwater Measurements The drillers checked for groundwater while advancing the penetration test borings, and again after auger withdrawal. We then filled the boreholes or allowed them to remain open for an extended period of observation, as noted on the boring logs. s�auM INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 26 E. Qualifications E.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions E.1.a. Material Strata We developed our evaluation, analyses, and recommendations from a limited amount of site and subsurface information. It is not standard engineering practice to retrieve material samples from exploration locations continuously with depth. Therefore, we must infer strata boundaries and thicknesses to some extent. Strata boundaries may also be gradual transitions, and project planning should expect the strata to vary in depth, elevation, and thickness, away from the exploration locations. Variations in subsurface conditions present between exploration locations may not be revealed until performing additional exploration work or starting construction. If future activity for this project reveals any such variations, you should notify us so that we may reevaluate our recommendations. Such variations could increase construction costs, and we recommend including a contingency to accommodate them. E.1.b. Groundwater Levels We made groundwater measurements under the conditions reported herein and shown on the exploration logs and interpreted in the text of this report. Note that the observation periods were relatively short, and project planning can expect groundwater levels to fluctuate in response to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, seasonal freezing and thawing, surface drainage modifications and other seasonal and annual factors. E.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility E.2.a. Plan Review We based this report on a limited amount of information, and we made a number of assumptions to help us develop our recommendations. We should be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the designs and specifications. This review will allow us to evaluate whether we anticipated the design correctly, if any design changes affect the validity of our recommendations, and if the design and specifications correctly interpret and implement our recommendations. e��a�uw INTERTE� Lennar Corporation Project B2202158 August 11, 2022 Page 27 E.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing We recommend retaining us to perform the required observations and testing during construction as part of the ongoing geotechnical evaluation. This will allow us to correlate the subsurface conditions exposed during construction with those encountered by the borings and provide professional continuity from the design phase to the construction phase. If we do not perform observations and testing during construction, it becomes the responsibility of others to validate the assumption made during the preparation of this report and to accept the construction-related geotechnical engineer-of-record responsibilities. E.3. Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of the addressed parties. Without written approval, we assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses and recommendations may not be appropriate for other parties or projects. E.4. Standard of Care In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. s�auw INTERTE� Appendix BRAUN II�TERTEC ..--�,� � � --�,.�. ��. ��,��•,. �� \ r .: w �a � �'� � ^•� _�� b : rt�: ;. �:._,. � �a�. � p � y q. k' _ .. . .+x�,4�=.! " � z1 . - i. u�, a ° � .. Y_.F.i°'� � � .., � .r j,°«� �� „ � � �� . �+ ... � •�1�� ..�"�� .� `�111.L.�:?w •n'-sp� .�� 3 � - ' ., �� - '�. $� : � <.�,,,�' � �! !�c+ s - � � m �' 4�: ��r�, P ' .. R� � ^ � �, f' �,�--'a, .. ,�w � - �A e, tr^, `. �,� �D t` °5"°A,: �. � ..' L�7 .�,��s�.-' . �€ . . / � UENOTESAPPROXIMATELOCATION OF I STANOARO PENETRATION TEST BORING � zso� o soo� SCALE�. 1"=500' B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORING: ST-� Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 221357 EASTING: 590758 DRILLER: B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY: P. Anderson START DATE: 03/28/22 END DATE: 03/28/22 SURFACE g08.4ft RIG: 7506 METHOD: 31/4"HSA SURFACING: Soil WEATHER: Wind cold ELEVATION: y� Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery . ; LEAN CLAY CL , black, moist TOPSOIL 0.2 ��;� SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), brown and gray, '; moist, medium(GLACIALTILL) �/ 2-4-3 X ��) 18 /� 13" 2-3-4 5 � (�) /� 11" 901.4 5-5-8 7.0 : CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, brown to � �13� 12 ;: dark brown, moist, stiff (GLACIAL TILL) 14" 3-7-9 :;Y 10 � �15 � t': ;i: ,' `: r' �i ;;' 4-6-8 F'�, � � (14) � ; : ,' ;;: ;': , : � 3�� 894.4 ' t`:i':;'� 14.0 !�,�' �'; SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), gray, moist, very stiff 11-18-8 �''��`�; (GLACIALTILL) 15 � (26) ,�, ' i % , 18�� ; �/ 9-10-11 887 4 �th SAND layer at 20 feet 20 X (21) /� 14" Water not observed while 21.0 END OF BORING drilling. Boring then grouted 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-1 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORING: ST-2 Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: Boring offset 10 feet north of staked location. See Foster Property attached sketch. 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 221450 EASTING: 591814 DRILLER: B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY: P. Anderson START DATE: 03/28/22 END DATE: 03/28/22 SURFACE g41.1 ft RIG: 7506 METHOD: 31/4" HSA SURFACING: Soil WEATHER: Wind cold ELEVATION: y� Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery . SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, dark brown, 0.1 moist TOPSOIL ! POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), ! fine-grained, brown, moist, loose to medium 1-2-5 dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) � �� 13" �] 3-4-5 5 X �9) 4 P200=10% L� 12" 4-5-5 � (10) 13" 4-6-6 �th CLAYlayer at 10 feet �� (12) 12" 929.1 3-3-5 12.0 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine-grained, �] �8� light brown to brown, moist, loose (GLACIAL �� 14" OUTWASH) 2-3-6 15 � �9� 11" 3-4-6 20 � ��p� 920.1 � 3" Water not observed while 21.0 END OF BORING drilling. Boring then grouted 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-2 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORING: ST-3 Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 221556 EASTING: 592706 DRILLER: B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY: P. Anderson START DATE: 03/28/22 END DATE: 03/28/22 SURFACE 92�.6 ft RIG: 7506 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA SURFACING: Soil WEATHER: Wind cold ELEVATION: y� Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery . SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace roots, 0.3 dark brown, moist TOPSOIL FILL : SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, brown, moist, � loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) �] 1-3-3 � ' X �6) 9 923.6 : ; /� 13" 4.0 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to 6-5-4 medium-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist, 5� �g� loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) 14" 920.6 4-5-5 7.0 : CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, brown, � ��p� 12 moist, stiff (GLACIAL TILL) 13" 6-6-9 :;Y 10 � �15 � t': ;i: ,' `: r' �i ;;' 3-6-8 F'�, � � (14) � ; : ,' ;;: ;': , : � 3�� 913.6 ' t`:i'':;'� 14.0 : SILTY SAND (SM), trace Gravel, brown, moist 6-5-7 : j to wet, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) 15 � (12) 13" 5-10-13 � ::: :: 20 � �23� 906.6 ��" Water observed at 20.0 feet 21.0 END OF BORING while drilling. Boring then grouted 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-3 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORING: ST-4 Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 221353 EASTING: 593709 DRILLER: B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY: P. Anderson START DATE: 03/28/22 END DATE: 03/28/22 SURFACE gg2.5 ft RIG: 7506 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA SURFACING: Soil WEATHER: Wind cold ELEVATION: y� Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery ,,',° °',° SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace roots, 0.5 dark brown, moist TOPSOIL : SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace Gravel, � brown, moist, loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) 4-4-4 : ; ; . (g� 928.5 �th Clay seam at 3 feet 13" 4.0 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to 3-4-5 medium-grained, light brown to brown, dry to 5� �g� 3 P200-3% moist, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL 11" OUTWASH) 2-2-3 � (5) 14" 2-3-3 10 � �6) 13" 3-3-4 � (7) 14" 4-6-8 15 � (14) 13" 4-6-10 20 � �16� 911.5 � 3" Water not observed while 21.0 END OF BORING drilling. Boring then grouted 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-4 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORING: ST-S Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 221015 EASTING: 594261 DRILLER: B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY: P. Anderson START DATE: 03/29/22 END DATE: 03/29/22 SURFACE g12.8 ft RIG: 7506 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA SURFACING: Soil WEATHER: Wind cold ELEVATION: y� Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery . SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace roots, 0.3 brown, moist TOPSOIL : SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace roots, : brown to black, moist, loose to medium dense �/ 4-5-6 ; (ALLUVIUM) X (11) : : ,' . /� 18�� ,. �] 2-3-2 �th Clay seam at 5 feet 5 X (5) L� 18" 3-3-2 � (5) 17" 4-4-4 �o � (g) 18" 900.8 12.0 ORGANIC SOIL (OH), slightly organic, trace fibers, black, moist (SWAMP DEPOSIT) � 3-3-3 {{ (6) 66 OC=10% �s 15" � 15 895.8 �� 17.0 i:: SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, with Clay �: lenses, brown, wet, loose (GLACIAL TILL) 2-3-3 � ::: : 20 � (6) 891�8 �� Water observed at 20.0 feet 21.0 END OF BORING while drilling. Boring then grouted 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-5 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORING: ST-G Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 220240 EASTING: 594333 DRILLER: B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY: P. Anderson START DATE: 03/29/22 END DATE: 03/29/22 SURFACE ggg.1 ft RIG: 7506 METHOD: 31/4" HSA SURFACING: Soil WEATHER: Wind cold ELEVATION: y� Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery . : SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace roots, 0.2 dark brown, moist TOPSOIL : SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, brown, moist, � loose (GLACIALTILL) �] 1-4-2 : ;. X �6) 934.1 : ' /� 17" 4.0 �' POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), 4-4-9 ' fine-grained, brown, moist, medium dense 5� (13) ; : ! (GLACIAL OUTWASH) � �� 5-6-6 � (12) 929.1 � 8�� 9.0 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to 4-5-6 medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, dry to 10 � �� 3 P200-2% moist, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL 15" OUTWASH) 4-5-5 � (10) 15" 5-5-5 15 � (10) 18" 6-7-9 20 � �16� 917.1 � 8" Water not observed while 21.0 END OF BORING drilling. Boring then grouted 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-6 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORING: ST-T Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 220203 EASTING: 593625 DRILLER: B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY: P. Anderson START DATE: 03/29/22 END DATE: 03/29/22 SURFACE g13.5 ft RIG: 7506 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA SURFACING: Grass WEATHER: Sunn ELEVATION: y Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery 912.5 SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace roots, 1.0 � dark brown, moist TOPSOIL FILL „��" FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium- � grained, trace Gravel, with Clay seams, dark 9-15-10 ��,k` brown, moist � �16 ) 6 x h 'i� , 5 6-4-4 � (8) 16" 906.5 �� " 7.0 ,�� FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to �/ 4�4-�1�2 4 medium-grained, trace Gravel, with inclusions �� 15" 904.5 of black Clayey Sand, brown, moist 9.0 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine-grained, g_g_� with Silt seams, brown, moist, medium dense 10 � (15) (GLACIAL OUTWASH) � g�� 901.5 12.0 : SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, brown, moist 4:::�; to wet, loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) 4-4-4 899.0 ' � �8) � 8�� Water observed at 13.0 feet 14.5 END OF BORING 15 while drilling. Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 20 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-7 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORING: ST-TA Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 220203 EASTING: 593625 DRILLER: J. Tatro LOGGED BY: H. Vloo START DATE: 05/19/22 END DATE: 05/19/22 SURFACE g13.5 ft RIG: 8503 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA SURFACING: Swam WEATHER: Sun ELEVATION: p Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery �� CLAYEY SAND (SC), slightly organic, dark 0.5 �x�,,� brown, moist TOPSOIL FILL `,�"'� SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-grained, 6-8-14 x'`x� brown, moist, medium dense (POSSIBLE FILL) ��`�� 22) 9 P200=13% > 909.5 � 17" 4.0 % CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, gray, moist, 3-5-14 �-' r very stiff (GLACIAL TILL) 5� ��g� 13 15" �:' / ; � 8-11-10 � � ;' ;,: ;; , � �2 � � 904.5 � 9.0 i SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), contains lenses of 2-2-2 �";' ,, Silty Sand, brown, moist, soft (GLACIAL TILL) 10 � �4� % ; 14" �i '� r 900. 5 5-5-3 13.0 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to �] 899 0 medium-grained, trace Gravel, gray, wet, loose 8 GLACIAL OUTWASH �, � 8) Water observed at 8.0 feet 14.5 while drillin END OF BORING 15 g Boring immediately backfilled 20 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-7A page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORING: ST-H Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 220501 EASTING: 593030 DRILLER: J. Tatro LOGGED BY: H. Vloo START DATE: 05/20/22 END DATE: 05/20/22 SURFACE g11.1 ft RIG: 8503 METHOD: 31/4" HSA SURFACING: Woods WEATHER: Clouds ELEVATION: Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery .`''° �,'`° ORGANIC SOIL (OL), black, moist (TOPSOIL) 910.0 ° ',''` . 1.1 �' ' SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SGSM), fine to ' medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, �/ 1-2-3 � loose (GLACIALTILL) X (5) 19 � :: /� 17" 2-4-4 5 � 18)' 904.1 4-5-7 7.0 : CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, grayish � �12� 14 ;: brown to gray, moist, stiff (GLACIAL TILL) � 8„ 4-4-5 :;Y 10 � 18)� t': ;i: ,' ��> �;' 898.1 '' :''; : ' 13.0 SANDY SILT (ML), gray, moist, loose �/ 3-5-5 896.6 (GLACIALTILL) 10 �� (� 8�) Water not observed while 14.5 END OF BORING 15 drilling. Installed piezometer. Water measured at a depth of 3.7 feet (elevation 907.4) on June 1, 2022. 20 Water measured at a depth of 9.5 feet (elevation 901.6) on August 2, 2022. 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-8 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORING: ST-9 Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 220550 EASTING: 592128 DRILLER: J. Tatro LOGGED BY: H. Vloo START DATE: 05/19/22 END DATE: 05/19/22 SURFACE g11.3 ft RIG: 8503 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA SURFACING: Woods WEATHER: Sun ELEVATION: Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery .`''° .,'`° ORGANIC SOIL (OL), black, moist (TOPSOIL) .,��,. ,,.,n,. >,�,;� >,��,. <.,�,, ..,��: 1-1-1 ,,�,< , � <.,��. .,��,. (2) ��<< . 5�� 907.3 .�ir< >>Ir„ 4.0 POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), 2-3-4 fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, 5� �7� 16 P200-7% ' moist, loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) 16" 4 : 2-3-2 � (5) 902.3 � 8�� 9.0 ;' CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, contains 2-2-3 :_- �, � lenses of Silty Sand, gray, moist, medium to 10 � �5� 14 ,�:,�`;�'; stiff(GLACIALTILL) �g�� t.,., F, t,, ,�:, . �; ; r �] 2-4-5 896.8 ; �; �;:'; x �9) L� 17" Water observed at 7.0 feet 14.5 END OF BORING 15 while drilling. Boring immediately backfilled 20 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-9 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORING: ST-�O Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 220583 EASTING: 590982 DRILLER: B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY: P. Anderson START DATE: 03/28/22 END DATE: 03/28/22 SURFACE g26.0 ft RIG: 7506 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA SURFACING: Soil WEATHER: Wind cold ELEVATION: y� Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery . SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace roots, 0.3 dark brown, moist TOPSOIL FILL � FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, ?5��, brown, moist 5-10-14 (24) 922.0 �� 8 4.0 % CLAYEY SAND (SC), brown, dry, hard 8-15-17 ,-' ;-, (GLACIAL TILL) 5 � (32) 7 14" 919.0 11-11-15 7.0 : CLAYEY SAND (SC), brown, moist, very stiff to � �26� 11 hard (GLACIAL TILL) 10" 10-14-16 :;Y 10 �/ �1 p� t � �;,'! � /� F,t, ;':, . ' ' '� 18-22-21 ,� ' � (43) 911.5 ; l�l ; 13�� 14.5 END OF BORING Water not observed while 15 drilling. Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 20 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-10 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORiN�: ST-11 Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 220236 EASTING: 590669 DRILLER: J. Tatro LOGGED BY: H. Vloo START DATE: 05/20/22 END DATE: 05/20/22 SURFACE g13.5 ft RIG: 8503 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA SURFACING: Woods WEATHER: Clouds ELEVATION: Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery °,',° °''`° SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, organic, black, 912. 5 , .,'�, . 1.0 moist TOPSOIL LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL), brown, moist, soft �%; (GLACIALTILL) �/ 1-2-2 X �4) 0.75 23 909.5 /� 18" 4.0 % CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, brown to 5-7-11 ,-`:;-, grayish brown, moist, very stiff (GLACIALTILL) 5� ��g� 13 0" �:' / ; � 6-10-14 � (24) 18" 6-9-12 :; Y 10 �/ (� 8 ) �� ' /� t': ;i: ,' F, t,, ,�:, . �; ;;: r: i'� 3-9-10 ; ;,; ; ,� � (19) 899.0 ; l�l ; 18�� 14.5 END OF BORING Water not observed while 15 drilling. Boring immediately backfilled 20 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-11 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORING: ST-�2 Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 220003 EASTING: 591941 DRILLER: J. Tatro LOGGED BY: H. Vloo START DATE: 05/20/22 END DATE: 05/20/22 SURFACE g06.5 ft RIG: 8503 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA SURFACING: Woods WEATHER: Clouds ELEVATION: Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery °`''° °''`° SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, organic, black, .,��,, 905.0 =�'�< ,,��„ moist (TOPSOIL) 1.5 : SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, brown, moist, 3-3-4 : loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) � (7) 13 P200-15% 902. 5 16" 4.0 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to 2-4-4 medium-grained, brown, moist to wet, loose 5� �g� (GLACIAL OUTWASH) � g�� 4-3-4 � ; ::� : � �� 897.5 � 8�� 9.0 ; SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, gray, g-5-5 �";' ,, moist, stiff (GLACIAL TILL) 10 � (10) % ; 16" �i 894.5 12.0 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, wet, very 1-2-2 loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) � (4) 892.0 � 8" Water observed at 7.5 feet 14.5 END OF BORING 15 while drilling. Boring immediately backfilled 20 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-12 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORiN�: ST-13 Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 219730 EASTING: 592676 DRILLER: J. Tatro LOGGED BY: H. Vloo START DATE: 05/19/22 END DATE: 05/19/22 SURFACE g04.1 ft RIG: 8503 METHOD: 31/4" HSA SURFACING: Woods WEATHER: Sun ELEVATION: Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery �� SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, 0.5 �, slightly organic, dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL X� k FILL 3-3-2 ;?��c� FILL: SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SGSM), fine to �] �5� � medium-grained, brown and black, moist �� 14" x h �`✓�'/, � `` " 2-7-8 �� " �th wood at 5 feet 5� (15) 12" ;�,� � �' 1-2-2 � f � (4) 895.1 %� �I� 9.0 � ORGANIC SOIL (OL), black, moist (SWAMP 2-2-4 1�J DEPOSIT) 10 �6� 16" 892.1 S �� 12.0 ,'', j>i;` SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SGSM), fine to ! medium-grained, gray, moist, loose (GLACIAL 2-3-3 ;'�: TILL 889.6 I; ;>` ) 18)' 12 Water not observed while 14.5 END OF BORING 15 drilling. Boring immediately backfilled Installed piezometer. Water measured at a depth of 4.5 feet (elevation 899.6) on June 1, 2022. 20 Water measured at a depth of 6.5 feet (elevation 897.6) on August 2, 2022. 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-13 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORiN�: ST-14 Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 219607 EASTING: 593445 DRILLER: J. Tatro LOGGED BY: H. Vloo START DATE: 05/19/22 END DATE: 05/19/22 SURFACE g09.5 ft RIG: 8503 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA SURFACING: Woods WEATHER: Sun ELEVATION: Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery °`''° °''`° SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, slightly .,��,, �:.��,, �,��;� organic, black, moist (TOPSOIL) >,��,. <.,�,, ..,��:� 2-3-4 ,,�<< , 906.5 �.��< .��,,, (7) 3.0 " SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SGSM), fine-grained, 18" ' grayish brown, moist, loose (GLACIAL TILL) �/ 2-4-4 5 X �8) 15 /� 18" 902.5 7.0 �: SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, with layers of 4-3-3 LEAN CLAY, gray, moist, loose (GLACIAL TILL) � �6� 900.5 � 8�� 9.0 SANDY SILT (ML), gray, moist, loose 2-3-5 (GLACIALTILL) 10 � �g� 13 18" 897.5 12.0 ': SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SGSM), fine-grained, trace Gravel, gray, moist, medium dense 5-6-5 ;';; (GLACIALTILL) � (11) 895.0 � 8" Water not observed while 14.5 END OF BORING 15 drilling. Boring immediately backfilled 20 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-14 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORiN�: ST-15 Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 219093 EASTING: 594192 DRILLER: J. Tatro LOGGED BY: H. Vloo START DATE: 05/19/22 END DATE: 05/19/22 SURFACE g20.9 ft RIG: 8503 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA SURFACING: Woods WEATHER: Sun ELEVATION: Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery °,',° °'',° CLAYEY SAND (SC), slightly organic, dark 919. 9 , .,'�, . 1.0 i brown, moist TOPSOIL ; SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SGSM), fine to � 3-5-5 �` medium-grained, reddish brown to brown, �, `: ` moist, loose (GLACIAL TILL) �� 15 17" �] 2-3-3 5 X 16) /� 913.9 9-10-9 7.0 SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, contains �] �19) 5 _: lenses of Clayey Sand, brown, moist, medium �, 18" '. : dense (GLACIAL TILL) 8-8-5 10 � (13) 17" 908.9 12.0 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, light brown, moist, loose 4-4-4 (GLACIAL OUTWASH) � (8) 906.4 � �" Water not observed while 14.5 END OF BORING 15 drilling. Boring immediately backfilled 20 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-15 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORiN�: ST-16 Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 218739 EASTING: 594227 DRILLER: J. Tatro LOGGED BY: H. Vloo START DATE: 05/19/22 END DATE: 05/19/22 SURFACE g00.4ft RIG: 8503 METHOD: 31/4"HSA SURFACING: Swam WEATHER: Sun ELEVATION: p Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery .`''° .,'`° ORGANIC SOIL (OL), black, moist (TOPSOIL) .,��,. ,,.,�,,. >,�,;� 898.4 ,�' . 2.0 CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace fibers, and roots, �/ 1-1-1 ,: ; gray, moist, soft to medium (GLACIAL TILL) 2 X 18 /� 10" �] 2-3-3 5 y (6) 894.4 � 18" 6.0 4. /�' POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), ' fine-grained, brown, wet, very loose (GLACIAL 1-1-1 OUTWASH) � (2) 17" 1-1-2 10 � �3) 18" 1-2-3 885.9 �5� '�th layers of SILTY, CLAYEY SAND at 14 � � 8" Water observed at 6.0 feet 14.5 feet 15 while drilling. END OF BORING Boring immediately backfilled 20 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-16 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORING: ST-�T Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 219173 EASTING: 593591 DRILLER: J. Tatro LOGGED BY: H. Vloo START DATE: 05/19/22 END DATE: 05/19/22 SURFACE g01.8 ft RIG: 8503 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA SURFACING: Grass WEATHER: Sun ELEVATION: Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery °,',° °,'`° CLAYEY SAND (SC), organic, black, moist 900.8 , .,'�, . 1.0 TOPSOIL CLAYEY SAND (SC), grayish brown, moist, soft � �' �. to medium (GLACIAL TILL) �/ 1-1-1 X (2) 19 L� � �„ �/ 1-2-3 5 X �5) 16 /� 17" 894. 8 3-3-3 7.0 ' POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), �] �6� ' fine-grained, brown, wet, very loose to loose �� 10" ; ; (GLACIAL OUTWASH) 1-1-1 10 � �2) 13" 2-3-3 887.3 � �6) � 8�� Water not observed while 14.5 END OF BORING 15 drilling. Boring immediately backfilled 20 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-17 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORING: ST-�H Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 219290 EASTING: 593010 DRILLER: J. Tatro LOGGED BY: H. Vloo START DATE: 05/19/22 END DATE: 05/19/22 SURFACE 89g g ft RIG: 8503 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA SURFACING: Grass WEATHER: Sun ELEVATION: Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery °`''° °''`° LEAN CLAY (CL), organic, black, moist .,��,. 897.0 � ��>��,..��;� TOPSOIL 1.3 LEAN CLAY (CL), trace fibers, gray, moist, % . medium (ALLUVIUM) �/ 1-2-3 X �5) 1 41 /� 17" �] 2-2-3 5 y (5) � 18" 891.3 7.0 FAT CLAY (CH), gray, moist, soft (ALLUVIUM) �/ 1-2-2 X �4) 1 65 /� 18" � 1-1-1 10 �2� 18" 885.3 13.0 SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, ;; gray, wet, very loose to loose (ALLUVIUM) 1-2-2 15 � �4) 18" �] 1-2-4 877 3 �th Cobble at 20 feet 20 X (6) L� 1" Water observed at 1.0 feet 21.0 END OF BORING while drilling. Boring immediately backfilled with bentonite grout 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-18 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORiN�: ST-19 Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 219064 EASTING: 590831 DRILLER: J. Tatro LOGGED BY: H. Vloo START DATE: 05/20/22 END DATE: 05/20/22 SURFACE g16.3 ft RIG: 8503 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA SURFACING: Swam WEATHER: Sun ELEVATION: p Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery °`''° °''`° CLAYEY SAND (SC), slightly organic, dark .,��,, 914.8 ��',, .,��,;; brown, moist (TOPSOIL) 1.5 % CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, grayish 1-3-3 brown, moist, medium(GLACIALTILL) � (6) 19 18" �/ 2-2-6 5 X �8) 18 /� 12" 909. 3 8-8-9 7.0 ' SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SGSM), fine to �] �� medium-grained, trace Gravel, and Cobbles, �, 0" °. reddish brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL ':�: TILL) 31-14-12 10 � (26) 17" 904.3 12.0 ;" ; SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, gray, % / / moist, stiff (GLACIAL TILL) 6-6-7 � (13) 901.8 � 8" Water not observed while 14.5 END OF BORING 15 drilling. Boring immediately backfilled 20 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-19 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORING: ST-ZO Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 219245 EASTING: 590746 DRILLER: J. Tatro LOGGED BY: H. Vloo START DATE: 05/20/22 END DATE: 05/20/22 SURFACE g26.9 ft RIG: 8503 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA SURFACING: Grass WEATHER: Clouds ELEVATION: Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery ,,',° °'',° CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace organic, dark 0.5 � %� %;� brown, moist TOPSOIL , LEAN CLAY (CL), trace fibers, with layer of SILTY SAND, brown, moist, soft (GLACIAL �] 2-1-2 %� -� / TILL) X �3) 0.5 922.9 L� 17" 4.0 <;' SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SGSM), fine to 1-2-6 ':i medium-grained, brown and reddish brown, 5� �g� 16 `;' moist, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL TILL) �� 9-14-15 � (29) 18" 6-10-16 10 � (26) 18" 7-7-9 � (16) 912.4 � 8" Water not observed while 14.5 END OF BORING 15 drilling. Installed piezometer. Water not observed to bottom of piezometer (elevation 912.7) on 20 June 1, 2022. Water not observed to bottom of piezometer (elevation 912.7) on August 2, 2022. 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-20 page 1 of 1 B RAU N LOG OF BORING INTERTEC '°e'O1eROeTO°n"°°"" See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2202158 BORING: ST-2� Geotechnical Evaluation LOCATION: See attached sketch Foster Property 181st Avenue NW and Cleveland Road NW Elk River, Minnesota NORTHING: 220912 EASTING: 593634 DRILLER: B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY: P. Anderson START DATE: 03/29/22 END DATE: 03/29/22 SURFACE 931.8 ft RIG: 7506 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA SURFACING: Soil WEATHER: Wind cold ELEVATION: y� Description of Materials �, Elev./ Blows � (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM �- qP MC Depth m 1110-1-2908) � (N-Value) tsf o�o Tests or Remarks ft � Recovery . SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace roots, ,.,. ., 0.1 "=`%':; dark brown, moist TOPSOIL ;' ;° CLAYEY SAND (SC), brown, moist, medium i;: %'; (GLACIALTILL) 2-3-4 927.8 � 17)' 4.0 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to 3-3-3 medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, dry, 5� �g� 3 P200-3% loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) �g�� 924. 8 5-8-12 7.0 SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, � (20) _: trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense 18„ ; : (GLACIAL OUTWASH) 8-7-7 10 � (14) 17" 919.8 8-8-9 12.0 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine-grained, �] �� light brown to brown, moist, medium dense �� 18" (GLACIAL OUTWASH) 5-9-7 15 � (16) 18" 6-8-11 20 � ��g� 910.8 � 8" Water not observed while 21.0 END OF BORING drilling. Boring then grouted 25 30 B2202158 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/10/2022 ST-21 page 1 of 1 s Rau N INTERTEC The 6cLnw Yw 8ulld On. Criteria forAssigning Group Symbols and Soil Classifiwtion q Group Group Names Using LaboratoryTests S mbol Group Namee Gravels CleanGravels C„>_4and1<C<<3° GW Well-gradedgravelE ° More than 50% of � ( (Less than 5% fines ) C„ <4 and/or (C<< 1 or C�> 3)° GP Poorly graded gravelE � coarse fraction O1 c retainedonNo.4 GravelswithFines FinesdassifyasMLorMH GM SiltygravelEF� c� � sieve) (Morethanl2%fines�) FinesClassifyasCLorCH GC ClayeygravelEF� �o � Sands CleanSands C„>_6and1<C<<3° SW Well-gradedsand� ` Y z 50% or more coarse (Less than 5% fines") C„ <6 and or C<<1 or C�> 3 SP Poorl o � ( / ( )° ygradedsand� � `o fractionpassesNo.4 F�i � Sands with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand — sieve) (Morethanl2%fines") FinesclassifyasCLorCH SC ClayeysandF�� PU 7 and plots on or above "A" line� CL Lean dayrc �M SiltsandClays Inorganic NLm PI <4 or plots below "A" line ML Silt � (Liquid limit less than i°n � 50) LiquidLimit-ovendried Organicday"�^^" Organic <OJS OL - Liquid Limit- not dried Organic silt "�^^ o m�� PI plots on or above "A" line CH Fat dayrc �m o Inorganic � o z Silts and Clays pl plots below "A" line MH Elastic siltrc�M LL o (Liquidlimit50or — more) LiquidLimit-ovendried Organicday"�^^' Organic <OJS OH Liquid Limit - not dried Organic silt "�^^ n HighlyOrganic5oils Primarilyorganicmatter,darkincolor,andorganicodor PT Peat A. Based on the material passing the 3-inch (75-mm) sieve. B. If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add "with cobbles or boulders, or both" to group name. C. Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well-graded gravel with silt GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay D. C� _ �eo/ �io �� _��a�Z /��io x �eo) E. If soil contains>_ 15% sand, add "with sand" to group name. F. If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM or SC-SM. G. If fines are organic, add "with organic fines" to group name. H. Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well-graded sand with silt SW-SC well-graded sand with clay SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay I. If soil contains>_ 15% gravel, add "with gravel" to group name. J. If Atterberg limits plot in hatched area, soil is CL-ML, silty clay. K. If soil contains 15 to < 30% plus No. 200, add "with sand" or "with gravel", whichever is predominant. L. Ifsoil contains>_ 30% plus No. 200, predominantlysand, add "sandy" to group name. M. If soil contains>_ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly gravel, add "gravelly" to group name. N. PI >_ 4 and plots on or above "A" line. 0. PI < 4 or plots below "A" line. P. PI plots on or above "A" line. Q. PI plots below "A" line. 50 sn ao 30 zo to � a 0 �Quto uMrr(t�.� Laboratory Tests DD Dry density, pcf qP Pocket penetrometer strength, tsf WD Wet density, pcf q� Unconfined compression test, tsf P200 % Passing #200 sieve LL Liquid limit MC Moisture content, % PL Plastic limit OC Organic content, % PI Plasticity index Descriptive Terminology of Soil Based on Standards ASTM D2487/2488 (Unified Soil Classification System) Particle Size Identification Boulders .............. over 12" Cobbles ................ 3" to 12" Gravel Coarse ............. 3/4" to 3" (19.00 mm to 75.00 mm) Fine ................. No. 4 to 3/4" (4.75 mm to 19.00 mm) Sand Coarse .............. No. 10 to No. 4(2.00 mm to 4.75 mm) Medium........... No. 40 to No. 10 (0.425 mm to 2.00 mm) Fine .................. No. 200 to No. 40 (0.075 mm to 0.425 mm) Silt ........................ No. 200 (0.075 mm) to .005 mm Clay ...................... <.005 mm Relative Proportions�, "' trace ............................. 0 to 5% little .............................. 6 to 14% Wlth .............................. > 15% Inclusion Thicknesses lens ............................... 0 to 1/8�� i i seam ............................. 1 8' to 1' layer .............................. over 1�� Apparent Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils Very loose ..................... 0 to 4 BPF Loose ............................ 5 to 10 BPF Medium dense .............. 11 to 30 BPF Dense ............................ 31 to 50 BPF Very dense .................... over 50 BPF Consistency of Blows Approximate Unconfined Cohesive Soils Per Foot Compressive Strength Very soft ................... 0 to 1 BPF................... < 0.25 tsf Soft ........................... 2 to 4 BPF................... 0.25 to 0.5 tsf Medium .................... 5 to 8 BPF .................. 0.5 to 1 tsf Stiff ........................... 9 to 15 BPF................. 1 to 2 tsf Very Stiff ................... 16 to 30 BPF............... 2 to 4 tsf Hard .......................... over 30 BPF................ > 4 tsf Moisture Content: Dry: Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch. Moist: Damp but no visible water. Wet: Visible free water, usually soil is below water table. Drilling Notes: Blows/N-value: Blows indicate the driving resistance recorded for each 6-inch interval. The reported N-value is the blows per foot recorded by summing the second and third interval in accordance with the Standard Penetration Test, ASTM D1586. Partial Penetration: If the samplercould not be driven through a full 6-inch interval, the numberof blows forthat partial penetration is shown as #/x" (i.e. 50/2"). The N-value is reported as "REF" indicating refusal. Recovery: Indicates the inches of sample recovered from the sampled interval. For a standard penetration test, full recovery is 18", and is 24" for a thinwall/shelbytube sample. WOH: Indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of hammer and rods alone; driving not required. WOR: Indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of rods alone; hammerweight and driving not required. Water Level: Indicates the water level measured by the drillers either while drilling (�_ ), at the end of drilling ( �), or at some time after drilling (�). Sample Symhols �}� St.andard Rane[raS�� Tast � Rn�k Cnre eModidied California jMCy . Thinw.all (iW}�Shelhy Pube �SHj is Auger � rexas Cnne Penezrpmeter 7 �'� Grah Sani�sle � t�ysiamic Cone Penetrometer �`r 5/2021 � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning EAW .7� �.,_ __�� . . � � United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Minnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office 4101 American Blvd E Bloomington, MN 55425-1665 Phone: (952) 252-0092 FaY: (952) 646-2873 http://www.fws. gov/midwest/Endangered/section7/s7process/step l.html In Reply Refer To: Project Code: 2022-0016504 Project Name: Foster Property t_a. 1� �'F] 1 h ri�l1��SlY. ti$-7R'W'R �� J March 07, 2022 Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: This response has been generated by the Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) system to provide information on natural resources that could be affected by your project. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) provides this response under the authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543), the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668d), the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703-712), and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.). Threatened and Endangered Species The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirement for obtaining a Technical Assistance Letter from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. Consultation Technical Assistance Please refer to the Midwest Region S7 Technical Assistance website for step-by-step instructions for making species determinations and for specific guidance on the following types of projects: 03/07/2022 projects in developed areas, HUD, CDBG, EDA, pipelines, buried utilities, telecommunications, and requests for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from FEMA. 2 Using the IPaC Official Species List to Make No Effect and May Affect Determinations for Listed Species If IPaC returns a result of "There are no listed species found within the viciniry of the project," then project proponents can conclude the proposed activities will have no effect on any federally listed species under Service jurisdiction. Concurrence from the Service is not required for No Effect determinations. No further consultation or coordination is required. Attach this letter to the dated IPaC species list report for your records. An example "No Effect" document also can be found on the S7 Technical Assistance website. l. If IPaC returns one or more federally listed, proposed, or candidate species as potentially present in the action area of the proposed project — other than bats (see below) — then project proponents must determine if proposed activities will have no effect on or may affect those species. For assistance in determining if suitable habitat for listed, candidate, or proposed species occurs within your project area or if species may be affected by project activities, you can obtain Life History Information for Listed and Candidate Species through the S7 Technical Assistance website. If no impacts will occur to a species on the IPaC species list (e.g., there is no habitat present in the project area), the appropriate determination is No Effect. No further consultation or coordination is required. Attach this letter to the dated IPaC species list report for your records. An example "No Effect" document also can be found on the S7 Technical Assistance website. 2. Should you determine that project activities may affect any federally listed, please contact our office for further coordination. Letters with requests for consultation or correspondence about your project should include the Consultation Tracking Number in the header. Electronic submission is preferred. Northern Long-Eared Bats Northern long-eared bats occur throughout Minnesota and Wisconsin and the information below may help in determining if your project may affect these species. This species hibernates in caves or mines only during the winter. In Minnesota and Wisconsin, the hibernation season is considered to be November 1 to March 31. During the active season (April 1 to October 31) they roost in forest and woodland habitats. Suitable summer habitat for northern long-eared bats consists of a wide variety of forested/wooded habitats where they roost, forage, and travel and may also include some adjacent and interspersed non-forested habitats such as emergent wetlands and adjacent edges of agricultural fields, old fields and pastures. This includes forests and woodlots containing potential roosts (i.e., live trees and/or snags >_3 inches dbh for northern long-eared bat that have exfoliating bark, cracks, crevices, and/or hollows), as well as linear features such as fencerows, riparian forests, and other wooded corridors. These wooded areas may be dense or loose aggregates of trees with variable amounts of canopy closure. Individual trees may be considered suitable habitat when they exhibit the characteristics of a potential roost tree and are located within 1,000 feet (305 meters) of forested/wooded habitat. Northern long-eared bats have also been observed roosting in human-made structures, such as buildings, barns, bridges, and bat houses; therefore, these structures should also be 03/07/2022 considered potential summer habitat and evaluated for use by bats. If your project will impact caves or mines or will involve clearing forest or woodland habitat containing suitable roosting habitat, northern long-eared bats could be affected. Examples of unsuitable habitat include: • Individual trees that are greater than 1,000 feet from forested or wooded areas, • Trees found in highly developed urban areas (e.g., street trees, downtown areas), • A pure stand of less than 3-inch dbh trees that are not mixed with larger trees, and • A stand of eastern red cedar shrubby vegetation with no potential roost trees. If IPaC returns a result that northern long-eared bats are potentially present in the action area of the proposed project, project proponents can conclude the proposed activities may affect this species IF one or more of the following activities are proposed: • Clearing or disturbing suitable roosting habitat, as defined above, at any time of year, • Any activity in or near the entrance to a cave or mine, • Mining, deep excavation, or underground work within 0.25 miles of a cave or mine, • Construction of one or more wind turbines, or • Demolition or reconstruction of human-made structures that are known to be used by bats based on observations of roosting bats, bats emerging at dusk, or guano deposits or stains. I f none o f the above activities are proposed, project proponents can conclude the proposed activities will have no effect on the northern long-eared bat. Concurrence from the Service is not required for No Effect determinations. No further consultation or coordination is required. Attach this letter to the dated IPaC species list report for your records. An example "No Effect" document also can be found on the S7 Technical Assistance website. I f any o f the above activities are proposed, please use the northern long-eared bat determination key in IPaC. This tool streamlines consultation under the 2016 rangewide programmatic biological opinion for the 4(d) rule. The key helps to determine if prohibited take might occur and, if not, will generate an automated verification letter. No further review by us is necessary. Please visit the links below for additional information about "may affect" determinations for the northern long-eared bat. NLEB Section 7 consultation Kev to the NLEB 4(dl rule for federal actions that mav affect Instructions for the NLEB 4(d) assisted d-keX Maternitv tree and hibernaculum locations bv state Other Trust Resources and Activities Bald and Golden Eagles - Although the bald eagle has been removed from the endangered species list, this species and the golden eagle are protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Should bald or golden eagles occur within or near the project area please contact our office for further coordination. For communication and wind energy projects, please refer to additional guidelines below. 03/07/2022 4 Migratory Birds - The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits the taking, killing, possession, transportation, and importation of migratory birds, their eggs, parts, and nests, except when specifically authorized by the Service. The Service has the responsibility under the MBTA to proactively prevent the mortality of migratory birds whenever possible and we encourage implementation of recommendations that minimize potential impacts to migratory birds. Such measures include clearing forested habitat outside the nesting season (generally March 1 to August 31) or conducting nest surveys prior to clearing to avoid injury to eggs or nestlings. Communication Towers - Construction of new communications towers (including radio, television, cellular, and microwave) creates a potentially significant impact on migratory birds, especially some 350 species of night-migrating birds. However, the Service has developed voluntary �uidelines for minimizing impacts. Transmission Lines - Migratory birds, especially large species with long wingspans, heavy bodies, and poor maneuverability can also collide with power lines. In addition, mortality can occur when birds, particularly hawks, eagles, kites, falcons, and owls, attempt to perch on uninsulated or unguarded power poles. To minimize these risks, please refer to guidelines developed by the Avian Power Line Interaction Committee and the Service. Implementation of these measures is especially important along sections of lines adjacent to wetlands or other areas that support large numbers of raptors and migratory birds. Wind Energy - To minimize impacts to migratory birds and bats, wind energy projects should follow the Service's Wind Energev Guidelines. In addition, please refer to the Service's Ea le Conservation Plan Guidance, which provides guidance for conserving bald and golden eagles in the course of siting, constructing, and operating wind energy facilities. State Department of Natural Resources Coordination While it is not required for your Federal section 7 consultation, please note that additional state endangered or threatened species may also have the potential to be impacted. Please contact the Minnesota or Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources for information on state listed species that may be present in your proposed project area. Minnesota Minnesota Department of Natural Resources - Endangered Resources Review Homepage Email: Review.NHIS(a�state.mn.us Wisconsin Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources - Endangered Resources Review Homepage Email: DNRERReview(u�wi.gov We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. Please feel free to contact our office with questions or for additional information. Attachment(s): • Official Species List 03/07/2022 • USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries • Migratory Birds • Wetlands 03/07/'L022 Official Species List This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: Minnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office 4101 American Blvd E Bloomington, MN 55425-1665 (952) 252-0092 03/07/2022 Project Summary Project Code: 2022-0016504 Event Code: None Project Name: Foster Property Project Type: Residential Construction Project Description: New housing development. Project Location: Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/(a�45.305281949999994,-93.52499179120149,14z .,;� � ��'','„rr Ft�rch M1'4ado'h �Y� k� �'7• TrUlt [�rxl F a��,.4 Poi 1: ..v.'r _ .