11.2 SR 03-03-2025The Elk River Vision
A welcoming community with revolutionary and spirited resourcefulness, exceptional service, and community
engagement that encourages and inspires prosperity
Request for Action
To
City Council
Item Number
11.2
Meeting Date
March 3, 2025
Prepared By
Joe Stremcha, Business Services Director/Assistant
City Administrator
Item Description
Athletic Facilities Framework Plan
Reviewed by
Jeff Shelby
Joe Stremcha
Cal Portner
Tina Allard
Action Requested
Staff will present the Athletic Facilities Framework Plan as recommended by the Parks and Recreation
Commission on February 12, 2025.
Background/Discussion
The Parks and Recreation Commission's discussion history concerning this plan is included.
Financial Impact
Cost estimates are included in the plan.
Mission/Policy/Goal
Opportunity to live, work, and play. Responsibly grow. Responsible for every dollar - good stewards.
Attachments
1. Athletic Facilities Framework Plan (February 2025)
2. Athletic Facilities Framework Plan History
Page 98 of 117
ATHLETIC FIELDS
FRAMEWORK PLAN
City of Elk River, Minnesota
February 2025
ELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONPage 99 of 117
CONTENTS
WHAT IS A FRAMEWORK PLAN 1
ATHLETIC FIELDS STUDY FINDINGS 1
OVERVIEW OF CONCEPTS 2
OAK KNOLL ATHLETIC COMPLEX CONCEPT 3
DAVE ANDERSON ATHLETIC COMPLEX CONCEPT 4
PLANTS AND THINGS RECREATION COMPLEX CONCEPT 5-6
PROJECT PHASES AND ESTIMATES 7-8
Sources: US Census, Elk River Comprehensive Plan, ESRI
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035DAACOKACPTRCLJWP renovationPRTC expansionPopulation Growth and Field Development in Elk River
WHAT IS A FRAMEWORK PLAN?
The Elk River Athletic Facilities Framework Plan includes an examination of the major outdoor fi eld
facilities in the City. Recent improvements at Lion John Weicht Park with 2 softball fi elds serve the high
school and to some extent the youth softball programs in Elk River, so this facility was included in fi eld
analysis, but is not expected to change and was not part of the design eff orts. This project looked at:
• Dave Anderson Athletic Complex
• Oak Knoll Athletic Complex (including school district property)
• Plants and Things Recreation Complex
(including an expansion area to the south of the built area)
The framework plan developed concepts for these facilities to a “schematic” level. Schematic design
allows for:
• Testing of ideas
• Assigning program
(how will the facility will be used?)
• Site fi t testing
(can the fi elds and related support facilities like parking fi t on the site?)
• Planning level cost estimating
(how much money do we need to allocate to realize this vision?)
Schematic design is early in the process, so what is built may ultimately shift somewhat from the
framework plan. There are still some variables that have not been resolved that could change what
can or should be done at the sites. In the case of this plan, this could include questions of property
ownership, larger than expected wetlands identifi ed by a future delineation, changing costs and/or
funding opportunities, changes to adjacent land uses, or unanticipated shifts in population growth.
What this plan allows the City to do is start moving forward with a funding strategy, knowing how much
these improvements will cost. It also helps the City plan for where to invest time, money, and resources
into existing facilities. For example, based on these designs, it would not be wise for the City to invest in
new buildings at DAAC, but it may make sense to continue investments to the baseball area at PTRC.
As the City gets closer to building out these facilities, additional design work will be needed to fi ne tune
layout adjustments and resolve some of the details.
GUIDANCE AND GOALS FOR THE FRAMEWORK PLAN
In order to develop the Framework Plan, goals were identifi ed and guidelines were provided. The goals
of this project included:
• Accommodate and identify locations for as many of the anticipated fi elds needed, based on the
2022 Athletic Fields Study
• Group alike facilities
-Give each sport a “home” facility
-Better facilitate tournaments
• Improve the quality of the facilities
• Improve facilities for maintenance and recreation programming
Additional guidance on what the Framework Plan should consider was also provided:
• Layout plans on existing City property (and some school district property at OKAC)
• The long term plans for adjacent land uses by DAAC are unclear and we may not always be able to
rely on the currently available parking. Reduce the level of intensive investment at this facility.
• The City has ownership of land south of the wetland complex at PTRC and this land is anticipated to
be a part of PTRC. Utilize this land for additional fi eld development. The boundaries of this land have
shifted since 2018 planning eff orts.