� - �� ip i �:� 1 sl ,;. K: P+fS'F �' �+ �., ..:w � I 1{4�,o-i � ,� !. n� Fwirt ��:�%n� a�,� �".a4 � Faik. 2 Counties: Sherburne County, Minnesota 03/07/2022 Endangered Species Act Species There is a total of 2 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. l. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. Mammals N AN1L Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp/species/9045 Insects NAME Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743 STATliS Threatened STATUS Candidate Critical habitats THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION. 03/07/2022 USFWS National Wildlife Refuge Lands And Fish Hatcheries Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refu�e system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns. THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA. 03/07/2022 Migratory Birds Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Actl and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection ActZ. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below. l. The �ratory Birds Treat.�� of 1918. 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. 3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data ma�ing tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below. For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. f►��► f� Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. Black-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA BREEDING SEASON Breeds Dec 1 to Aug 31 Breeds May 15 to Oct 10 and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9399 03/07/2022 NAME Canada Warbler Cardellina canadensis This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Golden-winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8745 Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. BREEDING SEASON Breeds May 20 to Aug 10 Breeds May 1 to Jul 20 Breeds May 10 to Sep 10 Probability Of Presence Summary The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence ( ) Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the lOkm grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high. How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps: l. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. 2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = l; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2. 3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score. Breeding Season ( ) 03/07/2022 Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area. 3 Survey Effort (I) Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the lOkm grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. No Data (—) A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. Survey Timeframe Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse. probability of presence breeding season � survey effort — no data SPLCIES Bald Eagle Non-BCC Vulnerable Black-billed cu�koo BCC Rangewide (CON) Canada Warbler BCC Rangewide (CON) Golden-winged Warbler BCC Rangewide (CON) Red-headed Woodpecker BCC Rangewide (CON) JAN FLB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SLP OCT NOV DEC li�� li liil liii ii�. .,., ,... ,.—i iiii I�„ ,.., ,.., li�� li liil liii ii�. .,., ,... ,.—i iiii I�„ ,.., ,.., li�� li liil liii ii�. .,., ,... ,.—i iiii I�„ ,.., ,.., li�� li liil liii ii�. .,., ,... ,.—i iiii I�„ ,.., ,.., li�� li liil liii ii�. .,., ,... ,.—i iiii I�„ ,.., ,.., Additional information can be found using the following links: • Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.�ov/birds/mana�ement/mana�ed-species/ birds-of-conservation-concern.ph� • Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.�ov/birds/ mana ement/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/ conservation-measures.DhD 03/07/2022 4 • Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratore b�pdf/ management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf Migratory Birds FAQ Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds. Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or ermits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site. What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern BCC and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location. The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN�. The AKN data is based on a growing collection of surve�, bandin�, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the lOkm grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development. Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenolog_y Tool. What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN�. This data is derived from a growing collection of survev. banding, and citizen science datasets . Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link. How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab 03/07/2022 of Ornithologev All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithologev Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If 'Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area. What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern: l. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands); 2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and 3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing). Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics. Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Ma�ing of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird StudX and the nanota studies or contact Caleb Spie�el or Pam Lorin�. What if I have eagles on my list? If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be 03/07/2022 aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page. 03/07/2022 Wetlands Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U. S. Arme�ps of Engineers District. Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site. WETLAND INFORMATION WAS NOT AVAILABLE WHEN THIS SPECIES LIST WAS GENERATED. PLEASE VISIT HTTPS://WWW.FWS.GOV/WETLANDS/DATA/MAPPER.HTML OR CONTACT THE FIELD OFFICE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 03/07/2022 IPaC User Contact Information Agency: ISG Name: Jeremy Groskreutz Address: 115 East Hickory Street, Suite 300 City: State: Zip: Email Phone: Mankato MN 56001 j eremy. groskreutz@isginc. com 5073876651 � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning EAW From: MN_MNIT_Data Request SHPO <DataRequestSHPO@state.mn.us> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2022 4:11 PM To: Jeremy Groskreutz Subject: RE: Search Request Hello Jeremy, Our database has no archaeological or historical records for the given project area. Jim ��EPARTMENT QF ao�iNis�RAriaN y1Ai� YIi�fG�J1C Pft�S.CR`±AS10P1 CF� ['_ SHPO Data Requests Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office 50 Sherburne Avenue, Suite 203 Saint Paul, MN 55155 (651) 201-3299 datarequestshpo@state.mn.us Notice: This email message simply reports the results of the cultural resources database search you requested. The database search is only for previously known archaeological sites and historic properties. IN NO CASE DOES THIS DATABASE SEARCH OR EMAIL MESSAGE CONSTITUTE A PROJECT REVIEW UNDER STATE OR FEDERAL PRESERVATION LAWS — please see our website at https://mn.�ov/admin/shpo/protection/ for further information regarding our Environmental Review Process. Because the majority of archaeological sites in the state and many historic/architectural properties have not been recorded, important sites or properties may exist within the search area and may be affected by development projects within that area. Additional research, including field surveys, may be necessary to adequately assess the area's potential to contain historic properties or archaeological sites. Properties that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or have been determined eligible for listing in the NRHP are indicated on the reports you have received, if any. The following codes may be on those reports: NR— National Register listed. The properties may be individually listed or may be within the boundaries of a National Register District. CEF — Considered Eligible Findings are made when a federal agency has recommended that a property is eligible for listing in the National Register and MN SHPO has accepted the recommendation for the purposes of the Environmental Review Process. These properties need to be further assessed before they are officially listed in the National Register. SEF — Staff eligible Findings are those properties the MN SHPO staff considers eligible for listing in the National Register, in circumstances other than the Environmental Review Process. DOE — Determination of Eligibility is made by the National Park Service and are those properties that are eligible for listing in the National Register, but have not been officially listed. CNEF — Considered Not Eligible Findings are made during the course of the Environmental Review Process. For the purposes of the review a property is considered not eligible for listing in the National Register. These properties may need to be reassessed for eligibility under additional or alternate contexts. Properties without NR, CEF, SEF, DOE, or CNEF designations in the reports may not have been evaluated and therefore no assumption to their eligibility can be made. Integrity and contexts change over time, therefore any eligibility determination made ten (10) or more years from the date of the current survey are considered out of date and the property will need to be reassessed. If you require a comprehensive assessment of a project's potential to impact archaeological sites or historic/architectural properties, you may need to hire a qualified archaeologist and/or historian. If you need assistance with a project review, please contact Kelly Gragg-Johnson, Environmental Review Specialist @ 651-201- 3285 or by email at kellv.�ra��iohnson@state.mn.us. The Minnesota SHPO Archaeology and Historic/Architectural Survey Manuals can be found at https://mn.�ov/admin/shpo/identification-evaluation/. Given the Governor's implementation of Stay Safe MN, SHPO staff will continue to work remotely and be available via phone and email, and the SHPO office will be closed to visitors and unable to accommodate in-person research and deliveries. Mail is being delivered to the office via USPS, FedEx and UPS, however, staff have limited weekly access to sort and process mail. Our office will continue to take file search requests via DataRequestSHPO@state.mn.us. Check SHPO's webpa�e for the latest updates and we thank you for your continued patience. �� From: Jeremy Groskreutz <Jeremy.Groskreutz@ISGlnc.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 4:40 PM To: MN_MNIT_Data Request SHPO <DataRequestSHPO@state.mn.us> Subject: Search Request This message may be from an external email source. Do not select links or open attachments unless verified. Report all suspicious emails to Minnesota IT Services Security Operations Center. SHPO, I am in need of a database search of any archaeological, historical or architectural resources at the site of a proposed housing development. The site is located within Section 36 of Elk River Township (T33N, R26W) in the City of Elk River, Sherburne County, MN. I have attached a shapefile for your reference. Thank you for your assistance with this matter. �� Jeremy Groskreutz Environmental Scientist Emp(�a��e �au�r�� '' 507.387.6651 E JeremV.GroskreutzC�ISGInc.com A 115 East Hickory Street + Suite 300 + Mankato, MN 56001 W ISGlnc.com � 1 r't 11 a � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning EAW Arc�ftiiiec�z�r� �_.; �� v K � F�:_i R: En ineerin F R 0 M: $ g LENNAR HOMES ISG Enviranmental Paul Tabone Planning Whitney M.S. Behny, PE Land Development Manager 7900 International Dr., Suite 550 ISGlnc.com Bloomington, MN 55425 22-26553 TRAFFfC IMPACT ARIALYSIS - DRAFT FO.STER PROPERTY RESIDEIVTIAL DEVELOPIR�EIVT -ELK RIVER, MN SIGNATURE SHEET I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE CALCULATIONS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Whitney M.S. Behny PE, Project Engineer License No. 60768 My license renewal date is June 30, 2024 Documents covered by this seal: Foster Properry Residential Development Traffic Impact Analysis ISG 7900 International Dr., Suite 550 Bloomington, MN 55425 Foster Properry Residential Development Elk River, Minnesota Engineer's Project Number: 22-26553 Dated this 10th day of November 2022 � . ., i�:`:'.,..�'_ . _i i�i�� ..., i i� .a L:-i. �.. � 11�i i.a -. u -rl� , _a�� -i 22-26553 iRAi=FiC IIVIPACT ANALYSIS - DRAFT FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN TABLE OF CONTENTS ExecutiveSummary ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 Studied Intersection Description and Location -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 Fi nd i ngs--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3 Introduction-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3 Purposeof Report ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3 StudyObjectives------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3 ExistingConditions------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 HousingData, Zoning, and Land Use---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 AreaRoadway System---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 Existing Traffic Volumes and Analysis Assumptions----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6 ProposedConditions------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 19 SiteTraffic------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20 OtherTraffic ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 22 TotalFuture Traffic ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 22 TrafficAnalysis --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23 Capacity and Level of Service at Studied Intersections ................................................................................................................... 23 CrashAnalysis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 30 Recommendations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 �� i�e�ture = ngineerin� � nvlr�niment� + lanning rage u 22-26553 TR1�rFiC 1�1PACT ANA�YSiS - DRAFT FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN APPENDICES Appendix A: Preliminary Site Concept + Ghost Plat + Intersection Study Map ....................................................................................A Appendix B: Elk River and Sherburne County Roadway Classification Map ..........................................................................................B Appendix C: Elk River City, Zoning, and Land Use Map --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------� Appendix D: Traffic Impact Report for Orrin Thompson Homes EAW .....................................................................................................D Appendix E: Hourly Traffic Volume, Classification, and Speed Counts perFormed by Sherburne County ............................................ E Appendix F: Turning Movement Assignments for Intersection 6, 7, and 8 ............................................................................................ F Appendix G: No Build (2022, 2023, 2026, 2046) Synchro Analysis Worksheets ...............................................................................G Appendix H: No Build Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Connection (2023, 2026, 2046) Synchro Analysis Worksheets ...................H Appendix I: Proposed Development Trip Distributions (2023, 2026, 2046) ......................................................................................... I Appendix J: Opening (2023) Synchro Analysis Worksheets --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------� Appendix K: Full Build (2026) Synchro Analysis Worksheets .................................................................................................................K Appendix L: Full Build (2046) Synchro Analysis Worksheets ................................................................................................................. L � � iii�i,tiafE: ; naiflEPi`iYla "- Ii'�'1Yv�liliEYlCc -!- lai'lflina �G�Iff 22-26553 TR1�rFiC 1�1PACT ANA�YSiS - DRAFT FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1 Sherburne County within the state of Minnesota . ................................................................................................ 4 Figure 2 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2016 Signalized Intersection LOS . ............................................................................... 13 Figure 3 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2016 Unsignalized Intersection LOS . ............................................................................13 Figure 4 Historical and Forecasted AADT of Cleveland Street NW (C.R. 40) ......................................................................................15 Figure 5 Historical and Forecasted AADT of 181St Avenue NW (C.S.A.H 12) ......................................................................................15 Figure 6 Historical and Forecasted AADT of Cleveland Street NW (C.R. 40) ......................................................................................16 Figure 7 Historical and Forecasted AADT of Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H. 13) ............................................................................... 16 Figure 8 Sherburne County Twin Lake Road Corridor Study Final Report (2019) ............................................................................. 17 Figure 9 Sherburne County Transportation Plan (2007) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 17 Figure10 US Census Bureau---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 Figure 11 ITE Trip Generation for the proposed residential development . ........................................................................................ 20 Figure 12 ITE Trip Generation for the ghost plats formally mentioned ............................................................................................... 20 � � iii�i,tiafE: ; naiflEPi`iYla "- Ii'�'1Yv�liliEYlCc -!- lai'lflina �G��4� 22-26553 TR1�rFiC 1�1PACT ANA�YSiS - DRAFT FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN TABLE OF TABLES Table 1 Existing (2022) LOS, Capacity, and Delay Comparison .............................................................................................................8 Table 2 No Build (2023) LOS, Capacity, and Delay Comparison . ..........................................................................................................8 Table 3 No Build (2026) LOS, Capacity, and Delay Comparison . ..........................................................................................................9 Table 4 No Build (2026) LOS, Capacity, and Delay Comparison . ..........................................................................................................9 Table 5 30% of Total Trips assumed to be redistributed to Intersections 2 and 3 upon completion of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest. Note this does not factor in the potential for total trip redistribution across the adjacent roadway network . ............. 10 Table 6 Twin Lakes Parkway Nortwest Connection No Build (2023) LOS, Capacity, and Delay Comparison .................................. 11 Table 7 Twin Lakes Parkway Nortwest Connection No Build (2026) LOS, Capacity, and Delay Comparision . ................................12 Table 8 Opening (2023) LOS, Capacity and Delay Comparison .......................................................................................................... 23 Table 9 Full Build (2026) LOS, Capacity and Delay Comparison ........................................................................................................ 24 Table 10 Full Build (2046) LOS, Capacity and Delay Comparison ...................................................................................................... 24 � �i�"liii�i,tiaf'� -� �laifi�Pf'i(la "- 'ii'elYvtliliE(ltc -!- -lai'lfli�la �� Zp-`�S�:�i;� I'Y=�1�,i�Y�iCE iiv'i�'�;i;i' r�l°�f�iLY�I` - Y�IZ1�F1.. FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Studied Intersection Description and Location This study has been prepared in anticipation of the proposed residential development, known as the Foster Property. A development name has not been determined at the time of writingthis report, but it is likely one will be given as the project moves into final development within the City of Elk River's due process. A parking study has been prepared in conjunction to this report by ISG by request of City planning and council at the concept level of this development. Refer to the study in regard to development pa rk i ng. The property is comprised of multiple parcels within Sherburne County (75-136-2400, 75-136-1300, 74-136-3200,75-136-3100, 75-136-4200). The site is currently an open undeveloped land with tree coverage and wetlands. The site was historically used for farming and mining operations. The mining pits have remained open and created a water feature of three ponds / basins within the southeast of the existing site. The ponds were established between 1960 and 1985 based on historical imaging. The site is surrounded by; • Cleveland Road Northwest/ County Road 40 (C.R. 40) alongthe east property boundary. • An existing residential development to the north called Miske Meadows. • Trott Brook on the west that weaves in and out of the property. The stream provides a natural buffer between the site and an existing residential development. • A wetland and open land to the south property boundary. The site is within the city limits of Elk River and close to the border of Elk River and Ramsey (east of the site). Miske Meadows is within its final phase of construction, and it is anticipated that Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest will be connected across Trott Brook to Twin Lakes Road Northwest/ County State Aid Highway 13 (C.S.A.H 13), this summer (by the end of fall 2022). The site is within close proximity to Twin Lakes Elementary, located within the northeast corner of Miske Meadows, and the Spectrum High School Athletic Field, located due south. The proposed development is anticipated to be mixed-residential with the concept anticipating 415 single family and 120 multi- family home units within the approximate 260-acres. Construction for the new residential development is expected to be completed in a conservative 4-phases. It is plausible that the site may be constructed in additional phases. For the sake of the study the conversative amount of 4 is utilized as it would have the quickest impact on the surrounding roadway network. It is conservatively assumed that 5% of the development would be completed by 2023 (Opening Condition) and the development is fully built by 2026 (Full Build). Additional growth is anticipated within the surrounding parcels and throughout the county. Information pertaining to growth trends along Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H 13), Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40), Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest, and 181St Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13) can be found within the Roadway Historical Growth Rate section of this report. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 1 of 32 2Z-`��:�' ��,�Fi�; iPv�i��a�i ,�i�,��YSi� — ��1�F1� FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN This Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) studied current, projected, and future traffic conditions at eight locations in the City of Elk River, Sherburne County, Minnesota. These locations included: • Intersection 1- Access A and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest • Intersection 2- Access B and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; Extension of 191StAvenue Northeast/ Ivanhoe Street Northwest • Intersection 3- Access C and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; Extension of 188th Ave Northeast • Intersection 4- Access D and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40); Extension of 191StAvenue Northeast/ Ivanhoe Street Northwest • Intersection 5- Access E and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) • Intersection 6- Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13) and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest • Intersection 7- Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13) and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) • Intersection 8- Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) and 181StAvenue Northwest (C.S.A.H. 12) It should be noted that at the time of writing, the COVID-19 virus pandemic has ongoing impacts on travel behavior, although COVID-19 restrictions have lifted throughout the state of Minnesota. As a result, the collected data is most likely impacted by the subsiding effects ofthe pandemic with workingfrom home and distance learning becomingtypical. It is unknown when local travel patterns will return to what was considered normal pre-COVID-19, the volumes collected are compared with pre-pandemic historical traffic counts. Traffic counts were collected for this study via pneumatic tubes by Sherburne County on May 3rd _ 5t", 2022, on: • Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) at 191St Avenue Northwest, • Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) at 190th Avenue Northwest, • And Cleveland Road Northwest at 181St Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H. 12). Data collection contained vehicle classification, speed, and volume of traffic. The traffic counts contained passenger vehicle and heavy vehicle. The counts were perFormed on Tuesday - Thursday intentionally to avoid lower volume traffic that may occur due to weekend travel, Monday, Fridays, and days abutting a Holiday were avoided. Lastly, school was in session during the counts and buses were counted as heavy vehicles for the study. Additional information pertaining to the intersections can be found within the Area Roadway System section of this report. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 2 of 32 22-265�� Y��,��=iG 1��1P,��T� ,�N,��YSi� - �i�l��T FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN Findings For the completed traffic study, multiple scenarios were evaluated using version 11 Synchro and SimTraffic traffic modeling software. The background traffic growth throughout the development is expected to cause increased delays throughout the study area. As traffic continues to increase, longer delays will be experienced but will be minor. According to the completed traffic modeling, the new traffic generated as a result of the proposed residential development will increase to varying degrees at the studied intersections; • Intersection 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 will operate at a LOS A for all scenarios. • Intersections 6, 7, and 8 are currently operating at a LOS A. As background traffic continues to increase, the approaches will experience longer delays and operate at a LOS C. The traffic queue lengths are not expected to exceed storage bay capacities at intersection 6 and 7. Intersection 8 will experience queue lengths longer than the existing storage bay. Additional discussion on delay and LOS is provided within the TrafFcAnalysis section of this report. INTRODUCTION Purpose of Report The purpose of this report is to document the methodologies, findings, recommendations, and conclusions of the Foster Property residential developmenttraffic impact analysis study, includingthe basis forall assumptions, traffic parameters, and conclusions. This report presents data in a logical format including tables and figures in order to accurately and clearly convey the data and its meaning. Study Objectives The objectives of this study include the following: 1. Provide sufficient access for the proposed development. 2. Identify the impacts to the transportation system and immediate area as a result of the proposed development. 3. Recommend necessary improvements to the adjacent transportation system to minimize crash risk and maintain an efficient system. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 3 of 32 22-265�� Y��,��=iG 1��1P,��T� ,�N,��YSi� - �i�l��T FO.STER PROPERTY RESIDEIVTIAL DEVELOPIR�EIVT -ELK RIVER, MN EXISTING CONDITIONS Housing Data, Zoning, and L�nd Use This repoit studies the impa�cts of a proposed residential development in the City of Elk River, Sherburne County, Minnesota. A preliminarysite plan is provided in Append'IxAas "Conceptual Layout". A project location and roadway function classification map are provided in Append'Ix B. More details � � regarding site traffic and trip generation are provided in later sections of this � report. � According to the 2040 Sherburne County Long-Range Transportation Plan, that the City of Elk River is anticipated to experience significant growth now until 2030. This is consistent with the City of Elk Rivers Comprehensive Plan outlining growth for residential development as well as business development. For this study growth was calculated based on historical MnDOT AADT and previously completed reportingfrom the City and County. The growth used forthis study is explained � within FBaadway Historical Growth Rate section of this report in detail. � The City of Elk River's existing city, zoning, and land use maps are provided in Append'Ix Figure 1 Sherburne County within the C. Land use of the proposed development property is zoned as Mixed Residential. At the stateofMinnesota. time of the study, all 415 single and 120 multi-family units are proposed that will be connected to the local roadway network by utilizing 5 access points: • Intersection 1- Access A and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest. • Intersection 2- Access B and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; Extension of 191st Avenue Northeast/ Ivanhoe Street Northwest. • Intersection 3- Access C and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; Extension of 188th Avenue Northeast. • Intersection 4- Access D and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40); Extension of 191stAvenue Northeast/ Ivanhoe Street Northwest. • Intersection 5- Access E and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40). Area Roadway System Through and adjacent to the study area: • Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) is a north-south county urban collector roadway • Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13) is a northeast-southwest minor arterial roadway • 181St Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H. 12) is a west-east minor arterial roadway • Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest is a local roadway Ur�n Coll�tor Ro�dways and Conn�tions to the Study Area Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) is a north-south "county urban collector" within the Sherburne County Roadway network. Collector roadways are major and minor roadways that connect local roadway and streets to arterial roadways. Collectors provide less mobility than arterials at lower speeds and for shorter distances. They balance mobility with land access. The posted speed limit on collectors is usually between 35 and 55 miles per hour (mph). Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40 serves as a collector for the existing and proposed residential homes that front or access the road. The roadway also serves Twin Lakes Elementary School. Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) connects to two (2) minor county arterial roadways; Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13) and 181St Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H. 12). The connection to � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 4 of 3� �Zp—`�S�:�i;� I'Y=�1�,i�Y�iCE iiv'i�'�;i;i' r�l°�f�iLY�I` - Y�IZ1�F1.. FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN the Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13) is an unsignalized intersection, forming a three-leg roundabout (Intersection 7). The roundabout was a result of the recommendations provided within the Twin Lakes Road / C.S.A.H. 13 Corridor Study that was completed by the County and City in 2019. There were a series of crashes at the intersection, indicating that the geometrics of the previous t-intersection needed improvement. The connection to 181St Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13) forms a three-leg stop control intersection (Intersection 8). Stop control is on the southbound movement only, allowing the arterial roadway to flow free. The urban collector is currently a 2-lane asphalt roadway that varies between being undivided and divided at access points for the existing residential development and school. The posted speed limit varies between 45 to 55 mph, with reduced speeds posted to the north at the previously mentioned access points. In addition, by-pass lanes are established for northbound left- turning vehicles and southbound dedicated right-turn lanes. The road section has paved shoulders on both sides of the roadway and a shared use trail along the west. The by-pass lanes are consistent with the recommendations within the Twin Lakes Road / C.S.A.H. 13 Corridor Study that was completed by the County and City in 2019. With the proposed residential development, the two access at Intersections 4 and 5, will need to comply with Sherburne County Access Spacing Guidelines. Within the current roadway classification of collector and the area classified as an urban / urbanizing area due to surrounding development the access spacing would fall under 6B (Table 21 within the Sherburne County Transportation Plan) in accordance with MnDOT Access Spacing Guidelines. Primary intersection for public street shall be spaced 1/8 of a mile apart and signals every 1/4 of a mile. Sherburne County does have separate access spacing guidelines that are more restrictive than MnDOTs where collector roadways within a posted speed limit of 50-55 mph may have intersection spacing every 1/2 of a mile and conditional secondary access every 1/4 of a mile. If speed limits were reduced to 40-45 mph access spacing can be reduced to 1/4 of a mile for full / primary access. Minor Ar�erial Roadways and Connections to the Study Are� Both Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13) and 181St Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H. 12) are minor arterial roadways within the Sherburne County roadway network. The minor arterials connect urban service area with cities and towns outside the Twin Cities region and serve medium to long distance trips. Per the Sherburne County 2007 Long-Range Transportation Plan, it is planned that Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13) will be extended to connect to Jarvis Street (C.S.A.H. 19). This is anticipated to be completed within 2024 and beyond. The proposed development will not access either of these minor arterial roadways directly and will connect to them via the intersections with Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40), as mentioned in the section above (Intersections 7 and 8). The two arterial roadways have posted speed limits of 55 mph and paved shoulders. The roadways have dedicated right-turn lanes at access points and bypass lanes at intersections where the mainline of traffic is free flowing. No pedestrian facilities are provided on either arterial roadway. Local Roadways and Connections to the Study Area Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest is a local roadway that currently serves a residential development located west of the proposed development. The roadway does not have full connectivity and currently dead ends to the east at Trott Brook and access to the minor arterial roadway of Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13) to the west (Intersection 6). � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 5 of 32 �Zp-`�S�:�i;� I'Y=�1�,i�Y�iCE iiv'i�'�;i;i' r�l°�f�iLY�I` - Y�IZ1�F1.. FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN The intersection of Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13) and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest form a four-legged, single circle roundabout (Intersection 6). This improvement was completed recently by the County and City. The roundabout was a result of the recommendations provided within the Twin Lakes Road / C.S.A.H. 13 Corridor Study that was completed by the County and City in 2019. The construction this summer will extend Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest across Trott Brook and connect into the residential development north of the proposed development (Miske Meadows) to Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40). The local roadway expansion will provide connectivity to the existing and proposed residential development and will likely impact the surrounding roadway network (Intersections 6, 7, and 8) as traffic redistributes and utilizes the new roadway. There are no known residential access spacing requirements with the City of Elk River. The proposed development is planned to have three access points (Intersection 1, Intersection 2, and Intersection 3) on Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest which will align with the access locations to the north or to an existing roadway. ExistingTrafFic Volumes and Analysis Assumptions The existing condition of the site is impacted by on-going construction of the residential development to the north. The Traffic Impact Analysis of the existing residential development was completed in 2004 and does not represent the development that has been constructed. In addition, a complete copy of the report is not accessible. For reference, a copy of the report has been provided in Appendix D. To establish existing traffic patterns, traffic count data was collected by Sherburne County at: • Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) at 191St Avenue Northwest, • Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) at 190th Avenue Northwest, • And Cleveland Road Northwest at 181St Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H. 12). The traffic counts were completed by pneumatic tubes on May 3ra _ 5th on a week where school was in session. A copy of the collected data can be found within Appendix E. The morning (AM) peak hour traffic occurred from 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM and the evening (PM) occurred from 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM. This is consistent with the school's schedule, which is typically the largest generator of trips. In addition, the provided traffic volumes show thatthe PM Peak Hour results in a higher volume of traffic. Within this report the PM Peak Hour shall be used for the analysis as this is consistent with the number of generated for the proposed development. The collected traffic volume was compared with Historical AADT volumes from MnDOT's Traffic MappingApplication usingthe PM peak hour volume, a K factor was determined using the following equation: DHV K= AADT K is the factor of the proportion of the annual average daily traffic (AADT) in an hour. Traffic volumes were not collected at intersection 6 or alongTwin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H 13) and 181St Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H. 12) therefore historical MnDOT volumes were used. The traffic volumes were projected with background growth rates to achieve 2022 traffic volumes from 2018 data. The turning movements were assigned using the TURNS5 Turing Movement Analysis Tool. A copy of the work completed can be found in Appendix F. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 6 of 32 2Z-`��:�' ��,�Fi�; iPv�i��a�i ,�i�,��YSi� — ��1�F1� FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT -ELK RIVER, MN Traffic volumes were not collected at intersections 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 as they will be constructed with the expansion of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest (1, 2, 3) or with the development (4, 5). The intersections (1, 2, 3) will be modified with the proposed development to add a fourth approach, northbound, for each intersection. The traffic generated at these intersections will be comprised of the traffic from residential development to the north, Miske Meadows, and school traffic. There was no traffic study completed for the expansion of Twin Lakes Parkway and the Study completed in 2004, provided in Appendix D, does not reflect the surrounding or existing roadway network as it is in existing or proposed condition. The No Build conditions assume that the roadway construction of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest is not completed and the background traffic that would be created from this construction is reflected in the proposed conditions (Opening and Full Build). Modeling of the traffic that will likely access Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest at Intersections 1, 2, 3 are discussed within the Twin Lakes Parkway I�orthwest Connection Volumes and Analysis Assumptions of this report. Intersections 4 and 5 will be established in the future construction phases of the proposed residential development along Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40). The residential development will be constructed in phases, and it is assumed that the Intersections (4 and 5) will not be established with the 2023 Opening. The intersections are shown within the 2026 and 2046 Full Build conditions. To analyze the traffic conditions within the study area, Synchro version 11's Synchro Control Delay (Percentile Method) and the Highway Capacity Manual 10th Edition delay methods were utilized for this report. Intersections 1-8 were modeled for the entire study area. The resulting Synchro analysis worksheets were prepared for the existing conditions (Intersections 6 and 7 are not included within the existing tables as they will be a result of the proposed development) and are provided in Appendix G. Tables 1- 4 show the existing level of service (LOS) and delay for Intersection 6, 7, and 8 for PM Peak Hour period of 3:30 PM - 4:30 PM for Existing 2022, No Build 2023, No Build 2026, and No Build 2046. The tables will be used as a comparison to understand the impacts of the proposed development. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 7 of 32 Intersecting Roadways Access A and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Access B and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; E�ension of 191st Avenue Northeast / Ivanhoe Street Northwest Access C and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; Eztension of 188th Ave Northeast Access D and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40); Eztension of 1913t Avenue Northeast / Ivanhoe Street Northwest Access E and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H.13) and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H.13) and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) and 1815� Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H.12) Intersecting Roadways Access A and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Access B and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; E�ension of 1913t Avenue Northeast / Ivanhoe Street Northwest Access C and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; E�ension of 188th Ave Northeast Access D and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40); E�ension of 1915� Avenue Northeast / Ivanhoe Street Northwest Access E and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H.13) and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H.13) and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) and 181St Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H.12) 2022 Existin Condition Intersection Intersection Number LOS (Level of Service) 2023 No Build Condition Intersection Intersection Number LOS (Level of Servicel Intersection Capacity Utilization (% Intersection Capacity Utilization (% Intersection Delay (seconds) Intersection Delay (seconds) Intersecting Roadways Access A and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Access B and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; E�ension of 191st Avenue Northeast / Ivanhoe Street Northwest Access C and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; Eztension of 188th Ave Northeast Access D and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40); Eztension of 1913t Avenue Northeast / Ivanhoe Street Northwest Access E and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H.13) and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H.13) and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) and 1815� Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H.12) Intersecting Roadways Access A and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Access B and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; E�ension of 191st Avenue Northeast / Ivanhoe Street Northwest Access C and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; E�ension of 188th Ave Northeast Access D and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40); E�ension of 191st Avenue Northeast / Ivanhoe Street Northwest Access E and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H.13) and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H.13) and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) and 181st Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H.12) 2026 No Build Condition Intersection Intersection Number LOS (Level of Service) Intersection Capacity Utilization (% Intersection Delay (seconds) 2046 No Build Condition Intersection Intersection Number LOS (Level of Intersection Capacity Utilization (°/a Intersection Delay (seconds) 22-265�� Y��,��=iG 1��1P,��T� ,�N,��YSi� - �i�l��T FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN Using Synchro version 11, multiple delay computation methods are available, includingthe Percentile Delay Method, the Highway Capacity Manual 10th Edition methodology, Highway Capacity Manual 2020 Edition methodology, and Highway Capacity Manual 2000 Edition methodology. Synchro's core delay calculation, the Percentile Delay Method, which is recommended by Synchro when evaluating actuated signals, produced delay results much closer to SimTraffic microsimulation model results than other delay computation methods. Observed queue lengths were reported to be closer to the 95th percentile queue lengths provided by SimTraffic and printed in the analysis worksheets in the Appendices. Twin Labces Parkway Northwest Connection Volumes �nd An�lysis Assumptions It is anticipated that the roadway connection of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest across Trott Brook will commence the summer of 2022 and completed in 2023. With the connection of the roadway, it is anticipated that traffic patterns will be modified. A traffic analysis of the impact of this connection was not completed with this proposed roadway project that is being completed in tandem with 8th phase of Miske Meadows residential development. To factor the impact the roadway connection may have on the surrounding roadway network, a separate model was created and evaluated from the existing condition. It was assumed that 30% of the trip generated from the overall completed Miske Meadows would utilize the access points at Intersections 2 and 3. To approximate the generated trips from the residential development, the ITE Trip Generation, 11t" Edition was used for the single family and multi-family lots within the development. A copy of the overall trips that are assumed from the development can be provided upon request. The 30% of trips re-distributed for the AM and PM Peak Hour of Trip Generation are presented below in Table 5. Table 5 30% of Total Trips assumed to be redistributed to Intersections 2 and 3 upon completion of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest. Note this does not factor in the potential for total trip redistribution across the adjacent roadway network. The volumes shown in Table 5 assume that the primary trips along Twin Lakes Parkway are for the homes constructed within the Miske Meadows Development. It is likely that additional impacts to the surrounding roadway network may occur as residents may use the roadway for bypass routes or access to Twin Lakes Elementary. Additional modeling beyond this report is recommended to determine the impacts of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest expansion as it is not within scope of this traffic impact analysis. To analyze the traffic conditions within the study area, Synchro version 11's Synchro Control Delay (Percentile Method) and the Highway Capacity Manual 10t" Edition delay methods were utilized for this report. Intersections 1-8 were modeled for the entire study area. The resulting Synchro analysis worksheets were prepared for the 2023, 2026, and 2046 conditions (Intersections 4 and 5 are not included within the existingtables as they will be a result of the proposed development) and are provided in Appendix H. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 10 of 32 22-26553 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS - DRAFT FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT -ELK RIVER, MN Tables 6- 9 show the existing level of service (LOS) and delay for Intersection 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8 for PM Peak Hour period of 3:30 PM - 4:30 PM for No Build 2023, No Build 2026, and No Build 2046. Note that No Build is used in reference to the proposed residential development and not the completion of Miske Meadows Residential Development. In addition, Intersection 1 would not generation turning movement trips as the Miske Meadows development does not generate traffic to the southern leg and will operate as a thru movement for most vehicles with the potential for vehicles to use the roadway connection as a turn-around. The volume is assumed to be negligible and not listed below. The tables will be used as a comparison to understand the impacts of the proposed development. TWIN LAKES PARKWAY NORTHWEST CONNECTION - NO BUILD 2023 � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 11 of 32 Table 6 Twin Lakes Parkway Nortwest Connection No Build (2023) LOS, Capacity, and Delay Comparison. Twin Lakes Intersecting Roadways Access A and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Access B and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; Extension of 1915t Avenue Northeast / Ivanhoe Street Northwest Access C and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; Extension of 188� Ave Northeast Access D and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40); Extension of 1915t Avenue Northeast / Ivanhoe Street Northwest Access E and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H.13) and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H.13) and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) and 1815tAvenue Northwest(C.S.A.H.121 Twin Lakes Intersecting Roadways Access A and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Access B and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; Extension of 191st Avenue Northeast / Ivanhoe Street Northwest Access C and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; Extension of 188th Ave Northeast Access D and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40); Extension of 191st Avenue Northeast / Ivanhoe Street Northwest Access E and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H.13) and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H.13) and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) and 181st Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H. 12) Northwest Connection - 2026 No Build Condition Intersection Intersection Intersection Intersection Number LOS (Level of Capacityo Delay (seconds) Servicel Utilization (/ol Northwest Connection - 2046 No Build Condition Intersection Intersection Intersection Intersection Number LOS (Level of Capacityo Delay (seconds) Servicel Utilization (/ol 22-2655� TR1�rFiC fi�1PA�T ANA�YSiS - �RAFT FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN Using Synchro version 11, multiple delay computation methods are available, including the Percentile Delay Method, the Highway Capacity Manual 10th Edition methodology, Highway Capacity Manual 2020 Edition methodology, and Highway Capacity Manual 2000 Edition methodology. Synchro's core delay calculation, the Percentile Delay Method, which is recommended by Synchro when evaluating actuated signals, produced delay results much closer to SimTraffic microsimulation model results than other delay computation methods. Observed queue lengths were reported to be closer to the 95th percentile queue lengths provided by SimTraffic and printed in the analysis worksheets in the Appendices. � �='v°➢� � � r ;>� �� 1 �. ;�-_, � � � � �'��:��`�°� For this report the Level of Service (LOS) will be analyzed. For signalized intersection, the LOS is defined in terms of the average total vehicle delay of all movements through an intersection. Vehicle delay is a method of quantifying several intangible factors, including driver discomfort, frustration, and lost travel time. Specifically, LOS criteria is stated in terms of average delay per vehicle during specified time period (PM peak hour). Vehicle delay is a complex measure based on variables including signal phasing, signal cycle length, and traffic volumes with respect to intersection capacity. Figure 3 shows the LOS table for signalized intersections. Ta61e 1. Level of Servi�e Criteeia For Signalized In[ersecxions Le�el af A�erage Controf �elay Gcnerai �escription 5ervi�e ise�fvehl FSignakized Interse�t4ans] A � I U FreN Fluv+ 6 �10 2G Staqle Fsow�slighc delays7 C �2D � 35 $tahle Elnw {ar�eptahle delays} � Apprdach�ng uns[a61e flow Rolerahle delay, aceas�ianally svan a35 - 55 throuyh more than one s�gnal �ytle helore pro[eedang} E a55 • 8� llns[able flow {into�erabie de�ayl F a8G Forted flow {�ammedl Figure 2 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2016 Signalized Intersection LOS. For unsignalized intersections LOS criteria can be further reduced into two intersection types: all-way-stop-controlled and two-way- stop-controlled. All-way, stop-controlled intersection LOS is expressed in terms of the average vehicle delay of all of the movements, much like that of a signalized intersection. Two-way, stop-controlled intersection LOS is defined in terms of the average vehicle delay of an individual movement(s). This is because the perFormance of a two-way, stop-controlled intersection is more closely reflected in terms of its individual movements, rather than its terms of its individual movements. Figure 4 shows the LOS table for unsignalized intersections. Table 2. Le+vel nf Service Cri[eria for llnsigna4ized Intersedions Levei of Sen+ice kveragE Con[rol Oelay (se[Iveh) a u - i �� 6 Ip IS C �15 - 25 D �2S 35 E .35-5� F ,50 Figure 3 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2016 Unsignalized Intersection LOS. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 13 of 32 22-265�� Y��,��=iG 1��1P,��T� ,�N,��YSi� - �i�l��T FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN The existing study area is operating at a high LOS per each intersection with the lowest LOS rating of C in the future conditions at Intersections 6, 7, and 8. l��.��r � fn'i�� I ��E��_. ��'� B� F�.�T� The growth rate was back-calculated using the historical traffic counts along Cleveland Street Northwest (C.R. 40), Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13), and 181St Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H. 12) in the study area using the following equation: F = C(1 + i)n where: C= the current AADT F= the f uture AADT i= percent growth in decimal f orm n= number o f years between C and F The historical AADT (Figures 4, 5, 6, 7) were utilized to forecast future AADT volumes to year 2046, 20-years from the assumed condition where all homes (2026) are established of the residential development (denoted as "Full Build"). Based on historical imaging and reporting, the roadway network has seen significant changes at the following timeframes: • 2006 — 2007 � The establishment of the first phase of the residential development to the north of the proposed site, Miske Meadows, and construction of Twin Lakes Park Elementary School. • 2006 — 2008 � Realignment of Cleveland Street Northwest (C.R. 40) to Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13). The work completed modified the intersection from a Y to a T intersection along the arc of Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13). • 2018 — 2019 � Intersection of Cleveland Street Northwest (C.R. 40) and Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13) is modified from a T intersection to a roundabout. Pedestrian crossings are established at the roundabout. • 2017 — 2021 � The residential development to the north of the proposed site, Miske Meadows, develops phase by phase, establishing multiple access points along Cleveland Street Northwest (C.R. 40). By-pass lanes are established at access points. A bituminous shared-use trail is established from the intersection of Cleveland Street Northwest (C.R. 40) to the south edge of the residential development. The trail is located on the west side of Cleveland Street Northwest (C.R. 40). The development and geometric modifications listed above can be seen in the historical AADT, with an increase in traffic seen in 2010. The future AADT was forecasted using the historical volumes from 2010 to 2018 due to the change in traffic volume after the construction and is illustrated in Figures 4 and 7. This resulted in an annualized growth ranging from 0.7 - 2.5%the roadways. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 14 of 32 22-26553 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS - DRAFT FO.STER PROPERTY RESIDEIVTIAL DEVELOPIR�EIVT -ELK RIVER, MN Historical and Forecasted AADT of Cleveland Street NW (C.R. 40) at 181st Avenue NW (C.S.A.H. 12) 2500 2000 1500 H �a Q 1000 500 0 y = 117.73x + 66.951 RZ = 0.9831 �e � � � I 1995 1999 2003 2007 2010 2014 2018 2022 2023 2026 2030 2034 2038 2042 2043 Year � Historical AADT - Forecast(Historical AADT) ��m Linear (Forecast(Historical AADT)) Figure 4 Historical and Forecasted AADT of Cleveland Street NW (C.R. 40) Historical and Forecasted AADT of 181st Avenue NW (C.S.A.H. 12) at Cleveland Street NW (C.R. 40) sz000 10000 8000 0 a 6000 a 4000 2000 0 y = 31135x + 5440.5 RZ = 0.9831 1995 1999 2003 2007 2010 2014 2018 2022 2023 2026 2030 2034 2038 2042 2043 Year � Historical AADT Forecast(Historical AADT) Linear (Forecast(Historical AADT)) Figure 5 Historical and Forecasted AADT of 1815t Avenue NW (C.S.A.H 12) � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 15 of 3� 22-26553 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS - DRAFT FO.STER PROPERTY RESIDEIVTIAL DEVELOPIR�EIVT -ELK RIVER, MN 4000 3500 3000 2500 H a z000 a 1500 1000 500 0 Historical and Forecasted AADT of Cleveland Street NW (C.R. 40) at Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H. 13) y=216.75x-71.413 RZ = 0.9831 � � �e � I 1995 1999 2003 2007 2010 2014 2018 2022 2023 2026 2030 2034 2038 2042 2043 Year � Historical AADT � Forecast(Historical AADT) ••••••••• Linear (Forecast(Historical AADT)) � Figure 6 Historical and Forecasted AADT of Cleveland Street NW (C.R. 40) 14000 12000 10000 � 8000 � a 6000 4000 2000 0 Historical and Forecasted AADT of Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H. 13) at Cleveland Street NW (C.R. 40) y = 381.29x + 4211.9 RZ = 0.9629 1995 1999 2003 2007 2010 2014 2018 2022 2023 2026 2030 2034 2038 2042 2043 2044 2045 Year � Values � Forecast ......... Linear (Forecast) Figure 7 Historical and Forecasted AADT of Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H. 13) � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 16 of 3� 22-26553 TRAFFfC IMPACT ANALYSIS - DRAFT FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN In addition to looking at MnDOT historical AADT's, the Comprehensive Plans for the City of Elk River and Sherburne County were evaluated. Both the City and County listed a projected growth within the County, City, and general community. - e'' - . . . 2016 23,743.00 2020 26,600.00 3% 2030 31960 2% 2040 34,890.00 1% AVERAGE 1.8796 Figure 8 Sherburne County Twin Lake Road Corridor Study Final Report (2019) - -. ;:. 1970 4,098.00 1980 6,785.00 5% 1990 11143.00 5% 2000 16,447.00 4% AVERAGE 4.74°� Figure 9 Sherburne County Transportation Plan (2007) � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 17 of 32 22-26553 TRAi=FfG IMPACT ARIALYSIS - DRAFT FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN • - - - �. •.. - . . 2011 22,790.00 2012 23,011.00 1% 2013 23174.00 1% 2014 23,346.00 1% 2015 23,563.00 1% 2016 23,743.00 1% 2017 23,924.00 1% 2018 24,211.00 1% 2019 24,522.00 1% AVERAGE 0.92% Figure 10 US Census Bureau. Upon discussion with the City and County and the data shown within Figures 4 through 10 the following growth rates were applied to the background traffic for Opening (2023), No Build (2023, 2026, 2046), Full Build (2026, 2046); . +1.4% along Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest . +2.5% along Cleveland Street Northwest (C.R. 40) . +1.4% along 181St Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H. 12) . +1.5% along Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13) � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 18 of 32 2Z-`��:�' ��,�Fi�; iPv�i��a�i ,�i�,��YSi� — ��1�F1� FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN PROPOSED CONDITIONS As formerly mentioned, existing traffic was projects to create a 1-year (2023) Opening Scenario. It is conservatively assumed that 5% of the development would be built at this time frame. Note this is dependent on the plan approval process, the construction of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest, bidding, and other external factors. It is conservatively assumed that by 2026 the entire development would be built out (Full Build) as shown on the concept. A 20-year (2046) Full Build traffic was also created to demonstrate the impacts the background traffic has on the current roadway network. Traffic was projected forward using the growth percentages listed above for 2026 and 2046. The future volumes that were calculated within the Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Connection section of this report as future volume have been added to the background traffic volumes at the intersections. The method for determining these traffic projects included trip generation and distribution analyses based on estimates from the ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition and existing traffic data. ��`� F�� The proposed residential development, as shown in Appendix A, shows two local roadway connections that could be used for future development. The areas are not currently a portion of the development nor show signs of expected future development. At the request of the City of Elk River a"Ghost Plat" has been created of what these areas could look like for future development. The areas are provided in Appendix A. The ghost plat of PID: 75-136-3300 is envisioned to connect the proposed development to 183rd Avenue Northwest which is an existing residential development. The connection would increase internal connectivity of the existing and proposed residential development. The ghost plat is proposed to construct 14 single family home units. The ghost plat of PID: 75-136-4205 is envisioned to expand the proposed developments multi-family area by 60 units. This would be consistent with the proposed lot style transition on the concept. It should be noted that this lot is currently a resident's home. The ghost plat would likely increase traffic volumes at Intersection 5 of the proposed development based on quickest route analysis. The ghost plats are discussed within the report and projected trips are shown but the proposed development results do not factor in the trips generated by the potentially developable areas. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 19 of 32 22-265�� Y��,��=iG 1��1P,��T� ,�N,��YSi� - �i�l��T FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN Site Traffic iF�I� �,��"�� `iI��1 The residential development, a proposed 539-unit development, is anticipated to start earthwork construction in fall 2022 and be constructed in phases from 2022 to 2026. It is expected that by 2026 the development will be completed and operating at full capacity, conservatively. The additional traffic created as a result of the proposed development will be composed of new trips generally created by the new residents and visitors. For this study, a trip is defined as a one-way movement between an origin and a destination. The expected number of trips the proposed development will generate was estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition. ITE Code 220 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) 120 Dwelling Units # of #of Generated #of #of New #of New Average Rate / Fitted Generated % % Trips Generated Trips Trips #of Curve Equation Trips Entering Exiting Entering Trips Exiting Entering Exiting R^2 Studies Weekday AM (AM Peak Hour of Generator) T=0.35(X)+28.13 70 24% 76% 17 53 17 53 0.76 40 WeekdayPM(PMPeakHourofGenerator) T=0.42(X)+34.78 85 62% 38% 53 32 53 32 0.8 38 Note: Sums may not add as expected due to roundfng. Utflfzed Trfp Generatfon Manual, 11th Editfon. Figure 11 ITE Trip Generation for the proposed residential development. ITE Code 220 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) 60 Dwelling Units # of #of Generated #iof #of New #iof New AverageRate/Fitted Generated % % Trips Generated Trips Trips #of Curve Equation Trips Entering Exiting Entering Trips Exiting Entering Exiting R^2 Studies Weekday AM (AM Peak Hour of Generator) T=0.35(X)+28.13 49 24% 76% 12 37 12 37 0.76 40 WeekdayPM(PMPeakHourofGenerator) T=0.42(X)+34.78 60 62% 38% 37 23 37 23 0.8 38 Note: Sums may not add as expected due to rounding. Utilized Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. Figure 12 ITE Trip Generation for the ghost plats formally mentioned. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page �0 of 32 Note: Sums may not add as expected due to rounding. Utilized Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. Note: Sums may not add as expected due to rounding. Utilized Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. 22-265�� Y��,��=iG 1��1P,��T� ,�N,��YSi� - �i�l��T FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN �ITE ��GE�� Proposed site access is being evaluated and following Sherburne County access guidelines. Access guidelines define a starting point for balancing property access, safety, and mobility concerns. Access guidelines can be used to improve communication, enhance safety, and maintain the capacity and mobility of transportation corridors. In addition, access guidelines may be used to respond to access requests and promote good access practices such as: • Aligning access with other existing access points. • Providing adequate spacing to separate and reduce conflicts. • Encouraging indirect access over direct access on high-speed, high-volume arterial routes. The proposed accesses for this development meet minimum county access spacing guidelines between accesses (Intersections 4 and 5) along the Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) if the roadway speed limit is reduced to 45 as perFormed in the north of the county roadway near the existing residential development. There are no know access spacing guidelines for the residential development on the local roadway of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest. The three access points (Intersections 1, 2, and 3) are proposed at locations of existing roadways or aligned with existing intersections. �� °�'��.��`�9��1 �� z;.�,. It is assumed that the residential development new trips would follow similartraffic patterns within the study area. It is anticipated that some traffic will be redistributed and utilize Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest to the west and use Intersection 6. It should be noted that no traffic study was completed for the expansion of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest. Based on distance and Existing (2022) Level of Service (LOS) ratings, it is anticipated that internal traffic on the local roadways will continue to access the minor arterial roadways via the quickest route rather than taking an extended route through the connecting local roadway system to avoid signals. The conservative assumption was provided in all models to represent the worst-case scenario. The exhibit of the Trip Distributions for the proposed traffic during the AM / PM period are provided in Appendix I. Trip distribution was completed for 2023 Opening conditions where it is assumed the development would utilize the access points of Intersections 1, 2 and 3. Trip distribution for 2026 and 2046 was split based on intersection access location, connecting to either Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest or Cleveland Road Northwest / C.R. 40. Trips assigned to the intersection within Synchro can be seen in the analysis reports as "Future Vol". These trips are included in the LOS analyses. �i� �r.`°� ��w �� « ��E�" ��r a��`��I ��„J Based on the data collected along Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) the percentage of heavy vehicles was documented as being low across the three days of collection. A 2.0% of heavy vehicles has been applied on all county collector and arterial roadways with 1.0% of heavy vehicles on the internal local roadways. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page �1 of 32 22-265�� Y��,��=iG 1��1P,��T� ,�N,��YSi� - �i�l��T FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN Other Traffic �� N� Bituminous trails or sidewalk connections are provided throughout the study area. A map showing the existing sidewalk and shared use trails are within in Appendix A. As the residential development is constructed, making connections to the City's sidewalk and trails should continue where feasible. Currently the proposed development is planning on constructing sidewalk on both sides of the roadway at Intersection 2 and 4. Sidewalk is provided on one side of the roadway within the remainder of the development. A shared use trail is proposed to be expanded with the development on the west side of Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40). The shared use trail is proposed to connect to trail network around the center three basins. Streets that do not have pedestrian walkways are recommended to construct pedestrian facilities to provide a refuge for pedestrian traffic. This would not only benefit students walking home but improve safety for pedestrian walking throughout the neighborhood to localized facilities (cluster mailboxes, trails or localized parks) or out for walk. No known public bus routes are within the area, and it is likely with the connection of Twin Lakes Parkway that the school bus routes will be modified through the area's roadway network. It was confirmed at the public hearingfor this development that the City will work with the School District as the development continues with the City permitting process. Total Future Traffic The trip generation, trip distribution, and traffic assignment analysis and calculations result in the PM peak hour volume for each study period. Appendix J shows the 2023 Opening PM peak volumes with 5% of the proposed development with the Synchro Analysis Worksheets. Appendix K and L for the 2026 Full Build and 2046 Full Build. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page �2 of 32 22-26553 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS - DRAFT FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Capacity and Level of Service at Studied Intersections The PM peak hour volumes for each study period were analyzed within Synchro (Percentile and HCM 6th Edition delay methods) for capacity and LOS at the study roadways and intersections. Tables 8-10 show the 2023 Opening, 2026 Full Build, 2046 Full Build condition LOS, delay, and intersection capacity. OPENING 2023 � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page �3 of 32 Table 8 Opening (2023) LOS, Capacity and Delay Comparison. Intersecting Roadways Access A and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Access B and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; Eztension of 1913t Avenue Northeast / Ivanhoe Street Northwest Access C and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; Eztension of 188th Ave Northeast Access D and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40); E�ension of 1913t Avenue Northeast / Ivanhoe Street Northwest Access E and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H.13) and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H.13) and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) and 1815� Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H.12) Intersecting Roadways Access A and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Access B and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; Eztension of 191St Avenue Northeast / Ivanhoe Street Northwest Access C and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest; E�ension of 188th Ave Northeast Access D and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40); E�ension of 1913t Avenue Northeast / Ivanhoe Street Northwest Access E and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H.13) and Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H.13) and Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) and 181St Avenue Northwest IC.S.A.H.121 2026 Full Build Condition Intersection Intersection Number LOS (Level of Servicel 2046 Full Build Condition Intersection Intersection Number LOS (Level of Servicel Intersection Capacity Utilization (% Intersection Capacity Utilization (% Intersection Delay (seconds) Intersection Delay (seconds) 22-26553 TR1�rFiC 1�1PACT ANA�YSiS - DRAFT FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN The background traffic growth throughout the development is expected to cause increased delays throughout the study area. As traffic continues to increase, longer delays will be experienced. According to the completed traffic modeling, the new traffic generated as a result of the proposed residential development will increase to varying degrees at the studied intersections. (�� J��f"�� i�F��#�� `�� i��1��%`�"��i`i �� i��; �� `�'��` f�i��7F�� The no build condition for this study assumes that the connection of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest is not completed for the (existing) 2022, 2023, 2026, or 2046 condition. As a result: Intersection 6 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A in 2022, 2023, 2026, and 2046. • Lowest approach LOS is a B forthe northeast movement as listed in the Synchro and Sim Traffic reporting. This would be considered the northbound approach when utilizing primarily cardinal directions. Intersection 7 Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A in 2022, 2023 and 2026. The intersection operates at a LOS B in 2046. Lowest approach LOS is a B for the southwest-bound movement as listed in the Synchro and Sim Traffic reporting. This would be considered the southbound approach when utilizing primarily cardinal directions. Intersection 8 Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A in 2022, 2023, 2026, and 2046. Lowest approach LOS is a C in 2022, 2023, and 2026 forthe southbound movement. In 2046 the approach will operate in a LOS D in 2046. o As traffic on the major approach increases the LOS will continue to decrease as gap-time for drivers to perForm the movement will decrease. Refer to Appendix G for the Synchro and Sim Tratfic reporting. � The no build condition for this study assumes that the connection of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest is completed for the 2023, 2026, or 2046 condition. As a result: Intersection 2 Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A in 2023, 2026, and 2046. Lowest approach LOS is an A. Intersection 3 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A in 2023, 2026, and 2046. • Lowest approach LOS is an A. Intersection 6 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A in 2023. The intersection operates at a LOS B in 2026 and 2046. • Lowest approach LOS is a B for the northeast-bound movement as listed in the Synchro and Sim Traffic reporting in 2023 and 2026. The approach operates at a LOS C in 2046. This would be considered the northbound approach when utilizing primarily cardinal directions. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page �5 of 32 22-265a� TR1��FiG fivrl��a�T ,�I�IA�YSiS - �R/��1� FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN Intersection 7 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A in 2023 and 2026. The intersection operates at a LOS B in 2046. • Lowest approach LOS is a B for the southwest approach as listed in the Synchro and Sim Traffic reporting in 2023 and 2026. The approach operates at a LOS C in 2046.This would be considered the southbound approach when utilizing primarily cardinal directions. Intersection 8 Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A in 2022, 2023, 2026, 2046. Lowest approach LOS is a C in 2022, 2023, and 2026 forthe southbound movement. In 2046 the approach will operate in a LOS D in 2046. o As traffic on the major approach increases the LOS will continue to decrease as gap-time for drivers to perForm the movement will decrease. Refer to Appendix H for the Synchro and Sim Tratfic reporting. �' �:'��s�a� ��,"�i� �a �e`;'w .�� `�:� � The opening condition for this study assumes that the connection of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest is completed for the 2023 condition and that 5% of the proposed development is built out. As a result: Intersection 1 Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. Lowest approach LOS is an A. Intersection 2 Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. Lowest approach LOS is an A. Intersection 3 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. • Lowest approach LOS is an A. Intersection 6 Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. Lowest approach LOS is a B for the northeast-bound movement as listed in the Synchro and Sim Traffic reporting. This would be considered the northbound approach when utilizing primarily cardinal directions. Intersection 7 Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. Lowest approach LOS is a B for the southwest-bound approach as listed in the Synchro and Sim Traffic reporting. This would be considered the southbound approach when utilizing primarily cardinal directions. Intersection 8 Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. Lowest approach LOS is a D for the southbound movement as listed in the Synchro and Sim Traffic reporting. o As traffic on the major approach increases the LOS will continue to decrease as gap-time for drivers to perForm the movement will decrease. Refer to AppendaJ for the Synchro and Sim Traffic reporting. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page �6 of 32 22-2655� TR1�rFiC fi�1PA�T ANA�YSiS - �RAFT FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN F�LL �lJIL� ��f�� I➢�� {��1 The opening condition for this study assumes that the connection of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest is completed for the 2026 condition and conservatively the entire development is built out. As a result: Intersection 1 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. • Lowest approach LOS is an A. Intersection 2 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. • Lowest approach LOS is an A. Intersection 3 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. • Lowest approach LOS is an A. Intersection 4 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. • Lowest approach LOS is an B for the eastbound movement as listed in Synchro and Sim Traffic. Intersection 5 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. • Lowest approach LOS is an B for the eastbound movement as listed in Synchro and Sim Traffic. Intersection 6 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of B. • Lowest approach LOS is a C for the northeast-bound movement as listed in the Synchro and Sim Traffic reporting. This would be considered the northbound approach when utilizing primarily cardinal directions. Intersection 7 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of B. • Lowest approach LOS is an B for the southwest-bound approach as listed in the Synchro and Sim Traffic reporting. This would be considered the southbound approach when utilizing primarily cardinal directions. Intersection 8 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. • Lowest approach LOS is a D for the southbound movement as listed in the Synchro and Sim Traffic reporting. o As traffic on the major approach increases the LOS will continue to decrease as gap-time for drivers to perForm the movement will decrease. Refer to Appendix K for the Synchro and Sim Traffic reporting. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page �7 of 32 22-2655� TR1�rFiC fi�1PA�T ANA�YSiS - �RAFT FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN ��i�� nRr�a�u�r�t��r�� .�l The opening condition for this study assumes that the connection of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest is completed for the 2046 condition and the entire development is built out. As a result: Intersection 1 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. • Lowest approach LOS is an B for the northbound movement as listed in Synchro and Sim Traffic. Intersection 2 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. • Lowest approach LOS is an B for the southbound movement as listed in Synchro and Sim Traffic. Intersection 3 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. • Lowest approach LOS is an B for the southbound movement as listed in Synchro and Sim Traffic. Intersection 4 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. • Lowest approach LOS is an B for the eastbound movement as listed in Synchro and Sim Traffic. Intersection 5 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of A. • Lowest approach LOS is an B for the eastbound movement as listed in Synchro and Sim Traffic. Intersection 6 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of C. • Lowest approach LOS is a D for the northeast-bound movement as listed in the Synchro and Sim Traffic reporting. This would be considered the northbound approach when utilizing primarily cardinal directions. Intersection 7 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of C. • Lowest approach LOS is an C for the southwest-bound approach as listed in the Synchro and Sim Traffic reporting. This would be considered the southbound approach when utilizing primarily cardinal directions. Intersection 8 • Operating at an overall intersection LOS of C. • Lowest approach LOS is a F for the southbound movement as listed in the Synchro and Sim Traffic reporting. o As traffic on the major approach increases the LOS will continue to decrease as gap-time for drivers to perForm the movement will decrease. Refer to Appenda L for the Synchro and Sim Traffic reporting. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page �8 of 32 2Z-`��:�' ��,�Fi�; iPv�i��a�i ,�i�,��YSi� — ��1�F1� FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN Summary • Intersections 1, 2, and 3 will be constructed with the extension of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest and with the proposed development. The intersections will continue to operate at a high LOS for 2023, 2026, and 2046. It is recommended that as Twin Lakes Parkway is developed that the surrounding traffic volumes are evaluated as the road will be providing an east-west connection that is not currently present. It is likely that due to the location of the school, that trip distribution with the surrounding roadway network will impact Intersection 6, 7, and 8. Traffic queues for the intersections do not exceed the storage length provided. • Intersections 4 and 5 will be created with the proposed development and will likely not be constructed within the first phase of the residential development, as reflected in the 2023 reporting. Intersections 2 and 4 are planned to connect the existing developments as a north-south throughfare for the existing residential development. It is likely that as traffic continues to increase, longer delays onto the adjacent collector roadways will be experienced. At the intersections of 4 and 5, it is likely that a by-pass lane or dedicated left-turn lane is needed for northbound traffic and a dedicated right- turn lane. The intersections will operate at a high level of service in 2023, 2026, 2046. Traffic queues forthe intersections do not exceed the storage length provided. • Intersections 6, 7, and 8 will operate at a similar condition as the No Build scenarios. The traffic produced from the development will minorly impactthe delay and capacity of the intersections. All three intersections will be within an overall acceptable level of service and decline as background traffic increases. Intersection 8 will need to be reevaluated in the future to determine the best intersection control improvement as the southbound left turn lane with decrease in level of service as the background traffic increases. Traffic queues for the intersection 8 may exceed the storage length provided if the intersection control is not improved in the future. The addition of the proposed traffic as a result of the residential development will have minimal effect on level of service and delay currently experienced and projected to be experienced. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page �9 of 32 �Zp-`�S�:�i;� I'Y=�1�,i�Y�iCE iiv'i�'�;i;i' r�l°�f�iLY�I` - Y�IZ1�F1.. FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT -ELK RIVER, MN Crash Analysis Crash data was obtained from the Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool for the past 10 years within the vicinity of the study area. The crash types are defined in the Guide to MN Crash Data Files and the MN Law Enforcement Accident Report Instruction Manual as described in the following table. Type K Killed Type A Type B Type C Type I� Intersection 6 Afatality resulted. Any injury, other than a fatal injury, which prevents the injured person from walking, Incapacitating injury driving, or normally continuing the activities the person was capable of perForming before the injury occurred. Non-incapacitating Any injury, other than a fatal injury or an incapacitating injury, which is evident to the injury Possible injury No apparent injury observers at the scene of the accident in which the injury occurred. Any injury reported or claimed which is not a fatal injury, incapacitating injury or non- incapacitating evident injury. Property damage only. At Intersection 6, four crashes have been reported within the vicinity of the intersection. The four crashes were reported as a Type C and N. One crash did not involve another vehicle and was a collision with a deer. The second crash was the result of snow- covered roadways where the driver lost control and went off the roadway. The third collision was a rear-end, where the secondary vehicle failed to brake within sufficient time. The final collision occurred when a vehicle traveling northbound came to a stop at the intersection and was waiting for a gap to turn right onto Twin Lakes Road. The driver proceeded with their movement when a second vehicle approached the intersection along the major leg of traffic. In doing so an angle collision between the two veh icles occurred. Note this crash occurred prior to the roundabout, where sight lines at the intersection may have been impeded. The recorded crash data does not indicate a need for geometric or traffic control changes to the intersection due to safety. Intersection 7 At Intersection 7, ten crashes have been reported within the vicinity of the intersection. The ten crashes that were reported as Types A, B, C, N. The first crash was a rear end collision where within the roundabout one vehicle rear ended a trailer being pulled by the preceding vehicle. Minor injuries were sustained by the drive who failed to brake. The second crash was the result of snow- covered roadway conditions where the driver lost control and collided with an off-street light pole. The third collision reported occurred south of the intersection and was weather related with road conditions reported with packed ice, snow, and heavy wind. A driver reduced their speed around the curve, lost control, and shifted into the opposing lane of traffic where they collided with oncoming traffic. The crash occurred prior to the construction of the roundabout and no driver was taken to the hospital. The fourth collision was prior to the construction of the roundabout, where a motorcyclist lost control of his vehicle along the curve on the former Y-intersection and spun out. This collision was reported as a single vehicle run off road with serious injury. The fifth, sixth, and seventh collisions were a result of snow-covered roadways, where the driver lost control and went off the road. These � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning {�ab�� ;��i o�f �� Zp—`�S�:�i;� I'Y=�1�,i�Y�iCE iiv'i�'�;i;i' r�l°�f�iLY�I` - Y�IZ1�F1.. FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN were also prior to the roundabout construction. Collision eight occurred along the approach of the roundabout with two rear end collisions stacking prior to entering the intersection. It was recorded to be at the end of the school day when congestion occurred. Collision nine occurred due to a driver striking a deer within the roadway. No other injuries to the driver were reported. The tenth crash was occurred outside of the intersection were a vehicle perFormed an illegal pass along the shoulder due to a vehicle stopping traffic flow while waiting to perForm a left-turn into a private drive. The vehicle perForming the illegal pass collided with the preceding vehicle via a rear end crash. From the crashes reported, the roundabout construction has addressed most geometric concerns. No additional modifications are recommended with the provided crash data above. Intersection 8 At intersection 8, 15 crashes have been reported within the vicinity of the intersection. The fifteen crashes that were reported as Types B, C, and N. Crash one and two were reported where both drivers drove off the roadway due to ice conditions. No additional vehicle was encountered within the reports. Collision three was reported as a rear-end collision within the westbound travel lane. It was recorded that an eastbound vehicle began perForming a left-turn movement in front of the westbound thru travel lane causing a secondary westbound vehicle to collide with the preceding vehicle that was yielding to the left-turning vehicle. Collision four is reported as a rear end crash where an eastbound traveling vehicle was waiting to perForm a left-turn. A secondary eastbound traveling vehicle perFormed an illegal pass along the shoulder and struck the corner of the vehicle. The fifth crash was due to debris falling off a trailer and hittingthe following vehicle. Collision five was a result of snow/ ice alongthe roadway where the driver lost control and collided with a secondary vehicle due to crossing the travel lane. The collision was at an angle and minor injuries were reported. The sixth collision was a result of slush conditions where the eastbound vehicle was unable to stop prior to perForming a left-turn movement. The opposing westbound vehicle proceed through the intersection resulting in an angle collision. The seventh reported crash was the result of a distracted driver who drove off the roadway into the ditch. Collision eight, nine, and ten were the result of a deer entering the roadway and the vehicle unable to avoid the animal. Collision eleven was a result of a driver failing to brake prior to rear-ending a stopped southbound at the intersection. Minor damages were reported to the vehicles. Collision twelve was the result of southbound vehicle entering the intersection with insufficient clearance and a westbound vehicle struck the driver side door. No injuries or towing were reported. Collision thirteen was an angle crash that was the result of eastbound vehicle failingto yield when perForming a left-turn and a westbound vehicle struck the car. Possible injuries were reported. Collision fourteen and fifteen was the result of a deer running into a vehicle. A majority of the crashes are a result of weather and deer. From the crashes reported above there is no indication that improvements are needed for geometric or traffic control changes to the intersection. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 31 of 32 �Zp-`�S�:�i;� I'Y=�1�,i�Y�iCE iiv'i�'�;i;i' r�l°�f�iLY�I` - Y�IZ1�F1.. FQSTER PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL DEVELQPIVIEIVT —ELK RIVER, MN RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed single-family residential development located along Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) with indirect access to Twin Lakes Road Northwest (C.S.A.H. 13) and 181St Avenue Northwest (C.S.A.H 12) will utilize five (5) access points that connect the development to local and collector roadways. At the time of this study it is recommended to evaluate these improvements to the public roadway network: • To reduce delay it is recommended that intersections 4 and 5 are established with dedicated southbound right-turn lanes and a dedicated northbound left-turn lanes or by-pass lanes. This will reduce delay for vehicles perForming a thru- movement at the intersections along the higher speed collector roadway. It is recommended that intersections 4 and 5 are established as two-way stop-controlled intersections with stop signs on the minor volume approach. • As the development continues to be constructed in phases, it is recommended that the County and City revaluates the posted speed limit to Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40) as the posted speed limit varies across the 2-mile stretch between 45 and 55 mph. o With the reduction of the posted speed, Intersections 4 and 5 would comply with Sherburne County Access Spacing guidelines along Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40). Note there has been expressed interest that the City obtain control of Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40). It is recommended that a separate analysis is perFormed by the local government units. • It is recommended that the City and County evaluate the impacts of the extension of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest to the surrounding roadway network. The extension that is planned to be completed the summer of 2022, will likely impact the surrounding roadway network, specifically Intersections 6, 7, and 8 that were mentioned within this report. This may result in relief to Intersection 8 that is expressed below. • It is recommended that Intersections 1, 2, and 3 are signed as two-way stop-controlled intersections. Stop signs are recommended on the northbound and southbound approaches. In addition, the northbound approaches are recommended to aligned with the southbound approaches at Intersections 2 and 3. • Local roadways shall be designed to the City of Elk River's minimum local design speed of 30-mph. • The background traffic and developmenttrafficwill result in an unacceptable level ofserviceforthe southbound approach of Intersection 8. The approach will likely function in a low level of service by 2046 if the anticipated growth rate and trip distribution is sustained. This is the result of increase traffic volumes for the southbound approach unable to perForm a completed movement in the intersection as gap-time along the major approaches decrease due to the increase in projected trips. It is recommended that an intersection control evaluation (ICE) is perFormed by City and County upon completion of the extension of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest and when 50 percent of the proposed development is completed. • The existing and proposed residential development serves pedestrian and bicycles throughoutthe study area with shared use trails, sidewalks, and parks. To accommodate pedestrian and cyclist: o Install sidewalk on one side of the roadway as shown in the Concept. Install sidewalk on both sides ofthe roadway at Intersections 2 and 4 to match the existing roadway section within the residential development to the north. o Stripe pedestrian crosswalks at intersections to increase visibility to drivers. Additionally, ensure between the developer and City that sight triangles for all intersections are not impeded by vegetation. Once pedestrian facilities are installed at the proposed development, a similar agreement should be established. Bicycle and pedestrian signage can also be established throughout the study area. � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 32 of 32 � Architecture + Engineering+ Environmental + Planning AppendixA y � ` �,: � �,y ��r �� ' �, y � �� rf I��T �y� �y� T c � � C �A-�� 1J ll I ��`^:-a• � � .. �a _ Ay�� , <�� \ � I �""` � 1717r1I�I�f�I�I�C1� � —�=�.