FINDINGS FROM THE
ATHLETIC FIELDS STUDY
In 2022, the City of Elk River completed a fi eld utilization
study. The City has been growing and user expectations
around fi elds have changed. The last major expansion
of fi eld space happened in 2005 with the expansion of
PTRC. At that time, the City was approximately 19,700
people. Since then the population has grown to 27,393
(ESRI). Growth is continuing, and at a more rapid pace
than anticipated.
The fi eld study looked at multiple variables when
developing recommendations for additions to the
system. These included:
• Population ratios relative to the last time fi elds were
added (2005)
• Comparisons (City only and including schools) with
other peer cities
• Participation trends in diff erent sports
• User Feedback
The study recommended the following additions:
• + 4 rectangle fi elds (football, soccer, lacrosse)
The framework plan adds 3 rectangle fi elds, and
increases fl exibility for programming
• + 3-4 60’ ballfi elds with 200-225’ fences
The framework plan adds 1 60’ baseball fi eld to the
system and 2 60’ softball fi elds
• + 1-2 75’ ballfi elds
The framework plan makes 1 90’ fi eld functional for 75’
and improves another for dedicated baseball
• + 1-2 90’ ballfi elds
The framework plan does not add any 90’ baseball
fi elds, but the addition of turf at Hales would increase
capacity and one practice fi eld was added at the HS
during renovations
As noted, the framework plan does not fully address all of
the demand, but does improve numbers and function.
ELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONATHLETIC FIELDS FRAMEWORK PLAN
City of Elk River, Minnesota1 Page 100 of 117
OVERVIEW OF CONCEPTS
OAK KNOLL ATHLETIC COMPLEX –
1 Full size baseball stadium, 1 dedicated fi eld for intermediate age baseball,
2 dedicated youth baseball fi elds
Oak Knoll will become a baseball specifi c complex where players of all
ages and abilities can interact and learn from each other. Hale’s Field
will be adjusted and improved. It is envisioned as a marquee, town ball
level stadium. If turfed, this would add capacity to the amount of use
the 90’ fi eld could take, as well as be an option for younger players (60’
and 75’ basepaths can be laid out on a larger turf fi eld). Youth fi elds will
be dedicated baseball fi elds with grass infi elds. There will also be an
intermediate baseball fi eld for 70/75’ basepaths that is appropriately sized
for this age group. Elk River will also be home to a miracle fi eld, closing a
regional gap between St. Cloud, Minnetonka, and Blaine.
DAVE ANDERSON ATHLETIC COMPLEX –
1 full sized rectangle fi eld, 2 revitalized softball fi elds
Plans for Dave Anderson Athletic Complex envision a shift away from the
aging softball complex to a more functional expansion of Orono Park.
Retaining two softball fi elds will help alleviate safety concerns with the
current pinwheel layout and seating down the foul lines. A large green
space can accommodate a full sized soccer fi eld, but will can also be
programmed with a multitude of smaller youth fi elds. It will also open
up improved operations for the City’s recreation programming, add
parking, and create a less “fenced in” feel to this side of the City’s park and
government campus.
PLANTS AND THINGS RECREATION COMPLEX –
5 new rectangle fi elds (Football, Lacrosse, Soccer), 4 youth sized softball
fi elds, retain current diamonds (2 full size, 4 fl ex BB/SB)
Plants and Things Recreation Complex will grow, while enhancing its role
as a key destination for youth athletics in Elk River and beyond. 5 rectangle
fi elds with new support facilities will better accommodate football,
lacrosse, and soccer games and tournaments. The layout of 4 new softball
fi elds creates a “right size” set of fi elds for youth fastpitch softball instead
of oversized fi elds designed for adult, slow pitch. The baseball fi elds in
the northwest remain, but are enhanced through site improvements for
support facilities. This layout also better facilitates tournament play, allowing
for 5 full sized soccer/football/lacrosse fi elds or many younger fi elds to be
active at the same time. Likewise, the facility could now host a little league
baseball or softball tournament with 8 fi elds going at once.
0$,10$,1
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
'5232))'5232))
3/$=$3/$=$
6725$*(
&$*(6&$*(6
%$77,1*%$77,1*
&$*(6&$*(6
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
&29(5('67$',806($7,1*:,7+&29(5('67$',806($7,1*:,7+
&21&(66,2169,(:,1*'(&.&21&(66,2169,(:,1*'(&.
$1'672506+(/7(5$1'672506+(/7(5
'5232))'5232))
3/$=$3/$=$
(;3$1'('(;3$1'('
321',1*321',1*
67250:$7(567250:$7(5
321',1*321',1*
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
321'321'
0,5$&/(0,5$&/(
),(/'),(/'
3/$<3/$<
*5281'*5281'
35(0,(535(0,(5
),(/'),(/'
,17(50(',$7(,17(50(',$7(
),(/'),(/'
<287+<287+
),(/'),(/'
<287+<287+
),(/'),(/'
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶352&725$9(1:352&725$9(1:6&+22/671:6&+22/671:
3 5 2 &7 2 5 5 '1 :
352
&
7
2
5
5
'
1
:
¶¶
¶ ¶
(;,67,1*321'(;,67,1*321'
)8785(
3$5.,1*
67$//6
29(5)/2:29(5)/2:
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
7766666766
)8785)8785(
3$5.1*3$5.,1*
67$//67$//6
¶¶
6281':$//6281':$//
0$,10$,1
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
'5232))'5232))
3/$=$3/$=$
6725$*(
&$*(6&$*(6
%$77,1*%$77,1*
&$*(6&$*(6
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
&29(5('67$',806($7,1*:,7+&29(5('67$',806($7,1*:,7+
&21&(66,2169,(:,1*'(&.&21&(66,2169,(:,1*'(&.$1'672506+(/7(5$1'672506+(/7(5
'5232))'5232))
3/$=$3/$=$
(;3$1'('(;3$1'('
321',1*321',1*
67250:$7(567250:$7(5
321',1*321',1*
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
321'321'
0,5$&/(0,5$&/(
),(/'),(/'3/$<3/$<
*5281'*5281'
35(0,(535(0,(5
),(/'),(/'
,17(50(',$7(,17(50(',$7(
),(/'),(/'
<287+<287+
),(/'),(/'
<287+<287+
),(/'),(/'
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶352&725$9(1:352&725$9(1:6&+22/671:6&+22/671:
3 5 2 &7 2 5 5 '1 :
352
&
7
2
5
5
'
1
:
¶¶
¶ ¶
(;,67,1*321'(;,67,1*321'
)8785(
3$5.,1*
67$//6
29(5)/2:29(5)/2:
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
7766666766
)8785)8785(
3$5.1*3$5.,1*
67$//67$//6
¶¶
6281':$//6281':$//
%86,1(66&(17(5'51:%86,1(66&(17(5'51:
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
3/$<*5281'3/$<*5281'
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
63/$6+3/$<
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
321',1*321',1*
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
321',1*321',1*
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
'5$,17,/(72'5$,17,/(72
,03529('5$,1$*(,03529('5$,1$*(
'5$,17,/(72'5$,17,/(72
,03529('5$,1$*(,03529('5$,1$*(
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
3/$=$3/$=$
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
¶¶
08/7,86(08/7,86(
),(/'),(/'
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
32:(532:(5
/,1(6/,1(6
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
'2*3$5.'2*3$5.
¶¶
¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶
%86,1(66&(17(5'51:%86,1(66&(17(5'51:
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
3/$<*5281'3/$<*5281'
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
63/$6+3/$<
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
321',1*321',1*
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
321',1*321',1*
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
'5$,17,/(72'5$,17,/(72,03529('5$,1$*(,03529('5$,1$*(
'5$,17,/(72'5$,17,/(72,03529('5$,1$*(,03529('5$,1$*(
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
3/$=$3/$=$
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
¶¶
08/7,86(08/7,86(
),(/'),(/'
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
32:(532:(5
/,1(6/,1(6
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
'2*3$5.'2*3$5.