�� ' : • '_ � � �� UU�UUIJLJLJLJ❑LJLJLJLJLJ❑ C (f� � �U � 'a i R , � LJ❑LJLJLJLJLJLJL]l�I��UUU � G� -� �J�% G ��q � m. �nnnnnnonnnnnnnnnnn ' y� �� nnnnnnon � n��nn � GG u0� �C �:�� - ti j° � c � v��uv uuuuuuuuuuu"v .-nn��<` s uuuuuu❑ � a�y� � "; . � ' �� ' �� 0!> " �G onnnnnnnc�� ' �� +t',R�`� , • � C nnnnnn C' � \\\� " ` v�i �' vUVU�� / �� C' �) � C� � � � �VUUU� � nCll1 � � `�� ,��F�R�F � '� ��% �GG�/�� CC u� �` '",. ' e, �vJ � �On�� ' . � � G U � ' �� r .. ��>- ; ' O� C ,� n � � j J � ��n( ,�� `:. 5 � C � �n n�l " �i �. f �� &� t �JJ CCC uvg VUIJIJL�1Jv�� ' ��U�vJJ I�% % \A �-�,�Y� � � ��.. �nn�nn�� jJ`� t,�� r `�� « O � ;.t`L�,�: t K * ` � C � w` �� ' 7% JO`� � ��, �t;,��4 � �L��s �� ,� � C � e�. �,y_!�'e",'y�' r � � �� - ;.,4 �� 1111 II ��%UUU�J � L� e � ; �li � ��.., � ` � ,� C �rr- 'q�.'t Y �j�/, _ # �� \ �e � � +� .r r��\ 1 I y�. . . C ., � . � r ._", ❑ � � � � i � r � � r �' z,�' � G ' r � � �� nnnn� m.� + ��' �� , � F.. � �kc � ,��"' // �� GGC $ � � �� ,. �; , �,�� ;.% ��`, -,i� �� „ � � �� _ � _ �tF�� ,�� o � �� _ - - �`�"�' -, �� .: � � �T �� G � � ❑ � % ,JJJ �` C� l ;> �i �C � '. � � ` � - �e� o�� o c � � � �: y� � �„� _ ., , � � � � ^� �,�; �n n �� '�4 / A T^ . ' i.l�� oo �_ �� l� y � a .�. � a8//� �" .� !' t �� r• <;»`- ;'��5• � ll - , � �' , �"t Y � �r � l y„�.r � 7 � * � �� ,, � ,: � ,�, ,�, ��%� � ` �°�'�: . � ��" '�.. '."� a �. a - - �U� 1s1t �' ' �Y _ � / �� _. C. �~�`'.,�,... . . '�''- CONCEPTUALLAYOUT �a `` . _ _ i . � �� M�� Asn��PzoPERr �,� , £, ,��..�� o .00 � � FOSTER PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT Archltecture + Engineenng+ Emironmental + Planning E�K aivEa, mwvEso,a-eoeznoiii ISGlnc.com �sc aR�Ecr rvo. zz-zessa .. - -'� *,�"' •� : � � � 0 �� ' g �5�--'�WFr� . �^ \ V ` ✓/ �\� � r �� ,�i � � --- � �` � � � �� \'�� . j ��, � : ,----T , ❑ � ❑ �� PROPERn�NEnP � , � a � � __ , , , s�o�,� , s.oR �,.Eaa�� ,� —�.�. � �; , � � �_�� , �I �,,=; ,,, ❑!❑i0!❑! ��" �� , � ��E�no�,�,a, o , � ' _ _ � _ � _ _ � _ � " � �/�� %" ' � _ - ,i� V" � i T � � � � „s��o Ev ��v o.s _ � -- � — — — � `�� , � �,�� -- I�% �,, ❑I❑ ❑I�I�\ y�� i �= � � � o-- � '� ,��,, o��rs�r�NE �o �mo: _, �� ,� �� — �, ,� F��F�ooP�� „a',�= � ; r�,— , ,, � ��o, ---- m �, ,, � �- . = , ," -- , __�,00_-- ��' —°��" � i _��,��EOF.Ro..aRoo� �� , , �------ �o�:��. � � , ; �` ,� i '�� _� � � �= �� GHOST PLATTED AREAS / � �\� _ _ . _ __ ,, � I " � i�� - - --- ------- � � `�u � — _ f _ _ f _ _ � � _. _. —� L — .__ ' IL — .— ' IL _ _ ' I I — � RaPE=r��NENP. z'i � _� ; �,,__-- — ----_ � oo.o,u ,' � � ,� — — � ,��i��, � ��i ��, x' i , � � — — —�— _ � �� _ _ �� ',�I�'',,I,,�}�,I''�, �� >� i , I' � , � � � �� '�� I � �', � � 1 �'�� I � � � �� ''�� , i _ _ ' � � I I' I, '',, � � I � � � I '��I�', �I�, � ,,� � � I — — , I �',��', � �� ' � �� ''�� 1�� I � 1�� I �''� � � �'� �� ,�� y � ' � '�� '� i , ��, � � � i � � � �� — �� ' � ��'� , ' �'�� 'i ooRo„ i ---- , � �� 1I �� , � �� I� I^ ��.,, m ° �° N �' I — I I — ' —�I— � � nrcnitecmre+engineering+environmental+alann�ing FOSTER PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ISGlnc.com �: ioen. imnesar,�- ize �sc aamEcr No. zazessa �:�",'�� e 3.�.�m��`�. --- �"'-��,;+�! �� 4 ,* 1 ��i ;T .� � ,� � a��, �� K �.� �'�'��; . �• .. � ��.�"�y�_��; � igi �f € i V �� ii ~� �; � � , ;�� ' � ' � +� ��,, �� .�� - �� '`I _ � l�� _; ��_�_i�_1�1 �I ��f l�l TI�, � �� -L l� I rn L�r 'F j� L � ��, � � �` � Po . ��'�� 0. ; %��; � „ • ,� �—�� m� g% ._�,�� e: � .. � Y' __ i / Po � — � 1� I �JJ. �, $ ' � � -^�-----�w ---� ---�— ;' _. � — C� '- _' � -- � � ,�— _ __ . '� ��.� ��-� '� �— � � � - �� ., �t , � � -� �� TRAFFIC STUDY INTERSECTION LOCATIONS-ONSITE � Architecture+EnBineerin6+Emironmental+Planning FOSTER PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT eu RiveR, Minneso„�-zozziosios �sc ae�ecr No. zzaeesa �� 1l� 3 I g'6 r �, � ,.. - -, .: + - - _ � Y � �� --�.-- ' l �� l � ^, _ . � � �� i �''�, � �,�1 _ �� - - ❑ � _ _ .� �.� �.1L7�� ; o �o� � 4 I� � ��, .,� �7T� � �• � � , __- � � . .. � O ��I �.� �f r. : . - -. '. - . . ,. � , �� ;y ^ o°°°�� ,�, :> ��P:oPE: .. � LLiI "'. � _NMF'�'- �.Ar'1� - — �R�� , � �; i � ; � s� � �, �F-�,� . ,. , �„ r,1 w�.,• I;,��` "` ,.�', �, ��..,� o .00 � � ��-` u;`d�i 1 u'��` �;—;_� � ��,��—ri�'l� I I I 11J_I11_I_I�I_LL�. - P��J ��' ., •_.��,i"`�`�.�`�"��. .' _ .' 7 � ; � � ` �i^ 7. . r '� r,a� ��= ( , . :��' � . �, ��" s .— ,, � . °�'� ` _ .:� =''�,, 1 �� !' S ' � � � qt �,. +'`,# � 1., s v 4 �,, � �� ,y ��" :�� '�' '� '`'" `� y�: _ � 1£'` „�, � �-�� fT �� , � � �„ `, �a � ` � ��.. . '�. f • > .�� { y�. � � y �`1,: t '�,, • ` x `:� �,�' ` ,�� ` 'ti � `� ; vrp.- , �"' . �r �- � 4 AA�''; � r: a ,!� ��` . '�..,�� +�'I'�h ...{�'��- ,,5.� �� :�<, ��t.`-�- y,,i� f �. � `�. r y �� o ..� �i { � �Y.4�,� ��r.�'� � ��`.._ 'S. \ . �"` ��/ ky�A '�'k�� `� . �i �l�FY�-�� i . y'�w"'� � f f� �. q� �al �s a' r � �4�e� �q,',. yw��"�` �•,' �1� T�`_ �. �r � , ` i 1j�, �� t � �� f� i° �,�� {� �+�'�Z r �.s �� ' � r��. �� ,s•=+' A '�"S� r6 �� , a �Y � �� i�+�� '�- .Fr� h !� � et',t+k�„ ��.�_ --' „r, '* ,,+ „� r � �r :, c � , � _ � f ,� `� . �, F , f "1� j ��'."YA�� -. tii j4 -�. .�'� A � � � .. t �. f }�� 'f-� r�� k �7�� f r� . - � � � y 3 t�. �� f� � � . ' � �_� � � ' ,• , �`�i 'w��. pA. 6,T�•P�n`6 s��= �u �i�a'�'�.�'K� a cf'��'s: ^ � ,..r- �F ��,��w� dk t��zZ� ,��''�i �� --`�t '•';.; � ..' Yrr �� t' � ,� ��?-T- � �t��'.�71�a'� �._ _ . . .;. '�,: a+'' .� rt f �� ,r'�f ,1�,,.' � r�yy:��y�ry4 , G,► y_ _ ' r �` f �'� '" ' ~r � � �.' {�+�,� � ,-�.�« ��'' :"� ¢�r .p*: 4�a�- r �rw:` T'�T�� . - Y.� y�r5 . � {�%'�� f� j'� t �r� �� s' ea�i �x"�;� .' ��` " l7�i��'}..• '��'�''-� ..-. i � �� . � a j, - o"u w' a�+i' �, d,n f ?. �� .C�,,,� t � �` ,d' ��,. , F .� Y�t{� �4 y - � '� • `'�'',; ;�' fi' �� , �' e��pg� *�d �`� ,�''.4i Gr� J :r �'� ��`�r �'��N AS:� ,1` �'�" '�,�y �'� � 7 �, ,�+ .� + � �� F b�� _ ;' �-�.. i:.,ah 'J' . n a ;r"� �'-. !° �.. �. � �, '7 „� � +i�",�ie�. +. � _ ,�f.y�".A1 J � ,��"� '}' ��,.y �•'r. ' � � `, .�-�%� �..3 . `: t� � t . � � �,+Ki e , �:i �`�•''` . �� • _ � y� � _� � _,.'�;Yf�i�i� ��t' ^ ' � �� ar� e� - ' . -._ . �. i � ,.� �"�:a� ..�:.� �- TRAFFIC STUDY INTERSECTION LOCATIONS-OFFISTE � nrchitecture+enBineering+emimmnental+Plann��ng FOSTER PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT �: iveR, Minneso„�-zozziosios �sc ae�ecr No. zzaeesa � � Architecture + Engineering+ Environmental + Planning Appendix B / .�^� \•��,/ �J ,. .L�Ib �.E 1�� Oe b4ILLELAeCSVCOU\NI�'Y.� r � d � � � V� � � � � � �v .. . . � � �� -- �� - � r ° .�. � .., � \J 0. ee �m \\ � e q e m I� ,�m �'�—' �� . A'�-o N '�•p, �� .. " L L ., —�'' e � � e 1 r � ti �,. „ r � � LL r � "L o m e, °-, - r., m e � � � �� 'n ,L rr- � m� e Z n_r� � � 4 ... . � c-� de � ��\ : 0. -� 4 m_..,�, � � ----- - �•a m -r � - � � r. ' ,. ��..,�. m .. m --r e � • �� 1 � tr � T � �� !r �� r d m t '� � ,- � � ��. ��r , , oo� �" m'� �,., � �l ' m� ¢ - !-, � . _ . �, � '�'a e c✓ 1 �) L � � _, � `° e..� �P 1;Je ° �' �- � , �� ,� � � �, I�I /('� 'V'.J✓ � HEA'NEPIN cm [�NTY..._� �� I \ ill �—� I / FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP SHERBURNE COLJNTY MINNESOTA MI\"�E90TADEPARTME\T OF TRA.\9PORT.ITIO\ OF£RCE OF TRA\"9PORT2T[O\ 9Y9TEM P,L1\2(iEME\"T L.S. DEP2,RTb7ENT OF�1R2,NSPORTATION FEDER2,L. HIGH4VAY ADbfINISTR2,TION � �,e�b "�� ' a �a " s �tirE�,,,.r . /� 0 oA E. aEssw.,. .. . �i -.. M a.,�-o,EA ... ..�i M er.oa n ecma. _. .. _. .. /�✓ m' ,,.„„op,.,,a„ Fuxcrionu c�assiFicariox ntiae SHERBURNE COUNTY nnNnasora 71 35 36 31 32 239T Ave 33 34 � 35 36 �- -- - - - ^ x N M�d . 22ITH AVE q > � 225TH CT Q 226TH CT �s� ¢ Z � 225iH AVE 6 5 �L,9T 2�r 4 p 22vTH AV mP Z 1 226TH AVE � Z , sO�C yCT A . i Z � = F � B � �I 79 � � 223RD AVE 223RD CT y� e w N � O� RICE � ' o � � 222NDCT �c� _ K z z ��STAVE �P lAl(EPARK p 8'� o ,,,.��°"��—� 221 ST AVE !,� ,� � - � � � . FIDGE 70 AVE .. PARK � , ] 218THAVE 11 �Z _ RANCH'RO __ BURR 8 21�HAVE 9 �O Z��VE 11 1'1 � 33 � CIR j OAK 'I�L V , 215TH CT 42 PRRK �,� 215iH AVE j � 27Cry � � 214i`AVE � d � Z 0 O ' OUE CT Q p � 213TH AVE � N� .� AVE z � G z13TH AVE --- �! 32 zizrHcr � � � U ryNDS R o � I�� g y� ��c I . , 211TH AVE G 2 TH C �� ,�r�'��P v Z � 1�THAVE 4 14 zo9rH nve � 18 �17 ' ar 16 15 14 i 13 z rH nWe OR 208iH AVE p � 13 � o � au 69 , � o Z��H A�E 20]TH AVE 2 7H CIR HOOVER CT A i �P J -1 i NavE �' � 1 � zosr � . �(� OLD CSAH 33 � JG �nqq �P�N TOPOFTHE 34 � 204iH AVE V\G1T WORLD PARK 33 � � 2�`� i ' � WOODf.ANO N yLF i za Ro n E �� raa�s aa �;c 21 �� 22 c� �� N 2o2NOq�E ------- Ro� A�F I� 2a1STGIR 23 o Z4 19 p JACKS N IR '1'3 20 T AVE i r' ��TH AVE 72 ,Lp15TAVE A 1 V '14 TW/ll i99THA E 4� � Lake � I � ,P� F > 198TH A � +g Nq y w ° 13 F � '� — � � � 33 0 �9s °—° w i i a 26 �� 35 { , �s3 25 �� i Tc�. �25 30 "� � 26 R�q �N F ` 792NDAVE- ' jJe � z O ' o'� � p o m E �� See+Elk R�i�ver=q- "°"A` `2T�= S�" , Q HARR � �' VALCEY S > qVF � ISLAND ` ' \ + r. — PARK i N189T N � I 1\ 1 PARK �i i �� Do �n�town) Map I �� a� � � � �� AMP u J � S � � �azY — t O I � L BIkCH MERDO m s�, d NPARK I _. I � - —� � N p� � a 36 p Nq �F ,.� t. � I , � � � � —� cn . ; 35 a ` 31 — 35. � i 36 � iasrH nve L � r � WEA N U � �ySGENTERDR '� �� I ��/�Qc � �i OAKS P � 8 5 I.,..: �/ i AVE � � 1� RD AVE I I� 1� �� 1 � 1 \ ` �8 E TT i 1 P OODGOL y.T BRO K.A.Blb95PARK i a V EWOOD �p�pF� � i 30 �i �� UGV GT r� � � COURSEG�O B� . �iBT 2 N 1 a 45 T '�S, o i"s�- � �� HILLSIDE � C E� I � MississippiRiver �I < ary o os� 9 N vE I 1�8 H G R p 1� 7]STH PJ� � ��.. PARK � ��( ' Z LIEVER i � ��,P��' I . .. . .. �� '1 � MARSH� 16T LM G��`� � � arshPARK 6 AV � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � r � � �� j 1ISTH CT 15 �N D 1�STH AVE T 1 4jH PVE Proposed Development < o City of Elk River �ocation � �m ' � D s 0 K � VALE C��;:. � � � i 1 ]OTH {�V Roads � „ ,z i Haven Palmer 'Santiago�� Blue Hill Baldwin � '){ �� — US Highway , . ,s,T � Clear Lake - Stat2 Hlghway ' Orrock �� Livonia � � Becker _ County State Aid issrHAVEYourH 15 � Highway (CSAH) ATHLETIC COMPLEN Big Lake Elk River isaRo ave Municipal State Aid — � ° � Street (MSAS) �4 a 13 ,s,sTA�E � —� N County Road e� � � � o 0.5 1 — Township Road +� Railroad �` 10 y� ��',' y47z F, y$� W �Q � City Street � � �� Miles Section Lines 23 v s Forest Road � y� oiscwMerz snem�me co��ry aoes �a waRa�� me a«��w �o� me �o��ea�ess 24 0 0 �5 rn me ��m�maoo� �o��med �� m��s mav- i� ��s vo�� esvo�sm�u�y io �enN me att�B�y Cltj7 j.1TT11tS Q ��s ��fo�a��o�_ �� e�e�� w�� sne,e�me �o�� ee ��ae�e fo, a�Y dama9es. � � Refuge Road — P ��d��9�ossofe��ess°�o�P�ofi�.e��ess��e,�Pao�.�o�sofe�s��ess��fo�a��o� � w o� o�ne� Pe��ary �o�s �n� m�9n� a�se f�om �,e ��e of �,��s maP o� �,e ��fo�maoo� �� Park , 54T� A�E � I �o��ams_ mav ��ro�maoo� ��s eer�e�ed m ee a��e e�� a��B�v ��s �a e�a�a��eed_ PP1Vat2 ROaCI � n�y e�o� o� om�ss�o�s snowd ee �evorced m snem�me co��ry P�eu� wo��_ �saaonve Peth_ H 1GIS\GIS_MapsllntemetivlepslElkR�rver\EIkR�rvermxd i Mep Greeted_ 6/25/2012 ' Mep Updeted_ 1/1/20�1 � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix C �� ii � \, � � i � �I 32 ¢ u Y u W 2215T AVE NW � 221 ST AVE NW 169 � 1____ 727 �________ 3 r_�___�___�___�__':�:-�- 7' 1 Z 1 / � u�i i RANCH Rp N� � ,� ' �`S� � ¢ i i i � � � � i `----- � - � � i i � ¢ � \ i �4,�0 - W 1 / \ / z � 1 / / � I � 1 �� ---�----- -----� � �� 0 1 _,I —=�09TH�AVE�A/W� � � � o �� 33 � 1 � /� a � /. 1 ______________ ', 1 '/ 1 � 1� � ��^ �' ' � / � � I � � / / � , I ! 1 � � 3 \ i 32 I1I I 1 2! 1 � i 1� 3 � ° �----y^--- `: � � �3t ---------- -� 2 � ------� A i a � 3 i � �'� i o p �� i � �i � ¢� y� i � , � � 44 �� '93RDAIiE'� � � � � � -, N. � � _ �\ � �A � ., ��. � � _ �.... 35� � �793N0"AVEyVW�-�.�_� Q ,�5�� \ 1 U .,,- �S � _ \� N �� : �i � . /� y � �____\ / � z � i �1i � ` _\�` J_ � i 1 / Ns � ti 1 1 N��__ i �i �; � � �� --' , ; ., , I ♦ �-181ST-AVE=NW 72 � MISSISSIFFI-RD-NW�� 1 � ' 1 � , � : �� I , � i� �� _ � . . w ��'___�'_'___'_' '�� " �i � l� � � u``i�- �� 101 � �—tzsrH �veNw�� Land Use Plan - '�� C ; LAND USE CATEGORY �� , "" � � Rural Residential ■ Business Park � � � Traditional Single-Family Residential ■ Industrial � � � � Mixed Residential , Parks & Open Space i ��, ; � 165�TH AVE NW I Multifamily � Public/Semi-Public � � � ■ Mixed Use Agriculture �` 10 i `��-----------' �I Neighborhood Commercial Utilities & Railroads �G�, � .;y� . ■ Highway Business i_� Future Urban ServiceArea G¢�y y` ` � . "�^ \.,y� �� ` `� ' � \ � Architecture + Engineering+ Environmental + Planning Appendix D � � 1 � � � TRAFFIC �MPA�T REPC}RT FC�R C�RR�N TH�]MPaC31� F��C3MES EA1N �LI�[ I��IiER, M N Prepared by Nlike Spack, P.E. TD� fi1 �-3�9-384� April �0�4 �;�� , � � Tabie of Cvntents ' 'i, Pro�e+�t Description ... .............................................................................................1 � .. ' ' � 1 1 i 1 ' 1 1 � ' � � � 1 2. Existing Cenditinns .................................................................................................1 3. Traffic Forecasts ...................................................................................................... 6 4. iraffic {3peratie�r�s Analysis .....................................................................................T 5. Nfitigation Measures ....................................................................................,..........15 G. Conclusions and Recomnne�dations ....................................................................16 List vf Fi ures Figur� 1 - Location Maps .............................................................................................2 �igure 2 Propased Site Plan .....................................................................................3 Figure 3- Ex�sting Geome#ric� 8 Traffic Conteai .......................................................4 Figure 4- Existing Te�f�ic Volumes ............................................................................ 5 Fig�are 5 Trip Distriinutions ........................................................................................8 Figure 6- 201"f A.�II. Peak Hour Traffic Vnlumes .......................................................9 Figure 7- 2011 P.M. Pea4c Hour T�raffic Vol�umes ......................................................1D �bgure 8- 2024 A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .....................................................11 Figure 9- 2024 P.M, �eak Hour Traffie Volumes ......................................................'12 Figure 10 - 2011 Daily Trafftc Vc�[urnes ......................................................................13 Figure � 1- 2U24 ❑aily Tra�fFc Volumes ......................................................................14 �Lis# of Tables Table 1-�xisting AM Peak Hour LC]5 Results ............................................................6 Table 2- Existing PM Peak Hour LQS Results ............................................................ G Tak�le 3 - Trip Generation ..............................................................................................fi Tahle 4- Forecasted AM Peak Hour LQS Results ......................................................7 Table 5 Forecasted PINI Peak Hour L�S Results .....................................................15 Appendix A-1 Turning Mv�ement Cour�t aata L�DS Calculati�ns Orrin T�iompson Homes, E�k Rrver MN i EAW Appendix �4 Traffr� Impaci f2epart Apri! 204i4 1 ' 1 1 � � 1 � 7.PI4C]JECT DESCRlPT�QIV (3rr�n Thompson Hame� is proposing to buiid a residential development on the Nliske Praperty iocatecf south of County Raad 13 (Twirr Lakes Raad} and west �� County f�oad 4C} �Davis Streei) in E!k R�ver, MN �se� Figure 1}. The site is currer�tly accupie� by ane farmstead. The proposed development will includ� 547 single family homes and 174 towr�homes (see Figure 2). This rep�rt addresses the tra#fic impact of the proposed deueiopment on the �rea rt�adway netwark. �. EX1S ilNG � C3N'Df TIC�IVrS Traffi� operations were analyzed for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours at the fo#lawing six int�rsecti�ns: • Trunk Highway 169 and Cour�ty Road 12 (Main Str�et} • Caunty Raad '�2 (Main 5tree�) and Cr��rnty Road 13 (Line Avent�elZane ' Avenue} • Gounty Road 12 �Main 5treet} and County Road 4t� {�leveland 5treet) • County Raad 13 �Twin Lakes Raad) and Gou�ty R�ad 4� �D�vis Street) � • Caunty R�a� �[] �Davis Street} and praposed development Narth Raad • Caunty Road 4{} (Davis 5treet) and prcap�sed develcapm�nt South Raad i 1 � � � � � 1 The existing lan� canfigurations and traffic contral for the four existing intersections are shQwrz in Figur� 3. TDI staff co{lected a.m. arrd p.m. peak haur turn�ng mavement cr�unts at the four existing study inters�ctions in April 2�D04. The data is included in the Appendix. The existing peak haur traffic vofumes are s�own in Figure 4. An intersection capacity analysis was conducted far the fo�r existing dnterseciior�s per the Highway Capacify Mar�ual. The ir�tersectivr� is assigned a "Lev�l of Service" letter grade based �n t�e intersectian �eometry, traffi� val�mes, and tra�Fic carrt�al. Le�rel c+f Servic� A�L�� A} r��rese�ts light traffi� flow (free f�aw eondi�ionsj while �evei of 5�r�ice F�LC�S F} represer�ts heavy traffi� flaw �aver capacity ��nditians). LOS D is cr�nsidered a�ce�tabie in urbar� conditions, �Ithough LQS C ar b�tt�r is preferred. A Level of Service grade is also calculaied for eact� stvp cQntralled approach at a� unsignaliz�d ir,ters�ction. The existing a.m. and p.m. pea� hour i.�S r�sults are shown in Tables 1 ar�d 2 �the LLS catculations are inc�uded in the Appendix}. Qrrrn T�ompson Nomes, �lk �4iver, N1N � 1 EAW App�r�drx A ' Traffic fmpact R�part Rpril �0�4 � 1 ' 1 , 1 1 � 1 , 1 � � 1 ' r ' � 1 ��] iH4"�4�PSLLY rhetbur�z �Prinaeton '- --' g3 Branch W1illtrswn� � �4'aAanal id� �Isanti 10 Lt+9�dfe - — - g � fr'efuye � ._ . � 4231t�1. (�-��y ,. . �� [. Iii�p ��j}�I _��'� St 1.. __ _ � L'ityr* .. _ �r �71 �] � Lake 4scQaia Muntkce9 0 ; - _ _ � • Forest s - �Rnnandale +Pvlaple -- �+ Lake �Buffalo H awa rd *Lake — ----'Delana 5� 'Jhlinsted - �`-:.:��q • �15 km Si}m-, - O?003 Randl��y & :wrwany � ' Lake � -- - 97 S4ia �BIaI � � G 81 .�amerset ]i��' �-- Fflr {�,f W'hrte , 6ear iake —Stlllwater +' al ¢�i�SP_V1��P"� 38 ��6aypdrt !�q fiS_ � "1�'+— Hudson-- � Site Locatian: Orr�n Thampscsn Homes E!k River, MN �R�3�iCi hi�NA1.L�l ��etr� k�. v, � S� „° F�sa' irirs �.rfE3 �'�'�Y ��' Vikin� 96vd ;� - ��'d `�+ � �� 't6S)IIi.S`ry I�"�i� rl�� nd,�.� '��.�. �� Z�'�it�'t L!7 I.7�+erfreltl �'ii'��"C �i � � ' , P.�nk 13 = .;i, .,� .� , , J `q,� tr " .� �� '�l,� F�t?th,�y ,:: � I. S�[�denburg jFarker'i,3 r- ° E{ Junivr� g�erRa.ry, � �f a SCikGOI �i �`CIlOO� '.fi F '% ; • I uw�s3tfi ,�� ' � '� � r' � �tn v� _> '� j� �.,�. ,�=�' � __ ;i ��l, st `,: � >• �. i��r, :�•� ---�_:'! h llAaia 5#'u _:� ,��ydaY:' _ ��.�f ,�� ,� g,�m.�__—� �., _ -,.-y� ,�:. _� _ �� t..,, � �. _- - ia Fst:�, 9 . � ,, � ��- -_-- - — --�� _ � �i� � �! `M Mo;sfde ! anhoe Av ��^,,, 83 � � �,;c3;', �' �.�p ,°'`�r-x �'� ' � � U , !_O�km �� g�,g4a�` �t��; ;�: � _ , �a mr�� .`'• �. �, � �r a I7['�tt� d,y { , :�ti* �r O��U3 Rand i�tiaiky 8�' y O�802 G OT. inc 4 5ite Lo�ation: ` �Drri� Thampson Homes Prepared by Tg! ` :`'� ��'- April 2fl174 ��"��"� :-;�, �� Figure 1 - Locativn Nlaps Omn Thompson EAW Elk Riaer, MN �� -:,��i?�`� �i 1�_l �� ;rr �:1 • � �sYr �i+�,. �x��:t � �� .. � „i''l,r �l`' �►'�' � • �, • �►� � �� ,t* �� *��,*.,� .. ��/,�* f �•� ��i• . 1 w",��,.,+,��t��,L►, :■,.,,,�..��.. _..: „`.�i�'��:��►�l`�fl_;:^ ��.�:;i�: :•_- :ril::.-.-.- _ , � � ,..,.... � �Ii�Uf� L � Prnnosed S�te PI� . , ' ' � 1 � 1 1 1 � � 1 � ' � � � � � � � � Na S C91e Co w� � 4 � `" 51Gh ;I � 91 - -- � �I `I / ZV fi+'al�i-+ +sil3 `814.4.i� , �, �., i. s. [.] ��tl - �J,� . rti�R�ar�} f7d !'4� t�� o,�� v� � „�`l� Ge eId �111e'Y l� I � U I ;1�'., p � � � �rh ,�v lrtinsienburg ,�parker �'y � � f •r Juii[ar F�y+ gemerita ;ty � r S�hoal ;I Schvof ;i a �` � Y. j rror±sr3th �� j` � !�, ^th=�� P.srk '� ✓r _- �il ��th St '' r �"��-a�'==�� Main 5:,� ;{ -�-.��.l.r=— �� ``� v �� , s � i�� s .a kr„ D.5 mii� p�3 Rand �N�y 3 �s �� =� "� .+�side t;dy Pa�• o.�raz �or. � / � �� STQP �a�1 1] win Lakss Rd � Co Rd 4p 4aris sy f`.� mphl l� �1 � v��o srv� _ ��— _—: =— ;j 1 ��4rh Ln � � � i � f� �li � w �' Fr, , 18-�th f+V i �� I ,_—�- +� is ��. _. � . �_ �„ , . _ - __ _-�. t'r lvanh�P A. . 5 '��t,� g3 n� L �/ � r . -y . � ;�� 1-yl z�.�a.e,, w Y g. , � ; � ,�.v � , . . _ r. ST�P " CORd72�� (55 mPhl Fl�lll"@ 3 - Existing G�c�metrics & Tr�ff�c C�ntrol (7�rir� T�ampsora EAIN E�k Ftiver, MN � Rrepared by �C�I A�ari3 2f704 y` ; �--.-r�� ,� �� 1 1 � 1 � � 1 1 1 1 � 1 ' 1 � � 1 1 t i No Scale g E 1 8 7 � � � � \ N P'! C F�F f'1 1V .� �� — 2st�i3Q� Candt2iMainSti , - �`�j7 ti�0 mphl � 791199 - ,I ; ' 1 rJ$/3L12 — � � � � sar�ss --w � �, �, �� Er . � � �� E N � I � � .—vr� : s � 0I1 Rd 13 vin �,akps R¢} Ch Iid 4O {OiV16 Slj ISS�p1�I ;55mph1 �$� -1 0 i is — �R�,1+�D fvi�l�h1.LY' ,�-s::;r� ,.. , 0 �aa ; } N m 'N' �s��5•� ' � � n.af7i.a�n,� 17�I Y . , i • '�,n .� _.. � :�� 75��' - . � � ' I � D1 �` � � 13 � , , ��I $ � �,� �h ,� , . �4o r. Uandero�urg ; Parker :. � {p Jupior i�pn �emerika� _ y�,;[k ; Scfiaol ' ;i 5chaal '� � t��.,y�29t : � .� ^�th-�.t,-� '�''�r{' ' � , i �kth u ; ` u+ -_ �:'—��SJ ■ �q'�. �:r � i �f - T7Q0 "--' —�4�80�k- � � 1�3 � ,'= ra�Jsrde I.., r � l i c= . ii�.�. 'ij��'� f ,� G�!`4'p3�' � �1.{1 km 4 `,'`. ., Q.$ rra i �,r: � e O �S:fl3 Panci !r�!iariy � " �aii}�O ��u� GD7. '.nt � � �N � � � n � � rnM - JWE� ! � � — ��1$2 ' — 33�11 ��b fiE 1 �' ��Mi�M1 $1 1� mph) �� - - '�,1 � ff}7f287 — � � rn 77194 4 � � mS.v�� v / Legend 2�0� AM Peak Haur � 2�a4 PN1 Peak Hour xxx�Yr�r � xxx = Daily traffic valumes frc�m MnfDC]T tra�� flow maps. TH �69 caur�ts �re frvm �QQ2, �alf ot�ers are fram 1999. /i�W.'.fJ✓ "3:� ��{lRQ �7V1'� �I i �-Iih Lri � i 11 �1 il, �•IB�th µv ; a�,� p�fi i� 48�0 1'i I :t � � 83 J L�`'.., , . . -rf.. ,�. . .. N Na" i _' 1� � — z,�� Nu P 2 -Yain St+ i� m�� / 7f7 151i337 - Figure 4 - �xisting Traffic Vol u m�s Orrin Thom�son EAW Elk Ri�rer, MN • �.`J� _ �;.� ,.f , �,� � � Prepared by Tdl April 2�04 � 1 � i ' � � � 1 � Table 1— Exis#in AM Peak Hour LOS Resr�lts fnt�ersect�on 2Q(�4 A,M. Pea1c Hvur TH 169 �nd Count R�ad 12 (Main Street� B County Road 12 �Main Street} ar�d Cr�unty Road R 13 [Line Avenue} Gaunty �aad 12 (Main 5#reet� and County Road �,A, 40 (C1eveland Street County Road 13 (Twin Lakes R�rad} and County �,�, Raad 4{� (Davis Street� The first L05 gi�es the Lt'�S for #he Enters��ti�n and the second LC}S gives tl�e 'L�S fQr the stapped apprc�ach. Table 2— Existin PM Pea'k Hvur L�JS Resul#s Intersec#ian ` 20�4 P.M. Peak Hour TH 1.69 and Count Rc�ad 12 (Mai� Street� C Cou�ty Ro�d 1� 4Main Street} and Coun#y Roac! B 13 (Line Avenue} County Rc�ad 12 (Mair� Stree#} and County Raad ��, 4f� [Cleveiand Streei} C�unty Raad 13 (Twin Lak�s Road} and Cp�nty Ajg, Rr�ad 4� {Qav�is Sire�t} The first LDS gi��s the LC3S f�r the intersection and the seeond LDS giv�s the LUS fflr the stapped approach. The current Annual �ai}y Traffic Vc�lume (A�T) for the area ro�dways are shown ' in Figure 4. The TH 169 A�Ts are 2aa2 traffic volumes and the �esf af the ADTs �re from 1999. T�rese AClTs are from the most current MnIDQT traffic flow maps. � ' � � � � � � �-, ��. 7�Ra FFlC FC7RECA S fS u yr°� `�'�` A trip generat3or� analysis was perf�rmed €ar the site based on ttte m�th�ds and rates published pn the !T� Trrp GeneratrQn Mancral, 7r" Edition. T�e trip g��eration for the prr��osed developme�t �s shown in Table 3. Table 3 - Trip Gener�tivn ITE Tri Rafes Land Daily AM Peak H�ur PM Peak Hour 11s� Descri tivn Tri s* �n Out En C3u� �� Single Famiiy Homes ��4,� �,p� 30� 35� �47 Units �� ftesidential Townhornes �,�� 2 64 5� ('f74 Ur�its} TDTAL A�aED TRIP� B2EQ 11fi 37{� 411 * Daily trips are round trips — one car in plus auf af the home {i.e. 1,fi�fl daily trips = 8�� vehicles} 2fl� 3 (l �3� �rrin Tlaornpsan Homes, �!k f2iver MN 5 �AW Appendix A tTraffic lmpacf Report Aprr! �004 1 � � 1 Traffic farecasts were developed for the year 2�11 and �Q24. A 3.5°�a ye�riy growth rat� w2�s us�d to a�count for grawth in background traffic on the are� roadways. This grflwth factor is cansist�nt with MnIDOT's current projection fact�r fc�r Sherburne Gaunty as well as MnIDC}T's Hrghway fif19l7�9 Corrrdor Pfan dated Aprif �a��. The �irectional trip di�tributtc�ns fnr tt�e uses in Table 3 are shown in �igure 5. � The trip c�istri�utians for the sit� are �ased on exisiing travel pafterns in the area. The combinatian of �ackgraund traffic and tri�as generat�d �y the propqsed develc�pment are sh4wn ir� the traffic �orecasts �n �igures 6 thr�ugk� 11. � i ' � 1 � � � 1 � 1 1 � �. r�aFF�c oPF�� f�vnrs anr�►L ysrs Ti�e traffic f�r�Casts shown on Figures 6 thrc�ugh 9 were used with the existing traffic cor�tro4 arrd lane �onfigurations shQwn in Figure 3 to �afcufate LQS grades for the faur existir�g study intersectioras. It is assu�ned that the �roposed Nort� R�ad and 5out� Rc��d ir�tersectiQe�s �n Caunty Road 40 will cansist of ane eastbaund shared rightlthrnughlleft lane that is stop eflntrolled, sne north�b�und throughf�eft �ane that is fr�e flr�w, and ane s�uthbaur�d thrflughlright lan� that is free flow. The results �re sh�wn in Tables 4 and 5. Tahle 4— Fvrecasteci AM Peak Haur L�S Results Intersection 2Q11 2011 2D24 2b�4 No-Suild Build No-Buied �uild TH 169 �nd County Raad 12 C � � � MaFn Street County I�c�ad 12 {Main 5treet} and A S g B Caunt Ro�d 13 Line Avenue �aunty 9�o�d 12 (Main Street} and ��' ,��'B' AlB� AIG' Coun# �toad 40 {Cleveland 5tree# Caun#y'�oad 13 {Twin Lakes Road} A!B' AIB, AIB, A1G' and Gount Raad 4i} Davis Stree# �aunty Rnad 4t} �Davis 5treet) and �!a AIA' nla AlA' ro osed Nr�rth Road Gaunty Raad 40 �Qavis 5treet} and �f� p,�q� nla AJA' rQ osed South Road "fhe first LOS gives the L(]S for the intersection and the second L(7S gi�es the L�5 for the stopped approach. ' CJrrrrr Th�rnpson Homes, E�k River, I'VJN 7 EAW Appenclix A Traf�ic tmpac� Report Aprrl 20t]4 v�i �� .� i � ir�GY�� . , ::;r I BB __ +� .- � � �`r, t4� ,i ry0 r-ii�ill.a��,n «.e •�: �.. J,O ; i':i �:r��rtn �;. ...,,.. n �� ie�2!'l.2?� �� .. . � � '��`� 13 J . �Q� E._�i.iih ?5 e "{,r�ndenl�urg Parher. �Qa�D . Ju�ior h;�, 9ernerrta, SCIIUQI �: SCIlO9� � i � � � `� I z+urs�3tl3 � - ••Jitl' ��t.- Adffi - II —�� -#tl"r wI .��, � Main St: � :��Y ' i.: . V '.. -'- __' _' _ 1. ��il `~ �°I�U�isY dr` �-r_v _, � .. �?�ly�, 4- ".ilh � I :0 �km 4.3 rnri� '':,,.:,,'", a��3 Rand t�Na�y � C�rreyaiiy � �� GQT, :nc Si#e Location; �/ Drrir� Thom�rs�an Harnes �35C rl{'FR ar'rrs �.��u.��w R'a�� Viking Bl�d � QIG 1-:]^�Th I.�• i o � a �I �,` � I�� 113-Ftf� . � ��i '��°�a - �� __- � 1 � ! it .�:.� - _ ---'� �-� ��;,nli+�e.�; .,, 83 ��r `{�`, ' - _ e: • r. _,.. . , ' . .�,+n �P� Nate: 5°I'o af trips are internal. Figure 5 - Tri p D�stri k�utions Qrrin Thompson ERW E!k River, MN �� Prepared by T�l r �` �'�.- _. � Aprif 2004 " `7` '�, � W.�� : ti� � ' � 1 1 � � 1 ' � 1 1 1 , � � 1 � � � 1 No 5cak � �� \ ��s� �� N C N - '�JI�S ,' I I` — 325r475 � __ _ 2{}�2� Co Rd 1� �Main S�� so �n> ' 9aJ135 � ' �� ' 5951245— o e� r 22SI225 - M � � 4��ryn ti� I '� �� .•�� i � ii lI1 '. r=5 1�� ^y3U,•3 ni�rtr;�n I; i II �r .� L iIl , ".�� ,�.v 3�..�3'8 � ,,+ri.�l '`.�iP lA.� 's�� i� F r.. �� a�i �'kx, �:;: , ; �. ; � �n r1� iPa�dwnhu� 'parker+.', � School� 9emerrcary � i. ': Schovl ,� i.art�tlr �t ;�� ' y'• �5#h-Sic.-_ R� �� s - -__ i� �th St :` F� - i . �, Eh, , �, `•-..i�-..::-�.::; biiilli $ ?. ��11 �3c��5 � � ,,. �� il . � ��,�I 7 � �_ , i41 `-: j I �`•= huS'side '.�;�a 'k�� 1�� G'i3V fTdF�' �1.o s��, : a.� m:;j ::,�j C7 :Q�03 Rand i�kHaiy 3� m�apany O �t�4? Gn'f. �re Q Q� o �nr � u� � av �' m � ` 741180 I I I' — Z�Q�� — 435l5� � o ftd 0 y tM'ain $7 i+d mphl .. I r 45145 -- - 13i7114D ' �95195—, �� 1f11 p a � � � 6 _ � / Legend 2[�� 1 No-6uild � ��i 1 Build 7CXXIYYY � � � �� - I , -- 5l10 — 5l16$ 13 win Lokas RAy� Co Rd40 ({Tavis Stj f55myhj [`��Gh1 12C1112i5 �' J �50 � / �St TJVt� �!T 5 . �O C117 j+ f .777e` / � �, - �, � � �� C �1 NaM Rd r I � !]9 mphi . n!al16� - - I nlaf24 -. es �n ` e � \ �. Vikino 8lvd ]�3�ih Lr �i� 18-1th A� � 8��xx—E — — -- - — --- !I —v _ 131st.-� _ f.c—�^� �v3iifla� .��v �� r� 83 .,�S,.J � c3��,�i - ...i9�S: °a � ��r :: �.: I �, 7 t h,:k ,. : :; S„ '� � � u'r � a �� 4 U �r� I � _ - �,5 , . -- 2F5I255 Rtl 12 MsM S1' {se �p�� rJ��JFJ .-� 19l31190 — I � �� A� m�y � E C u7 v JI I � �_ G Sauth Rd ��m�� . , nlal5 - -' n1al1fi5—. I a u'Y CV � � S Figure fi - 7�'I '� A.Itill. Peak Haur Traffic Vvlume� Qrt'in Thomps�rn EA1N Eik River, MN • ;�� Prepared by TQ! April 20Q4 �_� ' � ' � ' 1 � 1 � � 1 ' � 1 � 1 ' 1 � � l N 6 $Cd�2 �t] 4 E � N � � � `? � �u"3a r �L 'P -�. �Qi�� sQi + �� — 38014�5 l — zvrza co ae , x rMa�� I49 rnph} r ��r�,� ___.f- '� 1 394I560 — 49�5149�5 - y N p � � o � w ti � � ' �nPwi�sJ k'TA'UII.W I ��!�]t� H�� =':1 � 4 =z IBB � ' � � F,•� 1s- �„s�n,.��,, ,,;� jl1 ., �'� , �YI ��'ndA,y�y �I iJ�P. �.Ei� ''15"�'t'F';, o � 4�' j'� � J �o � Ch[h lyy i lr s llandenhurg 'Parker�i`, r r;;9'� Ju5 h4o� �emeritary � v il5qhoaf - ^ �� lions�tYti vt ��,J `� .c.✓,' �th=5�-.._ �� 4� �r� �r'" -- ' -'� =�fh St i� � I "r _ .A" I �ilfl g� ��:��`.. _-- 3f . .. �^ I�" ��I � y i:,.�. 16 '� 1' � � �II �.. ',I �i' . I :. t�ikHS�dA �,f � ;f � 4 ;+' �.1y f�.�' �� 1.�1 km 0.5 me�� O ��@3 Pantl?�Na3y & �paeiy Q:�QS GAi. ��e � � � �u�r3 �' a' `� 3fiD1430 I � ^ 350137D r r '� -- i��.i� Ca Rd 17 �Main 5t � 140 mpnk , 730I130 —+ I + II 3i�a _- -_ i �si„s � � �; ^ �E�� v N Legend 2D11 No-Build �—�--- 2Q11 Bui{t� x��r � � O Q � =, aE �� V Sanh Rd !]0 mphl . . nlal5 — ' nlal'S14 --. � � ` �d ` Fi�ur� 7 - � � 1 �I P. IVI . '�ea k H�ur Traffi�c Vvlumes qrrin T�ompsan EAW Elk Ri►rer, MN • �. Prepared by Taf April 2004 _ �. l.�'��; , � / � O 1 � � E Q �f] �f' N 4F1 � ~- � .— s�i o ,� ,Y � ^ si� os 37 i7+xn l�kes fid! Ca Rd d17 Oxris St1 �$5 �) p55 mph� 350f356 �' ' 5118[7 � l:ist �i�vr i�kes = i:aur�ty P.x� / a� / � �! f r` $ 0 � N o � C O o I � � n � Noim ate faa m�n� t' I ft�� ' nIa170—. o �n � �o 'v��,�o �i,�a �n jl �. Ivanli�e .=�., 18�th AV �� pyvtK I \ J i��5i.`�. .. _ _....LJ-,; i`',r �r�� 83 �r` �}F• �� '�a�3 .._ vl �'3th. ,;';t�� « U � ov � � � V . �- TJ`!��'iJ , ^ 3601364 Ca Rd 12 Main St� �� _ ! 101180 - . 4201420 -- � � L� � � � � � � 1 � r � � , � � 1 � �� 4 E � �fY �i} tf7 Ei�^ � O � � aJ �i1 �l3 C11fi f7 ._. ��20 � I — aa0�5so E { I� - 25125 Rd 1$ {1Aain S iso,�v�� ^GUI� 6�J --' .� i Ir 2fi51395 - 345I305 --. n �" � � � �� NT� e .� � � � �a � E � a u. yn O �� - � . — 5t10 -- 51165 ftd r � CTw�n l�kez Ra), Co- Idd aa tflavis 5t1 �SSmpllj 155mph3 1641160 -' / 10155 — � �IlP'LIYLf 11'I`SYILL.L3 �t-GiR � . �a€� - � ti'� �� ' ,- ��'nl.ii�,7 r7�E �_'.;: �, y . '. n i�:, i: �a a'. y� ; �� l2.�J - ,. _ --. :. �� , • i3 J �� '.�, / � � i� f6COV � € c �`n � i � lr � NoM Rd �70mp�j � fl�ai'��-� . .I � nfal2D -. o T � �o � E75t : dr+;- : lkes :'.•rmfv °.a.'� Vikinp 91rd " �'��tf� !..' � ; ��rn , �: � �andentrurg Parirer . �. . JuSchaol� �em�rnary n � �chool , i�a^s�jkii �t �' ,/'', 7tl1�.4;i _ P31iS� a'� N45cale �k�1 �l j I�-Itll.+'.� : . ��:.:... iY�t�fi .�i . _ �=�pf�'i �I � M - - �?dt_ ��— --- �dfl�4 --- ��` ��;; �, I'8 I st . I� i� - ''�1'T�.. ._ ..... ---��_ Ysl � ;I " "-� FbiYsirle I.�anfi�a B3 �s� jf�' Cdf��.�a � �� „ 1.0 km ' �" �� !�i� Y ' � _. r. o •'rr 02Ca3 Ra�3d 3�A�,Va�y 5; ��y O:;rG� G01', ta� �.,�sn �t,. ' ,�h �_�. i`7 N 67 � r � [}1 � N N ,oarzio — 325f355 Co Rd 13 MslR�St ' + - $7Q�� lW�mvh1 ,. i 65165 — ' � � �17p178d f 130I130 -, � � r�" , ,� r- m � � E~ � n / Legenc� 2�24 Na-�uiid � 2474 Build xX�uY�'Y � o� � E "n v� v V1 N � .-_. rJl�i'rJ — 36513�65 Rd 12 N1ain 3' (55 mph} � SjTJ�J -' -' 255f255 -- � � ._ y W�$� � �� ! �V SWth 1tq ' I]0 mphl ! nIa15 -- `` � I nJa1765 — . � o N � C � Figure 8 R �U�4 A.I�I. Peak Haur Traffic Volumes (]nrin Thpmpson EAW Elk RiVer, MN • �,��--�;_ Prepared by TQI : ��, `�� ' � April 2044 � 1 � � Y� �� E �� Hufh Rd ` ,� i39 mPn} ` I Ill�l°i QQ —'" � n1af7Q -. O sn N � � C � � I No Srale qTrt+'A�'1�./ �SWWIdR 6th-� Cranho� =�°� fr� 83 ,,7 o a�`'� r ' � �rL�l '9 i �,'• e � �9 ��th I7.�,� j -:.�h'� 181st,�� r� ii;,; � .o k� -�0 5 metl IJ ��3 Ransi �a�aily 3 `? � � "= 3�+side 0' l:sfy �dl7�' r� paeiy C�3Z�Q2 GDT, � ��ec e �d 2Q24 No-Buiid � 2D24 Build xxx�YYY ` � 3 -- � E Q � a si u� � I I — �a5 � — 4901490 R�tl ] 2 hlain 5!� fS5 mph3 � 3UJ�84 --' 5751575 -- 18-+th .� � Blyd :.� 3r /' ��n � R � Q E L �r I I �� Saulh Rd ' � f70 mph] , nlaf5—' I I �r�r,�a—, o a � C a Figure 9 - ��24 P.M. Peak Hvur Traific V'olumes Qnrin Thvmpsv� EAW Efk Ri�er, MN � r, ff� .� �.-..,�Y,�. Prepared by TD! , : � April 2�04 �� ' L.3Sf {l!'�SR idk25 c'a�nFy �at� V ��.�=--- — -- i !i I €��FTh Lry � � , � � 1 � � 1 1 1 � � 1 � � � � i � � H o Sca�€ �RAND A�NAI.L7f ;¢i ,..Utr� .:;$ �.; $ �st ;w� � p, _arv�s 189 `g __ Cuvnry f'a�ie N � �_-_---:: �... � ��;g3��`' ■ I ni�nta�� fa,�, [fl - � S'�-1T �r� �� '� �nu qy � •�' �� I I� y � � i i arrfrefd � g - . ...- - — -- o i �� ''�' 1 3 3 � � �_5' � 29t `;"., m a.�qtn .+a,� h �, i 1�'a�denhti�rg ;Parker'�� _ +� Junior Ffi�qh gem�rrt ' r �i ll chaal Fi Schma! � P� Oo� f l � � i llons�ith �t � o i, �I P� �.s; � . � � •°�th-a#�.- _ �.�•;'� e� ,y I _:j; _ y. , �t i-• � �y i _ _ ..�0�� r �� r � _ � �� 7�0�l9500 SBDOff406 = ? ^ �t!- r�: _....._ , -=�� , II _t . . �P�� .. i I � l � � p6�T+�pp � v a n h c� 'r .K'v t sr; B 3 ��:'$ L yj t3 � :�,Er F arde c, �� - F�.,� i � 1.� !cm ' � J a�� '�� 0.5 rrilj J� "`'�w O�{!L'3 F.and �.1�l�agy 3� Carama� O�;YO� G �T. nc �'� rh m Vikina 91rd �: k __- -4th .:t r}, � � � i8-4th kv L, egend 2�11 No-Build � 2011 Build Y.X)CfYYY � a » ,�..y ��: ''� �i S }: Y „ � r. Fic�ure �I � - 2�'I'f Da�ly Traffic llolumes i Drrin Thampsvn EAVI! i Elk River, MN � � �� '�- �,;..? Prepared by T[]I ;� � Apnl 2C104 �` _ ; � I Nq Scale � Ft,4t�3D MsNA.[.i� niyf7da � I� _� ill3 m �� • fL'� � �1 '�7i � :'n '+n ; 1k�deniwr� rparker` Juni�r l�igh �e��: II chaol ;� �ehod II fsons"3Sh � � �thaat_ . Pa+�. _ �I . . -tth :=� � "i,. _ ��` •�: ws� ��4tI3 .4".'Z t�i 'G �'St fieNf � -.. .'�.�i�L�'� 'I o „� 4-JlA=lY �.il3k' 1/i�L1I40 B�Yd p�. .:- - � ..�-:.-._�,__ y+�' r � * F .."'_ .._...�.._-.__' —. —_ 7�.. _;� �J-Fth Ln <nb,ar f ; --_�' � `f �': J' - - I, ,�'_—F2s`Ll ��-�. . -. --. q � � �' �. ��, pqrt' 1 ",+F `� �7 Sjt i1',, pa7 � 1 r '_ � { yi�i r I 7 �� ' � � ,�s . c'r� . � � o � rir , c � a � il �� II l 'T] � � �-� l8�tF1 :�Y �'Y £�= ■ � s pha►yl� , w�, ,sr I Flµ�-��'�� t�i 920Q1977D0 9Qp0i9i6Q0��— _ 1$ist.=�; j 7 �..�—� . . - - — T��-�-� r1.� ■� ' I anha�. "'•„ 83 +f �'.�� FG' � v�`#r,v /l�,y ,: i�:5: i.:: . �DiVV� iJ�T. �JC. ,�"� � ••�Ci1 :l'y I i �h � 1 �il 19 � �i,��,i �1.� kFm " 0."� iiy�l '' ��. � ��3 Pand !�ie "ia�y 3 C� Leger�d za24 �vo-s��id � 2a�4 �B�,�Ea X�}ilYYY Figure 1'1 - �4Z4 Uaiiy Traffi�c V�lumes (3rrin Thompson E�IW Elk River, MN • _ `,._>:. ,' �� 4; � �r�pared by T�I April 2DCi4 � � � � 1 � ' 1 , � � � � � � ' � � 1 � Table a— Forecasted PM Peak Hot�r LOS Results [ntersection �01'� 2011 202� 2024 No-Build BGiICS N�-8uilc! Build �H 1�9 and County Raad 12 E E F F Main St�ee#y Caunty Road 12 [Main Streetj and 8 C C D Count Road �3 Line Avenu� County Road �2 (Main 5tre�tj �nd ��, �,�, ��, ��; Count Road 4CJ �C�eveiand Street Caunty Rpad 13 (7win �akes Roadj �g' �G' AIB' AIC' and Count i�oad 40 C]avis Street) Cau�ty Ra�d 4� [i�a�is Streetj and n!� P,1�1 nla AIB' pro osed Narth Raad Caunty Rg�d 40 (C7avis Streety and nf� A!A' nfa AIA' ro osed 5outh Road The first LQ5 gives the L05 fpr the ir�t�rsect�on and the second L�S gives the Lc]S for the stopped approach. The Leve! of 5ervice Calculati�ns are in the Appendix. They include LDS calculatiQns for each intersectian appraach. Fc�r gene�al planning purposes, upgra�ing a#wo-lane raadway ta a fot�r-lane roadway should be consi�ered w��n the AADT is apprmximate�y 1 �,(]QD vehfcfes. An undivrded four-6ane raa�way s�au�d be cansidered for improvement to a divic�ed f�ur-lane roadway when the AADT app�aach�s 18,OOQ vehicles. Thes� are generai pGanning rules. TH �L1 aperates successfully south of TH 5 in Chaska as � two-lane roadway and it Garries aver 1�,�0[� v�hicles p�r d�y. The number af access points and the traffic cor�traE at the acc�:ss poi�ts generally dictat�s a corrid�r's capacity. The �iaily traf�ic forecasts ar� shown in Figur�s 10 and 11. The twa lane sections of Caunty Road 12 �Ma�n Street� and C�unty Road 13 �Line Aven�efTwir� L�kes Road} east of their intersectian are fQrecaste� to carry approximately 1�,fl00 vehicles under the 2024 build scenaria and 9000 vehicles urrder the na-build scenario. 5. Mifiga�r`vn lNeasures TH 169lCount Road 12 Main Street Intersection A!I of tF�e study interseGtions will operate at �05 D or better in the 2{]24 BuiEd pe�k hours exGept the inters�ctior� af TH 169 and Caunty Raad �� (M�in Str�etJ. This intersectian will aperate at an ur�acceptahle Leve! of Service E in 2011 whether the Orrin T�arr�pson Mames �re built Qr nat. 'Nlnl❑�T's Aprii 20D2 Nrghway 1Q71169 Corridor Plan dacumented strat�gies far prese�ring TH 169 as an Int�rregiona! Carridar from Roge�s ia Princetor�. The plan �ocumer�ts tt�irteer� patenti�l highw�y capaeity improvemer�# prajecfs �I�ng the carrida�. lJpgrading the TH 1�'�1County Road 12 (Main Street) inters�ctiar� tfl ar� inter�char�ge and adding an aver��ss at Schoal S#reet had the third b��t Benef�t-Cost Rat€o of the Orrin Thom,�son Nomes, Elk F2iver, MN 15 EAW Appendix A Traffrc Impac� Re,�art Apri� 2D04 ' � ' � 1 � � � � thirteen �rajects. The intersection v+rill operate acceptably if an int�rchange is cor�structed. Gount Raad 13 Twin Lakes Rc�ad ICaunt Ro�d 4� Da�is �treet Intersection Th�s intersection is �urr�r�tly a"y-intersec#ion" as shflwn in Figure 3, This is c�rrently acce�ta�le because there is [itt4e traffic on Caunty Raad 4D. !t is recommended that Caunty Road 4� �e recar��igured to tee inta Caun#y R�ad 1� at a 90 degree an�le fc�r safety purpc�ses. Count Road �� Main St�eet ICount Road 4(� Cfeveland Street In#ersectic�n This int�rse�tion will operate at an acceptable Level c�f Service �n �024 with �he existin� canfiguratian. Hawever, the increa�e in tra�fic with k�uild-out of the develapment cQmbined with the 55-mph speed Irmit will pr�:sent a safety hazar�. An e�stbound k�ypass lane shcruFd be built to County �tand�rds at �he i�tersection. Countv Road 12 (Main Street} �ast af Caunty I�oad 13 (Li�e Avenue� Na impravements to the roadway are curr�:ntfy necessary, ��t this roadway shauld be manitared over the nex� iw�nty years for prassible improvement. The 2024 �uild vol�mes may require additianal lan�s. County Road 13 (L�ne Avenue� nflrth�east af Ga�nty Raad 12 (Mair� Street} ' Nfl impro��ments to the roadway are currer�tly necessary, �ut t'�is roadway shaufd be morritored caver the next tweraty years for p�ss�ble impravement. The 2D�4 Build volumes may requ€re additia�ai ianes. � ' � Gaunt R�ad 4� Cleveland 5t�eetlDavis Street between Count Ro�d 12 and Caunty F�oad 13 This roadway v+rifl carry over 30�[l �e1�i�les per day when the develapment is �uilt-out. It should be paved as a two-lane rural roadway. 6. Cvnclusiorrs and Recommerrda��vns � drrrn Thompsan Homes is propasing tQ �uild a residentia! development on the Miske Properky dacated sca�th c�f �ounty Raad � 3�Twin Lakes RQadj �nd west of County Road 4q (Davis Str��t} in E3k Rdver, �VIN, The s�ie is currently �ccupied by arte farmstead, T�he proposed develapment will include 547 single family � hom�s and 174 town�omes. This repc�rk addresses the traffic impact af the p{opased �evelr pment on th�e area roadway n�twork. 1 � � Bas�d an the �bQv� trafFic ar��lysis, foll�wing are au� recammendatians: ■ TH 1691Cou�ty Raad 12 �Ma�n Street} IntersectiaR: 'Upgrade the in�ersectian to an interchar�ge pe� MnIDQT's A�ril 2QD� Nighw�y 10�I169 Corridor Plan. The ir�ters�ctian wiil be t�ver �apacity with ar withaut thi� deuelc�pmer�� in 2011. T�his dev�lopment is nat respansible far the conges�ion at thi$ intersection. �rrin T�rompson 1-fo.mes: Efk Rr�er, MN 1�6 EAW Appendix A ' Traffrc lmpact F2eporf April 2004 , � 1 � � � ' � � 1 � 1 � 1 � � � ' • Co�anty Road 13 (Twin Lakes Ro�d}ICounty Rr�ad 4D (aaUis Street) Intersec#ion; Recanfigure County Road �CJ t❑ tee i�to County Road 13 at a 9D degree angle. • Gaunty Road 12 �Main Street)l��unty Rc�ad 4fJ �CleVeland 5treetj Intersectian: Construct an east�oi�nd bypass lane to Cdunty standards at the intersection. • County Ro�� 1�(Main Street} east af County Ro�d 13 (�ine Avenue} and County Rc�ad � 3(Line Avenue} northeast of County Raad � 2(Main Str�et} Mo�itor these rc�adways o�rer the next twenty years far passibie improvement. 7he 2D24 Build volumes may require add�tiona{ fanes. • Caunty Raad 4D (CCeveland S#reetlaaWis S#reet� between Cou�ty F�aad 1� �nd Caunty Raad �3: This rQadway shc�uld be paved as a two-lane rural raadway. � Jrrin Thompson ff�mes, E!k River, IV1N 17 EAVf�Ap,nendrx A Tra�frc lmpaci R�por� Aprrf 2(�04 � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix E South Bound Start Cars & 2 Axle Time Bikes Trailer Lonq 05/03/22 * * * 01:00 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 04:00 0 3 3 05:00 0 15 8 06:00 0 34 17 07:00 0 82 19 08:00 0 87 20 09:00 0 69 14 10:00 0 20 15 11:00 0 44 10 12 PM 0 40 9 13:00 0 31 9 14:00 0 49 17 15:00 0 88 37 16:00 1 76 19 17:00 0 72 20 18:00 0 50 13 19:00 1 45 20 20:00 0 38 12 21:00 1 25 2 22:00 0 8 2 23:00 0 8 0 Total 3 884 266 Percent 02% 71.1% 21.4% AM 08:00 08:00 Peak Vol. 87 20 PM 16:00 15:00 15:00 Peak Vol. 1 88 37 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 1 Site Code: 4 Station ID: CH 40--570ft north of 191st JCT signs--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not Buses 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 54 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 106 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 111 2 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 91 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 41 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 60 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 56 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 48 1 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 75 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 5 138 1 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 93 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 12 29 8 1 9 3 0 0 0 8 21 1244 1.0°/a 2.3°/a 0.6°/a 0.1 °/a 0.7°/a 02°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.6°/a 1.7°/a 09:00 10:00 05:00 09:00 06:00 15:00 16:00 14:00 14:00 16:00 12:00 4 4 2 1 2 2 07:00 10:00 08:00 12:00 15:00 15:00 1 5 138 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 2 Site Code: 4 Station ID: CH 40--570ft north of 191st JCT signs--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bounc Start Time 05/04/22 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 os:oo 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Total Percent AM Peak Vol . PM Peak Vol . Cars & 2 Axle Bikes Trailer Lonq 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 1 16 11 0 44 22 0 85 23 0 86 28 0 70 23 0 33 18 0 30 18 0 42 14 0 38 12 1 46 17 0 87 28 1 65 20 1 93 26 0 62 26 3 47 10 0 36 14 0 24 5 0 9 1 0 2 2 7 922 321 0.5°/a 68.7°/a 23.9°/a 05:00 1 19:00 3 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 0.6°/a 08:00 08:00 07:00 86 28 1 17:00 15:00 15:00 93 28 3 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 15 0 8 3 0 0 0 9 21 2.1 °/a 1.1 °/a 0.0°/a 0.6°/a 02°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.7°/a 1.6°/a 07:00 10:00 3 2 14:00 13:00 4 3 05:00 1 12:00 12:00 1 3 Total 2 1 1 z 5 29 69 114 119 98 55 55 63 56 77 129 90 125 94 64 50 29 11 4 1342 06:00 04:00 08:00 1 1 119 12:00 15:00 15:00 1 7 129 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Page 3 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Site Code: 4 Station ID: CH 40--570ft north of 191st JCT signs--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bound Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not Time Bikes Trailer Lonq Buses 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe Total 05/05/22 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 01:00 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 04:00 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 05:00 0 17 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 06:00 0 48 28 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 83 o�:oo 0 84 30 1 5 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 123 08:00 0 73 31 3 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 114 09:00 1 67 10 1 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 88 10:00 0 31 16 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 54 11:00 0 44 16 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 69 12 PM 0 41 12 0 4 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 62 13:00 1 54 17 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 81 14:00 0 47 14 1 4 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 71 15:00 3 82 42 3 5 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 9 150 16:00 2 81 20 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 108 17:00 0 82 27 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 115 18:00 2 56 16 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 19:00 0 39 14 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 20:00 0 43 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 21:00 0 25 9 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 22:00 0 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 23:00 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Total 9 939 330 13 53 11 0 6 9 2 0 0 6 26 1404 Percent 0.6°/a 66.9°/a 23.5°/a 0.9°/a 3.8% 0.8°/a 0.0°/a 0.4°/a 0.6°/a 0.1 °/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.4°/a 1.9°/a AM 09:00 07:00 08:00 08:00 09:00 06:00 07:00 10:00 07:00 09:00 08:00 07:00 Peak Vol. 1 84 31 3 6 1 1 2 2 1 3 123 PM 15:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 13:00 15:00 12:00 12:00 15:00 15:00 Peak Vol. 3 82 42 3 5 2 1 3 1 9 150 Grand 19 2745 917 33 110 34 1 23 15 2 0 0 23 68 3990 Total Percent 0.5°/a 68.8°/a 23.0°/a 0.8°/a 2.8°/a 0.9°/a 0.0°/a 0.6°/a 0.4°/a 0.1 °/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.6°/a 1.7°/a SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 4 Site Code: 4 Station ID: CH 40--570ft north of 191st JCT signs--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined North Bound Start Time 05/03/22 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 os:oo 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Total Percent AM Peak Vol . PM Peak Vol . Cars & 2 Axle Bikes Trailer Lonq 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 4 1 0 12 5 0 34 10 0 56 24 0 43 24 0 55 34 0 25 12 0 24 8 0 15 12 0 42 14 0 37 21 0 71 37 1 78 53 0 64 28 0 44 24 1 33 14 0 17 10 0 14 3 0 4 2 0 2 4 2 678 342 02°/a 58.0°/a 29.3°/a 07:00 56 16:00 16:00 1 78 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 6 0 1 1 0 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 1.8°/a 09:00 09:00 34 6 16:00 14:00 53 3 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 7 2 0 0 � o 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 9 0 4 12 0 0 0 0 20 6.8% 0.8°/a 0.0°/a 0.3°/a 1.