¶¶
¶
¶¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
1(:
75$,/75$,/
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
1(:
75$,/75$,/
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
38//%$&.,1),(/'38//%$&.,1),(/'
72$&&2002'$7(72$&&2002'$7(
,17(50(',$7(3/$<,17(50(',$7(3/$<
08/7,86(),(/'608/7,86(),(/'6
&$1$&&2002'$7(&$1$&&2002'$7(
)%/$;62&&(5,1)%/$;62&&(5,1
<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6
08/7,86(),(/'608/7,86(),(/'6
&$1$&&2002'$7()%/$;62&&(5&$1$&&2002'$7()%/$;62&&(5
,1<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6,1<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6
&+$03,216+,3
),(/'),(/'
¶¶
:¶¶3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
6725067250
321'321'
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
785%,1(785%,1(
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
6725067250
321'321'
(;67,1*(;67,1*
321',1*321',1*
¶¶
::¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
7+$9(1:7+$9(1:
3/$=$:,7+3/$=$:,7+
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
3/$=$:,7+3/$=$:,7+
&21&(66,216&21&(66,216
672506+(/7(5672506+(/7(5
6725$*(6725$*(
3/$=$:,7+3/$=$:,7+
&21&(66,216&21&(66,216
672506+(/7(5672506+(/7(5
¶¶
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
1(:
75$,/75$,/
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
1(:
75$,/75$,/
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
38//%$&.,1),(/'38//%$&.,1),(/'
72$&&2002'$7(72$&&2002'$7(
,17(50(',$7(3/$<,17(50(',$7(3/$<
08/7,86(),(/'608/7,86(),(/'6
&$1$&&2002'$7(&$1$&&2002'$7(
)%/$;62&&(5,1)%/$;62&&(5,1
<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6
08/7,86(),(/'608/7,86(),(/'6
&$1$&&2002'$7()%/$;62&&(5&$1$&&2002'$7()%/$;62&&(5
,1<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6,1<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6
&+$03,216+,3
),(/'),(/'
¶¶
:¶¶3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
6725067250
321'321'
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
785%,1(785%,1(
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
6725067250
321'321'
(;67,1*(;67,1*
321',1*321',1*
¶¶
::¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
7+$9(1:7+$9(1:
3/$=$:,7+3/$=$:,7+
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
3/$=$:,7+3/$=$:,7+
&21&(66,216&21&(66,216
672506+(/7(5672506+(/7(5
6725$*(6725$*(
3/$=$:,7+3/$=$:,7+
&21&(66,216&21&(66,216
672506+(/7(5672506+(/7(5
¶¶
TOURNAMENT CAPACITY
One benefi t to the Framework Plan is an increase in tournament
capacity at most facilities. The table below considers the number of
fi elds at any one location that could host tournaments for diff erent
sports.
TIMING (SEE PAGES 7-8)
There should be minor investment in safety netting at DAAC. The
timeline on removal of these fi elds is far enough out that investment in
netting would be justifi ed.
1 - Three Rectangle fi elds at PTRC
(Allows for removal of existing PTRC and OKAC fi elds)
2 - Hale’s Field at OKAC
(Can shift depending on School District and City timing)
3 - Softball Fields at PTRC
(Allows for removal of DAAC fi elds and add grass at OKAC)
4 - Baseball Complex at OKAC
(Keep DAAC fi elds for baseball capacity while under construction)
5 - Upgrades to Baseball area and two rectanglie fi elds at PTRC
6 - Removal of Softball Fields at DAAC
NEXT STEPS
The next steps to continue this project will include:
• Wetland delineation – needs to be within 5 years of planned
improvements
• Final design
• Secure Funding
• Joint Powers Funding and Use Agreement with the School District
• Construction Documentation, Bidding, and Construction
• Ongoing Maintenance
1
3
4
2
6 5
Sport Existing Proposed Notes
Youth Baseball (60’)48DAAC or PTRC today, PTRC Proposed
Intermediate Baseball (75’)45DAAC or PTRC today, PTRC Proposed
Full Sized Baseball (90’)22PTAC for both, ISD adds capacity if OKAC
Fast Pitch Softball 48DAAC or PTRC today, PTRC Proposed
Slow Pitch Softball 44DAAC or PTRC today, PTRC Proposed
Rectangle Fields (FB/Lacrosse/Soccer)25OKAC today, PTRC Proposed
ELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONATHLETIC FIELDS FRAMEWORK PLAN
City of Elk River, Minnesota2 Page 101 of 117
0$,10$,1
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
'5232))'5232))
3/$=$3/$=$
6725$*(
&$*(6&$*(6
%$77,1*%$77,1*
&$*(6&$*(6
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
&29(5('67$',806($7,1*:,7+&29(5('67$',806($7,1*:,7+
&21&(66,2169,(:,1*'(&.&21&(66,2169,(:,1*'(&.
$1'672506+(/7(5$1'672506+(/7(5
'5232))'5232))
3/$=$3/$=$
(;3$1'('(;3$1'('
321',1*321',1*
67250:$7(567250:$7(5
321',1*321',1*
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
321'321'
0,5$&/(0,5$&/(
),(/'),(/'
3/$<3/$<
*5281'*5281'
35(0,(535(0,(5
),(/'),(/'
,17(50(',$7(,17(50(',$7(
),(/'),(/'
<287+<287+
),(/'),(/'
<287+<287+
),(/'),(/'
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶352&725$9(1:352&725$9(1:6&+22/671:6&+22/671:
3 5 2 &7 2 5 5 '1 :
352
&
7
2
5
5
'
1
:
¶¶
¶ ¶
(;,67,1*321'(;,67,1*321'
)8785(
3$5.,1*
67$//6
29(5)/2:29(5)/2:
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
7766666766
)8785)8785(
3$5.1*3$5.,1*
67$//67$//6
¶¶¶¶
6281':$//6281':$//
ELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONATHLETIC FIELDS FRAMEWORK PLANS
OAK KNOLL ATHLETIC COMPLEX
» Anticipates the removal/relocation of Ivan Sand
and the Education Technology Center
» Reconfi gures access to Proctor Road and School
Street, and creates a connection between the
two entries
» New, re-oriented full size (90’ basepath)
ballfi eld with grandstand seating
» Adds miracle fi eld and inclusive playground
» Plaza to support the premier fi eld, inclusive play
area, and miracle fi eld
» Creation of two dedicated youth (60’ basepath)
baseball fi elds with grass infi elds
» Creation of a dedicated intermediate (70-80’
basepaths) baseball fi eld with grass infi eld
» Centralized, elevated plaza with shelter to
support the youth and intermediate fi eld
» New parking to support expanded ballfi eld
program
FINAL FIELD ALIGNMENT FINAL FIELD ALIGNMENT
TBD ON ELECTRIC LINESTBD ON ELECTRIC LINES
» Sound wall to mitigate train noise
ELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONATHLETIC FIELDS FRAMEWORK PLAN
City of Elk River, Minnesota3 Page 102 of 117
¶¶
6281':$//
%86,1(66&(17(5'51:%86,1(66&(17(5'51:
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
3/$<*5281'3/$<*5281'
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
63/$6+3/$<
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
321',1*321',1*
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
321',1*321',1*
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
'5$,17,/(72'5$,17,/(72
,03529('5$,1$*(,03529('5$,1$*(
'5$,17,/(72'5$,17,/(72
,03529('5$,1$*(,03529('5$,1$*(
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
3/$=$3/$=$
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
¶¶
08/7,86(08/7,86(
),(/'),(/'
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
32:(532:(5
/,1(6/,1(6
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
'2*3$5.'2*3$5.
¶¶
¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶
ELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONATHLETIC FIELDS MASTER PLANS
DAVE ANDERSON
ATHLETIC COMPLEX
» Removes 2 softball fi elds and replaces them
with open fi eld space that can accommodate up
to a full sized rectangle fi eld or multiple youth
sized fi elds
» Improves safety considerations by reducing the
number of softball fi elds and having play occur
behind spectators
» Installation of drain tile in the outfi elds to reduce
fl ooding/ponding that is occurring today
» Addition of a centralized plaza and shelter to
support recreational fi eld use
» Creation of new parking to support fi eld
programming, as well as Orono Park
» Retains fl exibility for potential long term change
with adjacent land uses
ELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONATHLETIC FIELDS FRAMEWORK PLANS ELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONATHLETIC FIELDS FRAMEWORK PLAN
City of Elk River, Minnesota4 Page 103 of 117
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
1(:
75$,/75$,/
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
1(:
75$,/75$,/
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
38//%$&.,1),(/'38//%$&.,1),(/'
72$&&2002'$7(72$&&2002'$7(
,17(50(',$7(3/$<,17(50(',$7(3/$<
08/7,86(),(/'608/7,86(),(/'6
&$1$&&2002'$7(&$1$&&2002'$7(
)%/$;62&&(5,1)%/$;62&&(5,1
<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6
08/7,86(),(/'608/7,86(),(/'6
&$1$&&2002'$7()%/$;62&&(5&$1$&&2002'$7()%/$;62&&(5
,1<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6,1<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6
&+$03,216+,3
),(/'),(/'
¶¶
:¶¶3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
6725067250
321'321'
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
785%,1(785%,1(
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
6725067250
321'321'
(;67,1*(;67,1*