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 1.7°/a 09:00 09:00 7 2 15:00 15:00 11 2 11:00 08:00 1 2 13:00 14:00 1 2 Total 1 2 3 5 17 51 92 74 105 43 39 35 63 69 133 148 99 75 52 30 19 7 6 1168 07:00 09:00 2 105 15:00 16:00 7 148 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 5 Site Code: 4 Station ID: CH 40--570ft north of 191st JCT signs--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined North Bound Start Time 05/04/22 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 os:oo os:oo 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Total Percent AM Peak Vol . PM Peak Vol . Cars & 2 Axle Bikes Trailer Lonq 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 11 8 0 30 10 0 54 27 0 50 21 0 60 30 0 19 16 0 30 25 0 31 13 1 23 10 2 47 19 1 74 31 2 84 68 0 82 37 0 40 19 1 28 16 0 29 3 0 13 5 0 8 1 0 3 2 7 722 362 0.5°/a 56.6°/a 28.4°/a 09:00 60 14:00 16:00 2 84 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 7 0 1 0 1 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 23 1.8°/a 09:00 09:00 30 7 16:00 14:00 68 3 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 � � o 0 2 1 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 3 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 6 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 14 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 10 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 18 1 17 15 1 0 0 0 16 7.3% 1.4°/a 0.1 °/a 1.3°/a 12°/a 0.1 °/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 1.3°/a 08:00 08:00 11:00 10:00 07:00 09:00 9 2 1 2 2 1 16:00 13:00 16:00 13:00 14 3 3 2 Total 1 1 3 2 3 22 43 91 85 112 43 64 53 48 85 122 177 133 64 56 34 18 10 5 1275 09:00 09:00 4 112 14:00 16:00 4 177 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Page 6 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Site Code: 4 Station ID: CH 40--570ft north of 191st JCT signs--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined North Bound Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not Time Bikes Trailer Lonq Buses 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe Total 05/05/22 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 01:00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 02:00 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 03:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 04:00 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 05:00 0 5 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 06:00 0 32 14 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 51 07:00 0 51 27 5 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 89 08:00 0 47 22 4 10 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 86 os:oo 0 67 28 6 s o 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 � 116 10:00 0 23 12 1 5 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 44 11:00 0 33 15 1 3 4 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 59 12 PM 0 32 11 0 8 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 57 13:00 0 28 15 1 5 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 55 14:00 0 48 24 4 11 4 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 1 98 15:00 0 85 39 4 15 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 153 16:00 2 97 50 3 s 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 166 17:00 0 75 37 0 16 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 133 18:00 1 37 21 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 19:00 0 37 9 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 20:00 0 21 11 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 21:00 0 15 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 22:00 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 23:00 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Total 3 753 358 30 115 19 0 16 21 0 0 0 0 13 1328 Percent 02°/a 56.7°/a 27.0°/a 2.3°/a 8.7°/a 1.4°/a 0.0°/a 12°/a 1.6°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 1.0°/a AM 09:00 09:00 09:00 08:00 11:00 09:00 09:00 06:00 09:00 Peak Vol. 67 28 6 10 4 3 3 1 116 PM 16:00 16:00 16:00 14:00 17:00 14:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 Peak Grand 12 2153 1062 74 288 46 1 37 48 1 0 0 0 49 3771 Total Percent 0.3°/a 57.1 °/a 282°/a 2.0°/a 7.6°/a 12°/a 0.0°/a 1.0°/a 1.3°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 1.3°/a SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 1 Site Code: 1 Station ID: CH 40--542ft N of CSAH 12 NPZ sign--East side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bounc Start Time 05/03/22 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 o�:oo os:oo 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Total Percent AM Peak Vol . PM Peak Vol . Cars & 2 Axle Bikes Trailer Lonq 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 15 5 0 23 16 0 59 28 0 84 24 0 48 29 0 40 34 0 28 11 0 27 15 0 22 14 0 26 10 0 28 18 0 54 54 0 46 43 0 43 16 2 40 10 2 21 10 0 25 5 0 15 1 0 11 0 0 4 0 4 663 344 0.3°/a 51.0°/a 26.5°/a 07:00 84 18:00 15:00 2 54 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0.9°/a 09:00 09:00 34 1 15:00 15:00 54 6 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 21 0 0 � o 0 0 0 1 0 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 15 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 � o 11 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 s o 0 2 2 1 0 0 1 2 9 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 14 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 19 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 19 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 216 3 0 22 7 1 0 0 8 20 16.6°/a 02°/a 0.0°/a 1.7°/a 0.5°/a 0.1 °/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.6°/a 1.5°/a 07:00 21 15:00 16:00 19 2 09:00 09:00 3 2 16:00 12:00 12:00 4 2 1 Total 0 1 1 7 23 53 104 131 92 96 56 56 53 49 66 139 120 76 63 42 39 16 13 4 1300 07:00 05:00 07:00 1 1 131 12:00 15:00 15:00 1 4 139 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 2 Site Code: 1 Station ID: CH 40--542ft N of CSAH 12 NPZ sign--East side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bounc Start Time 05/04/22 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 � 5:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Total Percent AM Peak Vol . PM Peak Vol . Cars & 2 Axle Bikes Trailer Lonq 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 16 1 1 29 11 0 60 29 0 93 26 0 51 27 0 40 37 0 17 9 0 34 13 0 33 19 0 26 11 1 27 22 0 61 48 1 44 33 1 40 30 0 36 17 3 19 14 0 18 6 0 13 4 0 6 1 0 3 0 7 670 361 0.5°/a 49.9°/a 26.9°/a 05:00 1 19:00 3 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1.0°/a 07:00 09:00 08:00 93 37 1 15:00 15:00 15:00 61 48 9 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 25 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 21 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 10 1 0 4 2 0 0 0 1 1 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 10 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 18 � o 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 10 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 238 6 0 24 2 1 0 0 6 15 17.7°/a 0.4°/a 0.0°/a 1.8°/a 0.1 °/a 0.1 °/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.4°/a 1.1 °/a 07:00 10:00 25 1 15:00 16:00 18 2 11:00 4 12:00 12:00 15:00 4 2 1 Total 1 2 0 8 19 59 114 149 105 92 39 66 71 52 64 138 102 90 65 45 32 17 9 4 1343 06:00 08:00 07:00 1 4 149 12:00 17:00 15:00 1 3 138 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Page 3 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Site Code: 1 Station ID: CH 40--542ft N of CSAH 12 NPZ sign--East side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bound Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not Time Bikes Trailer Lonq Buses 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe Total 05/05/22 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 01:00 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 02:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 03:00 0 5 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 04:00 0 10 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 05:00 0 33 12 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 06:00 0 55 28 3 23 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 o�:oo 0 90 2� � 30 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 154 08:00 0 28 50 1 28 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 113 09:00 0 27 60 0 19 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 109 10:00 1 19 23 1 18 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 64 11:00 0 23 25 0 8 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 62 12 PM 0 20 23 0 17 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 64 13:00 1 18 28 2 16 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 71 14:00 0 8 33 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 54 15:00 0 27 69 7 25 1 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 3 139 16:00 2 36 43 0 23 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 108 17:00 1 35 31 1 17 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 87 18:00 1 23 24 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 19:00 0 28 19 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 20:00 0 14 13 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 31 21:00 0 15 5 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 22:00 0 16 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 23:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total 6 538 524 16 280 1 0 23 5 3 0 0 6 20 1422 Percent 0.4°/a 37.8°/a 36.8°/a 1.1 °/a 19.7°/a 0.1 °/a 0.0°/a 1.6°/a 0.4°/a 02°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.4°/a 1.4°/a AM 10:00 07:00 09:00 06:00 07:00 06:00 07:00 07:00 09:00 08:00 07:00 Peak Vol. 1 90 60 3 30 3 1 1 1 5 154 PM 16:00 16:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 12:00 15:00 12:00 13:00 15:00 Peak Grand 17 1871 1229 41 734 10 0 69 14 5 0 0 20 55 4065 Total Percent 0.4°/a 46.0°/a 302°/a 1.0°/a 18.1 °/a 02°/a 0.0°/a 1.7°/a 0.3°/a 0.1 °/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.5°/a 1.4°/a SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 4 Site Code: 1 Station ID: CH 40--542ft N of CSAH 12 NPZ sign--East side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined North Bound Start Time 05/03/22 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 os:oo os:oo 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Total Percent AM Peak Vol . PM Peak Vol . Cars & 2 Axle Bikes Trailer Lonq 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 19 8 0 25 19 1 50 41 2 19 15 0 13 15 0 15 11 2 16 8 0 30 18 1 38 22 0 50 45 1 57 42 0 55 34 0 40 32 2 35 28 1 28 16 0 19 15 0 15 7 0 3 2 10 530 381 0.8°/a 43.3°/a 31.1 °/a 09:00 2 12:00 2 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 1.5°/a 08:00 08:00 08:00 50 41 5 16:00 15:00 15:00 57 45 5 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 14 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 19 3 0 � 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 11 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 33 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 21 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 19 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 228 8 0 19 12 1 0 0 1 17 18.6% 0.7°/a 0.0°/a 1.6°/a 1.0°/a 0.1 °/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.1 °/a 1.4°/a 09:00 09:00 19 3 16:00 12:00 33 2 07:00 07:00 09:00 3 3 1 17:00 14:00 3 2 Total 2 0 4 0 2 3 40 62 120 so 41 34 44 61 78 124 140 115 94 74 60 36 25 6 1225 08:00 08:00 4 120 17:00 16:00 16:00 1 5 140 North Bound Start Cars & 2 Axle Time Bikes Trailer Lonq 05/04/22 0 2 0 01:00 0 2 0 02:00 0 1 1 03:00 0 0 0 04:00 0 2 0 05:00 0 1 2 06:00 0 17 9 07:00 0 25 15 os:oo 0 49 44 09:00 0 14 18 10:00 0 13 10 11:00 0 17 17 12 PM 0 18 24 13:00 1 28 12 14:00 1 34 34 15:00 1 47 47 16:00 2 83 44 17:00 0 61 46 18:00 0 27 21 19:00 0 38 16 20:00 1 31 18 21:00 0 14 6 22:00 0 16 8 23:00 0 8 2 Total 6 548 394 Percent 0.5°/a 432°/a 31.1°/a AM 08:00 08:00 Peak Vol. 49 44 PM 16:00 16:00 15:00 Peak SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 5 Site Code: 1 Station ID: CH 40--542ft N of CSAH 12 NPZ sign--East side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not Buses 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe Total 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 2 7 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 53 6 22 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 124 1 s o 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 47 0 8 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 10 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 47 1 10 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 56 0 11 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 56 4 16 1 0 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 97 6 17 2 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 3 128 2 41 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 178 0 22 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 132 0 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 18 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 24 237 7 1 18 16 7 0 0 0 10 1268 1.9°/a 18.7°/a 0.6°/a 0.1 °/a 1.4°/a 1.3°/a 0.6°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.8°/a 08:00 08:00 05:00 07:00 09:00 08:00 09:00 04:00 08:00 15:00 16:00 15:00 16:00 12:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 North Bound Start Cars & 2 Axle Time Bikes Trailer Lonq 05/05/22 0 4 1 01:00 0 1 0 02:00 0 1 2 03:00 0 0 0 04:00 0 1 0 05:00 0 2 1 06:00 0 16 7 07:00 0 23 23 os:oo 0 24 64 os:oo 2 2� z� 10:00 0 11 20 11:00 0 14 18 12 PM 0 28 13 13:00 1 16 36 14:00 2 16 33 15:00 1 42 63 16:00 3 61 52 17:00 1 37 61 18:00 0 30 34 19:00 1 36 28 20:00 0 19 24 21:00 0 13 19 22:00 0 13 12 23:00 0 7 5 Total 11 436 543 Percent 0.8°/a 322°/a 402°/a AM 09:00 08:00 08:00 Peak Vol. 2 24 64 PM 16:00 16:00 15:00 Peak Vol. 3 61 63 Grand 2� 1514 1318 Total Percent 0.7% 39.4% 34.3% SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 6 Site Code: 1 Station ID: CH 40--542ft N of CSAH 12 NPZ sign--East side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not Buses 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe Total 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 4 8 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 62 7 25 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 126 o �5 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 �� 2 12 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 50 1 7 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 2 48 0 11 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 56 1 16 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 76 4 15 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 77 7 33 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 152 3 39 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 166 0 25 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 127 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 76 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 31 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 32 262 13 0 18 18 0 0 0 0 19 1352 2.4°/a 19.4% 1.0°/a 0.0°/a 1.3°/a 1.3°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 1.4°/a 08:00 08:00 09:00 09:00 11:00 07:00 08:00 7 25 2 4 4 2 126 15:00 16:00 16:00 13:00 12:00 15:00 16:00 7 39 3 2 2 4 166 74 727 28 1 55 46 8 0 0 1 46 3845 1.9°/a 18.9°/a 0.7°/a 0.0°/a 1.4°/a 12°/a 02°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 12°/a SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 1 Site Code: 2 Station ID: CH 40--370ft South of 190th Power pole-east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bounc Start Time 05/03/22 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 o�:oo os:oo 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Total Percent AM Peak Vol . PM Peak Vol . Cars & 2 Axle Bikes Trailer Lonq 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 15 2 0 19 16 0 46 34 0 60 36 0 35 37 0 31 42 0 20 14 0 24 16 0 21 16 0 16 14 0 24 17 0 49 56 0 37 46 0 36 21 2 29 21 2 13 17 0 15 11 0 8 6 0 7 4 0 2 2 4 509 429 0.3°/a 41.4°/a 34.9°/a 07:00 60 18:00 15:00 2 49 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0.9°/a 09:00 09:00 42 2 15:00 15:00 56 6 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 � o 0 0 0 1 0 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 14 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 3 12 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 s o 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 16 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 22 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1s 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 231 5 1 18 7 0 0 0 7 8 18.8% 0.4°/a 0.1 °/a 1.5°/a 0.6°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.6°/a 0.7°/a 07:00 06:00 09:00 09:00 24 1 2 2 15:00 16:00 14:00 16:00 12:00 22 3 1 4 2 Total 0 1 0 6 22 50 101 122 89 96 51 56 50 38 65 134 111 70 63 41 33 14 13 4 1230 07:00 09:00 07:00 1 3 122 12:00 14:00 15:00 1 2 134 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 2 Site Code: 2 Station ID: CH 40--370ft South of 190th Power pole-east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bounc Start Time 05/04/22 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Total Percent AM Peak Vol . PM Peak Vol . Cars & 2 Axle Bikes Trailer Lonq 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 13 2 1 20 17 0 29 53 0 51 56 0 29 50 0 24 56 0 10 12 0 22 10 0 26 22 0 18 17 1 23 18 0 44 58 1 27 45 2 30 29 0 25 27 3 13 18 0 12 11 0 12 4 0 6 1 0 0 4 8 437 513 0.6°/a 342°/a 40.1 °/a 05:00 1 19:00 3 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0.6°/a 07:00 07:00 09:00 51 56 1 15:00 15:00 15:00 44 58 6 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 27 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 4 20 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 10 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 9 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 10 1 0 3 3 0 0 0 1 0 10 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 10 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 20 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 12 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 249 13 0 26 4 0 0 0 9 11 19.5% 1.0°/a 0.0°/a 2.0°/a 0.3°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.7°/a 0.9°/a 06:00 09:00 28 2 15:00 16:00 20 3 11:00 04:00 5 1 12:00 12:00 3 3 Total 1 2 0 7 17 58 113 141 105 97 33 53 66 48 56 130 95 81 66 44 33 18 9 5 1278 06:00 07:00 07:00 1 4 141 12:00 17:00 15:00 1 2 130 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Page 3 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Site Code: 2 Station ID: CH 40--370ft South of 190th Power pole-east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bound Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not Time Bikes Trailer Lonq Buses 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe Total 05/05/22 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 01:00 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 4 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 04:00 0 10 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 05:00 0 28 15 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 06:00 0 42 33 3 27 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 o�:oo 0 71 a2 � 33 0 0 � 0 2 0 0 0 0 150 08:00 0 30 53 1 23 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 110 09:00 0 33 57 0 16 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 108 10:00 0 22 16 1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 58 11:00 0 22 22 0 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 54 12 PM 0 19 22 0 16 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 61 13:00 1 32 20 1 11 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 70 14:00 0 9 28 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 15:00 0 36 55 5 23 1 0 3 3 0 0 0 1 2 129 16:00 2 40 38 2 19 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 103 17:00 1 33 33 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 85 18:00 1 23 22 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 19:00 0 28 16 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 54 20:00 0 19 10 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 21:00 0 12 7 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 22:00 0 14 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 23:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total 5 533 503 15 264 4 0 16 9 2 0 0 7 6 1364 Percent 0.4°/a 39.1 °/a 36.9°/a 1.1 °/a 19.4°/a 0.3°/a 0.0°/a 12°/a 0.7°/a 0.1 °/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.5°/a 0.4°/a AM 07:00 09:00 06:00 07:00 11:00 06:00 10:00 07:00 09:00 08:00 07:00 Peak Vol. 71 57 3 33 1 3 2 2 1 1 150 PM 16:00 16:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 13:00 13:00 12:00 12:00 15:00 15:00 Peak Vol. 2 40 55 5 23 1 3 3 1 2 129 Grand 17 1479 1445 34 744 22 1 60 20 2 0 0 23 25 3872 Total Percent 0.4°/a 382°/a 37.3°/a 0.9°/a 192°/a 0.6°/a 0.0°/a 1.5°/a 0.5°/a 0.1 °/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.6°/a 0.6°/a North Bound Start Cars & 2 Axle Time Bikes Trailer Lonq 05/03/22 0 1 0 01:00 0 0 0 02:00 0 1 2 03:00 0 0 0 04:00 0 1 1 05:00 0 3 1 06:00 0 21 7 07:00 0 39 13 os:oo 0 73 1s os:oo 1 3s 19 10:00 0 24 7 11:00 0 23 6 12 PM 1 21 11 13:00 1 41 10 14:00 0 54 8 15:00 0 81 26 16:00 1 95 39 17:00 0 79 21 18:00 0 55 20 19:00 2 56 10 20:00 1 38 11 21:00 0 29 4 22:00 0 18 5 23:00 0 4 2 Total 7 792 241 Percent 0.6°/a 68.6°/a 20.9°/a AM 09:00 08:00 09:00 Peak Vol. 1 73 19 PM 19:00 16:00 16:00 Peak SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 4 Site Code: 2 Station ID: CH 40--370ft South of 190th Power pole-east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not Buses 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe Total 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 3 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 61 5 6 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 106 o s 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 ss 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 2 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 41 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 58 2 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 70 5 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 119 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 140 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1os 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 18 50 7 0 10 15 0 0 0 0 15 1155 1.6°/a 4.3°/a 0.6°/a 0.0°/a 0.9°/a 1.3°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 1.3°/a 08:00 08:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 09:00 08:00 15:00 20:00 12:00 17:00 12:00 17:00 16:00 North Bound Start Cars & 2 Axle Time Bikes Trailer Lonq 05/04/22 0 2 0 01:00 0 2 0 02:00 0 1 2 03:00 0 0 0 04:00 0 2 1 05:00 0 2 3 06:00 0 15 7 o�:o0 0 28 10 os:oo 0 75 21 09:00 0 37 16 10:00 0 12 9 11:00 0 31 7 12 PM 0 32 15 13:00 1 30 9 14:00 3 50 16 15:00 1 78 30 16:00 2 107 44 17:00 1 102 29 18:00 0 44 17 19:00 0 43 14 20:00 1 45 12 21:00 0 21 6 22:00 0 21 4 23:00 0 10 2 Total 9 790 274 Percent 0.8°/a 65.9o�a 22 go�a AM 08:00 08:00 Peak Vol. 75 21 PM 14:00 16:00 16:00 Peak SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 5 Site Code: 2 Station ID: CH 40--370ft South of 190th Power pole-east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not Buses 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe Total 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 o s 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 3 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 45 4 9 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 112 2 3 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 63 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 51 1 5 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 50 3 4 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 79 5 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 122 2 6 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 167 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 143 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 22 68 6 1 8 16 1 0 0 0 3 1198 1.8°/a 5.7°/a 0.5°/a 0.1 °/a 0.7°/a 1.3°/a 0.1 °/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.3°/a 08:00 08:00 08:00 05:00 09:00 07:00 09:00 09:00 08:00 15:00 17:00 14:00 16:00 13:00 16:00 16:00 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Page 6 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Site Code: 2 Station ID: CH 40--370ft South of 190th Power pole-east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined North Bound Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not Time Bikes Trailer Lonq Buses 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe Total 05/05/22 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 01:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 02:00 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 05:00 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 06:00 0 21 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 33 07:00 0 41 11 5 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 62 os:oo 0 77 19 5 5 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 111 os:oo o sa 15 � 6 0 0 � 3 0 0 0 0 o so 10:00 0 29 8 0 4 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 45 11:00 0 29 8 0 1 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 45 12 PM 0 33 12 0 5 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 53 13:00 0 52 11 1 4 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 73 14:00 0 43 13 3 5 1 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 2 73 15:00 0 91 29 6 11 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 146 16:00 2 95 41 2 4 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 150 17:00 0 91 20 0 9 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 124 18:00 1 61 18 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 19:00 0 55 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 68 20:00 0 40 8 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 21:00 0 28 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 22:00 0 22 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 23:00 0 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Total 3 882 254 26 65 9 0 14 24 0 0 0 0 14 1291 Percent 02°/a 68.3°/a 19.7°/a 2.0°/a 5.0°/a 0.7°/a 0.0°/a 1.1 °/a 1.9°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 1.1 °/a AM 08:00 08:00 07:00 09:00 07:00 11:00 09:00 08:00 08:00 Peak Vol. 77 19 5 6 1 2 3 2 111 PM 16:00 16:00 16:00 15:00 15:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 Peak Grand 19 2464 769 66 183 22 1 32 55 1 0 0 0 32 3644 Total Percent 0.5°/a 67.6°/a 21.1 °/a 1.8°/a 5.0°/a 0.6°/a 0.0°/a 0.9°/a 1.5°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.9°/a South Bound Start Cars & 2 Axle Time Bikes Trailer Lonq 05/03/22 * * * 01:00 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 03:00 0 1 0 04:00 0 5 2 05:00 0 13 8 06:00 0 27 11 o�:oo 0 51 22 08:00 0 48 19 09:00 0 45 27 10:00 0 13 15 11:00 0 22 13 12 PM 0 18 11 13:00 0 18 9 14:00 0 29 15 15:00 0 64 42 16:00 0 49 31 17:00 0 34 10 18:00 1 32 6 19:00 0 26 12 20:00 0 22 11 21:00 0 15 1 22:00 0 6 0 23:00 0 5 0 Total 1 543 265 Percent 0.1% 582% 28.4% AM 07:00 09:00 Peak Vol. 51 27 PM 18:00 15:00 15:00 Peak Vol. 1 64 42 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 1 Site Code: 3 Station ID: CH 40--600ft south of 191st power pole-east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not Buses 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 10 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 51 o s o 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 � s� o s o 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 � �s 2 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 82 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 40 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 33 0 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 54 7 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 124 2 8 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 98 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 o s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 11 80 3 1 10 2 0 0 0 7 10 933 12°/a 8.6°/a 0.3°/a 0.1 °/a 1.1 °/a 02°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.8°/a 1.1 °/a 09:00 06:00 06:00 08:00 06:00 15:00 15:00 14:00 14:00 16:00 12:00 7 10 1 1 5 1 07:00 06:00 09:00 12:00 19:00 15:00 1 3 124 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 2 Site Code: 3 Station ID: CH 40--600ft south of 191st power pole-east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bounc Start Time 05/04/22 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 o�:oo os:oo 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Total Percent AM Peak Vol . PM Peak Vol . Cars & 2 Axle Bikes Trailer Lonq 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 12 8 0 35 21 0 65 20 0 51 22 0 51 21 0 10 8 0 12 11 0 30 11 0 19 9 1 30 11 0 70 36 1 42 32 2 39 21 0 36 17 2 19 9 0 19 7 0 13 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 6 560 271 0.6°/a 56.8°/a 27.5°/a 07:00 65 17:00 15:00 2 70 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0.7°/a 08:00 09:00 22 1 15:00 15:00 36 5 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 � s o 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 3 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 9 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 9 0 17 3 2 0 0 7 13 92% 0.9°/a 0.0°/a 1.7°/a 0.3°/a 02°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.7°/a 1.3°/a 07:00 06:00 9 1 14:00 14:00 9 2 06:00 07:00 1 1 12:00 12:00 3 3 Total 1 1 0 3 4 24 67 96 85 85 29 29 54 35 58 118 84 70 61 34 28 14 3 3 986 06:00 08:00 07:00 1 3 96 12:00 17:00 15:00 1 2 118 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Page 3 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Site Code: 3 Station ID: CH 40--600ft south of 191st power pole-east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bound Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not Time Bikes Trailer Lonq Buses 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe Total 05/05/22 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 01:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 04:00 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 05:00 0 17 10 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 06:00 0 39 21 2 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 o�:oo 0 69 23 0 � � o 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 108 os:oo 0 30 40 2 12 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 � ss 09:00 0 44 30 0 12 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 91 10:00 0 21 9 0 11 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 45 11:00 0 31 7 1 6 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 49 12 PM 0 20 14 0 11 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 49 13:00 1 26 12 0 10 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 55 14:00 0 29 12 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 15:00 0 55 41 5 15 1 0 4 3 0 0 0 1 1 126 16:00 2 50 32 2 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 95 17:00 0 52 17 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 18:00 2 30 10 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 19:00 0 23 8 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 20:00 0 19 6 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 21:00 0 15 7 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 22:00 0 9 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 23:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 5 591 303 13 133 5 0 18 8 2 0 0 7 9 1094 Percent 0.5°/a 54.0°/a 27.7°/a 12°/a 122°/a 0.5°/a 0.0°/a 1.6°/a 0.7°/a 02°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.6°/a 0.8°/a AM 07:00 08:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 08:00 10:00 07:00 09:00 07:00 07:00 Peak Vol. 69 40 2 12 1 3 2 2 1 3 108 PM 16:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 13:00 15:00 15:00 12:00 12:00 15:00 Peak Grand 12 1694 839 31 304 17 1 45 13 4 0 0 21 32 3013 Total Percent 0.4°/a 56.2°/a 27.8°/a 1.0°/a 10.1 °/a 0.6°/a 0.0°/a 1.5°/a 0.4°/a 0.1 °/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.7°/a 1.1 °/a SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 4 Site Code: 3 Station ID: CH 40--600ft south of 191st power pole-east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined North Bound Start Time 05/03/22 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 o�:oo os:oo os:oo 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Total Percent AM Peak Vol . PM Peak Vol . Cars & 2 Axle Bikes Trailer Lonq 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 21 5 o zs zo 0 48 29 0 34 21 0 17 7 0 12 4 0 10 4 0 25 5 0 21 14 0 49 26 1 54 27 0 45 15 0 19 17 1 22 11 0 14 7 0 9 6 0 8 0 0 0 2 2 440 223 02°/a 512°/a 25.9°/a 08:00 48 16:00 16:00 1 54 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 3 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 2.1 °/a 08:00 08:00 29 4 16:00 15:00 27 6 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 � o � 2 0 0 0 0 3 7 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 7 1 10 11 0 0 0 0 10 16.0% 0.8°/a 0.1 °/a 12°/a 1.3°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 12°/a 07:00 06:00 08:00 06:00 07:00 9 1 1 1 2 15:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 18 1 2 2 Total 0 2 0 1 9 34 65 91 69 30 21 23 39 46 102 104 74 49 42 27 18 11 3 860 07:00 08:00 3 91 16:00 16:00 2 104 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 5 Site Code: 3 Station ID: CH 40--600ft south of 191st power pole-east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined North Bound Start Time 05/04/22 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 o�:oo os:oo 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Total Percent AM Peak Vol . PM Peak Vol . Cars & 2 Axle Bikes Trailer Lonq 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 4 5 0 17 7 0 26 17 0 47 31 1 35 22 0 11 9 0 16 11 0 14 9 1 19 7 3 33 13 1 49 29 2 60 26 0 56 25 0 21 13 0 20 4 0 24 5 0 8 2 0 9 0 0 0 2 9 472 237 0.9°/a 48.9°/a 24.6°/a 05:00 1 14:00 3 Buses 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 4 1 0 0 0 1 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 2.1 °/a 08:00 08:00 08:00 47 31 4 16:00 15:00 15:00 60 29 5 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 13 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 7 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 18 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 26 1 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 23 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 16 0 18 15 1 0 0 0 18 16.5% 1.7°/a 0.0°/a 1.9°/a 1.6°/a 0.1 °/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 1.9°/a 09:00 08:00 15 2 16:00 13:00 26 2 09:00 07:00 09:00 2 2 1 16:00 13:00 5 2 Total 1 1 2 1 5 17 30 58 99 81 27 35 29 42 64 108 124 108 45 33 31 12 10 2 965 05:00 08:00 4 99 15:00 16:00 2 124 North Bound Start Cars & 2 Axle Time Bikes Trailer Lonq 05/05/22 0 3 0 01:00 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 04:00 0 1 0 05:00 0 2 1 06:00 0 19 6 07:00 1 2s 17 os:oo 0 45 38 os:oo o ao zz 10:00 0 16 8 11:00 0 20 6 12 PM 0 19 9 13:00 0 21 16 14:00 0 21 10 15:00 0 53 32 16:00 2 60 31 17:00 0 58 19 18:00 0 27 18 19:00 0 29 8 20:00 0 13 7 21:00 0 10 9 22:00 0 7 2 23:00 0 2 1 Total 3 494 260 Percent 0.3°/a 48.4°/a 25.5°/a AM 07:00 08:00 08:00 Peak Vol. 1 45 38 PM 16:00 16:00 15:00 Peak Vol. 2 60 32 Grand 14 1406 720 Total Percent 0.5% 49.4% 25.3% SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 6 Site Code: 3 Station ID: CH 40--600ft south of 191st power pole-east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not Buses 6 Tire Sinqle Sinqle Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classe Total 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 31 4 10 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 63 6 8 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100 � 19 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 2 so 0 4 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 6 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 9 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 41 1 9 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 53 4 15 2 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 60 9 27 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 124 2 19 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 17 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 98 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 178 11 0 17 25 0 0 0 0 6 1021 2.6°/a 17.4% 1.1 °/a 0.0°/a 1.7°/a 2.4°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.6°/a 08:00 09:00 10:00 09:00 09:00 09:00 08:00 6 19 2 3 3 2 100 15:00 15:00 14:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 15:00 9 27 2 4 5 1 124 65 475 34 1 45 51 1 0 0 0 34 2846 2.3°/a 16.7°/a 12°/a 0.0°/a 1.6°/a 1.8°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 0.0°/a 12°/a SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 1 Site Code: 4 Station ID: CH 40--570ft north of 191st JCT signs--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Soeed in Pace 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 0 0 0 0 3 8 19 23 27 6 15 17 18 13 54 16 12 3 7 13 5 4 0 0 0 2 2 13 34 54 38 18 25 14 15 26 46 32 33 24 19 21 13 3 0 0 0 2 15 20 38 30 23 10 18 17 7 28 33 51 35 23 31 15 9 2 0 0 0 1 4 9 15 3 3 5 2 7 8 7 5 8 9 14 8 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 26 54 106 111 91 41 60 56 48 75 138 109 93 66 66 51 29 10 36-45 40-49 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 Percent 21.3% 35.0% 32.8% 8.9% 1.7% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 09:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 06:00 05:00 08:00 Vol. 27 54 38 15 4 1 111 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 16:00 18:00 17:00 12:00 15:00 Vol. 54 46 51 14 4 1 138 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Page 2 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Site Code: 4 Station ID: CH 40--570ft north of 191st JCT signs--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Speed in Pace 05/04/22 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34-43 2 01:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29-38 1 02:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39-48 1 03:00 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 39-48 2 04:00 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 36-45 2 05:00 1 6 16 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 36-45 22 06:00 5 17 32 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 36-45 49 07:00 9 39 46 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 36-45 85 08:00 24 56 35 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 119 36-45 91 09:00 27 40 21 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 36-45 61 10:00 9 22 19 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 36-45 41 11:00 18 20 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 36-45 36 12 PM 21 18 22 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 36-45 40 13:00 15 24 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 36-45 39 14:00 26 32 15 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 36-45 47 15:00 53 50 22 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 36-45 72 16:00 7 29 42 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 36-45 71 17:00 22 39 53 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 36-45 92 18:00 15 30 40 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 36-45 70 19:00 9 27 23 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 36-45 50 20:00 5 21 17 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 36-45 38 21:00 7 18 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 36-45 20 22:00 4 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 36-45 6 23:00 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 34-43 2 Total 280 495 443 112 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1342 Percent 20.9% 36.9% 33.0% 8.3% 0.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 09:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 06:00 08:00 Vol. 27 56 46 19 2 119 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 17:00 16:00 16:00 14:00 15:00 Vol. 53 50 53 9 3 1 129 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 3 Site Code: 4 Station ID: CH 40--570ft north of 191st JCT signs--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Speed in Pace 05/05/22 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 36-45 4 01:00 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 * 1 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 03:00 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 39-48 3 04:00 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 35-44 2 05:00 1 3 19 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 40-49 24 06:00 19 21 26 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 36-45 47 07:00 25 32 52 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 36-45 84 08:00 36 42 29 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 36-45 71 09:00 30 36 18 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 36-45 54 10:00 19 17 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 36-45 31 11:00 19 34 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 36-45 47 12 PM 27 22 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 36-45 34 13:00 22 33 21 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 36-45 54 14:00 28 24 12 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 36-45 36 15:00 82 46 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 36-45 67 16:00 23 26 47 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 36-45 73 17:00 10 41 50 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115 36-45 91 18:00 5 27 38 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 36-45 65 19:00 6 16 22 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 36-45 38 20:00 7 21 20 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 36-45 41 21:00 7 12 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 36-45 26 22:00 1 7 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 36-45 15 Percent 26.4% 33.1% 31.5% 7.8% 1.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 08:00 08:00 07:00 06:00 07:00 05:00 07:00 Vol. 36 42 52 16 2 1 123 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 17:00 17:00 14:00 14:00 15:00 Vol. 82 46 50 13 3 1 150 Total 916 1396 1293 332 46 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3990 Percent 23.0% 35.0% 32.4% 8.3% 1.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15th Percentile : 22 MPH 50th Percentile : 38 MPH 85th Percentile : 44 MPH 95th Percentile : 47 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed : 36-45 MPH Number in Pace : 2689 Percent in Pace : 67.4 % Number of Vehicles > 45 MPH : 385 Percent of Vehicles > 45 MPH : 9.6 % Mean Speed(Average) : 36 MPH SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 4 Site Code: 4 Station ID: CH 40--570ft north of 191st JCT signs--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined North Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Soeed in Pace 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 0 0 0 1 2 7 7 13 25 7 9 6 11 13 27 22 7 6 5 5 2 2 0 2 1 2 5 16 26 19 38 17 11 9 19 15 37 46 27 14 11 13 7 2 1 0 1 2 5 16 35 18 32 10 12 11 19 26 46 36 29 27 23 8 7 2 0 0 1 0 5 8 18 17 9 8 5 7 10 12 17 34 29 21 9 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 5 17 51 92 74 105 43 39 35 63 69 133 148 99 75 52 30 19 7 34-43 3039 34-43 35-44 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 41-50 41-50 36-45 36-45 36-45 36-45 Percent 15.4% 29.0% 31.4% 18.5% 4.5% 0.9% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 09:00 09:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 06:00 09:00 Vol. 25 38 35 18 4 2 1 105 PM Peak 15:00 16:00 15:00 16:00 16:00 13:00 17:00 16:00 Vol. 27 46 46 34 9 1 1 148 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Page 5 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Site Code: 4 Station ID: CH 40--570ft north of 191st JCT signs--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined North Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Speed in Pace 05/04/22 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29-38 1 01:00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34-43 1 02:00 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34-43 2 03:00 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29-38 1 04:00 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 35-44 3 05:00 7 3 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 36-45 12 06:00 5 7 17 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 40-49 26 07:00 7 26 31 17 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 36-45 57 08:00 10 27 27 14 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 36-45 54 09:00 23 41 34 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 36-45 75 10:00 7 13 16 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 36-45 29 11:00 13 16 24 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 36-45 40 12 PM 7 15 23 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 36-45 38 13:00 7 13 21 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 36-45 34 14:00 20 15 30 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 41-50 46 15:00 20 42 37 19 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 122 36-45 79 16:00 14 53 69 31 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 177 36-45 122 17:00 17 30 49 30 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 133 41-50 79 18:00 9 19 26 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 36-45 45 19:00 14 19 13 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 36-45 32 20:00 6 9 12 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 36-45 21 21:00 2 5 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 36-45 13 22:00 2 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 41-50 8 23:00 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 36-45 3 Total 191 359 455 200 62 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1275 Percent 15.0% 282% 35.7% 15.7% 4.9% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 09:00 09:00 09:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 09:00 Vol. 23 41 34 17 8 2 112 PM Peak 14:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 Vol. 20 53 69 31 8 2 177 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 6 Site Code: 4 Station ID: CH 40--570ft north of 191st JCT signs--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined North Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Soeed in Pace 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 0 1 0 2 2 3 8 16 32 12 11 8 7 24 41 1 1 1 1 3 11 19 27 42 12 19 21 19 27 47 51 37 11 13 7 8 2 0 0 1 4 5 21 39 30 27 13 17 21 13 27 49 57 52 28 17 15 5 2 0 0 0 0 2 9 16 11 15 7 8 6 14 15 13 35 32 14 13 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 8 12 51 89 86 116 44 59 57 55 98 153 166 133 67 52 35 23 7 29-38 1 35-44 1 34-43 2 36-45 5 36-45 8 36-45 32 36-45 58 36-45 57 36-45 69 36-45 25 36-45 36 36-45 42 36-45 32 36-45 54 36-45 96 36-45 108 36-45 89 41-50 42 41-50 30 36-45 22 36-45 13 35-44 4 Percent 16.3% 28.8% 33.7% 17.0% 3.6% 0.5% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 09:00 09:00 07:00 07:00 06:00 07:00 09:00 Vol. 32 42 39 16 7 1 116 PM Peak 15:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 18:00 17:00 18:00 16:00 Vol. 41 51 57 35 6 3 2 166 Total 587 1080 1269 642 162 25 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3771 Percent 15.6% 28.6% 33.7% 17.0% 4.3% 0.