321',1*321',1*
¶¶
::¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
7+$9(1:7+$9(1:
3/$=$:,7+3/$=$:,7+
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
3/$=$:,7+3/$=$:,7+
&21&(66,216&21&(66,216
672506+(/7(5672506+(/7(5
6725$*(6725$*(
3/$=$:,7+3/$=$:,7+
&21&(66,216&21&(66,216
672506+(/7(5672506+(/7(5
¶¶¶¶
ELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONATHLETIC FIELDS MASTER PLANS
PLANTS AND THINGS
RECREATION COMPLEX
» Creates showcase opportunities for Plants and
Things at plaza areas in each of the three areas
» Relocates softball from DAAC and creates a 4
fi eld dedicated complex with youth sized fi elds
» Softball tournaments could incorporate the
existing pinwheel for an 8 fi eld schedule
» Parking to accommodate extensive fi eld use
» Creates a new rectangle fi eld destination that
can accommodate football, lacrosse, and soccer
with up to 5 full sized fi elds or many youth sized
layouts
» Each sport area would have concessions/
restroom/storm shelter
» Existing ballfi elds would have parking paved
» The smaller 90’ fi eld would have infi eld grass
pulled back to accommodate intermediate play
» New trails incorporated into the park
x#FSNJOHGPSUSBJOOPJTFNJUJHBUJPOJOTPVUIXFTU
ELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONATHLETIC FIELDS FRAMEWORK PLANS
BERMINGBERMING BERMINGELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONATHLETIC FIELDS FRAMEWORK PLAN
City of Elk River, Minnesota5 Page 104 of 117
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
6725$*(6725$*(
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
75$,/75$,/
&211(&7,21&211(&7,21
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
6725067250
321'321'
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
785%,1(785%,1(
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
7+$9(1:7+$9(1:
3/$=$:,7+3/$=$:,7+
&21&(66,216&21&(66,216
672506+(/7(5672506+(/7(5
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
1(:
75$,/
1(:52$'1(:52$'
$1'75$,/$1'75$,/
08/7,86(),(/'608/7,86(),(/'6
&$1$&&2002'$7(&$1$&&2002'$7(
)%/$;62&&(5,1)%/$;62&&(5,1
<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6
08/7,86(),(/'608/7,86(),(/'6
&$1$&&2002'$7()%/$;62&&(5&$1$&&2002'$7()%/$;62&&(5
,1<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6,1<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6
&+$03,216+,3&+$03,216+,3
),(/'),(/'
¶¶¶¶3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
6725067250
321'321'
(;67,1*(;67,1*
321',1*321',1*
3/$=$:,7+3/$=$:,7+
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
3/$=$:,7+3/$=$:,7+
&21&(66,216&21&(66,216
672506+(/7(5672506+(/7(5
6725$*(6725$*(
¶¶
¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶
ELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONATHLETIC FIELDS MASTER PLANS
PLANTS AND THINGS
RECREATION COMPLEX
ELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONATHLETIC FIELDS FRAMEWORK PLANS
11(:
75$75$,/
:1(:1(:1(:1(:1(:
75$/75$75$,/,/BERMINGBERMINGBERMINGBERMINGNEWNEW
TRAILTRAIL
ELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONATHLETIC FIELDS FRAMEWORK PLAN
City of Elk River, Minnesota6 Page 105 of 117
3$5.,1*
'5232))
3/$=$
%$77,1*%$77,1*
&$*(6&$*(6
&29(5('67$',806($7,1*:,7+&29(5('67$',806($7,1*:,7+
&21&(66,2169,(:,1*'(&.&21&(66,2169,(:,1*'(&.
$1'672506+(/7(5$1'672506+(/7(5
3/$<
*5281'
35(0,(535(0,(5
),(/'),(/'
¶¶
¶
¶
¶
¶¶352&725$9(1:352&725$9(1:¶¶
¶ ¶
(;,67,1*321'(;,67,1*321'
67$//6
29(5)/2:
67$//6
67$//67$//6
¶¶
FINAL FIELD ALIGNMENT FINAL FIELD ALIGNMENT
TBD ON ELECTRIC LINESTBD ON ELECTRIC LINES
75$,/
1(:
75$,/
1(:
75$,/
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'
08/7,86(),(/'608/7,86(),(/'6
&$1$&&2002'$7()%/$;62&&(5&$1$&&2002'$7()%/$;62&&(5
,1<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6,1<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6
&+$03,216+,3
),(/'),(/'
3$5.,1*
6725067250
321'321'
(;67,1*(;67,1*
321',1*321',1*
¶
¶
3/$=$:,7+3/$=$:,7+
&21&(66,216&21&(66,216
672506+(/7(5672506+(/7(5
6725$*(6725$*(
¶¶
BERMING
%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'
&$1$&&2002'$7()%/$;62&&(5¶3$5.,1*
67$//6
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
6725067250
321'321'
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
785%,1(¶¶
::¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
7+$9(1:7+$9(1:
3/$=$:,7+
6725$*(
3/$=$:,7+3/$=$:,7+
&21&(66,216&21&(66,216
672506+(/7(5672506+(/7(5
¶¶
75$,/75$,/
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
3$5.3$5.