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15th Percentile : 33 MPH 50th Percentile : 40 MPH 85th Percentile : 47 MPH 95th Percentile : 50 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed : 36-45 MPH Number in Pace : 2349 Percent in Pace : 62.3 % Number of Vehicles > 45 MPH : 835 Percent of Vehicles > 45 MPH : 22.1 % Mean Speed(Average) : 39 MPH SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Page 1 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Site Code: 1 Station ID: CH 40-542ft N of CSAH 12 NPZ sign--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Speed in Pace 05/03/22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 01:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39-48 1 02:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2938 1 03:00 0 0 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 41-50 5 04:00 0 0 2 8 7 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 46-55 15 05:00 1 0 7 21 17 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 46-55 38 06:00 1 4 20 44 33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 46-55 77 07:00 1 10 31 40 37 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 131 46-55 77 08:00 1 2 17 45 23 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 46-55 68 09:00 1 5 16 41 30 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 46-55 71 10:00 0 7 15 18 11 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 41-50 33 11:00 1 3 10 25 12 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 45-54 37 12 PM 2 7 16 15 9 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 41-50 31 13:00 5 5 16 15 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 41-50 31 14:00 2 6 13 18 22 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 46-55 40 15:00 3 8 35 65 20 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 139 41-50 100 16:00 5 5 17 54 35 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 46-55 89 17:00 1 1 8 29 29 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 46-55 58 18:00 2 0 8 22 27 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 46-55 49 19:00 1 3 12 14 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 41-50 26 20:00 1 8 13 12 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 41-50 25 21:00 1 0 7 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 41-50 13 22:00 1 2 3 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 50-59 6 23:00 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 45-54 3 Total 30 77 269 497 339 73 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1300 Percent 2.3% 5.9% 20.7% 382% 26.1% 5.6% 1.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 05:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 10:00 08:00 07:00 Vol. 1 10 31 45 37 12 2 1 131 PM Peak 13:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 16:00 15:00 14:00 15:00 Vol. 5 8 35 65 35 8 3 139 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 2 Site Code: 1 Station ID: CH 40-542ft N of CSAH 12 NPZ sign--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Soeed in Pace 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 4 1 0 2 2 3 3 3 2 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 5 12 11 3 2 4 12 3 1 7 3 5 4 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 5 6 21 22 30 30 10 19 12 11 18 20 19 10 15 7 4 4 1 0 0 0 3 27 55 58 34 30 19 30 22 19 27 72 44 35 22 20 15 8 5 0 0 3 6 16 28 46 19 21 6 9 20 13 9 30 26 30 15 12 9 4 1 1 0 1 3 8 2 7 6 4 1 1 3 3 5 5 8 6 7 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 8 19 59 114 149 105 92 39 66 71 52 64 138 102 90 65 45 32 17 9 34-43 51-60 44-53 46-55 46-55 46-55 41-50 41-50 41-50 41-50 46-55 46-55 41-50 46-55 46-55 46-55 41-50 46-55 46-55 46-55 44-53 Percent 2.4% 5.7% 20.0% 40.6% 24.3% 6.0% 0.7% 0.3% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 08:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 05:00 04:00 09:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 4 12 30 58 46 8 1 2 1 149 PM Peak 13:00 12:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 16:00 18:00 15:00 15:00 Vol. 3 12 20 72 30 8 2 1 138 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 3 Site Code: 1 Station ID: CH 40-542ft N of CSAH 12 NPZ sign--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Soeed in Pace 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 5 3 1 10 1 8 2 2 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 2 17 0 3 4 5 4 5 0 8 5 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 13 30 27 12 9 8 9 10 10 6 16 15 9 9 6 5 7 2 0 0 4 4 18 49 57 24 43 21 17 27 11 20 44 38 33 20 20 10 8 8 1 1 2 7 23 25 39 40 42 17 18 14 20 19 44 34 29 18 23 7 2 6 1 0 2 2 7 6 8 21 9 7 10 5 8 4 17 13 12 6 3 4 3 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 5 2 1 0 3 3 3 2 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 9 20 62 112 154 113 109 64 62 64 71 54 139 108 87 56 55 31 22 20 49-58 44-53 46-55 46-55 46-55 41-50 46-55 46-55 46-55 46-55 46-55 46-55 46-55 46-55 46-55 46-55 46-55 46-55 46-55 45-54 41-50 46-55 Percent 3.2% 4.4% 14.5% 33.5% 30.5% 10.5% 2.0% 0.6% 0.4% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 07:00 07:00 06:00 07:00 09:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 07:00 Vol. 5 17 30 57 42 21 5 2 2 1 1 154 PM Peak 13:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 12:00 13:00 13:00 13:00 15:00 Vol. 10 8 16 44 44 17 3 1 2 1 139 Total 108 217 744 1519 1099 303 51 15 5 2 1 1 0 0 4065 Percent 2.7% 5.3% 18.3% 37.4% 27.0% 7.5% 1.3% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15th Percentile : 41 MPH 50th Percentile : 48 MPH 85th Percentile : 53 MPH 95th Percentile : 57 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed : 46-55 MPH Number in Pace : 2618 Percent in Pace : 64.4 % Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 378 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 9.3 % Mean Speed(Average) : 48 MPH SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 4 Site Code: 1 Station ID: CH 40-542ft N of CSAH 12 NPZ sign--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined North Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Speed in Pace 05/03/22 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29-38 1 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 02:00 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 39-48 4 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 04:00 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 35-44 2 05:00 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 30-39 2 06:00 2 8 14 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 41-50 27 07:00 1 15 17 19 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 41-50 36 08:00 8 12 44 42 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 41-50 86 09:00 4 9 21 17 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 41-50 38 10:00 2 7 14 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 41-50 27 11:00 1 4 12 13 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 41-50 25 12 PM 7 1 17 12 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 41-50 29 13:00 5 11 22 16 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 41-50 38 14:00 2 13 26 29 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 41-50 55 15:00 5 8 32 50 19 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 41-50 82 16:00 5 5 23 60 36 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 140 46-55 96 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 4 1 1 0 0 0 115 41-50 94 41-50 74 41-50 60 41-50 36 41-50 25 36-45 Total 54 135 360 436 187 40 7 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 1225 Percent 4.4% 11.0% 29.4% 35.6% 15.3% 3.3% 0.6% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 08:00 07:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 PM Peak 12:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 20:00 16:00 16:00 Vol. 7 13 32 60 36 10 4 3 1 140 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 5 Site Code: 1 Station ID: CH 40-542ft N of CSAH 12 NPZ sign--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined North Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Speed in Pace 05/04/22 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 35-44 1 01:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 44-53 1 02:00 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 35-44 3 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 04:00 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 35-44 2 05:00 2 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 41-50 4 06:00 1 6 9 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 41-50 24 07:00 3 3 18 20 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 41-50 38 08:00 5 13 39 53 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 41-50 92 09:00 0 5 14 20 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 41-50 34 10:00 2 6 13 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 41-50 23 11:00 1 8 19 14 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 41-50 33 12 PM 3 2 24 19 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 41-50 43 13:00 3 6 19 24 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 41-50 43 14:00 11 14 22 39 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 41-50 61 15:00 7 8 33 57 20 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 41-50 90 16:00 1 6 48 70 45 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 41-50 118 17:00 3 11 22 51 35 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 132 46-55 86 18:00 0 3 22 26 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 41-50 48 19:00 0 4 17 35 12 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 41-50 52 20:00 1 3 19 23 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 41-50 42 21:00 2 4 11 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 41-50 19 22:00 0 6 11 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 36-45 17 Percent 3.9% 9.0% 28.9% 39.0% 15.6% 3.1% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 11:00 08:00 PM Peak 14:00 14:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 Vol. 11 14 48 70 45 8 3 1 178 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 6 Site Code: 1 Station ID: CH 40-542ft N of CSAH 12 NPZ sign--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined North Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Soeed in Pace 01:00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34-43 1 02:00 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 34-43 3 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 04:00 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 39-48 2 05:00 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 46-55 4 06:00 2 4 10 13 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 41-50 23 07:00 2 7 23 21 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 41-50 44 08:00 2 6 26 51 29 9 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 46-55 80 09:00 0 7 19 26 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 41-50 45 10:00 3 7 13 21 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 41-50 34 11:00 5 7 14 12 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 41-50 26 12 PM 0 2 20 22 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 56 41-50 42 13:00 5 4 16 24 19 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 46-55 43 14:00 5 11 12 26 19 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 46-55 45 15:00 5 3 43 70 25 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 41-50 113 16:00 5 6 37 56 50 8 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 166 46-55 106 17:00 2 3 28 51 37 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 127 46-55 88 18:00 3 1 20 35 19 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 41-50 55 19:00 1 3 11 38 18 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 76 46-55 56 20:00 2 2 13 23 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 41-50 36 21:00 0 2 9 17 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 41-50 26 22:00 1 5 7 11 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 41-50 18 23:00 1 0 3 7 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 41-50 10 Total 44 85 330 529 291 56 9 5 2 0 0 0 1 0 1352 Percent 3.3% 6.3% 24.4% 39.1% 21.5% 4.1% 0.7% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% AM Peak 11:00 07:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 PM Peak 13:00 14:00 15:00 15:00 16:00 16:00 13:00 13:00 12:00 19:00 16:00 Total 147 334 1057 1459 676 135 21 11 2 2 0 0 1 0 3845 Percent 3.8% 8.7% 27.5% 37.9% 17.6% 3.5% 0.5% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15th Percentile : 40 MPH 50th Percentile : 46 MPH 85th Percentile : 52 MPH 95th Percentile : 54 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed : 41-50 MPH Number in Pace : 2516 Percent in Pace : 65.4 % Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 172 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 4.5 % Mean Speed(Average) : 46 MPH SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 1 Site Code: 2 Station ID: CH 40--370ft S of 190th Power Pole--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Soeed in Pace 01:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29-38 1 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 03:00 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 41-50 2 04:00 3 7 5 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 36-45 12 05:00 5 12 9 6 3 10 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 36-45 21 06:00 10 22 16 12 18 16 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 36-45 38 07:00 6 25 20 9 32 18 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 122 51E0 50 08:00 6 12 11 12 27 16 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 89 51-60 43 09:00 9 9 11 15 30 15 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 46-55 45 10:00 7 7 9 11 9 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 46-55 20 11:00 4 14 8 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 36-45 22 12 PM 7 12 8 5 13 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 36-45 20 13:00 4 6 4 11 7 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 38 46-55 18 14:00 7 12 8 14 13 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 46-55 27 15:00 8 9 10 32 42 26 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 134 46-55 74 16:00 8 11 15 13 28 26 8 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 111 51-60 54 17:00 5 16 15 8 13 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 36-45 31 18:00 2 5 13 7 13 19 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 51-60 32 19:00 4 5 5 3 12 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 51-60 20 20:00 3 9 3 9 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 46-55 14 21:00 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 41-50 6 22:00 1 7 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 13 35-44 7 23:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 59-68 2 Total 105 204 175 185 280 203 64 10 2 0 1 1 0 0 1230 Percent 8.5% 16.6% 142% 15.0% 22.8% 16.5% 5.2% 0.8% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 06:00 07:00 07:00 09:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 06:00 08:00 07:00 PM Peak 15:00 17:00 16:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 16:00 15:00 13:00 16:00 22:00 15:00 Vol. 8 16 15 32 42 26 8 1 1 1 1 134 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 2 Site Code: 2 Station ID: CH 40--370ft S of 190th Power Pole--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Soeed in Pace 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 1 0 3 5 5 4 6 13 11 6 7 1 4 3 4 6 7 5 1 2 2 3 0 0 1 3 14 17 26 9 7 7 11 14 5 7 11 4 9 5 6 7 3 3 0 0 0 5 10 23 19 8 11 2 8 12 9 3 9 16 16 7 6 5 4 0 0 0 1 0 4 6 15 16 8 3 7 12 11 12 22 15 11 11 10 3 3 1 0 0 1 1 10 20 30 24 31 4 16 19 14 17 43 32 17 19 12 10 2 0 1 0 1 2 7 18 26 27 20 9 4 6 4 10 37 17 16 14 9 5 4 2 0 0 0 0 7 20 13 4 9 1 0 2 0 3 4 5 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 7 17 58 113 141 105 97 33 53 66 48 56 130 95 81 66 44 33 18 9 49-58 51-60 36-45 36-45 36-45 51-60 51-60 51-60 51-60 46-55 46-55 46-55 46-55 51-60 50-59 51-60 51-60 46-55 50-59 40-49 36-45 Percent 7.9% 13.4% 13.5% 13.4% 25.3% 18.7% 6.0% 1.3% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 08:00 07:00 06:00 08:00 09:00 08:00 06:00 06:00 04:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 13 26 23 16 31 27 20 4 1 1 1 141 PM Peak 17:00 12:00 16:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 16:00 18:00 15:00 Vol. 7 14 16 22 43 37 5 2 130 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Page 3 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Site Code: 2 Station ID: CH 40--370ft S of 190th Power Pole--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined South Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Speed in Pace 05/05/22 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 44-53 2 01:00 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 35-44 2 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 03:00 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 56E5 2 04:00 1 6 5 2 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 36-45 11 05:00 4 14 10 2 11 13 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 51-60 24 06:00 9 23 7 17 18 23 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 51-60 41 07:00 7 24 28 19 39 21 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 150 51Fi0 60 08:00 6 12 17 15 30 23 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 51-60 53 09:00 6 12 17 16 36 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 51Fi0 56 10:00 6 9 3 16 10 7 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 58 46-55 26 11:00 5 7 6 12 14 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 46-55 26 12 PM 5 4 10 8 22 9 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 61 49-58 31 13:00 7 10 21 10 14 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 41-50 31 14:00 2 5 8 10 10 6 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 45-54 20 15:00 5 11 14 21 42 30 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 51-60 72 16:00 5 9 9 16 20 33 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 51-60 53 17:00 6 9 12 11 18 25 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 51-60 43 18:00 4 7 8 9 15 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 54 49-58 25 19:00 6 11 3 12 9 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 46-55 21 20:00 4 3 4 6 8 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 46-55 14 21:00 1 6 4 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 46-55 10 22:00 4 6 2 0 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 51E0 8 23:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 35-44 1 Total 98 191 191 210 328 256 76 10 3 1 0 0 0 0 1364 Percent 7.2% 14.0% 14.0% 15.4% 24.0% 18.8% 5.6% 0.7% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 06:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 06:00 06:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 9 24 28 19 39 23 10 2 1 150 PM Peak 13:00 15:00 13:00 15:00 15:00 16:00 16:00 14:00 12:00 18:00 15:00 Vol. 7 11 21 21 42 33 11 2 1 1 129 Total 304 566 539 566 931 698 217 37 9 2 2 1 0 0 3872 Percent 7.9% 14.6% 13.9% 14.6% 24.0% 18.0% 5.6% 1.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15th Percentile : 37 MPH 50th Percentile : 49 MPH 85th Percentile : 57 MPH 95th Percentile : 61 MPH Stats 10 MPHPaceSpeed: 51Fi0 MPH Number in Pace : 1629 Percent in Pace : 42.1 % Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 966 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 24.9 % Mean Speed(Average) : 48 MPH SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Page 4 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Site Code: 2 Station ID: CH 40--370ft S of 190th Power Pole--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined North Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Speed in Pace 05/03/22 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34-43 2 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 02:00 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34-43 2 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 04:00 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29-38 1 05:00 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 34-43 2 06:00 3 2 9 9 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 41-50 18 07:00 6 7 16 19 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 41-50 35 08:00 12 10 24 46 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 41-50 70 09:00 11 11 14 21 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 41-50 35 10:00 3 7 6 14 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 46-55 20 11:00 4 11 12 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 36-45 23 12 PM 9 9 10 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 36-45 19 13:00 3 20 13 12 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 36-45 33 14:00 6 13 19 25 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 41-50 44 15:00 5 17 29 41 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 119 41-50 70 16:00 4 33 31 49 20 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 41-50 80 17:00 4 21 24 37 17 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 41-50 61 18:00 3 22 15 15 21 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 36-45 37 19:00 4 13 25 19 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 41-50 44 20:00 3 18 16 12 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 36-45 34 21:00 4 11 7 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 36-45 18 22:00 4 5 7 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 41-50 12 23:00 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 39-48 4 Total 89 235 282 349 177 19 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1155 Percent 7.7% 20.3% 24.4% 302% 15.3% 1.6% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 08:00 09:00 08:00 08:00 07:00 06:00 08:00 Vol. 12 11 24 46 12 2 106 PM Peak 12:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 15:00 17:00 17:00 16:00 Vol. 9 33 31 49 26 3 2 140 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 5 Site Code: 2 Station ID: CH 40--370ft S of 190th Power Pole--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined North Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Speed in Pace 05/04/22 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 35-44 2 01:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 44-53 1 02:00 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34-43 1 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 04:00 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 40-49 3 05:00 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 41-50 5 06:00 0 1 7 7 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 41-50 14 07:00 1 3 11 14 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 41-50 25 08:00 3 9 17 55 24 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 46-55 79 09:00 6 2 12 24 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 46-55 39 10:00 1 6 3 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 46-55 15 11:00 3 8 10 13 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 41-50 23 12 PM 1 11 17 18 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 41-50 35 13:00 0 7 20 12 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 41-50 32 14:00 1 10 28 26 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 41-50 54 15:00 0 18 19 50 34 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 122 46-55 84 16:00 2 28 42 51 36 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 167 41-50 93 17:00 6 17 45 45 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 143 41-50 90 18:00 3 15 15 18 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 46-55 34 19:00 3 16 18 14 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 36-45 34 20:00 9 20 14 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 36-45 34 21:00 1 14 5 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 36-45 19 22:00 1 10 9 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 36-45 19 23:00 3 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 36-45 8 Total 48 200 301 381 220 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1198 Percent 4.0% 16.7% 25.1% 31.8% 18.4% 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 09:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 07:00 08:00 PM Peak 20:00 16:00 17:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 16:00 Vol. 9 28 45 51 36 10 167 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 6 Site Code: 2 Station ID: CH 40--370ft S of 190th Power Pole--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined North Bound Start 1 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 Pace Number Time 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 999 Total Soeed in Pace 01:00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34-43 1 02:00 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34-43 3 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 04:00 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29-38 1 05:00 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 39-48 4 06:00 3 6 4 6 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 46-55 19 07:00 1 13 10 22 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 46-55 37 08:00 7 11 23 56 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 41-50 79 09:00 3 9 14 32 20 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 46-55 52 10:00 4 10 14 11 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 39-48 25 11:00 2 7 12 12 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 41-50 24 12 PM 2 9 23 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 41-50 36 13:00 2 12 26 16 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 41-50 42 14:00 4 13 22 17 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 41-50 39 15:00 8 19 30 55 30 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 41-50 85 16:00 5 17 35 60 28 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 41-50 95 17:00 2 18 39 39 24 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 41-50 78 18:00 4 19 20 22 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 41-50 42 19:00 2 18 15 20 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 41-50 35 20:00 3 18 15 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 36-45 33 21:00 2 5 15 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 41-50 27 22:00 3 15 6 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 36-45 21 23:00 1 4 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 41-50 8 Total 58 229 331 416 227 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1291 Percent 4.5% 17.7% 25.6% 322% 17.6% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 08:00 07:00 08:00 08:00 09:00 09:00 08:00 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 17:00 16:00 15:00 16:00 16:00 Total 195 664 914 1146 624 97 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3644 Percent 5.4% 182% 25.1% 31.4% 17.1% 2.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15th Percentile : 37 MPH 50th Percentile : 45 MPH 85th Percentile : 51 MPH 95th Percentile : 54 MPH Stats 10 MPH Pace Speed : 41-50 MPH Number in Pace : 2060 Percent in Pace : 56.5 % Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 101 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 2.8 % Mean Speed(Average) : 44 MPH SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 1 Site Code: 4 Station ID: CH 40--570ft north of 191st Jct signs-east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined Start 02-May-22 Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun WeekAverage Time South Bou North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo 12:00 AM * * 2 1 4 4 * " * 3 2 01:00 * 0 1 1 1 3 1 * * * 1 1 02:00 * 0 2 1 3 0 2 * * * 0 2 03:00 * 0 3 2 2 3 2 * ' * 2 2 04:00 * 6 5 5 3 4 8 * * * 5 5 05:00 * 26 17 29 22 29 12 * * * 28 17 06:00 * 54 51 69 43 83 51 * ' * 69 48 07:00 * 106 92 114 91 123 89 * * * 114 91 08:00 * 111 74 119 85 114 86 * " * 115 82 09:00 * 91 105 98 112 88 116 * * * 92 111 10:00 * 41 43 55 43 54 44 * * * 50 43 11:00 * 60 39 55 64 69 59 * * * 61 54 12:00 PM * 56 35 63 53 62 57 * " * 60 48 01:00 * 48 63 56 48 81 55 * * * 62 55 02:00 * 75 69 77 85 71 98 * * * 74 84 03:00 * 138 133 129 122 150 153 * * * 139 136 04:00 * 109 148 90 177 108 166 * * * 102 164 05:00 * 93 99 125 133 115 133 * * * 111 122 06:00 * 66 75 94 64 79 67 * * * 80 69 07:00 * 66 52 64 56 55 52 * * * 62 53 08:00 * 51 30 50 34 53 35 * " * 51 33 09:00 * 29 19 29 18 36 23 * * * 31 20 10:00 * 10 7 11 10 17 7 * * * 13 8 11:00 * 8 6 4 5 3 8 * * * 5 6 Lane 0 0 1244 1168 1342 1275 1404 1328 0 0 0 0 0 0 1330 1256 Day 0 2412 2617 2732 0 0 0 2586 AM Peak - - 08:00 09:00 08:00 09:00 07:00 09:00 - - - - - - 08:00 09:00 Vol. 111 105 119 112 123 116 115 111 PM Peak - - 15:00 16:00 15:00 16:00 15:00 16:00 - - - - - - 15:00 16:00 v„i _ _ �zn �na ��a �� Fn �Fa - - - - - - �za �Fn Comb. 0 2412 2617 2732 0 0 0 2586 Total ADT ADT 2,589 AADT 2,589 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 1 Site Code: 1 Station ID: CH 40--542ft N of CSAH 12 NPZ sign--East side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined Start 02-May-22 Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun WeekAverage Time South Bou North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo 12:00 AM * 0 2 1 3 4 7 0 0 " * 1 3 01:00 * 1 0 2 2 3 1 * * * 2 1 02:00 * 1 4 0 4 1 4 * * * 1 4 03:00 * 7 0 8 0 9 0 * ' * 8 0 04:00 * 23 2 19 4 20 2 * * * 21 3 05:00 * 53 3 59 8 62 5 * * * 58 5 06:00 * 104 40 114 34 112 34 * ' * 110 36 07:00 * 131 62 149 53 154 62 * * * 145 59 08:00 * 92 120 105 124 113 126 * " * 103 123 09:00 * 96 60 92 47 109 71 * * * 99 59 10:00 * 56 41 39 33 64 50 * * * 53 41 11:00 * 56 34 66 47 62 48 * ' * 61 43 12:00 PM * 53 44 71 56 64 56 * * * 63 52 01:00 * 49 61 52 56 71 76 * * * 57 64 02:00 * 66 78 64 97 54 77 * " * 61 84 03:00 * 139 124 138 128 139 152 * * * 139 135 04:00 * 120 140 102 178 108 166 * " * 110 161 05:00 * 76 115 90 132 87 127 * * * 84 125 06:00 * 63 94 65 67 56 82 * * * 61 81 07:00 * 42 74 45 73 55 76 * * * 47 74 08:00 * 39 60 32 59 31 49 * * * 34 56 09:00 * 16 36 17 26 22 36 * * * 18 33 10:00 * 13 25 9 27 20 31 * * * 14 28 11:00 * 4 6 4 10 2 14 * " * 3 10 Lane 0 0 1300 1225 1343 1268 1422 1352 0 0 0 0 0 0 1353 1280 Day 0 2525 2611 2774 0 0 0 2633 AM Peak - - 07:00 08:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 08:00 - - - - - - 07:00 08:00 Vol. 131 120 149 124 154 126 145 123 PM Peak - - 15:00 16:00 15:00 16:00 15:00 16:00 - - - - - - 15:00 16:00 \/nl _ _ 1'2Q 1d(1 1'2R 17R 1'2Q 1RR _ _ _ _ _ _ 1'2Q 1R1 Comb. 0 2525 2611 2774 0 0 0 2633 Total ADT ADT 2,635 AADT 2,635 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 1 Site Code: 2 Station ID: CH 40--370ft south of 190th Power pole-east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined Start 02-May-22 Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun WeekAverage Time South Bou North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo 12:00 AM * 0 2 1 3 4 5 * " * 2 3 01:00 * 1 0 2 2 3 1 * * * 2 1 02:00 * 0 3 0 3 0 3 * * * 0 3 03:00 * 6 0 7 0 9 0 * ' * 7 0 04:00 * 22 2 17 3 19 2 * * * 19 2 05:00 * 50 4 58 6 59 5 * * * 56 5 06:00 * 101 33 113 28 108 33 * ' * 107 31 07:00 * 122 61 141 45 150 62 * * * 138 56 08:00 * 89 106 105 112 110 111 * " * 101 110 09:00 * 96 69 97 63 108 80 * * * 100 71 10:00 * 51 36 33 25 58 45 * * * 47 35 11:00 * 56 34 53 43 54 45 * ' * 54 41 12:00 PM * 50 41 66 51 61 53 * * * 59 48 01:00 * 38 58 48 50 70 73 * * * 52 60 02:00 * 65 70 56 79 48 73 * " * 56 74 03:00 * 134 119 130 122 129 146 * * * 131 129 04:00 * 111 140 95 167 103 150 * " * 103 152 05:00 * 70 108 81 143 85 124 * * * 79 125 06:00 * 63 80 66 68 54 83 * * * 61 77 07:00 * 41 72 44 62 54 68 * * * 46 67 08:00 * 33 55 33 59 33 51 * * * 33 55 09:00 * 14 33 18 27 22 36 * * * 18 32 10:00 * 13 23 9 25 21 28 * * * 14 25 11:00 * 4 6 5 12 2 14 * " * 4 11 Lane 0 0 1230 1155 1278 1198 1364 1291 0 0 0 0 0 0 1289 1213 Day 0 2385 2476 2655 0 0 0 2502 AM Peak - - 07:00 08:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 08:00 - - - - - - 07:00 08:00 Vol. 122 106 141 112 150 111 138 110 PM Peak - - 15:00 16:00 15:00 16:00 15:00 16:00 - - - - - - 15:00 16:00 \/nl _ _ 1'2d 1d(1 1'2(1 1C.7 1�Q 1F(1 _ _ _ _ _ _ 1'21 1F� Comb. 0 2385 2476 2655 0 0 0 2502 Total ADT ADT 2,505 AADT 2,505 SHERBURNE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 13880 Business Center Drive; Suite #100 Elk River, MN 55330 Page 1 Site Code: 3 Station ID: CH 40--600ft south of 191 st Power pole--east side Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined Start 02-May-22 Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun WeekAverage Time South Bou North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo South Bo North Bo 12:00 AM * * 1 1 3 4 * " * 2 2 01:00 * 0 0 1 1 2 0 * * * 1 0 02:00 * 0 2 0 2 0 1 * * * 0 2 03:00 * 1 0 3 1 4 0 * ' * 3 0 04:00 * 7 1 4 5 5 2 * * * 5 3 05:00 * 24 9 24 17 31 6 * * * 26 11 06:00 * 51 34 67 30 70 31 * ' * 63 32 07:00 * 81 65 96 58 108 63 * * * 95 62 08:00 * 76 91 85 99 88 100 * " * 83 97 09:00 * 82 69 85 81 91 90 * * * 86 80 10:00 * 33 30 29 27 45 32 * * * 36 30 11:00 * 40 21 29 35 49 38 * * * 39 31 12:00 PM * 33 23 54 29 49 41 * " * 45 31 01:00 * 33 39 35 42 55 53 * * * 41 45 02:00 * 54 46 58 64 47 60 * * * 53 57 03:00 * 124 102 118 108 126 124 * * * 123 111 04:00 * 98 104 84 124 95 120 * * * 92 116 05:00 * 49 74 70 108 76 98 * * * 65 93 06:00 * 44 49 61 45 48 54 * * * 51 49 07:00 * 43 42 34 33 37 42 * * * 38 39 08:00 * 33 27 28 31 28 23 * " * 30 27 09:00 * 16 18 14 12 24 21 * * * 18 17 10:00 * 6 11 3 10 12 13 * * * 7 11 11:00 * 5 3 3 2 1 5 * * * 3 3 Lane 0 0 933 860 986 965 1094 1021 0 0 0 0 0 0 1005 949 Day 0 1793 1951 2115 0 0 0 1954 AM Peak - - 09:00 08:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 08:00 - - - - - - 07:00 08:00 Vol. 82 91 96 99 108 100 95 97 PM Peak - - 15:00 16:00 15:00 16:00 15:00 15:00 - - - - - - 15:00 16:00 v„i _ _ ��n �nn ��n ��n ��F ��n - - - - - - ��z ��F Comb. 0 1793 1951 2115 0 0 0 1954 Total ADT ADT 1,954 AADT 1,954 � Architecture + Engineering+ Environmental + Planning Appendix F PROJECT TRAFFIC FOR Cleveland (C.R. 40) AT 181st Avenue NW (C.S.A.H. 12) DESIGN HOURTURNING MOVEMENTS IN YEAR2022 DESIGN HOURTURNING MOVEMENTS IN YEAR 2023 Cleveland (C.R. 40) Cleveland (C.R. 40) (2700) (2800) 143 147 54.878 0.0 0� 452fi5� � 184Cts Qes kZ) w 54.981 0.0°k0� 45.1fi6� �g1stA�enu14.9°k(C.S.A.H. 1 ,� 434 854°k 508 (8100) ,� 439 85.1°k 516 (8200) 172°k 58 � 17.6°k 61 � (8100) 339 82.8� (8200) 344 82.4� 0.0°k 0 0.0°k 0 181stAvenue N� 181stAvenue N� C.S.A.H. 12) � 01 0� D Factors C.S.A.H. 12) � Ot 0� D Factors (XXXXX) 2022AP,DT 0.0°k 0.0°k� 0.0°k 50.0%NB (XXXXX) 2023AP,DT 0.0°k 0.0°kl o.o� 50.0%NB X)00C 2022DDHV 0 50.0%SB X)00C 2023DDHV 0 50.0%SB KML= 10.50% 0 60.0%WB KML= 10.50% 0 60.0%WB K SS = 10.50% ClevelarM(C.R.40) 40.0% EB K SS = 10.50% Cleveland (C.R. 40) 40.0% EB DESIGN HOURTURNING MOVEMENTS IN YEAR2026 DESIGN HOURTURNING MOVEMENTS IN YEAR 2046 Cleveland (C.R. 40) Cleveland (C.R. 40) (3000) (4400) 158 229 S�.OkI 0.0�1 45.0�� 55�Ok1 D.Ok1 45.Ok� 87 0 71 181stAvenueNW 126 0 103 181stAvenueNW(C.S.A.H. (C.S.A.H. 12) 12) 83 15.4°k 120 17.7°k 45� 537 (8500) 55� 679 (11000) 0 0.0°k 0 0.0°k 182°k 65 � 20.9°k 95 � (8500) 358 81.8� (11000) 453 79.1� 0.0°k 0 0.0°k 0 181stAvenue N� } 181stAvenue N� 1 C.S.A.H. 12) � OI 0� D Factors C.S.A.H. 12) � OI 0� D Factors (XXXXX) 2026AP,DT 0.0°k 0.0°k� 0.0°k 50.0%NB (XXXXX) 2046AP,DT 0.0°k 0.0°kl o.o� 50.0%NB X)00C 2026DDHV 0 50.0%SB X)00C 2046DDHV 0 50.0%SB KML= 10.50% 0 60.0%WB KML= 10.50% 0 60.0%WB K SS = 10.50% ClevelarM(C.R.40) 40.0% EB K SS = 10.50% Cleveland (C.R. 40) 40.0% EB PROJECT TRAFFIC FOR Cleveland (C.R. 40) AT 181st Avenue NW (C.S.A.H. 12) 2022 INPUT TMCs COMPARED TO 2022 DHV 2022 INPUT TMCs COMPARED TO 2023 DHV Cleveland (C.R. 40) Cleveland (C.R. 40) 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 65 81 0 66 � WA � WA 18��tsAe�u�Z)W � WA � WA 181stAvenu�Z�NW(C.S.A.H. 1 WA 74 0 WA 77 0 w�o w�o wn o o wn o 0 o sa wn � o s� wn � o za� w� 0 283 W� 0 own o ow� 181stAvenue N� 181stAvenue NW C.S.A.H.12 WA WA WA C.S.A.H.12 WA WA WA „ �oor „ �oor (XXX) 20221nput TMCs 0 0 0 (XX� 20221nput TMCs 0 0 0 X)OC Calculated 2022 DHV ClevelarM(C.R.40) X)OC Calculated 2023 DHV Cleveland (C.R. 40) X.XX Ratio X.XX Ratio 2022 INPUT TMCs COMPARED TO 2026 DHV 2022 INPUT TMCs COMPARED TO 2046 DHV Cleveland (C.R. 40) Cleveland (C.R. 40) 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 0 I 71 126 0 I 103 � WA 1 WA � WACts 83 �120W � WA 1 WA 181stwAenu120W(D.S.A.H. 1 w�o w�o o �� w� � o �� w� � 0 293 N/A �, 0 358 N/A �, 0 OWA 0 OWA 181stAvenue N� 181stAvenue N� C.S.A.H.12 WA WA WA C.S.A.H.12 WA WA WA „ �oor „ �oor (XXX) 20221nput TMCs 0 0 0 (XX� 20221nput TMCs 0 0 0 X)OC Calculated 2026 DHV ClevelarM(C.R.40) X)OC Calculated 2046 DHV Cleveland (C.R. 40) X.XX Ratio X.XX Ratio PROJECT TRAFFIC FOR Cleveland (CR 40) AT Twin Lakes Road (CSAH 13) DESIGN HOURTURNING MOVEMENTS IN YEAR2022 DESIGN HOURTURNING MOVEMENTS IN YEAR 2023 ClevelarM (CR 40) ClevelarM (CR 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0°k0 0.0 0� 0.0 0� Twin Lakes Road (CSAH 0.0°k0 0.0°k0� 0.0°k0� Twin Lakes Road (CSAH 13) ♦ 13) 1 0 0 0°k I 0 0 0°k ,� 387 83.9°k 461 (7300) ,� 391 83]°k 467 (7400) 74 16.1 °k 76 16.3°k 0.0°k 0 � 0.0°k 0 � (7300) 307 80.5� (7400) 312 80.1� 19.5°k 60 19.9°k 62 Twin Lakes Road (� Twin Lakes Road (� (XXXXX) 2022AP,DT 55.8°k 0.0°k� 442°k� 00%NB (XXXXX) 2023AP,DT 56.0°k 0.0°k� 44.0°k� 00%NB X)00C 2022 DDHV 143 X)00C 2023 DDHV 147 K ML = 10.50% (2700) 60.0% WB K ML = 10.50% (2800) 60.0% WB K SS = 10.50% Cleveland (CR 40) 40.0 % EB K SS = 10.50% ClevelarM (CR 40) 40.0% EB DESIGN HOURTURNING MOVEMENTS IN YEAR2026 DESIGN HOURTURNING MOVEMENTS IN YEAR 2046 ClevelarM (CR 40) ClevelarM (CR 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0°k 0.0°k 0.0°k 0.0°k 0.0°k 0.0°k �I 0 0� Twin Lakes Road (CSAH �I 0 0� Twin Lakes Road (CSAH 13) 13) 0 0.0°k 0 0.0°k 40� 488 (7700) 50� 626 (9900) 82 16.8°k 117 18.7°k 0.0°k 0 � 0.0°k 0 � (7700) 325 79.8� (9900) 418 77.4� 20.2°k 66 22.6°k 94 Twin Lakes Road (� Twin Lakes Road (� (XXXXX) 2026AP,DT SSB°k 0.0°k� 44.4°k� 00%NB (XXXXX) 2046AP,DT 55.9°k 0.0°k� M.1k� 00%NB X)00C 2026 DDHV 158 X)00C 2046 DDHV 229 K ML = 10.50% (3000) 60.0% WB K ML = 10.50% (4400) 60.0% WB K SS = 10.50% Cleveland (CR 40) 40.0 % EB K SS = 10.50% ClevelarM (CR 40) 40.0% EB PROJECT TRAFFIC FOR Cleveland (CR 40) AT Twin Lakes Road (CSAH 13) 2022 INPUT TMCs COMPARED TO 2022 DHV 2022 INPUT TMCs COMPARED TO 2023 DHV ClevelarM (CR 40) ClevelarM (CR 40) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WA WA WA Twin Lakes Road (CSAH WA WA WA Twin Lakes Road (CSAH ~ 13) ~ 13) 1 WA 0 0 WA 0 0 w�o w�o wn �a o wn �s o 0 own � o own � o za� w� 0 250 W� o so wn o sz w� Twin Lakes Road (� Twin Lakes Road (CSAH 13) WA WA 1 WA r 13) WA WA 1 WA r 80 0 I 63 I 82 0 I 65 I (XXX) 20221nput TMCs 0 0 0 (XX� 20221nput TMCs 0 0 0 X)OC Calculated 2022 DHV Cleveland (CR 40) X)OC Calculated 2023 DHV ClevelarM (CR 40) X.XX Ratio X.XX Ratio 2022 INPUT TMCs COMPARED TO 2026 DHV 2022 INPUT TMCs COMPARED TO 2046 DHV ClevelarM (CR 40) ClevelarM (CR 40) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 I 0 � WA 1 WA Twin Lake �� ad (CSAH � WA 1 WA Twin Lake �)oad (CSAH 1 WA 0 0 T WA 0 0 w�o w�o o �� w� � o �� w� � 0 259 N/A �, 0 324 N/A �, 0 66 WA 0 94 WA Twin Lakes Road (� Twin Lakes Road (� 13) WA WA 1 WA r 13) WA WA 1 WA r 88 0 I 70 I 128 0 I 101 I (XXX) 20221nput TMCs 0 0 0 (XX� 20221nput TMCs 0 0 0 X)OC Calculated 2026 DHV Cleveland (CR 40) X)OC Calculated 2046 DHV ClevelarM (CR 40) X.XX Ratio X.XX Ratio PROJECT TRAFFIC FOR Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) AT Twin Lakes Parkway NW DESIGN HOURTURNING MOVEMENTS IN YEAR2022 DESIGN HOURTURNING MOVEMENTS IN YEAR 2023 Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) (6900) (7000) 325 330 11.838 69.227I 18.Sfi0� Twin Lakes Parkway NW 11.839 70.232I 17.959� Twin Lakes Parkway NW + � 15 42.9°k + I 16 42.7°k ,� 3 82°k 36 (1100) ,� 3 82°k 37 (1100) 18 48.9°k 18 49.1°k 41.0°k 32 � 40.9°k 32 � (1500) 78 12.3� (1600) 79 12.0� 46.7°k 36 47.1 °k 37 Twin Lakes Parkwa� 62 3211I 98 D Factors Twin Lakes Parkw� 63 328 97 D Factors (XXXXX) 2022AP,DT 1� 66.8°kl 20.3°k� 55.0%NB (XXXXX) 2023AP,DT 1� 672°k� 19.8°k� 55.0%NB X)00C 2022DDHV 481 45.0%SB X)00C 2023DDHV 488 45.0%SB K ML = 10.50% (8300) 40.0% WB K ML = 10.50% (8500) 40.0%WB K SS = 8.50% Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) 60.0 % EB K SS = 8.50% Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) 60.0% EB DESIGN HOURTURNING MOVEMENTS IN YEAR2026 DESIGN HOURTURNING MOVEMENTS IN YEAR 2046 Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) (7300) (9400) 345 443 11.6°k 70.2°k 18.2°k 11.6°k 70.8°k 17.6°k � 40I 242 63� Twin Lakes Parkway NW " 51I 314 78� Twin Lakes Parkway NW 16 42.7°k 21 42.5°k � 38 (1100) � 49 (1400) 19 492°k 24 49.5°k 40.8°k 33 � 40.8°k 42 � (1600) 82 12.1� (2000) 104 117� 47.1 °k 39 47.5°k 49 � � Twin Lakes Parkway NW 65 3421I 103 D Factors Twin Lakes Parkway NW 84 4421I 128 D Factors (XXXXX) 2026AP,DT 1� 67.1°kl 20.1°k� 55.0%NB (XXXXX) 2046AP,DT 1� 67.5°kl 19B°k� 55.0%NB X)00C 2026DDHV 510 45.0%SB X)00C 2046DDHV 654 45.0%SB K ML = 10.50% (8800) 40.0% WB K ML = 10.50% (11000) 40.0%WB K SS = 8.50% Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) 60.0 % EB K SS = 8.50% Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) 60.0% EB PROJECT TRAFFIC FOR Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) AT Twin Lakes Parkway NW 2022 INPUT TMCs COMPARED TO 2022 DHV 2022 INPUT TMCs COMPARED TO 2023 DHV Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) 0 0 0 0 0 0 3�227 � 60 � Twin Lakes Parkway NW 3� 232 � 59 � Twin Lakes Parkway NW WA WA WA WA WA WA 1 WA 15 0 WA 16 0 w�o w�o wn �a o wn �a o o az wn � o az wn � o �ow� o �ow� o as wn o a� w� Twin Lakes Parkwa� Twin Lakes Parkway NW WA WA 1 WA r WA WA T WA r 62 321 I 98 I 63 328 I 97 I (XXX) 20221nput TMCs 0 0 0 (XX� 20221nput TMCs 0 0 0 X)OC Calculated 2022 DHV Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) X)OC Calculated 2023 DHV Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) X.XX Ratio X.XX Ratio 2022 INPUT TMCs COMPARED TO 2026 DHV 2022 INPUT TMCs COMPARED TO 2046 DHV Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) 0 0 0 0 0 0 4� Z42 1 63 � Twin Lakes Parkway NW 5� 3� 4 1�$ � Twin Lakes Parkway NW WA WA WA WA WA WA 1 WA 16 0 I WA 21 0 w�o w�o o �� w� � 0 32�� w� � 0 10 N/A �, 0 13 N/A �, 0 39 WA 0 49 WA Twin Lakes Parkwa� Twin Lakes Parkw� WA WA 1 WA r WA WA T WA r 65 342 I 103 I 84 442 I 128 I (XXX) 20221nput TMCs 0 0 0 (XX� 20221nput TMCs 0 0 0 X)OC Calculated 2026 DHV Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) X)OC Calculated 2046 DHV Twin Lakes Road NW (CSAH 13) X.XX Ratio X.XX Ratio � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix G HCM 2010 Roundabout 6: Twin Lakes Road NW & Twin Lakes Parkway NW/Tyler Street NW osi22i2o22 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Follow-Up Headway, s Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh 8.6 A � � � � Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 90 806 0.975 88 786 0.112 5.7 A 0 SE 1 1 88 90 338 113 3.186 0 1.000 5.7 A � � � � � - � � � Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 40 713 0.999 40 712 0.056 5.6 A 0 NW 1 1 40 40 461 186 3.186 0 1.000 5.6 A - - - � � - - - - Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 533 1008 0.981 523 989 0.529 10.3 B 3 NE 1 1 523 533 114 314 3.186 0 1.000 10.3 B � � � � � - � � � SW 1 1 353 360 91 410 3.186 0 1.000 7.2 A Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 360 1032 0.981 353 1012 0.349 7.2 A 2 � - - - - 2022 No Build 9:41 am 04/18/2022 2022 Existing - No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2022 Existing - No Build os�22�2022 Intersection: 6: Twin Lakes Road NW & Twin Lakes Parkway NW/Tyler Street NW Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2022 No Build SE NW NE SW LTR LTR LTR LTR 50 50 95 31 15 7 53 7 46 36 95 27 84 486 447 358 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd I��(�9?$.A.H. 13) Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Follow-Up Headway, s Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh 8.1 A � � � � Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 339 1041 0.982 333 1023 0.326 6.8 A 1 EB 1 1 333 339 82 522 3.186 0 1.000 6.8 A � � � � � - � � � Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 166 860 0.982 163 844 0.193 6.2 A 1 NW 1 1 163 166 273 148 3.186 0 1.000 6.2 A - - - � � - - - - Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 511 1030 0.980 501 1009 0.496 9.5 A 3 SW 1 1 501 511 93 346 3.186 0 1.000 9.5 A 2022 No Build 9:41 am 04/18/2022 2022 Existing - No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2022 Existing - No Build os�22�2022 Intersection: 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (1 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2022 No Build EB NW SW LR LR LR 56 31 80 30 17 27 66 42 74 581 772 545 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: 181 st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C. R. 40) osi22i2o22 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations �i �` 'F � �i i� Traffic Vol, veh/h 58 281 434 74 65 78 Future Vol, veh/h 58 281 434 74 65 78 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 0 200 Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 63 305 472 80 74 89 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 552 0 - 0 903 472 Stage 1 - - - - 472 - Stage 2 - - - - 431 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1018 - - - 308 592 Stage 1 - - - - 628 - Stage 2 - - - - 655 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1018 - - - 289 592 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 289 - Stage 1 - - - - 589 - Stage 2 - - - - 655 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.5 0 16.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 1018 - - - 289 592 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.062 - - - 0.256 0.15 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.8 - - - 21.7 12.1 HCM Lane LOS A - - - C B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - - 1 0.5 2022 No Build 9:41 am 04/18/2022 2022 Existing - No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2022 Existing - No Build os�22�2022 Intersection: 8: 181st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C.R. 40) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2022 No Build EB SB SB L L R 26 97 51 25 25 33 26 29 50 3857 200 200 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout 6: Twin Lakes Road NW & Twin Lakes Parkway NW/Tyler Street NW osi22i2o22 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Follow-Up Headway, s Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh 9.2 A � � � � Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 95 789 0.977 93 771 0.120 5.9 A 0 SE 1 1 93 95 359 119 3.186 0 1.000 5.9 A � � � � � - � � � Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 43 692 0.999 43 691 0.062 5.9 A 0 NW 1 1 43 43 490 194 3.186 0 1.000 5.9 A - - - � � - - - - Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 565 1003 0.982 555 985 0.563 11.1 B 4 NE 1 1 555 565 119 335 3.186 0 1.000 11.1 B � � � � � - � � � SW 1 1 374 381 97 436 3.186 0 1.000 7.5 A Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 381 1025 0.981 374 1006 0.372 7.5 A 2 � - - - - 2026 No Build 1:46 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2023 Opening - No Build osi22i2o22 Intersection: 8: 181st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C.R. 40) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2023 No Build EB SB SB L L R 31 52 70 20 26 28 41 46 60 3857 200 200 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd I��(�9?