¶¶
¶¶
¶
BERMINGBERMING
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
232))'5232))
3/$=$3/$=$
3/$<3/$<
2*5281'
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
29(5)/2:29(5)/2:
67$//67$//6
$7//67$767$//6
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
&$1$&&2002'$7()%/$;62&&&$1$&&2002'$7()%/$;62&&(5¶¶3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//67$//6
3/$=$3/$=$:,7+
725$6725$*(
¶
Project Cost: $5,550,000
Premier Field includes turf option: $3,125,000
Trails and plazas: $365,000
Other costs: $525,000
Soft Costs: $610,000
20% Contingency: $925,000
Softball Area Project Cost: $8,785,000
Fields: $1,750,000
Parking and Roads: $1,660,000
Trails and Plazas: $1,265,000
Other Costs: $1,440,000
Soft Costs: $915,000
25% Contingency: $1,755,000
Rectangle Fields Phase 1 Project Cost: $10,455,000
Fields: $1,165,000
Parking and Roads: $2,850,000
Trails and Plazas: $1,245,000
Other Costs: $2,015,000
Soft Costs: $1,090,000
25% Contingency: $2,090,000
PROJECT PHASES AND ESTIMATES
These pages outline the anticipated phases discussed on page 2. All costs are planning level to help the City budget based on observed contractor pricing on similar projects.
Additional design will further refi ne the costs. Costs may change based on infl ation, labor & material costs, permitting, timing, and other factors. Costs refl ect current (2025)
pricing and may shift in the future.
1 32
ELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONATHLETIC FIELDS FRAMEWORK PLAN
City of Elk River, Minnesota7 Page 106 of 117
0$,10$,1
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
'5232))'5232))
3/$=$3/$=$
6725$*(
&$*(6&$*(6
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
(;3$1'('(;3$1'('
321',1*321',1*
67250:$7(567250:$7(5
321',1*321',1*
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
321'321'
0,5$&/(0,5$&/(
),(/'),(/'
3/$<3/$<
*5281'*5281'
,17(50(',$7(,17(50(',$7(
),(/'),(/'
<287+<287+
),(/'),(/'
<287+<287+
),(/'),(/'
¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
6&+22/671:6&+22/671:
3 5 2 &7 2 5 5 '1 :
352
&
7
2
5
5
'
1
:
¶
(;,67,1*321'
)8785(
3$5.,1*
67$//6
29(5)/2:29(5)/2:
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
7766666766
)8785)8785(
3$5.1*3$5.,1*
67$//67$//6
¶¶
6281':$//6281':$//
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
1(:
75$,/
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
1(:
75$,/75$,/
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
38//%$&.,1),(/'38//%$&.,1),(/'
72$&&2002'$7(72$&&2002'$7(
,17(50(',$7(3/$<,17(50(',$7(3/$<
08/7,86(),(/'608/7,86(),(/'6
&$1$&&2002'$7(&$1$&&2002'$7(
)%/$;62&&(5,1)%/$;62&&(5,1
<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6<287+$1')8//6,=(),(/'6
¶¶
:¶¶3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
67250
3$5.,1*
67$//6
¶
¶
¶
7+$9(1:
3/$=$:,7+3/$=$:,7+
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
¶¶
BERMINGBERMING
%86,1(66&(17(5'51:%86,1(66&(17(5'51:
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
67$//667$//6
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
3$5.,1*3$5.,1*
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
3/$<*5281'3/$<*5281'
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
63/$6+3/$<
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
1(:1(:
75$,/75$,/
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
321',1*321',1*
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
321',1*321',1*
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
'5$,17,/(72'5$,17,/(72
,03529('5$,1$*(,03529('5$,1$*(
'5$,17,/(72'5$,17,/(72
,03529('5$,1$*(,03529('5$,1$*(
6+(/7(56+(/7(5
3/$=$3/$=$
%$//),(/'%$//),(/'
¶¶
08/7,86(08/7,86(
),(/'),(/'
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
32:(532:(5
/,1(6/,1(6
(;,67,1*(;,67,1*
'2*3$5.'2*3$5.