$.A.H. 13) Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Follow-Up Headway, s Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh 8.6 A � � � � Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 361 1032 0.981 354 1012 0.350 7.2 A 2 EB 1 1 354 361 91 552 3.186 0 1.000 7.2 A � � � � � - � � � Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 184 847 0.978 180 829 0.217 6.6 A 1 NW 1 1 180 184 288 164 3.186 0 1.000 6.6 A - - - � � - - - - Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 541 1020 0.980 530 1000 0.530 10.2 B 3 SW 1 1 530 541 102 370 3.186 0 1.000 10.2 B 2026 No Build 1:46 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 06/22/2022 Intersection: 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (1 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2026 No Build EB NW SW LR LR LR 78 79 54 24 26 21 68 81 53 581 772 545 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: 181 st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C. R. 40) osi22i2o22 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations �i �` 'F � �i i� Traffic Vol, veh/h 65 293 454 83 71 87 Future Vol, veh/h 65 293 454 83 71 87 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 0 200 Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 71 318 493 90 81 99 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 583 0 - 0 953 493 Stage 1 - - - - 493 - Stage 2 - - - - 460 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 991 - - - 287 576 Stage 1 - - - - 614 - Stage 2 - - - - 636 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 991 - - - 266 576 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 266 - Stage 1 - - - - 570 - Stage 2 - - - - 636 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.6 0 17.8 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 991 - - - 266 576 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.071 - - - 0.303 0.172 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.9 - - - 24.3 12.5 HCM Lane LOS A - - - C B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - - 1.2 0.6 2026 No Build 1:46 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 06/22/2022 Intersection: 8: 181st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C.R. 40) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2026 No Build EB SB SB L L R 25 52 90 14 30 36 34 45 78 3857 200 200 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout 6: Twin Lakes Road NW & Twin Lakes Parkway NW/Tyler Street NW osi22i2o22 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Follow-Up Headway, s Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh 13.5 B � � � � Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 121 712 0.981 119 698 0.170 7.1 A 1 SE 1 1 119 121 462 154 3.186 0 1.000 7.1 A � � � � � - � � � Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 56 601 0.999 56 600 0.093 7.1 A 0 NW 1 1 56 56 632 244 3.186 0 1.000 7.1 A - - - � � - - - - Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 725 972 0.980 710 952 0.746 17.7 C 7 NE 1 1 710 725 151 432 3.186 0 1.000 17.7 C � � � � � - � � � SW 1 1 481 491 125 563 3.186 0 1.000 9.7 A Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 491 997 0.980 481 977 0.492 9.7 A 3 � - - - - 2046 No Build 1:58 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 06/22/2022 Intersection: 6: Twin Lakes Road NW & Twin Lakes Parkway NW/Tyler Street NW Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2046 No Build SE NW NE SW LTR LTR LTR LTR 29 31 99 56 21 18 52 24 42 43 116 69 84 486 447 358 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd I��(�9?$.A.H. 13) Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Follow-Up Headway, s Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh 12.5 B � � � � Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 463 992 0.981 454 973 0.467 9.2 A 3 EB 1 1 454 463 130 712 3.186 0 1.000 9.2 A � � � � � - � � � Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 265 789 0.981 260 774 0.336 8.7 A 1 NW 1 1 260 265 359 234 3.186 0 1.000 8.7 A - - - � � - - - - Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 694 974 0.980 680 955 0.712 16.1 C 6 SW 1 1 680 694 148 476 3.186 0 1.000 16.1 C 2046 No Build 1:58 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 06/22/2022 Intersection: 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (1 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2046 No Build EB NW SW LR LR LR 78 136 150 33 50 82 68 116 160 581 772 545 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: 181 st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C. R. 40) osi22i2o22 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations �i �` 'F � �i i� Traffic Vol, veh/h 95 358 559 120 103 126 Future Vol, veh/h 95 358 559 120 103 126 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 0 200 Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 103 389 608 130 117 143 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 738 0 - 0 1203 608 Stage 1 - - - - 608 - Stage 2 - - - - 595 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 868 - - - 204 496 Stage 1 - - - - 543 - Stage 2 - - - - 551 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 868 - - - 180 496 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 180 - Stage 1 - - - - 478 - Stage 2 - - - - 551 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2 0 33.6 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 868 - - - 180 496 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.119 - - - 0.65 0.289 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.7 - - - 56.1 15.2 HCM Lane LOS A - - - F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - - - 3.8 1.2 2046 No Build 1:58 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 06/22/2022 Intersection: 8: 181st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C.R. 40) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2046 No Build EB WB SB SB L T L R 75 22 116 70 44 3 62 40 84 15 113 67 675 3857 200 - 200 � SimTraffic Report Page 1 Appendix H: No Build Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest Connection (2023, 2026, 2046) Synchro Analysis Worksheets ISG HCM 2010 TWSC 2: ROAD B& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW os�22�2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations � � � � Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 8 8 0 0 5 32 0 0 0 19 0 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 9 9 0 0 6 36 0 0 0 22 0 6 Major/Minor Major1 Conflicting Flow All 42 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.209 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1573 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1573 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - 0 Major2 0 9 - 4.11 - 2.209 - 1617 - 1617 0 Minor1 Minor2 0 54 69 9 51 51 24 - 27 27 - 24 24 - - 27 42 - 27 27 - - 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 - 947 823 1076 951 842 1055 - 993 875 - 997 877 - - 993 862 - 993 875 - - 938 818 1076 946 837 1055 - 938 818 - 946 837 - - 987 870 - 991 877 - - 988 862 - 987 870 - Approach E B HCM Control Delay, s 3.7 HCM LOS � � NB SB 0 8.8 A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) - 1573 - - 1617 - - 967 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.006 - - - - - 0.028 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 7.3 0 - 0 - - 8.8 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 2023 Opening 11:23 am 05/10/2022 2023 Opening - No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2023 Opening - No Build osi22i2o22 Intersection: 2: ROAD B& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2023 Opening SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: ROAD C& Twin Lakes Pkwy os�22�2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations � � � � Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 19 0 5 0 0 0 8 19 0 0 32 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 22 0 6 0 0 0 9 22 0 0 36 36 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor2 Minor1 Major1 94 94 54 97 112 22 72 54 54 - 40 40 - - 40 40 - 57 72 - - 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 4.11 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 2.209 892 798 1016 888 780 1058 1534 961 852 - 977 864 - - 977 864 - 957 837 - - 888 793 1016 879 888 793 - 879 955 852 - 971 971 859 - 952 SE NW 9.1 0 A A 775 1058 1534 775 - - 859 - - 837 - - � � 0 Major2 0 22 - 4.11 - 2.209 - 1600 - 1600 SW 0 0 0 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NERNWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh/h) 1534 - - - 912 1600 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - - 0.03 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - 0 9.1 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1 0 - - 2023 Opening 11:23 am 05/10/2022 2023 Opening - No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2023 Opening - No Build osi22i2o22 Intersection: 3: ROAD C& Twin Lakes Pkwy Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2023 Opening SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout 6: Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H 13)/Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H. 13) & Twin Lake��ray NW/Ty Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Follow-Up Headway, s Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh 9.4 A � � � � Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 88 780 0.975 86 761 0.113 5.9 A 0 SE 1 1 86 88 370 121 3.186 0 1.000 5.9 A � � � � � - � � � Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 51 693 0.999 51 693 0.074 6.0 A 0 NW 1 1 51 51 489 210 3.186 0 1.000 6.0 A - - - � � - - - - Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 579 1002 0.982 569 984 0.578 11.4 B 4 NE 1 1 569 579 120 338 3.186 0 1.000 11.4 B � � � � � - � � � SW 1 1 380 387 104 436 3.186 0 1.000 7.7 A Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 387 1018 0.981 380 999 0.380 7.7 A 2 � - - - - 2023 Opening 11:23 am 05/10/2022 2023 Opening - No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2023 Opening - No Build osi22i2o22 Intersection: 6: Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H 13)/Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H. 13) & Twin Lakes Pai Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2023 Opening SE NW NE SW LTR LTR LTR LTR 30 30 31 55 17 9 21 40 40 31 43 72 71 406 317 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd I��(�9?$.A.H. 13) Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Follow-Up Headway, s Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh 8.5 A � � � � Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 366 1024 0.981 359 1005 0.357 7.3 A 2 EB 1 1 359 366 98 526 3.186 0 1.000 7.3 A � � � � � - � � � Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 174 845 0.977 170 826 0.206 6.5 A 1 NW 1 1 170 174 290 174 3.186 0 1.000 6.5 A - - - � � - - - - Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 532 1030 0.979 521 1008 0.517 9.9 A 3 SW 1 1 521 532 93 371 3.186 0 1.000 9.9 A 2023 Opening 11:23 am 05/10/2022 2023 Opening - No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2023 Opening - No Build osi22i2o22 Intersection: 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (1 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2023 Opening EB NW SW LR LR LR 31 52 52 9 16 21 32 48 52 552 772 517 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: 181 st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C. R. 40) osi22i2o22 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations �i �` 'F � �i i� Traffic Vol, veh/h 61 283 439 77 66 81 Future Vol, veh/h 93 283 439 93 76 99 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 0 200 Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 101 308 477 101 86 113 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 578 0 - 0 987 477 Stage 1 - - - - 477 - Stage 2 - - - - 510 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 996 - - - 274 588 Stage 1 - - - - 624 - Stage 2 - - - - 603 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 996 - - - 246 588 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 246 - Stage 1 - - - - 561 - Stage 2 - - - - 603 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.2 0 19 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 996 - - - 246 588 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.101 - - - 0.351 0.191 HCM Control Delay (s) 9 - - - 27.3 12.6 HCM Lane LOS A - - - D B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - - 1.5 0.7 2023 Opening 11:23 am 05/10/2022 2023 Opening - No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2023 Opening - No Build osi22i2o22 Intersection: 8: 181st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C.R. 40) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2023 Opening EB SB SB L L R 26 42 54 18 24 33 36 43 53 1372 200 200 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: ROAD B& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW os�22�2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations � � � � Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 8 8 0 0 5 32 0 0 0 19 0 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 9 9 0 0 6 36 0 0 0 22 0 6 Major/Minor Major1 Conflicting Flow All 42 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1567 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1567 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - 0 Major2 0 9 - 4.12 - 2.218 - 1611 - 1611 0 Minor1 Minor2 0 54 69 9 51 51 24 - 27 27 - 24 24 - - 27 42 - 27 27 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 - 944 822 1073 948 840 1052 - 990 873 - 994 875 - - 990 860 - 990 873 - - 935 817 1073 943 835 1052 - 935 817 - 943 835 - - 984 868 - 988 875 - - 985 860 - 984 868 - Approach E B HCM Control Delay, s 3.7 HCM LOS � � NB SB 0 8.8 A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) - 1567 - - 1611 - - 964 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.006 - - - - - 0.028 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 7.3 0 - 0 - - 8.8 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 2026 Full Build 1:46 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 06/22/2022 Intersection: 2: ROAD B& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW Movement SB Directions Served LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 26 Average Queue (ft) 16 95th Queue (ft) 34 Link Distance (ft) 185 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) _ Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) � 2026 Full Build SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: ROAD C& Twin Lakes Pkwy os�22�2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations � � � � Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 19 0 5 0 0 0 8 19 0 0 32 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 0 6 0 0 0 9 22 0 0 36 36 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor2 Minor1 Major1 94 94 54 97 112 22 72 54 54 - 40 40 - - 40 40 - 57 72 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 889 796 1013 885 778 1055 1528 958 850 - 975 862 - - 975 862 - 955 835 - - 885 791 1013 876 885 791 - 876 952 850 - 969 969 857 - 950 SE NW 9.1 0 A A 773 1055 1528 773 - - 857 - - 835 - - � � 0 Major2 0 22 - 4.12 - 2.218 - 1593 - 1593 SW 0 0 0 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NERNWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh/h) 1528 - - - 909 1593 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - - 0.03 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - 0 9.1 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1 0 - - 2026 Full Build 1:46 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 06/22/2022 Intersection: 3: ROAD C& Twin Lakes Pkwy Movement SE Directions Served LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 26 Average Queue (ft) 18 95th Queue (ft) 37 Link Distance (ft) 250 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) _ Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) � 2026 Full Build SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout 6: Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H 13)/Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H. 13) & Twin Lake��ray NW/Ty Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Follow-Up Headway, s Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh �� Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 91 767 0.976 89 748 0.119 6.1 A 0 SE 1 1 89 91 388 124 3.186 0 1.000 6.1 A � � � � � - � � � Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 53 679 0.980 52 666 0.078 6.3 A 0 NW 1 1 52 53 509 223 3.186 0 1.000 6.3 A - - - � � - - - - Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 606 996 0.981 594 977 0.608 12.3 B 4 NE 1 1 594 606 126 353 3.186 0 1.000 12.3 B � � � � � - � � � SW 1 1 396 404 108 454 3.186 0 1.000 8.0 A Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 404 1014 0.979 396 993 0.398 8.0 A 2 � - - - - 2026 Full Build 1:46 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 06/22/2022 Intersection: 6: Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H 13)/Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H. 13) & Twin Lakes Pai Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2026 Full Build SE NW NE SW LTR LTR LTR LTR 30 30 56 102 12 17 24 27 36 40 69 87 71 406 317 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd I��(�9?$.A.H. 13) Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Follow-Up Headway, s Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh 9.1 A � � � � Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 366 1013 0.978 358 991 0.361 7.5 A 2 EB 1 1 358 366 109 569 3.186 0 1.000 7.5 A � � � � � - � � � Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 185 847 0.989 183 838 0.218 6.6 A 1 NW 1 1 183 185 288 187 3.186 0 1.000 6.6 A - - - � � - - - - Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 579 1023 0.981 568 1004 0.566 11.0 B 4 SW 1 1 568 579 99 374 3.186 0 1.000 11.0 B 2026 Full Build 1:46 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 06/22/2022 Intersection: 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (1 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2026 Full Build EB NW SW LR LR LR 125 75 160 22 34 72 93 77 151 552 772 517 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: 181 st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C. R. 40) osi2si2o22 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations � � � � � � Traffic Vol, veh/h 65 293 454 83 71 87 Future Vol, veh/h 97 293 454 99 81 105 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 0 200 Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 105 318 493 108 92 119 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 601 0 - 0 1021 493 Stage 1 - - - - 493 - Stage 2 - - - - 528 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 976 - - - 262 576 Stage 1 - - - - 614 - Stage 2 - - - - 592 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 976 - - - 234 576 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 234 - Stage 1 - - - - 548 - Stage 2 - - - - 592 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.3 0 20.3 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 976 - - - 234 576 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.108 - - - 0.393 0.207 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.1 - - - 30 12.9 HCM Lane LOS A - - - D B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - - - 1.8 0.8 2026 Full Build 1:46 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 06/22/2022 Intersection: 8: 181st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C.R. 40) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2026 Full Build EB SB SB L L R 53 52 96 36 38 45 54 55 72 1372 200 200 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: ROAD B& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW os�22�2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations � � � � Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 8 8 0 0 5 32 0 0 0 19 0 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 9 9 0 0 6 36 0 0 0 22 0 6 Major/Minor Major1 Conflicting Flow All 42 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1567 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1567 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - 0 Major2 0 9 - 4.12 - 2.218 - 1611 - 1611 0 Minor1 Minor2 0 54 69 9 51 51 24 - 27 27 - 24 24 - - 27 42 - 27 27 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 - 944 822 1073 948 840 1052 - 990 873 - 994 875 - - 990 860 - 990 873 - - 935 817 1073 943 835 1052 - 935 817 - 943 835 - - 984 868 - 988 875 - - 985 860 - 984 868 - Approach E B HCM Control Delay, s 3.7 HCM LOS � � NB SB 0 8.8 A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) - 1567 - - 1611 - - 964 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.006 - - - - - 0.028 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 7.3 0 - 0 - - 8.8 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 2046 Future Build 1:58 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 06/22/2022 Intersection: 2: ROAD B& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2046 Future Build SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: ROAD C& Twin Lakes Pkwy os�22�2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations � � � � Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 19 0 5 0 0 0 8 19 0 0 32 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 21 0 5 0 0 0 9 21 0 0 35 35 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor2 Minor1 Major1 92 92 53 94 109 21 70 53 53 - 39 39 - - 39 39 - 55 70 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 892 798 1014 889 781 1056 1531 960 851 - 976 862 - - 976 862 - 957 837 - - 888 793 1014 880 888 793 - 880 954 851 - 970 970 857 - 952 SE NW 9.1 0 A A 776 1056 1531 776 - - 857 - - 837 - - � � 0 Major2 0 21 - 4.12 - 2.218 - 1595 - 1595 SW 0 0 0 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NERNWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh/h) 1531 - - - 912 1595 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - - 0.029 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - 0 9.1 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1 0 - - 2046 Future Build 1:58 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 06/22/2022 Intersection: 3: ROAD C& Twin Lakes Pkwy Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2046 Future Build SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout 6: Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H 13)/Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H. 13) & Twin Lake��ray NW/Ty Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Follow-Up Headway, s Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh -3 � � � � Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 121 702 0.981 119 689 0.172 7.2 A 1 SE 1 1 119 121 476 154 3.186 0 1.000 7.2 A � � � � � — � � � Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 69 601 0.970 67 582 0.115 7.6 A 0 NW 1 1 67 69 632 261 3.186 0 1.000 7.6 A — — — � � — — — — Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 738 968 0.980 723 949 0.763 18.7 C 8 NE 1 1 723 738 155 442 3.186 0 1.000 18.7 C � � � � � — � � � SW 1 1 485 495 135 566 3.186 0 1.000 9.9 A Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 495 987 0.980 485 968 0.501 9.9 A 3 � — — — — 2046 Future Build 1:58 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 06/22/2022 Intersection: 6: Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H 13)/Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H. 13) & Twin Lakes Pai Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2046 Future Build SE NW NE SW LTR LTR LTR LTR 50 30 143 77 16 21 63 39 47 43 132 78 71 406 317 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd I��(�9?$.A.H. 13) Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Follow-Up Headway, s Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh -3 � � � � Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 468 979 0.981 459 961 0.478 9.5 A 3 EB 1 1 459 468 143 713 3.186 0 1.000 9.5 A � � � � � — � � � Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 274 789 0.993 272 783 0.347 8.8 A 2 NW 1 1 272 274 359 252 3.186 0 1.000 8.8 A — — — � � — — — — Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 707 974 0.980 693 954 0.726 16.7 C 7 SW 1 1 693 707 149 484 3.186 0 1.000 16.7 C 2046 Future Build 1:58 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 06/22/2022 Intersection: 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (1 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2046 Future Build EB NW SW LR LR LR 54 77 149 20 44 70 60 78 148 552 772 517 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: 181 st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C. R. 40) osi2si2o22 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 9.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations � � � � � � Traffic Vol, veh/h 95 358 559 120 103 126 Future Vol, veh/h 127 358 559 136 113 144 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 0 200 Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtFlow 138 389 608 148 128 164 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 756 0 - 0 1273 608 Stage 1 - - - - 608 - Stage 2 - - - - 665 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 855 - - - 185 496 Stage 1 - - - - 543 - Stage 2 - - - - 511 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 855 - - - 155 496 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 155 - Stage 1 - - - - 456 - Stage 2 - - - - 511 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.6 0 48.6 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 855 - - - 155 496 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.161 - - - 0.828 0.33 HCM Control Delay (s) 10 - - - 90.4 15.8 HCM Lane LOS B - - - F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - - - 5.5 1.4 2046 Future Build 1:58 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 06/22/2022 Intersection: 8: 181st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C.R. 40) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2046 Future Build EB SB SB L L R 74 157 90 33 69 57 54 147 91 1372 200 200 SimTraffic Report Page 1 � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix I Access A & Twin Lakes Access B & Twin Lakes Access C & Twin Lakes Origin 1 (N) Origin 2 (S) Origin 3 (W) Origin 4 (N) Origin 5 (W) Origin 6 (E) Access A & Twin Lakes Access B & Twin Lakes Access C & Twin Lakes Access A & Twin Lakes Access B & Twin Lakes Access C & Twin Lakes Access A & Twin Lakes Access B & Twin Lakes Access C & Twin Lakes Access A & Twin Lakes Access B & Twin Lakes Access C & Twin Lakes Access A & Twin Lakes Access B & Twin Lakes Access C & Twin Lakes Access A & Twin Lakes Access B & Twin Lakes Access C & Twin Lakes A & Twin Lakes B & Twin Lakes C & Twin Lakes A & Twin Lakes B & Twin Lakes C & Twin Lakes A & Twin Lakes B & Twin Lakes C & Twin Lakes A & Twin Lakes B & Twin Lakes C & Twin Lakes A & Twin Lakes B & Twin Lakes C & Twin Lakes A & Twin Lakes B & Twin Lakes C & Twin Lakes AM Peak Hour Entering Exiting Single Family 4 11 Multi-Familv 0 0 Origin 1 (N) Origin 1 (N) Origin 1 (N) Origin 2 (S) Origin 2 (S) Origin 2 (S) Origin 3 (W) Origin 3 (W) Origin 3 (W) Origin 4 (N) Origin 4 (N) Origin 4 (N) Origin 5 (W) Origin 5 (W) Origin 5 (W) Origin 6 (E) Origin 6 (E) Oriein 6 (El PM Peak Hour Entering Exiting 10 14 0 0 25% 25% 25% 25% 50% 50% 50% 50% 25% 25% 25% 25% 15% 5% 5% 15% 40% 20% 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 Origin 1 (N) Origin 1 (N) Origin 1 (N) Origin 2 (S) Origin 2 (S) Origin 2 (S) Origin 3 (W) Origin 3 (W) Origin 3 (W) Origin 4 (N) Origin 4 (N) Origin 4 (N) Origin 5 (W) Origin 5 (W) Origin 5 (W) Origin 6 (E) Origin 6 (E) Oriein 6 (El 15% 5% 5% 15% 40% 20% 0.00% 11.11% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 11.11% 0.00% 11.11% 22.22% 11.11% 11.11% 11.11% 11.11% 15% 5% 5% 15% 40% 20% 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 0.00% 11.11% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 11.11% 0.00% 11.11% 22.22% 11.11% 11.11% 11.11% 11.11% 15% 5% 5% 15% 40% 20% 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 7.14% 7.14% 7.14% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 7.14% 7.14% 7.14% 7.14% 21.43% 7.14% 7.14% 7.14% 7.14% AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Single Family 22 46 66 37 Multi-Familv 17 53 53 32 Access D & CR 40 Access E & CR 40 Origin 1 (N) Origin 2 (5) Origin 3 (W) Origin 4 (N) Origin 5 (W) Origin 6 (E) Access D & CR 40 Access E & CR 40 Access D & CR 40 Access E & CR 40 Access D & CR 40 Access E & CR 40 Access D & CR 40 Access E & CR 40 Access D & CR 40 Access E & CR 40 Access D & CR 40 Access E & CR 40 D&CR40 E&CR40 D&CR40 E&CR40 D&CR40 E&CR40 D&CR40 E&CR40 D&CR40 E&CR40 D&CR40 E&CR40 Origin 1 (N) Origin 1 (N) Origin 2 (S) Origin 2 (S) Origin 3 (W) Origin 3 (W) Origin 4 (N) Origin 4 (N) Origin 5 (W) Origin 5 (W) Origin 6 (E) Origin 6 (E) Origin 1 (N) Origin 1 (N) Origin 2 (S) Origin 2 (S) Origin 3 (W) Origin 3 (W) Origin 4 (N) Origin 4 (N) Origin 5 (W) Origin 5 (W) Origin 6 (E) Origin 6 (E) 65 % 35% 0% 0% 15% 15% 20% 25% E� E� � � � � 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 13.79% 6.90% 13.79% 6.90% 17.24% 10.34% 20.69% 10.34% 65 % 35% 0% 0% 15% 15% 20% 25% 0 0 0 0 10 5 10 5 13 7 16 9 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 13.33 % 6.67% 13.33 % 6.67% 17.33 % 9.33 % 21.33 % 12.00% 65 % 35% 0% 0% 20% 30% 30% 20% 0 0 0 0 15 8 23 12 23 12 15 8 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 12.93 % 6.90% 19.83 % 10.34% 19.83 % 10.34% 12.93 % 6.90% 65 % 35% 0% 0% 20% 30% 30% 20% 0 0 0 0 9 5 13 7 13 7 9 5 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 13. 24 % 7.35 % 19.12 % 10. 29 % 19.12 % 10. 29 % 13. 24 % 7.35 % AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Single Family 59 168 184 104 Multi-Familv 0 0 0 0 Access A & Twin Lakes Access B & Twin Lakes Access C & Twin Lakes Origin 1 (N) Origin 2 (S) Origin 3 (W) Origin 4 (N) Origin 5 (W) Origin 6 (E) Access A & Twin Lakes Access B & Twin Lakes Access C & Twin Lakes Access A & Twin Lakes Access B & Twin Lakes Access C & Twin Lakes Access A & Twin Lakes Access B & Twin Lakes Access C & Twin Lakes Access A & Twin Lakes Access B & Twin Lakes Access C & Twin Lakes Access A & Twin Lakes Access B & Twin Lakes Access C & Twin Lakes Access A & Twin Lakes Access B & Twin Lakes Access C & Twin Lakes s A & Twin Lakes s B & Twin Lakes s C & Twin Lakes s A & Twin Lakes s B & Twin Lakes s C & Twin Lakes s A & Twin Lakes s B & Twin Lakes s C & Twin Lakes s A & Twin Lakes s B & Twin Lakes s C & Twin Lakes s A & Twin Lakes s B & Twin Lakes s C & Twin Lakes s A & Twin Lakes s B & Twin Lakes s C & Twin Lakes Origin 1 (N) Origin 1 (N) Origin 1 (N) Origin 2 (S) Origin 2 (S) Origin 2 (S) Origin 3 (W) Origin 3 (W) Origin 3 (W) Origin 4 (N) Origin 4 (N) Origin 4 (N) Origin 5 (W) Origin 5 (W) Origin 5 (W) Origin 6 (E) Origin 6 (E) Ori�in 6 (El Origin 1 (N) Origin 1 (N) Origin 1 (N) Origin 2 (S) Origin 2 (S) Origin 2 (S) Origin 3 (W) Origin 3 (W) Origin 3 (W) Origin 4 (N) Origin 4 (N) Origin 4 (N) Origin 5 (W) Origin 5 (W) Origin 5 (W) Origin 6 (E) Origin 6 (E) Oriein 6 (E) 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 30% 30% 30% 20% 20% 20% 45% 45% 45% 5% 5% 5% 20% 20% 20% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 4 12 4 12 4 10 9 26 9 26 8 23 1 3 1 3 1 3 4 12 4 12 4 10 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 59 170 13 13 11 29 29 25 3 3 3 13 13 11 3 3 3 3 3 3 184 6.78% 7.06% 6.78% 7.06% 6.78% 5.88% 15.25% 15.29% 15.25% 15.29% 13.56% 13.53% 1.69% 1.76% 1.69% 1.76% 1.69% 1.76% 6.78% 7.06% 6.78% 7.06% 6.78% 5.88% 1.69% 1.76% 1.69% 1.76% 1.69% 1.76% 1.69% 1.76% 1.69% 1.76% 1.69% 1.76% 7.07% 7.07% 5.98% 15.76% 15.76% 13.59% 1.63% 1.63% 1.63% 7.07% 7.07% 5.98% 1.63% 1.63% 1.63% 1.63% 1.63% 1.63% 35% 35% 30% 20% 45% 5% 20% 5% 5% 7 7 6 16 16 14 2 2 2 7 7 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 104 6.73% 6.73% 5.77% 15.38% 15.38% 13.46% 1.92% 1.92% 1.92% 6.73% 6.73% 5.77% 1.92% 1.92% 1.92% 1.92% 1.92% 1.92% � Architecture + Engineering+ Environmental + Planning AppendixJ HCM 2010 TWSC 2: ROAD B& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW os�22�2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations � � � � Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 8 0 0 5 32 0 0 0 19 0 5 Future Vol, veh/h 8 11 1 4 8 32 1 0 5 19 0 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 9 13 1 5 9 36 1 0 6 22 0 6 Major/Minor Major1 Conflicting Flow All 45 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.209 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1570 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1570 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - 0 Major2 0 14 - 4.11 - 2.209 - 1611 - 1611 0 Minor1 Minor2 0 72 87 14 72 69 27 - 32 32 - 37 37 - - 40 55 - 35 32 - - 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 - 922 805 1069 922 823 1051 - 987 870 - 981 866 - - 977 851 - 983 870 - - 911 798 1069 911 816 1051 - 911 798 - 911 816 - - 981 865 - 975 863 - - 969 848 - 972 865 - Approach E B HCM Control Delay, s 2.9 HCM LOS � � NB SB 8.5 9 A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1039 1570 - - 1611 - - 937 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 0.006 - - 0.003 - - 0.029 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 7.3 0 - 7.2 0 - 9 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 2023 Opening 11:23 am 05/10/2022 2023 Opening - No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2023 Opening - No Build osi22i2o22 Intersection: 1: ROAD A& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW Movement NB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 29 Average Queue (ft) 4 95th Queue (ft) 21 Link Distance (ft) 504 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) _ Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) � 2023 Opening SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: ROAD B& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW os�2s�2o22 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations � � � � Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 8 0 0 5 32 0 0 0 19 0 5 Future Vol, veh/h 8 11 1 4 8 32 1 0 5 19 0 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 9 13 1 5 9 36 1 0 6 22 0 6 Major/Minor Major1 Conflicting Flow All 45 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.209 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1570 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1570 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - 0 Major2 0 14 - 4.11 - 2.209 - 1611 - 1611 0 Minor1 Minor2 0 72 87 14 72 69 27 - 32 32 - 37 37 - - 40 55 - 35 32 - - 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 - 922 805 1069 922 823 1051 - 987 870 - 981 866 - - 977 851 - 983 870 - - 911 798 1069 911 816 1051 - 911 798 - 911 816 - - 981 865 - 975 863 - - 969 848 - 972 865 - Approach E B HCM Control Delay, s 2.9 HCM LOS � � NB SB 8.5 9 A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1039 1570 - - 1611 - - 937 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 0.006 - - 0.003 - - 0.029 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 7.3 0 - 7.2 0 - 9 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 2023 Opening 11:23 am 05/10/2022 2023 Opening - No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2023 Opening - No Build osi22i2o22 Intersection: 2: ROAD B& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2023 Opening � LTR LTR 53 26 22 15 65 35 514 185 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: ROAD C& Twin Lakes Pkwy os�22�2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations � � � � Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 0 5 0 0 0 8 19 0 0 32 32 Future Vol, veh/h 19 0 5 1 0 3 8 27 0 2 38 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 22 0 6 1 0 3 9 31 0 2 43 36 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor2 Minor1 Major1 116 114 61 117 132 31 79 65 65 - 49 49 - - 51 49 - 68 83 - - 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 4.11 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 2.209 863 778 1007 862 761 1046 1526 948 843 - 967 856 - - 964 856 - 945 828 - - 855 773 1007 853 855 773 - 853 942 842 - 961 955 851 - 939 SE NW 9.2 8.7 A A 756 1046 1526 756 - - 851 - - 827 - - NE 1.7 0 Major2 0 31 - 4.11 - 2.209 - 1588 - 1588 SW 0.2 0 0 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NERNWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh/h) 1526 - - 990 883 1588 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.005 0.031 0.001 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - 8.7 9.2 7.3 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - A A A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.1 0 - - 2023 Opening 11:23 am 05/10/2022 2023 Opening - No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2023 Opening - No Build osi22i2o22 Intersection: 3: ROAD C& Twin Lakes Pkwy Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2023 Opening SE NE LTR LTR 26 30 18 9 37 31 250 116 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout 6: Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H 13)/Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H. 13) & Twin Lake��ray NW/Ty Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Follow-Up Headway, s Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh 9.5 A � � � � Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 88 777 0.975 86 758 0.113 5.9 A 0 SE 1 1 86 88 374 121 3.186 0 1.000 5.9 A � � � � � - � � � Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 55 693 0.999 55 693 0.079 6.0 A 0 NW 1 1 55 55 489 211 3.186 0 1.000 6.0 A - - - � � - - - - Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 581 1002 0.980 570 982 0.580 11.5 B 4 NE 1 1 570 581 120 342 3.186 0 1.000 11.5 B � � � � � - � � � SW 1 1 380 387 108 436 3.186 0 1.000 7.7 A Left LTR LTR 1.000 5.193 387 1014 0.981 380 995 0.382 7.7 A 2 � - - - - 2023 Opening 11:23 am 05/10/2022 2023 Opening - No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2023 Opening - No Build osi22i2o22 Intersection: 6: Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H 13)/Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H. 13) & Twin Lakes Pai Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2023 Opening SE NW NE SW LTR LTR LTR LTR 29 31 80 56 4 13 27 29 21 38 80 63 84 419 330 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd I��(�9?$.A.H. 13) Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Follow-Up Headway, s Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh 8.5 A � � � � Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 366 1023 0.981 359 1004 0.358 7.4 A 2 EB 1 1 359 366 99 526 3.186 0 1.000 7.4 A � � � � � - � � � Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 178 845 0.978 174 826 0.211 6.6 A 1 NW 1 1 174 178 290 175 3.186 0 1.000 6.6 A - - - � � - - - - Left LR LR 1.000 5.193 533 1030 0.979 522 1008 0.518 9.9 A 3 SW 1 1 522 533 93 375 3.186 0 1.000 9.9 A 2023 Opening 11:23 am 05/10/2022 2023 Opening - No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2023 Opening - No Build osi22i2o22 Intersection: 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (1 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2023 Opening EB NW SW LR LR LR 51 57 54 7 25 17 37 56 51 552 772 517 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 8: 181 st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C. R. 40) osio2i2o22 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations � � � � � � Traffic Vol, veh/h 61 283 438 78 67 82 Future Vol, veh/h 65 283 438 81 70 87 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 0 200 Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 71 308 476 88 80 99 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 564 0 - 0 926 476 Stage 1 - - - - 476 - Stage 2 - - - - 450 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1008 - - - 298 589 Stage 1 - - - - 625 - Stage 2 - - - - 642 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1008 - - - 277 589 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 277 - Stage 1 - - - - 581 - Stage 2 - - - - 642 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.7 0 17.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 1008 - - - 277 589 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.07 - - - 0.287 0.168 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.8 - - - 23.1 12.3 HCM Lane LOS A - - - C B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - - 1.2 0.6 2023 Opening 11:23 am 05/10/2022 2023 Opening - No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: 181 st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C. R. 40) osi22i2o22 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations �i �` 'F � �i i� Traffic Vol, veh/h 93 283 439 93 76 99 Future Vol, veh/h 93 283 439 93 76 99 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 0 200 Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 101 308 477 101 86 113 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 578 0 - 0 987 477 Stage 1 - - - - 477 - Stage 2 - - - - 510 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 996 - - - 274 588 Stage 1 - - - - 624 - Stage 2 - - - - 603 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 996 - - - 246 588 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 246 - Stage 1 - - - - 561 - Stage 2 - - - - 603 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.2 0 19 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 996 - - - 246 588 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.101 - - - 0.351 0.191 HCM Control Delay (s) 9 - - - 27.3 12.6 HCM Lane LOS A - - - D B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - - 1.5 0.7 2023 Opening 11:23 am 05/10/2022 2023 Opening - No Build Synchro 11 Report Page 1 � Architecture + Engineering+ Environmental + Planning Appendix K HCM 2010 TWSC 1: ROAD A& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW 10/18/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '� �' � Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 0 0 10 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 94 42 22 53 23 13 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 107 48 25 60 26 15 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 155 0 241 131 Stage 1 - - - - 131 - Stage 2 - - - - 110 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1425 - 747 919 Stage 1 - - - - 895 - Stage 2 - - - - 915 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1425 - 734 919 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 734 - Stage 1 - - - - 895 - Stage 2 - - - - 899 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.2 9.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 792 - - 1425 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.052 - - 0.018 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 - - 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 - 2026 Full Build 1:46 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 10/18/2022 Intersection: 1: ROAD A& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2026 Full Build WB NB LT LR 32 31 4 18 22 43 189 504 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: ROAD B& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW 10/18/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations � � � � Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 8 0 0 5 32 0 0 0 19 0 5 Future Vol, veh/h 8 57 42 22 47 32 23 0 13 19 0 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 9 65 48 25 53 36 26 0 15 22 0 6 Major/Minor Major1 Conflicting Flow All 89 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1506 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1506 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - 0 Major2 0 113 - 4.12 - 2.218 - 1476 - 1476 0 Minor1 Minor2 0 231 246 89 236 252 71 - 107 107 - 121 121 - - 124 139 - 115 131 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 - 724 656 969 718 651 991 - 898 807 - 883 796 - - 880 782 - 890 788 - - 707 640 969 694 635 991 - 707 640 - 694 635 - - 893 802 - 878 782 - - 859 768 - 871 783 - Approach E B HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 HCM LOS � � NB SB 9.9 10.1 A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 783 1506 - - 1476 - - 740 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.052 0.006 - - 0.017 - - 0.037 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.9 7.4 0 - 7.5 0 - 10.1 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1 2026 Full Build 1:46 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 10/18/2022 Intersection: 2: ROAD B& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2026 Full Build � LTR LTR 30 26 29 15 31 36 295 185 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: ROAD C& Twin Lakes Pkwy 10/18/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations � � � � Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 0 5 0 0 0 8 19 0 0 32 32 Future Vol, veh/h 19 0 5 20 0 12 8 45 36 20 76 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 0 6 23 0 14 9 51 41 23 86 36 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor2 Minor1 Major1 247 260 104 243 258 72 122 150 150 - 90 90 - - 97 110 - 153 168 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 707 645 951 711 646 990 1465 853 773 - 917 820 - - 910 804 - 849 759 - - 685 630 951 695 685 630 - 695 847 761 - 911 891 798 - 830 SE NW 10.1 9.8 B A 631 990 1465 631 - - 814 - - 747 - - NE 0.7 0 Major2 0 92 - 4.12 - 2.218 - 1503 - 1503 SW 1.2 0 0 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NERNWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh/h) 1465 - - 782 727 1503 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.047 0.038 0.015 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 9.8 10.1 7.4 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - A B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.1 0 - - 2026 Full Build 1:46 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 10/18/2022 Intersection: 2: ROAD B& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2026 Full Build � LTR LTR 30 26 29 15 31 36 295 185 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 4: Cleveland Rd NW (C.R. 40) & ROAD D 10/18/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations �i � �''F 'F i� Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 148 148 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 148 148 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 185 0 - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 168 168 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 252 168 168 0 - 0 Stage 1 168 - - - - - Stage 2 84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.23 4.13 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.83 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 2.219 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 726 875 1408 - - - Stage 1 861 - - - - - Stage 2 930 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 726 875 1408 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 726 - - - - - Stage 1 861 - - - - - Stage 2 930 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1408 - - - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 0 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A - A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - - - 2026 Full Build 1:46 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Cleveland Rd NW (C.R. 40) & ROAD E 10/18/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations � �''F 'F i� Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 148 148 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 148 148 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 168 168 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 252 168 168 0 - 0 Stage 1 168 - - - - - Stage 2 84 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.23 4.13 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.83 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 2.219 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 726 875 1408 - - - Stage 1 861 - - - - - Stage 2 930 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 726 875 1408 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 726 - - - - - Stage 1 861 - - - - - Stage 2 930 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1408 - - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A - A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - - 2026 Full Build 1:46 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Roundabout 6: Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H 13)/Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H. 13) & Twin Lake��ray NW/Ty Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Follow-Up Headway, s Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh 8.7 A � � � Left LTR LTR 1.000 2.609 4.976 91 828 0.976 89 808 0.110 5.6 A 0 SE 1 1 89 91 501 126 0 1.000 5.6 A � � � � � � NW 1 1 - 124 126 � 509 356 - 0 1.000 6.0 A Left LTR LTR 1.000 2.609 4.976 126 821 0.984 124 808 0.153 6.0 A 1 - - - � - - - - - Left LTR LTR 1.000 2.609 4.976 648 1106 0.982 636 1086 0.586 10.8 B 4 NE 1 1 636 648 217 375 0 1.000 10.8 B � � � � � � SW 1 1 - 488 497 � 130 505 - 0 1.000 7.2 A Left LTR LTR 1.000 2.609 4.976 497 1209 0.981 488 1185 0.411 7.2 A 2 i - - - - - 2026 Full Build 1:46 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 10/18/2022 Intersection: 6: Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H 13)/Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H. 13) & Twin Lakes Pai Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2026 Full Build SE NW NE SW LTR LTR LTR LTR 29 31 202 79 20 22 93 31 42 45 203 90 84 419 330 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 6th Roundabout 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd N�(�9?