¶¶
¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶
:
//
6725067250
.,1*.,1*
67$//67$//6
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
7+$9(1:7+$9(1:
¶
¶¶
¶ ¶
;,67,1*321'(;,67,1*321'
Project Cost: $13,385,000
Miracle Field and playground: $1,070,000
Other fi elds: $1,410,000
Parking and roads: $3,800,000
Trails and plazas: $845,000
Other costs (including sound wall allowance): $2,560,000
Soft Costs: $1,450,000
20% Contingency: $2,250,000
Northwest Area Project Cost: $3,800,000
Parking and Roads: $1,650,000
Trails and Plazas: $1,030,000
Other Costs: $325,000
Soft Costs: $300,000
15% Contingency: $495,000
Rectangle Fields Phase 2 Project Cost: $5,095,000
Fields: $775,000
Parking and Roads: $1,095,000
Trails and Plazas: $830,000
Other Costs: $845,000
Soft Costs: $530,000
25% Contingency: $1,020,000
Project Cost: $1,985,000
Parking and Roads: $760,000
Plaza and Trails: $645,000
Other: $235,000
Soft Costs: $165,000
10% Contingency: $180,000
4 65
ELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONATHLETIC FIELDS FRAMEWORK PLAN
City of Elk River, Minnesota8 Page 107 of 117
8-25-21 First discussion by Commission of having HKGi doing an Athletic Fields Demand Analysis and
Athletic Field Master Plan.
1-18-22 City Council approved the Athletic Field Utilization study.
2-9-22 The commission approved three commission members to serve on the athletic field utilization
committee.
3-9-22 Staff and subcommittee has first meeting with HKGi to start the study.
11-9-22 Parks and Recreation meeting went over the athletic fields study completed by HKGi.
1-11-23 Staff continued to work with HKGi on the final draft of the Athletic Field Analysis after receiving
feedback from the Commission in November.
2-8-23 Kevin Clarke from HKGi presented the Analysis and received feedback from the Commission in
hopes of bringing back another version for approval in March. The study was sent early to all the
commissioners for review before this meeting.
3-8-23 Kevin Clarke from HKGi presented the Elk River Athletic Fields Study Final Draft with the goal of
the commission approving and then appointing a subcommittee to work on the Athletic Facilities Master
Plan.
4-12-23 The Commission recommended staff for the subcommittee with the plan to have the draft
complete by fall 2023.
5-10-23 The Athletic Facilities Master Plan Project Schedule was presented to the commission. The goal
at this time was to have the first draft presented at the September 13th meeting and then presented to
City Council on October 2, 2023.
6-14-23 The Commission was given an update that following a June 5th City Council work session the
timeline changed with the plan to present to Council in December of 2023 for approval.
9-13-23 The Commission was updated that while working with HKGi on the master plan Hales Field was
added pushing the timeline for final presentation to January 2024. The advisory committee of Dave
Williams, Mike Brown, and Ryan Holmgren planned to meet in October.
12-13-23 Updates were given to the Commission that the subcommittee was still working on the plans
with HKGi and that the plans would be presented in early 2024.
2-14-24 The Commission was updated by staff that the city requested HKGi complete soil borings at the
PT Complex. The updated concepts were then slated to be brought to the March 13th Commission
meeting.
3-13-24 The Master plan was presented to the Commission. The consensus of the commission was to
move the plan to a future work session and not act at the meeting. Commissioners had concerns about
how close the fields were together, noise from the trains, and the cost of the projects.
4-10-24 Work Session to discuss the Athletic Facilities Master Plan. Major concerns by the
Commissioners were the order of the project, budget, parking lots, and layout of the fields at each
Page 108 of 117
location. There was also discussion about moving some fields to entirely new locations within the city.
There was no official recommendations or approval.
5-8-24 The Commission reviewed the draft of the Athletic Facilities Master Plan again. There were
changes made and more discussion about what was needed for a final version. The commissioners
asked for additional work sessions to review the plan again.
7-10-24 Commission meeting to discuss the Athletic Facilities Master Plan and review updates and
changes requested by the Commissioners at previous meetings such as scale bars to show distance, an
alternative Oak Knoll layout and 10-year CIP.
8-14-24 Special Work Session to discuss the Athletic Facilities Master Plan. HKGI presented detailed
concepts with the changes that had been previously requested. It was moved and voted on to change
the name of it to the Athletic Fields Framework Plan. There was lengthy discussion with the intent for
the plan to come back again to be voted on.
Page 109 of 117