$.A.H. 13) Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Follow-Up Headway, s Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh 7.7 A � � � Left LR LR 1.000 2.609 4.976 401 1148 0.980 393 1126 0.349 6.7 A 2 EB 1 1 393 401 180 591 0 1.000 6.7 A � � � � � � NW 1 1 - 248 250 � 288 293 - 0 1.000 5.9 A Left LR LR 1.000 2.609 4.976 250 1029 0.992 248 1020 0.243 5.9 A 1 - - - � - - - - - Left LR LR 1.000 2.609 4.976 650 1220 0.980 637 1195 0.533 9.1 A 3 SW 1 1 637 650 121 417 0 1.000 9.1 A 2026 Full Build 1:46 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 10/18/2022 Intersection: 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (1 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2026 Full Build EB NW SW LR LR LR 72 100 102 39 47 65 74 87 116 552 772 517 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: 181 st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C. R. 40) 10/18/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations �i �` 'F � �i i� Traffic Vol, veh/h 97 293 454 99 81 105 Future Vol, veh/h 97 293 454 99 81 105 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 0 200 Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 105 318 493 108 92 119 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 601 0 - 0 1021 493 Stage 1 - - - - 493 - Stage 2 - - - - 528 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 976 - - - 262 576 Stage 1 - - - - 614 - Stage 2 - - - - 592 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 976 - - - 234 576 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 234 - Stage 1 - - - - 548 - Stage 2 - - - - 592 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.3 0 20.3 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 976 - - - 234 576 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.108 - - - 0.393 0.207 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.1 - - - 30 12.9 HCM Lane LOS A - - - D B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - - - 1.8 0.8 2026 Full Build 1:46 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 10/18/2022 Intersection: 8: 181st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C.R. 40) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2026 Full Build EB SB SB L L R 74 70 70 28 39 44 62 67 69 1002 200 200 SimTraffic Report Page 1 � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix L HCM 2010 TWSC 1: ROAD A& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW 10/18/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '� �' � Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 0 0 60 10 0 Future Vol, veh/h 94 42 22 94 28 17 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 107 48 25 107 32 19 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 155 0 288 131 Stage 1 - - - - 131 - Stage 2 - - - - 157 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1425 - 702 919 Stage 1 - - - - 895 - Stage 2 - - - - 871 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1425 - 689 919 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 689 - Stage 1 - - - - 895 - Stage 2 - - - - 854 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.4 10.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 761 - - 1425 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.067 - - 0.018 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 - - 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 - 2046 Future Build 1:58 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 10/18/2022 Intersection: 1: ROAD A& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW Movement NB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 50 Average Queue (ft) 21 95th Queue (ft) 44 Link Distance (ft) 504 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) _ Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) � 2046 Future Build SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: ROAD B& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW 10/18/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations � � � � Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 8 0 0 5 32 0 0 0 19 0 5 Future Vol, veh/h 8 61 42 22 43 32 18 0 17 19 0 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 9 69 48 25 49 36 20 0 19 22 0 6 Major/Minor Major1 Conflicting Flow All 85 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1512 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1512 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stage 1 - Stage 2 - 0 Major2 0 117 - 4.12 - 2.218 - 1471 - 1471 0 Minor1 Minor2 0 231 246 93 238 252 67 - 111 111 - 117 117 - - 120 135 - 121 135 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 - 724 656 964 716 651 997 - 894 804 - 888 799 - - 884 785 - 883 785 - - 707 640 964 689 635 997 - 707 640 - 689 635 - - 889 799 - 883 785 - - 863 771 - 860 780 - Approach E B HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 HCM LOS � � NB SB 9.7 10.1 A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 812 1512 - - 1471 - - 736 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.049 0.006 - - 0.017 - - 0.037 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.7 7.4 0 - 7.5 0 - 10.1 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1 2046 Future Build 1:58 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 10/18/2022 Intersection: 2: ROAD B& Twin Lakes Pkwy NW Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2046 Future Build WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR 31 30 26 9 20 15 32 42 36 581 295 185 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: ROAD C& Twin Lakes Pkwy 10/18/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations � � � � Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 0 5 0 0 0 8 19 0 0 32 32 Future Vol, veh/h 19 0 5 16 0 17 8 53 36 20 76 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 0 6 18 0 19 9 60 41 23 86 36 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor2 Minor1 Major1 258 269 104 252 267 81 122 150 150 - 99 99 - - 108 119 - 153 168 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 695 637 951 701 639 979 1465 853 773 - 907 813 - - 897 797 - 849 759 - - 669 622 951 684 669 622 - 684 847 760 - 901 873 791 - 830 SE NW 10.3 9.7 B A 624 979 1465 624 - - 807 - - 746 - - � �. 0 Major2 0 101 - 4.12 - 2.218 - 1491 - 1491 SW 1.2 0 0 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NET NERNWLn1 SELn1 SWL SWT SWR Capacity (veh/h) 1465 - - 810 713 1491 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.046 0.038 0.015 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 9.7 10.3 7.5 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - A B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.1 0 - - 2046 Future Build 1:58 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 10/18/2022 Intersection: 3: ROAD C& Twin Lakes Pkwy Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2046 Future Build SE NW SW LTR LTR LTR 26 27 30 7 8 0 27 28 0 250 307 179 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 4: Cleveland Rd NW (C.R. 40) & ROAD D 10/18/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations �i � �''F 'F i� Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 215 211 0 Future Vol, veh/h 22 22 39 227 231 39 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 185 0 - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 92 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 25 24 44 258 263 44 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 480 263 307 0 - 0 Stage 1 263 - - - - - Stage 2 217 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.23 4.13 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.83 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 2.219 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 530 775 1252 - - - Stage 1 780 - - - - - Stage 2 799 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 508 775 1252 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 508 - - - - - Stage 1 748 - - - - - Stage 2 799 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 11.2 1.3 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1252 - 508 775 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 - 0.049 0.031 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8 0.1 12.5 9.8 - - HCM Lane LOS A A B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.2 0.1 - - 2046 Future Build 1:58 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 10/18/2022 Intersection: 4: Cleveland Rd NW (C.R. 40) & ROAD D Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2046 Future Build EB EB NB L R LT 31 30 54 17 13 12 42 37 45 602 381 185 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Cleveland Rd NW (C.R. 40) & ROAD E 10/18/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations � �''F 'F i� Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 215 211 0 Future Vol, veh/h 12 12 20 254 233 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 100 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 14 14 20 289 265 23 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 450 265 288 0 - 0 Stage 1 265 - - - - - Stage 2 185 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.23 4.13 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.83 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 2.219 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 552 773 1272 - - - Stage 1 779 - - - - - Stage 2 829 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 542 773 1272 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 542 - - - - - Stage 1 764 - - - - - Stage 2 829 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.9 0.6 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1272 - 637 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - 0.043 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 0.1 10.9 - - HCM Lane LOS A A B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - 2046 Future Build 1:58 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 10/18/2022 Intersection: 5: Cleveland Rd NW (C.R. 40) & ROAD E Movement EB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 22 Average Queue (ft) 6 95th Queue (ft) 23 Link Distance (ft) 424 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) _ Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) � 2046 Future Build SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 6th Roundabout 6: Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H 13)/Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H. 13) & Twin Lake��ray NW/Ty Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Follow-Up Headway, s Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh -3 � � � Left LTR LTR 1.000 2.609 4.976 121 760 0.981 119 745 0.159 6.5 A 1 SE 1 1 119 121 585 154 0 1.000 6.5 A � � � � � � NW 1 1 — 126 128 � 632 394 - 0 1.000 7.0 A Left LTR LTR 1.000 2.609 4.976 128 724 0.984 126 712 0.177 7.0 A 1 — — — � — — — — — Left LTR LTR 1.000 2.609 4.976 779 1073 0.980 763 1051 0.726 15.6 C 7 NE 1 1 763 779 247 459 0 1.000 15.6 C � � � � � � SW 1 1 — 575 587 � 152 608 - 0 1.000 8.6 A Left LTR LTR 1.000 2.609 4.976 587 1182 0.980 575 1158 0.497 8.6 A 3 i — — — — — 2046 Future Build 1:58 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 10/18/2022 Intersection: 6: Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H 13)/Twin Lakes Road NW (C.S.A.H. 13) & Twin Lakes Pai Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2046 Future Build SE NW NE SW LTR LTR LTR LTR 55 79 299 171 15 47 159 72 48 90 337 177 84 419 330 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 6th Roundabout 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd N�(�9?$.A.H. 13) Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Entry Lanes Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Follow-Up Headway, s Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh -3 � � � Left LR LR 1.000 2.609 4.976 503 1098 0.980 493 1076 0.458 8.4 A 2 EB 1 1 493 503 224 736 0 1.000 8.4 A � � � � � � NW 1 1 — 334 338 � 359 368 - 0 1.000 7.6 A Left LR LR 1.000 2.609 4.976 338 957 0.988 334 945 0.353 7.6 A 2 — — — � — — — — — Left LR LR 1.000 2.609 4.976 788 1158 0.981 773 1136 0.681 13.0 B 6 SW 1 1 773 788 172 525 0 1.000 13.0 B 2046 Future Build 1:58 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 10/18/2022 Intersection: 7: Cleveland Road NW (C.R. 40) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (C.S.A.H 13) & Twin Lakes Rd NW (1 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2046 Future Build EB NW SW LR LR LR 102 54 98 39 29 51 93 53 87 552 772 517 SimTraffic Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: 181 st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C. R. 40) 10/18/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 17.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations �i �` 'F � �i i� Traffic Vol, veh/h 127 358 559 136 113 144 Future Vol, veh/h 163 358 559 159 127 164 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 0 200 Veh in Median Storage, #- 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 177 389 608 173 144 186 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 781 0 - 0 1351 608 Stage 1 - - - - 608 - Stage 2 - - - - 743 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 837 - - - 166 496 Stage 1 - - - - 543 - Stage 2 - - - - 470 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 837 - - -� 131 496 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - � 131 - Stage 1 - - - - 428 - Stage 2 - - - - 470 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 3.3 0 85.4 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 837 - - - 131 496 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.212 - - - 1.102 0.376 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.5 - - - 174.3 16.6 HCM Lane LOS B - - - F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - - - 8.2 1.7 Notes �: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 2046 Future Build 1:58 pm 05/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 10/18/2022 Intersection: 8: 181st Ave NW (CSAH 12) & Cleveland Rd NW (C.R. 40) Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB L R 68 22 52 6 68 23 200 200 SB SB L R 114 96 63 55 106 91 1002 2046 Future Build 200 SimTraffic Report Page 1 � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning EAW +�rC�T�� R E P 0 R T F 0 R: FROM: E��ineer,ng Lennar Foster Property ISG F��uir�anm�nlal Elk River, MN 55330 f lanning Whitney M.S. Behny <,,;�,,, ,,_,.�_, 7900 International Plaza Dr., Suite 550 Bloomington, MN 55425 22 26553 PAF�KING STUDY - DFtA1=T FOSTER PFiOPEFiTY - ELK RIVCR, MN SIGNATURE SHEET I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE CALCULATIONS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. V�d 4Vhit�uey M.S. Be��uy Pe, Project Engineer License No. 60768 My license renewal date is June 30, 2024 Documents covered by this seal: Foster Property Parking Study Foste� Property Deve�o�me�ut Elk River, Minnesota Engineer's Project Number: 22-26553 Dated this 18t" day of October, 2022 � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page i 2� 2�553 Fn�`r6Yf�f� STU�Y - �t�t;l��i� FOST�R PFiOPEF�TY - ELK RIV[R, MN TABLE OF CONTENTS ExecutiveSummary ..................................................................................................................................................................................1 StudiedSite Description and Location .................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................................................................................2 Purposeof Report .................................................................................................................................................................................2 StudyObjectives ....................................................................................................................................................................................2 Approach...................................................................................................................................................................................................2 Background...............................................................................................................................................................................................3 SiteInformation .....................................................................................................................................................................................3 Occupancy.............................................................................................................................................................................................4 Multi-Modal Transportation ..................................................................................................................................................................5 ParkingAnalysis ........................................................................................................................................................................................6 Conclusions............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 APPENDICES AppendixA: Preliminary Site Plan ............................................................................................................................................................A AppendixB: Project Location Map ...........................................................................................................................................................B Appendix C: Northstar Commuter Rail Map .............................................................................................................................................0 AppendixD: No Parking Area Exhibit .......................................................................................................................................................D AppendixE: Parking Stall Counts ............................................................................................................................................................. E � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page iu �� G�:� s �'�'�(=;�e4�'�:; �"u"��u` - ��,�16__u� FO�T�R PFiOPEFiTY - ELK RIV[R, MN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Studied Site Description and Location This Parking Study analyzed proposed parking throughout the Foster Property Development located in Elk River, Minnesota. ISG used projections of population and average persons per household to estimate how many parking spaces will be needed for the development. This study has been prepared in response to the development plan of Foster Property in Elk River, Minnesota and comments from City Planning Commission and Council. The proposed development will have evaluated as North and South with the division of the property being the existing mining pits / basins. This area provides a natural break of the overall development and is used as a transition zone for the development for single family and mixed-use residential homes. The North is comprised with single-family homes providing a minimum of a 3-car garage. There is an option for these single-family homes to upgrade to a 4-car garage iftheir lot size allows. The South is comprised of single family and multifamily units with 2-car garages. The report will be modeled conservatively with the lower car garage option assumed for all home types. There are two ghost plats that were requested by City Staff to envision what future connectively and development could look like within these areas. There are no known plans to develop these lots at the time of this report as they are not owned by the developer. One ghost plat in the southwest is proposed to add 14 single-family units. The second ghost plat is in the east of the proposed development and is proposed to contain 60 multi-family units. The report will be focused on the land currently being designed out; however, due to the ghost plats potential to changing available parking numbers, they will be mentioned intermittentlythroughoutthis report. This report is being provided in tandem with a Traffic Impact Analysis completed by ISG, which is reviewing the existing and proposed traffic generated by the development. `�` Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 9� of i 2� 2�:�:,� f��i��`r{9i�t.; ��V"YJLV - i�i=��aF"�u FOSTER PFiOPEFiTY - ELK RIVCR, MN �_�_► �_�_�Z��l�_�_�� Purpose of Report The purpose of this report is to document the methodologies, findings, recommendations, and conclusions of the Parking Study; including the basis for all assumptions, analysis parameters, and conclusions. This report presents data in a logical format including tables and figures in order to accurately and clearly convey the data and its meaning. Study Objectives The objectives of this study include the following: 1. Identify how much parking is provided within the sections of the development 2. Determine how existing and future demands relate to current capacity APPROACH At the time of writing, the development and some of the surrounding roadways are not constructed. As a result, ISG did not collect occupancy and duration counts in preparation for this study. In orderto evaluate the number of parking spaces needed and those that will be available within the development, a multitude of sources were used to gather data. The Comprehensive Housing Needs Analysis for Shelburne County, the City of Elk River Comprehensive Plan, and the proposed site concept for Foster Property were all used in tandem in order to create the parking analysis. `�` Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page � of i '�� G�:�:,� w"�i�;'r{9i�iG �6�L`u" - ��=�t;f=_u FO�T�R PF�OPEFiTY - ELK RIVCR, MN � =��_�Z�1��_► � �� Site Information This report studies the proposed parking at Foster Property Development. A preliminary site plan of the housing development is provided in Ap�e�ud°ox A and a project location map is provided in A�pendix �. Foster Property is a proposed housing development on approximately 260-acres of land within Elk River, Minnesota that offers 6 different sized products and 535 lots total. This does not include the ghost plats formally mentioned The population of Elk River has steadily increased since 2012 with 24,522 residents in 2019. It is anticipated that the city will exceed this growth within future years. Fu�a��e �L provides a visual representation of the historical and projected population numbers. Conservatively, this projection does not represent current economic trends that may impact future growth. For the intent of this study, the future growth of residents will be assumed to maintain the shown trend. r �u� I i�i�I�.�iL �f�U W�Ki3JIYtC. I tL3 F'i��L,�iW lt�f� 25,000 24,500 z O � 24,000 a J a 23,500 O a 23,000 22,500 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 YEAR ♦ Population —Linear (Population) Figure 1: Historical and Projected Population of Elk River The proposed development is located on the eastern side of the City limits and contains three small ponds / basin like features. Although there are no final designs on the development, there is a proposed shared use trail around the perimeter of these water features that connect to a City maintained park. Programming and public parking for the park are under discussion with the developer and City Staff. Vehicles will navigate the development through a series of interconnected roads that are public and HOA maintained. The north has 10 proposed public roadways, and the south has 14 proposed public roadways with 10 HOA maintained roadways. The overall development is planned to have 5 access points to the surrounding roadway network, three in the north that will connect to Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest and two onto Cleveland Road Northwest / County Road 40 (C.R. 40). Note that the extension of Twin Lakes Parkway Northwest will be under construction the summer of 2022. The construction will extend the roadway across Trott Brook to the east onto Cleveland Road Northwest (C.R. 40). Access points along this road are planned to be aligned with existing i ntersections. `�` Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page � of i � � u- 7f17 f1Rx -�9�f,Rf, �.t i.:.i:i.�,., � .";i.`'ftp"•Il�� ''�� ,��3 — �.? ,�.�� The proposed roadways are being developed matching the City of Elk River's standard local roadway section where the roadway's width allows for two-way traffic flow and parking on one-side of the street. The proposed roadways were evaluated by their total length and excluded parking at intersections and driveway locations. Conservatively, the roadway side with more homes fronting the roadway was used for this analysis. Additional discussion on the calculations provided are within the Pa�kin� Analysis portion of this report. Occupancy Due to the development being in the design phases, occupancy was based on historical population and household data. At approximately 3 persons per household, the development is estimated to house around 1,600 people. The historic population data is shown in Table 10 k `�=;:ali'-'.=��-"-�; Since 1990, the average persons per household in Elk River has not exceeded 3. Elk River is a commuter community, with 83% ofthe residents being employed outsidethe city. Currently, there are 8,780 housing units, 72% ofwhich are single-family detached homes, 15% are multi-family, and 12% are single-family attached homes. The vacancy rate in Elk River is just under 4%, which shows the need for housing within the city. The proposed development will bring needed single and multi-family home options to the community. �1.t"a��l w.={"`: It is expected visitors will come to the development. Street parking paired with driveway parking will likely be used for these events. While the majority of parking spaces in the development are unit parking, the development provides 526 street parking spaces total across the north and the south. Of the 526 street spaces, 490 will be available at any time to visitors or the public, while the remaining 36 are on private drives in the south, and therefore reserved for residents and their visitors. Note that event parking for visitors is a short-term and temporary event. `�` Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 4 of i Table 1: Elk River Population/Household Data. '��-��:,:;s �'�'�.i=;i�9i��:; �6V1i�?`u' - ^�1�=�,�iG�"�u �osTr� ��nf - c�� ivc�, �r� Multi-Modal Transportation There are both bus routes and trains available for residents to access multiple surrounding cities within the City of Elk River. ��.��•��C�', i ��_ The MetroTransit system provides connectivity from Big Lake, MN through Elk River, MN to Target Field Station in Minneapolis through the commuter rail line, Northstar. The Northstar line connects to the METRO Blue and Green Lines at Target Station. There are four trains that stop at Elk River every weekday; two (2) in the morning headed southbound to Target Field Station and two (2) in the evening headed northbound to Big Lake Station. A map of the Northstar commuter rail route is shown in A�pe�ud°ox C. The Elk River Station provides over 750 parking stalls with the availability for overnight parking. The trains themselves have onboard bicycle storage, making them more accessible for those commuters without cars. Tickets for the commuter rail are $4.25 from Elk River to downtown Minneapolis for a single-use one way fare. The Transit Assistance Program (TAP) fare is $2.25 for the same route. The TAP is available to all eligible low-income customers. ri�. �„^,� ,..;�r.. � r3 {�.�rid�� Tri-CAP bus routes are available from Elk River to St. Cloud, as well as other stops in the area. Fares range from $1.25 to $3.75 for a one way ticket within Sherburne County. The bus is available from 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM Monday-Friday within Elk River. Tri- CAP has a Dial-A-Ride service, which provides curb-to-curb transit service within the service area. Within Sherburne County, the bus service has service to: • Big Lake • Elk River • St. Cloud • Monticello • Princeton These destinations along with the Dial-A-Ride service make surrounding cities accessible to Elk River residents by bus. `�` Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page � of i �� :� s � �'�.f=;�e4�'e�:�u��u` - ��;16__u� FO�T�R PF�OPEFiTY - ELK RIV[R, MN PARKING ANALYSIS This section will explain the assumptions used to determine the amount of parking provided within the proposed residential development. Parking is provided in this development by the combination of on-street and home unit parking. From the assumptions listed below, the total parking available within the proposed development are a combination of the two (2) sections. In addition, the analysis was broken up as mentioned, north and south. lx� 1 r= _�, o i"sr'.r�.u�3:; Parking is not permitted within 30-feet of an intersection, in front of resident driveways, or on the HOA maintained roadways. An Exhibit has been provided within Ap�end°ox Q that illustrates no parking locations. It should be noted that the driveways of the concept are not shown within this exhibit. Note that these lengths are not included within the on-street parking counts. The public roadways are being developed in accordance of the City of Elk River's minimum roadway width of 32-feet. This roadway width allows for the flow of 2-way traffic with on-street parking on one side of the roadway. For this analysis the side of the roadway where more homes fronting the roadway was utilized as this would result in very parking spots. In general, the on-street parking was calculated with the following equation: On Street Parking Avaiable = Total Roadway Length —/ntersection No Parking —(No. o f Driveways * Driveway Width) Note that no on-street parking was accounted for on the HOA maintained roadways and the proposed on-street parking stalls were added within private roadways. Within the proposed development the lots denoted within Ap�e�ud°ox A as 60- or 65-foot-wide lots are products of the developer that have a minimum of a 3-stall garage. The 55, 45, CMA townhomes, and Liberty townhomes all have a minimum of 2-stall garage. As formerly mentioned, these products do have the opportunity to be constructed with a 4 or 3-stall garage option. As this is up o the home buyer, the more conversate number is used for this analysis. The 60-, 60-, 55-, 45-foot-wide lots have a minimum driveway depth of 25-ft and a width of 20-ft. The CMAs have a minimum driveway depth of 30-ft and a width of 15-ft. The Liberty townhomes have a minimum of depth of 18-ft and 20-ft wide. All units have driveway parking for 2 additional vehicles, respectively. Ci`JLkt��L f�LV�LOF�i�clVo i�i�Ri�i�;G • •• • 1550 1135 �d;:'' �a��<$t�: 423 67 ��,.�a�s ��rh;;�z Priv�ie 5ireee 0 36 ��rkinp Due to Elk River being a commuter community, it was assumed that each person in the household has a car, despitethere being adequate public transportation forthose commuting. Conservatively, 3 persons per household was assumed for every unit within the development, per Table �L. It is assumed that households would host get-togethers for a multitude of occasions throughout the year. These two factors were used to determine the parking need in the development. There are 1,973 parking spots for the 323 units in the northern section of the development, which equates to 6 parking spaces to every 1 unit at any given time. In the south, there are 1,238 parking spaces for 216 units, which allows for just under 6 parking spaces for every Table 2 overall deveiopment parking. unit at any given time. The breakdown of how many stalls are available on any given street can be found in A�pendix E. `�` Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 6 of i ��-��.� �,a�� ru�v - ui�ar-�r FOSTER PROPERTY - ELK RIVER, MN CONCLUSIONS Elk River offers a unique experience for its community, having a smaller sized city with access to Minneapolis and ultimately the greater Twin Cities area. The proposed housing development will bring an additional 539 lots to the community, as well as a walkable trail system in the center of the community. With an estimated 3 persons per household, this development could house approximately 1,600 people. Overall, there will be 3,211 parking spaces provided through street parking, unit parking spaces, as well as private road spaces. This allows for approximately 2 parking spaces for every person within the community. It is determined that this is a feasible number of parking spaces for the development and will allow for additional visitor spaces for special occasions, such as garage sales, birthday parties, etc. Based on average household size it can be concluded that there is sufficient parking. `�` Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page � of i � Architecture + Engineering+ Environmental + Planning AppendixA �� — �� y � s �,: � �,J �_r 1—L ' y' � � � ' �I—I��T �� ' c < � � C ��-�I 1J ll I ��`^:-a• � � � .. �a \y�� , �� \ fi � � 1717r1I�I�f�I�I�C1� � —�;.�� ; �� UU�UUIJLJLJLJ❑LJLJLJLJLJ❑ C (f �U � 'a s R , 'r �� LJLJCJLJLJLJLJLJL]I�IJIJUUU `" G� ��J � �nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn C ° �O C ' r� �. nnnnnnon C� nnnnn �, G u0 �C �r�� - � ° � � � v�� uuuuuuuuuuW .-nn��<` `� �� , � uuuuuu❑ � � �U '��: � i � r �� 0!> " �G onnnnnnnc��` ' uu � s��`� ' � C� nnnnnn C J �i G vuvU U ,; �� j C «k�?'� �OU�� nnn '�t� � � � � G,�� C �<� � ��°. v�� nnnn� �� ,�R� � �G � C U❑ -.. . � ��On � �� , � � � � �� u � � � " n� '� . ,�, r .. � `4: ' � C � n �` �. J � 0��,�� . . - J �._ f� � � c � nn nn ' �J� � , J fi � � s> . �JJ c� � ` vUUUIJ�Jv� ��O'� \ % � �vJ �' '`� .. * .II II � c uuu� �� " % �� C' J� �d.. �� c � ... ��nClrl�l - � �J r � C `3 + J � • ��. "�t' �,K `� +'�� C �..w`, s@� � , 'F. � �%�� i��i �i:, �4i4�. �L. A�< �^ � � C . k�- ��,,' ; � ,� , (�� JUUU�J � �9 e � ; ��i � ��', � c n_ ' Y��, # �II �� a �: +� .r n�i� C � �- � 1 r y�. . . ��.zo,�� C .� r ._„ � � � � r � � r / '� G � �� n��nn� m�� R � � � + � � �, �� - , � F.. v►,: i� t� C�, �7��GGC _ , $ �' � � � ;�;� � �'- , � ,- �` A�.% ��, � �� ' -, � C � _ � _ �ta�� a� O � �� _ - �� ` .� � � � _... �� G � � ❑ � % ,JJJ �` C� l C�� -- • � � ° � �q' �J� �� C ' . � ,�: ��L, � �„' _ n . � � � � "T �f � �n rl �� '�4 / A T^ . ' i.l�� oo �_ �� l� y � a .�. � a8//� �" .� !' t �� r• <;»`- ;'��5• � ll - , � �' , �"t Y � �r � l y„�.r � 7 � * � �� ,, � ,: � ,�, ,�, ��%� � ` �°�'�: . � ��" '�.. '."� a �. a - - �U� 1s1t �' �-. r � � ✓ -f . - '�� .;' . '�-- CONCEPTUALLAYOUT �a `` ' . .. M,.�.�f Easn��PzoPERr �� ;� i £: ��..,� o .00 � � FOSTER PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT Archltecture + Engineenng+ Emironmental + Planning E�K aivEa, mwvEso,a-eoeznoiii ISGlnc.com �sc aR�Ecr rvo. zz-zessa � - -'4� *,�"' •� : � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix B �,: � - t : _> $ � � � ,,,� , ,,, '�r' -a _ �L � L e �" � � .5�, �� ' _ ,� e � �1 £ f � � Y _: �'d , . � . T �': �f� k p � �, � � c,� , �y`tY % �- A ,c �C � .� �' t f:.�,r �' " � .. . �. � �e��.� �� .� � � ; f zr � t r' i F:4 '�' '..c�-...... , . � .�, 4 ��., � �s,3 �`� 1.r� : �� r+��' � ' S� �.:n� t..� � , . . _. r� 4 s ptl` t ( � � �} : � t � � .� N, ♦ �.�i ��<tr.�,�yl��f' ., . � q� � �' s�''S � '�.�� . �{ ��- '. � . - � i. �.� 'i;�..S}�s;•�,F�� '�1+'h ..�; �� 'sy�}�' ^A .. � � � .. . +.`� �y� J7j � �� 'i: �'�..,�� ', - 5��^i"�',��' �,,.�-ey� � � �k .' � � . -. ' . • .''ti , � /. '' v,.�,` L� •` �� .�i• ':'�+�` � f. �aCA` * `�£' '� �.t� .,.� k� Y;�� 7��• R S ..�. . . . �'R `�C f �' ..Cr �;��Q �� t ,✓'�` '�p� 's�.. - 1' iF � A ;�<!� S:c x t. "� �` 1. +tf r�yyy; x � ��f ,�. .. o '� ' j � _� .. �it :� _, � �' ��•.• � �. aaCY . �� . � . � ' ;� t � � �� L � �s *Yo � rc��c ` � t ,� � ` 'rnr ..:Y �. ;-�[ � ,,'�'' r��, '4�,�' � � y�, � , ��r _ ' ' , "'�, ; i R�'`, � S }` J[ A` ..._ `�.,M'(4� � �� T �• .. �� .i�� -�;7 � i� � `�' . j�� T � k�� 44 t , ;i�r , , . ` '. _K, a `'�' � ,.1 �1_. �� ,.y.:r . � , x r ��,� ; ,. � ; _. _ > ; R��; � � y •' �[, � �' hr R' 1 . . .. C , � ✓'.,��* ? j� �� .r ,.T• ? -« �. �t=^ �"M�. t 't ��,4 H ^...� � . ° s ,g� � �'� � � * . Q , �� a �. �� :. r��i._ � �,1�`+wr � . � � �.. T � r �ir+ .�!'y� `'�"�R� t"' _j'' �.�+'+ 4 � :�_, n ^ ' S ` . •t �%�` .�1.'+dly��'��1� �• �� r �.��_ �K'� � � i`..�: �� t �.r +'1 . . � . .. 'S . . . a� r� t'S. q: . � � S �` �.. ` � � -c'-"e'�,} "S. h„�''`�,4'ti, �'4„ - �� . . �•� ��a �t - ) � .. �. ;�^�- .��....., . . Z _" . _ t� � • � 'f . - �i �.�e• ,� i ' ~+� �yr . . . �t, r y�s�- f' ��S sd . � : ;� r+,.k�, ` � � •: r � y` .i �` ��t . �'r ` . i 1 i � i .-�' .. � ��, �` `.lr� bt . . s ' ' - '{w / t�1'F.��'��!'.. � g� -�--- ` , . �}�� r4 .j . . � . �► „ � � � : � t �, ��,�.� � ° � ' � , .� . ` N ��.,a . , . � � � . . �. f 'F"r _ � �,�, �.� ; ' Y, 1" � J� �'�"�`� �'f 4 r "�� ,.� � . . � ),I � ' t. �� ','i' f � -�" �"r •�r s �t �,�'' ''�''�f. i �+, * . /�� 1�;. ... . k , . . � _ . 1 {�+� "l�+ � ' . �.�E� q'+ � �r(�r i �'�.� , � . �`� =Z.� :� �i', � �':< ��. j �.� �l �� f �� If I 4,� Y�,` Y'��.� '`'� �+'s+'' � i�` '� � `4 s �. va , . .. -. � ,s'` 1.�1 �� .*a •'�' � R r� ` r � � s: _ ,� , f.� �� . t� ( ' � • � o r � � � ' �.: - .� ay -r"`�` y.. `�"r - i' . '� . �' � ' � � :5�. � a�1Ji'� ,Y e 1 ' 's . ',�: 4 !-"-. �.e:';�ta, �ir ; �r. t + . _` f ' , r� � q . . �.. .t�. � �"" . i�� :: �'i• .��? e i�`—.r 4 � I '0 .1 .� •Ob � � � � .�� tA� ~��"'h. + F � �, t' ^ � � �� : �A �` • �'�u;�S� ='�i��''r�'�.....- � . _ �r ��. � �:� _ '., . �t.�. �_�"s.� ,� OVERALL SITE LOCATION ,�.�,.�.,� ° •°° ,N` � nrchitecture+enBineering+emimmnental+Plann��ng FOSTER PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ISGlnacom iv.Rr,a�, M �sc ae�ecr No. zzaeesa � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix C . � Rig Lake - : �>.:�,�e � ` �� .r � �y' ��4 �IV£1' im AlveMvilla � . � �3PIlSE�I � �;e��a� a _,� . Raw�ta�nen 14dlir�n�apo�is ,. '}' . ;� ,. '�„�--.-.-.��-----�--..., _ � � � Ngrtltstar itakipn �- �OfthSt�F{.IfSEI`w�mmi,rt��ra', � METR4 $lue �ine 4�Rr� � A��t12C} �r�en Lina � R-i � Park 8e Ride (� Con�i�cting Rnutas �7 1 7 � mr�vs O Anoka �ovn �apid$! a (�} � F�iuer��le �� + +�; �� 4�. iM^^) r�'� r. • . " 7�rg� �. , _�,, E��, iu � bi: _ 8!3 757 N �fl��}Ejj 1] �,�i ��,1 � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix D .. ��-�- II�� i�V��l!� c � \ -s��- __ _ _ \� � �' ��:,� ,� ��A � ��`�,_ �`�� - i—^'� � U �� V �� LJLJLJLJLJLJ �� ./�� % �-�� i ii ; �� c — � � I �`�i� �, / � ,.�� , . �� IJ �.. �� n� 3 i�� ;�n� `w'//// �\\\� - �/ �� w� � � � � _ � , ' � �/_� � � -- " `�t/ � �� ,, � � � � �� , — � 1 � �_„M \ ��yG �� .� _ M ROADDD �/ / _-- � � �f�'�\C �� .� > �� . 3 M � / � � � � �N� ) ` W ( < L9 ' w��l —WEr � � I = � ��I ROAD HH �o(� � / \\ � '�,_/ �� i+m� � � \i O �t/ /I �L—�.� l t�/�//�� v �� —�� 18 C�Y✓ — ..: ROADII "' � Y✓f � �� . - ��.r��r/�JK / 1 Yo'3 \ � rvm , � � ROADJJ _ -��;��Y� ``� § , - �' �� I�� , r � —WEf .\ �'9— g� � � � � �� ! � �� vm � ro_ �II� � ^ _ _ /4 / � —r� - � I I �� r T� � s �; �% �� , � d �� L L � o� I � J __ � \ � —/ o , , � , a- ,�w_, � �, a „ w__— � � — � � � � � =w-- — �, �� , �, � �-- „� — w�� —��_� � � >, — _ � �, , ��' i ,h = �--�;_ �,, � �� .� —� — � '� I I � �, NO PARKING ZONES � nrcnitecmre+engineering+envimnmental+alann��ng FOSTER PROPERTY DEVELOPNIENT �: i�ER. inrvEsara-- iioiia isc aa�ECT rvo. zz-zes�a � j�� I I"III ,n��.,� o .00 � ISGlnacom � Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix E � . � ��::.a.� : Centerline Length (FT) 3351.1 Centerline Length (FT) 2256.1 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 409.2 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 496.8 DrivewayWidths(FT)* i 760 DrivewayWidths(FT)* 620 Total Road Available (FT) 2181.9 Total Road Available (FT) 11393 StreetSpacesAvailable 109 StreetSpacesAvailable 56 UnitSpacesAvailable** 325 UnitSpacesAvailable** 290 Total ParkingSpaces 434 Total ParkingSpaces 346 *Assumed street parking onlyon west side of Road A. *Assumed street parking onlyon north side of Road 8. **This is assuming 381ots on the westside ofthe streetand **This is assuming 311ots on the north side of the streetand 27ontheeast.Assumed5spacesperhome,threegarage,2 27onthesouth.Assumed5spacesperhome,threegarage,2 driveway. driveway. Centerline Length (FT) 1224.7 Centerline Length (FT) 1193.6 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 378.5 Intersection Setbacks (FT) Driveway Widths (FT)* 180 Driveway Widths (FT)* Total Road Available (FT) 666.2 Total Road Available (FT) StreetSpacesAvailable 33 StreetSpacesAvailable 252.3 300 641.3 32 UnitSpacesAvailable** 75 UnitSpacesAvailable** 140 Total ParkingSpaces 108 Total ParkingSpaces 172 *Assumed street parking onlyon west side of Road C. *Assumed street parking onlyon south side of Road D. **This is assuming 91ots on the westside ofthe street and 6 **This is assuming 131ots on the north side of the streetand on the east. Assumed 5 spaces per home, three garage, 2 15 on the south. Assumed 5 spaces per home, three ga rage, 2 driveway. driveway. : � Centerline Length (FT) 3167.2 Centerline Length (FT) 700 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 14713 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 633 Driveway Widths (FT)* 460 Driveway Widths (FT)* 220 Total Road Available (FT) 1235.9 Total Road Available (FT) 416.7 StreetSpacesAvailable 61 StreetSpacesAvailable 20 UnitSpacesAvailable** 210 UnitSpacesAvailable** 105 Total ParkingSpaces 271 Total ParkingSpaces 125 *Assumed street parking onlyon east side of Road E. *Assumed street parking only on south side of Road F. **This is assuming 191ots on the west side ofthe streetand **This is assuming 111ots on the south side ofthe street 23ontheeast.Assumed5spacesperhome,threegarage,2 and2ltotal.Assumed5spacesperhome,threegarage,2 driveway. driveway. Centerline Length (FT) 446.4 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 61.2 Driveway Widths (FT)* 140 Total Road Available (FT) 245.2 Street Spaces Available 12 Unit Spaces Available** 60 Total ParkingSpaces 72 *Assumed street parking only on west side of Road 6. **This is assumi ng 7 lots on the west side of the street a nd 12 tota I. Assumed 5 spaces per home, three garage, 2 driveway. Centerline Length (FT) Intersection Setbacks(FT) Driveway Widths (FT)* Total Road Available (FT) Street Spaces Available Unit Spaces Available** 210 Total ParkingSpaces 273 *Assumed street parking onlyon south side of Road H. **This is assuming 21 lots on the north side of the street and 21 on the south. Assumed 5 spaces per home, three ga rage, 2 driveway. 1927 244.1 420 1262.9 63 r -a • Centerline Length (FT) 822.4 Centerline Length (FT) 595.3 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 307.7 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 61 Driveway Widths (FT)* 100 Driveway Widths (FT)* 180 Total Road Available (FT) 414.7 Total Road Available (FT) 354.3 StreetSpacesAvailable 20 StreetSpacesAvailable 17 UnitSpacesAvailable** 50 UnitSpacesAvailable** 85 Total ParkingSpaces 70 Total ParkingSpaces 102 *Assumed street parking onlyon east side of Road I. *Assumed street parking onlyon south side of Road 1. **This is assuming S lots on the westside ofthe street and 5 **This is assuming 91ots on the south side ofthe streetand on the east. Assumed 5 spaces per home, three garage, 2 17 total. Assumed 5 spaces per home, three garage, 2 driveway. driveway. •... ,.�.. Centerline Length (FT) 1840J Centerline Length (FT) 10923 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 697.2 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 453.4 Driveway Widths (FT)* 660 Driveway Widths (FT)* 260 Total Road Available (FT) 483.5 Total Road Available (FT) 378.9 StreetSpacesAvailable 24 StreetSpacesAvailable 18 UnitSpacesAvailable** 225 UnitSpacesAvailable** 290 Total ParkingSpaces 249 Total ParkingSpaces 308 *Assumed street parking only on north side of Road K. *Assumed street parking only on west side of Road L. **This is assuming 331ots on the north side ofthe streetand **This is assuming 131ots on the westside ofthe street and 45total.Assumed5spacesperhome,threegarage,2 Oontheeast.Assumed4spacesperhome,twogarage,2 driveway. driveway. Centerline Length (FT) 901.8 Centerline Length (FT) 398.2 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 248.1 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 124 Driveway Widths (FT)* 340 Driveway Widths (FT)* 60 Total Road Available (FT) 313.7 Total Road Available (FT) 214.2 StreetSpacesAvailable 15 StreetSpacesAvailable 10 UnitSpacesAvailable** 150 UnitSpacesAvailable** 30 Total ParkingSpaces 165 Total ParkingSpaces 40 *Assumed street parking onlyon south side of Road M. *Assumed street parking onlyon east side of Road N. **This is assuming 171ots on the south side ofthe street **This is assuming 31ots on the eastside ofthe streetand 6 and35total.Assumed5spacesper55'lot,threegarage,2 total.Assumed5spacesperhome,threegarage,2driveway. driveway.Assumed 4spaces per45' lot,two garage,2 `..., � � � .. Centerline Length (FT) 368.2 Centerline Length (FT) 368.5 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 368.2 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 368.5 Driveway Widths (FT)* 0 Driveway Widths (FT)* 0 Total Road Available (FT) 0 Total Road Available (FT) 0 StreetSpacesAvailable 8 StreetSpacesAvailable 4 UnitSpacesAvailable** 64 UnitSpacesAvailable** 48 Total ParkingSpaces 72 Total ParkingSpaces 52 *Assumedstreetparkingonlyindesignatedparkingareas. *Assumedstreetparkingonlyindesignatedparkingareas. **This is assuming 61ots on the north side ofthe street and **This is assuming 121ots on the eastside ofthe streetand 10onthesouth.Assumed4spacesperhome,twogarage,2 Oonthewest.Assumed4spacesperhome,twogarage,2 driveway. driveway. Y Centerline Length (FT) 618.2 Centerline Length (FT) 198.4 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 618.2 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 198.4 Driveway Widths (FT)* 0 Driveway Widths (FT)* 0 Total Road Available (FT) 0 Total Road Available (FT) 0 StreetSpacesAvailable 6 StreetSpacesAvailable 0 UnitSpacesAvailable** 80 UnitSpacesAvailable** 40 Total ParkingSpaces 86 Total ParkingSpaces 40 *Assumedstreetparkingonlyindesignatedparkingareas. *Assumedstreetparkingonlyindesignatedparkingareas. **This is assuming 121ots on the north side of the street and **This is assuming 6 spaces on the north side of the street 18onthesouth.Assumed4spacesperhome,twogarage,2 and4onthesouth.Assumed4spacesperhome,twogarage, driveway. 2 driveway. Centerline Length (FT) 473.6 Centerline Length (FT) 183 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 473.6 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 183 Driveway Widths (FT)* 0 Driveway Widths (FT)* 0 Total Road Available (FT) 0 Total Road Available (FT) 0 StreetSpacesAvailable 4 StreetSpacesAvailable 0 UnitSpacesAvailable** 72 UnitSpacesAvailable** 32 Total ParkingSpaces 76 Total ParkingSpaces 32 *Assumedstreetparkingonlyindesignatedparkingareas. *Assumedstreetparkingonlyindesignatedparkingareas. **This is assuming Sspaces on the westside of the street **This is assuming 41ots on the south side ofthe streetand andl0ontheeast.Assumed4spacesperhome,twogarage, 4onthenorth.Assumed4spacesperhome,twogarage,2 2 driveway. driveway. � _. ��... ad GG Centerline Length (FT) 647.1 Centerline Length (FT) • 183 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 647.1 Intersection Setbacks (FT) Driveway Widths (FT)* 0 Driveway Widths (FT)* Total Road Available (FT) 0 Total Road Available (FT) StreetSpacesAvailable 6 StreetSpacesAvailable 183 0 UnitSpacesAvailable** 40 UnitSpacesAvailable** 32 Total ParkingSpaces 46 Total ParkingSpaces 32 *Assumedstreetparkingonlyindesignatedparkingareas. *Assumedstreetparkingonlyindesignatedparkingareas. **This is assuming 91ots on the south side ofthe streetand **This is assuming 41ots on the south side ofthe streetand 17total.Assumed5spacesperhome,threegarage,2 4onthenorth.Assumed4spacesperhome,twogarage,2 driveway. driveway. . .: � _ .. . . . Centerline Length (FT) 194.8 Centerline Length (FT) 129.7 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 194.8 Intersection Setbacks (FT) 129.7 Driveway Widths (FT)* 0 Driveway Widths (FT)* 0 Total Road Available (FT) 0 Total Road Available (FT) 0 StreetSpacesAvailable 4 StreetSpacesAvailable 4 UnitSpacesAvailable** 24 UnitSpacesAvailable** 8 Total ParkingSpaces 28 Total ParkingSpaces 12 *Assumedstreetparkingonlyindesignatedparkingareas. *Assumedstreetparkingonlyindesignatedparkingareas. **This is assuming 21ots on the south side ofthe streetand **This is assuming 21ots on the north side ofthe streetand 4onthenorth.Assumed4spacesperhome,twogarage,2 Oonthesouth.Assumed4spacesperhome,twogarage,2 driveway. driveway.